Hubbry Logo
Frederick North, Lord NorthFrederick North, Lord NorthMain
Open search
Frederick North, Lord North
Community hub
Frederick North, Lord North
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Frederick North, Lord North
Frederick North, Lord North
Frederick North, Lord North
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Frederick North, 2nd Earl of Guilford (13 April 1732 – 5 August 1792), better known by his courtesy title Lord North, which he used from 1752 to 1790, was Prime Minister of Great Britain from 1770 to 1782. He led the Kingdom of Great Britain through most of the American Revolutionary War. He also held a number of other cabinet posts, including Home Secretary and Chancellor of the Exchequer.

Key Information

North's reputation among historians has varied wildly, reaching its lowest point in the late 19th century, when he was depicted as a creature of King George III and an incompetent who lost the American colonies. In the early 20th century a revised view emerged which emphasised his strengths in administering the Treasury, handling the House of Commons, and in defending the Church of England. The historian Herbert Butterfield, however, argued that his indolence was a barrier to efficient crisis management; he neglected his role in supervising the entire war effort.[1][2]

Early life

[edit]

Birth and family

[edit]

Frederick North was born in London on 13 April 1732 at the family house at Albemarle Street, just off Piccadilly.[3] He spent much of his youth at Wroxton Abbey in Oxfordshire. North's strong resemblance to King George III suggested to contemporaries that George III's father, Frederick, Prince of Wales, might have been North's real father, making North the king's half-brother, a theory compatible with the prince's reputation but supported by little else other than the circumstantial evidence.[4]

King George IV remarked that "either his royal grandfather or North's mother must have played her husband false",[5] North's father, Francis North, 1st Earl of Guilford, was from 1730 to 1751 Lord of the Bedchamber to Frederick, Prince of Wales, who stood as godfather to the infant, christened Frederick, possibly in honour of his real father.[6]

North was descended from Henry Montagu, 1st Earl of Manchester, paternal uncle of Edward Montagu, 1st Earl of Sandwich and was related to Samuel Pepys and the 3rd Earl of Bute. He at times had a slightly turbulent relationship with his father, Francis, yet they were very close. In his early years the family were not wealthy, though their situation improved in 1735 when his father inherited property from his cousin.[7]

Frederick's mother, Lady Lucy Montagu, a daughter of George Montagu, 1st Earl of Halifax, and his first wife, Ricarda Posthuma Saltonstall, died in 1734. His father remarried, but his stepmother, Elizabeth Kaye, widow of George Legge, Viscount Lewisham, eldest son of William Legge, 1st Earl of Dartmouth and his wife, Lady Anne Finch, third daughter of Heneage Finch, 1st Earl of Aylesford, died in 1745, when Frederick was thirteen. One of his stepbrothers was William Legge, 2nd Earl of Dartmouth, who remained a close friend for life.[8]

Education

[edit]

He was educated at Eton College between 1742 and 1748 and at Trinity College, Oxford, where in 1750 he was awarded an MA. After leaving the University of Oxford he travelled in Europe on a Grand Tour with Lord Dartmouth. They stayed in Leipzig for nearly nine months, studying under the constitutional scholar Johann Jacob Mascov.[9] They continued through Austria and Italy, staying in Rome from December 1752 to Easter 1753, then through Switzerland to Paris, returning to England in early 1754.[10]

Portrait of Lord North by Pompeo Batoni (1753)

Early political career

[edit]

Member of Parliament

[edit]

On 15 April 1754 North, then 22, was elected unopposed as the member of Parliament for Banbury.[11] He served as an MP from 1754 to 1790 and joined the government as a junior Lord of the Treasury on 2 June 1759 during the Pitt–Newcastle ministry (an alliance between the Duke of Newcastle and William Pitt the Elder). He soon developed a reputation as a good administrator and parliamentarian and was generally liked by his colleagues. Although he initially considered himself a Whig, he did not closely align with any of the Whig factions in Parliament, and it became obvious to many contemporaries that his sympathies were largely Tory.[12][2]

He was appointed Lieutenant-Colonel of the 1st Somerset Militia on 23 June 1759 when it was embodied for fulltime service, and commanded it in the West Country for Earl Poulett, the colonel, who was also Lord Lieutenant of Somerset. However, North resigned in November 1761 and concentrated on his political career.[13]

In November 1763, he was chosen to speak for the government concerning the radical MP John Wilkes. Wilkes had made a savage attack on both the Prime Minister and the King in his newspaper The North Briton, which many thought libellous. North's motion for Wilkes to be expelled from the House of Commons passed by 273 votes to 111. Wilkes' expulsion took place in his absence, as he had already fled to France following a duel.[14]

In government

[edit]

When a government headed by the Whig magnate Charles Watson-Wentworth, Lord Rockingham, came to power in 1765, North left his post and served for a time as a backbench MP. He turned down an offer by Rockingham to rejoin the government, not wanting to be associated with the Whig grandees that dominated the Ministry.[15]

He returned to office when Pitt returned to head a second government in 1766. North was appointed Joint Paymaster of the Forces in Pitt's ministry and became a Privy Counsellor. As Pitt was constantly ill, the government was effectively run by Augustus FitzRoy, 3rd Duke of Grafton, with North as one of its most senior members.[16]

In December 1767 he succeeded Charles Townshend as Chancellor of the Exchequer. With the resignation of the secretary of state Henry Seymour Conway in early 1768, North became Leader of the Commons as well. He continued to serve when Pitt was succeeded by Grafton in October.[2]

Premiership

[edit]
Further information: North ministry
In The State Tinkers (1780), James Gillray caricatured North (on his knees) and his allies as incompetent tinkers of the National Kettle. George III cries out in rapture in the rear.

Appointment

[edit]

When the Duke of Grafton resigned as Prime Minister, North formed a government on 28 January 1770. His ministers and supporters tended to be known as Tories, though they were not a formal grouping and many had previously been Whigs. He took over with Great Britain in a triumphant state following the Seven Years' War, which had seen the First British Empire expand to a peak by taking in vast new territories on several continents. Circumstances forced him to keep many members of the previous cabinet in their jobs, despite their lack of agreement with him.[17] In contrast to many of his predecessors, North enjoyed a good relationship with George III, partly based on their shared patriotism and desire for decency in their private lives.[18]

Falklands Crisis

[edit]
Main article: Falklands Crisis of 1770

North's ministry had an early success during the Falklands Crisis in 1770, in which Great Britain faced down a Spanish attempt to seize the Falkland Islands, nearly provoking a war.[17] Both France and Spain had been left unhappy by Great Britain's perceived dominance following the British victory in the Seven Years' War.[citation needed] Spanish forces seized the British settlement on the Falklands and expelled the small British garrison. When Britain opposed the seizure, Spain sought backing from her ally France. King Louis XV of France did not believe his country was ready for war, however, and in the face of a strong mobilisation of the British fleet, the French compelled the Spanish to back down. Louis also dismissed the Duc de Choiseul, the hawkish Chief Minister of France, who had advocated war and a large invasion of Great Britain by the French.

The British government's prestige and popularity were enormously boosted by the incident. It had successfully managed to drive a wedge between France and Spain and demonstrated the power of the Royal Navy, although it was suggested by critics that this gave Lord North a degree of complacency and an incorrect belief that the European powers would not interfere in British colonial affairs. This was contrasted with the previous administration's failure to prevent France from annexing the Republic of Corsica, a British ally, during the Corsican Crisis two years earlier. Using his newly found popularity, North took a chance and appointed Lord Sandwich to the cabinet as First Lord of the Admiralty.

American War of Independence

[edit]
French caricature on the government of Frederick North after the defeat of Grenada (1779).

Most of North's government was focused first on the growing problems with the American colonies. Later on, it was preoccupied with conducting the American War of Independence that broke out in 1775 with the Battle of Lexington. Following the Boston Tea Party in 1773, Lord North proposed a number of legislative measures that were supposed to punish the Bostonians. These measures were known as the Coercive Acts in Great Britain, while dubbed the Intolerable Acts in the colonies. By shutting down the Boston government and cutting off trade, he hoped they would keep the peace and dispirit the rebellious colonists. Instead, the acts further inflamed Massachusetts and the other colonies, eventually resulting in open war during the Boston campaign of 1775–76.

North delegated the overall strategy of the war to his key subordinates Lord George Germain and the Earl of Sandwich. Despite a series of victories and the capture of New York and Philadelphia, the British were unable to secure a decisive victory. In 1778 the French allied themselves with the American rebels, and Spain joined the war in 1779 as an ally of France, followed by the Dutch Republic in 1780. The British found themselves fighting a global war on four continents without a single ally. After 1778 the British switched the focus of their efforts to the defence of the West Indies, as their sugar wealth made them much more valuable to Great Britain than the Thirteen Colonies. In 1779 Great Britain was faced with the prospect of a major Franco-Spanish invasion, but the Armada of 1779 was ultimately a failure. Several peace initiatives fell through, and an attempt by Richard Cumberland to negotiate a separate peace with Spain ended in frustration.

The country's problems were augmented by the First League of Armed Neutrality, which was formed to counter the British blockade strategy, and threatened British naval supplies from the Baltic. With severe manpower shortages, North's government passed an act abandoning previous statutes placing restrictions on Catholics serving in the military. This provoked an upsurge of anti-Catholic feelings and the formation of the Protestant Association that led to the Gordon Riots in London in June 1780.[19] For around a week, the city was in the control of the mob until the military was called out and martial law imposed.[20] Public opinion, especially in middle-class and elite circles, repudiated anti-Catholicism and violence, and rallied behind the North government. Demands were made for a London police force.[21]

Britain's fortunes in the war in America had temporarily improved following the failure of a Franco-American attack on Newport and the prosecution of a Southern strategy that saw the capture of Charleston, South Carolina and its garrison. During 1780 and 1781, the North government gained strength in the House of Commons.[22] In October 1781, a British army under Lord Cornwallis surrendered at the conclusion of the siege of Yorktown. When the news reached North, he took it "as he would have taken a ball in his breast", and exclaimed repeatedly "Oh God! It is all over!"[23]

Resignation

[edit]
This modern American silver medallion commemorates the motion of no confidence against North on 27 February 1782 to end the American War of Independence. North resigned a month later.

North was the second British prime minister to be forced out of office by a motion of no confidence; the first was Sir Robert Walpole in 1742. North resigned on 20 March 1782 on account of the British defeat at Yorktown the year before. In an attempt to end the war, he proposed the Conciliation Plan, in which he promised that Great Britain would eliminate all disagreeable acts if the colonies ended the war. The colonies rejected the plan, as their goal had become full independence.

In April 1782 it was suggested in cabinet by Lord Shelburne that North should be brought to public trial for his conduct of the American War, but the prospect was soon abandoned.[24] Ironically, the war began to turn in Great Britain's favour again in 1782 through naval victories, owing largely to policies adopted by Lord North and the Earl of Sandwich. The British naval victory at the Battle of the Saintes took place after the government's fall. Despite predictions that Gibraltar's fall was imminent, that fortress managed to hold out and was relieved. Great Britain was able to make a much more favourable peace in 1783 than had appeared likely at the time when North had been ousted. In spite of this, North was critical of the terms agreed by the Shelburne government which he felt undervalued the strength of the British negotiating position.

Post-premiership

[edit]

Fox–North coalition

[edit]
Main article: Fox–North coalition

In April 1783 North returned to power as Home Secretary in an unlikely coalition with the radical Whig leader Charles James Fox known as the Fox–North Coalition under the nominal leadership of the Duke of Portland. George III, who detested the radical and republican Fox, never forgave this supposed betrayal, and North never again served in government after the ministry fell in December 1783. One of the major achievements of the coalition was the signing of the Treaty of Paris, which formally ended the American War of Independence.

The new prime minister, William Pitt the Younger, was not expected to last long, and North, a vocal critic, still entertained hopes of regaining high office. In this he was to be frustrated, as Pitt dominated the British political scene for the next twenty years, leaving both North and Fox in the political wilderness.

Later years and death

[edit]

North was an active speaker until he began to go blind in 1786. He succeeded his father as the 2nd Earl of Guilford on 4 August 1790 and entered the House of Lords, by which time he had entirely lost his sight.[25] North died in Mayfair, England (now part of London), and was buried at All Saints' Church, Wroxton (Oxfordshire), near his family home of Wroxton Abbey. His memorial was sculpted by John Flaxman RA.[26]

His son George North, Lord North, took over the constituency of Banbury, and in 1792 acceded to his father's title. Wroxton Abbey was until recently owned by Fairleigh Dickinson University, ironically an American college, with the modernised abbey serving as a location for American students to study abroad in England.

Legacy

[edit]

North is today predominantly remembered as the prime minister "who lost America".[27]

Both Lord North Street and Guilford Street in London are named after him.

Family

[edit]
Anne Speke (before 1741 – 1797), wife of Lord North. Portrait by Sir Joshua Reynolds (1723–1792)

On 20 May 1756 North married Anne Speke (before 1741 – 1797), daughter of George Speke MP, of Whitelackington in Somerset. She was the sole heiress of the Devonshire estates of the Drake family of Ash, which subsequently were sold piecemeal by North.[28] He and Anne had seven children:

Titles, styles and arms

[edit]
  • The Honourable Frederick North (1732–1752)
  • Lord North (1752–1790)
  • The Earl of Guilford (1790–1792)
Coat of arms of Frederick North, 2nd Earl of Guilford
Crest
A dragon's head erased sable ducally gorged and chained or.
Escutcheon
Azure, a lion passant or between three fleurs-de-lys argent.
Supporters
Two dragons sable ducally gorged and chained or.
Motto
La virtue est la seule noblesse (Virtue is the only nobility) and Animo et fide (With courage and fidelity).
Orders
The Most Noble Order of the Garter (Knight Companion)[31]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Frederick North, Lord North

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Frederick North, 2nd Earl of Guilford (13 April 1732 – 5 August 1792), commonly known as Lord North, was a British Tory politician who served as Prime Minister of Great Britain from 1770 to 1782, the longest continuous tenure of any British prime minister in the 18th century. Born in London as the eldest son of Francis North, 1st Earl of Guilford, he entered Parliament in 1754 representing Banbury and rose through government ranks, becoming Chancellor of the Exchequer in 1767 where he implemented fiscal policies that reduced the national debt and balanced the budget amid post-Seven Years' War finances. His premiership, conducted under strong influence from King George III, focused on parliamentary management and administrative efficiency but became defined by escalating tensions with the American colonies, including the introduction of the Tea Act and subsequent Intolerable Acts, which contributed to the outbreak of the American War of Independence in 1775. North's government prosecuted the war effort, marked by early British victories but ultimate strategic failures leading to the 1783 Treaty of Paris and loss of the Thirteen Colonies, for which he has been historically criticized as bearing primary responsibility despite personal reluctance for conflict and multiple resignation attempts. Resigning amid a Commons vote of no confidence in 1782, North later formed a short-lived coalition with Charles James Fox before retiring upon succeeding to his earldom in 1790, remembered as a capable financier and debater overshadowed by imperial defeat.

Early Life

Birth and Family Background

Frederick North was born on 13 April 1732 in , as the eldest son and heir of Francis North, later created 1st of Guilford, and his first wife, Lady Lucy Montagu, daughter of George Montagu, 1st . The North family belonged to the traditional aristocracy within the British peerage, with roots in legal and political service; North's paternal grandfather, also named Francis North, had been elevated to Baron Guilford in 1683 and served as from 1682 to 1685 under Charles II. North's early family environment reflected the privileges of noble status, including connections to the and administrative roles—his father held positions such as Cofferer of the Household under George II—yet it was marked by personal loss, as his mother died in December 1734 when he was two years old, prompting his father's remarriage to produce additional children, including half-brother Brownlow North, future . This lineage and patrilineal emphasis on public duty shaped North's upbringing amid the family's estates, including Wroxton Abbey in .

Education and Formative Influences

North received his early education at from 1742 to 1748, where he developed proficiency in classical studies typical of the institution's curriculum for aristocratic sons. This period laid the groundwork for his scholarly inclinations, emphasizing Latin, Greek, and , which later informed his parliamentary oratory. He proceeded to , matriculating around 1748 and earning a degree in 1750 without formal examination, a common dispensation for noblemen. Following Oxford, North undertook a Grand Tour from 1751 to 1753, traveling through , , , , , and spending nine months in studying under local scholars, which broadened his exposure to continental governance and . These experiences reinforced his preference for pragmatic administration over ideological fervor, shaping a political style rooted in fiscal caution and institutional continuity. As the eldest son of Francis North, 1st Earl of Guilford, a peer with court connections, North inherited a family tradition of loyalist , evident in his godparentage under , after whom he was named. His father's emphasis on duty to the Crown and resistance to Whig factionalism during North's youth fostered a formative deference to monarchical authority, influencing his later alignment with George III's preferences for stable governance over radical reform. This paternal legacy, combined with Eton's communal discipline and the Tour's cosmopolitan insights, cultivated North's reputation as a diligent, unflashy administrator rather than a visionary ideologue.

Entry into Politics

Election to Parliament

Frederick North was elected to the House of Commons in 1754 as the for , a pocket under the influence of his family. The election occurred during the general election of that year, shortly after North reached the age of majority at 22, having been born on 13 April 1732. His father, Francis North, 1st Earl of Guilford, held the position of high steward of , ensuring North's unopposed return to through familial rather than broad electoral contest. This entry marked the beginning of North's nearly four-decade tenure in the , representing uninterrupted until 1790, when he inherited his father's earldom and moved to the . The borough's structure, reliant on a limited electorate of freemen and influenced by landed interests, typified mid-18th-century English parliamentary practice, where aristocratic control secured seats for scions like North without significant opposition.

Initial Governmental Roles

Upon his election to Parliament in 1754, North's initial entry into government administration occurred in June 1759, when he was appointed a Lord of the Treasury (a junior position) in the ministry led by the and William Pitt the Elder. He retained this office through subsequent administrations under the Earl of Bute and , serving until July 1765, during which time he acquired practical experience in fiscal matters and honed his skills in parliamentary debate, including handling procedural aspects of the expulsion case in 1763. In August 1766, under the Earl of Chatham's ministry, North was appointed Joint Paymaster of the Forces, a role he accepted with reluctance due to its administrative demands, sharing duties with George Cooke until October 1767. Concurrently, on 10 December 1766, he was admitted to the , marking his elevation to advisory status on royal matters. These positions solidified North's reputation for diligence in financial oversight and loyalty to , positioning him for higher Cabinet responsibilities amid the political instability of the .

Chancellor of the Exchequer

Appointment and Early Fiscal Measures

Frederick North was appointed on 11 October 1767, succeeding who had died on 4 September 1767, within the ministry led by the . North had initially declined the position earlier in 1767 due to its demands but accepted after persuasion from Grafton and amid his father's improving health. His selection reflected confidence in his prior experience since 1759 and reputation for parliamentary diligence, positioning him to address Britain's substantial post-Seven Years' debt, which stood at approximately £146 million in 1767. In his initial budgets as Chancellor, North prioritized fiscal prudence over aggressive innovation, presenting clear and methodical that earned ' approval. His 10 1769 budget speech, in particular, was lauded for its lucidity and command of detail, with observer Richard Rigby noting it as one of the most effective in his 24 years of parliamentary experience, highlighting North's grasp of intricacies. These presentations emphasized ongoing debt servicing while avoiding new taxes, instead advocating restrained expenditure to gradually diminish the national burden, which he later reduced by £10 million overall by 1775 through sustained economies. North's early approach eschewed radical reforms, focusing instead on administrative efficiency and continuity with prior policies like the Townshend duties, which he managed without immediate alteration until partial repeal in 1770. This methodical style stabilized finances amid political turbulence, including the Wilkes controversies, but relied on incremental savings rather than structural overhauls, reflecting a conservative fiscal realism attuned to parliamentary constraints. By maintaining budget discipline without provoking opposition, North built credibility that facilitated his seamless transition to in January 1770.

Debt Reduction and Budgetary Reforms

Upon his appointment as on 11 September 1767, Frederick North inherited a national debt surpassing £130 million, swollen by the costs of the Seven Years' War (1756–1763), which required annual interest payments approaching £4 million by the early 1770s. North focused on restoring fiscal stability through expenditure cuts and enhanced administrative efficiency in revenue collection, avoiding aggressive new taxation that might provoke domestic unrest. In his early budgets, North emphasized prudent management, achieving surpluses by curbing wasteful outlays and reorganizing public accounts to eliminate redundancies. A notable was the expanded use of lotteries, which raised funds without increasing land taxes, thus distributing the burden more equitably and sustaining revenue streams. These measures brought order to disordered finances, with North's annual budgets earning broad parliamentary approval for their clarity and restraint. By 1775, North's policies had reduced the national debt by roughly £10 million, marking a significant peacetime achievement amid ongoing colonial tensions. This progress stemmed from consistent surpluses applied to debt principal via established mechanisms, rather than structural overhauls, reflecting North's preference for incremental realism over speculative reforms. However, the fiscal gains proved fragile; the American Revolutionary War's escalation from 1775 onward rapidly inflated expenditures, erasing the reductions and ballooning the debt anew.

Premiership

Rise to Prime Minister

North's ascent to the premiership culminated in his appointment as on 28 January 1770, a role that positioned him as under King George III. Prior to this, he had served as since 7 October 1767, succeeding whose sudden death in September of that year created the vacancy; North retained this fiscal post concurrently with his new leadership duties, reflecting his established expertise in budgetary matters. In January 1768, he had also assumed the role of Leader of the House of Commons from Henry Seymour Conway, where his clear speaking voice, urbanity, and command of financial debates bolstered his influence among MPs. The immediate catalyst was the resignation of the as earlier that month, amid mounting parliamentary instability and coalition fractures following the Townshend duties and Wilkes controversies. , seeking a reliable administrator loyal to , turned to North, whom he regarded as a "safe pair of hands" due to his diligence, administrative competence, and consistent support for royal policies during prior roles dating back to 1759. At 37 years old, North commanded sufficient parliamentary backing, particularly from Tory-leaning members, to form a that endured for over a decade despite opposition from Whig factions. This transition marked a shift toward more centralized influence in ministerial selection, with North's financial acumen and aversion to factional extremism proving key to stabilizing the administration.

Domestic Policies and Administrative Achievements

North's administration prioritized fiscal stability in the aftermath of the Seven Years' War, which had left Britain with a substantial national debt exceeding £130 million by 1763. As prior to and during his premiership, North implemented measures to boost tax revenues through efficient collection and modest adjustments, reducing the debt by approximately £10 million by 1775. These efforts included consolidating funding mechanisms and avoiding excessive new taxation, which helped stabilize public finances amid growing expenditures. A key legislative initiative was the Papists Act of 1778 (18 George III c. 60), which alleviated certain penal restrictions on Roman Catholics in Britain by permitting them to own land without Protestant trustees, educate their children abroad under restrictions, and enlist in the military while swearing an oath of allegiance. This act, introduced by Sir George Savile and supported by North's government, aimed to foster loyalty and expand recruitment pools during wartime pressures, though it provoked violent opposition culminating in the of June 1780, which caused over 200 deaths and extensive property damage in . Administratively, North demonstrated adept parliamentary management, sustaining a for over twelve years—the longest continuous ministry of the —through skillful negotiation and patronage, despite internal factionalism and opposition critiques. He also advanced the Royal Marriages Act of 1772, requiring royal descendants under 25 to obtain the sovereign's consent for marriages, thereby curbing unauthorized unions that could complicate succession or alliances. These measures underscored North's focus on institutional order and , contributing to governmental continuity even as external crises mounted.

Relations with Parliament and the Crown

North's appointment as and effective on 28 January 1770 stemmed directly from George III's preference for a loyal and capable administrator following the Duke of Grafton's resignation on 22 January 1770. The king regarded North as indispensable, privately terming him "my sheet anchor" on 7 November 1775, reflecting a relationship grounded in mutual trust and shared administrative priorities. This rapport manifested in tangible support, including the award of the in 1772 and the king's personal settlement of North's £20,000 debts in 1777, alongside an annuity of £4,100 granted upon North's resignation on 27 March 1782. Despite perceptions of subservience, North exhibited independence from the Crown by repeatedly seeking to resign when convinced of policy shortcomings, such as on 17 March 1778 and 21 January 1782, though George III's insistence often delayed his departure until parliamentary pressure became insurmountable. North's personal reservations about the American war—contrasting the king's greater resolve—further underscored this , as he lacked enthusiasm for prolonged conflict and viewed victory prospects pessimistically, yet executed royal directives out of . He balanced to with assurances to that the king did not encroach on legislative authority, thereby mitigating domestic tensions. In the , North demonstrated exceptional leadership, commanding consistent majorities—such as 116 votes on 9 January 1770—through persuasive oratory marked by wit and self-deprecating humor, alongside strategic use of and coalition-building among independents against a fragmented opposition. His tenure stabilized after the ' turbulence, fostering administrative efficiency that sustained power for over twelve years until the war's toll eroded support. North presided over weekly cabinet meetings at his residence, ensuring policy cohesion, and maintained supremacy despite intense debates on , including post-Saratoga critiques in 1777. The interplay of these relations culminated in North's resignation following a Commons vote of no confidence on 27 February 1782, prompted by the Yorktown surrender in 1781, which George III finally accepted on 20 March 1782 after prior refusals. This event established a precedent for prime ministerial accountability to Parliament over monarchical preference, highlighting how North's parliamentary acumen prolonged his ministry despite mounting war failures, while his loyalty to the Crown delayed but did not prevent its end.

Policies Toward the American Colonies

Upon becoming prime minister on 28 January 1770, North addressed ongoing colonial discontent from the by securing their partial repeal in the same year, retaining only the duty on to uphold 's asserted right to tax the colonies for revenue purposes. This measure aimed to reduce friction while maintaining fiscal authority, as Britain's national debt from Years' War necessitated colonial contributions without direct representation. For three years, North restrained from further provocative taxation, funding government through domestic alternatives like lotteries to avoid escalating resentment. The of 10 May 1773 marked a shift, granting the a monopoly on tea exports to the colonies and permitting direct sales to undercut smugglers, while preserving the three-pence import duty as a symbol of . Intended to alleviate the Company's financial distress and generate revenue, the act instead unified colonial opposition, culminating in the on 16 December 1773, where protesters destroyed 342 chests of tea valued at approximately £10,000. North viewed the destruction as an assault on imperial authority, rejecting petitions for duty repeal. In response, North's government enacted the Coercive Acts between March and June 1774, known to colonists as the : the closed the harbor until compensation was paid; the revoked the colony's charter, curtailing town meetings and enhancing royal governor powers; the Administration of Justice Act allowed trials of British officials in other colonies or Britain; and an expanded Quartering Act mandated housing for troops. The , passed concurrently on 22 June 1774, extended Catholic rights and territorial claims, further alienating Protestant colonists by appearing to favor . These punitive measures sought to isolate as an example, compel obedience, and restore order, but instead fostered intercolonial solidarity, including the in September 1774. Facing escalating crisis, North proposed conciliatory resolutions on 20 February 1775, offering that any voluntarily contributing to imperial defense and civil costs via its assembly would be exempt from parliamentary taxation for those purposes, while affirming Parliament's regulatory rights. This bilateral approach bypassed the to divide loyalties, but arrived after the 19 April 1775 , rendering it moot; the Second rejected it on 31 July 1775 for undermining colonial unity and conceding nothing on representation. Thereafter, North committed to suppression, deploying forces under generals like William Howe and delegating strategy to Lord George Germain, prioritizing coercion over negotiation despite recognizing the war's mounting costs and risks. Subsequent efforts, such as the 1778 Carlisle Peace Commission offering autonomy short of independence, failed amid French intervention post-Saratoga. North's policies reflected a causal insistence on undivided —rooted in Parliament's post-1688 supremacy and the need for revenue amid £130 million debt—but underestimated colonial resolve, , and the unifying effect of perceived overreach, ultimately contributing to Britain's strategic overextension and loss of the by the 1783 Treaty of Paris. While North personally favored limited concessions, King George III's influence and ministerial dynamics constrained flexibility, leading to a war expenditure exceeding £80 million without decisive victory.

The American Revolutionary War

The erupted under North's premiership following the passage of the Coercive Acts in 1774, which imposed punitive measures on in response to the of , 1773, including the closure of and the quartering of troops. These acts, aimed at reasserting parliamentary authority over colonial resistance to taxation, instead unified opposition across the colonies and prompted the convening of the . Armed conflict commenced on April 19, 1775, with the , marking the shift from protest to open rebellion. North attempted conciliation prior to full-scale war, proposing on February 20, 1775, that exempt the colonies from internal taxation in exchange for their contributions to imperial defense costs, a plan rejected by the as insufficient recognition of colonial rights. As the conflict escalated, North's government delegated military operations primarily to Secretary of State Lord George Germain, with naval affairs under Lord Sandwich and army mobilization overseen by Lord Amherst, resulting in fragmented command structures that hampered coordination. Early British successes, such as the victory at in August 1776 under General William Howe, captured but failed to deliver a decisive blow, as Howe hesitated to pursue the Continental Army aggressively. The war's trajectory shifted dramatically with the British defeat at Saratoga on October 17, 1777, where General John Burgoyne's northern campaign collapsed, convincing to enter the conflict as an American ally in 1778 and expanding the theater to a global struggle. In response, North proposed further concessions in 1778, offering to repeal objectionable acts and exempt the colonies from taxation if they renounced independence, though these faced resistance in from hardliners insisting on unqualified submission. Financially, North managed the escalating costs through increased loans, taxes, and innovations, but by March 6, 1780, he warned of domestic unrest risks from over-taxation while defending the war's necessity to prevent American independence's broader imperial repercussions. Despite personal despondency and repeated offers to resign—stemming from his aversion to prolonged warfare—North remained in office at King George III's insistence, framing the conflict as Parliament's defense of sovereignty rather than the Crown's vendetta. British strategy faltered further with the adoption of a southern campaign in 1780, intended to exploit Loyalist support, but defeats culminated in the surrender at Yorktown on October 19, 1781, where General Charles Cornwallis yielded to combined American and French forces. of Yorktown prompted North's exclamation of despair, "Oh God! It is all over!", signaling the collapse of military prospects. Mounting , fueled by and merchant petitions since 1775, led to a motion on February 27, 1782, withdrawing confidence in continuing the fight, forcing North's resignation on March 27, 1782. The war formally concluded with the Treaty of Paris on September 3, 1783, recognizing American independence, a outcome North later endorsed in coalition but which cemented his legacy as overseeing Britain's costly defeat.

Imperial and Foreign Challenges

North's administration confronted an early test in the crisis of 1770, when Spanish forces under the governor of seized the British settlement at Port Egmont on , violating the 1765 mutual recognition of claims by Britain and . The British response involved mobilizing the Royal Navy, with 15 ships of the line dispatched under orders to reclaim the outpost if necessary, while North's government issued an demanding restoration and compensation. , facing French hesitancy under , complied by September 22, 1770, evacuating the garrison and restoring the , averting war through a combination of naval demonstration and secret in which North privately conceded future abandonment of Port Egmont in exchange for immediate restitution—though Britain retained nominal rights until 1774. This episode underscored North's preference for firmness backed by military readiness over escalation, bolstering his domestic standing amid opposition calls for conflict. Beyond Europe, imperial governance in Ireland presented mounting challenges by the late , exacerbated by economic grievances and fears of French invasion amid the American conflict. Irish trade had long been restricted by the and woollen prohibitions, fostering resentment and Volunteer militias that numbered over 40,000 armed men by 1779, effectively paralyzing British enforcement. North's , compelled by these pressures, conceded legislative via the Irish Parliament's Renunciation Act of 1782—though concessions began earlier with the 1779 relaxation of trade barriers on Irish exports like provisions and linen, allowing direct commerce with the British colonies and removing duties on Irish imports to Britain. These measures, while stabilizing the situation short-term, highlighted the limits of centralized control over semi-autonomous dominions, as Irish leaders like leveraged the Volunteers to extract reforms without full . In the , North's ministry addressed maladministration through the Regulating Act of 1773, which established a of (Warren as first appointee) with oversight of Madras and Bombay presidencies, aiming to curb corruption and territorial overreach amid the Company's debts exceeding £1 million annually. This reform responded to scandals like the 1772 , which killed an estimated 10 million due to Company hoarding and export policies, prompting parliamentary inquiries into imperial exploitation. However, enforcement proved challenging, as ' expansionist campaigns against from 1780 onward strained resources without direct ministerial reversal, reflecting North's hands-off approach to distant colonial affairs until financial repercussions mounted. These initiatives, while stabilizing Company rule temporarily, sowed seeds for future accountability demands, as critiqued by in subsequent impeachments.

Economic Management and Crises

North's administration prioritized fiscal prudence in the early years of his premiership, building on his prior experience as to address the lingering debt from the Seven Years' War. Through measures such as efficient revenue collection and controlled expenditures, he reduced the national debt by approximately £10 million by 1775, achieving budgetary surpluses that were broadly approved in . A key innovation was the establishment of annual budget statements as a regular , whereby North presented detailed accounts of revenues, expenditures, and debt management, enhancing transparency and in . This practice, initiated during his tenure as both and , allowed for systematic review of government finances and helped maintain parliamentary support for his budgets with minimal opposition. The , commencing in 1775, precipitated severe economic crises that overwhelmed these peacetime achievements. War costs escalated rapidly, totaling £52.5 million by 1783 and accounting for 11% of national income by 1778, necessitating massive borrowing through loans and the issuance of government stock. The national debt, previously on a downward trajectory, surged as expenditures outpaced revenues, forcing reliance on increased domestic taxes, excises, and duties to service obligations. To mitigate the strain, North implemented via sinking funds and adjusted interest rates on loans, but these proved insufficient against the war's demands, leading to persistent deficits and heightened economic pressure on British taxpayers. Public finances deteriorated further with allied entries into the conflict, amplifying borrowing needs and contributing to inflationary pressures and discontent that eroded support for his government. Despite North's reputation for sound peacetime management, the absence of bold structural reforms left the economy vulnerable, with the war's fiscal legacy burdening Britain for decades.

Fall from Power

The surrender of British forces under General Charles Cornwallis at Yorktown on 19 October 1781 represented a catastrophic defeat that eroded support for North's ministry. News of the capitulation reached on 25 November 1781, prompting immediate parliamentary scrutiny of the war's continuation and highlighting the strategic failures in America. Although North's government survived initial debates, the loss of 7,000 troops and the alliance of French and American forces underscored the impracticality of reconquest. Parliamentary opposition coalesced around demands to halt offensive operations. On 22 February 1782, a motion to end the war in the American colonies failed by a single vote, 194 to 193, revealing the fragility of North's . Five days later, on 27 February, General Henry Conway introduced a resolution affirming that opponents of further prosecution had been vindicated by events; it passed, effectively withdrawing confidence in the government's American . This vote, combined with prior defeats like Saratoga in 1777, exposed deep divisions within the ministry and among supporters. King George III, a staunch ally of North, resisted the change by attempting to assemble an alternative coalition excluding the . These efforts failed amid the ' intransigence, forcing the to confront the ministry's collapse. North tendered his on 20 March 1782, concluding a premiership dominated by the American conflict. The event established a for parliamentary , as North became the first removed via effective no-confidence proceedings. The Marquis of Rockingham formed the succeeding on 27 March, initiating negotiations toward the Treaty of Paris.

Later Career

Opposition Period

Following his resignation as Prime Minister on 20 March 1782, North retained his seat in the and emerged as the leader of the opposition, commanding the support of approximately 100 MPs who had backed his administration. This bloc proved influential, particularly after the death of the on 1 July 1782, which elevated Lord Shelburne to head the government and shifted the balance of parliamentary power. North's opposition focused on critiquing the new ministry's handling of peace negotiations with the American colonies and other foreign affairs, while advocating for an end to the war on terms that preserved British interests short of full independence. On 18 December 1782, he opposed Charles James Fox's motion explicitly recognizing American independence, reflecting his preference for a federal union or other compromise structure over outright separation. In debates on Shelburne's preliminary peace articles, North expressed reservations, describing potential outcomes as "ruinous" on 3 December 1782 and delivering a lengthy, pointed condemnation of their terms on 17 February 1783, highlighting perceived weaknesses in territorial concessions and strategic concessions. Throughout this period, North demonstrated tactical acumen in parliamentary debates, such as speaking "uncommonly well" but neutrally during the Address debate on 5 December 1782, positioning his followers to influence outcomes without premature commitments. His leadership maintained cohesion among former supporters amid shifting alliances, setting the stage for potential cooperation with Whig elements dissatisfied with Shelburne, though North's inherent caution and loyalty to preferences tempered more aggressive opposition tactics.

Fox-North Coalition and Return to Influence

Following his resignation as Prime Minister in March 1782, North aligned with in opposition to the Shelburne ministry, providing crucial parliamentary support that contributed to its downfall in February 1783. The resulting Fox-North Coalition took office on 2 April 1783, with William Cavendish-Bentinck, 3rd Duke of Portland, as the nominal , as Foreign Secretary and Leader of the , and North as for the Home Department. This improbable union of North's followers—numbering around 100 MPs—with 's Whigs secured a Commons majority, allowing North to regain cabinet influence after over a year in opposition. One key accomplishment was the finalization of peace with the ; under the , British negotiators signed the Treaty of Paris on 3 September 1783, formally recognizing American independence and concluding hostilities from the Revolutionary War, on terms largely inherited from prior preliminaries. The 's collapse stemmed from the India Bill, drafted by and introduced by in early December 1783, which proposed vesting the political administration of British India in seven commissioners appointed by , effectively separating governance from the Company's commercial functions to curb perceived and mismanagement. Critics, including King George III, condemned the measure as a partisan power grab, noting the commissioners would include four Fox allies, two North supporters, and North's son, thus entrenching coalition control over imperial . George III, leveraging his influence in the and viewing the bill as an assault on royal authority amid his longstanding aversion to , orchestrated its defeat there in mid-December 1783; he then dismissed the ministry on 19 December, paving the way for to form a new government. North, sidelined by illness during the bill's passage, saw his political resurgence prove fleeting, as the coalition's ousting eroded his remaining influence and presaged heavy losses for his adherents in the 1784 general election.

Final Offices and Retirement

Following the dismissal of the Fox-North Coalition on 18 December 1783, North held no further government offices and his parliamentary influence declined sharply. The reduced his supporters in the to a small remnant, effectively ending his role as a party leader. North continued to speak occasionally in Commons debates until 1786, when progressive blindness curtailed his participation. His eyesight had deteriorated to total blindness by the time of the Regency crisis in 1788-1789, prompting his full retirement from public life. On 4 August 1790, North succeeded his father as 2nd Earl of Guilford, thereby transferring to the , though he took no active part in its proceedings due to his infirmity. North died on 5 August 1792 at his home in , , aged 60.

Personal Life

Family and Marriages

Frederick North was the only surviving son of Francis North, 1st of Guilford, and his first wife Lady Lucy Montagu, daughter of George Montagu, 1st ; he had five younger siblings from his parents' marriage. On 20 May 1756, at age 24, North married Speke (c. 1741 – 17 January 1797), daughter of George Speke, esquire, of Whitelackington, . The union produced seven children, of whom six survived to adulthood. Their eldest son, George Augustus North (born 11 September 1757 – 20 April 1802), succeeded his father as 3rd of Guilford in 1792 and served briefly as a . A younger son, Francis North (born 18 October 1761 – 10 October 1802), briefly held the title as 4th following his brother's death without male issue. Another son, Frederick North (born 7 February 1766 – 1827), also entered Parliament, representing constituencies including and . The daughters included Katherine Anne North (1760 – 9 April 1817), who married Sylvester Douglas, created Glenbervie in 1800, and Lady Anne North (1764 – 1832). An infant son, Dudley North (born 31 May 1777 – 1779), died young. North had no further marriages, and Anne Speke outlived him, dying nearly five years after his death on 5 August 1792.

Character, Health, and Daily Habits

Lord North was characterized by contemporaries as amiable, good-tempered, and serene, lacking malice and possessing an easy accessibility that endeared him to associates. His wit and humor were particularly noted, with describing him as "one of the best companions in the kingdom." Despite a physical appearance marked by a coarse and clumsy build, short-sighted eyes, wide mouth, thick lips, and inflated visage—likened by to a "blind trumpeter"—North's quick smile and frank geniality contributed to his personal popularity, even among political opponents. In his daily routines, North exhibited a tendency toward and indolence, often delaying responses to correspondence—for instance, leaving an urgent letter unanswered for seven weeks in 1775—and frequently conducting business from his bed, a habit criticized as "flimsy" by observers like Lord Thurlow. He enjoyed full spirits at the table, indulging in eating and drinking amid his amusements, which aligned with his sanguine disposition but contrasted with his conscientious approach to ministerial duties, such as establishing regular budget presentations as . North's health remained robust through much of his premiership but deteriorated in later years, with vision loss beginning around 1786 and progressing to total blindness by the Regency crisis of 1788–1789, though he continued participating in parliamentary debates. This affliction, compounded by general ill health, prompted his gradual withdrawal from public life after 1790, culminating in his death on 5 August 1792 in .

Legacy and Historiography

Immediate Aftermath and Contemporaries' Views

North tendered his as on 20 March 1782, following the ' passage of a motion on 27 February 1782 (234-215) to cease offensive operations in America, prompted by the British surrender at Yorktown in 1781. King George III, who had repeatedly resisted North's prior attempts to step down, reluctantly accepted, granting him an of £4,100 and expressing personal esteem: "I ever did and ever shall look on you as a friend as well as faithful servant." The Marquis of Rockingham formed a new ministry, emphasizing toward American independence, though Rockingham's death on 1 July 1782 led to the Earl of Shelburne's succession and initial peace talks. In the immediate opposition, North commanded about 100 loyal followers in the , positioning his group as a pivotal force between the Foxites and Shelburnites; by September 1782, he pledged general support for the administration except on constitutional matters. This leverage culminated in the Fox-North Coalition of February 1783, which toppled Shelburne over preliminary peace terms, though North played a subdued role under Fox's dominance. Contemporaries largely held North accountable for the American debacle, viewing him as politically responsible despite military shortcomings. Whig opponents like Edmund Burke had long decried North's coercive policies as exacerbating colonial unrest, advocating conciliation over force as early as 1775. Charles James Fox, leading parliamentary assaults, portrayed North's persistence in war as disastrous misjudgment, culminating in the no-confidence motions that forced resignation. Allies like Charles Jenkinson criticized North's post-resignation maneuvers as "shabby and undignified," while Lord Loughborough deemed him lacking "the talents requisite for the leader of a party out of office" in July 1782. The king alone maintained unqualified regard, later decrying North's coalition with Fox as "treachery and ingratitude," underscoring North's perceived loyalty to the Crown amid widespread attribution of imperial loss to his tenure. Public sentiment, reflected in satirical medals commemorating the February motion, reinforced his image as the architect of defeat.

Traditional Assessments and Blame for American Loss

Traditional historiography has long held Lord North primarily responsible for Britain's defeat in the American War of Independence (1775–1783), portraying his twelve-year premiership (1770–1782) as marked by indecisiveness, policy missteps, and inadequate wartime direction that squandered Britain's military superiority. Critics, including contemporary Whig opponents, faulted North for escalating tensions through measures like the of May 1773, which retained a tax on tea imports and inadvertently fueled colonial smuggling while provoking the on December 16, 1773. This act, intended to bolster the , was seen as emblematic of North's shortsighted economic coercion, ignoring the colonies' deepening commitment to "." The Coercive Acts, enacted in March–June 1774 to punish —closing until restitution for destroyed tea, revoking its , and quartering troops—further unified colonial resistance, transforming local unrest into widespread rather than quelling it as anticipated. North's government underestimated the colonies' resolve, with figures like the dismissing potential opposition as "not very formidable," while overlooking logistical strains such as transatlantic supply lines spanning 3,000 miles and the risk of French intervention. , a leading critic in , lambasted North's administration for pursuing force over conciliation, arguing in his March 22, 1775, speech on American taxation that coercion alienated colonists without addressing root grievances, and for lacking the vigilance needed to adapt to and alliances against Britain. North's delegation of military strategy to subordinates like Lord George Germain, coupled with minimal personal oversight, contributed to disasters such as the Saratoga surrender on October 17, 1777, which prompted French entry into the on February 6, 1778, tipping the balance irreversibly. Traditional accounts depict him as temperamentally unsuited for —despondent and overburdened—failing to enforce a unified strategy or mobilize sufficient resources, with early victories like [Long Island](/page/Long Island) (August 27, 1776) eroded by strategic hesitancy. The climactic Yorktown capitulation on October 19, 1781, elicited North's famed exclamation, "O God, it is all over," precipitating a no-confidence motion on March 20, 1782, that ended his ministry and cemented his image as the architect of imperial collapse. This narrative, dominant in 19th-century Whig histories, emphasized North's subservience to George III's intransigence over Parliament's , framing the loss as avoidable through firmer leadership rather than inexorable geopolitical forces.

Modern Reappraisals and Rehabilitation

In the twentieth century, historians increasingly challenged the longstanding caricature of Lord North as an inept figurehead for King George III, crediting him instead with substantial parliamentary and administrative skills that sustained his ministry for twelve years amid factional divisions. Peter D.G. Thomas's 1976 biography portrayed North as a "master politician" who dominated the House of Commons through adept management of debates, patronage, and coalitions, enabling legislative successes in areas like the 1770s budget reforms that addressed postwar debt without immediate tax hikes. Thomas argued that North's unpopularity stemmed more from his unflattering physical appearance and association with the American war than from personal failings, rehabilitating him as a conscientious leader who prioritized fiscal prudence, reducing the national debt from approximately £147 million in 1770 to £135 million by 1782 despite escalating military costs. Later scholarship reinforced this view by contextualizing North's American policy failures within systemic constraints, including George III's vetoes on conciliation and the opposition's inability to coalesce alternatives until 1782. Peter J. Marshall, in analyses of imperial governance, noted North's pragmatic efforts like the 1778 Conciliatory Proposition, which proposed allowing colonial assemblies to tax themselves for imperial defense—a measure rejected by Congress but indicative of North's willingness to devolve authority, predating similar overtures in Ireland. Historians such as Andrew O'Shaughnessy have highlighted North's domestic competence, including efficient handling of Indian affairs via the 1773 Regulating Act and economic stabilization through low-interest loans and spending cuts, achievements overshadowed by the war's outcome but evidencing sound judgment in non-colonial domains. This reappraisal underscores that the Revolution's loss arose from broader causal factors—geographic challenges, allied interventions by and , and colonial unity—rather than North's or strategic errors, with Germain bearing more direct blame for coordination. Contemporary evaluations, including those from the government portal, affirm North's overlooked fiscal legacy, portraying him as a capable steward of Britain's finances during crisis, whose rehabilitation reflects a shift from Whig-biased Victorian narratives toward evidence-based assessments of his era's political realities.

Balanced Evaluation of Achievements and Shortcomings

Lord North's premiership from 1770 to 1782 demonstrated competence in peacetime domestic governance, particularly in fiscal stewardship. He inherited substantial national debt from the Seven Years' War and, through measured tax policies and expenditure controls, reduced it by roughly £10 million by 1775, stabilizing Britain's finances amid post-war recovery. This achievement reflected effective management of parliamentary budgets without resorting to unpopular innovations, maintaining economic equilibrium until wartime demands intervened. North also advanced administrative reforms overseas, notably via the Regulating Act of 1773, which restructured the Company's operations to combat corruption and assert parliamentary oversight over its Indian territories, laying groundwork for centralized British rule in the subcontinent. His parliamentary skills further underscored strengths in routine administration: North adeptly steered contentious debates, such as the 1769 Middlesex election crisis, blending firmness with disarming humor to preserve government majorities and legislative cohesion. These qualities sustained a stable ministry longer than many predecessors, fostering continuity in an era of factional volatility. Early responses to colonial tensions, including the partial repeal of Townshend duties in 1770 (retaining only the tea tax to affirm parliamentary authority), aimed at conciliation while upholding fiscal principle, averting immediate crisis without full capitulation. Yet North's tenure faltered decisively in foreign and military policy, where indecision and inadequate adaptation prolonged the , culminating in the 1783 loss of . His government's coercive turn after 1774—escalating troops and blockades without a coherent for rapid victory—united disparate colonial interests against Britain, exacerbating rebellion rather than quelling it. Financial eroded under costs, reversing pre-1775 debt reductions as expenditures ballooned without proportional gains, exposing a failure to mobilize resources for total commitment or negotiate timely peace. Critics, including contemporaries like , faulted North's over-reliance on royal counsel and aversion to bold reforms, which stifled strategic pivots amid French and Spanish entry in ; this vacillation prioritized short-term parliamentary survival over decisive action, contributing causally to defeat by diffusing effort across theaters without securing core objectives. While not solely responsible—geographic distances and allied interventions compounded challenges—North's ministry bears primary accountability for persisting with untenable policies, marking a shortfall in visionary leadership during existential imperial strain. Overall, his record evinces proficiency in domestic steadiness but profound inadequacy in resolution, where administrative yielded to geopolitical rupture.

Titles, Styles, and Arms

Frederick North was born on 13 April 1732 as the eldest son of Francis North, 3rd Guilford. Until 10 June 1752, he was styled Frederick North, reflecting his status as the son of a . On that date, his father was created 1st of Guilford, after which North adopted the Lord North, by which he was known throughout his political career until 1790. Upon his father's death on 4 August 1790, North succeeded to the peerages as 2nd Earl of Guilford and 4th Baron Guilford, moving to the as The Earl of Guilford. He held additional honours, including appointment to the circa 1766, installation as a Knight of the on 18 June 1772, and election as a and Society of Antiquaries.

As 2nd Earl of Guilford, North bore the hereditary arms of the North family: Azure, a lion passant or between three fleurs-de-lys argent, with crest a dragon's head erased sable ducally gorged and chained or, topped by the coronet of an earl comprising eight silver strawberry leaves.

References

  1. https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1754-1790/member/north-frederick-1732-92
  2. https://www.gov.uk/government/history/past-prime-ministers/frederick-north
  3. https://www.ouramericanrevolution.org/index.cfm/people/view/pp0031
  4. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/biographies/lord-north
  5. https://www.americanheritage.com/men-revolution-5-frederick-lord-north
  6. https://www.museumofpm.org/prime-ministers/frederick-north-lord-north/
  7. https://history.blog.gov.uk/2015/08/12/lord-frederick-north/
  8. https://www.archontology.org/nations/uk/bpm/north.php
  9. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/152072195
  10. https://www.victorianweb.org/history/pms/north.html
  11. https://www.americanrevolution.org/frederick-north-biography/
  12. https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1754-1790/constituencies/banbury
  13. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/townshend-revenue-act
  14. https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/american-revolution-1763-1783/british-reforms-1763-1766/
  15. https://www.royal.uk/george-iii
  16. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/frederick-north-lord-north
  17. https://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/north.html
  18. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Frederick-North-Lord-North-of-Kirtling
  19. https://statutes.org.uk/site/the-statutes/eighteenth-century/1778-18-george-3-c-60-catholic-relief-act/
  20. https://www.historyhome.co.uk/c-eight/ministry/northmin.htm
  21. https://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/lordnorth.html
  22. https://allthingsliberty.com/2023/10/the-lord-north-conciliatory-proposal-a-case-of-too-little-too-late/
  23. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/british-perspective-american-revolution
  24. https://www.colonialsociety.org/publications/4745/crisis-falkland-islands
  25. https://falklandstimeline.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/nicolas-tracy.pdf
  26. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07075332.2010.489755
  27. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/legislativescrutiny/parliamentandireland/overview/meeting-irelands-terms/
  28. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/uk-pm-north.htm
  29. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/edmund-burke
  30. https://www.worldhistoryedu.com/lord-north-the-british-prime-minister-who-lost-the-american-colonies/
  31. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/revolutionary-war/battles/yorktown
  32. https://allthingsliberty.com/2022/10/the-motion-to-end-the-war-with-the-american-colonies-february-22-1782/
  33. https://allthingsliberty.com/2022/12/the-world-changing-motion-in-the-house-of-commons-february-27-1782/
  34. https://wroxtonworkshop.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/2022-Strong-.pdf
  35. https://www.historyofparliament.com/2013/09/04/lord-north-and-yorktown/
  36. https://www.historyhome.co.uk/c-eight/ministry/foxnorth.htm
  37. https://www.gov.uk/government/history/past-foreign-secretaries/charles-fox
  38. https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/North-1238
  39. https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/LZLK-Q74/frederick-north-2nd-earl-of-guilford-1732-1792
  40. https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1790-1820/member/north-george-augustus-1757-1802
  41. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/10138/frederick-north
  42. https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1790-1820/member/north-hon-frederick-1766-1827
  43. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/myths-of-the-american-revolution-10941835/
  44. https://www.americanhistorycentral.com/entries/edmund-burke/
  45. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7290373-lord-north
  46. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03612759.1976.9945466
  47. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/9780230304635_12
  48. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/legislativescrutiny/parliament-and-empire/parliament-and-the-american-colonies-before-1765/the-east-india-company-and-public-opinion/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.