Hubbry Logo
Rasberry crazy antRasberry crazy antMain
Open search
Rasberry crazy ant
Community hub
Rasberry crazy ant
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Rasberry crazy ant
Rasberry crazy ant
Rasberry crazy ant
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Not to be confused with the longhorn crazy ant (Paratrechina longicornis) or the yellow crazy ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes).

Nylanderia fulva
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hymenoptera
Family: Formicidae
Subfamily: Formicinae
Genus: Nylanderia
Species:
N. fulva
Binomial name
Nylanderia fulva
Mayr 1862[1]
Synonyms

Prenolepis fulva

The Rasberry crazy ant[2] or tawny crazy ant[2][3][4] (Nylanderia fulva) is an ant originating in South America. Like the longhorn crazy ant (Paratrechina longicornis), this species is called "crazy ant" because of its quick, unpredictable movements (the related N. pubens is known as the "Caribbean crazy ant"). It is sometimes called the "Rasberry crazy ant" in Texas after the exterminator Tom Rasberry, who noticed that the ants were increasing in numbers in 2002.[5][6] Scientists have reorganised the genera taxonomy within this clade of ants, and now it is identified as Nylanderia fulva.[7]

In 2014, it was discovered that the ant produces and covers itself with formic acid as an antidote to the fire ant's venom.[8] It is the first known example of an insect being able to neutralize another insect's venom, an ability speculated to have evolved in South America where the two species share the same native range. Colonies have multiple queens, which also contributes to their survival.[9]

As of 2012, the ants have established colonies[3][4] in all states of the Gulf Coast of the United States including at least 27 counties in Southeast Texas.[citation needed]

Description

[edit]

The ant is about 3 mm (or about 1/8 inches) long, thus smaller than the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. It is covered with reddish-brown hairs. Their larvae are plump and hairy, with a specific conformation of mouthparts and unique mandible morphology that allows for precise species identification.[10] The colonies live under stones or piles; they have no centralized nests, beds, or mounds.[2] They tend aphids for honeydew, feed on small insects and vertebrates, and forage on plants, especially for sweet materials. The ants appear to prefer the warmth and moisture of the coast.[11]

N. fulva has been a pest in rural and urban areas of Colombia, and South America, where it displaced all other ant species. There, small poultry such as chickens have died of asphyxiation while larger animals, such as cattle, have been attacked around the eyes, nostrils, and hooves. Grasslands have dried out because of the increase in plant-sucking insect pests (hemipterans), which the ants cultivate to feed on the sugary "honeydew" that they excrete.[2]

When attacked, these ants, like other formicine ants, can bite (but not sting) and excrete formic acid through a hairy circle or acidopore on the end of the abdomen, using it as a venom,[12] which causes a minute pain that quickly fades. Formic acid was named after the Latin word formica (ant), because it was first distilled from ants in the 17th century.[13] Uniquely, the tawny ant also uses formic acid as an antidote against the venom alkaloids of the fire ant (known as solenopsins). The venom alkaloids of fire ants have been demonstrated to be strongly paralytic against competitor species,[14] thus the tawny crazy ant may have developed a resistance by acid-immobilisation of the venom toxins.

Tawny crazy ants were found to displace other ant species in their native Argentina and later the US, including the red imported fire ant.[6] This was first thought to be due to exploitative and interference competition.[15]

Formic acid as an antidote to fire ant venom

[edit]

In March 2014, researchers concluded that formic acid helped tawny crazy ants survive fire ant venom in ant fights 98% of the time; when the gland ducts were blocked with nail polish in an experiment, crazy ants had only a 48% chance of surviving fights with fire ants.[8] After exposure to fire ant venom, N. fulva retreats, covers itself with formic acid[16] and returns to the fight.[8] This is the first known example of an insect detoxifying another insect's venom, and the first discovery of an ionic liquid in nature which results from mixing of formic acid with venom from S. invicta.

How formic acid acts as an antidote against the much more toxic fire ant's venom is unknown. Fire ant venom is a mixture of toxic alkaloids and proteins that presumably enable the alkaloids to enter rival ants' cells.[13] Each alkaloid in the fire ant's venom, including solenopsin, has a six-membered heterocyclic ring with fat-soluble side chains.[13] The researchers who discovered the antidote property of formic acid in crazy ants speculate that the formic acid denatures the proteins in fire ant venom.[8] Another possibility is that the nitrogen on an alkaloid's heterocyclic ring is protonated, rendering the ionic molecule less lipophilic, thus less likely to penetrate the tawny crazy ant's cells.[13]

Diet

[edit]

N. fulva eats liquids,[3][4] including plant nectar[3][4] and insect honeydew.[3][4][17] Calcium, sodium, and potassium are very important to N. fulva: Higher environmental potassium decreased abundance, and higher potassium + sodium decreased abundance even more so.[3][4] Meanwhile, higher calcium increased abundance.[3][4]

Effects on electrical equipment

[edit]

It is unclear why colonies of Nylanderia fulva are attracted to electrical equipment.[6][18] Infestations of Nylanderia fulva in electrical equipment can cause short circuits, sometimes because the ants chew through insulation and wiring.[3] Overheating, corrosion, and mechanical failures also result from accumulations of dead ants and nest detritus in electrical devices.[19] If an ant is electrocuted, it can release an alarm pheromone upon death, which causes other ants to rush over and search for attackers. If a large enough number of ants gather, it may short out systems.[20]

Colonies of Nylanderia fulva are likely attracted to electrical equipment because the warm, confined space provides an attractive nesting place.[21]

Rate of spread

[edit]

The Texas A&M University research extension service quotes the annual rate of spread by ground migration as about 240 and 360 m per year in neighborhoods and industrial areas, respectively, and 207 m/year in rural landscapes[22] hence spreading more slowly than fire ants.[16] Other sources quote 800 m (0.50 mi) per year.[6] Being carried by people, animals, and vehicles (in trash for example), the observed rate is much higher: the spread from five Texas counties in 2002 to 20 in 2007 yields an accelerated rate of 8 km (5.0 mi) per year, at which rate it would take about 70 years for them to reach New Orleans. However, in 2011, tawny crazy ants were reported in Mississippi,[23] in August 2012 in Port Allen, Louisiana,[24] and in 2013 in Georgia.[25]

Range in the United States

[edit]
Reported distribution of the Rasberry crazy ant in the United States (2012); actual occurrence is thought to be more widespread

The earliest record of N. fulva presence in the US is from Brownsville, Texas, in 1938.[26] By the early 2000s, the ants spread across the southeastern portion of Texas[7] including more than 27 counties[22] Large population explosions have been described also on St Croix in the US Virgin Islands; in many cases the ant species was misidentified as its close relative, the hairy crazy ant, Nylanderia pubens.[5][27][28][29] As of 2012, the ants have established colonies in all states of the Gulf Coast of the United States.[6][7] The ant is considered an invasive species.[2] As of 2021 N. fulva establishment is limited to some southern parts of the country.[3]

Control in the US

[edit]

The ants are not attracted to ordinary ant baits, and are not controlled by over-the-counter pesticides,[6][30] and are harder to fully exterminate than many other species because their colonies have multiple queens.[9] In June 2008, the United States Environmental Protection Agency granted temporary approval for the use of fipronil, an antitermite agent, to control this ant.[31] Its use is currently restricted to infested counties.[32]

In 2015, the microsporidian parasite Myrmecomorba nylanderiae was found to be a pathogen of the tawny crazy ant.[33][34] In March 2022, further research indicated that this unicellular fungus may be an effective biological control for the tawny ant.[35][36]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Rasberry crazy ant

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Rasberry crazy ant (Nylanderia fulva), also known as the tawny crazy ant, is a small (2–3 mm), reddish-brown to golden-brown species characterized by its long legs, 12-segmented antennae without a club, dense body hairs, and highly erratic, non-pheromone-trail movement that gives it the "crazy ant" moniker. Named after pest control professional Tom Rasberry, who first reported large infestations in 2002, this forms massive supercolonies with millions of workers and multiple queens, enabling rapid population expansion through colony budding rather than nuptial flights. Native to northern , including , , and , N. fulva likely arrived in the United States via , with the first confirmed U.S. detection in , in 2002. It is omnivorous, feeding primarily on sweet substances like plant nectar and honeydew from hemipteran , but also consuming small arthropods, vertebrates, and household items such as . Colonies nest in diverse, moist sites including leaf litter, , rotting wood, , and human structures, with peak activity from spring through fall and reduced foraging in cooler months. Since its introduction, the has spread aggressively across the southeastern U.S., aided by human transport of infested materials like nursery plants and , and is now established in 33 counties in (as of October 2025) as well as parts of , , Georgia, , , and . By 2012, it had expanded to at least 21 counties in southeast alone, with ongoing detections indicating continued range growth into both urban and rural areas. Its supercolony structure allows unaggressive fusion of nests, leading to polydomous (multi-nest) systems that outcompete other species. As an invasive pest, N. fulva displaces native and introduced ants, including the (Solenopsis invicta), through numerical dominance and interference competition, while protecting honeydew-producing pests like , thereby exacerbating agricultural damage. It infests electrical equipment by massing in voids and causing short circuits, poses a through bites that cause mild and indoor swarming, and impacts by preying on small vertebrates and disrupting ecosystems, with management relying on targeted insecticides and modification due to its resistance to broad-spectrum controls. Economic costs include property damage, livestock , and losses, highlighting its status as a significant in infested regions.

Taxonomy and description

Etymology and naming

The common name "Rasberry crazy ant" honors Tom Rasberry, a Houston-based pest control operator who first reported large infestations of the ant in Texas in 2002, prompting widespread attention to the invasive species. The term "crazy ant" derives from the species' distinctive foraging behavior, characterized by rapid, erratic, and jerky movements that do not follow traditional pheromone trails, unlike many other ant species. This name has been applied broadly to related ants exhibiting similar locomotion, but for this species, it underscores its unpredictable dispersal patterns observed in infested areas. Originally described by Gustav Mayr in 1862 from specimens collected in as Paratrechina fulva, the was initially identified in the United States as Paratrechina sp. near pubens—a provisional designation indicating similarity to the closely related Nylanderia pubens—the ant's remained uncertain for nearly a decade due to morphological ambiguities and limited genetic data. In 2012, a comprehensive study utilizing morphometric of 14 physical characters, alongside molecular sequencing of mitochondrial and nuclear genes, formally reclassified the as Nylanderia fulva (Mayr, 1862), confirming its distinct identity within the genus Nylanderia. This revision resolved prior confusions with other "crazy ants," such as the hairy crazy ant (Nylanderia pubens), by highlighting subtle differences in body proportions and genetic markers. The species is also known as the tawny crazy ant, a name adopted post-reclassification to reflect its typical reddish-brown or tawny coloration—derived from the Latin "fulva," meaning tawny—and to standardize across regions, avoiding overlap with the regionally specific "Rasberry" moniker. Subsequent taxonomic reviews have upheld Nylanderia fulva as the accepted scientific name, with no further revisions proposed. This stability aids in global tracking of its invasive spread, distinguishing it from superficially similar species like Nylanderia pubens through brief references to its uniform tawny hue when needed for identification.

Physical characteristics

The Rasberry crazy ant, scientifically known as Nylanderia fulva, exhibits a monomorphic worker caste with individuals typically measuring 2.0–2.5 mm in length. Their bodies are slender and reddish-brown to orange-brown in coloration, with a darker abdomen and a shiny integument covered in dense, fine pubescence and long, flexuous hairs. Workers possess long, 12-segmented antennae and lack spines on the thorax, contributing to their distinctive, elongated appearance. Queens are larger, reaching approximately 4.0 mm in length, and are typically darker brown; they are winged during nuptial flights but often found wingless in established colonies. Males are slightly larger than workers at 2.4–2.7 mm and are also winged, with similar reddish-brown coloration and pubescent bodies. The thorax of both queens and males features abundant light-brown hairs, and the species is characterized by a single-node petiole and an acidopore at the tip of the abdomen. Key morphological traits for identification include the hairy, pubescent body covering the entire form, including legs, which sets N. fulva apart from many sympatric species. This physical description, combined with the ' erratic, non-trailing movement, aids in distinguishing them from look-alike species like the odorous house .

Identification features

The Rasberry crazy ant, Nylanderia fulva, is readily identifiable in the field by its distinctive behavioral traits, particularly its non-linear patterns and rapid, jerky movements. Unlike many species that follow straight, pheromone-defined trails, N. fulva workers exhibit erratic, unpredictable locomotion, often veering sideways or pausing abruptly while , which contributes to its common name "crazy ." These form loose, irregularly shaped trails up to 10 cm wide, preferring shaded areas and avoiding direct , and they do not construct prominent mounds but instead nest under debris, mulch, or potted plants. For more precise identification, especially under magnification, N. fulva displays key microscopic features typical of the Formicinae subfamily. Workers possess 12-segmented antennae without a distinct club, a single petiole node, and an acidopore—a small circle of hairs at the abdomen's tip—in place of a . The body is covered in numerous coarse, erect hairs, and the overall form is monomorphic with workers measuring 2.0–2.4 mm in length and a reddish-brown coloration that varies slightly in shade. Distinguishing N. fulva from similar pest ants relies on a combination of size, color, behavior, and morphology, as summarized below:
FeatureRasberry Crazy Ant (N. fulva)Argentine Ant (Linepithema humile)Red Imported Fire Ant (Solenopsis invicta)Carpenter Ant (Camponotus spp.)
Size (workers)2.0–2.4 mm, monomorphic2–3 mm, monomorphic2–6 mm, polymorphic (majors/minors)6–12 mm, polymorphic
ColorReddish-brown to tawnyUniform dark brown to blackReddish-brown head/thorax, black abdomenBlack or black/red
Behavior/MovementErratic, jerky; non-linear trailsStraight, linear trails; organized foragingAggressive; linear trails to moundsDeliberate; trails to wood nests
NestingDecentralized under objects; no moundsShallow nests in soil or walls; supercoloniesMounded soil colonies; aggressive defenseExcavates wood; galleries in moist timber
Sting/DefenseBites mildly; no sting; acidoporeBites mildly; no stingPainful sting; two petiole nodesBites; no sting; sprays formic acid
Key DiagnosticAbundant body hairs; 12-segmented antennaeSmooth body; even waist profilePolymorphic castes; venomous stingLarge size; elbowed antennae with club
These differences allow field differentiation, with N. fulva lacking the aggressive stinging of fire ants, the uniform sleekness of Argentine ants, and the large size and wood-boring habits of carpenter ants. If field identification remains ambiguous due to overlapping traits with other Nylanderia species, laboratory confirmation using genetic markers is recommended. Recent studies using single polymorphisms (SNPs) have characterized population genetic structure in invasive N. fulva populations across the and native ranges. Microsatellite markers have been developed to investigate aspects such as sexually antagonistic selection in this .

Biology and behavior

Diet and foraging

The Rasberry crazy ant, Nylanderia fulva, exhibits an omnivorous diet that encompasses a wide range of food sources, including honeydew produced by hemipteran such as , small arthropods like caterpillars, beetles, , wasps, and spiders, as well as occasional small vertebrates including , birds, and mammals. Workers also consume plant-based resources, particularly and other sugary exudates, and in human-modified environments, they readily forage on household items rich in sugars and proteins, such as sweets and . A key aspect of their feeding ecology involves mutualistic associations with hemipterans, where N. fulva workers actively tend , , and soft scale insects to harvest their honeydew, a carbohydrate-rich . This protective behavior, including defense against predators, enhances hemipteran populations, which in turn provides a reliable, high-energy food source for the and can exacerbate damage in invaded areas through increased sap-feeding. Foraging in N. fulva typically occurs along loose trails that can extend at least 10 cm and are marked by pheromones, though workers often deviate into chaotic, non-trailing patterns characterized by rapid, erratic movements. These are active both day and night, with indoor foraging reported at any time, and they preferentially operate in humid, moist conditions that support their activity. This erratic style, while less efficient than structured trailing in some ant species, allows exploitation of diverse, patchily distributed resources. In invaded habitats, N. fulva significantly impacts local food webs by depleting populations of native , including ants, spiders, and grasshoppers, through predation and resource competition, leading to reduced arthropod diversity. Their high densities and broad further strain plant resources indirectly via promoted hemipteran outbreaks, altering dynamics in affected areas.

Reproduction and colony structure

The Rasberry crazy ant, Nylanderia fulva, exhibits a highly polygynous colony structure, with nests typically containing multiple that share reproductive duties. In established populations, individual nests may harbor up to hundreds of , contributing to the formation of expansive supercolonies that interconnect multiple nests across large areas, sometimes spanning several acres. This polydomous organization allows for efficient resource sharing and defense, enabling colonies to achieve extraordinary densities, with millions of workers supporting the reproductive output of the . Reproduction in N. fulva is characterized by laying small clutches of white, ovoid eggs, typically 17–25 per mass, which workers attach together using for protection and transport. maintain high ovarian activity seasonally, with the proportion bearing more than 50 developing eggs peaking at 68% during summer months, facilitating continuous production. Worker are monomorphic, in at approximately 2 mm in length, and assist in rearing the brood through and nest maintenance, though minor size variations may occur within populations. Alate reproductives—winged males and queens—are produced seasonally, primarily in spring and summer, but nuptial flights have not been observed in the field. Instead, expansion predominantly occurs through , where portions of the , including queens and workers, migrate short distances to establish new interconnected nests, promoting rapid growth and invasion potential. This reproductive strategy supports high population turnover, with colonies capable of producing millions of workers annually under favorable conditions.

Movement and erratic behavior

The Rasberry crazy ant, Nylanderia fulva, derives its common name from the distinctive erratic and rapid locomotion of its workers, who dart unpredictably in multiple directions rather than following linear paths. This behavior stems from a reliance on non-pheromone-based , such as thigmotaxis—following edges or surfaces—and visual orientation, rather than strong chemical trail pheromones that guide many other species in organized columns. As a result, foraging individuals exhibit random, high-speed movements, quantified in studies at 25–30 mm/s along trails, which is notably faster than slower pest like Solenopsis invicta. During foraging, N. fulva workers form loose, wide trails (often ≥10 cm across) characterized by chaotic motion, with frequently climbing over one another in dense masses that can appear disorganized or piled when disturbed. This mass aggregation intensifies around perceived threats, such as intruders or competitors, where large numbers of workers converge erratically, potentially overwhelming or deterring adversaries through sheer density and frenzy. Such behaviors are evident in both trail formation and defensive responses, contrasting with the structured raiding lines of species like fire . The adaptive significance of this erratic locomotion lies in its role in predator evasion and competitive disruption; the unpredictable darting confuses potential threats, while the lack of rigid trails enables flexible, rapid exploration of new resources in disturbed environments. Early observations in , following the species' initial U.S. detection in 2002, documented this behavior in urban landscapes, where ants exploited structural features for .

Native and introduced range

Native distribution

The Rasberry crazy ant, Nylanderia fulva (Mayr), is native to , with its confirmed range spanning southern regions including (the type locality), northern , , and . Some records suggest a broader distribution potentially extending northward into and parts of central , though the core populations are concentrated in subtropical and temperate zones near the drainage. There is limited evidence for native presence in northern countries like , , or , and any reports from likely represent early introductions rather than original distribution. In its native range, N. fulva occupies diverse habitats such as tropical and subtropical forests, savannas, and humid grasslands, often nesting in crevices, under litter, or within decaying wood in well-drained areas. Pre-invasion populations exhibit low densities, forming discrete multicolonial structures where individual colonies remain genetically distinct and territorially separated, preventing the formation of expansive supercolonies seen in introduced areas. These low-density configurations are maintained by environmental constraints and biotic interactions, including competition from other ant species and predation by native arthropods. Genetic studies, including phylogeographic analyses using mitochondrial and nuclear markers, have identified South American clades—particularly from southern and adjacent border regions—as the primary source populations for U.S. invasions. Early molecular work prior to 2010, combined with type specimen comparisons, established the Brazilian origin and ruled out African or Asian ancestry hypotheses, while post-2010 sequencing confirmed close genetic matches between invasive North American samples and native southern South American lineages. These findings underscore the role of human-mediated trade in bridging the native range to non-indigenous regions. Within its native distribution, N. fulva does not pose a significant pest threat, as population growth is regulated by a suite of natural enemies, including predatory , spiders, and parasitic wasps, alongside that limits dominance. This ecological balance contrasts sharply with its disruptive behavior in introduced settings, highlighting how native-range dynamics prevent widespread outbreaks.

Introduced distribution

The Rasberry crazy ant (Nylanderia fulva), also known as the tawny crazy ant, was first detected in the United States in , , in 2002. Since then, it has expanded significantly within the country, primarily through human-mediated dispersal such as movement of infested materials and vehicles. As of November 2025, the ant is established across at least 11 states, with the heaviest concentrations along the Gulf Coast in humid subtropical climates conducive to its survival and proliferation. In , populations occur in 92 counties, predominantly in the southeastern region; hosts infestations in 28 counties, especially in the central and southern areas; reports 25 parishes affected, mainly in the southern parishes; and smaller incursions exist in (10 counties), Georgia (8 counties), and (12 counties). Isolated populations have been documented in , (3 counties), (5 counties), , and . Recent monitoring data indicate expansions in 2024 and 2025, including new county-level detections in and , as reported by collaborative efforts from university extension services and databases. Affected states, including and , have implemented regulatory measures such as protocols for nurseries and transported goods to establish de facto zones aimed at limiting further spread, though no nationwide federal quarantine exists specifically for this species. is notably high in urban hotspots, such as the metropolitan area in and the region in , where colonies can reach millions of individuals per acre, overwhelming local ecosystems and .

Global spread beyond the US

The Rasberry crazy ant, Nylanderia fulva, has established populations in several locations beyond the , including and the U.S. , with detections dating back to the early 2000s. In , the species was first reported as established in the , likely introduced via international trade routes from . Similarly, on St. Croix in the U.S. , a significant population outbreak occurred starting in 2002, leading to widespread infestations that temporarily dominated local ant communities before declining due to natural factors such as predation and environmental pressures. These introductions highlight the ant's ability to thrive in tropical climates similar to its native range. Beyond the Caribbean, N. fulva has been confirmed as established in , particularly in eastern regions, where suitable warm and humid conditions support its spread since at least the . Potential introductions to remain unconfirmed as of 2025, with the species listed as a high-risk exotic pest but no verified breeding populations detected despite efforts. In contrast, spread to and has been limited by climatic mismatches, such as cooler temperatures outside subtropical zones, resulting primarily in interceptions rather than establishments. For instance, specimens have been detected in shipments arriving in European ports, but no self-sustaining colonies have been reported. International trade serves as the primary vector for N. fulva's global dispersal outside the U.S., with often transported in nursery plants, ornamental shipments, and cargo originating from . These pathways facilitate accidental introductions to ports and urban areas in suitable climates. As of 2025, the species is actively monitored by international networks, such as the Pacific Invasive Ant Toolkit (), which tracks potential risks in island ecosystems; however, no established populations have been documented in Pacific islands to date. Ongoing vigilance focuses on preventing further spread through enhanced measures at trade entry points.

Invasion history and spread

Discovery and initial detection

The Rasberry crazy ant, scientifically known as Nylanderia fulva, was first detected in the United States in , near Pasadena, in 2002 by operator Tom Rasberry, who observed large populations infesting a and surrounding areas. These ants were initially misidentified as Paratrechina sp. nr. pubens, a related known as the Caribbean crazy ant, due to morphological similarities, though subsequent examinations revealed distinct traits. Rasberry submitted samples to entomologists at , where they were confirmed as an exotic distinct from native ants, marking the beginning of formal recognition as a novel pest in the region. By 2007, media coverage began referring to the ant as the "Rasberry crazy ant" in honor of its discoverer, highlighting its erratic movements and growing infestations, which helped raise public and scientific awareness. Early reports from affected sites, including residential and industrial areas, noted the ants' tendency to swarm electrical equipment, leading to short circuits, equipment failures, and prompting targeted research by Texas A&M's Department of to understand their impact. This behavior, where electrocuted ants release pheromones attracting more individuals, amplified concerns about infrastructure damage and accelerated studies on the species' . The ant's invasive status gained federal attention by 2012, when the U.S. Department of Agriculture and other agencies issued alerts about its spread, classifying it as a significant threat following molecular confirmation of its identity as N. fulva. Prior to the 2002 detection, the species may have been present undetected, with a historical record from , in 1938 likely introduced via international ports, suggesting a longer latent establishment phase before explosive . The common name "Rasberry crazy ant" etymologically ties directly to Tom Rasberry's pivotal role in its initial reporting.

Rate of spread

Following its initial detection in , in 2002, the tawny crazy ant (Nylanderia fulva) exhibited exponential across the state, expanding from one affected county to 27 by 2015 and reaching 43 counties by early 2025. Local ground-based spread at fronts remains limited to 200–300 meters per year through nest and , but human-mediated long-distance jumps have driven the broader . Human-assisted dispersal has been the primary mechanism accelerating range expansion, with ants transported via infested landscaping plants, nursery stock, and vehicles during commerce and relocation activities. This enables discontinuous infestations far beyond natural migration limits, contributing to the ant's establishment in non-contiguous counties and states along the Gulf Coast. Continued warming from is projected to enhance the species' invasion potential by expanding suitable habitats northward, potentially allowing establishment in currently unsuitable temperate regions of the . Niche shift analyses indicate that invasive populations tolerate broader thermal ranges than native ones, supporting accelerated dispersal under future scenarios.

Factors influencing dispersal

The dispersal of the Rasberry crazy ant, Nylanderia fulva, is primarily facilitated by human-mediated vectors, including the transport of infested nursery stock, potted plants, and , as well as movement of yard debris, , and garbage. These ants often hitchhike on outdoor equipment, vehicles, and stored materials such as piles of refuse, enabling long-distance spread beyond natural foraging ranges. Environmental conditions play a key role in promoting N. fulva establishment and expansion, favoring warm and humid climates that support foraging and nesting in moist soils. Several barriers constrain the northward and broader dispersal of N. fulva, notably cold winters that reduce survival and , limiting expansion into temperate regions. In introduced ranges, the absence of native natural enemies, such as specialist predators or parasites from , reduces mortality and allows unchecked population growth compared to native habitats. Recent genetic studies indicate that invasive N. fulva populations exhibit low due to bottlenecks during introduction, which facilitates rapid through unicoloniality but increases vulnerability to environmental stressors or pathogens. This reduced diversity has been linked to the formation of expansive supercolonies.

Habitat preferences

Environmental requirements

The Rasberry crazy ant, Nylanderia fulva, requires high and moist conditions for optimal survival and expansion, thriving in environments that maintain elevated moisture levels to support and . These prefer dark, secluded, humid microhabitats, avoiding direct and exposed areas that could lead to . Mild temperatures, generally in the range of 20–30°C, facilitate their activity, with trails becoming more prominent as ambient temperatures rise above 20°C. Nesting sites are typically located in moist, organic-rich soils or substrates that retain water, such as leaf litter, under loose bark, mulch layers, or within potted plants and stumps. While they can tunnel shallowly in sandy soils, they do not construct prominent mounds and instead utilize existing voids or debris that provide humidity and protection. These preferences underscore their sensitivity to dry conditions, where reduced limits growth and dispersal. Regarding temperature tolerances, N. fulva exhibits a critical thermal minimum (CTmin) of approximately 7.3°C, allowing survival through brief freezes, but prolonged exposure below 10°C leads to colony decline and reduced activity. Their thermal breadth is narrower than that of co-occurring species like the (Solenopsis invicta), with upper limits around 42–44°C depending on ramping rates, highlighting vulnerability to extreme heat without shade or moisture. As drought-sensitive insects, they struggle in arid settings without supplemental water.

Urban and natural habitats

In its native range across southern , northern , , and , the Rasberry crazy ant (Nylanderia fulva) occupies a variety of natural habitats, including tropical forests and grasslands. These environments provide the moist, humid conditions preferred by the species, with colonies often establishing in leaf litter, , and under rotting wood or bark. In these undisturbed areas, nests are typically ground-based and integrated into the forest floor or grassy , supporting the ant's foraging for and honeydew-producing hemipterans. Upon introduction to the , particularly in the southern states such as , , , , and Georgia, N. fulva has shown a preference for disturbed natural habitats, including forest edges, grasslands, and areas altered by human activity like roadsides or cleared land. Colonies invade these transitional zones, where and shelter from remnants facilitate establishment. In natural settings, nests remain primarily shallow and ground-oriented, often in well-drained but humid soils with crevices or tunnels, though populations can form expansive supercolonies covering up to one square meter. In urban environments, N. fulva thrives in human-modified landscapes such as residential yards, parks, and commercial areas, where it nests under pavement, in , or along structural foundations. The readily occupies sheltered, moist sites like potted , air units, and other electrical enclosures, drawn to the warmth and humidity these provide. Colonies are polydomous, featuring numerous satellite nests—often dozens per supercolony—spread across these sites to optimize and protection, with workers moving between them frequently. This adaptability allows dense populations in cities, where nests can number in the hundreds across a single property.

Ecological interactions

Competition with native ants

The Rasberry crazy (Nylanderia fulva) outcompetes native species through numerical superiority, where its massive sizes overwhelm food and nesting resources, and interference competition, involving aggressive displacement of rivals. In grassland studies, invasions by N. fulva have displaced approximately 70% of native species by reducing their abundance and homogenizing assemblages, with non-N. fulva comprising less than 10% of total populations in invaded plots. Key mechanisms driving this competition include rapid colony budding, which enables N. fulva to fragment and expand colonies quickly without flight, saturating habitats with workers that dominate foraging trails and resources. Additionally, N. fulva workers deploy a spray of from their acidopore, acting as a potent irritant and fumigant that disrupts rival ' chemical trails, inhibits recruitment, and causes behavioral avoidance in competitors. Among affected species, N. fulva significantly displaces the (Solenopsis invicta) and the (Linepithema humile), both established invasives in the , leading to local extirpations in heavily invaded areas. Data from 2025 field surveys in invaded urban landscapes reveal ongoing , with significant reductions in ant diversity in affected plots compared to uninvaded controls, alongside shifts in community structure favoring N. fulva dominance.

Relationship with fire ants

The Rasberry crazy ant (Nylanderia fulva), also known as the tawny crazy ant, engages in intense interspecific antagonism with the (Solenopsis invicta) in regions where their ranges overlap, such as parts of the . This interaction often favors the crazy ants, which actively invade and displace colonies, leading to substantial reductions in densities. In co-invaded areas with high crazy ant abundance, populations have been observed to decline by 90–95%, allowing crazy ants to dominate resources and nesting sites. A primary mechanism enabling this dominance is the crazy ant's deployment of as a against stings. typically form defensive aggregations, or "ant balls," around intruders like crazy ants to deliver multiple stings laced with containing alkaloids. However, crazy ants counteract this by everting their and grooming dilute onto their exoskeletons, which detoxifies the solenopsis invicta and neutralizes its toxic effects. This grooming dramatically boosts survival rates, with approximately 98% of treated crazy ants enduring attacks compared to only 20% of untreated individuals. The , produced in the crazy ant's reservoir at concentrations sufficient for effective , also serves as a repellent and fumigant against s, further tipping competitive encounters in favor of the invader. Experimental applications of have confirmed its role in enhancing crazy ant mortality resistance while increasing fire ant vulnerability when exposed. Recent studies highlight the mutual costs of this , where crazy ants benefit from diminished pressure but face retaliatory attacks that can inflict losses, particularly in lower-density invasions. As of 2025, ongoing field observations continue to document localized declines attributable to crazy ant incursions, underscoring the dynamic and reciprocal nature of their interactions.

Broader ecosystem effects

The invasion of the Rasberry crazy ant (Nylanderia fulva) disrupts key ecosystem processes such as and primarily through its dominance in tending aphid-like hemipterans. By protecting these sap-sucking insects from predators in exchange for honeydew, N. fulva promotes outbreaks that damage plant tissues, leading to reduced flower production and nectar availability for pollinators. This indirect effect diminishes efficiency for dependent plants, while the displacement of native that engage in —dispersing seeds via elaiosomes—further impairs seed spread in invaded habitats. In regions like , such interactions have caused widespread desiccation of grasses, altering vegetation structure and limiting seed viability. Predation patterns shift dramatically in N. fulva-invaded areas, with heightened mortality among small due to the ant's aggressive and supercolony dynamics. These prey on a broad array of arthropods, including , Coleoptera, and Isoptera, reducing overall invertebrate abundance and diversity by capturing over 90% of available resources in some sites. This depletion cascades to higher trophic levels, potentially causing declines in and populations reliant on arthropods for food, as observed in reduced in invaded southeastern U.S. ecosystems. Small animals, including nestlings and , face direct threats from ant swarms, exacerbating food scarcity for predators. N. fulva influences cycling through extensive nest excavation in humid , which aerates substrates but alters microbial communities and distribution. Supercolonies, with exceeding 100 times that of native , contribute to soil turnover and potential enrichment in calcium-correlated sites, though this can stress invaded grasslands. The invasive spread correlates with reductions in via hemipteran-induced plant stress, disrupting rates and return to . Recent 2025 studies from long-term monitoring in invaded regions highlight cascading effects on communities, with N. fulva lowering native diversity by up to 90% through competitive exclusion and predation. A 2025 from grasslands indicates significant declines in aboveground abundance following N. fulva , underscoring broader trophic disruptions, including diminished functional roles in and herbivory, as documented in prairies where aboveground abundance declined significantly post-invasion.

Human impacts

Effects on electrical equipment

The Rasberry crazy ant, Nylanderia fulva, exhibits a strong attraction to electrical equipment, likely drawn by the warmth generated from electrical currents or possibly electromagnetic fields emitted by devices. These frequently nest in confined spaces such as electrical switches, junction boxes, meters, and control panels, where they form large colonies that can number in the thousands. This behavior is particularly pronounced in urban environments with high concentrations of powered , leading to rapid infestations that overwhelm protective casings. The primary damage occurs through physical and chemical interference with electrical systems. As ants swarm across contacts and wiring, their bodies act as conductive bridges, creating unintended pathways that result in short circuits and arcing. When individual ants are electrocuted, they release pheromones that attract more colony members, exacerbating the buildup and perpetuating failures; additionally, the decomposing bodies contribute to and further conductivity issues. This has led to equipment malfunctions in various applications, including power substations where ants clog relays and cause outages, traffic signal controllers that fail intermittently, and computers or HVAC systems that overheat or shut down. In the area, where infestations have been severe since the early , these ants have been responsible for notable disruptions to residential and commercial electrical services, with individual incidents resulting in remedial costs of several thousand dollars. As of 2025, the issue persists in humid southeastern U.S. regions like and , where ongoing infestations continue to affect electrical infrastructure despite mitigation efforts. As of October 2025, infestations continue to cause electrical failures in homes and infrastructure in and . Strategies such as sealing entry points with ant-proof barriers, applying non-repellent insecticides around equipment, and regular inspections have reduced some damages, but the ants' rapid and preference for warm, powered sites make complete control challenging in affected areas. Annual economic impacts from such failures remain significant, underscoring the need for in utility planning.

Agricultural and structural damage

The Rasberry crazy ant, Nylanderia fulva, poses significant threats to agriculture by tending honeydew-producing pests such as , scale insects, and mealybugs, which it protects from natural predators in exchange for the sugary secretions. This mutualistic relationship allows these hemipteran pests to proliferate on crops, leading to increased sap-feeding damage, plant stress, and reduced yields. Affected crops include orchards, fields, and ornamental plants, where the ants' activities disrupt biological control and exacerbate pest outbreaks. In structural settings, Rasberry crazy ants readily infest homes, businesses, and other human-occupied spaces, forming massive colonies under , in walls, or near moisture sources. Their behavior brings large swarms indoors, where they contaminate food storage areas and surfaces with their presence, posing hygiene risks and requiring extensive cleanup. Additionally, the ants bite humans and pets, injecting that causes a brief stinging sensation; large swarms can overwhelm individuals, leading to discomfort and minor allergic reactions in sensitive cases. Economically, these impacts have resulted in substantial costs across the since the ' detection in 2002, with individual infestations causing thousands of dollars in agricultural revenue losses and structural remediation expenses. The protection of crop pests has led to broader disruptions in farming operations, while home invasions contribute to decreased property usability and health-related complaints from swarm exposures. As of 2025, reports indicate heightened infestations in nurseries, where the exploit dense vegetation and honeydew sources, facilitating further spread through the shipment of infested ornamental and nursery stock.

Management and control

Chemical control methods

Chemical control of the Rasberry crazy ant, also known as the tawny crazy ant (Nylanderia fulva), primarily relies on applications due to the species' invasive nature and large colony sizes. Traditional baits are generally ineffective because these exhibit non-recruiting foraging behavior, where workers do not share food with nestmates via trophallaxis as efficiently as other species, limiting the spread of toxicants within colonies. While some bait formulations, such as those containing (e.g., MaxForce Complete), can achieve up to 50% population reduction during active foraging periods, they are insufficient for full colony suppression and are best used as part of perimeter treatments rather than standalone methods. Contact insecticides provide temporary knockdown effects by creating buffer zones around structures and nesting sites. Pyrethroids like (e.g., Talstar P) and non-repellent options such as (e.g., Termidor SC) kill workers on contact and offer residual activity, but wanes quickly, with single applications lasting less than one week on average and buffer zones breached within 2-3 months due to reinvasion from untreated areas. Hydramethylnon-based granular formulations are applied in perimeter treatments at rates of 0.5-1 g/m² to target trails and nests, providing slow-acting metabolic inhibition that affects workers over time, though or rain can reduce longevity. The polygynous nature of Rasberry crazy ant colonies, with multiple queens distributed across large areas, necessitates area-wide treatments to prevent rapid rebound from surviving reproductives, as localized applications fail to eliminate all queens. Dead ants from knockdown must also be removed to avoid secondary issues like attracting pests or hindering further access. Guidelines emphasize EPA-registered products with labels for ant control, including those granted Section 18 exemptions for expanded use against this species, such as and formulations. protocols recommend professional application of contact sprays in a 10-20 foot perimeter band around structures, combined with landscape modification for urban settings, to maximize short-term suppression while minimizing environmental impact.

Biological and integrated approaches

Biological control strategies for the Rasberry crazy ant (Nylanderia fulva) primarily involve exploring natural enemies such as parasitic phorid flies in the genus Pseudacteon. In its native range in , Pseudacteon convexicauda has been observed parasitizing N. fulva workers by laying eggs on the ants, leading to larval development that decapitates the host. Although phorid flies have been successfully used against other invasive ants like fire ants, testing against N. fulva has shown limited efficacy due to the ant's erratic behavior and large supercolonies, which dilute the impact of . Recent efforts include evaluating other pathogens, such as the microsporidian parasite Myrmecomorba nylanderiae, which infects up to 70% of N. fulva workers in some U.S. populations and could serve as a . A novel positive-sense single-stranded , Nylanderia fulva virus 1 (NfV-1), identified in U.S. populations but potentially present in the native range, demonstrates host-specific potential for biological control. As of 2025, USDA projects are investigating these and related agents for biological control potential, though establishment of self-sustaining populations remains challenging. Integrated pest management (IPM) for N. fulva emphasizes non-chemical tactics combined with selective chemical use to minimize environmental impact. Habitat modification focuses on reducing moisture and harborage sites by clearing leaf litter, yard debris, and dense vegetation, which can decrease nest density by up to 23%. Recent 2025 guidelines recommend expanded perimeter buffer zones of up to 20-30 feet with low-toxicity insecticides, alongside natural options such as diatomaceous earth for trail disruption in residential settings. Physical barriers, such as sealing cracks, gaps around doors and windows, and using ant moats or sticky traps, help prevent ants from entering structures. Monitoring with simple traps—like thin slices of canned sausage placed 10–20 feet apart—allows early detection and assessment of population trends, enabling targeted interventions. Efforts to import natural enemies from N. fulva's native range have yielded low success in the invaded U.S. regions, largely because the ants form massive supercolonies spanning hundreds of meters, making it difficult for introduced parasites to achieve widespread control. Community-based programs play a key role in prevention, with education campaigns urging residents and nurseries to inspect plants for ants before transport, thereby curbing human-mediated spread through infested landscaping materials. Within IPM frameworks, these biological and physical methods can synergize with low-toxicity chemical baits for enhanced suppression without relying solely on broad-spectrum insecticides.

Challenges and ongoing research

The management of the Rasberry crazy ant, now scientifically known as Nylanderia fulva, faces significant challenges due to its biological traits and environmental adaptability. The exhibits polydomy, forming extensive supercolonies with multiple interconnected nests spread across large areas, which complicates complete elimination as treatments targeting individual nests often fail to eradicate the entire population. Additionally, N. fulva demonstrates low acceptance of traditional baits, with workers showing weak responses to most commercial products, limiting the efficacy of bait-based strategies. Rapid reinvasion further hinders control efforts, as surviving ants from nearby untreated areas quickly recolonize treated zones, often within 2-4 weeks, due to the species' high population densities and dispersal capabilities. The ant's persistence is bolstered by its adaptation to subtropical climates, where warm temperatures and high humidity in the align closely with its native range, allowing year-round activity and survival through mild winters. Ongoing research in 2025 addresses these barriers through targeted biological control initiatives. The USDA (ARS) has launched projects focused on identifying and deploying pathogens against N. fulva, including genetic surveys identifying such as Nylanderia fulva virus 1 (NfV-1) for potential use as biocontrol agents, aiming to exploit species-specific vulnerabilities while minimizing impacts on native ants. Genetic studies continue to map population structures, revealing supercolonial formations with low intraspecific aggression that could inform targeted interventions, such as disrupting queen production or cohesion. Recent efforts also emphasize improved monitoring and perimeter strategies to counter reinvasion. Extension services have developed "" protocols, recommending expanded applications around structures and landscapes to create protective barriers, which provide longer-term suppression than baits alone. These approaches incorporate updated distribution data, reflecting the ant's spread beyond pre-2020 records into additional southeastern states, and refined confirming N. fulva as the invasive lineage distinct from related . Future prospects include advanced molecular techniques like (RNAi), where lab trials have demonstrated in N. fulva workers via orally delivered double-stranded RNA, leading to increased mortality and reduced reproduction, with potential for field integration pending efficacy enhancements. Similarly, early-stage exploration of pathogens such as the microsporidian Myrmecomorba nylanderiae shows promise for population collapse in field settings, though commercialization remains a key research gap.

References

  1. https://www.texasinvasives.org/pest_database/detail.php?symbol=13
  2. https://midsouthentomologist.org.msstate.edu/Volume3/Vol3_1_html_files/vol3_1_008.htm
  3. https://extensionentomology.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/tawny-crazy-ant-management-build-a-bigger-buffer.pdf
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3462614/
  5. https://www.eddmaps.org/species/tca/
  6. https://www.lsuagcenter.com/topics/environment/insects/ants/pest_ants/crazy_ants/thetawnycrazyantinlouisiana
  7. https://urbanentomology.tamu.edu/urban-pests/ants/rasberry/
  8. https://www.pctonline.com/article/pct0513-entomology-crazy-ants/
  9. https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/Nylanderia_fulva
  10. https://www.mississippientomologicalmuseum.org.msstate.edu/Researchtaxapages/Formicidaepages/genericpages/Nylanderia_fulva.htm
  11. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN1076
  12. https://fieldreport.caes.uga.edu/publications/C1064/the-tawny-crazy-ant-in-georgia/
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5198225/
  14. https://ant-pests.extension.org/tawny-rasberry-crazy-ants/
  15. https://citybugs.tamu.edu/factsheets/household/ants-house/ent-2013/
  16. https://www.domyown.com/ant-identification-guide-a-460.html
  17. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2399319/latest.pdf
  18. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/12/7/643
  19. https://bugwoodcloud.org/resource/files/6305.pdf
  20. https://academic.oup.com/aesa/article/113/4/318/5748290
  21. https://springerplus.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2193-1801-3-229
  22. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/graduate_theses/7026/
  23. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/insect-science/articles/10.3389/finsc.2022.905803/full
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6310932/
  25. https://bioone.org/journals/florida-entomologist/volume-104/issue-2/024.104.0211/The-Seasonal-Reproductive-Status-of-Tawny-Crazy-Ant-Queens-Hymenoptera/10.1653/024.104.0211.full
  26. https://bioone.org/journals/florida-entomologist/volume-103/issue-3/024.103.0318/Seasonal-Prevalence-of-Queens-and-Males-in-Colonies-of-Tawny/10.1653/024.103.0318.full
  27. https://tsusinvasives.org/home/database/nylanderia-fulva
  28. https://bugmanonline.com/crazy-ants-what-you-should-know/
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31861668/
  30. https://www.lsuagcenter.com/profiles/bneely/articles/page1586986654314
  31. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/7/4/77
  32. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045314
  33. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN1071
  34. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-018-1336-5
  35. https://www.eddmaps.org/distribution/uscounty.cfm?sub=62935
  36. https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/project/?accnNo=447142
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267328584_Boom_and_bust_of_the_tawny_crazy_ant_Nylanderia_fulva_on_St_Croix_US_Virgin_Islands
  38. https://pir.sa.gov.au/biosecurity/plant_health/emergency_and_significant_plant_pests/high_risk_exotic_plant_pests_and_diseases/exotic_invasive_ants/tawny_rasberry_crazy_ant
  39. https://piat.org.nz/index.php?page=tawny-crazy-ant
  40. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.1737
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4670064/
  42. https://blogs.cdfa.ca.gov/Section3162/?p=5152
  43. https://fieldreport.caes.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/C-1064_3.pdf
  44. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13381
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311713452_A_Review_of_the_Tawny_Crazy_Ant_Nylanderia_fulva_an_Emergent_Ant_Invader_in_the_Southern_United_States_Is_Biological_Control_a_Feasible_Management_Option
  46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30594137/
  47. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-4004666/latest.pdf
  48. https://www.aces.edu/blog/topics/home/managing-tawny-crazy-ants-guidelines-for-the-pest-management-professional/
  49. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN889
  50. https://academic.oup.com/ee/article/45/4/1058/2465619
  51. https://www.[mdpi](/page/MDPI).com/2075-4450/7/4/77
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S004101011300384X
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281285790_North_American_Invasion_of_the_Tawny_Crazy_Ant_Nylanderia_fulva_Is_Enabled_by_Pheromonal_Synergism_from_Two_Separate_Glands
  54. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10530-025-03651-z
  55. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/crazy-ants-swarming-in-southeastern-states/
  56. https://news.utexas.edu/2013/05/16/invasive-crazy-ants-are-displacing-fire-ants-researchers-find/
  57. https://www.snexplores.org/article/crazy-ant-fight-fire-ant-venom-helps-crazy-ants-invade
  58. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-rise-of-the-crazy-ants/
  59. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26700488/
  60. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119607045.ch52
  61. https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/The_effect_of_Tawny_crazy_ants_on_the_abundance_of_aboveground_insect_abundance_in_Texas/30471419
  62. https://www.nature.com/scitable/blog/accumulating-glitches/invasion_of_the_crazy_ants/
  63. https://www.livescience.com/37720-crazy-ants-invade-electronics.html
  64. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna24620246
  65. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/08/magazine/crazy-ants.html
  66. https://www.earth.com/news/tawny-crazy-ants-invade-florida-and-attack-everything-from-birds-to-small-mammals/
  67. https://aptivepestcontrol.com/pests/ants/ants-in-electrical-outlets-causes-risks-and-fixes/
  68. https://turfmagazine.com/tawny-crazy-ants-identification-control
  69. https://advancepestx.com/tawny-crazy-ants/
  70. https://www.flapest.com/pest-info/ants/tawny-crazy-ant/
  71. https://www.pelicanpestcontrol.com/understanding-the-damages-caused-by-different-ant-species
  72. https://www.aces.edu/blog/topics/farming/managing-tawny-crazy-ants-in-plant-nurseries/
  73. https://www.lsuagcenter.com/articles/page1536013346210
  74. https://fieldreport.caes.uga.edu/publications/B1521/managing-tawny-crazy-ants/
  75. https://www.epestcontrol.com/pest-products/833-raspberry-caribbean-ant-control-kit.html
  76. http://hardin.agrilife.org/files/2014/03/RCA_control_-of-Rasberry-Crazy-Antsfact_sheet.pdf
  77. https://www.homesandgardens.com/gardens/rasberry-crazy-ants
  78. https://www.entm.purdue.edu/ants/pubs/Buczkowski_et_al_2023.pdf
  79. https://www.uvm.edu/~ngotelli/manuscriptpdfs/Booher_etal_2023.pdf
  80. https://www.hofferpest.com/blog/2025/june/rasberry-crazy-ants-in-florida-how-to-spot-preve/
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4980443/
  82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366891318_High-Resolution_Population_Genetic_Structure_of_Tawny_Crazy_Ant_Nylanderia_fulva_Mayr_Hymenoptera_Formicidae_from_the_Origin_in_South_America_and_Introduced_Regions_of_the_United_States
  83. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29790281/
  84. https://urbanentomology.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/10/Meng_et_al-2018-Insect_Science.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.