Hubbry Logo
James FetzerJames FetzerMain
Open search
James Fetzer
Community hub
James Fetzer
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
James Fetzer
James Fetzer
James Fetzer
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

James Henry Fetzer (born December 6, 1940) is an American professor emeritus of the philosophy of science at the University of Minnesota Duluth, known for promoting conspiracy theories and Holocaust denial. Fetzer has worked on assessing and clarifying the forms and foundations of scientific explanation, probability in science, philosophy of mind, and philosophy of cognitive science, especially artificial intelligence and computer science.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Key Information

Fetzer began to promote John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories in the early 1990s. He later promoted 9/11 conspiracy theories, Holocaust denial, conspiracy theories regarding the 2002 death of Senator Paul Wellstone, and Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories.[7] He cofounded Scholars for 9/11 Truth in 2005,[8] and claims that elements in the United States government, United States Intelligence Community, and Israeli Mossad were responsible for the September 11 attacks. Fetzer asserts that no commercial planes or hijackers were involved at any of the attack locations, that Flight 93 did not exist, and that guided missiles and/or explosives were instead used to destroy the buildings and create the appearance of a plane crash in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Fetzer's allegations and speculations have drawn strong criticism as a source of disinformation and false conspiracy theories.[8][9][10][11][12] In October 2019, a Wisconsin court ordered Fetzer to pay the father of a Sandy Hook victim $450,000 in a defamation case.[13][14][15][16]

Fetzer's views have been featured by Iran's PressTV, Fars, and Tasnim news agencies and the pro-Russian website Veterans Today,[citation needed] which have been described as sources of state propaganda.[17] In an interview Fetzer supported Iranian and Russian media as "Press TV, along with RT and Sputnik News, have become the gold standard for reporting on international events and developments." He stated his opposition to the US and Israel as they "have become the greatest threats to freedom and democracy ever known, not only in the Middle East but throughout the world." He held up Iran as a "beacon of light in comparison to the United States."[18] In another interview, Fetzer stated "Russia and Iran are now providing leadership for the world community. May they prosper and endure!"[19]

Early life

[edit]

Fetzer was born in Pasadena, California, on December 6, 1940, to a father who worked as an accountant in a welfare office in Los Angeles County,[20] and grew up in a neighboring city, Altadena.[21]

After his parents' divorce, Fetzer moved to La Habra Heights, California, with his brother, mother, and stepfather.[21] His mother took her own life when he was 11, and he went to live with his father and stepmother.[21][22]

Following Fetzer's graduation from South Pasadena High School, he studied philosophy at Princeton University and graduated magna cum laude in 1962[8] where his undergraduate thesis, under the supervision of Carl G Hempel, won The Dickinson Prize.[1] He then joined the United States Marine Corps, and was second lieutenant in an artillery unit.[8] In the early 1960s, he was stationed at Okinawa, Japan.[20][22] During military service in the 1960s, Fetzer married, and divorced four years later, after having a son.[22] He remarried in the 1970s.[22]

In 1966, soon after promotion to captain, he resigned to enter graduate school.[8] Having attained a master's degree from Indiana University, he studied at Columbia University for a year, then returned to Indiana University and in 1970 gained a PhD in history of science and philosophy of science.[8][20][22]

Career

[edit]

He became an assistant professor at the University of Kentucky in 1970, and received the University of Kentucky Student Government's first Distinguished Teaching Award in 1973.[8] He was denied tenure at Kentucky in 1977, and spent the next ten years in visiting positions at the University of Virginia, University of Cincinnati, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and University of South Florida.[13][11] After ten years without a tenure-track position, in 1987 he was hired as a full professor at the University of Minnesota Duluth.[11] In 1996, Fetzer received a Distinguished McKnight University Professorship from the University of Minnesota,[23] a title that recipients retain until they retire from the University.[24] After Fetzer retired in 2006 he became professor emeritus.[25]

In the late 1970s, Fetzer received a National Science Foundation fellowship,[26] and contributed a chapter to a book on Hans Reichenbach.[27] In 1990, Fetzer received the Medal of the University of Helsinki.[1] He assisted theorists in computer science,[28][29] and joined the debate over proper types of inference in computing.[5] In the late 1990s, Fetzer was called to organize a symposium on philosophy of mind,[30] and authored textbooks on cognitive science and artificial intelligence.[3][4] He is an expert on philosopher Carl G. Hempel.[1][31]

Fetzer published over 100 articles and 20 books on philosophy of science and philosophy of cognitive science, especially of artificial intelligence and computer science.[6][32] In 2002, Fetzer edited Consciousness Evolving, a collection of studies on the past, the present, and the future of consciousness.[33] He founded the international journal Minds and Machines, which he edited for 11 years, and founded the academic library Studies in Cognitive Systems,[8] of which he was series editor.[1] He founded the Society for Machines & Mentality. Near and after retirement, Fetzer remained a contributor to as well as cited or republished in philosophy of science and cognitive science volumes and encyclopedias.[2][31][34][35][36]

Promotion of conspiracy theories

[edit]

Fetzer alleges government conspiracies include an involvement in the assassination of President Kennedy. He believes Kennedy's assassination was "a government hit job" and "the Zapruder film is a fake".[21] With Don "Four Arrows" Jacobs, Fetzer claimed that the 2002 airplane crash that killed US Senator Paul Wellstone was an assassination "by an out-of-control Republican cabal under the direction of" Karl Rove.[37] He also claimed that Paul McCartney died in 1966.[13][38]

Fetzer has alleged the 9/11 attacks were treasonable, and called for the military overthrow of President George W. Bush.[8] He has asserted that the World Trade Center buildings collapsed by controlled demolitions or by high-tech weaponry, gaining further critical attention.[8] In 2005, with Steven E. Jones, Fetzer co-founded Scholars for 9/11 Truth.[8] Within a year, Jones wrote to other members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth declaring he and others wished to sever their connections with the organization, because Fetzer's backing of theories about a direct energy weapon had left them open to severe mockery.[39] Jovan Byford criticized Fetzer's speculations that Jews or Israel were involved in a conspiracy to commit the 9/11 attacks as "a contemporary variant of the old, antisemitic conspiracist canard about the disloyalty of Jews and their usurpation of power in the name of communal interests and the accumulation of wealth."[40] Fetzer has asserted that elements in the US Department of Defense, US intelligence and the Israeli Mossad were involved in the attacks.

An article by Fetzer published by Iranian state-run Press TV and pro-Russian conspiracy theory and fake news website Veterans Today titled (by the latter) "Did Mossad death squads slaughter American children at Sandy Hook?" was described in January 2013 by Oliver Kamm in The Jewish Chronicle as "monstrous, calumnious, demented bilge" that "violates all bounds of decency".[41] Fetzer was a member of the Advisory Board of Veterans Today in 2013.[42] In 2015, Fetzer published a book co-written with Mike Palacek titled Nobody Died at Sandy Hook: It Was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control, which argued the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting never happened.[43] It was removed from circulation by its publisher, Moon Rock Books, after Sandy Hook parent Leonard Pozner won a defamation lawsuit against Fetzer in 2019.[14][15][16]

In December 2015 Iran's Tasnim News Agency published an interview with Fetzer where he claims the Charlie Hebdo shooting, the November 2015 Paris attacks, and the Islamic State beheading incidents were staged.[19]

Fetzer has also promoted theories that the Boston Marathon bombing, Parkland and Pulse nightclub shootings, and the Charlottesville car attack were hoaxes or classified training exercises, as he also alleged about Sandy Hook, and believes the Apollo Moon landings were faked.[13]

Fetzer contributed the foreword for a book entitled Breaking The Spell (2014) by Nicholas Kollerstrom, a work of Holocaust denial.[44] Fetzer has said of the Holocaust: "My research on the Holocaust narrative suggests that it is not only untrue but provably false and not remotely scientifically sustainable."[12][7]

In 2013, officials of the University of Minnesota, where Fetzer was a professor 1987 to 2006, said that "Fetzer has the right to express his views, but he also has the responsibility to make clear he's not speaking for the university." He has not been employed by the university since his retirement.[23]

Fetzer has backed claims the 2020 United States presidential election was "stolen" from Donald Trump.[45]

Lawsuits

[edit]

Leonard Pozner, father of Sandy Hook victim Noah Pozner, sued Fetzer and his co-author Mike Palacek for defamation in a Dane County, Wisconsin, court for statements contained in Nobody Died at Sandy Hook. Pozner’s son Noah, 6, was the youngest of the 26 people killed in the mass shooting. Fetzer and Palacek proceeded pro se.[46] In June 2019, circuit judge Frank Remington found that Fetzer and Palacek had defamed the Pozners. On October 16, 2019, a jury in Wisconsin awarded Leonard Pozner $450,000 for defamation. Fetzer's petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States was denied on October 3, 2022.[47]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

James Fetzer

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
James H. Fetzer (born December 6, 1940) is an American philosopher and professor emeritus of philosophy at the , where he specialized in the , , and the foundations of scientific knowledge. A former U.S. Marine Corps officer with a Ph.D. from in the , Fetzer authored or edited over 20 books and more than 100 articles on topics including causation, , corroboration, , and , earning recognition for rigorous methodological approaches to empirical . His application of critical reasoning and evidence analysis extended to historical events, notably editing volumes such as Assassination Science (1998) and Murder in (2003) that examined forensic, ballistic, and photographic discrepancies in the account of the . In 2006, Fetzer co-founded Scholars for 9/11 Truth, an organization of academics and professionals advocating scrutiny of the through scientific and engineering lenses, authoring works like The 9/11 Conspiracy: The Scamming of America (2007) that highlighted alleged anomalies in structural failures, flight paths, and media reporting. Fetzer's insistence on verifiable evidence over institutional consensus has positioned him as a prominent skeptic of narratives, though his conclusions have drawn legal challenges and institutional disavowals amid debates over source reliability and interpretive biases in investigations.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Upbringing

James Henry Fetzer was born on December 6, 1940, in Pasadena, California. Publicly available biographical details on his family background, parental influences, or specific experiences during childhood and adolescence remain limited, with no verified accounts from primary sources such as memoirs or official records detailing his early environment or formative years prior to higher education. Fetzer's subsequent path to studying philosophy at Princeton University suggests an early intellectual orientation, though the causal factors shaping this trajectory—such as familial emphasis on academics or regional cultural elements in mid-20th-century Southern California—are undocumented in accessible, reputable references.

Military Service

Fetzer was commissioned as a in the United States Marine Corps following his graduation from in 1962. He served as an artillery officer from 1962 to 1966. His military tenure occurred during the early escalation of the , though records indicate no deployment to combat zones in . Fetzer has described his service as formative, emphasizing discipline and leadership training acquired through the Corps.

Academic Background

James Fetzer received his A.B. in from in 1962, graduating magna cum laude and receiving the Dickinson Prize; his senior thesis addressed the logical structure of scientific explanation under the supervision of Carl G. Hempel. Following undergraduate studies, Fetzer pursued graduate work in the at , where he was awarded an NDEA Title IV Fellowship from 1966 to 1968 and earned an M.A. in 1968. He spent the 1968–1969 academic year as a of in at before returning to as a Graduate Research Assistant in 1969–1970. Fetzer completed his Ph.D. in at in 1970, with a dissertation on probability and scientific explanation supervised by Wesley C. Salmon.

Academic Career

University Positions

Fetzer began his academic career as an of at the , serving from 1970 to 1977. Following his departure from that position, he held a series of short-term visiting and adjunct roles, including visiting associate professor at the (1977–1978) and the (1978–1979), NSF research professor at the (1979–1980), visiting lecturer at the at Chapel Hill (1980–1981), and visiting associate professor at New College of the (1981–1983). These appointments continued through the mid-1980s, encompassing a MacArthur Visiting Distinguished Professorship at New College (1983–1984), adjunct professor at the (fall 1984–1985), visiting professor at the (spring 1984–1985), and research scholar at New College (1985–1986). In 1987, Fetzer joined the (UMD) as a full of , a position he held until 1996. During this period, he also served as chairman of the department from 1988 to 1992. In 1996, he was appointed Distinguished McKnight University , one of the inaugural recipients of this endowed chair at UMD, a role he maintained until his retirement in 2006; he simultaneously directed the Master of Liberal Studies Program from 1996 to 2006. Upon retirement, Fetzer was granted status as Distinguished McKnight University of at UMD.

Research Contributions

Fetzer's research contributions center on the , , cognitive systems, and the theoretical underpinnings of and . Over his career, he authored or edited more than 20 books and published over 100 articles and reviews in these domains, with his work garnering approximately 4,964 citations as of recent scholarly metrics. In the , Fetzer advanced analyses of scientific methodology, causation, and probabilistic reasoning. His 1981 book Scientific Knowledge: Causation, Explanation, and Corroboration critiques inductivist approaches and proposes a propensity-based interpretation of probability as a physical magnitude, offering an alternative framework for understanding natural laws and empirical corroboration. He further elaborated on these themes in Philosophy of Science (1993), examining the aims, methods, and methodological commitments of empirical inquiry, including the role of theoretical assumptions in scientific practice. Fetzer's epistemological work integrates philosophy with , emphasizing knowledge as involving information-processing capacities. In and Cognition (1991), part of the Studies in Cognitive Systems series, he explores how cognitive models inform theories of justification, belief formation, and evidence evaluation, bridging rationalist and empiricist traditions while critiquing computationalist reductions of mind. This aligns with his broader contributions to , where he argued against machine functionalism, contending that mental states cannot be fully realized by computational processes due to their dependence on biological and causal histories. In foundations, Fetzer addressed program verification and . His research includes philosophical examinations of software validation, knowledge representation, and the limits of empirical testing in algorithmic contexts, influencing discussions on AI's epistemic boundaries. These efforts underscore his interdisciplinary approach, applying logical and causal analyses to distinguish robust scientific from fallacious reasoning in complex systems.

Editorial and Publishing Roles

Fetzer co-edited the philosophy journal Synthese from 1990 to 1999, during which he also guest-edited multiple special issues on topics including probability, , and in 1979, 1981, 1983, 1990, and 2002. He founded and edited Minds and Machines: Journal for , , and from 1991 to 2001, publishing four issues annually on intersections of AI, philosophy, and cognition, before serving as co-editor until 2002. In book series editorship, Fetzer established Studies in Cognitive Systems in 1986, editing it until 2006 and overseeing more than 20 volumes on knowledge representation, information processing, and related theoretical foundations. He also founded Explorations in Philosophy in 1995 as series editor, focusing on philosophical inquiries into , mind, and . Fetzer held memberships on several editorial boards, including Philosophy of Science from 1999, History of Philosophy Quarterly from 2005, Heuristics, and Journal for Signs and Semiotic Systems from 2009. Extending his publishing activities to specialized historical analysis, he founded and has edited Assassination Research since 2002, a journal dedicated to advanced study of the John F. Kennedy assassination.

Philosophical Work

Philosophy of Science

Fetzer's philosophical work in the emphasizes the methodological foundations of empirical inquiry, focusing on how scientists acquire and justify through structured processes of causation, , and corroboration. In his 1981 monograph Scientific Knowledge: Causation, Explanation, and Corroboration, he constructs a unified framework to resolve longstanding issues, including the of by and the criteria for theoretical . Fetzer posits that science pursues objective, though inherently fallible, general via probabilistic assessments of evidence, rejecting both naive and rigid falsification as insufficient for capturing the complexity of scientific practice. This approach integrates causal mechanisms with , arguing that robust corroboration requires alignment between observational and theoretical predictions under specified conditions. Central to Fetzer's methodology is the critique of oversimplified models of scientific explanation, drawing on distinctions between deductive-nomological accounts and more probabilistic variants. He contends that explanations in science must account for both singular events and general laws, incorporating counterfactual reasoning to evaluate causal efficacy. In Philosophy of Science (1993), Fetzer delineates the aims of empirical science as advancing testable hypotheses through rigorous evidential appraisal, highlighting methodological commitments to logic and probability as safeguards against confirmation bias. His analyses underscore that scientific progress hinges on iterative refinement rather than absolute certainty, with probability serving as a tool for quantifying degrees of evidential support. Fetzer further advanced these themes through editorial contributions, such as Foundations of Philosophy of Science: Recent Developments (1993), which surveys post-positivist shifts in methodology, including realism debates and the role of non-observables in theory construction. Influenced by figures like Carl G. Hempel, whose philosophy Fetzer explored in edited volumes like Science, Explanation, and Rationality (2001), he advocates for a balanced realism that privileges causal structures over instrumentalist interpretations. Over his career, Fetzer authored or edited works exceeding 20 books and 100 articles on these topics, consistently applying formal tools to dissect scientific reasoning.

Epistemology and Critical Thinking

James H. Fetzer's epistemological work emphasizes the foundations of scientific knowledge, integrating probabilistic reasoning with causal structures to evaluate explanations and corroborate theories. In his 1981 book Scientific Knowledge: Causation, Explanation, and Corroboration, Fetzer critiques prevailing hypothetico-deductive models and advances a dispositional account of natural laws, arguing that scientific laws describe causal capacities rather than mere regularities, supported by analyses of and in empirical science. This approach privileges evidence-based inference over inductive generalizations, highlighting how theoretical entities influence observable phenomena through underlying mechanisms. Fetzer further explores epistemology's intersection with cognition and everyday reasoning in Epistemology and Cognition (1991), where he examines knowledge acquisition as involving computational processes akin to data-processing systems, drawing parallels between human cognition and artificial intelligence models. Co-authoring A Glossary of Epistemology/Philosophy of Science (1993) with Robert F. Almeder, he defines epistemology as the study of ordinary knowledge claims in daily life, contrasting it with philosophy of science's focus on methodologically derived knowledge, and provides terminological clarity for concepts like justification and belief revision. In , Fetzer advocates rigorous philosophical reasoning principles, as outlined in his edited volume Principles of Philosophical Reasoning (1984), which compiles essays on argument evaluation, fallacies, and probabilistic to distinguish sound from defective cognition. He promotes " to the best explanation" as a core method for assessing evidence, requiring systematic consideration of alternative hypotheses against empirical data to avoid or hasty generalizations. Fetzer also addresses epistemic threats like in his analysis of false information's deliberate deployment, distinguishing it from mere by intent and context, particularly in domains demanding high evidentiary standards such as and .

Applications to Evidence Analysis

Fetzer employs inference to the best explanation () as a for evaluating , positing that hypotheses should be assessed by their capacity to account for the totality of relevant data more adequately than rivals. This method, refined through integration of Popperian laws and modified Hempelian explanatory structures, prioritizes explanations that align with observed frequencies and propensities while accommodating probabilistic elements inherent in . IBE thus serves as a tool for distinguishing corroborated accounts from conjectures, demanding that be interpreted within a framework of causal realism rather than isolated observations. In analyzing evidence, Fetzer stresses the theory-laden nature of observations, arguing that gain significance only through theoretical lenses that reveal causal connections and potential distortions such as or selective presentation. He critiques practices like —citing only confirmatory evidence while ignoring contradictions—as epistemically flawed, advocating instead for comprehensive scrutiny that includes disconfirming instances to test . This approach draws from his broader , where corroboration emerges not from mere accumulation of facts but from explanations that withstand alternative hypotheses and align with principles of causation and probability. Fetzer's framework extends to practical evidence evaluation by applying semiotic principles, viewing evidentiary artifacts (e.g., documents, images) as signs whose interpretive validity depends on establishing referential links to underlying events via rigorous semiotic analysis. Such applications underscore the need for meta-epistemic awareness, including assessments of source reliability and potential biases in institutional narratives, to avoid uncritical acceptance of purported facts. By systematizing these methods, as elaborated in works on scientific and , Fetzer provides a blueprint for analysis that privileges explanatory depth over superficial consensus.

Critiques of Official Narratives

John F. Kennedy Assassination

James Fetzer has applied his expertise in the to scrutinize the evidence surrounding the assassination of President on November 22, 1963, in , , challenging the Warren Commission's 1964 conclusion that acted alone as the shooter. In edited volumes such as Assassination Science: Experts Speak Out on the Death of JFK (Open Court, 1998), Fetzer assembles analyses from medical professionals, physicists, and forensic experts who identify discrepancies in the autopsy records, ballistics trajectories, and witness testimonies that, in their view, preclude a lone gunman scenario. Contributors, including pathologist , argue that the throat wound observed at was an entry wound inconsistent with the official trajectory from Oswald's alleged position in the . Fetzer's subsequent work, Murder in Dealey Plaza: What We Know Now That We Didn't Know Then About the Death of JFK (2000), incorporates acoustic evidence from the police dictabelt recording, interpreted by experts like B. Thomas Louneston as indicating at least four shots, including one from the grassy knoll, with a probability exceeding 95% of multiple gunmen based on . He posits that the , which claims one projectile caused seven wounds to Kennedy and Governor , defies physics due to the bullet's alleged zigzag path and minimal deformation, as examined through and wound simulations. Fetzer maintains that these evidentiary failures stem from deliberate alterations and suppressions, including potential tampering with the , to fabricate a of Oswald's solitary guilt. Through these publications, Fetzer advocates for a multidisciplinary approach to historical events, emphasizing and Bayesian reasoning to assess hypotheses against official accounts. He attributes the to a conspiracy involving rogue CIA elements, anti-Castro Cuban exiles, and possibly , citing declassified documents like the House Select Committee on Assassinations' 1979 acoustic findings (later contested but not fully refuted in peer-reviewed critiques). While mainstream historians and commissions uphold the lone-gunman explanation based on chain-of-custody evidence and Oswald's rifle ownership, Fetzer counters that institutional biases in forensic reporting—evident in inconsistencies between Parkland and Bethesda observations—undermine without independent verification. His analyses prioritize empirical inconsistencies over narrative convenience, though critics argue they over-rely on speculative interpretations of ambiguous data.

September 11 Attacks

Fetzer co-founded Scholars for 9/11 Truth in December 2005 alongside physicist , establishing an organization of academics, professionals, and researchers dedicated to scrutinizing the official account of the , 2001, terrorist attacks through scientific inquiry and evidence analysis. The group's mission emphasized applying principles of , such as and empirical testing, to alleged inconsistencies in reports from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the . Fetzer served as the founding chairperson, promoting the view that the organization's work represented rigorous skepticism rather than unfounded speculation. In this capacity, Fetzer edited and contributed to The 9/11 Conspiracy: The Scamming of America (Catfeet Press, 2007), a collection of essays by group members challenging key elements of the official narrative. The volume contended that the collapses of the World Trade Center Twin Towers (WTC 1 and WTC 2) and WTC 7 could not be explained by aircraft impacts and ensuing fires alone, asserting instead that the symmetrical, near-free-fall descent—observed on September 11, 2001, with WTC 1 collapsing at 10:28 a.m., WTC 2 at 9:59 a.m., and WTC 7 at 5:20 p.m.—indicated pre-planned controlled demolition using explosives or incendiary devices. Fetzer argued in the book that structural engineering principles, including the towers' design to withstand multiple aircraft strikes, rendered the NIST fire-induced progressive collapse model implausible without additional causal factors. He cited visual evidence of molten metal flows and explosive ejections as supporting demolition hypotheses, while dismissing jet fuel fire temperatures (peaking around 1,000°C) as insufficient to weaken steel trusses rated for 2,000°C exposure. Fetzer extended his critiques to other attack sites, questioning the strike at 9:37 a.m., where allegedly impacted. He highlighted discrepancies in debris patterns and damage extent—a 75-foot-wide hole in the facade despite a 757's 124-foot wingspan—as evidence inconsistent with a large commercial impact, suggesting alternatives like a or smaller aircraft. Regarding the Shanksville crash of at 10:03 a.m., he pointed to the small crater size (about 40 feet wide) and paucity of recognizable wreckage as anomalous for a 100-ton jet disintegrating at 580 mph. These positions aligned with the group's broader contention that the attacks involved insider complicity, potentially including U.S. elements, to justify shifts like the . Fetzer delivered public lectures amplifying these arguments, such as a May 3, 2006, presentation at the University of St. Thomas titled "Critical Review of 9/11 Evidence," where he enumerated over 100 anomalies, including foreknowledge warnings ignored by intelligence agencies and inconsistencies in passenger manifests. In a 2006 forum, he defended the scholarly legitimacy of probing such irregularities, drawing parallels to historical precedents like the . His epistemological framework, outlined in essays like "Thinking about ' Theories': 9/11 and JFK," posited that conspiracies are empirically common (citing declassified examples) and that a priori dismissal of 9/11 hypotheses violates Bayesian reasoning by overweighting official sources over disparate evidence streams. Internal divisions emerged by 2006, leading to a with Jones over methodologies—Fetzer favoring broader media and versus Jones's focus on physical forensics like residues—resulting in competing factions. Fetzer's 9/11 advocacy emphasized causal realism, insisting that explanations must account for observed effects (e.g., pulverized concrete equivalent to 10-15 tons of TNT per tower) without ad hoc assumptions favoring improbable fire dynamics over verifiable precedents. He maintained these critiques into later years, integrating them into broader discussions of evidence manipulation, though mainstream engineering consensus, per NIST's 2005-2008 reports, attributes collapses to fire-weakened structures without explosives.

Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting

James Fetzer contended that the reported at on December 14, 2012, which authorities described as the killing of 20 children and 6 staff members by gunman Adam Lanza, was instead a fabricated event staged as a FEMA exercise to simulate a and advance federal objectives under the Obama administration. In his 2016 edited volume Nobody Died at Sandy Hook: It Was a FEMA Drill to Promote , co-authored with Mike Palacek and featuring contributions from researchers including James Tracy and Dennis Cimino, Fetzer compiled analyses asserting no genuine deaths occurred, with participants acting scripted roles amid inconsistencies in official accounts. Fetzer's primary arguments centered on empirical discrepancies he identified through scrutiny of , photographs, and media footage. He maintained that Sandy Hook Elementary had been permanently closed since 2008 due to asbestos contamination and structural issues, rendering it unavailable for active use four years prior to the alleged incident, supported by local reports and property assessments he referenced. Additional claims included the absence of typical mass casualty protocols, such as no areas or body transport visible in footage, and anomalies in visual evidence like unchanged window glass despite reported high-velocity gunfire impacts. Fetzer specifically alleged fabrication of victim documentation, including assertions that death certificates, such as that of Noah Pozner, were forged with irregularities like mismatched addresses and implausible wound descriptions inconsistent with standards. He applied his background in to argue these elements violated principles of causal coherence, positing the event as a "psy-op" involving crisis actors whose behaviors—such as parents displaying delayed emotional responses in interviews—deviated from expected patterns in genuine tragedies. Fetzer defended these positions in subsequent blog posts and interviews, emphasizing alternative hypotheses derived from discrepancies over deference to institutional narratives.

Other Events

Fetzer has scrutinized the official account of the 1969 , asserting it was staged by as part of a effort rather than a genuine achievement. He has co-authored and promoted works challenging the physical evidence, such as alleged anomalies in photographs and radiation data from the Van Allen belts, and discussed these claims in interviews and conferences. Regarding the April 15, 2013, Boston Marathon bombing, which killed three and injured over 260, Fetzer disseminated theories portraying it as a operation involving staged explosions and crisis actors to justify expanded surveillance and gun restrictions. These views positioned the event within a pattern of government-orchestrated psyops, akin to his analyses of other attacks. Fetzer has questioned elements of the Holocaust narrative, arguing in a 2023 article that empirical data on gas chambers, crematoria capacities, and population figures contradict mainstream historical claims, with political motivations overriding scientific scrutiny. He frames this as an instance where evidence-based reasoning exposes inconsistencies suppressed by institutional consensus. Following the November 2020 U.S. , Fetzer endorsed assertions of systemic fraud, including manipulated voting machines and ballot irregularities, that allegedly secured victory for over . These positions aligned him with broader challenges to , though subsequent court rulings, such as those dismissing over 60 related lawsuits for lack of evidence, upheld the results.

Defamation Lawsuit by

, father of Noah Pozner, a six-year-old victim of the 2012 , filed a lawsuit against James Fetzer and co-author Mike Palecek in Dane County , , on November 1, 2018. The suit centered on statements in their 2015 book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook: It Was a FEMA Drill to Destroy the Second Amendment, which asserted that the shooting was staged, that no children died, and specifically that Noah Pozner "never existed" and his was fabricated. Fetzer maintained these claims were based on forensic analysis of photographs, official reports, and alleged inconsistencies in the event's documentation, framing them as scholarly inquiry into a government psy-op. On June 18, 2019, Circuit Judge Barbara Kluka granted partial to Pozner, ruling that Fetzer's statements—that Pozner did not exist, did not attend , and was not killed there—were defamatory per se as false assertions of fact, not protected opinion or hyperbole under law. The court rejected Fetzer's defenses of truth and fair comment, finding no genuine factual dispute on the existence and death of Pozner, supported by evidence including the death certificate listing multiple gunshot wounds at on December 14, 2012. A proceeded on , resulting in a October 15, 2019, verdict awarding Pozner $350,000 for and $100,000 for , totaling $450,000 against Fetzer individually after apportionment. Fetzer appealed the and damages, arguing First Amendment protections for academic discourse and public debate on historical events, claiming the book's analysis constituted opinion on disputed facts rather than verifiable falsehoods. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling on March 18, 2021, holding that the statements implied verifiable facts about Pozner's family and were not rhetorical or conjectural, thus actionable despite Fetzer's intent to provoke inquiry into official narratives. Subsequent appeals, including petitions to the and U.S. , were denied, with the final affirmance on February 8, 2024, in Appeal No. 2023AP1002. Fetzer has publicly described the outcome as a suppression of evidence-based , citing anomalies like the rapid release of shooter Lanza's death certificate without details. Pozner, through his HONR Network founded in 2014, has pursued multiple suits against denialists to curb harassment, viewing Fetzer's claims as enabling threats against victims' families.

Appeals and Outcomes

Fetzer appealed the circuit court's June 2019 grant of partial on , which determined that his published statements accusing Pozner of fabricating his son's constituted per se, as well as the October 2019 jury award of $450,000 in . The Court of Appeals, in a decision dated March 18, 2021 (2021 WI App 27), affirmed the , finding no genuine issue of material fact that the statements were false assertions of fact rather than protected , and upheld the verdict as supported by sufficient evidence of emotional harm. The appeals court also affirmed a separate $650,000 contempt sanction imposed on Fetzer for violating a protective order by disseminating protected discovery materials related to Pozner's addresses, rejecting arguments of judicial bias and deeming the sanction appropriate for willful disobedience. Fetzer petitioned the U.S. for a writ of certiorari, challenging the ruling on First Amendment grounds, but the petition was denied on October 11, 2022, following denial of an associated application for stay. In post-judgment proceedings, the Dane County Circuit Court ordered turnover of Fetzer's , including royalty payments and , to partially satisfy plus interest, totaling over $457,000 by 2022. Fetzer appealed this order and the denial of his motion for reconsideration, but the Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed on September 14, 2023, holding that the circuit court properly exercised its equitable powers under Wisconsin statutes for enforcement and that Fetzer failed to demonstrate abuse of . A subsequent appeal of related enforcement actions, docketed as 2023AP1002, was similarly affirmed on February 8, 2024.

Public Engagement and Media

Conferences and Organizations

Fetzer co-founded Scholars for 9/11 Truth, an organization comprising academics and professionals who challenged the official account of the , 2001, attacks, asserting that evidence pointed to controlled demolitions and government complicity. The group, initially co-led with physicist , published analyses and hosted discussions promoting alternative explanations, including claims of foreknowledge and fabrication by U.S. agencies. Internal divisions led to a schism, with Jones and others departing in 2006 to form Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, citing disagreements over the promotion of unsubstantiated theories like directed-energy weapons. Fetzer organized the False Flags and Conspiracies conference series, which assembled speakers to examine alleged staged events and cover-ups across historical incidents. The 2022 edition, held December 3–4, featured experts on topics ranging from assassinations to mass shootings, emphasizing patterns of deception by authorities. He has also participated as a speaker at specialized events, including the 2014 JFK Assassination Conference where he discussed Secret Service involvement, and the 2016 conference hosted by Judyth Vary Baker, focusing on evidentiary anomalies in the Kennedy killing. These appearances aligned with his broader efforts to convene skeptics of official narratives through symposia and panels.

Radio and Podcast Activities

Fetzer hosted the internet radio and series The Real Deal with Jim Fetzer, which aired discussions on topics including the assassination, the , and the , often featuring guest experts in alternative narratives. The program was distributed through platforms such as and Podbean, with episodes archived on Fetzer's blogspot site. It included segments like interviews with researchers on event forensics and critiques of official accounts, continuing into at least December 2024. Beyond hosting, Fetzer made extensive guest appearances on radio and podcasts, reporting over 250 such engagements focused on conspiracy-related inquiries into historical events. He frequently appeared on The Michael Decon Program, including episodes in April 2024 addressing claims and in May 2024 covering 9/11, JFK, and underground facilities alongside . Other appearances encompassed Authentic News w/ Jim Fetzer, which ran multiple episodes, and a August 2022 segment on 77 WABC radio labeling him a conspiracy theorist. These activities positioned Fetzer within networks promoting of mainstream narratives, such as Rense.com affiliates, though sources hosting such content often prioritize unverified alternative viewpoints over empirical consensus.

Reception and Legacy

Academic and Professional Responses

Former colleagues in have expressed bafflement and disappointment at Fetzer's post-retirement pivot to promoting theories, viewing it as a departure from rigorous scholarly standards. Paul S. Davies, a philosophy professor who collaborated with Fetzer on earlier publications, described himself as "at a loss… genuinely puzzled and perplexed" by the shift, noting it contrasted sharply with Fetzer's prior reputation in and . Similarly, Eve A. , another academic who interacted with him professionally, characterized his advocacy as aggressive and likened it to "an insane elephant," calling him "a very accomplished bully." The , Fetzer's longtime institution where he retired in 2006 as McKnight Professor Emeritus, has publicly distanced itself from his views by appending disclaimers to his hosted faculty webpages. These state explicitly that Fetzer is a "conspiracy theorist," that he retired from UMD in 2006, and that "the opinions expressed on these pages are his own and not those of the ," invoking policies while underscoring institutional non-endorsement. This administrative response reflects a professional boundary-setting amid concerns over the credibility implications for the university. Formal academic critiques in peer-reviewed literature specifically targeting Fetzer's conspiracy-related arguments—such as those on the JFK assassination, 9/11 attacks, or shooting—appear limited, with responses more often manifesting as characterizations of his work as conjecture rather than evidence-based analysis. Professionals in fields like and higher education have labeled publications like Nobody Died at (2015) as lacking scholarly rigor and promoting "heinous" notions, such as crisis actors simulating deaths, without empirical substantiation beyond selective anomalies. Broader professional discourse, including from media watchdogs, has highlighted how Fetzer leverages his status to amplify fringe claims, though substantive empirical rebuttals engaging his epistemological frameworks remain scarce in academic journals.

Supporters and Defenders

Mike Palacek, a and co-editor, collaborated with Fetzer on Nobody Died at Sandy Hook: It Was a FEMA to Promote (2016), endorsing its core argument that the event was a scripted operation involving crisis actors rather than a genuine . The anthology features contributions from researchers like Kelly Watt, who claimed extensive personal investigations revealed fabrications in victim narratives and official documents, and Smallstorm, who analyzed photographic and video evidence to argue for foreknowledge and staging. Within broader conspiracy research circles, Fetzer's theories on events like 9/11 and the JFK assassination have garnered support from former associates in groups such as Scholars for 9/11 Truth, which he founded in , though internal divisions later emerged over specific mechanisms like controlled demolitions. Platforms like have published Fetzer's defenses of his positions post-lawsuit, framing them as exercises in critical inquiry against perceived government narratives. These endorsements remain confined to fringe outlets skeptical of mainstream accounts, lacking corroboration from empirical investigations or peer-reviewed analyses. Fetzer's advocacy for conspiracy theories, particularly denying the reality of mass shootings such as and promoting alternative explanations for events like the and 9/11 attacks, has elicited sharp rebukes from academic peers and observers who contend that it distorts and philosophical rigor. Former colleagues at the expressed bafflement at his shift from respected work in to endorsing claims lacking verifiable support, viewing it as a misuse of scholarly authority to propagate . Critics, including journalists and researchers, have highlighted how Fetzer's analyses often prioritize speculative interpretations over forensic data, witness testimonies, and official investigations, leading to accusations of pseudoscholarship that undermines public trust in established facts. A prominent legal repercussion arose from Fetzer's co-authorship of the 2014 book Nobody Died at : It Was a FBI Staged Drama, which asserted the 2012 was a with no deaths, staged by federal agencies using crisis actors. , father of victim Pozner, filed a lawsuit against Fetzer in state court in 2018, alleging that Fetzer's public statements—such as claiming never existed and that death certificates were fabricated—caused him severe emotional distress, , and reputational harm by inciting threats from believers in the theory. In a June 2019 trial, a found Fetzer liable for , determining his claims were false and made with reckless disregard for the truth. On October 15, 2019, the court awarded Pozner $450,000 in damages for emotional distress and punitive measures. Fetzer appealed, arguing First Amendment protections for opinion and public debate on government actions, but the Wisconsin Court of Appeals upheld the verdict in decisions dated March 18, 2021, and September 14, 2023, affirming the claims were provably false assertions of fact rather than protected conjecture. A further appeal was denied by the same court on February 8, 2024, solidifying the judgment and ordering compliance with asset disclosure for enforcement. The University of Minnesota Duluth explicitly distanced itself from Fetzer's views, stating post-litigation that his conspiracy endorsements do not reflect institutional positions.

References

  1. https://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/
  2. https://www.spartacus-educational.com/JFKfetzer.htm
  3. https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/James_H._Fetzer
  4. https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/B001HQ8LD4/about
  5. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ouxh7ywAAAAJ&hl=en
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James-Fetzer-2
  7. https://www.abebooks.com/9780812693652/Assassination-Science-Experts-Speak-Out-0812693655/plp
  8. https://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/jfk/
  9. https://www.c-span.org/organization/scholars-for-9-11-truth/54493/
  10. https://www.amazon.com/11-Conspiracy-Scamming-America/dp/0812696123
  11. https://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/completecv.html
  12. https://philpapers.org/rec/FETDTU
  13. https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKfetzer.htm
  14. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-009-8558-2
  15. https://philpapers.org/rec/FETPOS
  16. https://gwern.net/doc/psychology/linguistics/1991-fetzer-epistemologyandcognition.pdf
  17. https://www.ime.usp.br/~vwsetzer/Fetzer-rev.html
  18. https://scispace.com/authors/james-h-fetzer-54gmo4q8gk
  19. https://dl.acm.org/profile/81100561429
  20. https://umn.academia.edu/JamesFetzer
  21. https://www.semanticscholar.org/author/James-H.-Fetzer/6258963
  22. https://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/generalcontributions.html
  23. https://archive.org/details/foundationsofphi0000unse
  24. https://www.amazon.com/Science-Explanation-Rationality-Philosophy-Hempel/dp/0195121376
  25. https://www.amazon.com/Epistemology-Cognition-Studies-Cognitive-Systems/dp/0792308921
  26. https://books.google.com/books/about/Glossary_Epistemology.html?id=ePTWAAAAMAAJ
  27. https://philpapers.org/rec/FETPOP
  28. https://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/fetzerexpandedx.doc
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226221023_Propensities_and_Frequencies_Inference_to_the_Best_Explanation
  30. https://www.academia.edu/1354500/Disinformation_The_use_of_false_information
  31. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-94-009-1900-6.pdf
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321944561_Sign_use_and_cognition_in_automated_scientific_discovery_are_computers_only_special_kinds_of_signs
  33. https://www.academia.edu/93272641/Reasoning_about_Assassinations_Critical_Thinking_in_Political_Contexts
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241025810_Propensities_and_Frequencies
  35. https://books.google.com/books?id=yNcBAwAAQBAJ
  36. https://www.amazon.com/Assassination-Science-Experts-Speak-Death/dp/0812693663
  37. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/388625
  38. https://wisconsin-uwm.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9913897373402124&context=L&vid=01UWI_ML:MIL&lang=en&adaptor=Local%2520Search%2520Engine&tab=MAIN&query=mesh%252Cexact%252CHomicide%252CAND&mode=advanced&offset=0
  39. https://music.amazon.com/es-co/podcasts/2cb528a2-ab90-4b29-b2aa-be24199aaadc/episodes/580bd6dc-da04-4b1e-89f7-9c7437f1e1a5/crimes-conspiracies-and-beyond-s2-ep-32-part-2-dr-james-fetzer-on-the-jfk-assassination-conspiracy-theories
  40. https://www.c-span.org/person/james-h-fetzer/1020249/
  41. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780822390923-008/html
  42. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/THINKING-ABOUT-%2522-CONSPIRACY-THEORIES-%2522-%253A-9-%252F-11-and-Fetzer/502e600ed1944a0a9071f236d66aa594f34d202e
  43. https://news.stthomas.edu/dr-james-fetzer-to-offer-a-critical-review-of-911-evidence-on-may-3/
  44. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50074652
  45. https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/court-of-appeals/2021/2020ap001570.html
  46. https://books.google.com/books/about/Nobody_Died_at_Sandy_Hook.html?id=IFuKswEACAAJ
  47. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21-7916/244586/20221102075815208_20221102-075710-95758043-00000780.pdf
  48. https://jameshfetzer.org/2019/02/the-sandy-hook-conspiracy-school-was-shut-down-due-to-asbestos-contamination-4-years-before-alleged-shooting-new-book-reveals/
  49. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/18/nyregion/sandy-hook-victim-court-ruling.html
  50. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21-7916/225820/20220519155908006_20220519-153941-00002936-00009746.pdf
  51. https://jameshfetzer.org/ffc-2022-speakers-biographies/
  52. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/27/us/politics/capitol-riot-conspiracies.html
  53. https://jameshfetzer.org/2023/09/jim-fetzer-the-holocaust-narrative-politics-trumps-science/
  54. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sandy-hook-defamation-case-conspiracy-theorist-must-pay-father-victim-noah-pozner-450000-wisconsin-jury-says/
  55. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/18/sandy-hook-massacre-victim-father-wins-defamation-lawsuit
  56. https://www.mprnews.org/story/2019/10/16/wisconsin-jury-awards-450000-in-sandy-hook-defamation-case
  57. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/wi-court-of-appeals/115802477.html
  58. https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/court-of-appeals/2023/2022ap001751.html
  59. https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-7916.html
  60. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/wi-court-of-appeals/115072938.html
  61. https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/court-of-appeals/2024/2023ap001002.html
  62. https://eagar.mit.edu/publications/Eagar185supplement2.pdf
  63. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/bitstreams/df98a391-842a-4ad3-8248-ab5af4db40dd/download
  64. https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/fmr-umd-professor-to-speak-at-jfk-assassination-conference/
  65. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dh9z8uCxsgU
  66. http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/
  67. https://tunein.com/podcasts/Religion--Spirituality-Podcas/The-Real-Deal-with-Jim-Fetzer-podcast-p3199768/
  68. https://www.podbean.com/podcast-detail/6z57w-6fccb/The-Real-Deal-with-Jim-Fetzer-podcast
  69. https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/real-deal-media-live-with-dean-ryan-jim-fetzer/id1525397980?i=1000680925824
  70. https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/6c02be50-6da1-4cbd-b3a9-1626f088432f/episodes/857f83c4-ba37-4a15-b0d7-8d24790869a8/the-michael-decon-program-james-h-fetzer---question-everything
  71. https://podcasts.apple.com/de/podcast/talk-about-sandy-hook-james-fetzer/id1412000020?i=1000653150513
  72. https://player.fm/series/the-michael-decon-program/john-lear-x-jim-fetzer-911-jfk-underground-naval-facilities
  73. https://panoply.fm/podcasts/authentic-news-w-jim-fetzer-8906
  74. https://wabcradio.com/episode/james-fetzer-conspiracy-theorist-08-23-2022/
  75. https://podtail.com/podcast/alchemy-with-john-gibbons/alchemy-071-james-fetzer-nobody-died-at-sandy-ho-2/
  76. https://jameshfetzer.org/2025/09/real-deal-media-9-11-extravaganza-jim-fetzer-ph-d-vs-richard-gage-aia/
  77. https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-professor-of-denial/
  78. https://books.google.com/books/about/Nobody_Died_at_Sandy_Hook.html?id=-Z6wswEACAAJ
  79. https://abcnews.go.com/US/wisconsin-man-ordered-pay-450k-sandy-hook-father/story?id=66318604
  80. https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/18/us/sandy-hook-victim-father-lawsuit-deniers
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.