Hubbry Logo
GelidiumGelidiumMain
Open search
Gelidium
Community hub
Gelidium
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gelidium
Gelidium
Gelidium
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Gelidium
Gelidium amansii
Gelidium amansii
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Clade: Archaeplastida
Division: Rhodophyta
Class: Florideophyceae
Order: Gelidiales
Family: Gelidiaceae
Genus: Gelidium
J.V. Lamouroux, 1813
Synonyms

Acanthopeltis Okamura, 1892

Gelidium is a genus of thalloid red algae comprising 134 species. Its members are known by a number of common names.[note 1]

Description and life cycle

[edit]

Specimens can reach around 2–40 cm (0.79–16 in) in size. Branching is irregular, or occurs in rows on either side of the main stem. Gelidium produces tetraspores. Many of the algae in this genus are used to make agar.[1] Agarocolloids are known to be extracted in algae belonging to the orders Gracilariales and Gelidiales with certain applications in the food and cosmetics. Gelling properties often differ among species, seasons, seaweed age, and substitutions between sulphate esters, among other compounds. Sulphate composition often dictates gel strength, while methyl esters determine gelling and elasticity.[2]

Gelidium is assumed to follow the Polysiphonia life cycle, with sexual and tetrasporangial generations.[3] Tetrasporangia formation is also known to be affected by temperature and other environmental factors including light, salinity and moisture,[4] although germination rates remain unaffected based on an earlier study.[5]

In 1993, Gelidium robustum in Santa Barbara, California was investigated for 16-months showing tetrasporangial abundance throughout the year, but may not have the ability to germinate despite maximum spore output.[3]

Distribution

[edit]

Gelidium are widely distributed globally, specifically in tropical to temperate regions, but lacking in polar regions.[6] In the ocean, Gelidium can be found inhabiting the intertidal to subtidal zone.[7] Species from the genus require further studies to distinguish boundaries among members, as recent molecular research have shown that there are cryptic, unidentified species assumed to be regionally endemic and isolated but may also be ubiquitous in nature.[7] Some species are common in the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean (G. crinale) while some are confined in North Atlantic waters (G. pussillum)[8][9][10]. Reports of G. pussillum occurrence outside of its specified range may be questionable and requires further verification.[7]

Ecology

[edit]

Gelidiales consists of many species that are economically important as they produce agar while some serve ecologically significant functions such as substrate cover.[6] The growth of Gelidium can primarily be affected by nutrient availability and light. In turn, these factors are also regulated by temperature and water movement, respectively. Santelices (1991) evaluated how eight factors may affect Gelidium productivity, all of which are important in understanding how different interactions correlate to production yield. Some of these factors include seasonality, phenotypic characters, age, reproductive state, and even the source of the algae.[6]

Cultivation and exploitation

[edit]

An important agarophyte, Gelidium has been cultured in Korea[11] and China[12] since the early 1990s, with some cultivation efforts noted in Europe, specifically in Spain[13] and Portugal.[11][14] In South Africa, G. pristoides has been cultivated in the field while laboratory trials on G. crinale and Pterocladiella capillacea were tested in Israel.[15][16] In Portugal, G. sesquipedale has commonly been harvested for agar since the 1960s.[17] Management strategies are yet to be implemented especially among big commercial companies that should be responsible in harvesting the resource, similar to South Africa where the decrease in annual Gelidium landings show how fisher folk shifted to collecting kelp for abalone feeds instead of Gelidium harvesting.[18]

Gelidium has been found to be over-exploited in Japan, depleting algal beds[19] which in part, affects agar production, pushing the need for even more efforts in cultivation, replacing the practice of harvesting wild Gelidium.[20] In 2017, global data have shown that Norway, China, and Chile are among the countries that lead the overharvesting of seaweeds, mostly kelp.[20] Advances in Gelidium cultivation have been put forth including the use of floaters at sea and marine ponds for free-float technology in cultivation.[21] At its core, environmental factors are needed to be controlled for favorable growth of Gelidium revealing how ponds may be the better option among the set-ups.[20]

Agar is primarily extracted from Gelidium especially among North African Atlantic and South European species based on specific gel properties with water. In Morocco, Gelidium sesquipidale is known to be harvested during summer time to extract agar used commercially, making the country among the top producers in the world.[2]

Historical environmental analysis

[edit]

Gelidium species have been collected, pressed and maintained in herbaria and personal collections from the 1850s onwards since seaweed collecting became a popular pastime for the middle classes as well as scientists in Europe and North America.[22] These numerous well-documented specimens can provide information beyond taxonomy.[23]

Sensitive measurement of stable nitrogen isotope ratios in Gelidium species collected in southern Monterey Bay between 1878 and 2018 showed a pattern of changes that matched with changes in the California current and provided support for a theory about the end of the local fishing industry.[24] Nitrogen isotope ratios are well established as a measure of nutrient productivity in aquatic ecosystems. The California current runs along coastal California and correlation with information on fish catches indicates that an increase in nutrient-rich cold water is important for fish productivity, notably sardines.[25] The California current has only been measured since 1946. The correlations with the Gelidium nitrogen ratios allowed the California current to be projected back into the nineteenth century and compared with historical records of fish catches.[24] The data matched, notably for the highest sardine catches through the 1930s and then the sudden decrease from 1945 to 1950 that ended the Monterey cannery industry. This information supports the theory that environmental changes as well as overfishing caused the collapse of the local fishery business. More broadly, this suggests that elemental analysis of historical samples of macroalgae can provide evidence of primary productivity processes. The species used included specimens of G. coulteri, G. robustum, G. purpurascens, G. pusillum and G. arborescens collected over a 140-year timespan from the 6 km coastline between Point Pinos, Pacific Grove and Cannery Row, Monterey in California, US.[24]

Taxonomy and nomenclature

[edit]

Gelidiaceae has 159 species, considered to be the largest family in Gelidiales with four major genera: Capreolia, Gelidium, Gelidiophycus, and Ptilophora.[26]

Gelidium was first described by Lamouroux in 1813 and is regarded to be one the genera with the most species. Species diversity has been established by previous studies, whereas, molecular analysis reveals biogeographic relations that concerns its current distribution pattern in oceans.[7]

Identification of species has been a challenge as sexual plants are somewhat difficult to find in nature, therefore, other physiological features are examined instead, such as branching patterns and vegetative traits, but subsequent studies revealed that these are also affected by its development and environmental factors[9] highlighting the need for genetic studies utilizing genetic markers.[7]

Species

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Gelidium

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Gelidium is a of marine belonging to the family Gelidiaceae in the order Gelidiales and class Rhodophyceae, comprising approximately 145 of thalloid macroalgae that are primarily recognized for their economic importance as a source of high-quality . These are distributed globally along temperate and tropical coastlines, inhabiting intertidal and subtidal zones, often on rocky substrates in areas with rapid water movement, partial shade, and temperatures around 15–20°C. Morphologically, Gelidium plants are small and slow-growing, forming cartilaginous, bushy or tufted thalli that typically reach 0.5–6 cm in height, with terete or compressed axes exhibiting pinnate branching and blunt or acute apices. The genus exhibits ecological significance in marine benthic communities and supports in coastal ecosystems, while its species vary in tolerance and requirements. Economically, Gelidium is harvested from wild stocks in regions such as , , Korea, , and , serving as a key agarophyte for applications in , pharmaceuticals, and microbiological media due to the agar's superior gelling strength. Although cultivation in tanks and ponds has shown biological feasibility, economic viability remains limited, leading to ongoing research into sustainable farming and reseeding of natural beds to mitigate overharvesting.

Biology

Morphology and Anatomy

Gelidium species exhibit a thalloid body structure characterized by erect, branched fronds that typically reach heights of 2 to 40 cm, though some species grow up to 20-30 cm, arising from prostrate basal portions that attach to rocky substrates via discoid or rhizoidal holdfasts. The thalli possess a cartilaginous texture attributable to the high content of polysaccharides in the cell walls, which provide structural rigidity and flexibility. This erect portion often transitions from cylindrical bases to compressed or terete apices, with the prostrate system forming extensive rhizoidal networks for anchorage. Branching in Gelidium is predominantly irregular, dichotomous, or pseudodichotomous, resulting in fronds with compressed axes and flattened branchlets that arise in distichous, plumose, or irregular patterns. The medullary layer features rhizines, which are thick-walled secondary rhizoidal filaments connected by secondary pit connections, contributing to the internal cohesion of the . These branching patterns enhance surface area for capture while maintaining mechanical stability in turbulent marine environments. At the cellular level, Gelidium thalli display a uniaxial construction, with growth originating from a dome-shaped apical cell that segments basipetally to form a central axial filament surrounded by pericentral cells. The outer cortex consists of 2 to 3 layers of small, pigmented cells measuring 7-20 µm in diameter, which contain responsible for the characteristic red coloration. In contrast, the inner medulla comprises elongated, colorless cells up to 30 µm long, forming a loosely arranged without sieve areas or lenticular thickenings in the pit plugs. This organization supports efficient nutrient transport and structural support through secondary pit connections between adjacent cells. Growth forms vary across Gelidium species, reflecting adaptations to specific habitats; for instance, G. crinale forms dense turfs with wiry fronds under 7 cm tall, while G. corneum develops larger, upright fronds exceeding 20 cm in height. Some species exhibit dimorphism, with juvenile forms featuring simpler, unbranched axes that mature into more complex, branched structures. These variations influence overall thallus architecture, from compact, turf-like mats in intertidal zones to taller, solitary erect forms in subtidal areas. Pigmentation in Gelidium includes and phycobiliproteins such as and , conferring shades from red to deep purple, though bleaching to greenish hues can occur under high . The primary carbohydrate reserve is floridean starch, stored as granules in the of medullary and cortical cells adjacent to plastids or the nucleus, aiding in and osmotic regulation.

Reproduction and Life Cycle

Gelidium species exhibit a triphasic isomorphic life cycle typical of the Gelidiales order, involving alternation between a haploid phase, a diploid carposporophyte phase attached to the gametophyte, and an independent diploid tetrasporophyte phase, with all phases displaying similar macroscopic morphology. This "Polysiphonia-type" cycle ensures through in the tetrasporophyte and sexual fusion in the gametophyte, with tetrasporophytes often dominating natural populations in a ratio as high as 12:1 over sexual phases in some species like G. robustum. Sexual reproduction occurs in the haploid phase, which may be unisexual or bisexual and protandrous. Male gametophytes develop spermatangia from outer cortical cells on branch surfaces, releasing non-motile spermatia into the water column. Female gametophytes produce carpogonial branches on the margins, each consisting of a four-celled filament topped by a carpogonium bearing a elongated trichogyne that captures spermatia for fertilization. Unlike many florideophyte , Gelidium lacks a distinct auxiliary cell; instead, post-fertilization, the carpogonium enlarges and fuses directly with its supporting cell to form a multinucleate fusion cell, from which gonimoblast filaments arise to develop the carposporophyte within a cystocarp. The cystocarp in Gelidium is characteristically biloculate, protruding on both surfaces of the , and releases diploid carpospores that germinate into tetrasporophytes. Asexual reproduction dominates in the diploid tetrasporophyte phase, where tetrasporangia form within nemathecia—swollen, fertile branch tips—and undergo to produce four haploid tetraspores arranged cruciately, typically measuring up to 35 µm in diameter. These tetraspores are released and germinate directly into new gametophytes, closing the cycle. Carpospores from the sexual phase similarly develop into tetrasporophytes via . Vegetative propagation also occurs through fragmentation of the prostrate basal axes, allowing regeneration of erect fronds under stress conditions, such as after mechanical . Reproductive phenology in Gelidium is seasonal and influenced by environmental cues, particularly and photoperiod. For many temperate , tetraspore release peaks in summer when water temperatures exceed 20°C, while cystocarp maturation often occurs in cooler months; gametangial development in requires short-day conditions (8:16 h light:dark) at 20–25°C. Fertility can be induced by limitation followed by enrichment or specific temperature shifts, highlighting the role of abiotic factors in synchronizing . At the molecular level, karyological studies reveal variable numbers across Gelidium , with haploid counts typically ranging from 4–10 (e.g., 7–10 in G. amansii and G. vagum) and diploid phases around 9–30 (e.g., ~30 in G. latifolium var. luxurians), suggesting a basic number near 5 but with potential influencing fertility and adaptation. These levels support the isomorphic nature of the phases, though exact mechanisms linking environmental cues to reproductive onset remain understudied.

Habitat and Ecology

Distribution

Gelidium species exhibit a in marine environments, primarily occurring along temperate to subtropical rocky coasts worldwide, though they are absent from polar extremes such as and regions. Key regions include the , where populations are found in , , , , the , and ; the , encompassing Korea, , , (particularly ), , , and ; the , with occurrences in , , and ; and the , including , , and . This broad range spans tropical to temperate latitudes, with the comprising approximately 145 adapted to diverse coastal settings. In terms of zonation, Gelidium predominantly inhabits subtidal zones at depths of 5–20 m, though it can occupy intertidal areas in sheltered locations, attaching firmly to hard substrates such as rocks, shells, or crustose while avoiding soft sediments. The thrives under specific environmental conditions, with optimal temperatures ranging from 10–25°C and levels of 30–35 ppt, though some species tolerate broader ranges up to 10–30°C and 10–60 ppt. It generally avoids high wave exposure but persists in nutrient-enriched waters, such as those influenced by . Biogeographic patterns reveal a mix of widespread and endemic species; for instance, G. corneum is broadly distributed across the Atlantic from Morocco to Spain, while endemics like G. leptum occur in isolated areas such as southern Madagascar. Abundance hotspots are concentrated in upwelling zones, including the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal) and Baja California (Mexico), where high densities support commercial harvesting. Recent observations indicate potential range shifts in some populations, such as declines along the Basque coast linked to warming sea surface temperatures.

Ecological Interactions

Gelidium species, particularly canopy-forming ones like G. corneum, establish dense turfs and beds in rocky intertidal and subtidal zones, creating structural complexity that shelters epiphytes, , and while enhancing overall in these coastal habitats. These formations provide attachment sites and refuge from predators and wave action, supporting diverse associated communities in temperate and subtropical regions. As primary producers, Gelidium algae fix atmospheric CO₂ through photosynthesis, forming the base of marine food webs in their habitats. They serve as food for herbivores, including limpets (Patella spp.), which graze on turf-forming Gelidium and limit its upper distributional boundary by preventing upward expansion beyond approximately 50 cm in moderately exposed shores. Sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus nudus and Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus) also consume Gelidium, though its hard thallus structure reduces grazing intensity compared to softer algae. Various fish species further contribute to herbivory on Gelidium thalli. To deter predation, Gelidium produces chemical defenses such as volatile halogenated compounds (e.g., bromoform and dibromomethane), which exhibit antimicrobial and antiherbivory properties. Gelidium growth is influenced by abiotic factors, with optimal irradiance levels ranging from 50 to 200 µmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹, where higher photon flux densities enhance rates under nutrient-sufficient conditions but can induce bleaching at excessive intensities without adequate water movement. Nutrient availability, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, limits growth in oligotrophic waters, with nitrogen supplementation boosting biomass accumulation and storage. Temperature exerts synergistic effects with irradiance and nutrients, reducing growth above 25°C due to stress responses like bleaching, though optimal ranges vary by species and location (e.g., up to 29°C for G. crinale under high light). Gelidium hosts symbiotic endophytic and within its thalli, which may aid in nutrient uptake and stress tolerance, as observed in like G. crinale and G. pusillum. It also engages in competition with other macroalgae, such as , for space on rocky substrates through holdfast attachment and canopy dominance, influencing community structure in intertidal zones. Through ecosystem services, Gelidium contributes to carbon sequestration, supporting coastal carbon sinks. Additionally, its photosynthetic activity produces oxygen and facilitates nutrient cycling by assimilating nitrogen and phosphorus in coastal systems, promoting water quality and supporting broader marine productivity.

Taxonomy and Systematics

Classification History

The genus Gelidium was first formally established by Jean Vincent Félix Lamouroux in 1813, based on specimens of cartilaginous red algae previously classified under various names in the genus Fucus. The type species, Gelidium corneum (Hudson) J.V. Lamouroux, was designated later by Schmitz in 1894, serving as the nomenclatural type for the genus. Early taxonomic work encountered significant confusion with the related genus Pterocladia J.G. Agardh (established in 1851 to segregate species with bilocular cystocarps), as external morphology often overlapped, leading to misidentifications in regional floras until reproductive structures were more closely examined. In 1843, Friedrich Traugott Kützing recognized Gelidium as a distinct within his newly proposed Gelidiaceae, emphasizing anatomical features such as internal rhizines (thick-walled medullary filaments) for . Subsequent revisions in the mid-20th century, including K.C. Fan's 1961 on Chinese , clarified boundaries within Gelidiaceae by integrating morphological details like rhizoidal development and tetrasporangial arrangement, reducing synonymy but highlighting ongoing challenges in delimitation. By the , B. Santelices's studies addressed nomenclatural issues, proposing the merger of synonyms like Acropeltis Montagne into Gelidium (e.g., A. chilensis as G. chilense), based on shared vegetative and reproductive traits, under the International Code of Nomenclature for , fungi, and plants (ICN). The name Gelidium itself was conserved by the ICN in 2017, with G. corneum as the conserved type, to stabilize nomenclature amid historical ambiguities. Phylogenetically, Gelidium is positioned within the phylum Rhodophyta, class Florideophyceae, order Gelidiales, and Gelidiaceae, distinguished from the closely related genus Pterocladiella (formerly part of Pterocladia) primarily by the presence of well-developed rhizines and endogenous tetrasporangial development from medullary cells. The advent of molecular post-2000, using markers like plastid rbcL and mitochondrial cox1 genes, revealed polyphyly in traditional Gelidium concepts, prompting reclassifications such as the elevation of certain lineages to new genera (e.g., Gelidiella and Pterocladiella) and confirming for the core Gelidium within Gelidiaceae. Since the 2010s, integration of with morphology has uncovered cryptic diversity, leading to species splits and new discoveries, particularly in understudied regions like the and Atlantic coasts. As a result, the recognized count has risen to over 145 by 2025, reflecting enhanced resolution of phylogenetic relationships rather than solely new collections. In 2025, G. cristatum was described from subtidal turf-forming specimens on crustose off the East Sea coast of Korea, distinguished by its small size and erect branches arising radially from prostrate axes.

Species and Diversity

The genus Gelidium encompasses over 145 accepted , including one , 16 varieties, and 10 forms, reflecting its substantial taxonomic diversity within the Gelidiales order. These exhibit high , particularly in the and Atlantic regions, where localized adaptations to rocky substrates drive . Among the economically significant , G. corneum serves as a primary Atlantic source for extraction, with thalli reaching up to 30 cm in length and supporting substantial wild harvests. G. sesquipedale, prevalent in the Mediterranean, is valued for its high yield, which can exceed 40% of dry weight under optimal seasonal conditions. G. cartilagineum demonstrates a widespread distribution across temperate and tropical coasts, contributing to global production through its robust, cartilaginous thalli. Recent taxonomic discoveries have expanded the known diversity of Gelidium. In 2022, G. rosulatum was described from subtidal rosette-forming specimens off the eastern coast of Korea, distinguished by its compact, radial branching pattern. G. rodrigueziae, identified in 2023 from the Mexican Atlantic based on rbcL gene sequencing, features simpler branching than related taxa. A 2024 study revealed three new species from the southern Mexican Tropical Pacific—G. dawsonii, G. longisporophyllum, and G. rubruparvum—differentiated through morphological traits and molecular distances exceeding 2% in COI-5P and rbcL markers. Additionally, G. adriaticum was established in 2019 from Mediterranean samples, resolving prior misidentifications of small-bodied forms via rbcL and cox1 analyses. Diversity patterns in Gelidium underscore the genus's adaptability to varying thermal regimes. Cryptic species complexes, such as that surrounding G. crinale, have been uncovered using cox1 and rbcL markers, revealing hidden within morphologically similar turf-forming populations across tropical and temperate regions. Regionally, the Argentine hosts two Gelidium species (G. crinale and G. carolinianum), with the latter a new record for the , illustrating localized richness in the southwestern Atlantic. Identification of Gelidium species relies on vegetative traits such as branching patterns (e.g., dichotomous vs. alternate) and rhizoidal attachments, supplemented by molecular markers like rbcL and cox1 for resolving ambiguities. Challenges arise from the isomorphic haploid-diploid phases, which exhibit minimal morphological differences, necessitating integrated approaches to distinguish closely related taxa.

Economic Importance

Agar Production

Agar derived from Gelidium species is a heteropolysaccharide primarily composed of (70-80%) and agaropectin (20-30%), where forms the neutral, linear fraction responsible for strong gelation, while agaropectin contributes charged, branched structures that influence solubility and viscosity. This composition yields a high gel strength of 800-1200 g/cm² for a 1.5% solution, significantly surpassing that of from Gracilaria species (400-600 g/cm²), due to the lower content and higher purity in Gelidium-derived . Extraction begins with alkali pretreatment using (NaOH) to remove sulfates and enhance gelation by modifying agaropectin, typically at concentrations of 1-10% for 0.5-2 hours at ambient temperature. The pretreated Gelidium thalli are then subjected to hot water or pressure extraction at 95-121°C for 2-4 hours, yielding 20-30% based on dry algal weight. The resulting viscous solution is filtered to remove residues, concentrated if needed, and dried via freezing-thawing cycles (to -20°C followed by ambient thawing for ) or roller (passing the through heated cylinders at 80-100°C), producing a brittle, flaky product that is ground into powder. The historical development of agar production traces to in the , where it was first prepared as "kanten" around 1658 by Minoya Tarozaemon through Gelidium and freezing the extract for use in traditional desserts. Industrialization expanded in during the 1880s, with commercial extraction facilities established in and using imported Gelidium, coinciding with Robert Koch's 1881 adoption of for solidifying microbial culture media, revolutionizing . Key properties include gelation at 35-40°C and melting at 80-90°C, providing a wide that ensures stability in heated preparations without reversion. These attributes enable diverse applications: in for jellies, fillings, and media to prevent syneresis; in pharmaceuticals for capsules and pill coatings; and in for matrices and gels due to its clarity and sterility. Agar is graded by purity and intended use, with bacteriological grade requiring high clarity (>90% ), low (<4%), and gel strength >800 g/cm² for microbial and applications, while food-grade allows slightly higher impurities for culinary uses. Gelidium agar is preferred over alternatives for its superior clarity, firmness, and low electroendosmosis, making it ideal for high-precision biotech and pharmaceutical needs despite higher costs.

Harvesting and Cultivation

Gelidium species are primarily harvested from wild populations in intertidal and subtidal zones, where hand-picking, raking, or mechanical by divers is employed to collect the from rocky substrates. In major producing countries such as , , and the Republic of Korea, harvesting targets species like G. sesquipedale and G. amansii, with accounting for over 64% of global supply at approximately 22,000 tons fresh weight annually in recent years (e.g., 22,500 tons in 2022). To prevent , seasonal quotas and bans are implemented; for example, a cap of 6,040 tons fresh weight was set in the 2010s, though actual harvests have since exceeded this under updated management. Cultivation of Gelidium remains largely experimental due to the genus's slow growth rates, typically 5-10 cm per year for new shoots, and challenges in scaling vegetative propagation. Techniques involve fragmenting thalli for attachment to nets, ropes, or longlines in offshore farms, particularly in Korea and , where asexual regeneration and seeding have been tested since the late to produce seedstock. Growth rates in these sea-based systems can reach 2-13% per day under optimal turbulent conditions with supplementation, though economic viability is limited by low yields of around 25 kg fresh weight per square meter. Historical practices trace back to traditional harvesting of G. amansii (tengusa) in during the 17th century, where divers and rakes collected the algae from coastal waters for agar production. Demand surged post-World War II, prompting expanded wild harvesting in and , including mechanized methods in and to meet global agar needs. Global production of Gelidium biomass was approximately 34,500 tons fresh weight (equivalent to about 3,500–7,000 tons dry weight, based on 10–20% dry matter content) in 2020, the latest comprehensive data available, predominantly from wild sources. Gelidium contributes to the premium bacteriological segment of the global agar market, which exceeds $300 million in total value. Innovations include tissue culture methods to generate improved seedstock from apical fragments, enhancing propagation efficiency for potential large-scale farming. Additionally, integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) systems incorporating Gelidium with fish farms in regions like South Africa utilize algal uptake of nutrient waste to promote sustainability and reduce environmental impacts.

Conservation and Threats

Environmental Impacts

Gelidium populations have faced significant declines due to overharvesting driven by global demand for production. In , landings of Gelidium corneum peaked at 44,000 tons in 2006 but halved by the , attributed to and unregulated harvesting that increased unlicensed operators tenfold. In , annual landings dropped from a peak of 6,000 tons in the to approximately 300 tons in the , exacerbated by socio-economic pressures and reliance on imports following events like the 2002 . These reductions reflect a broader post-1950s global boom in Gelidium exploitation, with landings rising to 60,000 tons per year in the before continuous declines to 25,000 tons by the , correlating with habitat loss in key areas. Historical overexploitation has also prompted regulatory responses; in , intensive harvesting of Gelidium species in the 20th century led to diminished beds, though imports of cheaper raw materials further reduced domestic collection, as documented in studies from the early . records reveal morphological changes in Gelidium due to sustained pressures, with Gelidium canariense showing a halving of average thallus length from 13.24 cm in the 1980s to 7.8 cm from the 1990s onward, alongside a significant decrease in tetrasporangial sori, indicating reduced over 40 years (1970–2010). Climate change compounds these threats through warming-induced range shifts and intensified physical disturbances. In the Atlantic, canopy-forming Gelidium species have exhibited distributional contractions over the last three decades, with more pronounced shifts eastward of the Cantabrian Sea, as southern European coasts warm faster than global averages. Increased storm frequency and extreme wave events have disrupted holdfast attachment in Gelidium corneum, contributing to a 84% biomass decline from 12,000 tons to 1,900 tons over 20 years in the southeastern Bay of Biscay. Ocean acidification further weakens calcification in associated calcifying biota within Gelidium habitats, potentially altering community structure, though direct effects on non-calcifying Gelidium remain less pronounced. Pollution and habitat degradation add to population stresses. from nutrient runoff favors opportunistic competitors, while coastal development reduces available rocky substrates essential for Gelidium attachment. such as lead, , and bioaccumulate in Gelidium thalli, with concentrations in Gelidium pusillum exceeding safe limits in polluted coastal zones, posing risks to the and its role as a provider. Harvested beds across the Atlantic have experienced biomass reductions, often exacerbated by like Sargassum muticum, which proliferate in overexploited areas and outcompete Gelidium for space.

Conservation Efforts

Conservation efforts for Gelidium species, particularly G. corneum, focus on balancing commercial extraction with ecological protection through targeted research, sustainable harvesting guidelines, and emerging cultivation techniques. In , a 2021 project mapped the potential distribution of G. corneum along the Atlantic coast and analyzed threats such as climate-induced biogeographic shifts, recommending good practices for resource managers to ensure compatible conservation and exploitation. This initiative aligns with broader frameworks, including the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, which supports habitat protection for associations dominated by Gelidium spp. Sustainable management emphasizes local plans to align harvesting with population regeneration, including manual collection methods that minimize habitat disruption and preserve creeping thalli for recovery. The recommends vegetative propagation and spore-based cultivation for agarophytes like Gelidium to alleviate pressure on wild stocks, with global harvests estimated at 150,000 tonnes annually requiring such interventions for long-term viability. In , certification schemes such as the Aquaculture Stewardship Council-Marine Stewardship Council Seaweed Standard promote eco-friendly farming practices, applicable to Gelidium production in regions like . International initiatives include the Seaweed Roadmap (2025), which outlines steps for sustainable industry growth, targeting 8 million tonnes of production by 2030 while prioritizing on ecological thresholds, eDNA monitoring for , and local sourcing to maintain in like Gelidium. Cultivation trials in , , and have tested fragment attachment to floating structures and pond systems, though low growth rates necessitate genetic improvements for scalability, indirectly supporting wild population conservation. Monitoring efforts incorporate research on stock evaluation and restocking potential, alongside citizen science programs like the UK's Big Seaweed Search, where volunteers survey intertidal seaweed distributions to track environmental changes and inform protective measures. In , , long-term studies (1987–2021) demonstrate the sustainability of hand-plucked G. corneum harvests, with stable across exploited and non-exploited areas and annual recovery, underscoring the value of updated mapping and regulated reporting for ongoing success.

References

  1. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/14/10/826
  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/gelidium
  3. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.102305
  4. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/d542999b-97cc-46d7-908c-d67c2730aac8/content
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262724816_An_investigation_of_cystocarp_development_in_Gelidium_pteridifolium_with_a_revised_description_of_the_Gelidiales_Rhodophyta
  6. https://sryahwapublications.com/article/download/2638-5481.0301001
  7. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/16/7/399
  8. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4834/3/3/45
  9. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-journal-of-phycology/article/life-history-and-reproduction-of-gelidium-maggsiae-sp-nov-rhodophyta-gelidiales-from-ireland/BA4AA193AB5D1F07FAF85FAA56B188D3
  10. https://academic.oup.com/aob/article-pdf/23/3/397/682390/23-3-397.pdf
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0044848687901566
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225303772_A_Karyological_Demonstration_of_Meiosis_in_Gelidium-Latifolium_Gelidiaceae_Rhodophyta_from_Ireland
  13. https://www.e-algae.org/upload/pdf/algae-1992-7-2-281.pdf
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272771417311423
  15. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth3030045
  16. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00028360
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237080191_The_effects_of_grazing_on_the_distribution_and_composition_of_low-shore_algal_communities_on_the_central_coast_of_Portugal_and_on_the_southern_coast_of_Britain
  18. https://www.int-res.com/articles/meps2008/352/m352p125.pdf
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031942200896375
  20. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jpy.12083
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249926496_Culture_Studies_of_Gelidium_latifolium_Grev_Born_et_Thur_Rhodophyta_from_Norway_Growth_and_Nitrogen_Storage_in_Response_to_Varying_Photon_Flux_Density_Temperature_and_Nitrogen_Availability
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352513425001358
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225587442_Effect_of_outdoor_conditions_on_growth_rate_and_chemical_composition_of_Gelidium_crinale_in_culture
  24. https://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12866-024-03426-x
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113623000946
  26. https://www.algaebase.org/search/genus/detail/?genus_id=11
  27. https://www.algaebase.org/search/species/detail/?species_id=377
  28. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00040224
  29. http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=143726
  30. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2216/i0031-8884-22-2-185.1
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790316301075
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230164051_A_molecular_phylogeny_of_the_Gelidiales_Rhodophyta_based_on_analysis_of_plastid_rbcL_nucleotide_sequences
  33. https://www.e-algae.org/upload/pdf/algae-2012-27-2-083.pdf
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394621243_Diversity_of_turf-forming_Gelidium_species_growing_on_subtidal_crustose_coralline_algae_in_the_East_Sea_of_Korea_with_a_description_of_G_cristatum_sp_nov
  35. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/485029
  36. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10811-025-03641-7
  37. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1017094231494
  38. https://admin.algaebase.org/search/species/detail/?species_id=58849
  39. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00318884.2022.2046933
  40. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bot-2023-0046/html
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385782956_Morphological_and_molecular_evidence_reveals_three_new_species_of_Gelidium_Gelidiaceae_Rhodophyta_for_the_southern_Mexican_Tropical_Pacific
  42. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00318884.2019.1580102
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10049384/
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301600741_Molecular_identification_of_gelidioid_algae_Gelidiales_Rhodophyta_from_Singapore_with_a_description_of_Gelidium_sentosaense_sp_nov
  45. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/product/sigma/a9799
  46. https://www.usbio.net/media/A0930-05/Agar%252C%2520USP/data-sheet
  47. https://www.fao.org/4/y4765e/y4765e06.htm
  48. https://www.fao.org/4/x5822e/x5822e03.htm
  49. https://www.chemanalyst.com/Blogs/industrial-production-processes-of-agar-agar-methods-grades-and-applications-34
  50. https://cybercolloids.net/information/technical-articles/introduction-to-agar-production/
  51. https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/Agar%2520TR%25202011.pdf
  52. https://globalbioingredients.com/products/bacteriological-agar-for-microbiology/
  53. https://www.agarmex.com/en/do-you-have-any-questions-about-agar-well-answer-them
  54. https://www.tridge.com/news/el-jadida-seaweed-22500-tonnes-collected-under-goo
  55. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/5b54da89-75f1-45a2-a2af-2581550fbf78/content
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113624004422
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226895290_Gelidium_cultivation_in_the_sea
  58. https://www.agarmex.com/en/differences-between-gelidium-and-gracilaria-alga-agars
  59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2211926415300758
  60. https://www.fao.org/4/i1092e/i1092e02b.pdf
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321753205_Global_shortage_of_technical_agars_back_to_basics_resource_management
  62. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09670262.2017.1365175
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113621003020
  64. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC112669
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323863782_Long-term_decline_of_the_canopy-forming_algae_Gelidium_corneum_associated_to_extreme_wave_events_and_reduced_sunlight_hours_in_the_southeastern_Bay_of_Biscay
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229105804_Effects_of_ocean_acidification_on_macroalgal_communities
  67. https://www.academia.edu/59005553/Study_of_Gelidium_sesquipedale_overexploitation_effects_on_Sargassum_muticum_proliferation_of_in_El_Jadida_area_Morocco
  68. https://www.academia.edu/45755395/Heavy_metal_contamination_in_Gelidium_pusillum_A_human_health_risk_assessment
  69. https://fundacion-biodiversidad.es/en/proyectos_ficha/the-fields-of-the-red-algae-gelidium-corneum-on-the-spanish-atlantic-coast-is-their-conservation-compatible-with-their-commercial-exploitation/
  70. https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/habitats/30139
  71. https://www.fao.org/4/y4765e/y4765e00.htm
  72. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44183-025-00122-9
  73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-007-9285-1
  74. https://www.mcsuk.org/what-you-can-do/citizen-science/big-seaweed-search/what-is-the-big-seaweed-search/
  75. https://digibuo.uniovi.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/10651/60231/TFM_JaclynHiggins.pdf?sequence=4
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.