Hubbry Logo
Morse codeMorse codeMain
Open search
Morse code
Community hub
Morse code
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Morse code
Morse code
from Wikipedia

This Morse key was originally used by Gotthard railway, later by a shortwave radio amateur.[1]
Chart of the Morse code 26 letters and 10 numerals[2]

Morse code is a telecommunications method which encodes text characters as standardized sequences of two different signal durations, called dots and dashes, or dits and dahs.[3][4] It is named after Samuel Morse, one of several developers of the system. Morse's preliminary proposal for a telegraph code was replaced by an alphabet-based code developed by Alfred Vail, the engineer working with Morse. Vail's version was used for commercial telegraphy in North America. Friedrich Gerke simplified Vail's code to produce the code adopted in Europe, and most of the alphabetic part of the (ITU) "Morse" is copied from Gerke's revision.

The ITU International Morse code encodes the 26 basic Latin letters A to Z, one accented Latin letter (É), the Indo-Arabic numerals 0 to 9, and some punctuation and messaging procedural signals (prosigns). There is no distinction between upper and lower case letters.[2] Each code symbol is formed by a sequence of dits and dahs. The dit duration can vary for signal clarity and operator skill, but for any one message, once the rhythm is established, a half-beat is the basic unit of time measurement. The duration of a dah is three times the duration of a dit. Each dit or dah within an encoded character is followed by a period of signal absence, called a space, equal to the dit duration. The letters of a word are separated by a space of duration equal to three dits, and words are separated by a space equal to seven dits.[2][5][a]

Morse code can be memorized and sent in a form perceptible to the human senses, e.g. via sound waves or visible light, such that it can be directly interpreted by persons trained in it.[7][8] Morse code is usually transmitted by on-off keying of an information-carrying medium such as electric current, radio waves, visible light, or sound waves.[9][10] The current or wave is present during the time period of the dit or dah and absent during the time between dits and dahs.[11][12] Since many natural languages use more than the 26 letters of the Latin alphabet, Morse alphabets have been developed for those, largely by transliteration of existing codes.[13]

To increase transmission efficiency, Vail designed the original alphabetic code so the duration of each symbol was approximately inverse to the frequency that the character it represents occurs in English text. After revisions that led to ITU Morse code, the assignment of codes to characters in a few cases became non-optimal, although many encodings are. For instance, the most common letter in English, E, has the shortest code – a single dit. Because code elements are specified relatively, by proportion, rather than fixed duration, the code is usually sent at the highest rate the receiver is capable of decoding.[b]

Development and history

[edit]

Pre-Morse telegraphs and codes

[edit]
Single needle telegraph instrument

Early in the nineteenth century, European experimenters made progress with electrical signaling systems, using a variety of techniques including static electricity and electricity from Voltaic piles producing electrochemical and electromagnetic changes. These experimental designs were precursors to practical telegraphic applications.[14]

Telegraph key and sounder; the signal is "on" when the knob is pressed, and "off" when it is released, length and timing of the dits and dahs are entirely controlled by the telegraphist

Following the discovery of electromagnetism by Hans Christian Ørsted in 1820 and the invention of the electromagnet by William Sturgeon in 1824, there were developments in electromagnetic telegraphy in Europe and America. Pulses of electric current were sent along wires to control an electromagnet in the receiving instrument. Many of the earliest telegraph systems used a single-needle system which gave a very simple and robust instrument. However, it was slow, as the receiving operator had to alternate between looking at the needle and writing down the message. In Morse code, a deflection of the needle to the left corresponded to a dit and a deflection to the right to a dah.[15] The needle clicked each time it moved to the right or left. By making the two clicks sound different (by installing one ivory and one metal stop), transmissions on the single needle device became audible as well as visible, which led in turn to the Double Plate Sounder System.[16]

William Cooke and Charles Wheatstone in Britain developed an electrical telegraph that used electromagnets in its receivers. They obtained an English patent in June 1837 and demonstrated it on the London and Birmingham Railway, making it the first commercial telegraph. Carl Friedrich Gauss and Wilhelm Eduard Weber (1833) as well as Carl August von Steinheil (1837) used codes with varying word lengths for their telegraph systems.[17] In 1841, Cooke and Wheatstone built a telegraph that printed the letters from a wheel of typefaces struck by a hammer.[18]: 79 

Samuel Morse and Alfred Vail

[edit]
Morse code receiver that records on paper tape

The American artist Samuel Morse, the American physicist Joseph Henry, and mechanical engineer Alfred Vail developed an electrical telegraph system. The simple "on or off" nature of its signals made it desirable to find a method of transmitting natural language using only electrical pulses and the silence between them. Around 1837, Morse therefore developed such a method, an early forerunner to the modern International Morse code.[18]: 79 

The Morse system for telegraphy was designed to make indentations on a paper tape when electric currents were received.[19] Morse's original telegraph receiver used a mechanical clockwork to move a paper tape. When an electrical current was received, an electromagnet engaged an armature that pushed a stylus onto the moving paper tape, making an indentation on the tape. When the current was interrupted, a spring retracted the stylus and that portion of the moving tape remained unmarked.

In his earliest design for a code, Morse had planned to transmit only numerals, and to use a codebook to look up each word according to the number which had been sent. However, the code was soon expanded by Alfred Vail in 1840 to include letters and special characters, so it could be used more generally. Vail estimated the letter frequency of English by counting the movable type he found in the type cases of a local newspaper in Morristown, New Jersey.[18]: 84  The shorter marks were called "dots" and the longer ones "dashes", and the letters most commonly used were assigned the shortest sequences of dots and dashes. This code, first used in 1844, was what later became known as Morse landline code, American Morse code, or Railroad Morse, until the end of railroad telegraphy in the U.S. in the 1970s.[citation needed]

Operator-led change from graphical to audible code

[edit]

In the original Morse telegraph system, the receiver's armature made a clicking noise as it moved in and out of position to mark the paper tape. Early telegraph operators soon learned that they could translate the clicks directly into dots and dashes, and write these down by hand, thus making the paper tape unnecessary. When Morse code was adapted to radio communication, the dots and dashes were sent as short and long tone pulses.

Later telegraphy training found that people become more proficient at receiving Morse code when it is taught "like a language", with each code perceived as a whole "word" instead of a sequence of separate dots and dashes, such as might be shown on a page.[20]

With the advent of tones produced by radiotelegraph receivers, the operators began to vocalize a dot as dit, and a dash as dah, to reflect the sounds of Morse code they heard. To conform to normal sending speed, dits which are not the last element of a code became voiced as di. For example, the letter L ( ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ) is voiced as di dah di dit.[21][22] Morse code was sometimes facetiously known as "iddy-umpty", a dit lampooned as "iddy" and a dah as "umpty", leading to the word "umpteen".[23]

Gerke's refinement of Morse's code

[edit]
Comparison of historical versions of Morse code with the current standard. Left: Later American Morse code from 1844.[17][c] Center: The modified and rationalized version used by Friedrich Gerke on German railways. Right: Current ITU standard.

The Morse code, as specified in the current international standard, International Morse Code Recommendation, ITU-R M.1677-1,[2] was derived from a much-improved proposal by Friedrich Gerke in 1848 that became known as the "Hamburg alphabet", its only real defect being the use of an excessively long code ( ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  and later the equal duration code  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ) for the frequently used vowel O.

Gerke changed many of the codepoints, in the process doing away with the different length dashes and different inter-element spaces of American Morse, leaving only two coding elements, the dot and the dash. Codes for German umlauted vowels and CH were introduced. Gerke's code was adopted in Germany and Austria in 1851.[24]

This finally led to the International Morse code in 1865. The International Morse code adopted most of Gerke's codepoints. The codes for O and P were taken from a code system developed by Steinheil. A new codepoint was added for J since Gerke did not distinguish between I and J. Changes were also made to X, Y, and Z. The codes for the digits 09 in International Morse were completely revised from both Vail's original and Gerke's revised encodings. This left only four codes identical to the original Morse code, namely E, H, K, and N; and K and N had their original short dahs extended to full length.[17][c]

Radiotelegraphy and aviation

[edit]

In the 1890s, Morse code began to be used extensively for early radio communication before it was possible to transmit voice. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, most high-speed international communication used Morse code on telegraph lines, undersea cables, and radio circuits.

Although previous transmitters were bulky and the spark gap system of transmission was dangerous and difficult to use, there had been some early attempts: In 1910, the U.S. Navy experimented with sending Morse from an airplane.[25] However the first regular aviation radiotelegraphy was on airships, which had space to accommodate the large, heavy radio equipment then in use. The same year, 1910, a radio on the airship America was instrumental in coordinating the rescue of its crew.[26]

During World War I, Zeppelin airships equipped with radio were used for bombing and naval scouting,[27] and ground-based radio direction finders were used for airship navigation.[27] Allied airships and military aircraft also made some use of radiotelegraphy.

However, there was little aeronautical radio in general use during World War I, and in the 1920s, there was no radio system used by such important flights as that of Charles Lindbergh from New York to Paris in 1927. Once he and the Spirit of St. Louis were off the ground, Lindbergh was truly incommunicado and alone. Morse code in aviation began regular use in the mid-1920s. By 1928, when the first airplane flight was made by the Southern Cross from California to Australia, one of its four crewmen was a radio operator who communicated with ground stations via radio telegraph.

Beginning in the 1930s, both civilian and military pilots were required to be able to use Morse code, both for use with early communications systems and for identification of navigational beacons that transmitted continuous two- or three-letter identifiers in Morse code. Aeronautical charts show the identifier of each navigational aid next to its location on the map.

In addition, rapidly moving field armies could not have fought effectively without radiotelegraphy; they moved more quickly than their communications services could put up new telegraph and telephone lines. This was seen especially in the blitzkrieg offensives of the Nazi German Wehrmacht in Poland, Belgium, France (in 1940), the Soviet Union, and in North Africa; by the British Army in North Africa, Italy, and the Netherlands; and by the U.S. Army in France and Belgium (in 1944), and in southern Germany in 1945.

Maritime flash telegraphy and radio telegraphy

[edit]
A U.S. Navy Morse Code training class in 2015. The sailors will use their new skills to collect signals intelligence.

Radiotelegraphy using Morse code was vital during World War II, especially in carrying messages between the warships and the naval bases of the belligerents. Long-range ship-to-ship communication was by radio telegraphy, using encrypted messages because the voice radio systems on ships then were quite limited in both their range and their security. Radiotelegraphy was also extensively used by warplanes, especially by long-range patrol planes that were sent out by navies to scout for enemy warships, cargo ships, and troop ships.

Morse code was used as an international standard for maritime distress until 1999 when it was replaced by the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System. When the French Navy ceased using Morse code on 31 January 1997, the final message transmitted was "Calling all. This is our last call before our eternal silence."[28]

Demise of commercial telegraphy

[edit]

In the United States the final commercial Morse code transmission was on 12 July 1999, signing off with Samuel Morse's original 1844 message, WHAT HATH GOD WROUGHT, and the prosign SK ("end of contact").[29]

As of 2015, the United States Air Force still trains ten people a year in Morse.[30]

The United States Coast Guard has ceased all use of Morse code on the radio, and no longer monitors any radio frequencies for Morse code transmissions, including the international medium frequency (MF) distress frequency of 500 kHz.[31] However, the Federal Communications Commission still grants commercial radiotelegraph operator licenses to applicants who pass its code and written tests.[32] Licensees have reactivated the old California coastal Morse station KPH and regularly transmit from the site under either this call sign or as KSM. Similarly, a few U.S. museum ship stations are operated by Morse enthusiasts.[33]

Operator proficiency

[edit]
A commercially manufactured iambic paddle used in conjunction with an electronic keyer to generate high-speed Morse code, the timing of which is controlled by the keyer[d]

Morse code speed is measured in words per minute (WPM) or characters per minute (CPM). Characters have differing lengths because they contain differing numbers of dits and dahs. Consequently, words also have different lengths in terms of dot duration, even when they contain the same number of characters. For this reason, some standard word is adopted for measuring operators' transmission speeds: Two such standard words in common use are PARIS and CODEX.[34] Operators skilled in Morse code can often understand ("copy") code in their heads at rates in excess of 40 WPM.

In addition to knowing, understanding, and being able to copy the standard written alpha-numeric and punctuation characters or symbols at high speeds, skilled high-speed operators must also be fully knowledgeable of all of the special unwritten Morse code symbols for the standard Prosigns for Morse code and the meanings of these special procedural signals in standard Morse code communications protocol.

International contests in code copying are still occasionally held. In July 1939 at a contest in Asheville, North Carolina in the United States, Theodore Roosevelt McElroy (W1JYN) set a still-standing record for Morse copying, 75.2 WPM.[35] Pierpont (2004) also notes that some operators may have passed 100 WPM.[35] By this time, they are "hearing" phrases and sentences rather than words. The fastest speed ever sent by a straight key was achieved in 1942 by Harry Turner (W9YZE) (d. 1992) who reached 35 WPM in a demonstration at a U.S. Army base. To accurately compare code copying speed records of different eras it is useful to keep in mind that different standard words (50 dit durations versus 60 dit durations) and different interword gaps (5 dit durations versus 7 dit durations) may have been used when determining such speed records. For example, speeds run with the CODEX standard word and the PARIS standard may differ by up to 20%.

Today among amateur operators there are several organizations that recognize high-speed code ability, one group consisting of those who can copy Morse at 60 WPM.[36] Also, Certificates of Code Proficiency are issued by several amateur radio societies, including the American Radio Relay League. Their basic award starts at 10 WPM with endorsements as high as 40 WPM, and are available to anyone who can copy the transmitted text. Members of the Boy Scouts of America may put a Morse interpreter's strip on their uniforms if they meet the standards for translating code at 5 WPM.

A U.S. Navy signalman sends Morse code signals in 2005.

Through May 2013, the First, Second, and Third Class (commercial) Radiotelegraph Licenses using code tests based upon the CODEX standard word were still being issued in the United States by the Federal Communications Commission. The First Class license required 20 WPM code group and 25 WPM text code proficiency, the others 16 WPM code group test (five letter blocks sent as simulation of receiving encrypted text) and 20 WPM code text (plain language) test. It was also necessary to pass written tests on operating practice and electronics theory. A unique additional demand for the First Class was a requirement of a year of experience for operators of shipboard and coast stations using Morse. This allowed the holder to be chief operator on board a passenger ship. However, since 1999 the use of satellite and very high-frequency maritime communications systems (GMDSS) has made them obsolete. (By that point meeting experience requirement for the First was very difficult.)

Currently, only one class of license, the Radiotelegraph Operator License, is issued. This is granted either when the tests are passed or as the Second and First are renewed and become this lifetime license. For new applicants, it requires passing a written examination on electronic theory and radiotelegraphy practices, as well as 16 WPM code-group and 20 WPM text tests. However, the code exams are currently waived for holders of Amateur Extra Class licenses who obtained their operating privileges under the old 20 WPM test requirement.

International Morse code

[edit]

Morse codes of one version or another have been in use for more than 160 years — longer than any other electrical message encoding system. What is today called "Morse code" is different from what was originally actually developed by Vail and Morse. The Modern International Morse code, or continental code, was created by Friedrich Clemens Gerke in 1848 and initially used for telegraphy between Hamburg and Cuxhaven in Germany. Gerke changed nearly half of the alphabet and all of the numerals, providing the foundation for the modern form of the code. After some minor changes to the letters and a complete revision of the numerals, International Morse Code was standardized by the International Telegraphy Congress in 1865 in Paris, and later became the standard adopted by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Morse and Vail's final code specification, however, was only really used for land-line telegraphy in the United States and Canada, with the International code used everywhere else, including all ships at sea and sailing in North American waters. Vail's version became known as American Morse code or railroad code, and is now almost never used, with the possible exception of historical re-enactments.

Aviation

[edit]
Cayo Largo Del Sur VOR-DME

In aviation, pilots use radio navigation aids. To allow pilots to ensure that the stations they intend to use are serviceable, the stations transmit a set of identification letters (usually a two-to-five-letter version of the station name) in Morse code. Station identification letters are shown on air navigation charts. For example, the VOR-DME based at Vilo Acuña Airport in Cayo Largo del Sur, Cuba is identified by "UCL", and Morse code UCL is repeatedly transmitted on its radio frequency.

In some countries, during periods of maintenance, the facility may instead transmit the signal TEST ( ▄▄▄   ▄  ▄ ▄ ▄  ▄▄▄ ), or the identification may be removed, which tells pilots and navigators that the station is unreliable. In Canada, the identification is removed entirely to signify the navigation aid is not to be used.[37][38]

In the aviation service, Morse is typically sent at a very slow speed of about 5 words per minute. In the U.S., pilots do not actually have to know Morse to identify the transmitter because the dot/dash sequence is written out next to the transmitter's symbol on aeronautical charts. Some modern navigation receivers automatically translate the code into displayed letters.

The sound of non-directional beacon WG, on 248 kHz, located at 49.8992 North, 97.349197 West,[39] near Winnipeg's main airport

Amateur radio

[edit]
Vibroplex brand semiautomatic key[e] (informally called a "bug" since it vaguely resembles a stick insect)

International Morse code today is most popular among amateur radio operators, in the mode commonly referred to as "continuous wave" or "CW".[f] Other, faster keying methods are available in radio telegraphy, such as frequency-shift keying (FSK).

The original amateur radio operators used Morse code exclusively since voice-capable radio transmitters did not become commonly available until around 1920. Until 2003, the International Telecommunication Union mandated Morse code proficiency as part of the amateur radio licensing procedure worldwide. However, the World Radiocommunication Conference of 2003 made the Morse code requirement for amateur radio licensing optional.[40] Many countries subsequently removed the Morse requirement from their license requirements.[41]

Morse code recorded on the 40 meter ham radio band (31 sec)

Until 1991, a demonstration of the ability to send and receive Morse code at a minimum of five words per minute (WPM) was required to receive an amateur radio license for use in the United States from the Federal Communications Commission. Demonstration of this ability was still required for the privilege to use the shortwave bands. Until 2000, proficiency at the 20 WPM level was required to receive the highest level of amateur license (Amateur Extra Class); effective April 15, 2000, in the FCC reduced the Extra Class requirement to 5 WPM.[42] Finally, effective on February 23, 2007, the FCC eliminated the Morse code proficiency requirements from all amateur radio licenses.

While voice and data transmissions are limited to specific amateur radio bands under U.S. rules, Morse code is permitted on all amateur bands: LF, MF low, MF high, HF, VHF, and UHF. In some countries, certain portions of the amateur radio bands are reserved for transmission of Morse code signals only.

Because Morse code transmissions employ an on-off keyed radio signal, it requires less complex equipment than other radio transmission modes. Morse code also uses less bandwidth (typically only 100–150 Hz wide, although only for a slow data rate) than voice communication (roughly 2,400~2,800 Hz used by SSB voice).

Morse code is usually received as a high-pitched audio tone, so transmissions are easier to copy than voice through the noise on congested frequencies, and it can be used in very high noise / low signal environments. The fact that the transmitted power is concentrated into a very limited bandwidth makes it possible to use narrow receiver filters, which suppress or eliminate interference on nearby frequencies. The narrow signal bandwidth also takes advantage of the natural aural selectivity of the human brain, further enhancing weak signal readability.[citation needed] This efficiency makes CW extremely useful for DX (long distance) transmissions, as well as for low-power transmissions (commonly called "QRP operation", from the Q-code for "reduce power"). There are several amateur clubs that require solid high speed copy, the highest of these has a standard of 60 WPM. The American Radio Relay League offers a code proficiency certification program that starts at 10 WPM.

The relatively limited speed at which Morse code can be sent led to the development of an extensive number of abbreviations to speed communication. These include prosigns, Q codes, and a set of Morse code abbreviations for typical message components. For example, CQ is broadcast to be interpreted as "seek you" (I'd like to converse with anyone who can hear my signal). The abbreviations OM (old man), YL (young lady), and XYL ("ex-young lady" – wife) are common. YL or OM is used by an operator when referring to the other operator (regardless of their actual age), and XYL or OM (rather than the expected XYM) is used by an operator when referring to his or her spouse. QTH is "transmitting location" (spoken "my Q.T.H." is "my location"). The use of abbreviations for common terms permits conversation even when the operators speak different languages.

Although the traditional telegraph key (straight key) is still used by some amateurs, the use of mechanical semi-automatic keyers[e] (informally called "bugs"), and of fully automatic electronic keyers (called "single paddle" and either "double-paddle" or "iambic" keys) is prevalent today. Software is also frequently employed to produce and decode Morse code radio signals. The ARRL has a readability standard for robot encoders called ARRL Farnsworth spacing[43] that is supposed to have higher readability for both robot and human decoders. Some programs like WinMorse[44] have implemented the standard.

Other uses

[edit]

Radio navigation aids such as VORs and NDBs for aeronautical use broadcast identifying information in the form of Morse Code, though many VOR stations now also provide voice identification.[45] Warships, including those of the U.S. Navy, have long used signal lamps to exchange messages in Morse code. Modern use continues, in part, as a way to communicate while maintaining radio silence.

Automatic Transmitter Identification System (ATIS) uses Morse code to identify uplink sources of analog satellite transmissions.

Many amateur radio repeaters identify with Morse, even though they are used for voice communications.

Applications for the general public

[edit]
Representation of Morse code SOS

An important application is signalling for help through SOS, " ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ". This can be sent many ways: keying a radio on and off, flashing a mirror, toggling a flashlight, and similar methods. The SOS signal is not sent as three separate characters; rather, it is a prosign SOS, and is keyed without gaps between characters.[46] The specific meaning of the SOS prosign is equivalent to "This is the start of a distress message" (all other transmissions to go silent for the duration of the message).

Morse code as an assistive technology

[edit]

Morse code has been employed as an assistive technology, helping people with a variety of disabilities to communicate.[47][48][g][50] For example, the Android operating system versions 5.0 and higher allow users to input text using Morse Code as an alternative to a keypad or handwriting recognition.[51]

Morse can be sent by persons with severe motion disabilities, as long as they have some minimal motor control. An original solution to the problem that caretakers have to learn to decode has been an electronic typewriter with the codes written on the keys. Codes were sung by users; see the voice typewriter employing Morse or votem.[52]

Morse code can also be translated by computer and used in a speaking communication aid. In some cases, this means alternately blowing into and sucking on a plastic tube ("sip-and-puff" interface). An important advantage of Morse code over row column scanning is that once learned, it does not require looking at a display. Also, it appears faster than scanning.

In one case reported in the radio amateur magazine QST,[53] an old shipboard radio operator who had a stroke and lost the ability to speak or write could communicate with his physician (a radio amateur) by blinking his eyes in Morse. Two examples of communication in intensive care units were also published in QST magazine.[54][55] Another example occurred in 1966 when prisoner of war Jeremiah Denton, brought on television by his North Vietnamese captors, Morse-blinked the word TORTURE. In these two cases, interpreters were available to understand those series of eye-blinks.

Representation, timing, and speeds

[edit]

International Morse code is composed of five elements:[2]: §3 

  1. short mark, dot or dit ( ▄ ): "dit duration" is one time unit long
  2. long mark, dash or dah ( ▄▄▄ ): three time units long
  3. inter-element gap between the dits or dahs within a single character: one dit duration silence, one unit long
  4. short gap (between letters): one dah duration silence, three time units long
  5. medium gap (between words): a long silence, duration the same as two (silent) dahs sent with a normal one dit gap, seven time units (formerly five[6])

Note that the two mark signals, the dit and dah, are an odd number of dits long (1 or 3), and the gaps or spaces that always follow them are also odd numbers of dits (1, 3, or 7). Because of that, any code in ITU International Morse always comes out to an even number of dits when both the mark and space timing of the whole symbol are counted. That makes ITU Morse have a two-dit-long staccato beat, which helps telegraphers keep their transmit rate steady.

Transmission

[edit]

Morse code can be transmitted in a number of ways: Originally as electrical pulses along a telegraph wire, but later extended to an audio tone, a radio signal with short and long tones, or high and low tones, or as a mechanical, audible, or visual signal (e.g. a flashing light) using devices like an Aldis lamp or a heliograph, a common flashlight, or even a car horn. Some mine rescues have used pulling on a rope - a short pull for a dot and a long pull for a dah. Ground forces send messages to aircraft with panel signalling, where a horizontal panel is a dah and a vertical panel a dit.[56]

Morse messages are generally transmitted by a hand-operated device such as a telegraph key, so there are variations introduced by the skill of the sender and receiver — more experienced operators can send and receive at faster speeds. In addition, individual operators differ slightly, for example, using slightly longer or shorter dahs or gaps, perhaps only for particular characters. This is called their "fist", and experienced operators can recognize specific individuals by it alone. A good operator who sends clearly and is easy to copy is said to have a "good fist". A "poor fist" is a characteristic of sloppy or hard to copy Morse code.

Digital storage

[edit]

Morse code is transmitted using just two states (on and off). Morse code may be represented as a binary code, and that is what telegraph operators do when transmitting messages. Working from the above ITU definition and further defining a bit as a dot time, a Morse code sequence may be crudely represented a combination of the following five bit-strings:

  1. short mark, dot or dit ( ▄ ): '1'b
  2. longer mark, dash or dah ( ▄▄▄ ): '111'b
  3. intra-character gap (between the dits and dahs within a character): 0
  4. short gap (between letters): '000'b
  5. medium gap (between words): '0000000'b

The marks and gaps alternate: Dits and dahs are always separated by one of the gaps, and that the gaps are always separated by a dit or a dah.

A more efficient binary encoding uses only two-bits for each dit or dah element, with the 1 dit-length pause that must follow after each automatically included for every 2 bit code. One possible coding is by number value for the length of signal tone sent one could use '01'b for a dit and the automatic single-dit pause after it, and '11'b for a dah and the automatic single-dit following pause, and '00'b for the extra pause between letters (in effect, an end-of-letter mark). That leaves the code '10'b available for some other purpose, such as an escape character, or to more compactly represent the extra space between words (an end-of-word mark) instead of '00 00 00'b (only 6 dit lengths, since the 7th is automatically inserted as part of the prior dit or dah).

Although the dit and inter-letter pauses work out to be the same, for any letter containing a dah, the two-bit encoding uses digital memory more compactly than the direct-conversion bit strings mentioned above. Including the letter-separating spaces, all International Morse letter codes pack into 12 bits or less (5 symbols), and most fit into 10 bits or less (4 symbols); most of the procedural signs fit into 14 bits, with a few only needing 12 bits (5 symbols); and all digits require exactly 12 bits.

For example, Morse G ( ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  + 2 extra empty dits for "end of letter") would binary-encode as '11'b, '11'b, '01'b, '00'b; when packed it is '1111 0100'b = 'F4'x, which stores into only one byte (two nibbles) (as does every three-element code). The bit encoding for the longer method mentioned earlier the same letter would encode as '1110'b, '1110'b, '1000'b = '1110 1110 1000'b = 'EE8'x, or one-and-a-half bytes (three nibbles). The space saving allows small devices, like portable memory keyers, to have more and longer International Morse code sequences in small, conventional device-driver microprocessors' RAM chips.

Cable code

[edit]

The very long time constants of 19th and early 20th century submarine communications cables required a different form of Morse signalling. Instead of keying a voltage on and off for varying times, the dits and dahs were represented by two polarities of voltage impressed on the cable, for a uniform time.[57]

Timing

[edit]

Below is an illustration of timing conventions. The phrase MORSE CODE, in Morse code format, would normally be written something like this, where  ▄▄▄  represents dahs and  ▄  represents dits:

M O R S E       C O D E
 ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄   ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄   ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄   ▄ ▄ ▄   ▄   ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄   ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄   ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄   ▄ 

Next is the exact conventional timing for this phrase, with representing "signal on", and ˽ representing "signal off", each for the time length of exactly one dit:

M O R S E       C O D E
▓▓▓˽▓▓▓ ˽˽˽ ▓▓▓˽▓▓▓˽▓▓▓ ˽˽˽ ▓˽▓▓▓˽▓ ˽˽˽ ▓˽▓˽▓ ˽˽˽ ˽˽˽˽˽˽˽ ▓▓▓˽▓˽▓▓▓˽▓ ˽˽˽ ▓▓▓˽▓▓▓˽▓▓▓ ˽˽˽ ▓▓▓˽▓˽▓ ˽˽˽
symbol
dah
dit
letter
word
space
space
space

Spoken representation

[edit]

Morse code is often spoken or written with dah for dashes, dit for dots located at the end of a character, and di for dots located at the beginning or internally within the character. Thus, the following Morse code sequence:

 ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄   ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄   ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄   ▄ ▄ ▄   ▄   ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄   ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄   ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄   ▄ 
M O R S E       C O D E

is spoken (or sung):

dah dah dah dah dah di dah dit di di dit dit     dah di dah dit dah dah dah dah di dit dit 
 ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄   ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄   ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄   ▄ ▄ ▄   ▄   ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄   ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄   ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄   ▄ 
M O R S E C O D E

For use on radio, there is little point in learning to read Morse written in dashes and dots, as above; rather, the sounds of all of the letters and symbols need to be learned, for both sending and receiving.

Speed in words per minute

[edit]

All Morse code elements depend on the dot / dit length. A dah is the length of 3 dits (with no gaps between), and spacings are specified in number of dit lengths. An unambiguous method of specifying the transmission speed is to specify the dit duration as, for example, 50 milliseconds.

Specifying the dit duration is, however, not the common practice. Usually, speeds are stated in words per minute. That introduces ambiguity because words have different numbers of characters, and characters have different dit lengths. It is not immediately clear how a specific word rate determines the dit duration in milliseconds.

Some method to standardize the transformation of a word rate to a dit duration is useful. A simple way to do this is to choose a dit duration that would send a typical word the desired number of times in one minute. If, for example, the operator wanted a character speed of 13 words per minute, the operator would choose a dit rate that would send the typical word 13 times in exactly one minute.

The typical word thus determines the dit length. It is common to assume that a word is 5 characters long. There are two common typical words: PARIS and CODEX. PARIS mimics a word rate that is typical of natural language words and reflects the benefits of Morse code's shorter code durations for common characters such as E and T. CODEX offers a word rate that is typical of 5 letter code groups (sequences of random letters). Using the word PARIS as a standard, the number of dit units is 50 and a simple calculation shows that the dit length at 20 words per minute is 60 milliseconds. Using the word CODEX with 60 dit units, the dit length at 20 words per minute is 50 milliseconds.

Because Morse code is usually sent by hand, it is unlikely that an operator could be that precise with the dit length, and the individual characteristics and preferences of the operators usually override the standards.

For commercial radiotelegraph licenses in the United States, the Federal Communications Commission specifies tests for Morse code proficiency in words per minute and in code groups per minute.[58]: §13.207(c), §13.209(d)  The FCC specifies that a "word" is 5 characters long. The Commission specifies Morse code test elements at 16 code groups per minute, 20 words per minute, 20 code groups per minute, and 25 words per minute.[58]: §13.203(b)  The word per minute rate would be close to the PARIS standard, and the code groups per minute would be close to the CODEX standard.

While the Federal Communications Commission no longer requires Morse code for amateur radio licenses, the old requirements were similar to the requirements for commercial radiotelegraph licenses.[58]: §97.503, 1996 

A difference between amateur radio licenses and commercial radiotelegraph licenses is that commercial operators must be able to receive code groups of random characters along with plain language text. For each class of license, the code group speed requirement is slower than the plain language text requirement. For example, for the Radiotelegraph Operator License, the examinee must pass a 20 word per minute plain text test and a 16 word per minute code group test.[32]

Based upon a 50 dit duration standard word such as PARIS, the time for one dit duration or one unit can be computed by the formula:

T = 1,200/W

where: T is the unit time, or dit duration in milliseconds, and W is the speed in WPM.

High-speed telegraphy contests are held; according to the Guinness Book of Records in June 2005 at the International Amateur Radio Union's 6th World Championship in High Speed Telegraphy in Primorsko, Bulgaria, Andrei Bindasov of Belarus transmitted 230 Morse code marks of mixed text in one minute.[59]

Farnsworth speed

[edit]

Sometimes, especially while teaching Morse code, the timing rules above are changed so two different speeds are used: A character speed and a text speed. The character speed is how fast each individual letter is sent. The text speed is how fast the entire message is sent. For example, individual characters may be sent at a 13 words-per-minute rate, but the intercharacter and interword gaps may be lengthened so the word rate is only 5 words per minute.

Using different character and text speeds is, in fact, a common practice, and is used in the Farnsworth method of learning Morse code.

Alternative display of common characters in International Morse code

[edit]

Some methods of teaching Morse code use a dichotomic search table.

International Morse code binary search tree: The graph branches left for each dit and right for each dah until the character representation is reached. Official ITU codes are shown as black letters on dark grey, and are complete, including punctuation; a few non-ITU extensions are shown in outline-font on light grey, but many others are left out. ITU prosigns are circled in red with red text and are complete; unofficial prosigns are orange and are mostly complete.

Learning methods

[edit]

People learning Morse code using the Farnsworth method are taught to send and receive letters and other symbols at their full target speed, that is with normal relative timing of the dits, dahs, and spaces within each symbol for that speed. The Farnsworth method is named for Donald R. "Russ" Farnsworth, also known by his call sign, W6TTB. However, initially exaggerated spaces between symbols and words are used, to give "thinking time" to make the sound "shape" of the letters and symbols easier to learn. The spacing can then be reduced with practice and familiarity.

Another popular teaching method is the Koch method, invented in 1935 by the German engineer and former stormtrooper Ludwig Koch,[60] which uses the full target speed from the outset but begins with just two characters. Once strings containing those two characters can be copied with 90% accuracy, an additional character is added, and so on until the full character set is mastered.

In North America, many thousands of individuals have increased their code recognition speed (after initial memorization of the characters) by listening to the regularly scheduled code practice transmissions broadcast by W1AW, the station at the American Radio Relay League's headquarters[61] or by listening to the archived recordings available at its website.[62] As of 2015, the United States military taught Morse code as an 81 day self-paced course, having phased out more traditional classes.[63]

Mnemonics

[edit]
Scout movement founder Baden-Powell's mnemonic chart from 1918

Visual mnemonic charts have been devised over the ages. Baden-Powell included one in the Girl Guides handbook[64] in 1918.

In the United Kingdom, many people learned the Morse code by means of a series of words or phrases that have the same rhythm as a Morse character. For instance, Q in Morse is dah dah di dah , which can be memorized by the phrase "God Save the Queen", and the Morse for F is di di dah dit , which can be memorized as "Did she like it?"[h]

Letters, numbers, punctuations, prosigns for Morse code and non-Latin variants

[edit]
Category Character Code
Letters A, a  ▄ ▄▄▄ 
B, b  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ 
C, c  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
D, d  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ 
E, e  ▄ 
F, f  ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
G, g  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
H, h  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ 
I, i  ▄ ▄ 
J, j  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
K, k
Prosign for general invitation to transmit
 ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
L, l  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ 
M, m  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
N, n  ▄▄▄ ▄ 
O, o  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
P, p  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Q, q  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
R, r  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
S, s  ▄ ▄ ▄ 
T, t  ▄▄▄ 
U, u  ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
V, v  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
W, w  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
X, x  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Y, y  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
Z, z  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ 
Numbers 0  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
1  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
2  ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
3  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
4  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
5  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ 
6  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ 
7  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ 
8  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ 
9  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Punctuation Period [ . ]  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Comma [ , ]  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
Question mark [ ? ]  ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ 
Apostrophe [ ' ][i]  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Slash or Fraction bar [/]
DN digraph
 ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Open parenthesis [ ( ]
KN digraph; unofficial prosign for exclusive invitation to transmit
 ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Close parenthesis [ ) ]
KK digraph
 ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Colon [ : ]  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ 
Double dash [ = ]
BT digraph; prosign for new section or new paragraph
 ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Plus sign [ + ]
RN digraph; prosign for new message or new page
 ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Hyphen or Minus sign [ − ]  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Quotation mark [ " ][i]  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
At sign [ @ ]
AC digraph
 ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Nonstandard punctuation[j] Exclamation mark, [ ! ]
KW digraph, alt. MN[k]
 ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
alt.  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Ampersand [ & ][l]
AS digraph; prosign for wait
 ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ 
Semicolon [ ; ]  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Underscore [_][m]  ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Dollar sign [ $ ]
SX digraph
 ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Prosigns End of work
SK digraph
 ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Error
HH digraph
 ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ 
General invitation to transmit
Also used for letter 'K'
 ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Transmission start signal
CT digraph
 ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Next message follows
RN digraph; message or page separator[n]
 ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Verified
Also used for letter Ŝ
 ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Wait
Proposed for use as ampersand [ & ][l]
 ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ 
non-Latin[j]
extensions
À, à
Code shared with Å
 ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Ä, ä
Code shared with Æ, Ą
 ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Å, å
Code shared with À
 ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Ą, ą
Code shared with Ä, Æ
 ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Æ, æ
Code shared with Ä, Ą
 ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Ć, ć
Code shared with Ĉ, Ç
 ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ 
Ĉ, ĉ
Code shared with Ć, Ç
 ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ 
Ç, ç
Code shared with Ć, Ĉ
 ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ 
CH, ch
Code shared with Ĥ, Š
 ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
Đ, đ (D with stroke)
Code shared with É[o], Ę; distinct from eth (Ð, ð)
 ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ 
Ð, ð ( Edh or eth)
Distinct from D with stroke ( Đ, đ)
 ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
É, é[o]
Code shared with Đ ,Ę
 ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ 
È, è
Code shared with Ł
 ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Ę, ę
Code shared with Đ, É[o]
 ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ 
Ĝ, ĝ  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Ĥ, ĥ
Code shared with CH, Š
 ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
Ĵ, ĵ  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Ł, ł
Code shared with È
 ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 
Ń, ń
Code shared with Ñ
 ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
Ñ, ñ
Code shared with Ń
 ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
Ó, ó
Code shared with Ö, Ø, [ ! ][k]
 ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Ö, ö
Code shared with Ó, Ø, [ ! ][k]
 ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Ø, ø
Code shared with Ó, Ö, [ ! ][k]
 ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Ś, ś  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ 
Ŝ, ŝ
Prosign for verified
 ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Š, š
Code shared with CH, Ĥ
 ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
Þ, þ  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ 
Ü, ü
Code shared with Ŭ
 ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
Ŭ, ŭ
Code shared with Ü
 ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
Ź, ź  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
Ż, ż  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 

Cut numbers

[edit]

Most numbers have an unofficial short-form, given in the table below. They are only used when both the sender and the receiver understand that numbers, and not letters, are intended;[citation needed] for example, one often sees the most common R-S-T signal report rendered as 5NN[‡] instead of 599.[citation needed]

Cut numbers
[citation needed]
Intended
digit
"Cut" number
code
Same as code
in Intl. Morse
[*]
Normal code
(long form)
[*]
0  ▄▄▄  T  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
1  ▄ ▄▄▄  A  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
2  ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  U  ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
3  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  V  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ 
4 N/A[†] 4[†]  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ [†]
5  ▄ [‡] E or 5[‡]  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ [‡]
6 N/A[†] 6[†]  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ [†]
7  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄  B  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄ 
8  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄  D  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ 
9  ▄▄▄ ▄  N  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 
.  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄  K  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ 

Table notes

[*] Codes that are not cut numbers, or are not numbers, are shaded grey in the table.
[†] There are no distinct cut-number codes for 4 or 6, since cut numbers are made by reducing multiple dahs in the standard Morse number codes to only one dah, but keeping all the dits as-is; digits 4 and 6 already have only one dah.
[‡] Some operators just send the standard code for 5, even when using other cut numbers, since five dits are still fairly short (same duration as cut 3 and cut 7), and one might imagine a single dit possibly being misinterpreted as either a mistaken cut 1 or cut decimal point.[citation needed]

Prosigns

[edit]

Prosigns for Morse code are special (usually) unwritten procedural signals or symbols that are used to indicate changes in communications protocol status or white space text formatting actions. Almost all prosigns are also used to encode special characters, such as [ + ], [ = ], or [ ( ]; the receiving telegrapher must distinguish the character-meaning from the prosign-meaning by context.

Symbol representations

[edit]

The symbols [ ! ], [ $ ], and [ & ] are not defined inside the official ITU-R International Morse Code Recommendation,[2] but informal conventions for them exist. (The [ @ ] symbol was formally added in 2004. The [ % ] and [ ‰ ] symbols both have recommended long encodings.[2])

Exclamation mark
There is no standard representation for the exclamation mark [ ! ], although the KW digraph ( ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ) was proposed in the 1980s by the Heathkit Company.[p] While Morse code translation software prefers the Heathkit version, on-air use is not yet universal, as some amateur radio operators in North America and the Caribbean continue to use the older MN digraph ( ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ )[k] copied over from American Morse landline code.
Currency symbols
The ITU has never formally codified any currency symbols into Morse code: The unambiguous ISO 4217 currency codes are preferred for transmission (e.g. CNY, EUR, GBP, JPY, KRW, USD, etc.). However, the symbol [ $ ] was represented in the Phillips Code[q] as two characters "SX"; eventually operators dropped the intervening space and merged the two letter code or abbreviation into the single unofficial punctuation encoding SX ( ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ).
Ampersand [ & ]
The suggested unofficial encoding of the ampersand [ & ] sign listed above,[l] often shown as AS, is also the official Morse prosign for wait. In addition, the American Morse encoding for an ampersand ( ▄  ▄ ▄ ▄ ) was similar to ES ( ▄  ▄ ▄ ▄ ) and hams have nearly universally carried over this use as an abbreviation for "and" (e.g. WX HR COLD ES RAINY "the weather here is cold and rainy"). Since ES is well established and slightly quicker than AS, there is no motivation for replacing it.
Keyboard "at" sign [ @ ]
On 24 May 2004 – the 160th anniversary of the first public Morse telegraph transmission – the Radiocommunication Bureau of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-R) formally added the [ @ ] ("commercial at" or "commat") character to the official Morse character set, using the sequence denoted by the AC digraph:  ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  .[2][68]
This sequence was reported to have been chosen to represent "A[t] C[ommercial]", or a letter 'a' inside a swirl represented by a letter 'C'. The new character facilitates sending e‑mail addresses by Morse code, and is notable since it is the first official addition to the Morse set of characters since World War I.[68]
Percent [ % ] and permille [ ‰ ] signs
Percent and permille signs should be encoded with zeroes separated by a slash, joined to the preceding number by a dash; so e.g. "4%" would be sent as "4-0/0", and "5‰" as "5-0/00", and "6.7%" as "6.7-0/0".[2]

Diacritics and non-Latin extensions

[edit]

The typical tactic for creating Morse codes for diacritics and non-Latin alphabetic scripts has been to begin by simply re-using the International Morse codes already used for letters whose sound matches the sound of the local alphabet. Because Gerke code (the predecessor to International Morse) was in official use in central Europe,[24] and included four characters not included in the International Morse standard (Ä, Ö, Ü, and CH), these four have served as a beginning-point for other languages that use an alphabetic script, but require codes for letters not accommodated by International Morse.

The usual method has been to first transliterate the sounds represented by the International code and the four unique Gerke codes into the local alphabet, hence Greek, Hebrew, Russian, and Ukrainian Morse codes. If more codes are needed, one can either invent a new code or convert an otherwise unused code from either code set to the non-Latin letter. For example:

  • Spanish letter Ñ in Spanish Morse is  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ; it is a unique code specific to the Spanish language (although also used elsewhere for equivalent Ń), and is not used in either International Morse nor in Gerke Morse.
  • For the Greek letter Ψ, Greek Morse code uses the International Morse code for Q,  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ , which has no corresponding letter in modern Greek. Other than the code being otherwise unused, the choice is arbitrary: Ψ and Q have no historical, phonetic, or shape relationship.

For Russian and Bulgarian, Russian Morse code maps the Cyrillic characters to four-element codes. Many of those characters are encoded the same as their Latin alphabet look-alikes or sound-alikes (A, O, E, I, T, M, N, R, K, etc.). The Bulgarian alphabet contains 30 characters, which exactly matches the number of all possible permutations of 1, 2, 3, and 4 dits and dahs (Russian Ы is used as Bulgarian Ь, Russian Ь is used as Bulgarian Ъ). Russian requires two more codes, for the letters Э and Ъ which are each encoded with 5 elements.

Non-alphabetic scripts require more radical adaption. Japanese Morse code (Wabun code) has a separate encoding for kana script; although many of the codes are used for International Morse, the sounds they represent are mostly unrelated. The Japanese / Wabun code includes special prosigns for switching back-and-forth from International Morse:  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  signals a switch from International Morse to Wabun, and  ▄ ▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  to return from Wabun to International Morse.

For Chinese, Chinese telegraph code is used to map Chinese characters to four-digit codes and send these digits out using standard Morse code. Korean Morse code[69] uses the SKATS mapping, originally developed to allow Korean to be typed on western typewriters. SKATS maps hangul characters to arbitrary letters of the Latin script and has no relationship to pronunciation in Korean.

Unusual variants

[edit]

During early World War I (1914–1916), Germany briefly experimented with 'dotty' and 'dashy' Morse, in essence adding a dot or a dash at the end of each Morse symbol. Each one was quickly broken by Allied SIGINT, and standard Morse was resumed by Spring 1916. Only a small percentage of Western Front (North Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea) traffic was in 'dotty' or 'dashy' Morse during the entire war. In popular culture, this is mostly remembered in the book The Codebreakers by David Kahn and in the national archives of the UK and Australia (whose SIGINT operators copied most of this Morse variant). Kahn's cited sources come from the popular press and wireless magazines of the time.[70]

Other variations include forms of "fractional Morse" or "fractionated Morse", which recombine the characters of the Morse code–encoded message and then encrypt them using a cipher in order to disguise the text.[71]

Decoding software

[edit]

Decoding software for Morse code ranges from software-defined wide-band radio receivers, coupled to the Reverse Beacon Network,[72] which decodes signals and detects CQ messages on ham bands, to smartphone applications.[73]

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Morse code is a standardized system of encoding text characters as sequences of two distinct signal durations, known as dots (short signals) and dashes (long signals), or dits and dahs, primarily for transmission over telegraph lines or radio waves. Developed in the 1830s and 1840s by American inventor Samuel F. B. Morse and his collaborator Alfred Vail, it enabled the rapid sending and receiving of messages using the electric telegraph, revolutionizing long-distance communication. The code's origins trace back to Morse's early work on the electromagnetic telegraph, patented in 1840, with Vail playing a crucial role in refining the system and devising the alphabetic code of dots and dashes to replace Morse's initial numerical system for faster decoding. The first public demonstration occurred on May 24, 1844, when Morse transmitted the message "What hath God wrought" from Washington, D.C., to Baltimore, Maryland, marking a pivotal moment in telecommunications history. Over time, variations emerged, but the International Morse code, formalized through international agreements, became the global standard, defining 26 letters, 10 numerals, and various punctuation marks with specific timing: a dot as one unit, a dash as three units, intra-character spacing as one unit, inter-character as three units, and inter-word as seven units. Historically, Morse code was essential for maritime, military, and commercial communications, facilitating instant messaging across continents until the mid-20th century when voice radio and digital systems largely supplanted it. It remains in use for emergency distress signals, such as SOS. Today, it persists in amateur radio (often called continuous wave or CW mode), where operators use it for efficient, low-power contacts on high-frequency bands, valued for its simplicity and resilience in noisy conditions. The International Telecommunication Union continues to recognize its provisions for radiocommunication services, particularly in amateur and satellite operations, underscoring its enduring technical legacy.

History and Development

Origins in Early Telegraphs

Early optical telegraphs, such as semaphore systems, represented the first organized attempts at long-distance visual signaling. In 1792, French inventor Claude Chappe established a semaphore line between Paris and Lille using a series of towers spaced about 10 to 20 miles apart, where operators manually adjusted pivoting arms into various positions to encode letters and numbers, relayed via telescopes. These systems transmitted messages faster than couriers on horseback—a dispatch from Paris to Lille took roughly 32 minutes—but were severely limited by their dependence on clear line-of-sight visibility, restricting operations to daylight hours and fair weather conditions like fog, rain, or snow that obscured signals. Additionally, geographical barriers such as mountains or bodies of water prevented expansion, confining networks to linear routes and requiring extensive infrastructure of relay stations. The quest for more reliable communication led to the invention of electrical telegraphs in the early 19th century. In 1816, British inventor Francis Ronalds constructed the first working electric telegraph in his garden in Hammersmith, London, spanning about 8 miles of wire insulated with pitch and connected to an electrostatic generator that produced pulses to move indicators on synchronized dials at each end. Ronalds demonstrated instantaneous signal transmission over this distance, using a friction wheel to generate static electricity and paper tape to record messages, though his design was rejected by the British Admiralty as unnecessary given the prevalence of optical systems. This electrostatic approach marked a shift from visual to electric signaling but remained experimental due to the complexity of maintaining charge over wires. Building on such foundations, Charles Wheatstone and William Fothergill Cooke developed a practical electromagnetic telegraph in 1837, patented as a five-needle instrument that used electromagnets to deflect needles on a diamond-shaped board toward letters of the alphabet. The system operated by sending current pulses through wires to activate specific needles, allowing operators to spell out messages by pointing to characters, and was first installed along a 2-kilometer railway line between Paddington and West Drayton in London. Later refinements reduced the number of needles to two or one, simplifying installation while retaining the deflection mechanism for signaling. These step-by-step needle telegraphs enabled commercial use, particularly for railway signaling, by providing a visual readout without requiring auditory interpretation. Early codes for these electrical systems, such as the Wheatstone ABC code introduced in the 1840s for single-needle instruments, relied on sequences of needle deflections to represent letters, where left or right movements in combinations (e.g., one left for A, one right for B) encoded the alphabet without directly pointing to it. This binary-like deflection system, akin to a simplified Baconian cipher, allowed for compact transmission using minimal wires but demanded operator familiarity with the codebook to decode rapid sequences. Unlike optical semaphores' positional codes, these electrical variants prioritized electrical efficiency over visual clarity, though they still faced issues with ambiguous signals in noisy environments. Without standardized codes, long-distance electrical transmission posed significant challenges, including signal distortion from wire resistance and capacitance, which weakened pulses and caused fading or overlap over distances beyond a few miles. Early setups required frequent relays or boosters to maintain intelligibility, as uninsulated or poorly grounded wires led to electrostatic interference and inconsistent deflections, complicating message accuracy across networks. These limitations in reliability and scalability for extended lines underscored the need for more robust, code-efficient systems. Samuel Morse's independent development in the 1830s addressed many of these issues by introducing a simpler, audible signaling method.

Invention by Morse and Vail

Samuel F. B. Morse, a renowned portrait painter, conceived the idea for an electromagnetic telegraph during his return voyage from Europe in 1832, inspired by discussions on electromagnetism with fellow passenger Charles Thomas Jackson, who demonstrated principles involving electromagnets. This spark of inspiration came after Morse had spent several years in Europe studying art, during which he was exposed to emerging scientific lectures and experiments in the 1820s that heightened his interest in electricity. Over the next five years, Morse, with assistance from physicist Leonard Gale, iteratively developed a working model using rudimentary components like homemade batteries and clockwork mechanisms, addressing key challenges such as signal relay to extend transmission distance. By late 1837, Morse had refined the system sufficiently to apply for a U.S. patent and seek federal funding for a demonstration line, culminating in his first public exhibition of the electromagnetic telegraph in New York in January 1838. In September 1837, Alfred Vail, a recent graduate and skilled machinist from New York University, joined Morse after witnessing an early demonstration and offered his father's ironworks facilities for further development. Vail's pivotal contributions included mechanizing the transmitter and receiver, as well as devising the dot-dash signaling system that replaced Morse's initial numerical code, which assigned sequences of up to five pulses (represented as dots or dashes) to numbers 1 through 5, with letters then mapped to those numbers via a reference dictionary. This original 1838 code table streamlined encoding by using shorter combinations for frequent letters like E (one dot) and T (one dash), while the receiver electromagnetically marked graphical dots and dashes on a moving paper tape for visual decoding, eliminating the need for constant operator attendance. Working at the Speedwell Ironworks in Morristown, New Jersey, Vail and Morse tested the apparatus over increasingly longer wires, successfully transmitting messages up to over two miles by early 1838, validating the system's practicality. The invention reached its public milestone on May 24, 1844, when Morse transmitted the first official telegraph message from the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., to Vail in Baltimore, Maryland, over a 40-mile line funded by Congress. The message, "What hath God wrought," drawn from the Bible (Numbers 23:23) and suggested by Annie Ellsworth, daughter of a patent office commissioner, marked the telegraph's debut and heralded instantaneous long-distance communication. This event, conducted from the Supreme Court chamber, demonstrated the code's efficacy in real-world use and paved the way for commercial expansion.

Transition to Audible Code

The initial Morse telegraph system utilized a mechanical register where an electromagnet actuated a stylus to imprint dots and dashes onto a paper tape advanced by a clockwork motor, requiring operators to visually interpret the markings after each transmission. This graphical method, first demonstrated on the 1844 Washington-to-Baltimore line, proved cumbersome, as deciphering the tape was time-consuming and vulnerable to errors from smudged impressions or mechanical failures. During the 1840s, telegraph operators pioneered a shift to audible reception by training themselves to recognize the rhythmic clicking sounds emitted by the receiver's electromagnet during signal pulses, allowing messages to be transcribed in real time without paper records. As early as 1845, proficient operators could identify most letters aurally from these clicks on the original recording apparatus, marking the onset of this efficiency-driven innovation. By 1846, widespread use among regular operators had emerged, despite initial resistance in some offices. Alfred Vail significantly advanced audible reception by incorporating it into demonstrations of the telegraph system and standardizing its application in early commercial offices, where he served as one of the first operators alongside Morse. His efforts helped transition the technology from experimental setups to practical, operator-led communication. This evolution to audible code yielded key advantages, boosting effective speeds from approximately 10 words per minute in early visual decoding to over 30 words per minute for trained listeners by the 1850s, while eliminating the need for paper supplies and simplifying equipment maintenance. Among the early hurdles were the demands of operator training to differentiate short dot clicks from longer dash sounds amid varying signal qualities, prompting refinements in tone duration consistency to reduce confusions between similar characters like "I," "O," and "EE."

Refinements by Gerke and Others

In 1848, Friedrich Clemens Gerke, a German telegraph operator and pioneer, introduced significant refinements to the original American Morse code to better suit European languages and improve transmission efficiency over landlines. His version, often called the German Morse code, simplified the system by eliminating variable-length dashes and internal spaces within characters, reducing the complexity that made the American code prone to errors in noisy environments. Gerke shortened codes for frequently used letters, assigning the briefest sequences to high-frequency characters in German and other continental languages, such as reconfiguring patterns to minimize total strokes—for instance, optimizing the representation of vowels and consonants common in European texts—while adding symbols for accented letters like Ä, Ö, and Ü. This resulted in nearly half the alphabet being revised, making transmissions faster and more reliable compared to the original American Morse, which retained longer, more varied elements suited to early paper-tape recorders. Gerke's code was first implemented on the telegraph line between Hamburg and Cuxhaven in 1848, marking Europe's initial adoption of Morse-based signaling. By 1851, it had gained widespread acceptance in continental Europe, particularly after the Austro-German Telegraph Union standardized a version for cross-border communications, highlighting its advantages in efficiency with fewer average strokes per character—often 20-30% shorter than American equivalents for common words. This European variant diverged notably from American Morse, which continued in use primarily for domestic railroad and landline telegraphy in the United States, where its rhythmic patterns aided operators listening to mechanical sounders. Gerke's adjustments emphasized uniformity in dot and dash durations, facilitating the shift toward audible reception that enhanced operator speed. The path to global standardization began with the 1851 International Telegraph Conference in Berlin, where delegates adopted a modified form of Gerke's code as the foundation for international use, incorporating minor tweaks to align with multiple languages. Further refinements occurred in the 1860s, including expanded punctuation marks (such as periods and commas) and revised numeral encodings to reduce ambiguity in commercial messages. These changes culminated in 1865 at the founding congress of the International Telegraph Union in Paris, where the code was formally ratified as International Morse Code, distinct from American Morse and optimized for worldwide telegraph networks. This version prioritized brevity and clarity, enabling faster intercontinental exchanges and solidifying its role in global communication until the late 20th century.

Expansion into Radio and Maritime Use

In the late 1890s, Guglielmo Marconi pioneered the adaptation of Morse code for wireless telegraphy, transmitting signals via radio waves over increasing distances. By 1901, Marconi achieved the first transatlantic wireless transmission, receiving the Morse code letter "S"—represented by three dots—from his station in Poldhu, Cornwall, to St. John's, Newfoundland. This breakthrough extended Morse code beyond land-based wires, enabling long-distance communication without physical connections and laying the foundation for global radiotelegraphy. Maritime adoption accelerated in the early 20th century, driven by international efforts to standardize wireless use on ships. The 1903 Preliminary Conference on Wireless Telegraphy in Berlin established principles for radiotelegraph regulations, leading to the 1906 International Radiotelegraph Convention, which mandated intercommunication between ships and shore stations using Morse code. This framework required large passenger and cargo vessels to equip wireless installations, enhancing safety at sea. The 1912 Titanic disaster underscored Morse code's critical role, as operators Jack Phillips and Harold Bride transmitted the newly adopted SOS prosign—a continuous sequence of three dots, three dashes, and three dots—alerting nearby vessels like the Carpathia to the sinking, though initial calls also used the older CQD signal. The event prompted stricter enforcement of wireless regulations worldwide. Post-World War I, Morse code integrated into aviation for radio telegraphs aiding aircraft navigation and communication. In the 1920s, the U.S. federal government deployed radio ranges along airways, where stations broadcast directional Morse code signals—such as "A" (dot-dash) for one quadrant and "N" (dash-dot) for the adjacent—to guide pilots. These systems, precursors to modern aids, served as backups to visual beacons and voice radio, with international standards under the International Commission for Air Navigation (ICAN) promoting Morse in beacons by the late 1920s. Radiotelegraphy expanded commercially in the 1910s-1930s through networks like those operated by the Marconi Company, facilitating transoceanic press and business messages, while military forces in World War I and II relied on it for secure, long-range tactical signaling, including submarine and aircraft operations. Complementing radio, visual flash telegraphy emerged for maritime use, employing Morse code patterns via intense light signals. Invented by Arthur Cyril Webb Aldis around 1909, the Aldis lamp—a powerful, shuttered spotlight—allowed ships to communicate optically over several miles in clear weather, transmitting dots and dashes by brief flashes for identification, distress, or coordination when radio was unavailable or jammed. This method proved vital in naval and merchant fleets during the world wars, maintaining signaling reliability in electromagnetic silence.

Decline of Commercial Telegraphy

The invention of the telephone in 1876 by Alexander Graham Bell introduced a direct competitor to the telegraph, offering real-time voice communication that gradually eroded demand for Morse code-based messaging, particularly for short-distance and personal exchanges. By the 1890s, advancements in long-distance telephony further intensified this rivalry, with telegraph traffic beginning a steady decline as telephones proved faster and more convenient for many commercial applications. Although the telegraph reached its peak expansion during the radio and maritime eras in the early 20th century, the telephone's widespread adoption had already reduced overall demand by more than half in key markets by the 1930s. In the 1920s, the introduction of teletypewriters, using variations of the Baudot code for automated printing, accelerated the replacement of manual Morse operators, as these machines allowed typists to transmit text at higher speeds without specialized code training. By the 1930s, services like AT&T's Teletypewriter Exchange (TWX), launched in 1931, further diminished the need for Morse code in business communications, shifting traffic to printed telegrams and reducing operator roles significantly. Post-World War II, automation intensified with the adoption of Baudot-based systems and emerging digital technologies, such as early facsimile and computer-assisted transmission, which eliminated the reliance on skilled Morse operators and contributed to a sharp drop in telegraph messages from a 1945 peak of 236 million to under 70 million by 1970. Regulatory changes in the late 20th century marked the formal end of mandatory Morse use in commercial sectors. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) phased out the Morse code requirement for maritime radio operations on February 1, 1999, under the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS), replacing it with satellite and digital alternatives. In the United States, the final commercial Morse code transmission occurred on July 12, 1999, from station KFS, signaling the close of an era for maritime and coastal telegraphy. Western Union, once the dominant telegraph provider, discontinued all telegram services on January 27, 2006, fully pivoting to financial transfers amid the rise of email and fax. In aviation, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reduced reliance on Morse code for navigation aids in the 2000s, with pilots no longer required to demonstrate proficiency for licensing as digital GPS systems supplanted traditional radio beacons. Despite these developments, Morse code did not vanish entirely but shifted to niche and emergency roles, persisting in amateur radio, military signaling, and as a backup protocol where digital systems might fail, underscoring its enduring legacy in communication history.

International Morse Code Standard

Character Encoding and Structure

International Morse Code encodes characters using sequences of short signals, known as dots or "dits," and long signals, known as dashes or "dahs," which function as binary-like elements to represent letters, numbers, and symbols. These sequences follow specific rules for transmission: elements within a character are separated by a brief pause equivalent to one dot duration, characters within a word are separated by a pause of three dot durations, and words are separated by a longer pause of seven dot durations. This structure ensures unambiguous decoding during real-time transmission. The assignment of code lengths is based on the frequency of letters in English text, a principle developed by Alfred Vail during the code's refinement in the 1830s, where more common letters receive shorter sequences to minimize overall transmission time. For example, the letter E, the most frequent in English, is represented by a single dot (.), while rarer letters like Z receive longer sequences such as --.. This frequency-optimized design, confirmed in the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) standard, enhances efficiency by reducing the average length of messages. The ITU standard also provides specific codes for some accented letters, such as É (..-..), and additional procedural signals (prosigns). The full encoding for the 26 Latin letters A-Z, as standardized by the ITU, is presented below:
LetterCodeLetterCode
A.-N-.
B-...O---
C-.-.P.--.
D-..Q--.-
E.R.-.
F..-.S...
G--.T-
H....U..-
I..V...-
J.---W.--
K-.-X-..-
L.-..Y-.--
M--Z--..
Numbers 0-9 are encoded with five-element sequences, intentionally longer than most letter codes to reduce ambiguity and errors in interpretation during transmission. The ITU standard defines them as follows:
NumberCode
0-----
1.----
2..---
3...--
4....-
5.....
6-....
7--...
8---..
9----.
Basic punctuation marks are also included in the standard, using distinct sequences typically longer than alphanumeric codes for clarity. Examples include the period (.), encoded as .-.-.-; the comma (,), as --..--; and the question mark (?), as ..--.. . Procedural signals, or prosigns, such as AR for end of message, are transmitted as continuous sequences without inter-element pauses, represented as .-.-. The encoding principles emphasize a variable-length, prefix-free code that allows immediate decoding without delimiters between characters, optimized for sequential transmission efficiency as refined through international standardization in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Timing and Transmission Methods

In International Morse Code, the fundamental timing is based on a basic time unit equal to the duration of a dot. A dot lasts 1 unit, while a dash lasts 3 units. The space between elements (dots or dashes) within the same character is also 1 unit, the space between characters is 3 units, and the space between words is 7 units. These signals are transmitted primarily via continuous wave (CW) radio using on-off keying (OOK), where the carrier wave is modulated by turning it on for dots and dashes and off for spaces. In audible form, the on periods produce a tone typically in the 700-800 Hz range, with 750 Hz being a common standard in practice files and training materials. For digital storage, Morse code can be preserved in audio files such as WAV format, generated from text via specialized converters. A variant known as cable code was adapted for undersea telegraph cables, incorporating extra-long spaces—such as 5 units between characters—to mitigate signal distortion caused by the cable's capacitance, which otherwise caused pulses to spread and overlap. The total duration of a character in units is calculated as the sum of its dots (each 1 unit), dashes (each 3 units), and intra-character spaces (1 unit each, numbering one less than the total elements). For example: Total time=(number of dots×1)+(number of dashes×3)+(number of intra-character spaces×1)\text{Total time} = (\text{number of dots} \times 1) + (\text{number of dashes} \times 3) + (\text{number of intra-character spaces} \times 1) where the basic unit duration is approximately 60 milliseconds (0.06 seconds) at a transmission rate of 20 words per minute, based on the "PARIS " standard word totaling 50 units. Reception traditionally relies on manual decoding by ear, where operators distinguish the rhythmic patterns of tones or clicks. Early automated methods used paper tape recorders, such as telegraph registers, which employed electromagnets to emboss or inscribe dots and dashes onto moving paper strips for later transcription. These evolved into modern software decoders, like MRP40, which process audio input from microphones or files to transcribe Morse code in real time.

Speed Measurement and Operator Proficiency

The speed of Morse code transmission is quantified in words per minute (wpm), a metric standardized using the word "PARIS" as the reference, which comprises exactly 50 timing units (dots and spaces within and between its five characters, plus the following word space). This standard accounts for the average length of English words, allowing consistent measurement across variable text; for instance, at 20 wpm, the full "PARIS" sequence—including three-unit inter-character spaces and a seven-unit word space—is sent 20 times per minute. To compute effective speed from an actual transmission, the formula wpm = (total characters / 5) × (60 / seconds) provides an approximation, treating five characters as equivalent to one standard word like "PARIS" and scaling to per-minute rate; this adjusts for typical prose density without requiring element-by-element counting. For learning and early proficiency, the Farnsworth method employs fixed short timings for intra-character elements (e.g., at 15 wpm, where a dot lasts 80 milliseconds) while extending inter-character and inter-word spaces to reduce overall speed, facilitating auditory pattern recognition without reverting to visual counting of dots and dashes. Developed by Donald R. Farnsworth (F6TTB), this technique ensures characters are sent at a consistent, faster rhythm to build instinctive recall, with overall rates starting low (e.g., 10 wpm) and gradually increasing; it is particularly effective below 18 wpm, as endorsed by organizations like the ARRL for training materials. Operator proficiency varies by speed and skill markers, with novices typically mastering 5-10 wpm for basic communication, general operators achieving reliable 15-25 wpm for conversational exchanges, and experts surpassing 40 wpm under good conditions, often in contesting or professional settings. Essential factors include cultivating a "fist"—the operator's distinctive sending rhythm, characterized by subtle variations in timing and spacing that make code identifiable yet readable, akin to a personal signature in manual keying. High proficiency also demands "head copying," where operators comprehend and respond to messages entirely in their mind without transcription, leveraging context, predictive phrasing, and phonetic grouping to handle speeds up to 50 wpm or more. Historically, 19th-century telegraph operators gained proficiency through apprenticeships at offices, shadowing experienced mentors to learn sending, receiving, and error correction on live wires over months or years, often starting with simple message relay before advancing to high-volume traffic. In modern contexts, such as former U.S. amateur radio licensing, proficiency was assessed via exams like FCC Element 1, requiring accurate copying and sending at 5 wpm until the requirement's elimination in 2007; similar tests persist for commercial radio operators, emphasizing practical speed under regulated conditions.

Variations for Non-Latin Scripts

To accommodate accented letters in European languages using the Latin alphabet, International Morse Code employs combinations of base letter codes with the code for E (·), allowing representation of diacritics without dedicated sequences for each variant. For example, the German Ä is encoded as the sequence for A (·–) followed by E (·), resulting in ·–·, while Ö uses O (–––) + E (·) as –––·; this method was standardized for efficiency in telegraphy across languages like German, French, and Scandinavian tongues. For non-Latin scripts, national adaptations emerged in the 19th and 20th centuries to extend Morse code to local writing systems, often mapping characters to sequences based on phonetic similarity to Latin equivalents or frequency of use. The Russian Morse code, enacted by the Russian government in 1856, approximates International Morse for Cyrillic letters while adding unique codes for the 33-character alphabet; for instance, Ч (ch) is –––· and Я (ya) is ––..–. This variant was widely used in Soviet-era telegraphy and radio communications until the mid-20th century. Similarly, the Japanese Wabun code, developed in the late 19th century for katakana syllabary transmission, assigns distinct dot-dash patterns to the 46 basic kana plus voiced variants, prioritizing common syllables; it was employed extensively in World War II telegraphic and radio signals. In East Asia, adaptations addressed logographic and syllabic challenges differently. The Chinese telegraphic code, introduced in 1871 by the Great Northern Telegraph Company, bypasses direct character encoding by assigning four-digit numeric codes to over 7,000 common hanzi, which are then transmitted using standard Morse for numerals (e.g., the character 中 (middle) as 0022, sent as Morse for 0 -----, 0 -----, 2 ..---, 2 ..---); this numeric system enabled efficient handling of the vast script despite Morse's limitations for ideographs and remained in use until the 1980s. For Korean, the Hangul-based Morse code, formalized in the early 20th century using the SKATS transliteration system, maps the 24 jamo (consonants and vowels) to Morse sequences derived from Roman approximations, with syllables formed by combining initial and final jamo codes; it supports transmission of the phonetic alphabet without numeric intermediaries. Arabic Morse code, adapted in the early 20th century for the 28-letter abjad, assigns sequences to letters based on phonetic parallels to Latin, such as ا (alif) as ·– (like A) and ح (ha) as –····; prosigns and abbreviations were also localized for regional telegraph networks, though adoption was limited outside military and amateur contexts. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) incorporated some extensions for non-Latin use in the 20th century, such as prosign equivalents for Cyrillic and Arabic in radiocommunication recommendations, but overall implementation waned with the decline of wire and radio telegraphy by the 1970s, favoring phonetic or numeric alternatives in modern signaling.

Applications and Uses

Telegraphy and Early Communication

Morse code, developed by Samuel F. B. Morse in the 1830s and 1840s, enabled the rapid expansion of electrical telegraph networks across the United States during the mid-19th century. In 1844, Morse demonstrated the first successful long-distance telegraph line between Washington, D.C., and Baltimore, Maryland, transmitting the message "What hath God wrought." By 1845, Morse and his associates formed the Magnetic Telegraph Company to commercialize the technology, constructing lines along railroads and between major cities. This network grew rapidly; by the 1860s, over 100,000 miles of telegraph wire connected the eastern U.S., facilitating communication for businesses, government, and individuals. The 1866 successful laying of the first permanent transatlantic cable from Valentia, Ireland, to Heart's Content, Newfoundland, extended this system globally, using a variant of Morse code optimized for the cable's slower transmission speeds. In operation, telegraph messages were keyed by trained operators using a simple switch to interrupt electrical current, producing sequences of short (dots) and long (dashes) pulses corresponding to letters and numbers in Morse code. These signals traveled along copper wires, but to overcome signal degradation over long distances, relay stations amplified the pulses using electromechanical relays that retransmitted the code without human intervention. At the receiving end, another operator decoded the pulses via a sounder or register, transcribing the message onto paper. Billing was typically based on word count, with rates starting at around 25 cents per word in the 1850s, encouraging concise phrasing and the use of abbreviations. The telegraph's economic influence was profound, accelerating the flow of information for commerce and news. It enabled near-real-time stock quotes between New York and other financial centers, stabilizing markets and boosting trade volumes. In 1846, six New York newspapers founded the Associated Press as a cooperative to share the costs of telegraphing war news from the Mexican-American War, marking the birth of modern wire services. Personal and business wires also proliferated, transforming communication from days by mail to minutes by wire. In the U.S., American Morse code—optimized for landline and railroad use with fewer elements for frequent letters like E and T—prevailed, differing from the European-adopted International Morse code, which featured more uniform dot-dash ratios for clarity over varied lines. By the early 1900s, U.S. telegraph networks handled peak volumes of over 63 million messages annually, underscoring Morse code's central role in wired communication infrastructure.

Radio, Aviation, and Maritime Signaling

In radio communication, Morse code facilitated standardized procedures for establishing contact and managing transmissions. The CQ signal, transmitted as –·–· (general call to all stations), was used to initiate contact with any listening station, allowing operators to broadcast messages broadly without addressing a specific recipient. Q-codes, such as QRM (–·–· ·–· ––), denoted interference levels, enabling operators to query or report disruptions (e.g., "QRM 3" for moderate interference) and adjust accordingly during Morse transmissions. In aviation, Morse code remains integral for identifying navigation aids, even after the widespread adoption of GPS systems in the early 2000s. VHF Omnidirectional Range (VOR) stations broadcast a continuous three-letter Morse identifier (e.g., ·– ··· –· for "ABC") to confirm the station's identity, ensuring pilots tune the correct frequency. Similarly, Instrument Landing System (ILS) localizers transmit a three-letter identifier preceded by the Morse letter I (··), such as I-··· for "I-ABC," aiding precise alignment during approaches. For emergencies, pilots can still employ Morse via light signals or radio if voice fails, providing a backup for critical situations despite GPS reliance. Maritime signaling relied on Morse code for distress calls, with SOS (··· ––– ···) adopted as the international standard at the 1906 International Radiotelegraph Convention and effective from July 1, 1908, due to its distinct rhythm for rapid recognition in noisy conditions. Ships transmitted SOS on designated frequencies to summon aid, a practice that persisted until the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) fully replaced Morse radiotelegraphy on February 1, 1999, for all SOLAS-compliant vessels over 300 gross tons. Although GMDSS introduced automated satellite alerts, Morse was retained briefly as a backup during the transition but phased out entirely by 1999, shifting to digital systems for enhanced reliability. Early 20th-century maritime and aviation setups used spark-gap transmitters, which generated damped waves for Morse by creating electrical arcs across a gap, enabling the first wireless transmissions around 1901 but producing broadband interference. These evolved into vacuum-tube and solid-state transceivers by the mid-20th century, allowing cleaner continuous-wave (CW) Morse on allocated frequencies like 500 kHz, the international maritime calling and distress band from 1907 to 1999. Modern transceivers operate Morse on HF bands (e.g., 2-30 MHz) with narrow bandwidths for professional use, supporting encrypted or procedural signals in controlled environments. Notable case studies highlight Morse's role in crises. During the 1915 sinking of the RMS Lusitania, nearby ships issued wireless Morse warnings about German U-boat activity, but the vessel's operators also transmitted CQD and SOS distress signals after the torpedo strike, alerting rescuers despite the rapid 18-minute submersion. In World War II, Allied and Axis submarines used Morse code over high-frequency radio for encrypted coordination, with U.S. forces relaying convoy intelligence via CW bursts to evade detection, as documented in captured Kriegsmarine radio logs. These transmissions, often at speeds exceeding 30 words per minute, were vital for tactical maneuvers in the Battle of the Atlantic.

Amateur Radio and Modern Hobbyist Use

In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission eliminated the Morse code examination requirement for all amateur radio license classes in February 2007, aligning with international treaty revisions and removing a barrier to entry for new operators, though proficiency in continuous wave (CW) transmission remains encouraged within the community. Events such as the ARRL Straight Key Night in the 21st Century, held annually on January 1 from 0000 to 2359 UTC, promote the hobby's CW heritage by inviting participants to use manual straight keys or bugs for informal contacts, fostering camaraderie without competitive scoring. Amateur operators employ a range of modern tools to facilitate CW operation, including electronic keyers that automate iambic paddle inputs for consistent timing and semi-automatic bugs that mechanically generate dits while allowing manual dahs for a rhythmic, personalized "fist." Decoding software like CW Skimmer processes audio from receivers to transcribe Morse signals in real-time, enabling efficient monitoring during pileups or contests. CW thrives on high-frequency (HF) bands, particularly the 40-meter band around 7.000–7.100 MHz, where its narrow bandwidth supports long-distance contacts under varying propagation conditions. While digital modes such as FT8 have surged in popularity for weak-signal work since 2017, they have not supplanted CW, as activity logs show sustained or even increased Morse usage on dedicated sub-bands due to its simplicity and low power efficiency. Global gatherings like the International Lighthouse Lightship Weekend, occurring on the third full weekend of August each year, feature CW activations from over 500 stations worldwide, allowing hobbyists to exchange signals with coastal sites and highlight maritime radio traditions. Educational initiatives, including ARRL-sponsored scavenger hunts and practice oscillator kits, engage youth by integrating Morse into interactive games and simple builds, building foundational skills for amateur radio licensing. As of 2025, Morse code enjoys a notable revival among hobbyists through accessible smartphone applications, such as Morse Expert, which decodes live audio via the device's microphone for on-the-go practice and band monitoring. Its integration with software-defined radio (SDR) platforms, using low-cost receivers like RTL-SDR dongles connected to apps for spectrum analysis and automated CW handling, democratizes experimentation and lowers barriers for portable operations. In contests, proficient operators routinely achieve speeds exceeding 30 words per minute, underscoring CW's enduring appeal for skill-building.

Assistive Technology and Public Applications

Morse code serves as a vital input method in assistive technologies for individuals with severe motor impairments, such as paralysis, enabling communication through minimal physical actions. Devices like sip-and-puff systems allow users to generate dots and dashes by inhaling or exhaling into a tube connected to a computer or communication aid, facilitating text entry at speeds comparable to other switch-based methods for those with limited mobility. Eye-tracking interfaces integrated with Morse code recognition software further support paralyzed users by mapping gaze directions to code elements, as seen in systems like ECTmorse, which processes eye movements to produce text output for patients with conditions like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). These technologies often incorporate adaptive recognition algorithms to account for variable input timings, improving accuracy for users with tremors or fatigue. Integration of Morse code into augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices expands accessibility for non-verbal individuals, particularly those with locked-in syndrome or advanced neuromuscular diseases. For instance, eye-blink-based systems convert deliberate blinks into Morse signals, providing an affordable alternative to commercial AAC hardware by decoding inputs in real-time and synthesizing speech output. Simplified Morse interfaces, such as iMouse-sMc, use eye-tracking combined with abbreviated code sets to enable faster message composition on tablets or screens, reducing cognitive load for users with neuro-muscular impairments. Organizations like the Ace Centre have documented successful implementations of Morse in cloud-based AAC platforms, where it supports personalized vocabulary prediction to enhance daily communication efficiency. In public applications, Morse code features prominently in smartphone tools that democratize learning and translation for non-specialists. Google's Gboard keyboard includes a built-in Morse code input mode, allowing users to tap dots and dashes on the screen to compose messages in any app, with haptic feedback and predictive text to assist beginners. Educational games like Morse Mania offer interactive levels that teach code recognition through audio, visual, and vibration cues, progressing from basic letters to full words at speeds up to 40 words per minute, fostering engagement without requiring prior expertise. Similarly, puzzle apps such as Morsle present daily challenges where players decode words played in audio form, blending gamification with skill-building for casual users. Emergency signaling via Morse code remains relevant in crisis scenarios, particularly through tactile and visual methods accessible to the public. In hostage or captivity situations, simplified tapping patterns derived from Morse, such as the universal SOS sequence (three short, three long, three short taps), have been used to communicate distress through walls or pipes, though full alphabetic transmission is less common due to environmental noise. Flashlight apps on mobile devices, like Morse Code Torch, enable visual signaling by pulsing the phone's light in code patterns, useful for nighttime alerts or search-and-rescue operations where voice communication fails. These tools often include one-tap SOS transmission, ensuring rapid deployment in survival contexts. Culturally, Morse code inspires creative expressions beyond utility, embedding its rhythmic structure into music and art. Composers have incorporated Morse sequences into scores for their percussive quality, as in pieces where dots and dashes form melodic motifs, enhancing thematic depth in orchestral works. In popular music, artists embed hidden Morse messages in beats and lyrics, a technique seen in rock and electronic genres to convey subliminal narratives. Survival training programs emphasize SOS signaling with Morse for its simplicity, teaching participants to use improvised tools like mirrors or whistles in remote wilderness scenarios. For inclusivity, Morse code intersects with other accessibility systems, such as mappings to Braille patterns that align dot-dash sequences with tactile cell configurations, aiding dual-sensory learning for visually and motor-impaired users. In developing countries, its low-bandwidth nature supports text transmission over rudimentary radio networks in remote areas, where infrastructure limits data-heavy protocols, as demonstrated in historical Indian telegraphy extensions to rural regions. This efficiency persists in modern low-power devices, enabling reliable messaging in bandwidth-constrained environments like disaster zones.

Learning and Representation

Mnemonics and Training Techniques

Mnemonics are widely used to aid memorization of Morse code by associating the rhythmic pattern of dots and dashes with familiar words or phrases that phonetically mimic the sounds. For instance, the letter A (.-) can be remembered as "at," evoking the short dot followed by a longer dash, while B (-...) is linked to "bean," capturing the initial dash and subsequent dots. These associations leverage auditory patterns rather than visual charts, helping learners internalize characters as distinct "sounds" rather than sequences. Similarly, C (-.-.) might recall "Cate," and E (.) simply "e." Personalizing these phrases enhances retention, as individuals adapt them to their own linguistic experiences. Another mnemonic approach involves musical rhythms, where learners sing or hum the dot-dash sequences to familiar tunes, reinforcing the timing through melody. This method treats Morse elements as notes in a simple rhythm, such as associating short dots with quick beats and dashes with sustained ones, to build muscle memory for recognition. The Koch method, developed by German psychologist Ludwig Koch in the 1930s, emphasizes learning at full operational speed from the outset to train the brain for instant recognition. It begins with just two characters sent at 20 words per minute, expanding the set only after achieving 90% accuracy, contrasting with traditional methods that build speed gradually from slow paces. This incremental addition—typically up to 40 characters—focuses on acoustic familiarity, reducing bad habits like visual decoding. Practice tools support these techniques through structured repetition. Flashcards, whether physical or digital, present characters aurally for recall drills, promoting active listening over passive reading. Online platforms like LCWO.net offer interactive exercises using the Koch method, including sending and receiving simulations that track progress without requiring software installation. These tools facilitate daily drills, such as copying random character streams or transmitting from text inputs, to solidify proficiency. Learning progresses through distinct stages: initial recognition, where learners hear and write characters using pencil and paper; transmission, focusing on smooth keying of elements without pausing; and head-copy, the advanced phase of mentally decoding messages in real-time without transcription. Each stage builds auditory association, transitioning from deliberate breakdown of dots and dashes to intuitive comprehension. Effective tips include avoiding visual crutches like code trees, which hinder aural learning by encouraging sight-based habits instead of sound recognition. Group learning in clubs, such as the CWops Academy, fosters motivation through shared sessions, on-air practice, and peer feedback, accelerating skill development in a supportive environment.

Visual and Spoken Representations

Morse code is commonly represented visually through sequences of dots and dashes, where short signals appear as periods (.) and longer signals as hyphens (-), often arranged in diagrams or charts for reference during learning or transcription. These textual notations facilitate quick lookup and are standard in printed manuals and digital interfaces. In practical displays, such as LED-based systems, dots and dashes are depicted as brief flashes or sustained illuminations, enabling visual signaling in low-light or silent environments like aviation or emergency communications. For spoken representations, Morse code elements are verbalized using phonetic terms like "dit" for dots and "dah" for dashes, allowing operators to describe sequences orally without transmitting the actual signal. This convention, rooted in radiotelegraphy practices, ensures clarity when discussing code over voice channels; for instance, the letter A (. -) is spoken as "dit dah." Numbers are typically pronounced by their English names followed by their dot-dash sequence, such as "one" for .----, to avoid ambiguity in verbal exchanges. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) endorses standardized phonetic alphabets, like the NATO variant, for spelling out letters in conjunction with Morse descriptions, promoting international consistency in voice communications. Alternative displays adapt Morse code for digital or artistic contexts, including binary mappings where dots represent 0 and dashes represent 1, useful in computational encoding or software simulations. Rhythm notations translate the code into musical scores, emphasizing timing with short and long notes to convey characters, as seen in educational compositions that highlight the code's inherent cadence. Historically, paper tape perforations encoded Morse signals through punched holes—typically two stacked holes for dots and separated holes for dashes—enabling automated transmission in early telegraph systems developed in the 19th century. In modern applications, visual representations have evolved to include dense, grid-like patterns reminiscent of QR codes, where Morse sequences form two-dimensional barcodes for compact data storage and optical reading.

Prosigns, Abbreviations, and Cut Numbers

In Morse code communication, prosigns are procedural signals consisting of one or two letters transmitted as a single character without inter-element spacing, serving to indicate specific operational intentions or message structure. Common prosigns include AR (.-.-.), which denotes the end of a transmission, BT (-...-), used to separate paragraphs or indicate a pause, and SK (...-.-), signaling the conclusion of a contact. These signals are conventionally written in all capital letters to distinguish them from regular text and are essential for efficient, standardized exchanges in continuous wave (CW) operations. Abbreviations in Morse code further enhance brevity, with Q-signals being a prominent set originally developed for radiotelegraphy but widely adopted in amateur radio for concise inquiries and confirmations. For instance, QSL (--.- ... .-..) requests or confirms receipt of a message, while QRZ (--.- .-. --..) asks for a station's call sign. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) endorses Q-signals for maritime mobile services, where they facilitate clear procedural communication. Another key abbreviation system is the RST report, a three-digit code used in CW contacts to assess signal quality, comprising Readability (1-5, with 5 indicating perfectly readable), Strength (1-9, with 9 for extremely strong), and Tone (1-9 for CW, with 9 for pure tone). A typical strong report like 599 conveys excellent conditions across all metrics. Cut numbers represent a specialized abbreviation for numerals in high-speed contest environments, where digits 1 through 5 and 0 are shortened by substituting letters that share initial or final elements, reducing transmission time while relying on context for clarity. Standard mappings include A (.-) for 1 (.----), U (..-) for 2 (..---), W (.--) for 3 (...--), V (...-) for 4 (....-), H (....) for 5 (.....), B (-...) for 6 (-....), G (--.) for 7 (--...), Z (--..) for 8 (---..), N (-.) for 9 (----.), and T (-) for 0 (-----). In practice, a report like 5NN substitutes for 599, common in amateur radio contests to accelerate exchanges. These variants evolved for brevity in competitive settings and remain prevalent in modern ham radio operations.

Decoding Tools and Software

Decoding tools and software for Morse code primarily focus on automated interpretation of continuous wave (CW) signals, converting audio or visual inputs into readable text through digital signal processing techniques. Hardware solutions often incorporate the Goertzel algorithm to detect specific tone frequencies in Morse signals, as it provides an efficient method for single-frequency analysis with lower computational demands than full-spectrum transforms. This algorithm is commonly implemented in microcontroller-based decoders, such as Arduino projects that process audio via a microphone or line input to identify the presence of the CW tone, typically around 700-800 Hz. For instance, the xdemorse application uses a Goertzel tone detector to analyze sound card input in real time. In amateur radio receivers, CW filters narrow the passband to 200-500 Hz, isolating the Morse signal from adjacent interference and enhancing clarity before decoding; these can be analog active filters using op-amps or digital implementations in software-defined radios. Such filters significantly improve signal isolation in crowded bands, as demonstrated in homebrew designs for legacy transceivers. Software decoders process audio from a receiver's output, typically via a computer's sound card, to transcribe Morse into text. CWGet is a dedicated Windows and Android program that decodes CW signals while acting as a narrow-band DSP filter, supporting speeds up to 50 words per minute (wpm) and integrating with logging tools for contest operation; it requires no extra hardware beyond a simple audio connection. FLDigi, an open-source multi-mode suite for Linux, Windows, and macOS, includes CW support among its digital modes, enabling real-time decoding and transmission with adjustable bandwidth and noise reduction features. MRP40 stands out for its performance on weak, fading signals, offering automatic gain control, speed adaptation up to 60 wpm, and high decoding accuracy—often exceeding 95% on clean signals—making it a favored tool for amateur operators. Core algorithms in these tools emphasize signal analysis and ambiguity resolution. The Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is widely used for frequency-domain examination of audio samples, allowing decoders to detect the CW tone's presence and duration by analyzing spectral peaks over short windows, such as 20 ms intervals, which helps filter out broadband noise. For error correction, context-based methods like dictionary lookup or search algorithms address Morse's inherent ambiguities, where sequences without explicit separators (e.g., letter or word spaces) can match multiple characters; the SIMTHEO decoder, for example, employs a lean search tree to evaluate possible interpretations against a code table, prioritizing likely outcomes based on probabilistic matching without additional redundancy. Modern advancements integrate artificial intelligence for robust performance in adverse conditions. In the 2020s, neural network models have enhanced decoding, with approaches like MorseNet—a unified deep learning framework—simultaneously detecting and transcribing signals from spectrograms, improving reliability on distorted inputs. The YFDM model, based on YOLOv5, achieves an average precision of 67.3% for Morse detection at low signal-to-noise ratios (-5 to 0 dB), outperforming traditional methods in real-time scenarios with frequency drift. Mobile applications extend this accessibility; for example, the Morse Code Reader app on Android uses the device's microphone for live audio decoding, translating tones to text with adjustable sensitivity, though it performs best in quiet environments. These AI tools often reach 90% or higher accuracy at moderate speeds like 40 wpm on trained datasets, but real-world deployment varies with signal quality. Despite progress, limitations persist, particularly in noise sensitivity, where environmental interference or QSB (fading) can degrade performance, leading to insertion or deletion errors as thresholds adapt poorly to varying SNR levels. Decoders also struggle with prosigns—special procedural signals like CQ or AR that bend timing rules—often necessitating manual intervention to interpret non-standard elements correctly. Software inputs assume adherence to international Morse timing (dot as unit, dash as three units, letter space as three units), but variations in hand-sent code reduce automation's reliability without operator oversight.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.