Hubbry Logo
LumbeeLumbeeMain
Open search
Lumbee
Community hub
Lumbee
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Lumbee
Lumbee
from Wikipedia

The Lumbee, also known as People of the Dark Water,[2] are a mixed-race, state-recognized Native American tribe primarily located in Robeson County, North Carolina, who claim to be descended from numerous Indigenous peoples of the Southeastern Woodlands who once inhabited the region.[3][4]

Key Information

The Lumbee have been shown to have connections with other tri-racial isolate groups, such as the Melungeons, using historical documents.[5]

The Lumbee take their name from the Lumber River, which winds through Robeson County. Pembroke, North Carolina, in Robeson County, is their economic, cultural, and political center. According to the 2000 United States census report, 89% of the population of the town of Pembroke identified as Lumbee; 40% of Robeson County's population identified as Lumbee. The Lumbee Tribe was recognized by North Carolina in 1885. In 1956, the U.S. Congress passed the Lumbee Act, which recognized the Lumbees as being American Indians but denied them the benefits of a federally recognized tribe.[6]

In 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to advance the tribe's recognition.[7]

History

[edit]

Archaeological evidence reveals that the area now known as Robeson County (central to modern Lumbee territory) has been continuously occupied by Native people for at least 14,000 years. Every named era found elsewhere in pre-European-contact North Carolina is also present in the archaeological record of Robeson County (artifacts from Paleo-Indian, Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippian cultures).[8][9][10] All modern vicinities of Lumbee occupation contain numerous archaeological sites as recent as the Late Woodland period (mid-1700s), and oral traditions about the history of some Lumbee families extend back as far in Robeson County as the mid-1700s.[11]

18th century

[edit]

The earliest European document referring to Indian communities in the area of the Lumber River is a map prepared in 1725 by John Herbert, the English commissioner of Indian trade for the Wineau Factory on the Black River. Herbert identified the four Siouan-speaking communities as the Saraw, Pee Dee, Scavano, and Wacoma. Modern-day Lumbees claim connection to those settlements, but none of the four tribes is located within the boundaries of present-day Robeson County.[citation needed]

A 1772 proclamation by the governor of North Carolina, Arthur Dobbs — derived from a report by his agent, Colonel Griffith Rutherford, head of a Bladen County militia — listed the names of inhabitants who took part in a "Mob Raitously Assembled together,"[12] apparently defying the efforts of colonial officials to collect taxes. The proclamation declared the "Above list of Rogus [sic] is all living upon the Kings Land without title." A later colonial military survey described "50 families a mixt crew, a lawless People possess the Lands without Patent or paying quit Rents."[13][original research?]

Hamilton McMillan wrote that Lumbee ancestor James Lowrie had received sizable land grants early in the century, and, by 1738, possessed combined estates of more than 2,000 acres (810 ha). Adolph Dial and David Eliades claimed that another Lumbee ancestor, John Brooks, held the title to over 1,000 acres (400 ha) in 1735 and that Robert Lowrie gained possession of almost 700 acres (280 ha).[14]

A state archivist noted in the late 20th century that no land grants were issued during these years in North Carolina. The first documented land grants made to individuals claimed to be Lumbee ancestors did not take place until the 1750s, more than a decade later.[15][page needed] None of the various petitions for federal recognition by the Lumbee people relied on the McMillan, Dial, or Eliades claims.[16][page needed]

Land records show that in the second half of the 18th century, persons since identified as ancestral Lumbees began to take titles to land near Drowning Creek (Lumber River) and prominent swamps such as Ashpole, Long, and Back. According to James Campisi, an anthropologist retained by the Lumbee tribe to aid their petition for federal recognition, the area "is located in the heart of the so-called old field of the Cheraw documented in land records between 1737 and 1739."[17] In 1771, a convicted felon, by the name of Winsler Driggers, captured "near Drowning Creek, in the Charraw settlement," was reported as hanged under the Negro Act.[18][original research?] That mention, along with no evidence that a new settlement was established or the old settlement was abandoned, is not sufficient to confirm that the settlement on Drowning Creek in 1754 was a Cheraw settlement.[citation needed]

Pension records for veterans of the American Revolutionary War in Robeson County listed men with surnames later associated with Lumbee families, such as Samuel Bell, Jacob Locklear, John Brooks, Berry Hunt, Thomas Jacobs, Thomas Cummings, and Michael Revels.[citation needed] In 1790, other men with surnames since associated with Lumbee-identified descendants, such as Barnes, Braveboy (or Brayboy), Bullard, Chavers (Chavis), Cumbo, Hammonds, Lowrie (Lowry/Lowery), Oxendine, Strickland, and Wilkins, were listed as inhabitants of the Fayetteville District; they were all "Free Persons of Color" in the first federal census.[19][original research?]

Antebellum

[edit]

Following Nat Turner's slave rebellion of 1831, the state legislature passed amendments to its original 1776 constitution, abolishing suffrage for free people of color. This was one of a series of laws passed by North Carolina whites from 1826 to the 1850s which the historian John Hope Franklin characterized as the "Free Negro Code", creating restrictions on that class. Free people of color were stripped of various civil and political rights which they had enjoyed for almost two generations. They could no longer vote or serve on juries, bear arms without a license from the state, or serve in the state militia.[20] As these were obligations traditionally associated with citizenship, they were made second-class citizens.

In 1853, the North Carolina Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the state's restrictions to prevent free people of color from bearing arms without a license. Noel Locklear, identified as a free man of color in State v. Locklear, was convicted of being in illegal possession of firearms.[21][22][23] In 1857, William Chavers from Robeson County was arrested and charged as a free person of color for carrying a shotgun without a license. Chavers, like Locklear, was convicted. Chavers promptly appealed, arguing that the law restricted only "free Negroes," not "persons of color from Indian blood." The appeals court reversed the lower court, finding that "free persons of color may be, then, for all we can see, persons colored by Indian blood".[24]

Civil War

[edit]

A yellow fever epidemic in 1862–1863 killed many slaves working on the construction of Fort Fisher near Wilmington, North Carolina, then considered to be the "Gibraltar of the South". As the state's slave owners resisted sending more slaves to Fort Fisher, the Confederate Home Guard intensified efforts to conscript able-bodied free persons of color as laborers. There does not appear to be documentation of conscription among the free people of color in Robeson County.[25][26][27]

Despite the widespread sympathies among the Indian community for the plight of the participants in this guerilla warfare, nearly 150 Lumbee ancestors voluntarily enlisted in the Confederate Infantry, including the nephew-in-law of Henry Berry Lowry described below.[28]

Lowry War

[edit]

Early in the Civil War, North Carolina turned to forced labor to construct its defenses. Several Lowrie cousins had been conscripted as laborers to help build Fort Fisher, near Wilmington. Henry Berry Lowrie and several of his relatives took to the swamps where Indians resorted to "lying out" (that is, hiding out in remote areas) to avoid being rounded up by the Home Guard and forced to work as impressed laborers.[29]

The Lowrie gang, as it became known, resorted to crime and conducting personal feuds, committing robberies and murders against white Robeson County residents and skirmishing with the Confederate Home Guard. They grew bolder as the war turned against the Confederacy. In December 1864, the Lowrie gang killed James P. Barnes after he had drafted workers, including the Lowries, for work on local defenses. Barnes had earlier accused Henry's father, Allen Lowrie, of stealing hogs. Next, the gang killed James Brantley Harris, a Confederate conscription officer who had killed a Lowrie relative.[30]

After the Civil War, the Lowrie gang continued their insurgency, committing robberies and murders. The authorities' raids and attempts to capture gang members became known as the Lowry War.[31][32] Lowrie's gang continued its activities into the Reconstruction Era. Republican governor William Woods Holden declared Lowrie and his men outlaws in 1869, and offered a $12,000 reward for their capture: dead or alive. Lowrie responded with more revenge killings. Eluding capture, the Lowrie gang persisted after Reconstruction ended and conservative white Democrats gained control of North Carolina government, imposing segregation and white supremacy.[citation needed]

In February 1872, shortly after a raid in which he robbed the local sheriff's safe of more than $28,000, Henry Berry Lowrie disappeared. It is claimed he accidentally shot himself while cleaning his double-barrel shotgun.[33] As with many folk heroes, the death of Lowrie was disputed. He was reportedly seen at a funeral several years later.[32]

State recognition as Indians

[edit]

During Reconstruction, the legislature established public education for the first time, providing for white and black schools. All children of color were assigned to black schools, which were dominated by the children of freedmen (freed slaves). The Indian people of Robeson County had always been free and did not socially associate or interact with Blacks. They refused to send their children to school with the free Blacks and demanded for separate Indian schools. In the 1880s, as the Democratic Party was struggling against the biracial Populist movement which combined the strength of poor whites (Populist and Democrats) and blacks (mostly Republicans), Democratic state representative Hamilton McMillan proposed to have the state recognize these Indian people of Robeson County as the "Croatan Indians" and to create a separate system of Croatan Indian schools. By the end of the 19th century, the "Indians of Robeson County" (as they then identified) established schools in eleven of their principal settlements.[34]

Following the Reconstruction Era, white-dominated legislatures across the South imposed codified racial segregation into law. In North Carolina, the law effectively recognized only whites and free persons of color regardless of race; therefore people of mixed or Native ancestry had no other option than to attend black schools established for and in which most students were the children of freedmen. In 1887, Democratic state representative Hamilton McMillan supported an effort to charter separate schools for Indians.[35]

An Indian school system

[edit]
Three "Croatans" of Robeson County, c. 1909

In 1887, the Indians of Robeson County petitioned the state legislature to establish a normal school to train Indian teachers for the county's Indian schools. With state permission, they raised the requisite funds, along with some state assistance, which proved inadequate. Several tribal leaders donated money and privately held land for schools.[36] Robeson County's Indian Normal School eventually developed as Pembroke State University and subsequently as the University of North Carolina at Pembroke.[37]

In 1899, North Carolina Congressman John D. Bellamy introduced the first bill in Congress to appropriate federal funds to educate the Indian children of Robeson County.[37] They introduced another bill a decade later,[38] and yet another in 1911.[39] The Commissioner of Indian Affairs, T. J. Morgan, responded to Congress and the Croatan Indians, writing that, "so long as the immediate wards of the Government [Indians on reservations] are so insufficiently provided for, I do not see how I can consistently render any assistance to the Croatans or any other civilized tribes." [sic, civilized tribes were defined in contrast to Indians on reservations, who were wards of the government.][40]

By the first decade of the 20th century, a North Carolina Representative introduced a federal bill to establish "a normal school for the Indians of Robeson County, North Carolina," to be paid for by the federal government. Charles F. Pierce, U.S. Supervisor of Indian Schools in the Bureau of Indian Affairs, opposed the legislation since, "[a]t the present time it is the avowed policy of the government to require states having an Indian population to assume the burden and responsibility for their education, so far as is possible."[41]

Ku Klux Klan conflict

[edit]
Lumbees fighting Klansmen at the Battle of Hayes Pond

During the 1950s, the Lumbee made nationwide news when they came into conflict with the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, a white supremacist terrorist organization, then headed by Grand Dragon James W. "Catfish" Cole. Cole began a campaign of harassment against the Lumbee, claiming they were "mongrels and half-breeds" whose "race mixing" threatened to upset the established order of the segregated Jim Crow South. After giving a series of speeches denouncing the "loose morals" of Lumbee women, Cole burned a cross in the front yard of a Lumbee woman in St. Pauls, North Carolina, as a "warning" against "race mixing".[42] Emboldened, Cole called for a Klan rally on January 18, 1958, near the town of Maxton. The Lumbee, led by veterans of the Second World War, decided to disrupt the rally.[citation needed]

The "Battle of Hayes Pond", also known as "the Klan Rout", made national news. Cole had predicted more than 5,000 Klansmen would show up for the rally, but fewer than 100 and possibly as few as three dozen attended. Approximately 500 Lumbee, armed with guns and sticks, gathered in a nearby swamp, and when they realized they possessed an overwhelming numerical advantage, attacked the Klansmen. The Lumbee encircled the Klansmen, opening fire and wounding four Klansmen in the first volley, none seriously. The remaining Klansmen panicked and fled. Cole was found in the swamps, arrested and tried for inciting a riot. The Lumbee celebrated the victory by burning Klan regalia and dancing around the open flames.[42]

The Battle of Hayes Pond, which marked the end of Klan activity in Robeson County, is celebrated as a Lumbee holiday.[citation needed]

Early efforts to gain federal recognition

[edit]

The people achieved state recognition as "Croatan Indians" in 1885.[37] They first petitioned the federal government for recognition in 1888, but were rejected due to the Bureau of Indian Affairs' lack of funding.[43] In 1911, at the request of the tribe, the North Carolina General Assembly passed legislation changing their name to "Indians of Robeson County."[44] In 1913, future North Carolina Governor Angus McLean supported renaming the tribe to "Cherokee Indians of Robeson County" despite objections from some Lumbee people.[45] The tribe had previously petitioned for federal recognition as "Cherokee" Indians, but it was denied.[citation needed]

From 1913 to 1932, North Carolina legislators introduced bills in Congress to change the name of the people to Cherokee and gain federal recognition, but did not succeed.[citation needed]

In 1915, the report of Special Indian Agent O.M. McPherson of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, was sent to the North Carolina legislature. He primarily reported on the Cherokee in the state. He noted that the Indians of Robeson County had developed an extensive system of schools and a political organization. He thought that, as state-recognized Indians, they were eligible to attend federal Indian schools. But, as they were highly assimilated, spoke English, and already worked in the common state culture, he doubted that the federal Indian schools could meet their needs. Congress did not provide any additional funding to support education for Indians in North Carolina.[46]

In 1924, the Cherokee Indians of North Carolina petitioned for federal recognition as "Siouan Indians"; their request was rejected by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.[citation needed] That same year, representative Homer L. Lyon introduced legislation to federally recognize the Lumbee as the "Cherokee Indians of Robeson and Adjoining Counties," but the bill failed after opposition from Commissioner of Indian Affairs Charles H. Burke. In 1932, senator Josiah W. Bailey introduced a bill to recognize the Lumbee as Cherokee, but it failed after opposition from the Cherokee Nation and the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians.[47]

Federally commissioned reports

[edit]

In 1912, legislation was introduced to the US Senate to establish a school for the Indians of Robeson County. When the bill was sent to committee, it requested information from the Department of the Interior. The Indian Office sent Charles F. Pierce, the Supervisor of Indian Schools, to Robeson County to conduct a study of the tribe. Pierce reported that the state and county were providing funds to educate the 1,976 school-age Indian children. He also stated in his report that "one would readily class a large majority [of the Lumbee] as being at least three-fourths Indian.[48]

On April 28, 1914, the Senate called for an investigation into the status and conditions of the Indians of Robeson and adjoining counties. The Indian Office sent Special Indian Agent O.M. McPherson to the county to obtain information regarding the educational system of the tribe. In his report, submitted to the Senate on January 4, 1915, he wrote:

While these Indians are essentially an agricultural people, I believe them to be as capable of learning the mechanical trades as the average white youth. The foregoing facts suggest the character of the educational institution that should be established for them, in case Congress sees fit to make the necessary appropriation, namely the establishment of an agricultural and mechanical school, in which domestic science shall also be taught.[49]

Anthropologist John R. Swanton reported on possible origins of the Indians of Robeson County in his work on Southeast Indians. He wrote:

The evidence available thus seems to indicate that the Indians of Robeson County who have been called Croatan and Cherokee are descended mainly from certain Siouan tribes of which the most prominent were the Cheraw and Keyauwee, but they probably included as well remnants of the Eno, and Shakori, and very likely some of the coastal groups such as the Waccamaw and Cape Fears. It is not improbable that a few families or small groups of Algonquian or Iroquoian may have cast their lot with this body of people, but contributions from such sources are relatively insignificant. Although there is some reason to think that the Keyauwee tribe actually contributed more blood to the Robeson County Indians than any other, the name is not widely known, whereas that of the Cheraw has been familiar to historians, geographers and ethnologists in one form or another since the time of De Soto and has a firm position in the cartography of the region. The Cheraws, too, seem to have taken a leading part in opposing the colonists during and immediately after the Yamasee uprising. Therefore, if the name of any tribe is to be used in connection with this body of six or eight thousand people, that of the Cheraw would, in my opinion, be most appropriate.[citation needed]

In 1935, Indian Agent Fred Baker was sent to Robeson County in response to a proposed resettlement project for the Cherokee Indians of Robeson County. At the time, the people were attempting to organize as a tribe under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, which largely applied to Indians on reservations to encourage their self-government.

Baker reported:

I find that the sense of racial solidarity is growing stronger and that the members of this tribe are cooperating more and more with each other with the object in view of promoting the mutual benefit of all the members. It is clear to my mind that sooner of later government action will have to be taken in the name of justice and humanity to aid them.[citation needed]

D'Arcy McNickle, from the Bureau of Indian Affairs, came to Robeson County in 1936 to collect affidavits and other data from people registering as Indian under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934. McNickle stated, "there are reasons for believing that until comparatively recently some remnant of language still persisted among these people."[50]

In the 1960s, Smithsonian ethnologists William Sturtevant and Samuel Stanley described the Lumbee as "larger than any other Indian group in the United States except the Navajo", and estimated their population as 31,380 Lumbee (from North and South Carolina) in 1960.[49]

Indian New Deal

[edit]

The federal Indian Reorganization Act in 1934 was chiefly directed at Native American tribes on reservations. It encouraged them to re-establish self-government, which had been diminished since the founding of reservations and the supervision by the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs.[citation needed]

At this time, the Indians of Robeson County renewed their petition for federal recognition as a tribe. The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) sent John R. Swanton, an anthropologist from the Bureau of American Ethnology, and the Indian Agent Fred Baker to evaluate the claim of the Indians of Robeson County to historical continuity as an identified Indian community. In 1934, the future Lumbee revived their claim to Cherokee identity, joining the National Congress of American Indians under the name, "Cherokee Indians of Robeson County."[citation needed]

Swanton speculated that the group were more likely descended in part from Cheraw and other eastern Siouan tribes, as these were the predominant Native American peoples historically in that area. The Indians of Robeson County split in terms of how they identified as Native Americans: one group supported the Cheraw theory of ancestry. The other faction believed they were descended from the Cherokee, although the tribe had historically occupied territory in the mountains and western part of the state rather than the area of Robeson County. North Carolina's politicians abandoned support for the federal recognition effort until the tribal factions agreed on their identity.[citation needed]

In 1952, under the leadership of D.F. Lowrie, the tribe voted to adopt the name "Lumbee."[citation needed] The North Carolina legislature recognized the tribe's name change to the "Lumbee Indians of North Carolina" in 1953.[51] The tribe petitioned again for federal recognition.[citation needed]

Lumbee Act

[edit]

In 1955, congressman F. Ertel Carlyle introduced The Lumbee Act to recognize the "Lumbee Indians of North Carolina." It was passed into by Congress as H.R. 4656 (Pub. L. 84–570, 70 Stat. 254) in 1956 and signed by President Dwight D. Eisenhower.[52] The Senate inserted a compromise that withheld full recognition as a federally recognized tribe and prevented the tribe from being federally recognized or receiving federal benefits designated for tribal governments.[53] The Lumbee Act designated the Indians of Robeson, Hoke, Scotland, and Cumberland counties as the "Lumbee Indians of North Carolina."[citation needed]

It provided further, "Nothing in this Act shall make such Indians eligible for any services performed by the United States for Indians because of their status as Indians.'"[53] It also forbids a government-to-government relationship between the federal government and the Lumbee as well as forbidding them from applying through the BARS, the Bureau of Indian Affairs administrative process to gain recognition. This restriction as to eligibility for services was a condition which tribal representatives agreed to at the time in order to achieve status as a recognized tribe and have the Lumbee name recognized. The Lumbee had essentially assimilated into early colonial life prior to the formation of the United States. They lived as individuals, as did any other colonial and U.S. citizens. Lumbee spokesmen repeatedly testified at these hearings that they were not seeking federal financial benefits; they said they only wanted a name designation as Lumbee people.[citation needed]

Petitioning for full federal recognition

[edit]

In 1987, the Lumbee petitioned the United States Department of the Interior for full federal recognition. This is a prerequisite to receive the financial benefits accorded federally recognized Native American tribes. The latter have generally been those tribes who had signed treaties with the federal government and had reservations established, and a history of a tribal relationship with the federal government.[a] The petition was denied in 1989 because of the Lumbee Act.[37]

Senator Elizabeth Dole and Representative Mike McIntyre testifying at a congressional hearing on federal Lumbee recognition, 2003

The Lumbee resumed lobbying Congress, testifying in 1988, 1989, 1991 and 1993 in efforts to gain full federal recognition by congressional action.[54] All of these attempts failed in the face of opposition by the Department of Interior, the recognized Cherokee tribes (including North Carolina's Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians), some of the North Carolina Congressional delegation, and some representatives from other states with federally recognized tribes. Some of the North Carolina delegation separately recommended an amendment to the 1956 Act that would enable the Lumbee to apply to the Department of Interior under the regular administrative process for recognition.[54] In 2004 and 2006 the tribe made renewed bids for full recognition, to include financial benefits.[55]

In 2007, US Senator Elizabeth Dole from North Carolina introduced the Lumbee Recognition Bill. It was not enacted.[55] Lumbee Tribal Chairman Jimmy Goins appeared before the United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs in September 2007 to lobby for federal recognition of the tribe.[56]

In January 2009, US Representative Mike McIntyre introduced legislation (H.R. 31) to grant the Lumbee full federal recognition.[57] The bill gained support of more than 180 co-sponsors,[58] including both North Carolina US Senators, Richard Burr and Kay Hagan.[59] In June 2009, the United States House of Representatives voted 240 to 179 for federal recognition for the Lumbee tribe, acknowledging that they are descendants of the historic Cheraw tribe. The bill went to the United States Senate.[60] In October 2009, the United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs approved a bill for federal recognition of the Lumbee that also included a no-gaming clause.[61] The Senate adjourned for 2010 without taking action on the bill.[62]

In 2021, Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii sought a hearing on Lumbee federal recognition.[63] In April 2021, US Representative G. K. Butterfield introduced legislation to grant the Lumbee full federal recognition (H.R. 2758). The bill passed the House of Representatives in November 2021.[64] The Senate never acted. Another attempt at federal recognition passed the House but not the Senate. On December 17, 2024 Bruce Westerman of Arkansas introduced a bill sponsored by David Rouzer of Wilmington, North Carolina. The House approved 311-96, but the Senate would not be able to take action if Congress adjourned as planned.[65]

2020 presidential election

[edit]

During the 2020 United States presidential election campaign, then-candidate Joe Biden announced, on October 8, 2020, his support for federal recognition of the Lumbee tribe by pledging his backing to the Lumbee Recognition Act.[66] On October 21, 2020, President Donald Trump announced his support for federal recognition of the tribe via the same legislation.[67] The following weekend, Trump held a rally in Robeson County to shore up support among Native Americans.[68] During the rally, Trump stated that "[The] Lumbee Nation is forgotten no more!"[69] Trump's rally was significant in that it was the first official visit to Robeson County by a sitting US President in history.[70]

Historically most of Robeson County had trended Democratic, voting for Barack Obama by an 18 point margin in 2012. However, Donald Trump carried the county narrowly in 2016, winning by a 5 point margin over Hillary Clinton. In 2020, his margin of victory increased dramatically to an 18 point victory over Biden.[71][72] Many attribute this swing in Trump's favor to his visit and explicit support for recognition of the tribe by the federal government.[73][74]

Theories of origins

[edit]

Lost Colony of Roanoke

[edit]

In 1888, Hamilton McMillan proposed the Native inhabitants of Robeson County were descendants of England's "Lost Colony of Roanoke", who intermarried with what he described as the "Croatan Indians."[75][page needed] The Roanoke colony disappeared during a difficult winter, but the colonists reportedly left the word "Croatan" carved into a tree, hence the name MacMillan gave to the proto Lumbee.[citation needed]

MacMillan's theory may have been part of a cynical effort to woo Lumbee voters to the Democratic Party by creating a segregated Indian school system separate from the school system for African Americans.[76]

By the early 1900s, Robeson County whites used "Cro" as a racial epithet to describe their "Indian" neighbors. The Lost Colony theory of origins fell out of favor in the early twentieth century.[citation needed] "Croatan" was dropped from their name and they became known as the "Indians of Robeson County" in 1911.[44]

Lumbee historian Adolph Dial continued to advocate for the lost colony theory until his death in the 1990s.[77][76] Lumbee historian Malinda Mayor Lowery "is highly skeptical" of the theory.[76]

Cherokee descent

[edit]

The proto Lumbee first began identifying as Cherokee Indians in 1915, when they changed their name to the "Cherokee Indians of Robeson County." Four years earlier, they had changed their name from the "Croatan Indians" to the generic "Indians of Robeson County." But the Cherokee occupied territory much further to the west and in the mountains during the colonial era.

In his unpublished 1934 master's thesis, graduate student Clifton Oxendine theorized that the Lumbee descended from Iroquoian-speaking Cherokee. Citing "oral traditions," Oxendine suggested that the Lumbee were the descendants of Cherokee warriors who fought with the British under Colonel John Barnwell of South Carolina in the Tuscarora campaign of 1711–1713. He said the Cherokee settled in the swamps of Robeson County when the campaign ended, along with some Tuscarora captives.[78]

The Oxendine theory of Cherokee origin has been uniformly rejected by mainstream scholars. First, no Cherokee warriors are listed in the record of Barnwell's company.[79] Second, the Lumbee do not speak Cherokee or any other Indian language. Third, Oxendine's claims of oral traditions are completely unsubstantiated; no such oral traditions survive or are documented by any other scholar.

The Lumbee have abandoned this theory in their documentation supporting their effort to obtain federal tribal recognition. The federally recognized Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians categorically rejects any connection to the Lumbee, dismissing the Oxendine claims as "absurd" and disputing even that the Lumbee qualify as Native American.[80]

Cheraw descent

[edit]

Indian agent McPherson theorized that they may be related to the defunct Cheraw, a band of Siouan-speaking Indians that had been reduced by war and disease to 50 or 60 individuals by 1768.[citation needed]

The 1915 McPherson Report said in reference to the Cheraw (quoting the Handbook of American Indians, 1906):

Their numbers in 1715, according to Rivers, was 510, but this estimate probably included the Keyauwee. Being still subject to attack by the Iroquois, they finally—between 1726 and 1739—became incorporated with the Catawba ... They are mentioned as with the Catawba but speaking their own distinct dialect as late as 1743 (Adair). The last notice of them in 1768, when their remnant, reduced by war and disease to 50 or 60, were still living with the Catawba.[81]

The Catawba are a federally recognized tribe. The McPherson Report does not explain how or when the remaining four or five dozen Cheraw identified in 1768 separated from the Catawba and became the ancestors of the Lumbee.[citation needed]

Siouan descent

[edit]

After repeated rejections under the Croatan, Cherokee and Cheraw labels, the proto Lumbee petitioned the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs in 1924 for recognition as "Siouan" Indians. This refers to Siouan language-speaking groups, not the Sioux, an Indigenous people of the Great Plains. This petition was rejected largely on the grounds that Siouan is a language family, not a tribe. Moreover, there was no record of the Lumbee or their ancestors having ever spoken a Siouan or any other Indian language.[citation needed]

Keyauwee descent

[edit]

In 1933, John Swanton wrote that the Siouan-speaking Keyauwee and Cheraw of the Carolina Piedmont were the most likely Indian ancestors of the people known from 1885 to 1912 as Croatan Indians and later as the Indians of Robeson County.[82] He suggested that surviving descendants of the Waccamaw and the Woccon likely lived in the central coastal region of North Carolina. In the 21st century, these tribes are extinct as groups, except for a small band of Waccamaw that live on Lake Waccamaw and have been recognized by the state.[82]

Swanton traced the migration of Southeast tribes.[83] In addition to the Keyauwee, Cheraw, Bear River, Waccamaw, and Woccon already mentioned, he noted that the Eno and Waxhaw migrated from Piedmont South Carolina northeast to the north-central part of North Carolina, then back south again to a point on the Pee Dee River just south of the border of the two Carolinas.

By the 1770s, remnant Indians from the once distinct tribal communities of the Cheraw, Keyauwee, Hatteras, Waxhaw, Sugaree, Eno and Shakori gathered along the Lumbee River, near the border that now divides North and South Carolina.[citation needed] Some of these Indians moved further southward to join with the few surviving Catawba, but the majority settled near the pines, web of wetlands, and river that bear the name of the Lumbee. Over time in a process of ethnogenesis, they identified as a common people.[84]

Multiple tribes theory

[edit]

Lumbee historian Malinda Mayor Lowery proposed that the Lumbee people were most likely descended from the members of several other tribes who settled in the swamplands around Robeson County. Lowery argues that Cheraw, Saponi, Hatteras, Tuscarora and Cape Fear Indians settled in the area during the 18th and 19th centuries and adopted English as a lingua franca. Over time the various refugees merged into the Lumbee.[76]

Authenticity and doubts of origins

[edit]

Due to their lack of evidence of Native American ancestry and other conventional Indigenous cultural markers such as a unique language, Lumbee people are often confronted with doubts concerning the validity of their claims to Indigenous status.[85] Some white and black residents of Robeson County have expressed doubts about their origins, asserting that the Lumbee are descendants of white and black people who do not want to be viewed as black due to discrimination based on skin tone.[86] Some federally recognized tribes have endorsed the extension of recognition to the Lumbee, while others have opposed it, accusing the Lumbee of making fraudulent claims to Indigenous ancestry.[87]

Several tribes from the Western United States also promulgate the belief that the Lumbee are a mixed, mostly African-descent group. Some Lumbee report that they do not show any Native American ancestry on commercial genealogical DNA tests. Historian Malinda Maynor Lowery, a member of the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina, criticized the usefulness of such tests, stating that the testing companies lack base samples of the Lumbee's Indigenous ancestors' DNA with which the results can be compared.[88][89] Some Lumbee report that the doubts about their status have caused emotional and psychological harm in their community.[90]

Culture and traditions

[edit]
Lumbees at a pow wow in Lumberton, 2015

Surnames

[edit]

Locklear, Oxendine, Lowry, Hunt, Chavis, Brayboy, Freeman and Bullard are common Lumbee surnames.[91]

Language

[edit]
Lumbee
(spurious)
Native toUnited States
RegionNorth Carolina
EthnicityLumbee
Extinct(date missing)
Language codes
ISO 639-3(lmz deprecated in 2020 due to spurious)
Glottologlumb1237

Lumbee people speak both mainstream varieties of English and a vernacular form, Lumbee English.[92] The latter is not a Native American language, but rather a form of American Indian English. In 2020, the ISO 639-3 language code lmz was retired from use, as it was determined that no separate Lumbee language has ever existed. Linguists have speculated that the ancestors of the Lumbees had been Native peoples who had originally spoken the Cheraw dialect of the Eastern Siouan language prior to adopting English sometime before the early 18th century.[93][94][95][37] Lumbee ancestors encountered English-speaking European settlers and adopted their language much earlier than other Native American groups.[96] The Lumbee Act of 1956 specifically mentioned the dialect as a defining attribute of the people.[97]

By 1730, English settlers were surprised at the presence of a large English-speaking Native American tribe. The Lumbees’ lack of a traditional language led to extra difficulty in gaining federal recognition.[37]

Lumbee dialectal English descends from the English spoken by the British English, Highland Scots, and Scots-Irish. Probably due to this heritage, it shares similarities with the High Tider accent found in the Outer Banks, namely in use of the /ɒɪ/ sound where other English speakers use /aɪ/, the use of the word mommuck ('to mess up'), and the grammatical use of weren't (e.g. "she weren't here"). Lumbee dialect also makes use of several unique words and phrases: chauld ('embarrassed'); on the swamp ('in the neighborhood'); juvember (sling shot); and bog (a serving of chicken and rice). Grammatically, Lumbee dialect employs the word bes as a verb form (e.g. "it bes really crowded").[98]

There is a variation in the use of these elements among Lumbee people; some frequently use most of the vernacular's unique characteristics, while others use few of them but easily understand their meaning.[99] The vernacular has also evolved over time, with older speakers frequently using the /ɒɪ/ sound and a-prefixing verbs, while the grammatical use of weren't has been retained and strengthened in use among younger speakers.[100]

Lumbee Homecoming

[edit]
Vendors at the 2016 Lumbee Homecoming

Lumbee Homecoming is a celebration held annually in Pembroke since 1968. Homecoming is important in bringing together members of families, many from great distances, for a weeklong celebration of Lumbee culture. Festivities include a parade, a pow wow, pageants, and other cultural events. 2018 marked the 50th anniversary of the homecoming and saw crowds of over 20,000 spectators,[101] including the Governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper.[102]

Communities

[edit]

Lumbee communities were linked together by their extensive kinship ties, church affiliations, their sense of themselves as Indians, and their control of their educational system, all of which served as a mechanism for defining tribal membership and maintaining tribal boundaries. Communities are basically self-governing. One form of self-governance in the early 20th century was exhibited by a fraternal organization known as the Red Men's Lodge. By 1914, lodges existed in Prospect, Magnolia, Pembroke, Saddletree, Oxendine, and Union Chapel. Lodge members maintained social order, carried out ceremonies, marched in parades, and conducted funerals. The 1987 Lumbee Petition states that, "[w]ith so many prominent leaders it is easy to understand how the lodges could maintain order and, at the same time, protect the tribal members from organized violence from whites in the area".[103]

Lumbee patchwork

[edit]

In the late 19th century, Maggie Lowry Locklear (Lumbee), daughter of Henry Berry Lowry, created a unique patchwork quilt inspired by the longleaf pine. Her quilt is in the collection of the Museum of the Southeast American Indian at the University of North Carolina at Pembroke.[104]

In 1993, Hayes Alan Locklear (Lumbee) designed a dress, which was sewn by Kat Littleturtle (Lumbee) for Miss Lumbee Natascha Wagoner, who was chosen as the 8th Miss Indian USA. The dress featured a pinecone patchwork pattern inspired by Maggie Lowry Locklear's quilt. Since then, Lumbee women have adopted this pinecone patchwork dress style as the signature Lumbee dress.[104]

Cuisine

[edit]
Collard sandwiches served at a Lumbee Homecoming

Traditional Lumbee cuisine heavily intersects with Southern cuisine. Chicken and pastry is a mainstay of Lumbee food,[105] as is cornbread.[106] The collard sandwich—consisting of fried cornbread, collard greens, and fatback—is a popular dish among the Lumbee in Robeson County. It is sometimes served with chow-chow.[107]

Religion

[edit]

Today the Lumbee primarily practice Protestantism, and attending church is an important social activity. Churches have Sunday schools, youth organizations, senior citizens' programs, Bible study programs, and choir practices. Gospel songs are popular. Ministers are highly respected. When a sizeable number of Lumbee people move to a city, they tend to settle in a particular section or neighborhood and establish a church. This took place in Lumbee communities in Baltimore, Greensboro, Fayetteville, Charlotte, and Claxton, Georgia.[108]

A study has documented Lumbee Methodism back to 1787. Lumbees created two church conferences of Indian congregations — the Burnt Swamp Baptist Association, founded around 1880, and the Lumbee River Conference of the Holiness Methodist Association in 1900. In 1984 Bruce Barton documented 104 Lumbee churches.[citation needed] Prospect Community Church, with 1,008 members in 2017, has purportedly the largest congregation of Native Americans in the United States.[109]

Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina

[edit]

The Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina is one of eight state-recognized Native American tribes in North Carolina.[110] They participate at the state level in many ways, including in the North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs. They also participate in such national organizations as the National Congress of American Indians and the National Indian Education Association.

According to its constitution, adopted in 2000, the Lumbee tribal government is organized into three branches: the tribal chairperson (executive), the 21-member Tribal Council (legislative), and Supreme Court (judicial). The tribal chairperson and the Tribal Council are elected to three-year terms.

The current administration includes:[111]

  • Chairman: John Lowery
  • Administrator: Tammy Maynor
  • Administration assistant to the chairman: Camera Brewer
  • Enrollment director: Reena Locklear.

Unrecognized organizations

[edit]

Some unrecognized organizations identify as being Lumbee. One, the United Lumbee Nation of North Carolina and America, based in Exeter, California, petitioned for federal recognition in 1980.[112] The final determination was that the group "does not exist as an Indian tribe" and that they did not descend from any Lumbee community.[113]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Works cited

[edit]

Books

[edit]

Journal articles

[edit]

Primary sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The is a state-recognized Native American tribe comprising approximately 55,000 enrolled members, the largest such group east of the , primarily residing in Robeson, Hoke, , and counties in the southeastern part of the state. The tribe derives its name from the Lumbee River and traces its formal recognition as an to an state law, though historical records document their ancestors as a mixed-race often classified as "free persons of color" or in 19th-century censuses, with claims of descent from Siouan-speaking tribes, , or the Lost Colony of Roanoke that have shifted over time and lack corroboration from continuous pre-colonial tribal continuity. While self-identifying as indigenous, empirical assessments including autosomal DNA analyses of sampled individuals reveal predominantly European and African genetic ancestries, averaging around 4 percent Native American components, challenging narratives of distinct tribal purity and highlighting admixture from colonial-era interactions. In 1956, the U.S. passed the Lumbee Act acknowledging their Indian status but explicitly withholding full federal tribal benefits and requiring further administrative determination of origins, a limitation that persists despite state-level affirmation and recent federal legislative pushes, including a January 2025 presidential memorandum and a 2025 House-passed measure advancing toward potential full recognition. The tribe maintains cultural practices such as annual powwows and homecomings, alongside notable historical episodes like the 1958 armed disruption of a rally by Lumbee men, which underscored their resilience amid racial tensions.

Historical Background

Colonial and 18th-Century Presence

The earliest recorded land grants to individuals ancestral to the Lumbee in the Robeson County region occurred in the 1730s, when King George II issued patents to Henry Berry and James Lowrie in 1732, followed by a grant to James Lowrie in 1738 for property east of the in Lowrie Swamp. These transactions, situated along waterways like Drowning Creek (a of the ), reflect initial settlement by mixed-race groups in what became Robeson County, then part of Bladen County. By 1750, Henry Berry received additional grants in south-central , including areas now within Robeson, indicating expanding land claims amid colonial expansion. Colonial from 1754 document a "mixed crew" of squatters on Drowning Creek, described by Bladen County militia leader Colonel Rutherford as lawless inhabitants evading authority, suggesting the formation of independent, mixed-race communities in isolated swamp lands. These groups, often labeled mulattoes or in legal documents, secured further grants in the 1750s–1770s, such as Robert Sweat's 1754 patent on Shoe Heel Swamp and John Locklear's 1764 deed east of Long Swamp. Land ownership enabled avoidance of enslavement, as free status under colonial law permitted transactions without re-enslavement risks, fostering self-reliant agrarian settlements. By the mid-18th century, distinct communities had emerged along the , with deeds proliferating in the 1760s–1790s to bearers of surnames like Braveboy (1767, Mill Prong of Raft Swamp), Lowery (1767, same area), Chavers (1772, east of Drowning Creek), and Locklear (1779, south of Ashpole Swamp). Interactions with colonial officials remained sparse, confined largely to land patents and tax rolls, where these free persons of color were noted separately from white settlers and enslaved Africans, highlighting their liminal status in a biracial colonial framework. This pattern of frontier isolation along riverine swamps supported community cohesion by the 1770s, predating Robeson's formal county establishment in 1787.

Antebellum Developments

The ancestors of the Lumbee inhabited the swampy, marginal lowlands of , particularly along the , where poor soil and isolation limited integration into the broader . They practiced akin to that of neighboring white smallholders, cultivating crops like corn and raising livestock on small plots, while supplementing livelihoods through , , and occasional timber work in the wetlands. This geographic fostered social cohesion and autonomy, shielding communities from the intensifying slave-based cotton production that dominated fertile eastern regions by the and . Official records, including federal censuses and state tax , routinely classified these groups as "free persons of color," a broad category encompassing mulattoes and individuals of mixed ancestry, reflecting white authorities' reluctance to acknowledge separate Indian status amid rising racial binaries post-Nat Turner's 1831 rebellion. In the 1830 and 1850 U.S. Censuses for Robeson County, hundreds of households bearing surnames later linked to Lumbee families—such as Oxendine, Locklear, and Chavers—were enumerated under this rubric, often without slaves or large landholdings. Despite such impositions, community members asserted a distinct Indian identity, resisting reclassification as "" or "" through local disputes and court challenges that tested exclusionary laws. The 1835 constitution explicitly disenfranchised free persons of color, revoking voting rights and militia participation, which applied to these groups and heightened their liminal position. Notable cases included State v. Oxendine in June 1837, State v. Noel Locklear in 1853, and proceedings against William Chavers in 1857, where defendants contested non-Indian labels to preserve communal separation from both white and Black populations.

Civil War Era and the Lowry War

During the , Lumbee men in , faced by the into forced labor battalions, including work on fortifications such as near Wilmington, under harsh conditions with high mortality rates. Many Lumbee, including members of the Lowry family, evaded these drafts by hiding in the swamps along the , reflecting broader community resistance to Confederate authority among non-slaveholding Native families who held no stake in the plantation system. This evasion stemmed from practical survival needs and opposition to , as Lumbee were often classified as "free persons of color" and targeted for menial labor without combat exemptions afforded to whites. Tensions escalated in 1864 when , a young Lumbee man born around 1845, killed two individuals: one who accused him of hog theft—a common pretext for property disputes against Native families—and a officer who had insulted and mistreated women in the Lowry community. In retaliation, the arrested Allen Lowry, Henry's father, and his brother William, subjecting them to a sham trial on March 3, 1865, for alleged theft and murder before executing them extrajudicially by forcing them to dig their own graves and shooting them. These killings, occurring amid the war's final months, ignited the Lowry War, as Henry assumed leadership of a guerrilla band comprising primarily Lumbee members, along with some and at least one white ally, initiating raids against units, Confederate officials, and sympathizers. The band's actions were driven by revenge for the executions, ongoing threats, and defense against property seizures and racial oppression, rather than mere criminality, as evidenced by their selective targeting of authorities and wealth redistribution to poorer community members. From 1865 through 1871, the Lowry Band conducted persistent raids, ambushing pursuers, robbing plantations of wealthy Confederates, and evading capture through community support in Robeson County's rugged terrain, which solidified Lumbee collective resilience against external coercion. Governor William W. declared Henry Berry Lowry an outlaw in 1868, and by 1871, the offered a $10,000 bounty, yet federal artillery deployments and militia efforts, such as Colonel Wishart's operations, failed to dismantle the group, capturing only peripheral members. The band's survival underscored causal factors of familial loyalty, geographic advantage, and widespread Lumbee sympathy, forged from shared experiences of marginalization, culminating in Lowry's unexplained disappearance in early 1872 after a final raid, which effectively ended the conflict. This era marked a pivotal assertion of for the Lumbee, transforming localized resistance into a legendary narrative of defiance.

Reconstruction and State Recognition Efforts

Following the Civil War and during the , the Indians of Robeson County pursued political strategies to assert a distinct identity amid intensifying racial binaries, rejecting classification alongside freed Blacks or full assimilation with whites. Community leaders, including figures like James Dial, lobbied state officials to acknowledge their Indian heritage, emphasizing descent from earlier indigenous groups to justify separation from the emerging Jim Crow segregation framework. This maneuvering was driven by practical needs, such as access to public resources denied under post-1875 constitutional amendments that segregated schools for whites and Blacks but omitted provisions for Indians, effectively barring them from white institutions while associating them with colored facilities. By the early , these advocacy efforts coalesced around demands for legal recognition and separate institutional status, with petitions highlighting the group's self-identification as Indians unaffiliated with African descent. Refusal to enroll children in schools for free persons of color underscored their resistance to binary racial categorization, prompting alliances with Democratic legislators seeking to consolidate power in counties. Local opposition arose from some white residents and officials wary of diluting segregation's , who argued the group exhibited mixed ancestry and should remain in the "colored" category to preserve . These pressures culminated in state acknowledgment on February 10, 1885, when the enacted Chapter 92 of the Session Laws, officially designating the "Indians of Robeson County" as Indians—referencing the Croatan tribe linked to colonial-era narratives—and granting for distinct schools and governance structures. This legislation marked initial state-level validation of their claims, though it imposed ongoing navigation of segregation laws that tested the durability of their intermediate status against persistent local skepticism and binary enforcement.

Establishment of Indian Schools

In response to the lack of educational opportunities for Indian children in North Carolina's emerging segregated public school system post-Civil War, the state legislature recognized the Indians—precursors to the Lumbee—in 1885 and authorized a distinct school system for them. This culminated on March 7, 1887, when the General Assembly passed legislation establishing the Normal School in Robeson County as a teacher-training specifically for Indian youth, following petitions from community leaders emphasizing their separate ethnic status. The school operated as a state-funded entity within a tripartite segregation framework—separate from white and Black systems—receiving appropriations from county and state taxes allocated for Indian education, which supported construction of a building and basic operations. Its curriculum focused on elementary instruction and normal training to produce certified teachers, reinforcing community self-sufficiency amid Jim Crow-era restrictions that barred Indians from white schools while distinguishing them from Black ones. By the early , additional Indian schools proliferated in Robeson and adjacent counties, funded through similar mechanisms and governed by Indian-elected committees to maintain . These institutions played a pivotal role in elevating literacy rates among Lumbee children, who previously faced informal or no schooling, with enrollment growing from dozens in the 1890s to hundreds by the 1920s as state per-pupil funding enabled expansion. Graduates, often serving as educators and administrators within the Indian school network, cultivated leadership cadres that advocated for tribal interests, including subsequent recognition efforts, though the system's isolation limited broader academic resources until desegregation in the 1950s.

Confrontation with the Ku Klux Klan

On January 18, 1958, amid heightened activity in the Southeast following the 1954 decision, Klan leader James W. "Catfish" Cole organized a rally near Hayes Pond in Maxton, , an area with a significant Lumbee population. Cole, the Grand Dragon of the Klan, aimed to intimidate local residents through cross burnings and speeches promoting , drawing about 50 Klansmen equipped with robes and a wooden cross. Word of the planned event spread quickly among Lumbee communities, prompting an estimated 400 to 500 armed Lumbee men—many carrying rifles, shotguns, and pistols—to converge on the site, organized informally under leaders including Simeon Oxendine. The confrontation escalated rapidly as Lumbee participants surrounded the Klansmen, firing warning shots into the air and dismantling the rally setup. Oxendine and others seized Klan , including the cross, robes, and a Confederate flag-draped , with Oxendine famously wrapping himself in the captured cloth amid cheers from the crowd. Panicked Klansmen fled into the pond and surrounding woods, abandoning their vehicles and equipment; no fatalities occurred, though minor injuries were reported from the chaos. Cole escaped but later surrendered to authorities. National media outlets, including Life magazine and the , covered the event extensively, framing it as a decisive Lumbee that exposed Klan vulnerability and highlighted the community's resolve against . In the legal aftermath, eight Lumbee individuals faced charges such as carrying concealed weapons and public drunkenness, but all were either acquitted or had charges dismissed due to lack of evidence or sympathetic local juries. Cole, however, was arrested, tried, and convicted of incitement to riot, receiving a two-year sentence that effectively curtailed Klan organizing in the region. The incident fostered widespread local pride among Lumbee residents, symbolizing effective against external threats and reinforcing communal solidarity without reliance on external intervention.

Initial Federal Interactions and the Lumbee Act

The (BIA) conducted multiple investigations into the status of the Indians of Robeson County and adjoining areas beginning in the early , prompted by state legislative petitions and congressional bills seeking federal acknowledgment. A key inquiry followed a U.S. resolution on April 28, 1914, directing the Office of Indian Affairs to examine their conditions and educational needs; O.M. McPherson's subsequent report detailed their segregated schools but did not recommend extension of federal services. Over the period from 1912 to 1956, the BIA produced 11 reports in response to recognition proposals, consistently affirming the group's Indian descent from Siouan-speaking coastal tribes such as the and their continuous community residence along the since European contact, yet these assessments highlighted the absence of treaties, reservations, or established federal oversight, precluding eligibility for benefits like enrollment under the of 1934. In the 1930s, limited applications for enrollment yielded only partial approvals—22 out of 209 applicants in 1939 met blood quantum criteria—reflecting BIA skepticism toward broader tribal continuity for service provision absent a historical government-to-government relationship. Legislative attempts in the 1910s through 1930s, including bills designating the group as "," "," or "Siouan" Indians, failed to pass, as federal officials emphasized the lack of prior recognition or land base despite acknowledged Indian ancestry. This pattern of affirmation without action culminated in the Lumbee Act (Public Law 84-570), enacted on June 7, 1956, which officially named the Indians of Robeson, Hoke, , and Robeson counties, along with related groups in Alamance, Cumberland, and Sampson counties, as the Lumbee Indians of and acknowledged their descent from . The law simultaneously terminated their prior informal designation as "Cherokee Indians of Robeson County" under a 1913 state act and stipulated that "nothing in this Act shall make such Indians eligible for any services performed by the for Indians because of their status as Indians," while excluding them from population counts for federal Indian program allocations. The Act's structure embodied a paradoxical federal acknowledgment—affirming ethnic Indian identity while barring access to services and benefits—enacted amid the U.S. government's termination policy era (roughly –1968), which sought to assimilate Indian groups by ending special federal trusteeships for those or treaties, thereby curtailing new fiscal commitments during a period of broader and anti-communist domestic reforms. Congressional records indicate the measure aimed to resolve ongoing naming disputes and state-federal tensions without expanding obligations, preserving a limited acknowledgment that avoided the administrative recognition process later formalized in 1978.

Efforts Toward Federal Recognition

Early 20th-Century Petitions and Reports

In 1915, representatives of the Indians of Robeson County, later known as the Lumbee, petitioned of Indian Affairs for federal acknowledgment and educational support, claiming descent from the Lost Colony of Roanoke and continuous presence in the region. The petition was denied by Commissioner Cato Sells, who cited the absence of any prior relations, reservation lands, or documented federal oversight as disqualifying factors, emphasizing that federal jurisdiction required historical government-to-government ties rather than self-identification alone. This decision underscored evidentiary gaps, including no records of the group maintaining distinct tribal political structures under federal purview since colonial times. During the 1930s, amid the Indian Reorganization Act's push for tribal consolidation, Lumbee leaders renewed petitions to the (BIA) for services and recognition, submitting affidavits from elders attesting to unbroken community cohesion and separation from white and Black populations in Robeson County. In response, the BIA commissioned anthropological investigations, including field studies by researchers such as Anton V. Williams and later reviews, which documented evidence of through oral histories, physical traits, and local customs but noted pervasive intermarriage with European and African-descended individuals, resulting in mixed heritage without a singular tribal origin or centralized governance. These reports, while affirming Indian elements in the population's identity, highlighted the lack of continuous political organization or distinct reservation-based existence, leading BIA officials to withhold support on grounds that the group did not constitute a cohesive under federal criteria. Lumbee advocates countered these findings by stressing persistent endogamy, shared schools, and resistance to assimilation as proxies for tribal continuity, arguing that historical marginalization by state and federal policies had obscured formal structures rather than negated them. Nonetheless, the BIA's 1934–1936 assessments, drawing on four separate ethnological inquiries, concluded that while individuals exhibited Indian traits, the absence of unified or treaty-derived precluded collective eligibility for reorganization benefits, perpetuating the denial pattern from earlier decades. These pre-World War II exchanges revealed tensions between community-based claims and bureaucratic demands for documentary proof of pre-contact continuity or federal superintendence.

Impact of the Indian New Deal

In the wake of the (IRA) of June 18, 1934, which aimed to restore tribal self-government, restore lands, and promote economic development for federally recognized tribes, Indians in —later known as Lumbee—sought to organize under its provisions to establish a formal tribal structure and access benefits like land trusts and charters. Local leaders petitioned the (BIA) for inclusion, viewing the IRA as an opportunity to formalize their community amid ongoing economic hardship during the , but the effort faced immediate scrutiny due to their non-reservation status and lack of prior federal oversight. BIA Commissioner John Collier dispatched Fred A. to Robeson in 1935 to investigate claims of Siouan ancestry and eligibility for IRA organization, prompted by proposals for a resettlement to alleviate through federal aid. 's July 9, 1935, report detailed a population of approximately 7,500 individuals maintaining social separation from whites and blacks, with evidence of Indian bloodlines tracing to pre-colonial Siouan groups like the , but emphasized extensive intermarriage, absence of a unified tribal government, and no historical reservation, rendering them ineligible for full IRA tribal reorganization. administration, while sympathetic to their Indian identity, affirmed 's findings, recognizing only 22 individuals as qualifying Indians for minimal services but explicitly barring the group from tribal status, land provisions, or economic programs under the IRA, as they failed criteria requiring continuous federal-tribal relations. The rejection underscored the IRA's emphasis on reservation-based tribes, forcing Lumbee leaders to pivot toward localized adaptations, including enhanced community councils and petitions to state authorities for educational and welfare support, which bolstered internal cohesion without federal backing. This period marked a causal shift: while denying immediate resources, federal scrutiny via Baker's report lent empirical validation to their distinct Indian descent, informing subsequent claims of Siouan heritage and sustaining efforts despite the policy's exclusionary framework. Local initiatives, such as expanded Indian boarding schools, drew partial funding through state channels, fostering resilience but highlighting the limitations of IRA applicability to non-reservation communities.

Post-1956 Recognition Campaigns

Following the 1956 Lumbee Act, which acknowledged the Lumbee as Indians but explicitly barred them from eligibility for federal services and benefits provided to other federally recognized tribes, Lumbee advocates pursued administrative recognition through the (BIA) in the as the agency developed formalized acknowledgment procedures. However, the BIA denied the Lumbee access to this process, citing the 1956 statute's limitations on their tribal status, which prevented evaluation under criteria requiring continuous existence as a distinct descended from a historical with prior federal dealings. This rebuff highlighted federal toward the Lumbee's claims of tribal continuity, as the Act had designated them without a specific tribal affiliation or reservation history, fueling arguments that they lacked the evidentiary foundation for full acknowledgment. In response to these barriers and the absence of federal support, Lumbee leaders established the Lumbee Regional Development Association (LRDA) in 1968 as a nonprofit entity chartered by to promote economic self-sufficiency and community services in Robeson, Hoke, and counties. The LRDA focused on initiatives such as , , and job , drawing limited federal funds available to non-recognized groups under programs like the Economic Opportunity Act, while advocating for expanded eligibility amid state-federal disparities where provided some Indian-specific aid but could not replicate federal benefits like health services or land trusts. This self-help approach underscored tensions over benefits, as Lumbee eligibility for certain state resources clashed with federal exclusions, prompting campaigns to amend the 1956 Act or secure standalone legislation for parity with tribes receiving and support. The national Red Power movement of the 1960s and 1970s further galvanized Lumbee efforts, inspiring local mobilization for political organization and cultural assertion against both federal inaction and lingering state-level discrimination. Activists drew on this era's emphasis on tribal sovereignty to lobby Congress for bills extending recognition beyond the 1956 framework, though these legislative pushes faced resistance from federal agencies wary of setting precedents for groups without documented pre-contact tribal governance or treaties. Such advocacy highlighted causal frictions: the Lumbee's numerical strength (over 40,000 self-identified members by the 1970s) and state backing contrasted with evidentiary gaps in federal criteria, perpetuating a cycle where administrative denials reinforced the need for targeted bills while state support mitigated but did not resolve economic dependencies.

Contemporary Legislative Pushes (1980s–2010s)

Legislative efforts to grant full federal recognition to the Lumbee Tribe intensified in the 1980s, with the introduction of S. 901, the Lumbee Recognition Act, in the 101st Congress on May 3, 1989, which sought to extend federal acknowledgment and eligibility for services to the tribe while prohibiting gaming activities. Similar bills followed in the 1990s, including a measure passed by the House in 1993 that aimed to amend the 1956 Lumbee Act to remove restrictions on federal benefits. These initiatives highlighted bipartisan support in the House but encountered consistent stalls in the Senate, often due to concerns over bypassing the Department of the Interior's administrative recognition process. In the 2000s, pushes continued with H.R. 898 introduced in the 108th and H.R. 65 in the 110th , the latter passing the on June 7, 2007, by a wide margin after committee approval. The bill's companion, S. 333, underscored alliances within the delegation, including testimony from figures like Senator and Representative , who emphasized the tribe's longstanding state recognition since 1885 as a proxy for federal acknowledgment. Despite this congressional momentum, executive branch opposition from the Department of the Interior persisted, citing insufficient evidence of continuous tribal governance and community under federal criteria. The 2010s saw further attempts, such as H.R. 31 in the 111th Congress, introduced on January 6, 2009, and passed by the on June 4, 2009, as part of a package recognizing multiple tribes. President expressed support for Lumbee recognition, yet the bill failed to advance in the amid procedural hurdles and inter-tribal concerns. North Carolina senators, including later efforts aligned with from 2015 onward, framed the Lumbee's case around historical continuity and state-level precedents, though full enactment remained elusive through the Obama administration, reflecting a pattern of strong backing contrasted by senatorial and administrative barriers.

Developments in the 2020s

In January 2025, Representative introduced H.R. 474, the Lumbee Fairness Act, aimed at amending the 1956 Lumbee Act to grant full federal recognition to the , thereby extending eligibility for services and benefits available to members of other federally recognized tribes. On September 10, 2025, the passed the Fiscal Year 2026 (H.R. 3838), incorporating the Lumbee Fairness Act via H.Amdt.98, marking a significant legislative advancement for the tribe's long-standing recognition campaign. As of October 2025, the amended NDAA awaits consideration, with proponents expressing optimism due to Republican majorities in both chambers following the 2024 elections, potentially facilitating passage without the stringent administrative criteria imposed by the . This momentum builds on a January 2025 presidential directing the Department of the Interior to pursue recognition, though subsequent agency review in August 2025 redirected efforts toward congressional action amid procedural challenges. Federal recognition efforts have encountered persistent opposition from several federally recognized tribes, including the , who argue that granting status to the Lumbee would dilute limited federal resources allocated for tribes with documented continuous governmental and cultural existence since first European contact. Critics among Native American organizations further contend that the Lumbee's historical claims lack substantiation under the administrative acknowledgment process, potentially undermining the integrity of federal criteria designed to verify tribal authenticity and prevent resource strain on programs serving approximately 574 recognized tribes.

Theories of Ethnic Origins

Lost Colony of Roanoke Hypothesis

In 1885, North Carolina legislator Hamilton McMillan proposed that the Lumbee people descended from survivors of the Roanoke Lost Colony, who allegedly intermarried with local Croatan Indians and migrated inland to the Lumber River region by around 1650. McMillan's theory, elaborated in his 1888 pamphlet Sir Walter Raleigh's Lost Colony, drew on linguistic similarities, such as the presence of "Croatan" in local place names like Croatan Sound and the self-designation of some Lumbee families as "Croatans" in the mid-19th century, to argue for a direct English-Indian admixture preserving colonial surnames and customs. He posited that these mixed descendants maintained a distinct identity amid colonial disruptions, avoiding full assimilation into either European or other Native groups. The evidential foundation of McMillan's hypothesis rests primarily on circumstantial observations rather than contemporary documents or artifacts linking specific Roanoke colonists to 19th-century Lumbee ancestors. No archaeological finds, such as European-style artifacts in Lumbee settlements datable to the late , substantiate the migration narrative, and colonial records from Jamestown expeditions, including those by John Smith in 1607–1609, report no confirmed sightings of white-Indian hybrids matching the described profile. Genealogical scrutiny reveals minimal overlap between documented Roanoke passenger lists—featuring surnames like Dare, , and Harvie—and prevalent Lumbee family names such as , Oxendine, and Locklear, undermining claims of direct patrilineal descent. McMillan's interpretation amplified anecdotal white ancestry assertions common among eastern U.S. Indian groups seeking social distinction, but it lacks primary sources tying these to the 1587 Roanoke abandonment. This hypothesis gained traction in 19th-century Lumbee advocacy efforts, particularly to secure state-funded Indian schools separate from black and white institutions amid post-Reconstruction . McMillan, representing Robeson County in the , leveraged the theory to portray Lumbee as civilized descendants of English explorers, facilitating the 1885 establishment of the Normal School (later Pembroke State University) and influencing self-identification as "Croatan Indians" in the 1880 . While politically expedient for elevating Lumbee status against discriminatory policies, the theory's speculative nature—prioritizing romantic narrative over verifiable records—has been critiqued as a constructed origin tailored to contemporary needs rather than historical .

Claims of Cherokee Ancestry

The Indians of Robeson County asserted Cherokee ancestry through oral traditions dating to the late 19th century, positing descent from Cherokee groups that purportedly migrated eastward from Appalachian strongholds to the during or after colonial conflicts like the (1711–1715). These narratives, propagated by local leaders and historian Hamilton McMillan, linked figures such as John Lowery—a purported Cherokee treaty signer in 1806 with descendants in the area—to the community's lineage. By 1911–1913, amid dissatisfaction with the "Croatan" label's pejorative connotations, the group petitioned the legislature for redesignation as the "Cherokee Indians of Robeson County," a change enacted in 1913 to facilitate state schooling and federal outreach. Cherokee historical territory, however, encompassed the southern —spanning western 's mountains, eastern , northern Georgia, and parts of South Carolina's upcountry—with primary settlements along rivers like the and Hiwassee, far removed from the Atlantic coastal plain. No colonial maps, explorer accounts, or archaeological findings document villages, migrations, or sustained presence in the lowlands of southeastern , including Robeson County's vicinity, which lies over 250 miles east of core areas. Ethnographic records from the 18th and early 19th centuries, including treaty negotiations and missionary reports, similarly omit any eastward displacement to coastal zones, rendering such claims historically implausible absent supporting evidence. The U.S. Department of the Interior's 1915 investigation by Special Indian Agent O.M. McPherson rejected Cherokee affiliation, attributing Robeson County origins instead to intermixtures of English colonists from Roanoke's 1587 Lost Colony and local coastal groups like the Hatteras Indians, who migrated inland by circa 1650. McPherson highlighted geographic disconnection—"no tradition that [Cherokees] ever occupied the coast country in North Carolina"—and cultural divergences, including the community's English monolingualism, sedentary farming, and lack of Iroquoian language or matrilineal clans typical of Cherokee society. Eastern Cherokee representatives corroborated this, stating the groups "have had nothing whatever to do with" one another, leading to denial of tribal rights or appropriations. Subsequent federal reviews, including 1914 Senate hearings, found no basis for Cherokee-linked entitlements.

Siouan and Cheraw Connections

The , a Siouan-speaking tribe historically located in the region of present-day and , experienced significant dispersal in the mid-18th century due to conflicts, epidemics, and colonial pressures. A 1725 map by colonial surveyor John Herbert depicted Cheraw settlements extending into areas that would later become , suggesting early presence near the proto-Lumbee communities. By 1759, a outbreak decimated their numbers, and the last independent record of the Cheraw as a distinct group dates to 1768, following interactions with colonial authorities that fragmented their remnants. Historians have hypothesized that surviving Cheraw families migrated northward and integrated into mixed Indian communities along the in Robeson County during the late , contributing to the ethnic formation of groups later as Lumbee. This absorption posits that post-1768 dispersal led some Cheraw to join Siouan remnants, such as the Saura or Keyauwee, amid broader regional upheavals from warfare and land cessions. Anthropologist Robert K. Thomas, in his 1970s research on Lumbee origins, acknowledged partial descent from Cheraw-linked Chavis lineages but found no comprehensive tribal continuity, describing the Siouan amalgamation model as a plausible but indirect rather than proven linkage. Ethnographic studies, including those by state investigators in the early , supported Siouan roots primarily through geographic overlap and family surnames, though direct of mass absorption remains sparse. Linguistic evidence for Siouan connections is limited to speculative remnants, with no preserved Cheraw or Eastern Siouan dialect among Lumbee descendants, who adopted English by the 19th century. Place names in the Robeson , such as those evoking indigenous terms, have been interpreted by some linguists as faint echoes of Siouan , but these lack definitive attribution and could stem from multiple language families. Overall, while anthropological assessments view Siouan elements as a foundational layer in select Lumbee lineages, the connections rely on circumstantial migration patterns rather than unbroken cultural transmission, with critiques noting the absence of archaeological or oral traditions substantiating exclusive Cheraw ties.

Keyauwee and Other Small Tribe Theories

The Keyauwee, a small Siouan tribe inhabiting the region of near the Uwharrie and Deep Rivers in the late 17th century, numbered fewer than 200 individuals by 1701 according to explorer John Lawson's accounts of their palisaded village. Facing pressures from intertribal conflicts, colonial expansion, and epidemics, the Keyauwee undertook migrations in the early 1700s, relocating eastward toward the and coastal areas, with some groups documented near the by 1702. John R. Swanton hypothesized in the mid-20th century that survivors of these displacements, rather than fully joining the Catawba Nation, contributed to isolated communities in Robeson County, forming a demographic base for the Lumbee alongside other fragmented Siouan remnants. Colonial records provide sparse but corroborative evidence of Keyauwee movements, including Alexander Spotswood's 1716 proposal to resettle them with the Eno and Sara tribes along the frontier near present-day Enotown, amid the disruptions of the (1711–1713). Maps and surveys from the era, such as those referencing their alliance with the and , depict their shift from inland villages to more peripheral lowlands, potentially allowing small bands to evade larger confederacies and persist in the watershed. However, no continuous genealogical or linguistic records link Keyauwee directly to Lumbee families, rendering the theory reliant on inferred continuity from geographic overlap and the absence of ties to dominant tribes. Parallel hypotheses extend to other diminutive extinct tribes, such as the Shakori and Eno, which similarly dispersed from strongholds during the same period of upheaval. These groups, often numbering under 100 by the , appear in fragmented colonial dispatches as merging into alliances or scattering into remote settlements, with some scholars positing their absorption into proto-Lumbee enclaves to account for the latter's lack of preserved Siouan dialects or centralized political structures. Such theories emphasize causal factors like warfare-induced depopulation and colonial buffer zones, which fostered survival through isolation rather than assimilation, though archaeological and documentary traces remain inconclusive beyond 18th-century mentions.

Multi-Tribal or Mixed Ancestry Model

The multi-tribal or mixed ancestry model interprets the Lumbee as a creolized population formed through the intermarriage of remnant indigenous groups from multiple linguistic families (including Siouan, Algonquian, and Iroquoian speakers), , and individuals of African descent in the isolated swamps and frontiers of southern during the 18th and early 19th centuries. This framework, articulated in mid-20th-century anthropological studies of "tri-racial isolates," highlights how social fluidity in frontier zones enabled racial mixing, followed by within secluded communities to maintain separation from and Black populations. Scholars such as Brewton Berry described these groups, including the Lumbee, as exhibiting variable admixtures where indigenous elements were often overshadowed by European and African contributions, leading to physical and social traits that defied binary racial classifications. U.S. census records from the antebellum period provide empirical documentation of this admixture among Lumbee ancestors in Robeson County. In the 1850 , numerous households bearing surnames later associated with the Lumbee—such as Locklear and —were classified as "mulatto" or "free ," terms denoting persons of mixed and parentage under census instructions that lumped non-white mixtures together regardless of indigenous input. Similarly, the 1860 enumerated comparable families with designations reflecting interracial unions, with tax lists and records from the era reinforcing mulatto status for the majority, indicating that African-European mixing preceded or coincided with any consolidated indigenous identity. These records underscore a pattern of regional coalescence, where diverse migrants—indigenous refugees fleeing colonial wars, indentured Europeans, and escaped or free Africans—intermarried in lowlands offering refuge from stricter racial enforcement elsewhere. This model contrasts with single-tribe descent narratives by prioritizing historical processes of isolation and hybridization over primordial tribal continuity, positing the Lumbee as one of over 200 documented U.S. racial isolates that developed distinct intermediate statuses. It aligns with demographer Calvin Beale's cataloging of tri-racial communities, where the Lumbee were grouped with others like the Melungeons based on shared genealogical patterns of multi-source ancestry rather than linguistic or cultural ties to a specific pre-contact . Consequently, the model complicates federal recognition standards under the and subsequent criteria, which proof of descent from a historical tribe maintaining political cohesion, as mixed isolate formation implies a post-contact ethnogenesis without such verifiable continuity. Proponents argue this view better explains the absence of a retained indigenous language or centralized governance in early records, attributing community persistence to adaptive racial ambiguity amid slavery and Jim Crow segregation.

Genetic and Anthropological Evidence

Genetic studies of Lumbee individuals, primarily through Y-chromosome, mitochondrial, and autosomal DNA analysis, reveal a predominant admixture of European and sub-Saharan African ancestry, with Native American markers present but variable and typically low, averaging 4–20% in autosomal estimates across tested samples. Y-DNA haplogroups in Lumbee regional projects are overwhelmingly European (e.g., R1b, I1) or African (e.g., E1b1a), comprising about 96% of lineages, with minimal Native-specific markers like Q-M3. Autosomal results from commercial testing and targeted projects similarly show European components at 50–80%, African at 10–30%, and Native American at 0–20%, lacking uniformity that would indicate descent from a single pre-colonial tribe such as the Cheraw or Keyauwee. These patterns align with tri-racial isolate groups like the Melungeons, where post-contact intermixing dilutes any original Native genetic signal without evidence of bottled-up endogamy preserving distinct tribal haplogroups. Anthropological examinations, including physical anthropology from the mid-20th century and ethnographic work, support a post-contact ethnogenesis for the Lumbee, characterized by the coalescence of diverse ancestries in isolated southeastern North Carolina communities rather than continuity from a unified indigenous polity. Early serological and craniometric studies classified Lumbee physical traits as intermediate between European and African, with limited Native indicators, leading to estimates of majority non-Native admixture. Ethnographers like Karen Blu describe Lumbee identity as emerging from shared regional kinship and resistance to binary racial categorization in the Jim Crow South, without archaeological or oral traditions evidencing preserved tribal structures, languages, or ceremonies from pre-1600s groups. Consensus among anthropologists holds that the group's formation involved remnant Native survivors integrating with colonial-era free persons of color and whites, fostering a distinct "Indian" category sustained by endogamy and self-identification rather than verifiable descent from any documented historical tribe.

Skepticism and Critiques of Origin Narratives

The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) has repeatedly denied Lumbee petitions for federal recognition, citing failure to meet mandatory criteria under 25 C.F.R. Part 83, including evidence of descent from a historical tribe with continuous community existence since first sustained contact, maintenance of political influence over members, and distinct cultural practices such as a unique language or traditional governance structures. The Lumbee lack historical treaties with the federal government, have never maintained a reservation, and possess no aboriginal language, relying instead on English with regional dialects shared by non-tribal neighbors. Historical records document multiple shifts in Lumbee self-identification, undermining claims of unbroken tribal continuity from a specific pre-colonial group. Initially designated "Croatan Indians" by North Carolina legislation in 1885, the group petitioned for federal acknowledgment by associating with the Croatan tribe mentioned in 1580s colonial accounts; this name was abandoned by 1911 due to its pejorative connotations. Subsequent rebrandings included "Cherokee Indians of Robeson County" in 1913 and "Siouan Indians" in the 1930s, before adopting "Lumbee" in 1956 via congressional act, reflecting adaptation to contemporary political opportunities rather than fixed ancestral ties. Anthropologists and federal reviewers have noted these inconsistencies as evidence of ethnogenesis in the 19th century amid post-Civil War racial classifications, rather than descent from a singular indigenous polity. Recognized tribes, particularly the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, have voiced strong opposition to Lumbee recognition, arguing it would validate unsubstantiated claims and strain limited federal resources allocated to verified indigenous groups. Eastern Band Principal Chief Michell Hicks testified in 2020 that the Lumbee's "shifting claims" to ancestries including Cherokee, Siouan, and Lost Colony survivors lack verifiable historical or genealogical support, potentially enabling non-indigenous individuals to access benefits intended for tribes with documented pre-1778 continuity. The Cherokee Nation and Choctaw Nation echoed these concerns in a 2020 letter to Congress, warning that bypassing BIA standards for the Lumbee—whose members show predominant European and African admixture in available genetic surveys—could dilute services for tribes meeting rigorous evidentiary thresholds. Such critiques, grounded in tribal sovereignty interests, highlight risks of precedent for other groups fabricating indigenous identity without empirical substantiation.

Demographics and Socioeconomic Profile

Population Size and Geographic Distribution

The Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina maintains enrollment of approximately 55,000 members, making it the largest state-recognized tribe east of the Mississippi River. This figure reflects self-determined tribal membership criteria, distinct from federal enrollment processes, with updates based on applications and genealogical verification by the tribe's enrollment office. The vast majority of enrolled members reside in southeastern North Carolina, concentrated in Robeson County—where over 38% of the state's Native American population is located—and adjacent Hoke, Cumberland, and Scotland counties. Pembroke, within Robeson County, serves as a central hub for the community. Smaller numbers live elsewhere in the state and beyond, including diaspora populations formed through mid-20th-century migrations to urban centers for employment; notable examples include several thousand Lumbee in Baltimore, Maryland, particularly in areas like Upper Fells Point, stemming from post-World War II labor opportunities in shipyards and factories. U.S. Census Bureau data for American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) populations, including those self-identifying as Lumbee, indicate historical undercounts attributable to inconsistent self-reporting, evolving racial classifications (such as prior designations as "Croatan" or "free people of color"), and lack of federal recognition prompting varied identity assertions. For instance, national AIAN undercounts reached 4.9% in the 2010 Census, with similar challenges persisting due to reliance on self-identification rather than verified tribal affiliation. These factors result in census figures often lower than tribal enrollment totals, though 2020 data showed growth in AIAN self-identification overall.

Community Structure and Settlements

The Lumbee maintain their primary settlements along the Lumber River in Robeson County, North Carolina, with Pembroke emerging as the central hub for community life since the late 19th century. Other key locales include Maxton, Fairmont, Rowland, and Prospect, where Lumbee residents historically formed tight-knit enclaves, often comprising nearly exclusive populations tied to specific riverine and swamp-adjacent lands. These rural concentrations reflect adaptations to geographic isolation, fostering self-sustaining social units centered on shared territory rather than formal administrative boundaries. Social organization among the Lumbee emphasizes extended kinship networks, where identity derives from intergenerational family connections, shared surnames, and localized histories of residence. Relatives frequently cluster in multi-generational households or adjacent properties, reinforcing mutual support systems through obligations of reciprocity and communal storytelling about ancestral places. Churches, predominantly Baptist and Methodist congregations such as those affiliated with the Burnt Swamp Baptist Association founded in 1881, anchor these networks by hosting worship, education, and social events that sustain cohesion across generations. While the majority of Lumbee communities remain rural, reflecting the agrarian character of Robeson County's landscape, migration to urban centers like Baltimore and Lumberton has introduced divides in identity preservation. Rural settlements continue to embody core traditions through place-based kinship, whereas urban Lumbee often replicate church-centered structures to mitigate assimilation pressures and uphold ties to river valley origins. This duality underscores a resilient social fabric, where even dispersed members reference rural homesteads and family churches as anchors of belonging.

Economic Activities and Challenges

The Lumbee community's historical economy centered on subsistence agriculture, including tobacco and cotton farming, supplemented by lumber harvesting in the pine forests of Robeson, Hoke, and Scotland counties, which provided seasonal employment and timber for local mills until the mid-20th century. These activities sustained rural households amid limited infrastructure, though they offered low yields and vulnerability to crop failures and market fluctuations. Transitioning post-World War II, many Lumbee individuals entered manufacturing roles in nearby textile plants and poultry processing facilities, alongside service-sector jobs in education and healthcare concentrated around Pembroke, the tribe's economic hub. Contemporary economic pursuits reflect a diversification into services (such as retail and public administration), light manufacturing, and emerging tourism, with the Lumbee Regional Development Association (LRDA), established in 1968, facilitating workforce training and small business support to foster self-reliance. The tribe's 2025 creation of an Economic Development and Tourism Department aims to expand entrepreneurial opportunities, including vendor markets at events and natural resource ventures, building on prior efforts like the 2022 Agriculture and Natural Resources Department. Pursuits in gaming, such as proposed casinos in southeastern North Carolina, represent a strategic bid for revenue generation, though state legislative barriers have stalled implementation as of 2023. Persistent challenges include elevated poverty rates, with approximately 30% of Robeson County residents—where nearly half identify as Lumbee—living below the federal poverty line, double the North Carolina average of about 13%, and unemployment exceeding the state rate by 40%. These disparities stem causally from inadequate infrastructure, educational attainment gaps, and the absence of federal recognition, which denies access to Bureau of Indian Affairs funding, housing grants, and health services available to federally recognized tribes, perpetuating cycles of food insecurity affecting 34% of county children. Tribal programs like the HUD-funded Resident Opportunities and Self-Sufficiency (ROSS) initiative target housing stability and job placement to mitigate these issues, emphasizing local enterprise over external dependency.

Cultural Practices and Identity

Language and Linguistic Heritage

The Lumbee people possess no surviving indigenous language, having lost their ancestral tongues through extensive intermarriage, early adoption of English for economic and social survival, and lack of geographic isolation from European settlers beginning in the colonial era. This linguistic shift occurred relatively early compared to many other Native groups, with evidence suggesting complete transition to English varieties by the early 19th century, as no records of Native-language use persist in Lumbee oral traditions or documents from that period. In place of a Native language, Lumbee speakers use Lumbee Vernacular English, a dialect closely aligned with broader Southern American English patterns, particularly those influenced by early English, Highland Scots, and Scots-Irish settlers in the Southeast. This variety features distinctive phonological traits, such as non-rhotic pronunciation (e.g., "caar" for car) and vowel shifts, alongside lexical items unique to the community, including "cuz" as a greeting among kin or peers, "toten" denoting a supernatural omen, and "chauld" meaning embarrassed or shy. While some researchers have speculated on substrate influences from lost Siouan or Algonquian languages in isolated archaic terms or grammatical structures (e.g., "I am been there" for "I have been there"), empirical analysis shows minimal transparent evidence of such transfer, attributing most features to regional English evolution rather than direct Native retention. Cultural revival efforts since the late 20th century have centered on documenting and preserving Lumbee English as a marker of ethnic identity, rather than reconstructing extinct indigenous languages, given the absence of fluent speakers or written records. The North Carolina Language and Life Project at North Carolina State University initiated systematic linguistic surveys of Lumbee speech in 1994, producing resources like dialect dictionaries and films such as Indian by Birth: The Lumbee Dialect (2000), which highlight vernacular features to foster community pride and counter assimilation pressures. These initiatives, building on post-1970s federal policies like the Indian Self-Determination Act of 1975 that encouraged tribal cultural programs, have integrated dialect studies into local education but have not pursued bilingual models, as no heritage language exists for dual instruction; instead, they emphasize oral history and vernacular literacy to maintain linguistic distinctiveness amid standardization in schools.

Traditional Events and Festivals

The Lumbee Homecoming, an annual communal gathering, occurs over approximately one week in late June to early July, primarily in Pembroke, North Carolina, emphasizing family reunions, parades, and shared cultural activities that strengthen tribal identity. The event, which began in the late 1960s, marked its 56th iteration from June 30 to July 6, 2025, and includes pageantry, athletic competitions, car shows, food and craft vendors, and a concluding parade. These activities facilitate intergenerational connections by drawing participants from across the Lumbee community, preserving oral histories and social ties amid contemporary influences. The Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina organizes the "Dance of the Harvest Moon" Powwow each fall, blending adopted pan-Indian practices such as competitive dancing and drumming with local customs to affirm cultural continuity. Held September 26-28, 2025, at the Lumbee Tribe Cultural Center in Maxton, the event features drum contests, traditional dances in regalia, and demonstrations of Native arts, attracting participants and spectators to reinforce communal heritage. Through these festivals, younger Lumbee members engage in performances and observations that transmit identity markers, countering assimilation pressures from modernization. Local fairs, such as those integrated into Homecoming, further promote Lumbee-specific traditions like vendor markets showcasing regional crafts and foods, distinct yet complementary to broader Native American powwow elements. These events collectively serve as vital platforms for cultural reinforcement, with attendance often exceeding thousands, underscoring their role in sustaining Lumbee cohesion without reliance on federal recognition structures.

Religious Beliefs and Practices

The Lumbee predominantly practice Protestant Christianity, with Baptist and Methodist denominations being the most common affiliations, alongside smaller Pentecostal groups. This religious orientation reflects historical intermarriage and cultural adaptation post-European contact, where Christianity became integral to community identity by the 19th century. Robeson County, the core of Lumbee settlement, hosts approximately 130 Lumbee churches, underscoring their density and prominence in daily life. Churches function as vital social centers, organizing activities extending beyond Sunday services to include communal events, mutual aid, and political mobilization, a role solidified since the 1800s amid segregation and identity struggles. Lumbee religious life emphasizes Bible study, gospel music, and fervent church attendance, which reinforce kinship ties and moral frameworks within the tribe. Historical records indicate that Baptist and Methodist congregations, such as those established in the Lumber River region during the antebellum period, provided spaces for education and resistance against external racial classifications. Evidence for pre-Christian indigenous rituals among the Lumbee is sparse, as their coalescent tribal formation after colonial disruption prioritized adopted Christian practices over preserved traditional spiritualities; contemporary faith centers on scriptural literalism rather than syncretic elements from potential ancestral sources. While some Lumbee individuals incorporate vague pan-Indian motifs, such as references to a "Great Spirit," these remain marginal and lack institutional endorsement, often clashing with the tribe's entrenched evangelical commitments. Tensions arise when external pan-Indian revival movements advocate reconnecting with pre-colonial rites, viewed by many Lumbee leaders as incompatible with their Bible-centric heritage and post-contact ethnogenesis.

Cuisine and Daily Traditions

Lumbee cuisine centers on hearty, home-cooked dishes utilizing locally available ingredients, reflecting a blend of indigenous foraging and farming practices with rural Southern staples. Common foods include cornbread, collard greens, and chicken with pastry—a thick-noodle stew simmered with chicken broth—that serves as a communal staple during gatherings. The collard sandwich, made by layering boiled collards between slices of cornbread or biscuits, exemplifies resourcefulness in preparing greens harvested from family gardens or wild patches. Pork features prominently, derived from traditional hog killings that historically united families and neighbors in winter processing of livestock for preservation through salting and smoking. Daily traditions emphasize family-centric routines, with extended kin maintaining close, often daily contact through shared meals and labor. Meals are typically prepared and consumed in large, multi-generational settings, fostering social bonds amid rural lifestyles in Robeson County. Hunting persists as a seasonal practice, targeting deer, turkey, and small game in the surrounding woodlands and Lumber River environs, supplementing diets with fresh protein while adhering to local ecology and regulations. Foraging for wild plants and berries continues in limited forms, tied to ancestral knowledge of edible flora, though modern reliance on cultivated crops like corn and sweet potatoes predominates. These foodways incorporate influences from neighboring Scots-Irish settlers in baking techniques and African American communities in greens preparation, resulting in a cuisine that parallels broader Southern patterns without distinct tribal markers. Sweet potatoes, boiled or baked into puddings, round out meals as a versatile root vegetable grown in sandy soils. Preservation methods, such as canning vegetables and drying meats, sustain households through lean periods, underscoring self-reliance in daily provisioning.

Surnames, Kinship, and Social Organization

The Lumbee community features a distinctive set of surnames that reflect historical settlement patterns in Robeson County, North Carolina, with many originating among free persons of color documented in 18th- and early 19th-century records. Common surnames include Locklear, Oxendine, Chavis, Brayboy, Lowry, Hunt, Freeman, and Bullard, which appear frequently in colonial deeds, censuses, and genealogical compilations tracing back to the 1740s. Locklear stands out as the most prevalent surname, comprising a significant portion of Lumbee households and linked to early intermarriages among families of mixed European, African, and Native American descent in the Pee Dee River region. These names often cluster in specific locales, serving as markers of shared ancestry and facilitating identification within the group despite lacking a unified tribal origin narrative. Kinship among the Lumbee operates on bilateral lines, extending beyond nuclear families to encompass broad networks of relatives who maintain regular interaction and mutual support, reinforcing communal identity in the absence of formal clan structures from pre-colonial tribes. This system prioritizes blood ties and affinal relationships, where marriage into Lumbee families historically incorporated outsiders, embedding them within the kinship web and promoting loyalty akin to clan-based solidarity observed in other isolate communities. Extended kin groups emphasize collective welfare, with daily or frequent contact sustaining social cohesion amid external pressures like segregation, as evidenced in mutual aid associations formed in the 20th century. Social organization revolves around these family units, which historically practiced endogamy to delineate boundaries and preserve ethnic distinctiveness during periods of racial classification and exclusion from both white and Black institutions. In-group marriages, concentrated among shared surnames and settlements, minimized admixture and sustained a tri-racial isolate status, as documented in genealogical patterns from the 19th century onward. This endogamous framework, coupled with patrilineal surname transmission, fostered tight-knit, place-based loyalties that underpin Lumbee resilience, though it has also contributed to genetic bottlenecks noted in health studies of the population.

Arts, Crafts, and Material Culture

Lumbee material culture emphasizes handmade crafts adapted from regional Southeastern traditions, including patchwork quilting and basketry. The iconic pinecone quilting pattern, originating from a late-19th-century quilt by Maggie Locklear, features interlocking diamond shapes symbolizing family unity and has become a hallmark of Lumbee identity, incorporated into regalia such as pageant gowns designed by artist Hayes Alan Locklear in the 1970s. Basketry traditions utilize local materials like longleaf pine needles for coiled sewing baskets and river cane or oak splints for utilitarian items, as practiced by artisans such as Loretta Oxendine and Gloria Tara Lowery, who coil needles with tobacco twine to create durable, decorative forms reflecting lowland environmental adaptation. Oral traditions form a core expressive medium, with storytelling conveying kinship histories, moral lessons, and cultural resilience, often integrated into family gatherings and preserved through elders' narratives as documented by scholars like Malinda Maynor Lowery. Music draws from gospel and country influences, blending Protestant hymnody with acoustic instrumentation to transmit communal values; performers like Charly Lowry employ songs rooted in oral histories to sustain these practices amid modernization. Contemporary institutions adapt these elements for preservation and display. The Museum of the Southeast American Indian at the University of North Carolina at Pembroke houses collections of Lumbee quilts, baskets, and related artifacts, fostering educational exhibits on craft techniques and symbolic motifs derived from verified tribal histories. These efforts encourage artisans to incorporate authenticated Lumbee themes, countering generic commercialization while maintaining fidelity to empirical oral and material records.

Governance and Organizational Structure

The Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina

The Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina functions as the central governing authority for its enrolled members, operating from its headquarters at 6984 NC Highway 711 West in Pembroke, North Carolina. The organization's structure includes a tribal council composed of 21 elected representatives, each serving staggered three-year terms from 21 designated districts within the tribe's core service area of Robeson, Hoke, Scotland, and Cumberland counties. This elected body, formalized under the tribe's constitution adopted in 2001, oversees policy-making, resource allocation, and administrative operations to address community needs. Membership in the Lumbee Tribe requires applicants to provide documented evidence of direct biological descent from individuals listed on historical census rolls of the Indians of Robeson County, including the 1885 Croatan roll, 1894 and 1924 supplemental rolls, 1951 Lumbee roll, or 1962 verification list. Enrollment applications are processed through the Office of Tribal Enrollment and Records, with adult applicants required to apply in person; minors may be sponsored by parents or guardians. This descent-based criterion ensures continuity with documented ancestral lines, supporting a membership estimated at over 55,000 individuals primarily residing in southeastern North Carolina. The tribe's operations emphasize service delivery in key areas such as education and health, often through dedicated departments and targeted initiatives. In education, programs like Project IndigeCHOICE, funded by a five-year U.S. Department of Education grant, provide American Indian students with academic support, including summer camps, technology access, counseling, and alternative learning options to improve retention and outcomes. The Health and Human Services department coordinates community health initiatives, including support for mental health, substance misuse prevention, and general wellness services tailored to tribal members' needs. These efforts leverage partnerships with state agencies and federal grants to enhance access without duplicating broader recognition frameworks.

State-Level Recognition and Autonomy

The North Carolina General Assembly enacted legislation on February 10, 1885, recognizing the Indians of Robeson County—ancestors of the Lumbee—as the Croatan Indians, thereby authorizing the creation of a separate public school system exclusively for their children to address prior educational exclusion under state segregation laws. This initial acknowledgment laid the foundation for state-sanctioned tribal separation in education, including the 1887 establishment of the Croatan Normal Indian School (later renamed the University of North Carolina at Pembroke) dedicated to Lumbee teacher training and higher education. On April 20, 1953, the state passed Chapter 874 of the Session Laws, officially designating the group as the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina and affirming their status as an American Indian tribe with a recognized governing body empowered to exercise substantial governmental duties and powers analogous to those of the state in tribal affairs. This statute, codified as G.S. 71A-3, enables internal tribal governance, including elections conducted by a Tribal Elections Board for positions such as chairman, as outlined in the tribe's constitution. The recognition supports tribal oversight of community programs, historical educational institutions, and limited land management, but lacks provisions for sovereign territory like reservations or immunity from state jurisdiction. State-level status provides access to North Carolina-specific benefits, such as eligibility for certain educational funding and state Indian affairs programs, without extending to federal treaty rights or services reserved for fully recognized tribes. Amendments, including those in 2019 via Session Law 2019-162, have reinforced this framework by clarifying tribal rights while maintaining boundaries on autonomy to align with state oversight.

Internal Factions and Unrecognized Groups

Within the broader Lumbee community of Robeson and adjoining counties, several smaller, state-unrecognized groups have emerged as splinter entities, often asserting distinct tribal affiliations such as Tuscarora or Cherokee rather than aligning with the Lumbee designation. These include the Tuscarora Nation of North Carolina, the Tuscarora Tribe of North Carolina, the Eastern Carolina Tuscarora Indian Organization, the Hatteras Tuscarora Tribe, the Cherokees of Robeson and Adjoining Counties, and the Tuscarora Indian Tribe of Drowning Creek Reservation, collectively comprising approximately 1,750 members. Formed largely since the 1970s amid debates over identity and recognition strategies, these groups have pursued independent paths, rejecting enrollment in the primary Lumbee Tribe. A prominent example is the Tuscarora Nation of North Carolina, based in Robeson County, which applied for state recognition in 2019 but was denied by the North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs on grounds that it constituted a "splinter group" derived from the Lumbee population rather than a historically continuous separate entity. Similarly, groups like the Cherokees of Robeson and Adjoining Counties have claimed Cherokee heritage, diverging from Lumbee self-identification despite shared geographic and ancestral overlaps, and have actively opposed federal acknowledgment bills that would consolidate recognition under the Lumbee name to avoid subsumption. These divisions have complicated enrollment processes and leadership cohesion within the Lumbee Tribe since the late 20th century, as competing claims fragment community unity and dilute advocacy for federal status; for instance, the 2009 Lumbee Recognition Act explicitly allowed unenrolled Indians in the region to form separate entities, potentially exacerbating splits. Such factions argue for preservation of alternative historical narratives, including ties to Tuscarora remnants or Cherokee bands, though federal evaluators and the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians have contested these assertions for lacking documented continuity. This internal fragmentation has hindered broader recognition bids by portraying the regional indigenous population as politically divided rather than cohesive.

Federal Status and Implications of Partial Recognition

The Lumbee Act of 1956 (Public Law 84-570) extended limited federal recognition to the Indians of Robeson and adjoining counties in North Carolina, designating them as the Lumbee Indians and affirming their Indian status for certain purposes, but explicitly excluded them from the administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and terminated any prior federal relationship with groups such as the Cherokee Indians of Robeson County. This partial acknowledgment allows eligibility for specific programs, such as BIA higher education grants and loans, but bars access to core services including Indian Health Service (IHS) healthcare, BIA trust land management, and other government-to-government benefits reserved for fully recognized tribes. The Act's structure creates ongoing barriers to full federal acknowledgment through the BIA's administrative process, which requires meeting seven mandatory criteria: continuous Indian identity since first sustained contact with non-Indians; existence as a distinct community from historical times to present; maintenance of political influence or authority; provision of a governing document; descent from a historical tribe or identifiable group; unique historical continuity; and no evidence of state termination of federal status. For the Lumbee, these are unmet primarily due to documented historical discontinuities, including assimilation into broader populations, intermarriage diluting descent lines, and adoption of the Lumbee tribal name only in the mid-20th century rather than continuity from a specific pre-colonial entity like the Cheraw, leading to evidentiary gaps in generation-by-generation tribal lineage and political authority. Although a 2016 Department of the Interior Solicitor's opinion permitted the Lumbee to petition via this process, the tribe has prioritized legislative routes, reflecting the causal challenges posed by the 1956 Act's termination clause and historical record limitations. Partial recognition implies restricted fiscal support, with full status potentially unlocking substantial federal funding for health, education, and infrastructure; Congressional Budget Office estimates from 2022 projected costs exceeding $360 million over a decade for expanded IHS and BIA services to approximately 55,000 members, including annual per capita health expenditures comparable to other tribes. Earlier analyses similarly forecasted $75 million annually in direct program costs, plus indirect economic effects from land-into-trust eligibility, though these figures exclude potential gaming revenues under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which require full acknowledgment. Without full recognition, the Lumbee remain ineligible for these resources, perpetuating disparities in service access despite state-level acknowledgment since 1885.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.