Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Fort Concho
View on Wikipedia
Fort Concho Historic District | |
Headquarters building, September 2017 | |
![]() | |
| Location | San Angelo, Texas, United States |
|---|---|
| Coordinates | 31°27′15″N 100°25′40″W / 31.45417°N 100.42778°W |
| Website | fortconcho |
| NRHP reference No. | 66000823 |
| TSAL No. | 8200000596 |
| Significant dates | |
| Added to NRHP | October 15, 1966 |
| Designated NHLD | July 4, 1961 |
| Designated TSAL | January 1, 1986 |
Fort Concho is a former United States Army installation and National Historic Landmark District located in San Angelo, Texas. It was established in November 1867 at the confluence of the North and South Concho Rivers, on the routes of the Butterfield Overland Mail Route and Goodnight–Loving Trail, and was an active military base for the next 22 years. Fort Concho was the principal base of the 4th Cavalry from 1867 to 1875 and then the "Buffalo Soldiers" of the 10th Cavalry from 1875 to 1882. The troops stationed at Fort Concho participated in Ranald S. Mackenzie's 1872 campaign, the Red River War in 1874, and the Victorio Campaign of 1879–1880.
The fort was abandoned in June 1889, and over the next 20 years was divided into residences and businesses, with the buildings repurposed or recycled for their materials. Efforts to preserve and restore Fort Concho began in the 1900s and resulted in the foundation of the Fort Concho Museum in 1929. The property has been owned and operated by the city of San Angelo since 1935. Fort Concho was named a National Historic Landmark on July 4, 1961, and is one of the best-preserved examples of the military installations built by the US Army in Texas.
The Fort Concho Historic District covers the fort's original 40-acre (16 ha) grounds and 23 buildings, some of which are the oldest in San Angelo. As of August 2019[update], about 55,000 people visit the fort annually.
Operation by the US military
[edit]Fort Concho was established during the American colonization of Texas in the 19th century,[1] a process that began in the 1820s with the immigration of Anglo-Americans into Spanish, later Mexican, Texas.[2] Europeans first reached the Concho River valley in the 16th century. The Spanish established contact and then traded with the Jumano people, who inhabited the valley until they were driven out of it by the Apache peoples in the 1690s. The Apache were themselves expelled by the mid-18th century by the Comanche. However, in 1849, American colonists began crossing West Texas in large numbers to reach California, where gold had been discovered.[3] To protect its citizens, the United States Army ordered the construction of a string of forts along the frontier's routes of travel from 1850 to 1852.[4][5] Among those forts was Fort Chadbourne, established on October 28, 1852,[6] and among those avenues was the Butterfield Overland Mail route, established in 1858 with Fort Chadbourne as one of its stations.[7][8]
The beginning of the American Civil War in 1861 ended both enterprises. The Butterfield route moved out of Texas,[7] and the federal government ceded its Texas forts to the Confederate States of America.[9] Confederate Texas was unable to secure its territories, so as a consequence, white settlers retreated eastward throughout the war. After the end of the war in 1865, though, immigrants from the war-torn Southern States decamped for Texas.[10] Many of these immigrants became cattle herders and followed routes such as the Goodnight–Loving Trail,[11] established in 1866 on the Butterfield route[12] – which brought large volumes of cattle through the Concho Valley.[13]
Major General Philip Sheridan, appointed to command the postwar military district covering Texas and Louisiana on March 19, 1867,[14] at first ignored reports of raiding by indigenous peoples,[15] but later that year, the US Army was ordered to reoccupy its pre-war billets in Texas,[16] and that May, Fort Chadbourne was reoccupied by the 4th Cavalry.[11] Fort Chadbourne was, however, poorly supplied with water.[17] The US Army decided to replace Fort Chadbourne with a new installation. They identified the junction of the Concho Rivers as an ideal site because of its proximity to the routes it was to guard and nearby grazing land, and the abundance of water.[18][19]
In mid-1867, Major John Porter Hatch, commanding the 4th Cavalry, dispatched Lieutenant Peter M. Boehm to establish a camp on the Middle Concho, 50 miles (80 km) to the south of Fort Chadbourne. Captain Michael J. Kelly and 50 troopers established this camp, albeit on the North Concho, and remained there over the summer of 1867. On November 28, 1867, the 4th Cavalry's H Company departed from Fort Chadbourne for the Conchos. H Company's commander, Captain George G. Huntt, named the site of the new fort "Camp Hatch", but changed it at Hatch's request to "Camp Kelly" in January 1868 to honor Kelly, who had died on August 13, 1867, of typhoid fever. Construction of a permanent outpost began on a site north of the camp, which was named Fort Concho in March 1868 by Edward M. Stanton, United States Secretary of War.[20]
Construction
[edit]
Captain David W. Porter, assistant quartermaster of the Department of Texas, was tasked with constructing Fort Concho on December 10, 1867.[21] Progress was slow,[22] as all building materials had to be shipped in[23] and there was frequent bickering among the fort's officers, Huntt and Porter included.[24] Porter employed civilian masons and carpenters,[21][25] but also oversaw the construction of Forts Griffin and Richardson. As such, he was often not present at the fort to direct building work. In March 1868, Porter was replaced at Fort Concho by Major George C. Cram, who built a temporary guardhouse. Cram was also frequently absent from the fort, and in the year of his arrival had the regional mail line superintendent, Major Ben Ficklin, arrested. The United States Postmaster General intervened and by August, Cram was reassigned and construction was handed to Captain Joseph Rendlebrock, the 4th Cavalry's quartermaster. By the end of the year, Rendlebrock had completed the commissary, quartermaster's storehouse, and a wing of the hospital.[26]
The first permanent military structures on the fort grounds, five of the officer's residences and the first regimental barracks, were completed by August 1869. They were followed over the next year by two more officer's residences, another barracks, and a permanent guardhouse and stables. Hatch pushed for the completion of the fort through 1870–71, directing the building of a quartermaster's corral and a wagon shed. In February 1872, however, budget cuts by the US War Department resulted in the dismissal of the civilian workers and another lull in construction. By the end of the year, Fort Concho consisted of four barracks, eight officers' residences, the hospital, a magazine, bakery, several storehouses, workshops, and stables.[27]
In 1875, the parade ground was cleared and a flagstaff placed in its center. In the process, the adjutant's office was moved to the headquarters building. It was replaced in short order with a stone command structure, the headquarters building, built in 1876. Another officers' residence was built in 1877, as were the foundations for another that went unfinished for lack of funding. This building was completed in February 1879 as the schoolhouse and chapel. It was the final permanent structure completed at Fort Concho.[28] By 1879, the fort was an eight-company installation. Construction had, by 1877, cost the US Army $1 million ($29.5 million, adjusted for inflation)[29] on land it had leased.[30] Thirty-nine permanent buildings were on the fort grounds by April 1889.[31]
Base of the 4th Cavalry
[edit]
In the first seven months of Fort Concho's existence, its garrison – numbering 129, out of a force of 3,672 in Texas, according to the 1869 reports of the War Department – were occupied by its plodding construction. This was the cause of much criticism by local Texas newspapers; the frontier continued to retreat in the remaining years of the 1860s.[32] Meanwhile, outside of building work, the garrison patrolled, scouted, and escorted cattle herds and wagon trains on the San Antonio–El Paso Road.[33] There was thus little combat in Texas, according to the US Army records. Inaction by the army, whose garrisons were poorly and irregularly supplied, and criticism of that inaction, continued into 1871. Beginning with the creation of the Department of Texas that March, however, US Army activity in Texas changed. Sheridan adopted a strategy of feinting and constant movement early in the year, and then punitive expeditions in the winter, when the tribes' ponies would be weakest. As part of Sheridan's plan, the garrisons of the Texas forts established subposts. Among these were Fort Chadbourne, which was reoccupied, and Camp Charlotte,[34] on the Middle Concho.[35]
On February 25, 1871, Colonel Ranald S. Mackenzie took command of the 4th Cavalry. He moved the regimental headquarters to Fort Richardson a month later,[36] but kept a few companies at Fort Concho.[37] These companies participated in an inconclusive campaign against the Kiowa from May to September 1871,[38] returning to Fort Concho in November.[39] Comanche and Kiowa raids became more frequent over the rest of 1871, prompting a number of expeditions that rarely saw Native Americans. A notable exception was a patrol carried out by Sergeant William Wilson from March 26 to 29, 1872, that led to the US Army's discovery of water in the Staked Plains and a large Comanche settlement at Mushaway Peak. Hatch,[40] in charge of Fort Concho for Mackenzie,[41] reported Wilson's findings, which were confirmed by another patrol by Captain Napoleon B. McLaughlen.[42]
After Mackenzie and Hatch met with Brigadier General Christopher C. Augur,[43][44] in command of the Department of Texas, Mackenzie and McLaughlen, commanding Companies D and I, departed from their respective installations on June 17. Over the following months, the 4th Cavalry explored the South Plains and fought the Comanche at the Battle of the North Fork on September 29. As a result of that battle, the 4th Cavalry captured 124 women and children, 116 of whom were taken back to Fort Concho on October 21. The captives were interned in the quartermaster's corral and remained there until the Department of Texas ordered their release on April 14, 1873. They departed Fort Concho on May 24 under escort from the 11th Infantry and arrived at Fort Sill on June 10.[45]
On June 27, 1874, more than 200 indigenous warriors attacked a group of buffalo hunters camped at Adobe Walls, beginning the Red River War. In response, Augur ordered Mackenzie and the 4th Cavalry back to Fort Concho in July. By August,[46] Sheridan, now commanding the Military Division of the Missouri,[14] ordered five expeditionary forces of more than 3,000 soldiers each into the South Plains.[37] The southern force, under Mackenzie, left Fort Concho on August 23, 1874, with eight companies of the 4th Cavalry, four of the 10th Infantry, and one from the 11th Infantry. Over the following year, Mackenzie chased the Comanche to their base of operations in the Palo Duro Canyon and destroyed it on September 28. His force continued to patrol the area over the winter, preventing the Comanche from rebuilding their supplies and forcing their return to their reservation.[47]
Base of the 10th Cavalry
[edit]
By 1875, Fort Concho had become one of the main US Army bases in Texas,[48] but early in the year, the 4th Cavalry was transferred to Fort Sill to keep the South Plains nations on their reservation.[37] They were replaced at Fort Concho by the 10th Cavalry, an all-black regiment commanded by Colonel Benjamin Grierson.[49] He arrived at Fort Concho on April 17, 1875, and established the regimental headquarters there.[50] Stationed at Forts Concho, Stockton, Davis, Quitman, and Clark,[49] and their subposts,[51] the 10th Cavalry was tasked with patrolling the frontier, escorting wagons and settlers, and mounting expeditions.[49] Beginning in 1877, starving Plains tribes began killing buffalo hunters and raiding white settlements. In response, Grierson sent Captain Nicholas M. Nolan and a company of the 10th to subdue the raiders.[51] Nolan set out in July, and achieved nothing but the death of four soldiers from the 10th Cavalry's Company A.[52][53]
In late 1879, Grierson received word that a war party of Ojo Caliente and Mescalero Apache under Chief Victorio entered the Trans-Pecos. He left Fort Concho on March 23, 1880, at the head of five companies of the 10th Cavalry and some of the 25th Infantry to disarm the Mescaleros of the Fort Stanton reservation. Grierson's soldiers fought with Apache raiders over early April, then reached Fort Stanton on April 12. The disarmament was delayed until April 16 because of rains and resulted in failure when the Mescalero Apache escaped with most of their arms. Grierson returned to Fort Concho on May 16, but left the 10th Cavalry's M Company at the head of the North Concho in case the Apache appeared in the area.[54]
On June 17, 1880, Nolan and a battalion of the 10th Cavalry at Fort Sill returned to Fort Concho by Grierson's order. Ten days later, Grierson sent Nolan to patrol the Guadalupe Mountains and himself set out from Fort Concho on July 10.[55] Grierson harried Victorio over the summer until he was defeated at Rattlesnake Springs and driven into Mexico, where Victorio's band was destroyed on October 15, 1880, by the Mexican Army.[56] The 10th Cavalry transferred permanently to Fort Davis, farther to the west, in July 1882.[57]
Post-Texas Indian Wars and deactivation
[edit]On January 27, 1881, the Texas Rangers fought and defeated what was left of Victorio's band in the final battle of the American Indian Wars fought in Texas. The 10th Cavalry was replaced at Fort Concho in 1882 by the 16th Infantry, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Alfred L. Hough. Ten days before Hough and the regimental headquarters arrived at the fort that August, the Concho River flooded, destroying the town of Ben Ficklin and badly damaging San Angelo. As a result, the 16th Infantry spent its first week on-site rendering humanitarian aid. After recovering, San Angelo began to prosper, while Fort Concho declined from poor maintenance.[58] From 1882 until the fort's final closure, it served primarily as a base for troops awaiting transfer elsewhere in Texas.[30] When Fort McKavett was abandoned by the US Army in June 1883, its garrison moved to Fort Concho.[59]
By the mid-1880s, ranches enclosed the surrounding plains with barbed-wire fencing; the soldiers, barred by law from cutting the wire, were reduced to patrolling roads. Many of the frontier forts, such as Forts Davis and Griffin, had either been abandoned or were awaiting deactivation. After the 16th Infantry left Fort Concho for Fort Bliss in February 1887, locals believed Fort Concho would also be abandoned. In early 1888, the 8th Cavalry gathered at Fort Concho from around Texas and then left in June for Fort Meade, South Dakota. With their departure, only the 19th Infantry's K Company was garrisoned at Fort Concho. On June 20, 1889, the men of K Company lowered the flag over the fort for the final time and left the next morning.[60]
Relationship with San Angelo, Texas
[edit]
In 1870, entrepreneur Bartholomew J. DeWitt purchased a half-section of land (0.5 mi2 (1.3 km2)) across the Concho from Fort Concho. He divided the area into plots to build a town, later to be known as San Angelo. The township was not a profitable venture and its lots were sold at low prices. By 1875, San Angelo was a collection of saloons and brothels.[61][62] Relations between the town and Fort Concho's garrison were strained and often outright hostile. Violence between Fort Concho's black servicemen and townspeople was common,[63][64][65] and continued until the 10th Cavalry was replaced by the 16th Infantry in 1882. Humanitarian aid rendered to locals by the garrison, especially following the flood of 1882, eventually evaporated the lingering animosity.[66]
Fort Concho was crucial to San Angelo's early growth. The presence of its garrison attracted traders and settlers and allowed diversification in the town's economy.[62] The fort's chaplains were some of the first preachers and educators in the town and its medical staff, chiefly surgeon William Notson, also treated civilians. One of Notson's civilian assistants, Samuel L. S. Smith, became San Angelo's first physician, and in 1910 helped establish its first civilian hospital. The government-contracted merchants who serviced the fort would all settle in San Angelo and be counted among its architects.[67]
Preservation
[edit]
Following the closure of the fort in 1889, it was divided into commercial and residential lots and its buildings were accordingly renovated or demolished.[68] Enlisted Barracks 3 and 4 were replaced with a series of residences, while the officers' residences were preserved as private homes.[69] Additional buildings were built in and around the fort,[68] including a school constructed on the parade ground in 1907. As early as 1905, however, influential locals tried to conserve the fort. J. L. Millspaugh, one of the merchants contracted to supply Fort Concho, suggested without success that the city buy it.[70] That same year, realtor C. A. Broome formed the Fort Concho Realty Company in 1905 to sell his properties on the fort's grounds to the city. The eastern third of the fort grounds, which had remained preserved, was given to the city by the Santa Fe Railroad Company in 1913. Eleven years later, the Daughters of the American Revolution raised funds to preserve the fort and secured a designation for it as a Texas state historic site, with accompanying plaque.[71]
In 1927, a local named Ginevra Wood Carson acquired a room in the Tom Green County Courthouse for an exhibit on local history,[70] and there established what would become the Fort Concho Museum.[30] After the museum began expanding into other rooms of the courthouse, Carson moved it into Fort Concho's headquarters building on August 8, 1930. Carson struggled to raise a sum of $6,000 ($112,936, adjusted for inflation) to purchase the building from its owner, who in 1935 relented and accepted the $3,000 ($68,803, adjusted for inflation) she had been able to raise.[70] That same year, the city of San Angelo assumed partial administrative responsibility for the museum,[72][73] to be managed by a board of directors headed by Carson until she retired in 1953. Funding for the museum was slashed during the Great Depression and World War II, though four buildings were acquired in 1939. Further acquisitions occurred in the later 1940s, until the 1950s Texas drought again strained municipal resources. The museum was made a department of the city of San Angelo in 1955, but only one property purchased in that decade; the Fort Concho Museum by this time controlled only about a quarter of the fort grounds. In the 1960s, the city of San Angelo sought to cede the Fort Concho Museum to the federal and state governments, but both were prioritizing other Texas forts.[74]
On July 4, 1961, Fort Concho was named a National Historic Landmark District,[75] and on October 15, 1966, it was placed on the National Register of Historic Places,[76] by the National Park Service (NPS). A plan was prepared by the NPS in 1961,[74] and again in 1967.[71] In 1980, the Fort Concho Museum collaborated with Bell, Klein and Hoffman, an Austin-based architecture firm specializing in restorations,[77] to prepare another, three-phase plan to acquire the rest of the fort's grounds and demolish its 19th and 20th century modifications.[68] The museum began implementing that plan in 1981, spending over $900,000 ($3.11 million).[77] Those funds were raised by matched grants from the NPS via the Historic Preservation Fund.[68] The parade ground was then brought fully under the museum's control with the move of the school to a new campus.[78] An NPS survey in June 1985 found that the fort was in generally good condition, though a number of later buildings were still on its grounds.[68] On January 1, 1986, it was named a Texas State Antiquities Landmark by the Texas Historical Commission.[79] By 1989, the district consisted of 16 original buildings, six reconstructed buildings, and a stabilized ruin.[71]
In 2015, an anonymous donor gave $2,000,000 ($2.65 million, adjusted for inflation) to the Fort Concho Museum.[80] Two years later, the museum announced that it would use the donated money and other proceeds to expand its visitors center and rebuild Barracks 3 and 4 over 2018.[81] No commissions were made until December 2020, however, when the City of San Angelo announced imminent repairs to 14 buildings, and that the reconstructed Barracks 3 and the mess hall of Barracks 4 would house a research library on loan to the museum.[80] A permit was issued for the reconstruction of Barracks 3 and 4 in September 2021.[82]
Involvement in the YFZ ranch raid
[edit]On April 3, 2008, following a call from an alleged victim of abuse by members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, a polygamist Mormon sect, Texas authorities raided the YFZ Ranch,[83] 45 miles (72 km) from San Angelo.[84] The authorities began removing children from the ranch the next day, and relocated them to Fort Concho on April 5. The State of Texas was granted conservatorship over the children on April 7, and seven days later moved all women accompanying children older than five years to the Foster Communications Coliseum, also in San Angelo.[83] On June 2, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that the seizure of the children was unlawful, and the children were released from state custody.[85]
Grounds and architecture
[edit]As of August 2019,[update] the Fort Concho Historic District consists of 25 buildings standing on a 40-acre (16 ha) site, with a museum collection of 40,000 items.[86] The district's boundaries are formed by East Avenue A and the railroad track to the north, South Oakes Street to the west, a fence behind Officer's Row to the south, and a service road behind the administrative buildings to the east.[87] The fort is visited annually by 55,000 people.[86]
Fort Concho, like the forts built and operated by the US Army in Texas, is not fortified. It was designed as a cantonment, where troops could recuperate after being on campaign.[88] Its buildings are arranged around a parade ground, measuring 1,000 ft (300 m) long by 500 ft (150 m) wide,[30] that was the hub of its activity. The design of those buildings is a blend of the Neoclassical and Territorial styles, with the only ornament in the buildings being the stone lintels over each window. Each building was constructed from limestone upon a low-lying stone foundation, usually with an attached wooden veranda, with gabled roofs shingled in wood.[89] A low, stone wall surrounded the fort to keep buffalo out of the fort.[25] The material used in the fort's construction was sourced externally;[90] the stone and mortar came from Ben Ficklin, to the south of the fort,[22] and the wood was shipped from the Gulf Coast, as the native pecan and mesquite were unsuitable for construction.[90]
Barracks Row
[edit]
Barracks Row is made up by the six enlisted men's barracks that line the northern side of the parade ground. The barracks are rectangular, one-story dormitories with an attached kitchen and mess hall to the north of each barracks. They are topped with hipped roofs, crowned with one windcatcher and one single chimney each. A veranda wraps each barracks, but not their attached mess halls. North of the barracks are the stables, built like the rest of the fort, but with a flat roof.[91]
Barracks 1 and 2 were built in 1869 and 1870, respectively, and each contained two cavalry companies. These barracks are unique in having sally ports at their centers for leading horses through, rather than around, the barracks to reach the stables.[92] Barracks 1 had two dining halls to Barracks 2's one, but they were demolished sometime after the fort was abandoned.[93] Barracks 1 is the visitor center, while Barracks 2 is a display space housing wagons and replica artillery pieces.[94] Barracks 1 and 2 were acquired by the Fort Concho Museum in 1981.[77]
The other four barracks buildings were built to house infantrymen.[94] Barracks 5 and 6 were built in 1871 and remodeled in the 1920s to house a unit of US National Guard. The buildings had mostly fallen to ruin by 1947,[93] when they were purchased by the Fort Concho Museum.[95] Reconstruction of Barracks 5 and 6 was completed in 1951 as living history spaces. A veranda wraps around the mess halls. Barracks 3 and 4, which were demolished after the fort was abandoned and remain ruins, were identical to Barracks 5 and 6.[96]
Administrative Row
[edit]
The commissary and quartermaster's warehouse, built to the same plan in 1868 and 1869, respectively, are the oldest buildings in the city of San Angelo.[97] The commissary was purchased by the city government in 1939, but was used as a garage by the municipal transit department until 1974. It was restored in 1980 and then used as a meeting space. The quartermaster's warehouse opened in 1985 as an art museum.[74]
The headquarters building was constructed on Grierson's orders in 1876,[98] a decade into the fort's military operation.[99] The building is U-shaped, opening to the east, with two chimneys in the main structure and one in the north and south wings. A veranda is attached to the façade and back of the building, between the wings.[100] The headquarters building was used in various capacities in the 20 years after the US Army left Fort Concho. Four of the rooms on the ground floor, the court martial, orderly's room, adjutant's office, and regimental headquarters, have been remodeled to appear as they would have during the fort's military career.[101] About 50 ft (15 m) behind the headquarters building is the former residence of Oscar Ruffini,[102] San Angelo's first civic architect. The house was moved to its present location on May 14, 1951.[103]
The original hospital was built from 1868 to 1870. After the fort's deactivation, the hospital was used as a rooming house and for storage until it was destroyed by fire in 1911. The building was rebuilt in the mid-1980s with the aid of architectural and historical records. The hospital contains a museum about frontier medicine in its north ward, a library in the south ward, and general medical exhibits in the center.[104]
Officers' Row
[edit]
The Officers' Row are the ten buildings on the south side of the parade ground, comprised by Officer's Quarters 1 through 9 and the schoolhouse and chapel.[105] These houses were built in several phases from 1869 to the mid-1870s.[106] They generally follow an L-shaped plan with a primary residential building and kitchen, connected by a veranda. Interiors consisted of four equally sized rooms and a central hallway on the first floor and two more rooms on a second. The houses have three fireplaces; two in the main building and a third in the kitchen.[107]
Officer's Quarters 1 was built from 1870 to 1872 and served as the commanding officer's residence. Grierson, who lived there from 1875 to 1882,[108] added a kitchen and office onto the building, on the south and west ends, respectively, in 1881.[109] Grierson also added a carriage house and placed locks on every door in the building. The Fort Concho Museum purchased the building in 1964. In 1994, it was renovated and became the Concho Valley Pioneer Heritage Center.[108] Officer's Quarters 8 and 9 were built to the same plan as Officer's Quarters 1 and were also completed in 1872. Another room was added to the south side of Officer's Quarters 8 in 1936. Officer's Quarters 9 was restored to its original appearance in 1905.[110]
Officer's Quarters 2, 4, 5, and 6 were all built in 1870 and all follow the general plan. Their roofs extend over the verandas to cover them.[111] Officer's Quarters 2 was purchased by the Fort Concho Museum in 1952.[95] Officer's Quarters 5 is a ruin; only its foundations remain. About 90 ft (27 m) to the south of Officer's Quarters 5 is the site of a carriage house thought to be associated with the house. Officer's Quarters 6 was damaged by fire in 1961, but was repaired and turned into a living history exhibit.[112]
Officer's Quarters 3 was built in 1870,[109] possibly in March, which would make it the first of the officers' houses to be completed. The house was the fort commander's residence until Officer's Quarters 1 and 2 were finished.[106] The building has a total of five rooms, as it lacks a second floor. The two structures making up Officer's Quarters 7 were built from 1870 to 1877 to house field officers and their families. The buildings form a duplex and stand to the same height and have two fireplaces each. A porch connects the 15 ft (4.6 m) between the buildings.[111] On July 13, 1990, the E. H. Danner Museum of Telephony, part of the West Texas Collection of Angelo State University, was opened in the building.[113]
The schoolhouse and chapel was completed and dedicated on February 22, 1879, making it the last permanent structure to be completed during its military career.[114] The chapel is built like the officers' residences and it was first intended to be another duplex.[100] Funding was only sufficient for the foundation of the kitchen to be completed, so the building was finished as the present schoolhouse and chapel. After the US Army left, the building continued to function as a schoolhouse, and at one point, a private home.[114] The Fort Concho Museum purchased the schoolhouse in 1946 and restored it with funds raised by US military personnel on nearby Goodfellow Air Force Base.[95]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Field 2006, p. 6.
- ^ Handbook of Texas Online: Anglo-American Colonization.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 1–2.
- ^ Alexander & Utley 2012, pp. 32, 35.
- ^ Field 2006, p. 5.
- ^ Handbook of Texas Online: Fort Chadbourne.
- ^ a b Handbook of Texas Online: Butterfield Overland Mail.
- ^ Aston & Taylor 1997, p. 51.
- ^ Alexander & Utley 2012, p. 32.
- ^ Alexander & Utley 2012, pp. 33, 57.
- ^ a b Matthews 2005, p. 2.
- ^ Handbook of Texas Online: Goodnight–Loving Trail.
- ^ Uglow 2001, p. 138.
- ^ a b Handbook of Texas Online: Philip Henry Sheridan.
- ^ Chapman 1940, p. 262.
- ^ Graham 1970, p. 169.
- ^ Aston & Taylor 1997, p. 72.
- ^ Uglow 2001, pp. 131–32.
- ^ Aston & Taylor 1997, p. 73.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 2–4.
- ^ a b Matthews 2005, p. 3.
- ^ a b Chapman 1940, p. 264.
- ^ Uglow 2001, p. 132.
- ^ Chapman 1940, pp. 259, 268.
- ^ a b Field 2006, p. 22.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 4–7.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 6–10.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 10–12, 51.
- ^ Matthews 2005, p. 12.
- ^ a b c d Handbook of Texas Online: Fort Concho.
- ^ Aston & Taylor 1997, p. 74.
- ^ Chapman 1940, pp. 259, 264.
- ^ Matthews 2005, p. 13.
- ^ Chapman 1940, pp. 265–67, 269–71.
- ^ Handbook of Texas Online: Camp Charlotte.
- ^ Handbook of Texas Online: Mackenzie, Ranald Slidell.
- ^ a b c Handbook of Texas Online: Fourth United States Cavalry.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 13–14.
- ^ Chapman 1940, p. 267.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 14–15.
- ^ Handbook of Texas Online: Hatch, John Porter.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 15–16.
- ^ Matthews 2005, p. 16.
- ^ Handbook of Texas Online: Christopher Columbus Augur.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 16–19.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 19–21.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 21–23.
- ^ Matthews 2005, p. 23.
- ^ a b c Handbook of Texas Online: Tenth United States Cavalry.
- ^ Matthews 2005, p. 24.
- ^ a b Chapman 1940, p. 276.
- ^ Matthews 2005, p. 25.
- ^ Handbook of Texas Online: Nolan Expedition.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 28–30.
- ^ Matthews 2005, p. 31.
- ^ Handbook of Texas Online: Victorio.
- ^ Matthews 2005, p. 34.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 34, 57.
- ^ Alexander & Utley 2012, pp. 38–39.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 58–60.
- ^ Gibson 1971, pp. 26–27.
- ^ a b Handbook of Texas Online: San Angelo, TX.
- ^ Gibson 1971, pp. 6, 15–16.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 43–45.
- ^ Uglow 2001, pp. 132–33.
- ^ Matthews 2005, p. 57.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 48, 51, 53–56.
- ^ a b c d e National Park Service 1985, p. 2.
- ^ Bluthardt, Robert (November 1, 2010). "Through the Centuries at Old Fort Concho". Ranch and Rural Living. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019.
- ^ a b c Bluthardt & Flynn 1997, p. 11.
- ^ a b c Handbook of Texas Online: Fort Concho National Historic Landmark.
- ^ Matthews 2005, p. 61.
- ^ Field 2006, p. 58.
- ^ a b c Bluthardt & Flynn 1997, pp. 12–13.
- ^ "List of NHLs by State". National Park Service. Archived from the original on November 14, 2020. Retrieved February 16, 2019.
- ^ "Fort Concho Historic District". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. Archived from the original on February 24, 2020. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ a b c Bluthardt & Flynn 1997, p. 13.
- ^ Bluthardt & Flynn 1997, pp. 13–14.
- ^ "Fort Concho (41TG57)". Texas Historic Sites Atlas. Texas Historical Commission. Archived from the original on September 22, 2017. Retrieved March 22, 2021.
- ^ a b Tufts, John (December 18, 2020). "Fort Concho to use $2M from mystery donor to rebuild parts of fort missing over a century". San Angelo Standard-Times. Archived from the original on December 19, 2020.
- ^ McDaniel, Matthew (November 28, 2017). "Fort Concho looking forward to big things in its 151st year". San Angelo Standard-Times. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved April 2, 2021.
- ^ Trammell, Matt (September 3, 2021). "Reconstruction of Historic Ft. Concho Barracks Gets a Significant Boost". San Angelo Live. Retrieved December 28, 2021.
- ^ a b "Timeline: Before and after the 2008 raid on the FLDS' Yearning for Zion Ranch". San Angelo Standard-Times. April 18, 2018. Archived from the original on October 24, 2020. Retrieved April 13, 2020.
- ^ Gaitan, Michelle (April 18, 2018). "Yearning for Zion Ranch in Texas empty 10 years after raid". The Salt Lake Tribune. Archived from the original on May 14, 2021. Retrieved May 14, 2021.
- ^ "Polygamist parents, children begin reunions". NBC News. June 2, 2008. Archived from the original on February 14, 2019. Retrieved February 11, 2019.
- ^ a b Bluthardt, Robert (August 29, 2019). "Fort Concho a national historic landmark; no need for ranger hats". San Angelo Standard-Times. Archived from the original on October 23, 2020. Retrieved March 4, 2021.
- ^ National Park Service 1985, pp. 21–22.
- ^ Chapman 1940, p. 273.
- ^ National Park Service 1985, pp. 2–15.
- ^ a b Matthews 2005, p. 6.
- ^ National Park Service 1985, pp. 10–11.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 8, 37.
- ^ a b National Park Service 1985, p. 10.
- ^ a b Matthews 2005, p. 37.
- ^ a b c Bluthardt & Flynn 1997, p. 12.
- ^ National Park Service 1985, pp. 10, 15–16.
- ^ National Park Service 1985, p. 9.
- ^ National Park Service 1985, pp. 8–9.
- ^ Matthews 2005, p. 10.
- ^ a b National Park Service 1985, p. 8.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 10–11.
- ^ National Park Service 1985, p. 12.
- ^ Prestiano 1984, p. 7.
- ^ Matthews 2005, pp. 7, 53.
- ^ National Park Service 1985, p. 5.
- ^ a b Matthews 2005, p. 7.
- ^ National Park Service 1985, pp. 5–6.
- ^ a b Matthews 2005, p. 27.
- ^ a b National Park Service 1985, p. 6.
- ^ National Park Service 1985, pp. 7–8.
- ^ a b National Park Service 1985, pp. 6–7.
- ^ National Park Service 1985, p. 7.
- ^ "E.H. Danner Museum of Telephony". Angelo State University. Archived from the original on March 31, 2021. Retrieved March 31, 2021.
- ^ a b Matthews 2005, pp. 11, 51.
Sources
[edit]- "Fort Concho Historic District (National Register of Historic Places Inventory – Nomination)" (pdf). National Park Service. June 1985.
Books and articles
[edit]- Alexander, Thomas E.; Utley, Dan K. (2012). Faded Glory: A Century of Forgotten Texas Military Sites, Then and Now. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-1-60344-699-0.
- Aston, B. W.; Taylor, Ira Donathan (1997). Along the Texas Forts Trail. University of North Texas Press. ISBN 978-1-57441-035-8.
- Bluthardt, Robert; Flynn, Evelyn (1997). "Fort Concho: Texas Frontier Outpost". Texas Heritage. 15 (3). Texas Historical Foundation: 10–14. Archived from the original on July 4, 2021. Retrieved July 4, 2021.
- Chapman, John (April 1940). "Fort Concho ...". Southwest Review. 25 (3). Southern Methodist University: 258–286. JSTOR 43466526.
- Field, Ron (2006). Forts of the American Frontier 1820–91: The Southern Plains and Southwest. Fortress. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84603-040-6.
- Gibson, Joe A. (1971). Old Angelo. The Minuteman Press. OCLC 18364477.
- Graham, Roy Eugene (October 1970). "Federal Fort Architecture in Texas during the Nineteenth Century". The Southwestern Historical Quarterly. 74 (2). Texas State Historical Association: 165–188. JSTOR 30238099.
- Matthews, James T. (2005). Fort Concho. Texas State Historical Association. ISBN 978-0-87611-205-2.
- Prestiano, Robert. "Oscar Ruffini: The Early Years". Fort Concho Report. 16 (Summer 1984).
- Uglow, Loyd (2001). Standing in the Gap: Army Outposts, Picket Stations, and the Pacification of the Texas Frontier, 1866–1886. Texas Christian University Press. ISBN 978-0-87565-246-7.
Texas State Historical Association
[edit]- Anderson, H. Allen (October 22, 2020) [January 1, 1995]. "Fort Concho National Historic Landmark". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved May 21, 2023.
- Daniel, Wayne; Schmidt, Carol (October 3, 2019) [1952]. "Fort Concho". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved May 21, 2023.
- Davis, Charles G. (January 1, 1995) [1952]. "Fort Chadbourne". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2021.
- Davis, Charles G. (September 5, 2019) [1976]. "Camp Charlotte". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved April 17, 2021.
- Dawson, Joseph G. III (August 3, 2020) [1952]. "Sheridan, Philip Henry". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved March 21, 2021.
- Duke, Escal F. (February 1, 1996) [1952]. "San Angelo, TX". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2019.
- Henson, Margaret S. (January 4, 2021) [July 1, 1995]. "Anglo-American Colonization". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved February 9, 2022.
- Leckie, William H. (March 10, 2021) [July 1, 1995]. "Tenth United States Cavalry". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved May 21, 2023.
- Richardson, Rupert (November 1, 1994) [1976]. "Butterfield Overland Mail". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
- Richardson, T. C. (April 18, 2017) [1976]. "Goodnight–Loving Trail". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
- Rocap, Pember W. (January 1, 1995) [1976]. "Hatch, John Porter". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2019.
- Stout, Joseph A. Jr. (February 9, 2019) [1976]. "Victorio". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved February 11, 2019.
- Wallace, Ernest (November 30, 2019) [1952]. "Mackenzie, Ranald Slidell". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2019.
- Wallace, Ernest (October 6, 2016) [1952]. "Fourth United States Cavalry". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved February 26, 2021.
- Wooster, Robert (June 16, 2020) [November 1, 1994]. "Augur, Christopher Columbus". Handbook of Texas Online. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved March 21, 2021.
- "Nolan Expedition [1877]". Handbook of Texas Online. March 6, 2021 [1952]. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2019.
External links
[edit]
Fort Concho
View on GrokipediaFort Concho was a United States Army frontier post established in 1867 on the banks of the Concho River in what is now San Angelo, Texas, to safeguard settlers, mail routes, and trade paths from raids by Comanche and other Native American groups in West Texas.[1][2][3] The fort initially housed the 4th Cavalry Regiment, which conducted patrols and mapping expeditions, before serving from 1875 to 1882 as the regimental headquarters for the 10th United States Cavalry, the African American unit nicknamed the Buffalo Soldiers for their resilience in campaigns against hostile tribes.[1][3] Deactivated in June 1889 as threats diminished and railroads advanced settlement, the site transitioned to civilian use before preservation efforts in the 20th century restored many of its original structures, designating it a National Historic Landmark in 1961 to interpret the era of frontier military operations.[1][2][4]
Establishment and Frontier Context
Pre-Fort Threats and Strategic Necessity
Prior to the establishment of Fort Concho in 1867, the West Texas frontier, including the area around present-day San Angelo, faced persistent threats from Comanche and Kiowa warriors who dominated the region known as Comancheria. These nomadic Plains tribes conducted frequent raids on scattered ranches, wagon trains, and nascent settlements, stealing livestock, captives, and supplies while evading Spanish, Mexican, and early American forces; Comanche power peaked in the mid-19th century, with war parties ranging hundreds of miles to disrupt expansion into their hunting grounds.[5] Such incursions rendered the Concho River valley largely uninhabitable for Anglo settlers, as evidenced by the abandonment of earlier outposts like Fort Chadbourne in 1867, which had been plagued by relentless Indian attacks that depleted resources and endangered troops.[6] The strategic necessity for a new fort arose from the post-Civil War resurgence of American settlement in Texas, where federal authorities sought to secure the frontier against these nomadic threats to facilitate migration, cattle drives, and overland trade routes extending toward El Paso and the Pecos River.[7] The site's selection along the North Concho River provided reliable water and a central position for patrolling the vast, arid expanse of the Llano Estacado and Edwards Plateau, enabling rapid response to raids that had previously isolated eastern Texas from western territories.[2] This placement addressed the vulnerability of stagecoach lines, U.S. Mail routes, and emerging ranching operations, which were essential for economic integration but prime targets for hit-and-run tactics by mobile Comanche bands.[8] By 1867, the U.S. Army recognized that without a fortified base to project power, settler incursions would provoke escalated warfare, as prior forts like Chadbourne proved insufficient against sustained guerrilla-style assaults.[1] The fort's role was thus to enforce federal authority, map uncharted lands for future development, and deter or pursue raiders, marking a shift from reactive defense to proactive pacification in a region where Native control had stalled white expansion for decades.[9]Construction and Initial Setup in 1867
In November 1867, the U.S. Army selected a site at the confluence of the Main and North Concho Rivers in present-day San Angelo, Texas, for a new frontier post to replace Fort Chadbourne, which suffered from inadequate water supplies.[1][10] This location was strategically positioned along key routes, including segments of the Southern Transcontinental Trail and later the Goodnight-Loving Cattle Trail, to safeguard settlers, mail carriers, and traders from raids by Comanche and Kiowa tribes in the region.[7] Company H of the 4th U.S. Cavalry arrived at the site in December 1867 under the command of Captain George Gibson Huntt, marking the initial military occupation and setup of the camp.[1][10] The post was initially designated Camp Hatch in honor of Major John Porter Hatch, though it was briefly renamed Camp Kelly after Major Michael J. Kelly before being officially renamed Fort Concho in March 1868, reflecting its position near the Concho River system.[1][10] Construction proceeded slowly in the early months due to the remote location, with materials such as lumber hauled by oxcart from the Gulf Coast and local limestone quarried for foundations; the first permanent structures, a commissary storehouse and quartermaster storehouse, were completed in 1868 to support basic logistical needs.[1][10] These initial facilities enabled the fort to function as a forward base for patrolling and mapping the West Texas frontier, amid ongoing threats from Native American groups that necessitated rapid but resource-constrained development.[7]Military Operations and Achievements
Early Deployment with the 4th Cavalry Regiment
Fort Concho was established on November 11, 1867, when five companies of the 4th United States Cavalry Regiment arrived at the site near the North Concho River in present-day San Angelo, Texas, to create a new frontier outpost replacing the abandoned Fort Chadbourne.[11] The post, initially called Camp Reynolds after Maj. Gen. John F. Reynolds, was renamed Fort Concho by its first commander, Capt. George Gibson Huntt of Company H, which arrived in December 1867.[1] These units, comprising approximately 300 troopers, focused on securing the region against raids by Comanche, Kiowa, and other Plains tribes that threatened settlers, wagon trains, and the Butterfield Overland Mail route.[3] Upon arrival, the 4th Cavalry troops constructed temporary quarters using sods, canvas, and hides due to the lack of lumber and stone, enduring harsh conditions including extreme weather and scarce resources.[3] Permanent structures, including five officers' quarters and one barracks, were completed by August 1869 using local limestone and adobe, marking a shift from tent-based encampments to a more durable installation.[3] The regiment's early efforts emphasized fortification and infrastructure development, such as building roads and telegraph lines to connect with other posts like Fort Griffin and Fort Richardson.[1] From 1868 onward, the 4th Cavalry conducted reconnaissance patrols and skirmishes to deter Native American incursions, protecting expanding ranching and freighting operations in West Texas.[1] The fort served as the regiment's principal base until 1875, with headquarters stationed there intermittently between 1868 and 1873 to coordinate operations across the frontier.[1] In February 1871, Lt. Col. Ranald S. Mackenzie assumed command of the 4th Cavalry at Fort Concho, launching aggressive winter campaigns that intensified the regiment's role in subduing hostile tribes, including the destruction of Kickapoo villages in Mexico in May 1873.[12] These actions, involving over 1,000 miles of scouting in 1871 alone, exemplified the cavalry's mobile deployment strategy amid ongoing threats from nomadic warriors.[12]Headquarters for the 10th Cavalry and Buffalo Soldiers
Fort Concho served as the regimental headquarters for the 10th United States Cavalry from April 1875 until July 1882, succeeding the 4th Cavalry Regiment in that role on April 10, 1875.[3] The 10th Cavalry, formed in 1866 as one of the Army's post-Civil War regiments comprising African American enlisted men under white officers, arrived with companies as early as May 1873, but the full regimental headquarters transfer occurred under Colonel Benjamin H. Grierson on April 17, 1875.[13] Known as Buffalo Soldiers—a term originating from Native American warriors' respect for their endurance and appearance resembling buffalo hides—the regiment used the fort as its principal base for frontier operations in West Texas.[3][2] During this tenure, the 10th Cavalry's troops from Fort Concho performed essential duties including extensive scouting and patrolling of unmapped territories, construction of roads and telegraph lines to facilitate communication and travel, and escorting stagecoaches, cattle drives, and railroad survey teams against raids.[3][13] They enforced order as a de facto police force for settlers, mapping thousands of square miles and enabling regional development amid ongoing threats from Comanche, Apache, and other groups.[2] The Buffalo Soldiers represented approximately half of Fort Concho's active-duty personnel during the fort's operational history, underscoring their significant presence and contributions to frontier security.[2] Key military engagements launched or supported from the headquarters included pursuits of raiding parties, such as Captain Nicholas Nolan's 1877 expedition with sixty troopers across drought-afflicted north Texas chasing Comanche raiders.[14] The regiment also played a pivotal role in the campaign against Apache leader Victorio, culminating in a decisive 1880 victory over his band at Rattlesnake Springs.[13] By 1882, with Apache and Comanche resistance largely subdued through these sustained efforts, the need for a large garrison at Fort Concho diminished, prompting the relocation of 10th Cavalry headquarters to Fort Davis.[3][13] This shift reflected broader pacification of the Texas frontier, allowing the regiment to redirect resources elsewhere until the fort's deactivation in 1889.[2]Campaigns Against Comanche and Other Tribes
From Fort Concho, the 4th United States Cavalry under Colonel Ranald S. Mackenzie conducted aggressive expeditions against Comanche raiders in the Texas Panhandle and Llano Estacado during the summer of 1871, aiming to force the tribe onto reservations.[15] In October 1871, Mackenzie's forces engaged Comanches in Blanco Canyon, resulting in a skirmish where the colonel was wounded but the cavalry inflicted casualties and pursued the retreating warriors.[15] These operations marked the beginning of sustained pressure on Comanche mobility and supply lines from the fort's base. The campaign escalated in 1872, culminating in the Battle of the North Fork of the Red River on September 29, when Mackenzie's 4th Cavalry defeated a Comanche encampment near present-day Lefors, Texas, capturing over 100 women and children who were subsequently held in a stone corral at Fort Concho for six months.[1] [15] In 1873, troops from the fort pursued Lipan Apaches and Kickapoos across the Rio Grande into Mexico, destroying villages and seizing livestock in a cross-border incursion that heightened tensions with Mexican authorities.[7] The Red River War of 1874 represented the decisive phase against Comanche, Kiowa, and allied tribes, with Mackenzie leading the 4th Cavalry from Fort Concho in operations from July to November.[15] On September 28, Mackenzie's command surprised and destroyed five Indian villages in Palo Duro Canyon, killing approximately 15 warriors while suffering one cavalryman wounded, and seizing or slaughtering over 1,000 horses to undermine tribal logistics.[15] [7] A follow-up engagement near Tahoka Lake on November 5 routed remaining hostiles, contributing to the war's end as Comanche leader Quanah Parker surrendered with 407 followers at Fort Sill on June 2, 1875.[15] After the 4th Cavalry's departure, the 10th Cavalry (Buffalo Soldiers), with regimental headquarters at Fort Concho from 1875 to 1882, participated in the Victorio Campaign of 1879–1880 against Warm Springs Apaches under Chief Victorio.[3] Companies from the fort, under Colonel Benjamin H. Grierson, reinforced operations in West Texas and New Mexico, including temporary transfers to Fort Davis, where they conducted patrols and skirmishes that confined Victorio's band and supported the final pursuit leading to his death in October 1880 at Rattlesnake Springs.[16] [3] These efforts, combined with earlier actions against Comanche and Kiowa raiders, significantly reduced threats from Plains and Southwest tribes, enabling frontier settlement.[7]Final Years, Deactivation, and Regional Pacification in 1889
In the decade preceding deactivation, Fort Concho's role shifted from offensive campaigns to administrative and support functions, reflecting the broader decline in frontier hostilities following the Red River War of 1874–1875 and subsequent operations that confined Comanche and Kiowa populations to reservations.[1] By 1882, with the relocation of the 10th Cavalry's headquarters, the post primarily functioned as a temporary station for transient units awaiting reassignment, including elements of the 9th Cavalry and 24th Infantry, while maintaining basic garrison duties such as patrols and infrastructure upkeep.[3] These activities underscored the fort's diminishing strategic necessity as civilian settlements expanded across the Concho River valley, bolstered by improved transportation and the erosion of nomadic raiding patterns. Regional pacification in West Texas by the late 1880s resulted from sustained U.S. Army pressure, which disrupted tribal economies reliant on buffalo hunting and cross-border raids, culminating in the surrender of remaining Apache groups in 1886 and the effective neutralization of Comanche resistance through earlier decisive engagements.[1] The arrival of the Fort Worth and New Orleans Railway (later part of the Texas and Pacific) in San Angelo in 1888 accelerated this process by enabling rapid influxes of settlers, commercial freighting, and self-sustaining local militias, thereby transferring security responsibilities from federal troops to civil authorities.[8] This causal chain—military subjugation followed by infrastructural integration—rendered isolated outposts like Fort Concho obsolete, as evidenced by the Army's consolidation of forces toward more active southwestern theaters. Deactivation proceeded efficiently once orders were issued in early 1889, with the post's inventory auctioned and structures left intact for potential civilian salvage.[1] On June 20, 1889, the remaining detachment—primarily Company K of the 16th Infantry—conducted the final flag-lowering ceremony before marching out the following morning, marking the end of 22 years of continuous operation.[3][2] The abandonment symbolized the successful transition of the Texas frontier from martial law to orderly statehood, with no resurgence of organized tribal opposition thereafter.Architectural Design and Infrastructure
Overall Layout and Defensive Features
Fort Concho was established as an open military cantonment on approximately 40 acres along the Concho River, featuring over 40 buildings primarily constructed from native limestone quarried on-site, arranged in a rectangular layout centered around a large parade ground measuring about 500 by 1,000 feet.[2][1] The design emphasized functional efficiency for troop housing, administration, and logistics rather than enclosure, with key structures including enlisted barracks aligned along the north side of the parade ground, officers' quarters on the south, and support facilities such as stables, warehouses, and a headquarters building positioned peripherally to facilitate rapid mounted operations.[1] This configuration supported a garrison of up to 500 personnel at peak strength, enabling patrols and scouting expeditions into surrounding West Texas terrain.[17] Unlike European-style fortified outposts, Fort Concho lacked perimeter walls, stockades, or bastions, as U.S. Army frontier posts in Texas prioritized mobile cavalry responses over static defenses; Native American raids typically avoided direct assaults on well-garrisoned installations, rendering such features superfluous and resource-intensive in open plains environments.[18] Defensive strategy instead relied on the fort's strategic placement at the confluence of the North and South Concho Rivers, providing reliable water access while controlling converging east-west trails used by settlers, traders, and adversaries for movement across the region.[7] Corrals and stables for hundreds of horses and mules—essential for the 4th and 10th Cavalry regiments' pursuits—were situated adjacent to barracks to minimize response times, supplemented by blacksmith shops and forage storage to sustain expeditionary capabilities.[1] The layout evolved incrementally from 1867 onward, with initial temporary structures of wood and adobe giving way to permanent stone buildings by the 1870s, including six enlisted barracks (each housing about 80 men), four officers' quarters, a hospital, and commissary, all oriented to maximize ventilation and visibility across the parade ground for drills and assembly.[1] This open design facilitated daily routines like mounted inspections and artillery practice but exposed the post to environmental hazards such as dust storms and flooding, prompting minor earthen berms and drainage features rather than elaborate fortifications.[19] By deactivation in 1889, the infrastructure had proven adequate for pacifying the frontier without reliance on walled defenses, underscoring a doctrinal shift toward offensive patrolling over passive protection.[18]Specific Building Rows and Functions
Fort Concho's buildings were primarily constructed from locally quarried limestone and arranged around a central parade ground measuring approximately 500 by 1,000 feet, facilitating drills and daily operations.[1] The layout included distinct rows for officers' quarters and enlisted barracks, with support structures such as storehouses, workshops, and utility buildings positioned along the periphery.[1] By 1870, key stone buildings included two enlisted barracks on the north side of the parade ground, five officers' quarters on the south side, the post hospital, and initial administrative facilities.[20] Officers' Row comprised a series of commodious limestone residences designed for senior military personnel, featuring stone walls enclosing backyards for privacy and family use.[1] These quarters, completed progressively from 1869 onward, housed regimental commanders such as Colonels Ranald S. Mackenzie and Benjamin Grierson, supporting administrative oversight and family living amid frontier conditions.[20] Functions extended beyond lodging to include social spaces for officers' interactions, with interiors later replicated in museum exhibits to depict 19th-century military domestic life.[4] Enlisted men's barracks, positioned opposite Officers' Row, accommodated up to 400-500 troops in companies of infantry and cavalry, with two primary stone structures built by March 1870 for sleeping, messing, and basic maintenance.[21] [20] These barracks functioned as communal living quarters, equipped for daily soldier routines including arms storage and company formations prior to field deployments.[1] Additional frame barracks supplemented capacity during peak occupancy.[1] The post hospital, constructed of limestone by 1870, provided medical treatment for garrison personnel, featuring wards for patient care and a belvedere for surveillance.[1] [20] Its functions encompassed surgery, convalescence, and isolation for infectious cases, essential for maintaining troop readiness on the isolated frontier.[3] Headquarters served as the administrative hub, coordinating regimental operations, correspondence, and command decisions from its central location overlooking the parade ground.[20] Support buildings included the 1868 commissary and quartermaster storehouses for food and supply storage, stables and shops for equine and equipment maintenance, a bakery for bread production, guardhouse for detentions, powder magazine for ammunition safety, and a combined schoolhouse-chapel for education and religious services.[1] These utilitarian structures ensured logistical self-sufficiency, with stone construction enhancing durability against environmental and potential hostile threats.[1]Post-Military Transition and Preservation
Civilian Acquisition and Early 20th-Century Uses
Following the U.S. Army's abandonment of Fort Concho on June 20, 1889, the site's buildings were repurposed for civilian housing and commercial storage, averting widespread demolition.[1] The federal government sold the acreage and structures to private individuals, enabling integration into the expanding settlement of San Angelo.[20] In 1905, C. A. Broome established the Fort Concho Realty Company, which subdivided portions of the former post into residential lots as the Fort Concho addition to San Angelo, facilitating urban growth adjacent to the historic structures.[4] Throughout the early 1900s, the buildings continued serving residential and commercial functions, reflecting the site's transition from military outpost to civilian infrastructure amid West Texas frontier pacification.[1] Preservation efforts emerged by the late 1920s, with local resident Ginevra Wood Carson spearheading a 1929 fundraising campaign to acquire the fort's administration building, which opened as the Fort Concho Museum in 1930.[1] In 1935, the City of San Angelo purchased the remaining land and buildings, assuming control and initiating systematic restoration to safeguard the site's historical integrity.[20][1]Designation as National Historic Landmark and Restoration Efforts
Fort Concho was designated a National Historic Landmark on July 4, 1961, by the National Park Service, recognizing its significance in frontier military history and preservation of original structures.[4] This status elevated the site among fewer than 2,500 such landmarks nationwide, emphasizing its intact parade ground, barracks, and headquarters building from the late 19th century.[22] Earlier, in 1924, it received Texas state historic site designation through efforts led by the Pocahontas Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution, which installed a commemorative plaque.[4] The site was also listed on the National Register of Historic Places on October 15, 1966.[23] Restoration initiatives began in earnest during the early 20th century, with local civic leader Ginevra Wood Carson founding the Fort Concho Museum in 1929 after purchasing the 1876 headquarters building for $6,000; her efforts over three decades focused on acquiring and stabilizing properties to prevent further deterioration.[4] The City of San Angelo assumed ownership in 1935, converting the site into a public preservation project that now includes 24 original and restored structures across much of the original 1,600-acre post.[2] By 1951, two enlisted men's barracks had been reconstructed from ruins, marking early physical rehabilitation efforts.[1] Subsequent planning advanced preservation: in 1967, a three-phase master plan by Franklin G. Smith outlined development priorities, followed by a 1980 update from architects Bell, Klein, and Hoffman that guided reconstructions, including the post hospital as part of the John and Sally Meadows Historical Complex.[4] The Fort Concho Foundation, established in 1976, provided supplementary funding for building restorations, exhibit creation, and site maintenance.[24] To date, 17 buildings have been restored and five reconstructed, prioritizing archaeological fidelity and original limestone construction techniques.[25] Recent projects address long-standing gaps, such as the December 2024 completion of barracks and mess halls 3 and 4, rebuilt using 1870s designs after decades of planning and a $2 million anonymous donation in 2020; these structures now house archives and enhance visitor access.[26][27] A public celebration occurred in October 2025, underscoring ongoing commitments to authenticity amid San Angelo's urban growth.[28]Integration with San Angelo's Development
Following its deactivation on June 20, 1889, Fort Concho's structures were repurposed for civilian housing and commercial storage, facilitating the site's seamless incorporation into the expanding urban landscape of San Angelo.[1] This transition aligned with the broader shift in the region's economy from military dependency to agriculture and trade, as the fort's prior role in securing the frontier had already catalyzed the town's establishment across the Concho River in 1870.[1] The availability of the fort's robust infrastructure supported early residential and business activities, preventing abrupt abandonment and enabling gradual integration with surrounding civilian developments.[1] In the early 20th century, preservation initiatives further embedded the fort within San Angelo's civic identity. In 1929, local resident Ginevra Wood Carson acquired the headquarters building to establish the Fort Concho Museum, which relocated there in 1930, marking the onset of organized efforts to retain historical elements amid urbanization.[1] By 1935, the City of San Angelo assumed control, systematically purchasing properties and initiating restorations that continued through the mid-1950s, transforming surplus military assets into community resources.[1] These actions preserved architectural integrity while adapting the site for public use, contributing to the city's growth as a regional hub by leveraging heritage for educational and recreational purposes.[1] The fort's designation as a National Historic Landmark in 1961 amplified its role in San Angelo's economic development, positioning it as a key tourism draw that sustains local commerce through visitor attractions and events.[4] Today, the preserved structures host annual activities that engage residents and attract out-of-town visitors, integrating the site into the city's modern economy without disrupting urban expansion, as surrounding areas have developed compatibly around this historic core.[29] This symbiotic relationship underscores how Fort Concho evolved from a frontier outpost to an enduring element of San Angelo's cultural and developmental framework.[30]
