Hubbry Logo
Exploding whaleExploding whaleMain
Open search
Exploding whale
Community hub
Exploding whale
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Exploding whale
Exploding whale
Exploding whale
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

1970 whale explosion in Florence, Oregon, filmed by KATU news, one of the most widely reported cases of the exploding whale phenomenon. This explosion was intentionally caused using dynamite, but whale carcasses may also burst on their own.

There have been several cases of exploding whale carcasses due to a buildup of gas in the decomposition process. This can occur when a whale strands itself ashore. Actual explosives have also been used to assist in disposing of whale carcasses, ordinarily after towing the carcass out to sea, and as part of a beach cleaning effort.[1] It was reported as early as 1928, when an attempt to preserve a carcass failed due to faulty chemical usages.

A widely reported case of an exploding whale occurred in Florence, Oregon, in November 1970, when the Oregon Highway Division (now the Oregon Department of Transportation) blew up a decaying sperm whale with dynamite in an attempt to dispose of its rotting carcass. The explosion threw whale flesh around 800 feet (240 metres) away, and its odor lingered for some time. American humorist Dave Barry wrote about it in his newspaper column in 1990 after viewing television footage of the explosion, and later the same footage from news station KATU circulated on the Internet. It was also parodied in the 2007 American film Reno 911!: Miami, the 2018 Australian film Swinging Safari, and the 2010 The Simpsons episode, "The Squirt and the Whale". It has since been honored by the Eugene Emeralds of Minor League Baseball in 2023.[2]

An example of a spontaneously bursting whale carcass occurred in Taiwan in 2004, when the buildup of gas inside a decomposing sperm whale caused it to burst in a crowded urban area while it was being transported for a post-mortem examination. Other cases, natural and artificial, have also been reported in Canada, South Africa, Iceland, Australia, Denmark, and the United Kingdom. Artificial explosions have also been imposed by governments, and approved by the International Whaling Commission in emergency situations. However, it has also been criticized for its long-lasting odor.[1]

United States

[edit]

Florence whale

[edit]
External videos
KATU-TV's broadcast of the explosion, remastered in 2020
video icon Exploding Whale 50th Anniversary, Remastered!, KATU

On November 9, 1970,[3] a 45-foot-long (14 m) sperm whale washed ashore at Florence on the central Oregon Coast.[4][5] The weight of the carcass was estimated at 8 short tons (16,000 lb; 7,300 kg).[6] At the time, Oregon beaches were under the jurisdiction of the state's Highway Division, which, after consulting with the United States Navy, decided to remove the whale using dynamite – assuming that the resulting pieces would be small enough for scavenger animals to consume.

George Thornton, the engineer in charge of the operation, told an interviewer that he was not sure how much dynamite would be needed, saying that he had been chosen to remove the whale because his supervisor had gone hunting. A charge of one-half short ton (450 kg) of dynamite was selected.[7][8] A military veteran with explosives training who happened to be in the area warned that the planned twenty cases of dynamite was far too much, and that 20 sticks (8.4 lb or 3.8 kg)[9] would have sufficed, but his advice went unheeded.[4]

The dynamite was detonated on November 12 at 3:45 p.m.[3] A cameraman, Doug Brazil, filmed it for a story by news reporter Paul Linnman of KATU-TV in Portland, Oregon. In his voice-over, Linnman joked that "land-lubber newsmen" became "land-blubber newsmen [...] for the blast blasted blubber beyond all believable bounds".[7] The explosion caused large pieces of blubber to land near buildings and in parking lots some distance away from the beach. Only some of the whale was disintegrated; most of it remained on the beach for the Oregon Highway Division workers to clear away. In his report, Linnman also noted that scavenger birds, who it had been hoped would eat the remains of the carcass after the explosion, did not appear as they were possibly scared away by the noise.

Days before the blast, a local explosive expert had purchased a new automobile in a "Get a Whale of a Deal" promotion. It was damaged by a chunk of falling blubber.[4]

Ending his story, Linnman noted that "It might be concluded that, should a whale ever be washed ashore in Lane County again, those in charge will not only remember what to do, they'll certainly remember what not to do". When 41 sperm whales beached nearby in 1979, state parks officials burned and buried them.[10]

Later that day, Thornton told the Eugene Register-Guard, "It went just exactly right. [...] Except the blast funneled a hole in the sand under the whale" and that some of the whale chunks were subsequently blown back toward the onlookers and their cars.[11]

Thornton was promoted to the Medford office several months after the incident, and served in that post until his retirement. When Linnman contacted him in the mid-1990s, the newsman said Thornton felt the operation had been an overall success and had been converted into a public-relations disaster by hostile media reports.[12]

The Siuslaw Pioneer Museum has bone fragments of the Florence exploding whale, called "Florence's most infamous moment" by local press.[13] Currently, Oregon State Parks Department policy is to bury whale carcasses where they land. If the sand is not deep enough, they are relocated to another beach.[14]

Renewed interest

[edit]

The story was brought to widespread public attention by writer Dave Barry in his Miami Herald column of May 20, 1990, when he reported that he possessed footage of the event. Barry wrote: "Here at the institute we watch it often, especially at parties." Some time later, the Oregon State Highway division started to receive calls from the media after a shortened version of the article was distributed on bulletin boards under the title "The Far Side Comes to Life in Oregon". The unattributed copy of Barry's article did not explain that the event had happened approximately 25 years earlier. Barry later said that, on a fairly regular basis, someone would forward him his own column and suggest he write something about the described incident.[15] As a result of these omissions, an article in the ODOT's TranScript notes that:

"We started getting calls from curious reporters across the country right after the electronic bulletin board story appeared," said Ed Schoaps, public affairs coordinator for the Oregon Department of Transportation. "They thought the whale had washed ashore recently, and were hot on the trail of a governmental blubber flub-up. They were disappointed that the story has twenty-five years of dust on it."

Schoaps has fielded calls from reporters and the just plain curious in Oregon, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., and Massachusetts. The Wall Street Journal called, and Washington, D.C.–based Governing magazine covered the immortal legend of the beached whale in its June issue. And the phone keeps ringing. "I get regular calls about this story," Schoaps said. His phone has become the blubber hotline for ODOT, he added. "It amazes me that people are still calling about this story after nearly twenty-five years."[8]

The KATU footage resurfaced later as a video file on several websites, becoming a viral video.[16] A 2006 study found that the video had been viewed 350 million times across various websites.[17] In 2020, residents of Florence voted to name a new recreational area "Exploding Whale Memorial Park" in honor of the incident;[18] it also has a memorial plaque.[1] For the 50th anniversary of the event, KATU pulled the original 16 mm footage from the archives and released a remastered edition of the news report in 4K resolution.[19] Commemorating the anniversary as well, locals were reported to visit the beach and dress as whales.[1]

Florence celebrates Exploding Whale Day annually at Exploding Whale Memorial Park. In 2024, the public was invited to build an altar for the exploded whale.[20]

Taiwan

[edit]

Another whale explosion occurred on January 29, 2004, in Tainan City, Taiwan.[21] This time the explosion resulted from the buildup of gas inside a decomposing sperm whale, which caused it to burst. The cause of the phenomenon was initially unknown, since it occurred in the spinal area of the whale, not in its abdomen as might be expected. It was later determined that the whale had most likely been struck by a large shipping vessel, damaging its spine and weakening the area, and leading to its death. The whale died after beaching on the southwestern coast of Taiwan, and it took three large cranes and 50 workers more than 13 hours to shift the whale onto the back of a truck.

Taiwan News reported that, while the whale was being moved, "a large crowd of more than 600 local Yunlin residents and curiosity seekers, along with vendors selling snack food and hot drinks, braved the cold temperature and chilly wind to watch workmen try to haul away the dead marine leviathan".[22] Professor Wang Chien-ping had ordered the whale be moved to the Sutsao Wild Life Reservation Area after he had been refused permission to perform a necropsy at the National Cheng Kung University in Tainan. When it burst, the whale carcass was on the back of a truck near the center of Tainan, en route from the university laboratory to the preserve. The bursting whale splattered blood and entrails over surrounding shop fronts, bystanders, and cars.[23] The explosion did not, however, cause injuries or prevent researchers from performing a necropsy on the animal.[24]

Over the course of about a year, Wang completed a bone display from the remains of the whale. The assembled specimen and some preserved organs and tissues have been on display in the Taijiang Cetacean Museum since April 8, 2005.[25]

Others

[edit]
External videos
video icon Dicker, Ron. "Sperm Whale Explodes In Stomach-Churning Clip From Faroe Islands". Huffington Post. November 27, 2013.
  • In 1928, entrepreneurs Harold L. Anfenger and M. C. Hutton accidentally exploded a whale carcass they were attempting to preserve for a sideshow when the embalmer they had hired badly misjudged the balance of salt and formaldehyde necessary to preserve the specimen.[26]
  • Whale corpses are regularly disposed of using explosives; however, the whales are usually first towed out to sea. Government-sanctioned explosions have occurred in South Africa, Iceland, and Australia.[27][28]
  • A number of controlled explosions have been made in South Africa. Explosives were used to kill a beached humpback whale 25 miles (40 km) west of Port Elizabeth on August 6, 2001,[29] while a southern right whale that beached near Cape Town on September 15, 2005, was killed by authorities through detonation. In the latter instance, the authorities stated that the whale could not have been saved, and that the use of explosives in such cases was recommended by the International Whaling Commission.[30] A few weeks after the Port Elizabeth explosion, the carcass of a second humpback was dragged out to sea and explosives were used to break it into pieces so it would not pose a hazard to shipping.[31] Yet another explosion was performed in Bonza Bay on September 20, 2004, when an adult humpback whale died after beaching itself. In order to sink the whale, authorities towed it out to sea, affixed explosives to it, and set them off from a distance.[32]
  • A whale carcass adrift in the Icelandic harbour of Hafnarfjörður was split in two by a controlled explosion on June 5, 2005. The remains were dragged out to sea; however, they soon drifted back, and eventually had to be tied down.[27]
  • On September 2, 2010, a 31.2-foot (9.5 m) humpback whale that had been stranded for two weeks near the Western Australian city of Albany was killed by the Department of Environment and Conservation using explosives.[28][33] The department had planned to let the whale die of natural causes, but decided to kill the animal with explosives after it repositioned itself on a sandbar.[28]
  • A sperm whale carcass burst in Við Áir, Faroe Islands, on November 26, 2013, when measures were taken to avoid a larger burst by perforating its skin. Footage of the incident was shown on Kringvarp Føroya, the national Faroese broadcaster.[34]
  • In April 2014, officials in Trout River, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, expressed concern that the carcass of a blue whale which had washed ashore might burst, as it had expanded to twice its normal size from trapped gas.[35]
  • One of three sperm whales that died after becoming beached on the Lincolnshire coast near Skegness, United Kingdom in January 2016 burst due to a build-up of gases in the carcass, after a marine biologist cut into it while trying to perform a post-mortem. The bursting caused a "huge blast of air".[36]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Exploding whale

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The exploding whale most famously refers to a notorious incident on November 12, 1970, in , where officials from the State Highway Division detonated approximately half a ton of beneath an 8-ton, 45-foot-long carcass that had beached three days earlier, causing massive chunks of to explode outward up to a quarter-mile (1,320 feet) and rain down on onlookers, vehicles, and the surrounding . While exploding whales occur naturally due to gas buildup in decomposing carcasses, this deliberate explosion became the most iconic example. The whale, a mature male (Physeter macrocephalus), washed ashore on November 9 near the mouth of the Siuslaw River, drawing crowds due to its size and the foul odor from rapid decomposition in the mild coastal weather. Local authorities, lacking modern protocols for disposal, consulted U.S. explosive experts and decided on after rejecting alternatives like or , which were deemed impractical for such a large specimen. Engineer George Thornton, then 41, oversaw the operation, placing 20 cases (about 1,000 pounds) of along the whale's body in hopes the blast would pulverize it into fragments small enough for and tides to scatter. The detonation, witnessed by a despite warnings to stay a quarter-mile away, instead produced a spectacular failure: the explosion created a plume over high, but intact sections of —some weighing hundreds of pounds—were hurled unpredictably, one landing on a parked and crushing its roof while others splattered nearby homes and bystanders. No serious injuries occurred, though the cleanup took days, with workers using bulldozers to haul away remains amid lingering stench. The event was captured on film by KATU-TV reporter Paul Linnman, whose broadcast—featuring his narration of "The blast blasted blubber beyond all believable bounds"—aired locally on and later gained international notoriety after rediscovery in the . In the decades since, the exploding whale has become a cultural icon of and government overreach, inspiring annual "Exploding Whale Day" celebrations in on November 12, complete with viewings of the footage, T-shirts, and a dedicated memorial park opened in 2020. The incident prompted changes in marine carcass management, with now favoring towing to sea or controlled to avoid similar mishaps. Thornton, who died in 2013, reflected on it with confidence in the plan but frustration with media coverage, considering the effort a success. The story has been referenced in media, from humor columns to documentaries, symbolizing the perils of solutions to natural problems.

Scientific Background

Causes of Explosions

The of a carcass begins shortly after death, primarily driven by anaerobic in the gut and tissues that break down , producing gases such as (CH4), (H2S), (NH3), and . These gases accumulate within the body's cavities, causing the carcass to bloat as rises. The process is part of the natural stage, where microbial activity converts proteins and other tissues into volatile compounds, often resulting in a characteristic foul odor from . Several factors can heighten the risk of an explosion by accelerating gas production or preventing its release. Warm environmental temperatures promote faster and , leading to quicker gas buildup compared to colder conditions. An intact skin layer, reinforced by thick , acts as a barrier that traps these gases inside, exacerbating in larger species like sperm whales, which possess greater body volume and more substrate for bacterial activity. Human interference, such as puncturing the skin, can also trigger a sudden release if pressure has already mounted. Documented explosions typically require such a trigger, like piercing or moving the carcass, rather than occurring spontaneously, though extreme buildup can lead to rupture without interference. The physics underlying the explosion involves gradual pressure accumulation until the tensile strength of the skin and is exceeded, resulting in rupture rather than a high-velocity . This leads to rapid decompression, propelling liquefied remains and debris outward, sometimes over significant distances. In a large , the total gas volume can reach substantial levels—potentially several cubic meters—equivalent to the needed to overcome the carcass's structural integrity. The event is thus a mechanical failure from overpressurization, not combustion.

Disposal Challenges

The disposal of beached whale carcasses presents significant logistical, environmental, and challenges, primarily due to the massive size of the animals, which can exceed 50 feet in length and weigh tens of tons. Authorities intervene to mitigate risks such as the spread of pathogens from decomposing tissues, which can pose hazards to humans and pets through bacterial contamination, and the intense odor from that affects nearby communities and . Additionally, carcasses obstruct beaches, hindering recreational access and potentially damaging local ecosystems through contamination of and sediments. Traditional disposal methods have included burial in beach sand, though this is often limited by insufficient depth to prevent exposure from tides, erosion, or storms, which can unearth remains and exacerbate health risks. Towing carcasses out to sea for natural sinking has been another approach, but it carries drawbacks such as the potential for the body to drift back ashore, create navigation hazards for boats, or attract sharks to coastal areas. Allowing natural decomposition on-site is the least costly and most ecologically beneficial option in remote areas, as it supports nutrient cycling and scavenger activity, but it is slow—taking months or years—and generates persistent foul odors that deter public use of the beach. In the mid-20th century, explosive disposal emerged as a rationale for rapid fragmentation of carcasses to facilitate quicker removal and reduce obstruction, particularly when other methods were deemed impractical; this involved calculating charges to break the body into manageable pieces, though imprecise execution often led to widespread debris scattering. Today, such methods are largely discouraged due to and environmental concerns. Modern alternatives prioritize and efficiency, including transport to landfills, which handles about one-third of cases in the as an optimal method for complete and minimal ecological disruption. , often partial to reduce volume before landfilling, is used for smaller or accessible carcasses, while professional necropsies—conducted by experts to gather scientific data on causes of death—precede disposal and may involve targeted tissue sampling without full dismemberment. Controlled venting by trained personnel, which entails careful assessment and release of built-up gases to prevent spontaneous rupture, has become a preferred initial step for bloated carcasses before further processing. As of July 2025, a U.S. general permit facilitates disposal of carcasses, promoting sustainable offshore methods that support deep-sea ecosystems while using drift modeling to minimize re-stranding risks. Safety protocols are essential to address explosion risks from internal gas accumulation during decomposition, requiring expert evaluation of bloating levels and establishment of evacuation zones around the site. Workers must wear protective gear, maintain distance from the carcass to avoid bacterial exposure, and disinfect the area post-removal; local authorities often coordinate with environmental agencies to ensure compliance with regulations on and debris management.

Major Incidents

Oregon Incident (1970)

On November 9, 1970, an 8-ton, 45-foot carcass washed ashore near , posing a significant disposal challenge for local authorities due to its size and the resulting odor from decomposition. The State Highway Division, responsible for clearing road hazards along the coastal route, consulted with U.S. Navy and munitions experts before deciding on an explosive method to fragment the remains. Assistant District Engineer George Thornton led the effort, opting for as the most expedient solution to reduce the carcass to small pieces that could be more easily removed by scavengers and tides. Preparation for the detonation involved placing approximately half a of —equivalent to 20 cases—beneath the to maximize fragmentation. Officials established a viewing area on nearby dunes for public safety and issued an advisory to evacuate within a quarter-mile to avoid potential . However, curiosity drew dozens of spectators who largely ignored the warning, crowding closer to the site despite the risks. The explosion occurred on , , in the afternoon, when Thornton detonated the charge, sending a massive plume of , , and tissue skyward. Fragments of and flesh were propelled up to 800 feet away, raining down on parked cars, homes, and onlookers, with some chunks large enough to cave in car roofs and damage property along U.S. Highway 101. Remarkably, no human injuries were reported, though the blast failed to fully disintegrate the carcass, leaving substantial remnants that continued to emit a foul stench for weeks afterward. Eyewitnesses, including local residents and reporter Paul Linnman who filmed the event for KATU-TV, described the aftermath as a chaotic " rain" or " snowstorm," with shocked spectators fleeing amid the falling debris and intensifying odor. The incident highlighted the miscalculation in explosive force, as larger pieces survived intact rather than vaporizing as intended.

Taiwan Incident (2004)

In January 2004, a 17-meter (56-foot) carcass weighing approximately 60 tons washed ashore on the southwestern coast of near the city of . The whale had beached earlier in the week and was loaded onto a by researchers for transport to in for a postmortem examination and necropsy. Over the days since its death, the carcass had begun decomposing, leading to the accumulation of gases from internal bacterial activity—a common risk in handling large remains. On January 26, 2004, while the truck was navigating a busy street in , the built-up gases caused the whale's abdomen to rupture explosively. The blast propelled blood, organs, and entrails outward, splattering nearby cars, shops, and buildings over a distance of about 50 meters (164 feet). According to reports, the eruption created a chaotic scene, with chunks of tissue raining down and forcing traffic to halt for several hours as passers-by reacted in shock. A marine biologist attributed the incident directly to the pressure generated by decomposing gases within the unopened carcass. The immediate aftermath involved significant disruption in the urban area, with no fatalities reported but considerable mess requiring prompt cleanup efforts. Local authorities and workers used hoses to wash streets and shovels to remove debris, restoring order after hours of delay. Taiwanese officials later emphasized the hazards of transporting large, unprocessed carcasses without prior precautions to mitigate gas buildup, drawing attention to improved protocols for future strandings.

Faroe Islands Incident (2013)

In November 2013, four sperm whales were observed entering the sound between the islands of and in the , where they became stranded due to a severe with winds reaching 108 mph. Three of the whales stranded on a beach, with one managing to swim away safely; two died shortly after, and their carcasses were left on the beach near Við Áir as began. The third whale, weighing approximately 30 tons, struggled for several days before succumbing, leaving authorities to address the potential hazards posed by the bloating remains. On November 26, marine biologist Bjarni Mikkelsen was tasked with intervening on one of the dead carcasses to prevent a spontaneous from built-up gases, a common disposal technique involving perforation of the skin to vent pressure. Using a , Mikkelsen made an incision in the whale's , but the procedure triggered an unexpected and violent rupture, propelling blood, fluids, and entrails up to 20 meters across the beach. Mikkelsen, dressed in protective gear, narrowly escaped serious injury by quickly retreating as the contents erupted forcefully. The explosion covered the surrounding beach area with viscera but caused no broader environmental or structural damage, though it released a strong and underscored the risks of close-proximity handling. The event was captured on video by local media and shared within Faroese communities, serving as a stark of the dangers involved. In response, experts highlighted the incident as a cautionary example, recommending the use of remote tools or maintaining greater safety distances in future carcass interventions to mitigate such risks.

Additional Cases

Global Examples

In 2005, a carcass stranded on Mnandi Beach near , , was euthanized using explosives after failed rescue attempts, scattering and debris across the beach and necessitating extensive cleanup efforts by local authorities. Multiple reports from , , document carcasses venting gases explosively during decomposition on beaches, particularly during the 2019 unusual mortality event when over 170 s stranded along the coast, with some carcasses bloating and releasing pressure in sudden bursts that posed hazards to beachgoers and cleanup crews. In , a 2010 incident involved a sick stranded in Princess Royal Harbour that was euthanized using an attached charge while on a sandbar, resulting in scattering and highlighting risks of methods. Since 2000, over 10 reported exploding whale cases have occurred in and , predominantly involving s or large species like humpbacks, with incidents in the (2016 burst during on coast) and several Australian strandings. Common themes across these global examples include most explosions being spontaneous due to bacterial producing and other gases, with intentional blasts becoming rare after the 1970 incident due to learned risks of uncontrolled debris spread.

Recent Developments

Following increased awareness of past disposal mishaps, the (NOAA) released updated Carcass Disposal Best Practices in 2022, prioritizing non-explosive methods such as towing carcasses offshore, burial in designated sites, or natural in remote areas to minimize public safety risks and environmental impacts. These guidelines also advocate for enhanced surveillance, including the use of drones for initial assessments of stranding sites to evaluate carcass condition and gas accumulation without close human proximity. Similar protocols from international bodies, like those from the , echo this shift toward technology-assisted, low-risk strategies. A notable minor incident occurred in 2022 in the , where a decomposing carcass on a released a dramatic burst of gas during controlled venting efforts by authorities, averting a potential uncontrolled rupture; the remains were subsequently disposed of via burial without further complications. No major exploding whale events have been reported globally through 2025, reflecting improved preventive measures. Rising ocean temperatures linked to have been shown to accelerate marine carcass rates, potentially heightening explosion risks by promoting faster bacterial activity and gas production, according to a 2024 analysis of environmental factors in drift and decay. A related 2023 study on global marine heatwaves further indicates that warmer waters could exacerbate stranding frequencies and timelines for large cetaceans. International whale stranding networks, coordinated through organizations like NOAA's Stranding Network and the Global Stranding Network, continue to advance monitoring with integrated sensors for detecting early gas buildup in beached carcasses, enabling timely interventions to prevent hazardous releases. These efforts include sharing across countries to track patterns and refine response protocols.

Cultural Impact

Media Coverage

The media coverage of exploding whale incidents has evolved from localized reporting to global viral phenomena, often emphasizing the grotesque spectacle and human miscalculations involved. The 1970 Oregon incident received initial attention through a regional television broadcast by KATU-TV reporter Paul Linnman, whose three-and-a-half-minute news segment captured the botched dynamite detonation and its aftermath of scattered blubber, describing the event as a "disaster" due to the widespread mess that coated spectators and vehicles. The footage aired locally in Portland, Oregon, but remained obscure for two decades until humorist Dave Barry referenced it in a May 20, 1990, column for the Miami Herald, titled "The Farside Comes to Life in Oregon," which syndicated nationally and sparked renewed interest by comparing the real event to a Gary Larson cartoon. The 2004 Taiwan incident garnered international headlines shortly after it occurred, with outlets like the reporting on the spontaneous of a 60-ton carcass during transport through , dubbing it a shocking urban disruption that showered blood and organs on cars and shops. and other networks amplified the story as the "whale bomb," highlighting the pre-social media virality of graphic photographs that circulated widely in print and early online media, drawing attention to the risks of handling decomposing marine mammals in populated areas. In 2013, the case achieved rapid global reach through digital video sharing, starting with a clip from Faroese Television showing a carcass bursting as a incised it, which was uploaded to and amassed millions of views by 2014. This incident exemplified a broader trend in reporting since the early , where sensational headlines focused on the explosive visuals and errors in disposal protocols, transitioning from print-dominated coverage to video platforms that accelerated dissemination and public fascination.

Legacy and Commemorations

The exploding whale incident of 1970 has achieved iconic status as a symbol of in and environmental management, often cited in discussions of hasty . It has been referenced in various media, including humorist Dave Barry's 1990 syndicated column that popularized the story nationally, and in documentaries such as the 2025 Oh Whale by Winslow Crane-Murdoch, which explores the event's cultural resonance. Additionally, the incident appears in books like Paul Linnman's 2003 memoir The Exploding Whale: And Other Remarkable Stories from the Evening News, drawing from the reporter's firsthand coverage. The event's humorous legacy has endured through parodies and memes, particularly since the when the original news footage went viral online. "Exploding whale" has become slang for spectacularly failed plans, evoking the botched detonation that scattered over spectators and vehicles. Viral remixes of the video, including comedic sketches and comparisons to modern mishaps like responses, continue to amplify its comedic appeal. Educationally, the incident serves as a in biology classes to illustrate processes, where gases from bacterial breakdown cause and potential rupture in carcasses. It is incorporated into curricula to teach and , using the event to explain why whales can "explode" naturally. In training, it provides warnings against explosive disposal methods, highlighting risks to public safety and the environment. Commemorations in , include annual "Exploding Whale Day" events, such as the 54th anniversary celebration in 2024, featuring talks, gatherings, and family-friendly activities at local venues. The 55th anniversary was celebrated on November 16, 2025, with events including a gathering, toasts, awards, and family-friendly activities at Homegrown Public House & Brewery in . The community dedicated the Exploding Whale Park in 2020 for the 50th anniversary, with now recognized as "Exploding Whale Month" at the site. A plaque unveiled in 2000 marks the 30th anniversary, cementing the event's place in . The broader impact includes influencing wildlife disposal policies, with now prioritizing burial of beached whales on-site or relocation over explosives to avoid similar disasters. George Thornton, the engineer overseeing the 1970 operation, was eulogized upon his 2013 death at age 84 as "the exploding whale guy," reflecting how the incident overshadowed his 37-year career in obituaries across major outlets.

References

  1. https://www.oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/florence_whale_explosion/
  2. https://www.opb.org/artsandlife/series/history/florence-oregon-whale-explosion-history/
  3. https://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/2013/10/george_thornton_the_odot_engin.html
  4. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/exploding-blue-whales
  5. https://www.oregonlive.com/entertainment/2020/11/oregons-exploding-whale-50-years-later-10-ways-to-celebrate-the-big-blast-of-blubber.html
  6. https://www.oregonlive.com/history/2020/11/everyone-remembers-paul-linnman-as-guy-who-blew-up-that-whale-the-portland-tv-news-veteran-is-ok-with-that.html
  7. https://www.theexplodingwhale.com/evidence/resources/transcript
  8. https://www.oregonlive.com/travel/2020/06/now-you-can-visit-exploding-whale-memorial-park-on-the-oregon-coast.html
  9. https://www.registerguard.com/story/lifestyle/2024/11/11/exploding-whale-day-florence-oregon-coast/76092539007/
  10. https://letstalkscience.ca/educational-resources/stem-explained/can-whales-really-explode
  11. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/sep/23/whale-strandings-what-happens-after-they-die-and-how-do-authorities-safely-dispose-of-them
  12. https://www.discoverwildlife.com/animal-facts/marine-animals/why-do-whales-explode
  13. https://animals.howstuffworks.com/mammals/beached-whales-explode.htm
  14. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2025.1474460/full
  15. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/nov/17/how-do-you-get-rid-of-a-beached-whale-before-it-explodes
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0964569118300061
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0025326X19300542
  18. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/48553/noaa_48553_DS1.pdf
  19. https://www.epa.gov/marine-protection-permitting/ocean-disposal-marine-mammal-and-sea-turtle-carcasses
  20. https://www.ourwildpugetsound.com/journal/whats-the-best-way-to-handle-whales-that-wash-ashore
  21. https://www.newsweek.com/four-ways-deal-beached-whale-carcass-872297
  22. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-65350482
  23. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-life-distress/frequent-questions-necropsies-animal-autopsies-marine-mammals
  24. https://files-delwp.em.vic.gov.au/public/JSP/SWP/SWP-129.pdf
  25. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/07/16/2025-13268/issuance-of-a-general-permit-for-ocean-disposal-of-marine-mammal-and-sea-turtle-carcasses
  26. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/12/7/1156
  27. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/11/01/242347861/man-behind-oregons-famous-exploding-whale-dies
  28. https://www.earthtouchnews.com/oceans/whales-and-dolphins/blast-from-the-past-newly-named-park-honours-oregons-exploding-whale
  29. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna4096586
  30. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3437455.stm
  31. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/jan/30/china
  32. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/2004/01/30/news/38a3ef81-a1db-43fb-8171-6f31153d3d13/
  33. https://nammco.no/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/nammco-23-npr-faroes.pdf
  34. https://www.earthrace.net/sperm-whale-stranding-in-the-faroe-islands/
  35. https://www.upi.com/Odd_News/2013/11/29/Exploding-whale-video-goes-viral-on-Internet/57531385708475/
  36. https://www.theexplodingwhale.com/more-whales/20131126-faroe-islands
  37. https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2013/nov/27/sperm-whale-explodes-man-opens-stomach-video
  38. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/graphic-content-warning-sperm-whale-explodes-in-faroe-islands/LC4FVPDG4FS4OJHCIS6DKGOFC4/
  39. https://www.wired.com/2014/05/exploding-whale-physics/
  40. https://www.smh.com.au/world/beached-whale-killed-with-explosives-20050915-gdm2mo.html
  41. https://allafrica.com/stories/200509140553.html
  42. https://www.iflscience.com/exploding-whale-caught-on-camera-as-boat-pulls-up-to-decaying-carcass-61333
  43. https://www.theinertia.com/video/whale-carcass-explosion-caught-on-camera-in-california/
  44. https://www.nps.gov/articles/spike-in-gray-whale-deaths-triggers-investigations.htm
  45. https://www.theexplodingwhale.com/more-whales/20100902-australia
  46. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/body-of-dead-sperm-whale-explodes-during-autopsy-a3164516.html
  47. https://www.theexplodingwhale.com/more-whales
  48. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-protection-act-policies-guidance-and-regulations
  49. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/48553
  50. https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/rivers-oceans/96-percent-of-oceans-worldwide-experienced-extreme-heatwaves-in-2023-new-study-finds
  51. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/48552/noaa_48552_DS1.pdf
  52. https://katu.com/news/local/exploding-whale-day-54-years-since-whale-infamously-blown-up-on-oregon-beach
  53. https://www.ohs.org/events/the-50th-anniversary-of-blasted-blubber.cfm
  54. https://davebarry.substack.com/p/the-exploding-whale
  55. https://www.registerguard.com/story/news/2020/11/12/50-years-later-exploding-whale-still-lives-oddest-moment-history-florence-oregon/6189681002/
  56. https://nationalpost.com/news/scientist-narrowly-misses-being-blown-away-as-whale-corpse-explodes-in-front-of-him
  57. https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-history-of-exploding-whales-is-the-history-of-the-internet-itself/
  58. https://collegeofglobalfutures.asu.edu/blog/2020/11/18/a-cautionary-whale-of-a-future-building-tale/
  59. https://www.wweek.com/arts/movies/2025/11/04/oh-whale-explores-oregons-infamous-exploding-whale-video/
  60. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1226511.Exploding_Whale
  61. https://www.theexplodingwhale.com/evidence/resources/dave-barry-article/
  62. https://www.bright-frog.com/post/the-story-of-the-exploding-whale-and-how-to-make-bad-decisions
  63. https://www.boredpanda.com/coronavirus-comparison-exploding-sperm-whale-doncaster-council/
  64. https://www.kezi.com/news/florence-community-celebrates-54-years-since-whale-blown-up-on-beach/article_15742838-9fda-11ef-9235-1fa48b7a5c5d.html
  65. https://florencechamber.com/event/55th-exploding-whale-celebration/583/
  66. https://www.kezi.com/news/local/florence-celebrates-exploding-whale-day-55-years-later/article_cb3332a2-0693-45ee-bd89-a465259130c1.html
  67. https://www.98online.com/exploding-whale-day-is-now-an-official-holiday-in-oregon-to-commemorate-americas-first-viral-news-story
  68. https://vocal.media/history/the-odd-case-of-the-exploding-whale-in-oregon-a-bizarre-moment-in-history
  69. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/man-behind-oregons-infamous-exploding-whale-dies-flna8c11504906
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.