Hubbry Logo
CarroballistaCarroballistaMain
Open search
Carroballista
Community hub
Carroballista
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Carroballista
Carroballista
Carroballista
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A Roman carroballista from the time of Trajan

Carroballista was an ancient, cart-mounted ballista, a type of mobile field artillery. According to the Roman author Vegetius (Epitoma rei militaris II.25), each legion had 55 carroballistae (one per centuria) which were arrow/bolt-shooter of the cheiroballistra (Greek: χειροβαλλίστρα) type. Vegetius tells us that each carroballista was carried by mules and operated by one contubernium (i.e., eight soldiers commanded by one decanus). Surviving representation of a carroballista are from the bas-reliefs of Trajan's Column (Scene XL and Scenes LXV/LXVI) and the Column of Marcus Aurelius.

Structure

[edit]
Modern reconstruction of one possible appearance of a cheiroballistra
Roman cart-mounted ballista (Trajan's Column)
Roman cart-mounted ballista on the Column of Marcus Aurelius

The structure of the carroballista machine is identical to that of the cheiroballistra or manuballista, which translates in all its forms to "hand ballista", was an imperial-era Roman siege engine. Designed by Hero of Alexandria and mostly composed of metal (the spring mechanism and the skeins), it shot bolts that were smaller than those in other forms of ballistae and generally made of metal. It was the next major improvement after the scorpio.[1] The name of the weapon is composed of the Greek words for 'hand' and 'shooter' implying that portable versions might also have existed, similar to crossbows.

It seems that the technical innovations introduced by the adoption of the cheiroballistra by the Roman army at the end of the 1st century AD made the use of the cart possible. In fact, the light but stout metal spring-frame and the wider space in the frontal part of the machine given by the arched strut conferred a greater manoeuvrability to the whole ballista.

Shooting position

[edit]

According to the Trajan's column representation (Scene XL), the carroballista was manoeuvred by one man mounted on the cart with the ballista and by another man positioned behind the cart and operating probably some sort of winch handle. The presence of the mules in front of the cart suggests that the carroballista could be easily moved through the battlefield whilst shooting bolts. This interpretation is not unanimously accepted by scholars.

It is not certain that the ballistae are actually shooting. The whole representation could be simply an image of carts transporting ballistae to their destination nest on the battlefield. But the bolts or arrows are here depicted in a ready-to-fire position, hazardous for artillerymen if the ballistae are simply being transported in order to be dismounted and deployed on the battlefield.

In another section of the Trajan's column (Scene LXVI) the simple transportation of the ballista is depicted and now we have no arrows or bolts ready to be released on the ballista, the ballista is empty, and no artilleryman is manoeuvring the machine. An artilleryman is pulling the cart near the wheel and this suggests that the whole machine must have been quite a heavy structure.

Structure of the cart

[edit]
A four-wheeled ballista drawn by armoured horses, from an engraving illustrating a 1552 edition of De rebus bellicis.

It is sure that the cart was pulled by two mules or horses and that the size was probably that of standard Roman carts, i.e. c. 5 Roman feet (c. 147 cm) width (as depicted in the Trajan's Column, Scene XL and Scene LXVI), but the whole design of the cart is uncertain.

There are many hypotheses about the structure of the cart and probably different models of the same machine seem to have been in use at the same time:

  • a simple two-wheel cart used to transport the ballista to its final emplacement on the field;
  • a special two-wheel cart [i.e. carroballista] with a ballista mounted on the cart and with the frontal part positioned towards the mules;
  • a special ballista simply mounted on two wheels and without cart (Trajan's Column Scene LXVI) and probably transported with the frontal part positioned rear, like Modern Era cannons, or forward and with a Transport-hook or Transport-hooks at the frontal position (see again Trajan's Column, Scene LXVI).[2]
  • a special four-wheel cart with a mounted ballista, as described in the book De Rebus Bellicis.

Many scholars do not have an opinion about this problem, due to scarce evidence, as clearly stated by Alan Wilkins.

See also

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Warry, Warfare in the Classical World (1995), p. 178.
  2. ^ About this hypothesis and a proposal of reconstruction of a carroballista of this type, see W. Soedel and V. Foley, Scientific American, March 1979, pp. 150–160.

General and cited references

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Carroballista

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The carroballista was a mobile weapon employed by the Roman Imperial army, consisting of a torsion-powered mounted on a two-wheeled for rapid deployment and maneuverability on the , capable of launching heavy bolts or stones over distances of several hundred meters to support engagements. Introduced in the AD, likely in response to vulnerabilities exposed during the ambush of 9 AD, the carroballista represented an innovation in Roman siege and , allowing legions to deliver precise, protected fire against enemy troops or fortifications without relying on cumbersome stationary machines. Its design featured an all-iron frame for lightness and durability, paired with sinew-wrapped torsion springs that enabled a greater arm pull-back for enhanced power, with projectiles such as 200-gram bolts achieving velocities up to 104 m/s in reconstructions. Visual evidence from , completed around 113 AD, depicts the weapon in action during the Dacian Wars (101–106 AD), showing it towed by mules and operated by a small crew amid advancing legionaries. The late 4th-century military author Flavius Vegetius Renatus described the carroballista in his Epitoma rei militaris (Book II, Chapter 25), noting that each legion was allocated 55 such ballistae—one roughly per century—for hurling darts, supplemented by 10 larger onagri for stones, with each machine crewed by eight specialized (ballistarii) responsible for maintenance and operation. This organization underscored its role as integral to legionary tactics, providing anti-personnel firepower that could disrupt enemy lines or cover advances, though its effectiveness diminished against heavily armored foes or in rough terrain. The weapon's legacy influenced later medieval concepts, highlighting Rome's emphasis on in warfare.

History and Development

Origins in Roman Artillery

The development of Roman artillery in the pre-imperial period laid the foundational technologies for later mobile weapons, drawing heavily from Hellenistic innovations in torsion-powered engines that emerged in the BCE. These early machines emphasized efficiency in range and accuracy, primarily for warfare, where they provided offensive and defensive capabilities against fortifications. By the late Republic, Roman engineers had refined these designs into more portable forms suitable for field use. A key example was the scorpio, a compact bolt-thrower that appeared around the BCE and was designed for man-portable operation by a single . This utilized torsion springs made from twisted sinew, housed in metal-plated boxes to enhance and precision, allowing it to launch bolts with enough force to penetrate armor and multiple targets at ranges exceeding 300 meters. The scorpio's lightweight construction and curved, tapered arms, akin to a recurved bow, marked a shift toward that could be rapidly deployed by units without requiring extensive assembly. The evolution toward greater portability accelerated in the early Imperial era with designs like Hero of Alexandria's cheiroballistra, a 1st-century AD bolt-shooting featuring an all-metal frame that replaced heavier wooden components. This innovation emphasized lighter yet sturdier metal elements, such as iron spring frames and plating, which improved ease of transport, dismantling, and field repairs while maintaining high power output for rapid missile launches. The cheiroballistra represented a critical bridge from static engines to more versatile , influencing subsequent Roman adaptations. At the core of these advancements were two essential technological prerequisites: the torsion power system and the fundamental mechanism. Torsion was generated by tightly twisting bundles of animal sinew or into ropes, which were wound around wooden axles within sturdy frames to store ; after the AD, sinew became the preferred material due to its superior elasticity. The principle involved two arms connected by a bowstring, propelled forward by the release of these springs to hurl projectiles, enabling consistent velocity and accuracy over distances of 300 to 400 meters.

Introduction and Adoption

The carroballista, a mobile field artillery piece consisting of a ballista mounted on a two-wheeled cart, was developed in the 1st century AD as the Roman Empire's first example of cart-mounted torsion artillery, building briefly on the torsion mechanics of earlier stationary ballistae. This innovation addressed the limitations of heavier siege engines by enabling rapid transport and deployment by teams of horses or mules, marking a shift toward versatile infantry support in open-field engagements. Likely invented in the late AD, the carroballista saw widespread adoption during Trajan's reign (98–117 AD), particularly in the Dacian Wars (101–106 AD), where reliefs on depict its use in formations for close-range bolt fire against enemy positions. By this period, it had become a standard component of Roman legions, reflecting the empire's expanding campaigns that demanded artillery capable of accompanying marching troops rather than being confined to sieges. The 4th-century military treatise Epitoma rei militaris by (II.25) provides key insight into its institutional integration, stating that each of the 55 centuriae in a legion—each comprising about 80 men—was allocated one carroballista, totaling 55 per legion for coordinated . This standardized assignment underscored the weapon's role in enhancing mobility and firepower during expansive frontier wars. Advancements in Roman metalworking facilitated this adoption by replacing wooden trusses with metal rods in frames, significantly reducing weight while maintaining structural integrity and allowing the carroballista to be mounted on lightweight carts for swift battlefield repositioning beyond fixed operations. These engineering improvements, evident in late Republican and early Imperial designs, enabled the carroballista to evolve from a static precursor into a practical tool for dynamic campaigning under emperors like .

Design and Components

Ballista Mechanism

The carroballista's mechanism derives from the cheiroballistra design, employing a lightweight, metal-reinforced frame that houses two lateral torsion springs as the primary power source. These springs, composed of twisted bundles of sinew or encased in protective metal cylinders, drive a pair of flexible arms spanning approximately 1 to 1.5 meters in width, enabling efficient bolt projection through a palintonon configuration where the arms rotate within the frame for enhanced energy transfer. This imperial-era advancement prioritized iron and components over earlier wooden elements, improving resistance to and operational reliability in field conditions. Central to the mechanism are the bowstring, tensioned by a hand-cranked equipped with a ratchet-and-pawl system to incrementally draw it back and store torsional energy without slippage. The trigger assembly features a that secures the drawn bowstring, released via a precise ratchet mechanism to propel the , while adjustable field frames encase the springs and allow fine-tuning of tension for consistent performance across varying battlefield conditions. This setup facilitates rapid reloading and firing by a small crew, with the entire mechanism mounted on the cart for stability during operation. The system is calibrated for iron-tipped bolts typically 60-90 cm long and weighing 100-200 grams, such as the 195-gram specimens analyzed in reconstructions, achieving muzzle velocities around 104 m/s for effective ranges of 200-300 under optimal conditions. Finite element modeling of the torsion springs confirms their capacity to withstand stresses up to 607 MPa, underscoring the sophistication that balanced power, portability, and durability in Roman artillery.

Cart Structure and Mobility

The carroballista's cart was engineered for enhanced mobility, distinguishing it from stationary and allowing integration with movements. Historical depictions on , particularly in scenes XL and LXVI, illustrate a two-wheeled platform designed for portability, typically drawn by a pair of mules or horses to facilitate rapid repositioning on the battlefield. This configuration emphasized simplicity and lightness, with the mechanism mounted directly atop the cart for quick deployment in support roles. A later variation appears in the anonymous 4th-century AD treatise De Rebus Bellicis, which proposes the ballista quadrirotis—a four-wheeled pulled by two armored horses to provide greater stability over varied terrain while maintaining offensive capability. The design incorporated a reinforced frame to secure the torsion-powered , enabling the entire assembly to traverse rough landscapes without excessive strain on the draft animals. Such features underscore the evolution toward more versatile , with the cart's low center of gravity aiding balance during maneuvers. Reconstructions based on these sources estimate the total weight of the carroballista, including and mechanism, at 100-200 kg, permitting handling by a small team of soldiers or auxiliary animal power for short-distance adjustments. For long marches, the frame was detached from the and components packed separately in the legion's baggage train, a standard practice for Roman to optimize transport efficiency across campaigns. Reassembly by a trained crew could occur rapidly, often in under 30 minutes, ensuring the weapon's readiness without impeding operational tempo.

Operation and Crew

Crew Roles and Organization

The carroballista was operated by a specialized integrated into the structure of the Roman legion's centuries. indicates that each legion was equipped with 55 such weapons, roughly one per century. The consisted of a small team of ballistarii, typically around eight soldiers forming a . This team formed the core organizational unit for the carroballista, ensuring its mobility and readiness alongside the . The crew members, known as ballistarii, were classified as , exempt from routine fatigues such as entrenching or foraging due to their technical expertise in . describes their primary responsibilities as managing the machine during operations, performing repairs, maintaining it in optimal condition, and directing its use in battle to support formations. These soldiers underwent specialized training within their centuries, focusing on the mechanical aspects of torsion to enable coordinated deployment with the broader line. Logistically, the contubernium handled the carroballista's transport, with mules assigned specifically for pulling the cart to facilitate rapid positioning in . This structure emphasized efficiency, allowing the crew to transition quickly from march to firing support without disrupting the century's cohesion.

Firing Procedure and Positions

The firing procedure for the carroballista began with tensioning the torsion springs, a process that required a levered winch operated by two or three crew members to wind back the arms and store energy in the twisted sinew or rope bundles, achieving the necessary torque for propulsion. Once tensioned, a crew member loaded a bolt into the central groove of the slider mechanism, ensuring secure placement for launch. Aiming followed, with the primary operator adjusting the weapon's orientation using a sliding sight for direction and an elevation crank or stand to account for range and wind conditions, often positioning the cart on stable ground for precision. The sequence concluded with the trigger release, propelling the bolt forward via the sudden unwinding of the arms. Crew positions during operation emphasized efficiency and stability, with the primary gunner typically standing beside or mounted on the cart to sight and fire, as illustrated in reliefs on (scene 40), where a is shown positioned at the rear for direct control. The winch operators worked from behind the frame, cranking in coordination to tension the springs without disrupting the gunner's aim. Historical depictions and reconstructions indicate that firing occurred primarily from a halted position to maintain accuracy, as the reloading process demanded a stationary platform to avoid misalignment during winch operation or bolt placement. Post-firing maintenance involved relaxing the bowstring and springs immediately to prevent in the torsion bundles, a standard practice for sustaining the weapon's performance over multiple shots, as excessive prolonged tension could degrade the sinew material. Reconstructions based on these procedures, such as those informed by and column reliefs, demonstrate a full cycle allowing sustained fire in combat scenarios, though exact timing varied with crew proficiency.

Military Usage

Role in Legions and Battles

The carroballista served as a vital component of Roman legionary tactics, functioning as mobile positioned in the rear of lines to deliver anti-personnel support. As described by the late Roman military writer Renatus in his Epitoma rei militaris (Book II, Chapter 25), these weapons were deployed not only for camp defense but also "in the field behind the line of ," where they could disrupt advancing enemy formations or safeguard legion flanks during open-field engagements. This placement allowed legions to maintain offensive momentum while integrating ranged fire into maneuvers, a key adaptation for battles against varied opponents. Historical evidence highlights the carroballista's prominence in Emperor Trajan's Dacian Wars (101–106 AD), as vividly depicted on in , a monumental spiral commemorating the campaigns. Scenes on the column, such as those in scenes XL and LXV-LXVI, show carroballistae mounted on carts advancing closely behind columns across the , firing bolts to support assaults on Dacian strongholds and open terrain. These representations underscore their role in enhancing legionary flexibility during extended operations in rugged landscapes, where rapid repositioning was essential against Dacian forces employing guerrilla tactics and . The carroballista's tactical advantages stemmed from its portability, enabling legions to deploy without the delays of preparations, thus firing coordinated volleys to suppress enemy charges and break morale. With one carroballista allocated per century, a standard 5,000-man legion could field approximately 55 such pieces, providing concentrated fire support across the battle line. This density proved particularly valuable against more mobile adversaries, such as the nomadic or semi-nomadic groups encountered in later frontier campaigns, including possibly those during Emperor ' Marcomannic Wars (166–180 AD), where enhanced legion mobility was critical to counter Germanic incursions. Their effective range of around 300 meters further allowed for preemptive strikes from protected positions, bolstering overall battlefield control.

Ammunition and Effectiveness

The carroballista primarily utilized iron-tipped bolts as its main ammunition, often referred to as modified pila or specialized , with iron heads typically 20-40 cm long and total lengths around 0.5-1 m, weighing approximately 200 grams. These quadrangular projectiles were engineered for penetration, capable of piercing light armor and inflicting casualties at distances of 200-300 meters. Possible incendiary variants, involving wrapped flammable materials ignited before firing, were employed for anti-materiel purposes such as igniting enemy works or supplies, though archaeological and textual evidence for their specific use with the carroballista remains limited. Reconstructions of the weapon demonstrate an of 250-350 meters, achieved with muzzle velocities of approximately 104 m/s for a 200-gram bolt under optimal tension. Accuracy tests from these models show groupings within 10-20 meters at 200 meters, aided by the device's stable cart mounting and flat trajectory. The averaged 2-4 shots per minute (120-240 per hour), constrained by the manual loading process that referenced the firing procedure's and tensioning steps, allowing sustained but not rapid barrages during engagements. Compared to larger stationary ballistae, the carroballista's lighter limited its destructive capacity against heavy fortifications or massed . Its sinew-based torsion springs were particularly vulnerable to environmental factors, contracting and reducing power in cold or wet conditions, which could halve effectiveness in adverse . Scholarly assessments highlight ongoing debate regarding its precise impact, given the scarcity of direct contemporary accounts beyond artistic reliefs and later descriptions, emphasizing its role more as mobile support than decisive firepower.

Evidence and Legacy

Historical and Artistic Sources

The primary textual evidence for the carroballista comes from Flavius Renatus' Epitoma rei militaris, a late 4th-century AD compendium on Roman and tactics. In Book II, Chapter 25, describes the carroballista as a lightweight, cart-mounted assigned to each century in the legion, emphasizing its role in providing mobile support to formations. This account serves as the most detailed ancient reference to the weapon's integration into legionary structure, highlighting its torsion-powered mechanism for hurling bolts or stones. Additional textual insight appears in the anonymous late 4th- or early 5th-century treatise De rebus bellicis, which proposes military reforms and illustrates innovative war machines, including a four-wheeled variant of the drawn by armored horses. The text portrays this "ballista quadrirotis" as an enhanced mobile platform capable of rapid deployment against enemy fortifications or troops, with protective plating for the crew and draft animals to withstand counterfire. Earlier indirect references to precursor technologies are found in ' Histories (Book VIII), which details Greek torsion catapults like the euthytonon used during the siege of Syracuse in 213–212 BC, influencing subsequent Roman adaptations of cart-mounted . Similarly, Flavius Josephus' (Book III, Chapter 5) recounts the Roman use of ballistae and other engines during the siege of Jotapata in 67 AD, noting their deployment by legions with up to 160 machines across three legions, providing context for the evolution toward mobile variants. Artistic representations offer visual corroboration of the carroballista's design and employment. The bas-reliefs on in , erected around 113 AD to commemorate the Dacian Wars, depict the weapon in scenes XL, LXV, and LXVI, showing two-wheeled carts pulled by mules with crews adjusting the torsion arms for firing during advances. These carvings illustrate the device's maneuverability on campaign, positioned amid legionary lines to suppress enemy positions. Later evidence appears on the , dedicated circa 180 AD, where similar reliefs portray cart-mounted ballistae in action against and forces along the , underscoring its continued use into the 2nd century AD. No complete archaeological examples of the carroballista have been recovered; surviving fragments, such as wooden torsion springs and bronze components from general Roman catapults at sites like Carlisle () and Xanten-Wardt (Germany), date to the 1st–2nd centuries AD and inform reconstructions of related mechanisms. Scholarly interpretations of these sources have focused on resolving ambiguities in design and operation. Alan Wilkins, in Roman Artillery (2003), analyzes the reliefs to argue for a compact, two-wheeled frame with sinew torsion bundles, debating whether the depicted machines fired bolts or small stones based on proportional scaling from ' descriptions (pp. 39–50). Complementing this, Werner Soedel and Vernard Foley's 1979 article "Ancient Catapults" in examines the underlying torsion technology across Greek and Roman artillery, interpreting De rebus bellicis illustrations as evidence of iterative improvements in mobility, though noting the treatise's speculative nature amid sparse physical evidence. These analyses prioritize the columns' iconography and ' text as the core evidentiary base, avoiding overreliance on later medieval copies of the sources.

Modern Reconstructions and Studies

Modern reconstructions of the carroballista have primarily been led by Alan Wilkins, a classics scholar specializing in ancient , whose full-scale models, often built in collaboration with engineer Len Morgan, have informed contemporary understanding of Roman siege and field weapons. Wilkins' work, detailed in his 2024 edition of Roman Imperial Artillery, emphasizes the carroballista's metal-framed design and torsion-powered mechanism, drawing from archaeological finds like those at and frontier sites to replicate operational functionality. These models have been tested in live-fire demonstrations, achieving bolt velocities of up to 104 m/s for projectiles around 195 grams, highlighting the weapon's potential as mobile close-support . Key mechanical studies, such as the 2014 analysis by Penta, Rossi, and Savino, employed mathematical modeling and finite element methods to evaluate the carroballista's torsion springs and overall efficiency, confirming ranges of several hundred meters for lead balls or bolts while underscoring its lightweight cart-mounted structure for use. Earlier scholarship, including Dietwulf Baatz's examinations of Roman torsion systems in the 1980s, provided foundational insights into spring materials and , influencing these reconstructions by stressing the superiority of sinew-based torsion over tension mechanisms. Historical integrations of such into legions were explored by John Warry in his 1980 illustrated , portraying the carroballista as integral to Roman tactical formations during open battles. In the 2020s, experiments at the Roman Army Museum near featured full-scale replicas of related bolt-shooters, including a carroballista variant, where live tests demonstrated accuracy at 100-150 meters against man-sized targets, aligning with ancient depictions on . Digital simulations in recent studies, building on Penta, Rossi, and Savino, have further analyzed mobility, revealing the cart's role in rapid repositioning but limiting sustained fire to stationary setups due to reloading mechanics. These efforts address ongoing debates, with analyses from 2022 favoring stationary firing for precision, as mobile operation would compromise stability and crew safety during torsion winding. Reconstructions are displayed at institutions like the Roman Army Museum, serving as educational tools, while their design principles show minimal direct influence on medieval counterweight trebuchets, which shifted to gravity-based systems.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094114X14001529
  2. https://www.academia.edu/96170371/Mechanical_behavior_of_the_imperial_carroballista
  3. https://archive.org/stream/pdfy-sOkC3FmoLlr4C6zz/The%2BMilitary%2BInstitutions%2BOf%2BThe%2BRomans%2B%255BDe%2BRe%2BMilitari%255D_djvu.txt
  4. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/649/roman-artillery/
  5. https://warhistory.org/@msw/article/torsion-powered-artillery-engines
  6. https://www.archaeopress.com/Archaeopress/DMS/888517F4AB104E4AB010FF3592201D35/9781803277837-sample.pdf
  7. https://www.world-archaeology.com/features/roman-artillery/
  8. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00007319/document
  9. https://deremilitari.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/dennis2.pdf
  10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2014.05.006
  11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/265911
  12. https://acoup.blog/2022/05/13/collections-ancient-tanks-chariots-scythed-chariots-and-carroballistae/
  13. https://www.roman-britain.co.uk/military/glossary/
  14. http://www.romanarmy.net/pdf/The%20Xanten-Wardt%20and%20Carlisle%20catapult%20finds.pdf
  15. https://www.archaeopress.com/Archaeopress/Products/9781803277837
  16. https://www.trajans-column.org/?page_id=107
  17. https://www.academia.edu/856702/Auxiliary_Artillery_Revisited
  18. https://www.academia.edu/38814693/The_Roman_Army_in_Detail_The_Ballistarii_artillerymen_in_the_Roman_army
  19. https://www.academia.edu/22896532/Dacian_Military_Equipment_and_Technology
  20. https://www.academia.edu/38810499/The_Cheiroballistra_a_reconstruction
  21. https://www.facebook.com/groups/402842090524966/posts/1211116933030807/
  22. https://www.romanobritain.org/8-military/mil_roman_artillery.php
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275227669_Performance_of_Greek-Roman_Artillery
  24. https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_de-re-militari-english_vegetius-renatus-flaviu_1767
  25. https://archive.org/details/derebusbellicis0000unse
  26. https://archive.org/details/romanartillery0000wilk
  27. https://lru.praxis.dk/Lru/microsites/hvadermatematik/hem1download/kap10_projekt10_3_25_Ancient_Catapults_Scientific_American.pdf
  28. https://publications.iaa.org.il/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?filename=3&article=1019&context=iaareports&type=additional
  29. https://www.oupress.com/9780806127941/warfare-in-the-classical-world/
  30. https://www.vindolanda.com/blog/roman-artillery-at-the-roman-army-museum
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.