_MET_29.158.270a_001Sept2014.jpg/250px-Pair_of_Thigh_Defenses_(Cuisses)_MET_29.158.270a_001Sept2014.jpg){kind=small}
_MET_29.158.270a_001Sept2014.jpg/1125px-Pair_of_Thigh_Defenses_(Cuisses)_MET_29.158.270a_001Sept2014.jpg)
Community hub
0 subscribers8 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
All channels
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to Cuisses.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Cuisses
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2011) |
_MET_29.158.270a_001Sept2014.jpg)
Cuisses (/kwɪs/; /kwis/; French: [kɥis]) are a form of medieval armour worn to protect the thigh.[1] The word is the plural of the French word cuisse meaning 'thigh'. While the skirt of a maille shirt or tassets of a cuirass could protect the upper legs from above, a thrust from below could avoid these defenses. Thus, cuisses were worn on the thighs to protect from such blows. Padded cuisses made in a similar way to a gambeson were commonly worn by knights in the 12th and 13th centuries, usually over chausses, and may have had poleyns directly attached to them. Whilst continental armours tended to have cuisses that did not protect the back of the thigh, English cuisses were typically entirely encapsulating, due to the English preference for foot combat over the mounted cavalry charges favoured by continental armies.
Cuisses could also be made of brigandine or splinted leather, but beginning around 1340 they were typically made from steel plate armour.[2] From 1370 onward they were made from a single plate of iron or steel.[2]
Ancient Greece
[edit]Perimeridia (Ancient Greek: περιμηρίδια) and Parameridia (παραμηρίδια) were metal armour for covering the thighs.[3] Though not in common use in the ordinary Greek panoply, are shown sufficiently often on the monuments and vase-paintings as occasionally employed by Greek warriors at least as far back as the fifth century B.C. They are frequently mentioned by Greek writers, of the third century B.C. and downwards, but here almost exclusively as employed by cavalry, both for the rider and his horse (in addition, some writers call the protective armour of the horse parapleuridia (παραπλευρίδια), while others makes a further distinction of παραπλευρίδια for horses driven in chariots and παραμηρίδια for those ridden by the cavalry).[4][5]
Citations
[edit]- ^ A Glossary of the Construction, Decoration and Use of Arms and Armor: In All Countries and in All Times, George Cameron Stone, Courier Dover Publications, Jul 2, 1999 P.245
- ^ a b Smith 2010, p. 70.
- ^ Harry Thurston Peck, Harpers Dictionary of Classical Antiquities (1898), Perimeridia
- ^ A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (1890), Perimeridia
- ^ Harry Thurston Peck, Harpers Dictionary of Classical Antiquities (1898), Perimeridia
References
[edit]- Smith, R. (2010). Rogers, Clifford J. (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Medieval Warfare and Military Technology: Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195334036.
| Head |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Face | ||
| Neck | ||
| Torso | ||
| Arms | ||
| Legs | ||
| Pieces | ||
 | This medieval armour–related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
Cuisses
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
Etymology and Terminology
Origin of the Term
The term "cuisses" derives from the Old French singular "cuisse," meaning "thigh," which itself traces back to the Latin "coxa," referring to the hip or thigh bone.[5] This linguistic root entered Middle English through Anglo-Norman influences during the 14th century, reflecting the Norman Conquest's lasting impact on English vocabulary for military and anatomical terms.[6] The earliest documented uses of "cuisses" appear in 14th-century inventories and military records, where the plural form denotes paired protective pieces for the thighs, distinguishing the armor from the singular body part. For instance, a 1325 indenture lists 33 pairs of cuisses and 34 pairs of cuisses and poleyns among armory supplies.[7] Similarly, French armorial texts from the period, such as those detailing knightly equipment, employed the term to describe thigh defenses in chronicles and equipment tallies, solidifying its adoption in chivalric contexts.[7] Over time, the plural "cuisses" became standardized in English and French sources to emphasize the symmetrical nature of the armor components, evolving from descriptive anatomical language to a specific technical term in armorial inventories by the mid-14th century.[6] This usage parallels broader French-derived terminology for lower-body armor, such as "greves" for shin guards.[5]Related Armor Terminology
Poleyns, also known as knee cops, refer to plate armor components designed to protect the knee joint, frequently integrated or attached to the lower edge of cuisses for comprehensive upper leg coverage.[8] Greaves denote shin guards that encase the lower leg from the knee to the ankle, typically paired with cuisses and poleyns to form a complete leg harness but distinct in their focus on the calf and shin.[9] Tassets, in contrast, are articulated lames or skirt-like plates suspended from the fauld or cuirass, providing thigh protection as an extension of the torso armor rather than standalone leg pieces like cuisses.[10] In medieval English sources deriving from Anglo-Norman, the term "jambeaux" (plural of jambeau) designated armor for the lower leg below the knee, akin to greaves.[11] This usage, rooted in the Old French "jambe" meaning leg, highlights the precision in medieval armor naming conventions for specific components. Cuisses are specifically delineated for the upper thighs, distinguishing them from lower leg protections such as greaves for the shins or poleyns for the knees, while tassets emphasize downward extensions from the upper body rather than dedicated thigh encasement. The shared French etymological roots, with "cuisse" deriving from the anatomical term for thigh and "jambeaux" from "jambe" meaning leg, underscore the precision in medieval armor naming conventions.Historical Development
Ancient and Classical Precursors
In ancient Greece, particularly during the 5th century BCE, cavalry forces employed thigh guards known as perimeridia or parameridia, constructed from bronze or leather to protect the upper legs while maintaining mobility on horseback.[12] These protections are referenced in military contexts, such as Xenophon's description in the Anabasis of Cyrus the Younger's cavalry at the Battle of Cunaxa (401 BCE), where about 600 horsemen wore breastplates, thigh guards (mērophylakia in Greek), and helmets to enhance defense during charges.[13] Such armor allowed Greek cavalry, often lighter than infantry equipment, to support hoplite phalanxes by harassing flanks without sacrificing speed.[14] Roman legionaries from the 1st century CE utilized pteruges—fringed leather or layered linen strips hanging from the waist or shoulders—as thigh protections in their standard kit, providing flexible coverage against slashes and thrusts while permitting unhindered marching and combat movement.[15] These elements were integrated into lorica hamata or segmentata ensembles. Persian and Scythian warriors of the Achaemenid period (circa 500 BCE) incorporated scale-armored thigh pieces into their mounted gear, emphasizing protection for nomadic cavalry in steppe warfare. Achaemenid depictions in palace reliefs at Persepolis and Susa illustrate elite horsemen with iron or bronze scales sewn onto leather or fabric, extending to the knees for defense against arrows and spears while preserving riding agility.[16] Scythian examples, such as a leather scale armor from the Subeixi culture (8th–3rd century BCE) reaching the upper thighs, highlight similar influences, with bronze scales overlapping for flexibility, as evidenced by artifacts from Eurasian steppe burials.[17] These designs, shared across Iranian nomadic groups, prioritized mobility for archers and lancers. These ancient innovations in thigh protection laid conceptual groundwork, influencing Byzantine intermediates that transitioned into medieval European forms.Medieval Evolution
During the 12th and 13th centuries, cuisses first appeared as padded or quilted defenses worn over mail chausses to protect the thighs, often incorporating integral knee guards known as poleyns. These early forms provided cushioning against blows while maintaining mobility, as evidenced in illustrations from the Maciejowski Bible, a Parisian manuscript created around 1250 that depicts warriors in such leg protections during combat scenes.[18] This design reflected the limitations of mail alone against increasingly powerful edged weapons, supplementing rather than replacing the underlying chausses.[19] By the early 14th century, around 1340, cuisses began transitioning to steel plate construction, enabled by advances in metallurgy that allowed for more durable and form-fitting metal components.[19] By the 1370s, designs evolved to feature single lames—broad, continuous plates—offering full thigh coverage and greater articulation.[19] These innovations prioritized rigidity and impact resistance over the flexibility of padded variants, aligning with the growing prevalence of plate over mail in elite harnesses.[20] The Hundred Years' War (1337–1453) significantly influenced cuisses development, particularly in England, where tactical emphasis on dismounted foot combat by men-at-arms necessitated robust leg armor to withstand close-quarters engagements.[21] This adaptation is reflected in armory records and battlefield accounts, underscoring how wartime demands accelerated the standardization of plate leg defenses for infantry-heavy tactics.[19]Renaissance and Decline
During the 16th century, cuisses evolved from their medieval plate foundations into more refined forms, featuring articulated lames that allowed greater flexibility for the thighs while maintaining protection. Milanese armorers excelled in these innovations, producing parade armors with intricate etching and embossing inspired by classical motifs, such as foliate patterns and mythological figures, often gilded for ceremonial display.[22] The practical use of cuisses began to wane after 1550, as pike and shot infantry formations—combining long pikes with arquebuses and muskets—dominated battlefields, prioritizing speed and firepower over heavy encumbrance that full leg armor imposed on soldiers.[22] Despite this, cuisses retained partial relevance in elite heavy cavalry outfits through the 17th century, particularly among cuirassiers who valued thigh protection against edged weapons and debris. This is illustrated in the 1612 Dutch-made cuirassier armor linked to King Charles I, which featured cuisses and poleyns, reflecting continued adaptation for mounted shock tactics during the English Civil War era.[23] By the late 1600s, cuisses largely became obsolete, giving way to tassets—shorter, articulated thigh plates suspended from the cuirass for partial coverage—or extended greaves focused on the lower legs, as warfare increasingly favored lighter harnesses against musket fire and maneuverability in linear tactics.[22]Design and Construction
Materials and Early Forms
In the 13th century, cuisses emerged in padded forms designed to protect the thighs from blunt force trauma, typically constructed from multiple layers of fabric such as linen or wool, often resembling shortened gambesons tailored specifically for the legs.[24] These early iterations were quilted to secure the padding, which consisted of stuffing materials like cotton or animal hair to enhance shock absorption while maintaining some degree of mobility for the wearer.[24] Known as gamboised cuisses by the mid-13th century, these padded defenses were commonly worn over mail chausses by knights and infantry, providing a foundational layer of protection that predated more rigid constructions.[24] By the 13th century, variations incorporating leather or brigandine-style elements became prevalent in infantry kits, featuring small metal plates riveted to hardened hide for added rigidity against slashes and thrusts.[25] The riveted plates, typically oblong and concealed beneath the outer hide, offered a balance between defense and weight, making them suitable for prolonged marches or dismounted combat.[24] Early cuisses, whether padded or leather-reinforced, contributed to their widespread adoption before the shift toward full plate forms in subsequent centuries.[24]Plate Armor Innovations
The development of steel plate cuisses in the 14th and 15th centuries marked a significant advancement in leg armor, transitioning from earlier mail and padded forms to rigid, contoured plates that provided superior protection while allowing greater mobility. These plates were typically made from tempered steel, shaped closely to the thigh's contours with a medial ridge for structural reinforcement, and featured sliding rivets for smooth articulation between overlapping lames. A prime example is found in the Churburg Armoury collection at Schloss Churburg, Italy, where sets circa 1410 demonstrate this construction, with cuisses consisting of a primary plate and a riveted side plate to enclose the thigh fully.[3][26] Key innovations enhanced both functionality and comfort, including wing-shaped extensions on the poleyn (knee cop) that provided lateral protection and distributed impact forces, as seen in the broad oval wings of Churburg examples from around 1420. Internal leather linings, secured by rivets along the plate edges, prevented chafing against the skin and allowed for secure attachment to underlying garments. These cuisses averaged 1-1.5 mm in thickness, resulting in a total weight of approximately 2-3 kg per pair, balancing deflection capability with wearability.[3][27][28] Such designs were engineered to withstand period weaponry, with the contoured shaping and angled surfaces enabling cuisses to deflect lance thrusts at 30-40 degree impacts, reducing penetration risk during mounted combat. This was informed by metallurgical progress, including early heat treatments that improved steel's resilience, as detailed in analyses of late medieval armor.[29][30]Regional Variations
During the peak of medieval armor production in the 15th century, regional variations in cuisse design reflected local craftsmanship, tactical preferences, and aesthetic traditions across Europe. Italian cuisses, particularly those from Milan, emphasized fluted surfaces to facilitate the deflection of glancing blows, with gilding applied to enhance both durability and visual appeal for elite wearers. A representative example is the pair of steel thigh defenses (cuisses) dated circa 1450, now in the Metropolitan Museum of Art (accession number 29.158.270a), which exemplifies the refined Milanese approach to protective shaping and ornamental finishing.[4] In contrast, German Gothic cuisses adopted more angular and pointed forms, optimizing resistance against thrusting weapons prevalent in Central European warfare. These designs, often produced in key centers like Augsburg, featured sharp edges and reinforced lames that prioritized structural integrity over ornamentation, aligning with the broader Gothic style's emphasis on vertical lines and pointed silhouettes. Surviving examples from Augsburg workshops, such as those attributed to armorers like Lorenz Helmschmid in the late 15th century, illustrate this robust construction suited to the demands of imperial conflicts.[31] English cuisses diverged notably from continental norms by incorporating fully enclosing "encapsulated" structures that protected the entire thigh, including the rear, unlike the open-sided variants common elsewhere. This adaptation stemmed from the infantry-focused tactics of the Wars of the Roses (1455–1487), where dismounted combatants required comprehensive lower-body coverage against close-quarters melee. As detailed in scholarly analyses of English harnesses, such as those by Tobias Capwell, this enclosed design enhanced mobility and defense for foot soldiers in England's civil strife, marking a practical evolution tied to national military needs.Usage and Function
In Combat and Warfare
Cuisses played a crucial role in protecting the thighs from low-level threats during close-quarters melee in battlefield formations, where soldiers faced slashing weapons and blunt impacts at leg height. In battles such as Agincourt in 1415, cuisses—primarily worn by men-at-arms and knights—guarded against sword cuts aimed at the lower body, poleaxe hooks that could unbalance or hook the leg, and incidental horse kicks from disrupted cavalry or pack animals amid the mud and chaos of combat.[32] These defenses allowed fighters who transitioned to hand-to-hand combat to maintain mobility and stability against pressing attacks.[2] For cavalry, cuisses were essential in enabling mounted charges by shielding the rider's thighs from low thrusts by ground-level lances or spears from foot soldiers, preserving balance during high-speed impacts. Pre-1400, when cuisses were typically padded or leather-based rather than fully plated, they offered limited resistance to arrow penetration, exposing riders to bodkin-tipped projectiles that could pierce softer materials at close range.[33][34] By the early 15th century, the adoption of steel plating enhanced their efficacy against such threats, supporting aggressive tactics in open-field engagements.[1] Archaeological and artistic evidence from period effigies and martial treatises underscores the tactical integration of cuisses in warfare. Mid-15th-century Scottish military effigies, for instance, depict articulated cuisses as standard components of full plate harnesses, indicating their routine use to counter leg-targeted strikes in pitched battles.[35] These sources highlight cuisses' attachment to faulds for seamless lower-body coverage, optimizing protection without hindering stride in dynamic warfare.[36]In Tournaments and Ceremonial Contexts
In tournaments, cuisses were adapted from standard battlefield designs to prioritize impact resistance during jousts, featuring additional articulated lames and locking mechanisms such as turning pins to secure poleyns against the force of couched lances. These reinforcements allowed greater protection while maintaining mobility on horseback, as evidenced in 16th-century English tournament armor where long cuisses included multiple lames extended at the top via rivets and leathers for enhanced durability.[37] For ceremonial contexts, cuisses worn by nobility often incorporated gilding and embossing to emphasize status and spectacle during parades and courtly displays. A prominent example is the pair from Henry VIII's Greenwich armoury around 1540, decorated with etched scrolling foliage retaining traces of gilding, which highlighted royal prestige in Tudor-era events.[37] Such ornate elements transformed functional leg protection into symbols of chivalric grandeur. Safety modifications were essential for melee-style tournaments, where cuisses featured rounded edges and inward turns to reduce the risk of lacerations from glancing blows. Tournament regulations emphasized these adaptations to limit injuries, as seen in the boxed, rounded borders of Henry VIII's cuisses, which aligned with broader European practices for regulated combat.[37]Cultural Impact and Legacy
Representations in Art and Literature
In medieval illuminated manuscripts, cuisses frequently appear as integral elements of knightly armament, symbolizing the chivalric ideal of protected valor in combat and tournament scenes. These illustrations, often set against vibrant gold grounds, highlight cuisses as markers of elite knighthood, aligning with the manuscript's Burgundian patronage and its focus on pious chivalry. Similarly, in the Ruskin Hours (c. 13th–14th century, France), marginal scenes of armored figures depict padded or early plate cuisses, underscoring the vulnerability of the lower body in heroic narratives.[38] Sculptural representations in tomb effigies further immortalize cuisses as emblems of a knight's martial legacy and social standing. The brass effigy of Sir John Crosby (d. 1476) in St. Helen's Church, Bishopsgate, London, portrays the knight in full plate harness, with cuisses featuring three horizontal ridges for articulation, symbolizing both defensive prowess and the wearer's adherence to chivalric codes during the Wars of the Roses era.[39] Another early instance appears in the Tewkesbury Abbey effigy (c. 14th century), where splinted cuisses of riveted plates cover the thighs, evoking the transition to more advanced armor forms and the enduring motif of the knight as a steadfast guardian.[40] These effigies, often with crossed legs to denote crusading zeal, position cuisses not merely as functional gear but as visual affirmations of eternal honor and fealty. In literature, cuisses serve as potent symbols of knightly status while subtly evoking the fragility of the lower body amid chivalric exploits. In Arthurian romances, such as the anonymous Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (late 14th century), the arming passage vividly details "comely cuisses" laced tightly around Gawain's thighs, portraying them as essential to the hero's ornate harness and symbolizing both physical invulnerability and the moral trials of temptation that test a knight's resolve.[41] This imagery extends to broader Arthurian motifs, where unprotected or wounded thighs represent existential vulnerability—echoing the Fisher King's maimed state as a metaphor for spiritual barrenness—thus contrasting cuisses' protective role with the perils of unchecked passion or divine disfavor.[42]Modern Reproductions and Reenactments
In the 20th century, museums including the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Royal Armouries produced replicas of cuisses to facilitate study and display, employing mild steel for structural plates and leather for straps and linings to replicate 15th-century Milanese or German patterns with high fidelity. These replicas emphasize historical accuracy in shaping, such as medial ridges and articulated lames, while using modern fabrication techniques to ensure longevity without compromising aesthetic details.[4][3][43] Reenactment organizations like the Society for Creative Anachronism (SCA) and Historical European Martial Arts (HEMA) practitioners commonly adapt cuisses from 16-gauge mild or stainless steel, selected for its balance of durability and impact resistance during simulated combats and training. These versions typically weigh 4-6 kg per pair, approximating the mass of period originals to maintain realistic mobility, and feature leather suspension straps for secure fitting over padded garments. Such adaptations prioritize safety standards, including rounded edges and reinforced joints, while drawing brief inspiration from Renaissance ceremonial styles for decorative fluting.[44][45][46] Since the 2000s, innovations in historical armor reproduction have incorporated carbon fiber composites into cuisses for tournament and reenactment applications, offering significantly reduced weight—often under 2 kg per pair—compared to steel while providing comparable impact absorption through layered resin matrices. This material balances historical authenticity in form, such as contoured thigh plates and integrated poleyns, with enhanced safety by minimizing fatigue during prolonged wear in full-contact events like buhurt. Adoption has grown among competitive reenactors seeking to mitigate injury risks without sacrificing protective efficacy.[47][48][49]References
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:A_record_of_European_armour_and_arms_through_seven_centuries_%28Volume_1%29.djvu/292