Hubbry Logo
PublicityPublicityMain
Open search
Publicity
Community hub
Publicity
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Publicity
Publicity
Publicity
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In marketing, publicity is the public visibility or awareness for any product, service, person or organization. It may also refer to the movement of information from its source to the general public, often (but not always) via the media. The subjects of publicity include people of public recognition, goods and services, organizations, and works of art or entertainment.

A publicist is someone that carries out publicity, while public relations (PR) is the strategic management function that helps an organization establish and maintain communication with the public. This can be done internally, without the use of popular media. From a marketing perspective, publicity is one component of promotion and marketing. The other elements of the promotional mix are advertising, sales promotion, direct marketing and personal selling.

Organizations will sometimes organize events designed to attract media coverage, and subsequently, provide positive publicity; these events are known as publicity stunts.

History

[edit]
French advertising poster "Maggi arôme pour corser" by Firmin Bouisset, circa 1895.

Publicity originates from the French word publicité 'advertisement'.[1] Publicity as a practice originates in the core of Paris, where shopping, tourism and the entertainment industry met commercialised print media and a burgeoning publishing industry. Among the urban society, scenes of consumption and new consumer identities were circulated through advertisement. La Maison Aubert shaped the emerging discipline of publicity. In early 19th century Paris, the advertisements and publicity campaigns for consumer items, such as cashmere shawls, and retailers such as perfumeries soon attracted regulation on flyposting.[2]

19th century US companies included not only pro-sales messages in their publicity, but also explanations, demonstrations and exaggerations. Patent medicine and cosmetics manufacturers in the US frequently described or even showed consumers before and after the usage of the product. The Blair Manufacturing Company was among the US companies that advertised its products by comparing old-fashioned consumers who did not use the advertised product with the progressive customers who did. Before-after-changes became common in advertisement from 1910 onwards.[3] In the early 20th century, American Albert Lasker, developed the used of advertising for appealing to consumers' psychology.[4]

The contemporary economist Thorstein Veblen criticised the relative benefit of publicity. He argued that vendibility is not utility, and that publicity had "no traceable relation to any benefit which the community may derive." Veblen estimated how much the publicity campaigns of companies added to the price consumers were paying. He argued that the publicity overhead for over-the-counter pharmaceuticals and cosmetics was more than half the retail price.[5]

Public relations

[edit]

Publicity is often referred to as the result of public relations, in terms of providing favourable information to media and any third party outlets; these may including bloggers, mainstream media, as well as new media forms such as podcasts. This is done to provide a message to consumers without having to pay for direct time or space. This in return creates awareness and achieves greater credibility. After the message has been distributed, the publicist in charge of the information will lose control of how the message is used and interpreted, in contrast to the way it works in advertising.[6] According to Grunig, public relations is often reduced to publicity. He also states how publicity is a form of activity in which should be associated with the sales promotion effort of a company, in order to help aid advertising and personal salesmanship as well.[7] Kent also stated that the doing of publicity can help attract attention whilst also supplying information regarding a specific organization or individual client and any event, activity or attribute associated with them.[8]

A coffeehouse in 17th century London.

The use of publicity is also known to be an important strategic element and promotional tool due to its effect of intentional exposure on a consumer. This helps publicity gain an advantage over other forms of marketing, such as advertising,[9] often in order to boost credibility. Favourable publicity is also created through reputation management, in which organizations try strive to control via the web.[10] Furthermore, despite the fact that publicity, both good or bad, can be beneficial for an organization, company or individual, much of it is paid for despite claims that publicity is often free.[11]

Despite publicity being an influential benefit within the marketing sector, one disadvantage which highly affects publicity is the lack of ability in which publicity cannot be repeated, in comparison to paid advertising.[9]

Publicists

[edit]

A publicist is a person whose job is to generate and manage publicity for a company, product, public figure (especially a celebrity), or work such as a book, movie, or band. Though there are many aspects to a publicist's job, their main function is to persuade the news media to report about their client in the most positive way possible. Publicists identify newsworthy aspects of products and personalities to offer to media outlets as possible reportage ideas. A variant of this practice which relies on linking a brand to a breaking news story has been dubbed "newsjacking".[12] Publicists are also responsible for shaping reportage about their clients in a timely manner that fits within a media outlet's news cycle. They attempt to present a newsworthy story in a way that influences editorial coverage in a certain, usually positive, direction. This is what is generally referred to as spin.

A press agent, or flack, is a professional publicist who acts on behalf of his or her client on all matters involving public relations. Press agents are typically employed by public personalities and organizations such as performers and businesses. A press agent will provide information to the media such as upcoming public events, interview opportunities, and promotional dates, and will work with the media in getting in touch with an appropriate client or resource. Press agents are occasionally required to act as "spin doctors, to put into the best light their clients' public actions. While press agents have traditionally worked with newspapers and television, they may also be conversant with newer media forms such as blogs and podcasts.

Negativity

[edit]
Press photographers in Hong Kong.
Marketing
Management
Key concepts
Account-based marketing · Activation · Annoyance factor · Attribution · Distribution · Brand licensing · Brand management · Cannibalization · Co-creation · Communications · Consumer behaviour · Consumer culture · Digital marketing · Dominance · Effectiveness · Ethics · Horizontal integration · Influencer marketing · Mix · Pricing · Product marketing · Promotion · Retail · Segmentation · Service · Social marketing · Strategy · Vertical integration
Promotional content
Advertising · Ambush marketing · Branding · Corporate anniversary · Direct marketing · Franchising · Gender in advertising · Label · Loyalty marketing · Mobile marketing · On-hold messaging · Personal selling · Premiums · Prizes · Product placement · Propaganda · Publicity · Sales promotion · Sex in advertising · Underwriting spot
Promotional media
Behavioral targeting · Brand ambassador · Counter display unit · Display advertising · Display stand · Drip marketing · Endcap · Gondola · In-game advertising · Mobile advertising · Native advertising · New media · Online advertising · Out-of-home advertising · Point of sale · Product demonstration · Promotional merchandise (merchandising) · Promotional representative · Visual merchandising · Web banner · Word-of-mouth
Research
Market research · Marketing research · Mystery shopping · Consumer research

Publicity can also create a negative effect for those being publicized. One of the most important factors in relation to influencing a consumer's buying decision is how a company, brand, or individual deals with negative publicity. Negative publicity may result in major loss of revenue or market shares within a business.[13] It can also play a part in damaging a consumer's perception of a brand or its products.[13][14] Negative publicity's high credibility and greater influence compared to other company-controlled communications play a part in the potential damage it may have on a corporate image. Crises involved with an organization may also result in negative publicity.[15]

Furthermore, negative publicity affects everything from the evaluation of a brand and product to the present. Often, when awareness of a company, brand, or individual is high, negative publicity is deemed to hurt possible sales. In contrast, companies, brands, and individuals who are not widely known may use the negative publicity in order to increase brand awareness among the public.[16]

The extensive range of media outlets, including both traditional and new media, provide opportunities for companies to market their products or services. This restricts or reduces the ability to manage negative publicity, as their message may be spread across media outlets.[14] In order for organizations to try salvage any negative publicity surrounding their brand, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is one solution which can help protect the image of a company or help reverse the damage. Companies must adopt the CSR approach early for it to be effective, or potential risks such as falsified intentions may develop within a consumer's perception.[17]

Despite the damaging effect negative publicity may cause, negative publicity may not always have the expected effect.[16] There is a possibility that negative publicity may in fact gain more attention as opposed to positive publicity.[13] Regardless of the nature of negative publicity and its ability to turn most people away, any slight hint of negative publicity can in fact build interest amongst the consumer. As stated by Monga & John, negative publicity is not always harmful, and consumers whom identify a brand with strong attitudes are highly unlikely to be affected by the negative publicity formed.[14]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Publicity

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Publicity is the non-paid placement of favorable or about an , product, or cause in media outlets, aimed at generating public awareness and shaping perceptions through channels rather than direct sponsorship. Unlike , which involves compensated space and explicit control over messaging, publicity relies on coverage, often conferring greater perceived credibility due to the role of journalists who vet content for newsworthiness. This distinction stems from publicity's dependence on media gatekeepers, limiting sender control but enabling broader reach when stories align with or timely events. Emerging as a formalized practice in the early 1900s through efforts like the Publicity Bureau of and Ivy Lee's counsel to railroads, publicity formalized amid rapid industrialization and press growth, serving initially to counter negative sentiment and promote corporate legitimacy. Key methods include press releases, staged events, and expert positioning, which exploit media incentives for compelling narratives to amplify influence on opinion and behavior. While positive publicity drives awareness and sales via third-party validation, its dual-edged nature invites controversies, as uncontrolled negative coverage—such as exposures—can erode trust and value more severely than equivalent paid ads, challenging the adage that all attention benefits. Empirical studies confirm this, showing from scandals persists longer when amplified by media , underscoring publicity's causal potency in both elevation and downfall.

Definition and Core Concepts

Fundamental Definition

Publicity denotes the process of attracting public attention to a , , product, service, or event through the of , typically via media channels without direct financial compensation for placement. This contrasts with , where entities pay for controlled messaging, as publicity relies on "earned" coverage from journalists or outlets who independently deem the information newsworthy. Such coverage is often viewed as more credible by audiences due to the perceived editorial gatekeeping, though its effectiveness depends on the outlet's and the story's inherent appeal. At its core, publicity manifests as either the quality of public visibility or deliberate actions to foster awareness, such as issuing press releases or staging events that prompt media response. It can generate both favorable and unfavorable outcomes, with negative publicity—arising from scandals or controversies—potentially damaging reputations despite efforts to mitigate it. Historically rooted in press agentry, modern publicity integrates with broader communication strategies but remains distinct in its non-paid nature and reliance on third-party validation. In strategic contexts, publicity functions as a tool within to shape perceptions by leveraging media's role in , prioritizing stories with timeliness, relevance, or novelty to secure organic amplification. Its measurement often focuses on reach, sentiment, and in coverage, underscoring that success hinges on audience engagement rather than guaranteed control over narratives.

Key Characteristics and Principles

Publicity constitutes earned media, obtained through independent media coverage rather than paid placement, distinguishing it fundamentally from advertising by relying on the initiative of journalists to disseminate information about products, services, events, or entities. This non-paid nature allows for potentially broad dissemination via established media channels, targeting large audiences without direct financial outlay for space or time. However, publicity inherently involves limited control over the narrative, as media outlets select, edit, and frame content according to their editorial standards, potentially resulting in positive, neutral, or adverse portrayals. A core characteristic enhancing publicity's value is its perceived , stemming from third-party endorsement by journalists who act as gatekeepers of information, thereby conferring greater trustworthiness compared to self-promoted claims. This arises because coverage appears as objective reporting rather than sponsored content, fostering and influencing opinions more persuasively in many contexts. Publicity efforts often emphasize short-term impact, such as during product launches or crises, while requiring alignment with journalistic criteria to succeed. Central principles guiding effective publicity revolve around newsworthiness, determined by factors including timeliness (recent or upcoming events), impact (consequences affecting many), proximity (local relevance), prominence (involvement of notable figures), conflict (controversy or opposition), and human interest (emotional or relatable elements). Practitioners generate publicity by staging events, issuing releases, or leveraging relationships that embody these values, thereby increasing pickup probability without guaranteeing outcomes. Ethical underpinnings, such as truthful representation and avoidance of deception, sustain long-term efficacy, as manipulative tactics risk backlash and eroded media trust. Success demands strategic focus on outcomes like and over mere activity volume, with measurement tied to media impressions and .

Distinctions from Advertising and Public Relations

Publicity is distinguished from advertising by its reliance on earned, unpaid media coverage rather than paid placements, which enhances perceived credibility through apparent third-party validation independent of direct sponsorship. Advertising, by contrast, involves compensated communication where the message source is explicitly identified, allowing precise control over content, timing, and distribution but often incurring skepticism due to its commercial intent. This fundamental divergence stems from advertising's status as a form of controlled promotion, whereas publicity leverages editorial discretion, potentially yielding higher engagement as audiences view it as less biased. In terms of outcomes, studies indicate publicity can outperform in under certain conditions, such as when prior attitudes toward the sponsor are negative, due to its indirect endorsement effect, though excels in scenarios requiring immediate, targeted reach. For instance, a of experimental data found publicity's relative effectiveness moderated by factors like message involvement and sponsor familiarity, underscoring its context-dependent advantages over 's guaranteed but discounted visibility. Publicity also differs from , of which it forms a tactical subset aimed specifically at securing media exposure for heightened awareness, while constitutes a strategic discipline encompassing broader efforts to foster mutually beneficial stakeholder relationships, manage crises, and sustain organizational reputation over time. Publicity prioritizes short-term attention through news generation, often unpredictable in tone and volume, whereas integrates such tactics into ongoing dialogue, , and issue to build enduring trust. This delineation highlights publicity's narrower focus on visibility versus ' holistic approach to influence and .

Historical Development

Origins in Press Agentry

Press agentry originated in the United States during the mid-to-late as a profit-driven practice of securing media coverage through and staged events, primarily to promote ventures like circuses, theaters, and exhibitions. Press agents operated on a one-way model, crafting exaggerated narratives or "" to feed newspapers, which competed fiercely for readership amid rising and print circulation. This era, often called the "Age of the Press Agent," saw agents prioritizing audience attraction over factual accuracy, as profitability depended on ticket sales rather than public trust. Unlike later models, press agentry viewed the press as a tool for amplification, with agents fabricating stories or leveraging stunts to generate free publicity, exploiting the era's limited journalistic standards and absence of ethical codes. Phineas Taylor (P.T.) Barnum (1810–1891) epitomized press agentry through his promotion of spectacles that blurred entertainment and deception. Starting with his New York American Museum in the 1840s, Barnum employed agents to circulate tales of curiosities like the "" hoax in 1842, drawing crowds via newspaper hype despite later debunkings. By 1871, with the formation of P.T. Barnum's Grand Traveling Museum, Menagerie, Caravan, and Hippodrome (later Barnum & Bailey Circus), he scaled tactics such as the 1885 acquisition of the from the London Zoo, which agents publicized as the world's largest animal, generating transatlantic coverage and boosting attendance to over 1 million visitors annually. Barnum's methods, including paid anonymous endorsements and orchestrated controversies, demonstrated publicity's commercial efficacy, as his ventures amassed fortunes—estimated at $4 million by 1891—while influencing journalism's appetite for drama. These practices laid the groundwork for publicity as a distinct field by establishing as a cost-effective alternative to paid , though often at the expense of veracity. Press agentry's legacy persisted into the early , evolving amid growing media scrutiny, but its core insight—that compelling narratives drive coverage—remains foundational to publicity strategies. Critics, including later PR theorists, noted its ethical shortcomings, yet empirical success in revenue generation validated its causal role in professionalizing for promotional ends.

Emergence in the 20th Century

The professionalization of publicity as a distinct practice began in the early , driven by the expansion of , corporate industrialization, and the need for organizations to manage public perceptions beyond mere hype. In 1900, the Publicity Bureau was established in as the first firm dedicated exclusively to publicity services, handling multiple clients such as railroad companies through systematic media outreach and relationship-building, which laid the groundwork for structured, client-focused operations rather than ad hoc press agentry. Ivy Lee advanced this evolution by introducing transparency as a core principle. In 1906, while advising the during labor disputes, Lee issued the Declaration of Principles, pledging to supply the press and public with "absolutely accurate and frank" information on a timely basis, thereby differentiating modern publicity from earlier manipulative tactics and emphasizing factual disclosure to foster trust. This approach influenced corporate responses to crises, such as anthracite coal strikes, by prioritizing verifiable data over deception. Edward Bernays expanded publicity into a psychologically informed , publishing in 1923, which framed it as the "engineering of consent" through audience research and indirect influence. His 1929 "" campaign, staging women smoking publicly during an to associate cigarettes with , demonstrated how publicity could leverage social movements for commercial gain, though it drew later scrutiny for prioritizing over unvarnished truth. By the 1920s and 1930s, dedicated agencies proliferated, with founded in 1927 introducing data-driven methods and long-term client strategies, such as integrated campaigns for brands like . World War I efforts, including the U.S. under , further refined techniques that transitioned into peacetime corporate use, solidifying publicity's role in shaping opinion amid radio's rise. Formal ethical codification followed, as the adopted its first Code of Ethics in 1947, mandating honesty and fairness to counter perceptions of inherent bias in the field.

Post-Digital Shifts and Recent Evolutions

The integration of (AI) into publicity practices has marked a significant post-digital evolution, enabling real-time , automated content personalization, and predictive crisis response as of 2024. AI tools now assist publicists in drafting targeted pitches and monitoring media coverage at scale, with 61% of professionals identifying AI proficiency as a top skill for success in the field. This shift stems from the saturation of traditional digital channels, where algorithmic changes on platforms like Meta and X (formerly ) have reduced organic reach, compelling practitioners to leverage AI for data-driven strategies that prioritize amplification over paid promotion. However, AI's application raises concerns over algorithmic biases that could perpetuate inaccuracies in narrative crafting, as evidenced by cases where generated content inadvertently amplified misleading information. Post-2020 evolutions have further emphasized hyperscale social video platforms, such as and , which dominate content consumption and reshape publicity by favoring short-form, user-generated formats that generate viral earned coverage. Deloitte's 2025 digital media trends report highlights how these platforms challenge legacy media, with consumers spending over 50% of their digital time on social video, prompting publicity campaigns to integrate influencer partnerships for authentic endorsements rather than scripted releases. This era has seen a causal pivot toward measurable outcomes, with PR analytics tools tracking engagement metrics like share-of-voice in real-time, enabling adjustments amid platform fluctuations that can diminish visibility by up to 30% following updates. , while bordering on paid tactics, has evolved publicity by fostering organic buzz through micro-influencers, whose niche audiences yield higher trust and coverage rates compared to broad endorsements. Regulatory and ethical adaptations represent another layer of recent shifts, particularly with data privacy laws like the EU's GDPR expansions and emerging AI governance frameworks influencing cross-border publicity efforts since 2023. Publicists now incorporate compliance into strategies, using AI for ethical content auditing to mitigate risks of scandals or amplification, as seen in high-profile cases where fabricated videos eroded brand trust. Despite these tools' efficiency gains—reducing campaign planning time by 40% in some agencies—the human element persists, with surveys indicating that 70% of executives value strategic judgment over for control. This post-digital landscape underscores a return to causal realism in publicity, where empirical from multi-channel monitoring supplants anecdotal media placements, fostering resilience against platform volatilities and toward inauthentic digital noise.

Mechanisms and Strategies

Traditional Publicity Techniques

Traditional publicity techniques, originating largely from the press agentry model of the 19th and early 20th centuries, focus on generating coverage through one-way dissemination of information designed to provoke media interest without direct payment. This model, as articulated by scholars James Grunig and Todd Hunt, emphasizes publicity over two-way dialogue, often employing to secure press attention in newspapers and other outlets. Early practitioners prioritized outcomes like attendance or awareness, sometimes at the expense of factual accuracy, though later refinements stressed transparency to build long-term . Publicity stunts and staged events formed a core tactic, particularly in the press agentry era. Showman exemplified this in the 1840s–1850s by promoting his American Museum through fabricated attractions and hype, such as the 1842 "Feejee Mermaid"—a mummified monkey-fish hybrid—to spark public curiosity and stories, drawing over 82,000 visitors in three weeks despite widespread skepticism. Barnum's methods included advance hype via anonymous planted stories and processions with bands and posters, leveraging human interest in novelty to amplify unpaid coverage, though they frequently involved deception that eroded trust when exposed. The press release emerged as a pivotal tool for more systematic publicity. In October 1906, , deemed a founder of modern , distributed the first such document after a train crash near Atlantic City that killed over 50 people, providing unembellished facts on plain paper to journalists instead of restricting access, which curbed rumors and secured sympathetic reporting. This inverted the traditional practice of withholding information, establishing a format with datelines, boilerplate, and quotes that enabled organizations to pitch stories proactively while appearing neutral. Press conferences and media events supplemented these efforts by facilitating direct pitches to reporters. By the mid-20th century, spokespersons hosted gatherings to unveil announcements, distributing media kits with photos, bios, and data to streamline coverage in print and broadcast media. Success hinged on cultivating relationships through exclusive tips or timely relevance, yielding third-party validation that lacked, though gatekeepers like editors determined final narratives. These techniques persisted pre-digitally due to their cost-effectiveness and perceived authenticity, with empirical studies showing earned mentions often outperforming paid ads in trust metrics among audiences.

Digital and Social Media Strategies

Digital publicity strategies harness online platforms to cultivate organic attention, media mentions, and audience without direct payment for placement, relying instead on shareable content and network effects. facilitates this by enabling real-time dissemination and amplification through user interactions, shifting traditional one-way publicity toward interactive dialogues that can generate earned coverage. Platforms like X (formerly Twitter), , and prioritize algorithmic promotion of high- content, allowing publicity efforts to scale exponentially via viral mechanics. A core tactic involves crafting content optimized for virality, such as short-form videos or memes that evoke emotion, humor, or controversy to prompt shares. The "The Man Your Man Could Smell Like" campaign, launched in 2010, utilized humorous video responses tailored to viewer comments on and social media, resulting in over 40 million views and a 107% sales increase in the first month. Similarly, campaigns encourage participants to create and tag branded material, fostering authenticity and broad reach; the Association's in 2014 prompted over 17 million videos worldwide, raising $115 million in donations through organic participation rather than paid promotion. Hashtag initiatives, like branded challenges, further concentrate visibility, as seen in trends where user adoption drives algorithmic favoritism and cross-platform spillover. Influencer collaborations represent another pivotal strategy, where publicists secure endorsements from credible online figures to lend third-party validation and extend reach to niche audiences. In 2025, 86% of U.S. marketers plan to engage influencers, reflecting the tactic's efficacy in generating authentic buzz amid declining trust in traditional advertising. The global influencer marketing market is forecasted to hit $32.55 billion that year, with over 80% of practitioners reporting positive ROI from campaigns emphasizing micro-influencers (those with 10,000–100,000 followers) for higher engagement rates averaging 3–5% versus 1% for celebrities. Success hinges on selecting influencers aligned with the brand's narrative, as mismatched partnerships risk backlash, evidenced by data showing 40% of consumers in surveyed countries discovering new brands weekly via influencers in late 2024. Real-time and monitoring tools enable proactive publicity, such as events or rapid response to trends, which can convert fleeting online conversations into sustained media narratives. Digital PR integrates social amplification with SEO tactics, like seeding shareable infographics or quotes to earn backlinks and mentions from journalists active on platforms. Analytics-driven targeting refines these efforts; for instance, identifies peak windows, while of post formats ensures content resonates, with studies indicating video posts yield 1200% more shares than text alone across major networks. However, platform algorithms evolve, necessitating adaptive strategies to counter risks like shadowbanning or echo-chamber isolation, where content circulates primarily among predisposed users.

Measurement and Evaluation Methods

Publicity effectiveness is quantitatively assessed through metrics such as media impressions, which estimate the number of individuals potentially exposed to coverage by multiplying the circulation or size of outlets by the prominence of mentions. Reach measures unique audience exposure without duplication, while compares an entity's media presence against competitors during a specific period. These output-focused indicators track volume but often overlook content quality or impact, as evidenced by industry analyses showing correlations between high impressions and awareness gains in controlled campaigns. Valuation methods like value (EMV) assign monetary worth to unpaid coverage by multiplying impressions by the (CPM) from equivalent paid advertising, adjusted for factors such as outlet prestige or audience engagement. For instance, EMV = Impressions × CPM × Adjustment Variable, where the adjustment (e.g., 1.5–3 for 's perceived authenticity premium) accounts for non-equivalence to ads, though critics note this remains an approximation lacking direct causal proof of sales lift. Advertising value equivalency (AVE), an older metric that estimates the monetary value of earned media coverage by comparing it to the cost of equivalent paid advertising space—calculated, for example, by multiplying the physical dimensions or airtime of the coverage by the outlet's prevailing advertising rates—equating space to ad costs, remains commonly used in public relations despite criticisms for overlooking qualitative aspects like credibility, sentiment, and audience engagement; it has been widely discredited since 2010 by bodies like the International Association for Measurement and Evaluation of Communication (AMEC) for ignoring editorial influence and overvaluing print over digital. Qualitative evaluation incorporates , categorizing coverage tone as positive, neutral, or negative via tools, and content audits assessing message alignment or key message pickup rates. Outcome metrics link publicity to behavioral changes, such as spikes from mentions (tracked via ) or survey-measured shifts in public perception pre- and post-campaign. employs frameworks like the PRIA model, integrating inputs (efforts), outputs (coverage), outcomes (/), and impacts ( results) to attribute effects amid confounders, often requiring econometric modeling for . Tools for implementation include media monitoring platforms like or , which aggregate clips, compute , and analyze sentiment in real-time across global sources as of 2025. Despite advances, challenges persist: earned media's indirect complicates ROI isolation, with studies indicating only 20–30% of PR value captured by standard metrics due to attribution errors. Comprehensive evaluation thus demands triangulating quantitative data with qualitative insights and executive-valued proxies, such as alignment with strategic goals over pure financial proxies.

Professional Roles

The Role of Publicists

Publicists serve as specialized professionals tasked with generating and managing coverage to promote clients, including individuals, brands, organizations, or products, distinct from paid by relying on media outlets' independent interest. Their primary function involves crafting narratives that align with journalistic standards to secure unpaid placements in articles, broadcasts, or features, thereby amplifying visibility without direct financial exchange for the coverage itself. This role emphasizes proactive pitching of story ideas to reporters and editors, often through personalized outreach built on established relationships, as media acceptance hinges on perceived newsworthiness rather than obligation. Core responsibilities include drafting and distributing press releases, organizing media events or tours, and coordinating interviews to facilitate client exposure. Publicists also monitor media landscapes for opportunities, such as tying client developments to current events—for instance, aligning a product's launch with industry trends to increase pickup rates—and track coverage outcomes using tools like clipping services to quantify reach, with metrics often including estimated audience impressions exceeding millions for high-profile campaigns. In sectors like or , they curate press kits with bios, , and fact sheets to streamline access, as seen in book publicity where publicists aim for reviews in outlets like , which can boost sales by 20-50% based on historical data from industry analyses. Beyond generation, publicists mitigate risks by preparing clients for scrutiny and responding to emerging negative stories, though their focus remains on proactive positivity rather than full , which often falls to broader PR teams. Success demands skills in writing concise, compelling pitches—typically under 300 words to respect time—and networking, with professionals often maintaining of hundreds of contacts tailored to client niches. Employment data from the U.S. indicates publicists, categorized under specialists, numbered approximately 246,500 in 2023, with median annual wages around $68,610, reflecting the competitive nature of building influence in fragmented media ecosystems. While independent freelancers comprise a significant portion, many operate within agencies, charging retainers from $5,000 to $20,000 monthly depending on client prominence and campaign scope.

Publicity within Broader Public Relations Practices

Public relations constitutes a strategic management function that establishes and maintains mutually beneficial relationships between organizations and their publics through planned communication efforts. Publicity operates as a core tactic within this domain, emphasizing the generation of unpaid, third-party media coverage to foster awareness and perceived legitimacy, distinct from broader PR elements like stakeholder dialogue or crisis response. This integration allows publicity to amplify organizational narratives via earned media, where editorial endorsements—such as news articles or features—carry higher credibility than controlled messaging due to their independence from direct payment. In practice, publicity supports overarching PR objectives by embedding media outreach into comprehensive campaigns that include owned media (e.g., corporate websites) and paid media (e.g., advertisements), forming a PESO model (paid, earned, shared, owned) for holistic reach. For instance, PR teams pitch stories to journalists to secure coverage that aligns with reputation-building goals, while monitoring outcomes to mitigate risks like unfavorable spins, which publicity alone cannot fully control. This tactic's value lies in its cost-efficiency and authenticity, as earned placements often yield wider dissemination through shares and references, though success depends on newsworthiness criteria like timeliness and set by media gatekeepers. Broader PR practices extend beyond publicity's focus on visibility to encompass proactive relationship cultivation, ethical advocacy, and measurement of sentiment shifts via tools like media monitoring software. Publicity thus functions not in isolation but as a within ethical frameworks, such as those from the , which stress transparency to avoid manipulative tactics and ensure alignment with organizational integrity. When effectively coordinated, it enhances PR's role in influencing without the overt commercialism of , though overreliance can expose entities to uncontrolled narratives if or timing falters.

Positive Impacts

Economic and Awareness Benefits

Publicity generates economic benefits primarily through its cost structure, requiring no direct payment for media space, unlike , which incurs substantial fees for placement. This allows organizations to achieve broad of messages at lower marginal costs, often yielding higher returns on for -building phases of campaigns. A of 25 empirical studies demonstrated that publicity is more effective than in influencing product attitudes and purchase intentions, particularly for lesser-known brands, where the absence of paid endorsement signals enhances perceived authenticity and drives sales uplift without equivalent expenditure. These dynamics stem from publicity's reliance on third-party validation, which amplifies economic leverage by fostering organic amplification through shares and discussions, extending reach beyond initial coverage. In terms of awareness benefits, publicity excels at elevating salience via credible, independent channels that consumers trust more than controlled narratives. Research on shows it contributes significantly to building consumer consideration sets, with effects persisting longer than time-limited ad buys due to archival nature of editorial content. For instance, studies integrating paid and found that positive publicity reinforces recall and , indirectly boosting through sustained and reduced acquisition costs over time. This is especially pronounced for emerging products, where publicity's superior effectiveness in meta-analytic comparisons leads to measurable increases in without the skepticism often attached to paid promotions. Quantifiable impacts include correlations between publicity volume and metrics; for low-awareness items, heightened exposure from media mentions alone can elevate purchase probability by increasing cognitive , as evidenced in analyses of product trials where incidental coverage mimicked advertising's priming effects at fractional costs. Overall, these benefits hinge on strategic execution, with publicity's economic edge diminishing for highly familiar brands where advertising's control and repetition prove more efficient for reinforcement.

Case Studies of Successful Publicity

The "A is Forever" campaign, initiated in 1947 by the advertising agency N.W. Ayer, fundamentally reshaped consumer perceptions of by associating them indelibly with eternal love and marriage proposals, transforming a stagnant market into a cultural norm. Prior to the campaign, diamond rings were not a widespread ; only about 10% of U.S. rings featured diamonds in the 1930s, hampered by the and the 1929 stock market crash that halved gem values. The slogan, coined by copywriter Frances Gerety, emphasized diamonds' indestructibility to discourage resale and promote retention as heirlooms, while targeted media placements in magazines and films cultivated aspirational imagery. This effort yielded measurable economic gains: U.S. diamond sales rose from $23 million in 1939 to $2.1 billion by 1979, with a 55% increase in the first three years alone, establishing ' dominance in a previously oversupplied industry. Red Bull's Stratos project, executed on October 14, 2012, exemplified high-stakes experiential publicity through Austrian skydiver Felix Baumgartner's sponsored jump from 128,100 feet (39 kilometers) above Earth, shattering in freefall and setting records for highest skydive and longest freefall duration at 4 minutes 19 seconds. Costing an estimated $30–65 million, the event aligned with Red Bull's brand ethos of extreme human achievement, generating unprecedented : over 52 million live viewers across platforms, nearly 1 billion views cumulatively, and 61 million impressions in real time. Post-jump analysis indicated a surge in brand affinity, with Red Bull's global sales reaching 5.2 billion cans in 2012, up from prior years, as the reinforced market positioning against competitors by dominating headlines and fostering without direct product mentions. The Ice Bucket Challenge, originating in July 2014 from golfer Chris Kennedy and rapidly amplified by celebrities like and , demonstrated grassroots viral publicity's potential for nonprofit awareness and fundraising. Participants filmed themselves dousing with ice water, nominating others via to donate to research or repeat the act, yielding over 17 million videos uploaded and $115 million raised by the in the U.S. alone, compared to $2.5 million the prior year. This organic cascade, driven by low-barrier participation and shareability, increased global donations to $220 million across 155 countries, accelerating FDA approval of as an treatment in 2017 by funding clinical trials and biomarker research, though critics noted short-term funding spikes often wane without sustained mechanisms.

Negative Aspects

Risks of Uncontrolled Exposure

Uncontrolled exposure in publicity arises when intended for positive spreads beyond the originator's influence, allowing third parties such as media outlets, users, or competitors to reinterpret or amplify it in unintended ways. This lack of control distinguishes publicity from paid , where messaging can be directly managed, and represents its primary disadvantage, as outcomes become unpredictable and potentially damaging to or objectives. Businesses and individuals pursuing publicity thus face heightened to negative public reactions or distortions that erode trust and market position. One major risk involves invasions, where heightened visibility exposes personal details to exploitation, including doxxing, , or . For public figures or executives, media amplification of personal information—such as locations or family details—can attract , with studies linking increased exposure to elevated threats from malicious . In cases of leaked or viral publicity, such as unauthorized product teasers, sensitive operational data may surface, circumventing controlled disclosures and inviting regulatory scrutiny or competitive sabotage. Historical instances, like corporate leaks amplified via social channels, demonstrate how initial publicity bids can cascade into widespread data breaches affecting stakeholders' safety and . Reputational damage often follows from uncontrolled narratives, as audiences or critics reframe stories negatively, leading to backlash or boycotts. For example, promotional efforts that gain traction can backfire when users highlight flaws or ethical lapses, as seen in 2025 cases where brands like Apple and Nike faced unintended scrutiny from attention-grabbing campaigns that spiraled into . This amplification effect, inherent to viral publicity, can result in measurable economic losses; one notes that unchecked messaging inconsistencies erode , with recovery costs exceeding initial gains in severe scenarios. Moreover, for organizations, such exposure risks legal entanglements, including suits if misreported details proliferate without opportunities. Beyond individuals and firms, uncontrolled exposure contributes to broader societal risks, such as spread or public panic from sensationalized coverage of sensitive topics. Empirical reviews indicate that when publicity on uncontrollable risks (e.g., health crises) lacks managed framing, it heightens public anxiety without proportional behavioral benefits. Mitigating these demands proactive monitoring and contingency planning, though the inherent volatility of underscores publicity's double-edged nature.

Effects of Negative Publicity

Negative publicity typically erodes attitudes toward brands, leading to diminished purchase intentions and . demonstrates that exposure to negative information about a product or activates stronger negative framing in compared to positive messaging, resulting in more pronounced declines in favorability. For instance, a study analyzing responses to publicized scandals found that negative publicity significantly lowered attitudes, with effects persisting even after responses, particularly when consumers held high involvement with the issue. Financial repercussions often follow, including immediate drops in and . A of product crises revealed consistent negative impacts on behaviors, with firms experiencing facing reduced streams and heightened vulnerability to boycotts. Small and medium-sized businesses surveyed reported average losses of $10,000 to $50,000 from negative press incidents, while larger corporations can see erode by up to 30% in the days following severe scandals. Long-term effects extend to and employee morale, fostering skepticism that undermines competitive positioning. Negative publicity influences brand image through attribution processes, where consumers attribute faults to the company rather than external factors, thereby depressing future purchase intentions. However, for relatively unknown products, negative coverage can paradoxically boost sales by elevating awareness among potential buyers indifferent to the criticism, though this benefit diminishes for established brands where prior positive associations amplify the harm.

Ethical and Controversial Dimensions

Core Ethical Challenges

One primary ethical challenge in publicity involves maintaining truthfulness amid pressures to fabricate or exaggerate narratives for media attention. Publicity campaigns often prioritize compelling stories over accuracy, leading to the dissemination of misleading that can erode when exposed. For instance, the TARES ethical test for persuasive communication emphasizes truthfulness as a foundational element, requiring messages to be verifiably accurate rather than merely persuasive, yet violations occur when practitioners prioritize client interests over factual integrity. Scholarly analyses highlight that such deceptions stem from the incentive structures in publicity, where short-term gains from viral coverage outweigh long-term reputational risks, as evidenced by cases where fabricated endorsements or staged events have backfired, prompting regulatory scrutiny from bodies like the on deceptive practices. Transparency issues arise particularly in distinguishing earned publicity from covert , where undisclosed financial ties undermine audience autonomy. Public relations codes, such as the PRSA's provisions on and , mandate disclosure of sponsorships to avoid deceiving media outlets and the , but enforcement relies on self-regulation, which critics argue is insufficient given the opacity of modern digital publicity tactics like influencer seeding. Conflicts of interest exacerbate this, as publicists may represent multiple clients with competing agendas, potentially leading to biased story placements that favor paying entities over impartial reporting. Empirical studies of PR practitioners across cultures reveal that while ethical codes exist universally, adherence varies due to economic pressures, with transparency lapses more prevalent in competitive markets where "gray areas" in blur ethical lines. Invasion of privacy represents another core tension, as publicity stunts or investigative tactics for "newsworthy" exposure often infringe on individuals' without consent. Ethical frameworks in stress respect for as integral to fairness, yet real-world applications frequently involve aggressive or personal disclosures to generate buzz, raising causal concerns about harm to subjects disproportionate to public benefit. Manipulative messaging further compounds this by employing psychological framing to elicit , such as fear-mongering or selective omissions, which scholarly reviews identify as antithetical to authentic communication principles. These challenges are amplified in digital eras, where rapid dissemination amplifies harms, underscoring the need for publicists to weigh first-order effects on vulnerable parties against promotional goals.

Major Controversies and Debates

One central debate in publicity revolves around the tension between strategic narrative shaping and deliberate deception, where practitioners employ techniques like selective disclosure or staged events to generate media coverage, raising questions about authenticity. For instance, professionals often face dilemmas in balancing client advocacy with public interest, such as withholding material facts during crisis responses, which can erode trust when exposed. This issue intensified with historical figures like , who in 1929 orchestrated the "" march in , hiring women to smoke cigarettes publicly as a symbol of , thereby manufacturing grassroots-like endorsement to boost sales amid cultural taboos—a tactic later critiqued as manipulative that blurred publicity with engineered social movements. Privacy invasion represents another flashpoint, particularly in celebrity and political publicity, where aggressive pursuit of exclusive stories has led to ethical breaches like unauthorized surveillance or doxxing to secure coverage. pursuits, exemplified by the 1997 fatal car crash involving Princess Diana in —chased by photographers seeking sensational images—highlighted the causal risks of unchecked publicity hunger, prompting debates on whether media outlets' complicity in such tactics constitutes indirect harm for profit. Critics argue this reflects a systemic incentive structure in newsrooms, where viral exposure trumps individual rights, though defenders invoke first-amendment protections for public figures' newsworthiness. In corporate contexts, greenwashing controversies underscore publicity's role in misleading environmental claims, as seen in the 2015 , where the company installed software to falsify diesel vehicle test results, generating positive media buzz on "clean diesel" technology until exposed by independent testing in September 2015, resulting in over $30 billion in global fines and recalls. This case fueled debates on self-regulation versus stricter oversight, with evidence showing that voluntary disclosures often prioritize image over verifiable data, exacerbating consumer skepticism toward corporate publicity. Modern digital-era debates center on misinformation amplification and , where coordinated fake endorsements simulate organic publicity, as in the 2016 Cambridge Analytica operation, which harvested data from 87 million users without consent to micro-target political messages during the referendum and U.S. election, blending algorithmic publicity with psychological profiling to sway voters. Ethical concerns extend to AI-generated content, including deepfakes used for fabricated endorsements, prompting calls for disclosure mandates, though implementation lags due to jurisdictional variances and free-speech counterarguments. Proponents of minimal contend that market corrections via public scrutiny suffice, citing empirical drops in values post-scandals, while skeptics highlight persistent asymmetries in information access that favor powerful actors. Regulatory debates persist on curbing paid influence disguised as earned publicity, such as undisclosed influencer partnerships or bot-driven trends, which a 2023 study identified as comprising up to 15% of engagement in brand campaigns, distorting perceived consensus. Organizations like the advocate codes emphasizing transparency, yet enforcement remains uneven, with violations often yielding short-term gains before backlash, as in the 2018 debacle where influencers hyped a event, leading to federal convictions and lawsuits totaling millions. These cases illustrate causal realism in publicity's double-edged nature: while fostering , unchecked practices risk societal polarization and diminished epistemic trust.

References

  1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324835716_Understanding_the_Concept_of_Publicity_in_Public_Relations_A_Synoptic_Review
  2. http://www.uop.edu.pk/ocontents/publicity.pdf
  3. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-8349-6854-8_18
  4. https://www.jainuniversity.ac.in/blogs/exploring-the-differences-advertising-and-publicity
  5. https://foiworks.com/difference-between-advertising-and-publicity/
  6. https://instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/MiniMe_HistoryOfPR.pdf
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000768132400154X
  8. https://www.ereleases.com/pr-fuel/biggest-pr-myth-of-all/
  9. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwynne/2014/07/08/the-real-difference-between-pr-and-advertising-credibility/
  10. https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-assets/35397_book_item_35397.pdf
  11. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/business-studies/difference-between-advertising-and-publicity/
  12. https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-publicity.html
  13. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/public-relations-pr.asp
  14. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/introduction-public-relations/news-values
  15. https://www.digitalthirdcoast.com/blog/values-content-newsworthy
  16. https://www.entrepreneur.com/growing-a-business/10-principles-for-creating-an-effective-public-relations/280309
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251158830_The_effectiveness_of_publicity_versus_advertising_A_meta-analytic_investigation_of_its_moderators
  18. https://keydifferences.com/difference-between-publicity-and-public-relations.html
  19. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/publicity-vs-public-relations
  20. https://www.elegantthemes.com/blog/marketing/publicity-vs-pr-two-sides-of-the-same-marketing-coin
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0363811118300225
  22. https://www.sjsu.edu/ajeep/docs/IntroToPR.pdf
  23. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Courses/Southern_Illinois_University_Edwardsville/Social_Media_for_Public_Relations/01%253A_Origins_of_PR_and_PR_Principles/1.03%253A_The_History_and_Development_of_Modern_PR
  24. https://www.prmuseum.org/pr-timeline
  25. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/publicrelations/chapter/chapter-2/
  26. https://bigcom.com/2017/01/pt-barnum-marketing-and-public-relations/
  27. https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-assets/114726_book_item_114726.pdf
  28. https://archive.pagecentertraining.psu.edu/public-relations-ethics/core-ethical-principles/lesson-2-sample-title/ethics-the-public-relations-models-press-agentry-model/
  29. https://journalism.university/persuasive-communication/pr-20th-century-rise-agencies-ethics/
  30. https://instituteforpr.org/do-the-right-thing/
  31. https://journalism.university/persuasive-communication/birth-modern-public-relations-bernays/
  32. https://www.jaffepr.com/blog/how-ai-has-affected-pr-one-brief-year
  33. https://gnovisjournal.georgetown.edu/the-gnovis-blog/2023/the-impact-of-ai-on-pr-and-strategic-communications-a-double-edged-sword-by-maria-fernanda-chanduvi/
  34. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/technology/digital-media-trends-consumption-habits-survey/2025.html
  35. https://www.meltwater.com/en/blog/pr-trends-your-brand-should-be-dominating
  36. https://www.prnewsonline.com/handling-the-pr-fallout-from-social-media-algorithm-changes/
  37. https://www.agilitypr.com/pr-news/pr-tech-ai/ai-in-public-relations-the-new-frontier-in-2025/
  38. https://www.prsa.org/article/how-ai-is-driving-pr-innovation-ST-June25
  39. https://prlab.co/blog/uses-of-ai-in-public-relations/
  40. https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-assets/113755_book_item_113755.pdf
  41. https://daily.jstor.org/how-p-t-barnum-gave-the-public-what-it-wanted/
  42. https://www.ukessays.com/essays/media/introduction-of-press-agentry-model-media-essay.php
  43. https://www.meltwater.com/en/blog/press-release-anatomy-and-history--not-much-has-changed
  44. https://newswirejet.com/history-of-press-release-from-print-to-digital-evolution/
  45. https://prlab.co/blog/traditional-pr-vs-digital-pr-key-differences-explained/
  46. https://blndpr.com/blog/public-relations/
  47. https://www.agilitypr.com/pr-news/social-media-influencer-marketing/the-role-of-social-media-in-shaping-modern-public-relations-strategies/
  48. https://www.hoytorg.com/digital-and-social-media-strategies/
  49. https://digitaldefynd.com/IQ/viral-marketing-case-studies/
  50. https://www.itsfundoingmarketing.com/blog/viral-marketing-campaign-examples-case-studies
  51. https://sproutsocial.com/insights/influencer-marketing-statistics/
  52. https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-benchmark-report/
  53. https://www.statista.com/topics/2496/influence-marketing/
  54. https://wolfenden.agency/insights/combining-digital-pr-with-social-media-strategies-for-maximum-impact/
  55. https://www.socialinsider.io/blog/social-media-case-study/
  56. https://prlab.co/blog/social-media-pr/
  57. https://www.cision.com/resources/insights/pr-campaign-measurement/
  58. https://www.mentionlytics.com/blog/pr-measurement/
  59. https://releasd.com/blog/public-relations-evaluation-methods/
  60. https://www.launchmetrics.com/resources/blog/measure-earned-media-value
  61. https://brand24.com/blog/earned-media-value/
  62. https://instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2003_AVE1.pdf
  63. https://www.amecorg.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/AMEC-Policy-on-Advertising-Value-Equivalent-AVEs-12-September.pdf
  64. https://determ.com/blog/pr-evaluation-methods/
  65. https://www.bu.edu/prlab/2022/04/05/pr-measurements-tools-for-evaluation/
  66. https://www.cpra.org.au/index.cfm//education/measurement-evaluation/measurement-evaluation-framework/
  67. https://www.meltwater.com/en/blog/50-metrics-to-measure-your-content-marketing-campaign
  68. https://prowly.com/magazine/pr-evaluation-top-metrics/
  69. https://www.prsa.org/article/5-ways-to-measure-pr-performance-value-and-roi
  70. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/media-and-communication/public-relations-specialists.htm
  71. https://www.mediabistro.com/be-inspired/what-does-a-publicist-do/
  72. https://otterpr.com/what-does-a-publicist-do/
  73. https://jobs.aaf.org/career/publicist/job-descriptions
  74. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/careers/what-does-a-publicist-do
  75. https://www.publishers.org.uk/about-publishing/careers/publicist/
  76. https://www.berklee.edu/careers/roles/publicist
  77. https://books.forbes.com/blog/blog-what-is-earned-media-pr/
  78. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/earned-vs-paid-media
  79. https://www.cision.com/resources/insights/types-of-earned-media/
  80. https://www.5wpr.com/new/using-public-relations-for-publicity/
  81. https://timespro.com/blog/publicity-vs-public-relations-differences-and-examples
  82. https://instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/IPR-Non-Paid-Media.pdf
  83. https://users.ssc.wisc.edu/~sorensen/papers/negative_publicity_2010.pdf
  84. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/02/how-an-ad-campaign-invented-the-diamond-engagement-ring/385376/
  85. https://www.campaignasia.com/article/a-look-back-to-when-de-beers-changed-the-rules-of-engagement/481261
  86. https://mediashower.com/blog/de-beers-diamond-marketing/
  87. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/10/15/felix-baumgartners-jump-proves-the-power-of-publicity-stunts/
  88. https://www.sprinklr.com/blog/redbull-social-media-marketing/
  89. https://bettermarketing.pub/red-bulls-30-million-marketing-stunt-almost-didn-t-happen-88d24fefdeff
  90. https://fitsmallbusiness.com/crazy-publicity-stunts/
  91. https://deviatelabs.com/resources/10-of-the-best-and-worst-marketing-stunts-of-all-time/
  92. https://www.func.media/publications/the-top-publicity-stunts-of-the-last-decade
  93. https://guaranteedprwire.com/what-is-the-primary-disadvantage-of-publicity/
  94. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/marketing-risks
  95. https://www.kaspersky.com/resource-center/definitions/social-media-privacy
  96. https://aaronhall.com/publicity-violations-unauthorized-teasers-leaks/
  97. https://epic.org/issues/consumer-privacy/social-media-privacy/
  98. https://www.forbes.com/sites/edwardsegal/2025/05/05/crisis-prevention-lessons-from-ads-and-promotionsthat-backfired/
  99. https://swoogo.events/blog/risks-benefits-social-media-events-strategy/
  100. https://prlab.co/blog/13-pr-nightmares-revealed/
  101. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277920047_Won%27t_we_scare_them_The_impact_of_communicating_uncontrollable_risks_on_the_public%27s_perception
  102. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228150911_The_Effects_of_Negative_Publicity_and_Company_Reaction_on_Consumer_Attitudes
  103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0148296322004520
  104. https://upcity.com/experts/cost-of-bad-press/
  105. https://sanguinesa.com/the-cost-of-a-pr-crisis-what-businesses-can-learn-from-high-profile-scandals/
  106. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328467368_The_influence_of_negative_publicity_on_brand_equity_attribution_image_attitude_and_purchase_intention
  107. https://jbs-ojs-shsu.tdl.org/jbs/article/view/415
  108. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mksc.1090.0557
  109. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=2137&context=gradschool_dissertations
  110. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356730078_ETHICS_IN_PUBLIC_RELATIONS_ETHICAL_THEORIES_CODES_AND_CONFLICTS
  111. https://www.prsa.org/professional-development/prsa-resources/ethics
  112. https://www.prsa.org/article/ensuring-the-ethical-use-of-social-media-in-pr
  113. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/20636
  114. https://www.sammisochoa.com/10-ethical-concerns-public-relations-professional-should-address/
  115. https://prandlattes.com/ethical-issues-faced-by-pr-professionals/
  116. https://money.howstuffworks.com/10-deceptive-pr-campaigns-in-history.htm
  117. https://journals.openedition.org/ricsp/559?lang=en
  118. https://everything-pr.com/crisis-pr-failures-in-history-lessons-learned-from-public-relations-disasters/
  119. https://www.prdaily.com/exploring-prs-ethical-gray-areas/
  120. https://digitaldefynd.com/IQ/top-marketing-scandals-in-history/
  121. https://wadds.co.uk/blog/2021/3/23/10-ethical-issues-facing-international-public-relations
  122. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811123001339
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.