Hubbry Logo
Datum referenceDatum referenceMain
Open search
Datum reference
Community hub
Datum reference
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Datum reference
Datum reference
Datum reference
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Technical drawing with references and geometric specifications

A datum reference or just datum (plural: datums[Note 1]) is some geometrically important part of an object, such as a point, line, plane, hole, set of holes, or pair of surfaces. It serves as a reference in defining the geometry of the object and (often) in measuring aspects of the actual geometry to assess how closely they match with the nominal value, which may be an ideal, standard, average, or desired value.

For example, on a car's wheel, the lug nut holes define a bolt circle that is a datum from which the location of the rim can be defined and measured. This matters because the hub and rim need to be concentric to within close limits (or else the wheel will not roll smoothly).

The concept of datums is used in many fields, including carpentry, metalworking, needlework, geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T), aviation, surveying, geodesy (geodetic datums), and others.

Uses

[edit]

In carpentry, an alternative, more common name is "face side" and "face edge". The artisan nominates two straight edges on a workpiece as the "datum edges", and they are marked accordingly. One convention is to mark the first datum edge with a single slanted line (/) and the second with double lines (//). For most work, the datum references of the workpiece need to be square. If necessary they may be cut, planed or filed to make them so. In subsequent marking out, all measurements are then taken from either of the two datum references.

In aviation, an aircraft is designed to operate within a specified range of mass and (chiefly longitudinal) balance; an airman is responsible for determining these factors for each flight under their command. This requires the calculation of moment for each variable mass in the aircraft (fuel, passengers, cargo, etc.), by multiplying its weight by its distance from a datum reference. The datum for light airplanes is usually the engine firewall or the tip of the spinner, but in all cases it is a fixed plane perpendicular to the aircraft's longitudinal axis, and specified in its operating handbook.

Engineering

[edit]
Screenshot from AutoCAD with various geometric dimensioning and tolerancing datum reference symbols (total indicator reading, perpendicularity, and parallelism

An engineering datum used in geometric dimensioning and tolerancing is a feature on an object used to create a reference system for measurement.[1] In engineering and drafting, a datum is a reference point, surface, or axis on an object against which measurements are made.

These are then referred to by one or more 'datum references' which indicate measurements that should be made with respect to the corresponding datum feature .

In geometric dimensioning and tolerancing, datum reference frames are typically 3D. Datum reference frames are used as part of the feature control frame to show where the measurement is taken from. A typical datum reference frame is made up of three planes. For example, the three planes could be one "face side" and two "datum edges". These three planes are marked A, B and C, where A is the face side, B is the first datum edge, and C is the second datum edge. In this case, the datum reference frame is A/B/C. A/B/C is shown at the end of feature control frame to show from where the measurement is taken. (See the ASME standard Y14.5M-2009 for more examples and material modifiers.)

The engineer selects A/B/C based on the dimensional function of the part. The datums should be functional per the ASME standard. Typically, a part is required to fit with other parts. So, the functional datums are chosen based on how the part attaches. However, typically, the functional datums are not used to manufacture the part. The manufacturing datums are typically different from the functional datums to save cost, improve process speed, and repeatability. A tolerance analysis may be needed in many cases to convert between the functional datums and the manufacturing datums. Computer software can be purchased for dimensional analysis.

There are typically 6 degrees of freedom that need to be considered before choosing which feature is A, B, or C. For this example, A is the primary datum, B is the secondary, and C is the tertiary datum. The primary datum controls the most degrees of freedom. The tertiary datum controls the least degrees of freedom. For this example, of a block of wood, datum A (the face) controls 3 degrees of freedom, B (first edge) controls 2 degrees of freedom, and C (second edge) controls 1 degree of freedom. 3+2+1 = 6, all 6 degrees of freedom are considered.

The 6 degrees of freedom in this example are 3 translation and 3 rotation about the 3D coordinate system. The face datum A controls 3: translation along the z-axis, rotation about the x-axis, and rotation about the y-axis. The edge datum B controls 2: translation along the y-axis and rotation about the z-axis. Finally, The edge datum C controls 1 degree of freedom, namely the translation along the x-axis.[2]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Datum reference

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In (GD&T), a datum reference is the indication of a datum feature within a feature control frame to establish the datum reference frame (DRF). A datum is a theoretically exact point, axis, line, or plane derived from the true geometric counterpart of a specified datum feature on a part, serving as the origin from which the location or geometric characteristics of other features are established and measured. Datum references are fundamental to GD&T, a standardized language for defining and communicating engineering tolerances as outlined in ASME Y14.5, enabling precise control of part geometry to ensure interchangeability and functionality in manufacturing and assembly. A datum feature, which is the physical, tangible surface or feature of size (such as a hole, slot, or flat plane) on the actual part, is indicated by a datum feature symbol—a capital letter enclosed in a rectangular frame with a triangular leader—and represents the approximate counterpart from which the ideal datum is simulated during inspection. Unlike the imperfect datum feature, the datum itself is an abstract, perfect geometric entity created by measurement tools like granite surface plates or gauge pins to eliminate variations in real-world surfaces. The datum reference frame (DRF), established by one or more datum references, forms a three-dimensional that constrains all of a part (three translations and three rotations), providing a consistent basis for applying tolerances to features like position, orientation, and profile. Typically, this frame is built using a primary datum to arrest three degrees of freedom, a secondary datum for two more, and a tertiary datum for the remaining one, with the specified in the feature control frame to reflect functional assembly requirements. By prioritizing datums that simulate conditions in an assembly, datum references ensure that inspections align with intent, reducing errors in production and improving across industries such as , automotive, and precision machining.

Fundamentals

Definition

A datum reference in is a theoretically point, axis, line, plane, or combination thereof, derived from the true geometric counterpart of a specified datum feature on a physical part. This concept serves as the foundational origin for establishing the location and geometric characteristics of other features, eliminating ambiguity in measurements by providing a standardized reference. In practice, datum references form the basis of a used for dimensioning, tolerancing, and processes, ensuring that parts can be manufactured and assembled interchangeably across different production environments. By constraining the —three translational and three rotational—datum references enable precise and repeatable evaluations of part geometry relative to a common framework. A key distinction exists between an datum, which assumes a perfect geometric form without imperfections, and a simulated datum, which represents a practical created during using equipment like surface plates or fixtures to mimic the ideal constraints. This simulation accounts for real-world variations while maintaining the theoretical intent of the datum reference.

Types of Datums

In (GD&T), datums are classified into three primary types based on their geometric form: point, line (or axis), and plane. These types derive from theoretical idealizations of part features and are defined according to , providing precise references for and tolerancing. The number of (DOF) each constrains typically corresponds to their role in the datum reference frame (DRF) under the rule: primary (3 DOF), secondary (2 DOF), and tertiary (1 DOF). A point datum represents a theoretically exact , typically derived from spherical or pinpoint features on a part. It is ideal for establishing 3D positioning without imposing size or orientation constraints, as it constrains only one degree of freedom when used as a tertiary datum, such as the final or in a datum reference frame. A line datum, often referred to as an axis, is a theoretically exact straight line derived from cylindrical or linear features. When used as a secondary datum, it constrains two , typically the two translations to the primary datum in the reference frame. A plane datum is a theoretically exact flat surface, usually from planar features, serving as the primary orientation reference. It constrains translation in (normal to the plane) and rotation about two axes within the plane, thus restricting three to stabilize the part's position. Selection of datum types depends on functional relevance to the part's or operational interfaces, ensuring the chosen datum reflects real-world assembly conditions; stability to minimize variation during ; and ease of access for practical on the physical part. Representative examples include designating the end face of a shaft as a plane datum to establish primary orientation or the central axis of a as a line datum to control positional alignment. These selections contribute to constructing a complete datum reference frame without delving into simulation details.

Establishment and Simulation

Datum Features

A datum feature is the actual physical feature on a part, such as a surface, line, or point, that is used to establish a datum for referencing other features during tolerancing and inspection. According to ASME Y14.5-2018, section 3.17, it represents the tangible element indicated by the datum feature symbol on a , serving as the basis for simulating the theoretical datum. This feature is typically selected from integral part elements like machined faces, holes, or slots that align with functional requirements. The qualification process for a datum feature involves simulating its contact with a datum feature simulator to approximate the geometric form of the datum, ensuring consistent and repeatable establishment. For planar datum features, particularly as primary datums, high-point contact is used, where the surface mates with the simulator at its three highest points to define the tangent plane, minimizing the impact of surface irregularities. For datum features representing lines or points, such as those from cylindrical holes or slots, qualification often employs methods like the maximum material boundary (for MMC conditions) or fitting to derive the axis or point, approximating the perfect form boundary. These simulation techniques are prescribed in to account for the feature's actual geometry during and verification. Selecting appropriate datum features is essential for accurate tolerancing; they must be accessible for fixturing, provide repeatable contact points, and represent functional interfaces to reflect real-world assembly conditions. emphasizes choosing features based on their relationship to the tolerance zones, prioritizing stability and over arbitrary selections. Common errors in selection include over-constraining the part with excessive or redundant references, which can introduce conflicts and restrict allowable variation, or using unstable features like rounded edges or small interrupted surfaces that lead to rocking or inconsistent measurement results. For example, a machined flat surface on a workpiece is commonly qualified as a primary datum feature by placing it in three-point high-point contact with a precision surface plate simulator, establishing a stable plane reference while accommodating minor form errors. Qualified datum features contribute to the overall datum reference frame by providing the constrained origins for dimensional control.

Datum Reference Frame

The datum reference frame (DRF) is a three-dimensional coordinate system established in geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) to fully constrain the position and orientation of a part, enabling precise measurement and inspection of geometric features relative to specified datums. It achieves this by systematically locking all six degrees of freedom (DOF) of a rigid body in three-dimensional space—three translational (along X, Y, Z axes) and three rotational (about those axes)—through the sequential application of primary, secondary, and tertiary datums. This frame serves as the foundational reference for defining tolerance zones, ensuring that part variations are evaluated consistently against theoretically perfect datum planes, lines, or points derived from actual datum features. The hierarchy of datums in constructing a full DRF follows a strict precedence to avoid or under-constraint. The primary datum, typically a plane, constrains three DOF: one to the plane and two rotations about axes parallel to it, establishing the initial orientation and position. The secondary datum, often a line or plane to the primary, then constrains two additional DOF: one along its direction and one rotation about an axis to both datums. Finally, the tertiary datum, such as a point or line, constrains the remaining single DOF, usually a or not yet fixed, completing the orthogonal . This sequential simulation begins with the primary datum and builds orthogonally, ensuring mutual and no overlapping constraints, as per established GD&T principles. In cases where full six-DOF constraint is unnecessary, a partial DRF may employ fewer than three datums—for instance, using only a primary and secondary datum to constrain four DOF for two-dimensional controls or cylindrical features. However, for comprehensive three-dimensional referencing, the full DRF is standard to eliminate all possible part motion. A representative example is a rectangular machined block: the bottom face serves as the primary datum plane (constraining vertical translation and two tilts), a side face as the secondary datum plane (constraining lateral translation and one roll), and an edge intersection as the tertiary datum line (constraining the final slide), thereby defining the , and axes for all subsequent measurements.

Applications in Engineering

Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T)

In (GD&T), datum references are integrated into feature control frames to define the allowable geometric variations of part features relative to a standardized . A feature control frame consists of a rectangular box divided into compartments: the first contains the geometric tolerance symbol (e.g., position or orientation), the second specifies the tolerance value, and subsequent compartments list material condition modifiers followed by datum references in hierarchical order, such as A (primary), B (secondary), and C (tertiary). This ordering ensures that tolerances are applied sequentially, establishing the primary datum for orientation and , the secondary for further constraint, and the tertiary to fully fix the reference frame. Basic dimensions in GD&T are theoretically exact values, enclosed in rectangles, that locate features relative to the datum reference frame without associated tolerances; instead, the geometric tolerances in the feature control frames govern the permissible variations in form, orientation, , or profile. For instance, the position of a feature might be defined by basic dimensions projecting from datums A and B, with the feature control frame specifying the tolerance zone size and datum references to control deviations from the ideal geometry. Material condition modifiers, such as Maximum Material Condition (MMC) and Least Material Condition (LMC), applied to datum references in the feature control frame, allow for datum feature shift (or "datum shift allowances") to accommodate manufacturing variations while maintaining functional assembly. At MMC, the datum feature is at its maximum size (e.g., smallest or largest shaft), permitting the maximum allowable shift within the tolerance zone; at LMC, the shift is minimized to preserve material for mating parts. This modifier enables additional tolerance beyond the stated value, known as bonus tolerance, calculated as the between the MMC size and the actual feature size, representing the departure from MMC toward LMC: Bonus tolerance=∣MMC size−actual size∣\text{Bonus tolerance} = |\text{MMC size} - \text{actual size}| (for holes: actual size - MMC size; for shafts: MMC size - actual size). A practical example is the position tolerance for a pattern of holes on a plate, where datum A is a primary planar surface (e.g., the bottom face) and datum B is a secondary axis derived from a central bore or slot. The feature control frame might specify a position tolerance of 0.5 mm at MMC relative to datums A and B, with basic dimensions locating the hole centers; if a hole's actual is 0.2 mm larger than its MMC of 10 mm, the bonus tolerance adds 0.2 mm to the positional allowance, enhancing manufacturability. The use of datum references in GD&T offers significant benefits over traditional coordinate tolerancing, particularly in reducing tolerance stack-up errors by tying all measurements to a common datum reference frame rather than independent plus/minus dimensions that accumulate uncertainties across features. This approach allows for larger individual tolerances while ensuring functional interchangeability, as the datum-based system directly relates geometric controls to assembly intent.

Manufacturing and Inspection

In manufacturing, fixtures and gages are designed to incorporate datum features for precise part fixturing, ensuring repeatability during production processes. Locating pins, for instance, are commonly used to simulate secondary datums by contacting specific points or areas on the workpiece, with fixed pins providing rigid positioning and adjustable push pins accommodating variations in part size. These elements align the part to the datum reference frame (DRF), constraining degrees of freedom to mimic functional assembly conditions as outlined in standards for gage and fixture design. Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMMs) utilize structured probing sequences to simulate the DRF during , beginning with manual or automated probing of primary and secondary datum features to establish part alignment. The collects multiple points on each datum—typically at least three for planes or more for complex features like cylinders—to define the , after which the software translates and rotates the part's measured points relative to the machine's axes before evaluating other features. This alignment process verifies GD&T tolerances against the established datums in a single setup. Inspection challenges often arise from datum misalignment caused by form errors, such as out-of-roundness in cylindrical datums or in planar surfaces, which can introduce systematic errors in the DRF if not addressed. These issues are resolved through best-fit methods, like Chebyshev minimization, that optimize the datum simulation by finding the geometric fit which minimizes deviations across all measured points, thereby reducing in tolerance evaluations. A practical example is the inspection of blocks, where cylinder bores serve as tertiary datums to ensure precise alignment of mating components like pistons and heads. CMM probing projects measurements from the bores into the head face plane, achieving positional accuracy within microns despite potential form errors in the bores, which is critical for and . The use of datum references in and inspection ultimately ensures functional interchangeability of parts from different suppliers during assembly, as consistent DRF simulation prevents fit-up issues in complex systems like powertrains.

Standards and Notation

ASME Y14.5

The standard, published by the and reaffirmed in 2024, serves as the primary U.S. reference for (GD&T), including detailed provisions for datum establishment, the creation of a datum reference frame (DRF), and their application in engineering drawings. It defines a datum as a theoretically exact point, axis, line, or plane derived from a datum feature, with the DRF formed by three mutually perpendicular planes established through sequential simulation of primary, secondary, and tertiary datum features to constrain the . The standard emphasizes that datums must reflect functional mating requirements, ensuring the DRF simulates real-world assembly conditions during inspection and manufacturing. Key rules in ASME Y14.5-2018 (R2024) outline datum precedence, where the primary datum (e.g., labeled A) constrains three degrees of freedom by providing the most extensive contact, the secondary datum (e.g., B) constrains two additional degrees for orientation, and the tertiary datum (e.g., C) constrains the remaining one degree for location. Modifiers such as maximum material condition (MMC) applied to datum references allow for datum feature shift, where the datum simulator can translate within the clearance derived from the feature's size deviation from MMC, providing bonus tolerance while maintaining the DRF's orientation. Composite tolerancing, addressed in section 10.5, uses multiple segments in a feature control frame to apply a looser upper segment for location relative to the full DRF and a tighter lower segment for orientation or pattern control with fewer or no datum references, enhancing precision for patterns of features. Historical updates to the standard have refined datum referencing practices; the 2009 edition introduced explicit rules for using patterns of features (e.g., multiple holes or slots) as datum features, allowing the DRF to be established from the collective of the pattern to control or coaxiality more effectively than individual features. The 2018 edition built on this by clarifying datum establishment for flexible parts, introducing provisions for multiple DRFs or partial datum to account for deformation under load, and addressing unstable datum features like convex surfaces that might "rock" during simulation. For instance, a feature control frame specifying position tolerance relative to the DRF might be notated as:

|POS| ⌀0.1 |A|B|C|

|POS| ⌀0.1 |A|B|C|

indicating a 0.1 tolerance zone for the feature's location and orientation with respect to the DRF defined by datums A, B, and C. is widely adopted in U.S. , particularly in defense and sectors, where it ensures and precision in complex assemblies, as mandated by the Department of Defense since 2009.

ISO Standards

The (ISO) provides a comprehensive framework for datum referencing through its Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) standards, emphasizing mathematical precision and global in drawings. ISO 1101, titled "Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Geometrical tolerancing — Tolerances of form, orientation, and ," establishes the foundational rules for applying geometrical tolerances, including how datums integrate into tolerance specifications by influencing links related to form, orientation, , and datums. Complementing this, ISO 5459, "Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Geometrical tolerancing — Datums and datum systems," defines terminology, rules, and methodologies for indicating and interpreting datums and datum systems, covering single datums, common datums, and composite systems derived from workpiece features. These standards specify datum simulation as a theoretically exact geometric counterpart derived from real surfaces, ensuring consistent establishment of reference frames through sequential constraint of , and address the of datums as a hierarchical linkage for tolerancing applications. A key distinction from the standard lies in ISO's flexible approach to datum requirements and precedence. Unlike ASME's rigid A-B-C labeling and strict sequential precedence, ISO permits independent datum requirements where datums can be established without implied hierarchy if the order is not critical, allowing for ambiguous sequencing in non-essential cases. Additionally, ISO explicitly references the (three translational and three rotational) in datum establishment without mandating alphabetic labels, promoting a more mathematically oriented process that defines datums as perfect forms (e.g., planes or cylinders) fitted to actual features using or methods. This philosophical difference supports broader adaptability in international contexts, though recent alignments facilitate hybrid use with ASME. The evolution of these standards reflects ongoing harmonization efforts, with the 2017 update to ISO 1101 introducing new modifiers for toleranced and referenced features, while the 2024 revision of ISO 5459 refined datum simulation definitions to better align with global practices, including enhanced rules for datum targets and composite systems that ease integration with ASME for multinational projects. For size-related datums, ISO 286-1, "Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — ISO code system for tolerances on linear sizes — Part 1: Basis of tolerances, deviations and fits," provides the basis for treating linear size features as datums in tolerancing chains, ensuring compatibility with form and orientation controls. In notation, ISO employs datum targets as circular symbols on drawings to specify partial features; for instance, three discrete points or areas on a surface, labeled A1, A2, and A3 within divided circles, collectively establish datum A as a plane, constraining three translational for irregular or incomplete surfaces. ISO standards for datum referencing see predominant adoption in and , particularly within the automotive and machinery sectors, where their emphasis on supports supply chain efficiency across borders; for example, major OEMs in these regions mandate ISO GPS compliance for precision components like engine blocks and assemblies.

References

  1. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/datum/
  2. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/asme-y14-5-gdt-standard/
  3. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/datum-reference-frame/
  4. https://waykenrm.com/blogs/what-are-datums/
  5. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/104/4/j44mac.pdf
  6. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/datums-features-and-simulators/
  7. https://jiga.io/articles/datum-reference-frames/
  8. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/datums-control-degrees-of-freedom/
  9. https://www.qualitymag.com/articles/90752-gdt-workshop-datum-feature-selection-and-use
  10. https://grabcad.com/tutorials/asme-y14-5-2018-key-terms-and-definitions-explained
  11. https://www.tec-ease.com/gdt-tips-view.php?q=43
  12. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/relating-secondary-datum-feature-to-primary-datums/
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827116004364
  14. https://www.faro.com/en/Resource-Library/Article/understanding-composite-positional-tolerances-in-gd-t
  15. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/what-are-basic-dimensions-and-how-do-they-work-in-gdt/
  16. https://www.tec-ease.com/gdt-tips-view.php?q=72
  17. https://www.tec-ease.com/gdt-tips-view.php?q=51
  18. https://www.school-mechademic.com/blog/datum-feature-modifier
  19. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/maximum-material-condition/
  20. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/true-position/
  21. https://fractory.com/true-position-gdt/
  22. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/gdt-vs-coordinate-tolerancing/
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924013697004597
  24. https://www.asme.org/getmedia/783d07ce-d52d-4a2f-801c-6d1e123e9b4e/29529.pdf
  25. http://engr.case.edu/merat_francis/flm/My_Publications/Conferences/HeuristicPlanningCMMs.pdf
  26. https://hexagon.com/resources/resource-library/intro-coordinate-metrology
  27. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/10919/28472/1/JMCalkinsDissertation.pdf
  28. https://www.autodesk.com/blogs/design-and-manufacturing/understanding-the-basics-of-geometric-dimensioning-and-tolerancing-gdt/
  29. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/asme-2009-vs-2018/
  30. https://geotol.com/core-programs/2018-standards/
  31. https://files.asme.org/Catalog/Codes/PrintBook/35976.pdf
  32. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:5459:en
  33. https://www.gdandtbasics.com/iso-vs-asme-standards/
  34. https://qualityforum.zeiss.com/migration/images/3726_84ff0ae78e27ad93796f8bbb20513e34.pdf
  35. https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/87855/beb1d5de3e76428a93a438572d6be272/ISO-5459-2024.pdf
  36. https://www.excedify.com/pages/asme-vs-iso-gd-t-training-which-one-should-you-learn
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.