Hubbry Logo
Exploding animalExploding animalMain
Open search
Exploding animal
Community hub
Exploding animal
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Exploding animal
Exploding animal
Exploding animal
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The explosion of animals is an uncommon event arising from natural causes or human activity. Among the best known examples are the post-mortem explosion of whales, as a result of either natural decomposition or deliberate attempts at carcass disposal.[1] Other instances of exploding animals are defensive in nature or the result of human intervention.

Causes of explosions

[edit]

Natural explosions can occur for a variety of reasons. Post-mortem explosions, like that of a beached whale, are the result of the build-up of natural gases created by methane-producing bacteria inside the carcass during the decomposition process.[2] Natural explosions while an animal is living may be defense-related. A number of toads in Germany and Denmark exploded in April 2005.[3] In 1910, many newspapers carried a story about a duck that allegedly exploded after consuming yeast; Snopes has characterized the account as very improbable, comparing it to urban legends about rice or Alka-Seltzer causing birds to explode.[4][5]

Weaponization

[edit]
Main article: Animal-borne bomb attacks

Various military attempts have been made to use animals as delivery systems for weapons. In Song dynasty China, oxen carrying large explosive charges were used as self-propelled explosive missiles.[6] During World War II the United States investigated the use of "bat bombs" consisting of bats carrying small incendiary bombs,[7] while at the same time the Soviet Union developed the "anti-tank dog" for use against German tanks.[8] Other attempts have included an Iranian experiment with "kamikaze dolphins", intended to seek out and destroy submarines and enemy warships.[9] There have also been a number of documented incidents of animal-borne bomb attacks, in which donkeys, mules or horses were used to deliver bombs.[10][11][12]

Examples

[edit]

Ants

[edit]

Some insects explode altruistically, at the expense of the individual in defense of its colony; the process is called autothysis. Several species of ants, such as Camponotus saundersi in southeast Asia, can explode at will to protect their nests from intruders.[13][14] C. saundersi, a species of carpenter ant, can self-destruct by autothysis. Two oversized, poison-filled mandibular glands run the entire length of the ant's body. When combat takes a turn for the worse, the ant violently contracts its abdominal muscles to rupture its body and spray poison in all directions. Likewise, many species of termites, such as Globitermes sulphureus, have members, deemed the soldier class, who can split their bodies open emitting a noxious and sticky chemical for the same reason.[15]

Cows

[edit]

In January 1932, the Townsville Daily Bulletin, an Australian newspaper, reported an incident where a dairy cow was partially blown up and died on a farm at Kennedy Creek (near Cardwell, North Queensland). The cow had reportedly picked up a blasting cap in her mouth while grazing in a paddock. This was only triggered when the cow began to chew her cud. The resulting explosion blew the cow's head off and knocked the farmer who was milking her at the time unconscious.[16]

Rats

[edit]

The explosive rat, also known as the rat bomb, was a weapon developed by the British Special Operations Executive (SOE) in World War II for use against Germany. Rat carcasses were filled with plastic explosives and were to be distributed near German boiler rooms, where it was expected they would be disposed of by burning, with the subsequent explosion having a chance of causing a boiler explosion. The explosive rats never saw use, as the first shipment was intercepted by the Germans; however, the resulting search for more booby-trapped rats consumed enough German resources for the SOE to conclude that the operation was a success.[17]

Toads

[edit]

In April 2005, nature protection officials observed toads in the Altona district of Hamburg swelling up with gases and explode, propelling their innards for distances of up to one meter.[18] These incidents prompted local residents to refer to the lake where the toads lived as the Tümpel des Todes, 'Pool of Death'.[19] The incidents were reported as occurring with greatest frequency between 2 and 3 a.m. Werner Smolnik, an environmental movement worker, stated that at least 1,000 toads had died in this manner over the span of a few days. According to Smolnik, the toads expanded to three and a half times their normal size before blowing up.[18] The toads were noted to live a short time after exploding.[20]

Initial theories included a viral or fungal infection, possibly transmitted via drainage from a nearby horse racing track.[19] However, laboratory tests were unable to detect an infectious agent.[18] Berlin veterinarian Franz Mutschmann collected toad corpses and performed necropsies, and hypothesized that the phenomenon was linked to a recent influx of predatory crows to the area. According to his theory, crows attacked the toads and picked out their livers through the skin between their chests and abdominal cavities. The toads enlarged themselves as a defensive mechanism, but due to the hole in their body and their missing liver, their blood vessels and lungs ruptured and expelled their intestines.[18] Mutschmann's theory was dismissed as unlikely by an ornithologist. The official report classified the incident as lacking a satisfactory explanation.[19]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Exploding animal

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Exploding animals encompass that engage in —a sacrificial rupture of their bodies to release defensive secretions—and larger vertebrates whose carcasses burst postmortem from gas accumulation during . In the former, certain species, such as Colobopsis explodens, exemplify this through minor workers contracting their abdominal muscles violently upon threat, ejecting a potent, mixture from specialized mandibular glands that immobilizes or repels predators while entombing the itself. This , evolved in tropical arboreal environments, prioritizes colony survival over individual longevity, with the expelled fluid containing toxic compounds like fatty acids and alkaloids that deter attackers. Comparable occurs in of the Globitermes, where soldiers deploy similar mechanisms during nest defense. Postmortem explosions, by contrast, arise passively from bacterial fermentation producing and other gases that distend sealed body cavities until rupture, a risk heightened in intact, sun-exposed carcasses of like whales or elephants where delay initial breach. These events underscore causal processes in but lack the adaptive intent of , highlighting distinct biological versus taphonomic dynamics.

Natural Biological Explosions

Autolytic Defense in

Certain species of , particularly in the genus Colobopsis (commonly referred to as the COCY group), employ —a form of altruistic —as a defensive strategy against intruders. When threatened, minor worker ants voluntarily rupture their body walls, specifically the intersegmental membrane between the third and fourth abdominal tergites, to release a viscous, adhesive secretion from hypertrophied mandibular glands. This explosive rupture ejects a toxic mixture that immobilizes or kills the attacker by entangling its appendages and sensory organs, while the sacrificing ant perishes due to internal hemorrhage. The behavior is most prominently documented in Colobopsis explodens, a species described in 2018 from and , where it inhabits lowland dipterocarp forests at elevations up to 700 meters. Minor workers, which comprise the majority of the colony's foraging force, initiate by gripping the enemy with their mandibles, flexing their gasters upward, and contracting abdominal muscles to force the rupture; this process can occur within seconds of provocation by predators such as centipedes, spiders, or rival . Similar autolytic mechanisms appear in the Camponotus cylindricus complex from and , where workers release secretions rich in monoterpenes, hydrocarbons, and derivatives, providing both and irritant properties. These chemicals deter further invasion by contaminating the attacker's and disrupting its mobility, with histological studies confirming the glands' enlargement solely in minor workers adapted for defense. Autothysis represents an evolved colony-level adaptation, as the death of a single worker preserves nest integrity and kin, aligning with theory where benefits outweigh individual loss. Observations indicate the behavior is triggered selectively during territorial disputes or when escape is impossible, rather than reflexively, suggesting cognitive assessment of threat severity. While effective against larger arthropods—evidenced by field encounters where ruptured halted advances—the mechanism's specificity limits its use to minor workers, sparing reproductives and majors specialized for other roles. Comparable self-destructive defenses occur in but differ phylogenetically, underscoring in social for chemical autothysis.

Decomposition-Induced Explosions

Gas Buildup in Marine Mammals

Decomposition in deceased marine mammals, particularly cetaceans such as whales, generates significant internal gas pressure through bacterial activity on tissues and organs. Anaerobic bacteria in the gut and body cavities break down proteins and other organic matter, producing gases including methane, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide, which accumulate within the carcass. The thick blubber layer and elastic skin of these animals resist initial expansion, but as pressure builds—potentially reaching several atmospheres—rupture can occur if the tensile strength of the integument is exceeded, leading to explosive expulsion of liquefied remains. This process is exacerbated in stranded individuals, where the carcass is exposed to warmer ambient temperatures that accelerate putrefaction compared to deep-sea decomposition. Large body size contributes to the phenomenon's severity in species like sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) and blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus), where volumes exceeding 100 cubic meters allow for substantial gas entrapment before causes surfacing. Unlike smaller marine mammals such as dolphins, where skin may tear earlier, whales' robust can contain gases until critical thresholds, increasing explosion risk during handling or natural . Necropsy protocols recommend precautionary incisions to vent gases, as unaddressed has caused injuries to responders; for instance, in cases of gas differentiation, postmortem gas analysis confirms origins over antemortem . Documented incidents highlight the hazards. On November 28, 2013, in the , a carcass exploded during stomach incision by a , propelling viscera over 50 meters due to pent-up gases. In April 2014, an 81-foot (25-meter) beached in Trout River, Newfoundland, , bloated to double its girth with , prompting evacuation fears of spontaneous rupture amid rising spring temperatures. Similarly, a 2023 fin whale stranding in Ireland was abandoned post-autopsy initiation after audible gut bubbling indicated imminent pressure release, underscoring routine risks in strandings. Such events remain rare relative to strandings—estimated at hundreds annually worldwide—but underscore the need for remote gas venting techniques to mitigate public safety threats.

Swelling and Rupture in Amphibians

In deceased amphibians, particularly those in aquatic or humid environments, postmortem swelling arises primarily from osmotic influx of water through the permeable and the generation of gases by anaerobic . This process begins shortly after , as autolytic enzymes from ruptured cells and invading (e.g., and species) ferment soft tissues, producing gases such as , , , and . The thin, elastic skin and small body size of most amphibians (typically 5–15 cm in length for common species like Rana temporaria) limit the extent of distension compared to larger vertebrates, but bloating can still achieve 1.5–2 times the original volume within 24–48 hours under temperate conditions (10–20°C). Rupture occurs when internal pressure overcomes integumental integrity, often along the ventral midline or cloacal region, expelling liquefied viscera and purge fluids. This is facilitated by the absence of rigid skeletal support in the abdomen and the skin's low tensile strength (yielding at pressures as low as 10–20 kPa in frog species). Documented observations in wild and captive amphibians confirm swelling as a routine postmortem artifact, especially in water where hydrostatic pressure and dissolved oxygen influence bacterial activity rates; however, verified ruptures from pure decomposition—distinct from predation-induced evisceration or disease (e.g., ranavirus edema)—remain anecdotal and underreported, likely due to rapid scavenging and environmental dispersal of remains. In terrestrial species, desiccation may mitigate gas retention, reducing rupture likelihood, whereas aquatic taxa like Xenopus exhibit more pronounced bloating from combined fluid and gas accumulation. Factors accelerating this sequence include warm temperatures (>20°C), high , and prior injury compromising epithelial barriers, which hasten bacterial colonization. Empirical studies on amphibian carrion indicate peak gas production within 1–3 days, correlating with pH drops to 5–6 from byproducts, further softening tissues. While sensational accounts of "exploding frogs" (e.g., , , , involving ~1,000 common toads) were ultimately attributed to corvid predation removing livers and triggering toxic swelling rather than microbial gases, the underlying postmortem mechanisms align with dynamics in unmolested cadavers. No large-scale empirical data quantifies rupture frequency, underscoring the need for forensic research specific to , as current evidence derives from general models and opportunistic field notes.

Human-Engineered Explosions

Weaponization in Warfare

During , several Allied and experimented with weaponizing animals to deliver explosives or incendiary devices against enemy targets, leveraging the animals' natural behaviors for infiltration and surprise. These efforts, often developed under secrecy by units, aimed to disrupt industrial and military infrastructure but frequently encountered logistical and reliability issues. The British (SOE) developed exploding rats in 1941 as a sabotage tool against . Dead rat carcasses were hollowed out and filled with plastic explosives, designed to be smuggled into German coal supplies; when workers shoveled the "rats" into boilers, the explosives would detonate, damaging furnaces and halting production. Approximately 100 such rats were prepared and shipped via neutral countries, but the consignment was intercepted by German authorities, who displayed the rodents publicly to mock British ingenuity, preventing any operational use. In the United States, Project X-Ray, initiated in 1942 under the direction of Lytle Adams (a friend of President ), sought to deploy Mexican free-tailed bats as carriers of incendiary bombs against Japanese cities. Thousands of bats were captured from caves, fitted with timed napalm-filled devices weighing about 1 ounce each, and placed in bomb-shaped clusters dropped from aircraft at dawn; the bats would awaken, scatter, roost in buildings, and ignite widespread fires upon device activation. Tests demonstrated potential for creating up to 1 million separate fires, but accidents—including one that burned down an airfield in —and competition from atomic bomb development led to cancellation in October 1944 after expending around $2 million. The employed extensively from 1941 onward, training strays and other canines to carry 12-25 pounds of explosives strapped to their backs, triggered by a wooden protrusion that detonated upon contact with a 's undercarriage. Handlers starved the dogs and conditioned them to associate food with the smell and noise of tank engines, deploying them against German Panzer divisions during battles like ; estimates suggest hundreds of dogs were used, destroying or disabling several dozen tanks despite frequent failures, such as dogs fleeing back to Soviet lines or detonating prematurely on friendly vehicles due to familiar diesel scents.

Exploding Rats

The exploding rat was a sabotage device devised by the British Special Operations Executive (SOE) during , consisting of rat carcasses hollowed out and packed with plastic explosives. Developed in 1941 at Aston House in , the weapon aimed to disrupt German industrial operations by targeting boilers and locomotives. An SOE officer procured 100 rat carcasses by posing as a medical student, after which the animals were skinned, filled with high explosives, and sewn shut to resemble natural deaths. The intended mechanism relied on German workers' habits: agents would scatter the rigged rats near coal piles used to fuel ship boilers or factory furnaces, anticipating that the rodents would be discarded into the fires alongside the , where the heat would trigger and cause structural damage to the . This low-cost, deniable approach aligned with SOE's broader strategy of unconventional to hinder Nazi production without direct confrontation. No fuses or timers were incorporated, emphasizing simplicity and reliance on enemy routines for activation. A shipment of the exploding rats was intercepted by German forces en route to occupied territories, preventing any operational deployment. Rather than achieving physical destruction, the discovery prompted the Nazis to publicize the devices at military training schools, generating an "extraordinary moral effect" and diverting resources into widespread rat hunts across factories and ports—ironically amplifying disruption beyond the intended sabotage. Declassified SOE files released via the confirm the project's failure in execution but highlight its psychological impact on German morale and .

Accidental Explosions Involving Animals

Industrial and Farm Incidents with Livestock

Incidents of explosions in industrial and settings involving typically arise from the ignition of gas produced through animal digestion or manure decomposition in confined spaces. , a flammable gas, accumulates when ventilation is inadequate, reaching explosive concentrations of 5-15% in air, and can be sparked by electrical equipment, static discharge, or open flames. Such events underscore risks in high-density operations where thousands of animals generate significant volumes daily, though they remain rare relative to total facilities. On January 27, 2014, in Rasdorf, , methane released by approximately 90 dairy cows via belching and ignited in a , causing an that damaged the roof and lightly burned one cow. Police in state attributed the blast to a static or spark from a water boiler, with no human injuries reported. Similar methane-driven events have occurred in pig barns, where anaerobic manure pits produce gas that builds up under low-ventilation conditions. In September 2011, an at a German pig farm killed 1,500 pigs and seriously injured a worker, part of a pattern linked to gas accumulation in intensive facilities. In the United States, foaming in deep-pit operations has triggered multiple explosions since around 2011, as the foam traps high concentrations (50-70%) that ignite during pit agitation or maintenance. One documented case involved a roof being lifted several feet, propelling a 30-40 feet from the entrance, with fires spreading rapidly due to the gas release. These incidents, concentrated in the , highlight how dietary factors like exacerbate foam formation, increasing explosion hazards in large-scale hog confinement. No fatalities among animals or workers were specified in early reports, but the events prompted research into ventilation and foam management.

Notable Cow Cases

In Rasdorf, , on January 27, 2014, methane gas emitted by approximately 90 cows accumulated in a cowshed, reaching flammable concentrations before igniting via a static and causing an that damaged the roof and injured one cow with a leg wound. Each cow produces up to 500 liters of methane daily through , and poor ventilation in the structure contributed to the gas buildup, as confirmed by local police investigations. No human injuries occurred, and the incident underscored risks of methane accumulation in confined spaces. Near Birdseye, , in 1907, a cow strayed onto an unsecured claim and ingested 19 sticks of stored for prospecting operations. The occurred when the animal began ruminating and chewing its , which likely triggered the unstable explosives, resulting in the cow's head being severed and partial of the carcass. Historical accounts from local miners valued the lost and the cow at around $45 combined, highlighting early 20th-century challenges with wildlife accessing hazardous materials in remote areas. At the South Fork Dairy farm in , on April 10, 2023, an engine fire in a ignited combustible materials, leading to a rapid and blaze that killed an estimated 18,000 cows—representing about 3% of 's dairy herd—and critically injured one worker via burns. Investigations by the State determined the initial cause as accidental equipment failure, with potential exacerbation from and gases in manure lagoons, though no evidence of was found; this event stands as the deadliest single barn fire involving livestock in U.S. recorded history.

Scientific Explanations and Debunking

Physiological and Chemical Mechanisms

In decomposing animal carcasses, anaerobic bacteria such as Clostridium species initiate putrefaction by fermenting proteins and carbohydrates in tissues, producing gases including methane (CH₄), carbon dioxide (CO₂), hydrogen (H₂), and hydrogen sulfide (H₂S). These gases accumulate internally, causing the body to bloat as internal pressure rises against the skin and integument, which can stretch to several times its original volume before rupturing if the carcass integrity is compromised by incisions, decay weakening, or external trauma. In marine mammals like whales, the thick blubber layer traps gases more effectively, exacerbating distension; documented cases, such as a 2019 sperm whale beaching in Tasmania, showed bloating from bacterial fermentation leading to spontaneous rupture upon minimal disturbance. Physiologically, live amphibians exhibit a defensive mechanism where they gulp air or water to distend the body, increasing apparent size to deter predators via hydrostatic pressure from the or body cavity expansion. In the 2005 Hamburg incidents, corvids pecked out livers—organs that regulate metabolic balance and processing—prompting uncontrolled ; without hepatic regulation, blood vessels and lungs ruptured through the entry wound, expelling viscera in a burst-like manner rather than true force. This process lacks chemical but mimics mechanically, as the toad's respiratory muscles continue pumping air post-injury until tissue failure. Chemical realism underscores that no verified cases involve ignition or rapid oxidation leading to ; instead, ruptures stem from gradual gas diffusion exceeding tensile strength of organic barriers, with H₂S contributing toxicity but not flammability under ambient conditions. In ruminants like cows, rumen normally produces via methanogenic , but pathological bloat (tympanites) from frothy impediments can cause fatal ; explosions are anecdotal and unverified physiologically, typically requiring post-mortem gas escalation. Empirical data from veterinary confirm thresholds around 10-20 kPa for rupture, far below velocities.

Common Misconceptions and Verified Causes

A prevalent misconception is that beached carcasses routinely explode violently due to unchecked internal gas pressure, as sensationalized in media accounts. In fact, while bacterial decomposition generates and other gases causing significant bloating, the whale's thick typically develops small fissures that permit gradual venting, rendering dramatic explosions infrequent and often requiring external disturbance to occur. A documented natural rupture happened in on January 13, 2004, when a carcass split open from accumulated gases during transport, but such events remain exceptional rather than normative. Similarly, reports of mass toad explosions, such as the April 2005 episode near , , where approximately 1,000 common toads (Bufo bufo) swelled to three times normal size before bursting over several days, were initially ascribed to viral infections, fungal pathogens, or even suicidal behavior. Investigations revealed the cause as predation by (Corvus corone), which learned to excise toad livers with precise strikes; the wounded toads then inflated defensively by gulping air to deter further attacks, leading to skin rupture from overextension. No evidence supported infectious agents or toxins as primary drivers. Verified physiological causes center on gas accumulation exceeding structural tolerances. In ruminants like , ruminal tympany—or bloat—arises from rapid of or wet forages producing frothy and that trap in the , potentially rupturing the if unvented; farmers mitigate this via trochar insertion. A related incident on January 26, 2014, in Rasdorf, , involved ignited cow causing a barn , injuring one cow but stemming from static discharge rather than individual rupture. For larger cadavers, such as marine mammals, anaerobic bacterial action post-mortem yields biogenic gases that distend tissues until seams fail, though rarely achieves without confinement or puncture. These mechanisms underscore causal chains of and biomechanical limits, absent in unsubstantiated claims of spontaneous from stress or diet alone.

References

  1. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/22661/
  2. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0300985816629720
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6231895/
  4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51368402_The_Chemistry_of_Exploding_Ants_Camponotus_SPP_Cylindricus_COMPLEX
  5. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1463-6395.2011.00523.x
  6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000042063.01424.28
  7. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/exploding-blue-whales
  8. https://letstalkscience.ca/educational-resources/stem-explained/can-whales-really-explode
  9. https://www.theverge.com/2014/5/2/5674734/why-do-dead-whales-explode
  10. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2020.00333/full
  11. https://blog.education.nationalgeographic.org/2014/05/01/beached-blue-bloated/
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3366475/
  13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSKV84oqOTo
  14. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-27263956
  15. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/canadian-town-worries-about-exploding-whale-180951268/
  16. https://www.businessinsider.com/beached-fin-whale-explosion-ireland-shore-animal-autopsy-2023-7
  17. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/etimes/trending/what-is-whale-explosion-and-how-does-it-impact-the-water-body/articleshow/116316462.cms
  18. https://www.froglife.org/info-advice/frequently-asked-questions/frogs-toads-injury-illness-or-death/
  19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20375836/
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281910094_Processes_and_Mechanisms_of_Death_and_Decomposition_of_Vertebrate_Carrion
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5310619/
  22. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna7654561
  23. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/oct/27/richardnortontaylor
  24. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/bat-bombs-wwiis-project-x-ray/
  25. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/1090bats/
  26. https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-history/how-anti-tank-dogs-helped-advance-soviet-forces/
  27. https://www.warhistoryonline.com/world-war-ii/anti-tank-dogs-scared-weapon.html
  28. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/wwtwo/soe_gallery_05.shtml
  29. https://www.hazardexonthenet.net/article/69470/German-cow-flatulence-causes-cowshed-explosion.aspx
  30. https://porkcheckoff.org/research/deep-pit-swine-facility-flash-fires-and-explosions-sources-occurrences-factors-and-management/
  31. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/gassy-german-cows-blamed-for-barn-explosion/
  32. https://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyle/flatulent-cows-start-fire-at-german-dairy-farm-police-idUSBREA0Q1HZ/
  33. https://nautil.us/the-curious-case-of-the-exploding-pig-farms-234669/
  34. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/mysterious-exploding-foam-is-bursting-barns-124424083/
  35. https://www.wired.com/2012/03/hog-manure-foam/
  36. https://modernfarmer.com/2014/03/little-progress-mystery-exploding-pig-poop/
  37. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25922514
  38. https://apnews.com/gassy-german-cows-blamed-for-barn-explosion-c1934ce04da34e7e8496e6e1b9c81206
  39. https://cowboystatedaily.com/2024/12/14/wyoming-history-that-time-in-1907-a-cow-ate-19-sticks-of-dynamite-and-exploded/
  40. https://www.texastribune.org/2023/05/19/cows-dairy-farm-texas-investigation/
  41. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2023/12/27/18000-cows-dead-fire-south-fork-dairy-dimmitt-texas/72005659007/
  42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7353809/
  43. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2005/04/29/exploding-german-toads-baffle-scientists/777a5b80-8109-4762-b00b-59214e2c7b25/
  44. https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/europe/stone-the-crows-exploding-toad-case-solved-5345207.html
  45. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2021/6632654
  46. https://www.ck12.org/flexi/biology/aquatic-organisms/why-do-whales-explode-when-they-die/
  47. https://nowiknow.com/the-mystery-of-the-exploding-toads/
  48. https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/tummy-trouble/
  49. https://animals.howstuffworks.com/mammals/beached-whales-explode.htm
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.