Hubbry Logo
BardingBardingMain
Open search
Barding
Community hub
Barding
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Barding
Barding
Barding
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A museum display of a sixteenth-century knight with an armoured horse
Chinese Song dynasty lamellar horse barding as illustrated on Wujing Zongyao

Barding (also spelled bard or barb) is body armour for war-horses.[1] The practice of armoring horses first developed extensively in antiquity in the Asian kingdoms of Parthia and Pahlava. After the conquests of Alexander the Great in the 4th century BCE it likely made its way - along with cataphract technology - into European military practices via the Seleucid Empire[2] and later the Byzantine Empire.[citation needed] Though its historical roots lie in antiquity in the regions of what was once the Persian Empire, barded horses have become a symbol of the late European Middle Ages chivalry and the era of knights.

Examples of armour for horses could be found as far back as classical antiquity. Many historians believe that cataphracts, with scale armour for both rider and horse, influenced the later European knights, via contact with the Byzantine Empire.[3]

During the Late Middle Ages as armour protection for knights became more effective, their mounts became targets. This vulnerability was exploited by the Scots at the Battle of Bannockburn in the 14th century, when horses were killed by the infantry, and by the English at the Battle of Crécy in the same century where long-bowmen shot horses and the then dismounted French knights were killed by heavy infantry. Barding developed as a response to such events.

The full bard was developed by Lorenz Helmschmied and Konrad Seusenhofer for Maximilian I, who used them extensively for propagandic and aesthetic purposes, as well as diplomatic gifts.

Surviving period examples of barding are rare; however, complete sets are on display at the Philadelphia Museum of Art,[4] the Wallace Collection in London, the Royal Armouries in Leeds, and the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. Horse armour could be made in whole or in part of cuir bouilli (hardened leather), but surviving examples of this are especially rare.[5]

Cataphracts

[edit]
Main article: Cataphract
Taq-e Bostan: equestrian statue of Khosrow II as a cataphract

A cataphract was a cavalryman in full armour riding a horse that was partially or fully armoured. This type of cavalry originated in central Asia and was adopted by the eastern satrapies of the ancient Persian Empire.[6]

The Seleucid cataphract used scale armour because of its flexibility and effective protection against archers and also because, unlike regular metal types, it was not too heavy for the horses.[7]

European barding

[edit]
See also: Cultural depictions of Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor § Armour and weapons
Albrecht May, Master-of-Arms, entering Namur, riding a horse wearing his master Maximilian I's bard in 1480. The bard is crafted by Lorenz Helmschmied. The female figure is likely Mary of Burgundy, the contemporary ruler of the Burgundian State and wife of Maximilian, holding the combined heraldry of Austria and Burgundy.
Maximilian I on an armored horse, ca. 1575, from Eine Reihe von in Farben zum Theil schön ausgeführten Bildern, Herzog August Bibliothek, Wolfenbüttel.
Notice the breastplate(s) with the griffin: according to Kirchhoff, this breastplate and the (double-headed) imperial eagle cruppers from the bard made for Frederick III above seemed to have been combined with other parts by Maximilian to create the full bard that he used in Strasbourg, 1492.

The full bard is a "complete ensemble of horse armour", created for Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor, by master armourers from Augsburg and Innsbruck like Lorenz Helmschmied and Konrad Seusenhofer. The development of the full bard was also connected with the development of Maximilian armour and the Landsknecht (all three arose from the time Maximilian was in Burgundian Netherlands), as both human and equine combatants required more and more protection. But the full bard was expensive and only the richest knights could afford it.[8][9]

The celebrated Augsburg maker Lorenz Helmschmied made the most technologically developed and also the most complete of the full bards, "The Helmschmid workshop also produced spectacular bards that all but completely enclosed the horse’s body (26.261.14), including the underside of the girth and abdomen, as well as the legs. Complete to the extreme, and of such technical complexity and considerable expense that they were most likely intended solely for ceremonial purposes and as diplomatic gifts.".[10]

The extremely elaborated and innovative bards crafted by Lorenz Helmschmied were important as iconographic and propagandic devices for Maximilian in his Burgundian years, as the horse wearing his bards served as living banners for the master even when he could not be present himself. Maximilian utilized the technological expertise of Augsburg, renowned for its innovative wonders and automata, for his bards that, in combination with equine and human performances, would produce optical and technological marvels corresponding to the Burgundian entremets for the Burgundian viewers. Kirchhoff writes that, "In its most luxurious iterations, horse armor did far more than protect an expensive and extensively trained steed. It transformed the animal’s body into a moving sculpture and a communicative surface upon which to inscribe the iconography of power. In the case of the bard now in Vienna, the crupper plates that encase the horse’s flanks form imperial double eagles that are enlivened by etched feathers and emblazoned with an escutcheon bearing the arms of Austria. The corresponding crupper shown in images of the 1480 entries uses the marshalled heraldry of the Habsburg and Burgundian dynasties,supported by a figure that resembles the duchess herself, to declare the consolidation of Mary and Maximilian’s power [...] No surviving equine armor approaches the technical and visual ambition of the articulated bard, and the Helmschmids are the only armorers known to have created matrixes of steel plates flexible enough to encase a horse’s entire lower body as it moved. Indeed, this type of armor became associated with Maximilian, who continued to commission bards that covered horses’ legs and bellies to arm his own steeds and also as diplomatic gifts to forge alliances and demonstrate Habsburg power." The recipients of these bards included Sigismund I the Old, who was presented with "two coursers all covered with steel to the fetlocks and the belly, save in the spurring place".[9] Another case was Henry VIII's so-called Burgundian bard.[11]

When the parts are interchangeable, parts of different bards can be mixed to create a full bard. Maximilian seemed to have reattached this bard's imperial eagle cruppers from the bard made fore Frederick III (and crafted by Helmschmìed and Seusenhofer, as shown in the image above) to parts from other bards for a procession in Strasbourg on 31 August 1492, described by the Venetian diplomat Andrea Franceschi as “horse armored from head to foot – an extremely glittering sight!”. According Franceschi's letter, "the animal’s breast was emblazoned with two griffins and on each of its flanks was the imperial eagle."[12][13]

Elements

[edit]
Milanese parade chanfron of Grandmaster Alof de Wignacourt, c. 1600, displayed at the Palace Armoury, Valletta, Malta
Chanfron, Gaya confederacy
Renaissance Italian horse armor c. 1575, showing the chanfron protecting the horse's head, with small rondel and spike. Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland OH
A chanfron made in Italy in the early 16th century
Fragments of a set of armour with a criniere (protecting neck), peytral (protecting chest) and the croupiere (protecting hind quarters). This set was created by Lorenz Helmschmied and Konrad Seusenhofer for Frederick III, Holy Roman Emperor and later also used by his son Maximilian I. Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna, Austria.
Peytral with decorative openings, early 16th century, Germany
This 15th-century depiction of a tournament shows fully caparisoned horses, from Le Livre des tournois by Barthélemy d'Eyck.

The chanfron (also spelled chaffron, chamfron, champion, chamfron, chamfrein, champron, and shaffron) was designed to protect the horse's face. Sometimes this included hinged cheek plates. A decorative feature common to many chanfrons is a rondel with a small spike.[14] The chanfron was known as early as ancient Greece, but vanished from use in Europe until the mid eleventh century[15] when metal plates replaced boiled leather as protection for war horses. The basic design of the chanfron remained stable until it became obsolete in the seventeenth century, although late examples are often notable for engraved decoration. A chanfron extended from the horse's ears to its muzzle. Flanges often covered the eyes. In an open chanfron, the eyes received no protection. Hinged extensions to cover the jowls were commonly used for jousting tournaments.[16] The enigmatic Torrs pony-cap from Scotland appears to be a bronze chanfron from about the 2nd century BC, perhaps later fitted with the bronze horns found with it.

The criniere (also known as manefaire or crinet) was a set of segmented plates that protected the horse's neck. In full barding this consisted of two combinations of articulated lames that pivoted on loose rivets. One set of lames covered the mane and the other covered the neck. These connected to the peytral and the chanfron.[17] Light barding used only the upper lames. Three straps held the crinet in place around the neck.[17] It is thought that thin metal was used for these plates, perhaps 0.8 mm. Mail armour was often affixed to the crinet and wrapped about the horse's neck for additional protection.

The croupiere (also crupiere bacul or crupper) protected the horse's hind quarters. It could be made from any combination of leather, mail, or plate armour.

The flanchards, used to protect the flank, attached to the side of the saddle, then around the front or rear of the horse and back to the saddle again. These appear to have been metal plates riveted to leather or in some cases cuir bouilli armour (which is boiled or treated leather sealed with beeswax or the like). They sometimes had openings designed to allow the rider to use spurs.

The peytral was designed to protect the chest of the horse, while the croupiere protected the rear. It sometimes stretched as far back as the saddle.

Barding was often used in conjunction with cloth covers known as caparisons. These coverings sometimes covered the entire horse from nose to tail and extended to the ground. It is unclear from period illustrations how much metal defensive covering was used in conjunction. Textile covers may also be called barding.

Another commonly included feature of barding was protection for the reins, so they could not be cut. This could be metal plates riveted to them or chainmail linked around them.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Barding

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Barding, also known as horse armor, is protective equipment designed to shield war horses from enemy attacks during battle, typically consisting of metal plates, , , or coverings that mirror the development of human armor. Employed primarily by elite units, barding enhanced the survivability of both rider and mount, allowing for more aggressive charges and prolonged engagements on the . The origins of barding trace back to the B.C. in and the , where it was introduced from Eastern influences using iron or bronze scales stiffened with leather or thick felt blankets for partial coverage of the 's body, neck, and head. By the A.D., Persian and Sassanid cataphracts—fully armored and rider combinations—perfected this tactic, as evidenced by archaeological finds like the intact scale armor sets discovered at in 1932, which highlighted the use of layered metal plates buckled or slipped over the animal like a . In , barding reemerged in the with the adoption of hauberks and padded caparisons, evolving into full plate ensembles by the 15th century as knighthood and chivalric warfare intensified. Key components of barding included the shaffron for head protection, crinet for the neck, peytral for the chest, flanchards for the sides, and for the rump, often customized with decorative elements like , , or inlays to denote status. Materials varied by era and region: early examples favored hardened (cuir bouilli) or for lighter weight, while late medieval and pieces relied on tempered for comprehensive defense, as seen in the ornate bard for I (ca. 1485–1490) or the ceremonial set for of (ca. 1630–1640). Though effective, full barding was resource-intensive and logistically challenging, contributing to its decline after the 1580s as firearms and rendered heavily armored obsolete.

Historical Origins

Ancient Barding in the East

Barding refers to protective coverings designed for warhorses, with the earliest evidence appearing in Assyrian reliefs dating to around 900 BCE, which depict armored mounts used in warfare. These initial forms provided partial protection, such as chest defenses, evolving over centuries in Eastern civilizations to support mounted combat tactics. In the Achaemenid Empire (c. 550–330 BCE), horse barding transitioned from partial coverings to more comprehensive designs, influenced by the need to shield animals in shock cavalry engagements. Materials typically included bronze scales sewn onto leather or cloth backings, offering flexibility and defense against projectiles while allowing mobility. This evolution marked a shift toward full-body protection, setting the foundation for later heavy cavalry units. Cataphract armor, a hallmark of Eastern , emerged prominently among Persian, Parthian, and Sasanian forces from the 5th century BCE through the 7th century CE, featuring full-body horse protection constructed from overlapping scale or lamellar plates of or iron attached to underlayers. These coverings extended from the horse's head to tail, excluding the legs for maneuverability, and included specialized components like chanfrons for the head and peytrals for the chest to safeguard vital areas during charges. Worn by elite riders similarly clad in scale or , this armor emphasized both protection and intimidation on the battlefield. The tactical significance of barding lay in enabling devastating shock charges by heavily armored , which could shatter enemy formations when combined with horse archers. A prime example is the in 53 BCE, where approximately 1,000 Parthian cataphracts, supported by archers, encircled and overwhelmed a Roman force of over 30,000, using repeated charges to exploit gaps created by arrow volleys and ultimately routing the legions. This approach highlighted barding's role in transforming into an unstoppable force against unarmored foot soldiers. Artistic depictions in Achaemenid seals and reliefs illustrate early partial barding on mounts, while Sasanian artifacts, such as rock reliefs at and , portray fully scaled horses from head to tail, complete with ornate chanfrons and peytrals that underscore both functional and symbolic importance. These representations, often found in palace friezes and seal impressions, reveal the progressive coverage and metallic embellishments that defined Eastern barding traditions. This Eastern innovation in barding influenced Western adoption through Hellenistic intermediaries, as Greek forces encountered and occasionally adapted Persian-style protections during conflicts in the 4th century BCE.

Early Adoption in the West

The adoption of barding in Western cultures began with Hellenistic influences following the Great's campaigns against the Persian Empire in the 4th century BCE. Encountering Persian cataphracts—fully armored units that inspired tactical adaptations— incorporated elements of this style into his Macedonian forces, enhancing the Companions' with protective horse coverings to counter Eastern . This marked an early Western shift toward barded equine units, though full cataphract configurations remained more prevalent in successor states like the Seleucids. In the and early Empire, barding saw limited and experimental use, primarily among auxiliary cavalry from the BCE. or felt coverings protected horses' foreheads (chamfrons) and sides, as evidenced by archaeological finds from sites like and Newstead in Britain, dated to the late 1st to early CE; these were typically 4-5 mm thick, sometimes reinforced with metal studs for auxiliary alae and cohortes equitatae facing . By the CE, under (r. 253–268 CE), reforms expanded heavy cavalry, evolving partial barding to metal-reinforced versions, such as bronze scale armor covering the chest, flanks, and neck, as seen in the hoard from (ca. 250 CE), comprising over 2,000 scales for side hangings that allowed mobility while shielding vital areas. The Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire continued and refined this tradition from the 6th to 10th centuries CE, with the Strategikon (ca. 600 CE) describing iron protections for the heads and breastplates for horses of elite heavy cavalry (), providing partial safeguarding of vital areas suited to Eastern frontiers. Key artifacts, such as Roman tombstones from the (2nd–3rd century CE) and other Roman-era mosaics and reliefs, depict horses with partial protections like breast and flank guards, contrasting fuller Eastern styles by prioritizing lighter, partial coverage for speed in Mediterranean campaigns. Western adoption lagged due to tactical preferences for infantry-heavy legions, diverse terrains favoring foot soldiers over mounted charges, and logistical challenges in supplying barding for large armies, as often relied on local recruits unaccustomed to heavy equine gear. Germanic tribes integrated into Roman service showed minimal barding use until (4th–5th centuries CE), scavenging Roman pieces sporadically but favoring unarmored mobility in forested regions until adopting fuller Roman styles post-integration.

Medieval Developments

European Barding Evolution

The evolution of barding in medieval began with its reintroduction in the 12th century, facilitated by contacts during the , where European knights encountered Eastern equestrian protections. Early depictions, such as those from the , show rudimentary fabric caparisons—primarily quilted trappers—for protection against arrows and lances, marking the initial spread of the practice from Byzantine and Islamic influences encountered in the during the (1096–1099). Barding reached its peak in the 14th and 15th centuries, paralleling advances in human plate armor, as armorers transitioned from mail and padded trappers to reinforced plate constructions that covered the horse's neck (crinet), chest (peytral), and rump (croupière) for comprehensive protection. This development was driven by the need to safeguard warhorses in close-quarters melee, where knights increasingly fought dismounted or in mixed formations, and to counter crossbow and longbow fire in tournaments and battles. Full plate bardings became standard for elite heavy cavalry by the mid-15th century, allowing horses to withstand lance charges and sword strikes while maintaining mobility. A pivotal event underscoring this evolution was the Battle of Agincourt in 1415, where English longbowmen targeted the partially armored horses of the French knights, causing chaos in the mud. However, the rise of gunpowder weapons in the late 15th century—such as handgonnes and early cannons—accelerated the decline of barding, as projectiles rendered heavy armor ineffective and burdensome for prolonged campaigns. Regional variations reflected tactical and economic differences across Europe: in and , heavier plate bardings were more prevalent on the battlefield due to reliance on shock cavalry tactics, while in , lighter quilted or partial coverings sufficed, influenced by archery-heavy armies that prioritized horse speed over encumbrance. Tournament applications often featured ornate, full-coverage bardings for display and safety during jousts, such as those documented in 14th-century Italian tournaments, contrasting with the more utilitarian, abbreviated sets on battlefields to avoid during extended marches. Socioeconomically, barding served as a potent status symbol for the nobility, with complete sets costing the equivalent of multiple warhorses—often £50 or more in late 15th-century terms—thus restricting its use to elite warriors who could afford the expense and logistical support.

Influence from Eastern Traditions

The Crusades served as a primary conduit for the transmission of Eastern barding techniques to medieval , particularly during the when European knights encountered advanced horse armors employed by and Seljuq forces in the . This exposure led to the gradual adoption of lamellar elements—small overlapping plates of or metal laced together—in European barding designs, especially among knights stationed in the . Trade routes along the Mediterranean further facilitated the exchange, with Venetian and Genoese merchants importing Eastern armor components that influenced local workshops by the early . The Mongol invasions of the 13th century exerted a profound impact on Eastern European barding practices, particularly in and , where steppe-style protections were incorporated to counter the invaders' mobile tactics. These adaptations enhanced mobility for Eastern European , blending nomadic resilience with local traditions amid the ongoing threat of Mongol incursions. Islamic contributions from the Ottoman and other empires reached Europe via the and during the , culminating in 1492, where cultural exchanges introduced ornate and functional barding features. In under Norman rule and in , Christian forces encountered Islamic-style head defenses and decorative hindquarter protections with quilted silk and metallic scales. These elements, transmitted through captured armors and artisan migrations, influenced Spanish and Italian designs, emphasizing both protection and aesthetic splendor. Ottoman examples, such as 16th-century ceremonial gilt copper chanfrons, further exemplified this fusion, with their polished metal adapted for parade barding in -era tournaments. European hybridization of Eastern techniques peaked in the , as seen in Italian armories where scale mail—overlapping small plates derived from Islamic and precedents—was combined with emerging Western plate components for comprehensive coverage. Workshops in and produced barding sets integrating scale trappers over plate peytrals (chest guards), offering flexibility for while maintaining rigidity against thrusts; such hybrids appear in Tuscan from the 1370s. This synthesis addressed the limitations of pure plate by incorporating scale's arrow resistance, reflecting broader cultural exchanges. The long-term legacy of these Eastern influences manifested in European heraldry and artistic representations, where motifs like interlocking scales persisted in illuminated manuscripts depicting barding. Late 14th-century German codices illustrating scenes feature armors textured with patterns reminiscent of Eastern lamellar, symbolizing exotic prowess. These designs infiltrated chivalric , underscoring the enduring cultural imprint on Western aesthetics.

Design and Components

Protective Elements

The protective elements of barding focused on shielding the horse from direct weapon impacts, such as thrusts, slashes, and strikes, while maintaining mobility for maneuvers. These components evolved from rudimentary coverings to sophisticated modular designs, prioritizing defense without excessively hindering the animal's movement. Head armor, known as the chanfron or shaffron, consisted of full-face metal plates that covered from the ears to the nostrils, featuring narrow eye slits for vision and ventilation holes to prevent overheating. This design specifically guarded against penetrating strikes during charges, deflecting blows that could otherwise fracture the skull. Early forms appeared around as or fabric masks reinforced with metal, but by the mid-15th century, they had advanced to articulated plates for greater durability and fit. Body coverage included the peytral for the chest, flanchards for the sides, and for the rear, constructed as interlocking or layered modular pieces that could be adjusted for different sizes. The peytral, a curved plate over the chest and shoulders, absorbed and distributed the force of frontal impacts and cuts, often angling downward to glance off blows. Flanchards provided overlapping side protection against flanking attacks, while the crupper shielded the hindquarters and tail from rear strikes, all layered with underlying to spread impact energy and reduce bruising. These elements were typically fastened via straps under the , allowing flexibility for galloping while covering vital areas. Neck protection, termed the crinet, utilized flexible or segmented plate links extending from the chanfron to the shoulders, enabling free head movement crucial for directional charges and evasion. This component countered slashing wounds to the vulnerable throat and upper neck from overhead strikes or opportunistic arrows, with plates often riveted to allow articulation without gaps. By the , crinets were standard in full barding sets for elite . Leg and underbelly guards were less common due to their added weight and complexity but essential in comprehensive full barding to prevent debilitating slashes from ground-level weapons. These typically employed lightweight splints of metal or hardened fabric draped over the limbs and , focusing on averting deep cuts rather than . Such protections appeared sporadically in 16th-century examples for high-status mounts, often integrated as extensions of the flanchards. Historical reconstructions demonstrate barding's defensive efficacy, particularly when combining plate or with padded layers; tests against period arrows showed penetration depths reduced to 20-60 mm—often non-lethal for —compared to unarmored equivalents that suffered full and fatal injuries. Against broad-bladed arrows and swords, these setups mitigated severe wounding in most short engagements, though effectiveness diminished over prolonged use due to (typically 18-40 kg total).

Decorative and Functional Features

Barding often incorporated heraldic embellishments to signify the knight's lineage and identity on the or in tournaments. These included , plumes, and embroidered coats-of-arms applied to fabric caparisons, which draped over the horse's body and head. Such decorations emerged prominently from the late , with caparisons bearing the rider's heraldic colors or full arms to aid recognition amid the chaos of . For instance, 14th-century jousting sets frequently featured these elements, as seen in surviving illustrations and artifacts where embroidered adorned the horse's covering to project status and allegiance. Functional add-ons enhanced rider stability without compromising the barding's primary role, such as integrated straps for securing attachments. These features, common in 15th-century designs, helped keep the in place during intense maneuvers, blending utility with the covering's aesthetic layers. Caparisons themselves contributed to this by providing a stable base that helped keep the in place during intense maneuvers. Quilted linings with strategic slits further addressed ventilation and comfort, preventing equine overheating in multi-layered setups; vertical slits at the bottom of caparisons permitted free leg movement while allowing air circulation, a practical adaptation noted in medieval depictions of warhorses. Symbolic elements added layers of meaning beyond protection, incorporating religious icons and animal motifs to inspire or intimidate. Crusader barding often displayed es, such as the red on Templar caparisons, symbolizing faith and divine favor during the Holy Wars of the 12th and 13th centuries. Animal motifs, like lions or eagles, evoked ferocity and nobility, serving roles. A notable example appears in the achievements over Edward the Black Prince's in (1376), where the horse bears his heraldic ostrich feathers and other emblems, underscoring chivalric heritage and military legacy. Adaptations for display distinguished parade barding from combat variants, emphasizing opulence with , , and occasional gems to dazzle audiences at ceremonies or tournaments. These pieces, prevalent from the 15th to 16th centuries, featured embossed or plates with gilt fringes on chanfrons and cruppers, transforming the horse into a mobile of wealth and prestige. Unlike utilitarian battlefield gear, such barding prioritized visual splendor, as exemplified in ceremonial sets for like those crafted in 16th-century , where decorative and accents highlighted the rider's rank.

Materials and Construction

Common Materials Used

Throughout history, barding relied on a variety of materials chosen for their protective qualities, availability, and adaptability to equine movement. In the 11th to 13th centuries, foundational forms of barding often utilized and textiles, such as boiled or hardened leather (cuir bouilli) and quilted padded cloth known as gambesons, which provided flexible, lightweight protection suitable for early caparisons and underlayers. These materials were affordable and allowed for mobility, with padded cloth versions using layers of or wool stuffed for cushioning against impacts. Metallic elements evolved from ancient bronze scales used in Eastern horse armor as early as the Achaemenid period (5th-4th century BCE), with Parthian and later examples incorporating iron and from the 3rd century BCE onward for their durability and scalability in forming flexible yet resistant coverings, to iron and plates dominant in medieval European barding by the mid-15th century. , produced by , was tempered through and heating to achieve levels of approximately 40-50 Rockwell C (Rc), balancing toughness against brittleness for effective deflection of blows. European armorers sourced iron primarily from pre-Alpine regions like the Tyrol in the , where local blooms were folded and forged into plates. In Eastern traditions, composite layers incorporated or felt underlays beneath or lamellar links, valued for their ability to facilitate removal by twisting around the shaft upon penetration, thus minimizing wound damage during Central Asian campaigns. These underlays, often sourced from regional or in nomadic areas, provided additional and insulation, contrasting with Europe's metal-focused designs. Durability in barding involved trade-offs between weight and protection; full steel ensembles typically added 20-40 kg to a horse's load, significantly impacting in prolonged engagements while offering superior resistance compared to lighter or alternatives.

Manufacturing Techniques

In ancient Eastern traditions, particularly among the Parthians and Sasanians, barding was crafted by or riveting small metallic scales onto a backing of , felt, or to form flexible protective layers. Archaeological evidence from sites like reveals bronze and iron scale sets affixed via riveting or , with thongs or ropes used to elements together, enhancing mobility for charges while covering the horse's trunk and excluding areas like the crupper top for ventilation. During the medieval period in , blacksmiths employed techniques to shape plate components for barding, hammering heated iron or over anvils into curved forms such as peytrals and chanfrons, followed by annealing—controlled heating and slow cooling—to soften the metal, reduce brittleness, and prevent cracking during use. In 15th-century , specialized guilds and armories, including those of families like the Missaglias, focused on producing high-quality plate horse armor, often matching human suits in craftsmanship and exporting sets across for elite knights. Assembly processes emphasized modularity, with pieces like crinets, flanchards, and cruppers connected via lacing, buckles, or sliding rivets to achieve a custom fit tailored to horse breeds, especially heavy destriers bred for shock combat, allowing adjustments for girth, leg length, and saddle integration without restricting gait. Artisans used tools such as shears for trimming plates, punches for creating rivet holes and articulations, and sledges for initial forging, with production typically involving teams of 5-10 skilled workers—including hammermen, millmen, and apprentices—per complete barding set, drawing from 14th-century English armorer contracts and workshop inventories that document collaborative labor in royal and guild settings. Quality control involved proofing tests simulating battlefield stresses, such as or discharges against joints and plates to verify integrity, with approved pieces marked by stamps like the London Armourers' Company's mark of an "A" surmounted by a to confirm resilience before delivery.

References

  1. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/horse-armor-in-europe
  2. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/cataphracts-barding-the-history-of-horse-armor/
  3. https://www.academia.edu/5415651/Armures_perses
  4. https://www.worldhistory.org/Parthian_Cataphract/
  5. https://www.academia.edu/8345015/Sasanian_Horse_Armor
  6. https://www.britannica.com/event/Battle-of-Carrhae
  7. https://x-legio.com/file/79/Evidence%20for%20horse%20armour%20in%20the%20Roman%20Army%20-%20Sebastian%20Schuckelt.pdf
  8. https://artgallery.yale.edu/collections/objects/34666
  9. https://jmss.org/article/download/58167/43770/158451
  10. https://archaeologicahereditas.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/roman_horsemen_against_germanic_tribes..pdf
  11. https://resources.metmuseum.org/resources/metpublications/pdf/The_Armored_Horse_in_Europe_1480_1620.pdf
  12. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/arms-and-armor-common-misconceptions-and-frequently-asked-questions
  13. https://journals.openedition.org/arabianhumanities/3293
  14. https://www.medievalists.net/2012/11/horse-armor-in-medieval-and-renaissance-europe-an-overview/
  15. https://collections.lacma.org/node/251292
  16. https://www.historynet.com/an-inside-look-at-medieval-horse-armor/
  17. https://exarc.net/issue-2022-1/ea/evaluation-mail-horse-armour
  18. https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/horse-armor-0016506
  19. https://www.drpaulfoxfsa.com/crusades-and-heraldry
  20. http://weiner-gozen.blogspot.com/2015/02/horse-barding-types-and-styles-during.html
  21. http://medievalhorseandclothing.com/about_horses/horse_trappings.html
  22. https://d-nb.info/1212213645/34
  23. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/armor
  24. http://oakeshott.org/some-aspects-of-the-metallurgy-and-production-of-european-armor/
  25. https://www.utc.edu/sites/default/files/2020-12/mongols.pdf
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363159991_Sasanian_horse_armor
  27. https://www.stormthecastle.com/blacksmithing/ebooks/the-armourer-and-his-craft-pdf.pdf
  28. https://www.academia.edu/73174108/Armourers_and_their_workshops_the_tools_and_techniques_of_late_medieval_armour_production
  29. https://european-armour.com/Marks.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.