Hubbry Logo
Flare gunFlare gunMain
Open search
Flare gun
Community hub
Flare gun
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Flare gun
Flare gun
Flare gun
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
An Orion-brand single-shot, breech-loaded, 12 gauge flare gun. Its design is typical of commercially available flare guns, with a high-visibility red casing.
Patel Gun
A single-shot, 26.5/25 mm flare gun manufactured by Patel Ballistics. It is chambered in a different caliber from the Orion flare gun.

A flare gun, also known as a Very pistol or signal pistol, is a large-bore handgun that discharges flares, blanks and smoke. The flare gun is typically used to produce a distress signal.

Types

[edit]

The most common type of flare gun is a Very (sometimes spelled Verey),[1] which was named after Edward Wilson Very (1847–1910), an American naval officer who developed and popularized a single-shot breech-loading snub-nosed pistol that fired flares (Very lights).[2] They have a single action trigger mechanism, hammer action, and a center fire pin.[3] Modern varieties are frequently made out of durable plastic of a bright colour that makes them more conspicuous and easier to retrieve in an emergency and assists in distinguishing them from conventional firearms.

British 1" calibre Very pistol used in World War I

The Very pistol, typical of the type used in the Second World War, have a bore diameter of 1.04 inches (26.5 mm), commonly referred to as a "one inch bore" for short, now known as "Calibre 4" for signal pistols.[4][5] These are still available and more recent longer-barrel models can also fire parachute flares.[6] Many newer models fire smaller 12-gauge (18.5 mm) flares.[5] In countries where possession of firearms is strictly controlled, such as the United Kingdom, the use of Very pistols as emergency equipment on boats is less common than, for example, the United States; in the U.K. flare guns are regulated as a firearm and require a firearms license, which are typically only granted to masters of larger vessels and harbormasters.[7] In such locations, distress flares are more commonly fired from single-shot tube devices which are then disposed of after use. These devices are fired by twisting or striking a pad on one end, but the contents are otherwise similar to a round from a flare gun, although the flares themselves are much larger and can burn brighter for longer.[8] In the Russian Federation, which also has strict controls on firearms, a special tube-shaped flare launching device called a "Hunter's Signal" (Сигнал Охотника) is available. This is reusable but is deliberately designed in a way to avoid resemblance to a gun.[9]

Flare guns may be used whenever someone needs to send a distress signal. The flares must be shot directly above, making the signal visible for a longer period of time and revealing the position of whoever is in need of assistance. There are four distinct flare calibers: 12-gauge (18.53 mm), 25 mm, 26.5 mm, and 37 mm – the first three being the most popular for boaters.[5]

Use as weapons

[edit]
A Molins No.2 Mk.5, 1-inch calibre Very pistol, c. 1940, made by I.L. Berridge Ltd.

Flare guns may be used for the destruction of inflammable material, or in an anti-personnel role.[10][11][12]

Pocket mortars

[edit]

In World War II, Germany manufactured grenades designed to be fired from adapted flare guns known as the Sturmpistole in its final form. Fragmentation rounds and anti-tank HEAT warheads were produced for the pistol, however the latter only had 80 mm of penetration (RHA) requiring it to be either fired on lightly armoured targets or used on the sides and rears of heavily armoured targets such as the late-war tanks that were beginning to enter service.[13]

The Soviets developed the Baranov pocket mortar during 1943, which fired a 175 g round with an 8 g explosive charge out to a range of 200-350 m (it was also proposed to increase this to 600-700 m).[14] A later development was the PSA/PSA-1/ASP, a copy of the US issue M8 flare pistol. This fired an experimental grenade which was 40% more powerful than that used with the Kampfpistole.[15][16]

Conversion kits

[edit]

Conversion kits are available intended to convert flare guns to accept conventional ammunition by use of barrel inserts. There are also 12 gauge inserts intended to allow use of rifle or pistol ammunition in conventional 12 gauge shotguns. Use of any of these devices in the Orion plastic 12 gauge flare gun is not recommended by the manufacturer and ATF tests have demonstrated that sometimes a single use results in a catastrophic failure. In the United States, if these conversion kits are used in a metal flare gun, the converted gun is considered to be a firearm by the ATF. If a rifled barrel insert is used, the converted firearm is classified as a pistol; if a smoothbore barrel insert is used, the converted firearm is classified as an AOW subject to the additional requirements of the NFA.[17] Flare cartridges are low pressure compared to conventional ammunition and even metal flare guns are not designed or intended to be used with conventional ammunition. Conversion of a flare gun to fire conventional ammunition may also be restricted by local improvised firearm laws.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Flare gun

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A flare gun, also known as a Very pistol or signal pistol, is a single-shot, breech-loading handgun-like device designed to fire pyrotechnic cartridges that launch signal flares for visual distress signaling, illumination, or tactical communication. Invented by U.S. Navy Lieutenant Edward W. Very in the 1870s, the device was patented as an improvement in signal cartridges (U.S. Patent No. 190,263, May 1, 1877) and adopted by the Navy in 1882 for maritime signaling with colored flares. Flare guns typically feature break-action or hinged barrels for loading cartridges in calibers such as 12 gauge, 25 mm, 26.5 mm, or 37 mm, propelling the flare payload to altitudes of 300 to 1,000 feet where it burns brightly for 30 to 60 seconds, often under a parachute for enhanced visibility over several miles. Widely used in naval, aviation, and survival contexts during the World Wars and beyond, flare guns are approved by the U.S. Coast Guard as visual distress signals for vessels, though modern alternatives like EPIRBs have supplemented but not fully replaced them due to flares' reliability in direct line-of-sight scenarios.

History

Origins and Early Development

The earliest signal pistols, precursors to modern flare guns, emerged during the to enable reliable pyrotechnic signaling for military coordination, particularly at night or in poor visibility. In 1861, the U.S. Army adopted a percussion signal , approximately 9 inches long with an 11/16-inch bore, designed to ignite pyrotechnic flares via a or . This was followed in by a shorter 6-inch model manufactured by William Marston of New York, inscribed "U.S. ARMY SIGNAL PISTOL 1862," specifically engineered to launch Martha Coston's patented pyrotechnic flares for emitting colored lights in distress or communication codes. Coston's innovations built on earlier 1846 advancements by J. Rodgers in colored flares housed in metal containers, addressing the limitations of unreliable hand-held or rocket-based signals that predated systematic pyrotechnic use in warfare. Martha Coston secured a U.S. for a percussion-ignited signal on April 5, 1869, refining the mechanism to more dependably fire her self-contained "Coston Lights" cartridges, which produced timed sequences of red, white, and green illuminations visible for miles. These early pistols marked a shift from ad-hoc —rooted in 17th-century European and developments—to dedicated handguns that elevated flares for broader dispersal and reduced ground clutter, enhancing causal effectiveness in signaling over open water or battlefields. The U.S. Navy variant of 1861, distinct in its 10/16-inch bore, paralleled Army models and saw use in Union maritime operations, demonstrating empirical advantages in coordination during the Civil War. A pivotal advancement occurred in 1877 when U.S. Navy Edward W. Very patented signal cartridge improvements (U.S. 190,263, May 1, 1877), introducing self-contained, large-bore rounds that simplified loading and firing while producing brighter, longer-burning flares. The resulting "Very pistol," a rugged, typically in 1-inch , became the archetypal flare gun, prioritizing and for maritime distress signals and coastal defense. By the late , this design influenced international adoption, with European navies producing variants for export and police use, setting the stage for standardized integration before 1914. These developments underscored a trajectory toward devices optimized for verifiable and minimal mechanical failure, driven by naval imperatives rather than broader civilian needs.

Military Applications in World Wars

In , flare guns, commonly known as Very pistols after their inventor Edward W. Very, served primarily as signaling devices across major combatants to facilitate communication in environments where radio was limited or prohibited. British forces employed the No. 1 Mk III signal pistol, manufactured from 1916 onward, to fire flares equipped with whistles that produced audible signals for commanding movements, such as advances or retreats from trenches. These pistols, typically in 1-inch (25.4 mm) caliber, launched colored flares—red for alarm, green for all clear, and white for illumination—to mark enemy positions, request support, or signal aircraft for reconnaissance and bombing runs. The United States military adopted the Mark IV Very pistol, a brass 25 mm single-shot device directly modeled on the French M1917 pattern, for both ground and air service use starting in 1917. American Expeditionary Forces utilized these for battlefield signaling with pyrotechnic cartridges, enabling coordination of infantry assaults, distress calls under radio silence, and illumination of no-man's-land during night operations. German forces relied on the earlier Hebel Model 1894 Leuchtpistole, a 27 mm flare gun, for analogous roles including trench signaling and aerial identification, reflecting the widespread standardization of such tools due to their simplicity and effectiveness in pre-electronic warfare. During , flare guns retained their core signaling functions but saw expanded applications, including adaptations for combat roles amid resource constraints. The U.S. military standardized the AN-M8 flare pistol, a lightweight aluminum 25 mm model, for aircraft crews to discharge recognition signals, emergency flares, and target illumination, enhancing coordination and search-and-rescue operations. British RAF pilots fired Very lights—colored flares from signal pistols—to identify friendly aircraft to ground anti-aircraft batteries, preventing incidents during intense air campaigns like the in 1940. German units deployed the Walther and later , both 27 mm steel-frame pistols produced from the 1930s through 1945, for ground-to-air signaling, flare deployment to light battlefields, and distress indications. In a notable innovation driven by shortages of dedicated anti-tank weapons, the Germans modified signal pistols into the or , chambered for grenade rounds like the , allowing infantry to engage armored vehicles at short ranges up to 100 meters during defensive actions on the Eastern and Western Fronts from onward. This adaptation, while limited by the pistol's low velocity and accuracy, demonstrated the versatility of gun designs under wartime exigencies, though it was overshadowed by rifle-launched alternatives. Multi-barrel variants, such as the four-barrel Gebrüder Rempt , supported rapid airfield illumination for night landings.

Post-War Civilian Adoption and Evolution

Following , surplus military flare pistols, including 1-inch (25.4 mm) models from Allied and Axis forces, flooded civilian markets at low cost, facilitating widespread adoption for non-military signaling. These devices, originally designed for and distress calls, were repurposed by boaters, pilots, and hunters seeking reliable visual alerts in remote or emergency scenarios. , the boom in recreational boating and amplified demand, as surplus guns like the U.S. Navy's or captured German Leuchtpistole Z were acquired through dealers and outdoors suppliers. U.S. Coast Guard regulations mandating visual distress signals on certain vessels further entrenched flare guns in civilian maritime use, with requirements evolving from voluntary recommendations in the 1940s to formalized rules by the 1960s for coastal and inland waters, later expanding in 1981 to boats 16 feet and longer on the . Aviation authorities similarly endorsed them for small aircraft survival kits, emphasizing their ability to project flares up to 1,000 feet for visibility over miles. Hunters adopted them for backcountry signaling, often pairing with parachute flares lasting 5-7 seconds at 1,000 or more, reducing response times in search-and-rescue operations. Evolution shifted toward civilian-optimized designs, such as the post-1945 Olin 25 mm Marine Signal Flare Launcher, which prioritized resistance and simplicity for marine environments. By the , 12-gauge flare adapters emerged, allowing standard shotguns to launch signals, broadening accessibility without dedicated pistols; these used shotshells with pyrotechnic payloads for 300-500 foot altitudes. nations introduced minor variants like the Czech vz. 44/67, copies of Soviet SPSh-44, for export to markets, while Western manufacturers focused on brighter, longer-burning compliant with safety standards. Despite electronic alternatives like EPIRBs gaining traction from the , pyrotechnic guns persisted due to their low cost (under $100 for basic models) and proven reliability in low-visibility conditions, though with mandates for flare replacement every 42 months to ensure efficacy.

Technical Design and Operation

Core Mechanism and Firing Process

Flare guns utilize a rudimentary firing mechanism akin to oversized handguns, featuring a smoothbore barrel, a pivoting or break-action breech for cartridge insertion, a spring-loaded hammer or striker, a firing pin, and a trigger-linked sear. Common calibers include 12 gauge, 25 mm, and 26.5 mm to accommodate pyrotechnic signal cartridges containing a primer, propellant charge, and flare payload. The design prioritizes simplicity and reliability for emergency use, with the barrel often elevating to 45 degrees or more upon firing to maximize projectile height. The firing sequence commences with loading a primed cartridge into the open breech, followed by closing and latching the barrel to seal the chamber. In single-action configurations, the user manually cocks the , compressing a that stores energy to drive the . Pulling the trigger disengages the sear, releasing the to propel the into the cartridge primer, which explodes to ignite the black powder or smokeless . This rapidly generates gas pressure—typically reaching several thousand psi—ejecting the from the barrel at muzzle velocities of 100-200 m/s. Upon launch, the projectile's integrated delay fuse or activates an expulsion charge, separating any or dispersing the igniter to combust the pyrotechnic mixture, producing intense output visible up to 40 km under optimal conditions. In mechanisms like that patented in US 3,044,360, the operates within a guided tube backed by an expansive , cocked via a downward for consistent primer strike . Variations exist, such as centerfire pins in some military models, but the process universally relies on controlled rather than high-velocity for propulsion.

Flare Cartridge Specifications and Physics

Flare cartridges for signal pistols, commonly chambered in 26.5 mm (Calibre 4), feature a or aluminum case approximately 80 mm in length and 26.5 mm in diameter, containing a primer, black powder-based lifting , a delay fuse, an ejection charge, a , and a for illumination. The cartridge weight varies by color, ranging from 38 g for red or green variants to 62 g for types, with net content between 13 g and 26.5 g. Upon firing, the primer ignites the lifting charge, generating gas that propels the from the short barrel (typically 100-150 mm) at a of around 40-50 m/s, far lower than conventional due to the small quantity and unrifled bore designed for pyrotechnic loads rather than high-velocity projectiles. This low- design (often under 10,000 psi) prevents in lightweight pistol frames made of aluminum or . The projectile follows a parabolic ballistic trajectory influenced by launch angle, gravity, and minimal air resistance from its streamlined shape, reaching an apex height of 100 m ±20 m when fired at 45-60 degrees elevation for optimal visibility. At the apex, a timed delay fuse (typically 3-5 seconds post-launch) activates the ejection charge, deploying a small parachute to slow descent and stabilize the flare while igniting the pyrotechnic payload, which burns for 8 ±1.5 seconds with luminous intensities exceeding 10,000 candela (cd) for green, 30,000 cd for red, and 40,000 cd for white signals. The pyrotechnic burn relies on oxidizer-fuel mixtures (e.g., strontium salts for red light via chemiluminescence and incandescence, or magnesium for white), producing visible spectrum output for daytime/nighttime signaling, with effective visibility up to 7-10 km at night depending on atmospheric conditions. Variations exist across calibers, such as 12-gauge shotgun-compatible flares, which use shotshell hulls with similar but adapted for longer barrels, achieving comparable heights but with adjusted propellant for higher chamber pressures in sporting arms. variants incorporate a charge for a loud (up to 170 dB at 3 m) and , prioritizing auditory and visual cues over sustained illumination. Trajectory predictability is enhanced by the projectile's from barrel (if present) or fins, minimizing deviation, though wind can displace the descent path by 50-100 m.
ColorAscent HeightBurn TimeLuminous IntensityNet Explosive Content
100 m ±20 m8 s>30,000 cd15 g
100 m ±20 m8 s>40,000 cd26.5 g
Green100 m ±20 m8 s>10,000 cd15 g
120 mN/A (flash)Flash/smoke/report13 g
Data averaged from manufacturer specifications; actual performance varies by model and conditions.

Material and Construction Variations

Early flare guns relied on durable metals to withstand repeated use and environmental exposure. The U.S. Army Model 1862 Percussion Signal , for example, incorporated a barrel, iron components, and wood grips for structural integrity and ergonomic handling. German Leuchtpistolen from the Wars featured steel construction with forged leaf springs and hand-fitted assemblies, emphasizing reliability in military contexts despite added weight. Some period designs, like the Skylar Signal Flare , used alloys for inherent resistance in marine settings. Contemporary designs shift toward lighter alloys and synthetics to reduce mass while maintaining functionality, given the low-pressure nature of flare propulsion. Aluminum and hybrids offer resistance and longevity for versatile applications, including maritime distress signaling. frames dominate in 12-gauge models, such as those from Orion, as the modest firing pressures—far below those of standard ammunition—permit non-metallic barrels without risk of rupture, yielding buoyant, rust-proof tools ideal for recreational boating. These plastic variants are compact and cost-effective, often weighing under 1 pound unloaded. In larger calibers like 25mm or 26.5mm, metallic persists for superior impact resistance and precision in or tactical roles, contrasting the fragility of polymers under abuse. Certain commercial iterations employ die-cast metal for reinforced against drops or saltwater immersion. Overall, material choices reflect trade-offs: metals prioritize ruggedness for professional use, while polymers favor portability and economy for civilian kits, with no empirical data indicating failure rates exceeding those of legacy models when used as intended.

Types and Variants

Single-Shot Signal Pistols

signal pistols represent the foundational design of flare guns, consisting of simple, breech-loading handguns engineered to propel a single pyrotechnic cartridge upward for over distances. These devices feature a hinged or break-open barrel that allows loading of one cartridge at a time, followed by manual cocking and trigger activation to ignite the primer and launch the flare via internal ballistics similar to a . The mechanism prioritizes reliability in adverse conditions, with robust construction to withstand from low-velocity, high-drag projectiles designed for aerial burn time rather than penetration. Originating in the late 19th century, the archetype was the Very pistol, developed by U.S. Navy Edward W. Very around 1877 to fire specialized signal lights for maritime and military communication. Early models employed a 1.5-inch (38 mm) caliber to accommodate "Very lights," which provided colored illumination for up to several minutes at altitudes exceeding 1,000 feet. British adaptations, such as the No. 1 Mk III introduced circa 1915, utilized a 1-inch (25 mm) bore with brass barrel and frame for corrosion resistance in naval environments, weighing approximately 1.5 pounds unloaded and featuring a 4.1-inch barrel length. The Mk III* variant, produced during , incorporated a flanged muzzle extension to shield the operator's hand from flare heat during firing. Caliber standardization varied by nation and era, with 26.5 mm emerging as prevalent in European and Allied forces during the World Wars for compatibility with illumination, smoke, and parachute flares reaching 300-600 meters in height. Post-war civilian versions often adopted 12-gauge shotgun shells for broader ammunition availability, enabling distress signals visible up to 5-10 miles under clear conditions, though empirical tests show effectiveness diminishes in or due to light scattering. German Leuchtpistole models, like the Walther LP 34 from 1926, maintained single-shot configurations in 26.5 mm, emphasizing stamped steel construction for . Operational specifications typically include a barrel to minimize spin on fin-stabilized flares, with firing pins striking centerfire primers for consistent ignition. Safety features, such as manual hammers or extractors, prevent premature discharge, though incidents arise from improper angling—optimal launch requires 70-90 degrees to achieve parabolic trajectories maximizing hang time. Modern replicas, like the 26.5 mm pistol, replicate these dimensions with 7.9-inch overall length and 18.6-ounce weight, confirming ballistic performance akin to originals through unchanged charges of 1-2 grams yielding muzzle velocities around 70-100 m/s.

Multi-Shot and Launcher Models

Multi-shot flare guns deviate from the predominant single-shot design, enabling sequential firing of multiple signals without immediate reloading, which proved advantageous in military contexts demanding rapid illumination or communication, such as airfield lighting or naval coordination. These models typically employ clustered barrels or rotary mechanisms rather than traditional revolver cylinders, reflecting engineering adaptations for pyrotechnic payloads incompatible with standard firearm reloading systems. Historical examples emerged during World War I and interwar periods, while contemporary variants prioritize capacity for tactical or survival applications. The Gebrüder Rempt four-barrel flare pistol, developed in 1917 for the Imperial German military, exemplifies early multi-shot innovation. Contracted for 2,500 units and produced by multiple firms including Gebrüder Rempt, it featured detachable clusters of four 25 mm barrels, with eight clusters supplied per unit to facilitate quick swaps for sustained fire. Designed primarily for airfield illumination using high-volume flares, its robust construction allowed deployment in static positions, though fewer than 24 examples survive today, underscoring limited field endurance or post-war attrition. Japanese naval forces adopted the Nambu Type 90 signal in , available in double- and triple-barrel configurations for 28 mm flares, marking a progression from earlier single- and double-barrel prototypes introduced in 1927. The triple-barrel variant, manufactured by firms like Kayaba, incorporated spring-loaded recoil absorption via a sliding track, enabling shipboard use for distress signaling or direction amid the Imperial Japanese Navy's expansion. These pistols emphasized portability despite their bulk, with the Type 90 designation deriving from the imperial year 2590, and served through for visual communication in fleet operations. Modern launcher models, often classified under 37 mm specifications, extend multi-shot capability into civilian, , and domains, with designs like the 6-shot rotary or top-break launchers accommodating flares, smoke signals, or non-lethal rounds. The 37 mm multi-shot top-break launcher, for instance, supports rapid deployment of up to six rounds in tactical scenarios, featuring smooth-bore barrels for pyrotechnic compatibility and modular construction for accessory integration. Similarly, rotary variants such as the Skylighter 6-shot model accept 5-inch signal cartridges, prioritizing high-capacity signaling over lethal intent, though their unregulated status in some jurisdictions stems from flare-specific bore dimensions distinguishing them from destructive devices. These launchers trace regulatory lineage to adaptations like the LMT M203 flare variant but innovate with multi-chamber systems for prolonged engagements without detachment. Production emphasizes durability in aluminum or , with effective ranges up to several hundred meters for aerial flares, though empirical data on widespread adoption remains sparse due to niche demand.

Caliber-Specific Designs

Flare guns exhibit caliber-specific designs optimized for pyrotechnic cartridge compatibility, launch velocity, and application demands, with predominant sizes including 12-gauge (18.5 mm), 25 mm, 26.5 mm, and 37 mm. These calibers reflect historical standardization and modern adaptations, where barrel dimensions and breech mechanisms accommodate distinct cartridge geometries to ensure safe ignition and aerial deployment. The 12-gauge configuration, prevalent in post-war civilian and maritime models, repurposes shotgun shell casings for distress flares, featuring short-barreled, pistols with die-cast aluminum or steel construction for resistance in marine environments. Cartridges typically propel payloads to 300-500 feet at 16,000 for 6-7 seconds, with launchers like the Orion model incorporating safety interlocks to prevent premature discharge. This caliber's design leverages widespread infrastructure, enabling cost-effective production but limiting it to lower-pressure compared to dedicated signaling rounds. In contrast, 26.5 mm flare pistols, rooted in and II military signaling tools such as the British Very pistol and German , utilize barrels of approximately 1-inch (25.4-26.65 mm) diameter with break-action or simple breech-loading mechanisms to fire elongated plastic or brass-cased cartridges measuring 80 mm in length. These designs prioritize high-altitude projection—often exceeding 200 meters—for illumination or distress, with the caliber's prevalence stemming from early 20th-century standardization across Allied and Axis forces, though modern variants like the /AC Unity maintain single-shot capacity at weights around 0.5 kg for portability. The slight dimensional variance, such as German "Caliber 4" at 26.65 mm, underscores interoperability challenges in surplus markets. Larger 37 mm launchers, akin to line-throwing or less-lethal platforms, feature extended barrels and modular frames to handle heavier flare payloads or hybrid rounds, accommodating diverse like parachuted signals for extended burn times. Meanwhile, 25 mm variants, sometimes cross-compatible with 26.5 mm in pistols like historical French models, offer a transitional for or kits, though less common in contemporary production due to regulatory preferences for 12-gauge universality. Empirical testing reveals that choice directly influences and visibility, with smaller bores favoring precision signaling over payload volume.

Primary Applications

Maritime Distress Signaling

Flare guns, also known as signal pistols, have been employed in maritime distress signaling since the late to alert nearby vessels or shore stations of emergencies at sea. U.S. Navy Edward W. Very developed the first practical line-throwing and signal in 1877, which facilitated pyrotechnic communication between ships when other methods were limited, particularly at night or in poor visibility. These devices launch aerial flares that provide high visibility, with red-colored projectiles indicating distress as standardized in international maritime protocols. Under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), merchant vessels must carry pyrotechnic distress signals, including rocket parachute flares launched via signal pistols, to ensure compliance with visual signaling requirements for operations. SOLAS mandates at least 12 rocket parachute flares per lifeboat and boat, capable of reaching altitudes exceeding 300 meters and burning for at least 40 seconds to maximize detection range, often visible from over 10 nautical miles under optimal conditions. Common calibers for maritime signal pistols include 26.5 mm (Calibre 4), which fire self-contained red parachute or meteor cartridges designed for distress, while white cartridges serve for collision avoidance. In U.S. regulations for recreational vessels over 16 feet, at least three approved pyrotechnic devices, such as pistol-launched parachute flares, are required for night use, complementing electronic aids like EPIRBs. Parachute flares launched from signal pistols remain effective for precise location marking in maritime rescues, particularly in scenarios where electronic signals may fail or require visual confirmation, with pyrotechnics providing immediate, line-of-sight illumination over wide areas. Empirical tests show these flares achieve burn times of 40 seconds at peak altitudes, outperforming handheld variants in visibility distance, though their short duration necessitates multiple firings for sustained alerting. Despite advancements in satellite-based systems, flares retain regulatory primacy for short-range, verifiable signaling, as they compel direct observer response upon sighting. Other calibers, such as 12-gauge or 25 mm, are used in some regions for compatible aerial meteor or parachute shells, offering versatility but requiring vessel-specific approval.

Aviation and Terrestrial Survival Uses

Flare guns serve as critical signaling tools in survival kits, particularly for pilots and passengers following crashes in remote or overwater environments. Pistol-launched parachute flares, such as those specified under 46 CFR 160.024, propel pyrotechnic payloads to altitudes exceeding 1,000 feet, providing sustained red illumination visible for several miles during both day and night operations. The Federal Aviation Administration's 91-58A endorses these devices for distress signaling when rescue assets are anticipated nearby, emphasizing their ability to achieve greater altitude and duration compared to hand-held alternatives, though effectiveness diminishes in high winds or adverse weather. Historical military applications, including World War II-era kits, integrated flare pistols for downed to mark positions for search . In , flare guns complement electronic beacons like ELTs by offering visual confirmation of survivor locations, with recommendations for inclusion in overwater equipment under FAA guidelines for flights beyond 50 nautical miles from shore. Vietnam-era kits, such as the SEEK system, incorporated compact pen-style flare guns to fire signals aiding evasion and in hostile terrain. For terrestrial , flare guns enable users—including hikers, hunters, and off-road travelers—to transmit distress signals across obstructed like dense forests or mountains, where ground-based is limited. Devices like the Orion 12-gauge flare pistol, compatible with aerial cartridges, are recommended for such kits due to their portability and ability to project signals upward for detection from afar. These tools are valued for dual-purpose utility in resource-scarce environments, potentially serving as fire starters if signals fail to attract immediate aid. Signal visibility typically extends 3 to 5 miles under optimal conditions, with red parachute variants prioritizing nighttime efficacy through prolonged burn times of 30 seconds to several minutes. Survival protocols stress firing multiple rounds in sequence toward visible aircraft or along expected search paths to maximize empirical detection rates, as single shots may be obscured by terrain or foliage. Inclusion in personal kits aligns with broader recommendations for signaling alongside mirrors and whistles, enhancing overall rescue probabilities in isolated land scenarios.

Military and Tactical Signaling

Signal pistols, commonly known as flare guns, have served military purposes since the late , primarily for visual communication in low-visibility conditions or over extended ranges where was required. The Very pistol, developed by U.S. Edward Wilson Very (1847–1910), represented an early standardized design for launching pyrotechnic flares to indicate positions, request resupply, or coordinate maneuvers. This handgun-style launcher fired 1.5-inch caliber cartridges, enabling rapid deployment of colored or white lights visible for miles, thus facilitating ground-to-air or ship-to-shore signaling without electronic dependency. In , Allied and forces integrated flare pistols into tactics for battlefield illumination and enemy observation. British troops used models to discharge Verey lights over , aiding night raids and artillery spotting, with examples recovered from the 1916 attesting to their frontline utility. During , the U.S. AN-M8 aircraft signal pistol supported emergency ejections and survival signaling, while ground units employed similar devices for marking drop zones and directing . German and Japanese militaries adapted flare guns for reconnaissance flares and anti-aircraft identification, leveraging parachute-suspended payloads for prolonged visibility up to 10,000 feet altitude. Modern tactical applications emphasize discreet, low-tech signaling in and contested environments, where flare guns designate targets for precision strikes or illuminate areas for assaults. U.S. forces continue using 25mm and 40mm signal pistols, often with rifle-mounted launchers like the adapter, for illumination rounds burning at 65,000 for 40 seconds. These devices provide causal advantages in electronic warfare scenarios by avoiding spectrum emissions, though empirical data from conflicts like highlight risks of inadvertent fires from descending flares. In doctrine, colored flares enable coded messages for extraction or , maintaining operational security against signal intercepts.

Safety and Risks

Handling Hazards and Empirical Incident Data

Handling flare guns involves significant risks due to their pyrotechnic nature, including potential for severe burns from the hot barrel immediately after discharge, which can exceed 500°C, and from the itself, which burns at temperatures up to 2,000°C and is difficult to extinguish with . Misfires or improper loading can result in cartridge rupture within the chamber, causing fragmentation and lacerations to the user, while accidental ignition of stored flares poses hazards in confined spaces like vessels. Pyrotechnic signals also release toxic fumes and require secure storage away from heat sources to prevent or degradation leading to unreliable performance. Empirical data on flare gun incidents reveal a pattern of rare but high-severity outcomes, often tied to misuse rather than routine handling failures, with limited aggregate statistics available due to classification challenges distinguishing them from general non-powder injuries. High-velocity flare guns, akin to certain non-powder firearms, have been associated with fatalities; for instance, a 2025 incident in , involved a juvenile fatally a man in the chest with a flare gun, and a similar 2021 case in , resulted in death from a modified flare gun discharge. Facial and penetrating injuries predominate when struck by , as documented in forensic reconstructions of signal flare s, where retained projectiles cause extensive tissue damage. Fire-starting incidents underscore ignition risks during handling or discharge; a 2020 Vineyard Fire in , burning 560 acres, was attributed to a juvenile mishandling a , and in 2025, minors firing flares ignited a yacht at an marina. Broader pyrotechnic misuse data, including U.S. responses to thousands of annual flare sightings—many non-distress-related—highlights indirect hazards like resource diversion, though direct tallies remain anecdotal rather than systematically tracked. Urban flare gun crimes, such as over a dozen incidents in , in 2024-2025 involving minors, further illustrate handling lapses leading to and public endangerment, though these emphasize intentional rather than accidental errors. Overall, while comprehensive national databases underreport flare-specific injuries by grouping them with non-powder guns, case evidence indicates effective lethality comparable to low-caliber firearms when mishandled.

Mitigation Strategies and Training Protocols

Mitigation strategies for flare gun risks emphasize proper storage, handling, and operational procedures to prevent common hazards such as thermal burns, premature ignition, or misdirection, which can result from degradation or . Devices should be stored in a cool, dry environment between 40°F and 90°F, shielded from direct , sources exceeding 167°F, and excessive exposure beyond 10 minutes, as pyrotechnic compounds degrade under such conditions, increasing misfire risks. Regular inspections for physical damage, , or expiration—typically 42 months from manufacture—are required, with compromised units discarded through authorized channels like local departments to avoid spontaneous combustion. During handling and firing, users must point the barrel skyward at a 45-degree angle, facing downwind to minimize blowback ignition of clothing or nearby flammables, while maintaining a clear zone free of personnel and structures. Eye and skin protection, such as gloves and goggles, are essential, as flares burn at temperatures exceeding 1,000°F; the operator should avert their gaze immediately after discharge to avoid retinal damage from intense light. Loading involves inserting the cartridge with the barrel swung open away from the firing mechanism, followed by a firm closure and hammer cocking only when ready to fire, per manufacturer specifications to prevent accidental discharge. Post-firing, the hot barrel must cool undisturbed, and spent casings handled with care to avoid residual heat. Training protocols prioritize hands-on familiarization through certified courses, such as those offered by the U.S. Auxiliary or boating safety organizations, where participants practice with expired or simulated flares to build without live pyrotechnic risks. Maritime users, per U.S. requirements under 33 CFR 175, must ensure crew competency in deploying USCG-approved signals, including flare guns for vessels on coastal waters, emphasizing sequential firing (e.g., two aerial flares when is sighted) and integration with non-pyrotechnic aids like EPIRBs for redundancy. In aviation survival kits, guidelines in Advisory Circular 91-58A recommend pilot training on pyrotechnic device activation during emergency procedures, focusing on overwater operations where one device per life raft is mandated, with drills simulating low-visibility conditions to mitigate disorientation errors. Military protocols, such as those in U.S. Marine Corps directives, limit live-fire training to designated ranges with minimum altitudes and seasonal restrictions to reduce ground hazards from descending flares. Overall, protocols stress manufacturer manuals and periodic refreshers, as empirical data from incidents indicate that operator inexperience contributes to over 20% of pyrotechnic mishaps reported to authorities.

Firearms Classification Debates

In the United States, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) classifies standard flare guns as non- under the when designed solely to discharge pyrotechnic signal cartridges, exempting them from federal firearms licensing and requirements. However, this shifts if the device is modified with sub-caliber inserts or conversion kits to chamber fixed ammunition such as 12-gauge shells, rendering it a subject to . Similarly, possession of 37mm or 38mm gas/flare guns loaded with anti-personnel ammunition—such as rounds capable of firing projectiles or gas intended for use against persons—reclassifies them as destructive devices under the , necessitating ATF approval, serialization, and tax stamps. State-level interpretations introduce further contention, with jurisdictions like New York treating certain flare guns as s under penal codes, leading to prosecutions for unlicensed possession even without modifications. In a 2025 California case, an ex-felon convicted of possessing a flare gun argued it fell outside definitions, but courts upheld the classification based on state penal code interpretations equating signal pistols to s when capable of expelling projectiles by explosion. New York lawmakers proposed in 2025 to elevate possession of a flare gun with intent for unlawful use against another to in the fourth degree, reflecting concerns over potential weaponization despite federal exemptions for signaling devices. similarly imposes background checks or bans in some contexts, diverging from federal non-firearm status. Debates arise from the tension between flare guns' primary role in maritime and distress signaling—where empirical data shows low misuse rates compared to their safety utility—and their convertibility into lethal devices using commercially available adapters. Gun rights advocates contend that preemptively classifying unmodified flare guns as firearms imposes undue burdens on boaters and pilots, citing ATF's own distinctions and the rarity of documented conversions leading to crimes, while proponents of stricter controls highlight forensic cases where flares caused burns or fires when fired at persons, arguing for uniform regulation to close perceived loopholes. No unified international standard exists, with countries like the exempting single-use pyrotechnic flares from firearms certification but regulating pistol-style launchers, whereas bans them outright and requires permits, amplifying cross-border inconsistencies in trade and maritime compliance.

International Regulatory Differences

In the United States, flare guns designed solely for discharging pyrotechnic signaling cartridges are not classified as firearms under the , provided they lack the capability to fire fixed or other projectiles. However, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) rules that 37mm or 38mm gas/flare guns become under the when possessed with anti-personnel , such as cartridges containing wood pellets, rubber balls, or bean bags, necessitating federal registration, taxation, and compliance with destructive device regulations. This distinction hinges on type and potential for lethal use, with no license required for standard maritime or survival flare guns absent prohibited rounds. In the , flare guns, including non-disposable signal pistols like Very pistols, are categorized as Section 1 firearms under the , requiring a Firearms Certificate (FAC) for possession, storage, and use due to their bore size and projectile-launching mechanism. This classification treats them equivalently to conventional handguns, with strict storage mandates and police vetting, reflecting concerns over convertibility to weapons; handheld flares are preferred for boating to avoid licensing hurdles. European Union member states apply the Firearms Directive (EU) 2017/853, which regulates signal and pistols—including those for distress —as Category D firearms or equivalent alarm weapons, subject to national licensing to prevent easy conversion into lethal devices via sub-caliber adapters or alternative . Requirements vary: in the , a license is mandatory for boat-mounted flare pistols; in , border authorities inspect signal pistols for compliance with marking and deactivation standards during maritime travel. has documented seizures of illegal converted signal flare pistols at ports, underscoring enforcement against modifications. Pyrotechnic themselves are exempt from the directive's controls if used exclusively for signaling. Australia amended its regulations in July 2013 to exempt flare guns explicitly designed as signaling devices from standard firearms licensing when used for maritime distress, provided they meet Australian Maritime Safety Authority standards and are not modified for other ammunition. In contrast, does not classify dedicated marine flare guns as restricted firearms under the Criminal Code if used solely for signaling, though operators must carry approved visual distress signals per rules, with no permit needed beyond basic equipment certification.
Country/RegionClassificationKey Requirements
Not a firearm (standard pyrotechnic use); destructive device with anti-personnel ammoNo license for signaling; NFA registration/tax stamp for prohibited ammo
United KingdomSection 1 firearmFirearms Certificate, secure storage
(varies by state)Alarm/signal weapon (Category D or equivalent)National license; border checks for maritime use
AustraliaExempt signaling device (post-2013)Compliance with maritime safety standards; no license for unmodified use
Not a restricted firearm (marine signaling)Approved distress signals; no permit beyond boating certification
These divergences stem from the absence of a global standard, with stricter regimes prioritizing anti-conversion measures amid evidence of improvised weaponization, while permissive approaches emphasize maritime imperatives.

Improvised and Non-Standard Uses

Weaponization Attempts: Empirical Effectiveness

Attempts to repurpose flare guns as weapons have historically involved modifications for launchers or improvised discharge of pyrotechnic rounds against personnel, but empirical outcomes reveal low reliability due to factors including low (typically 50-100 m/s), inaccuracy beyond short ranges, and the incendiary rather than penetrative nature of , which prioritize sustained burning over immediate or fragmentation. In , the German adapted the signal pistol to fire anti-tank grenades and Sprenggranate anti-personnel rounds, achieving armor penetration up to 80 mm at close range but proving ineffective in combat owing to a maximum accurate range of 75 meters, poor causing erratic trajectories, and limited fragmentation that failed to reliably neutralize or light vehicles. Production ceased by 1943 in favor of dedicated systems like the , which offered greater range, accuracy, and destructive power without the adaptation compromises of flare pistol frames. Postwar civilian and criminal uses further illustrate ineffectiveness, with over a dozen documented U.S. incidents since 2017 yielding primarily non-fatal thermal injuries such as facial burns requiring stitches or scarring, rather than incapacitation or death. For example, a September 2025 altercation in a New York involved a point-blank facial shot resulting in survivable wounds treated with sutures, while a 2019 produced similar burn trauma without halting the assault. Fatalities remain anomalous, as in a May 2025 case where a flare gun discharge killed a man, likely due to precise vital-area impact at extreme proximity, but such outcomes contrast with ballistic tests showing flares embed superficially, ignite , and cause second- to fourth-degree burns without consistent penetration or stopping effect against mobile targets. Forensic and analyses confirm flares' suboptimal performance, as their low-pressure launches (often under 500 psi) and pyrotechnic payloads generate heat (up to 1,600°C) for ignition but minimal tissue disruption, frequently failing to deter aggressors and risking self-injury from flare expulsion gases or rebound. No systematic studies quantify aggregate , but incident rarity and rates—coupled with expert assessments deeming them inferior to conventional firearms for defensive or offensive roles—indicate weaponization yields inconsistent, high-risk results unfit for tactical reliability.

Documented Cases and Forensic Outcomes

In Albany, New York, authorities documented 12 incidents of flare gun misuse in criminal activities between July 2024 and July 2025, primarily involving juveniles in assaults and other unspecified crimes, resulting in 16 arrests, five ongoing investigations, and one closed case. These cases highlight a trend of flare guns being acquired cheaply and deployed in urban settings, though specific forensic details on injuries or ballistics were not publicly detailed. A forensic examination of a 12-gauge Orion flare gun recovered in a Washington state case revealed its limited penetrative potential, with muzzle velocities around 334 feet per second and energies of approximately 110 foot-pounds for standard flares, insufficient for reliable lethality but capable of causing severe burns at 1800–2000°F. In that incident, a suspect fired the stolen device at a pursuing officer from about 10 feet, missing the target; the suspect claimed accidental discharge while attempting to throw it, leading to conviction for second-degree assault with a firearm, felon in possession, and methamphetamine possession, totaling 4.5 years imprisonment, despite the gun not being recovered at the scene. The analysis classified the flare gun as a firearm under state law due to its explosive primer, underscoring how even unmodified models can produce a report and flash mimicking conventional handguns. Modifications significantly enhance lethality, as evidenced by a 2022 officer-involved shooting in , where suspect Marty Robin Hutto, 50, pointed a flare gun adapted with a sleeve to fire 12-gauge shotgun shells—achieving velocities comparable to a .22-caliber round at 500 feet per second—at a deputy, who responded by fatally shooting Hutto in the upper left arm with a 9 mm . The modification allowed the device to propel projectiles effectively, prompting the deputy's use of lethal ; an and ballistic analysis of the recovered flare gun were pending through the at the time. In a Hungarian suicide case reported in 2025, an 86-year-old man modified a 26 mm flare gun by adding an 8 mm secondary barrel to chamber a 7.62 mm Tokarev cartridge, resulting in a self-inflicted occipital headshot that produced a distinctive 6.5 cm x 1.5 cm keyhole lesion—combining entry (soot-stained, internal beveling) and exit (external beveling) features due to the bullet's deformation and path through the skull. Forensic reconstruction confirmed close-range discharge via a 0.3 g deformed bullet fragment in the vehicle roof, with associated skull fractures (8 x 5 cm), brain contusions, subarachnoid hemorrhages, and embedded bone fragments; the expert verification affirmed the improvised weapon's capacity for fatal penetration, atypical for standard flare guns. Such alterations, often simple and accessible to non-experts, demonstrate causal pathways from signaling devices to lethal tools, though unmodified flares prioritize incendiary over ballistic effects in empirical tests.

Modern Developments and Alternatives

Technological Advancements in Pyrotechnics

Recent advancements in pyrotechnic compositions for signal flares, including those compatible with flare guns, have focused on eliminating oxidizers to address environmental contamination risks, such as from manufacturing and testing. Perchlorate-free formulations for red flares, developed under the U.S. Department of Defense's Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) project WP-200730 completed in , successfully reformulated the Navy's Mk124 Marine Smoke and Illumination Signal and the Army's M126A1 Ground Signal Illumination Red Star Parachute, achieving higher and extended burn times while passing safety tests for impact, friction, and thermal stability. Similar efforts yielded perchlorate-free compositions for the Mk144 marine signal in 2016, using alternative oxidizers to maintain visibility without the persistent ecological hazards of perchlorates. These changes comply with regulatory pressures while preserving or enhancing signaling efficacy for maritime and distress applications. Performance-oriented refinements have also advanced pyrotechnic reliability and output. In , the U.S. Army's upgraded the M127A1 handheld signal to the M127E2 variant, incorporating finer magnesium granulation and a two-part binder in place of , resulting in luminous intensities of 150,000–160,000 —75% brighter than the 90,000 minimum—and illuminating over 492,000 square feet of ground area, a 300% improvement over prior benchmarks, with no failures in 126 environmental tests. For yellow flares, a 2017 study optimized compositions with 61 wt% as oxidizer and color source, 27 wt% aluminum fuel, and 12 wt% binder, delivering 287% greater light intensity and 170% superior color quality compared to traditional Russian tracers by minimizing interfering emissions and maximizing reaction temperatures. Such innovations extend to signals, where high-nitrogen compounds replaced perchlorates in the Army's M195 flare by 2012, reducing sensitivity to ignition stimuli while sustaining illumination. These developments prioritize purity, burn consistency, and reduced hazardous byproducts, enabling flare gun payloads to achieve greater ranges—often exceeding 5–10 miles under optimal conditions—without compromising deployability in 12-gauge, 25 mm, or 37 mm formats. Patent US8216403B2 exemplifies perchlorate-free red flare recipes using and magnesium for sustained smoke and flame output. Overall, pyrotechnic progress reflects a balance between empirical performance data and causal environmental imperatives, though adoption varies by regulatory jurisdiction.

Shift to Electronic and Non-Pyrotechnic Options

The transition from pyrotechnic flare guns to electronic visual devices (eVDSDs) has accelerated in maritime applications, primarily due to concerns over handling and storage of explosives, as well as their limited shelf life and environmental disposal challenges. In September 2025, the U.S. issued ALCOAST 396/25, mandating a shift away from pyrotechnic signals for cutters, requiring full adoption of eVDSDs by June 1, 2026, to mitigate risks like accidental ignition and to enhance operational reliability. This policy builds on earlier approvals, such as the 2016 USCG certification of LED-based strobes that meet night visual distress requirements without . Electronic alternatives, such as the ACR ResQFlare introduced around 2020, emit high-intensity LED flashes visible up to 10 nautical miles for over 8 hours on battery power, flashing without producing heat, smoke, or projectiles. Similarly, Sirius Signal's distress light, USCG-approved as a direct substitute for pyrotechnic handhelds and aerial flares, eliminates expiration dates—unlike , which degrade after 3-4 years—and reduces hazards during deployment. These devices comply with 33 CFR 175.130 for recreational boats, allowing one eVDSD to replace three pyrotechnic signals for night use when combined with daytime flags. Despite advantages in longevity and safety, electronic options face limitations in daytime visibility, as they lack the smoke trails of pyrotechnics, prompting hybrid recommendations for vessels in high-traffic or low-light-preferred scenarios. Adoption has been uneven in aviation, where pyrotechnic flare guns persist for precise aerial signaling due to electronic signals' shorter range in open skies, though some pilots integrate portable LED strobes as supplements. By April 2026, USCG recreational boating rules will further prioritize eVDSDs, reflecting empirical data from incident reports showing pyrotechnic mishaps, including burns and false fires, outnumbering successful distress activations.

References

  1. https://www.vgca.net/files/VGCAGlossaryFirearmTerms2-25-14.pdf
  2. https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/firearms/regs/initial-statement-reasons-11-17.pdf
  3. https://dokumen.pub/information-at-sea-shipboard-command-and-control-in-the-us-navy-from-mobile-bay-to-okinawa-9781421410265-1421410265-9781421410845-1421410842.html
  4. https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history/2025/october/ardois-night-signal-lamp-system
  5. https://www.firearmsnews.com/editorial/survival-flare-guns/486801
  6. https://www.explainthatstuff.com/flares.html
  7. https://www.dco.uscg.mil/CG-ENG-4/VDS/
  8. https://americansocietyofarmscollectors.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/1970-B21-U-S-Military-Signal-Pistols.pdf
  9. https://www.thehenryford.org/collections-and-research/digital-collections/artifact/284411
  10. https://www.militarytrader.com/militaria-collectibles/very-pistols-illuminated
  11. https://firearmshistory.blogspot.com/2011/03/utility-firearms-flare-gun-or-very.html
  12. http://www.museumoftechnology.org.uk/objects/_expand.php?key=731
  13. https://www.nramuseum.org/guns/the-galleries/world-war-i-and-firearms-innovation/case-32-wwi-america-and-the-allies/us-remington-mk-iii-flare-pistol.aspx
  14. https://www.ima-usa.com/products/us-ww1-mark-iv-very-flare-pistol
  15. https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/flare-pistol-mark-iv-united-states-army-air-service/nasm_A19190062000
  16. https://www.greatwarforum.org/topic/278999-flare-gun/
  17. https://ww2talk.com/index.php?threads/use-of-flares-for-signalling.39544/
  18. https://www.bergflak.com/LPstory.html
  19. https://www.thearmorylife.com/german-sturmpistole/
  20. https://www.forgottenweapons.com/gebruder-rempt-four-barrel-enormous-flare-pistol/
  21. https://exoticammo.com/flare-guns/
  22. https://www.nytimes.com/1981/06/07/sports/laws-on-flare-pistol-a-conflict-in-boating.html
  23. https://www.ima-usa.com/products/original-u-s-post-wwii-era-25mm-marine-signal-flare-launcher-pistol-by-olin-of-east-alton-illinois
  24. https://exoticammo.com/26-5mm-flare-guns-versatile-tools-for-signaling-and-survival/
  25. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3168788A/en
  26. https://exoticammo.com/how-does-a-flare-launcher-work/
  27. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3044360A/en
  28. https://comet-marine.com/downloads/signal-pistol-calibre-4/signal-pistol-cartridges-2020-datasheet.pdf
  29. https://www.tara-aerospace.com/SP-26
  30. https://www.arsenal-bg.com/c/pyrotechnics-19/26-mm-signal-cartridge-and-26-mm-signal-pistol-zarya-235
  31. https://noedelscientific.com/user/flaregun1.pdf
  32. https://vintageshipsalvage.com/product-category/flare-guns-essential-marine-safety-equipment/
  33. https://www.boatus.org/findings/45
  34. https://clixfueling.com/blogs/news/top-flare-guns-for-boats-ultimate-safety-guide
  35. https://www.forgottenweapons.com/origin-of-a-flare-pistol-shpagins-spsh-44/
  36. https://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Webley_%2526_Scott_Signal_Pistols
  37. https://royalarmouries.org/collection/object/object-12256
  38. https://www.ima-usa.com/products/original-british-wwi-1915-mkiii-webley-scott-brass-flare-gun
  39. https://iwainternationalinc.com/new-ikon-ac-unity-26-5mm-flare-gun-not-a-firearm/
  40. https://www.forgottenweapons.com/japanese-type-97-naval-flare-pistol/
  41. https://smallarmsreview.com/bulky-monsters-japanese-flare-pistols-nambu-type-90/
  42. http://www.nambuworld.com/fgtype90triplepix.htm
  43. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZGY-zXZQx0
  44. https://exoticammo.com/product/37mm-multi-shot-launcher/
  45. https://www.skylighter.com/collections/37mm-launchers
  46. https://lmtdefense.com/product/flare-launcher/
  47. https://www.westmarine.com/orion-12-gauge-high-performance-alerter-basic-4-flare-kit-8665804.html
  48. https://eaglesafety.net/products/brands/orion/orion-12-gauge-flare-gun
  49. https://pdf.nauticexpo.com/pdf/chemring-marine/signal-pistol-calibre-4-26-5-mm/32190-45751.html
  50. https://www.facebook.com/RoyalArmouries/posts/us-navy-officer-edward-very-invented-a-simple-yet-effective-signal-pistol-in-the/10165625650615370/
  51. https://comet-marine.com/our-products/signal-cartridge-calibre-4/
  52. https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/DCO%2520Documents/5p/5ps/Design%2520and%2520Engineering%2520Standards/Life%2520Saving%2520and%2520Fire%2520Safety/Docs/SOLASPyroGuide%282005%29.pdf?ver=2017-10-20-144043-990
  53. https://www.marinepublic.com/blogs/training/376330-solas-visual-distress-signals-line-throwing-regulations
  54. https://edtech.com.sg/marine-pyrotechnics/
  55. https://boatus.org/study-guide/equipment/vds
  56. https://wescom-group.com/wescom-news/the-enduring-importance-of-pyrotechnic-signals-in-the-marine-industry/
  57. https://www.liferaftprofessionals.com/blogs/survival-at-sea-advice-and-tips-marine-safety/marine-emergency-flares-what-you-need-to-know?srsltid=AfmBOor3g4zSPJDp620hwsrHdIUy32N4N4-ZDRlF-AKD8TYTYGMHVaTW
  58. https://forum.gcaptain.com/t/essentially-theoretical-question-about-distress-flares/71697
  59. https://boatingmag.com/gear/best-flares-distress-signals/?srsltid=AfmBOopdhuilbFDh2oyTa1GCAXjqiZ_23qL2m78T7-249KQ6mnDfJSiV
  60. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC%2091-58A.pdf
  61. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-F/part-91/subpart-F/section-91.509
  62. https://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?/topic/117152-vietnam-survival-kit-flare-gun-more/
  63. https://www.scouter.com/topic/32185-wilderness-survival-use-of-flares/
  64. https://www.aviationsurvival.com/theimportanceofemergencyflares
  65. https://aviationconsumer.com/safety/aviation-survival-kits/
  66. http://www.kingsownmuseum.com/mus03fireflare.htm
  67. https://royalmontrealregiment.com/10866-2/
  68. https://crateclub.com/blogs/loadout/how-to-launch-signal-flares-a-comprehensive-guide-to-tactical-signaling
  69. https://siriussignal.com/dangers-of-pyrotechnic-flares/
  70. https://www.quora.com/If-someone-were-hit-by-a-flare-shot-out-of-a-flare-gun-what-would-happen-to-them
  71. https://www.medicalalgorithms.com/injuries-associated-with-a-flare-gun
  72. https://www.boat-ed.com/indiana/studyGuide/Pyrotechnic-VDSs/10101602_35359/
  73. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0436880.pdf
  74. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15520121/
  75. https://www.latimes.com/socal/daily-pilot/news/story/2025-05-26/teen-arrested-in-fatal-flare-gun-shooting-in-huntington-beach
  76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24418292_A_Fatal_Shot_with_a_Signal_Flare-A_Crime_Reconstruction
  77. https://wildfiretoday.com/vineyard-fire-may-have-been-caused-by-flare-gun/
  78. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBkAktfeU1g
  79. https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Our-Organization/Assistant-Commandant-for-Response-Policy-CG-5R/Office-of-Incident-Management-Preparedness-CG-5RI/US-Coast-Guard-Office-of-Search-and-Rescue-CG-SAR/If-You-See-A-Flare/
  80. https://cbs6albany.com/news/local/crime-stats-flare-gun-crimes-on-the-rise-in-the-capital-city-crimes-stats-albany-crime-analysis-center-shots-fired-neighborhood-july-2024-2025-police-
  81. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40153858/
  82. https://www.fisheriessupply.com/flare-safety
  83. https://www.orionsignals.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/SM_ALinsertw_Safety-WebVersion-1.21v4.pdf
  84. https://www.bwsailing.com/cc/2016/06/five-steps-to-use-a-marine-flare-in-an-emergency/
  85. https://www.maritimenz.govt.nz/recreational/safety/communications/distress-flares/
  86. https://www.boatingsafety.com/blogpost/1828549/480907/How-Do-I-Use-a-Flare-Gun
  87. https://www.uscgboating.org/assets/1/AssetManager/Boaters-Guide-to-Federal-Requirements-for-Receational-Boats-20231108.pdf
  88. https://www.miramar.marines.mil/portals/60/docs/flare_and_smoke_usage.pdf
  89. https://boatus.org/distress-signals/requirements
  90. https://www.atf.gov/firearms/firearms-guide-identification-firearms-section-6
  91. https://downloads.regulations.gov/ATF-2018-0001-11590/attachment_3.pdf
  92. https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/ruling/1995-3-3738mm-gasflare-guns-anti-personnel-ammunition-are-defined-nfa-weapons
  93. https://www.atf.gov/file/55446/download
  94. https://www.justanswer.com/law/avro4-penal-code-ny-and-or-statue-u-s-c.html
  95. https://www.sanfranciscocriminallawyerblog.com/ex-felon-in-possession-of-flare-gun-in-not-in-possession-of-a-weapon/
  96. https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S8460
  97. https://www.quora.com/Is-a-firearm-license-required-for-owning-a-flare-gun
  98. https://crateclub.com/blogs/loadout/can-a-flare-gun-be-used-for-self-defense
  99. https://www.guns.com/news/2013/01/02/flare-guns-as-weapons
  100. https://www.reddit.com/r/sailing/comments/j9x7qt/is_there_an_i_international_standard_for_what/
  101. https://siriussignal.com/international/
  102. https://www.greatwarforum.org/topic/115911-flare-gun-recognition/
  103. https://www.atf.gov/firearms/firearms-guide-identification-firearms-section-7
  104. https://forums.ybw.com/threads/flare-guns.33200/
  105. https://forums.ybw.com/threads/signal-flare-gun-and-the-law.426380/
  106. https://www.seesac.org/f/docs/Meeting/EU-Amended-Firearms-Directive-Tirana-Final.pptx
  107. https://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/f122/which-countries-restrict-flare-pistols-on-boats-not-a-gun-thread-per-se-133845.html
  108. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2016-03/DG-ENTR_Evaluation-of-the-Firearms-Directive_Final-Report_final-1.pdf
  109. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2024-000837-ASW_EN.html
  110. https://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/f122/which-countries-restrict-flare-pistols-on-boats-not-a-gun-thread-per-se-133845-2.html
  111. https://www.bbcboards.net/showthread.php?t=101842
  112. https://www.sea-help.eu/en/guide/signal-gun-entry-croatia/
  113. https://h3vr.fandom.com/wiki/Sturmpistole
  114. https://www.quora.com/How-did-the-Sturmpistole-penetrate-80mm-of-armor-with-only-a-25-oz-charge-Also-why-was-it-considered-ineffective
  115. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/crime/2025/09/10/woman-charged-shooting-neighbor-flare-gun/86074639007/
  116. https://baynews9.com/fl/tampa/news/2019/10/13/pasco-carjacking-victim-shot-with-flare-gun-speaks-out
  117. https://www.wtol.com/article/news/woman-speaks-out-after-teen-sentenced-for-shooting-her-with-flare-gun/512-f8b2d51d-51cf-4152-950d-a1b989accd9d
  118. https://nypost.com/2025/09/09/us-news/elderly-woman-shoots-man-in-the-face-with-flare-gun-inside-gated-long-island-retirement-community/
  119. https://www.foxla.com/news/huntington-beach-flare-gun-shooting
  120. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oCS9wjvCWI
  121. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11041880/
  122. https://www.pewpewtactical.com/flare-gun-self-defense/
  123. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiWI9mQRfOU
  124. https://www.moultonadvertiser.com/news/article_6efaae3c-18ef-11ed-a2df-830763d56981.html
  125. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12024-025-01102-8
  126. https://serdp-estcp.mil/projects/details/80841e7e-2bfe-485a-a9b2-55a484f0949f/wp-200730-project-overview
  127. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02261
  128. https://www.army.mil/article/174528/improved_m127a1_handheld_signal_from_picatinny_greatly_illuminates_the_battlefield
  129. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214914716301179
  130. https://aces.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asia.201200036
  131. https://patents.google.com/patent/US8216403B2/en
  132. https://www.acrartex.com/news/legal-requirements-for-electronic-boat-flares/
  133. https://siriussignal.com/electronic-distress-signals-replace-flares-on-recreational-boats/
  134. https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCG/bulletins/3f3cb74
  135. https://www.thehulltruth.com/boating-forum/766036-new-uscg-approved-substitute-flares.html
  136. https://www.sailingworld.com/gear/a-safe-distress-flare-alternative/
  137. https://www.landfallnavigation.com/weems-plath-electronic-flare-sos-distress-light.html
  138. https://blog.dockwa.com/us-coast-guard-electronic-led-flares-regulations
  139. https://www.facebook.com/groups/sailingandcruising/posts/8185940658186510/
  140. https://cruisingclub.org/article/electronic-emergency-visual-signals-replace-flares
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.