Hubbry Logo
Flash mobFlash mobMain
Open search
Flash mob
Community hub
Flash mob
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Flash mob
Flash mob
Flash mob
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A public pillow fight in Bologna, Italy

A flash mob (or flashmob)[1] is a group of people that assembles suddenly in a public place, performs for a brief time, then quickly disperses, often for the purposes of entertainment, satire, and/or artistic expression.[2][3][4] Flash mobs may be organized via telecommunications, social media, or viral emails.[5][6][7][8][9]

The term, coined in 2003, is generally not applied to events and performances organized for the purposes of politics (such as protests), commercial advertisement, publicity stunts that involve public relation firms, or paid professionals.[7][10][11] In these cases of a planned purpose for the social activity in question, the term smart mobs is often applied instead.

The term "flash rob" or "flash mob robberies", a reference to the way flash mobs assemble, has been used to describe a number of robberies and assaults perpetrated suddenly by groups of teenage youth.[12][13][14] Bill Wasik, originator of the first flash mobs, and a number of other commentators have questioned or objected to the usage of "flash mob" to describe criminal acts.[14][15] Flash mobs have also been featured in some Hollywood movie series, such as Step Up.[16]

History

[edit]

First flash mob

[edit]
Flash mobbing was quickly imitated outside of the United States. This picture is of "sydmob" 2003, the first flash mob held in Sydney, Australia.

The first flash mobs were created in Manhattan in 2003, by Bill Wasik, senior editor of Harper's Magazine.[7][9][17] The first attempt was unsuccessful after the targeted retail store was tipped off about the plan for people to gather.[18] Wasik avoided such problems during the first successful flash mob, which occurred on June 17, 2003, at Macy's department store, by sending participants to preliminary staging areas—in four Manhattan bars—where they received further instructions about the ultimate event and location just before the event began.[19]

More than 130 people converged upon the ninth-floor rug department of the store, gathering around an expensive rug. Anyone approached by a sales assistant was advised to say that the gatherers lived together in a warehouse on the outskirts of New York, that they were shopping for a "love rug", and that they made all their purchase decisions as a group.[20] Subsequently, 200 people flooded the lobby and mezzanine of the Hyatt hotel in synchronized applause for about 15 seconds, and a shoe boutique in SoHo was invaded by participants pretending to be tourists on a bus trip.[9]

Wasik claimed that he created flash mobs as a social experiment designed to poke fun at hippies and to highlight the cultural atmosphere of conformity and of wanting to be an insider or part of "the next big thing".[9] The Vancouver Sun wrote, "It may have backfired on him ... [Wasik] may instead have ended up giving conformity a vehicle that allowed it to appear nonconforming."[21] In another interview he said "the mobs started as a kind of playful social experiment meant to encourage spontaneity and big gatherings to temporarily take over commercial and public areas simply to show that they could".[22]

Precedents and precursors

[edit]

In 1973, the story "Flash Crowd" by Larry Niven described a concept similar to flash mobs.[23] With the invention of popular and very inexpensive teleportation, an argument at a shopping mall—which happens to be covered by a news crew—quickly swells into a riot. In the story, broadcast coverage attracts the attention of other people, who use the widely available technology of the teleportation booth to swarm first that event—thus intensifying the riot—and then other events as they happen. Commenting on the social impact of such mobs, one character (articulating the police view) says, "We call them flash crowds, and we watch for them." In related short stories, they are named as a prime location for illegal activities (such as pickpocketing and looting) to take place. Lev Grossman suggests that the story title is a source of the term "flash mob".[24]

People dancing at the Eutopia 15 Flashmob Event while crossing Puerta del Puente in Córdoba, Spain (2015)

Flash mobs began as a form of performance art.[18] While they started as an apolitical act, flash mobs may share superficial similarities to political demonstrations. In the 1960s, groups such as the Yippies used street theatre to expose the public to political issues.[25] Flash mobs can be seen as a specialized form of smart mob,[7] a term and concept proposed by author Howard Rheingold in his 2002 book Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution.[26]

Use of the term

[edit]

The first documented use of the term flash mob as it is understood today was in 2003 in a blog entry posted in the aftermath of Wasik's event.[17][19][27] The term was inspired by the earlier term smart mob.[28]

Flash mob was added to the 11th edition of the Concise Oxford English Dictionary on July 8, 2004, where it noted it as an "unusual and pointless act" separating it from other forms of smart mobs such as types of performance, protests, and other gatherings.[3][29] Also recognized noun derivatives are flash mobber and flash mobbing.[3] Webster's New Millennium Dictionary of English defines flash mob as "a group of people who organize on the Internet and then quickly assemble in a public place, do something bizarre, and disperse."[30] This definition is consistent with the original use of the term; however, both news media and promoters have subsequently used the term to refer to any form of smart mob, including political protests;[31] a collaborative Internet denial of service attack;[32] a collaborative supercomputing demonstration;[33] and promotional appearances by pop musicians.[34] The press has also used the term flash mob to refer to a practice in China where groups of shoppers arrange online to meet at a store in order to drive a collective bargain.[35]

In 19th-century Tasmania, the term flash mob was used to describe a subculture consisting of female prisoners, based on the term flash language for the jargon that these women used. The 19th-century Australian term flash mob referred to a segment of society, not an event, and showed no other similarities to the modern term flash mob or the events it describes.[36]

Legality

[edit]

The city of Braunschweig (Brunswick), Germany, has stopped flash mobs by strictly enforcing the already existing law of requiring a permit to use any public space for an event.[37] In the United Kingdom, a number of flash mobs have been stopped over concerns for public health and safety.[38] The British Transport Police have urged flash mob organizers to "refrain from holding such events at railway stations".[39]

Crime

[edit]
Main article: Flash rob

Referred to as flash robs, flash mob robberies, or flash robberies by the media, crimes organized by teenage youth using social media rose to international notoriety beginning in 2011.[12][13][14][40] The National Retail Federation does not classify these crimes as "flash mobs" but rather "multiple offender crimes" that utilize "flash mob tactics".[41][42] In a report, the NRF noted, "multiple offender crimes tend to involve groups or gangs of juveniles who already know each other, which does not earn them the term 'flash mob'."[42] Mark Leary, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Duke University, said that most "flash mob thuggery" involves crimes of violence that are otherwise ordinary, but are perpetrated suddenly by large, organized groups of people: "What social media adds is the ability to recruit such a large group of people, that individuals who would not rob a store or riot on their own feel freer to misbehave without being identified."[43]

It's hard for me to believe that these kids saw some YouTube video of people Christmas caroling in a food court, and said, 'Hey, we should do that, except as a robbery!' More likely, they stumbled on the simple realization (like I did back in 2003, but like lots of other people had before and have since) that one consequence of all this technology is that you can coordinate a ton of people to show up in the same place at the same time.

— Bill Wasik[44]

These kids are taking part in what's basically a meme. They heard about it from friends, and probably saw it on YouTube, and now they're getting their chance to participate in it themselves.

— Bill Wasik[14]

HuffPost raised the question asking if "the media was responsible for stirring things up", and added that in some cases the local authorities did not confirm the use of social media making the "use of the term flash mob questionable".[15] Amanda Walgrove wrote that criminals involved in such activities do not refer to themselves as "flash mobs", but that this use of the term is nonetheless appropriate.[44] Dr. Linda Kiltz drew similar parallels between flash robs and the Occupy Movement stating, "As the use of social media increases, the potential for more flash mobs that are used for political protest and for criminal purposes is likely to increase."[45]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Flash mob

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A flash mob is a public gathering of individuals, typically strangers coordinated via , text, or internet, who assemble abruptly in a public space to execute a brief, often pointless or absurd act before rapidly dispersing. The phenomenon originated in in 2003, when senior editor Bill Wasik organized the first successful event on June 17 at department store, where approximately 200 participants pretended to shop for an eccentric carpet before leaving within 10 minutes. Wasik conceived flash mobs as an art experiment to demonstrate the ease of mobilizing crowds through digital means and to satirize the conformist tendencies within hipster subcultures, proving that even "alternative" scenes could be engineered to follow trends without inherent purpose. Flash mobs proliferated globally by late 2003, evolving from Wasik's initial eight events—such as silent in lobbies or cowering before models—to include choreographed dances, performances, and public stunts that engaged or surprised onlookers. Early examples emphasized brevity and to heighten the surreal effect, but the format soon attracted commercial appropriations, like promotional "flash concerts" by corporations such as Ford and , which Wasik critiqued for undermining the original critique of manufactured hype. While flash mobs have been employed for artistic expression, marriage proposals, and —such as synchronized dances protesting social issues—their rapid coordination has also facilitated disruptive or , including coordinated robberies and riots, prompting debates over and diverging from the inaugural non-violent, ephemeral intent. Peer-reviewed analyses highlight how amplified the model's scalability, yet also its vulnerability to exploitation by groups seeking anonymity in crowds for or assaults, as seen in urban incidents from to . This dual trajectory underscores the causal dynamics of digital mobilization: empowering spontaneous assembly while risking escalation absent centralized accountability.

Origins and Early Development

Invention and First Event

Bill Wasik, a senior editor at , invented the flash mob concept in 2003 as a social experiment to investigate deindividuation in crowds and the conformist tendencies within hipster subcultures. He organized the events anonymously via invitations to test how quickly participants could assemble briefly for absurd, coordinated actions before dispersing, drawing on theories of while critiquing the rapid adoption of trends in urban creative scenes. Wasik coordinated eight such events in that year, with the phenomenon spreading organically afterward, though he publicly claimed authorship only in a 2006 Harper's article reflecting on its viral escalation. The initial attempt, designated MOB #1, occurred on June 3, 2003, at Claire’s Accessories store in , , involving about 60 invitees instructed to converge for seven minutes without a specific action defined. It failed when New York Police Department officers dispersed the group prematurely, suspecting unauthorized activity, highlighting early logistical challenges in coordinating spontaneous assemblies. The first successful flash mob, MOB #2, took place on June 17, 2003, in the rug department of in , drawing around 200 participants recruited through forwarded emails. The group pretended to be residents of a commune seeking a "love rug" for their utopian living space, performing the scripted absurdity for several minutes before exiting orderly, which garnered media attention including coverage in Wired News. This event established the core mechanics: short-notice digital coordination, brief , and rapid dissolution to emphasize ephemerality over sustained protest or entertainment. A follow-up, MOB #3 on July 2, 2003, at the Grand Hyatt hotel lobby involved about 200 people lining the mezzanine to stare silently before applauding for 15 seconds, further refining the format into a performative spectacle.

Precedents and Influences

The concept of the flash mob, as formalized in 2003, built upon precedents in art and performance that emphasized ephemeral, participatory disruptions in public spaces. , initiated by artist in 1959 with events like 18 Happenings in 6 Parts, involved unstructured, site-specific actions engaging audiences in absurd or sensory experiences without traditional scripts or stages, foreshadowing flash mobs' reliance on collective improvisation and quick dispersal. Dadaist performances in the 1910s and 1920s, such as those by involving chaotic public readings and interventions, similarly used shock and brevity to critique bourgeois norms, influencing later tactics of sudden group assembly for ironic effect. Social psychology experiments provided a key empirical foundation, particularly Stanley Milgram's 1960s studies on conformity, including a 1968 New York sidewalk demonstration where actors gazing upward induced up to 80% of passersby to join within minutes, illustrating how minimal cues propagate crowd behavior through social proof. Bill Wasik explicitly cited Milgram's work as shaping his view of crowds as manipulable mediums for artistic critique of hipster trend-following. Ray Johnson's 1960s "nothing" events and mail art networks, which convened participants for purposeless gatherings advertised via correspondence, further modeled flash mobs' decentralized coordination and rejection of overt meaning. The nomenclature "flash mob" originated from Larry Niven's 1973 short story "Flash Crowd," which depicted instantaneous mass convergences enabled by futuristic teleportation, anticipating organized spontaneity in urban settings. Broader historical analogs include medieval dancing manias, documented from the 14th century onward, where hundreds uncontrollably danced in streets for days, driven by psychosocial contagion rather than orchestration, though these lacked flash mobs' intentional brevity and instructions. Late-19th-century Incoherent movement gatherings in France, featuring satirical parties mocking artistic pretension, echoed the ironic humor Wasik deployed to lampoon cultural fads. Countercultural precedents like the Yippies' 1960s street theater protests, blending activism with spectacle, and Situationist dérivés—psychogeographic wanders subverting city routines—contributed to the tactical ethos of reclaiming public space, albeit without modern digital mobilization.

Initial Spread and Cultural Reception

Following the initial New York City flash mobs organized by Bill Wasik in June 2003, the concept disseminated swiftly through email invitations, blog postings, and word-of-mouth among urban professionals and early internet users. Wasik coordinated at least seven additional events in Manhattan that summer, including a gathering of approximately 500 participants at a Toys "R" Us store who pretended to shop for a giraffe. By July 2003, the phenomenon had expanded to other U.S. cities, with Boston hosting its first event titled "Ode to Bill," which drew participants critiquing the trend's rapid adoption. International spread followed promptly, as evidenced by the inaugural Sydney flash mob in August 2003, organized via similar online channels and attracting local participants to a public space for a brief, coordinated action. The early propagation relied on nascent digital communication tools like and mailing lists, which allowed organizers to assemble dispersed groups quickly without traditional advertising. This virality was amplified by coverage in and blogs, which documented events and provided instructions for replication, leading to dozens of independent mobs across by late 2003. Participant numbers varied, but events typically involved 50 to several hundred individuals converging for durations of five to ten minutes before dispersing. Culturally, flash mobs were initially received as a quirky, innovative expression of spontaneity in the early urban landscape, often portrayed in media as "bizarre public stunts" made possible by . Outlets like ABC News highlighted their novelty as a testing in public spaces, with public reactions blending amusement and mild disruption concerns from bystanders and authorities. Wasik, reflecting in a Harper's , framed the mobs as a deliberate on hipster trend-chasing and media-driven fads, revealing an underlying critique of conformist behavior masquerading as , though contemporaneous reception largely overlooked this intent in favor of surface-level excitement. Early analyses noted the mobs' appeal to young, tech-savvy demographics seeking ephemeral , but also foreshadowed scalability issues as imitation proliferated without centralized control.

Definition and Core Characteristics

Essential Elements of a Flash Mob

A flash mob is defined as a group of people who assemble suddenly in a public place, perform a coordinated but brief action—often unusual or seemingly random—and then quickly disperse, typically without lingering or leaving evidence of organization. This phenomenon relies on prior coordination through digital means such as , text messages, or online platforms, which summon participants to a specific time and location while preserving the appearance of spontaneity for bystanders. Central to the concept is the element of surprise, achieved by the rapid convergence of unrelated individuals who blend into the crowd until the action begins, startling observers and amplifying the event's impact. The performance itself must be synchronized yet ephemeral, usually lasting no more than a few minutes, to evade immediate disruption and sustain the "flash" quality; longer durations risk transforming it into a conventional gathering or . Public of the venue is essential, as flash mobs occur in open spaces like streets, shopping centers, or transit hubs where large numbers can gather without prior permission, heightening both visibility and logistical challenges for authorities. Coordination demands precise instructions distributed secretly to participants, often detailing simple, replicable actions such as synchronized dances, chants, or gestures to ensure uniformity despite diverse recruits. Quick dispersal immediately follows, with participants scattering individually to avoid detection or escalation, reinforcing the transient nature that distinguishes flash mobs from sustained assemblies. These elements—digital orchestration, brevity, surprise, and evasion—form the causal core enabling the format's viral appeal and adaptability across contexts, from to disruption. Flash mobs differ from conventional mobs, which arise from spontaneous and often devolve into uncontrolled disorder or without a predefined endpoint, in that they are meticulously planned via digital coordination among participants, execute a scripted lasting mere minutes, and mandate immediate dispersal to restore normalcy. This structured transience prevents escalation into sustained chaos, as evidenced by early flash mob protocols emphasizing innocuous, non-confrontational acts followed by prompt scattering. In distinction to political protests or demonstrations, which typically involve prolonged occupation of spaces to broadcast explicit demands and sustain visibility for or media coverage, flash mobs foreground brevity and theatrical surprise, dispersing before authorities can intervene and relying on post-event viral dissemination for impact rather than on-site confrontation. Although some flash mob variants incorporate , the eschews overt messaging in favor of performative disruption that mimics , thereby evading classification as traditional assembly. Flash mobs contrast with professional street performances or busking, where skilled entertainers solicit audiences in advance for remuneration through repeated acts like or music, by mobilizing unpaid, untrained volunteers en masse through secretive summons, enacting synchronized group behaviors without seeking direct or financial exchange. This democratizes participation, transforming bystanders into unwitting spectators of ephemeral novelty rather than consumers of individualized artistry. Unlike or 1960s-style , which emphasize conceptual , scripted , or small-scale in semi-controlled environments to provoke intellectual response, flash mobs harness digital networks to assemble large, anonymous crowds for visceral, accessible spectacles in unaltered public venues, prioritizing communal thrill and social bonding over elite critique or enduring installation.

Benign and Constructive Uses

Entertainment and Performance Flash Mobs

and performance flash mobs feature groups coordinating brief, synchronized artistic acts—typically dances or musical numbers—in public venues to unexpectedly engage and amuse bystanders. These events prioritize aesthetic surprise and communal joy over promotion or , often drawing from or classical repertoire. Emerging in the mid-2000s as flash mob practices evolved from experimental assemblies, performance variants emphasized rehearsed in secret to maintain spontaneity for observers. A prominent example occurred on , 2010, when the Opera Company of Philadelphia staged the "" chorus from George Frideric Handel's inside department store in . Over 650 choristers from 28 local ensembles, dressed as shoppers, initiated the five-minute rendition amid holiday crowds before dispersing, as part of the company's "Random Acts of Culture" initiative to integrate into everyday public life. The performance, captured on video, amassed millions of online views, illustrating how such events leverage digital sharing for broader cultural impact. In dance-focused instances, over 200 performers executed "Do-Re-Mi" from The Sound of Music at Central Station on March 23, 2009, surprising commuters during rush hour with precise movements achieved after only two rehearsals. Similarly, on August 29, 2009, 13,597 participants in Mexico City's Plaza synchronized a dance to Michael Jackson's "Thriller," establishing a World Record for the largest such performance and honoring the recently deceased artist through mass participation in a public square. These spectacles underscore the form's capacity for large-scale coordination, blending amateur and professional talent to evoke shared exhilaration in urban environments. Performance flash mobs have proliferated in transportation hubs, malls, and plazas worldwide, facilitated by coordination while preserving the illusion of assembly. Their appeal lies in transforming mundane spaces into temporary stages, fostering ephemeral connections among strangers, though scalability varies from dozens to thousands depending on and venue. Unlike scripted theater, the format's brevity—usually under ten minutes—and rapid dispersal emphasize , with lasting resonance often derived from bystander reactions documented in viral footage.

Commercial and Promotional Applications

Flash mobs have been adapted for commercial purposes primarily as a form of , where brands orchestrate surprise performances in public spaces to draw crowds, create shareable content, and associate products with spontaneity and joy. These events typically involve coordinated dancers or actors promoting services, retail products, or releases, often filmed for online dissemination to amplify reach beyond the immediate audience. The strategy exploits the novelty of flash mobs to generate and consumer buzz at lower costs than conventional , though success depends on seamless execution and audience receptivity. A landmark example is T-Mobile's "Dance" event on January 15, 2009, at London's , where hundreds of hired performers initiated a choreographed routine to popular songs, inviting startled commuters to join amid the morning rush. Part of the carrier's "Life's for Sharing" campaign emphasizing connectivity, the performance was captured on video, which accumulated over 41 million views and spawned parodies, demonstrating viral potential. The associated advertisement earned the TV Commercial of the Year at the 2010 British Television Advertising Awards, highlighting its role in elevating brand perception through experiential marketing. Subsequent applications include follow-up T-Mobile events, such as the 2011 "Welcome Back" flash mob at , which reinforced the brand's theme of shared experiences. Retailers have similarly deployed flash mobs near stores to boost foot traffic, as in coordinated dances promoting seasonal sales or product lines, transforming routine shopping into participatory spectacles that encourage amplification. While effective for visibility—evidenced by increased online engagement metrics—these tactics risk alienating audiences if perceived as overly scripted or disruptive, underscoring the need for authentic integration with public spaces.

Activism and Social Experimentation

Flash mobs originated as deliberate social experiments orchestrated by Bill Wasik, a senior editor at , to investigate crowd dynamics and the influence of digital coordination on . In 2003, Wasik organized a series of gatherings in , using email lists to instruct participants to assemble briefly in public spaces, perform a scripted action, and disperse without lingering. The inaugural successful event occurred on June 17, 2003, when approximately 100 individuals converged on the rug department of , feigned interest in purchasing a "love rug," and departed en masse while chanting phrases like "rally of the rugs." Wasik's intent was to demonstrate the ease of manufacturing artificial trends and mob mentality among urban trend-followers, critiquing the superficiality of hipster culture by showing how people would adhere to purposeless instructions disseminated via nascent social networks. Over the course of that summer, he coordinated at least eight such events, refining tactics to evade early failures caused by participant confusion or non-compliance, thereby empirically validating the concept's feasibility for rapid, leaderless assembly. These experiments highlighted causal mechanisms in crowd formation: pre-arranged signaling via enabled synchronized action without traditional , revealing vulnerabilities in public spaces to engineered spontaneity. Wasik later reflected that the mobs served as a proof-of-concept for how minimal coordination could override individual skepticism, fostering temporary detached from genuine shared purpose. Empirical outcomes included high compliance rates among invitees—often exceeding 70% attendance—and quick dissipation, underscoring the transient nature of digitally mobilized groups when incentives were absent. Beyond experimentation, flash mobs have been adapted for , leveraging their sudden onset and brevity to amplify messages, evade , or disrupt targeted sites while minimizing sustained confrontation. In , the Flo6x8 collective began staging flamenco-infused flash mobs in bank branches around 2012 to austerity measures, evictions, and financial institutions' role in economic hardship following the 2008 crisis. Performers would enter lobbies unannounced, execute rhythmic and sequences decrying capitalist exploitation, and exit promptly, drawing media attention to grievances like widespread foreclosures affecting over 350,000 households annually in the early 2010s. These actions, concentrated in , combined cultural expression with , pressuring branches to halt evictions temporarily in some cases, though critics noted their symbolic impact often outpaced tangible policy changes. In politically repressive contexts, activists have employed flash mob tactics for evasion and resilience. During Hong Kong's 2019 pro-democracy protests, demonstrators adopted fluid, decentralized assemblies resembling flash mobs—gathering via encrypted apps like Telegram for brief occupations of streets or malls before scattering—to counter police predictability and facial recognition systems. This approach sustained participation amid escalating crackdowns, with events involving thousands on August 3, 2019, focusing on demands for . Similarly, in Myanmar's 2021 anti-coup movement, protesters in cities like formed short-lived flash mobs of chants and signs to military rule, deliberately limiting durations to under five minutes to reduce exposure to snipers and arrests, which had claimed over 700 lives by May. Such tactics empirically reduced per-event casualties compared to prolonged static s, though overall effectiveness depended on broader networks. These applications illustrate flash mobs' utility in for causal disruption—interrupting normalcy to force visibility—while their decentralized structure resists centralized suppression, albeit risking escalation if perceived as threats by authorities.

Criminal and Destructive Misuses

Organized Retail Thefts and Robberies

Organized retail thefts involving flash mobs refer to coordinated groups that rapidly assemble, often via platforms, to enter retail stores en masse, seize high-value merchandise, and disperse before can respond effectively. These incidents typically target such as designer handbags, jewelry, and electronics, with participants employing tactics like overwhelming security personnel, using vehicles to block exits, or employing smash-and-grab methods involving broken windows or smashed display cases. Unlike traditional , flash mob operations prioritize speed and numbers—sometimes involving dozens of individuals—to maximize haul value, which can exceed hundreds of thousands of dollars per event, while minimizing individual risk through . Prominent examples illustrate the phenomenon's prevalence in major U.S. cities. In , on September 26-27, 2023, multiple flash mobs ransacked stores including Apple, Lululemon, and across the city over two nights, leading to at least 52 arrests and charges against over 70 individuals, predominantly adults, for and . In , a group of more than 30 masked thieves targeted a store in Canoga Park on July 22, 2023, stealing over $300,000 in purses, clothing, and jewelry within minutes; similar assaults hit an Yves Saint Laurent boutique in Glendale on August 13, 2023, and a Nike store near on December 17, 2023, involving 17 masked individuals pushing past shoppers. has seen recurrent incidents, contributing to its ranking among the highest retail theft rates nationally, with coordinated groups exploiting lax enforcement to hit jewelry and apparel outlets. reported 51 flash mob thefts at Lululemon stores alone through early 2025, per police records. These activities form a subset of (), with the reporting that 52.9% of surveyed retailers experienced increased ORC incidents in 2022, often involving flash mob tactics to evade detection. Nationwide retail shrinkage from exceeded $100 billion in 2023, with external theft accounting for a significant portion, and felony shoplifting classifications nearly doubling in select cities post-2019. Coordination via apps like Telegram or enables real-time mobilization, turning benign flash mob spontaneity into criminal enterprises linked to resale on platforms like or street markets, though prosecutions face challenges from witness intimidation and jurisdictional gaps. Urban centers like , , and report elevated frequencies, correlating with policy leniency on under certain monetary thresholds.

Role in Riots, Looting, and Violence

Flash mobs, originally characterized by brief, coordinated gatherings via digital communication, have been co-opted for orchestrating looting and violence during periods of civil unrest, leveraging social media for rapid mobilization that evades traditional policing. In such misuses, participants assemble suddenly to overwhelm targets—whether stores, crowds, or public spaces—before dispersing, complicating law enforcement response and amplifying damage through sheer numbers. This adaptation exploits the core mechanics of flash mobs but substitutes entertainment with criminal intent, often resulting in assaults, property destruction, and economic losses exceeding millions in affected areas. During the 2011 England riots, which spanned multiple cities from August 6 to 11, authorities attributed elements of the widespread looting and arson—causing over £200 million in damages and five deaths—to flash mob-like coordination via platforms such as BlackBerry Messenger, enabling hundreds to converge on retail districts in , , and Birmingham for opportunistic thefts from stores like and . Prime Minister noted the role of in "organizing disorder," prompting temporary network shutdowns, though critics argued this reflected deeper socioeconomic grievances rather than solely technological facilitation. Similar dynamics appeared in U.S. cities, where 2011 unrest in and saw "flash robs" evolve into violent episodes, with groups of 50 to 200 youths using to summon attacks on passersby and businesses. In Chicago, a series of 2011 flash mob incidents from May to August involved predominantly teenage groups assaulting individuals in the Loop and districts, with police reporting over 29 arrests tied to beatings of at least a dozen victims, including a man hospitalized after a mob of 50 youths pummeled him on June 4. These events, organized via Facebook and Twitter, targeted public transportation and retail areas, prompting curfews and heightened patrols amid fears of escalating "mob mentality" violence disproportionately affecting non-participants. Philadelphia experienced comparable outbreaks, such as the July 27, 2011, looting of the Macy's store on Market Street by around 1,000 teens, resulting in 19 arrests and $7,000 in stolen goods, which officials linked to social media summons for "wilding." More recent instances underscore persistence, as in on September 26, 2023, when over 100 masked juveniles executed flash mob-style raids on luxury retailers like Lululemon, Apple, and following a over a police shooting, leading to 53 arrests, widespread , and an estimated $1 million in losses amid smashed windows and stolen merchandise worth tens of thousands. In , a July 2023 incident saw 30 masked individuals storm a Canoga Park jewelry store in under a minute, fleeing with high-value items in vehicles, exemplifying how these tactics integrate with broader rings. Such events highlight enforcement challenges, as the ephemeral nature allows perpetrators to claim spontaneity, though data from the indicates a surge in group thefts post-2020, correlating with urban unrest spikes. Flash mob tactics, involving coordinated groups overwhelming retail targets, have been integrated into (ORC) operations, where stolen goods are systematically fenced for profit through networks. ORC, encompassing flash robs, contributes to U.S. retail losses exceeding $45 billion annually, with perpetrators often reselling high-value items like electronics and apparel to sustain broader criminal enterprises. Law enforcement attributes many such incidents to structured groups, including street , that leverage for recruitment and execution to evade detection. For example, in August 2023, a flash robbery at a Nordstrom store resulted in over $300,000 in losses, with police investigating ties to or networks based on the operation's scale and coordination. Arrests in organized task force operations further illustrate these links; in January 2024, a 28-year-old suspect connected to a Nordstrom flash mob was apprehended as part of efforts targeting ORC rings involving repeated, multi-store hits. Similarly, in November 2024, four men faced charges in Maryland for orchestrating 37 flash mob-style thefts at retailers including GameStop and Dick's Sporting Goods, demonstrating role specialization and interstate fencing indicative of professional crime syndicates. While flash mobs amplify ORC's efficiency by deploying large numbers to deter intervention, evidence of direct integration with —such as drug cartels—is limited, with most documented cases involving domestic gangs or loose booster networks that feed into larger illicit economies. These tactics exacerbate challenges for retailers, as stolen merchandise often funds ancillary crimes like distribution, though causal chains require verification through rather than anecdotal reports.

Legality of Benign Assemblies

In the United States, benign flash mobs—spontaneous, non-violent gatherings for purposes such as performance or social experimentation—are typically shielded by the First Amendment's protections for free speech and the right to peaceable assembly, provided they do not substantially disrupt public order or violate neutral regulations on time, place, and manner. Courts have extended these safeguards to expressive conduct beyond mere words, as affirmed in precedents like (1989), where symbolic actions received robust protection absent incitement to . However, participants risk charges for if the assembly impedes pedestrian or vehicular traffic, enters private property without permission, or exceeds venue-specific capacity limits; for instance, municipal codes in cities like New York require permits for events anticipated to draw over 20-50 people in public thoroughfares. Local authorities must apply permit requirements content-neutrally, without targeting the expressive content, per guidelines from organizations like the ACLU, to avoid First Amendment violations. Internationally, the legal status of benign flash mobs varies by jurisdiction, often hinging on distinctions between spontaneous expression and regulated public demonstrations. The , in a 2019 ruling on a Russian case (Kravchenko v. Russia), classified flash mobs as peaceful assemblies under Article 11 of the , holding that prosecution solely for lacking prior notification infringes on unless justified by compelling public safety needs. In contrast, stricter regimes in countries like mandate permits for any public space usage involving groups, as enforced in since the mid-2000s, leading to dispersals of even non-disruptive events to prevent escalation. Similar permit mandates apply in parts of the under the , where assemblies of 20 or more on highways require advance notice if they might obstruct passage, though benign, short-duration mobs in open areas often evade enforcement absent complaints. Enforcement challenges for benign assemblies stem from their ephemeral nature, complicating preemptive while underscoring the tension between spontaneity and public . Legal scholars note that overly broad anti-flash mob ordinances risk facial invalidity under free expression doctrines, as seen in U.S. analyses advocating content-neutral frameworks over outright bans. In practice, benign events succeed when organizers coordinate discreetly to minimize disruption, such as dispersing within minutes, thereby aligning with default tolerances for small-scale public interactions in democratic societies.

Prosecution of Criminal Flash Mob Activities

Prosecutors pursue charges against participants in criminal flash mobs primarily under statutes for , , , , and organized retail theft, with penalties escalating based on the value of stolen goods and use of violence. For instance, in , individuals involved in coordinated group thefts exceeding $950 in value face grand theft charges, potentially carrying sentences of up to three years in state prison, while adds further liability for planning via or apps. Federal involvement occurs when activities cross state lines or involve interstate commerce, as investigated by the FBI's Organized Retail Theft task forces, which collaborate with local law enforcement to build cases meeting thresholds for wire fraud or violations. Successful prosecutions often rely on surveillance footage, social media posts, and witness identifications to establish individual roles, though challenges arise from the of crowds, masked participants, and rapid dispersal, complicating attribution of specific acts. In a 2023 series of flash mob robberies targeting luxury retailers, nine defendants pleaded guilty to and organized retail , resulting in sentences ranging from to 10 years and four months in for leaders, with the group responsible for over $1.7 million in losses; evidence included vehicle tracking and accomplice testimony. Similarly, in County 7-Eleven robberies in September 2024, arrests followed parental surrenders of minors and LAPD photo releases, leading to juvenile charges under and statutes, though many cases involved first-time offenders receiving diversion programs rather than incarceration. Legal hurdles include proving intent and coordination in ostensibly "spontaneous" assemblies, as mob psychology defenses may argue lack of premeditation, and some jurisdictions' policies—such as California's Proposition 47, which reduced many thefts below thresholds—limit aggressive pursuit of low-value cases. In and , district attorneys have declined to prosecute certain incidents under $1,000, even in group contexts, citing resource constraints and deprioritization of minor offenses, which critics attribute to ideological reluctance to impose strict penalties on youth offenders. Academic analyses highlight difficulties in applying or laws to flash mobs, as statutes often require proof of or public endangerment, not mere , prompting calls for updated frameworks to address mobilization. Recent legislative responses aim to bolster prosecutions, including California's 2024 laws signed by Governor Newsom enhancing penalties for repeat organized thefts and funding task forces for surveillance and patrols, while federal bills like the Combating Organized Retail Crime Act seek to unify interstate enforcement. Conviction rates improve with multi-agency coordination, as seen in a 2023 arrest for a Yves Saint Laurent burglary where conspiracy charges stuck due to digital footprints, yielding a multi-year sentence. However, under-prosecution persists in high-burden urban areas, where evidentiary gaps and plea bargains often result in lighter outcomes compared to the scale of coordinated damages.

Policy Responses and Recent Legislation

In response to rising incidents of flash mob-style organized retail thefts, federal lawmakers reintroduced the Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025 on April 10, 2025, sponsored by Senators and , to address flash mob robberies through enhanced interagency task forces, improved data sharing between federal and state authorities, and dedicated for investigations into multistate theft rings. The bill builds on prior versions by establishing a centralized federal database for tracking stolen goods and prioritizing prosecution of groups coordinating via , reflecting empirical data from the FBI indicating that such crimes cost retailers over $100 billion annually in losses as of 2023. At the state level, enacted multiple measures in 2024 to deter flash mob attacks, including Assembly Bill 1803, signed by Governor on September 12, 2024, which imposes felony enhancements for thefts involving organized groups of five or more participants or exceeding $50,000 in value, directly targeting "flash-mob attacks by organized gangs." Additional legislation signed on August 16, 2024, closed loopholes in cargo theft prosecutions and mandated reporting of retail crime trends, contributing to a reported 20% decline in smash-and-grab incidents in targeted counties by mid-2025. Maryland's House Bill 825, effective October 1, 2025, allows aggregation of multiple retail thefts into felony charges even if below individual thresholds, enabling prosecutors to pursue organized flash mob operations as single conspiracies, a shift prompted by post-COVID surges in such events documented by state retail associations. Similarly, Alabama's Retail Theft Crime Prevention Act (SB 206), signed in September 2023, elevated penalties for coordinated thefts including flash mobs, creating civil liability for participants and boosting recoveries through dedicated units. These state initiatives often complement federal efforts by focusing on local challenges, such as rapid mobilization via apps, though critics from retail sectors argue that lax prior sentencing contributed to escalation, with data showing repeat offenders in 70% of cases before reforms.

Societal Impacts and Criticisms

Positive Contributions to Culture and Community

Flash mobs originated as spontaneous assemblies that injected elements of surprise and collective performance into public spaces, often eliciting joy and fostering momentary communal bonds among participants and observers. The first documented flash mob in , , occurred on August 23, 2003, outside the Queen Victoria Building, where participants gathered briefly for coordinated actions, exemplifying early efforts to reclaim urban areas for lighthearted social experimentation. Choreographed performances, such as the T-Mobile dance event at London’s Liverpool Street Station on January 15, 2009, involved approximately 350 dancers surprising commuters with synchronized routines, generating widespread entertainment and viral dissemination that popularized dance in everyday settings. These events contributed to cultural vibrancy by blending commercial promotion with accessible artistry, amassing millions of online views and encouraging public participation in expressive activities. Playful variants like international flash mobs, including the 2008 gathering in ’s , drew hundreds into non-violent, recreational combat using soft pillows, promoting stress relief and reclaiming city squares for uninhibited fun. Such assemblies enhance social interaction by uniting diverse individuals in shared, ephemeral experiences, thereby strengthening community ties without sustained organization. In educational contexts, flash mobs serve as tools for building and creativity, as participants collaborate on rehearsals and executions. Additionally, participation in flash mob activities offers physical and benefits through dynamic movement and group synchronization, functioning as engaging forms of exercise that improve coordination and mood. Rooted in artistic interventions, these gatherings have influenced by normalizing brief, collective disruptions that prioritize delight over disruption.

Negative Effects on Public Safety and Economy

Flash mob gatherings, particularly those repurposed for criminal ends such as organized thefts or riots, have precipitated incidents of violence that endanger bystanders and strain public safety resources. In in 2011, a group of approximately 100 teenagers organized via assaulted pedestrians near Temple University's campus, resulting in multiple injuries including a broken for one victim; three perpetrators later pleaded guilty to felony assault charges. Similar events in cities like and during 2011 involved flash mob-style beatings and disruptions at public events, prompting local governments to monitor for and form task forces to mitigate risks of sudden violence. These occurrences heighten the potential for stampedes, , and assaults, as large, rapidly assembled groups overwhelm police response capabilities and foster an environment of unpredictable disorder. Law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, classify flash mob shoplifting—where coordinated groups, often teenagers in matching attire for anonymity, swarm stores—as a subset of organized retail crime that frequently escalates to threats or physical confrontations with employees and customers. Delaware State Police have issued advisories emphasizing personal safety over intervention in such scenarios, underscoring the inherent dangers to civilians caught in these transient but aggressive assemblies. During the 2020 George Floyd protests, opportunistic looters exploited flash mob tactics to target high-end retailers in cities like Oakland, creating "whack-a-mole" scenarios for police that diverted resources from broader riot control and prolonged public exposure to violence. Congressional reports note recurring patterns of flash mobs storming stores, stealing en masse, and assaulting staff, which traumatize workers and erode community trust in public spaces. Economically, flash mob-driven organized retail crimes contribute to substantial losses, with U.S. retailers reporting $112.1 billion in theft and inventory shrinkage in 2022 alone, a 19% increase from $93.9 billion in 2021, partly attributable to coordinated group thefts. The National Retail Federation attributes a portion of these costs to flash mob incidents, which impose $720,000 in losses per $1 billion in sales—up 50% since 2015—through direct merchandise theft, heightened security expenditures, and elevated insurance premiums. Such activities have prompted store closures, including in high-theft areas like San Francisco and Los Angeles, where smash-and-grab flash robs deter investment and raise consumer prices to offset shrinkage. In riot contexts, flash mob looting exacerbates fiscal damage; for instance, post-2020 unrest inflicted billions in property destruction on small businesses, reducing their viability and local economic activity by discouraging relocation or expansion in affected zones. Overall, these events amplify broader organized retail crime networks, funding illicit resale and imposing indirect costs via increased law enforcement budgets and diminished retail foot traffic due to heightened public apprehension.

Debates Over Term Dilution and Cultural Phenomenon

The original conception of the flash mob, as articulated by Bill Wasik in his 2006 essay, emphasized brief, coordinated public assemblies for performative or absurdist acts, drawing from a 1973 science-fiction story titled "Flash Crowd" to evoke sudden, ephemeral gatherings without violent or destructive intent. These early events, starting in in May 2003, aimed to explore and consumerist critique through non-commercial, fleeting spectacles that dispersed quickly to avoid permanence or confrontation. By the , the term's application expanded to describe social media-orchestrated groups engaging in , , or assaults, such as the 2011 Philadelphia incidents where dozens of youths coordinated via text messages to overrun stores and transit systems, resulting in arrests for and . This shift prompted criticism that the label dilutes the original's artistic essence, conflating benign with predatory coordination; Wasik has been cited in discussions lamenting how such misuse inspires "flash mob thuggery" while eroding the term's association with playful experimentation. Proponents of retaining a broad definition argue it captures a causal driven by technology's of , where the same tools enabling dance performances also facilitate opportunistic crime, as evidenced in analyses of urban riots amplified by platforms like in 2011 disturbances. Critics, however, contend this equivalence fosters semantic confusion and cultural devaluation, with empirical reviews distinguishing "criminal flash mobs" to preserve the phenomenon's roots in positive, non-violent public expression amid rising concerns over security threats from unscripted assemblies. Such debates underscore tensions between the flash mob's initial role in fostering ephemeral community creativity—evident in global replications like synchronized dances—and its reframing as a vector for deindividuated , potentially deterring benign uses due to heightened public wariness.

References

  1. https://harpers.org/archive/2006/03/my-crowd/
  2. https://www.natcom.org/publications-library/flash-memory-history-flash-mobs/
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8510885/
  4. https://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1471&context=shlr
  5. https://elephant.art/crowd-and-proud-the-history-of-the-flash-mob-20042022/
  6. https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2003/07/30/913314.htm?site=galileo/indepthfeature&topic=latest
  7. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/flash%2520mob
  8. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/flash-mob_n2
  9. https://people.howstuffworks.com/flash-mob.htm
  10. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/flashmob
  11. https://plainenglish.com/lingo/flash-mob/
  12. https://www.ijbhtnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_3_May_2014/5.pdf
  13. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15534510601046569
  14. https://www.npr.org/2010/12/20/132205587/planning-a-flash-mob-better-keep-it-quiet
  15. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wp_RHnQ-jgU
  16. https://www.phillymag.com/news/2010/11/15/a-flash-mob-for-the-cultured/
  17. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EYAUazLI9k
  18. https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/largest-thriller-dance
  19. https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Americas/2009/0830/p06s04-woam.html
  20. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna32612234
  21. https://www.valens-research.com/dynamic-marketing-communique/it-all-happens-in-a-flash-how-did-this-surprise-marketing-tactic-become-viral-gorillas-of-guerrilla-marketing/
  22. https://www.hostess-promoter.com/en/blog/advertising-that-uses-flashes-of-the-crowd-advantages-and-risks-of-flash-mobs/
  23. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/mar/11/tmobile-flashmob-ad-of-year
  24. https://bettiesandbelles.com/top-5-corporate-flash-mobs-in-history/
  25. https://flashmobbers.au/10-ways-flashmobs-can-supercharge-retail-marketing-campaigns/
  26. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-22110887
  27. https://theconversation.com/flashmobs-and-flamenco-how-spains-greatest-artform-became-a-tool-for-political-protest-49310
  28. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/aug/04/hong-kong-protesters-return-streets-day-after-violent-clashes
  29. https://asia.nikkei.com/spotlight/myanmar-crisis/myanmar-protesters-stage-flash-mobs-to-avoid-bullets
  30. https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/the-evolution-of-flash-mobs-from-pranks-to-crime-and-revolution/article_80af53fa-a43f-5d1a-ad37-c0ba281a926a.html
  31. https://www.npr.org/2023/10/09/1203697964/flash-mob-retail-thefts
  32. https://www.investopedia.com/organized-retail-crime-7097862
  33. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-08-16/smash-and-grabs-flash-mob-robberies-shopper-fear-retailer-concern
  34. https://apnews.com/article/philadelphia-store-mob-thefts-teenagers-f2351d631f691aa081233b1df1bee54d
  35. https://www.deepsentinel.com/blogs/retail/dissecting-flash-mob-robberies-swarm-and-steal/
  36. https://www.investors.com/news/retail-theft-losses-mount-from-shoplifting-flash-mobs-organized-crime/
  37. https://counciloncj.org/shoplifting-trends-what-you-need-to-know/
  38. https://www.cleveland.com/world/2011/08/flash_mob_phenomenon_given_par.html
  39. https://www.cleveland.com/world/2011/08/flash_mobs_blamed_for_incident.html
  40. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304778304576375661383528354
  41. https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/0809/Flash-mob-attacks-Rising-concern-over-black-teen-involvement
  42. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-09-26/are-violent-flash-mobs-really-a-trend
  43. https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/man-beaten-by-mob-of-young-men-in-streeterville/
  44. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/9/27/us-teens-ransack-loot-philadelphia-shops-in-flash-mob-style-raids
  45. https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/transnational-organized-crime/organized-retail-theft
  46. https://fortune.com/2021/12/04/flash-mob-robberies-organized-crime-nordstrom-best-buy-retail/
  47. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/organized-crime-gangs-300k-l-flash-rob-police-say-rcna99904
  48. https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/task-force-arrests-28-year-old-connected-to-flash-mob-robbery-at-nordstrom/
  49. https://wtop.com/maryland/2024/11/4-accused-of-taking-part-in-crime-ring-that-hit-gamestop-dicks-more-stores-with-flash-mob-robberies/
  50. https://www.cwsdefense.com/blog/2024/august/the-criminal-consequences-of-flash-mob-robberies/
  51. https://interfacesystems.com/blog/organized-retail-crime/
  52. https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/are-flash-mobs-illegal/
  53. https://www.vondranlegal.com/legal-risks-of-a-flash-mob
  54. https://www.aclu-wa.org/know-your-rights/know-your-rights-guide-protests/
  55. https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2019/11/22/echr-flash-mobs-are-peaceful-assembly-of-people-staging-demonstration-without-prior-authorisation-does-not-necessarily-justify-interfering-with-a-persons-right-to-freedom/
  56. https://www.echrcaselaw.com/en/echr-decisions/the-flash-mobs-under-the-umbrella-of-the-freedom-of-assembly/
  57. https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/flash-mobbing--art-business-event-or-protest
  58. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1516&context=iplj
  59. https://aaronhall.com/legal-terms-for-flash-mob-performances-in-public-venues/
  60. https://www.pasadenastarnews.com/2024/07/30/8-sentenced-for-roles-in-flash-mob-robberies-across-southern-california/
  61. https://www.courthousenews.com/california-smash-and-grab-robbers-get-up-to-10-years-in-prison/
  62. https://www.foxla.com/news/7-eleven-flash-mob-robberires-parents-turn-in-kids
  63. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/12/03/retail-theft-organized-crime/
  64. https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2472&context=faculty-articles
  65. https://fortune.com/2024/08/16/california-crackdown-newsom-signs-10-bills-shoplifting-flash-mob/
  66. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/grassley-cortez-masto-reintroduce-legislation-to-combat-organized-retail-theft
  67. https://nypost.com/2023/08/18/arrest-made-in-flash-mob-style-burglary-at-california-ysl-store/
  68. https://www.carriermanagement.com/news/2025/04/14/274153.htm
  69. https://www.gov.ca.gov/2024/09/12/governor-newsom-signs-smash-and-grab-bill-to-strengthen-felony-sentences-for-large-scale-theft-offenses/
  70. https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/crime/lawmakers-in-maryland-try-to-stop-retial-theft-and-smash-and-grabs/65-fee0bdaa-8d29-4926-87cc-a96c72a517d6
  71. https://www.nfib.com/news/news/new-state-law-targets-shoplifting-organized-retail-theft/
  72. https://ecam.com/security-blog/retail-and-cargo-theft
  73. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:First_Sydney_flash_mob%2C_August_2003.jpg
  74. https://www.trendhunter.com/trends/flash-mob-dancing-synchronized-dancing-at-london-liverpool-street
  75. https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/t-mobile-ad-breaks-during-celebrity-big-brother/874347
  76. https://flashmobbers.au/the-impact-of-flashmobs-on-pop-culture-and-social-media/
  77. https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/international-pillow-fight-day-helping-090201315.html
  78. https://flashmobbers.au/flashmob-services/flashmob-connect/harnessing-the-power-of-flashmobs-in-schools-creative-expression-and-community-building/
  79. https://health.usnews.com/health-news/health-wellness/articles/2014/10/15/why-flash-mobs-are-good-for-your-health
  80. https://6abc.com/archive/8314533/
  81. https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/0803/Flash-robs-How-Twitter-is-being-twisted-for-criminal-gain-VIDEO
  82. http://file.lacounty.gov/lasd/cms1_166469.pdf
  83. https://dsp.delaware.gov/2019/07/12/delaware-state-police-offer-awareness-and-prevention-tips-regarding-flash-mob-crime-sprees/?print=print
  84. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2020/06/15/criminals-used-george-floyd-protests-cover-looting-police-say/5324881002/
  85. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48061
  86. https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/retail/2023/09/27/retail-theft-lost-inventory-statistics-2022/70975031007/
  87. https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/01/30/2023/grassley-cortez-masto-bill-bolsters-federal-response-to-organized-retail-theft
  88. https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/organized-shoplifting-100-billion-problem-heres-why-were-all-screwed
  89. https://www.foxbusiness.com/money/george-floyd-riots-looting-small-business
  90. https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/organized-retail-crime-economic-impact-and-policy-responses
  91. https://commonreader.wustl.edu/are-flash-mobs-over-or-just-ruined/
  92. https://www.wired.com/story/crowd-control/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.