Hubbry Logo
OnlyFansOnlyFansMain
Open search
OnlyFans
Community hub
OnlyFans
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
OnlyFans
OnlyFans
OnlyFans
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

OnlyFans is an Internet content paid subscription service based in London, England.[3] The service is widely known for its popularity with pornographers,[3][4] although it also hosts other content creators including athletes, musicians, and comedians.[5][6][7]

Key Information

Content on the platform is user-generated and monetized via monthly subscriptions, tips, and pay-per-view. Creators are paid 80% of these fees and earn a yearly average of $1,300. The company launched a free safe-for-work streaming platform, OFTV, in 2021. OnlyFans grew in popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic. As of 2024, the site had more than four million registered creators and 370 million registered users.[8]

In August 2021, a campaign to investigate the company began in the United States Congress, and it was reported that from October 2021 onward it would no longer allow sexually explicit material,[4] due to pressure from banks that OnlyFans used for user payments. However, this decision was reversed six days later due to a backlash from users and creators.[9][10][11]

Overview

[edit]

OnlyFans is a British subscription-based video on demand service and social media network.[3] It acts as a video hosting service, allowing content creators to upload videos and garner subscribers to their content.[12] As such, it is part of the creator economy.[13] Subscribers pay creators in monthly instalments, in one-time tips, or via pay-per-view. The company takes 20% of these fees.[12][14]

OnlyFans is mainly used by pornographic creators,[3][4][15] both amateur and professional, but it also has a market with other content creators—including chefs, fitness trainers, and musicians.[5]

A 2022 study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that "OnlyFans users were predominantly white, married, males who identified as heterosexual, bisexual, or pansexual."[16] The study found that the sexual attitudes of OnlyFans users were not significantly different from the general population.

The company employs approximately 1,000 people, 80% of whom focus on content moderation and support.[17][2] It had 2021 revenues of US$932 million.[18] It is led by chief executive officer (CEO) Keily Blair and owned by Fenix International Limited,[19][20] which itself is majority owned by Leonid Radvinsky.

History

[edit]

Key figures

[edit]

In November 2016, Tim Stokely founded OnlyFans as a platform for performers to "directly monetize their content and interactions".[14] Stokely's start up capital was a £10,000 loan from his father, Guy Stokely. He had previously founded the websites GlamGirls and Customs4U.[21][22] Tim's brother Thomas Stokely became the company's chief operating officer and their father assumed the position of finance head.[21][22]

Initially, OnlyFans banned explicit content on its platform [23] and sought to attract musicians and influencers.[23] However, by 2017, OnlyFans lifted its ban on pornography.[23]

Two years later, businessman Leonid Radvinsky, owner of MyFreeCams,[24] acquired 75% ownership of Fenix International Limited, the provider of OnlyFans, and became one of its directors.[25][14] The Independent claimed that after this, OnlyFans "gained a pop culture reputation for being a hive of pornography".[26]

In December 2021, Tim Stokely announced that he would be stepping down as CEO and Amrapali Gan would be assuming the position.[27] In July 2023, lawyer Keily Blair was appointed CEO.[20]

2020s growth

[edit]

Amateur and professional sex workers drove OnlyFans' early growth, a process further accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic and the recession it caused.[28] Between March and April in 2020, the user and creator base grew by 75%.[29]

The site grew rapidly after it was mentioned by Beyoncé in the remix of the Megan Thee Stallion song, "Savage", released in April 2020.[30] Traffic increased by 15% and CEO Tim Stokely claimed OnlyFans was seeing approximately 200,000 new users and 6,000–8,000 new creators register daily.[19][29] 2020 also saw numerous celebrities, including Cardi B, Rebecca Minkoff, and Tyler Posey, as well as media companies like Munchies join the platform, which further boosted interest in the site.[29][31] By December 2020, OnlyFans had 85 million users and more than 1 million creators, generating more than US$2 billion in sales that year.[32]

Sky News reported in 2020 that OnlyFans had not paid value-added tax for three years and could face heavy penalties from tax authorities; it began charging value-added tax in July 2020 after "discussions" with HM Revenue and Customs.[33]

By March 2021, OnlyFans' user base topped 120 million and creators collectively earned $3 billion in revenue.[29] OnlyFans stated that it pays out more than $200 million a month to creators.[32][34] In 2021, their revenue was around $900 million, a rise from $350 million in the previous year, with the company reaching a market valuation of $1 billion.[35] Owner Leonid Radvinsky received $500 million in dividends in the roughly two-year period from 2021 to 2022.[18][36]

In April 2021, Time named OnlyFans in its Time 100 Most Influential Companies list.[37] Also in 2021, Fast Company named OnlyFans as one of the 10 most innovative social media companies.[38] The Financial Times named OnlyFans one of the fastest-growing companies in Europe in 2022 and 2023.[39]

As of May 2023, OnlyFans had 3 million registered creators and 220 million registered consumers.[40][41] In 2023, creators earned an average of nearly $1,300 per year.[42]

In 2024, OnlyFans posted revenues of $1.3bn in the year up to 30 November 2023, an increase of 20% over the previous year. OnlyFans also paid $150m in UK corporation tax in 2023.[43] In 2025, Reuters reported that Fenix International was in talks to sell the company to a Los Angeles–based investor group led by the Forest Road Company at a valuation of around $8 billion.[44]

Restrictions on pornographic creators

[edit]

Shortly following increased campaigning against OnlyFans due to concerns about child sexual abuse material, on 19 August 2021, the company announced that from 1 October 2021 onwards it would not be allowing sexually explicit content.[45] The company pushed the update through a new Terms of Service Policy.[11] The company would still have allowed nudity on some grounds.[46]

The reason for this shift was initially reported as pressure from credit card companies including Mastercard, but CEO Tim Stokely later told Financial Times that it was due to withdrawn support from banks such as BNY Mellon and JPMorgan Chase, and that Mastercard had "no bearing on the decision".[11][47][48] Stokely said that BNY Mellon had "flagged and rejected" each transaction from the company, and that Metro Bank had withdrawn support abruptly in 2019.[48]

The decision was met with widespread backlash by creators and consumers of OnlyFans. Six days after the initial announcement, OnlyFans said that it would be reversing the decision and that adult content would be allowed on the site indefinitely, citing that they had "secured assurances necessary" to do so.[9][10][49][50][51][52]

The website Fansly surged in popularity as an alternative to OnlyFans for sex workers after the retracted ban announcement. Originally beginning operations in November 2020, Fansly's website design and functionality has been regarded by MEL Magazine as "nearly identical" to OnlyFans.[53]

In August 2022, a series of lawsuits were filed in the US, which alleged that OnlyFans had bribed employees of Meta to add Instagram accounts of OnlyFans creators who also sold content on OnlyFans' competitor websites to a terrorist blacklist. According to the lawsuits, adult performers including Alana Evans had traffic driven away from their Instagram accounts after being falsely tagged as terror-related, effectively shadow banning them and diminishing their ability to promote their content on rival websites. OnlyFans denied awareness of such activity.[54][55] The plaintiffs withdrew the bribery claim in July 2023 and the case was dismissed in August 2023, with the court noting that it did not have jurisdiction over OnlyFans, which is based in the UK.[56] In September 2024, Judge William A. Alsup ruled that the performers failed to show that Meta had interfered with their contracts or violated unfair competition law.[57]

Content creators from Russia and Belarus reported that they were not able to withdraw their funds or were excluded from the platform as part of the economic sanctions following the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. OnlyFans said that this was because "worldwide financial restrictions" led them to have "very limited methods to pay Creator accounts linked to Russia and Belarus". OnlyFans later said that they had restored full functionality to these accounts.[58][59] On 21 April 2022, OnlyFans "temporarily paused" Russian creators' accounts.[60]

Chatters and chatbots

[edit]

In 2024, multiple investigative articles independently revealed that many creators relied on other people, called chatters, to impersonate the creator in messages with their subscribers despite promising direct connections on their OnlyFans profiles.[61][62][63] Furthermore, one of these articles, from Reuters, reported that many creators also use chatbots for the same purpose.[61] OnlyFans' terms of service explicitly prohibited the use of chatbots and state that creators are legally responsible for any transaction with a subscriber.[64] Two U.S. federal class-action lawsuits have been filed against the company, as well as against agencies employing the chatters, alleging that these practices defraud consumers.[61][62]

Safety and security

[edit]

Child sexual abuse material

[edit]

As part of the age and identity verification process, prospective creators must provide more than nine pieces of personally identifying information and documents before they can post content on OnlyFans. This includes full name, date of birth, bank account information, address, email address, valid government ID, a standalone selfie, a selfie while holding their photo ID, and social media handles. Depending on the country, Fans may have to provide various personally identifying information, confirmations, payment details, and documents to view media content on OnlyFans.[65]

In 2021, BBC News reported in 2021 that it was able to circumvent the system. OnlyFans was criticised by UK police for not doing enough to protect children;[66] however, the country's government regulator, Ofcom, praised the site in 2022 for its use of third-party verification tools.[67]

A BBC Three documentary alleged in 2020 that a third of Twitter profiles globally advertising 'nudes4sale' (or similar) belong to underage individuals, many of whom used OnlyFans to share their content.[68][69] In May 2021, the BBC reported that OnlyFans was "failing to prevent underage users from selling and appearing in explicit videos" after an investigation. This included reports from UK Police, schools and Childline.[66] However, the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children reported under 100 instances of child sexual abuse material on OnlyFans per year, while MindGeek-owned companies accounted for around 13,000 cases, Twitter accounted for 65,000 and Facebook accounted for 20 million instances.[70][45]

On 10 August 2021, US Representative Ann Wagner announced a bipartisan coalition pressuring the Department of Justice to investigate OnlyFans for child exploitation, citing increasing reports by law enforcement and child safety organizations that minors were being sold on OnlyFans, as well as instances of sex trafficking and image-based abuse.[70][71] Over 100 members of Congress signed the petition.[70] The Christian pressure group Exodus Cry and the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, founded as a Catholic organization, were cited as influencers in the campaign against the website.[45][72][73]

Later in August 2021, OnlyFans released its first transparency report regarding the company's safety compliance program. OnlyFans said that it uses machine learning classifiers to locate child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and hashes to keep track of CSAM content, passing such information on to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC). However, in July 2021 it only passed one hash and details of 14 accounts, out of the 15 suspended for CSAM, onto the NCMEC. Gizmodo and The Verge commented on the unclarity of the reports' figures, which are limited to July 2021 and combine requests for data from law enforcement and from charity helplines.[74][75]

The company gave $500,000 to the Child Rescue Coalition in 2022 for a project intended to investigate adult online behavior that is sexually threatening to children.[76] It partnered with StopNCII.org in 2023, an online tool that uses a hash function system to prevent the spread of revenge porn and other non-consensual image sharing.[77]

Reuters documented 30 complaints from court and police records over a five year period between December 2019 and June 2024 involving more than 200 explicit videos and images of children, including some adults having oral sex with toddlers.[78] Multiple videos of minors had allegedly been on OnlyFans for more than a year.[78] In response to these reports, the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) described the platform as "an industry leader in online safety", while the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) praised its participation in voluntary initiatives to detect and remove abusive content.[78]

Data security

[edit]

In February 2020, BuzzFeed News reported that up to four terabytes of hacked OnlyFans content went viral on social media. It was supposed to have come from hundreds of different accounts and was spread on Mega cloud storage and Google Drive. OnlyFans denied that any breach had occurred. Daly Barnett, a technologist from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told BuzzFeed News that "These platforms routinely have terrible security posture and reprehensible incident response."[79][80]

In August 2020, Forensic News reported that some content creators' accounts had been deleted without warning, leaving them unable to withdraw their balances.[81] Radvinsky's previous business ventures were flagged by banks for indicators of money laundering.[82][83]

Non-pornographic content

[edit]

In March 2021, the company launched its creative fund to provide £20,000 grants to four emerging musicians in the United Kingdom, as selected by Stokely and Stefflon Don.[84] Later that year, OnlyFans soft launched OFTV, an app and streaming site with a collection of its safe for work content.[29] Floyd Mayweather Jr., DJ Khaled and Fat Joe, and Terrell Owens were among the new content creators during the year.[35][85][86]

A second initiative, the following year, was the OFTV program Creative Fund: Fashion Edition, a reality fashion show featuring designer Rebecca Minkoff. It was judged by Law Roach, Sir John, and Maeve Reilly; the winner received $50,000, and $25,000 was awarded to second and third place.[87][2] A four-part Comedy Edition of the program in the U.K. and Ireland is set to air in 2023, with a similar prize fund. It was judged by London Hughes, Jamali Maddix and Mae Martin; Jack Guinness hosted and Sofie Hagen appeared.[88]

In 2022, OFTV released Model Farmers, a reality television show hosted by Becky Houze. The show features celebrities working on a farm in the United Kingdom.[89] In 2022, OnlyFans signed deals with the Sims family, who starred in the English reality television show The Only Way is Essex, and Whitney Cummings to star in shows for OFTV, set to release in 2023. Cummings also started an account on OnlyFans' main site.[90][91]

Individual creators

[edit]

A trend on OnlyFans saw creators allowing free access to sexual content in exchange for proof of charity donations, beginning with Kaylen Ward raising US$1 million in contributions to charity during the Australian wild bushfires in Australia in January 2020.[92][93]

Bella Thorne broke OnlyFans earnings records when she joined the platform in August 2020, generating US$2 million in a week, including US$1 million in a 24-hour period.[94] Thorne promised subscribers nude photos, but instead provided only photos in lingerie, leading to a large number of chargebacks. Following the chargebacks, OnlyFans limited the amount creators could charge and how quickly creators could receive their payouts, though the company said it was unrelated to Thorne and part of "an evolving process".[95][96] Sex work advocates called Thorne a "tourist" in the sex work industry and blamed her for the policy change, saying it would cause them to lose a portion of their income.[97][98] Thorne's record was broken in April 2021 by Bhad Bhabie, who garnered US$1 million in six hours.[99] The broken record led to social media criticism of Bhabie's subscribers, as her OnlyFans account launched shortly after she turned 18.[100]

In May 2022, Carmen Electra joined the site, debuting her account with photos from her 50th birthday.[101] The same year, Pennsylvania congressional candidate Alexandra Hunt joined the platform and announced that her campaign had raised around $100,000 in one month.[102]

In September 2022, the Twitch streamer Amouranth told Business Insider that she was earning $1.5 million every month on the site and had grossed more than $27 million in total since joining in early 2020.[103] On 9 December 2022, YouTuber Markiplier launched an OnlyFans account page and the influx of traffic caused the site to crash.[104][105][106]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

OnlyFans

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

OnlyFans is an online subscription platform founded in 2016 by British entrepreneur that allows content creators to monetize exclusive through fan-paid subscriptions, tips, and messaging, with the company retaining a 20% commission on gross payments while creators receive 80%. The service, initially conceived for premium content across various niches, rapidly became dominated by sexually explicit material, attracting millions of creators and users amid the economic disruptions of the . By 2024, OnlyFans reported $7.22 billion in gross revenue from transactions exceeding those of prior years, supported by 377.5 million registered fan accounts and 4.634 million creator accounts, with top earners including hundreds surpassing $1 million annually. In October 2025, CEO Keily Blair announced that the platform had paid $25 billion cumulatively to creators since its founding. Owner Leonid Radvinsky received $701 million in dividends for fiscal year 2024, bringing his total dividend earnings since 2021 to approximately $1.8 billion. Since May 2025, Radvinsky has been in discussions to sell OnlyFans at a valuation of approximately $8 billion led by Forest Road Company, with no deal finalized. The platform has been lauded for enabling direct for many independent producers but criticized for enabling exploitation, with investigations revealing instances of nonconsensual content, underage material, and ties to despite moderation efforts.

Overview

Founding and Ownership

OnlyFans was founded in November 2016 by British entrepreneur Tim Stokely, who established the platform under Fenix International Limited, a company he incorporated that year in London, United Kingdom. Stokely, previously involved in adult-oriented ventures like GlamWorship.com and Customs4U.com, launched OnlyFans with an initial £10,000 loan from his father, Guy Stokely, aiming to create a subscription-based site for content creators to monetize directly from fans. In 2018, Ukrainian-American businessman acquired a majority stake in Fenix International Limited from the Stokely family, becoming the controlling owner of OnlyFans. , who had earlier founded the site in 2004, expanded his portfolio in the adult content industry through this purchase, with Fenix remaining the parent entity headquartered in . By 2025, held sole ownership of Fenix, having received substantial dividends, including $701 million in 2024 alone, amid reports of potential sale discussions valuing the company at around $8 billion. stepped down as CEO in 2021, succeeded by , but the platform's core ownership structure under persisted.

Platform Mechanics and User Base

OnlyFans operates as a subscription-based content-sharing platform where creators establish profiles to upload media such as photos, videos, and live streams, accessible primarily to paying subscribers. Users can sign up and log in using email and password or social media options including X (formerly Twitter) via OAuth authorization; selecting the latter redirects users to X to grant permission, authenticating and logging them into OnlyFans or creating a new account if successful. However, following X's 2023 API changes that ended free access, this feature has become unreliable for many, with reports of login failures, redirect loops, errors, or inability to proceed; troubleshooting includes clearing cache and cookies, trying another browser, or using email/password instead. Creators can set a monthly subscription price to $0 or typically ranging from $4.99 to $49.99, with many opting for free subscriptions to provide access to teasers and photos while monetizing additional explicit videos via pay-per-view (PPV), often at low cost; this grants fans unlimited access to their feed upon subscription. Payments for subscriptions, PPV, tips, and other transactions are processed using traditional methods such as credit cards, debit cards, and approved prepaid or gift cards; the platform does not accept cryptocurrency directly as of 2026, with no official plans announced to introduce such support. Fans may employ indirect approaches, such as acquiring prepaid Visa or Mastercard gift cards or virtual cards funded by cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, USDT, or USDC via third-party services, which can then be used for platform transactions. Additional streams include PPV posts and messages, where fans purchase individual pieces of content, tips sent directly to creators, and custom requests fulfilled via direct messaging. The platform facilitates direct interaction through private messaging, allowing creators to send mass messages, automated welcomes, or personalized PPV content, while features enable real-time engagement with optional PPV access for exclusive streams. Creators retain 80% of earnings, with the platform taking a 20% commission, and payouts occur weekly once thresholds are met. The user base encompasses both creators and fans, with approximately 4.1 million active creators and over 377 million registered users as of late 2024. Creators predominantly consist of women, comprising 70-84% of the total, with an average age of 29 years; the accounts for the largest share, hosting about 1.1 million creators. Fan demographics skew heavily male, with estimates indicating 63-79% male subscribers, many married (around 90% in some analyses), white, and aged 25-34, reflecting a subscriber base driven by demand for personalized, often adult-oriented content. The platform's growth has been sustained post-COVID, with creators averaging 21 subscribers each, though top earners capture disproportionate revenue due to and niche specialization. Platforms like X (formerly Twitter) significantly contribute to user acquisition, with t.co shortened links accounting for 5.31% of total traffic to OnlyFans.com as of December 2025, ranking second after direct access at 54.65%; social media referrals overall comprise about 14% of traffic, with X holding approximately 64% of that share. Analysis of 1 million fan transactions from 2025 data shows Twitter as a leading source for free page fan acquisition, contributing 147,718 fans with a long-term return on marketing investment (ROMI) of 429%.

Business Model

Revenue Generation and Company Finances

OnlyFans derives its revenue through a 20% commission on all creator earnings, which stem from subscriptions, tips, content, and custom fan requests. This model positions the platform as an intermediary that facilitates direct monetization between creators and subscribers, capturing a fixed share without producing content itself. The structure incentivizes platform growth by aligning incentives with creator success, as higher transaction volumes directly scale company income. In its ending November 30, 2024, OnlyFans recorded $7.22 billion in gross payments volume—funds transacted between users and creators—yielding $1.41 billion in net revenue after the 20% cut. Pre-tax profits for the period totaled $684 million, a 4% rise from 2023, reflecting operational efficiency with no debt or external financing. For the prior (2023), net revenue stood at $1.3 billion, with pre-tax profits of $658 million, up 25% year-over-year from $525 million in 2022.
Fiscal Year Ending Nov 30Gross Payments VolumeNet RevenuePre-Tax Profit
2022Not publicly detailed~$1.05B (est.)$525M
2023$6.6B$1.3B$658M
2024$7.22B$1.41B$684M
The company's finances benefit from low overhead, with revenue per employee exceeding $37 million in across a staff of roughly 40, enabling profit margins around 48% of net revenue. As a private entity owned by Fenix International Limited, OnlyFans has pursued no public funding rounds post-launch, sustaining growth through . In May 2025, its parent company entered discussions for a potential sale valuing the platform at approximately $8 billion, implying a multiple of about 5.7 times net revenue. This valuation accounts for recurring subscription dynamics and scalability, though it remains below peers in high-growth digital marketplaces due to the platform's heavy reliance on adult content.

Creator Compensation and Economic Realities

Creators receive 80% of generated from their content, with OnlyFans retaining a 20% commission on subscriptions, tips, (PPV) messages, and other transactions. Subscription fees, set by creators between $4.99 and $49.99 monthly, form the base, supplemented by tips and PPV sales, which accounted for 60% of creator in recent analyses. This model incentivizes frequent engagement, as consistent posting correlates with higher retention and upsell opportunities. Despite the platform's $7.22 billion gross revenue in fiscal 2024, individual creator earnings reveal stark disparities. The average creator earns $150 to $180 monthly, equating to roughly $2,000 annually, with nearly 50% making under $100 per month. There is no reliable, publicly available average for first-month earnings specifically for new OnlyFans creators in 2025 or 2026; new creators typically start with lower amounts as they build an audience, consistent with the wide variability in earnings where most earn far less than top performers. Among 4.19 million creators as of 2025, the top 1% capture 33% of total revenue, while the top 0.1% secure 76%, often exceeding $146,000 annually through large subscriber bases and premium pricing. Elite performers, such as those with pre-existing fame from social media, can generate millions monthly—e.g., $2.3 million reported for one top creator in 2025—but this requires substantial upfront investment in promotion and content production. Economic realities underscore the platform's winner-takes-most dynamics, where success hinges on niche appeal, marketing via external platforms like or , and audience-building rather than mere content volume. Most creators fail to achieve sustainable income due to high competition, subscriber churn (with only a fraction renewing beyond initial curiosity), and operational costs including taxes, equipment, and self-promotion, often netting far less than gross figures after deductions. Empirical data indicates that while outliers thrive on viral appeal or leverage, the creator's output yields supplemental rather than primary income, challenging narratives of widespread profitability. Factors like distribution—70% creators—and content focus amplify saturation in niches, where retention demands ongoing innovation amid algorithmic and constraints.

Historical Timeline

Launch and Initial Expansion (2016-2019)

OnlyFans was launched on November 20, 2016, by British entrepreneur in as part of Fenix International Limited. The venture began with a £10,000 from Stokely's father, Guy Stokely, a retired banker, marking the final such the family would provide. Stokely, who had previously founded the custom adult video site and worked in phone chat services, developed the platform to allow creators to earn directly from subscribers via monthly fees, pay-per-view content, and tips, taking a 20% commission on transactions. Initially targeted at creators such as fitness trainers and musicians for exclusive content sharing, OnlyFans quickly gained traction among performers leveraging its subscription model to bypass traditional industry gatekeepers like studios and agents. The site's emphasized and direct fan interaction, with creators controlling access to photos, videos, and messages, which appealed to those in niche markets seeking higher earnings retention. Early marketing focused on through , though the platform's adult-oriented roots—stemming from Stokely's background—shaped its user demographics from inception. By 2018, the platform remained relatively obscure outside specialized circles, prompting Ukrainian-American investor to acquire a 75% controlling stake for an undisclosed sum, injecting resources for technological improvements and marketing. This ownership shift supported steady expansion, with registered users reaching 13.5 million and creators numbering around 348,000 by the end of 2019. Revenue for the year ending November 2019 approximated $60-70 million, reflecting compound growth from near-zero starting figures but still modest compared to later surges. During 2016-2019, adoption was organic, driven by word-of-mouth among influencers and performers, with minimal involvement and operations run lean from Stokely's home setup. The period established OnlyFans as a viable alternative to free platforms like , where creators faced algorithmic limitations on monetization.

Surge During COVID-19 (2020-2022)

During the , OnlyFans experienced explosive growth in user registrations and revenue, driven primarily by global lockdowns that confined people indoors, disrupted traditional and sex work industries, and prompted economic distress leading individuals to seek alternative income streams through . Registered users surged from 13.48 million in 2019 to 82.31 million in 2020, reflecting a more than 500% increase attributable to heightened online activity and the platform's appeal for direct of personal content amid widespread and stimulus payments. By 2021, user numbers further climbed to 187.97 million, as the platform capitalized on sustained remote lifestyles and a shift toward subscription-based and niche content consumption. Creator sign-ups similarly accelerated, with reports indicating over 500% growth in new accounts during the pandemic's early phases, as laid-off workers, including those from and , turned to OnlyFans for flexible earnings without intermediaries. The platform's user base expanded from approximately 20 million pre-pandemic to over 120 million within a year, fueled by both amateur creators offering personalized interactions and established performers migrating from shuttered physical venues. This influx was compounded by increased subscriber spending, with gross payments from fans reaching £1.7 billion (about $2.41 billion) in the 12 months ending May 2021, a 615% year-over-year rise linked directly to lockdown-induced isolation and digital pivots in intimacy and entertainment. Company revenue reflected this momentum, jumping from $49 million in 2019 to $358 million in 2020—a % increase—before gross revenues rose another 118% in 2021, underscoring the platform's 20% cut on transactions as a key profit driver amid the surge. However, the growth was not without volatility; in August 2021, OnlyFans announced plans to prohibit sexually explicit content effective , citing pressure from banking and processors, which sparked creator backlash and fears of revenue collapse given adult material's dominance. The policy was reversed within days after negotiations, preserving the platform's trajectory into , where user growth continued albeit at a decelerating pace from peaks. This episode highlighted dependencies on adult content for the surge, with non-explicit offerings like fitness and failing to match the scale of erotic subscriptions during the period.

Maturation and Headwinds (2023-2025)

Following the explosive growth during the , OnlyFans entered a phase of maturation characterized by sustained but decelerating expansion. In 2023, the platform processed $6.62 billion in gross payments, reflecting a 19.9% year-over-year increase, while pre-tax profits rose 25.3% to $658 million; this period saw 4.118 million active creators and 305 million registered fans. By 2024, gross revenue climbed to $7.22 billion, a more modest 9% gain, with pre-tax profits edging up 4% to $684 million and creator numbers reaching approximately 4.6 million amid 377.5 million total users by year-end. These figures underscore a stabilization, as user and creator additions—such as 936,000 new creators in 2023 alone—continued but at rates insufficient to replicate prior surges, signaling market saturation in core demographics. Diversification initiatives gained traction, with non-adult content categories reporting 15-20% year-over-year growth by 2025, contributing to a gradually broadening base beyond the platform's adult material dominance. Company leadership, including owner , distributed $701 million in dividends during 2024, positioning the business for potential strategic sale at an $8 billion valuation, which analysts viewed as a maturation milestone amid investor interest in assets. Regulatory scrutiny intensified as a primary headwind, particularly around and age verification. In May 2024, the UK's launched an investigation into whether OnlyFans adequately prevented minors from accessing , focusing on compliance with obligations under the Online Safety Act. This culminated in a £1.05 million fine imposed in March 2025 for providing inaccurate information on age-assurance measures to regulators. Additionally, a January 2025 whistleblower report alleged that payment processors and Visa overlooked transactions linked to material on the platform, prompting calls for enhanced financial oversight despite OnlyFans' transparency reports claiming cooperation with . Market dynamics posed further challenges for creators, with intensifying among 4.19 million accounts by early 2025 leading to "slow months" and inconsistent earnings for many, as platform growth failed to proportionally boost per-creator income amid user fatigue and economic pressures. Reports from creators highlighted exhaustion and , with only a achieving sustainable profitability despite overall payouts exceeding $5.8 billion in 2024, underscoring the platform's maturation into a crowded ecosystem where top earners captured disproportionate shares.

Content Dynamics

Dominance of Adult Material

Adult material overwhelmingly dominates OnlyFans, with estimates placing 70-80% of the platform's content as pornographic in nature. This prevalence stems from the platform's design facilitating direct monetization of explicit videos, images, and interactions, which attract the core subscriber base—predominantly male users comprising 75-80% of subscriptions. For explicit content featuring male creators, the primary subscriber base consists predominantly of gay or bisexual men, irrespective of the creator's sexual orientation or whether the content is solo or collaborative. Approximately 70% of creators produce such content, leveraging niches within to generate earnings that far outpace non-explicit offerings. The economic centrality of is evident in revenue figures and creator payouts, where the top 1% of earners—nearly 97% women—derive substantial income from explicit content sales, contributing to OnlyFans' $6.3 billion in gross revenues for 2024. Among popular creators highlighted in 2026 reviews, accounts such as @skylarmaexo (noted for high engagement, creative scenes, and over 6 million likes), @ayumiwaifu (reader's choice favorite for appeal and value), @the.italian.giulia (elegant, interactive content often with free access), @miakhalifa (established celebrity creator with strong following and consistent popularity), and @lyiax (editor's top pick for overall quality) exemplify successful adult content providers, though the "best" accounts remain subjective depending on preferences for content type (e.g., solo, couple, niche), engagement, and pricing (many offer free or low-cost access). This segment has propelled the platform to eclipse traditional operators like (formerly MindGeek), with OnlyFans revenues now roughly double those of Pornhub's parent company. Non-adult creators, while present, represent a minority whose output struggles to compete in visibility and profitability against the algorithmic favoritism toward high-engagement explicit material. OnlyFans' 2021 announcement to ban sexually explicit content, prompted by banking pressures, triggered immediate creator exodus threats and a policy reversal within days, highlighting the platform's inextricable dependence on adult material for user retention and financial viability. This episode, coupled with sustained growth post-reversal, affirms that adult content not only forms the bulk of uploads but also underpins the subscription model, where explicit transactions and fan interactions yield the highest yields per creator.

Marginal Non-Adult Offerings

Approximately 30% of OnlyFans creators produce non-adult content, including fitness instruction, cooking demonstrations, tutorials, artistic guidance, and educational material, while the remaining 70% focus on adult-oriented offerings. Among these non-adult niches, fitness and wellness attract the largest following after adult content, followed by musicians and visual artists who share clips, composition tips, or digital artwork processes. Fitness trainers, yoga instructors, and gym enthusiasts succeed without risqué elements through clothed content that provides value via exclusive access to expertise, ongoing guidance, and personalized workouts not available for free on other platforms; this model fosters community engagement and recurring subscription income, with some achieving six-figure earnings focused on instructional depth rather than explicit material. Non-adult creators often leverage the platform's subscription model to offer exclusive workouts, videos, or skill-building lessons, appealing to subscribers seeking personalized, paywalled access beyond free alternatives. Success in these areas typically requires an established external audience, as the platform's user base skews toward interests, limiting organic discovery for content. For instance, fitness trainers may provide customized training plans or live Q&A sessions, but such creators represent a minority of high earners compared to their counterparts. Despite the platform's flexibility for diverse content, non-adult offerings generate a disproportionately small share of , with adult material accounting for the primary economic driver through higher subscription retention and tip volumes. A small number of non-adult creators, such as those in niche or , have reported substantial earnings—potentially reaching six figures annually—but these cases rely on viral or unique value propositions rather than platform-wide trends. Overall, the marginal viability of non-adult content underscores OnlyFans' origins and user demographics, which prioritize direct monetization of explicit material over broader creative diversification.

Creator Operations and Support Systems

Creators initiate operations by completing an identity verification process, submitting a valid government-issued photo ID—such as a passport, driver's license, or national ID card—a real-time holding the ID, and additional personal details exceeding nine pieces of identifying information. For creators in allowed countries like Nigeria, there is no specific passport requirement; other valid government-issued IDs suffice. This step, required for account activation, typically processes in 5-10 minutes but may extend to 72 hours. Verified creators then access the platform's , known as the Statistics Page, which displays key metrics including total earnings, content view counts, subscriber numbers, geographic distribution of fans, and referral sources. These enable data-driven decisions on and promotion, though the built-in tools offer limited depth compared to third-party enhancements; the dashboard lacks official features for setting categories, niches, or tags on profiles or content, with creators advised to focus strategically on specific themes or styles to attract dedicated audiences, while tagging collaborators via @username in posts and using hashtags in post descriptions enhance visibility for social media promotions without formal category selections. The referral sources analytics highlight the platform's lack of internal discoverability, as OnlyFans provides no search functionality or recommendation algorithms, requiring creators to attract nearly all subscribers through external marketing on social media and other platforms. Content management tools support operational efficiency through features like post scheduling, which queues media for automatic release; the Vault for archiving and reposting past content; and Stories for temporary 24-hour photo or video shares. Creators set subscription prices, including free tiers to attract users with teaser or full content, offer (PPV) attachments in posts or streams, enable tipping on profiles or messages, and integrate polls or quizzes for fan engagement. No single official ranking exists for top free OnlyFans creators, as "top" varies by metrics like subscriber engagement, likes, and content quality. Early 2026 reviews highlight popular free accounts such as of_kitty (bold high-quality content, ~459k likes), erinmabx (wild unfiltered posts, frequent updates), jadelynmusic (lively feed, humor, ~335k likes), ayumiwaifu (cosplay/nerdy vibe, consistent updates), and lyiax (chaotic personal style, ~68k likes), with others frequently mentioned including khloeex, the.italian.giulia, and paolaaxo. The official OnlyFans blog recommends non-explicit free accounts like @chedurena (comedy) and @mia_art (art) for January 2026. Livestreaming allows real-time interaction with PPV options, while co-streaming facilitates collaborations, with sessions archived to the Vault. Cam models and similar creators commonly upload high-quality recordings of full live sessions as exclusive on-demand content, monetized through subscriptions or PPV. Fundraising targets can be added to posts for direct donations toward specified goals. Messaging systems form a core operational component, with mass direct messages (DMs) customizable for targeted fan segments, including exclusions and PPV media attachments to drive revenue. Automatic welcome messages greet new subscribers via Chats settings, and top fan recognition highlights the highest 1-5% spenders for exclusive . OnlyFans prohibits facilitating in-person meetings for any transactions beyond on-platform interactions, effectively banning arrangements for sexual meetups through the platform. Reliable reports of pornstars commonly meeting OnlyFans subscribers for sex are absent, as such activities would breach terms of service and invite legal risks related to prostitution in numerous jurisdictions. Campaigns generate trackable to monitor from external promotions. Payout operations require linking verified bank details post-approval, with earnings held in a pending balance for 7-21 days based on location to prevent chargebacks and fraud. Withdrawals process thereafter, typically within hours to days, though delays have prompted creator complaints about inconsistent support responsiveness. Platform support relies on a ticket-based accessible via the profile's Help section, where creators submit queries on payments, technical issues, or policy compliance; response times vary, with some reports citing delays or perceived inadequacies. The Creator Center provides feature overviews and performance insights to optimize usage.

Internal Operations

Moderation and Compliance Efforts

OnlyFans maintains a dedicated content moderation department that reviews all uploaded material, including live streams, in accordance with its and . The platform's policy, last updated on March 4, 2024, outlines the criteria for intervention, including violations involving illegal activities, non-consensual acts, , or material (CSAM), and specifies procedures for content removal, account suspension, or permanent bans. Prohibited content explicitly includes depictions of minors in sexual contexts, , , animal cruelty, , and promotion of illegal substances or weapons, with creators required to verify age and consent through government-issued identification prior to posting. To combat CSAM specifically, OnlyFans has implemented reporting mechanisms and deactivated accounts upon detection; for instance, in July 2021, the platform reported deactivating 15 accounts for CSAM and another 14 for violating bestiality policies. In October 2023, OnlyFans entered a partnership with the (IWF), sharing technical expertise to identify and block CSAM distribution across the web, marking a proactive step beyond reactive removals. Compliance efforts also involve responding to requests, though transparency reports indicate variability in disclosure volumes, with the platform emphasizing cooperation while navigating structures that limit external oversight of subscriber-only content. Despite these measures, moderation has faced scrutiny for inconsistencies. A 2022 BBC investigation alleged lax verification processes allowed underage creators and illegal content to persist, with the platform reportedly failing to detect violations in test submissions. officials have highlighted challenges posed by millions of creator-specific paywalls, which obscure CSAM detection without direct access, complicating proactive scanning as of July 2024. Critics, including U.S. lawmakers in , argued that OnlyFans lacked sufficient automated tools or rapid reporting protocols to authorities, prompting calls for enhanced mechanisms amid broader concerns over platform liability. The company's small core staff of approximately 42 employees as of 2024 raises questions about scalability, though it relies on a combination of human reviewers and policy enforcement rather than publicly detailed AI-driven moderation at scale.

Employment of Chatters and Automation

Many OnlyFans creators outsource messaging to third-party agencies that employ "chatters," individuals hired to impersonate the creator in subscriber interactions, including ghostwriting messages, fostering rapport, and (PPV) content or custom requests. These chatters often operate remotely, with a concentration in low-wage regions like the to exploit differences for 24/7 coverage, allowing agencies to handle high-volume inboxes without the creator's involvement. Compensation structures typically combine base pay—sometimes as low as $2 per hour—with commissions tied to sales conversions, though reports highlight inconsistent earnings, mandatory unpaid training, and demands for prior experience in adult chat services. Working conditions for chatters frequently involve extended shifts, in simulating intimacy, and exposure to explicit subscriber demands, contributing to burnout and high turnover. Agencies such as Chatters and AROA recruit globally via online job postings, emphasizing skills in persuasive communication over formal qualifications, with roles marketed as flexible remote opportunities but often lacking labor protections due to the industry's gray-area status. This model enables top creators to scale revenue—potentially multiplying earnings through volume—but relies on chatters' of subscribers, who believe they are engaging directly with the model. Parallel to human chatters, via AI-powered chatbots has proliferated since around 2023, with tools like FlirtFlow, Botly, and Supercreator integrating directly with OnlyFans to handle DMs autonomously. These systems analyze subscriber behavior, generate personalized responses, re-engage lapsed users, and automate PPV promotions, operating 24/7 without fatigue and at lower ongoing costs than human labor. Agencies increasingly adopt AI to supplement or displace chatters, as evidenced by SaaS platforms reporting rapid revenue growth—such as one tool generating $556,000 in three months by 2025 through automated chatting and PPV handling. While enhancing efficiency, this shift raises concerns over authenticity, with bots trained on creator data to mimic voices but potentially eroding subscriber trust if detected. By mid-2025, AI automation extended beyond text to image generation, further reducing reliance on human intermediaries.

Security Framework

Data Protection Protocols

OnlyFans implements data protection measures aligned with applicable legal standards, including compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for users, which mandates safeguards for processing such as , transparency, and purpose limitation. The platform collects —including identification, financial, and verification data—from creators and subscribers primarily for account management, age verification, anti-fraud purposes, and community safety, with policies requiring explicit user for processing and storage. Security protocols include of user , though the platform does not employ , enabling internal access for moderation, legal compliance, and requests when legally required. is reportedly encrypted both in transit and at rest to mitigate unauthorized access risks, supplemented by regular audits, access controls, and employee training on handling. To deter unauthorized sharing and identify content ownership, OnlyFans applies watermarks to images, including screenshots and selfies, typically displaying the creator's username (e.g., @username or OnlyFans.com/@username) in semi-transparent white text in the bottom right corner. Backups are maintained to ensure , but specifics on standards (e.g., AES-256) are not publicly detailed in official documentation. In transparency reports, OnlyFans discloses handling of data subject access requests (DSARs) under GDPR, processing global inquiries for user information while limiting disclosures to verified legal bases, such as combating child sexual abuse material (CSAM). The privacy policy permits sharing personal data with affiliates, service providers, and authorities for fraud prevention or court orders, without routine third-party sales, though critics note potential vulnerabilities from non-end-to-end encryption exposing content and metadata to platform insiders or compelled disclosures. Creators and users are advised to enable two-factor authentication and monitor account activity, as platform-level protections do not fully prevent phishing or credential stuffing attacks.

Incident Response to Breaches and Threats

In February , content from hundreds of OnlyFans performers leaked online, including videos shared via Telegram channels. The platform's marketing chief, Steve Pym, stated on that an internal investigation found no of a security breach or hack originating from OnlyFans systems, attributing the incident instead to potential compromises at the individual creator level. In September 2021, researchers from the firm BehindML disclosed that former OnlyFans employees retained unauthorized access to sensitive performer and user , including direct messages and payout information, due to inadequate of credentials upon termination. This exposed risks of insider threats and misuse, though no widespread exploitation was confirmed at the time. OnlyFans did not publicly detail immediate remediation steps beyond general assurances of ongoing audits, prompting criticism from advocates for delayed access controls. OnlyFans has encountered external cyber threats, including a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack in 2023 claimed by the group , which disrupted site availability for several hours. The platform mitigated the attack through standard DDoS protection services, restoring operations without reported data compromise, though specifics on defensive measures or post-incident enhancements remain undisclosed. User-reported incidents, such as account takeovers via or , have led OnlyFans to direct affected parties to contact [email protected] for investigation, password resets, and two-factor authentication enforcement. The company emphasizes rapid user notifications in cases of suspected unauthorized access but has not outlined a formalized public incident response framework, such as mandatory breach disclosures under regulations like GDPR. In France, OnlyFans creators report persistent risks of content leaks and piracy, with up to 45% of material distributed on illicit forums, alongside cyberharassment affecting 30% through threats and photo theft leading to anxiety, depression, and isolation. Testimonies from creators underscore mental health strains from these violations, though no massive leaks have been documented in 2025-2026; some express preference for platforms offering stronger anti-piracy measures, such as rapid takedown processes. Transparency reports from OnlyFans, such as the April 2024 edition, focus primarily on content-related reporting to bodies like the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) rather than detailing breach protocols or threat mitigation metrics. Critics, including cybersecurity firms, note that many "leaks" involve off-platform sharing of pirated content or creator device compromises rather than core infrastructure failures, suggesting platform responses prioritize containment over proactive disclosure.

Battles Over Age Verification and CSAM

OnlyFans has faced regulatory scrutiny and legal challenges in implementing robust age verification to prevent minors from accessing content, amid a of state-level laws in the United States requiring such measures for platforms with substantial explicit material. In 2022, enacted the first such statute, mandating age verification for websites where over one-third of content is deemed harmful to minors, prompting OnlyFans to enhance its ID-based verification processes for users. By 2025, at least 10 additional states, including , , and , had similar laws in effect or pending, creating compliance burdens that critics argue infringe on and free speech while proponents cite imperatives. OnlyFans mandates government-issued ID submission for all creators and subscribers to confirm they are at least 18. Additionally, since August 2021, OnlyFans has implemented Yoti's facial age estimation technology, requiring users to take a real-time selfie analyzed by AI with liveness detection to prevent spoofing; the selfie is deleted immediately after processing, and OnlyFans receives only an anonymous age threshold result (e.g., over 18) to ensure users are over 18 and prevent minors from accessing or monetizing content. However, enforcement varies, with reports of workarounds like VPNs eroding effectiveness in regions like the . In the UK, the Online Safety Act, effective July 2025, compels platforms hosting potentially harmful content to deploy age checks, leading to launch an investigation into OnlyFans in May 2024 over alleged deficiencies in verification systems that could allow underage access. The platform's response included bolstering biometric and document checks, yet legal battles persist, exemplified by a June 2025 U.S. ruling upholding Texas's verification law against First Amendment challenges, signaling broader acceptance of such mandates despite industry pushback on risks. These disputes highlight tensions between restricting minor exposure to and avoiding overreach that could drive users to unregulated alternatives. Parallel controversies involve child sexual abuse material (CSAM) proliferating on OnlyFans despite moderation claims, with a December 2024 Reuters investigation identifying multiple accounts suspected of hosting explicit content involving minors, including videos suggestive of exploitation reviewed by experts. In 2021, a bipartisan group of 102 U.S. Congress members, led by , urged the Department of Justice to probe OnlyFans for CSAM prevalence, citing reports of missing children and trafficking links, though no charges directly against the company ensued at that time. Victims' advocates have pursued civil suits alleging platform in content oversight, with cases emerging by late 2024 seeking compensation for abuse facilitated through creator accounts. OnlyFans asserts proactive scanning via tools like those from the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, reporting over 1,000 CSAM instances in 2023, but skeptics, including , question the efficacy given persistent detections. These issues underscore causal failures in upstream verification, where lax creator onboarding—despite ID requirements—has enabled underage or exploitative material to evade filters, fueling calls for federal mandates over state-by-state fragmentation.

Conflicts with Payment Processors

In August 2021, OnlyFans announced it would prohibit sexually explicit content on its platform starting , attributing the decision directly to pressure from banking partners and processors unwilling to continue facilitating transactions involving . The move stemmed from Visa and Mastercard's longstanding policies restricting high-risk adult content processing, which include requirements for enhanced verification and compliance to mitigate reputational and legal risks. CEO confirmed that major institutions, including the , Metro Bank, and , had refused or threatened to terminate services due to the platform's association with sexual content, forcing the policy shift to maintain operational viability. The announcement triggered widespread backlash from creators reliant on explicit content for revenue, prompting OnlyFans to reverse the ban on , 2021, after negotiating alternative assurances from payment partners to sustain processing without full content restrictions. This episode highlighted processors' leverage over platforms, as Visa and had previously enforced similar curbs, such as suspending payments to MindGeek-owned sites like in December 2020 amid unverified content allegations. Ongoing tensions persist, with OnlyFans classified as a high-risk , complicating partnerships and exposing it to account freezes or terminations by traditional banks averse to adult industry exposure. In January 2025, a whistleblower alleged that Visa and inadequately enforced anti-money laundering protocols, allowing payments linked to material on OnlyFans to continue despite internal flags, underscoring processors' selective enforcement amid broader adult content scrutiny. These conflicts reflect processors' dual role in enabling transactions while imposing extralegal content controls, often prioritizing liability avoidance over consistent policy application.

Global Bans and Compliance Hurdles

OnlyFans faces outright bans or severe restrictions in numerous countries, primarily due to stringent national laws prohibiting , internet censorship, or moral regulations on . As of 2025, the platform is completely banned in at least 16 nations, including , where access was blocked on July 15, 2025, following declarations that it threatens national morals, cultural values, and amid broader efforts to curb Western-influenced and monetized sexuality. Similar prohibitions exist in , where the site violates federal laws against disseminating obscene materials; , , and other Middle Eastern states like , , UAE, and , driven by Islamic legal standards against explicit content; and Asian countries such as , , , , and , enforced through blanket internet controls or ideological restrictions.
Country/RegionBasis for Ban/RestrictionKey Date/Enforcement
Internet censorship and moral threatsJuly 15, 2025
Obscenity lawsOngoing since platform launch
Creator restrictions under IT rulesPartial, creator-focused
(e.g., , , UAE)Religious prohibitions on Comprehensive blocks
Strict content regulationsFull site ban
In addition to government-imposed blocks, OnlyFans proactively restricts creator registrations and operations in approximately 108 as of December 2024, citing regulatory barriers, financial service limitations, and inability to ensure compliance with local laws on age verification, , and anti-exploitation measures. These hurdles include navigating disparate international frameworks, such as Europe's GDPR for data privacy, varying age-of-consent thresholds, and prohibitions on certain content types, which demand platform-wide adaptations like localized verification processes that exceed standard KYC requirements in complexity. Payment processing poses persistent global challenges, as major networks like Visa and impose stringent policies on high-risk adult transactions, leading to delayed international payouts—often 3-5 business days for bank transfers and up to 14 days for cross-border wires—and occasional rejections due to flags or content-related scrutiny. A January 2025 whistleblower report highlighted failures by these processors to fully halt payments tied to material on the platform, underscoring ongoing tensions between financial gatekeepers and adult-oriented businesses, which have prompted OnlyFans to maintain risk-based compliance programs aligned with U.S. Department of Justice guidelines while monitoring evolving global legal developments. Such issues contribute to operational fragmentation, with creators in permitted regions facing tools to exclude banned territories, further complicating revenue streams in a platform reliant on worldwide subscriptions.

Key Controversies

Human Exploitation in Creation and Consumption

Sex traffickers have exploited OnlyFans to monetize the production of explicit content from coerced women, with police reports documenting cases of isolation, , and financial control over victims' earnings. In one investigation, authorities identified instances where traffickers managed accounts, forcing victims to produce content under threats while retaining a portion of revenues, which the platform's 20% fee structure indirectly facilitates by processing payments from such activity. Anti-trafficking organizations have compiled case studies showing pimps using the site to advertise and sell access to victims, often under the guise of independent creators, with the platform's verification processes failing to detect external control in multiple documented examples. Creators, predominantly young women entering the platform amid economic pressures, face heightened risks of exploitation through or relational , where initial voluntary participation evolves into dependency on pimps or managers who demand content production quotas. In France, creators additionally confront persistent content piracy and leaks disseminated on underground sites, alongside cyberharassment and photo theft following breaches, often linked to recruitment by clandestine agencies via social networks that impose production demands and pressures toward offline prostitution, contributing to mental health impacts including anxiety and isolation. Empirical analyses reveal that traffickers profit substantially—up to 80% of gross earnings after the platform's cut—while victims receive minimal shares, perpetuating cycles of abuse masked as entrepreneurial autonomy. deterioration, including PTSD and dissociation, has been reported among survivors who were compelled to perform acts beyond initial , underscoring the causal link between the platform's model and sustained exploitation. On the consumption side, subscribers exhibit patterns of compulsive spending akin to gambling , with documented cases of individuals accruing debts exceeding $100,000 from subscriptions and tips, leading to and marital dissolution. One verified incident involved a expending $135,000 on content, resulting in financial ruin and proceedings as of 2024. Behavioral studies indicate that the platform's algorithmic promotion of personalized content exacerbates dopamine-driven habits, contributing to isolation and eroded real-world relationships among primarily ers, many of whom are married rather than solitary. Financial impacts extend to broader economic harm, as excessive consumption diverts disposable income from productive uses, with reports estimating average monthly spends in the hundreds for heavy users, correlating with increased and reduced savings rates. This pattern aligns with models where intermittent from creator interactions sustains , often at the of users' fiscal stability and psychological , without platform interventions like spending caps to mitigate risks.

Deceptive Practices and Subscriber Fraud

OnlyFans creators frequently employ third-party "chatters"—often low-wage workers in agencies—to impersonate them in direct messages with subscribers, fostering the illusion of personal interaction to encourage purchases of content and tips. These chatters follow scripted strategies designed to build emotional bonds, such as feigning interest in subscribers' lives or simulating intimacy, which leads subscribers to spend far more than they might otherwise. A investigation revealed that this practice powers much of the platform's revenue model for top earners, with agencies training chatters to exploit vulnerabilities like , resulting in subscribers reporting expenditures in the thousands of dollars under of authenticity. Subscribers often discover the through inconsistencies, such as mismatched writing styles, response times, or knowledge gaps that reveal the interlocutor is not the creator, prompting accusations of . For instance, in early 2025, multiple male subscribers detailed experiences on platforms like where they believed they were developing romantic connections with popular models, only to uncover agency involvement after noticing discrepancies like uniform phrasing across interactions. This mirrors broader complaints where subscribers feel manipulated into believing they are receiving exclusive, one-on-one engagement, a core selling point of OnlyFans' subscription model promising "direct" access to creators. Legal challenges have mounted against OnlyFans for facilitating these practices, despite its prohibiting "misleading or deceptive conduct." A class-action lawsuit filed on July 29, 2024, by Hagens Berman alleges the platform knowingly permits professional chatters to impersonate creators, violating laws by deceiving users about the authenticity of interactions and enabling agencies to siphon up to 50% of earnings through upsell commissions. Similarly, a October 2024 billion-dollar class-action suit in contends that this "" constitutes wire fraud, with plaintiffs arguing OnlyFans profits from the deception via transaction fees on induced spending. OnlyFans has defended the practice as a common industry tool, but courts have yet to rule definitively, highlighting tensions between platform liability and creator autonomy. Emerging use of automation exacerbates the fraud, with some creators deploying AI chatbots or bots to mimic interactions at scale, further eroding any pretense of genuineness. Reports from late 2024 indicate agencies shifting from human chatters to AI tools that generate personalized-seeming responses, potentially increasing deception volume while reducing costs, though subscribers remain unaware and continue to pay premiums for what they perceive as human engagement. These tactics have drawn scrutiny for privacy risks, as chatters or bots access sensitive subscriber data to tailor manipulations, underscoring how OnlyFans' lax oversight prioritizes revenue over transparency.

Persistent Child Safety Failures

A investigation published on May 26, 2021, revealed that OnlyFans was failing to prevent underage users from selling explicit videos, with the platform's age verification processes allowing minors as young as 14 to create accounts and upload content despite stated minimum age requirements of 18. The report documented cases where British teenagers evaded ID checks through basic methods, such as using falsified documents or adult proxies, highlighting systemic weaknesses in initial verification and ongoing monitoring. Subsequent regulatory scrutiny underscored these lapses. In May 2024, the UK's launched an investigation into OnlyFans' age verification measures after reports that children could access on the site, questioning whether the platform's "challenge 25" policy—requiring ID only for suspicious users—was sufficient to block minors. By March 27, 2025, fined OnlyFans' operator £1 million (approximately $1.4 million USD) for providing inaccurate information about its age assurance processes during the probe, including misleading claims on the effectiveness of ID verification and user monitoring. Structural features of the platform exacerbate detection challenges. As of July 2024, officials reported to that OnlyFans' millions of paywalled accounts—requiring subscriptions or payments to access content—impede proactive scanning for material (CSAM), particularly self-generated content from minors, allowing exploitative material to persist undetected until reported. A January 2025 whistleblower disclosure further alleged that payment processors and Visa continued facilitating transactions linked to CSAM and on OnlyFans, despite platform policies against such content, pointing to failures in financial oversight and integration. These incidents reflect ongoing vulnerabilities, as open-source analyses from 2022 noted that OnlyFans' subscription model complicates investigations into potential criminal content like assault depictions involving minors, often delaying or preventing law enforcement access without user complaints. Despite a 2023 partnership with the Internet Watch Foundation to enhance CSAM reporting, the recurrence of verification fines and access issues into 2025 indicates that reactive measures have not fully resolved proactive prevention gaps.

Societal Ramifications

Effects on Individuals and Families

Creators on OnlyFans have reported elevated risks of issues, including anxiety, depression, , , and low , stemming from the pressures of constant content production and public exposure. on online sex work, which encompasses much of OnlyFans activity, consistently links participation to adverse psychological outcomes, such as and identity conflicts, particularly among those entering due to financial desperation or validation-seeking behaviors. Consumers, often men in committed relationships, exhibit patterns of compulsive spending and usage akin to , with reports of individuals allocating thousands of dollars monthly despite financial strain, leading to neglected responsibilities and eroded personal productivity. This combines elements of porn consumption, gambling-like variable rewards from interactions, and parasocial attachments to creators, fostering dependency that diminishes real-world relational investment. Studies indicate that a of subscribers are married, and excessive use correlates with reduced marital satisfaction and intimacy, as partners perceive it as a breach of trust equivalent to . Within families, discovery of a spouse's OnlyFans involvement—either as creator or heavy consumer—frequently precipitates marital breakdown, with anecdotal evidence from legal consultations showing heightened divorce initiations due to perceived betrayal or financial secrecy. For creators who are parents, platform activity can jeopardize child custody arrangements, as courts in cases like a 2024 Philadelphia ruling have deemed explicit content creation incompatible with parental fitness when it risks child exposure or moral influence. Income derived from OnlyFans also alters divorce settlements by inflating spousal or child support calculations, potentially straining family finances post-separation. Children in such households face indirect harms, including parental modeling of commodified intimacy and potential inadvertent access to explicit materials, though quantitative data on long-term familial outcomes remains limited due to the platform's recency.

Shifts in Media Economics and Culture

The emergence of OnlyFans has accelerated the transition within media economics from intermediary-dominated models—such as advertising-supported free content on platforms like Pornhub or studio-produced videos—to direct-to-consumer subscriptions, enabling creators to retain a larger share of revenue without relying on aggregators or distributors. This shift was propelled by the platform's 2020 surge during the COVID-19 pandemic, when gross payments to creators reached approximately $2 billion, reflecting increased individual content production amid lockdowns that disrupted traditional filming and distribution. By 2023, gross site volume hit $6.6 billion, with creators receiving $5.3 billion, marking a 19% year-over-year increase and underscoring the viability of subscription tiers, tips, and pay-per-view features over ad revenue or one-time sales. Economically, OnlyFans exemplifies high efficiency in the , generating $37.6 million per employee in revenue by minimizing content production costs—creators self-fund and upload—while platforms like traditional media firms incur substantial overhead for IP and . This model has democratized access, with over 4 million creators by 2023 earning an average of nearly $1,300 annually, though top earners skew distributions heavily toward personalized content comprising 70-80% of the platform's output. Unlike legacy porn industries reliant on centralized studios, OnlyFans facilitates niche, fan-directed production, reducing barriers for amateurs but intensifying competition and risks, as evidenced by underground markets for leaked content. Culturally, the platform has normalized subscription-based intimacy, blending dynamics with erotic personalization and challenging prior norms of anonymous, mass-market consumption. This evolution, turbocharged post-2020, has prompted debates on relational impacts, with some psychologists noting potential desensitization to non-monetized interactions among younger users, though empirical data on causation remains limited. Critics, including reports from organizations like Culture Reframed, argue it fosters degradation by commodifying personal vulnerability, yet platform defenders highlight empowerment through absent in studio contracts. Overall, OnlyFans has contributed to a broader cultural pivot toward creator-fan directness, diminishing gatekeepers in adult media while raising questions about sustainability amid saturation and evolving viewer preferences for authenticity over polished production.

References

  1. https://oyelabs.com/onlyfans-business-model/
  2. https://www.supercreator.app/guides/origin-and-rise-of-onlyfans
  3. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/onlyfans-sex-origins/
  4. https://variety.com/2025/digital/news/onlyfans-fiscal-2024-revenue-earnings-1236495750/
  5. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/section/onlyfans-exposed/
  6. https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2021/06/16/the-shady-secret-history-of-onlyfans-billionaire-owner/
  7. https://www.crunchbase.com/person/tim-stokely
  8. https://system.privco.com/company/onlyfans
  9. https://www.themediamoment.com/analysis/meet-british-founder-onlyfans-raking-in-millions
  10. https://pleazeme.com/onlyfans-founder/
  11. https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/2025/08/22/onlyfans-owner-gets-701-million-dividend-payout/85775905007/
  12. https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/onlyfans-got-7-2-billion-in-payments-in-2024-heres-how-much-owner-leonid-radvinsky-made-from-adult-site-11755853856209.html
  13. https://variety.com/2025/digital/news/onlyfans-porn-site-sale-talks-8-billion-1236408046/
  14. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/onlyfans-owner-talks-sell-investor-group-about-8-billion-value-sources-say-2025-05-22/
  15. https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/entertainment/article/3270446/meet-onlyfans-founder-tim-stokely-so-what-he-now-essex-native-ran-popular-content-platform-his
  16. https://www.phoenix-creators.com/onlyfans-blog/cant-sign-into-onlyfans-via-twitter-here-are-potential-fixes
  17. https://start.onlyfans.com/
  18. https://www.mexc.co/crypto-pulse/article/onlyfans-crypto-48221
  19. https://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-onlyfans-content-platform-explained-2024-4
  20. https://blog.onlyfans.com/ultimate-guide-to-onlyfans-features/
  21. https://pleazeme.com/onlyfans-ppv/
  22. https://www.enforcity.com/onlyfans-success/private-messaging-on-onlyfans
  23. https://bluresca.com/blog/a-guide-to-ppv-content-on-onlyfans/
  24. https://www.supercreator.app/guides/how-does-onlyfans-pay-creators?2eb56155_page=5&a90997f3_page=5&c6321869_page=8&ccc5f900_page=3&dbdf1114_page=7
  25. https://pleazeme.com/onlyfans-statistics/
  26. https://www.businessinsider.com/onlyfans-app-surges-creators-users-revenue-owner-leonid-radvinsky-earnings-2025-8
  27. https://ofstats.net/
  28. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/detailed-analysis-onlyfans-user-audience-alexandr-udodov-ew3gf
  29. https://www.spreadthoughts.com/onlyfans-statistics-by-country/
  30. https://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/1elkt3r/turned_out_90_of_onlyfans_subscribers_are_married/
  31. https://social-rise.com/blog/onlyfans-statistics
  32. https://onlymonster.ai/blog/how-many-onlyfans-creators-are-there/
  33. https://www.semrush.com/website/onlyfans.com/overview/
  34. https://onlytraffic.com/blog/onlyfans-statistics-and-analytics
  35. https://www.untaylored.com/post/how-onlyfans-makes-money-the-business-and-revenue-model-explained
  36. https://www.upmarket.co/blog/onlyfans-official-revenue-net-profit-creator-and-subscriber-data-updated-september-2024/
  37. https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/onlyfans-takes-7-2bn-subscribers-134429895.html
  38. https://multiples.vc/insights/the-8b-economics-of-onlyfans
  39. https://social-rise.com/blog/how-much-does-onlyfans-take
  40. https://www.tubefilter.com/2024/09/12/onlyfans-digital-products-revenue/
  41. https://zipdo.co/onlyfans-creator-statistics/
  42. https://www.livemint.com/news/us-news/onlyfans-rich-list-2025-the-jaw-dropping-earnings-of-top-of-creators-like-sophie-rain-how-much-do-men-spend-on-models-11750232964741.html
  43. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/study-men-spend-48-52-211500140.html
  44. https://www.supercreator.app/guides/top-onlyfans-earners
  45. https://social-rise.com/blog/average-onlyfans-income
  46. https://www.supercreator.app/guides/onlyfans-average-income
  47. https://infloww.com/blog/average-income-for-onlyfans-creators
  48. https://csape.ewu.edu/when-did-onlyfans-come-out
  49. https://sonary.com/content/how-onlyfans-became-a-billion-dollar-platform/
  50. https://www.forbes.com.au/news/billionaires/porn-profits-how-onlyfans-became-a-4-billion-goldmine/
  51. https://www.businessmodelideas.com/blog/the-rise-of-onlyfans
  52. https://www.statista.com/topics/10083/onlyfans/
  53. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhOmkRxqSYQ
  54. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/timstokely_what-i-learned-starting-a-billion-dollar-activity-7337814328110178306-LYHU
  55. https://www.amraandelma.com/onlyfans-statistics/
  56. https://news.yahoo.com/onlyfans-boomed-during-lockdown-users-163310865.html
  57. https://musically.com/2021/05/25/covid-19-pandemic-helped-onlyfans-sales-grow-by-615/
  58. https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/onlyfans-gross-revenue-rises-9-120109374.html
  59. https://vocal.media/journal/only-fans-statistics-key-trends-growth-insights-and-user-demographics
  60. https://www.ainvest.com/news/onlyfans-7-2-billion-revenue-engine-diversification-potential-strategic-sale-looming-2508/
  61. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/aug/22/onlyfans-owner-dividends-revenue-potential-sale
  62. https://techfundingnews.com/onlyfans-set-for-8b-exit-pushing-creator-economys-limits/
  63. https://www.scrippsnews.com/business/company-news/onlyfans-faces-investigation-over-whether-it-allowed-children-to-access-pornography-on-its-website
  64. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr42g1lprw5o
  65. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/mar/27/onlyfans-ofcom-fine-age-checks-inaccurate-information
  66. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-whistleblower-says-mastercard-visa-failed-stop-payments-child-sex-abuse-2025-01-24/
  67. https://onlyfans.com/transparency/2023/6
  68. https://onlymonster.ai/blog/is-onlyfans-worth-it-in-2025/
  69. https://onlyguider.com/blog/what-percentage-of-onlyfans-is-porn/
  70. https://zipdo.co/onlyfans-male-vs-female-statistics/
  71. https://leadiax.com/how-to-start-an-onlyfans-as-a-guy/
  72. https://vocal.media/journal/only-fans-stats-2025-traffic-earnings-and-average-male-vs-female-income
  73. https://www.matthewball.co/all/ofpl
  74. https://www.riverfronttimes.com/top-onlyfans-models/
  75. https://www.bombex.com/blogs/onlyfans/best-celeb
  76. https://starmodelmanagement.com/onlyfans-niche-ideas/
  77. https://pleazeme.com/onlyfans-niche-ideas/
  78. https://infloww.com/blog/onlyfans-non-adult
  79. https://gastronaut.rs/countless-creators-are-redefining-success-through/
  80. https://onlyfans.com/transparency-center/verification
  81. https://social-rise.com/blog/onlyfans-verification-process
  82. https://www.supercreator.app/guides/how-does-onlyfans-verify-creators
  83. https://onlymonster.ai/
  84. https://onlyguider.com/blog/fansly-vs-onlyfans/
  85. https://www.adweek.org/blog/top-7-social-media-platforms-for-onlyfans-growth
  86. https://www.laweekly.com/best-free-videos-onlyfans/
  87. https://blog.onlyfans.com/free-onlyfans-accounts/
  88. https://www.supercreator.app/guides/want-to-turn-your-webcam-into-a-cash-cow-discover-the-best-cam-sites-for-earning-big
  89. https://onlyfans.com/acceptable-use-policy
  90. https://www.supercreator.app/guides/how-long-do-onlyfans-payouts-take
  91. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/onlyfans-creators-payout-problems-online-sex-workers
  92. https://www.reddit.com/r/onlyfansadvice/comments/1kqrkdj/is_anyone_else_having_issues_with_payouts/
  93. https://www.infloww.com/blog/onlyfans-payout-not-in-bank
  94. https://contactanycelebrity.com/cac/contact-onlyfans/
  95. https://blog.onlyfans.com/creator-center/
  96. https://onlyfans.com/transparency/2023/5
  97. https://onlyfans.com/transparency-center/policy
  98. https://social-rise.com/blog/onlyfans-terms-of-service
  99. https://blog.rulta.com/onlyfans-content-guidelines-navigating-the-do-s-and-don-ts
  100. https://gizmodo.com/onlyfans-reveals-how-often-police-demand-user-info-sor-1847521508
  101. https://www.iwf.org.uk/news-media/news/onlyfans-in-groundbreaking-partnership-with-internet-watch-foundation/
  102. https://fightthenewdrug.org/bbc-investigation-into-onlyfans-reportedly-finds-lax-moderation-underage-content/
  103. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/07/millions-of-onlyfans-paywalls-make-it-hard-to-detect-child-sex-abuse-cops-say/
  104. http://wagner.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congresswoman-ann-wagner-leads-bipartisan-coalition-calling-doj
  105. https://allwork.space/2024/10/how-are-onlyfans-employees-raking-in-more-revenue-than-employees-at-apple-google-and-microsoft/
  106. https://www.vice.com/en/article/onlyfans-management-agency-chatters/
  107. https://english.elpais.com/international/2023-11-23/500-a-day-to-pretend-to-be-a-model-the-big-business-behind-onlyfans-chatters.html
  108. https://www.wired.com/story/i-went-undercover-secret-onlyfans-chatter-wasnt-pretty/
  109. https://workandhealth.substack.com/p/onlyfans-work-health-and-ai-in-the
  110. https://www.ghostchatters.com/
  111. https://aroaagency.com/hiring-onlyfans-chatters
  112. https://www.flirtflow.ai/
  113. https://getbotly.com/
  114. https://www.vice.com/en/article/onlyfans-models-are-usuing-ai-chatbots-to-talk-dirty-for-them/
  115. https://restofworld.org/2025/onlyfans-ai-dm-bots/
  116. https://www.supercreator.app/onlyfans-bot
  117. https://blog.rulta.com/how-onlyfans-handles-user-data-and-privacy
  118. https://onlyfans.com/privacy
  119. https://onlyfans.com/transparency/2023/11
  120. https://veepn.com/blog/is-onlyfans-safe/
  121. https://dmcaforce.com/how-onlyfans-protects-content/
  122. https://blog.rulta.com/onlyfans-and-data-protection-how-your-information-is-used
  123. https://onlyfans.com/transparency/2022/8
  124. https://joindeleteme.com/blog/is-only-fans-safe/
  125. https://www.security.org/digital-safety/is-onlyfans-safe/
  126. https://databreaches.net/2020/02/27/onlyfans-says-it-wasnt-hacked-after-hundreds-of-performers-videos-leak-online/
  127. https://www.vice.com/en/article/former-onlyfans-employees-user-personal-data-security-risk/
  128. https://blog.avast.com/former-onlyfans-employees-retain-data-access-avast
  129. https://thecyberexpress.com/onlyfans-cyber-attack-assault-content-creators/
  130. https://www.purevpn.com/blog/onlyfans-data-leaks/
  131. https://www.doerhrm.com/beyond-the-screenshots-recovering-control-limiting/
  132. https://www.glooton.com/onlyfans-france-entre-emancipation-et-sante-mentale/
  133. https://onlyfans.com/transparency/2024/4
  134. https://www.sbenergy.com/sbenergy-259/onlyfans-blowjob-leak/
  135. https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/age-verification-bills/
  136. https://www.ipvanish.com/blog/us-age-verification-laws/
  137. https://www.yoti.com/blog/yoti-facial-age-estimation-different-industries/
  138. https://vpnoverview.com/unblocking/censorship/how-to-bypass-onlyfans-age-verification/
  139. https://idtechwire.com/uk-comms-regulator-opens-onlyfans-investigation/
  140. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jul/24/what-are-the-new-uk-online-safety-rules-and-how-will-they-be-enforced
  141. https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1lm0gj0/supreme_court_clears_the_way_for_increased_age/
  142. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/onlyfans-sex-children-accounts/
  143. https://goldlaw.com/victims-of-onlyfans-may-have-cases-for-financial-compensation/
  144. https://www.missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cybertipline/cybertiplinedata
  145. https://www.lawfuel.com/does-onlyfans-require-id-and-how-are-new-state-laws-affecting-it-in-2025/
  146. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/aug/19/onlyfans-to-ban-adult-material-after-pressure-from-payment-processors
  147. https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/20/tech/onlyfans-explicit-content-ban-payment
  148. https://www.theverge.com/2021/8/27/22641095/onlyfans-sex-work-ban-online-porn-payment-processing-controversy
  149. https://www.theverge.com/2021/8/24/22639356/onlyfans-ceo-tim-stokely-sexually-explicit-content-ban-banks
  150. https://time.com/6092947/onlyfans-sexual-content-ban/
  151. https://www.paymentsjournal.com/onlyfans-now-reversed-ban-underscores-bankings-influence-on-adult-content/
  152. https://insidetelecom.com/why-china-onlyfans-was-banned-and-what-it-means-for-users/
  153. https://thedailyguardian.com/china/china-shuts-down-onlyfans-calls-it-a-threat-to-national-morals-and-social-order-624938/
  154. https://pleazeme.com/onlyfans-banned-countries/
  155. https://social-rise.com/blog/is-onlyfans-illegal
  156. https://www.phoenix-creators.com/onlyfans-blog/is-onlyfans-illegal-in-my-country
  157. https://www.bloommgmt.co/blog/banned-and-allowed-countries-onlyfans
  158. https://ouinex.com/en/blog/crypto-news/verification-more-challenging-on-only-fans-than-crypto
  159. https://www.unfiltered-management.com/blog/onlyfans-payout
  160. https://blog.rulta.com/how-onlyfans-handles-international-transactions
  161. https://pippinclub.com/blog/guide-to-onlyfans-geoblocking/
  162. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/onlyfans-sex-trafficking/
  163. https://www.unco.edu/social-research-lab/pdf/of_report_1_19_24_final.pdf
  164. https://endsexualexploitation.org/wp-content/uploads/Sex-Trafficking-Abusive-Pimps_OnlyFans_DDL-Proof-2022.pdf
  165. https://www.leparisien.fr/societe/jetais-sa-poule-aux-oeufs-dor-linquietant-business-de-mym-et-onlyfans-qui-fait-plonger-les-jeunes-dans-le-x-03-06-2025-G3VUCCD7OZHMLAABK27ALIZVEI.php
  166. https://kindbridge.com/porn-addiction/onlyfans-addiction/
  167. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/dinner-party-smart/202308/men-subscribing-to-onlyfans-are-not-who-you-might-think
  168. https://www.addictionresource.net/blog/onlyfans-addiction/
  169. https://www.recoverylighthouse.com/blog/society/onlyfans-a-modern-phenomenon-and-its-unforeseen-impact-on-addiction/
  170. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/onlyfans-sex-chatters/
  171. https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/onlyfans-chat-models-reddit-lawsuit-b2845964.html
  172. https://www.hbsslaw.com/cases/onlyfans-chatters
  173. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/onlyfans-catfishing-users-1236026987/
  174. https://www.wired.com/story/onlyfans-models-are-using-ai-impersonators-to-keep-up-with-their-dms/
  175. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-57255983
  176. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/protecting-children/ofcom-investigates-onlyfans-age-verification-measures
  177. https://www.reuters.com/technology/onlyfans-faces-uk-probe-into-age-verification-measures-2024-05-01/
  178. https://www.reuters.com/technology/uk-watchdog-fines-onlyfans-operator-14-million-over-age-disclosure-failures-2025-03-27/
  179. https://www.newhaven.edu/news/releases/2022/child-trafficking-study.php
  180. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/social-instincts/202304/3-mental-health-consequences-of-onlyfans-stardom
  181. https://scholarspace.jccc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=hare_bell
  182. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/handle/2077/81791/VT24_MPH241_PA_IL.pdf?sequence=1
  183. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/lifestyle/article-14581273/tragic-reason-men-spend-thousands-bankrupt-onlyfans-committed-relationships.html
  184. https://medium.com/publishous/stop-using-onlyfans-78edec1e14e5
  185. https://canopy.us/blog/onlyfans-addiction/
  186. https://www.thestar.com/life/relationships/how-onlyfans-obsession-is-affecting-men-and-their-relationships-things-started-to-get-weird/article_5fc04045-e5d8-53f2-ad50-5442d2a20cc8.html
  187. https://www.rhkauffman.com/your-onlyfans-account-could-cost-you-child-custody/
  188. https://www.justanswer.com/family-law/f07a7-will-having-onlyfans-being-cam-giri-cause-lose.html
  189. https://www.obermayerfamilymatters.com/2024/03/when-onlyfans-meets-your-divorce/
  190. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMiSCMRMD6E/
  191. https://www.economist.com/business/2025/06/24/how-onlyfans-transformed-porn
  192. https://fortune.com/2024/09/12/onlyfans-reveals-record-breaking-revenue-6-6-billion-2023/
  193. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/how-onlyfans-beat-nvidia-and-apple-to-become-the-worlds-most-revenue-efficient-company/articleshow/124766188.cms
  194. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/sep/06/onlyfans-owner-paid-359m-dividend-as-companys-revenues-grow-20-in-a-year
  195. https://swlondoner.shorthandstories.com/is-onlyfans-affecting-gen-zs-view-of-intimacy/
  196. https://www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2023/04/17/a-psychologist-digs-into-the-mental-health-repercussions-of-onlyfans-stardom/
  197. https://www.deseret.com/2023/9/11/23859829/onlyfans-porn-degradation-culture-reframed/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.