Hubbry Logo
China Railway CRH2China Railway CRH2Main
Open search
China Railway CRH2
Community hub
China Railway CRH2
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
China Railway CRH2
China Railway CRH2
China Railway CRH2
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
China Railway CRH2 EMU
CRH2A-2044
In service2007–present
ManufacturerKawasaki Heavy Industries,
CRRC Qingdao Sifang
Family nameShinkansen (E2 series)
Number builtCRH2A: 120+369+1 trainsets (3920 cars)
CRH2B: 27 trainsets (432 cars)
CRH2C (stage 1): 30 trainsets (240 cars)
CRH2C (stage 2): 30 trainsets (240 cars)
CRH2E: 20+5 trainsets (480 cars)
CRH2G: 29 trainsets (232 cars)[1]
Number scrapped1 trainset (10 cars; derailment)
SuccessorCR300AF, CR300BF, CR400AF, CR400BF
FormationCRH2A: 8 cars per trainset (4M4T)
CRH2B/E: 16 cars per trainset (8M8T)
CRH2C: 8 cars per trainset (6M2T)
CapacityCRH2A: 610/571/562/588/600/608
CRH2B: 1230
CRH2C: 610/626
CRH2E: 630/880(CRH2E-2463, 2464 and 2465)
OperatorsChina Railway
- CR Beijing
- CR Shanghai
- CR Jinan
- CR Xi'an
- CR Wuhan
- CR Nanchang
- CR Zhengzhou
- CR Taiyuan
- CR Chengdu
- CR Guangzhou
- CR Nanning
Lines servedMost 200–250 km/h (124–155 mph) high speed rail lines across China, plus some conventional lines
Specifications
Train lengthCRH2A/C: 201.4 m (660 ft 9 in)
CRH2B/E: 401.4 m (1,316 ft 11 in)
Width3,380 mm (11 ft 1 in)
Height3,700 mm (12 ft 2 in)
Platform height1,250 mm (4 ft 1 in)
Maximum speedCRH2A/B/E: 250 km/h (155 mph)
CRH2C (stage 1): 300 km/h (186 mph)
CRH2C (stage 2): 350 km/h (217 mph)
Traction systemWater cooling IGBT–VVVF inverter control
(CRH2B/E: Mitsubishi Electric type MAP-304-A25V141,
CRH2A/C: Hitachi type CII-HHR1420A/B/D, Zhuzhou CSR Times Electric type TGA10/10A/10E/10G)
Traction motors3-phase AC induction motors
(CRH2B/E: Mitsubishi Electric type MB-5120-A, Zhuzhou CSR Times Electric type MT-205
CRH2A/C: Hitachi/CRRC Yongji Electric type YJ-92A, Zhuzhou CSR Times Electric type YQ-365)
Power outputCRH2A: 4.8 MW (6,437 hp)
CRH2B/E: 9.6 MW (12,874 hp)
CRH2C:
  • Stage 1: 7.2 MW (9,655 hp)
  • Stage 2: 8.76 MW (11,747 hp)
TransmissionAC-DC-AC
Electric system(s)25 kV 50 Hz AC Overhead catenary
Current collectionPantograph
Braking system(s)Regenerative, electronically controlled pneumatic brakes
Track gauge1,435 mm (4 ft 8+1⁄2 in) standard gauge

The CRH2 Hexie (simplified Chinese: 和谐号; traditional Chinese: 和諧號; pinyin: Héxié Hào; lit. 'Harmony') is one of the high-speed train models in China. The CRH2 is based on the E2-1000 Series Shinkansen design from Japan with the license purchased from a consortium formed of Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Mitsubishi Electric, and Hitachi, and represents the second Shinkansen train model to be exported.

In 2004, the Ministry of Railway in China purchased an initial 60 sets of the train from Kawasaki Heavy Industries with a maximum speed of 250 km/h (155 mph). However, the newer versions of the CRH2 are not related to the E2-1000 Series despite having the same exterior shell.[2]

Variants

[edit]
The CRH2 developed from the E2 Series Shinkansen
CRH2A-2260&2011 at Xiamen railway station

CRH2A

[edit]

On October 20, 2004, the Ministry of Railway in China ordered 60 sets of CRH2A trains from Kawasaki Heavy Industries in Japan. Along with 60 sets of Bombardier's Regina-based CRH1A, and 40 sets of Alstom's Pendolino-based CRH5A, these train sets are consider as first batch of CRH trains.

Each of the CRH2A set consists of 8 cars. The first 3 sets (CRH2-001A - CRH2-003A) were built in Japan, the next 6 sets (CRH2-004A - CRH2-009A) were delivered in complete knock down form and assembled by CSR Sifang Locomotive and Rolling Stock. The remaining 51 sets (CRH2-010A - CRH2-060A) were built by Sifang through technology transfer from Japan.

The first train arrived at Qingdao port on March 8, 2006, with little fanfare, and was not even publicized in China. These trains have a maximum operation speed of 250 km/h (155 mph) and started providing high-speed train service from April 18, 2007, the date of the sixth national railway speed-up.

According to Chinese and Japanese media, CRH2A trains started test trials ahead of commercial operation on the Shanghai-Hangzhou and Shanghai-Nanjing lines on January 28, 2007.

On September 14, 2010, the Chinese MOR ordered additional 40 sets of CRH2A trains (CRH2-151A - CRH2-190A) from CSR Sifang.

Additionally, from 2012 to 2017, CRH2A-2212 to CRH2A-4131 were introduced.

CRH2A-4020

[edit]

Following a derailment in Guizhou in 2022, CRH2A-4020 was converted to become the first dedicated High-Speed freight train of China. The two derailed carriages, 00 and 07, were scrapped, while new windowless carriages were rebuilt in place. The rest of the train was also modified in a similar manner, but the windows were retained. The modified train was revealed in March 2024, and entered testing the following month.[3]

CRH2B

[edit]
CRH2B at Wuxi Railway Station

In November 2007, the Ministry of Railway in China ordered 10 CRH2 sets with 16 cars per set (8M8T). These trains have been given designations CRH2B (CRH2-111B - CRH2-120B). Each CRH2B has three 1st seating cars (ZY), twelve 2nd seating cars (ZE), and one dining car (CA). Designed maximum operation speed is 250 km/h (155 mph) with a power of 9,600 kW (12,874 hp). These CRH2 have "Phoenix eyes" headlights who were not present on the CRH2A.

The first units were delivered on June 29, 2008,[4][5] and came into service on the Hefei–Nanjing Passenger Railway on August 1, 2008.[6]

CRH2C (CRH2-300)

[edit]
CRH2C

After the introduction of the modified E2-1000 Series, Sifang built its own CRH2 with a maximum safe operating speed of 300 km/h (186 mph). The original train sets imported from Kawasaki had a maximum safe operating speed of 250 km/h (160 mph).

During June 2005 and September 2005, The Chinese Ministry of Railways launched bidding for High speed trains with a top speed over 300 km/h (186 mph). Along with Siemens's Velaro-based CRH3C, CSR Sifang bid 60 sets of CRH2C, includes 30 sets of CRH2C stage one with a top speed of 300 km/h (186 mph), and 30 sets of CRH2C stage two with a top speed of 350 km/h (217 mph).

In development and research of the 350 km/h (217 mph) high speed train, The CRH2-300 project was launched by Chinese MOR and CSR. In 2006 the China Development Bank provided CNY 15 billion developmental financial loans to CSR Group for the projects of 200–300 km/h (124–186 mph) high speed trains.[7] Over 50 academics, 150,000 technicians, 600 contractors were involved in the project.[8] This train's livery is not like the CRH2A, which the blue stripe does not end at the fronts of trainsets.

CRH2C stage one

[edit]
CRH2C-2080

CRH2C Stage one is a modified version of CRH2A. It has a maximum operating speed up to 300 km/h (186 mph) by replacing two intermediate trailer cars with motorized cars. Equipped with an array of the state-of-the-art technologies, including aluminum alloy body with a reduced weight, high speed turntable, high speed pantograph, and optic-fiber based integrated control system.[9]

Chinese MOR ordered 30 sets of CRH2C stage one, name code CRH2-061C - CRH2-090C. The first set, CRH2-061C was unveiled on December 22, 2007.[10][11]

During the test on April 22, 2008, CRH2-061C reached a top speed of over 370 km/h (230 mph) on Beijing-Tianjin high-speed rail.[12]

During the test on December 11, 2009, CRH2-061C reached a top speed of 394.2 km/h (244.9 mph) on Zhengzhou-Xi'an high-speed rail.[13]

Together with CRH3C, the CRH2C stage one first came into service on Beijing-Tianjin Intercity high-speed rail on August 1, 2008, and all CRH2C stage one trains have been replaced by CRH3C in April, 2009. Currently, most of these trains are serving on the Shanghai-Nanjing high speed rail.

CRH2C stage two

[edit]
CRH2C-2103

CRH2C Stage two is the "re-design" version of the CRH2. Some of the details, like the aluminum body structure, noise reduction technology & reduction technique, draw on the CRH3C. And cancelled the driver's door. According to CSR Sifang, the improvements include the following aspects:

  • The axle weight of the bogie increased from 14 to 15 tonnes (30,865 to 33,069 lb), to prevent tremble of the train body at a higher speed,[8] the gear ratio has been optimized from 3.036 to 2.379, the critical instability speed is 550 km/h (340 mph).
  • The thermal capacity of the bogie has been increased, which satisfied the continuous operation at 350 km/h (217 mph)
  • With the YQ-365 type AC traction motor. It has a maximum operating speed up to 350 km/h (217 mph) with a power of 8,760 kW (11,747 hp).
  • The rigidity of the car body has been increased to lower the noise and vibration.
  • Optimized car body and window design for better air tightness and strength.
  • Added pressure protection system to avoid pressure fluctuation in the compartment and improvement of comfort.
  • Optimized design of the roof antenna, exterior windscreen and windows for a lower air resistance.[14]

Chinese MOR ordered 30 sets of CRH2C stage two, name code CRH2-091C - CRH2-110C and CRH2-141C - CRH2-150C. The first set, CRH2-091C was unveiled in January 2010 and came into service on Zhengzhou-Xi'an high-speed rail in February, 2010.[15] Currently, most of these trains are serving on the Shanghai-Nanjing high speed rail, too.

CRH2E

[edit]
A CRH2E arriving Beijing West railway station as D924 Guangzhou-Beijing overnight train in 2015.
Inside a traditional berth style sleeper car of a CRH2E.

In November and December 2007, the Ministry of Railway in China ordered 20 CRH2 sleeper trains with 16 cars per set (8M8T). These trains are modified CRH2Bs, outfitted with traditional railway sleeping berths (couchette car) and have been given designations CRH2E (numbered CRH2-121E - CRH2-140E). Each CRH2E has thirteen 1st class sleeping cars (WR), two 2nd class seating cars (ZE), and one buffet car (CA) or one second class/dining car (ZEC). Designed maximum operation speed is 250 km/h (155 mph) with 9,600 kW (12,874 hp) of power output.

The first batch of CRH2E, CRH2-121E - CRH2-126E, came into service on Beijing-Shanghai railway on December 21, 2008.[4][16] On 23 July 2011, one sleeper coach on CRH2-139E trainset has been derailed in the 2011 Wenzhou train collision, together with CRH1-046B.

The rest of CRH2Es were deployed on Beijing–Guangzhou–Shenzhen–Hong Kong High-Speed Railway since January 2015, operating overnight sleeper trains between Beijing and Guangzhou (including some trains to Shenzhen).

Double Deck CRH2E

[edit]

A brand new variant of the CRH2E entered service in 2017 numbered beyond CRH2E-2463.[17][18] Instead of a traditional railway sleeping berth the sleeper train is organized with the corridor running down the middle of the train car with double deck "capsules" on each side.[19] Each capsule is similar in layout to airplane first class, and passengers are no longer sharing the room. Each capsule comes with independent tables, outlets, lamps, hangers and curtains. The body of the train is redesigned to reduce noise levels during travel. The trains have been dubbed "moving hotels".[20]

CRH2G

[edit]
CRH2G-2417

CRH2G is a specialized cold and sand/windstorm resistant version of the CRH2 manufactured by CRRC Qingdao Sifang. The trains were tested on the Lanzhou–Xinjiang HSR and Harbin–Dalian HSR.[21] Tests where completed on November 10, 2015, and the first sets were assigned to Lanzhou–Xinjiang HSR.[22]

CRH2-380 (CRH2C-2150 experimental train)

[edit]
CRH2C-2150, an experimental testbed for CRH380A, at Shanghai Hongqiao Railway Station.
Main article: China Railway CRH380A

In 2008, the Chinese MOR & CSR launched CRH2-380 project, the main purpose is to develop new-generation of high speed trains with maximum operation speed of 380 km/h (236 mph). CRH2 is one of the fundamental platforms of the new trains, which is designated as CRH380A. The experimental train is a highly modified CRH2C number 2150. The main difference between this train and the regular CRH380A is the presence of two additional doors on the rear of the first and the last coach like on the CRH2C.

[edit]
  • First Class Coach
    First Class Coach
  • Second Class Coach
    Second Class Coach
  • Buffet Car
    Buffet Car
  • The buffet car of the CRH2E
    The buffet car of the CRH2E
  • Compartment Connection
    Compartment Connection

Formation

[edit]

At the time of the sixth national railway speed-up, at least 37 CRH2A sets had been delivered by Kawasaki and Sifang.[23] In 2008, all 60 CRH2A sets had been delivered by Kawasaki. The post-2008 production model of the CRH2 are designed and made solely by Sifang with a maximum safe operation speed of 350 km/h (217 mph).[2]

CRH2A (Previous)

[edit]
Coach No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Type1 ZE ZEC ZE ZY ZE
Type2 ZE ZY ZE ZEC ZE ZY ZE
Type3 ZE ZET ZE ZEC ZE ZY ZE
Type4 ZYS ZE ZE ZEC ZE ZYT
Type5 ZY ZE ZEC ZE ZY
Type6 ZE ZEC ZY ZE
Type7 ZE ZYE ZE ZEC ZE ZY ZE
Type8 ZY ZE ZEC ZE
Power Configuration TC M TP T MP M TC
Power Units Unit 1 Unit 2
Capacity1 55 100 85 100 55 (+16) 100 51 64
Capacity2 55 100 46 100 55 (+16) 100 51 64
Capacity3 55 100 43+16 100 55 (+16) 100 51 64
Capacity4 15+4 51+4 85 100 55 (+16) 100 24+4
Capacity5 42 78 85 100 55 (+16) 100 51
Capacity6 55 100 85 100 55 (+16) 78 51 64
Capacity7 55 100 16+43 100 71 100 51 64
Capacity8 48 90 90 77 63 90 90 65
  • ^1 Other train sets
  • ^2 Set Nº. 2006, 2011 and 2021
  • ^3 Set Nº. 2015, 2027 and 2030
  • ^4 Set Nº. 2042
  • ^5 Set Nº. 2043
  • ^6 Set Nº. 2044–2060
  • ^7 Set Nº. 2151–2211. Coach No. 3 has 16 First Class Seats and 43 Second Class seats
  • ^8 Set Nº. 2212–2416, 2427–2460, 2473–2499, 2828, 4001–4071, 4082–4095 and 4114–4131

CRH2A (Renovated)

[edit]
Coach No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Type1 ZE ZEC ZE ZY ZE
Type2 (EC) ZY ZE ZEC ZE
Power Configuration TC M MP M MP M TC
Power Units Unit 1 Unit 2
Capacity1 55 100 85 100 55 (+16) 100 51 64
Capacity2 (EC) 48 90 90 77 63 90 90 65
  • ^1 Set Nº. 2001–2009, 2011–2060 and 2151–2211
  • ^2 Set Nº. 2212–2416, 2427–2460, 2473–2499, 2828, 4001–4071, 4082–4095 and 4114–4131

CRH2B

[edit]
Coach No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Type ZY ZE CA ZE
Power Configuration TC M TP T M T M T TP M TC
Power Units Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4
Capacity 36 68 51 100 85 100 85 (32) 85 100 85 100 85 100 85 65
  • Set Nº. 2111–2120, 2466–2472 and 4096–4105

CRH2C

[edit]
Coach No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Type ZE ZEC ZE ZY ZE
Power Configuration TC M MP M MP M TC
Power Units Unit 1 Unit 2
Capacity1 55 100 85 100 55+16 100 51 64
Capacity2 55 100 85 100 54+16 100 51 65
  • ^1 Set Nº. 2062–2067 and 2069–2090
  • ^2 Set Nº. 2091–2110 and 2141–2149

CRH2E

[edit]
Coach No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Type1 ZE WR CA WR ZE
Type2 ZE WR WRC WR ZE
Type3 WR WRC WR
Power Configuration TC M TP T M T M T TP M TC
Power Units Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4
Capacity1 55 40 (0) 40 40 55
Capacity2 55 40 20 55
Capacity3 40 60 20 60 40
  • ^1 Set Nº. 2121–2138 and 2140
  • ^2 Set Nº. 2461 and 2462
  • ^3 Set Nº. 2463–2465

CRH2G

[edit]
Coach No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Type ZY ZE ZEC ZE
Power Configuration TC M MP M MP M TC
Power Units Unit 1 Unit 2
Capacity 48 90 77 63 90 65
  • Set Nº. 2417–2426, 4072–4081 and 4106–4113

Accidents

[edit]
Main article: Wenzhou train collision

On July 23, 2011, two bullet trains were traveling in the same direction and the train in front, the CRH 1-046B was stopped by a or a faulty signal hit by lightning. The light that the second train was supposed to stop at was hit by lightning, malfunctioned and showed a green signal while it was supposed to be red. The second train was a CRH 2-139E. The CRH2 front cars fell off the viaduct and one standing at a 90° angle between the viaduct and the ground. The cars that fell to the ground are cars 1-3 and the fourth one was the one standing.

On June 6, 2022, D2809, operated by CRH2A-4020, was impacted by a mudslide just outside of Rongjiang Railway Station in Guizhou. The train derailed, and the driver was killed in the accident. All passengers survived.[24]

Distribution

[edit]

As of April 2024:

Operator Quantity Serial number Depot Notes
CRH2A
CR Wuhan 33 2011、2013、2022、2029、2033、2035、2039、2043、2046、2050～2052、2054、2055、2059、2060、2152、2162～2164、2173、2179、2192、2193、2200、2201、2205～2211 Hankou
15 2017、2019、2023、2027、2034、2045、2047～2049、2053、2056、2151、2169、2180、2199 Wuhan
CR Shanghai 28 2001～2003、2005、2007、2016、2018、2020、2028、2031、2057、2058、2161、2166、2168、2174～2176、2181～2184、2187、2189、2194～2196、2203 Shanghai South
44 2004、2006、2008、2009、2012、2014、2015、2021、2024～2026、2030、2032、2036～2038、2040～2042、2044、2153～2160、2165、2167、2170～2172、2177、2178、2185、2186、2188、2190、2191、2197、2198、2202、2204 Nantong
CR Nanchang 19 2215～2218、2233、2236、2237、2246、2249、2250、2252、2257、2260、2261、2284、2285、2290、2429、2430 Nanchang
20 2212～2214、2220～2224、2247、2248、2251、2253～2256、2259、2291～2293、2302 Nanchang West
18 2219、2235、2282、2283、2324、2427、2447、2452、2457、2458、4006、4012、4013、4045、4047～4050 Xiamen North
7 2234、2258、2451、2453、2454、4008、4046 Fuzhou South
22 2271、2275、2326、2434～2437、2440～2442、2446、2455、2456、2476、2477、2493、2494、4009、4014～4017 Longyan
CR Chengdu 25 2230、2305、2321、2323、2335、2336、2338～2340、2385、2390、2438、2480～2482、2490、2491、4007、4022、4035～4040 Chongqing North
8 2228、2231、2304、2325、2373、2492、4023、4042 Chongqing West
13 2272、2333、2337、2360、2363、2364、2374、2391、2392、2395～2397、4020 Guiyang North
CR Nanning 55 2238、2240～2245、2262、2263、2269、2270、2276、2279、2281、2286、2287、2296、2297、2301、2303、2312～2314、2327、2328、2346～2348、2370、2371、2375、2377、2378、2383、2386、2387、2393、2394、2398、2399、2401、2404、2407、2443～2445、2450、4018、4027、4031、4032、4069、4071、4114、4115 Nanning
35 2239、2266、2277、2278、2280、2288、2289、2300、2306、2307、2366～2369、2376、2384、2400、2402、2412、2413、2431～2433、2439、4034、4041、4043、4068、4070、4116～4121 Guilin North
CR Taiyuan 20 2294、2295、2308～2311、2316～2319、4122～4131 Taiyuan
CR Guangzhou 21 2274、2298、2320、2330、2331、2341、2349、2350、2380、2381、2389、2403、2405、2416、2474、2488、4002、4004、4025、4056、4067 Guangzhou South
26 2299、2329、2343、2344、2372、2379、2382、2388、2408、2409、2428、2448、2473、2475、2478、2479、2487、2495、2497、4003、4024、4060、4062～4064、4066 Foshan West
6 2449、2496、2498、4055、4061、4065 Changsha
CR Jinan 22 2225～2227、2267、2268、2332、2334、2361、2362、2365、2410、2411、2414、2415、2459、2483、2485、2486、4010、4011、4051、4052 Qingdao
10 2345、2352～2359、2484 Jinan
CR Kunming 43 2229、2232、2264、2265、2273、2315、2322、2342、2351、2406、2460、2489、2499、2828、4001、4005、4019、4021、4026、4028～4030、4033、4044、4053、4054、4057～4059、4082～4095 Kunming South
China Railway 1 2010 N/a 200~250 km/h comprehensive inspection train
CRH2B
CR Shanghai 10 2111～2120 Nanjing
CR Wuhan 17 2466～2472、4096～4105 Hankou
CRH2C
CR Shanghai 57 2062～2067、2069～2110、2141～2149 Nanjing
China Railway 3 2061, 2068, 2150 N/a Track Inspection Train
CRH2E
CR Beijing 17 2122～2126、2128、2130～2135、2137、2138、2463～2465 Beijing
CR Guangzhou 7 2121、2127、2129、2136、2140、2461、2462 Shenzhen
China Railway 1 2139 Retired CRH2E-2139 was severely damaged after Wenzhou train collision on 23 July 2011. Carriages 1 to 5 scrapped after derailment, Carriages 6 to 10 dismantled by MOR, and Carriages 11 to 16 transformed into inspection trains.
CRH2J
China Railway 1 0205 N/a Comprehensive inspection trains in orange livery

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

China Railway CRH2

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The China Railway CRH2 is a family of high-speed electric multiple unit (EMU) trainsets manufactured by CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co., Ltd., derived from the E2-1000 Series Shinkansen design through a 2004 technology transfer agreement with Kawasaki Heavy Industries that included procurement of initial units and localization requirements for domestic production. These aluminum-bodied trains, known as "Hexiehao" (Harmony), feature distributed power configurations in 8- or 16-car formations, powered by 25 kV AC overhead catenary, and are optimized for speeds of 250–350 km/h depending on the variant and track conditions. Introduced into revenue service in late 2007 on lines like , the CRH2 series played a pivotal role in China's rapid expansion, enabling the world's largest dedicated passenger network by enabling frequent, reliable operations at elevated speeds while incorporating iterative domestic improvements in , traction systems, and passenger capacity. Key variants include the CRH2A (initial imported/localized sets at 250 km/h), CRH2C (upgraded for 300–350 km/h with enhanced braking and lightweighting), and specialized types like CRH2E for overnight services, collectively numbering in the hundreds of sets and serving trunk routes across eastern and . The platform's development exemplified technology assimilation, transitioning from licensed imports to indigenous upgrades that boosted efficiency and reduced costs, though it sparked international disputes over enforcement and export restrictions in subsequent CRH derivatives.

History

Origins and Technology Transfer

The China Railway CRH2 originated from China's early 2000s strategy to build a domestic high-speed rail capability by importing and localizing proven foreign designs, with a focus on technology transfer to accelerate indigenous production. In 2004, following unsuccessful bids for Japan's 700-series Shinkansen due to refusals by key stakeholders like JR Tokai, the Ministry of Railways turned to Kawasaki Heavy Industries for a variant of the E2-1000 series, which formed the core platform for the CRH2. This selection emphasized aerodynamic car bodies, articulated train formations, and bogie designs optimized for high-speed stability on upgraded tracks. On October 20, 2004, Kawasaki secured a contract from the for 60 eight-car trainsets—totaling 480 cars—intended for 250 km/h operations on existing lines as part of the sixth national railway speed-up initiative. The agreement mandated comprehensive , including blueprints, manufacturing processes, and engineering expertise, to Chinese partners, reflecting Beijing's policy of linking market access to knowledge sharing for long-term . Kawasaki committed to delivering initial units while enabling local assembly to reduce costs and build capacity. Kawasaki formalized the transfer through a February 22, 2005, with CSR Sifang and Co., Ltd., establishing Sifang Kawasaki Technology Co., Ltd., for localized production. Three prototype sets were fully built in and shipped to , where the first arrived in early 2006; the remaining sets were assembled domestically using transferred technologies, allowing Sifang to master welding techniques, aluminum alloy fabrication, and integration of Japanese-derived traction systems. This process enabled rapid scaling, with over 50 sets entering service by 2007, though subsequent IP disputes highlighted tensions over the extent and application of assimilated know-how.

Initial Deployment and Localization

In October 2004, China's signed a contract with for 60 sets of CRH2A trains, valued at approximately $800 million, establishing a known as Kawasaki-Sifang & to facilitate . This agreement included the provision of three fully assembled trains, six complete knock-down (CKD) kits for local assembly at CSR Sifang's facility, and for producing an additional 51 trainsets domestically, encompassing blueprints, processes, and training for Chinese engineers, some of whom were sent to . The first CRH2 train arrived at on March 8, 2006. The CRH2 entered commercial service in April 2007, coinciding with the sixth national railway speed-up initiative, initially operating on routes such as to at speeds up to 250 km/h. These early deployments utilized the imported and locally assembled units to validate performance on upgraded conventional lines before expansion to dedicated high-speed corridors, marking the debut of the "Hexiehao" () series in revenue operations. Localization efforts progressed through phased assembly of CKD and semi-knock-down kits, enabling CSR Sifang to achieve production rates exceeding two trainsets per week by 2010, with local content requirements escalating to over 70% in supply chains. While Chinese state media portrayed this as successful indigenous digestion of foreign technology, Kawasaki executives later expressed concerns over protection and the extent of transfers, attributing rapid scaling to contractual obligations rather than voluntary innovation sharing. By the late 2000s, the process had shifted to predominantly domestic manufacturing, supporting broader CRH2 variant production amid China's buildup.

Evolution to Indigenous Production

Following the 2004 technology transfer agreement between and South Locomotive & Rolling Stock Corporation (later ), the initial CRH2 production emphasized local assembly of imported components to build manufacturing expertise. Under the deal, three prototype 8-car sets were constructed in and delivered starting in December 2006, while the remaining 57 sets were assembled at Sifang Locomotive and Rolling Stock in using complete knock-down kits and transferred design specifications derived from the E2-1000 Series . This phase prioritized rapid deployment for lines like Beijing-Tianjin, operational from August 2008, with local content initially limited to non-critical parts to ensure reliability amid 's aggressive HSR expansion. By 2007-2008, localization advanced through iterative absorption, enabling Sifang to produce subsequent CRH2A orders domestically with progressively higher indigenous components, including adapted bogies and auxiliary systems, reducing reliance on Japanese suppliers. The second localization phase, focused on core subsystems like traction motors, achieved cost reductions of approximately 12.5% via substituted domestic equivalents, reflecting causal gains from hands-on digestion rather than mere importation. This shift supported scaled production for over 300 CRH2 sets by 2010, aligning with China's "market for technology" strategy that mandated transfers for foreign access. The pivotal step to indigenous production materialized with the CRH2C variant in , the first CRH2 derivative fully designed and manufactured in by Qingdao Sifang, featuring elongated 16-car formations and aerodynamic tweaks for 350 km/h operations on upgraded lines. Subsequent models like CRH2-380 further embodied self-reliant , incorporating Chinese-developed and lighter materials, with production exceeding 100 units by 2012 and no foreign kits required. This evolution, completed within roughly four years of initial transfers, established domestic mastery but drew Japanese critiques of overreach, as Kawasaki alleged unapproved modifications in designs like the CRH380 series. Despite such disputes, empirical output—'s HSR fleet surpassing 2,000 CRH2-based units by —validated the efficacy of enforced localization in scaling capabilities.

Design and Engineering

Basis in Foreign Technology

The China Railway CRH2 series originates from Japanese technology, specifically the E2-1000 series design developed by . In October 2004, entered into an export and agreement with China's , awarding a contract for 60 high-speed trainsets to be produced in collaboration with Qingdao Sifang Locomotive & Co., Ltd., a of China South Locomotive & Corporation (CSR). This deal facilitated the localization of key components, including the aluminum alloy carbody, advanced systems, and distributed electric propulsion, adapted for operation at a maximum speed of 250 km/h on China's emerging network. Under the agreement, initial trainsets involved direct imports and partial assembly in , with subsequent units manufactured domestically through licensed valued at approximately 0.6 billion RMB. The CRH2 incorporated the E2 series' aerodynamic profiling, earthquake-resistant features, and lightweight construction principles, which had proven effective on Japan's Tohoku and Joetsu lines since the late . This foreign foundation enabled rapid deployment of China's CRH2 fleet starting in , with over 300 sets entering service by 2010. While the was formalized through contracts emphasizing joint production and knowledge sharing, subsequent developments in China's , including higher-speed variants, have drawn scrutiny from Japanese firms regarding adherence, though official agreements focused on the 200-250 km/h segment. The CRH2's reliance on Kawasaki's expertise marked one of the earliest successful imports of Shinkansen-derived outside , following the 700T series export to .

Key Structural and Aerodynamic Features

The CRH2 utilizes a lightweight aluminum alloy carbody fabricated from hollow profile extrusions, which reduces overall vehicle mass by approximately 20-30% relative to conventional constructions, thereby improving energy efficiency and dynamic performance at speeds up to 250 km/h. This structure employs welded aluminum sections, typically using alloys such as 6N01 for its extrudability and weldability, forming a rigid shell that enhances torsional stiffness and fatigue resistance under repeated high-speed loading. Aerodynamically, the CRH2 incorporates a streamlined profile derived from the Japanese E2-1000 series, featuring a tapered, elongated fairing designed to minimize frontal drag coefficients and suppress micro-pressure waves during entries, where fluctuations can exceed 20 kPa without mitigation. The length, typically around 4-6 meters in early models, reduces aerodynamic radiation from the head car by optimizing airflow separation, with computational studies indicating that head components contribute over 50% of total at 350 km/h simulations. Smooth exterior surfacing, including fairings and underbody panels, further diminishes and velocities, limiting side force increases under crosswinds to below 10% of total aerodynamic load. These features collectively enable stable operation in diverse conditions, including viaducts and prevalent in China's high-speed network.

Propulsion, Power, and Performance Specifications

The CRH2 series utilizes a distributed system based on three-phase asynchronous AC induction traction motors, with each motor of the YJ92A type rated at 300 kW output, 2,000 V voltage, 106 A current, and 4,140 r/min rotational speed. These motors are mounted on the bogies of the power cars, enabling efficient distribution across the axles for high-speed operation. The traction drive incorporates AC-DC-AC conversion via IGBT-based inverters to control motor speed and , drawing from a 25 kV 50 Hz AC overhead supply collected by pantographs. Power output for standard CRH2A configurations totals 4,800 kW in 8-car formations, scaling to 9,600 kW in 16-car sets through additional powered bogies, supporting consistent across variable lengths. This equates to approximately 16 per 8-car unit, each contributing to the overall hourly-rated capacity under nominal conditions. Performance specifications for the baseline CRH2A emphasize operational reliability at design speeds of 250 km/h, with axle loads limited to 14 tons to minimize track wear and ensure stability. Higher-speed variants within the CRH2 family, such as the CRH2C, achieve operational maxima of 300-350 km/h through enhanced motor ratings and aerodynamic optimizations, though base models prioritize 200-250 km/h service on conventional electrified lines. Braking integrates regenerative systems with the traction motors to recover energy, supplemented by pneumatic and disc mechanisms for full-stop control.
SpecificationCRH2A Value
Traction Motor TypeYJ92A Asynchronous AC
Motor Power (per unit)300 kW
Total Power (8-car)4,800 kW
Electric System25 kV 50 Hz AC
Design Speed250 km/h
≤14 t

Variants

CRH2A and Early Models

The CRH2A represents the foundational variant of the CRH2 series, derived from the Japanese E2-1000 Series through a agreement with . In October 2004, China's placed an order for 60 eight-car sets, initially specified for a maximum operating speed of 200 km/h, with the design adapted for standard-gauge (1,435 mm) tracks and Chinese operational requirements. The first train arrived at on March 8, 2006, marking the beginning of imports. Of the initial batch, the first three sets (CRH2-001A to CRH2-003A) were fully assembled in by Kawasaki, while subsequent sets involved progressively localized production: six sets (CRH2-004A to CRH2-009A) were delivered as CKD kits for assembly at Locomotive & Works, and the remaining 51 were manufactured domestically using transferred technology from Kawasaki, enabling Qingdao Sifang to produce the aluminum-bodied cars with distributed traction systems. This localization process, mandated as part of the procurement contract, facilitated rapid scaling but drew later criticisms from Japanese firms over the scope of intellectual property sharing, including requirements for ongoing design improvements. Each CRH2A set comprises eight cars (4M4T configuration, with four motorized power cars), measuring 201.4 m in , 3.38 m in width, and 3.7 m in , with a total seating capacity of 610 passengers and an axle load not exceeding 14 tons. Early CRH2A models entered commercial service on August 1, 2008, primarily on the Beijing–Tianjin intercity railway, where they operated at speeds up to 250 km/h following modifications that exceeded the original contract specifications. Propulsion relies on water-cooled IGBT-VVVF inverters driving asynchronous AC motors, each rated at 300 kW, supporting reliable performance on electrified lines at 25 kV 50 Hz AC. These initial deployments emphasized capacity for short-to-medium intercity routes, with the trains' aerodynamic duck-bill nose and lightweight aluminum structure derived directly from engineering to minimize air resistance and enhance stability. Unlike later indigenous variants, early CRH2A units retained closer fidelity to the Japanese blueprint, including designs optimized for curve negotiation and systems for overhead contact, though Chinese adaptations addressed local manufacturing tolerances and signaling integration. The CRH2A's role as an early model laid the groundwork for subsequent variants by validating imported technology under Chinese conditions, with over 490 sets eventually produced, though the pioneering units highlighted initial challenges in localization and speed upratings amid ambitious expansion goals. Operational feedback from these trains informed refinements in cabin ergonomics, such as standard second-class seating and basic first-class accommodations, but also exposed limitations in higher-speed that later models addressed.

CRH2B and Capacity-Focused Variants

The CRH2B variant represents a capacity-optimized extension of the CRH2 series, featuring a fixed 16-car formation to handle higher passenger volumes on congested intercity routes compared to the standard 8-car CRH2A. This design doubles the length to 401.4 meters while maintaining the same width of 3,380 mm, with eight powered motor cars (8M8T configuration) delivering 9,600 kW of power for consistent performance. It supports a maximum design speed of 250 km/h and an operational speed of 200 km/h, prioritizing reliability and throughput over top-end velocity. Interior layout emphasizes seating density, comprising three first-class cars (ZY), twelve second-class cars (ZE), and one dining car (CA), accommodating 1,229 passengers total—155 in first class and 1,074 in second class. This configuration enhances efficiency for peak-hour demand without relying on temporary couplings of shorter sets, which were occasionally used elsewhere in the CRH2 family. Production totaled 27 trainsets (432 cars), manufactured by CSR Sifang Locomotive and Rolling Stock (now CRRC Qingdao Sifang) starting in 2008 under localized assembly following initial technology transfer. The CRH2B entered revenue service on August 1, 2008, initially deployed on the – intercity railway to exploit the variant's superior throughput amid growing regional travel needs. Subsequent allocations focused on similar medium-distance corridors requiring balanced speed and capacity, though units have faced phased retirements as higher-capacity indigenous trains like the CRH380 series proliferated. No distinct sub-variants beyond the standard CRH2B emphasize further capacity tweaks, distinguishing it from speed-oriented or specialized siblings in the CRH2 lineup.

High-Speed CRH2C and CRH2-380

The CRH2C represents an advanced iteration of the CRH2 series, engineered by for elevated operational speeds exceeding the standard 250 km/h of earlier models. This variant incorporates structural reinforcements and aerodynamic enhancements derived from the foundational Japanese technology, enabling a maximum operating speed of 350 km/h during testing and routine service up to 300 km/h on select high-speed lines. Initial prototypes underwent rigorous testing, with one unit achieving notable speeds in April 2008 as part of China's push toward 300 km/h rail capabilities. Further refinements in the CRH2C lineup addressed power distribution and traction systems, boasting a total power output of 8,760 kW across distributed units, which supported stable performance at higher velocities. These trains feature an aluminum alloy body for reduced weight and improved rigidity, critical for maintaining safety margins at speeds approaching 350 km/h. Deployment began on key corridors like the Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railway, where the CRH2C's capacity for 16-car formations allowed for efficient passenger throughput. The CRH2-380, evolving directly from the CRH2C through the CRH2-350 project initiated around 2010, marked a significant step in indigenous development by . Designated primarily as the CRH380A in production, it achieves a cruising speed of 350 km/h with a maximum capability of 380 km/h, surpassing prior CRH2 limits via optimized asynchronous motors and advanced braking systems. This model replaced imported Japanese components with domestically engineered equivalents, including traction converters and control software, reflecting China's localization strategy post-technology transfer. Key specifications for the CRH380A include a train length of 203 meters for 8-car sets (extendable to 401 meters for 16-car), a width of 3.38 meters, and heightened aerodynamic profiling to minimize drag at sustained high speeds. Power output reaches 9,600 kW, enabling rates suitable for dense operational schedules on lines such as Beijing-Guangzhou. While test runs demonstrated speeds up to 486 km/h in related prototypes, commercial limits adhere to 350-380 km/h to balance constraints and energy efficiency. These variants underscore iterative focused on speed, reliability, and within China's expansive rail network.

Specialized CRH2E and CRH2G

The CRH2E represents a sleeper-adapted variant of the CRH2 series, configured as 16-car formations primarily for overnight high-speed services. It features 13 sleeping cars equipped with soft sleeper compartments, typically nine four-berth units per car yielding 468 berths, alongside a and end power cars with limited seating. Powered by 9,600 kW electric AC traction at 25 kV 50 Hz, the CRH2E achieves a top operational speed of 250 km/h (155 mph). Production included 20 single-deck sets and five double-deck CRH2E-NG units, manufactured by in collaboration with Kawasaki and between 2006 and 2016. Initial deployment occurred on December 21, 2008, along the Beijing-Shanghai route, with subsequent use on long-distance overnight paths such as Beijing-Shenzhen, Beijing-Kunming, and Shanghai-Chengdu. Later iterations, like the CRH2E-2463 model rolled out on March 27, 2017, by CRRC Qingdao Sifang, adopted a longitudinal bunk layout spanning 412.8 meters and accommodating 880 passengers—37% more than predecessors—while retaining the 250 km/h design speed and adding per-berth windows. This configuration enhances capacity for extended journeys, distinguishing it from daytime CRH2 models by prioritizing rest over seating volume. The CRH2G variant adapts the CRH2 platform for severe environmental conditions, with 29 eight-car sets optimized for extremes including sub-zero cold, sandstorms, high winds, elevated temperatures, altitudes, and ultraviolet exposure. Each set, measuring approximately 201 and seating 613 passengers, employs 4,800 kW power output and a maximum speed of 250 km/h, featuring a redesigned aerodynamic head shape for resilience. Developed by around 2014, these trains underwent testing on the Lanzhou-Xinjiang high-speed line (Lan-Xin railway), where harsh desert and mountainous terrains demand robust climate adaptations. Operational deployment of the CRH2G focuses on northwestern routes like Lan-Xin, enabling reliable service amid sand abrasion, from -40°C to over 40°C, and high-altitude operations exceeding 2,000 . Enhancements include reinforced materials against corrosion and wind loads, supporting consistent performance in regions prone to dust ingress and structural stress. Both CRH2E and CRH2G underscore targeted within the CRH2 lineage, extending the base model's versatility to niche demands without altering core or gauge standards.

Operations

Formations and Train Configurations

The CRH2 series employs fixed trainset formations optimized for high-speed operations, with configurations varying by variant to balance capacity, power distribution, and service type. Most sets feature distributed traction, where motor cars (M) alternate with trailer cars (T), enabling efficient power delivery across the consist. Typical formations draw from the original Japanese blueprint but include adaptations for Chinese infrastructure, such as modified spacing and placement. The CRH2A, the most numerous variant, operates in 8-car formations comprising 4 motor cars and 4 trailer cars (4M4T), with a total length of approximately 201.4 meters. Power cars are positioned at ends and intermediate points (e.g., cars 1, 3, 6, 8 as Mc or M cars), supporting a maximum operating speed of 250 km/h. Passenger accommodations include a mix of first-class, second-class, and sometimes buffet cars, with capacities around 610-650 passengers per set. CRH2B sets double the length to 16 cars (8M8T configuration), extending to about 401.4 to increase capacity for denser routes, accommodating up to 1,200-1,300 passengers. This formation maintains similar motor-trailer alternation but scales power output proportionally, with end cars as powered units flanked by unpowered intermediates. Higher-speed CRH2C variants retain the 8-car formation but adopt a 6M2T power distribution for enhanced and top speeds up to 350 km/h, concentrating more motors toward the center for stability. This setup, with lengths mirroring the CRH2A at 201.4 , prioritizes performance over capacity, seating 576 passengers in standard layouts. Specialized CRH2E sleeper trains use 16-car formations (8M8T), similar to CRH2B but reconfigured for overnight services with soft sleeper compartments, second-class seats, and dining facilities, totaling around 13 sleeper cars plus support units. Double-deck CRH2E-NG subsets introduce bi-level cars for increased bedding capacity, though limited to five sets. CRH2G variants, less common, follow compact 8-car or modified 16-car setups tailored for regional high-speed routes, emphasizing flexibility in motor placement.
VariantCarsPower ConfigLength (m)Capacity (approx.)
CRH2A84M4T201.4610-650
CRH2B168M8T401.41,200-1,300
CRH2C86M2T201.4576
CRH2E/G16/88M8T var.401.4/201.4Varies (sleeper/regional)

Deployment and Route Distribution

The CRH2 series, particularly the CRH2A variant, forms a substantial portion of China's early fleet, with 491 units constructed primarily for operations on lines designed for 200–250 km/h service speeds. These were initially deployed across multiple railway administrations to support the rapid expansion of the high-speed network in the late and early , serving as the primary on numerous regional and routes. Deployment focuses on eastern and central China, where dense urban corridors demand high-frequency services with intermediate stops. For instance, CRH2 trains operate on the Hefei–Fuzhou High-Speed Railway, linking economic hubs in , , , and provinces. Similarly, they are utilized on the Wenzhou–Ningbo High-Speed Railway in Province, facilitating connectivity between coastal manufacturing centers. Additional allocations include lines under the Shanghai Railway Group, which oversees 124 CRH2-type high-speed trainsets for regional operations as of 2025. Route distribution emphasizes capacity-oriented services rather than ultra-high-speed long-haul expresses, with CRH2 sets often configured in 8- or 16-car formations to match passenger volumes on secondary high-speed corridors. Following the phasing in of newer Fuxing EMUs on premier lines like Beijing–Shanghai, many CRH2 units have been reassigned to less demanding routes or retained for peak-hour surges, ensuring continued utilization amid fleet modernization. This redistribution reflects operational efficiencies gained from the trains' adaptability to varied track infrastructures and signaling systems prevalent in China's heterogeneous rail network.

Maintenance and Operational Challenges

The CRH2 series, as electric multiple units (EMUs) derived from Japanese technology and localized in , requires a structured maintenance regime divided into five levels under regulations, with levels I and II focusing on daily and weekly inspections, while higher levels (III-V) involve comprehensive overhauls. Third-grade maintenance for CRH2 EMUs typically spans 15 days, addressing components like traction systems and bogies, with costs for an 8-car set at level III estimated at approximately 4 million yuan (about $600,000 USD as of 2023 exchange rates). These intervals are constrained by operational demands, necessitating optimized scheduling to minimize downtime amid high train-set utilization. Maintenance challenges stem from the rapid scaling of China's network, which outpaced initial depot infrastructure and technician expertise, leading to inefficiencies in track assignment, shunting, and for CRH2 fleets. For instance, manual planning often fails to meet daily operational demands or achieve global optimality, prompting development of iterative algorithms for train-set circling and maintenance slotting, as demonstrated in case studies of 124 CRH2 units under Group. Localization of production introduced variability in component quality, exacerbating on critical parts like railway wheels, where from random parameters such as load variations and track irregularities has been analyzed as a impairing long-term performance. Bogie components, vital for stability at speeds up to 250-350 km/h depending on , require reliability assessments based on fault kilometer data, highlighting vulnerabilities to operational stresses. Operational challenges include the high intensity of service, with CRH2 trains often circling in tight schedules that limit turnaround times for inspections, compounded by the need for condition-based maintenance (CBM) to detect incipient faults in traction systems before failures occur. on CRH2 electrical traction highlights the necessity of real-time fault detection methods, such as those applied to DC-link circuits, to predict degradation in capacities and ensure reliability under harsh operating environments. Systemic issues from aggressive network expansion, including over-reliance on imported designs without fully matured domestic supply chains, have historically strained parts availability and training, though breakdowns have declined; by 2016, rail car malfunctions accounted for 7.4% of incidents, with 80% tied to defects. Vibration-induced problems in CRH2 vehicles further complicate operations, requiring ongoing monitoring to mitigate risks from high-speed dynamics.

Safety and Reliability

Major Accidents and Incidents

On July 23, 2011, CRH2-139E trainset D301, operating on the –Taizhou– high-speed railway, rear-ended stalled CRH1A trainset D3115 near in Province, resulting in the of four carriages from D301 and the deaths of 40 people, with 192 others injured. The collision occurred at approximately 99 km/h after D3115 had halted due to a lightning-induced failure in the LKD2-T1 during a , though the subsequent failed to stop in time despite emergency braking. This incident marked the first fatal accident in and highlighted vulnerabilities in the signaling infrastructure amid the country's accelerated network expansion. An official investigation attributed the crash to multiple factors, including design flaws in the signal system—such as inadequate protection against lightning strikes and poor integration of components from different manufacturers—and managerial shortcomings, including inadequate maintenance protocols and insufficient training for handling adverse weather. Critics, including independent analysts, pointed to broader systemic pressures from the rapid rollout of high-speed rail projects, which prioritized speed of deployment over rigorous testing and quality control, potentially exacerbated by procurement irregularities favoring domestic suppliers. The CRH2-139E's front carriages telescoped upon impact, contributing to the severity, though the train's aluminum body structure largely contained damage compared to more catastrophic failures in non-high-speed incidents. In the aftermath, authorities faced public backlash for rapidly burying derailed carriages under concrete to expedite debris clearance and resuming operations on the line within five days, actions perceived as prioritizing infrastructure recovery over thorough investigation and victim accountability. The dismissed several officials, and the probe led to temporary halts in some high-speed operations nationwide for reviews, though no changes were mandated for the CRH2 series itself. Surviving portions of CRH2-139E were repurposed for maintenance duties rather than scrapped. A separate incident occurred on June 4, 2022, when CRH2A-4020 operating as D2809 derailed near Rongjiang in Province after striking mud and debris from a triggered by heavy rainfall, killing the train conductor and injuring eight passengers. The affected two carriages but caused no further fatalities, with investigations emphasizing external geological risks over or track deficiencies. This event underscored ongoing challenges with natural hazards in mountainous regions but did not implicate CRH2 operational flaws. No other major CRH2-involved accidents with significant casualties have been documented.

Systemic Safety Criticisms

The CRH2 series, derived from licensed Japanese E2 technology and subsequently localized through domestic production, has faced criticisms for systemic vulnerabilities arising from accelerated manufacturing localization and lapses in component production. analyses have identified recurrent failures in wheels, attributed to variability in properties and operational parameters such as load fluctuations and track irregularities, which can propagate to risks or secondary damage to rails and suspensions. Gearbox components in CRH-series trains, including CRH2 variants, have exhibited premature failures due to inadequate retention, surface , and deviations from original specifications, exacerbating under high-speed conditions. Traction systems in CRH2 trains present additional systemic concerns, with incipient faults—such as subtle electrical anomalies or degradations—often evading early detection, potentially evolving into cascading failures that compromise reliability and passenger safety. These issues stem from the challenges of integrating outsourced subsystems during rapid scaling, where price pressures on suppliers led to inconsistent part quality, as evidenced by broader recalls involving defective components. Critics argue that China's emphasis on volume production over rigorous adherence to foreign licensor standards diluted margins, with structural elements like frames showing cracks from similar material inconsistencies. Maintenance regimes for CRH2 fleets have been strained by the high operational tempo of China's network expansion, complicating fault prediction and inventory management for critical spares, which amplifies risks and latent defect accumulation. While no large-scale CRH2-specific catastrophes have been directly linked to these flaws, the prevalence of glitches—totaling over 150 in early high-speed operations—underscores a systemic of deployment speed over iterative safety validation, contrasting with the fault-free record of progenitor designs. Peer-reviewed fault diagnosis highlights the need for advanced, real-time monitoring to mitigate these inherent risks, indicating that domestic adaptations have introduced complexities not fully resolved through standard protocols.

Comparative Reliability Data

The CRH2, licensed from Japan's E2 series Shinkansen design, demonstrates operational reliability influenced by both inherited engineering and China's high-speed rail (HSR) context, including rapid network expansion and varying maintenance practices. Direct quantitative comparisons of metrics like mean distance between failures (MDBF) for CRH2 versus the E2 are limited in public data, with studies focusing more on component-level analysis, such as bogie faults or antiskid valves modeled via Weibull distributions for failure prediction. Systemic factors, including signaling integration and training, have impacted overall performance in China, contrasting with Japan's mature, dedicated infrastructure. Safety records serve as a key proxy for reliability in high-speed operations. The system, including E2 variants, has maintained zero passenger fatalities from derailments or collisions since 1964, despite transporting over 10 billion passengers by 2024, due to integrated safeguards like earthquake detection and rigorous track standards. In comparison, China's HSR network, deploying CRH2 since 2007, experienced the 2011 collision where a CRH1 struck a halted CRH2 amid a signaling malfunction, causing 40 deaths and exposing early vulnerabilities in rapid rollout. Statistical analyses of broader railway safety from 1990–2020 indicate Japan's lower accident rates per train-kilometer, attributed to incremental development versus China's accelerated build-out. Punctuality data further differentiates systems: Shinkansen services achieve over 99.9% on-time performance, with average annual delays under one minute per train, supported by uniform operations on dedicated lines. Chinese HSR, including CRH2 routes, has improved to exceed 95% punctuality in recent years but faced higher variability early on, linked to network density and external disruptions.
MetricShinkansen (E2 Basis)CRH2/China HSR Context
Passenger Fatalities (Collisions/Derailments)0 (1964–2024, >10 billion passengers)Multiple incidents, e.g., 40 deaths in crash
On-Time Performance>99.9%, <1 min average delay/year>95% post-2010s, with early fluctuations
Development ApproachSteady, safety-prioritizedRapid expansion, initial reliability challenges

Impact and Controversies

Technological and Economic Achievements

The CRH2 series, derived from licensed Japanese E2-1000 technology through a consortium led by , facilitated China's initial (HSR) operations starting in 2007, with domestic production commencing at Locomotive & Rolling Stock Co. Ltd. This enabled localization rates exceeding 90% by the early , reducing component costs such as traction motors by 12.5% in subsequent production phases and spurring innovations in local manufacturing processes. Variants like the CRH2C achieved operational speeds of 300 km/h, with testing up to 380 km/h, incorporating enhanced power outputs up to 8,760 kW and improved car body rigidity for stability at high velocities. Over 570 CRH2 sets were produced domestically by 2019, including 491 CRH2A units, supporting the deployment of thousands of daily HSR services and contributing to the network's expansion to over 2,600 CRH pairs per day by 2018. Economically, the CRH2's integration into lines like Beijing-Tianjin reduced travel times from over 70 minutes to approximately 30 minutes, enhancing connectivity and facilitating increased volumes that boosted regional , labor mobility, and tourism revenues. This localization-driven scalability lowered per-unit costs, enabling China to construct the world's largest dedicated HSR network—surpassing 40,000 km by 2023—while generating spillover effects in ancillary industries through absorption and domestic .

Criticisms of Technology Acquisition

The CRH2 series was developed through a 2004 technology transfer agreement between of and the China South Locomotive & Rolling Stock Corporation (CSR), specifically its Sifang subsidiary, under which Kawasaki licensed design elements of its for production of 200 km/h trains localized in . This arrangement involved exporting components, training Chinese engineers, and joint manufacturing as part of a $740 million deal, enabling CSR to produce the CRH2 domestically. Critics, including Japanese rail executives, have argued that China's acquisition strategy constituted coercive , as foreign firms were required to share proprietary designs and form joint ventures to qualify for lucrative domestic contracts, practices later deemed violations of rules on . In 2010, Yoshiyuki Kasai, chairman of , publicly accused Chinese suppliers of "stealing" foreign technology to replicate systems, stating that provided under license was exploited to undercut original developers. Kawasaki echoed these concerns in 2011, asserting that China had infringed on patents by producing unauthorized derivatives of transferred designs without permission, prompting an internal Chinese investigation into industry IP vulnerabilities, though no formal concessions were made. Chinese officials rejected these allegations, maintaining that all transfers complied with contractual terms and that subsequent innovations, such as upgraded CRH2 variants, represented legitimate domestic advancements rather than infringements. However, the rapid localization—achieving over 90% domestic content within years—enabled CSR (later ) to dominate exports with lower-cost trains, eroding market share for Kawasaki and other licensors, as evidenced by 's global bids leveraging CRH2-derived technology against original systems. This outcome fueled broader debates on the of such transfers, with reports highlighting how initial dependencies on foreign IP transitioned into competitive displacement without reciprocal protections.

Broader Strategic and Fiscal Implications

The CRH2 program exemplified China's strategy of acquiring foreign technology through joint ventures to achieve rapid domestic industrialization and strategic autonomy in sectors. In 2004, China signed agreements with and other Japanese firms to import and license E2-series technology, resulting in the production of initial CRH2 sets by Sifang Locomotive and Rolling Stock under terms that mandated localization of manufacturing. This approach enabled China to scale production to over 500 CRH2 variants by the early , transitioning from import dependence to exporting re-engineered derivatives under the brand, thereby enhancing national leverage in global rail markets and supporting initiatives like the Belt and Road, where Chinese HSR exports have secured contracts in over 20 countries. Critics, including reports from policy think tanks, argue that these transfers were coerced by conditioning massive domestic contracts—valued in billions—on disclosures, contravening principles and eroding incentives for foreign by allowing to undercut competitors with state-subsidized low-cost replicas. Empirical studies indicate, however, that such transfers spurred ancillary domestic innovations, with patent filings in related rail technologies increasing by up to 20% in regions hosting CRH assembly plants post-transfer. This duality underscores a causal : short-term foreign for long-term Chinese self-sufficiency, though at the expense of global R&D norms. Fiscally, the CRH2 rollout contributed to China's unprecedented rail outlay, with the broader high-speed network—bolstered by CRH2 deployments—requiring cumulative investments exceeding $1 trillion since 2008, financed largely through Corporation (CRC) bonds and state bank loans that have ballooned CRC's debt to approximately $900 billion by 2022. While CRH2 operations have facilitated over 2,600 daily high-speed pairs, generating revenues from fares and freight integration, only about 6% of the 45,000 km operates at full profitability, with underutilized lines in rural areas exacerbating fiscal strain amid slowing post-pandemic ridership. Proponents cite multiplier effects, such as GDP boosts of 2-3% in connected cities via enhanced labor mobility, yet analysts warn of systemic risks including hidden liabilities and opportunity costs for alternative investments.

References

  1. https://www.jttri.or.jp/130211-kawasaki-presentation.pdf
  2. https://cesi.econ.cuhk.edu.hk/wp-content/uploads/Lin_Yatang_International-Technology-Transfer-and-Domestic-Innovation_Evidence-from-the-High-Speed-railway-Sector-in-China.pdf
  3. https://www.loco-info.com/view.aspx?id=16426
  4. https://locomotivedata.com/trains/crrc-qingdao-sifang/crh2a
  5. https://welcometochina.com.au/the-evolution-of-chinese-high-speed-trains-from-zero-to-480km-h-7728.html
  6. https://www.loco-info.com/view.aspx?id=13115
  7. https://www.railwayage.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Heading-Off-Track-The-Impact-of-China%E2%80%99s-Mercantilist-Policies-on-Global-High-Speed-Rail-Innovation-.pdf
  8. https://en.namu.wiki/w/CRH2
  9. https://www.railjournal.com/news/jr-central-boss-slams-china-for-technology-theft/
  10. https://global.kawasaki.com/en/corp/newsroom/news/detail/ba041020.html
  11. https://jamestown.org/program/chinese-high-speed-rail-leapfrog-development/
  12. https://global.kawasaki.com/en/corp/newsroom/news/detail/ba0502-03.html
  13. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2016/10/13/chinas-highly-successful-demand-for-technology-transfer-in-high-speed-trains/
  14. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/kindle/2011-07/08/content_12864491.htm
  15. https://www.easytourchina.com/tip-v1639-china-high-speed-railway
  16. https://mediarail.wordpress.com/china/how-asia-became-the-first-high-speed-rail-continent/
  17. http://www.anbound.com/Section/ArticleView_3765_1.htm
  18. https://www.engineering.org.cn/engi/EN/10.1016/j.eng.2020.01.008
  19. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/933411559841476316/pdf/Chinas-High-Speed-Rail-Development.pdf
  20. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/chinas-awkward-quest-for-bullet-train-technology/
  21. https://www.cccme.cn/products/detail-1127113.aspx
  22. https://www.sincholdrail.com/news/steel-needs-in-the-new-era-of-high-speed-railw-8955633.html
  23. https://www.extrica.com/article/15180
  24. https://www.eea-journal.ro/ro/2019/art-2019_2-03-p029.pdf
  25. https://www.railwaygazette.com/news/china-rolls-out-300-km/h-trainset/32617.article
  26. https://www.extrica.com/article/18427
  27. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0954409717701784
  28. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/11/3664
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359836818324995
  30. https://www.crrcgc.cc/en/2013-06/03/article_AE4F56347F9D4DF6830149C1AC628E0E.html
  31. https://cdn.akamai.steamstatic.com/steam/apps/621927/manuals/CRH2A_ManualEnglish.pdf?t=1521108687
  32. https://www.loco-info.com/view.aspx?id=-656&t=Type
  33. https://www.crrcgc.cc/en/2016-02/24/article_3D1CC483DC82403D8C1F339C499D69D8.html
  34. https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/4287141
  35. https://archive-yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/train-makers-rail-against-chinas-high-speed-designs
  36. https://uic.org/IMG/pdf/20180910_highspeed_rolling_stock.pdf
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Tested-train-the-CRH2C-high-speed-EMU_fig1_311856522
  38. https://www.loco-info.com/view.aspx?id=13777
  39. http://www.chinatoday.com.cn/english/report/2013-02/28/content_526230_2.htm
  40. https://www.seat61.com/beijing-to-shanghai-by-train.htm
  41. http://en.sasac.gov.cn/2020/03/27/c_1102.htm
  42. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c898/2eb219f29cb2163cb89c9a27c689507122e0.pdf
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/high-speed-railway
  44. https://www.loco-info.com/view.aspx?id=16426&t=
  45. https://www.railwaygazette.com/in-depth/chinas-high-speed-fleet-expands-steadily/32292.article
  46. https://www.railway-technology.com/projects/hefeifuzhouhighspeed/
  47. https://rollingstockworld.com/passenger-cars/the-world-of-high-speed-railways-and-trains-history-and-trends/
  48. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09544828.2025.2571006
  49. https://www.checkerboardhill.com/2019/01/mixing-conventional-and-high-speed-trains-in-china/
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095809920300230
  51. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176961
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191261523000887
  53. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.02752
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360835217301274
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392783206_Fatigue_analysis_of_CRH2_high_speed_train_railway_wheels_occurred_due_to_random_parameters
  56. https://academic.oup.com/tse/article/3/3/tdab017/6368635
  57. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925231218304983
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417423002683
  59. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-16345592
  60. https://www.railjournal.com/passenger/high-speed/wenzhou-crash-report-blames-design-flaws-and-poor-management/
  61. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jul/25/chinese-rail-crash-cover-up-claims
  62. https://mx-schroeder.medium.com/mismanaged-mayhem-the-2011-wenzhou-china-train-collision-e5d218d7c4e2
  63. https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/04/china/china-train-derail-death-intl-hnk
  64. http://epaper.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202206/06/WS629d33dfa3109375516ec9c9.html
  65. https://europepmc.org/article/med/36554884
  66. https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/technology/article/1299188/chinas-high-speed-rail-programme-case-too-far-too-fast
  67. https://jcarme.sru.ac.ir/article_1995_d9b615342744a2a6931cf999577d36ef.pdf
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1350630718316005
  69. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33301413/
  70. https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/China-recalls-54-bullet-trains-over-safety-concerns/article13651723.ece
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1350630705000762
  72. https://www.smart-union.org/safety-a-victim-in-chinas-high-speed-rail-effort/
  73. https://www.masstransitmag.com/rail/news/10344370/glitches-mar-chinas-high-speed-railways
  74. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00500-023-08140-w
  75. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/8/4790
  76. https://pp.bme.hu/tr/article/view/11377
  77. https://www.emerald.com/srt/article/2/1/35/342877/Application-of-complex-network-theory-in
  78. https://www.hsrail.org/blog/the-shinkansens-legendary-operation-and-safety-record-2/
  79. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1631/jzus.A1500220
  80. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283245759_Comparison_of_the_technologies_of_the_Japanese_Shinkansen_and_Chinese_High-speed_Railways
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001457522002007
  82. https://www.jrailpass.com/blog/japan-train-punctuality
  83. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40534-019-0188-z
  84. https://www.loco-info.com/view.aspx?id=-964&type=Country
  85. https://qinyurain.weebly.com/uploads/4/7/2/8/47280099/hsrtt_april17.pdf
  86. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9632/ac77fc007b78159acdd4f4f2336ab80c63b0.pdf
  87. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2011-06/23/content_12755947.htm
  88. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/on-the-fast-track-technology-transfer-in-china/
  89. https://www.railwayage.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Heading-Off-Track-The-Impact-of-China%25E2%2580%2599s-Mercantilist-Policies-on-Global-High-Speed-Rail-Innovation-.pdf
  90. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1034&context=ipbrief
  91. http://www.china.org.cn/business/2011-07/08/content_22945196.htm
  92. https://www.piie.com/blogs/china-economic-watch/china-forced-technology-transfer-and-theft
  93. https://itif.org/publications/2021/04/26/heading-track-impact-chinas-mercantilist-policies-global-high-speed-rail/
  94. https://railsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/RSA-CRRC.pdf
  95. https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3320817/chinas-high-speed-rail-nears-50000km-milestone-debt-and-profit-concerns-mount
  96. https://www.thevietnamese.org/2025/08/financial-losses-from-high-speed-rail-systems-lessons-viet-nam-should-learn/
  97. https://asiatimes.com/2025/06/chinas-fast-growing-high-speed-railway-network-faces-reality/
  98. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/a61cfd4e-200d-5eb4-bf7b-41767c033435
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.