Hubbry Logo
Assessment of kidney functionAssessment of kidney functionMain
Open search
Assessment of kidney function
Community hub
Assessment of kidney function
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Assessment of kidney function
Assessment of kidney function
Assessment of kidney function
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Diagram showing a schematic nephron and its blood supply. The basic physiologic mechanisms of handling fluid and electrolytes by the nephron - filtration, secretion, reabsorption, and excretion - are labelled.

Assessment of kidney function occurs in different ways, using the presence of symptoms and signs, as well as measurements using urine tests, blood tests, and medical imaging.

Functions of a healthy kidney include maintaining a person's fluid balance, maintaining an acid-base balance; regulating electrolytes sodium, and other electrolytes; clearing toxins; regulating blood pressure; and regulating hormones, such as erythropoietin; and activation of vitamin D. The kidney is also involved in maintaining blood pH balance.

Description

[edit]
Main article: Renal physiology

The functions of the kidney include maintenance of acid-base balance; regulation of fluid balance; regulation of sodium, potassium, and other electrolytes; clearance of toxins; absorption of glucose, amino acids, and other small molecules; regulation of blood pressure; production of various hormones, such as erythropoietin; and activation of vitamin D.

The Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is regarded as the best overall measure of the kidney's ability to carry out these numerous functions. An estimate of the GFR is used clinically to determine the degree of kidney impairment and to track the progression of the disease. The GFR, however, does not reveal the source of the kidney disease. This is accomplished by urinalysis, measurement of urine protein excretion, kidney imaging, and, if necessary, kidney biopsy.[1]

Much of renal physiology is studied at the level of the nephron – the smallest functional unit of the kidney. Each nephron begins with a filtration component that filters the blood entering the kidney. This filtrate then flows along the length of the nephron, which is a tubular structure lined by a single layer of specialized cells and surrounded by capillaries. The major functions of these lining cells are the reabsorption of water and small molecules from the filtrate into the blood, and the secretion of wastes from the blood into the urine.[citation needed]

Proper function of the kidney requires that it receives and adequately filters blood. This is performed at the microscopic level by many hundreds of thousands of filtration units called renal corpuscles, each of which is composed of a glomerulus and a Bowman's capsule. A global assessment of renal function is often ascertained by estimating the rate of filtration, called the glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

Clinical assessment

[edit]

Clinical assessment can be used to assess the function of the kidneys. This is because a person with abnormally functioning kidneys may have symptoms that develop. For example, a person with chronic kidney disease may develop oedema due to failure of the kidneys to regulate water balance. They may develop evidence of chronic kidney disease, that can be used to assess its severity, for example high blood pressure, osteoporosis or anaemia. If the kidneys are unable to excrete urea, a person may develop a widespread itch or confusion.[citation needed]

Urine tests

[edit]

Part of the assessment of kidney function includes the measurement of urine and its contents. Abnormal kidney function may cause too much or too little urine to be produced. The ability of the kidneys to filter protein is often measured, as urine albumin or urine protein levels,[2] measured either at a single instance or, because of variation throughout the day, as 24-hour urine tests.[citation needed]

Blood tests

[edit]

Blood tests are also used to assess kidney function. These include tests that are intended to directly measure the function of the kidneys, as well as tests that assess the function of the kidneys by looking for evidence of problems associated with abnormal function. One of the measures of kidney function is the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Other tests that can assess the function of the kidneys include assessment of electrolyte levels such as potassium and phosphate, assessment of acid-base status by the measurement of bicarbonate levels from a vein, and assessment of the full blood count for anaemia.[citation needed]

Glomerular filtration rate

[edit]
Main article: Glomerular filtration rate

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) describes the volume of fluid filtered from the renal (kidney) glomerular capillaries into the Bowman's capsule per unit time.[3] Creatinine clearance (CCr) is the volume of blood plasma that is cleared of creatinine per unit time and is a useful measure for approximating the GFR. Creatinine clearance exceeds GFR due to creatinine secretion,[4] which can be blocked by cimetidine. Both GFR and CCr may be accurately calculated by comparative measurements of substances in the blood and urine, or estimated by formulas using just a blood test result (eGFR and eCCr) The results of these tests are used to assess the excretory function of the kidneys. Staging of chronic kidney disease is based on categories of GFR as well as albuminuria and cause of kidney disease.[2]

Central to the physiologic maintenance of GFR is the differential basal tone of the afferent and efferent arterioles (see diagram). In other words, the filtration rate is dependent on the difference between the higher blood pressure created by vasoconstriction of the input or afferent arteriole versus the lower blood pressure created by lesser vasoconstriction of the output or efferent arteriole.

GFR is equal to the renal clearance ratio when any solute is freely filtered and is neither reabsorbed nor secreted by the kidneys. The rate therefore measured is the quantity of the substance in the urine that originated from a calculable volume of blood. Relating this principle to the below equation – for the substance used, the product of urine concentration and urine flow equals the mass of substance excreted during the time that urine has been collected. This mass equals the mass filtered at the glomerulus as nothing is added or removed in the nephron. Dividing this mass by the plasma concentration gives the volume of plasma which the mass must have originally come from, and thus the volume of plasma fluid that has entered Bowman's capsule within the aforementioned period of time. The GFR is typically recorded in units of volume per time, e.g., milliliters per minute (mL/min). Compare to filtration fraction.[citation needed]

There are several different techniques used to calculate or estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR or eGFR). The above formula only applies for GFR calculation when it is equal to the clearance rate.

The normal range of GFR, adjusted for body surface area, is 100–130 average 125 (mL/min)/(1.73 m2) in men and 90–120 (mL/min)/(1.73 m2) in women younger than the age of 40. In children, GFR measured by inulin clearance is 110 (mL/min)/(1.73 m2) until 2 years of age in both sexes, and then it progressively decreases. After age 40, GFR decreases progressively with age, by 0.4–1.2 mL/min per year.[citation needed]

Estimated GFR (eGFR) is now recommended by clinical practice guidelines and regulatory agencies for routine evaluation of GFR whereas measured GFR (mGFR) is recommended as a confirmatory test when more accurate assessment is required.[5]

Medical imaging

[edit]

The kidney function can also be assessed with medical imaging. Some forms of imaging, such as kidney ultrasound or CT scans, may assess kidney function by indicating chronic disease that can impact function, by showing a small or shrivelled kidney.[citation needed]. Other tests, such as nuclear medicine tests, directly assess the function of the kidney by measuring the perfusion and excretion of radioactive substances through the kidneys.[citation needed]

Kidney function in disease

[edit]

A decreased renal function can be caused by many types of kidney disease. Upon presentation of decreased renal function, it is recommended to perform a history and physical examination, as well as performing a renal ultrasound and a urinalysis.[citation needed] The most relevant items in the history are medications, edema, nocturia, gross hematuria, family history of kidney disease, diabetes and polyuria. The most important items in a physical examination are signs of vasculitis, lupus erythematosus, diabetes, endocarditis and hypertension.[citation needed]

A urinalysis is helpful even when not showing any pathology, as this finding suggests an extrarenal etiology. Proteinuria and/or urinary sediment usually indicates the presence of glomerular disease. Hematuria may be caused by glomerular disease or by a disease along the urinary tract.[citation needed]

The most relevant assessments in a renal ultrasound are renal sizes, echogenicity and any signs of hydronephrosis. Renal enlargement usually indicates diabetic nephropathy, focal segmental glomerular sclerosis or myeloma. Renal atrophy suggests longstanding chronic renal disease.[citation needed]

Chronic kidney disease stages

[edit]
Main article: Chronic kidney disease

Risk factors for kidney disease include diabetes, high blood pressure, family history, older age, ethnic group and smoking. For most patients, a GFR over 60 (mL/min)/(1.73 m2) is adequate. But significant decline of the GFR from a previous test result can be an early indicator of kidney disease requiring medical intervention. The sooner kidney dysfunction is diagnosed and treated the greater odds of preserving remaining nephrons, and preventing the need for dialysis.

CKD stage GFR level ((mL/min)/(1.73 m2))
Stage 1 ≥ 90
Stage 2 60–89
Stage 3 30–59
Stage 4 15–29
Stage 5 < 15

The severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is described by six stages; the most severe three are defined by the MDRD-eGFR value, and first three also depend on whether there is other evidence of kidney disease (e.g., proteinuria):

0) Normal kidney function – GFR above 90 (mL/min)/(1.73 m2) and no proteinuria
1) CKD1 – GFR above 90 (mL/min)/(1.73 m2) with evidence of kidney damage
2) CKD2 (mild) – GFR of 60 to 89 (mL/min)/(1.73 m2) with evidence of kidney damage
3) CKD3 (moderate) – GFR of 30 to 59 (mL/min)/(1.73 m2)
4) CKD4 (severe) – GFR of 15 to 29 (mL/min)/(1.73 m2)
5) CKD5 kidney failure – GFR less than 15 (mL/min)/(1.73 m2) Some people add CKD5D for those stage 5 patients requiring dialysis; many patients in CKD5 are not yet on dialysis.

Note: others add a "T" to patients who have had a transplant regardless of stage.

Not all clinicians agree with the above classification, suggesting that it may mislabel patients with mildly reduced kidney function, especially the elderly, as having a disease.[6][7] A conference was held in 2009 regarding these controversies by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) on CKD: Definition, Classification and Prognosis, gathering data on CKD prognosis to refine the definition and staging of CKD.[8]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Assessment of kidney function

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Assessment of kidney function encompasses a range of clinical tests and measurements that evaluate the kidneys' capacity to filter blood, excrete waste products such as and , regulate fluid and electrolyte balance, and produce hormones like and active . These assessments are essential for detecting kidney damage, diagnosing conditions such as (CKD), monitoring disease progression, and guiding therapeutic interventions. CKD, defined as abnormalities of or function persisting for more than three months with implications for health, affected approximately 14% of the global adult population as of 2023 and is often linked to underlying causes like and . The cornerstone of kidney function assessment is the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which quantifies the volume of fluid filtered from the blood by the glomeruli per unit time, normally ranging from 90 to 120 mL/min/1.73 m² in healthy adults and declining with age (e.g., approximately 60 mL/min/1.73 m² by age 70). GFR can be measured directly using exogenous markers like clearance, considered the gold standard, though this method is rarely used in routine practice due to its complexity and cost. More commonly, estimated GFR (eGFR) is calculated from endogenous markers such as serum creatinine levels via equations like the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula, with the 2021 race-free version incorporating for improved accuracy and reduced bias across diverse populations. In addition to GFR, assessment includes evaluation of proteinuria or albuminuria, which signals glomerular barrier dysfunction and is quantified through urine tests such as the albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) in a spot sample or total protein in a 24-hour collection. Normal albuminuria is below 30 mg/g (category A1), with levels of 30–300 mg/g (A2) or above 300 mg/g (A3) indicating or macroalbuminuria, respectively, and warranting further investigation. Complementary blood tests, including serum , (BUN), and electrolytes, provide insights into tubular function and overall renal handling of nitrogenous wastes, while detects cellular elements or casts suggestive of acute injury. Guidelines from organizations like KDIGO recommend annual screening with eGFR and ACR for at-risk individuals, such as those with , , or , to enable early detection and risk stratification using heat maps that combine GFR and albuminuria categories. In settings with limited laboratory access, point-of-care testing for and albumin is suggested as a practical alternative. Accurate assessment not only informs — with lower GFR stages associated with higher risks of end-stage kidney disease and mortality—but also supports personalized , including adjustments to drug dosing for renally cleared medications.

Fundamentals

Role of kidneys in homeostasis

The kidneys play a central role in maintaining by filtering blood to remove products such as and , thereby preventing their accumulation in the body. They also regulate and concentrations, including sodium, , and water, to ensure proper cellular function and osmotic equilibrium. Additionally, the kidneys contribute to acid-base through the of and of hydrogen ions, which helps stabilize blood pH. Beyond these excretory and regulatory functions, the kidneys produce essential hormones: stimulates production in the , renin initiates the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to control , and the active form of () promotes calcium absorption for bone health. At the structural level, the nephron serves as the functional unit of the kidney, consisting of a glomerulus—a network of capillaries where initial blood filtration occurs—and a series of tubules that facilitate selective reabsorption and secretion. In the glomerulus, plasma is filtered to form an ultrafiltrate, while the proximal and distal tubules reabsorb vital nutrients, water, and electrolytes back into the bloodstream, and secrete additional waste or excess ions into the filtrate. This intricate architecture enables the kidneys to process vast volumes of blood efficiently, with approximately 180 liters of plasma filtered daily, ultimately producing 1-2 liters of urine as the concentrated byproduct. Impaired kidney function disrupts these processes, leading to toxin accumulation that causes —a of elevated blood and associated metabolic disturbances. Electrolyte imbalances from reduced regulation can result in , potentially triggering cardiac arrhythmias, or fluid overload manifesting as . Furthermore, diminished erythropoietin production contributes to , reducing oxygen-carrying capacity and exacerbating fatigue and cardiovascular strain. provides a key measure of this filtration efficiency, underscoring the need for regular assessment to detect early dysfunction.

Key functional parameters

The assessment of kidney function relies on several core measurable parameters that reflect the kidneys' ability to filter, reabsorb, secrete, and concentrate substances in the blood. These parameters provide quantitative insights into and are essential for evaluating overall kidney performance. A fundamental concept in renal physiology is clearance, defined as the volume of plasma from which a substance is completely removed (cleared) by the kidneys per unit time, typically expressed in milliliters per minute (mL/min). This metric integrates glomerular filtration, tubular , and , serving as a basis for assessing the of substance handling by the kidneys. The (GFR) represents the volume of fluid filtered from the glomerular capillaries into per unit time, serving as the primary indicator of filtration capacity. In healthy adults, normal GFR ranges from 90 to 120 mL/min/1.73 m² of , standardized to account for body size variations. Renal blood flow (RBF) quantifies the delivered to the kidneys, constituting approximately 20-25% of , or about 1-1.2 L/min in adults. RBF is typically measured indirectly through effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), which estimates the plasma portion cleared of markers like para-aminohippuric acid, as total blood flow includes red blood cells not directly accessible for clearance calculations. Tubular reabsorption and secretion are critical processes that fine-tune the composition of the filtrate after glomerular filtration. For instance, approximately 99% of filtered sodium is reabsorbed along the , primarily in the (about 65-70%), with the remainder handled in the loop of Henle, distal tubule, and collecting duct to maintain electrolyte balance. , conversely, actively transports substances like organic acids and bases from into the tubular lumen for elimination. The kidneys' concentrating ability, mediated by the countercurrent mechanism in the medulla, enables up to 1200 mOsm/L under conditions of , far exceeding of around 300 mOsm/L. Urine and blood tests serve as primary tools to quantify these parameters in clinical practice. Normal values for key functional parameters vary by factors such as age and sex, as summarized below:
ParameterNormal Value/Range
GFR (adults, standardized to 1.73 m²)90-120 mL/min; declines ~1 mL/min/year after age 40, faster in females
Urine output (adults)0.5-1 mL/kg/hr
Proteinuria (24-hour excretion)<150 mg/day

History and Physical Examination

Relevant medical history

Assessing kidney function begins with a thorough medical history, which helps identify risk factors, potential etiologies, and the need for further diagnostic evaluation. This patient-centered approach guides clinicians in determining whether renal impairment is acute, chronic, or progressive, and informs targeted questioning to uncover modifiable and non-modifiable contributors to kidney disease. Key risk factors elicited from history include diabetes and hypertension, which are the leading causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Family history of renal disease is also critical, as it raises suspicion for hereditary conditions such as autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), where a positive family pedigree often supports diagnosis alongside imaging. Autoimmune conditions, exemplified by systemic lupus erythematosus, increase the risk of lupus nephritis and subsequent renal involvement. Recurrent urinary tract infections represent another important risk, particularly in predisposing individuals to scarring and progressive CKD. Medication and toxin exposures must be systematically reviewed, as nephrotoxic agents can precipitate or exacerbate renal dysfunction. Common culprits include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), aminoglycoside antibiotics, and iodinated contrast agents used in imaging. A history of chemotherapy regimens or occupational/heavy metal exposure, such as lead or cadmium, warrants particular attention due to their potential for direct tubular toxicity. Past medical events provide context for prior insults to renal function. Episodes of severe dehydration, often from gastrointestinal losses or inadequate intake, can lead to prerenal azotemia and recurrent injury if frequent. Congestive heart failure contributes through reduced renal perfusion and cardiorenal syndrome. Prior glomerulonephritis, whether post-infectious or immune-mediated, signals potential for chronic glomerular damage. Kidney stones, especially recurrent or obstructing, may cause obstructive nephropathy and warrant history of stone composition and passage. Lifestyle factors modifiable through intervention also influence renal health. Smoking accelerates CKD progression by promoting endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress. Obesity, particularly visceral adiposity, heightens risk via hyperfiltration and metabolic strain on nephrons. Diets high in salt or animal protein increase glomerular pressure and acid load, potentially hastening decline in susceptible individuals. A structured questioning framework enhances history-taking efficiency. Inquire about the duration and progression of any symptoms, such as edema or fatigue, to differentiate acute from chronic processes. For hereditary risks, construct a family pedigree focusing on renal outcomes, age of onset, and extrarenal manifestations in conditions like ADPKD. This historical data may corroborate subtle physical signs, such as pallor suggesting anemia from renal insufficiency.

Clinical signs and symptoms

Clinical signs and symptoms of kidney dysfunction often arise from impaired filtration, fluid and electrolyte imbalances, and accumulation of metabolic waste products. Patients may report a range of subjective symptoms that prompt initial evaluation, while objective signs observed during physical examination help guide further assessment. Common symptoms include oliguria or anuria, characterized by reduced urine output of less than 500 mL per 24 hours in adults, reflecting decreased glomerular filtration. Nocturia, or frequent urination at night, occurs due to impaired urinary concentration ability in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Edema, manifesting as swelling around the eyes or ankles, results from sodium and water retention secondary to reduced kidney function. Fatigue, often linked to anemia from decreased erythropoietin production, is a frequent complaint in advancing disease. Pruritus, or severe itching, stems from uremia-induced phosphate retention and skin deposition of waste products. Hypertension-related headaches may also emerge as blood pressure rises uncontrollably due to renin-angiotensin system activation. Physical signs include hypertension, which may present with fundoscopic changes such as arteriolar narrowing or retinopathy indicative of chronic vascular damage. Pallor of the skin and mucous membranes signals anemia associated with CKD. Signs of volume overload, such as bibasilar crackles on lung auscultation or jugular venous distension, indicate fluid retention exceeding the kidneys' excretory capacity. Abdominal palpation may reveal enlarged kidneys, as seen in conditions like hydronephrosis or polycystic kidney disease. Skin assessment can uncover uremic frost—rare crystalline urea deposits on the face and neck—or excoriations from chronic scratching due to pruritus. Examination techniques emphasize monitoring vital signs, particularly blood pressure trends over serial visits to detect persistent hypertension. Daily weight measurements help identify fluid retention, with gains of more than 1-2 kg suggesting edema. Visible hematuria, appearing as pink or cola-colored urine, serves as a red flag for glomerular or structural issues. Flank pain, often sharp and unilateral, raises concern for obstruction, infection, or infarction requiring urgent evaluation.
Symptom/SignUnderlying Mechanism
Edema (periorbital/ankles)Fluid retention from decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and, in nephrotic syndrome, hypoalbuminemia leading to reduced oncotic pressure.
FatigueAnemia due to insufficient erythropoietin production by damaged kidneys.
PruritusUremia causing hyperphosphatemia and calcium-phosphate deposition in skin.
HypertensionActivation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system from reduced renal perfusion.
Oliguria/AnuriaImpaired tubular function and glomerular filtration leading to inadequate urine production.
NocturiaLoss of concentrating ability resulting in polyuria during the day and compensatory nighttime frequency.
Flank painDistension from or inflammation in urinary tract obstruction/infection.
PallorChronic anemia from erythropoietin deficiency and iron dysregulation.

Laboratory Investigations

Urine tests

Urine tests provide a non-invasive means to evaluate kidney function by analyzing the composition, concentration, and cellular elements of urine, which reflect glomerular filtration, tubular reabsorption, and excretory processes. These assessments are essential for detecting early renal abnormalities, such as proteinuria or hematuria, and for monitoring disease progression in conditions like chronic kidney disease. Routine urinalysis begins with a dipstick test, which rapidly screens for several parameters. The urine pH is typically measured, with normal values ranging from 4.5 to 8.0; values above 7 may indicate urinary tract infections, while persistent acidity below 5.0 can suggest renal tubular acidosis. Protein detection via dipstick is qualitative, often reporting trace to 3+ levels, but it is less sensitive for low-level albuminuria compared to quantitative methods like 24-hour collections. The dipstick also identifies glucose (indicating possible glomerular damage or ), ketones (from dehydration or starvation), and blood or hemoglobin (suggesting hematuria from glomerular or lower urinary tract sources). Microscopic examination of urine sediment complements the dipstick by identifying cellular and formed elements. Red blood cell casts are a hallmark of , indicating bleeding from the glomerular basement membrane, while dysmorphic red blood cells further support glomerular origin. White blood cells and bacteria point to urinary tract infections, often with white cell casts confirming . Crystals, such as calcium oxalate or uric acid, may signal nephrolithiasis or metabolic disorders predisposing to stone formation. Quantitative urine tests offer precise measurements of excretion rates. A 24-hour urine collection quantifies total protein, with levels exceeding 3.5 g/day diagnostic of nephrotic syndrome; it also assesses creatinine clearance (correlating with serum creatinine for overall function) and electrolyte losses like sodium or potassium. For microalbuminuria, the spot urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) is preferred, with values above 30 mg/g indicating early glomerular injury and increased cardiovascular risk. Urine osmolality and specific gravity evaluate the kidneys' concentrating and diluting capacity, critical for water homeostasis. Normal urine osmolality ranges from 50 to 1200 mOsm/kg, varying with hydration status; impaired concentration (e.g., below 300 mOsm/kg after water deprivation) suggests tubular dysfunction, as in diabetes insipidus. Specific gravity normally falls between 1.003 and 1.030, with fixed values around 1.010 indicating loss of concentrating ability in advanced renal failure. Specialized tests like urine protein electrophoresis detect monoclonal proteins, such as Bence Jones light chains in multiple myeloma, which can cause direct tubular damage and cast nephropathy. This test is crucial for identifying paraprotein-related renal injury in plasma cell dyscrasias.

Blood tests

Blood tests play a crucial role in assessing kidney function by measuring the accumulation of waste products and imbalances in electrolytes and hormones that result from impaired filtration and excretion. These tests provide indirect evidence of glomerular filtration efficiency and tubular reabsorption, helping to detect both acute and chronic kidney dysfunction. Common panels include basic metabolic panels that evaluate creatinine, urea nitrogen, and electrolytes, often supplemented by specific markers for more precise evaluation. Serum creatinine, a byproduct of muscle creatine metabolism, is freely filtered by the glomeruli and serves as a key indicator of kidney filtration capacity. In individuals with normal kidney function, serum creatinine levels typically range from 0.6 to 1.2 mg/dL in men and 0.5 to 1.1 mg/dL in women. Levels rise when glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreases, as the kidneys fail to excrete it adequately, but a detectable increase often occurs only after approximately 50% of kidney function is lost, making it a relatively insensitive early marker. Factors such as age, sex, muscle mass, and body size influence baseline levels, with lower values common in older adults, females, and those with reduced muscle mass due to malnutrition or sedentary lifestyle. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN), the nitrogenous end product of protein catabolism, is another marker of kidney excretory function, with normal serum levels ranging from 7 to 20 mg/dL. Elevated BUN reflects reduced renal clearance but can also be influenced by prerenal factors, including dehydration, gastrointestinal bleeding, and high-protein diets, which increase urea production or decrease renal perfusion. The BUN-to-creatinine ratio helps differentiate causes of azotemia; a ratio greater than 20:1 suggests prerenal azotemia due to disproportionate urea reabsorption in the tubules under low-flow conditions. Electrolyte imbalances are common in kidney disease and are assessed through serum measurements of sodium, potassium, and bicarbonate. Serum sodium typically ranges from 135 to 145 mEq/L and remains relatively stable in chronic kidney disease (CKD) unless influenced by fluid status or medications, though hyponatremia can occur in advanced stages due to impaired water excretion. Potassium levels normally fall between 3.5 and 5.0 mEq/L, but hyperkalemia (elevated potassium) frequently develops in CKD as the kidneys' ability to excrete potassium diminishes, particularly in stages 3-5, increasing risks of cardiac arrhythmias. Bicarbonate, with a normal range of 22 to 29 mEq/L, decreases in advanced kidney disease due to reduced acid excretion and bicarbonate regeneration, leading to metabolic acidosis that exacerbates bone and muscle complications. Alternative and additional markers provide complementary insights into kidney function. Cystatin C, a low-molecular-weight protein produced at a constant rate by all nucleated cells, is filtered by the glomeruli and serves as an alternative to creatinine, with levels less affected by muscle mass, age, or sex, offering improved accuracy for GFR estimation in diverse populations. Serum phosphate levels normally range from 2.5 to 4.5 mg/dL; (>4.5 mg/dL) arises in CKD due to decreased renal excretion, contributing to vascular calcification and . (PTH) levels elevate in response to and , driving that promotes and cardiovascular risks in progressive . Anemia assessment in kidney function evaluation often involves measuring hemoglobin levels, which can drop due to erythropoietin deficiency as renal peritubular cells are damaged in CKD. Hemoglobin is typically normal in early CKD stages but declines in later stages, with values below 11 g/dL indicating clinically significant anemia that correlates with reduced quality of life and increased morbidity.

Glomerular filtration rate

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) represents the volume of fluid filtered from the renal glomerular capillaries into the Bowman's capsule per unit time and serves as the most reliable indicator of kidney function, typically expressed in milliliters per minute normalized to body surface area (mL/min/1.73 m²). It is considered the gold standard metric for assessing renal excretory function, with normal values ranging from 90 to 120 mL/min/1.73 m² in healthy adults. Direct measurement of GFR provides the highest accuracy but is resource-intensive, while estimation methods using endogenous markers like serum creatinine are more practical for routine clinical use, though they rely on validated equations that incorporate variables such as age, sex, and race. Direct measurement of GFR is achieved through clearance of exogenous markers that are freely filtered by the glomerulus without tubular reabsorption or secretion, with inulin clearance remaining the historical gold standard. In this method, inulin is administered via continuous intravenous infusion after a priming dose to achieve steady-state plasma concentrations, followed by timed urine collections (typically 1-2 hours) and simultaneous blood sampling to measure concentrations. The GFR is calculated using the clearance formula: GFR=Uin×VPin\text{GFR} = \frac{U_{\text{in}} \times V}{P_{\text{in}}} where UinU_{\text{in}} is the urine inulin concentration, VV is the urine flow rate (mL/min), and PinP_{\text{in}} is the plasma inulin concentration. This approach yields precise results but is cumbersome due to the need for bladder catheterization and analytical challenges in measuring inulin levels. Endogenous markers offer a less invasive alternative, with creatinine clearance being a common method that approximates GFR by measuring the clearance of serum creatinine, a byproduct of muscle metabolism. Creatinine is administered endogenously but undergoes some tubular secretion, leading to an overestimation of true GFR by 10-20% in healthy individuals. The calculation follows a similar formula: Ccr=Ucr×VPcrC_{\text{cr}} = \frac{U_{\text{cr}} \times V}{P_{\text{cr}}} where UcrU_{\text{cr}} and PcrP_{\text{cr}} are urine and plasma creatinine concentrations, respectively, requiring 24-hour urine collection and blood sampling. Despite its accessibility, this method's accuracy diminishes in conditions with altered creatinine production or secretion. To simplify estimation without urine collection, several formulas use serum creatinine (SCr) as the primary input, adjusted for demographic factors. The Cockcroft-Gault equation, developed in 1976, estimates creatinine clearance (CrCl) as: CrCl=(140−age)×weight×(0.85 if female)72×SCr\text{CrCl} = \frac{(140 - \text{age}) \times \text{weight} \times (0.85 \text{ if female})}{72 \times \text{SCr}} (with weight in kg, age in years, and SCr in mg/dL); it was derived from 249 hospitalized patients and performs well for drug dosing but assumes stable creatinine production. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation, introduced in 1999, directly estimates GFR as: GFR=175×(SCr)−1.154×(age)−0.203×(0.742 if female)×(1.212 if African American)\text{GFR} = 175 \times (\text{SCr})^{-1.154} \times (\text{age})^{-0.203} \times (0.742 \text{ if female}) \times (1.212 \text{ if African American}) validated against measured GFR in 1,070 patients with (CKD), offering improved accuracy over prior methods for GFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m². The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, updated in 2021 to a race-free version, refines this further for broader GFR ranges, particularly above 60 mL/min/1.73 m², using a spline function for SCr and incorporating an optional term for enhanced precision in populations with variable muscle mass: eGFR=142×min⁡(SCr/κ,1)α×max⁡(SCr/κ,1)−1.200×0.9938age×(1.012 if female)\text{eGFR} = 142 \times \min(\text{SCr}/\kappa, 1)^{\alpha} \times \max(\text{SCr}/\kappa, 1)^{-1.200} \times 0.9938^{\text{age}} \times (1.012 \text{ if female}) (where κ=0.7\kappa = 0.7 for females and 0.9 for males, α=−0.241\alpha = -0.241 for females and -0.302 for males); it reduces bias compared to MDRD in diverse cohorts exceeding 8,000 participants. These estimation formulas have limitations, particularly in extremes of body composition or age, where they may inaccurately reflect true GFR; for instance, they underestimate in obesity due to higher creatinine generation and overestimate in malnutrition or the elderly from reduced muscle mass. In such cases, isotopic methods like plasma clearance of ⁵¹Cr-EDTA provide a precise alternative, involving a single intravenous bolus followed by multiple blood samples over 4-6 hours to compute clearance via slope-intercept analysis, correlating closely with inulin (within 5-10% difference). These exogenous techniques are reserved for research or high-stakes clinical scenarios due to radiation exposure and cost. Clinically, GFR thresholds guide CKD , with values below 60 mL/min/1.73 m² for at least three months indicating stage G3 or worse dysfunction, prompting further evaluation per KDIGO guidelines.

Diagnostic Imaging

Ultrasonography

Ultrasonography serves as the initial imaging modality for evaluating structure due to its accessibility and safety profile. This technique employs high-frequency sound waves to generate real-time cross-sectional images, enabling assessment of renal size, position, echotexture, and the presence of obstructions or masses without the use of . It is particularly valuable in the initial workup of suspected renal , providing rapid diagnostic insights at the point of care. The procedure is performed using a curvilinear with frequencies of 2-5 MHz for adult kidneys to achieve adequate penetration. Patients are positioned or in a lateral decubitus to optimize acoustic windows, with scans acquired in longitudinal and transverse planes through the , often utilizing the liver or as reference structures. To enhance visualization, a full is preferred as it displaces overlying bowel loops, while for 6-8 hours may be recommended in some cases to reduce intestinal gas interference. B-mode ultrasonography produces images of renal , while Doppler modes— including color flow for vascular mapping and pulsed-wave spectral Doppler for velocity measurements—assess blood flow dynamics within arcuate and interlobar arteries. Normal kidneys on measure 10-12 cm in length (left slightly longer at approximately 11.2 cm versus 10.9 cm on the right), with smooth contours and volumes of 110-190 mL in men and 90-150 mL in women. The cortex appears relatively hypoechoic compared to the liver, with clear corticomedullary differentiation: hypoechoic pyramids centrally and an echogenic containing fat, vessels, and the collecting system. No dilation of the or calyces is observed, and cortical thickness is typically 7-10 mm. Pathological changes are readily identifiable, including characterized by dilation of the and calyces graded from mild (pelvis only) to severe (cortical thinning). Simple cysts present as well-defined, anechoic lesions with posterior acoustic enhancement and thin walls, while complex or solid tumors appear as heterogeneous masses with irregular margins or internal vascularity on Doppler. In , kidneys exhibit atrophy with lengths under 9 cm, thinned cortex, and increased overall often exceeding that of adjacent liver , reflecting and sclerosis. Parenchymal diseases such as acute or manifest as diffusely increased , loss of corticomedullary distinction, and preserved or enlarged size in early stages. A key quantitative parameter is the renal resistive index (RI), derived from spectral Doppler waveforms in the intrarenal arteries: RI=peak systolic velocity−end-diastolic velocitypeak systolic velocityRI = \frac{\text{peak systolic velocity} - \text{end-diastolic velocity}}{\text{peak systolic velocity}} Normal RI values range from 0.5 to 0.7, indicating low vascular resistance; elevations above 0.7 or an inter-kidney difference greater than 0.1 suggest increased resistance due to obstruction, parenchymal damage, or microvascular disease. Advantages of renal ultrasonography include its low cost, lack of , portability for bedside use in critically ill patients, and real-time capability for dynamic assessments like . However, it is operator-dependent, with image quality degraded by patient factors such as , excessive bowel gas, or shallow body habitus, potentially limiting detection of subtle lesions. Ultrasonography can also briefly guide renal biopsies by providing real-time needle visualization to ensure accurate targeting.

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Computed tomography (CT) and (MRI) provide advanced anatomical and functional evaluation of the kidneys, particularly in complex cases where ultrasonography is insufficient, such as suspected vascular abnormalities or malignancies. These modalities offer higher resolution and contrast enhancement capabilities compared to initial screening with , enabling detailed assessment of renal , vasculature, and collecting system. Non-contrast CT is primarily used for detecting renal calculi, where stones are identified by their density measured in Hounsfield units (HU), typically exceeding 200-500 HU, distinguishing them from or non-calcified lesions. This technique avoids risks in patients with impaired renal function and delivers an effective dose of approximately 5-10 mSv. Contrast-enhanced CT, acquired in phases such as the nephrogram phase (90-180 seconds post-injection), evaluates renal and parenchymal enhancement, revealing abnormalities like delayed or absent enhancement in infarcts. CT angiography further assesses vascular pathology, including , where may present with a characteristic "string-of-beads" or beading appearance due to alternating stenoses and dilatations. Key findings on include heterogeneous enhancement patterns in tumors, wedge-shaped defects in infarcts, and rim-enhancing collections in perinephric abscesses. Indications for CT include suspected renal , trauma with vascular injury, and complex urinary tract obstructions; however, should be used with caution in patients with eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m², accompanied by hydration and monitoring to minimize the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. MRI offers radiation-free with excellent soft-tissue contrast, making it suitable for patients where CT is contraindicated or for pediatric cases. Non-contrast MRI utilizes T1- and T2-weighted sequences to characterize renal masses, such as hypointense cysts on T1 and hyperintense on T2, or solid tumors with variable signal intensity. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI improves lesion conspicuity but carries a risk of (NSF) in patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²), a fibrosing condition linked to free gadolinium deposition, particularly with linear agents like gadodiamide; macrocyclic agents (e.g., gadoterate) pose lower risk. MR urography, often using heavily T2-weighted sequences, delineates the collecting system and ureters without contrast, aiding evaluation of obstructions or congenital anomalies. Functional MRI techniques, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), quantify apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to detect renal fibrosis, with lower ADC in fibrotic tissue indicating restricted diffusion; arterial spin labeling (ASL) measures perfusion non-invasively by magnetically tagging blood, providing quantitative cortical and medullary blood flow without exogenous contrast. Indications for MRI include suspected renal tumors when CT is inconclusive, vascular evaluation in young patients, and functional assessment in chronic kidney disease; it is preferred over CT for avoiding radiation in repeated .

Histological Assessment

Indications for renal biopsy

Renal biopsy is indicated when non-invasive assessments, such as laboratory tests and imaging, fail to provide a definitive diagnosis of kidney pathology, particularly in cases where histological evaluation is essential to guide targeted therapy. Primary indications include persistent unexplained proteinuria or hematuria, where biopsy can identify underlying glomerular diseases. For instance, in patients with suspected , including rapidly progressive forms, biopsy is crucial to confirm the diagnosis and classify the subtype, enabling appropriate immunosuppressive treatment. In nephrotic syndrome, renal biopsy is warranted to determine the etiology when common causes like minimal change disease or membranous nephropathy are not evident from serologic testing, as it distinguishes treatable conditions from progressive ones. Systemic diseases affecting the kidney, such as vasculitis (e.g., ANCA-associated) or amyloidosis, also necessitate biopsy to assess renal involvement and severity, which influences systemic management. Additionally, in transplant kidneys, biopsy is indicated for unexplained graft dysfunction to differentiate rejection from other causes like recurrence of primary disease. Contraindications to renal biopsy must be carefully evaluated to minimize procedural risks. Absolute contraindications include uncorrectable bleeding diathesis, uncontrollable severe hypertension, active renal or perirenal infection, and skin infection at the biopsy site. Relative contraindications encompass controlled hypertension, mild coagulopathy (which can often be corrected), solitary kidney, and small kidneys (cortex <1 cm), where the potential harm may outweigh diagnostic benefits. Pre-biopsy evaluation is essential to ensure safety and optimal yield. This includes coagulation studies (e.g., PT, aPTT, platelet count) to identify and correct any diathesis, and renal ultrasound imaging to assess kidney size, anatomy, and suitability for biopsy, particularly to select between native and transplanted kidneys. In cases of suspected systemic involvement, additional serologic tests may precede biopsy to refine indications.00948-3/fulltext) The diagnostic yield of renal biopsy is high, often identifying specific pathologies that alter management in over 80% of cases. For example, in adults with isolated hematuria or proteinuria, is diagnosed in approximately 25-30% of biopsies, representing the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide. Other frequent findings include minimal change disease in nephrotic presentations and amyloid deposition in systemic amyloidosis, providing prognostic insights and therapeutic direction. Ethical considerations are paramount in deciding on renal biopsy, emphasizing informed consent and a balanced assessment of risks versus benefits. Patients must be fully informed of potential complications, such as major bleeding (up to 1-2%) or the need for transfusion, and how biopsy results could guide therapies like immunosuppression, potentially preventing progression to end-stage kidney disease. Biopsy should only proceed when the anticipated histological information will meaningfully impact clinical decision-making, avoiding unnecessary procedures in low-yield scenarios.01008-8/fulltext)

Biopsy procedures and interpretation

Renal biopsy procedures primarily involve percutaneous ultrasound-guided techniques to obtain tissue samples from the kidney. This approach uses real-time ultrasound imaging to target the renal cortex, typically employing an automated core biopsy needle of 16- to 18-gauge size, with 1 to 3 passes to secure adequate glomeruli for analysis. For patients at high risk of bleeding complications, such as those with coagulopathy or severe hypertension, transjugular renal biopsy serves as a safer alternative, accessing the kidney via the jugular vein and hepatic veins to minimize direct renal puncture risks. Following the procedure, patients undergo post-biopsy monitoring, including 4 to 6 hours of supine bed rest to reduce bleeding risk, followed by 24 hours of observation with serial hemoglobin measurements and vital sign checks to detect early hemorrhage. Complications from renal biopsy are predominantly hemorrhagic, with gross hematuria occurring in approximately 5% to 10% of cases, often resolving spontaneously within days. Perinephric hematomas form in up to 90% of procedures but are typically minor and asymptomatic, requiring intervention in only about 1% of major cases involving significant blood loss or hemodynamic instability. Arteriovenous fistulas represent a rarer complication, affecting less than 1% of patients and usually detected incidentally on follow-up imaging without clinical sequelae. Once obtained, biopsy samples are divided for processing across multiple modalities to enable comprehensive histopathological evaluation. Light microscopy involves fixation in formalin or Bouin's solution, followed by embedding in paraffin and staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for general architecture, periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) for basement membranes, and Jones methenamine silver for glomerular details such as mesangial expansion. Immunofluorescence microscopy uses frozen sections stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies to detect immune deposits, including IgG and C3 in patterns indicative of glomerulonephritis. Electron microscopy, performed on glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue, provides ultrastructural insights, such as podocyte foot process effacement in minimal change disease or electron-dense deposits in immune complex disorders. Interpretation of renal biopsy findings relies on standardized classifications to guide diagnosis and prognosis. For lupus nephritis, the World Health Organization (WHO) system categorizes lesions into classes I through VI based on glomerular involvement, from minimal mesangial changes (class I) to advanced sclerosing nephritis (class VI), influencing treatment intensity. In renal transplant biopsies, the Banff classification employs lesion scoring for interstitial inflammation, tubulitis, and vascular changes to diagnose rejection subtypes and monitor graft function. Pathological reports often highlight prognostic features, such as the extent of glomerular crescents, where involvement exceeding 50% correlates with poorer renal outcomes and rapid progression to end-stage disease. Recent advances in renal biopsy analysis incorporate molecular profiling of fresh or snap-frozen tissue to assess gene expression patterns, enhancing diagnostic precision beyond traditional histology. Techniques like quantitative PCR and RNA sequencing identify upregulated genes associated with fibrosis or rejection, such as those in TGF-β pathways, enabling personalized prognostic stratification and early intervention in transplant recipients.

Evaluation in Disease States

Acute kidney injury assessment

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria as an abrupt decrease in kidney function, manifesting as an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) by ≥0.3 mg/dL (≥26.5 μmol/L) within 48 hours, or an increase to ≥1.5 times the baseline value presumed to have occurred within the prior 7 days, or a urine output of <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours. This definition emphasizes rapid changes that can often be reversible with prompt intervention, distinguishing AKI from chronic conditions. AKI is classified into prerenal, intrinsic renal, and postrenal categories based on the underlying pathophysiology. Prerenal AKI results from reduced renal perfusion, such as hypovolemia or heart failure, and is characterized by a blood urea nitrogen (BUN) to creatinine ratio >20:1 due to enhanced . Intrinsic AKI involves direct kidney parenchymal damage, often from () due to ischemia or nephrotoxins, where urinary sodium concentration is typically >40 mEq/L, contrasting with <20 mEq/L in prerenal states. Postrenal AKI arises from urinary tract obstruction, such as from stones or tumors, and is identified by imaging evidence of hydronephrosis on ultrasound. The assessment of AKI begins with a focused history to identify risk factors like recent surgery, nephrotoxic medications (e.g., NSAIDs or contrast agents), or dehydration, followed by laboratory evaluation and imaging. Key labs include the fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa), calculated as: FeNa(%)=(UNa/PNaUCr/PCr)×100\text{FeNa} (\%) = \left( \frac{\text{U}_\text{Na} / \text{P}_\text{Na}}{\text{U}_\text{Cr} / \text{P}_\text{Cr}} \right) \times 100 where U_Na and U_Cr are urinary sodium and creatinine, and P_Na and P_Cr are plasma values; a FeNa <1% supports prerenal etiology by indicating intact tubular reabsorption. Prompt renal ultrasound is recommended to rule out postrenal causes, as it can detect obstruction within hours of presentation. Emerging biomarkers enhance early detection of AKI before SCr rises significantly. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), measurable in urine or serum, increase within 2–6 hours of renal insult, with urinary NGAL levels >150 ng/mL predicting AKI in high-risk settings like . These markers are particularly useful for identifying intrinsic tubular injury, offering prognostic insights beyond traditional criteria. Prognosis in AKI is guided by KDIGO staging, which evolved from the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage) and AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network) criteria to provide a unified system based on SCr multipliers and urine output duration. Stage 1 involves SCr 1.5–1.9 times baseline or ≥0.3 mg/dL increase (or urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6–12 hours); stage 2 is SCr 2.0–2.9 times baseline (or <0.5 mL/kg/h for ≥12 hours); and stage 3 is SCr ≥3.0 times baseline, ≥4.0 mg/dL, initiation of renal replacement therapy, or urine output <0.3 mL/kg/h for ≥24 hours (or anuria ≥12 hours). Higher stages correlate with increased mortality, with stage 3 associated with up to 50% in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients. Baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) provides context for SCr interpretation but is not required for initial staging.
StageSerum Creatinine CriteriaUrine Output Criteria
11.5–1.9 × baseline or ≥0.3 mg/dL increase<0.5 mL/kg/h for 6–12 h
22.0–2.9 × baseline<0.5 mL/kg/h for ≥12 h
3≥3.0 × baseline, or ≥4.0 mg/dL, or RRT initiated<0.3 mL/kg/h for ≥24 h or anuria ≥12 h

Chronic kidney disease staging

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is staged primarily using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, which classify the condition based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria levels to guide prognosis, management, and risk stratification. This staging system emphasizes the interplay between kidney function decline and proteinuria, enabling clinicians to predict progression and tailor interventions. The GFR categories range from G1, indicating normal or high kidney function, to G5, representing kidney failure, while albuminuria is categorized from A1 (normal to mildly increased) to A3 (severely increased). The following table summarizes these categories as defined by KDIGO 2024:
GFR CategoryeGFR (mL/min/1.73 m²)Description
G1≥90Normal or high
G260–89Mildly decreased
G3a45–59Mildly to moderately decreased
G3b30–44Moderately to severely decreased
G415–29Severely decreased
G5<15Kidney failure
Albuminuria CategoryAlbumin-to-Creatinine Ratio (mg/g)Description
A1<30Normal to mildly increased
A230–300Moderately increased
A3>300Severely increased
These thresholds are derived from extensive cohort studies linking eGFR and to outcomes such as end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Risk prediction in CKD staging incorporates a heat map of GFR-albuminuria combinations, where lower GFR and higher correlate with exponentially increased risk of progression to ESRD. For instance, individuals in G5 with A3 face the highest risk, with hazard ratios exceeding those in earlier stages by orders of magnitude, while tools like the Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) provide individualized 2- to 5-year predictions with high accuracy (C-statistic 0.88–0.91). This matrix facilitates early referral when the 5-year risk of kidney replacement therapy exceeds 3–5%. Monitoring CKD progression involves serial eGFR estimates using equations such as CKD-EPI, preferably with for enhanced accuracy, alongside annual albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) assessments from first-morning urine samples. Screening for complications is recommended at specific thresholds, including evaluation when eGFR falls below 60 mL/min/1.73 m² and mineral and bone disorder assessment below 45 mL/min/1.73 m², with more frequent monitoring (e.g., every 3 months) for advanced stages like G4. The most common causes of CKD include , accounting for approximately 30–40% of cases globally, hypertensive nephrosclerosis at 20–30%, and glomerular diseases at 10–15%. Progression is accelerated by factors such as persistent and , which independently worsen kidney function decline and increase ESRD risk. End-stage kidney disease, corresponding to G5, warrants initiation of dialysis or transplantation when eGFR drops below 10–15 mL/min/1.73 m² or uremic symptoms (e.g., , ) emerge, prioritizing patient-centered timing to optimize outcomes. can serve as an accelerator of underlying CKD progression in at-risk individuals.

References

  1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507821/
  2. https://www.kidney-international.org/article/S0085-2538(23)00766-4/fulltext
  3. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)01853-7/fulltext
  4. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/21824-kidney
  5. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/305488
  6. https://www.osmosis.org/learn/The_role_of_the_kidney_in_acid-base_balance
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4427087/
  8. https://teachmephysiology.com/urinary-system/nephron/
  9. https://www.kenhub.com/en/library/anatomy/kidney-histology
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9338902/
  11. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/21509-uremia
  12. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.324001
  13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539871/
  14. https://med.libretexts.org/Courses/Chabot_College/BIOS15%253A_Anatomy_and_Physiology_Textbook/17%253A_The_Urinary_System/17.04%253A_Urine_Formation_and_Glomerular_Filtration_Rate_%28GFR%29
  15. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482248/
  16. https://courses.washington.edu/pbio375/clearance/clearance.html
  17. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/007305.htm
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11114984/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6249883/
  20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK606132/
  21. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564390/
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7015670/
  23. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/chronic-kidney-disease/symptoms-causes/syc-20354521
  24. https://www.kidney.org/kidney-topics/risk-factors-chronic-kidney-disease
  25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532934/
  26. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/lupus-nephritis/symptoms-causes/syc-20354335
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7861116/
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9960203/
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4270362/
  30. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441896/
  31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535404/
  32. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK599516/
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4089662/
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12843775/
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7894668/
  36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK613065/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12404170/
  38. https://kdigo.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/KDIGO-2024-CKD-Guideline.pdf
  39. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557685/
  40. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK606103/
  41. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482482/
  42. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK563255/
  43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499952/
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3433942/
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8541429/
  46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32750458/
  47. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544228/
  48. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2102953
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12031902/
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33661505/
  51. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535381/
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9098467/
  53. https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/abdominal-ultrasound/about/pac-20392738
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2991216/
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2039780/
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4220362/
  57. https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x
  58. https://ajronline.org/doi/10.2214/AJR.04.1838
  59. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/radiol.2019192094
  60. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK567754/
  61. https://radiopaedia.org/articles/nephrogenic-phase
  62. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2093338-overview
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8813013/
  64. https://kdigo.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/KDIGO-2021-GD-Guideline-Executive-Summary.pdf
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2693431/
  66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470275/
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10512899/
  68. https://www.academicradiology.org/article/S1076-6332%2825%2900318-6/abstract
  69. https://academic.oup.com/ckj/article/8/2/151/471252
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034837625000087
  71. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12113655/
  72. https://radiopaedia.org/articles/transjugular-renal-biopsy?lang=us
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10921104/
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2049080117302376
  75. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/19/6424
  76. https://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386%2818%2931102-8/fulltext
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6531025/
  78. https://www.kidney-international.org/article/S0085-2538%2815%2950227-5/fulltext
  79. https://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386%2821%2900948-3/fulltext
  80. https://www.cureus.com/articles/430189-electron-microscopy-in-renal-biopsy-interpretation-when-and-why-it-still-matters
  81. https://www.kidneypathology.com/English_version/Processing_renal_samples.html
  82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499817/
  83. https://banfffoundation.org/central-repository-for-banff-classification-resources-3/
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7597974/
  85. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5753432/
  86. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1680813/full
  87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0085253815481608
  88. https://kdigo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/KDIGO-2012-AKI-Guideline-English.pdf
  89. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2012/1001/p631.html
  90. https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/genitourinary-disorders/acute-kidney-injury/acute-kidney-injury-aki
  91. https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/60/fractional-excretion-sodium-fena
  92. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3257513/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.