Hubbry Logo
BabylonBabylonMain
Open search
Babylon
Community hub
Babylon
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Babylon
Babylon
Babylon
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

This article contains special characters. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols.

Babylon (/ˈbæbɪlɒn/ BAB-il-on) was an ancient city located on the lower Euphrates river in southern Mesopotamia, within modern-day Hillah, Iraq, about 85 kilometres (53 miles) south of modern-day Baghdad. Babylon functioned as the main cultural and political centre of the Akkadian-speaking region of Babylonia. Its rulers established two important empires in antiquity, the 19th–16th century BC Old Babylonian Empire, and the 7th–6th century BC Neo-Babylonian Empire. Babylon was also used as a regional capital of other empires, such as the Achaemenid Empire. Babylon was one of the most important urban centres of the ancient Near East, until its decline during the Hellenistic period. Nearby ancient sites are Kish, Borsippa, Dilbat, and Kutha.[2]

The earliest known mention of Babylon as a small town appears on a clay tablet from the reign of Shar-Kali-Sharri (2217–2193 BC), of the Akkadian Empire.[3] Babylon was merely a religious and cultural centre at this point and neither an independent state nor a large city, subject to the Akkadian Empire. After the collapse of the Akkadian Empire, the south Mesopotamian region was dominated by the Gutian Dynasty for a few decades, before the rise of the Third Dynasty of Ur, which encompassed the whole of Mesopotamia, including the town of Babylon.

The town became part of a small independent city-state with the rise of the first Babylonian Empire, now known as the Old Babylonian Empire, in the early second millennium BC. The Amorite king Hammurabi founded the short-lived Old Babylonian Empire in the 18th century BC. He built Babylon into a major city and declared himself its king. Southern Mesopotamia became known as Babylonia, and Babylon eclipsed Nippur as the region's holy city. The empire waned under Hammurabi's son Samsu-iluna, and Babylon spent long periods under Assyrian, Kassite and Elamite domination. After the Assyrians destroyed and then rebuilt it, Babylon became the capital of the short-lived Neo-Babylonian Empire, from 626 to 539 BC. Both the Hanging Gardens of Babylon and Walls of Babylon were ranked among the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, with the former allegedly existing between approximately 600 BC and AD 1. However, there are questions about whether the Hanging Gardens of Babylon even existed, as there is no mention within any extant Babylonian texts of its existence.[4][5] After the fall of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, the city came under the rule of the Achaemenid, Seleucid, Parthian, Roman, Sassanid, and Muslim empires. The last known habitation of the town dates from the 11th century, when it was referred to as the "small village of Babel".

It has been estimated that Babylon was the largest city in the world c. 1770 – c. 1670 BC, and again c. 612 – c. 320 BC. It was perhaps the first city to reach a population above 200,000.[6] Estimates for the maximum extent of its area range from 890 (3½ sq. mi.)[7] to 900 ha (2,200 acres).[8] The main sources of information about Babylon—excavation of the site itself, references in cuneiform texts found elsewhere in Mesopotamia, references in the Bible, descriptions in other classical writing, especially by Herodotus, and second-hand descriptions, citing the work of Ctesias and Berossus—present an incomplete and sometimes contradictory picture of the ancient city, even at its peak in the sixth century BC.[9] UNESCO inscribed Babylon as a World Heritage Site in 2019. The site receives thousands of visitors each year, almost all of whom are Iraqis.[10][11] Construction is rapidly increasing, which has caused encroachments upon the ruins.[12][13][14]

Babylon stopped functioning as an urban centre between the 2nd century BC and the 7th century CE. Over those 700 years, it gradually declined from a major city to near-total abandonment. Small communities have continued to live in the area, and nearby towns such as Hillah remain inhabited on the historical site.[15]

Names

[edit]
A map of Babylon, with major areas and modern-day villages

The spelling Babylon is the Latin representation of Greek Babylṓn (Βαβυλών), derived from the native (Babylonian) Bābilim, meaning "gate of the god(s)".[16] The cuneiform spelling was 𒆍𒀭𒊏𒆠 (KÁ.DIG̃IR.RAKI). This would correspond to the Sumerian phrase Kan dig̃irak.[17] The sign 𒆍 (KÁ) is the logogram for "gate", 𒀭 (DIG̃IR) means "god", and 𒊏 (RA) represents the coda of the word dig̃ir (-r) followed by the genitive suffix -ak. The final 𒆠 (KI) is a determinative indicating that the previous signs are to be understood as a place name.

Archibald Sayce, writing in the 1870s, postulated that the Semitic name was a loan-translation of the original Sumerian name.[18] However, the "gate of god" interpretation is increasingly viewed as a Semitic folk etymology to explain an unknown original non-Semitic placename.[19] I. J. Gelb in 1955 argued that the original name was Babilla, of unknown meaning and origin, as there were other similarly named places in Sumer, and there are no other examples of Sumerian place-names being replaced with Akkadian translations. He deduced that it later transformed into Akkadian Bāb-ili(m), and that the Sumerian name Kan-dig̃irak was a loan translation of the Semitic folk etymology, and not the original name.[20][16] The re-translation of the Semitic name into Sumerian would have taken place at the time of the "Neo-Sumerian" Third Dynasty of Ur.[21] (Bab-Il).

Babylon in 1932

A fragmentary limestone votive inscription dated by paleography to the Early Dynastic II period (c. c. 2700 BC) was suggested to include the name of Babylon.[22] It read "en5-[si] BAR.KI.BAR dumu a-hu-ì-lum ̆lu-ì-lum-be-l[í] lú-ur-kù-bí dím é damar-utu mu-gub-am6". Proposed as being in the Akkadian language though earlier than that language is attested, it refers to an unknown lord who was the governor (ENSI) of BAR.KI.BAR who constructed a temple for (possibly) Marduk, suggesting that the city might be Babylon.[23] During the ED III period, sign placement was relatively fluid and so the KI sign could be seen as the determinative, with the name of the city as BAR.BAR, perhaps pronounced Babbar.[24] Paul-Alain Beaulieu proposes that the original name could mean "shining" "glowing" or "white". It would be likely that it was later read as Babbir, and then Babbil by swapping the consonant r with l.[23] The attribution to Marduk and to Babylon is considered doubtful.[16][25]

The earliest reasonably firm mention of the city of Babylon came from one of Shar-Kali-Sharri's year names, which reports founding temples of Annunitum and Ilaba in KÁ.DINGIRki, thought to be Babylon, indicating that the folk etymology was already widely known in the Akkadian Empire (c. 2334–2193 BC) period.[16] However, the original form of the name (Babbar/Babbir) was not forgotten, as seen from the phonetic spelling ba-ab-bí-lum in the Ur III period,[26] and the spellings Pambalu and Babalu in the Kassite period.[24]

Another attested spelling for the city of Babylon is TIN.TIR.KI, attested sparsely in the Old Babylonian period, known mostly from later Neo-Babylonian copies, and was in widespread usage in the 1st Millennium BC.[23] The spelling E.KI also appears in the 1st Millennium BC.[27][23]

In the Hebrew Bible, the name appears as Babel (Hebrew: בָּבֶל Bavel, Tib. בָּבֶל Bāḇel; Classical Syriac: ܒܒܠ Bāwēl, Imperial Aramaic: בבל Bāḇel; in Arabic: بَابِل Bābil), interpreted in Genesis 11:9 to mean "confusion", from the verb bilbél (בלבל, "to confuse").[28] The modern English verb, to babble ("to speak foolish, excited, or confusing talk"), is popularly thought to derive from this name but there is no direct connection.[29]

Ancient records in some situations use "Babylon" as a name for other cities, including cities like Borsippa within Babylon's sphere of influence, and Nineveh for a short period after the Assyrian sack of Babylon.[30][31]

Archaeology

[edit]
A map of ruins in 1905, with locations and names of villages

From the accounts of modern travellers, I had expected to have found on the site of Babylon more, and less, than I actually did. Less, because I could have formed no conception of the prodigious extent of the whole ruins, or of the size, solidity, and perfect state, of some of the parts of them; and more, because I thought that I should have distinguished some traces, however imperfect, of many of the principal structures of Babylon. I imagined, I should have said: "Here were the walls, and such must have been the extent of the area. There stood the palace, and this most assuredly was the tower of Belus." – I was completely deceived: instead of a few insulated mounds, I found the whole face of the country covered with vestiges of building, in some places consisting of brick walls surprisingly fresh, in others merely of a vast succession of mounds of rubbish of such indeterminate figures, variety and extent, as to involve the person who should have formed any theory in inextricable confusion.

Claudius J. Rich, Memoir on the Ruins of Babylon (1815), pp. 1–2.[32]

The site covers an area of about 1,000 hectares (3+3⁄4 sq mi), with about 450 hectares (1+3⁄4 sq mi) within the several kilometer (mile) long city walls, containing a number of mounds, the most prominent of which are Kasr, Merkes (13 meters; 43 ft above the plain), Homera, Ishin-Aswad, Sahn, Amran, and Babil.[33] It is roughly bisected by the Shatt Al-Hillah, a branch of the Euphrates river, which has shifted slightly since ancient times. The local water table has risen, making excavation of lower levels difficult. Prior to the heavy use of baked bricks in the reign of Neo-Babylonian ruler Nebuchadnezzar II (605–562 BC), construction at Babylon was primarily of unbaked brick, with the occasional use of baked bricks or bitumen.[34]

  • Kasr – also called Palace or Castle, it was the location of the Neo-Babylonian ziggurat Etemenanki of Nebuchadnezzar II. It lies in the center of the site and rises to 19 meters (62 ft) above the plain.
  • Amran Ibn Ali – about 22 meters (72 ft) high and at the south of the site. It is the site of Esagila, a temple of Marduk that also contained shrines to Ea and Nabu.
  • Homera – a reddish-colored mound on the west side. Most of the Hellenistic remains are here. Most of the remains of the ziggurat Etemenanki were heaped here when it was demolished by Alexander the Great in 331 BC.[35]
  • Babil – a mound about 25 meters (82 ft) high at the northern end of the site. Its bricks have been subject to looting since ancient times. It held a palace built by Nebuchadnezzar.

Subsequent excavation, looting, and reconstruction have reduced these original heights found by the German excavators.

Excavations

[edit]

Claudius Rich, working for the British East India Company in Baghdad, excavated Babylon in 1811–12 and again in 1817.[36][37][38] Captain Robert Mignan explored the site briefly in 1827. In 1829, he completed a map of Babylon which includes the location of several villages.[39][40] William Loftus visited there in 1849.[41] Austen Henry Layard made some soundings during a brief visit in 1850 before abandoning the site.[42][43]

The location of the Qurnah Disaster, where hundreds of cases of antiquities from Fresnel's mission were lost in 1855
"Entry of Alexander into Babylon", a 1665 painting by Charles LeBrun, depicts Alexander the Great's uncontested entry into the city of Babylon, envisioned with pre-existing Hellenistic architecture.

Fulgence Fresnel, Julius Oppert and Felix Thomas heavily excavated Babylon from 1852 to 1854.[44][45] Much of their work was lost in the Qurnah Disaster, when a transport ship and four rafts sank on the Tigris river in May 1855.[46] They had been carrying over 200 crates of artifacts from various excavation missions, when they were attacked by Tigris river pirates near Al-Qurnah.[47][48] Recovery efforts, assisted by the Ottoman authorities and British Residence in Baghdad, loaded the equivalent of 80 crates on a ship for Le Havre in May 1856.[49][46] Few antiquities from the Fresnel mission made it to France.[46][47][44] Subsequent efforts to recover the lost antiquities from the Tigris, including a Japanese expedition in 1971–72, have been largely unsuccessful.[49]

Original tiles of the processional street. Ancient Babylon, Mesopotamia, Iraq.

Henry Rawlinson and George Smith worked there briefly in 1854.[50] The next excavation was conducted by Hormuzd Rassam on behalf of the British Museum. Work began in 1879, continuing until 1882, and was prompted by widespread looting of the site. Using industrial scale digging in search of artifacts, Rassam recovered a large quantity of cuneiform tablets and other finds. The zealous excavation methods, common at the time, caused significant damage to the archaeological context.[51][52] Many tablets had appeared on the market in 1876 before Rassam's excavation began.[2]

Mušḫuššu (sirrush) and aurochs on either side of the processional street. Ancient Babylon, Mesopotamia, Iraq.

A team from the German Oriental Society led by Robert Koldewey conducted the first scientific archaeological excavations at Babylon. The work was conducted daily from 1899 until 1917. A major problem for Koldewey was the large scale mining of baked bricks, which began in the 19th century and which were mainly sourced from the time of Nebuchadnezzar II. At the time, excavations for brick mining, for various building projects, including the Hindiya dam were under way.[53] The primary efforts of the dig involved the temple of Marduk and the processional way leading up to it, as well as the city wall.[54][55][56][57][58][59]

Artifacts, including pieces of the Ishtar Gate and hundreds of recovered tablets, were sent back to Germany, where Koldewey's colleague Walter Andrae reconstructed them into displays at the Vorderasiatisches Museum Berlin.[60][61] The Koldewey expedition recovered artifacts from the Old Babylonian period.[62] These included 967 clay tablets, with 564 tablets from the Middle Babylonian period, stored in private houses, with Sumerian literature and lexical documents.[2] The German archaeologists fled before oncoming British troops in 1917, and again, many objects went missing in the following years.[2]

Further work by the German Archaeological Institute was conducted by Heinrich J. Lenzen in 1956 and Hansjörg Schmid in 1962, working the Hellenistic, Parthian, Sasanian, and Arabic levels of the site. Lenzen's work dealt primarily with the Hellenistic theatre, and Schmid focused on the temple ziggurat Etemenanki.[63][64][65]

A topographical survey at the site was conducted in 1974, followed in 1977 by a review of the stratigraphical position of the main monuments and reconsideration of ancient water levels, by the Turin Centre for Archaeological Research and Excavations in the Middle East and Asia, and the Iraqi-Italian Institute of Archaeological Sciences.[66] The focus was on clearing up issues raised by re-examination of the old German data. Additional work in 1987–1989 concentrated on the area surrounding the Ishara and Ninurta temples in the Shu-Anna city-quarter of Babylon.[67][68][69]

A number of Iraqi excavations have occurred at Babylon, the earliest in 1938. From 1979 to 1981 excavation and restoration work was conducted at the Ninmah Temple, Istar Temple, and the Southern Palace.[70][71][72][73][74][75] Occasional excavations and restorations continued in the 1970s and 1980s.[76]

During the restoration efforts in Babylon, the Iraqi State Organization for Antiquities and Heritage conducted extensive research, excavation and clearing, but wider publication of these archaeological activities has been limited.[77][78] Most of the known tablets from all modern excavations remain unpublished.[2]

Sources

[edit]
Illustration by Leonard William King of fragment K. 8532, a part of the Dynastic Chronicle listing rulers of Babylon grouped by dynasty

The main sources of information about Babylon—excavation of the site itself, references in cuneiform texts found elsewhere in Mesopotamia, references in the Bible, descriptions in other classical writing, especially by Herodotus, and second-hand descriptions citing the work of Ctesias and Berossus—present an incomplete and sometimes contradictory picture of the ancient city, even at its peak in the sixth century BC.[9] Babylon was described, perhaps even visited, by a number of classical historians including Ctesias, Herodotus, Quintus Curtius Rufus, Strabo, and Cleitarchus. These reports are of variable accuracy and some of the content was politically motivated, but these still provide useful information.[79]

Historical knowledge of early Babylon must be pieced together from epigraphic remains found elsewhere, such as at Uruk, Nippur, Sippar, Mari, and Haradum.

Early references

[edit]
Brick structures in Babylon, 2016

The earliest known mention of Babylon as a small town appears on a clay tablet from the reign of Shar-Kali-Sharri (2217–2193 BC) of the Akkadian Empire. References to the city of Babylon can be found in Akkadian and Sumerian literature from the late third millennium BC. One of the earliest is a tablet describing the Akkadian king Šar-kali-šarri laying the foundations in Babylon of new temples for Annūnı̄tum and Ilaba. Babylon also appears in the administrative records of the Third Dynasty of Ur, which collected in-kind tax payments and appointed an ensi as local governor.[16][80]

The so-called Weidner Chronicle (also known as ABC 19) states that Sargon of Akkad, c. 23rd century BC in the short chronology, had built Babylon "in front of Akkad" (ABC 19:51). A later chronicle states that Sargon "dug up the dirt of the pit of Babylon, and made a counterpart of Babylon next to Akkad". (ABC 20:18–19). Van de Mieroop has suggested that those sources may refer to the much later Assyrian king Sargon II of the Neo-Assyrian Empire, rather than Sargon of Akkad.[31]

Classical dating

[edit]

Ctesias, quoted by Diodorus Siculus and in George Syncellus's Chronographia, claimed to have access to manuscripts from Babylonian archives, which date the founding of Babylon to 2286 BC, under the reign of its first king, Belus.[81] A similar figure is found in the writings of Berossus, who, according to Pliny,[82] stated that astronomical observations commenced at Babylon 490 years before the Greek era of Phoroneus, indicating 2243 BC. Stephanus of Byzantium wrote that Babylon was built 1002 years before the date given by Hellanicus of Lesbos for the siege of Troy (1229 BC), which would date Babylon's foundation to 2231 BC.[83] All of these dates place Babylon's foundation in the 23rd century BC. However, cuneiform records have not been found to correspond with these classical, post-cuneiform accounts.

History

[edit]
The Queen of the Night relief. The figure could be an aspect of the goddess Ishtar, Babylonian goddess of sex and love.

The first attested mention of Babylon was in the late 3rd millennium BC during the Akkadian Empire reign of ruler Shar-Kali-Sharri one of whose year names mentions building two temples there. Babylon was ruled by ensi (governors) for the empire. Some of the known governors were Abba, Arši-aḫ, Itūr-ilum, Murteli, Unabatal, and Puzur-Tutu. After that nothing is heard of the city until the time of Sumu-la-El. After around 1950 BC Amorite kingdoms will appear in Uruk and Larsa in the south.[25]

Old Babylonian period

[edit]
A map showing the Babylonian territory upon Hammurabi's ascension in 1792 BC and upon his death in 1750 BC
Old Babylonian cylinder seal, hematite. This seal was probably made in a workshop at Sippar (about 65 km or 40 mi north of Babylon on the map above) either during, or shortly before, the reign of Hammurabi.[84] It depicts the king making an animal offering to the sun god Shamash.
Linescan camera image of the cylinder seal above, reversed to resemble an impression

According to a Babylonian king list, Amorite rule in Babylon began (c. 19th or 18th century BC) with a chieftain named Sumu-abum, who declared independence from the neighboring city-state of Kazallu. Sumu-la-El, whose dates may be concurrent with those of Sumu-abum, is usually given as the progenitor of the First Babylonian dynasty. Both are credited with building the walls of Babylon. In any case, the records describe Sumu-la-El's military successes establishing a regional sphere of influence for Babylon.[85]

Babylon was initially a minor city-state, and controlled little surrounding territory. Its first four Amorite rulers did not assume the title of king. The older and more powerful states of Elam, Isin, and Larsa overshadowed Babylon until it became the capital of Hammurabi's short-lived empire about a century later. Hammurabi (r. 1792–1750 BC) is famous for codifying the laws of Babylonia into the Code of Hammurabi. He conquered all of the cities and city states of southern Mesopotamia, including Isin, Larsa, Ur, Uruk, Nippur, Lagash, Eridu, Kish, Adab, Eshnunna, Akshak, Shuruppak, Bad-tibira, Sippar, and Girsu, coalescing them into one kingdom, ruled from Babylon. Hammurabi also invaded and conquered Elam to the east, and the kingdoms of Mari and Ebla to the northwest. After a conflict with the Old Assyrian period king Ishme-Dagan, he forced his successor to pay tribute late in his reign.

After the reign of Hammurabi, the whole of southern Mesopotamia came to be known as Babylonia. From this time, Babylon supplanted Nippur and Eridu as the major religious centers of southern Mesopotamia. Hammurabi's empire destabilized after his death. The far south of Mesopotamia broke away, forming the native Sealand Dynasty, and the Elamites appropriated territory in eastern Mesopotamia. The Amorite dynasty remained in power in Babylon, which again became a small city state. After the destruction of the city the Kassites rose to control the region.

Texts from Old Babylon often include references to Shamash, the sun-god of Sippar, treated as a supreme deity, and Marduk, considered as his son. Marduk was later elevated to a higher status and Shamash lowered, perhaps reflecting Babylon's rising political power.[16]

Middle Babylon

[edit]

In 1595 BC,[a] the city is thought to have been sacked by Mursili I, ruler of the Hittite Empire sometime during the 31-year reign of Samsu-Ditana, last ruler of the First Dynasty of Babylon. This is based on a line in the century later Telepinu Proclamation reading "Subsequently he marched to Babylon and he destroyed Babylon, and defeated the Hurrian troops, and brought captives and possessions of Babylon to Hattusa.".[86] Originally it was thought that cult statues of Babylon, including Marduk, were carried off to the Kingdom of Khana but the source Agum-Kakrime Inscription is now generally considered a much later forgery.[87] Thereafter, the Kassite dynasty took power in the city of Babylon, renaming it Karduniash, ushering in a dynasty that lasted for 435 years, until 1160 BC.

Babylon was weakened during the Kassite era, and as a result, Kassite Babylon began paying tribute to the Pharaoh of Egypt, Thutmose III, following his eighth campaign against Mitanni.[88] Kassite Babylon eventually became subject to the Middle Assyrian Empire (1365–1053 BC) to the north, and Elam to the east, with both powers vying for control of the city.

By 1155 BC, after continued attacks and annexing of territory by the Assyrians and Elamites, the Kassites were deposed in Babylon. An Akkadian south Mesopotamian dynasty then ruled for the first time. However, Babylon remained weak and subject to domination by Assyria. Its ineffectual native kings were unable to prevent new waves of foreign West Semitic settlers from the deserts of the Levant, including the Arameans and Suteans in the 11th century BC, and finally the Chaldeans in the 9th century BC, entering and appropriating areas of Babylonia for themselves. The Arameans briefly ruled in Babylon during the late 11th century BC.

Assyrian period

[edit]
Sennacherib of Assyria during his Babylonian war, relief from his palace in Nineveh

During the rule of the Neo-Assyrian Empire (911–609 BC), Babylonia was under constant Assyrian domination or direct control. During the reign of Sennacherib of Assyria, Babylonia was in a constant state of revolt, led by a chieftain named Merodach-Baladan, in alliance with the Elamites, and suppressed only by the complete destruction of the city of Babylon. In 689 BC, its walls, temples and palaces were razed, and the rubble was thrown into the Arakhtu, the sea bordering the earlier Babylon on the south. The destruction of the religious center shocked many, and the subsequent murder of Sennacherib by two of his own sons while praying to the god Nisroch was considered an act of atonement.

Consequently, his successor, Esarhaddon hastened to rebuild the old city and make it his residence for part of the year. After his death, Babylonia was governed by his elder son, the Assyrian prince Shamash-shum-ukin, who eventually started a civil war in 652 BC against his own brother, Ashurbanipal, who ruled in Nineveh. Shamash-shum-ukin enlisted the help of other peoples against Assyria, including Elam, Persia, the Chaldeans, and Suteans of southern Mesopotamia, and the Canaanites and Arabs dwelling in the deserts south of Mesopotamia.

Once again, Babylon was besieged by the Assyrians, starved into surrender and its allies were defeated. Ashurbanipal celebrated a "service of reconciliation", but did not venture to "take the hands" of Bel. An Assyrian governor named Kandalanu was appointed as ruler of the city. Ashurbanipal did collect texts from Babylon for inclusion in his extensive library at Ninevah.[2]

Neo-Babylonian Empire

[edit]
Main article: Neo-Babylonian Empire
A cuneiform cylinder from reign of Nebuchadnezzar II, honoring the exorcism and reconstruction of the ziggurat Etemenanki by Nabopolassar.[89]
Detail of a relief from the reconstruction of the Ishtar Gate in the Pergamon Museum, Berlin
A reconstruction of the blue-tiled Ishtar Gate, Pergamon Museum, Berlin, which was the northern entrance to Babylon. It was named for the goddess of love and war. Bulls and dragons, symbols of the god Marduk, decorated the gate.

Under Nabopolassar, Babylon escaped Assyrian rule, and the allied Medo-Babylonian armies destroyed the Assyrian Empire between 626 BC and 609 BC. Babylon thus became the capital of the Neo-Babylonian (sometimes called the Chaldean) Empire.[90][91]

With the recovery of Babylonian independence, a new era of architectural activity ensued, particularly during the reign of his son Nebuchadnezzar II (604–561 BC).[92] Nebuchadnezzar ordered the complete reconstruction of the imperial grounds, including the Etemenanki ziggurat, and the construction of the Ishtar Gate—the most prominent of eight gates around Babylon. A reconstruction of the Ishtar Gate is located in the Pergamon Museum in Berlin.

Nebuchadnezzar is also credited with the construction of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, said to have been built for his homesick wife, Amytis. Whether the gardens actually existed is a matter of dispute. German archaeologist Robert Koldewey speculated that he had discovered its foundations, but many historians disagree about the location. Stephanie Dalley has argued that the hanging gardens were actually located near the Assyrian capital, Nineveh.[93]

Nebuchadnezzar is also notoriously associated with the Babylonian exile of the Jews, the result of an imperial technique of pacification, used also by the Assyrians, in which ethnic groups in conquered areas were deported en masse to the capital.[94] According to the Hebrew Bible, he destroyed Solomon's Temple and exiled the Jews to Babylon. The defeat was also recorded in the Babylonian Chronicles.[95][96]

Persian conquest

[edit]
Main article: Fall of Babylon

In 539 BC, the Neo-Babylonian Empire fell to Cyrus the Great, king of Persia, with a military engagement known as the Battle of Opis. Babylon's walls were considered impenetrable. The only way into the city was through one of its many gates, or through the Euphrates River. Metal grates were installed underwater, allowing the river to flow through the city walls while preventing intrusion. The Persians devised a plan to enter the city via the river. During a Babylonian national feast, Cyrus' troops upstream diverted the Euphrates River, allowing Cyrus' soldiers to enter the city through the lowered water. The Persian army conquered the outlying areas of the city while the majority of Babylonians at the city center were unaware of the breach. The account was elaborated upon by Herodotus[97][79]

Herodotus also described a moat, an enormously tall and broad wall, cemented with bitumen and with buildings on top, and a hundred gates to the city. He writes that the Babylonians wear turbans and perfume and bury their dead in honey, that they practice ritual prostitution, and that three tribes among them eat nothing but fish. The hundred gates can be considered a reference to Homer. Following the pronouncement of Archibald Henry Sayce in 1883, Herodotus' account of Babylon has largely been considered to represent Greek folklore rather than an authentic voyage to Babylon. However, recently, Dalley and others have suggested taking Herodotus' account seriously.[97][98]

A Babylonian soldier in the Achaemenid army, c. 470 BC, Xerxes I tomb

According to 2 Chronicles 36 of the Hebrew Bible, Cyrus later issued a decree permitting captive people, including the Jews, to return to their own lands. The text found on the Cyrus Cylinder has traditionally been seen by biblical scholars as corroborative evidence of this policy, although the interpretation is disputed[by whom?] because the text identifies only Mesopotamian sanctuaries but makes no mention of Jews, Jerusalem, or Judea.

Under Cyrus and the subsequent Persian king Darius I, Babylon became the capital city of the 9th Satrapy (Babylonia in the south and Athura in the north), as well as a center of learning and scientific advancement. In Achaemenid Persia, the ancient Babylonian arts of astronomy and mathematics were revitalized, and Babylonian scholars completed maps of constellations. The city became the administrative capital of the Persian Empire and remained prominent for over two centuries. Many important archaeological discoveries have been made that can provide a better understanding of that era.[99][100]

The early Persian kings had attempted to maintain the religious ceremonies of Marduk, who was the most important god, but by the reign of Darius III, over-taxation and the strain of numerous wars led to a deterioration of Babylon's main shrines and canals, and the destabilization of the surrounding region. There were numerous attempts at rebellion and in 522 BC (Nebuchadnezzar III), 521 BC (Nebuchadnezzar IV) and 482 BC (Bel-shimani and Shamash-eriba) native Babylonian kings briefly regained independence. However, these revolts were quickly repressed and Babylon remained under Persian rule for two centuries, until Alexander the Great's entry in 331 BC. Following his conquests, he died in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar II in Babylon on the evening of 10–11 June 323 BC.

Hellenistic period

[edit]

In October of 331 BC, Darius III, the last Achaemenid king of the Persian Empire, was defeated by the forces of the Ancient Macedonian ruler Alexander the Great at the Battle of Gaugamela, occupying Babylon. Under Alexander, Babylon again flourished as a center of learning and commerce. However, following Alexander's death in 323 BC in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar, his empire was divided amongst his generals, the Diadochi, and decades of fighting soon began. Babylon was within the Seleucid Empire throughout most of this period, and declined somewhat in importance but remained active.[101]

Renewed Persian rule

[edit]
Main article: Babylonia § Persian Babylonia

Under the Parthian and Sassanid Empires, Babylon (like Assyria) became a province of these Persian Empires for nine centuries, until after AD 650.[citation needed] Although it was captured briefly by Trajan in AD 116 to be part of the newly conquered province of Mesopotamia, his successor Hadrian relinquished his conquests east of the Euphrates river, which became again the Roman Empire's eastern boundary.[102]

However, Babylon maintained its own culture and people, who spoke varieties of Aramaic, and who continued to refer to their homeland as Babylon. Examples of their culture are found in the Babylonian Talmud, the Gnostic Mandaean religion, Eastern Rite Christianity and the religion of the philosopher Mani. Christianity was introduced to Mesopotamia in the 1st and 2nd centuries, and Babylon was the seat of a Bishop of the Church of the East until well after the Arab/Islamic conquest. Coins from the Parthian, Sasanian and Arabic periods excavated in Babylon demonstrate the continuity of settlement there.[103]

Muslim conquest

[edit]
Main article: Muslim conquest of Persia

In the mid-7th century, Mesopotamia was conquered and settled by the expanding Muslim Empire, and a period of Islamization followed. Babylon was dissolved as a province and Aramaic and Church of the East Christianity eventually became marginalized. Ibn Hawqal (10th century) and Arab scholar al-Qazwini (13th century) describe Babylon (Babil) as a small village.[104] The latter described a well referred to as the 'Dungeon of Daniel' that was visited by Christians and Jews during holidays. The grave-shrine of Amran ibn Ali was visited by Muslims.

According to medieval Arabic writings, Babylon was a popular site to extract bricks,[2] which were used to build cities from Baghdad to Basra.[105]

European travellers, in many cases, could not discover the city's location, or mistook Fallujah for it. Benjamin of Tudela, a 12th-century traveller, mentions Babylon, but it is not clear if he went there. Others referred to Baghdad as Babylon or New Babylon and described various structures encountered in the region as the Tower of Babel.[106] Pietro della Valle travelled to the village of Babil in Babylon in the 17th century and noted the existence of both baked and dried mudbricks cemented with bitumen.[105][107]

Modern era

[edit]
The Lion of Babylon

The eighteenth century saw an increasing flow of travellers to Babylon, including Carsten Niebuhr and Pierre-Joseph de Beauchamp, as well as measurements of its latitude.[108] Beauchamp's memoir, published in English translation in 1792, provoked the British East India Company to direct its agents in Baghdad and Basra to acquire Mesopotamian relics for shipment to London.[109]

By 1905, there were several villages in Babylon, one of which was Qwaresh with about 200 households located within the boundaries of the ancient inner city walls. The village grew due to the need for laborers during the German Oriental Society excavations between 1899 and 1917.[citation needed]

Iraqi government

[edit]

The site of Babylon has been a cultural asset to Iraq since the creation of the modern Iraqi state in 1921. The site was officially protected and excavated by the Kingdom of Iraq under British Administration, which later became the Hashemite Kingdom of Iraq, and its successors: the Arab Federation, the Iraqi Republic, Ba'athist Iraq, also officially called the Iraqi Republic, and the Republic of Iraq. Babylonian images periodically appear on Iraqi postcards and stamps. In the 1960s, a replica of the Ishtar Gate and a reconstruction of Ninmakh Temple were built on site.[110]

In February 1978, the Ba'athist government of Iraq under Saddam Hussein, began the "Archaeological Restoration of Babylon Project": reconstructing features of the ancient city atop its ruins. These features included the Southern Palace of Nebuchadnezzar, with 250 rooms, five courtyards, and a 30-meter (98 ft) entrance arch. The project reinforced the Processional Way, the Lion of Babylon, and an amphitheater constructed in the city's Hellenistic era. In 1982, the government minted a set of seven coins, displaying iconic features of Babylon. A Babylon International Festival was held in September 1987, and annually thereafter until 2002, excepting 1990 and 1991, to showcase this work. The proposed reconstruction of the Hanging Gardens and the great ziggurat never took place.[111][110][112]

Hussein installed a portrait of himself and Nebuchadnezzar at the entrance to the ruins and inscribed his name on many of the bricks, in imitation of Nebuchadnezzar. One frequent inscription reads "This was built by Saddam Hussein, son of Nebuchadnezzar, to glorify Iraq." These bricks became sought after as collector's items after Hussein's downfall.[113] Similar projects were conducted at Nineveh, Nimrud, Assur and Hatra, to demonstrate the magnificence of Arab achievement.[114]

In the 1980s, Hussein completely removed the village of Qwaresh, displacing its residents.[115][14] He later constructed a modern palace in that area called Saddam Hill, over some of the old ruins, in the pyramidal style of a ziggurat. In 2003, he intended to have a cable car line constructed over Babylon, but plans were halted by the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Under US and Polish occupation

[edit]
A World Monuments Fund video on conservation of Babylon

Following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the area around Babylon came under the control of US troops, before being handed over to Polish forces in September 2003.[116] US forces under the command of General James T. Conway of the I Marine Expeditionary Force were criticized for building the military base "Camp Alpha", with a helipad and other facilities on ancient Babylonian ruins during the Iraq War. US forces occupied the site for some time and caused irreparable damage to the archaeological record. In a report of the British Museum's Near East department, John Curtis described how parts of the archaeological site were levelled to create a landing area for helicopters, and parking lots for heavy vehicles. Curtis wrote of the occupation forces:

They caused substantial damage to the Ishtar Gate, one of the most famous monuments from antiquity [...] US military vehicles crushed 2,600-year-old brick pavements, archaeological fragments were scattered across the site, more than 12 trenches were driven into ancient deposits and military earth-moving projects contaminated the site for future generations of scientists.[117]

A US military spokesman claimed that engineering operations were discussed with the "head of the Babylon museum".[118] The head of the Iraqi State Board for Heritage and Antiquities, Donny George, said that the "mess will take decades to sort out" and criticised Polish troops for causing "terrible damage" to the site.[119][120] Poland resolved in 2004 to place the city under Iraq control, and commissioned a report titled Report Concerning the Condition of the Preservation of the Babylon Archaeological Site, which it presented at a meeting in December 2004.[111] In 2005, the site was handed over to the Iraqi Ministry of Culture.[116]

In April 2006, Colonel John Coleman, former Chief of Staff for the I Marine Expeditionary Force, offered to issue an apology for the damage done by military personnel under his command. He also claimed that the US presence had deterred far greater damage by other looters.[121] An April 2006 article stated that UN officials and Iraqi leaders have plans to restore Babylon, making it into a cultural center.[122][123]

Two museums and a library, containing replicas of artifacts and local maps and reports, were raided and destroyed.[124]

Panoramic view of ruins in Babylon photographed in 2005
Panoramic view of ruins in Babylon, 2005

Present-day

[edit]

In May 2009, the provincial government of Babil reopened the site to tourists. Over 35,000 people visited in 2017.[10] An oil pipeline runs through an outer wall of the city.[125][126] In July 2019, the site of Babylon was inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.[11]

Thousands of people reside in Babylon within the perimeter of the ancient outer city walls, and communities in and around them are "rapidly developing from compact, dense settlements to sprawling suburbia despite laws restricting constructions".[40][14] Modern villages include Zwair West, Sinjar Village, Qwaresh, and Al-Jimjmah, among which the first two are better off economically.[127] Most residents primarily depend on daily wage earning or have government jobs in Al-Hillah. Some cultivate dates, citrus fruits, figs, fodder for livestock and limited cash crops, although income from the land alone is not enough to sustain a family.[14] Both Shi'a and Sunni Muslims live in Sinjar village, with mosques for both groups.[14]

The State Board of Antiquities and Heritage (SBAH) is the main authority responsible for the conservation of the archeological site. They are assisted by Antiquity and Heritage Police, and maintain a permanent presence there. The World Monuments Fund is involved in research and conservation. The SBAH Provincial Inspectorate Headquarters is located within the boundaries of the ancient inner city walls on the east side. Several staff members and their families reside in subsidized housing in this area.

Cultural importance

[edit]
A 1493 woodcut in the Nuremberg Chronicle, depicting the fall of Babylon
"The Walls of Babylon and the Temple of Bel (Or Babel)", by 19th-century illustrator William Simpson – influenced by early archaeological investigations

Before modern archaeological excavations in Mesopotamia, the appearance of Babylon was largely a mystery, and typically envisioned by Western artists as a hybrid between ancient Egyptian, classical Greek, and contemporary Ottoman culture.[128]

Due to Babylon's historical significance as well as references to it in the Bible, the word "Babylon" in various languages has acquired a generic meaning of a large, bustling diverse city. Examples include:

  • Babylon is used in reggae music as a concept in the Rastafari belief system, denoting the materialistic capitalist world, or any form of imperialist evil. It is believed that Babylon actively seeks to exploit and oppress the people of the world, specifically people of African descent. It is believed by Rastafarians that Babylon attempts to forbid the smoking of ganja because this sacred herb opens minds to the truth.[129]
  • Babylon 5 – A science fiction series set on a futuristic space station that acts as a trading and diplomatic nexus between many different cultures. Many stories focus on the theme of different societies and cultures uniting, respecting differences, and learning from each other rather than fighting or looking on each other with prejudice and suspicion.[citation needed]
  • Babylon A.D. takes place in New York City, decades in the future.[non-primary source needed]
  • Babilonas (Lithuanian name for "Babylon") is a real estate development in Lithuania.[non-primary source needed]
  • "Babylon" is a song by Lady Gaga that uses allusions to ancient Biblical themes to discuss gossip.[non-primary source needed]
  • Eternals (2021) depicts Babylon on its greatest extent and is shown to be protected and aided in its development by the titular species team.

Biblical narrative

[edit]

In Genesis 10:10, Babel (Babylon) is described as founded by Nimrod along with Uruk, Akkad and perhaps Calneh—all of them in Shinar ("Calneh" is now sometimes translated not as a proper name but as the phrase "all of them"). Another story is given in Genesis 11, which describes a united human race, speaking one language, migrating to Shinar to establish a city and tower—the Tower of Babel. God halts construction of the tower by scattering humanity across the earth and confusing their communication so they are unable to understand each other in the same language.

According to 2 Kings 20:12 and Isaiah 39 of the Hebrew Bible after Hezekiah, the king of Judah, became ill, Baladan, king of Babylon, sent a letter and gifts to him. Hezekiah showed all of his treasures to the delegation, and the prophet Isaiah later said to him: "Behold, the days come, that all that is in thine house, and that which thy fathers have laid up in store unto this day, shall be carried into Babylon: nothing shall be left, saith the LORD".

According to Daniel 5 the prophet Daniel lived in Babylon for most of his life. Nebuchadnezzar made Daniel ruler over the entire province of Babylon for having interpreted his dream. Years later, Belshazzar held a banquet, at which fingers of a hand appeared and wrote on a wall. Daniel was called to provide an interpretation of the writings, upon which he explained that God had put an end to Belshazzar's kingdom. Belshazzar was killed that very night, and Darius the Mede took over the kingdom.

Isaiah 13:19 says the following regarding Babylon: "And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees' excellency, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. It shall never be inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation: neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall the shepherds make their fold there." Jeremiah 50 says that Babylon "shall not be inhabited, but it shall be wholly desolate".

In Jewish tradition, Babylon symbolizes an oppressor against which righteous believers must struggle.[citation needed] In Christianity, Babylon symbolizes worldliness and evil. Prophecies sometimes symbolically link the kings of Babylon with Lucifer. Nebuchadnezzar II, sometimes conflated with Nabonidus, appears as the foremost ruler in this narrative.[130]

The Book of Revelation in the Christian Bible refers to Babylon many centuries after it ceased to be a major political center. The city is personified by the "Whore of Babylon", riding on a scarlet beast with seven heads and ten horns, and drunk on the blood of the righteous. Some scholars of apocalyptic literature believe this New Testament "Babylon" to be a dysphemism for the Roman Empire.[131] Other scholars suggest that Babylon in the book of Revelation has a symbolic significance that extends beyond mere identification with the first century Roman empire.[132]

Babylon in art

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Babylon

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Babylon (Sumerian cuneiform: 𒆍𒀭𒊏𒆠 or ka₂-dìĝir-ra-ki) was an ancient Mesopotamian city located on the River in southern , approximately 85 kilometers south of in present-day Babil Governorate, . The city emerged around 2000 BCE and became a major political, cultural, and economic center, serving as the capital of the from circa 1894 to 1595 BCE under rulers like , who promulgated a comprehensive legal code that influenced subsequent Near Eastern . During the from 626 to 539 BCE, Babylon reached its peak as the world's largest metropolis under , who transformed it through extensive building projects including the glazed-brick , the Processional Way, and the massive dedicated to the god . These achievements highlighted Babylon's advancements in architecture, urban planning, and astronomy, while its strategic location facilitated trade and imperial expansion across the . The city's fall to the Achaemenid in 539 BCE marked the end of its independence, though its legacy endured in literature, , and as a symbol of ancient grandeur.

Nomenclature

Etymology and Linguistic Origins

The Akkadian name for the city, Bābili or Bāb-ilim, consists of bāb () and ilim ( or "gods"), yielding the meaning "Gate of the God(s)". This etymology represents an interpretive adaptation by Semitic-speaking Akkadians of a potentially older substrate name whose pre-Akkadian origins remain unattested in surviving records. In cuneiform inscriptions, the name frequently employed Sumerian logograms ka₂-dìĝir-ra-ki (cuneiform: 𒆍𒀭𒊏𒆠), where ka denotes "gate", dìĝir signifies "", ra functions as a locative particle, and ki indicates "place" or "earth", reinforcing the "gate of the god(s)" semantic layer through bilingual Sumerian-Akkadian scribal conventions. No explicit attestations of the name in purely Sumerian contexts predate the Akkadian period, with the earliest cuneiform references emerging around 2300 BCE during the , such as in administrative texts from the reign of (c. 2217–2193 BCE). The term's transmission to later languages preserved this form, with the Greek Babylṓn (Βαβυλών) directly reflecting the Akkadian vocalization and entering European languages via classical sources, unaltered in its core phonetic structure despite phonetic shifts in non-Semitic tongues.

Historical Designations

In Akkadian-language inscriptions dating from the Old Babylonian period (c. 1894–1595 BCE) through the (626–539 BCE), the city was designated as Bābili or Bābilu, appearing in royal annals, administrative documents, and temple records as the central urban hub of southern . This form persisted in local usage even after the Achaemenid Persian conquest in 539 BCE, where Babylonian variants continued in satrapal and cultic texts, while inscriptions rendered it as Bābiru, reflecting administrative adaptation under imperial control. Greek historians, beginning with in his Histories (composed c. 440 BCE), transliterated the name as Βαβυλών (Babylōn), a form disseminated through Hellenistic and Roman accounts following Alexander the Great's capture of the city in 331 BCE, solidifying its designation in Western classical literature tied to narratives of eastern conquests. Medieval Arabic geographical and historical sources from the Islamic era (post-7th century CE), including works by authors like al-Yaʿqūbī (d. 897 CE) and later compilers, consistently referred to the site's ruins as Bābil, preserving phonetic echoes of the ancient Akkadian amid Abbasid scholarly interest in pre-Islamic antiquities, with Ottoman-era documents (16th–19th centuries) retaining this Arabic Bābil in traveler reports and provincial mappings.

Geography and Environment

Topographical Features

Babylon occupies the alluvial of the River in southern , within the modern Babil Governorate of , at coordinates approximately 32°32′N 44°25′E. This positioning placed the site amid a vast, low-elevation plain formed by repeated riverine depositions, where elevations rarely exceed a few meters above the river level, fostering initial settlement through the availability of nutrient-rich sediments essential for viability. The underlying consists primarily of alluvial deposits, including silts, clays, and fine sands, which derived from upstream erosion in the and contributed to but also instability due to poor drainage and high water retention. These alluvial soils enabled agricultural productivity by providing deep, loamy substrates conducive to crop cultivation, yet their saturation during seasonal high waters posed deterministic constraints on habitation, as evidenced by stratigraphic profiles revealing thick flood-deposited layers interspersed with occupational horizons. Borehole data from the site indicate recurrent paleoflood events, with sediment accumulations up to several meters thick, which periodically buried structures and necessitated elevated building platforms to mitigate inundation risks inherent to the floodplain's hydrology. Such geological records demonstrate how the terrain's fertility drove persistent occupation despite the causal hazards of erosion and deposition, limiting settlement scale without adaptive measures. The surrounding landscape features minimal topographic relief, with gentle riverbank gradients transitioning to expansive flats extending eastward toward the , offering unobstructed visibility but scant natural elevations for . Proximity to Euphrates meanders and occasional marshy depressions further influenced defensibility by providing water barriers against incursions from the open , while the sediment-laden environment supported reed growth that could impede mobility in wetter phases, thereby channeling access routes along the riverine corridor. This configuration rendered the site strategically viable for control over resources, predicated on the river's role as both lifeline and potential vulnerability.

Hydrological Systems and Their Role

Babylon's location astride the River provided essential water resources and facilitated riverine transport, underpinning the city's economic prosperity through the Neo-Babylonian period (626–539 BCE). The river's annual floods deposited nutrient-rich , supporting intensive settlement, while engineered diversions channeled water for urban supply and navigation. Artificial canals, such as the Arakhtu—identified as the "River of Babylon" in records—extended the ' utility by encircling the city's southern perimeter for approximately 8 kilometers, enabling intra-urban transport of goods and materials. Excavations trace this canal's quays and alignments to Old Babylonian practices (c. 1894–1595 BCE), corroborated by clay tablets detailing dimensions, such as widths up to 20 meters and techniques involving levees and sluices. These systems mitigated risks by diverting excess flow, as evidenced in administrative texts recording maintenance corvée labor to prevent breaches during peak discharges exceeding 5,000 cubic meters per second. However, the Euphrates' dynamic hydrology introduced vulnerabilities, with multiple avulsions—channel shifts—documented through stratigraphic layers revealing abandoned meanders filled with silt deposits dating to the late 1st millennium BCE. Satellite imagery from Landsat missions (1972 onward) confirms these paleo-channels near Babylon's ruins, now dry and silted, indicating a major eastward shift by the Seleucid era (312–63 BCE) that reduced flow to the city center and accelerated sedimentation. Empirical records of flood control lapses, including levee failures in the 6th century BCE chronicled in Babylonian chronicles, correlate with episodic inundations that damaged infrastructure and contributed to infrastructural decay amid waning central authority. By the 1st century CE, persistent silting had rendered upstream canals unnavigable, exacerbating Babylon's marginalization as river gradients shallowed and deposition rates outpaced dredging capacities estimated at 10,000 cubic meters annually.

Archaeological Investigations

Initial 19th-Century Excavations

Claudius James Rich, the British Resident in Baghdad, conducted the earliest modern survey of Babylon's ruins in December 1811, spending ten days mapping the principal mounds including the Kasr and Amran Ibn Ali, and performing limited excavations at the Mujelibe mound. He re-excavated the Lion of Babylon statue and collected inscribed bricks attributing constructions to Nebuchadnezzar II, providing initial epigraphic confirmation of the site's Neo-Babylonian identity. Rich's descriptive approach, detailed in his posthumously published Narrative of a Journey to the Site of Babylon in 1811, emphasized surface observations and rudimentary sketches but lacked stratigraphic analysis or deep trenching, constrained by 19th-century tools, local instability, and exploratory rather than systematic aims. Subsequent mid-century efforts included the French expedition led by Fulgence Fresnel and Jules Oppert from 1852 to 1854, which targeted Babylonian mounds and yielded inscriptions alongside the first detailed published in 1853. These digs uncovered glazed and inscribed bricks sent to but were severely hampered by logistical failures, including the loss of many artifacts when rafts sank on the River, resulting in incomplete records and minimal stratigraphic data. Methodological shortcomings persisted, with excavations prioritizing artifact recovery over contextual preservation amid colonial-era priorities and limited funding. The late-19th-century phase commenced in 1899 under for the Deutsche Orient-Gesellschaft, initiating more methodical probes that exposed sections of the and associated glazed bricks from the processional way, dated through associated to Nebuchadnezzar II's . Despite introducing grid-based techniques superior to prior surveys, these works faced inherent limits from the site's deep overburden—up to 24 meters of accumulated debris—and reliance on manual labor without modern machinery, yielding verifiable architectural evidence but incomplete urban layouts. Early reporting occasionally reflected Eurocentric interpretations, yet artifactual data, including thousands of tablets, underscored empirical reliability over narrative biases.

20th-Century German and Allied Efforts

Following the interruption of , German archaeological efforts at Babylon under the Deutsche Orient-Gesellschaft did not substantially resume in the , though plans for continuation were discussed as early as the . Koldewey's prior work had already exposed key foundations of the by 1917, including a inscribed with Nebuchadnezzar II's dedication to , confirming the structure's Neo-Babylonian scale and mud-brick construction stabilized by . Limited soundings in the and 1930s by Iraqi authorities built on these, mapping residual podium layers approximately 20 meters high, amid British Mandate oversight until Iraq's independence in 1932. Post-World War II Iraqi-led excavations, supported by the State Board of Antiquities, intensified in the 1940s and , uncovering the southern extension of the complex and associated Neo-Babylonian drainage systems. These efforts, conducted amid regional instability following the 1941 and British reoccupation, prioritized structural recovery over extensive artifact export, yielding sherds and foundation deposits datable to the BCE. By the , systematic trenching revealed palace substructures in the Kasr mound, with over 200 fragments recovered, though geopolitical tensions limited international collaboration. In the 1970s, Iraqi digs under the Babylon Excavation Project exposed further segments of the Processional Way and yielded approximately 300 cuneiform tablets from administrative contexts, including economic records from the late Neo-Babylonian era. These findings informed conservation amid rising political pressures. By the 1980s, under 's regime, large-scale reconstruction incorporated modern bricks stamped with inscriptions claiming revival "in the reign of Saddam Hussein, victorious leader, rebuilder of Babylon," emulating Nebuchadnezzar II's style; over 60 million such bricks were used for walls and a palace terrace, though archaeological purists criticized the anachronistic layering over original strata. This era's work, blending recovery with propagandistic restoration, preserved outlines of the but introduced verifiable modern contaminants like cement footings.

Recent Digital and Fieldwork Advances (Post-2000)

In 2024, excavations conducted by the in uncovered 478 artifacts from Babylonian and Sassanian periods, including cuneiform-inscribed tablets, cylindrical seals, pottery jars, and building remnants, providing new empirical data on ancient administrative and daily practices. The digs, led by Qahtan Abbas Hassan Aboud, focused on stratified layers yielding items datable to multiple eras, enhancing chronological resolution beyond prior 20th-century efforts. Uppsala University's ongoing digital reconstruction project integrates texts, excavation records, and topographical surveys into a 3D model of ancient Babylon, with a planned 2025 publication detailing Neo-Babylonian urban layout. Directed by Assyriologist Olof Pedersén, the model employs software like to simulate structures such as the and Processional Way, cross-verifying textual descriptions against physical remains for causal accuracy in and . This approach prioritizes verifiable alignments over speculative restorations, addressing gaps in fragmented archaeological data. UNESCO's post-2003 assessments documented extensive site damage from coalition military activities, including vehicle tracks eroding foundations and of temporary bases altering terrain, with monitoring continuing to track stabilization efforts. Reports from 2009 onward emphasize empirical measurement of structural degradation, informing preservation strategies that favor data-driven interventions over unsubstantiated restoration claims. These advances collectively refine understandings of Babylon's material durability and environmental vulnerabilities through integrated fieldwork and modeling.

Primary Sources and Historiography

Cuneiform Inscriptions and Archives

Cuneiform inscriptions and archives from Babylon consist primarily of clay tablets inscribed in Akkadian using wedge-shaped script, serving as direct empirical records of administrative, legal, economic, and historical events. These indigenous sources, numbering in the tens of thousands for the Babylonian periods, prioritize factual documentation over interpretive narratives, offering verifiable data on , , and through dated contracts, ledgers, and observations. Unlike secondary accounts, these tablets reflect causal realities of daily operations and royal actions, with economic texts revealing patterns of and market exchanges unadorned by ideological embellishment. In the Old Babylonian period under (c. 1792–1750 BCE), archives yield thousands of tablets documenting laws, trade agreements, and royal letters, including variants and administrative applications of the legal code inscribed on a . These records detail specific transactions, such as property sales and temple offerings, providing granular evidence of legal enforcement and economic activity across Babylonian territories. For instance, letters attributed to address provincial governance and , corroborating the expansion of centralized authority through pragmatic directives rather than mythic glorification. Neo-Babylonian archives expand this corpus with systematic chronicles and institutional ledgers, particularly from temple complexes like , recording conquests, accessions, and fiscal accounts. The Babylonian Chronicles, a series of serialized tablets, offer year-by-year summaries of rulers' deeds, such as Nebuchadnezzar II's campaigns, with terse entries focused on outcomes like victories or omens without rhetorical excess. Economic ledgers from this era, including receipts for bronze and timber, illustrate accounting practices in institutional settings, tracking debts, taxes, and labor allocations to sustain urban infrastructure and military endeavors. Astronomical inscriptions within these archives anchor absolute chronology via precise , enabling cross-verification of historical events against computational models. A notable example links a observation to the destruction of Babylon by in 689 BCE, as noted in contemporary , confirming the timeline of Assyrian intervention through empirical celestial data rather than retrospective biases. Such , compiled by temple scribes, underscore the Babylonians' methodical approach to timekeeping, integrating observations with regnal years for reliable dating of administrative and political shifts.

Accounts from Classical Authors

Herodotus (c. 484–425 BCE), in Book 1 of his Histories, portrayed Babylon as a vast square city with each side spanning 120 stadia (roughly 22 km), yielding a perimeter of 480 stadia and an area exceeding 900 square kilometers, enclosed by double walls separated by a moat filled from the , the outer wall 50 royal cubits (approximately 27 meters) thick and 200 cubits (about 100 meters) high, topped by battlements and featuring 100 bronze gates with bronze lintels. He detailed the bisecting the city, with embankments and a bridge of twelve plethra (about 360 meters) comprising stone piers linked by removable wooden sections raised nightly for security, alongside canals diverting the river's course for . These elements reflect partial empirical grounding, as excavations reveal extensive walls with baked-brick facings, river-aligned canals for and defense, and monumental gateways like the (c. 575 BCE), which measured 14 meters high with glazed-brick decorations, corroborating advanced hydraulic engineering but contradicting the hyperbolic scale—actual fortified enclosures spanned roughly 8–10 km in perimeter and covered 4–5 square kilometers, per mound surveys and German digs (1899–1917), indicating amplified dimensions, possibly drawing from oral traditions or conflating multiple enclosures to evoke Homeric grandeur akin to Thebes' hundred gates. Strabo (c. 64 BCE–24 CE), in 16.1.5–6, offered a later assessment, estimating the wall circuit at 385 stadia (about 70 km) and noting the city's transformation into a barren expanse by the CE, with remnants of fortifications amid marshes at the ziggurat site, its population largely relocated to Seleucia-on-the-Tigris by Seleucid kings, rendering Babylon a mere village amid deserted palaces and overgrown precincts. This aligns with archaeological evidence of post-Achaemenid silting, abandonment, and Hellenistic redirection of trade routes, though Strabo's figure still exceeds verified ruin extents, underscoring persistent classical tendencies toward schematic exaggeration over precise mensuration, uninformed by direct survey. ( BCE), echoing , reiterated massive walls and gates but introduced variances like attributing construction to , further blending myth with topography, verifiable only in broad strokes against cuneiform-attested Neo-Babylonian builds under (r. 605–562 BCE). Such accounts, while capturing Babylon's engineered splendor and hydraulic centrality, prioritize rhetorical wonder over metric fidelity, as cross-verified by mound perimeters (e.g., Kasr mound 1.5 km by 0.8 km) and limited preserved heights (10–20 meters max), revealing causal distortions from hearsay rather than firsthand calibration.

References in Abrahamic Texts

The Book of Genesis (11:1–9) describes the Tower of Babel as a structure built by unified humanity in the plain of Shinar to reach the heavens, resulting in divine confusion of languages and dispersion, serving as an etiological account for linguistic diversity and human overreach rather than a strictly historical chronicle. This narrative frames Babel—equated with Babylon—as the origin of rebellion against divine order, though archaeological evidence links it thematically to Mesopotamian ziggurats like Etemenanki without direct corroboration of the event's supernatural elements. Subsequent Hebrew Bible texts portray Babylon as a historical imperial power, particularly under (r. 605–562 BCE), who besieged in 597 BCE, exiled Jehoiachin and elites (2 Kings 24:8–17; 52:28–30), and destroyed the city and temple in 587 BCE. Babylonian administrative ration tablets from Nebuchadnezzar's 10th to 35th regnal years explicitly name Jehoiachin (Ya'u-kinu) as a recipient of oil and barley allotments alongside his sons, confirming his captivity and royal status in Babylon independently of biblical accounts. Prophetic books anticipate Babylon's downfall as divine retribution: 13–14 (composed circa 8th–6th centuries BCE) predicts irreversible desolation by , rendering it uninhabitable like Sodom (Isaiah 13:19–22), while 50–51 details conquest from the north and permanent ruin ( 51:26). These oracles, issued before the empire's peak, align with its 539 BCE fall to via diversion, though the texts emphasize theological causation over geopolitical factors like internal Persian coordination. In the , Babylon appears sparingly in historical guise—1 Peter 5:13 greets from "Babylon," likely a for given the city's post-539 BCE decline—but predominantly symbolically in –18 as "Babylon the Great," a harlot embodying corrupt imperial opposition to , evoking Old Testament motifs of pride and idolatry without referencing the physical site's ongoing irrelevance. The mentions Babylon once (Surah 2:102) as the locale where angels taught sorcery to humans as a test of , associating it with pre-Islamic magical traditions falsely attributed to Solomon's era, but lacking detailed historical or prophetic engagement with the city's timeline or events. These Abrahamic references prioritize moral and eschatological instruction, with empirical validation limited to exile-era details amid broader theological interpretations unsubstantiated by non-textual records.

Historical Development

Pre-Babylonian Settlement and Akkadian Influence (c. 2300–1894 BCE)

The site of , situated on the eastern bank of the River in central , exhibits evidence of initial settlement during the late third millennium BCE, aligning with the territorial expansions of the . Archaeological findings from early excavation levels include ceramic vessels and cylinder seals bearing motifs characteristic of Akkadian glyptic art, demonstrating cultural continuity from Sumerian predecessors while incorporating Semitic linguistic and stylistic elements. These artifacts indicate a modest community engaged in and localized , without indications of extensive or centralized at this stage. Textual records provide the earliest attestations of Babylon as bāb-ilim ("gate of the gods"), first appearing in administrative cuneiform tablets dated to the reign of the Akkadian ruler Shar-Kali-Sharri (c. 2217–2193 BCE), who documented interactions with the town amid efforts to stabilize the empire's southern frontiers. Subsequent Babylonian historiographical compositions, such as the Chronicle of Early Kings, credit Sargon of Akkad (c. 2334–2279 BCE) with establishing the settlement "in front of Akkad" to consolidate control over Euphrates trade corridors linking Sumerian city-states to northern territories. Sargon's military campaigns, which subdued resistant polities like Uruk and Lagash, indirectly facilitated Babylon's incorporation into a proto-imperial network, evidenced by standardized administrative practices reflected in regional seal impressions. Babylon's strategic position astride fluvial trade routes—facilitating the movement of barley, wool, and —drove incremental economic integration, as inferred from comparative artifact distributions across Akkadian provincial sites. Limited monumental remains, including temple foundations possibly dedicated to astral deities like Anunitum, suggest religious institutions supported community cohesion but lacked the scale of contemporary centers such as or Kish. Throughout the Akkadian collapse (c. 2154 BCE) and the subsequent Ur III dynasty (c. 2112–2004 BCE), followed by the Isin-Larsa , Babylon persisted as a peripheral settlement, overshadowed by dominant southern powers and devoid of independent royal inscriptions or expansive building projects until the Amorite incursions circa 1894 BCE. This phase underscores causal dependencies on imperial oversight and hydrological advantages rather than autonomous political agency.

Old Babylonian Dynasty and Empire (1894–1595 BCE)

The Old Babylonian Dynasty, also known as the First Dynasty of Babylon, was established around 1894 BCE by Sumu-abum, an Amorite ruler who transformed the modest city-state of Babylon into the nucleus of an expanding power in southern Mesopotamia. The Amorites, a Semitic-speaking nomadic people originating from the Syrian steppe, had infiltrated Mesopotamian city-states following the collapse of the Third Dynasty of Ur circa 2004 BCE, gradually assuming control through military prowess and alliances. Babylon remained peripheral for the first century of Amorite rule, overshadowed by rivals like Isin and Larsa, until the reign of Hammurabi (circa 1792–1750 BCE), who initiated aggressive campaigns to consolidate territory. Hammurabi's expansions began with victories over southern adversaries, including the conquest of in 1787 BCE and the decisive defeat of in 1763 BCE, which incorporated key agricultural regions and trade routes along the . By circa 1760 BCE, his forces had subdued to the east and extended influence northward toward , effectively unifying much of under Babylonian hegemony for the first time since the . These achievements are corroborated by royal year-name lists, which chronicle annual military exploits, and diplomatic correspondence from the Mari archives, unearthed at the site of ancient Mari on the , detailing Hammurabi's alliances, betrayals, and troop movements. Central to Hammurabi's legacy is the , inscribed circa 1754 BCE on a 2.25-meter depicting the king receiving divine authority from , the sun god of justice; this artifact, now in the , enumerates 282 laws addressing commerce, family, and retribution, reflecting centralized administrative reforms to stabilize the diverse conquered territories. During this apex, Babylon's urban population likely exceeded 25,000 inhabitants, inferred from archaeological surveys of residential density in the city's core, supporting a that managed , taxation, and temple economies across the empire. Following Hammurabi's death, his successors, including (1749–1712 BCE), faced mounting rebellions from subjugated regions like the Sealand Dynasty in the south and Assyrian incursions in the north, eroding territorial integrity through protracted and economic strain. The dynasty culminated under Samsu-ditana (1625–1595 BCE), whose reign ended abruptly in 1595 BCE when Hittite forces under King raided from , sacking Babylon amid internal disarray but withdrawing without establishing lasting occupation, leaving a exploited by the .

Kassite Rule and Middle Babylonian Period (1595–1155 BCE)

The , a people from the , seized control of following the Hittite sack of Babylon in 1595 BCE, establishing a dynasty that endured for over four centuries and marked a phase of administrative consolidation and cultural adaptation rather than radical upheaval. These rulers, though ethnically distinct, integrated into Babylonian traditions by restoring temples, maintaining cuneiform scribal practices, and fostering diplomatic ties with neighboring powers such as and to secure trade routes and marital alliances. Early kings like Agum-Kakrime repatriated cult statues looted during the chaos of the Old Babylonian collapse, symbolizing a deliberate effort to legitimize their rule through religious continuity. Prominent among them was Kurigalzu I (c. 1400 BCE), who constructed as a fortified royal center northwest of Babylon, featuring a dedicated to and extensive palace complexes built with molded mud-bricks, shifting some administrative focus from the traditional capital while preserving Babylonian architectural norms. This king also refurbished southern temples like those at , evidencing investments in infrastructure to bolster loyalty among local priesthoods and elites. Military initiatives included campaigns against , with later rulers such as Kashtiliash IV (c. 1232–1225 BCE) engaging in protracted conflicts that strained resources amid simultaneous Assyrian pressures. Kudurru boundary stones, limestone stelae erected from the mid-second millennium BCE, document royal land grants to vassals and officials, often inscribed with legal privileges, divine emblems, and imprecatory curses to deter encroachment; these artifacts reveal Kassite emphasis on equine management, with terms for and pasturage appearing in associated texts, alongside references to fortified outposts for defense. Such measures underscored efforts to secure peripheral territories vulnerable to nomadic incursions and rival states. By the late 13th century BCE, Assyrian expansion under kings like led to the temporary conquest and sack of Babylon in 1225 BCE, exposing Kassite military vulnerabilities despite a brief recovery. Encroachments intensified as asserted dominance over northern trade corridors, eroding Babylonian autonomy through tribute demands and border raids, culminating in systemic weakening that presaged the dynasty's overthrow.

Assyrian Supremacy (911–612 BCE)

The Neo-Assyrian Empire asserted dominance over Babylonia following its resurgence under Adad-nirari II around 911 BCE, gradually incorporating the region through military campaigns and vassal arrangements, though full subjugation intensified under Tiglath-Pileser III, who captured Babylon in 729 BCE and proclaimed himself its king. Babylonian elites often chafed under Assyrian rule, leading to recurrent revolts fueled by ethnic Chaldean and Aramean resistance, as well as ideological clashes over religious prerogatives, with Assyrians frequently imposing tribute and garrisons to maintain control. These uprisings, documented in Assyrian royal annals, highlighted Babylon's strategic value as a economic and symbolic center, yet also exposed Assyrian vulnerabilities in pacifying southern Mesopotamia. A pivotal episode occurred under (r. 705–681 BCE), who faced repeated Babylonian alliances with ; after Marduk-apla-iddina II's final expulsion, besieged and utterly destroyed Babylon in 689 BCE, razing temples, looting treasures, and redirecting the to flood the ruins, an act Babylonian sources later decried as divine offense provoking Assyrian downfall. His successor (r. 681–669 BCE), attributing his father's assassination to this sacrilege, initiated extensive reconstruction around 680 BCE, restoring temples like and Esarra, repopulating the city, and returning cult statues to legitimize Assyrian oversight. This policy of reconciliation aimed to integrate Babylon culturally while subordinating it politically, yet underlying tensions persisted. Esarhaddon partitioned rule between his sons, installing Shamash-shum-ukin as king of Babylon (r. 668–648 BCE) under Ashurbanipal's Assyrian suzerainty (r. 669–631 BCE). In 652 BCE, Shamash-shum-ukin rebelled, forging coalitions with Elamites, Chaldeans, and Arab tribes against perceived Assyrian overreach, igniting a four-year war that devastated Babylonia. Assyrian forces besieged Babylon relentlessly, capturing it in 648 BCE; Shamash-shum-ukin died by self-immolation amid the ruins, prompting Ashurbanipal to install the pliable Kandalanu as puppet king while suppressing Chaldean strongholds. Assyrian annals boast of these victories, but Babylonian chronicles portray the era as one of unrelenting oppression, with forced deportations and temple appropriations eroding local autonomy. This cycle of revolt and reprisal engendered profound resentment, manifesting in cultural suppression through Assyrian prioritization of Nineveh's cults over Babylonian worship and economic exploitation via heavy taxation, which strained systems and agrarian output. By the late 620s BCE, Assyrian decline enabled , a Chaldean commander, to seize Babylon in 626 BCE and declare independence. In 616 BCE, he allied with king , launching joint offensives that exploited Assyrian overextension, setting the stage for the empire's collapse by 612 BCE. Babylonian records emphasize this alliance as retribution for centuries of subjugation, underscoring causal links between Assyrian brutality and their eventual expulsion.

Neo-Babylonian Empire (626–539 BCE)

The emerged in 626 BCE when , a Chaldean leader, seized the throne of Babylon amid the weakening Assyrian Empire, marking the start of from Assyrian domination after decades of subjugation. 's focused on consolidating power and allying with the to dismantle Assyrian strongholds, culminating in the sack of in 612 BCE, though full Assyrian collapse required further campaigns until 609 BCE. This foundation enabled territorial expansion into former Assyrian provinces, establishing Babylon as the imperial center with administrative reforms emphasizing temple institutions for economic stability. Under , who succeeded in 605 BCE following his father's death, the empire reached its verifiable peak through military conquests and monumental constructions, extending control from the to parts of and Arabia. A key campaign involved the siege and capture of in 587 BCE, as recorded in the Babylonian Chronicle, leading to the destruction of the city and the of Judean elites to Babylon, securing and suppressing in the west. These victories bolstered imperial resources without reliance on unverified spectacles, as empirical evidence from records prioritizes pragmatic governance over legendary embellishments. Nebuchadnezzar II's building projects exemplified the era's zenith, including the reconstruction of Babylon's fortifications and gates, with the erected around 575 BCE using glazed blue bricks stamped with his royal inscription, serving as a ceremonial entrance flanked by Processional Way reliefs of lions and dragons. The city's defensive walls, excavated to widths of 17 to 22 meters, underscored engineering prowess derived from conquered labor and materials, encircling the core urban area for strategic defense. Temple archives from sites like and document economic prosperity through systematic tribute collection, land grants, and trade in commodities such as silver and grain, reflecting a centralized system where royal sustained institutional wealth without evidence of unsustainable extravagance. This period's causal dynamics—conquest fueling construction and administration—highlight a brief but empirically robust imperial phase grounded in Mesopotamian bureaucratic traditions.

Achaemenid Persian Domination (539–331 BCE)

In October 539 BCE, captured Babylon following the diversion of the River, allowing his forces to enter the city without significant resistance, as recorded in the contemporary , which notes the Babylonian populace's welcoming of the conqueror after dissatisfaction with King 's policies. The , a clay inscription deposited as a foundation document in Babylon's temples shortly after the conquest, portrays as divinely favored by to overthrow Nabonidus and restore neglected cults and displaced peoples, though scholars view it as propagandistic legitimation rather than impartial history, aligning factually with the Chronicle's account of a bloodless entry. appointed local officials, including his general as of Babylon, preserving Babylonian administrative structures such as temple economies and record-keeping to ensure economic stability and tribute flow. Babylonia was organized as the ninth satrapy of the , a wealthy contributing silver talents and goods, as evidenced by Fortification Tablets documenting Babylonian personnel and resources integrated into imperial logistics, such as workers and provisions transported to Persia. Despite this integration, cultural and religious continuity persisted, with Persian kings funding temple repairs—Darius I restored the Eanna temple in —and Babylonian priesthoods maintaining astronomical and scholarly traditions in Akkadian, evidenced by ongoing tablets from and archives. However, tensions arose; a revolt in 522 BCE, exploiting chaos after Cambyses II's death, installed a as Nebuchadnezzar IV, which Darius I crushed, executing leaders and reorganizing the satrapy. Further unrest in 482 BCE under saw two rebel kings, Bel-shimanni and Shamash-eriba, briefly claim Babylon amid tax grievances and Greek War distractions, prompting a harsh suppression: Xerxes sacked the city, looted temples including , and discontinued the title "King of Babylon" for subsequent rulers, though local governance and cult practices resumed under tighter oversight. These suppressions underscore Persian prioritization of fiscal reliability over full cultural autonomy, yet Babylonian identity endured in script, law, and ritual until Alexander's conquest in 331 BCE.

Hellenistic and Seleucid Control (331–141 BCE)

Following his victory at the on October 1, 331 BCE, advanced into and entered Babylon without resistance on October 20, where the Persian surrendered the city and its treasury. was welcomed by the Babylonian priesthood, who petitioned him to restore the temple of , damaged under , and he ordered repairs while sacrificing to Bel-Marduk and planning to make Babylon his capital. He died in the palace of in Babylon on June 10 or 11, 323 BCE, after which the city became a focal point in the Wars of the . Seleucus I Nicator, appointed satrap of Babylonia in 321 BCE, fled due to Antigonus I's pressure but reconquered the region in August 312 BCE with a small force, marking the start of the Seleucid era and establishing Babylon as the initial imperial base. Seleucus founded Seleucia on the Tigris nearby in 300 BCE as a Greek-style city, promoting Hellenization through Greek settlers, coinage, and administrative practices, yet Babylonian traditions persisted, evidenced by the continuation of cuneiform astronomical diaries recording celestial observations and local events from 331 to 141 BCE. Seleucid rulers adopted Babylonian royal ideology, participating in the Akitu festival and issuing inscriptions in Akkadian to legitimize rule. Under (r. 281–261 BCE), temple restorations occurred, including repairs to and Ezida starting in 268 BCE, commemorated in a cuneiform cylinder portraying him as restorer of Babylonian cults alongside Greek Olympios. However, as Seleucid focus shifted westward with Antioch founded as the primary capital around 300 BCE, Babylon's administrative and economic centrality declined, with resources and governance prioritizing Syrian centers over Mesopotamian ones. Seleucid control persisted amid internal strife until 141 BCE, when Parthian forces under Mithridates I captured Babylon, ending Hellenistic dominance in the region.

Parthian, Sasanian, and Early Islamic Eras (141 BCE–9th Century CE)

In 141 BCE, Mithridates I (also known as Arsaces VI) of the seized Babylon amid the collapse of Seleucid authority in , capturing the city as part of his rapid expansion into between April and June of that year. Under Parthian administration, Babylon functioned as a provincial outpost rather than a political or economic focal point, with authority centered on nearby Seleucia-on-the-Tigris and later ; local records of astronomical observations persisted until approximately 75 CE, suggesting continuity in priestly traditions amid diminishing urban vitality. Archaeological evidence, including sporadic Parthian drachmae and tetradrachmae discovered in Babylonian strata, indicates integration into imperial trade networks but no substantial revival of the city's infrastructure or population. The Sasanian conquest of the Parthians in 224 CE subsumed Babylon into a Mesopotamian satrapy under centralized imperial rule, where it retained marginal significance overshadowed by as the dynastic capital. During Khosrow I's reign (531–579 CE), extensive projects, including the restoration of canals across the alluvial plains, bolstered in the Babylonian heartland, though these efforts prioritized broader regional stability over the reconstruction of the ancient urban core. Jewish scholarly centers like the academies of Sura and , located proximate to Babylon's ruins, thrived under Sasanian tolerance interspersed with periods of , as documented in Talmudic sources, but the site itself evidenced no major architectural or demographic resurgence, with Sasanian coins appearing infrequently in excavations. Arab Muslim forces overran Sasanian Iraq between 636 and 651 CE, incorporating Babylon during the conquest of Mesopotamia following decisive victories at al-Qadisiyyah (636 CE) and the fall of Ctesiphon (637 CE), as detailed in al-Tabari's chronicles of the campaigns under Caliphs Abu Bakr and Umar. Initial Umayyad and Abbasid administration treated the area as a peripheral district, with no recorded investments in restoring Babylonian monuments; by the 8th century, population shifts to garrison cities like Kufa and the founding of Baghdad (762 CE) accelerated depopulation. Letters and responsa from the Babylonian geonim, spanning the 7th–9th centuries, allude to economic hardships and communal fragmentation in the region, while archaeological silences—marked by scant early Islamic dirhams and the absence of new settlements—signal the site's effective abandonment as a viable urban entity by around 800 CE.

Medieval to Ottoman Stagnation (9th–19th Centuries)

Following the early Islamic era, the site of ancient Babylon experienced prolonged stagnation, with medieval travelers documenting its state as extensive ruins amid desolation. In 1327, during his journey up the , traversed the region past the remnants of Babylon near al-Hilla, observing political turmoil in the surrounding Shi'i towns and the evident decay of ancient structures without signs of habitation or restoration. Similarly, 13th-century geographer described the Birs Nimrud (the ruins of the ziggurat) as a prominent surviving feature of Babylon, surrounded by barren mounds and sparse vegetation, indicative of long-term abandonment rather than active settlement. Under Abbasid, Seljuk, and subsequent Islamic dynasties through the , the area supported only minor rural activities, such as brick quarrying from the ancient remains for nearby construction, but lacked urban revival. Ottoman administrative records from the 16th to 19th centuries reflect the site's peripheral status, with the adjacent of al-Hilla—founded around 1101 and expanded using Babylonian bricks—operating as a small provincial center focused on and local , rather than redevelopment of the mounds themselves. The population remained low, with no evidence of large-scale infrastructure or fortification projects on the core ruins. Archaeological examinations of the tell profiles reveal no significant depositional layers attributable to medieval or Ottoman-era construction, preserving the Neo-Babylonian and earlier largely intact beneath surface erosion and minor . This stasis stemmed causally from : progressive aridity exacerbated by millennia of leading to soil salinization, coupled with the River's avulsion and eastward course shift over centuries, which diverted vital away from the low-lying site and rendered large-scale habitation unsustainable.

Governance and Institutions

Royal Administration and Bureaucracy

The Babylonian positioned the king as the earthly representative of divine authority, with royal inscriptions asserting that rulers acted under the mandate of patron deities such as to maintain cosmic order and administer justice. This underpinned administrative legitimacy across dynasties, where kings commissioned temple repairs, canal maintenance, and resource allocation as fulfillments of godly will, evidenced by dedications recovered from sites like Babylon and . While kings were not uniformly deified in nomenclature—unlike some Akkadian predecessors—their titles emphasized selection by the gods for stewardship over land and people, fostering a hierarchical chain from divine decree to human execution. Provincial governance relied on officials known as bēl pīḫāti, or "lords of the province," appointed to oversee distant territories, collect revenues, and enforce royal edicts, a title attested in Kassite and Neo-Babylonian texts from the second millennium BCE onward. These governors managed local taxation quotas, labor corvées, and , reporting upward through scribal networks to central authorities in Babylon, as documented in boundary stones and administrative letters that detail their fiscal responsibilities. The system's resilience is indicated by the continuity of such roles even under foreign overlords, adapting to Assyrian or Persian oversight without full collapse, though enforcement varied with the core empire's strength. Cuneiform bureaucracy formed the operational backbone, with scribes recording transactions on clay tablets that cataloged land allotments, harvest yields, and trade levies, amassing archives exceeding tens of thousands from Babylonian sites alone. In the Neo-Babylonian period (626–539 BCE), this apparatus achieved notable efficiency through standardized contracts for tax farming, where private agents bid to collect dues—often 10–20% of agricultural output—in exchange for fixed payments to temples or crown, minimizing direct state overhead while maximizing revenue extraction. Verification occurred via cross-checked ledgers and seals, reducing fraud as inferred from low dispute rates in surviving Eanna and Esagil temple archives; however, post-conquest decentralization under Achaemenid rule fragmented this centralization, leading to localized exemptions and delayed collections. Later Hellenistic and Parthian eras further eroded unified oversight, with scribal roles shifting toward temple autonomy amid reduced royal impositions. The , issued circa 1755–1750 BCE by the sixth king of the First Babylonian Dynasty, stands as the most comprehensive surviving legal compilation from ancient Babylon, consisting of 282 casuistic provisions inscribed in Akkadian on a 2.25-meter erected in the temple of at Babylon. These laws systematized precedents accumulated in temple archives over centuries, covering offenses from and to family disputes and property rights, with penalties scaled by the social status of victim and perpetrator—free persons (awīlum), dependents (muškēnum), or slaves—to reflect hierarchical norms. A core principle in criminal matters was lex talionis, prescribing retaliatory equivalence such as the of a surgeon's hand for a botched operation on a free man or death for builders whose faulty homes caused fatalities, thereby aiming to deter aggression through mirrored consequences proportional to harm inflicted. Enforcement occurred via decentralized courts presided over by judges (dayyānum) appointed by the king, local assemblies, or temple officials, where litigants presented cases without intermediaries, relying on oral pleas, witness testimonies, divine oaths, or ordeals like river trials to ascertain guilt. Surviving Old Babylonian letters and contracts from sites like and document case-by-case applications, such as royal queries resolving ambiguities by referencing precedents rather than rigid adherence to the code, indicating its role as a guideline amid a litigious culture that generated vast archival records for iterative judicial adaptation. These processes, verifiable through thousands of cuneiform tablets detailing verdicts and fines, fostered causal stability by channeling disputes into institutionalized channels, minimizing vigilante retaliation and enabling economic predictability in a riverine society prone to resource conflicts. Under Kassite rule (circa 1595–1155 BCE), legal frameworks exhibited continuity with minimal documented reforms, as foreign rulers integrated into Babylonian scribal traditions without overhauling core principles, evidenced by persistent use of Akkadian in administrative texts and absence of new codifications. In the (626–539 BCE), trial records from temple archives reveal analogous practices, with judges consulting prior rulings or ad hoc royal edicts for disputes involving and debts, though with increased emphasis on written consultations of precedents amid expanded imperial . This evolutionary stasis underscores the code's enduring utility in maintaining order across dynasties, as deviations risked undermining the legitimacy derived from , the sun god of justice invoked in Hammurabi's .

Economic Systems

Irrigation-Dependent Agriculture

Babylonian agriculture relied on extensive networks diverting water from the River to irrigate fields in an arid environment receiving less than 200 mm of annual rainfall. Basin irrigation dominated, involving the construction of earthen dikes to impound seasonal spring floods—primarily from Tigris-Euphrates —and secondary feeder canals to distribute water across low-lying plots, enabling soil saturation without reliance on rainfall. This system supported two main crop types: rain-fed uplands were minimal, while lowland fields focused on flood-dependent cereals and perennials. Barley served as the principal crop, sown in furrows during autumn (October-November) after plowing and initial flooding, with harvests reaped in early summer (April-May) using sickles; date palms provided supplementary yields through year-round irrigation via root-zone channels. Crop rotations typically alternated barley with fallow periods or legumes like chickpeas to restore nitrogen, as documented in field allocation texts from temple estates, preventing continuous monoculture depletion. Harvest tallies inscribed on cuneiform tablets quantified outputs, often tying rents to one-third of yields delivered to landlords. In the Neo-Babylonian era, such practices yielded intensive production, with estate surveys indicating barley returns 25% higher than in prior Kassite times due to enhanced canal maintenance and land reclamation. Empirical data from Neo-Babylonian and succeeding Achaemenid archives, including the Murashû family tablets from (ca. 455-403 BCE), record average seed-to-harvest ratios of approximately 10:1, calculated from sown seed (typically 1 kor per of land) against harvested volumes after threshing and . These ratios reflected efficient but labor-intensive inputs, including oxen-plowing teams and manual weeding, with variability tied to timing—excessive inundation risked loss, while deficits prompted supplemental draws. Despite these efficiencies, irrigation-dependent farming exposed soils to salinization, as evaporated floodwater left mineral residues (primarily ) in fine alluvial clays with poor natural drainage. Textual evidence from second-millennium onward references expanding "saline ground" (ki-mun), correlating with yield declines, while modern core profiles from southern Mesopotamian sites reveal elevated salt accumulations in strata dating to the first millennium BCE, confirming causal buildup from prolonged use without widespread leaching. Mitigation involved periodic fallowing and applications, but systemic vulnerability contributed to long-term productivity constraints under intensive exploitation.

Commercial Trade and Resources

Babylon's commercial networks extended across Mesopotamia and beyond, leveraging riverine transport along the Euphrates and Tigris rivers to connect with Persian Gulf ports, where intermediaries like Dilmun facilitated maritime exchanges for imported metals and semiprecious stones. Cuneiform tablets and seals document the influx of tin and copper, critical for bronze alloy production, alongside lapis lazuli sourced from Afghan mines and routed through Central Asian overland paths before reaching Babylonian markets. These commodities, absent in local alluvial soils, were acquired via barter or silver-equivalent payments, with Dilmun serving as a redistribution hub for Gulf-bound shipments from eastern suppliers. In the Neo-Babylonian era (626–539 BCE), and derived textiles formed the backbone of exports, with temple estates such as Uruk's Eanna complex overseeing large-scale shearing, processing, and sales, as recorded in administrative ledgers detailing annual wool incomes exceeding thousands of shekels in value and allocations for quotas. These operations generated surpluses exchanged for timber, aromatics, and precious metals, with price lists from Babylonian archives evidencing market-driven valuations for wool at rates fluctuating between 1-2 shekels of silver per mina, reflecting supply controls and demand from Levantine and Anatolian buyers. Institutional oversight, including temple-imposed distributions, ensured steady output, though private merchants increasingly handled intraregional distribution under royal charters. Such trade dynamics, verified through thousands of tablets, amassed silver reserves that funded monumental and , causally linking resource inflows to Babylon's urban expansion by enabling specialized labor and infrastructure beyond . Price volatility in records from the 6th to 4th centuries BCE indicates competitive markets rather than fixed allocations, with and dates often serving as proxies for broader exchange values. This with Gulf networks sustained Babylon's role as a redistribution center until Achaemenid conquests redirected some flows.

Religious Framework

Core Deities and Cosmology

The Babylonian pantheon centered on as the supreme deity and patron god of the city, elevated to head of the gods through mythological narratives that emphasized his role in establishing cosmic order. Other major deities included , , and Ea, but Marduk's primacy reflected Babylon's political dominance, with his attributes encompassing creation, justice, and storm elements. Empirical evidence from votive statues dedicated to these gods, recovered from temple deposits, attests to their worship across social strata, with inscriptions invoking divine favor for donors. In the , a creation myth composed circa 18th–12th centuries BCE, rises to kingship by defeating the chaos goddess , using her divided body to form the heavens and , thereby delineating the structured from primordial disorder. This cosmology portrayed a flat disk enclosed by waters above and below, supported by the sky vault, with the as a subterranean realm for the dead, reflecting observations of natural phenomena like floods and celestial movements integrated into divine causation. Ishtar, equivalent to earlier Sumerian , embodied dual aspects as goddess of love, fertility, and sexual desire alongside war and destruction, her association linking erotic passion to martial fury in hymns describing her as both nurturing and tempestuous. Temple hymns reinforced this worldview, praising deities' roles in maintaining cosmic balance, with Marduk's fifty names in symbolizing comprehensive dominion over natural and astral forces. Babylonian cosmology intertwined with , where deities governed planetary motions empirically tracked through systematic observations from circa 1800 BCE onward, such as lunar cycles predicting omens tied to Marduk's or Ishtar's , evidencing a causal framework viewing celestial events as divine communications influencing earthly affairs. Votive offerings inscribed with astral invocations further demonstrate this integration, prioritizing native Babylonian interpretations over external influences.

Temple Complexes and Rituals

The , known in Sumerian as "the temple whose top is lofty," constituted the central temple complex in Babylon dedicated to and served as the focal point of the state's religious cult. Located in the heart of the city, it encompassed multiple courtyards, shrines, and the ziggurat, with dedicatory inscriptions from (r. 605–562 BCE) documenting extensive reconstructions involving vast quantities of materials such as , bricks, and cedar. Ritual activities centered on daily offerings and periodic festivals, with textual records indicating regular sacrifices of animals like sheep and oxen presented within its precincts. The festival, celebrated annually in the spring around the vernal equinox, featured prominent s at , including processions of divine statues along the Processional Way to the akitu-temple outside the . These ceremonies involved the king submitting to humbling by priests, such as symbolic slapping to affirm his legitimacy, followed by reenactments of foundational myths affirming cosmic order. Priestly personnel, organized in a strict governed by purity requirements and prebendal shares in temple revenues, managed these events; high-ranking officials like the en (chief priest) oversaw inner sanctum access, while lower roles included butchers, bakers, and gatekeepers ensuring sanctity. Archaeological and textual evidence, including tablets detailing offerings, corroborates the scale of animal sacrifices, with assemblages implying systematic slaughter for divine consumption during festivals. Temple maintenance imposed a significant economic burden, as and affiliated complexes controlled extensive lands, granaries, and labor forces, expending resources—such as 146 minas of silver annually in one late period account—on sacrificial animals, merchandise, and personnel wages, diverting substantial state revenues and contributing to fiscal strains amid royal building programs.

Social and Intellectual Life

Hierarchical Structure and Daily Existence

Babylonian society exhibited a rigid class structure delineated in private contracts and archival tablets, comprising the awīlum ( free persons with and administrative roles), muškēnum (free commoners dependent on patrons or state for livelihood), and wardum (slaves typically from , capture, or birth into servitude). These distinctions permeated economic transactions, such as sales or labor agreements, where an awīlum might oversee muškēnum tenants, while wardum performed menial tasks under ownership marked by ear-piercing or branding. Family life revolved around nuclear households documented in tablets, which specified bride prices, dowries (often silver or equivalent to 30-60 shekels), and mutual obligations for support and , with provisions for childless unions sometimes including or surrogate arrangements to ensure lineage continuity. Daily routines centered on agrarian labor, with men cultivating fields or , and households managing multi-generational dwellings of mud-brick, where children contributed to chores from early ages as evidenced by records. Sustenance derived from ration systems allotting for (typically 1-2 sila per person daily, yielding flatbreads baked on hearths), supplemented by river , onions, and dates, as tallied in administrative ledgers for laborers and temple dependents. , brewed from fermented , served as a staple drink and equivalent, distributed in vessels holding about 1 liter per ration. Women fulfilled empirical roles in production and , brewing in households or taverns—a trade linked to and regulated by output quotas in contracts—while select nadītu priestesses resided in temple cloisters, administering estates, conducting offerings to deities like Šamaš, and wielding economic autonomy through investments in fields or . These activities underscored gendered divisions, with women rarely in public governance but integral to domestic and maintenance per archival evidence.

Advancements in Scholarship and Technology

Babylonian scholars, trained in edubba (tablet houses) during the Old Babylonian period (c. 2000–1600 BCE), mastered writing, , and computational techniques through copying exercises on clay tablets, fostering innovations in record-keeping and problem-solving. Scribal curricula included reciprocal tables and multiplication algorithms, enabling practical applications in land surveying and . The (base-60) , positional and versatile for fractions, underpinned mathematical tablets that solved quadratic equations and approximated numbers, such as √2 ≈ 1.414213 on the tablet from (c. 1800–1600 BCE). This system facilitated advanced geometry, including applications in trigonometric-like ratios predating Greek developments by millennia, as seen on (c. 1800 BCE), which lists Pythagorean triples for right triangles. Astronomical records, preserved in cuneiform tablets like the Venus Tablets of Ammi-Saduqa (c. 1650 BCE), documented synodic periods of over 21 years with observational precision yielding a cycle of 2919.60 days, aligning closely with modern values and enabling predictive ephemerides. Neo-Babylonian and Seleucid-era tablets (c. 747–61 BCE) refined predictions and planetary positions using arithmetic progressions, achieving accuracies for lunar phenomena within minutes, as in Kidinnu's calculations rivaling 19th-century efforts. Medical texts, such as the diagnostic series SA.GIG and drug compendia like Šammu šikinšu, cataloged over 250 plant-based remedies, 120 minerals, and 180+ other substances combined with bases like beer or oil for treatments of ailments from to wounds. These empirical formulations emphasized observable symptoms over purely ritualistic approaches, with plant drugs comprising the majority, as in lists identifying 159 botanical agents. Babylonian astral science persisted into the Seleucid era (312–63 BCE), where tablets in and Babylon transmitted observational data and methods to Greek astronomers, influencing Hellenistic models through direct of period relations and zodiacal divisions. This causal link is evident in shared techniques, bridging empirical Babylonian data with Greek theoretical without wholesale replacement.

Architectural and Engineering Feats

City Planning and Fortifications

The urban layout of Babylon centered on the River, which bisected the city into eastern and western halves connected by bridges, with the core area enclosed by massive fortifications during the Neo-Babylonian period under (r. 605–562 BCE). Archaeological excavations, including those conducted in the early 20th century, reveal a planned rectangular for the , approximately 2 kilometers north-south and 1.5 kilometers east-west, featuring grid-like street patterns orthogonal to the river's east-west flow. The Processional Way, a major north-south thoroughfare about 20 meters wide, extended from the northern southward toward the Southern Palace complex, paved with slabs over a base and flanked by walls adorned with glazed reliefs depicting lions and dragons. This orthogonal design facilitated ceremonial processions and efficient movement within the densely built urban core, integrating residential, administrative, and cultic zones while prioritizing defensibility against both human threats and environmental hazards. Fortifications consisted of double walls—an inner and outer enceinte—constructed primarily of sun-dried mud bricks faced with baked bricks, with Nebuchadnezzar II credited in his inscriptions for rebuilding and extending these defenses using an estimated 15 million bricks. The inner walls stood roughly 50 feet high and 90 feet thick at the base, incorporating eight fortified gates, while the outer system included a moat fed by the Euphrates, enhancing flood resistance and siege deterrence. Ancient accounts, such as Herodotus' description of a 85-kilometer perimeter with walls wide enough for chariots, have been scaled down by modern surveys and excavations, which indicate the fortified inner city perimeter closer to 10 kilometers, with the outer extending further but not matching hyperbolic claims—discrepancies attributed to rhetorical exaggeration rather than empirical measurement. These structures empirically mitigated Euphrates flooding through elevated foundations and levee integration, while their thickness and gate designs, verified by foundation trenches and brick stamps, provided causal advantages in repelling invasions by allowing archer positions and storage for prolonged defenses.

Monumental Structures and Innovations

The ziggurat, dedicated to the god and often identified as a basis for the biblical narrative, represented a pinnacle of Babylonian monumental with its massive scale confirmed by archaeological evidence. Excavations by between 1899 and 1917 revealed foundations forming a square base approximately 91 meters by 91 meters, supporting a seven-tiered structure that likely rose to a similar height, though much of the superstructure has eroded or been dismantled over millennia. (r. 605–562 BCE) extensively reconstructed the ziggurat, as documented in his inscriptions claiming the use of and baked bricks to elevate its platform toward the heavens, with estimates suggesting millions of such durable fired bricks were required for stability against the region's flooding and seismic activity. Babylonian engineers innovated with fired technology, producing standardized stamped with royal inscriptions for accountability and , which allowed for taller and more resilient structures than sun-dried mud bricks alone could achieve. This material, bound with asphalt bitumen sourced from natural seeps, formed the core of Etemenanki's surviving podium, measuring about 60 by 60 meters in its inner mud-brick remnants surrounded by baked facing. Archaeological remains also indicate early applications of true arches and barrel vaults in subterranean drainage systems and gateways, precursors to more advanced Roman forms, constructed from mud bricks but demonstrating principles of load distribution without wooden centering in some cases. No evidence supports the use of hydraulic lifts or cranes; instead, inclined ramps and systems likely facilitated elevation of materials, as inferred from tool marks and debris at Mesopotamian sites. Monumental projects like relied on labor mobilization, a state-enforced system drawing from the populace for seasonal , with records from the Neo-Babylonian period attesting to organized teams of workers—often numbering in the thousands—tasked with brick-making, transport, and assembly under royal oversight. This compulsory service, integrated into the agricultural to avoid peak farming, enabled the causal scaling of labor for feats requiring immense human input, such as the estimated 17 million bricks for 's rebuild, without reliance on slave economies alone. Such organization reflected the centralized bureaucracy's capacity to coordinate resources across the empire, prioritizing durability and symbolism in religious over utilitarian efficiency.

Military Engagements

Defensive and Expansionist Strategies

The Neo-Babylonian army integrated chariotry, , and , with elite assault units called qurādu or similar numbering approximately 5,000, adapted from Assyrian organizational models and augmented by lighter auxiliary forces for flexibility in engagements. These components enabled combined-arms tactics, where chariots facilitated rapid maneuvers and flanking while infantry provided sustained pressure in close formations. Expansionist efforts under (r. 605–562 BC) emphasized siege capabilities, deploying battering rams and mobile assault platforms to dismantle enemy defenses during westward campaigns into the and beyond. Royal annals, such as the Babylonian Chronicles, record these operations in annalistic detail, highlighting annual mobilizations that prioritized logistical preparation and engineering for prolonged offensives. Strategic alliances amplified reach; for instance, (r. 626–605 BC) forged a pact with the circa 612 BC to dismantle Assyrian hegemony, leveraging cavalry alongside Babylonian infantry for coordinated strikes against northern strongholds. Defensively, Babylonian commanders exploited the River's hydrology, channeling its waters into expansive moats encircling key urban centers, creating barriers 65 to 250 feet wide that deterred direct assaults and compelled attackers into vulnerable river crossings. This riverine approach, integrated with patrols and , formed a layered deterrent system, as evidenced in accounts of repelled incursions where natural water obstacles disrupted enemy cohesion without relying solely on static walls.

Pivotal Battles and Conquests

Nabopolassar, founder of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, allied with the Median king Cyaxares to dismantle Assyrian power, culminating in the sack of Nineveh in 612 BCE as detailed in the Fall of Nineveh Chronicle (ABC 3). The Medes assaulted the Assyrian capital first, breaching its defenses after prolonged fighting, while Babylonian troops arrived post-capture to garrison the site and pursue fleeing Assyrian remnants southward. This victory, with no specific casualty figures preserved in the chronicle, effectively shattered Assyrian imperial control, enabling Babylonian expansion into former Assyrian territories. Nebuchadnezzar II extended Babylonian hegemony through the of , which fell in 587 BCE after an 18-month blockade beginning in 589 BCE, resulting in the city's destruction, the razing of , and mass s of Judean elites, artisans, and soldiers—numbering in the thousands per contemporaneous accounts corroborated by Babylonian records. The campaign stemmed from Judah's rebellion against Babylonian vassalage, with Zedekiah's installation as puppet king in 597 BCE following an earlier of approximately 10,000 from the prior . No precise battlefield casualties are recorded on stelae, but the operation exemplified overextension risks, as sustained Judean resistance and Egyptian interventions strained Babylonian logistics. The empire's conquest by in 539 BCE featured the pivotal in late September, where Persian forces routed ' army, leading to the surrender of and a bloodless entry into Babylon itself on (or 29) per lunar dating in the (ABC 7). Traditional accounts attribute the city's fall to ' engineering of a Euphrates diversion to lower water levels, permitting troops to ford the riverbed and exploit unguarded gates, though primary chronicles emphasize internal collapse and minimal urban fighting rather than dramatic inundation tactics. This rapid defeat, with unverifiable casualty details, ended Neo-Babylonian without widespread devastation, as adopted conciliatory policies toward local priesthoods.

Decline and Terminal Phases

Internal and External Pressures

The late faced internal pressures from religious and political divisions exacerbated by King (r. 556–539 BCE). 's prioritization of the moon god over , Babylon's traditional deity, alienated the powerful priesthood and nobility, who viewed his policies as a deviation from established cult practices. His extended absence in , Arabia, spanning roughly 552–543 BCE, neglected key rituals like the festival and administrative duties in Babylon, fostering elite discontent and eroding loyalty to the crown. This strife manifested in passive resistance and potential sabotage, as evidenced by the minimal opposition to Persian forces in 539 BCE, where Babylonian elites reportedly facilitated Cyrus the Great's entry rather than mounting a defense. Following the Persian conquest, external geopolitical pressures intensified under Achaemenid rule, with Babylon integrated as a satrapy bearing substantial fiscal obligations. The region contributed an annual tribute of 1,000 silver talents, alongside provisions for the Persian court and one-third of the imperial army's annual maintenance, which strained local silver supplies and contributed to elevated interest rates and price instability. These demands centralized economic control in Persian hands, limiting Babylonian autonomy and redirecting resources away from local and networks. Socioeconomic weakening accelerated after revolts against (r. 486–465 BCE), particularly the uprising circa 482–478 BCE, which prompted brutal reprisals including the partial destruction of the temple, removal of the statue, execution of priests, and mass deportations. These events diminished Babylon's status as a religious and economic hub, with temples losing fiscal immunities and receiving fewer royal land grants and donations thereafter. Empirical records from archives indicate a post-482 BCE contraction in temple revenues, as reduced benefactions and heightened taxation on agricultural outputs—such as and dates—eroded the endowments supporting priestly households and maintenance, signaling a causal link between imperial extraction and institutional decay.

Abandonment and Environmental Factors

The River, vital for Babylon's sustenance, experienced multiple avulsions throughout the , altering channel positions and reducing water flow to ancient settlements including Babylon, particularly as main courses shifted eastward away from the site's location on subsidiary branches like the Arahtum. Post-Hellenistic adjustments in river dynamics, including sluggish flow and flooding documented in Neo-Babylonian records, exacerbated this by promoting marsh formation and weakening urban foundations, prompting engineering responses like elevation of the city center by approximately 5 meters under around 600 BCE, with ongoing effects into later antiquity. Intensive irrigation across the Mesopotamian floodplain, reliant on Euphrates waters without adequate drainage, caused progressive salinization by the 2nd millennium BCE and continuing thereafter, elevating soil salt content and shifting crop viability from wheat to more tolerant barley, thereby contracting arable land and undermining agricultural output essential for urban support. Regional pollen records from sediment cores in southern Mesopotamia reflect corresponding vegetation transitions from irrigated cultigens to drought-resistant steppe species during late Holocene phases, signaling broader ecological degradation that diminished carrying capacity around sites like Babylon by the early centuries CE. Archaeological strata at Babylon reveal incremental alluvial deposition from Euphrates floods overlaying Parthian and Sasanian remains, with silt layers accumulating to bury structures and infrastructure by the CE as channel migration distanced the active riverbed, rendering maintenance untenable and accelerating depopulation. This sedimentation, compounded by levee salinization and reduced fluvial energy, transformed fertile levees into unproductive expanses, isolating the site hydrologically.

Cultural Legacy

Transmission to Successor Civilizations

The , discovered at Babylon and dated to 539 BC, represents an early adoption of Babylonian legal and propagandistic motifs by Achaemenid rulers, inscribed in Akkadian to proclaim the Great's conquest, temple restorations, and repatriation of exiles in terms resonant with Mesopotamian royal traditions. This artifact illustrates Persian continuity of Babylonian administrative practices, including edicts emphasizing divine favor and civic order, which influenced subsequent imperial decrees across the empire. Babylonian astronomical records, preserved on clay tablets spanning centuries of systematic observations, directly informed Greek science following the Hellenistic conquests. , active around 150–125 BC, incorporated Babylonian cycles and planetary data—such as the 18-year saros period for predictions—into his models, synthesizing them with geometric methods to advance and star catalogs. , in the 2nd century AD, further relied on these transmitted parameters, including lunar and planetary anomaly periods originally derived from Babylonian ephemerides, as evidenced by discrepancies in his attributions that trace back to sources predating Greek access. This empirical transfer occurred via Seleucid patronage of Babylonian priest-astronomers after Alexander's 331 BC capture of the city, enabling the flow of artifacts and data to centers like without wholesale library destruction. Bilingual inscriptions and hybrid Greco-Babyloniaca scripts from the late Babylonian and early Hellenistic periods facilitated the adaptation of knowledge into alphabetic systems, preserving technical terms in astronomy and for Greek and later users. These artifacts, including astronomical diaries, bridged syllabic to phonetic scripts, allowing , , and eventually —through Sassanid intermediaries—to access and reinterpret Babylonian computational methods, as seen in the persistence of notation in Islamic astronomy. Post-Alexander integrations, rather than dispersals, sustained this causal chain, with physical tablets serving as primary vectors for empirical legacies into successor cultures.

Representations in Art and Literature

Pieter Bruegel the Elder's 1563 painting The Tower of Babel portrays a colossal ziggurat-inspired structure as the biblical tower associated with ancient Babylon, blending Flemish port city elements at its base with architectural motifs evoking the Etemenanki temple while exaggerating scale for symbolic effect to represent human hubris, diverging from archaeological evidence of the actual stepped pyramid's dimensions. This work, housed in the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna, influenced subsequent European iconography by merging biblical narrative with imagined Mesopotamian grandeur, though its Roman Colosseum-like details reflect Renaissance artistic liberties rather than precise Babylonian forms verified by excavations. In the , Le Brun's Entry of into Babylon (c. 1665) depicts the Macedonian conqueror's 331 BCE procession through the city's gates amid celebratory crowds, emphasizing opulent processional streets and palaces in a style that prioritizes dramatic triumph over fidelity to cuneiform records or relief depictions of the event. Such paintings often romanticize Babylon's urban layout, incorporating motifs from Assyrian palace reliefs—known for their narrative sequences of conquests and mythical beasts—that shaped broader Mesopotamian visual traditions later adapted in Babylonian contexts, though these reliefs primarily document Assyrian campaigns rather than Babylonian self-representations. Operatic treatments, such as George Frideric Handel's Belshazzar (1745), dramatize the city's fall through oratorio-style scenes of feasting and , drawing on biblical accounts while amplifying decadence unsupported by stratigraphic evidence from the site's Neo-Babylonian layers, which reveal structured ceremonial architecture like the rather than unchecked excess. Modern cinema, exemplified by D.W. Griffith's Intolerance (1916), reconstructs Babylonian sets inspired by glazed-brick replicas and period reliefs, portraying ritual processions and ziggurats to evoke imperial splendor, yet introduces liberties like exaggerated interpersonal dramas absent from historical annals. Films such as Oliver Stone's (2004) similarly depict Alexander's entry with throngs and monumental walls, grounding visuals in museum artifacts like the Processional Way tiles while prioritizing cinematic spectacle over the tactical submissions recorded in Greek sources.) These representations frequently emphasize mythic decadence, contrasting empirical findings of Babylon's engineered and fortifications that sustained a of approximately 200,000 circa 550 BCE.

Modern Site and Preservation

20th–21st Century Conflicts and Damage

In the 1980s, ordered the reconstruction of parts of Babylon, including walls and palaces, using over 60 million modern bricks stamped with inscriptions comparing himself to . This project imposed incompatible modern materials on ancient foundations, leading to structural instability and archaeological contamination that accelerated deterioration. Archaeologists criticized the work as anachronistic and damaging, as the bricks' poor adhesion to original mud-brick layers contributed to later collapses. Following the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of , American and Polish coalition forces established a at the Babylon site, occupying approximately 150 hectares from April 2003 onward. Troops and contractors caused extensive damage by driving heavy vehicles over ancient paths, bulldozing hilltops for helicopter pads, digging trenches, and compacting soil with gravel and asphalt, severely impacting areas like the Processional Way and the ruins of Nebuchadnezzar's South Palace. The reported "massive damage" from these activities between 2003 and 2004, including contamination from fuel spills and portable toilets that seeped into the soil. intensified during the post-invasion chaos, with attempts to remove glazed bricks from dragon decorations on walls. Military entrenchments at Babylon exacerbated long-term decay by disrupting the site's fragile and exposing unexcavated layers to , compounding vulnerabilities from prior reconstructions. A UN report confirmed substantial harm from scraping, leveling, and , noting irreversible impacts on archaeological integrity. Although posed threats to Babylonian heritage during its 2014–2017 territorial control in , the site avoided direct iconoclastic destruction like that at or , but remained vulnerable amid regional instability. By 2021, rise and poor drainage—aggravated by war-related neglect and invasive modern fills—had caused sections of reconstructed walls to collapse, as documented in on-site assessments. These failures highlighted how conflict-induced disruptions hastened natural degradation processes at the exposed ruins.

UNESCO Status, Tourism, and Restoration Efforts

In July 2019, the ancient city of Babylon was inscribed on the World Heritage List during the 43rd session of the in , , recognizing its outstanding universal value as a Mesopotamian metropolis spanning over 4,000 years of history. This listing followed decades of Iraqi lobbying since 1983 and aimed to support preservation amid ongoing threats like and urban encroachment, though emphasized the need for a comprehensive management plan to address modern intrusions on the site. Restoration initiatives have focused on stabilizing key structures, with the (WMF) leading efforts through its Future of Babylon project initiated in 2009 in partnership with Iraq's State Board of Antiquities and Heritage. As of 2025, WMF projects nearing completion include waterproofing treatments to mitigate groundwater damage to the and surrounding Processional Way, using non-invasive techniques like drainage improvements and protective coatings to prevent salt crystallization and structural weakening. Complementary digital preservation strategies involve and modeling, such as CyArk's interactive reconstructions and Uppsala University's ongoing digital model integrating archaeological data with texts, which allow virtual analysis without physical intervention and aid in risk assessment for flood-prone areas. Tourism has seen measured growth post-inscription, with Babylon attracting 49,629 visitors in 2024, contributing to Iraq's national tourism revenues of $5.7 billion that year—a 25% increase from 2023—driven partly by cultural sites amid broader religious pilgrimages. developments in 2025, including a new 5-star and enhanced access roads near the site, are projected to further integrate Babylon into Iraq's economy, with Baghdad's designation as Arab Capital for 2025 expected to funnel regional visitors toward heritage destinations like Babylon, potentially elevating site-specific GDP contributions through sustainable visitor facilities. Empirical hurdles persist, including pandemic-related delays that postponed on-site training and conservation phases by over a year starting in 2020, limiting hands-on progress until restrictions eased. However, excavations in yielded 478 artifacts, including tablets and seals, advancing stratigraphic understanding and artifact cataloging without exacerbating site erosion, as teams prioritized controlled digs over expansive uncovering.

Interpretive Debates

Veracity of the Hanging Gardens

No archaeological remains consistent with the Hanging Gardens have been identified at the site of Babylon, despite systematic excavations conducted there from the late 19th to early 20th centuries by teams led by , who specifically sought evidence of terraced gardens or associated irrigation systems but found only vaulted substructures possibly linked to palace foundations, lacking botanical or hydraulic features matching ancient descriptions. Extensive stratigraphic analysis of Babylonian ruins, including those from the Neo-Babylonian period under (r. 605–562 BCE), has yielded no traces of elevated planting beds, advanced water-lifting mechanisms, or exotic flora supports required for such a structure. Babylonian inscriptions, which document hundreds of 's construction projects in detail—such as the ziggurat and —contain no references to gardens of any elevated or hanging variety, an omission notable given the king's propensity for self-aggrandizing records of monumental works. The primary ancient attestations derive from Greek and later Hellenistic sources, whose reliability is compromised by temporal distance and potential conflation of Mesopotamian sites. Herodotus, writing circa 450 BCE after purportedly visiting Babylon, describes the city's walls, river diversions, and palaces in detail but makes no mention of hanging gardens, despite claiming familiarity with local wonders. Berossus, a 3rd-century BCE Babylonian priest writing in Greek under Seleucid patronage, provides the earliest explicit account attributing terraced gardens to Nebuchadnezzar II for his Median wife Amytis, but his Babyloniaca survives only in fragments quoted by later authors like Josephus, introducing risks of transmission errors or Hellenistic embellishment to align with Greek notions of oriental luxury. These accounts postdate the presumed construction era by centuries and lack corroboration from contemporaneous Near Eastern texts, suggesting possible legendary accretion rather than eyewitness reporting. Alternative attributions propose the gardens' descriptions stem from Assyrian engineering feats mislocalized to Babylon's greater fame. Assyrian royal inscriptions from Sennacherib (r. 705–681 BCE) detail the creation of expansive, terraced palace gardens at , irrigated via a 50-mile-long aqueduct system with stone-lined canals and screw-like pumps capable of elevating water to artificial heights amid arid terrain—features echoing Greek reports of mechanized watering for "hanging" vegetation. Archaeological surveys near have uncovered related hydraulic infrastructure, including canal remnants and vaulted terraces, absent in Babylonian contexts, supporting the hypothesis that Greek writers, encountering ruins or oral traditions, transposed Assyrian achievements onto Nebuchadnezzar II's era. From an empirical standpoint, the persistent lack of primary Babylonian evidence—contrasted with affirmative Assyrian records—indicates the Hanging Gardens as described were likely not a feature of Babylon but a mythologized representation of real Mesopotamian horticultural innovation, possibly relocated in antiquity due to Babylon's symbolic prestige over its Assyrian predecessors. This interpretation aligns with causal patterns in ancient , where verifiable engineering feats were often attributed to archetypal rulers like Nebuchadnezzar to enhance appeal, without necessitating outright fabrication.

Correlation with the Tower of Babel Narrative

The narrative in Genesis 11:1–9 depicts humanity united in building a and tower "with its top in the heavens" in the land of (ancient /), prompting divine intervention through confusion of languages and dispersion to explain linguistic diversity. This etiological account, likely composed or redacted during the Babylonian exile in the BCE, parallels Mesopotamian traditions but reframes them theologically as a caution against human presumption. Etemenanki, the ziggurat dedicated to in Babylon's complex, whose name translates to "House, foundation of heaven and earth," is the primary historical structure linked to the biblical tower by scholars. Reconstructed by around 562 BCE after earlier iterations dating to the BCE, it featured seven terraced levels rising approximately 91 meters, constructed from sun-baked bricks with an asphalt foundation, serving as a symbolic stairway for deities rather than a literal ascent to heaven. Inscriptions on Nebuchadnezzar's cylinders detail its rebuilding to evoke cosmic order, yet no archaeological evidence supports a structure defying physical limits or a catastrophic mid-construction failure tied to language diversification. While some literalist interpretations posit a historical event around 2200 BCE involving a real tower collapse and rapid linguistic fragmentation, linguistic evidence indicates gradual divergence over millennia, with no corroborating artifacts for a singular global dispersion. Empirical analysis favors the narrative as of symbolism encountered by Judean exiles, possibly polemically critiquing Babylonian , transformed into an etiological emphasizing divine sovereignty over empirical Mesopotamian . Successive repairs, as evidenced by layered foundations, may have inspired motifs of incomplete or ruined towers, but causal chains point to theological adaptation rather than verbatim .

References

  1. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/beautiful-babylon-jewel-ancient-world/
  2. https://whoseculture.hsites.harvard.edu/babylon
  3. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/the-isin-larsa-and-old-babylonian-periods-2004-1595-b-c
  4. https://www.mei.edu/publications/iraqs-ancient-city-babylon-gets-long-overdue-international-recognition
  5. https://www.southern.edu/administration/archaeology/museum/permanent_exhibit_timeline/nebuchadnezzar_builder_of_babylon.html
  6. https://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/cultures/mh07/summary
  7. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/saao/aebp/Essentials/Countries/Babylonia/index.html
  8. https://www.livius.org/articles/place/babylon/
  9. https://www.worldhistory.org/babylon/
  10. https://www.etymonline.com/word/Babylon
  11. https://uruk-warka.dk/babylon.html
  12. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/babylon-under-the-achaemenids
  13. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/468707
  14. https://latitude.to/articles-by-country/iq/iraq/181/babylon
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Location-map-of-the-study-area-showing-the-floodplain-of-the-Tigris-and-Euphrates-rivers_fig1_292140080
  16. https://www.academia.edu/34778927/Geology_of_the_Archeological_Hills_and_Monuments_Examples_from_Iraq
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/River-cross-section-showing-boreholes-Soil-layers-of-Ancient-Babylon-station_fig1_357467748
  18. https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2011FE/webprogram/Paper189329.html
  19. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/heartland_of_cities.pdf
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Topographic-map-of-the-Mesopotamian-floodplain-drawn-using-Shuttle-Radar-Topography_fig1_389086357
  21. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/changing_watercourses.pdf
  22. https://faculty.bennington.edu/~kwoods/classes/enviro-hist/salt%20and%20silt%20in%20mesopotamia.pdf
  23. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/45229/45229-h/45229-h.htm
  24. https://www.schoyencollection.com/24-smaller-collections/maps/map-irrigation-ms-3196
  25. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/ar/81-90/81-82/81-82_Babylonia.pdf
  26. https://biblehub.com/q/Evidence_for_Jeremiah_51_10_on_Babylon.htm
  27. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/term/BIOG62827
  28. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/W_1825-0503-37
  29. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/narrative-of-a-journey-to-the-site-of-babylon-in-1811/journey-to-babylon-in-the-year-1811/73885B9C9DC5534FAC8DCC68E7C632AE
  30. https://www.uni-muenster.de/GoviB/babylon/index.html
  31. https://www.uni-muenster.de/GoviB/babylon/excavationhistory.html
  32. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/71398/71398-h/71398-h.htm
  33. https://evangelicalfocus.com/archaeological-perspectives/31080/lions-bulls-and-dragons-robert-koldewey-and-the-discovery-of-nebuchadnezzar-iis-babylon
  34. https://www.livius.org/articles/place/babylon/etemenanki/
  35. https://www.wmf.org/projects/ishtar-gate-of-babylon
  36. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ancient-art-civilizations/ancient-near-east1/babylonian/v/visiting-babylon
  37. https://archaeologymag.com/2024/10/excavation-in-ancient-babylon-uncovers-478-artifacts/
  38. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/babylon-iraq-saddam-hussein
  39. https://www.worldhistory.org/image/9875/saddam-hussein-plaque-in-babylon/
  40. https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/babylon-artifacts-iraq-0021574
  41. https://arkeonews.net/ancient-babylon-excavation-uncovers-478-artifacts-including-cuneiform-tablets-and-cylindrical-seals/
  42. https://www.uu.se/en/department/archaeology-ancient-history-and-conservation/research/research-projects/model-of-babylon
  43. https://www.nordicbim.com/fi/references/ancient-babylon-depicted-in-a-magnificent-3d-model
  44. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000183134
  45. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000190812
  46. https://cdli.earth/
  47. https://archive.org/details/lettersinscripti01hammuoft
  48. https://ehammurabi.org/
  49. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/W_1878-1015-22
  50. https://www.academia.edu/951554/Accounting_in_Neo_Babylonian_Institutional_Archives_Structure_Usage_Implications
  51. https://webspace.science.uu.nl/~gent0113/eclipse/downloads/huber_de_meis_2004.pdf
  52. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/ancient_records_assyria2.pdf
  53. https://www.livius.org/articles/place/babylon/babylon-ishtar-gate/
  54. https://www.penn.museum/sites/journal/1119/
  55. http://www.melammu-project.eu/database/gen_html/a0000229.html
  56. https://enduringword.com/bible-commentary/genesis-11/
  57. https://zondervanacademic.com/blog/tower-of-babel
  58. https://biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Kings+24%3A8-17%3BJeremiah+52%3A28-30&version=NIV
  59. https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2019/03/22/three-babylonian-inscriptions-about-the-exile/
  60. https://www.livius.org/articles/person/jehoiachin-in-babylonia/
  61. https://biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah+13%3A19-22%3BJeremiah+51%3A26&version=NIV
  62. https://biblehub.com/topical/p/prophecy_of_the_fall_of_babylon.htm
  63. https://www.gotquestions.org/Babylon-in-the-Bible.html
  64. https://biblehub.com/topical/t/the_symbolism_of_babylon.htm
  65. https://www.thelastdialogue.org/article/the-topic-babylon-mentioned-in-quran/
  66. https://www.wmf.org/monuments/babylon-archaeological-site
  67. https://www.nmc.utoronto.ca/research-publications/faculty-publications/babylon
  68. http://www.swartzentrover.com/cotor/bible/timelines/Babylon/Akkad/Akkad.htm
  69. https://libjournals.unca.edu/ncur/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/1845-Gregory-James-FINAL.pdf
  70. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/ois11.pdf
  71. http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/148219/PARKOFF-THESIS-2012.pdf
  72. https://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlj/2009/cdlj2009_007.html
  73. https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/meru/hd_meru.htm
  74. https://www.worldhistory.org/amorite/
  75. https://www.livius.org/articles/place/babylonian-empire/
  76. https://www.worldhistory.org/timeline/hammurabi/
  77. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/the-middle-babylonian-kassite-period-ca-1595-1155-b-c-in-mesopotamia
  78. https://iraqhistory.org/en/excavations-of-dur-kurigalzu/
  79. http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/ranghaya/kassites.htm
  80. https://etana.org/sites/default/files/coretexts/20257.pdf
  81. https://www.worldhistory.org/assyria/
  82. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/babylonia-i/
  83. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/ancient_records_assyria1.pdf
  84. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/745/the-mutual-destruction-of-sennacherib--babylon/
  85. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/321907
  86. https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2024/08/23/ashurbanipal-an-archaeological-biography/
  87. https://www.britishmuseum.org/blog/who-was-ashurbanipal
  88. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/mesopotamian-chronicles-content/abc-3-fall-of-nineveh-chronicle/
  89. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/babylonian-chronicles/
  90. https://www.academia.edu/37568578/Neo_Babylonian_Chaldean_Empire
  91. https://www.academia.edu/7666705/2014_Jursa_The_Neo_Babylonian_Empire
  92. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-ancient-history/neobabylonian-society-and-economy/96531719FFEE9691086B5A04725637A3
  93. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/mesopotamian-chronicles-content/abc-5-jerusalem-chronicle/
  94. https://inside.charlotte.edu/news-features/2019-08-12/evidence-587586-bce-babylonian-conquest-jerusalem-found-mount-zion/
  95. https://smarthistory.org/neo-babylonian/
  96. https://hal.science/hal-01854499v1/document
  97. https://www.academia.edu/251208/Temple_Economy_and_Religion_in_First_Millennium_Babylonia
  98. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/W_1880-0617-1941
  99. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-iran/babylonian-evidence-of-achaemenian-rule-in-mesopotamia/26FA8339690EC83F49C3C26FF4EDA31A
  100. https://alexander-the-great.org/alexanders-campaign/alexander-the-great-enters-babylon
  101. https://greekreporter.com/2025/09/06/alexander-the-great-babylon/
  102. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Seleucus-I-Nicator
  103. https://www.livius.org/articles/person/seleucus-i-nicator/
  104. https://www.hellenistichistory.com/2023/09/11/hellenistic-babylon-and-seleucid-imperial-ideology/
  105. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/mesopotamian-chronicles-content/bchp-6-ruin-of-esagila-chronicle/
  106. https://www.britannica.com/place/Seleucid-Empire
  107. https://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/exhibit/seleucids/essay.html
  108. https://www.livius.org/articles/person/arsaces-vi-mithradates-i-the-great/
  109. https://www.worldhistory.org/Parthia_%28Empire%29/
  110. https://www.parthia.com/parthia_hoards.htm
  111. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/babylonian-jews-and-sasanian-imperialism-in-late-antiquity/jewish-society-under-sasanian-rule/8CB679D46BD894BF9C2EFCA1440EC8BF
  112. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/gaon
  113. https://www.enotes.com/topics/ibn-battuta/criticism/criticism/ross-e-dunn-essay-date-1986
  114. https://psychosocial.com/index.php/ijpr/article/download/6904/6229/12511
  115. https://www.archnet.org/authorities/3699
  116. https://archeowiesci.pl/en/1739-bc-year-when-the-sumerian-civilization-collapsed/
  117. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-does-future-euphrates-spell-middle-east-180967224/
  118. https://www.en.ag.geschichte.uni-muenchen.de/research/rinbe/index.html
  119. https://www.academia.edu/43781263/The_Divine_Determinative_and_the_Names_of_Babylonian_Rulers
  120. https://isac.uchicago.edu/research/symposia/religion-and-power-divine-kingship-ancient-world-and-beyond-0
  121. https://www.ebl.lmu.de/dictionary/p%25C4%25ABh%25C4%2581tu%2520I
  122. https://journal.fi/store/article/view/89456/66859
  123. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/za-2020-0017/pdf?licenseType=restricted&srsltid=AfmBOorMMYQ3JWrrA_eP-SXUh8qlOsyK5woF03Fp7WuhVYdy_PMvdIcf
  124. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/mar/15/stone-tablets-mesopotamia-iraq-red-tape-bureaucracy
  125. https://academic.oup.com/book/45753/chapter/398233098
  126. https://www.academia.edu/97961495/_Taxation_and_Fiscal_Administration_in_Babylonia_
  127. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/fiscal-regimes-and-the-political-economy-of-premodern-states/ancient-near-east-and-egypt/964EC551EF6136E9C6991F3AE89DD229
  128. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/ancient/hammpre.asp
  129. https://forhistiur.net/en/2010-08-pfeifer/
  130. https://africame.factsanddetails.com/article/entry-1016.html
  131. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wat2.1230
  132. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/Publications/nn232.pdf
  133. https://janes.scholasticahq.com/article/2317-agriculture-of-the-old-babylonian-period/attachment/6258.pdf
  134. https://knowledgebasedsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/3740087.pdf
  135. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229515612_A_Defense_of_the_Theory_of_Progressive_Soil_Salinization_in_Ancient_Southern_Mesopotamia
  136. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140196325001594
  137. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1412087/2/Altaweel_Simulating_the_effects_of_salinization_on_irrigation_agriculture_in_southern_Mesopotamia.pdf
  138. https://oxfordre.com/asianhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277727-e-475
  139. https://www.fabriziomusacchio.com/weekend_stories/told/2025/2025-01-01-mesopotamian_lapis_lazuli_trade_route/
  140. https://books.openedition.org/momeditions/8176?lang=en
  141. https://www.academia.edu/660344/_Eanna_s_Trade_in_Wool_
  142. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01226052v1/document
  143. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400833580-006/html?lang=en
  144. https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2022-08/teminExplorEconHist2002.pdf
  145. https://cdli.earth/articles/cdlj/2017-2
  146. https://www.academia.edu/35604241/Trade_Routes_and_Commercial_Networks_in_the_Persian_Gulf_during_the_Third_Millennium_BC
  147. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/amgg/listofdeities/marduk/
  148. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/221/the-mesopotamian-pantheon/
  149. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/ois4.pdf
  150. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/225/enuma-elish---the-babylonian-epic-of-creation---fu/
  151. https://www.thecollector.com/ishtar-goddess-of-love-mesopotamia/
  152. https://dokumen.pub/mesopotamian-astrology-an-introduction-to-babylonian-amp-assyrian-celestial-divination-8772892870-9788772892870.html
  153. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/ois6.pdf
  154. https://www.livius.org/articles/place/babylon/esagila/
  155. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5615/jcunestud.70.2018.0189
  156. https://www.gatewaystobabylon.com/religion/akitu.htm
  157. https://indroyc.com/2023/04/01/akitu-feast-a-celebration-of-new-beginnings-in-ancient-mesopotamia/
  158. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/research/research-projects/humanities/the-social-world-of-babylonian-priests
  159. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004444799/BP000009.xml
  160. https://www.academia.edu/3465953/_The_Late_Babylonian_Temple_Economy_Politics_and_Cult_
  161. https://academic.oup.com/book/28459/chapter/229049734
  162. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/iraq/article/two-old-babylonian-marriage-contracts-from-isin/F401B9DB57FA9273261EF24C5029B280
  163. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1349279/1/454702_vol1.pdf
  164. https://www.beerandbrewing.com/how-women-brewsters-saved-the-world
  165. https://knowledgebasedsociety.com/eduba-the-old-babylonian-scribe-school/
  166. https://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~tony/whatsnew/may12/tablets/bab-mult2.html
  167. https://people.uncw.edu/hermanr/mat346/babylonian.pdf
  168. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/origins-trigonometry-may-lie-ancient-tablet-180964640/
  169. https://www.physics.unlv.edu/~jeffery/astro/babylon/venus_tablet.html
  170. https://ircamera.as.arizona.edu/NatSci102/NatSci102/text/babylonian.htm
  171. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1056&context=gvjh
  172. https://researchoutreach.org/articles/investigating-healing-arts-ancient-mesopotamia/
  173. https://www.jstor.org/stable/986109
  174. https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/74061/1/CAS-eSeries_Nr4_150610_20_Archiv.pdf
  175. https://gallerix.org/pnews/202505/arxitekturnye-innovacii-drevnego-vavilona/
  176. https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2019/10/17/nebuchadnezzar-an-archaeological-biography/
  177. https://magazine.byu.edu/article/doing-business-in-babylon/
  178. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iraq/babylon-walls.htm
  179. https://www.thearchaeologist.org/blog/the-walls-of-babylon-fact-or-fiction
  180. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/iraq/article/tower-of-babylon-stele-found-in-babylon/A712F186B2FA1965854911081620467B
  181. https://www.schoyencollection.com/history-collection-introduction/babylonian-history-collection/tower-babel-stele-ms-2063
  182. https://armstronginstitute.org/125-nebuchadnezzars-tower-of-babel
  183. https://case.edu/lifelonglearning/sites/default/files/2020-02/VanBeek-ArchesAndVaultsInTheAncientNearEast-ScientificAmerican-1987.pdf
  184. https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-asia/inside-etemenanki-real-life-tower-babel-0010025
  185. https://www.academia.edu/35603966/Labor_in_the_Early_States_An_Early_Mesopotamian_Perspective
  186. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=123
  187. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/babylonia-enemy-of-assyria
  188. https://www.thearchaeologist.org/blog/warfare-and-strategy-in-ancient-mesopotamia
  189. https://uasvbible.org/2024/09/03/what-can-we-learn-from-the-life-and-reign-of-nebuchadnezzar-ii/
  190. https://www.bibleodyssey.org/articles/babylonian-accounts-of-the-invasion-of-judah/
  191. https://apologeticspress.org/unbeatable-babylon-4471/
  192. https://www.bibleodyssey.org/articles/babylonian-accounts-of-the-invasion-of-judah
  193. http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/imperialism/readings/babylonianchronicle.html
  194. https://www.thetorah.com/article/the-history-leading-up-to-the-destruction-of-judah
  195. https://worldhistoryedu.com/the-siege-of-jerusalem-by-nebuchadnezzar-ii/
  196. https://www.livius.org/sources/content/herodotus/cyrus-takes-babylon/
  197. https://popular-archaeology.com/article/the-fall-of-babylon-a-reassessment/
  198. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/economy-of-late-achaemenid-and-seleucid-babylonia/economy-of-late-achaemenid-and-seleucid-babylonia-state-of-the-problem-methodology-and-sources/F53BE9CBAFCF85C408AC3D840B529C5A
  199. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230035623_A_review_of_Holocene_avulsions_of_the_Tigris_and_Euphrates_Rivers_and_possible_effects_on_the_evolution_of_civilizations_in_Lower_Mesopotamia
  200. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379108002163
  201. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440311004675
  202. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/iraq/article/new-insights-on-the-role-of-environmental-dynamics-shaping-southern-mesopotamia-from-the-preubaid-to-the-early-islamic-period/F7084E4BF1171D8B77021B286BFE300C
  203. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339952803_Geomorphology_of_the_Mesopotamian_Plain_A_Critical_Review
  204. https://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2013/cyrus-cylinder
  205. https://nmspacemuseum.org/inductee/hipparchus/
  206. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00033790.2010.545983
  207. https://www.syriacstudies.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/67168718.pdf
  208. https://journal.fi/store/article/view/129801/78657
  209. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26572347
  210. https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/the-tower-of-babel-pieter-bruegel-the-elder/bAGKOdJfvfAhYQ?hl=en
  211. https://www.boijmans.nl/en/collection/in-depth/bruegel-s-tower-of-babel
  212. https://jhna.org/articles/come-let-us-make-a-city-and-a-tower-pieter-bruegel-the-elder-tower-of-babel-creation-harmonious-community-antwerp/
  213. https://worldhistoryedu.com/assyrian-reliefs-purpose-major-themes-artistic-style/
  214. https://www.quora.com/Are-there-any-movies-set-in-ancient-Babylon
  215. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/babylon
  216. https://www.thearchaeologist.org/blog/the-reconstruction-of-babylon-under-saddam-hussein-a-controversial-legacy
  217. https://whc.unesco.org/en/activities/586/
  218. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jan/15/iraq.arts1
  219. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna12316998
  220. https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2005/02/01/us-base-has-caused-shocking-damage-to-babylon
  221. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/attack-on-ancient-babylon/
  222. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8142929.stm
  223. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/06/world/middleeast/babylon-iraq-archeology-conservation.html
  224. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/278/
  225. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2019/7/5/iraqs-babylon-listed-as-world-heritage-site-by-unesco
  226. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-48888893
  227. https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2025/09/12/how-the-restoration-of-ancient-babylon-is-helping-to-draw-tourists-back-to-iraq
  228. https://cultureincrisis.org/projects/conservation-of-the-ishtar-gate-part-of-the-future-of-babylon-project
  229. https://www.cyark.org/projects/babylon/3D-Explorer
  230. https://www.einscan.com/art-and-heritage/einscan-saves-ancient-babylon-civilization/
  231. https://www.news8000.com/lifestyle/babylon-was-once-an-ancient-wonder-today-it-s-a-very-different-story/article_3ec22eb3-ece8-552a-8044-ef1934182f4f.html
  232. https://www.travelandtourworld.com/news/article/iraqs-tourism-industry-booms-to-5-7-billion-as-baghdad-babylon-and-karbala-lead-the-way-for-growth-heres-everything-you-need-to-know/
  233. https://www.iraqinews.com/iraq/babylon-tourism-drive-industrial-capital/
  234. https://www.travelandtourworld.com/news/article/how-iraqs-babylon-is-transforming-tourism-and-economy-with-major-infrastructure-projects-and-unesco-heritage-preservation/
  235. https://english.aawsat.com/home/article/2792076/iraq%25E2%2580%2599s-beleaguered-babylon-doing-battle-against-time-water-and-modern
  236. https://www.history.com/articles/hanging-gardens-existed-but-not-in-babylon
  237. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/hanging-gardens-of-babylon-in-assyrian-nineveh/
  238. https://armstronginstitute.org/1054-the-hanging-gardens-of-nineveh
  239. https://academic.oup.com/book/9858/chapter/157142626
  240. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/may/05/babylon-hanging-garden-wonder-nineveh
  241. https://archaeology.org/issues/online/collection/hanging-garden/secrets-of-the-seven-wonders/
  242. https://biblearchaeology.org/research/patriarchal-era/2695-is-there-archaeological-evidence-for-the-tower-of-babel
  243. https://biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/bbr/tower_walton.pdf
  244. https://answersresearchjournal.org/where-is-the-tower-of-babel/
  245. https://www.thetorah.com/article/the-tower-of-babel-a-polemic-against-marduks-temple-esagil
  246. https://soas-repository.worktribe.com/OutputFile/421533
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.