Hubbry Logo
Bram FischerBram FischerMain
Open search
Bram Fischer
Community hub
Bram Fischer
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bram Fischer
Bram Fischer
Bram Fischer
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
For the 2017 film, see Bram Fischer (film).

Key Information

Part of a series on
Apartheid
Events
Organisations
People
Places
Related topics

Abraham Louis Fischer (23 April 1908 – 8 May 1975) was a South African Communist lawyer of Afrikaner descent with partial Anglo-African ancestry from his paternal grandmother, notable for anti-apartheid activism and for the legal defence of anti-apartheid figures, including Nelson Mandela, at the Rivonia Trial. Following the trial, he was himself put on trial accused of furthering communism. He was sentenced to life imprisonment and diagnosed with cancer while in prison. The South African Prisons Act was extended to include his brother's house in Bloemfontein, where he died two months later.

Family and education

[edit]

Fischer came from a prominent Afrikaner family; his father was Percy Fischer (1878–1957), a judge president of the Orange Free State and his grandfather was Abraham Fischer (1850–1913), a prime minister of the Orange River Colony and later a member of the cabinet of the unified South Africa.[2]

Prior to studying at University of Oxford (New College) as a Rhodes scholar during the 1930s, he was schooled at Grey College and Grey University College in Bloemfontein, he was a resident of House Abraham Fischer which is named after his grandfather Abraham Fischer. During his stay at Oxford, he travelled on the European continent, including a trip in 1932 to the Soviet Union. In a letter to his parents during his trip indicating that he had become radicalized, he noted similarities between the position of Russian farmers that he encountered along the Volga river and South African blacks.[3]

In 1937, Fischer married Molly Krige, a niece of Jan Smuts; the couple had three children. Their son, Paul died of cystic fibrosis at the age of 23 while Fischer was in prison.[4] Molly became involved in politics and was detained without trial during the 1960 state of emergency declared after the Sharpeville massacre. In 1964, Bram, Molly and a friend, Liz Franklin, were driving to Cape Town for daughter Ilse's 21st birthday. Bram swerved the car to avoid hitting a cow that had strayed onto the road. The car veered off the road and overturned into a river, causing Molly to drown.

Professional and political activities

[edit]

Fischer joined the Communist Party of South Africa (SACP) in the 1940s and soon rose to leadership positions. The CPSA had a close relationship with the African National Congress (ANC) and in 1943, Fischer co-authored revisions to the constitution of the ANC. In 1946 he was charged with incitement arising out of his position as a leader of the CPSA and the African Mine Workers' Strike of that year. After the CPSA was dissolved and banned in 1950, he became Chairman of the illegal South African Communist Party when it was established underground in 1953.[5]

Alongside Issy Maisels and others, Fischer played an integral role on the defense team in the Treason Trial of 1956 – 1961 where Mandela and many other anti-apartheid activists were acquitted on 29 March 1961. In his autobiography, Mandela affectionately recalls Fischer reading the left wing publication New Age at his table during the trial proceedings.[6]

Fischer led Nelson Mandela's legal defence team at the Rivonia Trial of 1963 – 1964. By a coincidence, Fischer had not been present at the raid on Liliesleaf Farm, although he had in fact been part of the trusted Rivonia inner circle.[7] A number of documents seized by authorities were in his handwriting.[8]

Mandela and co-defendants were sentenced to life imprisonment instead of the death penalty, which the state prosecutor Percy Yutar had been asking for. This was considered a victory for the defence. International pressure also played a role.[9] At this time, Fischer's role as leader of the SACP was unknown even to his closest white friends.

After the verdict, Bram Fischer visited the Rivonia trial prisoners on Robben Island to discuss the question of an appeal in their case. Wishing to protect the prisoners, he did not tell them of his wife’s death one week earlier. After the meeting, Mandela learned about Mrs. Fischer's death and wrote to Fischer, a letter that his prison guards never delivered.[10] A few days later Fischer was himself arrested, held in solitary confinement for three days and then released. On 23 September 1964, he was again arrested and joined the 12 white men and women facing charges of being members of the illegal South African Communist Party.

Fischer was released on bail to handle a patent case in London. He applied for bail to attend to his case. In his appeal to Court in the bail application he stated:

I am an Afrikaner. My home is in South Africa. I will not leave my country because my political beliefs conflict with those of the Government.[11]

Fischer returned to South Africa to face trial despite pressure put on him to forgo his £5,000 bail and go into exile. One day, after proceedings began, he did not arrive at Court and instead sent a letter to his counsel, Harold Hanson which was read out in court. He wrote:

By the time this reaches you I shall be a long way from Johannesburg and shall absent myself from the remainder of the trial. But I shall still be in the country to which I said I would return when I was granted bail. I wish you to inform the Court that my absence, though deliberate, is not intended in any way to be disrespectful. Nor is it prompted by any fear of the punishment which might be inflicted on me. Indeed I realise fully that my eventual punishment may be increased by my present conduct...

My decision was made only because I believe that it is the duty of every true opponent of this Government to remain in this country and to oppose its monstrous policy of apartheid with every means in his power. That is what I shall do for as long as I can...

What is needed is for White South Africans to shake themselves out of their complacency, a complacency intensified by the present economic boom built upon racial discrimination. Unless this whole intolerable system is changed radically and rapidly, disaster must follow. Appalling bloodshed and civil war will become inevitable because, as long as there is oppression of a majority, such oppression will be fought with increasing hatred.[12]

Fischer went underground to support the liberation struggle against apartheid. In doing so, he went against the advice of Mandela, who had advised him to support the struggle in the courtroom, "where people could see this Afrikaner son of a judge president fighting for the rights of the powerless. But he could not let others suffer while he remained free. […] Bram did not want to ask others to make a sacrifice that he was unwilling to make himself."[13]

Fischer was struck off the advocate's roll in 1965 in a trial completed in his absence. Advocates Harold Hanson, Sydney Kentridge, and Arthur Chaskalson defended him at the hearing.[14] Vernon Berrange led the defence case and Ismail Mahomed (who later became Chief Justice in the new South Africa) and Denis Kuny acted as Junior Counsel.[15]

Imprisonment and death

[edit]

Fischer carried on underground activities for almost a year. He was arrested in November 1965, nine months after his return to South Africa and after 290 days underground. In March 1966 he was put on trial for a second time on charges of furthering the aims of communism and conspiracy to overthrow the government. He was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment. He was imprisoned in Pretoria Central Prison.[16]

After the revolution, he will be my garden boy

— Bram Fischer (about General Petrus Johann Coetzee)[17][18]

In 1974 Denis Goldberg and another prisoner, Marius Schoon, became concerned about Fischer’s health; his hip was giving him pain, his digestion was poor and he looked gaunt and frail. Suspecting that Fischer would not receive the proper care he needed, Goldberg kept a detailed diary of Fischer’s medical care which was subsequently smuggled out of prison. Fischer needed a crutch to walk but a request for one was denied; a broom was found and used instead. In September 1974 he fell and fractured his femur and neck whilst trying to shower, after which it took thirteen days before he was admitted to hospital. When he returned from the hospital Fischer was in a wheelchair, disorientated and unable to look after himself. The hip was found to be cancerous. Goldberg argued, and was eventually allowed, to spend the nights with Fischer in his cell where he tried to make him comfortable. By this time Fischer was so emaciated that Goldberg could easily carry him to the toilet pot.[19]

It was not until December of that year that the authorities had him transferred to a hospital. When news of his illness was publicised, the public lobbied government for his release.[20]

Non-political prisoners rarely served their full term and would be released after serving half or two-thirds of their sentence, but political prisoners were required to serve every day of their sentence. Fischer was allowed to leave the prison shortly before his death and placed under house arrest at his brother's home in Bloemfontein in April 1975.[19] He died a few weeks later.

The prisons department had Fischer's ashes returned to them after the funeral and they have never been located. Anti-apartheid political leaders in Parliament Colin Eglin and Harry Schwarz both called for Fischer's remains to be returned to his family, which was refused.[21]

Tributes and legacy

[edit]

Nelson Mandela wrote in his 1995 autobiography, Fischer was one of the "bravest and staunchest friends of the freedom struggle that I have ever known."[22] From a prominent Afrikaner family, he gave up a life of privilege, rejected his heritage, and was ostracized by his own people, showing "a level of courage and sacrifice that was in a class by itself."[23]

Fischer had been reluctant to serve as leader of the defence at the Rivonia Trial, since many of the witnesses could implicate him in illegal communist activities. In addition, his handwriting was found on documents from Liliesleaf Farm. His white friends could not understand his reluctance and persuaded him to do so, not knowing his Communist Party membership. As a result, when Lionel Bernstein heard about it, he remarked that "He deserves the Victoria Cross".[24][25]

In her account of her detention and solitary confinement by the South African Security Branch in 1963, Ruth First writes about being questioned about Fischer, telling her interrogators, "Bram is a friend, a very dear friend of mine, a wonderful man, and – thank God for the reputation of your people that you have at least one saving grace – he's an Afrikaner."[26]

Fischer was awarded the Lenin Peace Prize, in 1967.[27][28]

He was respected by fellow prisoners in Pretoria Central, and even earned the respect of prison warden Vermeulen, who at his trial following suspected involvement in the prison escape involving Tim Jenkin and others in 1979, called him the nicest prisoner he'd guarded, saying "Fischer was very keen on rugby. We used to talk about it a lot. I felt sorry when he died. He was a gentleman. He was the leader of the prisoners."[29]

One of the first major post apartheid housing projects in Johannesburg was named Bram Fischerville in his honour.[30] It is located north of Soweto, has 22,000 formal houses and was settled from 1997 onwards.

In Country of My Skull (1998), Antjie Krog wrote, "He was so much braver than the rest of us, he paid so much more, his life seems to have touched the lives of so many people – even after his death".[31]

In 2003 Fischer became the first South African ever to be posthumously reinstated to the Bar.[32]

In 2004, despite opposition from alumni and management, Fischer was awarded a posthumous honorary degree by Stellenbosch University.[33]

Rhodes House (University of Oxford), where Fischer was a student, has held an annual Bram Fischer Memorial Lecture to honour his legacy since 2007, a reincarnation of a former lecture in his name hosted by New College.[34]

In December 2012, Bloemfontein Airport was renamed Bram Fischer International Airport.[35]

Works about Fischer

[edit]

An early biography was written in Bram Fischer's lifetime by Naomi Michison, A Life for Africa: The Story of Bram Fischer (1973).

Burger's Daughter (1979), a novel by literature Nobel Prize winner and fellow South African, Nadine Gordimer, is based on the life of Bram Fischer's daughter; he is the "Burger" of the title.

Fischer is also the subject of Stephen Clingman's Bram Fischer: Afrikaner Revolutionary, which won the Alan Paton Award in 1999, and Martin Meredith's Fischer's Choice.

South African director Sharon Farr's documentary, Love, Communism, Revolution & Rivonia – Bram Fischer’s Story, won the Encounters Film Festival Audience Award for Best South African Documentary in August 2007.

Harry Kalmer wrote The Braam Fischer Waltz, a play performed by David Butler at the National Arts Festival in Grahamstown in 2013 and 2014.[36]

In 2017 the feature film Bram Fischer (alternative title An Act of Defiance) directed by Jean van de Velde was released in the Netherlands, with the role of Bram Fischer played by Peter Paul Muller.[37]

Notes and references

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bram Fischer

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Abram "Bram" Fischer (23 April 1908 – 8 May 1975) was a South African lawyer of Afrikaner descent and a leading member of the underground South African Communist Party (SACP), best known for heading the defense team in the 1963–1964 Rivonia Trial, where his legal strategy spared Nelson Mandela and seven other African National Congress (ANC) leaders from execution on charges of sabotage and conspiracy to commit guerrilla warfare. Born into a prominent nationalist family—his father was a judge president of the Orange Free State and his grandfather a former prime minister of the Orange River Colony—Fischer rejected his privileged heritage to advocate for multiracial socialism and the violent overthrow of apartheid, joining the Communist Party of South Africa (CPSA) in the early 1940s and rising to its central committee after its 1950 ban. Educated as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford University and admitted to the Johannesburg Bar in 1935, Fischer built a successful practice in mining law, becoming in 1951, before devoting his skills to defending ANC and SACP figures against charges under repressive laws like the Suppression of Communism Act. His at exposed regime entrapment tactics and emphasized the defendants' restraint in avoiding civilian casualties, framing their actions as a defensive response to state violence rather than indiscriminate terror, which influenced the judge's decision for over . Rather than surrender after —amid revelations of his own attendance at ANC military planning sessions at —Fischer went underground in January 1965 to coordinate SACP and Umkhonto we Sizwe operations, including sabotage campaigns aimed at economic infrastructure to weaken the apartheid state. Arrested in December 1965 and tried in 1966, Fischer was convicted on multiple counts of communist membership and furthering its aims through conspiracy to , receiving a life sentence that reflected the regime's determination to neutralize white radicals who lent legitimacy to black liberation efforts. Imprisoned under harsh conditions, he was denied adequate medical care for cancer until his conditional release in April 1975, dying weeks later at his brother's home in ; the state confiscated his ashes to prevent their use as a political symbol. His unyielding commitment to Marxism-Leninism, including support for armed struggle despite personal risks and family opposition, marked him as a bridge between Afrikaner elites and revolutionary movements, earning posthumous recognition like the 1967 but also highlighting tensions within anti-apartheid ranks over ideological purity and tactical violence.

Early Life and Family Background

Ancestry and Upbringing

Abraham Louis Fischer, commonly known as Bram, was born on 23 April 1908 in , the administrative center of the . He was the eldest of five children—four sons and one daughter—born to Ulrich Fischer and Ella Cecil Fischer (née Fichardt). His father, , held the position of Judge-President of the Provincial Division of the , a role that underscored the family's entrenched status within the Afrikaner establishment. Percy's lineage traced back to Abraham Fischer, who served as of the from 1907 until its incorporation into the in 1910, reflecting a heritage of political prominence among . Fischer's mother, Ella, descended from the influential Fichardt family of the Free State and was recognized for her intellectual acumen, community leadership, and advocacy on social issues, including women's roles in public life. The family resided in a modest yet respectable home on Reitz Street in , emblematic of their middle-to-upper-class Afrikaner milieu amid the post-Anglo-Boer War , where many Boer families grappled with economic hardship and cultural resurgence. This environment instilled early exposure to nationalism and legal principles, though Fischer later diverged from these foundations. Fischer's upbringing occurred in a household emphasizing education and , with his parents' positions affording access to networks in the . Siblings included sisters Ada Cecil de Villiers and brothers Paul Marthinus Steyn, Pieter Ulrich, and Gustav Fichardt Fischer, fostering a close-knit dynamic within Bloemfontein's conservative, pro-Afrikaner society. The period's lingering effects from the 1899–1902 war, including Afrikaner reconciliation efforts under figures like , shaped the familial ethos of resilience and loyalty to Boer heritage, even as broader Union politics evolved.

Familial Influences and Early Environment

Bram Fischer was born on 23 April 1908 in , capital of the , into a prominent Afrikaner of sixth-generation . His father, Percy Ulrich , practiced as a lawyer at the Bloemfontein Bar before ascending to the role of Judge President of the Orange Free State Supreme Court. His , Ella Fichardt, came from an English-speaking background, contributing to a bilingual household environment. Bram's paternal grandfather, Abraham , had served as the first Prime Minister of the from 1907 to 1910 and later as a cabinet member in the government, embedding the in Afrikaner political and legal traditions. The family's early residence included a period on the Bergendal farm near starting around 1914, following 's temporary ostracism from legal circles, before relocating to a home named , symbolizing the household's emphasis on hospitality and balance. On the farm, young Bram played with children of workers, such as Loel and Golokwaan, though emerging racial norms later manifested, as evidenced by his refusal at age 14 to sit with a during a meal. Weekly Sunday walks with his father across the farm's landscape fostered a personal bond and appreciation for the Free State's terrain, while the bilingual dynamic— with and English with Ella—reinforced a dual within the white South African . Familial influences centered on legal and political exposure through Percy and Abraham, instilling early familiarity with governance and jurisprudence amid Afrikaner nationalist circles. Ella's actions, such as taking the children to visit imprisoned rebels—where Bram once received a toy from a prisoner—may have planted seeds of empathy toward the marginalized, contrasting the family's establishment status. This privileged yet racially stratified environment in Bloemfontein's conservative heartland shaped Bram's formative years, bridging Afrikaner heritage with subtle cross-cultural elements before his formal schooling at Grey College.

Education and Early Influences

Tertiary Education in South Africa

Fischer commenced his at Grey University College in , an institution that later evolved into the University of the (now the ). There, he pursued a (BA) degree, completing it in the late 1920s, followed by a (LLB) in 1931. Both degrees were awarded cum laude, reflecting his exceptional academic performance amid a rigorous that emphasized legal principles and classical studies typical of the era's n universities. During this period, Grey University College operated under the affiliation of the (UNISA), enabling students like Fischer to earn federally recognized qualifications while benefiting from localized instruction in . His studies laid the foundational legal expertise that would define his later career, though contemporary records indicate no overt political radicalization at this stage; instead, his focus aligned with the conservative Afrikaner milieu of the institution, where he engaged in extracurricular activities such as rugby, captaining teams and earning sporting accolades. These experiences honed his skills, which contrasted with the path he later adopted. By 1931, having fulfilled the requirements for bar admission in South Africa through his LLB, Fischer prepared to extend his education abroad via the Rhodes Scholarship awarded that year for the Orange Free State province, marking the transition from his domestic tertiary phase. This achievement underscored the meritocratic elements of early 20th-century South African higher education, accessible to high-achieving white students from privileged backgrounds like his own.

Rhodes Scholarship and Oxford Experience

In 1931, Fischer was awarded a Rhodes Scholarship representing the Orange Free State province, enabling him to study at New College, Oxford University. He arrived at Oxford in January 1932 and pursued studies leading to a diploma in law and economics over the subsequent three years, from 1931 to 1934. During his time at , Fischer traveled extensively across Europe, including visits to , the , and , experiences that exposed him to rising totalitarian ideologies and contributed to his disillusionment with . These journeys, undertaken amid the early political upheavals, prompted a ideological shift, as he began engaging with communist ideas while still a . Fischer's period thus marked a pivotal transition from his privileged, pro-establishment upbringing in toward radical political commitments, informed by direct observation of authoritarian regimes rather than abstract theory.

Admission to the Bar and Initial Practice

Upon returning to in 1934 after completing his studies at Oxford University, Fischer was called to the bar at the Bar on 10 1935, marking the start of his professional career as an advocate. The economic conditions of the initially hindered his practice, with briefs arriving slowly and requiring him to undertake ""— under established advocates—to build experience and income. He devilled for prominent figures including W.H. , Oliver Schreiner, and Tilson Barry, concentrating on gold mining law, a key area of 's legal economy. To supplement earnings, Fischer lectured on legal topics at correspondence schools and the in 1936. As his practice developed in the late , Fischer secured work primarily from major mining houses and commercial clients, establishing an early reputation in and . This foundational commercial focus contrasted with his later involvement in political cases, reflecting the bar's emphasis on corporate litigation during that era. Fischer was called to the Bar on 10 January 1935 after completing his legal training. He initially worked as a "devil" under senior advocates including W.H. , Oliver Schreiner, and Tilson Barry, concentrating on cases related to . His practice developed steadily, with briefs from major mining houses that highlighted his meticulous preparation and analytical skills, positioning him for a potentially eminent career in . Unusually for a Afrikaner in the segregated legal system, Fischer accepted cases defending non-white individuals prosecuted under pass laws and related restrictions from the beginning of his practice. These engagements involved representing clients ensnared by enforcement of statutes, demonstrating an early departure from prevailing professional norms that typically limited such advocates to white or corporate matters. In February–March 1943, Fischer traveled to in (present-day ) to act as counsel in a dispute over royal succession among the Basotho paramount chiefs. This international brief underscored his versatility beyond South African mining litigation, involving complex and colonial administration issues.

Political Ideology and Affiliations

Entry into Communism

Fischer's exposure to Marxist ideas began during his time at Oxford University in the late 1920s, where he encountered students and intellectuals discussing and critiques of , though he did not formally affiliate with any communist groups at that stage. This intellectual curiosity deepened in 1932 when, shortly after being called to the bar in , he toured the and observed the implementation of Stalin's First Five-Year Plan, an experience that reportedly impressed him with the possibilities of centralized to address inequality, despite the regime's emerging repressive tendencies. Upon returning to South Africa, Fischer's growing concern over and economic disparities—evident in events like the 1922 and ongoing Native Land Act restrictions—led him to seek political outlets beyond liberal reformism. By 1938, he and his wife Molly had joined the branch of the of South Africa (CPSA), attracted by its uncompromising opposition to the color bar and advocacy for non-racial class struggle, distinguishing it from other groups that accommodated white privilege. Recruited in part by Indian activist , Fischer viewed the CPSA as a vehicle for dismantling capitalist exploitation intertwined with racial hierarchy, though exact motivations remain inferred from his later statements and biographical accounts, as primary contemporaneous records are sparse due to the party's semi-clandestine operations. Fischer's entry marked a shift from passive to active involvement, though he maintained his legal practice to avoid early scrutiny; the CPSA's emphasis on resonated with his Afrikaner upbringing's emphasis on discipline, repurposed toward revolutionary ends rather than nationalist conformity. By the early , he had risen to the party's central committee, reflecting rapid trust earned through intellectual rigor and commitment, amid internal debates over the CPSA's alignment with the and its push for African worker . This phase solidified his belief that parliamentary paths were insufficient against entrenched white minority rule, prioritizing underground organization over open agitation.

Alignment with ANC and SACP Structures

Fischer joined the Communist Party of South Africa (CPSA), the predecessor to the (SACP), in 1942 alongside his wife Molly. He advanced to senior leadership within the SACP, including election to its and serving as acting chairman during the period following the party's 1950 ban under . His SACP roles remained clandestine, unknown even to close associates outside the organization, reflecting the party's underground operations amid suppression. As a white anti-apartheid activist, Fischer aligned with the (ANC) through auxiliary structures rather than direct membership, given the ANC's primary focus on African leadership. In 1943, he collaborated with ANC president A.B. Xuma to revise the organization's constitution, enhancing its framework for broader mobilization. He became a founding member of the Transvaal Congress of Democrats in the early 1950s, which formed part of the Congress Alliance—a coalition integrating the ANC with white, Indian, and Coloured allies to coordinate opposition to apartheid. Fischer's structural alignment manifested in legal defenses bolstering ANC leadership: in 1952, he represented , , and eighteen other ANC figures charged in the trial; during the 1956–1961 Treason Trial, he contributed as senior counsel to the successful acquittal of 156 defendants, including ANC executives; and in the 1963–1964 , he led the defense team for Mandela and ANC command structures, arguing against . These efforts intertwined SACP strategy with ANC operations, as the parties maintained a formal alliance post-1950, with SACP members like Fischer facilitating clandestine support for Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK), the ANC's armed wing. His involvement extended to procuring safe houses, such as , for joint ANC-SACP-MK activities.

Advocacy for Revolutionary Methods

Fischer initially adhered to the (ANC)'s policy of non-violent resistance, consistent with its approach through the 1950s Defiance Campaigns and the 1952 Programme of Action, which emphasized civil disobedience without recourse to force. However, following the Sharpeville massacre on March 21, 1960—where police killed 69 unarmed protesters and wounded over 180—and the subsequent that led to the banning of the ANC and Pan Africanist Congress (PAC) in April 1960, Fischer, as a member of the (SACP) , participated in deliberations that shifted toward accepting limited armed actions as a defensive response to escalating repression. This culminated in the formation of Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK), the ANC's military wing, on December 16, 1961, with initial operations targeting infrastructure to avoid human casualties and pressure the government without full-scale war. In internal SACP and ANC discussions, Fischer expressed caution about irreversible escalation into violence, as recalled by colleague , who noted his anxiety over a step "from which there could be no return," yet he ultimately endorsed MK's strategy as a pragmatic necessity after peaceful petitions, strikes, and boycotts had provoked only intensified state violence, including mass arrests and under laws like the 90-day detention provisions. He advocated confining operations to symbolic attacks on economic and military installations—such as power stations and —to expose apartheid's injustices internationally and domestically, while minimizing civilian harm, aligning with MK's manifesto that declared as the least risky path forward given the regime's monopoly on force. During his 1966 trial for and conspiracy, Fischer's statement from the dock provided his most explicit defense of revolutionary methods, arguing that apartheid's "gravely dangerous" entrenchment—evidenced by laws enforcing , forced removals affecting millions, and suppression of dissent—rendered non-violence futile, as the government had met every ANC concession with greater coercion. He justified membership in the illegal SACP and support for MK as morally imperative, stating it aimed to "bring the Government and its supporters to their senses before it is too late" through targeted disruption rather than personal violence, drawing on empirical observations of global successes in and elsewhere where armed resistance compelled . Fischer emphasized that this approach sought a "national democratic revolution" to dismantle white minority rule, not immediate communist takeover, positioning revolutionary action as a restrained ethical response to a system he described as inherently violent and unsustainable.

Anti-Apartheid Activism and the Rivonia Period

Defense in the Rivonia Trial

Bram Fischer, an Afrikaner advocate, was appointed senior counsel for the defense in the , which began on October 9, 1963, in the and involved ten anti-apartheid leaders charged with , conspiracy to commit , and planning to overthrow the government through . The accused, including , , , , , , Elias Motsoaledi, Andrew Mlangeni, and James Kantor, all pleaded not guilty; Fischer led a team comprising Vernon Berrangé QC, , Arthur Chaskalson, and Joel Joffe. His selection as lead advocate was strategic, leveraging his ethnic background and reputation to counter perceptions of bias in a Nationalist-dominated . In his for the defense, contested key state allegations, denying that accused numbers 1 through 7 (Mandela, Sisulu, Mbeki, Goldberg, Kathrada, Mhlaba, and Motsoaledi) formed the full National High Command of Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK), the accused's armed wing, and specifically argued that Goldberg, Kathrada, and (initially charged but later removed) held no such membership. He maintained that MK operated separately from the (), rejecting claims of it being the ANC's military arm or the ANC serving as a proxy, instead portraying the ANC as a broad seeking equal political rights with support from diverse groups. further asserted that MK limited actions to after peaceful protests failed, denying any formal adoption of Operation Mayibuye—a proposed guerrilla infiltration plan—or broader warfare strategies by 1963, while referencing Mandela's pre-arrest activities up to August 1962 to frame motives as defensive rather than revolutionary aggression. On April 20, 1964, Fischer formally opened the defense case, immediately followed by Mandela's famous three-hour statement from the dock, which elaborated on the ANC's non-violent and the shift to armed resistance as a last resort against apartheid oppression. The strategy transformed the trial into a platform for exposing apartheid's moral and legal illegitimacy, arguing that laws lacked consent from the disenfranchised Black majority and justified resistance. Fischer's rigorous cross-examinations and evidentiary challenges, including proof of ANC-MK organizational separation and rejection of guerrilla escalation plans, undermined the prosecution's push for despite overwhelming evidence of acts. On June 12, 1964, Judge Quartus de Wet convicted eight defendants (Kantor and acquitted) but imposed rather than death sentences, a outcome directly attributed to the defense's demonstration that actions aimed at minimal harm and political disruption, not mass violence. This preserved the leadership for future activism, though Fischer's high-profile role intensified scrutiny on his own communist affiliations, leading to his later .

Transition to Clandestine Operations

Following the Trial's conclusion on 12 June 1964, where had led the defense of ANC and SACP leaders accused of sabotage, he faced intensified scrutiny from apartheid authorities. On 23 September 1964, was arrested alongside twelve others on charges of membership in the banned of (SACP), violating the Suppression of Communism Act. Released on bail of R14,000, his trial commenced on 16 November 1964, with proceedings revealing his central role in the party's clandestine operations, including furtherance of its aims through illegal activities. On 23 January 1965, as the trial resumed after an adjournment, Fischer failed to appear, instead absconding to transition fully into underground of the ANC and SACP resistance networks. In a letter to his counsel read in court, he justified the move by rejecting submission to laws that systematically denied to the majority, declaring his intent to resist apartheid's tyranny from hiding rather than face conviction and imprisonment. This decision marked his shift from overt legal advocacy to covert revolutionary coordination, driven by the post-Rivonia decapitation of ANC and SACP command structures, including the capture of Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK) high command members. As a covert SACP member since the 1940s, Fischer prioritized reorganizing these groups to sustain armed opposition, viewing non-violent paths as exhausted after events like . Underground, Fischer adopted disguises—including wigs, glasses, and aliases like "Albert Williams"—and operated from safe houses, such as a farm initially, to evade sweeps. He co-led the formation of MK's second National High Command, recruiting operatives, planning against to disrupt the without targeting civilians, and funds and . These efforts aimed to rebuild underground cells fragmented by state bans and arrests, extending SACP-ANC in guerrilla preparation, though hampered by surveillance and betrayals. Fischer's operations reflected his ideological commitment to communist-led as the causal mechanism for dismantling apartheid, prioritizing empirical organization over legalism amid escalating repression. His 294 days in hiding underscored the risks, including isolation from family and constant relocation, until led to his capture.

Arrest, Trial, and Imprisonment

Capture and Prosecution Under Anti-Communist Laws

Following the verdict on 12 June 1964, Fischer, who had been released on bail pending his own charges under the , absconded and entered a clandestine existence to evade authorities. He operated under assumed identities, coordinating activities for the banned (ANC) and (SACP), including efforts to reorganize armed resistance networks disrupted by arrests. This underground phase lasted approximately ten months, during which South African security forces conducted an extensive manhunt involving surveillance and informant networks. Fischer was captured on 11 November 1964 in after police raided a based on information from a recently ed associate, Eli Weinberg, who had been tortured into providing details. At the time of , authorities seized documents linking him to SACP and , including codes and operational plans. He appeared in court under heavy guard, with reports indicating 45 armed policemen securing his initial appearance due to fears of attempts by underground comrades. Prosecuted alongside 13 co-accused under the Suppression of Communism Act—which criminalized membership in the banned SACP (prohibited since 1950) and acts intended to further communist aims, including —Fischer faced three main counts: illegal party membership, to overthrow the by violence, and furthering the doctrines of . The trial commenced on 16 November 1964 in Johannesburg's Regional Court before Judge G. G. Vieyra, with the state presenting evidence from intercepted communications, witness testimony from informants, and captured materials demonstrating Fischer's role as central committee member and chief of staff for military operations. Fischer, as Accused No. 1, conducted much of his own defense, challenging the admissibility of coerced confessions and arguing that the Act's broad definitions stifled legitimate , though he did not deny his communist convictions. In a statement from the dock on 7 March 1966, Fischer openly admitted his leadership in the SACP and justified armed struggle as a response to apartheid's systemic violence, rejecting non-violent paths as ineffective against state repression. The court convicted him on all counts on 16 March 1966, sentencing him to , rejecting defense pleas for leniency based on his legal stature and prior bar admission. Co-accused received terms ranging from suspended sentences to 10 years, highlighting the prosecution's focus on Fischer's seniority. Appeals were dismissed, with the state emphasizing the Act's role in curbing threats to internal security amid escalating guerrilla activities.

Sentencing and Prison Conditions

Fischer's trial commenced on 23 March 1966 in , where he was charged with one count of under the relevant apartheid-era legislation, six contraventions of the Suppression of Communism Act, and additional lesser offenses related to and underground activities. On 4 May 1966, he was convicted on all major counts after refusing to testify in his own defense, citing the political nature of the proceedings. Sentencing followed on 9 May 1966, imposing for the conviction, twenty-four years cumulatively for the Suppression of Communism Act violations, and concurrent terms of two to three years for remaining charges, reflecting the state's intent to neutralize perceived threats from communist-linked subversion. Following conviction, Fischer was incarcerated primarily at Pretoria Central Prison, a facility notorious for its stringent security measures applied to high-profile political detainees. Prior to and during initial stages of his imprisonment, he endured four months of solitary confinement, a punitive measure that authorities reportedly applied selectively to isolate him from other inmates and limit external communication. Prison conditions for white political prisoners like Fischer, while marginally less severe than those for black counterparts in terms of basic amenities, still involved rigorous oversight, restricted family visits, and psychological pressures designed to break resistance, including denial of reading materials and enforced idleness. These practices aligned with broader apartheid penal policies aimed at suppressing dissent, though Fischer's status as an Afrikaner barrister afforded limited concessions, such as occasional legal correspondence, which were inconsistently granted. Authorities justified such treatment by classifying Fischer as a security risk due to his in clandestine networks, leading to enhanced surveillance and prohibitions on political discussions even among . Despite appeals from family and legal figures for humanitarian considerations, regulations remained unyielding, contributing to reports of degrading routines that exacerbated isolation for long-term lifers. Fischer's experience underscored the era's dual system, where ideological opponents faced systematic dehumanization regardless of racial privileges, as evidenced by contemporaneous accounts from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's hearings.

Health Deterioration and Death

In 1974, while serving a life sentence in Pretoria Central Prison, Fischer was diagnosed with terminal . He underwent a in July 1974, but prison authorities consistently refused him adequate post-operative medical assistance, contributing to a rapid decline in his health. Family members and supporters, including appeals from his wife Ilse and international advocates, repeatedly petitioned for his release or compassionate transfer due to his worsening condition, but these were denied by the apartheid government until his final weeks. By early 1975, Fischer's illness had advanced to the point where he required constant care, prompting a limited concession: on March 3, 1975, he was transferred from the prison hospital to his brother Dr. Paul Fischer's home in . This move was enabled by an amendment to the South African Prisons Act, which extended prison jurisdiction to the private residence to ensure he remained under state control rather than being formally released. Despite the transfer, Fischer's health continued to fail amid inadequate ongoing treatment and the regime's insistence on maintaining his imprisonment status. Fischer died on May 8, 1975, at age 64, from complications of , shortly after the transfer. His , without full remission of sentence, drew criticism from anti-apartheid groups for the government's refusal to grant clemency despite evident , though officials cited his convictions for terrorism and communism as justification for denying release. A small, supervised funeral followed at his brother's home, with broader public mourning restricted under apartheid security measures.

Personal Life and Sacrifices

Marriage and Immediate Family

Bram Fischer married Molly Krige on 18 September 1937, following a six-year . Molly, born in 1908, hailed from a prominent Afrikaner ; her aunt was married to , linking her to South Africa's political elite. The couple settled initially in before moving to , where Bram established his legal practice. They had three children: daughter Ruth Emilie, born on 14 August 1939; daughter Ilse, born in 1943; and son Paul, born in 1947. Paul died in 1971 at age 23 from . Molly shared Bram's emerging political commitments, engaging in anti-apartheid activities alongside household and child-rearing duties. Molly Fischer died in a car accident on 5 October 1964, leaving Bram to raise the children amid his intensifying clandestine work. Her death occurred shortly after Bram's own legal troubles escalated, compounding family strains under apartheid .

Impact on Family and Personal Relationships

Fischer's decision to go underground in late 1964, following his release on after initial for sabotage charges linked to the , severed his direct involvement in family life. This clandestine existence prioritized revolutionary activities over personal obligations, leaving his wife Molly solely responsible for their three children amid apartheid-era and . Molly, an activist in her own right, endured banning orders restricting her movements and associations, as well as brief imprisonment, while managing household demands and the intensive care required for their son Paul, who suffered from —a condition that demanded constant medical attention in an era of limited treatments. The family's stability unraveled further with Molly's death in a car accident on September 6, 1964, when their vehicle capsized into a river; this occurred mere months before Fischer's full disappearance underground, preventing his presence during her final days or funeral arrangements. Paul, the youngest child, succumbed to in 1969 at age 23, an event Fischer could not attend due to his incarceration following recapture in 1965 and subsequent life sentence in 1966—exacerbating the isolation of daughters Ruth and Ilse, who navigated and young adulthood without parental support. Fischer's prolonged absence and imprisonment strained broader personal ties, including with his Afrikaner elite extended family, whose conservative values clashed with his communist affiliations and rejection of racial hierarchy; this rift manifested in disownment by some relatives, underscoring the personal cost of his ideological commitments. His daughters later reflected on these losses in public forums, such as Truth and Reconciliation Commission hearings in 1997, where Ruth Rice and Ilse Wilson detailed the emotional toll of their father's and denied family visits, framing his sacrifices as both heroic and heartbreaking for those left behind. Despite such devotion to the cause—evident in his offense at queries doubting the trade-off of family for politics—contemporaries noted the profound human toll, with figures like consoling the daughters in 1975 by emphasizing Fischer's character amid their compounded bereavements.

Legacy and Controversies

Posthumous Honors and Left-Wing Adulation

In 2003, Fischer was posthumously reinstated to the Johannesburg Bar, reversing his disbarment for his political activities. In December 2004, awarded him a posthumous honorary in , a decision that provoked significant controversy, including opposition from alumni, heated public debate, and even a at the ceremony, reflecting resistance from Afrikaner conservative circles to honoring a figure associated with and armed resistance against apartheid. On March 26, 2015, the conferred a posthumous Honorary of upon him, with the citation emphasizing his role in defending justice during the . Post-apartheid under ANC governance further commemorated Fischer through infrastructure renamings. In 2008, Drive in , , was renamed Bram Fischer Drive, part of a broader effort to replace apartheid-era names with those of anti-apartheid figures. Similarly, Ordinance Road in became Bram Fischer Road. In 2012, Bloemfontein's airport was redesignated as , with President describing him as a "peer of former President Mandela" and a key underground leader in the liberation struggle. Fischer has received adulation particularly from left-wing and ANC-aligned institutions, often portrayed as a paragon of for sacrificing his privileged Afrikaner background to support communist-led resistance, including sabotage operations. The and figures like Zuma have lauded his clandestine leadership of Umkhonto we Sizwe, framing it as selfless commitment to and . Memorial events, such as the annual Bram Fischer Memorial Lecture hosted by the Rhodes Trust since the early 2000s, underscore this reverence in academic and progressive circles, though such accolades largely emanate from post-1994 institutions with historical ties to the liberation movement, amid critiques of overlooking his endorsement of violent tactics.

Criticisms of Communist Ideology and Violent Tactics

Critics of communist ideology have highlighted its empirical track record of and mass death, attributing these to inherent flaws in centralized planning and suppression of individual incentives, which undermine productive efficiency and lead to resource misallocation. In the , communist policies under resulted in approximately 20 million deaths from executions, forced labor camps, and engineered s like the (1932–1933), which claimed 3–7 million lives through deliberate grain seizures and collectivization failures. Similarly, Mao Zedong's (1958–1962) in triggered a killing an estimated 30–45 million people due to unrealistic production quotas, communal farming disruptions, and falsified reporting that concealed shortages. These outcomes, documented in archival data and survivor accounts, illustrate causal mechanisms where ideological dogma overrides empirical feedback, fostering and inefficiency rather than the promised classless . Bram Fischer's lifelong adherence to Marxism-Leninism, formalized through his leadership in the underground (SACP) after its 1950 ban, persisted despite mounting evidence of these global failures by the mid-20th century. The 1956 Khrushchev speech denouncing Stalin's and purges was widely reported, yet Fischer escalated his commitment, coordinating with SACP figures like to integrate communist doctrine into anti-apartheid strategy. Detractors, including liberal South African intellectuals, argued this reflected ideological blindness, as Fischer prioritized revolutionary internationalism—aligning with Soviet models despite their documented repression—over pragmatic reforms or non-violent advocacy, potentially forsaking his privileged position as an Afrikaner lawyer for an unproven doctrine linked to totalitarian states. Fischer's endorsement of violent tactics through Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK), co-founded by SACP and ANC leaders in 1961, drew condemnation for escalating conflict without proportionate strategic gains, as initial sabotage targeted infrastructure like power lines and government offices to avoid casualties but evolved into broader operations risking civilian harm. While MK claimed moral restraint, later actions such as the 1983 Church Street bombing—though post-Fischer—exemplified the trajectory he helped initiate, killing 19 civilians and injuring over 200, which critics said alienated potential white allies and justified apartheid regime crackdowns under laws like the 1967 Terrorism Act. Analyses of the armed struggle's effectiveness contend it failed militarily to overthrow the state, with apartheid's end in 1994 driven more by internal economic pressures, international sanctions, and negotiated reforms than guerrilla victories, rendering Fischer's clandestine role—from planning post-Rivonia operations to his 1964 arrest for sabotage conspiracy—a morally fraught gamble that prolonged instability without dismantling the system.

Broader Assessments of Motivations and Outcomes

Fischer's motivations are often characterized by historians as rooted in a sincere opposition to apartheid's systemic , shaped by his observations of during his legal career and international experiences, including studies at Oxford University in the 1930s where he encountered Marxist ideas. Despite his privileged Afrikaner background as the son of a judge, he joined the (SACP) in the , believing communism provided the ideological and organizational framework to overthrow what he saw as an intertwined system of racial capitalism and imperialism. This commitment led him to prioritize revolutionary change over reform, as evidenced by his underground role post-1963 , where he evaded capture to reorganize resistance networks. Assessments of these motivations highlight a tension between moral clarity against apartheid's injustices—such as forced removals and pass laws affecting millions—and an ideological alignment with global that disregarded evidence of its repressive outcomes, including Stalin-era purges and forced collectivization resulting in millions of deaths. Fischer's public defense in his 1966 trial affirmed his dedication to advancing communist goals, framing apartheid as an extension of Western targeted by the Soviet bloc, yet he downplayed communism's internal contradictions. Critics contend this reflected a form of selective outrage, privileging anti-colonial over empirical failures of communist states, where similar promises of equality devolved into authoritarian control and . In terms of outcomes, Fischer's actions sustained the (ANC) and SACP's armed wing, Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK), through strategic planning that emphasized "properly controlled violence" via of infrastructure, avoiding civilian targets initially but escalating to guerrilla tactics that contributed to the regime's delegitimization. This resistance, bolstered by his evasion of testimony and reorganization efforts, pressured international isolation of apartheid , aiding its dismantlement by 1994. However, the SACP-influenced turn to violence from 1961 onward, which Fischer supported as a , prolonged conflict and civilian hardships, with MK operations linked to bombings and clashes that fueled state crackdowns and internal strife. Post-apartheid analyses note that while his sacrifices symbolized integrity and inspired multiracial , the enduring ANC-SACP alliance correlated with policy emphases on redistribution over market reforms, contributing to persistent inequality and GDP growth lagging behind comparable emerging economies since 1994. His legacy thus embodies both catalytic resistance against oppression and the causal risks of endorsing revolutionary ideologies with poor track records, where short-term moral imperatives yielded mixed long-term societal gains.

References

  1. https://www.sahistory.org.za/people/advocate-abram-bram-fischer
  2. https://theconversation.com/mandelas-lawyer-bram-fischer-a-man-who-paid-the-ultimate-price-116436
  3. https://www.thecairoreview.com/essays/bram-fischers-legacy/
  4. https://nationalmuseumpublications.co.za/bram-fischer-born-this-day-23-april-1908/
  5. https://www.geni.com/people/Bram-Fischer/6000000025866340692
  6. https://woodlandhillsestate.co.za/history/
  7. https://nationalmuseumpublications.co.za/ella-fischer-1884-1964-beloved-community-leader-and-mother-of-bram-fischer/
  8. https://overcomingapartheid.msu.edu/people.php?kid=163-574-599
  9. https://books.google.com/books/about/Fischer_s_Choice.html?id=h8fnDwAAQBAJ
  10. https://www.nelsonmandela.org/news/entry/tribute-by-ilse-fischer-wilson-to-nelson-mandela
  11. https://sahistory.org.za/people/advocate-abram-bram-fischer
  12. https://gcbsa.co.za/law-journals/2023/december/Pages%20from%20Advocate%20December%202023%20Web-16.pdf
  13. https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1097&context=fac_articles_chapters
  14. https://www.ufs.ac.za/templates/news-archive/campus-news/2023/october/bram-fischer-life-and-legacy-explored-in-memorial-lecture
  15. https://witsvuvuzela.com/2015/03/28/10-things-you-didnt-know-about-bram-fischer/
  16. https://www.rhodeshouse.ox.ac.uk/programmes-events/the-bram-fischer-memorial-lecture/
  17. https://encyclopaediaafricana.com/fischer-bram-abram/
  18. https://www.nytimes.com/1975/05/09/archives/abram-fischer-of-south-africa-jailed-leader-of-communist-party-is.html
  19. https://sahistory.org.za/article/abram-fischer-timeline-1908-1975
  20. https://www.heraldonline.co.zw/bram-fischer-his-life-defined-meaning-of-integrity/
  21. https://lrc.org.za/wp-content/uploads/Fourth-Bram-Fischer-Lecture.pdf
  22. https://pzacad.pitzer.edu/NAM/newafrre/writers/fischer/fischerQ.htm
  23. https://sahistory.org.za/article/transition-armed-struggle-norman-levy
  24. https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstreams/07a211cc-69c7-407b-a10f-97436bfa593c/download
  25. https://sahistory.org.za/article/armed-struggle-and-state-repression-1960s
  26. http://www.mandela.gov.za/mandela_speeches/1995/950609_bramfischer.htm
  27. https://oulitnet.co.za/fischer/statement.asp
  28. https://www.sahistory.org.za/article/rivonia-trial-1963-1964
  29. http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mandela/fischerstatement.html
  30. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.za/node/5603207
  31. https://sahistory.org.za/dated-event/south-african-communist-party-leader-abram-fischer-sentenced-life-imprisonment-charges
  32. https://aliciapatterson.org/glenn-frankel/bram-fischers-journey/
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273455103_The_Post-Rivonia_ANC_and_SACP_underground
  34. https://www.nytimes.com/1966/05/15/archives/bram-fischeran-afrikaner-in-dissent.html
  35. https://www.theconversation.com/mandelas-lawyer-bram-fischer-a-man-who-paid-the-ultimate-price-116436
  36. https://sahistory.org.za/article/trial-state-versus-abram-fischer-and-thirteen-others-norman-levy
  37. https://sahistory.org.za/sites/default/files/Bram%2520Fischer-%2520Christian%2520Action%2520pamphlet.pdf
  38. https://www.marxists.org/subject/africa/bunting-brian/fischer-trial.pdf
  39. https://sahistory.org.za/dated-event/bram-fischer-sentenced-life-imprisonment
  40. https://www.aamarchives.org/campaigns/political-prisoners.html
  41. https://nationalbarcouncil.co.za/2018/06/03/unsung-hero/
  42. https://www.justice.gov.za/trc/special/prison/wilson.htm
  43. https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/tvseries/episode58/section1.htm
  44. https://www.justice.gov.za/trc/media/1997/9707/s970721k.htm
  45. https://sahistory.org.za/dated-event/bram-fischer-dies
  46. https://sahistory.org.za/people/molly-fischer
  47. https://nationalmuseumpublications.co.za/molly-fischer-a-struggle-icon-in-her-own-right/
  48. https://www.kathradafoundation.org/2025/05/08/this-is-a-letter-of-sympathy-to-ruth-and-ilse-fischer-on-the-death-of-their-father-advocate-bram-fischer-and-is-a-wonderfully-moving-tribute-to-the-great-person-he-was/
  49. https://www.twinkl.com/teaching-wiki/bram-fischer
  50. https://www.news24.com/fischer-award-sparks-debate-20041110
  51. https://www.news24.com/bomb-doesnt-stop-bram-award-20041209
  52. https://www.wits.ac.za/news/latest-news/graduations/2015/the-law-is-about-justice.html
  53. https://allafrica.com/stories/200806021225.html
  54. https://www.ulwaziprogramme.org/durban-street-names/
  55. https://www.thepresidency.gov.za/remarks-president-jacob-zuma-ocassion-renaming-bram-fischer-international-airport-bloemfontein
  56. https://nehandaradio.com/2022/06/30/bram-fischer-a-son-of-africa-whose-life-defined-the-meaning-of-integrity/
  57. https://www.anc1912.org.za/the-sun-will-rise-statements-from-the-dock-by-southern-african-political-prisoners/
  58. https://sahistory.org.za/article/umkhonto-wesizwe-mk
  59. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03057070.2021.1974224
  60. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/185315449.pdf
  61. https://gcbsa.co.za/law-journals/2023/december/p%252043%2520-%252048.pdf
  62. https://sahistory.org.za/sites/default/files/archive-files/Dav5n681.1681.5785.005.006.Jun1981.12.pdf
  63. https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1707&context=ncilj
  64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/160110
  65. https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/75042/JSAS_2021.pdf?sequence=1
  66. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1762697
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.