Hubbry Logo
Assyrian captivityAssyrian captivityMain
Open search
Assyrian captivity
Community hub
Assyrian captivity
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Assyrian captivity
Assyrian captivity
Assyrian captivity
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Deportation of the Israelites after the destruction of Israel and the subjugation of Judah by the Neo-Assyrian Empire, 8th–7th century BCE

The Assyrian captivity, also called the Assyrian exile, is the period in the history of ancient Israel and Judah during which tens of thousands of Israelites from the Kingdom of Israel were dispossessed and forcibly relocated by the Neo-Assyrian Empire. One of many instances attesting Assyrian resettlement policy, this mass deportation of the Israelite nation began immediately after the Assyrian conquest of Israel, which was overseen by the Assyrian kings Tiglath-Pileser III and Shalmaneser V. The later Assyrian kings Sargon II and Sennacherib also managed to subjugate the Israelites in the neighbouring Kingdom of Judah following the Assyrian siege of Jerusalem in 701 BCE, but were unable to annex their territory outright. The Assyrian captivity's victims are known as the Ten Lost Tribes, and Judah was left as the sole Israelite kingdom until the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem in 587 BCE, which resulted in the Babylonian captivity of the Jewish people. Not all of Israel's populace was deported by the Assyrians; some of those who were not expelled from the former kingdom's territory eventually became known as the Samaritan people.

Biblical account

[edit]

The captivities began in approximately 732 BCE according to modern scholarship.[1]

And the God of Israel stirred up the spirit of Pul king of Assyria, and the spirit of Tilgathpilneser king of Assyria, and he carried them away, even the Reubenites, and the Gadites, and the half tribe of Manasseh, and brought them unto Halah, and Habor, and Hara, and to the river Gozan, unto this day. (1 Chronicles 5:26)

In the days of Pekah king of Israel came Tiglathpileser king of Assyria, and he took Ijon, and Abel Beth Maacah, and Janoah, and Kedesh and Hazor, and Gilead, and Galilee, all the land of Naphtali, and carried them captive to Assyria. (2 Kings 15:29)

In 722 BCE, around ten years after the initial deportations, the ruling city of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, Samaria, was finally taken by Sargon II after a three-year siege started by Shalmaneser V.

Against him came up Shalmaneser king of Assyria; and Hoshea became his servant, and gave him presents.

And the king of Assyria found conspiracy in Hoshea: for he had sent messengers to So king of Egypt, and brought no present to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year: therefore the king of Assyria shut him up, and bound him in prison. Then the king of Assyria came up throughout all the land, and went up to Samaria, and besieged it three years.

In the ninth year of Hoshea the king of Assyria took Samaria, and carried Israel away into Assyria, and placed them in Halah and in Habor by the river of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes. (2 Kings 17:3–6)

The king of Assyria carried the Israelites away to Assyria, settled them in Halah, on the Habor, the river of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes, because they did not obey the voice of the LORD their God but transgressed His covenant—all that Moses the servant of the LORD had commanded; they neither listened nor obeyed. (2 Kings 18:11–12)

The term "cities of the Medes" mentioned above may be a corruption from an original text "Mountains of Media".[2][3]

And when Asa heard these words, even the prophecy of Oded the prophet, he took courage, and put away the detestable things out of all the land of Judah and Benjamin, and out of the cities which he had taken from the hill-country of Ephraim; and he renewed the altar of the LORD, that was before the porch of the LORD.

And he gathered all Judah and Benjamin, and them that sojourned with them out of Ephraim and Manasseh, and out of Simeon; for they fell to him out of Israel in abundance, when they saw that the LORD his God was with him.

So they gathered themselves together at Jerusalem in the third month, in the fifteenth year of the reign of Asa. (2 Chronicles 15:8–10)

Many Israelite civilians were killed during the invasion, with infants being dashed and pregnant women being ripped open (Hosea 13:16).[4] Similar acts were perpetrated in later Assyrian conquests, such as their conquest of Elam.[5]

According to 2nd Chronicles, Chapter 30, there is evidence that at least some people of the Northern Kingdom of Israel were not exiled. These were invited by king Hezekiah to keep the Passover in a feast at Jerusalem with the Judean population. (The holiday was set one month forward from its original date.) Hezekiah sent his posts to spread the word among the remnant of the Northern kingdom; the posts were mocked during their visit to the country of Ephraim, Manasseh and Zebulun. However, some people of Asher and Manasseh and of Zebulun humbled themselves and came to Jerusalem. In a later part of the chapter, even people from the Tribe of Issachar and the strangers that "came out from the land of Israel" were said to take part in the passover event. Biblical scholars such as Umberto Cassuto and Elia Samuele Artom claimed that Hezekiah might have annexed these territories, in which inhabitants of the Kingdom of Israel remained, into his own kingdom.

And Hezekiah sent to all Israel and Judah, and wrote letters also to Ephraim and Manasseh, that they should come to the house of the LORD at Jerusalem, to keep the passover unto the LORD, the God of Israel. (2 Chronicles 30:1)

So they established a decree to make proclamation throughout all Israel, from Beer-sheba even to Dan, that they should come to keep the passover unto the LORD, the God of Israel, at Jerusalem; for they had not kept it in great numbers accordingly, as it is written.

So the posts went with the letters from the king and his princes throughout all Israel and Judah, according to the commandment of the king, saying: 'Ye children of Israel, turn back unto the LORD, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, that He may return to the remnant that are escaped out of the hand of the kings of Assyria. And be ye not like your fathers and like your brethren who acted treacherously against the LORD, the God of their fathers, so that He delivered them to desolation, as ye see. Now be ye not stiffnecked as your fathers were, but yield yourselves unto the LORD and enter into His sanctuary which He hath sanctified for ever; and serve the LORD your God that His fierce anger may turn away from you.

For if ye turn back unto the LORD, your brethren and your children shall find compassion before them that led them captive, and shall come back into this land; for the LORD your God is gracious and merciful, and will not turn away His face from you if ye return unto Him.' (2 Chronicles 30:5–9)

So the posts passed from city to city through the country of Ephraim and Manasseh, even unto Zebulun; but they laughed them to scorn, and mocked them. Nevertheless certain men of Asher and Manasseh and of Zebulun humbled themselves, and came to Jerusalem. (2 Chronicles 30:11–12)

For a multitude of the people, even many of Ephraim and Manasseh, Issachar and Zebulun, had not cleansed themselves, yet did they eat the passover otherwise than it is written. For Hezekiah had prayed for them, saying: 'The good LORD pardon ...' (2 Chronicles 30:18)

And all the congregation of Judah, with the priests and the Levites, and all the congregation that came out of Israel, and the strangers that came out of the land of Israel, and that dwelt in Judah, rejoiced. So there was great joy in Jerusalem; for since the time of Solomon the son of David king of Israel there was not the like in Jerusalem. (2 Chronicles 30:25–26)

In 2nd Chronicles, Chapter 31, it is said that the remnant of the Kingdom of Israel returned to their homes, but not before destroying Ba'al and Ashera places of Idol worship left in "all Judah and Benjamin, in Ephraim also and Manasseh".

Now when all this was finished, all Israel that were present went out to the cities of Judah, and broke in pieces the pillars, and hewed down the Asherim, and broke down the high places and the altars out of all Judah and Benjamin, in Ephraim also and Manasseh, until they had destroyed them all. Then all the children of Israel returned, every man to his possession, into their own cities. (2 Chronicles 31:1)

Assyrian cuneiform

[edit]

The Babylonian Chronicle ABC1 records that Shalmaneser V conquered Samaria, as stated in the Bible.[6] Likewise, Assyrian cuneiform states that 27,290 captives were taken from Samaria,[7] the capital of the new Assyrian province of Samerina, by Sargon II.

Sargon records his first campaign on the walls of the royal palace at Dur-Sharrukin (Khorsabad):

In my first year of reign *** the people of Samaria *** to the number of 27,290 ... I carried away.

Fifty chariots for my royal equipment I selected. The city I rebuilt. I made it greater than it was before.

People of the lands I had conquered I settled therein. My official (Tartan) I placed over them as governor. (L.ii.4.)[7]

The description of the final defeat of the Northern Kingdom of Israel above appears to be a minor event in Sargon's legacy. Some historians attribute the ease of Israel's defeat to the previous two decades of invasions, defeats, and deportations.

Some estimates assume a captivity numbering in the hundreds of thousands, minus those who died in defense of the kingdom and minus those who fled voluntarily before and during the invasions.[8] It has also been suggested that the numbers deported by the Assyrians were rather limited and the bulk of the population remained in situ.[9] There is also evidence that significant numbers fled south to the Kingdom of Judah. Archaeologically speaking, it is known that the invasion was accompanied by large-scale destruction and abandonment at many sites.[10] There are also some cuneiform texts that document the presence of Israelites in Assyria after the deportations.[11][12]

Modern scholarship

[edit]

Contemporary scholarship confirms that deportations occurred both before and after the Assyrian conquest of the Kingdom of Israel in 722–720 BCE, with varying impacts across Galilee, Transjordan, and Samaria.[13] During the earlier Assyrian invasions, Galilee and Transjordan experienced significant deportations, with entire tribes vanishing; the tribes of Reuben, Gad, Dan, and Naphtali are never again mentioned. Archaeological evidence from these regions shows that a large depopulation process took place there in the late 8th century BCE, with numerous sites being destroyed, abandoned, or feature a long occupation gap.[13][14] In contrast, some scholars argue that Samaria—a larger and more populated area—presents a more mixed picture. While some sites were destroyed or abandoned during the Assyrian invasion, major cities such as Samaria and Megiddo remained largely intact, and other sites show a continuity of occupation.[13][14] Other scholars argue that archaeological findings from Samaria show that the territory as a whole—except for a few small areas—was devastated following the Assyrian conquest.[15][16] The Assyrians settled exiles from Babylonia, Elam, and Syria in places including Gezer, Hadid, and villages north of Shechem and Tirzah.[17] However, even if the Assyrians deported 30,000 people, as they claimed, many would have remained in the area.[13] Based on changes in material culture, Adam Zertal estimated that only 10% of the Israelite population in Samaria was deported, while the number of imported settlers was likely no more than a few thousand, indicating that most Israelites continued to reside in Samaria.[18][19]

Archaeologist Eric H. Cline believes only 10–20% of Samaria's Israelite population (i.e. 40,000 Israelites) were deported to Assyria in 720 BCE. About 80,000 Israelites fled to Judah whilst between 100,000 and 230,000 Israelites remained in Samaria. The latter intermarried with the foreign settlers, thus forming the Samaritans.[20] By contrast, Avraham Faust argues that the population in all the former territories of the kingdom of Israel was reduced to between 20,000 and 40,000 inhabitants by the 7th century BCE.[21]

Return

[edit]

Unlike the Kingdom of Judah, which was allowed to return from its Babylonian captivity, the ten tribes of the Northern Kingdom never had a foreign edict granting permission to return and rebuild their homeland. Many centuries later, rabbis of the restored Kingdom of Judah were still debating the return of the lost ten tribes.[22][23]

According to the Books of Chronicles chapter 9 verse 3, the Israelites, who took part in the Return to Zion, are stated to be from the Tribe of Judah alongside the Tribe of Simeon that was absorbed into it, the Tribe of Benjamin, the Tribe of Levi (Levites and Priests) alongside the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh, which according to the Book of Kings 2 Chapter 17 were exiled by the Assyrians (the Biblical scholars Umberto Cassuto and Elia Samuele Artom claimed these two tribes' names to be a reference to the remnant of all Ten Tribes that was not exiled and absorbed into the Judean population).[24]

And in Jerusalem dwelt of the children of Judah, and of the children of Benjamin, and of the children of Ephraim and Manasseh. (1 Chronicles 9:3)

Nonetheless, Nehemiah chapter 11 verse 3 describes a group called "Israel" settling in Judean neighborhoods. This "Israel" was composed of various Israelite tribes, who intermarried with each other. In contrast, the Israelite tribes of Judah and Benjamin settled in Jerusalem.[25]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Assyrian captivity

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Assyrian captivity (Hebrew: גָּלוּת אַשּׁוּר) refers to the mass deportation of the inhabitants of the ancient Northern Kingdom of by the following the conquest of its capital, , in 722 BCE. This event marked the end of the independent Kingdom of , which had existed since the division of the united monarchy around 930 BCE, and resulted in the exile of tens of thousands of to distant regions of the empire, where they were resettled and largely assimilated, giving rise to the historical concept of the "Ten Lost Tribes." The conquest stemmed from Israel's repeated rebellions against Assyrian dominance in the during the reign of (745–727 BCE), who had already annexed parts of northern and deported populations from cities like in 733–732 BCE. (727–722 BCE) initiated the siege of after King Hoshea of withheld tribute and sought alliances with and others, but it was (722–705 BCE), Shalmaneser's successor, who claimed the final capture of the city in his accession year. According to Sargon's own inscriptions, he "besieged and captured , carrying off 27,290 of the people who dwelt therein." The Assyrian strategy of mass deportation aimed to break resistance, repopulate conquered territories, and integrate skilled laborers into the empire's economy and military. The deportees, primarily the elite classes including the royal family, , and artisans, were dispersed to prevent organized revolt and were settled in areas such as Halah, Gozan on the Habor River (near modern ), and the towns of the in eastern . In their place, Sargon resettled foreigners from , Cuthah, Avva, Hamath, and into , creating a mixed population that formed the basis of the later community. Archaeological from sites like Tel Hadid supports the presence of these Assyrian-period settlers, indicating a deliberate policy of cultural and demographic reconfiguration. The captivity had profound long-term effects, dissolving the Northern Kingdom's distinct identity and shifting the focus of Israelite history to the surviving Southern until its own fall to in 586 BCE. While some remained in the land and intermingled with newcomers, the exiled groups assimilated into Assyrian society, contributing to labor projects and the , with no significant records of return or organized restoration. This event is documented in both Assyrian royal annals and biblical texts, underscoring its role as a pivotal catastrophe in ancient Near Eastern history.

Historical Background

Division of the Israelite Kingdoms

Following the death of King Solomon circa 930 BCE, the previously unified Israelite fragmented into two separate entities: the Northern Kingdom, known as , and the Southern Kingdom, known as Judah. This , rooted in longstanding tribal tensions and exacerbated by Solomon's heavy taxation and forced labor policies, erupted when his son rejected demands for relief at a assembly in , prompting the northern tribes to rebel and install I as their king. The created a lasting political rupture, with comprising ten tribes and controlling the more fertile northern territories, while Judah retained the tribes of Judah and Benjamin in the south. To consolidate his rule and prevent loyalty to the temple from undermining his authority, I established alternative religious centers at Bethel in the south and Dan in the north, erecting golden calves there as symbols of worship and appointing non-Levite priests. These sanctuaries, intended to replicate the religious functions of the southern temple while avoiding pilgrimages to , were decried in later biblical traditions as idolatrous innovations that sowed seeds of religious division. This move not only centralized religious practice in the north but also highlighted the ideological split, as Jeroboam's reforms prioritized political independence over unified cultic observance. The Northern Kingdom of Israel suffered from chronic internal instability throughout its existence, marked by frequent dynastic upheavals, assassinations, and short-lived reigns that rarely exceeded a generation except for the Omride dynasty. Nine different dynasties succeeded one another in less than two centuries, often through violent coups, as seen in the rapid successions following the end of Jehu's line with the assassination of Zechariah circa 752 BCE, ushering in a particularly turbulent period after the death of Jeroboam II circa 746 BCE. In the subsequent approximately 30 years, six kings—Zechariah, Shallum, Menahem, Pekahiah, Pekah, and Hoshea—held power, with four assassinated (Zechariah by Shallum, Shallum by Menahem, Pekahiah by Pekah, and Pekah by Hoshea). This era featured failed alliances, such as Pekah's pact with Aram-Damascus against Judah, and escalating Assyrian pressure from circa 740 BCE, including heavy tribute demands under Tiglath-Pileser III—such as the 1,000 talents of silver exacted from Menahem in 738 BCE, raised via taxes on the wealthy—that impoverished the kingdom and exacerbated social strains. Compounding this turmoil were volatile alliances and conflicts with the neighboring kingdom of Aram-Damascus, including periods of tribute payments, joint campaigns against Judah, and territorial losses in the Transjordan, which eroded Israel's military cohesion and left its borders vulnerable to external powers. Amid these crises, overlapping with the early ministry of the prophet Isaiah from circa 740 BCE, the kingdom experienced widespread idolatry, social injustice, moral decay, fear of invasion, destruction of cities, family separations, poverty, and enslavement, fostering widespread despair and humiliation that intensified with Assyrian campaigns. Geographically, Israel's core territories centered on the Samaria region, extending northward through the fertile Jezreel Valley to include Galilee and parts of the Transjordan, with its capital established at Samaria by Omri around 880 BCE. Major urban centers such as Megiddo, a strategic fortress controlling the Via Maris trade route, and Jezreel, a royal residence in the valley, anchored the kingdom's administrative and military infrastructure. This layout provided agricultural prosperity but also exposed Israel to invasions from the north and east due to its position astride key international corridors.

Expansion of the Neo-Assyrian Empire

The marked a resurgence from the territorial contractions of the Middle Assyrian period, beginning with the reign of (911–891 BCE), who drove back encroaching Aramaean forces and reclaimed core Assyrian lands along the . His campaigns, including a major expedition in his 18th (895 BCE) from Guzana along the Habur River to its confluence and down the to Hindanu, consolidated control over a network of tribute-paying settlements in the Middle region, laying the foundation for sustained imperial growth. These efforts transitioned from defensive recovery to proactive expansion in the 9th century BCE, prioritizing nearby, resource-rich areas with established populations. Tiglath-Pileser III (745–727 BCE) accelerated this momentum after seizing the throne in a coup, implementing reforms that centralized power and transformed the military into a professional standing force. By recruiting foreign conscripts, establishing a messenger relay system to enforce royal commands, and curtailing the autonomy of provincial lords who had amassed influence during periods of weak central rule, he shifted from seasonal levies to year-round campaigns capable of permanent territorial integration. These administrative and military innovations, documented in his annals, enabled to project power westward into the , pressuring states there into tributary alliances. Central to Assyrian control was a policy of mass deportation, which relocated tens of thousands from conquered regions to the empire's core or remote provinces, serving both punitive and strategic purposes. From 745–620 BCE, this practice suppressed local resistance by disrupting social structures while supplying labor for , , and needs, with estimates indicating an average of around 15,000 deportees annually over the empire's history, rising higher during periods of intense expansion such as 745–620 BCE. Such relocations exemplified the empire's systematic approach to , integrating diverse populations to prevent revolts and sustain expansion. This westward push manifested in targeted campaigns, such as those against , which culminated in its destruction in 732 BCE under . Following initial coastal advances in 734/3 BCE and field victories in 733/2 BCE, Assyrian forces besieged and captured the capital, executing King and annexing its territories as provinces. These operations highlighted Assyria's methodical elimination of regional powers threatening its Levantine frontier. Economic drivers underpinned these conquests, as tribute in grain, metals, livestock, and luxury goods fueled the imperial apparatus and supported urban centers. Dominance over Fertile Crescent trade routes—via royal roads for rapid communication, riverine transport, and maritime links—secured access to essential commodities and generated revenue through tariffs and monopolies. Vassal buffer states and fortified garrisons further protected these networks against rivals like Egypt to the south and Urartu to the north, ensuring long-term stability.

Key Events of the Conquest

Campaigns of

, king of from 745 to 727 BCE, initiated the empire's aggressive expansion into the as part of a broader policy to consolidate control over rebellious regions and secure tribute. In 738 BCE, during an earlier campaign against northern and , King of submitted tribute of 1,000 talents of silver to avert direct Assyrian invasion, as recorded in both biblical accounts and Assyrian inscriptions. This payment temporarily aligned as a , but tensions escalated with the around 735–734 BCE, when King Pekah of allied with King Rezin of to pressure the kingdom of Judah into an anti-Assyrian coalition. The Assyrian response unfolded in a series of campaigns from 734 to 732 BCE, targeting the anti-Assyrian alliance. first advanced along the Philistine coast, subduing cities like Gaza and , before turning inland to confront and Aram. He captured key northern and eastern territories of the Northern Kingdom, including (encompassing tribes of Zebulun and Naphtali, referred to as magdimu or the district of Megiddo in Assyrian records), , and regions east of the up to Abel-Shittim. These areas were annexed directly as Assyrian provinces, with Assyrian officials installed to administer them and extract resources. The conquest dismantled much of Israel's defensive and economic base, isolating the remaining core around , and inflicted profound suffering through the destruction of cities, family separations, poverty, and enslavement, fostering widespread despair and humiliation among the populace. Deportations followed the captures as a standard Assyrian strategy to weaken resistance and repopulate conquered lands. Assyrian annals record the deportation of 13,520 people specifically from , with additional captives from and Transjordan contributing to a broader tally of around 16,620 deportees from the Levantine campaigns, though fragmentary texts prevent precise breakdowns. These exiles were resettled in territories, such as along the Habur River, to serve in labor or military roles. Biblical sources parallel this in 2 Kings 15:29, stating that Tiglath-Pileser "took Ijon, Abel-beth-maacah, Janoah, , Hazor, , and , all the land of , and he carried the people captive to ." This further oppression intensified the kingdom's vulnerability, paving the way for the climactic siege and fall of Samaria in 722/721 BCE. Politically, the campaigns culminated in the removal of , who was assassinated amid the Assyrian pressure, allowing the installation of as a pro-Assyrian puppet in around 732 BCE. This arrangement preserved a rump Israelite kingdom temporarily but marked the onset of subjugation, setting the stage for further Assyrian interventions. Assyrian summary inscriptions explicitly note 's submission and payment of , underscoring the shift from to direct overlordship.

Fall of Samaria under Shalmaneser V and Sargon II

The final phase of the Assyrian conquest of the Northern Kingdom of began with the rebellion of King , who ascended to the throne around 732 BCE following the Assyrian annexation of much of his territory under . In approximately 725 BCE, Hoshea withheld tribute from and sought military aid from "So, king of Egypt"—likely a reference to of —hoping to break free from Assyrian dominance. This act of defiance prompted (r. 727–722 BCE), the newly enthroned Assyrian king, to launch an invasion of , capturing Hoshea and initiating a prolonged of , the fortified capital. The siege of Samaria, which lasted three years from roughly 725 to 722 BCE, is corroborated by both biblical and extrabiblical sources, highlighting the city's formidable defenses. According to the biblical narrative in 2 Kings 17:3–6, Shalmaneser V "came up against" Hoshea, bound him as a prisoner, and laid siege to the city until its fall, after which the Israelites were exiled to regions including Halah, the Habor River (likely the Khabur), Gozan (on the Habor), and the cities of the Medes. Assyrian records, such as the Babylonian Chronicle (ABC 1), confirm that Shalmaneser "ravaged Samaria" during his reign, though they provide limited details on the campaign's progress. The strategic significance of Samaria cannot be overstated; established as the capital by King Omri around 880 BCE, it featured robust fortifications, including a casemate wall and advanced water systems like the tunnel engineered under King Ahab, which the Assyrians ultimately breached through sustained military pressure. The conquest's completion is attributed to (r. 722–705 BCE), Shalmaneser's successor, who ascended amid a turbulent transition possibly involving his brother's overthrow. In his royal inscriptions, including the Great Summary Inscription from Khorsabad and prism fragments cataloged in the Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period (RINAP), Sargon claims personal credit for capturing in his accession year (722 BCE), stating: "I besieged and conquered , led away as booty 27,290 inhabitants of it." This figure underscores the scale of the operation, targeting the elite and skilled populace to dismantle resistance, though the biblical account aligns in describing the exile without specifying numbers. The discrepancy in attribution—Shalmaneser in biblical texts versus Sargon in Assyrian annals—likely reflects Sargon's propagandistic emphasis on his achievements, as no surviving inscriptions from Shalmaneser detail the siege's outcome. Thus, the fall of marked the effective end of the independent Kingdom of Israel, fully incorporating it into the Assyrian provincial system.

Biblical Accounts

Narratives in the Books of Kings

The Books of Kings provide the primary biblical narrative of the Assyrian captivity of the northern kingdom of , centered in 2 Kings 17:1-23, which recounts the final years of King 's reign and the subsequent fall of . According to this account, became king in the twelfth year of Judah's King Ahaz and ruled for nine years, doing evil in the sight of the Lord, though not as severely as his predecessors. He conspired against by withholding tribute and seeking alliance with , leading King of to imprison him, besiege for three years, and ultimately capture the city in 's ninth year, deporting the to Assyrian territories. The narrative attributes Israel's downfall not to military defeat alone but to persistent , covenant violations, and rejection of divine warnings, framing the as a culmination of generational sin. The text details how the feared other gods, conformed to Canaanite practices by building high places and sacred pillars, and ignored God's commandments despite repeated admonitions from prophets, including figures like and who urged repentance. This rejection stiffened their resolve, leading God to remove them from His presence, as foretold in earlier prophetic messages. The deportees were resettled in Halah, along the Habor River, in Gozan, and in the cities of the , while the Assyrian king imported populations from , Cuthah, Avva, Hamath, and to repopulate , resulting in a syncretistic religious where newcomers feared the superficially but continued idol worship. This depiction embodies Deuteronomistic theology, portraying the Assyrian exile as divine punishment for breaching the covenant, directly echoing the curses in Deuteronomy 28 for disobedience, such as scattering among nations and servitude to enemies. The historian emphasizes that God's patience endured through warnings via prophets, but persistent —worshiping idols, , and —necessitated judgment to fulfill covenant stipulations. Israel's history from onward is recast as a cycle of redemption followed by rebellion, underscoring the consequences of forsaking . Preceding 2 Kings 17, the books offer chronological summaries of Israelite kings from (c. 841–814 BCE) to (c. 732–722 BCE), highlighting recurring cycles of , brief reforms, and increasing Assyrian vassalage as theological markers of decline. 's violent purge of worship (2 Kings 9–10) initiated a dynasty but failed to eradicate , as subsequent rulers like tolerated high places and foreign cults. By Menahem's reign (c. 752–742 BCE), Israel paid tribute to Assyria's to maintain autonomy (2 Kings 15:19–20), a pattern continued under , who lost territory in Assyrian campaigns (2 Kings 15:29), and , whose rebellion triggered the final . These vignettes illustrate a downward spiral of and subjugation, reinforcing the Deuteronomistic view that unfaithful kings led the nation to . These narratives in Kings foreshadow themes echoed briefly in prophetic books like Hosea, where Israel's unfaithfulness is likened to adultery, anticipating captivity as marital divorce.

References in Prophetic Books

The prophetic books of the Hebrew Bible frequently reference the Assyrian captivity of the Northern Kingdom of Israel as a manifestation of divine judgment for covenant unfaithfulness, employing vivid metaphors and oracles to convey moral warnings and eschatological hope. These texts, spanning pre-exilic and post-exilic periods, frame the invasion and exile not merely as historical events but as theological consequences of idolatry, social injustice, and apostasy, urging repentance and fidelity to Yahweh. In the 8th century BCE, the prophet Hosea portrayed Israel as an unfaithful wife whose idolatry, particularly the worship of golden calves at Bethel and Dan, provoked Yahweh's wrath and invited Assyrian domination. Hosea 11:5-6 explicitly predicts that Israel "shall not return to the land of Egypt, but the Assyrian shall be their king, because they have refused to return," with swords devouring their cities as punishment for rebellion. This imagery of familial betrayal and inevitable subjugation underscores the captivity as a reversal of the Exodus, where Assyria replaces Egypt as the instrument of discipline. Similarly, , active around 760 BCE, issued oracles condemning Israel's elite for opulent lifestyles and systemic injustices against the poor, foretelling as the ultimate consequence. In Amos 5:27, declares, "I will take you into beyond ," reinterpreted in context as to , symbolizing removal from the for ritual hypocrisy and ethical failures. These pronouncements emphasize that the captivity serves as , stripping away false securities to enforce accountability. Later 8th-century prophets extended these themes to warn Judah, linking the Northern Kingdom's fall to potential judgment on the South. Isaiah 7:8 prophesies that "within sixty-five years Ephraim [Israel] will be shattered from being a people," accurately anticipating the Assyrian conquest and dissolution of the Northern Kingdom by 722 BCE, while urging King Ahaz to trust Yahweh over foreign alliances. Micah, a contemporary, lamented Samaria's impending ruin in Micah 1:6, portraying it as high places of idolatry reduced to heaps, and connected this to Judah's moral decay, using the Northern exile as a cautionary mirror for southern fidelity. Post-captivity, prophets like and invoked the Assyrian exile as a paradigmatic for the Southern Kingdom facing Babylonian threats, reinforcing themes of judgment and restoration. 50:17-18 likens to a scattered sheep devoured first by and then , attributing both exiles to Yahweh's sovereignty over nations as punishers of iniquity. , in visions such as , allegorizes the sisters Oholah () and Oholibah () as harlots punished by Assyrian lovers turned assailants, using the Northern precedent to indict Judah's alliances and , promising ultimate redemption for the repentant.

Assyrian Primary Sources

Royal Inscriptions and Annals

The royal inscriptions and annals of the Neo-Assyrian kings provide crucial primary textual evidence for the conquest and captivity of the northern Kingdom of , often paralleling narratives in the Books of Kings while emphasizing Assyrian imperial achievements. These documents, typically inscribed on steles, prisms, and wall reliefs in palaces, detail military campaigns, collections, and deportations in a propagandistic style that highlights the kings' prowess and divine favor. Key examples from , , and corroborate the progressive subjugation of Israelite territories, using the term Bit-Ḫumri ("House of ") to denote the kingdom, a designation that persisted long after the Omride dynasty's fall in the BCE, reflecting the enduring Assyrian perception of 's political identity. Tiglath-Pileser III's annals, preserved in multiple fragments including the Iran Stele discovered in western Iran, record the initial Assyrian encroachments into Israelite territory during his reign (745–727 BCE). The Iran Stele explicitly lists , king of (Bit-Ḫumri), among the rulers who paid to avert invasion, specifying silver, gold, and other valuables extracted from Israelite subjects in the late 740s BCE. Later entries in the annals describe the 732 BCE campaign, where Tiglath-Pileser overthrew the anti-Assyrian king , annexed and surrounding regions as the province of Megiddo, and installed as a ruler, thereby reducing 's territory significantly. These accounts underscore the systematic weakening of the kingdom through and partial conquest, setting the stage for its ultimate fall. Shalmaneser V's records (726–722 BCE) are notably sparse compared to those of his predecessors and successor, with only fragmentary inscriptions surviving that allude to his involvement in the region. One such text mentions the siege of Samaria (Bit-Ḫumri) as part of broader campaigns against rebellious western vassals, but it omits any claim of victory or completion of the conquest, likely due to Shalmaneser's untimely death or usurpation. This paucity of detailed annals has fueled scholarly debate on the extent of his role, though the eponym lists confirm Assyrian military pressure on Samaria in his final year. Sargon II's display inscriptions from his capital at Khorsabad (Dūr-Šarrukin) boldly assert personal credit for the final capture of in 720 BCE—framed as 722 BCE in some chronologies—portraying it as a swift triumph over a under siege by his predecessor. These texts claim that Sargon deported 27,290 "guilty" inhabitants, described as skilled warriors and artisans, resettling them across the empire to prevent and integrate their labor into Assyrian . The inscriptions employ hyperbolic language to glorify the event, referring to Samaria as Bit-Ḫumri and emphasizing the king's repopulation of the area with foreign settlers to ensure loyalty.

Cuneiform Prisms and Reliefs

prisms from the reign of provide detailed textual accounts of the Assyrian conquest of , serving as key primary sources for the event. 's Prism A, discovered in , records the siege and capture of the city, stating that the king deported 27,290 inhabitants as booty, conscripted 50 chariots from them for his royal contingent, and resettled the remainder in . The inscription further describes the restoration of to a greater state than before, the importation of peoples from conquered lands to repopulate it, and the appointment of an Assyrian as provincial , imposing tribute equivalent to that of Assyrian subjects. The Prism of , another artifact, echoes these details with slight variations, emphasizing the of a "numerous people" from and the influx of foreigners from other regions to bolster the city's population. This prism highlights the military defeat of Samaria's forces, who had allied against , and notes the plundering of the city alongside the resettlement of deportees in Assyrian territories such as Halah and Media. Like Prism A, it portrays the conquest as a divine victory, integrating Samaria into the empire's administrative framework. Palace reliefs at , Sargon II's capital (modern Khorsabad), visually depict scenes of deportees in chains and tribute bearers from , symbolizing Assyrian dominance over conquered Levantine territories. In Room V of the palace, the sculpted panels illustrate processions of captives and exiles from the west, likely including representations of Israelite deportees from portrayed as a generic Levantine city amid broader campaigns against and Judah. These reliefs, carved in , emphasize the scale of subjugation through imagery of bound prisoners and laden tribute animals, reinforcing the king's propagandistic narrative of unchallenged imperial expansion.

Immediate Aftermath

Deportations and Population Resettlement

The Assyrian deportation policy targeted the to dismantle its social and political structures, focusing on the removal of elites, skilled artisans, soldiers, and other key populations to prevent rebellion and bolster the empire's workforce. Following the siege and capture of in 722 BCE, 's royal inscriptions record the deportation of 27,290 individuals from the city and surrounding areas, with earlier campaigns by in 732 BCE displacing additional thousands from regions like and , leading scholarly estimates of a total around 40,000 deportees from overall based on Assyrian records of approximately 13,520 under and 27,290 under [Sargon II](/page/Sargon II). These exiles were primarily resettled in the Assyrian heartland along the Khabur (Habor) and Gozan rivers, as well as in more distant territories such as Media, where they were integrated into local economies through assigned roles in agriculture, construction, and . Complementing these removals, the Assyrians pursued a systematic replacement strategy to repopulate the depopulated territories and ensure administrative control. Foreign groups were imported from conquered areas including , Cuthah, Avva, Hamath, and , settling them in and the former Israelite provinces to create ethnically diverse communities less prone to unified resistance. Assyrian administrative records, such as those from provincial oversight, document these resettlements as part of broader efforts to redistribute labor and maintain imperial stability, with newcomers often assigned to specific economic tasks like farming or tribute collection. The core objectives of this policy were to fracture local leadership and kinship networks, thereby minimizing the risk of revolts, while harnessing deportee skills for Assyrian infrastructure projects and agricultural expansion. Evidence from tablets and royal illustrates how deportees were cataloged and allocated for labor, reflecting a calculated approach to and political pacification across the empire. These mass relocations inflicted immediate economic strain on the Israelite territories, as the of productive classes left vast farmlands untended and disrupted established trade and agricultural systems. Archaeological surveys in reveal layers of abandonment and reduced settlement density in the decades post-conquest, indicating short-term declines in population and productivity that hampered local recovery.

Assyrian Provincial Reorganization

Following the conquest of in 722 BCE, the Assyrian Empire under (r. 722–705 BCE) transformed the former Kingdom of Israel into the province of , with the city of serving as its administrative capital. This reorganization integrated the territory into the Neo-Assyrian imperial structure, dividing it into provinces such as and Magiddû to facilitate direct control and resource extraction. Governance was placed under Assyrian-appointed officials, often referred to as prefects or s (šaknu), who oversaw local administration from fortified centers; a cuneiform tablet discovered at , addressed directly to such a provincial , attests to this hierarchical oversight. To secure the province and vital trade routes, Assyria invested in infrastructure, constructing Assyrian-style fortifications and road networks that linked key sites. At , excavations reveal a large rectangular fortified structure, possibly a bīt mardīte—a roadside and provisioning post—designed to control communication lines through the . Similarly, Megiddo, as the center of the adjacent Magiddû province, featured an imposing Assyrian palace and rebuilt gates with orthogonal planning typical of imperial architecture, enhancing military mobility and economic flow across the region. These developments, initiated shortly after 722 BCE, underscored 's strategy of embedding permanent control mechanisms. Economically, Samerina became a vital supplier within the empire, subject to standardized taxation and systems that demanded agricultural produce and . The contributed wine and oil from its fertile lands, as evidenced by continuity in production patterns post-conquest, alongside and other funneled through imperial channels to support Assyrian garrisons and campaigns. Additionally, local manpower was conscripted for and labor projects, bolstering the empire's expansion efforts across the . This fiscal integration ensured Samerina's role as a peripheral but productive asset. Archaeological evidence, including Assyrian seals, bullae, and ostraca inscribed in , demonstrates sustained bureaucratic oversight in from the late BCE until the empire's collapse around 612 BCE. A scarab seal bearing Sargon II's iconography, found near , highlights early administrative presence, while wedge-impressed storage jars and a stela fragment attributed to the king further confirm imperial stamping of goods and authority. fragments and administrative debris at sites like and indicate ongoing record-keeping for tribute and personnel, reflecting the province's enduring incorporation into Assyrian governance.

Long-Term Consequences

Emergence of the Ten Lost Tribes Concept

The concept of the Ten Lost Tribes originated in the biblical narrative of 2 Kings 17, which recounts the Assyrian conquest of the northern Kingdom of Israel around 722 BCE and the subsequent of its population to various regions within the empire, such as Halah, Habor by the river of Gozan, and the cities of the , implying a complete dispersal and loss of distinct identity. This account portrays the exile as divine punishment for , with the deported adopting foreign customs and thus forfeiting their covenantal status, as emphasized in verses 34–40. Post-exilic Jewish literature further developed this idea by contrasting the partial return of Judahites from with the apparent absence of northern returnees. In Ezra-Nehemiah, the focus is exclusively on the and restoration of Judean exiles under Persian rule, with no mention of northern tribes participating, thereby reinforcing the notion of their permanent separation and untraceable fate. The , composed in the second century BCE, depicts the northern exiles, including Tobit's family from the , resettled in and Media, maintaining some religious practices amid assimilation. Similarly, the first-century historian Flavius Josephus, in (11.133), describes the ten tribes as dwelling beyond the River in immense numbers, having not returned with the two tribes from , thus solidifying their "lost" status in Jewish tradition. Rabbinic literature from the Talmudic period amplified these speculations, portraying the tribes as isolated in remote locations. The Babylonian Talmud (Sanhedrin 65b) references the Sambatyon River—a legendary stream that rages for six days but rests on the —beyond which the ten tribes were exiled, preventing their return until the messianic era. Midrashic texts, such as those in Pesikta Rabbati, elaborate on their preservation in this , viewing it as a divine safeguard for future redemption. During the medieval and early modern periods, the lost tribes motif fueled messianic expectations and geographic speculations among Jewish communities. Travelers' accounts and rabbinic writings, like those of in the ninth century, claimed sightings of the tribes in distant lands, often linking their rediscovery to the arrival of the . In modern times, various groups asserted descent from these tribes, including the of and , whose tribal customs and oral traditions some scholars have tentatively compared to Israelite practices, though such claims lack conclusive evidence. , a 19th-century movement, posited that the Anglo-Saxon peoples, particularly the British and Americans, were the lost tribes, interpreting biblical prophecies as fulfilled through their global empire; this theory, critiqued as pseudohistorical, tied into Protestant and imperial ideology. In Africa, communities like the Lemba of and have claimed Israelite origins based on cultural and genetic similarities, such as Y-chromosome markers akin to Jewish Cohanim, though these connections remain debated and do not indicate direct descent from the Assyrian exiles. These myths often served to sustain hopes of national restoration amid hardships. Scholars widely agree that the deported northern Israelites largely assimilated into Assyrian and subsequent societies, with no evidence of a mass return or preserved tribal identity, as Assyrian records indicate integration through intermarriage and resettlement policies. Genetic studies have explored potential traces in modern populations, such as elevated frequencies of certain haplogroups among or Lemba, but these findings are inconclusive, often reflecting broader Semitic migrations rather than specific Assyrian deportations, and debates persist over methodological limitations and historical correlations.

Development of Samaritan Identity

Following the Assyrian conquest of the northern kingdom of Israel in 722 BCE, the region of was repopulated with deportees from various conquered territories, including , Cuthah, Avva, Hamath, and , leading to a mixed population that practiced a syncretistic form of . According to the biblical account in 2 Kings 17:24-41, these settlers initially faced divine punishment in the form of lion attacks, prompting the Assyrian to send back an exiled Israelite to Bethel to instruct them in the worship of ; however, the groups continued to blend Yahweh reverence with their native deities, such as Succoth-benoth and , establishing a hybrid cult that persisted in the region. This formed the basis of early religious practices, distinguishing the community from the southern while incorporating elements of Israelite tradition. Tensions between this emerging Samaritan group and the returning Judean exiles intensified during the Persian period, particularly around 520 BCE when the Samaritans offered assistance in rebuilding the Jerusalem Temple but were rejected as "foreigners" and adversaries by Zerubbabel and the Judean leaders, as described in Ezra 4:1-3. This rejection exacerbated mutual suspicions, solidifying the Samaritans' separate identity and prompting them to establish their own religious center. By approximately 400 BCE, during the late Persian era, the Samaritans constructed a temple on Mount Gerizim near Shechem, which they regarded as the divinely ordained site for worship in accordance with their interpretation of Deuteronomy 27, further institutionalizing their divergence from Judean practices centered on Jerusalem. Central to Samaritan identity is their self-perception as the authentic continuation of the northern Israelite tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh, faithful to the Mosaic Torah without the later prophetic writings accepted by Judeans. Their sacred text, the Samaritan Pentateuch, preserves a version of the Torah with textual variants that emphasize Mount Gerizim as the chosen holy site—altering Deuteronomy 27:4 from Mount Ebal to Gerizim—and aligns closely with themes in Deuteronomy and the narrative of Joshua's conquest, reinforcing their claim to the land's covenantal legacy. This scriptural tradition, transmitted in Samaritan Hebrew script, underscores their rejection of Jerusalem's centrality and their adherence to a purer form of Israelite religion untainted by post-exilic Judean developments. The Samaritan community endured significant challenges through the Hellenistic and Roman periods, including the destruction of their Gerizim temple by the Hasmonean ruler in 128 BCE, yet maintained continuity by relocating worship to community centers and preserving oral and written traditions. Despite persecutions under later Roman emperors and conversions during the Byzantine era, the group persisted as a distinct ethnoreligious minority, with archaeological evidence from inscriptions in the 2nd century BCE attesting to their diaspora presence and self-identification as . Today, the Samaritan population numbers approximately 860 individuals, primarily residing in , , and Kiryat Luza on in the , continuing their ancient practices amid modern geopolitical tensions.

Modern Scholarship

Archaeological Corroboration

Archaeological excavations in the region of ancient have uncovered significant material evidence corroborating the Assyrian conquest of the northern kingdom around 722 BCE and its subsequent administrative integration. At , the capital of the Kingdom of , over 100 ostraca—Hebrew inscriptions on pottery shards—date to the late BCE and document the delivery of wine and oil for royal officials, reflecting a sophisticated bureaucratic system that persisted under Assyrian provincial oversight. These inscriptions, primarily from administrative contexts, indicate continuity in local record-keeping practices even after the conquest, as the Assyrians repurposed existing infrastructure for governance. Destruction layers at key northern sites further support the military campaigns of the 720s BCE. At Hazor, Stratum VA reveals a thick ash layer with burned structures and scattered Assyrian-style arrowheads, attributed to the campaigns of and that dismantled Israelite strongholds. Similarly, Tel Dan's Stratum IIA shows evidence of violent destruction around 732–720 BCE, including collapsed walls and weaponry consistent with Assyrian tactics, marking the end of the independent there. While Lachish, a Judahite site, experienced its primary destruction in 701 BCE under , its Level III remains—featuring a massive ramp, counter-ramp, and hundreds of iron arrowheads—illustrate the standardized Assyrian assault methods applied regionally, including against Israelite cities earlier in the century. The Tel Dan inscription, a 9th-century BCE fragment discovered in 1993, provides pre-conquest context by referencing the "House of David," confirming the existence of a Davidic dynasty in Judah and, by extension, the intertwined monarchies of and Judah that the Assyrians targeted. This artifact, erected by an Aramean king boasting victories over Israelite and Judean rulers, underscores the historical reality of the Israelite kingdom's structure prior to its fall. Post-722 BCE, Assyrian provincial reorganization is evident in material culture at sites like Megiddo Stratum III, dated to the late 8th–early 7th centuries BCE. Excavations there yield pottery with wedge-impressed designs mimicking , alongside Assyrian-style seals and architectural features such as a two-chambered , signaling the integration of the region into the empire's administrative network through resettlement and cultural imposition. These finds, including storage jars and official stamps, reflect demographic shifts and economic oversight by Assyrian authorities.

Debates on Historicity and Scale

Scholars widely accept the core of the Assyrian of the Northern Kingdom of , including the fall of in 722 BCE under , as corroborated by both biblical accounts in 2 Kings 17 and Assyrian royal inscriptions. This consensus holds despite chronological adjustments proposed by Israel Finkelstein's "low chronology," which shifts some II destruction layers—such as those at Megiddo—to slightly later dates within the 8th century BCE, aligning them more closely with Assyrian campaigns between 732 and 720 BCE without undermining the overall sequence of events. However, debates persist regarding the biblical portrayal of the exile as a near-total removal of the population (2 Kings 17:6, 18), which some scholars argue exaggerates the scale for theological emphasis on , contrasting with Assyrian records that emphasize selective deportations of elites and potential rebels to maintain control. The scale of the deportations remains a focal point of contention, with Assyrian sources specifying 27,290 captives taken from alone, as recorded in 's display inscriptions. In comparison, scholarly estimates place the total population of the Northern Kingdom at approximately 350,000 in the mid-8th century BCE, suggesting that the deportations affected only a fraction—likely 10-20%—of the inhabitants rather than the entire populace. Bustenay Oded's analysis highlights that Assyrian policy under targeted specific groups, such as urban elites, artisans, and military personnel, to depopulate centers of resistance while leaving rural populations intact to sustain agriculture and tribute, thereby challenging notions of a complete . Post-2000 genetic studies have further illuminated these debates by demonstrating substantial continuity in Levantine populations despite Assyrian interventions. Analysis of from Bronze and remains in the Southern Levant reveals that modern groups, including Lebanese (~93%) and Jewish populations (at least ~50%), derive substantial ancestry from Canaanite forebears, with admixture from eastern sources—potentially including Assyrian settlers—estimated at around 10-20% in some models by the end. These findings, from genome-wide data of 73 individuals across sites like and Megiddo, indicate localized assimilation rather than mass displacement, critiquing the "lost tribes" narrative through shared Levantine genetic origins without evidence of large-scale migration to distant regions. Methodological challenges in reconciling sources compound these issues, as biblical texts frame the captivity theologically as punishment for (2 Kings 17:7-23), while Assyrian serve propagandistic purposes, exaggerating victories to legitimize imperial rule without detailing demographic impacts. Archaeological gaps exacerbate uncertainties, particularly due to widespread looting of Assyrian sites in and —such as and —since the , which has destroyed potential evidence of deportee settlements and resettlement patterns. This destruction, often linked to conflict and illicit , hinders comprehensive verification of the captivity's extent, underscoring the reliance on incomplete textual and genetic proxies in modern scholarship.

References

  1. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/ancient_records_assyria2.pdf
  2. https://web.ics.purdue.edu/~rauhn/israeltext.htm
  3. https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/tribes358016
  4. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/saao/aebp/essentials/governors/massdeportation/
  5. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/710485
  6. https://faculty.uml.edu/ethan_spanier/teaching/documents/cp6.0assyriantorture.pdf
  7. https://www.nobts.edu/news/articles/2019/TelHadid2019.html
  8. https://rsc.byu.edu/covenant-compassion/experience-israelite-refugees
  9. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/163256/aspunaug_1.pdf?sequence=1
  10. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1075&context=sor_fac_pubs
  11. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-two-kingdoms-of-israel
  12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3263268
  13. https://www.bibleodyssey.org/articles/the-sanctuaries-at-dan-and-bethel/
  14. https://www.thetorah.com/article/reading-the-golden-calves-of-sinai-and-northern-israel-in-context
  15. https://bibletalk.tv/the-northern-kingdom-of-israel-from-jeroboam-ii-to-the-assyrian-captivity
  16. https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/361904/jewish/The-Kings-of-Israel.htm
  17. https://www.armstronginstitute.org/112-assyria-invades-israel
  18. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/social-archaeology-of-the-levant/phases-in-the-history-of-the-kingdom-of-israel/7F65159DF5C5EEC7C94B4A6973E63E03
  19. https://humanities.m.tau.ac.il/sites/humanities.tau.ac.il/files/media_server/all-units/%25D7%2591%25D7%2599%25D7%25AA%2520%25D7%25A1%25D7%25A4%25D7%25A8%2520%25D7%259C%25D7%259E%25D7%2593%25D7%25A2%25D7%2599%2520%25D7%2594%25D7%2599%25D7%2594%25D7%2593%25D7%2595%25D7%25AA/%25D7%25A2%25D7%2591%25D7%2595%25D7%2595%25D7%2593%25D7%2595%25D7%25AA%2520%25D7%2593%25D7%2595%25D7%25A7%25D7%2598%25D7%2595%25D7%25A8%25D7%2598/%25D7%25A9%25D7%2595%25D7%2590%25D7%2599%25D7%25A6%27%25D7%2599%2520%28%25D7%25A1%25D7%25A7%25D7%2599%25D7%25A0%25D7%2594%29%2520%25D7%2594%25D7%25A1%25D7%2592%25D7%2595%25D7%2595%25D7%2594-%2520%25D7%2593%25D7%2595%25D7%25A7%25D7%2598%25D7%2595%25D7%25A8%25D7%2598.pdf
  20. https://www.academia.edu/6097624/The_Aramean_Oppression_of_Israel_in_the_Reign_of_Jehu
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324179630_The_Kingdom_of_Geshur_and_the_Expansion_of_Aram-Damascus_into_the_Northern_Jordan_Valley_Archaeological_and_Historical_Perspectives
  22. https://www.thetorah.com/article/prophets-in-the-northern-kingdom-amos-and-hosea
  23. https://www.biblicaltraining.org/library/isaiah-historical-context
  24. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004275904/B9789004275904-s019.pdf
  25. https://www.academia.edu/3169336/Samaria_Jezreel_and_Megiddo_Royal_Centres_of_Omri_and_Ahab
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233515288_Stages_in_the_Territorial_Expansion_of_the_Northern_Kingdom
  27. https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/bitstream/123456789/8018/1/forgotten-kingdom-archaeology.pdf
  28. https://www.usu.edu/markdamen/ane/lectures/8.1.pdf
  29. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/saao/knpp/downloads/liverani_saab2.pdf
  30. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0415c0pj/qt0415c0pj.pdf
  31. https://www.usu.edu/markdamen/ane/lectures/8.2.pdf
  32. https://www.academia.edu/5023826/The_Socio_economic_Structure_of_the_Neo_Assyrian_Empire_Resource_Extraction_and_Redistribution_The_Imperial_Engine
  33. https://airtonjo.com/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Peter-Dubovsky-Tiglath-Pileser-III-Campaigns-734-732-Biblica-2006.pdf
  34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27926464
  35. https://ub01.uni-tuebingen.de/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10900/153690/Dubovsky_063.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  36. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=studiaantiqua
  37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42614666
  38. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/tiglath-pileser-iii
  39. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/saao/aebp/Essentials/Countries/Israel/index.html
  40. https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2021/10/08/king-hoshea-an-archaeological-biography/
  41. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/mesopotamian-chronicles-content/abc-1-from-nabu-nasir-to-samas-suma-ukin/
  42. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/saao/aebp/Essentials/Kings/ShalmaneserV/
  43. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/rinap/Q006482
  44. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/saao/saa01/P334789
  45. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Kings+17%3A1-6&version=NRSVUE
  46. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Kings+17%3A7-23%2C24-41&version=NRSVUE
  47. https://www.academia.edu/47701465/A_Reference_to_the_Covenant_Code_in_2_Kings_17_24_41
  48. https://www.academia.edu/1541269/The_Deuteronomistic_Image_of_History_as_Interpretive_Device_in_the_Second_Temple_Period
  49. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+28&version=NRSVUE
  50. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Kings+9-17&version=NRSVUE
  51. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Hosea+2&version=NRSVUE
  52. https://oxfordre.com/religion/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-1194
  53. https://www.workingpreacher.org/commentaries/revised-common-lectionary/ordinary-18-3/commentary-on-hosea-111-11-5
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328735008_Akkadian_Bullutu_and_Hebrew_rp_Pardon_and_Loyalty_in_Hosea_and_in_Neo-Assyrian_Political_Texts
  55. https://www.bibleodyssey.org/articles/let-justice-roll-down-like-waters/
  56. https://www.academia.edu/14064690/Exegetical_Study_of_Amos_5_18_27
  57. https://www.preceptaustin.org/isaiah_7_commentary
  58. https://rsc.byu.edu/approaching-holiness/understanding-micahs-lament-judah-micah-110-16-through-text-archaeology-geography
  59. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/idea-of-israel-in-second-temple-judaism/between-disaster-and-restoration/E85802E2D05F5E1313B0D8AB5FDC3E6C
  60. https://rsc.byu.edu/isaiah-prophets/ezekiel-prophet-judgment-prophet-promise
  61. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/people-cultures-in-the-bible/people-in-the-bible/50-people-in-the-bible-confirmed-archaeologically/
  62. https://www.academia.edu/46447639/The_Royal_Inscriptions_of_Tiglath_pileser_III_744_727_BC_and_Shalmaneser_V_726_722_BC_Kings_of_Assyria_Royal_Inscriptions_of_the_Neo_Assyrian_Period_Vol_1_Winona_Lake_Eisenbrauns_with_Hayim_Tadmor_and_Shegio_Yamada_
  63. https://www.academia.edu/37979581/_Samaria_Hamath_and_Assyria_s_Conquests_in_the_Levant_in_the_Late_720s_BCE_The_Testimony_of_Sargon_II_s_Inscriptions_in_S_Hasegawa_et_al_ed_The_Last_Days_of_the_Kingdom_of_Israel_Beihefte_zur_Zeitschrift_f%C3%BCr_die_alttestamentliche_Wissenschaft_511_Berlin_Boston_2018_55_86
  64. https://build-oracc.museum.upenn.edu/rinap/downloads/Frame_RINAP_2.pdf
  65. https://www.thetorah.com/article/assyrian-deportation-and-resettlement-the-story-of-samaria
  66. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/163256/aspunaug_1.pdf
  67. https://www.academia.edu/3463490/The_Economics_of_Mass_Deportation_in_the_Neo_Assyrian_Empire_under_Tiglath_Pileser_III
  68. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00758914.2024.2351677
  69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278416518302198
  70. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/682081
  71. https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1178438.pdf
  72. https://claudemariottini.com/2014/04/28/a-seal-from-the-time-of-sargon-ii/
  73. https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/dcc/2-kings-17.html
  74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4131732
  75. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004444898/BP000013.xml
  76. https://academic.oup.com/book/4771/chapter/147022419
  77. https://lexundria.com/j_aj/11.133/wst
  78. https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2500863/jewish/Where-Are-the-Ten-Lost-Tribes-of-Israel.htm
  79. https://www.sefaria.org/topics/the-ten-tribes
  80. https://academic.oup.com/book/4771/chapter/147020668
  81. https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/the-ten-lost-tribes-a-world-history
  82. https://readingroo.ms/3/8/6/3/38630/38630-h/38630-h.htm
  83. https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/2017/08/wei418017
  84. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/myth-of-the-twelve-tribes-of-israel/tribes-that-were-not-lost/BAEE997B6F05C26B49864979B0705E9D
  85. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1659&context=msr
  86. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1071&context=sor_fac_pubs
  87. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337763709_Theories_of_the_Origin_of_the_Samaritans-Then_and_Now
  88. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/the-temple-on-mount-gerizim-in-the-bible-and-archaeology/
  89. https://www.bible.ca/manuscripts/Samaritan-Pentateuch-SP-Bible-Manuscript-Textual-Variants-Old-Testament-scribal-gloss-error-Deut27-4-Mt-Gerizim-Ebal-Dead-Sea-Scroll-4Q33-Deuteronomy-f.htm
  90. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/2/85
  91. https://www.the-samaritans.net/
  92. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338759968_Algorithmic_handwriting_analysis_of_the_Samaria_inscriptions_illuminates_bureaucratic_apparatus_in_biblical_Israel
  93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27925599
  94. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270412189_Hazor_and_the_Chronology_of_Northern_Israel_A_Reply_to_Israel_Finkelstein
  95. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84363234.pdf
  96. https://www.academia.edu/3149708/The_Destruction_of_Lachish_by_Sennacherib_and_the_Dating_of_the_Royal_Judean_Storage_Jars
  97. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-artifacts/the-tel-dan-inscription-the-first-historical-evidence-of-the-king-david-bible-story/
  98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305753777_The_Pottery_of_Megiddo_Strata_III-II_and_a_Proposed_Subdivision_of_the_Iron_IIC_Period_in_Northern_Israel
  99. https://dor.huji.ac.il/Download/Article/27926166.pdf
  100. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4200589
  101. https://books.google.com/books/about/Mass_Deportations_and_Deportees_in_the_N.html?id=_iZ0QgAACAAJ
  102. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929717302768
  103. https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(20)30487-6
  104. https://www.aaas.org/news/aaas-analysis-shows-widespread-looting-and-damage-historical-sites-syria
  105. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/3/12/iraq-officials-say-isil-ransacked-ancient-assyrian-site
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.