Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Hexadecimal
View on Wikipedia
| Part of a series on |
| Numeral systems |
|---|
| List of numeral systems |
Hexadecimal (hex for short) is a positional numeral system for representing a numeric value as base 16. For the most common convention, a digit is represented as "0" to "9" like for decimal and as a letter of the alphabet from "A" to "F" (either upper or lower case) for the digits with decimal value 10 to 15.
As typical computer hardware is binary in nature and that hex is power of 2, the hex representation is often used in computing as a dense representation of binary information. A hex digit represents 4 contiguous bits – known as a nibble.[1] An 8-bit byte is two hex digits, such as 2C.
Special notation is often used to indicate that a number is hex. In mathematics, a subscript is typically used to specify the base. For example, the decimal value 491 would be expressed in hex as 1EB16. In computer programming, various notations are used. In C and many related languages, the prefix 0x is used. For example, 0x1EB.
Written representation
[edit]Common convention
[edit]Typically, a hex representation convention allows either lower or upper case letters and treats the letter the same regardless of its case.
Often when rendering non-textual data, a value stored in memory is displayed as a sequence of hex digits with spaces that between values. For instance, in the following hex dump, each 8-bit byte is a 2-digit hex number, with spaces between them, while the 32-bit offset at the start is an 8-digit hex number.
00000000 57 69 6B 69 70 65 64 69 61 2C 20 74 68 65 20 66
00000010 72 65 65 20 65 6E 63 79 63 6C 6F 70 65 64 69 61
00000020 20 74 68 61 74 20 61 6E 79 6F 6E 65 20 63 61 6E
00000030 20 65 64 69 74 2C 20 69 6E 63 6C 75 64 69 6E 67
00000040 20 79 6F 75 20 28 61 6E 64 20 6D 65 29 21
Identification
[edit]There are several conventions for expressing that a number is represented as hex.
- A decimal subscript can give the base explicitly. For example 15910 indicates decimal 159, 15916 indicates hex 159. Some prefer a text subscript, such as 159decimal and 159hex, or 159d and 159h
- In C and many languages influenced by it, the prefix
0xindicates that the numeric literal after it is in hex, a character of a string or character literal can be expressed as hex with the prefix\x(for example'\x1B'represents the Esc control character) and to output an integer as hex via printf-like function, the format conversion code%Xor%xis used
- In URIs (including URLs), character codes are written as hex pairs prefixed with
%:http://www.example.com/name%20with%20spaceswhere%20is the code for the space (blank) character, ASCII code point 20 in hex, 32 in decimal.
- In XML and XHTML, a character can be expressed as a hex numeric character reference using the notation
ode;, for instanceTrepresents the character U+0054 (the uppercase letter "T"). If there is noxthe number is decimal (thusTis the same character).[2]
- In Intel-derived assembly languages and Modula-2,[3] hex is denoted with a suffixed H or h:
FFhor05A3H. Some implementations require a leading zero when the first hex digit character is not a decimal digit, so one would write0FFhinstead ofFFh. Some other implementations (such as NASM) allow C-style numbers (0x42)
- Other assembly languages (6502, Motorola), Pascal, Delphi, some versions of BASIC (Commodore), GameMaker Language, Godot and Forth use
$as a prefix:$5A3,$C1F27ED
- Some assembly languages (Microchip) use the notation
H'ABCD'(for ABCD16); similarly, Fortran 95 uses Z'ABCD'
- Ada and VHDL enclose hex numerals in based "numeric quotes":
16#5A3#,16#C1F27ED#. For bit vector constants VHDL uses the notationx"5A3",x"C1F27ED".[4]
- Verilog represents hex constants in the form
8'hFF, where 8 is the number of bits in the value and FF is the hex constant
- PostScript and the Bourne shell and its derivatives denote hex with prefix
16#:16#5A3,16#C1F27ED
- Common Lisp uses the prefixes
#xand#16r. Setting the variables *read-base*[5] and *print-base*[6] to 16 can also be used to switch the reader and printer of a Common Lisp system to hex representation for reading and printing numbers. Thus hex numbers can be represented without the #x or #16r prefix code, when the input or output base has been changed to 16.
- MSX BASIC,[7] QuickBASIC, FreeBASIC and Visual Basic prefix hex numbers with
&H:&H5A3
- BBC BASIC and Locomotive BASIC use
&for hex[8]
- TI-89 and 92 series uses a
0hprefix:0h5A3,0hC1F27ED
- ALGOL 68 uses the prefix
16rto denote hex numbers:16r5a3,16rC1F27ED. Binary, quaternary (base-4), and octal numbers can be specified similarly.
- The most common format for hex on IBM mainframes (zSeries) and midrange computers (IBM i) running the traditional OS's (zOS, zVSE, zVM, TPF, IBM i) is
X'5A3'orX'C1F27ED', and is used in Assembler, PL/I, COBOL, JCL, scripts, commands and other places. This format was common on other (and now obsolete) IBM systems as well. Occasionally quotation marks were used instead of apostrophes.
- Donald Knuth used a typewriter typeface to represent hex in his book The TeXbook,[9] like: 5A3, C1F27ED
Implicit
[edit]In some contexts, a number is always written as hex, and therefore, needs no identification notation.
- In the Unicode standard, a character value is represented with
U+followed by the hex value, e.g.U+00A1is the inverted exclamation point (¡).
- Color references in HTML, CSS and X Window can be expressed with six hex digits (two each for the red, green and blue components, in that order) prefixed with
#: magenta, for example, is represented as#FF00FF.[10] CSS also allows 3-hexdigit abbreviations with one hexdigit per component:#FA3abbreviates#FFAA33(a golden orange: ).
- In MIME (e-mail extensions) quoted-printable encoding, character codes are written as hex pairs prefixed with
=:Espa=F1ais "España" (F1hex is the code for ñ in the ISO/IEC 8859-1 character set).[11])
- PostScript binary data (such as image pixels) can be expressed as unprefixed consecutive hex pairs:
AA213FD51B3801043FBC... - Any IPv6 address can be written as eight groups of four hex digits (sometimes called hextets), where each group is separated by a colon (
:). This, for example, is a valid IPv6 address:2001:0db8:85a3:0000:0000:8a2e:0370:7334or abbreviated by removing leading zeros as2001:db8:85a3::8a2e:370:7334(IPv4 addresses are usually written in decimal).
- Globally unique identifiers are written as thirty-two hex digits, often in unequal hyphen-separated groupings, for example
3F2504E0-4F89-41D3-9A0C-0305E82C3301.
Alternative symbols
[edit]

Notable other hexadecimal representations that use symbols other than letters "A" through "F" to represent the digits above 9 include:
- During the 1950s, some installations, such as Bendix-14, favored using the digits 0 through 5 with an overline to denote the values 10–15 as 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
- The SWAC (1950)[15] and Bendix G-15 (1956)[16][15] computers used the lowercase letters u, v, w, x, y and z for the values 10 to 15.
- The ORDVAC and ILLIAC I (1952) computers (and some derived designs, e.g. BRLESC) used the uppercase letters K, S, N, J, F and L for the values 10 to 15.[17][15]
- On the PERM (1956) computer, hex numbers were written as letters O for zero, A to N and P for 1 to 15. Many machine instructions had mnemonic hex-codes (A=add, M=multiply, L=load, F=fixed-point etc.); programs were written without instruction names.[19]
- The Honeywell Datamatic D-1000 (1957) used the lowercase letters b, c, d, e, f, and g whereas the Elbit 100 (1967) used the uppercase letters B, C, D, E, F and G for the values 10 to 15.[15]
- The Monrobot XI (1960) used the letters S, T, U, V, W and X for the values 10 to 15.[15]
- The NEC parametron computer NEAC 1103 (1960) used the letters D, G, H, J, K (and possibly V) for values 10–15.[20]
- The Pacific Data Systems 1020 (1964) used the letters L, C, A, S, M and D for the values 10 to 15.[15]
- New numeric symbols and names were introduced in the Bibi-binary notation by Boby Lapointe in 1968.
- Bruce Alan Martin of Brookhaven National Laboratory considered the choice of A–F "ridiculous". In a 1968 letter to the editor of the CACM, he proposed an entirely new set of symbols based on the bit locations.[12]
- In 1972, Ronald O. Whitaker of Rowco Engineering Co. proposed a triangular font that allows "direct binary reading" to "permit both input and output from computers without respect to encoding matrices."[13][14]
- Some seven-segment display decoder chips (i.e., 74LS47) show unexpected output due to logic designed only to produce 0–9 correctly.[21]
Sign
[edit]The hex system can express negative numbers the same way as in decimal, by putting a minus sign (−) before the number to indicate that it is negative.
Bit pattern
[edit]Hex can express the bit pattern in a processor, so a sequence of hex digits may represent a signed or even a floating-point value. This way, the negative number −4210 can be written as FFFF FFD6 in a 32-bit CPU register (in two's complement), as C228 0000 in a 32-bit FPU register or C045 0000 0000 0000 in a 64-bit FPU register (in the IEEE floating-point standard).
Exponential notation
[edit]Just as decimal numbers can be represented in exponential notation, so too can hex numbers. P notation uses the letter P (or p, for "power"), whereas E (or e) serves a similar purpose in decimal E notation. The number after the P is decimal and represents the binary exponent. Increasing the exponent by 1 multiplies by 2, not 16: 20p0 = 10p1 = 8p2 = 4p3 = 2p4 = 1p5. Usually, the number is normalized so that the hex digits start with 1. (zero is usually 0 with no P).
Example: 1.3DEp42 represents 1.3DE16 × 24210.
P notation is required by the IEEE 754-2008 binary floating-point standard and can be used for floating-point literals in the C99 edition of the C programming language.[22] Using the %a or %A conversion specifiers, this notation can be produced by implementations of the printf family of functions following the C99 specification[23] and Single Unix Specification (IEEE Std 1003.1) POSIX standard.[24]
Verbal representation
[edit]
Since there were no traditional numerals to represent the quantities from ten to fifteen, alphabetic letters were re-employed as a substitute. Most European languages lack non-decimal-based words for some of the numerals eleven to fifteen. Some people read hex numbers digit by digit, like a phone number, or using the NATO phonetic alphabet, the Joint Army/Navy Phonetic Alphabet, or a similar ad-hoc system. In the wake of the adoption of hex among IBM System/360 programmers, Magnuson (1968)[25] suggested a pronunciation guide that gave short names to the letters of hex – for instance, "A" was pronounced "ann", B "bet", C "chris", etc.[25] Another naming-system was published online by Rogers (2007)[26] that tries to make the verbal representation distinguishable in any case, even when the actual number does not contain numbers A–F. Examples are listed in the tables below. Yet another naming system was elaborated by Babb (2015), based on a joke in Silicon Valley.[27] The system proposed by Babb was further improved by Atkins-Bittner in 2015-2016.[28]
Others have proposed using the verbal Morse code conventions to express four-bit hex digits, with "dit" and "dah" representing zero and one, respectively, so that "0000" is voiced as "dit-dit-dit-dit" (....), dah-dit-dit-dah (-..-) voices the digit with a value of nine, and "dah-dah-dah-dah" (----) voices the hex digit for decimal 15.
Systems of counting on digits have been devised for both binary and hex. Arthur C. Clarke suggested using each finger as an on/off bit, allowing finger counting from zero to 102310 on ten fingers.[29] Another system for counting up to FF16 (25510) is illustrated on the right.
| Hex | Name | Decimal |
|---|---|---|
| A | ann | 10 |
| B | bet | 11 |
| C | chris | 12 |
| D | dot | 13 |
| E | ernest | 14 |
| F | frost | 15 |
| 1A | annteen | 26 |
| A0 | annty | 160 |
| 5B | fifty bet | 91 |
| A,01C | annty christeen |
40,990 |
| 1,AD0 | annteen dotty |
6,864 |
| 3,A7D | thirty ann seventy dot |
14,973 |
| Hex | Name | Decimal |
|---|---|---|
| A | ten | 10 |
| B | eleven | 11 |
| C | twelve | 12 |
| D | draze | 13 |
| E | eptwin | 14 |
| F | fim | 15 |
| 10 | tex | 16 |
| 11 | oneteek | 17 |
| 1F | fimteek | 31 |
| 50 | fiftek | 80 |
| C0 | twelftek | 192 |
| 100 | hundrek | 256 |
| 1,000 | thousek | 4,096 |
| 3E | thirtek eptwin | 62 |
| E1 | eptek one | 225 |
| C4A | twelve hundrek fourtek ten |
3,146 |
| 1,743 | one thousek seven hundrek fourtek three |
5,955 |
| Hex | Name | Decimal |
|---|---|---|
| A | ae | 10 |
| B | bee | 11 |
| C | cee | 12 |
| D | dee | 13 |
| E | ee | 14 |
| F | eff | 15 |
| A0 | atta | 160 |
| B0 | bitta | 176 |
| C0 | citta | 192 |
| D0 | dickety | 208 |
| E0 | eckity | 224 |
| F0 | fleventy | 240 |
| 1A | abteen | 26 |
| 1B | bibteen | 27 |
| 1C | cibteen | 28 |
| 1D | dibbleteen | 29 |
| 1E | ebbleteen | 30 |
| 1F | fleventeen | 31 |
| 100 | one bitey | 256 |
| 10,000 | one millby | 65,536 |
| 100,000,000 | one billby | 4,294,967,296 |
Conversion
[edit]Binary conversion
[edit]
Most computers manipulate binary data, but it is difficult for humans to work with a large number of digits for even a relatively small binary number. Although most humans are familiar with the base 10 system, it is much easier to map binary to hex than to decimal because each hex digit maps to a whole number of bits (410). This example converts 11112 to base ten. Since each position in a binary numeral can contain either a 1 or a 0, its value may be easily determined by its position from the right:
- 00012 = 110
- 00102 = 210
- 01002 = 410
- 10002 = 810
Therefore:
| 11112 | = 810 + 410 + 210 + 110 |
| = 1510 |
With little practice, mapping 11112 to F16 in one step becomes easy. The advantage of using hex rather than decimal increases rapidly with the size of the number. When the number becomes large, conversion to decimal is very tedious. However, when mapping to hex, it is trivial to regard the binary string as 4-digit groups and map each to a single hex digit.[30]
This example shows the conversion of a binary number to decimal, mapping each digit to the decimal value, and adding the results.
| (1001011100)2 | = 51210 + 6410 + 1610 + 810 + 410 |
| = 60410 |
Compare this to the conversion to hex, where each group of four digits can be considered independently and converted directly:
| (1001011100)2 | = | 0010 | 0101 | 11002 | ||
| = | 2 | 5 | C16 | |||
| = | 25C16 | |||||
The conversion from hex to binary is equally direct.[30]
Other simple conversions
[edit]Although quaternary (base 4) is little used, it can easily be converted to and from hex or binary. Each hex digit corresponds to a pair of quaternary digits, and each quaternary digit corresponds to a pair of binary digits. In the above example 2 5 C16 = 02 11 304.
The octal (base 8) system can also be converted with relative ease, although not quite as trivially as with bases 2 and 4. Each octal digit corresponds to three binary digits, rather than four. Therefore, we can convert between octal and hex via an intermediate conversion to binary followed by regrouping the binary digits in groups of either three or four.
Division-remainder in source base
[edit]As with all bases there is a simple algorithm for converting a representation of a number to hex by doing integer division and remainder operations in the source base. In theory, this is possible from any base, but for most humans, only decimal and for most computers, only binary (which can be converted by far more efficient methods) can be easily handled with this method.
Let d be the number to represent in hex, and the series hihi−1...h2h1 be the hex digits representing the number.
- i ← 1
- hi ← d mod 16
- d ← (d − hi) / 16
- If d = 0 (return series hi) else increment i and go to step 2
"16" may be replaced with any other base that may be desired.
The following is a JavaScript implementation of the above algorithm for converting any number to a hex in String representation. Its purpose is to illustrate the above algorithm. To work with data seriously, however, it is much more advisable to work with bitwise operators.
function toHex(d) {
var r = d % 16;
if (d - r == 0) {
return toChar(r);
}
return toHex((d - r) / 16) + toChar(r);
}
function toChar(n) {
const alpha = "0123456789ABCDEF";
return alpha.charAt(n);
}
Conversion through addition and multiplication
[edit]
It is also possible to make the conversion by assigning each place in the source base the hex representation of its place value — before carrying out multiplication and addition to get the final representation. For example, to convert the number B3AD to decimal, one can split the hex number into its digits: B (1110), 3 (310), A (1010) and D (1310), and then get the final result by multiplying each decimal representation by 16p (p being the corresponding hex digit position, counting from right to left, beginning with 0). In this case, we have that:
B3AD = (11 × 163) + (3 × 162) + (10 × 161) + (13 × 160)
which is 45997 in base 10.
Tools for conversion
[edit]Many computer systems provide a calculator utility capable of performing conversions between the various radices frequently including hex.
In Microsoft Windows, the Calculator, on its Programmer mode, allows conversions between hex and other common programming bases.
Elementary arithmetic
[edit]Elementary operations such as division can be carried out indirectly through conversion to an alternate numeral system, such as the commonly used decimal system or the binary system where each hex digit corresponds to four binary digits.
Alternatively, one can also perform elementary operations directly within the hex system itself — by relying on its addition/multiplication tables and its corresponding standard algorithms such as long division and the traditional subtraction algorithm.
Real numbers
[edit]Rational numbers
[edit]As with other numeral systems, the hex system can be used to represent rational numbers, although repeating expansions are common since sixteen (1016) has only a single prime factor: two.
For any base, 0.1 (or "1/10") is always equivalent to one divided by the representation of that base value in its own number system. Thus, whether dividing one by two for binary or dividing one by sixteen for hex, both of these fractions are written as 0.1. Because the radix 16 is a perfect square (42), fractions expressed in hex have an odd period much more often than decimal ones, and there are no cyclic numbers (other than trivial single digits). Recurring digits are exhibited when the denominator in lowest terms has a prime factor not found in the radix; thus, when using hex notation, all fractions with denominators that are not a power of two result in an infinite string of recurring digits (such as thirds and fifths). This makes hex (and binary) less convenient than decimal for representing rational numbers since a larger proportion lies outside its range of finite representation.
All rational numbers finitely representable in hex are also finitely representable in decimal, duodecimal and sexagesimal: that is, any hex number with a finite number of digits also has a finite number of digits when expressed in those other bases. Conversely, only a fraction of those finitely representable in the latter bases are finitely representable in hex. For example, decimal 0.1 corresponds to the infinite recurring representation 0.19 in hex. However, hex is more efficient than duodecimal and sexagesimal for representing fractions with powers of two in the denominator. For example, 0.062510 (one-sixteenth) is equivalent to 0.116, 0.0912, and 0;3,4560.
| n | Decimal Prime factors of: base, b = 10: 2, 5; b − 1 = 9: 3; b + 1 = 11: 11 |
Hexadecimal Prime factors of: base, b = 1610 = 10: 2; b − 1 = 1510 = F: 3, 5; b + 1 = 1710 = 11: 11 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reciprocal | Prime factors | Positional representation (decimal) |
Positional representation (hex) |
Prime factors | Reciprocal | |
| 2 | 1/2 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 2 | 1/2 |
| 3 | 1/3 | 3 | 0.3333... = 0.3 | 0.5555... = 0.5 | 3 | 1/3 |
| 4 | 1/4 | 2 | 0.25 | 0.4 | 2 | 1/4 |
| 5 | 1/5 | 5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 5 | 1/5 |
| 6 | 1/6 | 2, 3 | 0.16 | 0.2A | 2, 3 | 1/6 |
| 7 | 1/7 | 7 | 0.142857 | 0.249 | 7 | 1/7 |
| 8 | 1/8 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.2 | 2 | 1/8 |
| 9 | 1/9 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.1C7 | 3 | 1/9 |
| 10 | 1/10 | 2, 5 | 0.1 | 0.19 | 2, 5 | 1/A |
| 11 | 1/11 | 11 | 0.09 | 0.1745D | B | 1/B |
| 12 | 1/12 | 2, 3 | 0.083 | 0.15 | 2, 3 | 1/C |
| 13 | 1/13 | 13 | 0.076923 | 0.13B | D | 1/D |
| 14 | 1/14 | 2, 7 | 0.0714285 | 0.1249 | 2, 7 | 1/E |
| 15 | 1/15 | 3, 5 | 0.06 | 0.1 | 3, 5 | 1/F |
| 16 | 1/16 | 2 | 0.0625 | 0.1 | 2 | 1/10 |
| 17 | 1/17 | 17 | 0.0588235294117647 | 0.0F | 11 | 1/11 |
| 18 | 1/18 | 2, 3 | 0.05 | 0.0E38 | 2, 3 | 1/12 |
| 19 | 1/19 | 19 | 0.052631578947368421 | 0.0D79435E5 | 13 | 1/13 |
| 20 | 1/20 | 2, 5 | 0.05 | 0.0C | 2, 5 | 1/14 |
| 21 | 1/21 | 3, 7 | 0.047619 | 0.0C3 | 3, 7 | 1/15 |
| 22 | 1/22 | 2, 11 | 0.045 | 0.0BA2E8 | 2, B | 1/16 |
| 23 | 1/23 | 23 | 0.0434782608695652173913 | 0.0B21642C859 | 17 | 1/17 |
| 24 | 1/24 | 2, 3 | 0.0416 | 0.0A | 2, 3 | 1/18 |
| 25 | 1/25 | 5 | 0.04 | 0.0A3D7 | 5 | 1/19 |
| 26 | 1/26 | 2, 13 | 0.0384615 | 0.09D8 | 2, D | 1/1A |
| 27 | 1/27 | 3 | 0.037 | 0.097B425ED | 3 | 1/1B |
| 28 | 1/28 | 2, 7 | 0.03571428 | 0.0924 | 2, 7 | 1/1C |
| 29 | 1/29 | 29 | 0.0344827586206896551724137931 | 0.08D3DCB | 1D | 1/1D |
| 30 | 1/30 | 2, 3, 5 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 2, 3, 5 | 1/1E |
| 31 | 1/31 | 31 | 0.032258064516129 | 0.08421 | 1F | 1/1F |
| 32 | 1/32 | 2 | 0.03125 | 0.08 | 2 | 1/20 |
| 33 | 1/33 | 3, 11 | 0.03 | 0.07C1F | 3, B | 1/21 |
| 34 | 1/34 | 2, 17 | 0.02941176470588235 | 0.078 | 2, 11 | 1/22 |
| 35 | 1/35 | 5, 7 | 0.0285714 | 0.075 | 5, 7 | 1/23 |
| 36 | 1/36 | 2, 3 | 0.027 | 0.071C | 2, 3 | 1/24 |
| 37 | 1/37 | 37 | 0.027 | 0.06EB3E453 | 25 | 1/25 |
| 38 | 1/38 | 2, 19 | 0.02631578947368421 | 0.0435E50D79435E4AC62B4 | 2, 13 | 1/26 |
| 39 | 1/39 | 3, 13 | 0.0256410 | 0.069 | 3, D | 1/27 |
| 40 | 1/40 | 2, 5 | 0.025 | 0.06 | 2, 5 | 1/28 |
| 41 | 1/41 | 41 | 0.02439 | 0.063E9538D283B5B62FB8 | 29 | 1/29 |
| 42 | 1/42 | 2, 3, 7 | 0.0238095 | 0.0618 | 2, 3, 7 | 1/2A |
| 43 | 1/43 | 43 | 0.023255813953488372093 | 0.05F417D | 2B | 1/2B |
| 44 | 1/44 | 2, 11 | 0.0227 | 0.05D1745 | 2, B | 1/2C |
| 45 | 1/45 | 3, 5 | 0.02 | 0.05B | 3, 5 | 1/2D |
| 46 | 1/46 | 2, 23 | 0.02173913043478765869567 | 0.0590B21642C9C4EF44A9 | 2, 17 | 1/2E |
| 47 | 1/47 | 47 | 0.0212765957446808510638297872340425531914893617 | 0.0572620AE4C415C9882B931 | 2F | 1/2F |
| 48 | 1/48 | 2, 3 | 0.02083 | 0.05 | 2, 3 | 1/30 |
Irrational numbers
[edit]The table below gives the expansions of some common irrational numbers in decimal and hex.
| Number | Positional representation | |
|---|---|---|
| Decimal | Hex | |
| √2 (the length of the diagonal of a unit square) | 1.414213562373095048... | 1.6A09E667F3BCD... |
| √3 (the length of the diagonal of a unit cube) | 1.732050807568877293... | 1.BB67AE8584CAA... |
| √5 (the length of the diagonal of a 1×2 rectangle) | 2.236067977499789696... | 2.3C6EF372FE95... |
| φ (phi, the golden ratio = (1+√5)/2) | 1.618033988749894848... | 1.9E3779B97F4A... |
| π (pi, the ratio of circumference to diameter of a circle) | 3.141592653589793238462643 383279502884197169399375105... |
3.243F6A8885A308D313198A2E0 3707344A4093822299F31D008... |
| e (the base of the natural logarithm) | 2.718281828459045235... | 2.B7E151628AED2A6B... |
| τ (the Thue–Morse constant) | 0.412454033640107597... | 0.6996 9669 9669 6996... |
| γ (the limiting difference between the harmonic series and the natural logarithm) | 0.577215664901532860... | 0.93C467E37DB0C7A4D1B... |
Powers
[edit]The first 16 powers of 2 are below as hex to show relative simplicity compared to decimal representation.
| 2x | Hex | Decimal |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 1 | 1 |
| 21 | 2 | 2 |
| 22 | 4 | 4 |
| 23 | 8 | 8 |
| 24 | 10 | 16 |
| 25 | 20 | 32 |
| 26 | 40 | 64 |
| 27 | 80 | 128 |
| 28 | 100 | 256 |
| 29 | 200 | 512 |
| 210 | 400 | 1,024 |
| 211 | 800 | 2,048 |
| 212 | 1,000 | 4,096 |
| 213 | 2,000 | 8,192 |
| 214 | 4,000 | 16,384 |
| 215 | 8,000 | 32,768 |
| 216 | 10,000 | 65,536 |
Cultural history
[edit]The traditional Chinese units of measurement were base-16. For example, one jīn (斤) in the old system equals sixteen taels. The suanpan (Chinese abacus) can be used to perform hex calculations such as additions and subtractions.[31]
As with the duodecimal system, there have been occasional attempts to promote hex as the preferred numeral system. These attempts often propose specific pronunciation and symbols for the individual numerals.[32] Some proposals unify standard measures so that they are multiples of 16.[33][34] An early such proposal was put forward by John W. Nystrom in Project of a New System of Arithmetic, Weight, Measure and Coins: Proposed to be called the Tonal System, with Sixteen to the Base, published in 1862.[35] Nystrom among other things suggested hexadecimal time, which subdivides a day by 16, so that there are 16 "hours" (or "10 tims", pronounced tontim) in a day.[36]
The word hexadecimal is first recorded in 1952.[37] It is macaronic in the sense that it combines Greek ἕξ (hex) "six" with Latinate -decimal. The all-Latin alternative sexadecimal (compare the word sexagesimal for base 60) is older, and sees at least occasional use from the late 19th century.[38] It is still in use in the 1950s in Bendix documentation. Schwartzman (1994) argues that use of sexadecimal may have been avoided because of its suggestive abbreviation to sex.[39] Many western languages since the 1960s have adopted terms equivalent in formation to hexadecimal (e.g. French hexadécimal, Italian esadecimale, Romanian hexazecimal, Serbian хексадецимални, etc.) but others have introduced terms which substitute native words for "sixteen" (e.g. Greek δεκαεξαδικός, Icelandic sextándakerfi, Russian шестнадцатеричной etc.)
Terminology and notation did not become settled until the end of the 1960s. In 1969, Donald Knuth argued that the etymologically correct term would be senidenary, or possibly sedenary, a Latinate term intended to convey "grouped by 16" modelled on binary, ternary, quaternary, etc. According to Knuth's argument, the correct terms for decimal and octal arithmetic would be denary and octonary, respectively.[40] Alfred B. Taylor used senidenary in his mid-1800s work on alternative number bases, although he rejected base 16 because of its "incommodious number of digits".[41][42]
The now-current notation using the letters A to F establishes itself as the de facto standard beginning in 1966, in the wake of the publication of the Fortran IV manual for IBM System/360, which (unlike earlier variants of Fortran) recognizes a standard for entering hexadecimal constants.[43] As noted above, alternative notations were used by NEC (1960) and The Pacific Data Systems 1020 (1964). The standard adopted by IBM seems to have become widely adopted by 1968, when Bruce Alan Martin in his letter to the editor of the CACM complains that
With the ridiculous choice of letters A, B, C, D, E, F as hexadecimal number symbols adding to already troublesome problems of distinguishing octal (or hex) numbers from decimal numbers (or variable names), the time is overripe for reconsideration of our number symbols. This should have been done before poor choices gelled into a de facto standard!
Martin's argument was that use of numerals 0 to 9 in nondecimal numbers "imply to us a base-ten place-value scheme": "Why not use entirely new symbols (and names) for the seven or fifteen nonzero digits needed in octal or hex. Even use of the letters A through P would be an improvement, but entirely new symbols could reflect the binary nature of the system".[12] He also argued that "re-using alphabetic letters for numerical digits represents a gigantic backward step from the invention of distinct, non-alphabetic glyphs for numerals sixteen centuries ago" (as Brahmi numerals, and later in a Hindu–Arabic numeral system), and that the recent ASCII standards (ASA X3.4-1963 and USAS X3.4-1968) "should have preserved six code table positions following the ten decimal digits -- rather than needlessly filling these with punctuation characters" (":;<=>?") that might have been placed elsewhere among the 128 available positions.
Base16
[edit]Base16 is a binary to text encoding in the family that also contains Base32, Base58, and Base64. Data is broken into 4-bit sequences, and each value (0-15) is encoded as a character. Although any 16 characters could be used, in practice, the ASCII digits "0"–"9" and letters "A"–"F" (or "a"–"f") are used to align with the typical notation for hex numbers.
Support for Base16 encoding is ubiquitous in modern computing. It is the basis for the W3C standard for URL percent encoding, where a character is replaced with a percent sign "%" and its Base16-encoded form. Most modern programming languages directly include support for formatting and parsing Base16-encoded numbers.
Advantages of Base16 encoding include:
- Most programming languages have facilities to parse ASCII-encoded hex
- Being exactly half a byte, 4-bits is easier to process than the 5 or 6 bits of Base32 and Base64, respectively
- The notation is well-known; easily understood without needing a symbol lookup table
- Many CPU architectures have dedicated instructions that allow access to a half-byte (aka nibble), making it more efficient in hardware than Base32 and Base64
Disadvantages include:
- Space efficiency is only 50%, since each 4-bit value from the original data will be encoded as an 8-bit byte; in contrast, Base32 and Base64 encodings have a space efficiency of 63% and 75% respectively
- Complexity of accepting both upper and lower case letters
See also
[edit]- Bailey–Borwein–Plouffe formula – Formula for computing the nth base-16 digit of π
- Hex dump – Hexadecimal view of computer data
- Hex editor – Computer program for byte manipulation
- Hexadecimal time – Time notation using base 16 instead of base 60
- Hexspeak – Novelty form of variant English spelling
- IBM hexadecimal floating-point – Number representation
- P notation – Concise notation for large or small numbers
References
[edit]- ^ "The hexadecimal system". Ionos Digital Guide. Archived from the original on 2022-08-26. Retrieved 2022-08-26.
- ^ "The Unicode Standard, Version 7" (PDF). Unicode. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2018-10-28.
- ^ "Modula-2 – Vocabulary and representation". Modula −2. Archived from the original on 2015-12-13. Retrieved 2015-11-01.
- ^ "An Introduction to VHDL Data Types". FPGA Tutorial. 2020-05-10. Archived from the original on 2020-08-23. Retrieved 2020-08-21.
- ^ "*read-base* variable in Common Lisp". CLHS. Archived from the original on 2016-02-03. Retrieved 2015-01-10.
- ^ "*print-base* variable in Common Lisp". CLHS. Archived from the original on 2014-12-26. Retrieved 2015-01-10.
- ^ MSX is Coming — Part 2: Inside MSX Archived 2010-11-24 at the Wayback Machine Compute!, issue 56, January 1985, p. 52
- ^ BBC BASIC programs are not fully portable to Microsoft BASIC (without modification) since the latter takes
&to prefix octal values. (Microsoft BASIC primarily uses&Oto prefix octal, and it uses&Hto prefix hex, but the ampersand alone yields a default interpretation as an octal prefix. - ^ Knuth, Donald Ervin (1986). The TeXbook. Duane Bibby. Reading, Mass. ISBN 0-201-13447-0. OCLC 12973034.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ "Hexadecimal web colors explained". Archived from the original on 2006-04-22. Retrieved 2006-01-11.
- ^ "ISO-8859-1 (ISO Latin 1) Character Encoding". www.ic.unicamp.br. Archived from the original on 2019-06-29. Retrieved 2019-06-26.
- ^ a b c Martin, Bruce Alan (October 1968). "Letters to the editor: On binary notation". Communications of the ACM. 11 (10). Associated Universities Inc.: 658. doi:10.1145/364096.364107. S2CID 28248410.
- ^ a b Whitaker, Ronald O. (January 1972). Written at Indianapolis, Indiana, US. "More on man/machine" (PDF). Letters. Datamation. Vol. 18, no. 1. Barrington, Illinois, US: Technical Publishing Company. p. 103. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-12-05. Retrieved 2022-12-24. (1 page)
- ^ a b Whitaker, Ronald O. (1976-08-10) [1975-02-24]. "Combined display and range selector for use with digital instruments employing the binary numbering system" (PDF). Indianapolis, Indiana, US. US Patent 3974444A. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-12-24. Retrieved 2022-12-24. (7 pages)
- ^ a b c d e f g Savard, John J. G. (2018) [2005]. "Computer Arithmetic". quadibloc. The Early Days of Hexadecimal. Archived from the original on 2018-07-16. Retrieved 2018-07-16.
- ^ "2.1.3 Sexadecimal notation". G15D Programmer's Reference Manual (PDF). Los Angeles, CA, US: Bendix Computer, Division of Bendix Aviation Corporation. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-06-01. Retrieved 2017-06-01.
This base is used because a group of four bits can represent any one of sixteen different numbers (zero to fifteen). By assigning a symbol to each of these combinations, we arrive at a notation called sexadecimal (usually "hex" in conversation because nobody wants to abbreviate "sex"). The symbols in the sexadecimal language are the ten decimal digits and on the G-15 typewriter, the letters "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", and "z". These are arbitrary markings; other computers may use different alphabet characters for these last six digits.
- ^ Gill, S.; Neagher, R. E.; Muller, D. E.; Nash, J. P.; Robertson, J. E.; Shapin, T.; Whesler, D. J. (1956-09-01). Nash, J. P. (ed.). "ILLIAC Programming – A Guide to the Preparation of Problems For Solution by the University of Illinois Digital Computer" (PDF). bitsavers.org (Fourth printing. Revised and corrected ed.). Urbana, Illinois, US: Digital Computer Laboratory, Graduate College, University of Illinois. pp. 3–2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-05-31. Retrieved 2014-12-18.
- ^ Royal Precision Electronic Computer LGP – 30 Programming Manual. Port Chester, New York: Royal McBee Corporation. April 1957. Archived from the original on 2017-05-31. Retrieved 2017-05-31. (NB. This somewhat odd sequence was from the next six sequential numeric keyboard codes in the LGP-30's 6-bit character code.)
- ^ Manthey, Steffen; Leibrandt, Klaus (2002-07-02). "Die PERM und ALGOL" (PDF) (in German). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-10-03. Retrieved 2018-05-19.
- ^ NEC Parametron Digital Computer Type NEAC-1103 (PDF). Tokyo, Japan: Nippon Electric Company Ltd. 1960. Cat. No. 3405-C. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-05-31. Retrieved 2017-05-31.
- ^ "SN5446A, '47A, '48, SN54LS47, 'LS48, 'LS49, SN7446A, '47A, '48, SN74LS47, 'LS48, 'LS49 BCD-to-Seven-Segment Decoders/Drivers". Dallas, Texas, US: Texas Instruments Incorporated. March 1988 [1974]. SDLS111. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-10-20. Retrieved 2021-09-15. (29 pages)
- ^ "ISO/IEC 9899:1999 – Programming languages – C". ISO. Iso.org. 2011-12-08. Archived from the original on 2016-10-10. Retrieved 2014-04-08.
- ^ "Rationale for International Standard – Programming Languages – C" (PDF). Open Standards. 5.10. April 2003. pp. 52, 153–154, 159. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-06-06. Retrieved 2010-10-17.
- ^ The IEEE and The Open Group (2013) [2001]. "dprintf, fprintf, printf, snprintf, sprintf – print formatted output". The Open Group Base Specifications (Issue 7, IEEE Std 1003.1, 2013 ed.). Archived from the original on 2016-06-21. Retrieved 2016-06-21.
- ^ a b c Magnuson, Robert A. (January 1968). "A hexadecimal pronunciation guide". Datamation. Vol. 14, no. 1. p. 45.
- ^ a b Rogers, S.R. (2007). "Hexadecimal number words". Intuitor. Archived from the original on 2019-09-17. Retrieved 2019-08-26.
- ^ Babb, Tim (2015). "How to pronounce hexadecimal". Bzarg. Archived from the original on 2020-11-11. Retrieved 2021-01-01.
- ^ a b Atkins-Bittner, Tab (2015). "How to Pronounce Hexadecimal Numbers". xanthir.com. Retrieved 2025-01-08.
- ^ Clarke, Arthur; Pohl, Frederik (2008). The Last Theorem. Ballantine. p. 91. ISBN 978-0007289981.
- ^ a b Mano, M. Morris; Ciletti, Michael D. (2013). Digital Design – With an Introduction to the Verilog HDL (Fifth ed.). Pearson Education. pp. 6, 8–10. ISBN 978-0-13-277420-8.
- ^ "算盤 Hexadecimal Addition & Subtraction on a Chinese Abacus". totton.idirect.com. Archived from the original on 2019-07-06. Retrieved 2019-06-26.
- ^ "Base 4^2 Hexadecimal Symbol Proposal". Hauptmech. Archived from the original on 2021-10-20. Retrieved 2008-09-04.
- ^ "Intuitor Hex Headquarters". Intuitor. Archived from the original on 2010-09-04. Retrieved 2018-10-28.
- ^ Niemietz, Ricardo Cancho (2003-10-21). "A proposal for addition of the six Hexadecimal digits (A-F) to Unicode" (PDF). ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2. Retrieved 2024-06-25.
- ^ Nystrom, John William (1862). Project of a New System of Arithmetic, Weight, Measure and Coins: Proposed to be called the Tonal System, with Sixteen to the Base. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
- ^ Nystrom (1862), p. 33: "In expressing time, angle of a circle, or points on the compass, the unit tim should be noted as integer, and parts thereof as tonal fractions, as 5·86 tims is five times and metonby [*"sutim and metonby" John Nystrom accidentally gives part of the number in decimal names; in Nystrom's pronunciation scheme, 5=su, 8=me, 6=by, c.f. unifoundry.com Archived 2021-05-19 at the Wayback Machine ]."
- ^ C. E. Fröberg, Hexadecimal Conversion Tables, Lund (1952).
- ^ The Century Dictionary of 1895 has sexadecimal in the more general sense of "relating to sixteen". An early explicit use of sexadecimal in the sense of "using base 16" is found also in 1895, in the Journal of the American Geographical Society of New York, vols. 27–28, p. 197.
- ^ Schwartzman, Steven (1994). The Words of Mathematics: An etymological dictionary of mathematical terms used in English. The Mathematical Association of America. p. 105. ISBN 0-88385-511-9. s.v. hexadecimal
- ^ Knuth, Donald. (1969). The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 2. ISBN 0-201-03802-1. (Chapter 17.)
- ^ Alfred B. Taylor, Report on Weights and Measures, Pharmaceutical Association, 8th Annual Session, Boston, 15 September 1859. See pages and 33 and 41.
- ^ Alfred B. Taylor, "Octonary numeration and its application to a system of weights and measures", Proc Amer. Phil. Soc. Vol XXIV Archived 2016-06-24 at the Wayback Machine, Philadelphia, 1887; pages 296–366. See pages 317 and 322.
- ^ IBM System/360 FORTRAN IV Language Archived 2021-05-19 at the Wayback Machine (1966), p. 13.
Hexadecimal
View on GrokipediaFundamentals
Definition and Properties
Hexadecimal is a positional numeral system with a radix of 16, employing 16 distinct symbols to represent numerical values from 0 to 15 in each digit position. This extends the decimal system's 10 digits (0-9) by incorporating six additional symbols, typically letters, to denote values 10 through 15.[6] In hexadecimal notation, the position of each digit determines its place value as a power of 16, with the rightmost digit representing and each subsequent digit to the left multiplying by successively higher powers of 16. The overall value of a hexadecimal number is calculated as the weighted sum of its digits: where each is an integer from 0 to 15, and is the degree of the highest power of 16 needed.[6] A key property of hexadecimal is its compact representation of binary data, as each hexadecimal digit encodes exactly four binary digits (bits), given that . This one-to-four correspondence reduces the length of representations for large numbers compared to pure binary strings, while also being more concise than decimal for certain computing contexts involving powers of two.[6] Base-16 is particularly practical in digital systems because it aligns directly with binary architecture, facilitating efficient grouping of bits—such as into 8-bit bytes, which require only two hexadecimal digits—without the misalignment issues of non-power-of-2 bases like decimal.[7]Digits and Symbols
Hexadecimal digits represent values from 0 to 15 using a set of sixteen symbols. The numerals 0 through 9 denote the values 0 to 9, while the letters A, B, C, D, E, and F represent the values 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15, respectively.[8][9] Lowercase letters a through f serve as equivalent variants for these higher values and are widely accepted in practice.[8][10] Historically, the choice of letters A-F was not universal in early computing; some systems employed alternative glyphs for digits beyond 9, such as U, V, W, X, Y, and Z on the SWAC computer at UCLA during the 1950s and 1960s.[11] Other proposals have suggested non-letter symbols for higher digits to avoid confusion with alphanumeric text, but these remain rare and have not been adopted in standard usage.[12] To identify hexadecimal numbers in programming and documentation, various prefixes and suffixes are employed. In languages like C and its derivatives, the prefix0x (or 0X) precedes the digits, as standardized in the C programming language specification.[13] Some assemblers, such as those from Motorola, use a $ prefix, while Intel-style assemblers append an H (or h) suffix.[14] In contexts like HTML and CSS color codes, hexadecimal values are implicit without a prefix, typically following a # symbol and consisting of three or six digits.[15]
Hexadecimal notation exhibits no universal standard for case sensitivity, though it is case-insensitive in most parsers and interpreters, allowing both uppercase A-F and lowercase a-f interchangeably.[15] Uppercase letters are preferred in formal documentation and specifications for clarity and tradition, whereas lowercase variants predominate in source code and informal contexts to align with common programming conventions.[16]
Representation
Written Conventions
Hexadecimal numbers are typically written without spaces or commas between digits to maintain compactness, though for enhanced readability in lengthy representations, digits are often grouped into sets of four starting from the right, separated by spaces, such as 1A2B 3C4D for the number 1A2B3C4D.[17] To distinguish hexadecimal from decimal numbers, explicit prefixes like 0x (common in languages such as C and Java) or suffixes like h (used in assembly and some documentation) are employed, for example, 0xFF or FFh; in programming contexts where the base is unambiguous, such identifiers may be omitted.[18][19] Although hexadecimal primarily represents unsigned values, negative numbers are conventionally denoted by prefixing a minus sign to the hexadecimal representation, such as -0x10, while in binary two's complement contexts, the sign is handled through bit patterns without altering the hexadecimal notation itself.[20] Each hexadecimal digit serves as a shorthand for a four-bit binary nibble, allowing compact representation of binary data; for instance, the digit A corresponds to the binary pattern 1010.[21]Verbal Description
Hexadecimal numbers are typically pronounced digit by digit, reading from left to right in a manner similar to reciting a sequence of individual characters, without applying decimal-style positional modifiers such as "teen" or "ty" endings. The digits 0 through 9 are named using standard English cardinal numbers: zero, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, and nine. The additional digits A through F, representing values 10 to 15, are pronounced according to their English letter names: ay, bee, see, dee, ee, and eff.[22][23] In certain technical contexts, particularly those involving clear audio communication like radio or telephony in computing and engineering, the NATO phonetic alphabet may be employed for the letters to minimize ambiguity: alpha for A, bravo for B, charlie for C, delta for D, echo for E, and foxtrot for F. For instance, the hexadecimal value 1A3 might be verbalized as "one ay three hex," "one alpha three hexadecimal," or simply "one A three in hex" to specify the base and prevent confusion with decimal equivalents. The abbreviation "hex" is commonly used in speech for brevity, especially among programmers and engineers.[24] While English conventions dominate in global computing discussions, adaptations exist in other languages where letter pronunciations align with local phonetic norms. For example, in French, the digit A is often pronounced as "a" (like "ah") and B as "bé," reflecting standard French alphabet recitation, with the overall number read digit by digit followed by "hexadécimal."[25]Special Notations
Hexadecimal notation extends beyond standard integer representations to handle large or small values and signed numbers through specialized formats. Exponential notation, akin to scientific notation in decimal, is useful for compactly representing very large or small quantities in computing and engineering contexts. In floating-point representations standardized by IEEE 754, hexadecimal exponential notation uses a binary exponent but is often displayed with a hexadecimal mantissa and a decimal exponent scaled to powers of 2. A common format in programming is 0xM.PpN, where M is the integer mantissa in hex, P the fractional part, and N the decimal exponent for 2^N; for example, 0x1.0p4 equals 16 in decimal (1 × 2^4). This syntax, introduced in the C99 standard, enables exact binary floating-point literals without intermediate decimal conversions, reducing rounding errors in numerical computations.[26][27] Signed hexadecimal representations go beyond prefixing a minus sign for negatives, particularly in computing where two's complement encoding is prevalent for efficient arithmetic. In two's complement, a negative number is formed by inverting all bits of its positive counterpart and adding one, then expressing the result in hexadecimal digits. For an 8-bit system, -5 (decimal) is FB in hexadecimal, as the binary 00000101 inverts to 11111010 and adding one yields 11111011. This method allows seamless addition and subtraction of signed values on hardware without separate positive/negative logic.[28] One's complement, an older alternative, inverts bits without adding one (e.g., -5 as FA hex), but it is less common today due to issues like double zero representations.[28] In software tools and calculators supporting hexadecimal mode, implicit exponential notation often appears for floating-point or overflow values, displaying large hex numbers in scientific-like form (e.g., 1.234E+10h) to manage screen limitations. Modern scientific calculators, such as Casio models, handle hex inputs but switch to exponential display for results exceeding fixed-digit capacity, integrating base-16 with standard E-notation for readability during conversions or computations.[29]Conversion Methods
To and From Decimal
To convert a positive integer from decimal to hexadecimal, apply the repeated division algorithm by 16: divide the number by 16, record the remainder as the next least significant digit (converting values 10-15 to A-F), and continue with the quotient until it reaches zero; the hexadecimal representation is then the remainders read from last to first.[30] This method leverages the base-16 structure, where each remainder directly yields a valid hexadecimal digit.[31] For example, convert 255 from decimal to hexadecimal: Reading remainders upward gives FF in hexadecimal, equivalent to 255 in decimal.[30] To convert from hexadecimal to decimal, expand the number using positional notation: multiply each digit's decimal value (0-9 as is, A=10, B=11, C=12, D=13, E=14, F=15) by 16 raised to the power of its position from the right (starting at position 0), then sum the products.[32] The general formula for a hexadecimal number with digits is: [33] For the example FF in hexadecimal:- F (15) × 16¹ + F (15) × 16⁰ = 15 × 16 + 15 × 1 = 240 + 15 = 255 in decimal.[32]
hex() method on int objects to produce hexadecimal strings via the same algorithmic principles.[34]
Special cases include zero, which represents as 0 in both bases, requiring no division steps.[30] For negative numbers, first convert the absolute value using the above methods, then prefix a minus sign to the hexadecimal result, as in signed magnitude representation.[34]
To and From Binary
Converting binary numbers to hexadecimal involves grouping the binary digits into sets of four, known as nibbles, starting from the rightmost bit. Each nibble is then replaced by its corresponding hexadecimal digit, where 0000 represents 0, 0001 represents 1, up to 1111 representing F. If the total number of binary digits is not a multiple of four, leading zeros are added to the left to complete the leftmost nibble. For example, the binary number 11111111 groups into two nibbles (1111 and 1111), each equivalent to F, yielding FF in hexadecimal.[35][36] The reverse process, converting hexadecimal to binary, replaces each hexadecimal digit with its four-bit binary equivalent: 0 is 0000, 1 is 0001, A is 1010, B is 1011, C is 1100, D is 1101, E is 1110, and F is 1111. No padding is typically required, as each digit maps directly to a full nibble. For instance, the hexadecimal number FF becomes 11111111 in binary by substituting F (1111) for each digit.[37][38] This direct correspondence—one hexadecimal digit per nibble—provides significant advantages in computing, particularly for representing bytes, which consist of eight bits or two nibbles; thus, a single byte requires exactly two hexadecimal digits for compact notation.[36][39] Such conversions are supported natively in many tools, including scientific calculators in programmer mode and programming languages like Python, which offer built-in functions such asbin() for binary and hex() for hexadecimal representations, facilitating quick automation while manual methods remain useful for verification and understanding.[40][41]
To Other Bases
Converting hexadecimal numbers to octal (base 8) is facilitated by their shared foundation as powers of two, allowing an intermediate binary representation where each hexadecimal digit corresponds to four bits and each octal digit to three bits. To perform the conversion, expand the hexadecimal number into its binary equivalent, then regroup the binary digits into sets of three starting from the right (padding with leading zeros if necessary), and replace each group with the corresponding octal digit.[42] For example, the hexadecimal number FF expands to the binary 11111111; regrouping as 011 111 111 yields the octal 377, since 011 binary is 3, 111 is 7, and 111 is 7.[42] Alternatively, conversion via decimal is possible but less direct for this pair.[43] To convert numbers from other bases to hexadecimal, the general method involves first transforming the source number to decimal using place-value expansion or repeated division, then applying the standard hexadecimal conversion from decimal via repeated division by 16 and recording remainders. For bases that are powers of two, such as octal or base 4, a more efficient direct path exists through binary representation, avoiding full decimal intermediation.[44] This approach leverages the compatible bit groupings: three bits per octal digit or two bits per base-4 digit aligning with the four bits per hexadecimal digit.[45] Conversions between hexadecimal and less common bases, such as duodecimal (base 12) or base 36, are rare in practice and invariably require chaining through decimal as an intermediary, with no simplified direct mapping available due to incompatible radices. Duodecimal, historically used in some measurement systems like inches per foot, employs digits 0-9 and symbols for 10 (often A) and 11 (B), but lacks widespread computational adoption.[46] Base 36, utilizing 0-9 and A-Z for values up to 35, appears occasionally in compact encodings like travel record locators or unique identifiers, yet such transformations from hexadecimal proceed via decimal for accuracy.[47] For instance, the hexadecimal FF (255 decimal) converts to 73 in base 36, as 7 × 36¹ + 3 × 36⁰ = 255. In all cases, no universal direct formula exists for hexadecimal conversions to arbitrary bases; efficiency depends on selecting an optimal intermediate like decimal for general use or binary for power-of-two alignments, ensuring step-by-step verification to maintain precision.[43]Arithmetic
Basic Operations
Hexadecimal arithmetic follows the same principles as decimal arithmetic but operates in base-16, where digits range from 0 to F (representing 0 to 15 in decimal), and carries or borrows occur when values exceed 15 or fall below 0, respectively.[38] Operations are performed column-wise from right to left, with each position representing successive powers of 16.[48]Addition
Addition in hexadecimal is conducted digit by digit, starting from the least significant digit (rightmost), with a carry of 1 generated to the next column whenever the sum of digits plus any incoming carry equals or exceeds 16.[38] The resulting digit is the sum modulo 16, expressed using hexadecimal symbols (0-9, A-F). For example, adding FF (255 in decimal) and 1 proceeds as follows: FF
+ 1
----
100
FF
+ 1
----
100
Subtraction
Subtraction involves digit-by-digit deduction from right to left, borrowing 16 from the next higher column (equivalent to adding 16 to the current digit and subtracting 1 from the borrower) when the minuend digit is smaller than the subtrahend.[38] The result is the difference, with borrows propagating as needed. For instance, subtracting 1 from 100 (256 in decimal) gives: 100
- 1
----
FF
100
- 1
----
FF
Multiplication
Multiplication in hexadecimal mirrors decimal long multiplication, where each digit of the multiplicand is multiplied by each digit of the multiplier, shifted by appropriate powers of 16, and summed, with intermediate carries resolved modulo 16.[38] Single-digit multiplications produce results up to F × F = E1 (15 × 15 = 225 in decimal, or 14 × 16 + 1). For example, A (10 in decimal) × 2 = 14 (20 in decimal):- A × 2 = 20 (1 × 16 + 4, or 14 in hexadecimal).[38]
Division
Division uses long division adapted to base-16, dividing the dividend into chunks that fit the divisor, yielding a quotient digit (0-F) and a remainder less than 16, with the process repeating for subsequent digits.[38] For example, 100 (256 in decimal) ÷ 10 (16 in decimal):10 | 100
| 0 (initial partial dividend 10 < 10? No, but align)
| 10 (10 goes into 10 once: 1 × 10 = 10, subtract 0)
| 0 (bring down 0, 00 ÷ 10 = 0)
-----
10 rem 0
10 | 100
| 0 (initial partial dividend 10 < 10? No, but align)
| 10 (10 goes into 10 once: 1 × 10 = 10, subtract 0)
| 0 (bring down 0, 00 ÷ 10 = 0)
-----
10 rem 0
Advanced Techniques
For efficient multiplication in hexadecimal arithmetic, multiplication tables provide a quick reference for products of single digits from 0 to F. These tables are constructed by computing each product in base 16, where results exceeding F require carrying over to higher digits, similar to the addition carry rules in basic operations. A partial table focusing on multiplications involving digits A through F illustrates the patterns, such as F × F = E1 (equivalent to 15 × 15 = 225 in decimal, or 14 × 16 + 1, yielding E1 in hex).[50]| × | A | B | C | D | E | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 64 | 6E | 78 | 82 | 8C | 96 |
| B | 6E | 79 | 84 | 8F | 9A | A5 |
| C | 78 | 84 | 90 | 9C | A8 | B4 |
| D | 82 | 8F | 9C | A9 | B6 | C3 |
| E | 8C | 9A | A8 | B6 | C4 | D2 |
| F | 96 | A5 | B4 | C3 | D2 | E1 |
