Hubbry Logo
Mud loggingMud loggingMain
Open search
Mud logging
Community hub
Mud logging
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mud logging
Mud logging
Mud logging
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Inside a mud logging cabin
Well logging methods

Mud logging is the creation of a detailed record (well log) of a borehole by examining the cuttings of rock brought to the surface by the circulating drilling medium (most commonly drilling mud). Mud logging is usually performed by a third-party mud logging company. This provides well owners and producers with information about the lithology and fluid content of the borehole while drilling. Historically it is the earliest type of well log. Under some circumstances compressed air is employed as a circulating fluid, rather than mud. Although most commonly used in petroleum exploration, mud logging is also sometimes used when drilling water wells and in other mineral exploration, where drilling fluid is the circulating medium used to lift cuttings out of the hole. In hydrocarbon exploration, hydrocarbon surface gas detectors record the level of natural gas brought up in the mud. A mobile laboratory is situated by the mud logging company near the drilling rig or on deck of an offshore drilling rig, or on a drill ship.

The services

[edit]

Mud logging technicians in an oil field drilling operation determine positions of hydrocarbons with respect to depth, identify downhole lithology, monitor natural gas entering the drilling mud stream, and draw well logs for use by oil company geologist. Rock cuttings circulated to the surface in drilling mud are sampled and discussed.

The mud logging company is normally contracted by the oil company (or operator). They then organize this information in the form of a graphic log, showing the data charted on a representation of the wellbore.

Well-site geologist mud logging

The oil company representative (Company Man, or "CoMan"), together with the tool pusher and well-site geologist (WSG)[1], provides mud loggers with their instructions. The mud logging company is contracted specifically as to when to start well-logging activity and what services to provide. Mud logging may begin on the first day of drilling, known as the "spud in" date, but is more likely at some later time (and depth) determined by the oil industry geologist's research. The mud logger may also possess logs from wells drilled in the surrounding area. This information (known as "offset data") can provide valuable clues as to the characteristics of the particular geostrata that the rig crew is about to drill through.

Mud loggers connect various sensors to the drilling apparatus and install specialized equipment to monitor or "log" drill activity. This can be physically and mentally challenging, especially when having to be done during drilling activity. Much of the equipment will require precise calibration or alignment by the mud logger to provide accurate readings.

Mud logging technicians observe and interpret the indicators in the mud returns during the drilling process, and at regular intervals log properties such as drilling rate, mud weight, flowline temperature, oil indicators, pump pressure, pump rate, lithology (rock type) of the drilled cuttings, and other data. Mud logging requires a good deal of diligence and attention. Sampling the drilled cuttings must be performed at predetermined intervals, and can be difficult during rapid drilling.

Another important task of the mud logger is to monitor gas levels (and types) and notify other personnel on the rig when gas levels may be reaching dangerous levels, so appropriate steps can be taken to avoid a dangerous well blowout condition. Because of the lag time between drilling and the time required for the mud and cuttings to return to the surface, a modern augmentation has come into use: Measurement while drilling. The MWD technician, often a separate service company employee, logs data in a similar manner but the data is different in source and content. Most of the data logged by an MWD technician comes from expensive and complex, sometimes electronic, tools that are downhole installed at or near the drill bit.

Scope

[edit]
1" (5 foot average) mud log showing heavy (hydrocarbons) (large area of yellow)

Mud logging includes observation and microscopic examination of drill cuttings (formation rock chips), and evaluation of gas hydrocarbon and its constituents, basic chemical and mechanical parameters of drilling fluid or drilling mud (such as chlorides and temperature), as well as compiling other information about the drilling parameters. Then data is plotted on a graphic log called a mud log. Example1, Example2.

Other real-time drilling parameters that may be compiled include, but are not limited to; rate of penetration (ROP) of the bit (sometimes called the drill rate), pump rate (quantity of fluid being pumped), pump pressure, weight on bit, drill string weight, rotary speed, rotary torque, RPM (Revolutions per minute), SPM (Strokes per minute) mud volumes, mud weight and mud viscosity. This information is usually obtained by attaching monitoring devices to the drilling rig's equipment with a few exceptions such as the mud weight and mud viscosity which are measured by the derrickhand or the mud engineer.

Rate of drilling is affected by the pressure of the column of mud in the borehole and its relative counterbalance to the internal pore pressures of the encountered rock. A rock pressure greater than the mud fluid will tend to cause rock fragments to spall as it is cut and can increase the drilling rate. "D-exponents" are mathematical trend lines which estimate this internal pressure. Thus both visual evidence of spalling and mathematical plotting assist in formulating recommendations for optimum drilling mud densities for both safety (blowout prevention) and economics. (Faster drilling is generally preferred.)

1" (every foot) mud log showing corrected d-Exponent trending into pressure above the sand

Mud logging is often written as a single word "mudlogging". The finished product can be called a "mud log" or "mudlog". The occupational description is "mud logger" or "mudlogger". In most cases, the two word usage seems to be more common. The mud log provides a reliable time log of drilled formations.[2]

Details

[edit]
  • The rate of penetration in Figure 1 & 2 is represented by the black line on the left side of the log. The farther to the left that the line goes, the faster the rate of penetration. On this mud log, ROP is measured in feet per hour, but on some older, hand-drawn mud logs, it is measured in minutes per foot.
  • The porosity in Figure 1 is represented by the blue line farthest to the left of the log. It indicates the pore space within the rock structure. Oil and gas reside within this pore space. Note how far to the left the porosity goes, where all the sand (in yellow) is. This indicates that the sand has good porosity. Porosity is not a direct or physical measurement of the pore space but rather an extrapolation from other drilling parameters and, therefore, is not always reliable.
(Figure 3)
Sample of drill cuttings of shale while drilling an oil well in Louisiana. For reference, the sand grain and red shale are approximately 2 mm in diameter.
  • The lithology in Figure 1 & 2 is represented by the cyan, gray/black and yellow blocks of color. Cyan = lime, gray/black = shale and yellow = sand. More yellow represents more sand identified at that depth. The lithology is measured as a percentage of the total sample as visually inspected under a microscope, normally at 10× magnification (Figure 3). These are but a fraction of the different types of formations that might be encountered. (Color coding is not necessarily standardized among different mud logging companies, though the symbol representations for each are very similar.) In Figure 3, a sample of cuttings is seen under a microscope at 10× magnification after they have been washed off. Some of the larger shale and lime fragments are separated from this sample by running it through sieves and must be considered when estimating percentages. Also, this image view is only a fragment of the total sample, and some of the sand at the bottom of the tray cannot be seen and must also be considered in the total estimation. Thus, this sample would be considered to be about 90% shale, 5% sand and 5% lime (in 5% increments).
  • The gas in Figure 1 & 2 is represented by the green line and is measured in units as the quantity of total gas, but does not represent the actual quantity of oil or gas the reservoir contains. In (Figure 1) the squared-off dash-dot lines just to the right of the sand (in yellow) and left of the gas (in green) represents the heavier hydrocarbons detected. Cyan = C2 (ethane), purple = C3 (propane) and blue = C4 (butane). Detecting and analyzing these heavy gases help to determine the type of oil or gas the formation contains.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mud logging

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Mud logging is a critical process in the oil and gas industry that involves the real-time monitoring, collection, and analysis of rock cuttings, drilling mud returns, and associated gases brought to the surface during to evaluate subsurface , detect hydrocarbons, and assess formation properties. This technique provides essential data on , , permeability, and potential pay zones by examining the materials circulated uphole via , which is pumped down the drillstring to cool the bit, remove debris, and maintain well stability. The process begins at the shale shaker, where cuttings are separated from the and systematically sampled at regular depth intervals for visual and microscopic examination to determine rock type, color, , and content. Gas detectors, such as total gas sensors and gas chromatographs, extract and quantify hydrocarbons from the flow line, often using flame ionization detectors sensitive to concentrations as low as 5 parts per million, to identify shows of oil or gas in real time. Mud loggers, working in shifts from on-site units, also track parameters like rate of penetration, weight on bit, and pit volumes to correlate surface data with downhole conditions and generate detailed well logs. Introduced commercially in 1939, mud logging has evolved from basic geological recording to an integrated service incorporating advanced sensors and computerized since the 1970s, enhancing its role in formation evaluation and integration with measurement-while-drilling (MWD) tools. Its importance lies in supporting safe drilling by detecting overpressured zones and influxes early, optimizing well trajectories, and aiding in the identification of intervals to maximize production efficiency and minimize risks like kicks or blowouts. Today, it remains a foundational element of wellsite operations, performed by specialized geologists and engineers to inform decisions across , development, and production phases.

Introduction

Definition and Purpose

Mud logging is the real-time monitoring and analysis of drilling mud and borehole samples to generate geological and during the of oil and gas wells. This process involves examining rock cuttings, gases, and other materials brought to the surface by the circulating , enabling the creation of a detailed well log that records subsurface conditions. Drilling mud serves as the primary carrier of formation materials, including cuttings from the rock penetrated by the and dissolved or entrained gases, which provide critical insights into , , and fluid content without relying on downhole tools. The primary purpose of mud logging is to detect formation changes, identify hydrocarbons, evaluate drilling parameters, and facilitate immediate to enhance drilling efficiency and safety. By tracking indicators such as gas levels, lithological descriptions, and pore pressure, mud loggers help prevent hazards like well kicks or blowouts while optimizing the to target productive zones. This real-time data supports broader drilling operations by correlating subsurface geology with surface measurements, allowing geologists and engineers to adjust operations proactively. Mud logging units are typically stationed at the wellsite in trailers or dedicated enclosures, equipped with sensors and analyzers to deliver continuous data streams directly to the drilling team. These units process samples collected at regular intervals, such as every 3 to 10 meters of depth, accounting for lag time in material transport to ensure accurate depth correlation.

Historical Development

Mud logging originated in the early as drillers and geologists manually observed drilling mud for signs of s, such as oil sheen or gas bubbles, during the transition to rotary in U.S. oil fields. By , these qualitative assessments evolved into more systematic manual gas detection methods to monitor formation responses at the surface. The first commercial mud logging service was launched by Baroid in 1939, employing patented techniques developed by John T. Hayward of Barnsdall Oil Company to record depth, , and shows using basic gas traps and detectors. In 1940, Hayward detailed this approach in his paper "Continuous Logging at Rotary-Drilling Wells," which described a dedicated mud logging unit equipped with instruments for tracking parameters like depth, rate of penetration, and gas levels. Throughout the and early , the service expanded with the adoption of transportable gas logging trailers and improved gas analysis tools, enabling broader application in field operations. The 1960s marked a shift toward quantitative analysis with the integration of for precise measurement of concentrations in mud gases, allowing loggers to correlate gas shows with properties like and pore pressure. In the 1970s, was introduced to mud logging units, enhancing the identification of specific hydrocarbons and non-hydrocarbon gases for more accurate formation evaluation. By the , the adoption of computerized systems transformed mud logging from manual charting to real-time digital recording and analysis, incorporating sensors for parameters and automated alerts. This evolution from qualitative observations to quantitative, real-time digital logging was driven by technological advancements and the growing complexity of drilling operations. The blowout in 2010 underscored deficiencies in real-time monitoring, including aspects of mud logging, prompting broader regulatory reforms by the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (established in 2011) that strengthened standards for equipment and safety systems to prevent similar incidents. Since the , mud logging has further integrated with advanced technologies like for and enhanced geochemical tools, continuing its evolution into digital and automated systems as of 2025.

Role in Drilling Operations

Integration with Drilling Processes

Mud logging is integrated into the drilling workflow as a continuous surface monitoring process that begins at spudding, the initial penetration of the formation, and extends through the completion phase of the well, with the highest intensity occurring during operations where analysis is critical for operational decisions. This placement allows mud loggers to observe the returns and cuttings as they surface, providing immediate feedback on subsurface conditions without interrupting the drilling progression. During various drilling phases, interacts closely by monitoring key parameters such as the rate of penetration (ROP), weight on bit (WOB), and flow rates to correlate these metrics with formation depths and lithological variations. For instance, fluctuations in ROP and WOB are tracked to identify changes in rock hardness or , enabling operators to adjust parameters like bit selection or properties in response to detected lithology shifts. This monitoring helps prevent hazards, including stuck pipe incidents caused by inadequate hole cleaning—detected through reduced cuttings return rates—and lost circulation, where pit level drops signal fluid losses into permeable formations, prompting timely weight adjustments. Recent advancements, such as automated remote logging systems installed with minimal rig intervention, further enhance real-time monitoring efficiency as of September 2025. Mud logging data is systematically incorporated into daily drilling reports, which compile geological evaluations, petrophysical insights, and operational metrics to ongoing and future well activities. Synchronization with specific operations, such as trips (pulling and running the ) and casing runs, intensifies sample collection efforts; during trips, loggers monitor connection gas levels to assess formation stability, while casing phases involve heightened scrutiny of returns to ensure proper zonal isolation. This integration supports broader formation evaluation, briefly complementing wireline logging by providing preliminary real-time data ahead of downhole tools.

Collaboration with Other Services

Mud logging services collaborate extensively with teams to enable precise well trajectory adjustments informed by real-time formation data, such as rate of penetration (ROP) and gas curves that correlate with target zones. This integration supports geosteering, where mud loggers' and indicators guide the to maximize exposure in formations like those in the Permian Basin. In multidisciplinary teams comprising geologists, engineers, and drillers, mud logging fosters cross-disciplinary decision-making through shared interpretations of surface indicators, enhancing overall drilling efficiency and reducing sidetracks. A key integration point involves coordination with mud engineers, who rely on mud loggers' monitoring of fluid properties—including , , and gas trends—to maintain optimal mud balance and prevent issues like wellbore instability. For instance, increases in connection gas detected by mud loggers alert engineers to potential overpressured formations, prompting timely mud weight adjustments. Data exchange occurs via standardized platforms like WITSML, allowing seamless transfer of real-time mud property readings to support fluid management across the wellsite. Mud logging also interfaces with petrophysicists by providing gas show and cuttings data that inform modeling and identification, particularly when merged with downhole measurements for accurate pore pressure predictions. This collaboration extends to (LWD) services, where surface-derived ROP and total gas data calibrate LWD tools like and resistivity logs, improving pay zone detection during operations. Mud loggers supply real-time inputs to (MWD) systems, optimizing parameters such as torque and weight on bit based on formation responses. Post-well, mud logging datasets are integrated with seismic interpretations to refine subsurface models, correlating surface samples with geophysical data for enhanced formation evaluation. Such holistic data fusion, often using software like ’s Techlog, supports comprehensive well reviews and future planning in multidisciplinary environments.

Mud Logging Procedures

Sample Acquisition and Handling

Sample acquisition in mud logging begins with collecting drilling cuttings and mud from the returns at the surface, primarily through flow-line sampling where the circulating drilling mud carries formation materials up the annulus to the shale shaker. The shale shaker separates solids from the liquid mud by vibrating screens, allowing cuttings to be captured for analysis while the mud continues through the system. This process ensures that representative samples of the penetrated formations are obtained directly from the mud returns. A critical aspect of acquisition is accounting for lag time, the duration required for cuttings to travel from the to the surface, which varies with well depth, mud pump rate, and annular velocity—typically ranging from a few minutes in shallow sections to 30-60 minutes or more in deeper intervals. Lag time is calculated using the mud pump rate and , often expressed in pump to determine when samples from a specific depth arrive at the surface; for instance, corrections of approximately 10 feet per 1,000 feet of depth may be applied to refine accuracy. Samples are collected at regular intervals, commonly every 10-30 feet of drilled depth, with additional collections during significant changes in parameters or prior to trips out of the hole to capture transitional lithologies. Handling procedures involve the collected cuttings to remove adhering , followed by sieving to sort particles by and isolate the relevant for examination, using tools such as full-height sieves with mesh sizes tailored to the formation type. Cuttings are then dried, either naturally or with low-heat methods, to prepare them for storage and prevent degradation. To avoid , clean, non-reactive tools and solvents are employed during , ensuring that foreign materials do not alter the sample's lithological or properties. For preservation and transport to laboratories, dried or wet samples are sealed in labeled jars or polythene bags, marked with lag-adjusted depth, date, and well details to maintain integrity. Depth correlation is achieved by adjusting the driller's depth measurements with the calculated lag time, aligning surface samples with their subsurface origin to create an accurate stratigraphic record; this logger's lag-adjusted depth distinguishes it from real-time driller's depth and enables integration with other logs. These preserved samples may subsequently support gas extraction for detection, though detailed analysis occurs in dedicated procedures.

Gas Detection Methods

Gas detection in mud logging involves extracting and analyzing gases from drilling mud to identify hydrocarbons and other gases indicative of subsurface formations. The primary goal is to monitor for potential reservoirs, kicks, and hazards in real time during operations. Total gas measurement typically begins with degassers, such as gas traps installed at the shale shaker's possum belly, where flows and releases entrained gases through agitation or vacuum suction. These systems achieve extraction efficiencies of 30-70%, capturing a gas-air mixture that is then transported via suction lines to the logging unit for analysis. The extracted gas is often quantified using a hot wire detector, which operates on thermal conductivity principles to measure total gas content. For detailed composition, chromatographic separation is employed to identify and quantify specific components, including C1-C5 hydrocarbons ( through ) and non-hydrocarbons like CO2. uses a carrier gas to separate components by molecular weight in a column, with batch samples analyzed periodically; results are reported as peak heights or areas in units such as parts per million (ppm) or percentages. occurs daily with standard test gases to ensure accuracy. Hydrocarbons are primarily detected using flame ionization detectors (FID), which ionize carbon-containing compounds in a hydrogen flame and measure conductivity changes, sensitive to concentrations as low as 5 ppm. Inert and non-hydrocarbon gases, such as CO2, , or , are detected via thermal conductivity detectors (TCD), which compare the heat dissipation of the gas mixture against a reference using a circuit. Gas levels are expressed in ppm, percentages, or arbitrary "gas units," where one unit often equates to approximately 1,000 ppm depending on . Background gas levels represent baseline concentrations from drilling-induced sources or minor formation diffusion, typically low and consistent. A gas show, indicating potential reservoir intervals, occurs with significant elevations above background, such as increases exceeding 1,000 ppm, often linked to porous or permeable zones. For safety, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) thresholds are critical; concentrations at or above 20 ppm trigger contingency plans, with detection alarms set as low as 5 ppm on mud logging units to protect personnel. Distinctions are made between connection gas, which appears during pipe trips due to swabbed or released downhole gases, and flow gas, measured continuously during mud circulation to reflect active formation influx. can be qualitative, noting presence or absence of gases for initial screening, or quantitative, providing precise concentrations and ratios via for detailed formation evaluation. These methods integrate into broader geological logs for correlation, though gas data alone provides key real-time insights.

Cuttings and Lithology Analysis

Cuttings analysis in mud logging involves the systematic examination of rock fragments generated during to identify characteristics and formation properties. These cuttings, transported to the surface via drilling mud, are collected at the shale shaker and processed to minimize contamination from cavings or recycled material. The primary goal is to provide real-time insights into subsurface , enabling geologists to describe rock types and estimate properties such as . Visual inspection serves as the foundational technique, where geologists initially assess cuttings for color, texture, and gross using standardized charts and hand lenses. Under a binocular stereomicroscope, finer details emerge, including (classified as fine, medium, or coarse using Wentworth scale equivalents), roundness (angular to well-rounded), and sorting (poor to well-sorted), which help distinguish clastic rocks like s from shales or carbonates. For instance, well-sorted, sub-rounded grains may indicate a mature formation. Staining techniques, such as red for carbonates, enhance identification of mineral components like or dolomite. Lithology classification relies on integrating these observations with comparative charts and auxiliary tests. Common rock types—, , —are identified through texture and reactivity; for example, effervescence with (HCl) confirms carbonates. estimates derive from visual assessment of intergranular space and texture, often categorized as none, low, or high, providing qualitative indicators of potential without quantitative measurement. These descriptions are logged in a standardized format, including percentages of each per sample interval (typically 10-90 feet), to build a composite lithologic column. Hydrocarbon indications in cuttings are evaluated through under (UV) light, where oil-stained samples exhibit yellow to white glows, signaling potential shows without relying on gas analysis. For more precise , on-site or post-run (XRD) quantifies mineral compositions, such as in sandstones or clays in shales, aiding in detailed . Stratigraphic compares these findings with offset well data, aligning lithologic transitions to refine depth estimates and formation boundaries. Gamma ray correlations, derived from mud logging sensors, further validate by matching natural radioactivity patterns to cuttings descriptions, such as high gamma in shales versus low in clean sandstones. This integrated approach ensures accurate real-time formation evaluation, supporting decisions.

Equipment and Instrumentation

Sensors for Mud Properties

Sensors for mud properties play a critical role in monitoring the physical and chemical characteristics of fluids during operations, enabling early detection of deviations that could indicate issues. These sensors are typically installed at key points in the mud circulation system, such as pits, flowlines, and shaker inlets, to provide continuous, on parameters like volume, flow rate, , , , , solids content, and resistivity. By tracking these properties, operators can maintain integrity and respond promptly to anomalies, such as fluid gains or losses. Pit volume sensors, often ultrasonic or radar-based, measure the fluid level and total volume in mud pits to identify gains (influxes or kicks) or losses (lost circulation). For instance, systems like the Pason Pit Volume Totalizer (PVT) support up to 32 tanks and use configurable alarms to alert crews to volume changes exceeding set thresholds, facilitating proactive . These sensors detect kicks by registering unexpected increases in pit levels, which could signal formation fluid influx, while losses are indicated by volume reductions during circulation. Flow meters quantify the circulation rate of drilling mud entering and exiting the wellbore, ensuring balance between input and return flows. Such meters are mounted on return flowlines; for example, the SLB Cameron mud flow sensor employs purging to mitigate condensation and solids buildup, providing reliable volumetric flow measurements. Deviations in flow rate, when compared to pump stroke counts, help detect kicks (increased return flow) or losses (reduced return flow) in real time. Viscometers and densitometers assess the rheological properties of mud, including and (mud weight), which are essential for maintaining hole cleaning and pressure control. Inline devices like the Rheonics SRD measure from 0.0 to 4.0 g/cc (equivalent to mud weights such as 8.5-12 pounds per [ppg] for typical water-based systems) and up to 3,000 cP, with integrated compensation for accuracy up to 300°C. These sensors ensure mud remains within operational limits, preventing issues like poor cuttings . Temperature sensors, such as or resistance temperature detectors (RTDs), monitor temperature at inlet and outlet points to evaluate thermal effects on fluid properties. The Weatherford Mud Temperature In/Out provides precise readings across a wide range of mud types, helping identify geothermal gradients or cooling from influxes. Variations in temperature can signal kicks, as formation fluids often differ thermally from circulating mud. pH sensors, typically glass electrode-based, measure the acidity or alkalinity of the mud to control and . Automated systems incorporate probes for continuous monitoring, as outlined in field testing protocols, ensuring values remain in the optimal range (e.g., 9-11 for water-based muds) to support additives like . Solids content sensors, including acoustic or optical types, quantify low-gravity and high-gravity to prevent excessive buildup that impairs performance. Real-time optical sensors analyze and concentration in the flowline, providing transparency into drilled management and enabling adjustments to reduce spikes. Elevated levels, often exceeding 6-10% by volume, can indicate inefficient shaker performance or formation influx. Resistivity probes, functioning as conductivity sensors, assess mud and by measuring electrical resistance. Electromagnetic induction sensors like the CNPS CL-DD11 detect changes in ion content, correlating to levels that affect inhibitive properties in water-based muds. Low resistivity (high conductivity) may indicate saltwater influx, aiding in detection. All these sensors adhere to calibration standards from API Recommended Practice 13B-1, which specifies procedures for verifying accuracy using reference fluids like fresh water for density balances. ensures measurements align with manual tests, with sensors typically verified daily or per shift to maintain precision within ±0.1 ppg for density or ±0.1 for pH. Integration into the mud logging unit allows automated data transmission and anomaly alerts, such as for pit gains exceeding 1-2 barrels, enhancing operational safety. Recent advancements as of 2025 include AI-assisted self-calibration for sensors to adapt to environmental conditions, improving reliability in real-time monitoring.

Data Acquisition and Logging Systems

Data acquisition and logging systems in mud logging serve as the core infrastructure for capturing, recording, and initially processing from operations, ensuring accurate correlation with depth and time. These systems typically comprise computerized units equipped with specialized software such as MudLog 8 from WellSight Systems, which facilitates the creation of detailed well logs incorporating rate of penetration (ROP), gas readings, and lithological descriptions. Depth encoders, often integrated with the via rotary mechanisms, provide precise measurements of progress by tracking block position and string rotation, enabling (TVD) calculations essential for . The acquisition process involves of key parameters including gas concentrations, cuttings descriptions, and properties, at high-frequency intervals to capture transient events during . from multiple sources—such as gas detectors and flow meters—is aggregated through interfaces like or protocols in units like the IMUDLOGGING-3, allowing for continuous monitoring and initial processing on-site. Backups are maintained via redundant servers to prevent data loss, with real-time uploads to cloud platforms secured through and access controls to mitigate cybersecurity risks in remote operations. Logged data is standardized in formats such as Log ASCII Standard (LAS) files, which structure information into sections for headers, curves, and parameters, facilitating interoperability across industry software. In areas with limited connectivity, such as remote onshore sites, redundancy is achieved through parallel paper chart recorders that duplicate digital outputs for manual verification. These systems exhibit scalability to accommodate varying operational demands, with modular onshore setups prioritizing cost-effective, land-based server integration, while offshore configurations incorporate ruggedized units and links for enhanced reliability in harsh marine environments. Integration with rig sensors via protocols like WITSML enables the generation of composite logs that combine mud logging data with measurements from measurement-while-drilling (MWD) tools, supporting broader formation evaluation efforts.

Data Analysis and Interpretation

Geological Logging Techniques

Geological logging techniques in mud logging involve the systematic compilation and interpretation of derived from cuttings, gases, and related parameters to construct detailed subsurface profiles. These techniques primarily focus on creating logs, gas logs, and chromatograms, which serve as primary records of formation characteristics encountered during . logs are constructed by analyzing rock cuttings collected at regular intervals, typically every 10 feet, under a to describe rock type, color, , sorting, , and texture; these descriptions are then plotted as percentage compositions in 10% increments on the mud log to visualize stratigraphic changes. Gas logs record total gas concentrations measured using ionization detectors with sensitivities down to 5 ppm, plotting background gas baselines and anomalous shows to indicate potential porous or permeable zones. Chromatograms, generated via , separate and quantify individual fractions such as (C1), (C2), (C3), and butanes (nC4, ), providing ratios like C1/C2 to differentiate gas origins and aid in . Correlation of these mud logging outputs with electric logs, such as and resistivity from logging-while-drilling (LWD) or wireline tools, enhances accuracy by aligning transitions and gas peaks with downhole measurements, allowing for refined depth control and formation boundary identification. Mnemonic codes standardize these descriptions; for instance, "SS" denotes , "SH" for , and "LS" for , facilitating consistent data entry and log readability across operations. In interpretation, pay zones are identified by integrating gas peaks—significant increases above background levels, often by several times—with cuttings evidence, such as oil under (rated by color and intensity) and changes in rate of penetration (ROP), which may increase due to softer rocks. Net pay thickness is calculated by summing the intervals where these indicators overlap, excluding non-productive or tight sections, typically requiring confirmation via subsequent coring or testing to validate quality. Increasingly, models are applied to integrate these data for more accurate predictions, as of 2025. Porosity estimation in mud logging often relies on shale density measurements from cuttings, where bulk density trends are used to infer undercompaction and approximate effective porosity; lower bulk densities in shales (e.g., below typical compact values around 2.6 g/cm³) may indicate higher preserved porosities, though this is semi-quantitative and calibrated against known regional trends. Interpretation approaches contrast deterministic methods, which apply direct empirical rules—like fixed gas show thresholds for pay designation—with probabilistic techniques that incorporate statistical models to account for variability in gas migration or cuttings contamination, yielding confidence intervals for zone boundaries. Depth tying between mud log events and actual drilled depths involves lag calculations based on pump rates and annular volume, but inherent errors from circulation delays and sample smearing typically range from ±5 feet, necessitating cross-verification with LWD data to minimize stratigraphic misalignment. These techniques collectively enable geologists to synthesize a coherent formation model, supporting decisions on reservoir potential while acknowledging limitations in resolution compared to wireline logging.

Real-Time Monitoring and Alerts

Real-time monitoring in mud logging involves the continuous acquisition and display of parameters, gas levels, and properties on dedicated screens at the rig site, enabling immediate assessment of well conditions. Sensors capture data such as rate of penetration (ROP), total gas content, and mud flow rates multiple times per second, with visualizations updated in near-real time to facilitate rapid decision-making. This setup allows mud loggers to track deviations from baseline trends, such as sudden increases in gases, which could indicate formation influxes or imbalances. Alert systems are integral to mud logging operations, triggering notifications when predefined thresholds are exceeded to prevent well control incidents. For gas shows, alarms activate upon a 10% increase in gas levels or concentrations reaching hazardous limits, often using flame ionization detectors sensitive to as low as 5 parts per million of hydrocarbons. Verbal notifications are standard for immediate threats like kicks, where mud loggers directly alert the driller to halt operations and initiate circulation adjustments. Automated alerts, such as system-generated warnings for abnormal pressures detected via gas ratios or pit volume changes, can integrate with rig control software to notify supervisors remotely. These systems ensure near-instantaneous detection by sensors, with alerts generated in seconds, and full operational responses typically within minutes to activate safety protocols. Mud logging integrates with blowout preventers (BOPs) by providing early warnings that prompt preemptive closure of the BOP stack before influxes escalate, as mud flow exits above the BOP for monitoring. In one from deepwater operations, real-time mud logging detected a gas influx through rising total gas and connection gas spikes, allowing crews to increase mud weight and circulate out the kick within 20 minutes, averting a potential without BOP activation. Such integrations enhance overall by enabling proactive . Trend analysis in mud logging examines patterns in parameters like ROP slowdowns, which may signal transitions to harder formations requiring bit adjustments or reduced weight-on-bit to avoid equipment failure. Loggers plot ROP against depth and gas levels to identify correlations, such as decreased ROP alongside increasing , indicating lithological changes. During shift handovers, incoming mud loggers review digital logs and trend charts to maintain continuity, ensuring ongoing monitoring of evolving well behaviors without data gaps. These practices contribute to broader enhancements by minimizing undetected hazards during operations.

Applications and Advantages

Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Insights

Mud logging contributes to formation evaluation by providing real-time data on subsurface lithology and fluid content through the analysis of drill cuttings and returned drilling mud. Cuttings examination allows for qualitative and semi-quantitative assessments of rock properties, including grain size, sorting, and texture, which inform estimates of porosity and permeability. These properties are correlated with observed hydrocarbon shows—such as fluorescence under UV light or solvent extracts—to identify zones capable of storing and transmitting hydrocarbons, aiding in the delineation of potential intervals. Gas detection in the mud stream enables the identification of fluid types and source rock potential. Advanced analyzes hydrocarbon components from (C1) to pentanes (C5) and beyond, using ratios like C1/C2 or total gas to wet gas to differentiate oil-prone from gas-prone reservoirs. Source rock identification involves estimating (TOC) content through on-site of cuttings, which quantifies organic richness and thermal maturity, helping to map potential generation zones. This approach provides preliminary geochemical data that complements deeper laboratory analyses. Key reservoir insights from mud logging include determining thickness via continuous lithology logs that track transitions between impermeable seals and porous sands or carbonates, and delineating structural traps through abrupt changes in rock type or dip indicators from cuttings orientation. Fluid contacts, such as oil-water interfaces, are inferred from variations in gas composition and shows intensity, supporting real-time adjustments in drilling strategy. Integration with sidewall cores enhances precision by validating mud log interpretations against direct samples, achieving reliable picks for reservoir tops and bottoms in development wells. Geochemical fingerprinting of oils, derived from mud gas isotopes and molecular ratios, correlates produced fluids to specific source rocks, refining reservoir models. Additionally, gas/oil ratios measured from shows contribute to initial volumetric reserve calculations by estimating hydrocarbon saturation and recovery factors early in exploration.

Safety Enhancements and Risk Mitigation

Mud logging plays a critical role in enhancing safety by enabling early detection of zones through monitoring increases in gas levels, which can signal influxes of formation fluids into the wellbore. This real-time gas analysis allows operators to identify potential kicks—uncontrolled entry of s or fluids—before they escalate into s, thereby preventing catastrophic failures. For instance, sudden spikes in total gas or specific hydrocarbon ratios detected via mud logging sensors provide immediate warnings, facilitating timely interventions such as increasing mud weight or activating blowout preventers. Another key safety function involves continuous monitoring for (H2S) toxicity, a highly dangerous gas that can be liberated during in sour formations. Mud logging units are equipped with dedicated H2S detectors that measure concentrations in the returning mud stream, triggering alarms if levels exceed safe thresholds (e.g., low alarm at 10 ppm per ACGIH TLV, high alarm at 15-20 ppm per OSHA ceiling), prompting evacuation according to site-specific protocols and standards. This monitoring is essential in offshore and onshore operations, where H2S exposure poses risks of and explosions; sensors are strategically placed in the mud logging shack, , and mud pits to ensure comprehensive coverage. Compliance with standards such as those outlined by the International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC) requires these systems to integrate with rig-wide gas detection protocols, reducing personnel exposure risks. In terms of risk mitigation, mud logging aids in identifying unstable formations prone to collapses by analyzing cuttings for signs of shearing or swelling, such as increased cavings or changes in that indicate instability. This proactive identification allows drilling teams to adjust parameters like mud density or rotary speed to stabilize the wellbore, averting stuck pipe incidents or hole collapses that could trap tools or personnel. Similarly, tracking lost circulation zones—where escapes into fractured or permeable formations—is achieved through flow rate discrepancies and pit volume monitoring, enabling the use of lost circulation materials to seal zones and maintain hydrostatic balance. These measures have contributed to achieving zero-incident wells in high-risk environments by providing data-driven decisions that minimize non-productive time and hazards. Post-2010 regulations, enacted in response to the incident, have mandated enhanced real-time monitoring as part of broader requirements under the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), emphasizing continuous monitoring to prevent loss of . These rules require mud logging data integration into emergency response plans. detection workflows typically involve a multi-step : initial anomaly identification via gas shows or flow mismatches, through pit gain calculations, and escalation to well control teams for shut-in procedures, often simulated in IADC-accredited programs to ensure crew proficiency. Such integrations have demonstrably reduced incidents by enabling faster response times.

Modern Developments

Technological Advancements

Recent innovations in mud logging have significantly enhanced the accuracy and efficiency of analysis during operations. AI-driven systems utilize algorithms to identify drilling complications, such as kicks or lost circulation, by processing mud gas and cuttings data in real time, reducing false alarms through advanced . For instance, workflows integrating prior knowledge with neural networks have demonstrated improved detection rates for multitype anomalies in complex formations. Similarly, models applied to digital images of enable prediction with accuracies of 85-95%, allowing geologists to classify rock types like or without extensive manual examination. These AI applications mark a shift from manual interpretation to , where historical mud logging datasets train models to forecast formation properties and potential hazards ahead of time. Digital transformations have further revolutionized mud logging through cloud-based platforms for sharing among remote teams. Systems like Solo Cloud synchronize mud logging data with other parameters, enabling collaborative analysis and decision-making across global operations. In 2024, ROGII acquired TLog software to integrate real-time mudlogging into Solo Cloud, advancing data exchange between service providers and operators. Post-2020, the adoption of IoT sensors has accelerated, with connected devices monitoring mud properties such as , , and gas content continuously, transmitting data wirelessly to central hubs for immediate processing; this integration has seen widespread use in new projects, enhancing responsiveness in offshore and unconventional wells. Additionally, (VR) integration allows for immersive virtual log reviews, where engineers can navigate 3D models of wellbore data to visualize changes and gas shows, improving training and remote consultations without physical presence on site. Advanced instrumentation, including high-resolution , has improved the analysis of gas in mud streams, providing precise geochemical fingerprints for reservoir characterization. Techniques like gas chromatography-combustion- ratio (GC-C-IRMS) deliver real-time carbon ratios (δ13C) with resolutions better than 0.5‰, distinguishing biogenic from thermogenic hydrocarbons during . Hybrid approaches combine surface mud with logging-while- (LWD) tools, mitigating data lag in deeper wells exceeding 10,000 feet by fusing resistivity and measurements with mud gas insights, resulting in more accurate formation evaluation. These advancements have driven cost reductions through minimized non-productive time and optimized , as evidenced in automated daily using generative AI. In 2025, approaches have further improved predictions for safe windows with high accuracy. The overall transition to and hybrid systems not only enhances safety by enabling proactive alerts but also supports deeper well explorations, where traditional manual methods fall short.

Environmental and Regulatory Aspects

Mud logging plays a crucial role in during oil and gas drilling by enabling precise monitoring of drilling fluids, which helps minimize generation. Real-time analysis of mud properties, such as , , and solids content, allows operators to optimize fluid circulation and adjust formulations promptly, reducing unnecessary mud losses and the volume of spent fluids requiring disposal. This targeted approach aligns with broader strategies, including the 3R principle (reduce, reuse, ), where mud logging data supports initiatives that have demonstrated reductions in consumable , such as a 15% decrease in rag usage through improved material efficiency. Additionally, mud logging facilitates the detection of environmental contaminants, particularly naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) in drilling mud. Specialized mud monitors installed on return lines and tanks provide continuous gamma radiation surveillance, identifying elevated NORM levels from formations like shales or scales in real-time to prevent accumulation and potential release into the environment. This capability is essential for mitigating radiological risks, as NORM in mud can contaminate soils and waters if not managed, and logging data informs safe handling protocols during operations. On the regulatory front, mud logging ensures compliance with key environmental standards, including U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines under 40 CFR Part 98 for monitoring and reporting flare gas emissions. During drilling, mud loggers measure hydrocarbon gases in the mud stream using tools like flame ionization detectors, which quantify concentrations as low as 5 parts per million; this data is critical for assessing flaring volumes and adhering to emission limits to curb and releases. Internationally, adherence to ISO 14001:2015 standards for environmental management systems is common in mud logging operations, emphasizing pollution prevention, energy efficiency, and continual improvement in waste and emissions controls across global sites. Mud logging also supports well decommissioning by providing accurate formation evaluation data that guides plug and abandonment decisions, ensuring environmental integrity post-drilling. Detailed logs of , pressures, and contacts from form a permanent record used to verify barrier placements and prevent leaks, aligning with regulatory requirements for site restoration and protection. This contributes to reduction, as optimized drilling informed by mud logs shortens rig time and lowers overall emissions; for instance, digital logging technologies like systems minimize on-site travel and paper use, enabling CO2 offsets such as planting trees to compensate for operational emissions (e.g., 291 tons offset in one regional program). The integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles into mud logging reflects industry-wide sustainability efforts, with service providers adopting charters tied to UN that prioritize and resource stewardship. These frameworks score operations on ESG metrics—such as a 56% baseline achievement in environmental performance—and drive innovations like low-emission monitoring units. Globally, regulations vary, with the imposing stricter controls on discharges under the OSPAR Convention, prohibiting oil-based muds with free oil content above trace levels to protect marine ecosystems, compared to U.S. rules under the Clean Water Act that allow limited offshore discharges but ban free oil in the . This disparity influences mud logging practices, requiring enhanced contaminant tracking in EU operations to meet and zero-discharge goals.

References

  1. https://www.slb.com/resource-library/oilfield-review/defining-series/defining-mud-logging
  2. https://oilandgasoverview.com/what-is-mud-logging-in-oil-and-gas/
  3. https://onepetro.org/spe/general-information/1832/Mud-logging
  4. https://www.cnps.com/the-importance-of-mud-logging-in-the-oil-and-gas-industry/
  5. https://geoexpro.com/resolving-uncertainty-the-importance-of-mud-logging/
  6. https://onepetro.org/petrophysics/article-pdf/2197455/spwla-1967-vviin5a1.pdf
  7. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geophysics/pdf-lookup/27/4/507
  8. https://geoexpro.com/wellsite-mud-logging-and-reservoir-geochemistry/
  9. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/reports/safety/2-deepwaterhorizon-roi-uscg-volume-i-20110707-redacted-final.pdf
  10. https://onepetro.org/SPWLAALS/proceedings-abstract/SPWLA25/SPWLA25/679012
  11. https://onepetro.org/spemoce/proceedings-abstract/24MOCE/24MOCE/575384
  12. https://dwl-usa.com/wp-content/uploads/IADC-SPE-SPE-189680-MS-1.pdf
  13. https://onepetro.org/SPESATS/proceedings-abstract/18SATS/18SATS/SPE-192401-MS/215253
  14. https://onepetro.org/IPTCONF/proceedings-abstract/24IPTC/24IPTC/542311
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392103267_Mudlogging
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391705046_Integration_of_Mud_logging_Data_with_MWDLWD_Systems
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303833799_Integration_of_Mud_Logging_and_Advanced_Wireline_Log_Data_in_Formation_Evaluation_A_Case_Study_from_an_Exploratory_Well_in_Venezuela
  18. https://onepetro.org/JPT/article/58/05/56/196453/Extracting-Reliable-Density-and-Porosity-Data-From
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780750678834500012
  20. https://www.weatherford.com/documents/technical-specification-sheet/products-and-services/drilling/cuttings-sieve/
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128161531000092
  22. https://wiki.aapg.org/Mudlogging:_gas_extraction_and_monitoring
  23. https://onepetro.org/books/book/79/chapter/14386008/Mud-Logging
  24. https://ugspub.nr.utah.gov/publications/open_file_reports/ofr-499.pdf
  25. https://onepetro.org/FE/article/3/04/686/75647/Evaluation-of-Gas-Extraction-Efficiency-During-Mud
  26. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/09-g31.pdf
  27. https://drillingforgas.com/drilling/standards/h2s-standards/
  28. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1979/1522/report.pdf
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390843146_Lithology_Identification_from_Cuttings
  30. https://www.spec2000.net/log-data-acquisition/logging-sample-description-logs.htm
  31. https://www.scribd.com/document/654966677/Cuttings-analysis-during-mud-logging
  32. https://www.thermofisher.com/blog/mining/the-key-to-successful-mud-logging-part-1/
  33. https://onepetro.org/books/book/44/chapter/10961851/Mud-Logging
  34. https://pason.com/products/pit-volume-totalizer-pvt/
  35. https://www.slb.com/products-and-services/innovating-in-oil-and-gas/well-construction/rigs-and-equipment/rig-equipment/mud-pumps-mixing-and-processing/mud-flow-sensor
  36. https://www.emerson.com/documents/automation/article-coriolis-sensors-open-lines-to-real-time-data-micro-motion-en-64078.pdf
  37. https://rheonics.com/products/inline-density-meter-srd/
  38. https://onepetro.org/SPEERM/proceedings-abstract/08ERM/08ERM/145577
  39. https://www.weatherford.com/documents/technical-specification-sheet/products-and-services/drilling/mud-temperature-in-out-sensor/
  40. https://onepetro.org/DC/article/24/04/611/191923/Automatic-Measurement-of-Drilling-Fluid-and-Drill
  41. https://standards.globalspec.com/std/14208051/api-rp-13b-1
  42. https://drillingcontractor.org/real-time-sensor-solutions-provide-greater-transparency-in-fluids-solids-management-68265
  43. https://www.cnps.com/product/mud-conductivity-sensor-for-mud-logging-unit/
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110062116302124
  45. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/11/3592
  46. https://www.cnps.com/the-future-of-mud-logging-advances-in-sensor-technology/
  47. https://wellsight.com/software/mudlog-8-6-1
  48. https://www.rigzone.com/insights/how-it-works-3/what-is-mud-logging-and-why-is-it-important-in-drilling-414
  49. https://www.dynapar.com/knowledge/encoder-basics/encoder-how-to-guides/measure-depth-with-rotary-encoders
  50. https://www.petrolink.com/real-time-drilling-software/
  51. https://imudlogging.com/product/iml-3-mud-logging-unit
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X23001991
  53. https://www.usgs.gov/programs/national-geological-and-geophysical-data-preservation-program/las-format
  54. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/tap-technical-assessment-program/707aa.pdf
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/mud-logging
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390702362_Introduction_to_Mud_logging_in_Hydrocarbon_Exploration
  57. https://www.spec2000.net/log-data-acquisition/logging-mud-logging-and-mud-gas-logging-mwd.htm
  58. https://www.cnps.com/product/shale-density-meter-for-mud-logging-unit/
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254553508_Measuring_and_Using_Shale_Density_to_Aid_in_Drilling_Wells_in_High-Pressure_Areas
  60. https://www.spec2000.net/calculating-porosity/porosity-density-log-models.htm
  61. https://onepetro.org/SPEHSE/proceedings-pdf/16HSE/16HSE/D021S024R001/3831002/spe-179368-ms.pdf/1
  62. https://drillingforgas.com/evaluation/mud-logging/mud-logging-parameters-monitoring/
  63. https://www.rigzone.com/insights/operational-questions-8/what-are-the-best-practices-for-mud-logging-in-drilling-934
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338689037_Early_Kick_Detection_and_Optimization_by_Advanced_Mud_logging
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390844449_Mud_logging_and_Formation_Pressure_Evaluation
  66. https://onepetro.org/JPT/article/60/08/51/197631/Measuring-Porosity-and-Permeability-From-Drill
  67. https://jpt.spe.org/mud-gas-data-could-reveal-a-wealth-of-reservoir-information
  68. https://www.weatherford.com/documents/papers/2017/increasing-certainty-in-formation-evaluation-utilizing-advanced-mud-logging-gas-analysis/
  69. https://www.geolog.com/files/pdf/geolog_geosource_MS.pdf
  70. https://onepetro.org/SPEOKOG/proceedings-abstract/83POS/83POS/SPE-11553-MS/62241
  71. https://onepetro.org/SPEATCE/proceedings-abstract/07ATCE/07ATCE/142878
  72. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/aapg/aapgbull/article/25/7/1302/546167/Estimation-by-Volumetric-Methods-of-Recoverable
  73. https://drillingcontractor.org/how-to-ensure-h2s-safety-on-offshore-rigs-8267
  74. https://iadc.org/reader/modu-hse-guidelines/index.html
  75. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ese3.1643
  76. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/tap-technical-assessment-program/743aa.pdf
  77. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390702261_Role_of_Mud-loggers_in_Primary_Well_Control
  78. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2010/10/15/2010-25665/oil-and-gas-and-sulphur-operations-in-the-outer-continental-shelf-safety-and-environmental
  79. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/ekd-step1-2assessmentreportfinal-v-1-20170803.pdf
  80. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/14/10/250
  81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374119207_Machine_Learning-Based_Real-Time_Prediction_of_Formation_Lithology_and_Tops_Using_Drilling_Parameters_with_a_Web_App_Integration
  82. https://www.rogii.com/products/tlog
  83. https://www.halliburton.com/en/products/real-time-virtual-logging-system
  84. https://jpt.spe.org/immersive-experience-vr-revolutionizing-oil-workflows-restricted
  85. https://onepetro.org/SPEATCE/proceedings-pdf/22ATCE/22ATCE/3962040/spe-210384-ms.pdf
  86. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2025.1529320/full
  87. https://www.exlog.com/uploads/files/ExLog_ESG-2022_Spreads-View.pdf
  88. https://monitors-uk.tracerco.com/blogs/news/mud-monitor-logging-while-drilling
  89. https://www.fluidcomponents.com/assets/media/Articles/Mud-Logging-Flare-Gas-0614.pdf
  90. https://www.ospar.org/documents?v=32321
  91. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-09/documents/2017_final_gp_for_fr_091817.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.