Hubbry Logo
Name-droppingName-droppingMain
Open search
Name-dropping
Community hub
Name-dropping
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Name-dropping
Name-dropping
Name-dropping
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Name-dropping (or name-checking) is the practice of naming or alluding to important people or institutions in order to indicate one's association with them. The term often connotes an attempt to impress others; it is usually regarded negatively,[1] and under certain circumstances may constitute a breach of professional ethics.[2] It may be done within a conversation,[1] a story,[3] a song, an online identity,[4] or other communication.

When used as part of a logical argument it can be an example of the false authority fallacy.[5]

Purposes

[edit]

Name-dropping is used to position oneself within a social hierarchy. It is often used to create a sense of superiority by raising one's status.[citation needed] By implying (or directly asserting) a connection to people of high status, the name-dropper hopes to raise their own social status to a level closer to that of those whose names they have dropped, and thus elevate themselves above, or into, present company.

Name-dropping can also be used to identify people with a common bond. By indicating the names of people one knows, one makes known their social circle, providing an opportunity for others with similar connections to relate.[6]

As a form of appeal to authority, name-dropping can be an important form of informal argumentation, as long as the name being dropped is of someone who is an expert on the subject of the argument and that person's views are accurately represented.

Methods

[edit]

Use of the first name may be effective, as in the case of "Kingsley" for Kingsley Amis.[7]

Name-dropping is also sometimes used in works of fiction to place a story in a certain historical timeframe, or to imply the involvement of a historical figure in the action (for example, in a story set during World War II, mentioning Adolf Hitler or Winston Churchill). [citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Name-dropping

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Name-dropping is the practice of casually mentioning or alluding to famous, influential, or prominent individuals—often claiming some form of personal association with them—in conversation or writing to impress others, elevate one's social status, or gain credibility. This behavior is generally viewed with disapproval, as it can imply exaggeration or pretense about the depth of the relationship involved. From a psychological perspective, name-dropping frequently stems from underlying insecurities, anxiety, or a desire to compensate for perceived inadequacies in one's own contributions to a discussion. Experts in and , such as W. Keith Campbell, link it to boosting through association with high-status figures, potentially indicating narcissistic traits where individuals seek validation by proxy. Conversely, organizational Liane Davey describes it as a of discomfort and , noting that it often backfires by making the speaker appear less competent, manipulative, or less likable to listeners. In professional and academic settings, name-dropping serves as a discursive for but risks becoming a notorious known as ad verecundiam, where excessive invocation of authorities obscures the speaker's own position and leads to disorientation in dialogue. Sociologically, it reflects broader dynamics of status signaling and social climbing, though studies show it undermines trust and rather than fostering genuine connections.

Overview and Definition

Definition

Name-dropping is the practice of casually mentioning or alluding to famous, influential, or prestigious individuals, institutions, or experiences to imply a personal association or familiarity with them, often in a social or conversational context. This behavior typically involves a studied but seemingly offhand reference to enhance one's perceived status or credibility among listeners. A key element of name-dropping is the intent to elevate one's social standing through indirect implication rather than through direct personal achievements or relevant factual contributions. It differs from legitimate networking, where mentions serve a practical purpose, or from appropriate citations in professional discussions, as name-dropping prioritizes impression over substance. For example, an individual might say, "I had lunch with last week," in a to impress others, even if the encounter was incidental or exaggerated, thereby suggesting a level of familiarity that boosts their own image.

Characteristics

Name-dropping manifests through unprompted mentions of associations with prominent individuals during conversations, often asserting social closeness in a way that appears indirect yet self-promotional. These mentions typically range from distant admiration, such as , to more substantial claims like friendships or collaborations, with stronger assertions frequently perceived as manipulative. A key observable trait is the disproportionate frequency of such references relative to the discussion's relevance, where names are invoked excessively to elevate the speaker's perceived status rather than contribute meaningfully. Patterns of name-dropping commonly emerge in self-promotional settings, including social gatherings where individuals seek to establish hierarchy and job interviews where candidates aim to bolster credibility. In professional environments, it may involve citing high-status figures like executives to justify actions or influence decisions, signaling an attempt to align with power structures. Unlike genuine factual sharing, such as academic citations that provide verifiable support, name-dropping prioritizes impression management over substantive information exchange, often leading to perceptions of inauthenticity. In academic discourse, excessive name-dropping can function as a rhetorical strategy for legitimation but risks causing disorientation in dialogue. Common indicators include abrupt conversational shifts to insert names without context and a lack of detailed, verifiable connections, such as vague phrases implying loose ties like "acquaintance of an acquaintance." These traits distinguish it as a rhetorical device for self-enhancement, frequently backfiring by reducing the speaker's likeability and competence in observers' eyes.

Historical Development

Etymology and Origins

The term "name-dropping" first appeared in print on October 11, 1945, in the Berkshire Evening Eagle, a in , where it described the casual invocation of celebrities' names in conversation to impress others. The phrase derives from the metaphorical act of "dropping" such names nonchalantly, as if they hold little value to the speaker, thereby implying familiarity with the elite while seeking to elevate one's own social standing. This linguistic emergence coincided with post-World War II cultural shifts, but the underlying behavior predates the term by centuries. The practice of invoking prominent names for persuasive or status-enhancing purposes has ancient roots, particularly in Roman oratory, where rhetoricians employed references to esteemed figures to bolster arguments and establish authority. , a master orator of the late , exemplified this in his speech Pro Archia Poeta (62 BCE), defending the poet Aulus Licinius Archias' Roman citizenship by drawing on Greek literary traditions to affirm the societal value of and intellectual pursuits. This method served not only academic discourse but also broader social aspirations. During the , analogous strategies proliferated among humanist scholars, who cited classical authorities to legitimize their intellectual and moral claims amid a revival of antiquity. Figures like Francesco Petrarch (1304–1374) frequently referenced and other Greco-Roman thinkers to advocate for education in the liberal arts and , positioning their works within a continuum of esteemed precedent to enhance persuasive power and scholarly credibility. By the early , name-dropping as a recognized social tactic emerged prominently in Hollywood and literary circles from the through the 1940s, fueled by the burgeoning celebrity culture and aspirations of social climbing among urban elites. The era's , centered in , transformed actors and directors into icons whose mere mention could signal insider knowledge and refined taste. The proliferation of , including radio broadcasts and cinema in the 1930s, intensified this dynamic; stars like those from MGM and Warner Bros. became symbols of glamour, prompting aspirants to drop their names in conversations to convey cultural sophistication and access to .

Evolution in Modern Society

Following , the advent of television in the 1950s and the expansion of during the 1950s and 1960s markedly accelerated the prevalence of name-dropping in everyday discourse. These media forms democratized access to celebrity lives, transforming distant icons into familiar figures whose names could be invoked to convey sophistication, insider knowledge, or aspirational ties in social interactions. For instance, scandal magazines like Confidential sensationalized Hollywood gossip, fostering a culture where mentioning stars such as became a shorthand for cultural currency among the public. The digital revolution from the onward reshaped name-dropping into a pervasive online strategy, particularly on platforms like and , where users leverage tags, shares, and endorsements to amplify . This "digital name-dropping" allows individuals to associate with high-profile figures or influencers, often fabricating proximity through curated posts. By the 2020s, the practice has intensified with the rise of influencer economies, where associating with niche creators—such as tagging lifestyle gurus on —serves to boost visibility and perceived relevance in professional and social networks. Globally, name-dropping has adapted to local contexts, thriving in non-Western celebrity-driven cultures like 's Bollywood and South Korea's scenes, where fan engagement amplifies its role. In , the practice is intertwined with longstanding social hierarchies, with individuals invoking titles, degrees, and past roles on professional cards or in conversations to signal status, a custom rooted in and class awareness. In K-pop fandoms, enthusiasts on platforms like drop idols' names—such as or Youngbae—in reaction videos to affirm loyalty, evolving from hybrid English-Korean pronunciations in the early to more "purified" forms by the mid-2010s under for authenticity, thereby strengthening communal bonds. Perceptions of name-dropping have evolved from an accepted conversational lubricant in mid-20th-century social circles to a practice increasingly scrutinized in by the 2010s, particularly in and . Codes like those from the Radio Television Digital News Association explicitly deem commercial endorsements—often involving celebrity name invocations—incompatible with journalistic integrity, as they undermine and . In pitching scenarios, name-dropping prior coverage or associations is criticized as presumptuous and ineffective, frequently leading journalists to dismiss such overtures outright.

Motivations

Social Motivations

Name-dropping functions as a key strategy for status elevation in social interactions, where individuals reference prominent figures or connections to signal affiliation with elite networks and bolster their perceived social capital within hierarchical settings like parties, clubs, or professional gatherings. By implying proximity to high-status others, name-droppers aim to enhance their own standing, leveraging the borrowed prestige to gain acceptance or influence among peers. This tactic aligns with broader impression management goals, where associating with influential names serves as an indirect way to convey competence and desirability without overt self-promotion.

Psychological Motivations

Name-dropping often serves as a mechanism to boost , particularly among individuals experiencing insecurity or low personal validation. By associating oneself with prestigious figures, people can temporarily enhance their perceived status and derive a sense of borrowed prestige, compensating for internal doubts about their own accomplishments. This behavior aligns with the psychological strategy known as (BIRGing), where individuals link themselves to successful others to elevate their . Research indicates that such self-presentational tactics stem from a need to regulate fragile , as name-droppers seek external props to affirm their worth in social interactions. Narcissistic traits further drive name-dropping through conversational , a where individuals dominate discussions by redirecting to themselves, often via references to notable connections. This reflects an over-inflated self-view that requires validation from implied elite associations, allowing the speaker to position themselves as superior without direct boasting. Analyses of conversational dynamics highlight how such tactics fulfill the narcissist's pursuit of ego enhancement, turning dialogues into platforms for self-aggrandizement rather than mutual exchange. Experts note that narcissists employ name-dropping to signal entitlement to high-status affiliations, reinforcing their grandiose self-perception. In contexts of , name-dropping functions as a to mitigate fears of rejection or inadequacy in unfamiliar settings. Individuals may invoke prominent names to bridge conversational gaps and project confidence, drawing on empathy deficit theories that suggest overestimate negative evaluations from others. Organizational psychologists describe this as arising from discomfort and doubt in one's contributions, where associating with respected figures reduces perceived . Such use helps alleviate immediate anxiety by creating an illusion of , though it often stems from underlying relational insecurities. Cognitive biases underpin the persistence of name-dropping, particularly the illusion of association, which fosters a distorted that proximity to prestige inherently elevates one's identity. This self-serving bias creates a positive feedback loop, as the perceived enhancement of status reinforces the behavior through reinforced self-perception. Studies on reveal how name-droppers overestimate the tactic's effectiveness, driven by egocentric biases that prioritize personal gain over social reciprocity. This cognitive pattern explains the habitual nature of the practice, as individuals misattribute borrowed acclaim to their own merits.

Techniques

Verbal Techniques

Verbal techniques in name-dropping refer to overt strategies employed in spoken or written to explicitly reference notable individuals, often to bolster one's position or . These methods are typically and unprompted, distinguishing them from more indirect approaches. Research in argumentation and identifies several key verbal tactics, including straightforward insertions of names, integration through personal narratives, and repetitive patterns within a single exchange. One primary verbal technique is the direct mention, where a speaker or writer inserts the name of a prominent figure without contextual buildup, aiming to invoke or association immediately. For instance, in academic or casual conversations, individuals might reference philosophers like ", , or Foucault" to underscore an argument, often in rapid succession to assert intellectual prowess. This approach is characterized by its abruptness, such as dropping multiple authoritative names within the first few minutes of , which can signal an attempt to dominate the discussion through borrowed prestige. Anecdotal weaving represents another explicit method, involving the construction of short personal stories that center on encounters or relationships with famous individuals to lend authenticity to one's claims. In experimental scenarios simulating social introductions, participants have been observed fabricating or recounting narratives like "I’m also lucky to be a friend of ’s (we’ve known each other for ages, ever since )," followed by details of shared activities such as "we hang out or play Playstation, and from time to time we exercise together." This technique embeds the name within a fabricated or real-life tale, making the association appear organic while explicitly highlighting the connection. Frequency patterns in verbal name-dropping involve the repeated invocation of names or associations during a single interaction, reinforcing the speaker's perceived links to circles. Scholars note that excessive repetition, such as layering multiple names in quick , creates a "detour" effect in , where the shifts focus from substance to the droppers' affiliations, often leading to disorientation for listeners. This repetitive strategy is particularly prevalent in competitive settings like academic debates, where it serves to cumulatively build an of exclusivity.

Subtle Techniques

Subtle techniques of name-dropping involve indirect methods that imply associations with notable individuals or groups without explicit mention, allowing individuals to signal status while minimizing the risk of appearing boastful. These approaches rely on ambiguity and inference, drawing from research on self-presentation tactics where indirect assertions of closeness to high-status figures can enhance perceived credibility more effectively than overt claims. For instance, allusions and hints often take the form of vague references that prompt the listener to infer a connection, such as describing an advisory role with "a prominent figure in the tech industry" rather than naming the person directly. This method leverages the audience's imagination to fill in gaps, as studies show that subtle fan-like admiration or trivial associations (e.g., praising a celebrity's work without claiming personal ties) can positively influence first impressions by avoiding detection as manipulative self-promotion. Visual aids represent another covert strategy, where individuals display photographs, signed items, or memorabilia to subtly evoke connections during interactions or in personal spaces. Placing a framed photo from an event alongside a recognizable in an office or home setting implies proximity without verbal elaboration, functioning as a non-verbal cue that aligns with broader patterns of status signaling through possessions. Psychological analyses indicate that such displays serve as extensions of the , broadcasting affiliations to social groups or elites and reinforcing the owner's perceived rank in observer's minds. Similarly, a signed or artifact from a encounter can prompt questions that allow the owner to elaborate indirectly, enhancing while maintaining . Associative props extend this subtlety into everyday choices, such as selecting , accessories, or items linked to influential figures or brands endorsed by them. Wearing a luxury watch associated with a high-profile entrepreneur or a fashion item popularized by celebrities signals alignment with elite tastes without naming anyone, tapping into as a form of rank signaling in consumer psychology. Research highlights how such choices communicate social hierarchy implicitly, as observers attribute status based on recognized symbols rather than explicit narratives. This technique is particularly effective in professional or social environments where visual cues subtly elevate one's standing. In digital contexts, subtle name-dropping manifests through platform features like hashtags, story shares, and geotags that imply access or proximity. For example, posting a photo geotagged at an exclusive event known for attendance suggests presence among VIPs without specifying encounters, a practice that has emerged as a modern status signaling tool on . Using niche hashtags tied to influencer-favored experiences or sharing ephemeral stories from high-profile venues further hints at connections, allowing users to curate an aura of exclusivity. Studies on digital self-presentation note that these indirect cues amplify perceived by encouraging followers to infer unstated affiliations.

Contexts and Representations

Social and Professional Contexts

In everyday social settings such as parties or dates, name-dropping can function as an by establishing common ground, but excessive or unsubstantiated mentions often lead to negative impressions, including perceptions of manipulativeness that reduce likability and competence. norms vary by : in upper-class circles, casual references to notable acquaintances may signal shared without offense, whereas in more casual groups, it frequently appears pretentious and alienates participants seeking authentic connections. In professional environments, name-dropping during , such as referencing clients at conferences, can enhance credibility and facilitate alliances when tied to genuine , yet it backfires if perceived as an attempt to inflate status, isolating the individual and undermining perceived competence. In , however, the practice breaches ethical standards; for instance, a Columbia analysis criticized inconsistent celebrity name usage in reporting as unprofessional and potentially promotional, akin to unauthorized plugs that compromise objectivity. Cultural variations influence acceptability: in collectivist societies like , mentioning connections aligns with practices—reciprocal relationship-building essential for social and business harmony—making it a normative tool for fostering trust rather than boasting. Conversely, in individualistic cultures like the , such references are often viewed skeptically as self-promotional, clashing with values emphasizing personal merit over relational leverage. Overall, name-dropping may forge short-term alliances by signaling access to influential circles, but it erodes long-term trust when seen as insincere, prompting audiences to question the dropper's authenticity and reliability in ongoing interactions.

Cultural Representations

In F. Scott Fitzgerald's (1925), the protagonist frequently name-drops prestigious institutions and figures, such as claiming an education and associations with European , to fabricate an aura of elite status amid his social climbing efforts. This literary device highlights Gatsby's illusory pursuit of acceptance in upper-class circles, where superficial references to mask his humble origins. Academic name-dropping appears as a critiqued trope in , exemplified by excessive citation of authoritative figures to bolster arguments without substantive engagement. A 2015 study in the journal Argumentation analyzes this practice as a form of ad verecundiam fallacy, where over-reliance on names like philosophers or theorists creates discursive disorientation and undermines genuine scholarly dialogue in social sciences and . In film and television, name-dropping is often satirized to expose excess and deception, as seen in Martin Scorsese's The Wolf of Wall Street (2013), where (played by ) boasts about celebrity encounters and lavish connections to inflate his fraudulent persona and lure investors. Similarly, hip-hop lyrics treat brand name-dropping as an equivalent to personal name-dropping, signaling status through luxury affiliations; Lil Pump's "" (2017) repetitively invokes the label over 50 times to project wealth and crew loyalty in a minimalist trap style. The evolution of name-dropping in music reflects shifting cultural markers of success, beginning with Run-D.M.C.'s 1986 track "My ," which celebrated the sneaker brand as a symbol of street authenticity and sparked the first major hip-hop-fashion collaboration. In the 2020s, this trope continued with artists referencing celebrity collaborations and brands; for example, Lil Yachty's 2023 track "" and associated projects subtly nod to luxury affiliations and industry ties to affirm rising status, though critics note it can amplify perceptions of performative excess. By the mid-, such references in rap often highlight commercial endorsements, underscoring ongoing tensions between authenticity and market-driven signaling. Broader cultural tropes portray name-dropping as a tool for social climbing in , particularly narratives like William Gibson's (1984), where characters invoke megacorporations such as Tessier-Ashpool or Ono-Sendai to navigate dystopian power structures and assert influence amid privatized societies. This motif recurs in Gibson's works, emphasizing how fragmented references to elite entities highlight alienation and ambition in high-tech, low-life worlds.

Perceptions

Positive Views

In professional settings such as programs and job referrals, strategic name-dropping serves a legitimate purpose by enhancing and facilitating connections without exaggeration. For instance, referencing a mutual acquaintance or colleague, such as stating that "a contact at a leading tech firm recommended this opportunity," can signal trustworthiness and shared networks, thereby increasing the likelihood of positive responses in networking scenarios. This approach is particularly effective in cover letters and interviews when permission is obtained from the named individual and the mention ties directly to relevant skills or experiences, avoiding any perception of pretense. In creative industries like and , name-dropping is often culturally accepted as a means to signal trends and foster authenticity, contributing to economic benefits. A notable example is the rap and hip-hop genres, where lyrical mentions of luxury brands have historically driven sales; for instance, ' 2001 track "Pass the " led to a reported nearly 30% increase in Courvoisier sales shortly after its release. Analyses of top rap songs from 2006 to 2020 reveal sustained prevalence of such brand placements, reflecting their integration as a normalized strategy to align artists with cultural influencers and boost visibility for products. For individuals from underrepresented groups navigating biased professional environments, name-dropping connections can function as a self-presentation tool to build and access opportunities that might otherwise be limited by . Research on in labor markets indicates that racial minorities often strategically highlight affiliations or networks to mitigate anticipated , thereby enhancing their perceived competence and opening doors in competitive fields. This tactic aligns with broader emphasizing adaptive self-presentation to counter , allowing underrepresented professionals to leverage for advancement. When employed humorously or ironically, name-dropping can subvert potential negativity, turning it into an engaging form of self-expression in and contexts. Humorous bragging has been shown to benefit job candidates and entrepreneurs by increasing perceptions of likability and securing better outcomes, such as or hires, compared to straightforward boasts.

Criticisms

Name-dropping is often criticized for fostering inauthenticity in social interactions, as it prioritizes superficial associations over genuine , thereby eroding trust and meaningful connections. Psychologists note that this practice can come across as manipulative or deceptive, particularly when it involves embellishing or fabricating ties to prominent figures, leading listeners to question the speaker's sincerity and credibility. In professional settings, name-dropping raises ethical concerns by undermining objectivity and impartiality. For instance, in , it can signal or an attempt to leverage celebrity associations for , conflicting with codes that emphasize and avoidance of conflicts of interest. Similarly, in collaborative platforms like , promotional name-dropping to inflate notability violates guidelines against and self-promotion, potentially leading to content removal or editing restrictions. Socially, name-dropping frequently backfires by alienating others, as it signals underlying insecurity or narcissistic tendencies rather than authentic . Analyses link it to an inflated sense of self, where the practice shifts focus to status-seeking, often resulting in perceptions of the individual as self-absorbed or lacking . In dynamics, this can manifest as manipulative , evoking discomfort and damaging professional relationships by appearing overly calculated or insincere. In academia, particularly within social sciences and , excessive name-dropping through citations or references creates broader harms, such as "collective disorientation" in , where over-reliance on authoritative names obscures substantive arguments and hinders shared understanding. This practice, akin to a logical detour, annoys audiences and impairs intellectual exchange by prioritizing prestige over content.

References

  1. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/name-dropping
  2. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/name-dropping
  3. https://qz.com/907931/name-dropping-basically-always-backfires
  4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9362-6
  5. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15534510802343997
  6. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/name-dropping
  7. https://simplicable.com/new/name-dropping
  8. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/name-dropping_n
  9. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_tullius_cicero-pro_archia/1923/pb_LCL158.5.xml?readMode=recto
  10. https://www.worldhistory.org/Renaissance_Humanism/
  11. https://www.npr.org/transcripts/123584348?storyId=123584348
  12. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2001/07/the-tabloid-habit/302262/
  13. https://www.fastcompany.com/91353050/namedropping-on-linkedin
  14. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-you-name-drop-your-linkedin-headline-fast-company-a1i3e
  15. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/smallbusiness/why-big-name-influencers-are-losing-power-and-micro-influencers-are-taking-over/ar-AA1BRoaN
  16. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/a-culture-of-dropping-names/story-CWkiHUf5TfKcXGmgdFBa8J.html
  17. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/how-to-drop-a-name-hybridity-purity-and-the-kpop-fan/59A825170C794DD51E579566FEB49878
  18. https://www.rtdna.org/ethics
  19. https://www.agilitypr.com/pr-news/uncategorized/beware-the-dangers-of-name-dropping-when-pitching-top-tier-journalists/
  20. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15534510802343997
  21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510802343997
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281296024_On_Name-Dropping_The_Mechanisms_Behind_a_Notorious_Practice_in_Social_Science_and_the_Humanities
  23. https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/psychology-stuff-and-things
  24. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mind-brain-and-value/202401/the-psychology-behind-symbolic-products
  25. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-consumer-psychology/psychology-of-consumer-social-hierarchy-and-rank-signaling/0BBA96630729DC85AB86D4C0621D99E8
  26. https://www.rajivgopinath.com/blogs/marketing-hub/brand-and-product-strategy/product-marketing/status-signaling-and-its-influence-on-consumer-behavior
  27. https://www.townandcountrymag.com/leisure/travel-guide/a65479049/status-posting-social-media-trend-summer-2025/
  28. https://www.yourtango.com/money/habits-are-normal-upper-class-homes-make-middle-class-people-uncomfortable
  29. https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.12208abstract
  30. https://www.cjr.org/short_takes/namedropping.php
  31. https://repository.usfca.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=olc
  32. https://archive.cbts.edu/Fulldisplay/42dRB9/418314/The_Great_Gatsby_Chapter_4.pdf
  33. http://bofca.com/bofca-review-roundup-1227/
  34. https://genius.com/Lil-pump-gucci-gang-lyrics
  35. https://medium.com/moderated/the-power-of-name-dropping-fashion-brands-in-songs-1a4d7c314bb0
  36. https://www.revolt.tv/article/best-celebrity-namedrops-in-rap-and-r-and-b
  37. https://vtuhr.org/articles/10.21061/vtuhr.v9i0.1
  38. https://scrupp.com/blog/name-dropping-r1
  39. https://resumegenius.com/blog/cover-letter-help/cover-letter-referral
  40. https://www.capecodtimes.com/story/business/2004/05/25/cognac-industry-toasts-american-rappers/50926035007/
  41. https://www.meiea.org/Journal/Vol23/Farwell_Stickle_Shackelford
  42. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0001839216639577
  43. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01879/full
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12206245/
  45. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/03/are-you-a-name-dropper-and-what-would-oprah-say-about-that.html
  46. https://www.spj.org/spj-code-of-ethics/
  47. https://blog.reputationx.com/wikipedia-notability
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.