Hubbry Logo
BifenthrinBifenthrinMain
Open search
Bifenthrin
Community hub
Bifenthrin
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bifenthrin
Bifenthrin
Bifenthrin
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Bifenthrin
Names
Preferred IUPAC name
rel-(2-Methyl[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)methyl (1R,3R)-3-[(1Z)-2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-en-1-yl]-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylate
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
ChEMBL
ChemSpider
ECHA InfoCard 100.120.070 Edit this at Wikidata
KEGG
UNII
  • InChI=1S/C23H22ClF3O2/c1-14-16(10-7-11-17(14)15-8-5-4-6-9-15)13-29-21(28)20-18(22(20,2)3)12-19(24)23(25,26)27/h4-12,18,20H,13H2,1-3H3/b19-12-/t18-,20-/m1/s1 checkY
    Key: OMFRMAHOUUJSGP-JHEGMOCKSA-N checkY
  • InChI=1/2C23H22ClF3O2/c2*1-14-16(10-7-11-17(14)15-8-5-4-6-9-15)13-29-21(28)20-18(22(20,2)3)12-19(24)23(25,26)27/h2*4-12,18,20H,13H2,1-3H3/b2*19-12-/t2*18-,20-/m10/s1
    Key: OXCDWLBJSLVWHB-LKRLXIKPBY
  • Cc1c(cccc1c2ccccc2)COC(=O)C3C(C3(C)C)C=C(C(F)(F)F)Cl
  • Cl\C(=C/[C@@H]3[C@H](C(=O)OCc2cccc(c1ccccc1)c2C)C3(C)C)C(F)(F)F
Properties
C23H22ClF3O2
Molar mass 422.87 g·mol−1
0.1 mg/L
Hazards
Occupational safety and health (OHS/OSH):
Main hazards
 irritant and aquatic pollutant
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).
checkY verify (what is checkY☒N ?)

Bifenthrin is a pyrethroid insecticide. It is widely used against ant infestations.

Chemical properties

[edit]

Bifenthrin is poorly soluble in water and often remains in soil. Its residual half-life in soil is between 7 days and 8 months, depending on the soil type, with a low mobility in most soil types. Bifenthrin has the longest known residual time in soil of insecticides currently on the market. It is a white, waxy solid with a faint sweet smell. It is chemically synthesized in various forms, including powder, granules and pellets. However, it is not naturally occurring.[1]

Like other pyrethroids, bifenthrin is chiral; it has different enantiomers which can have different effects. Bifenthrin is found in two enantiomers: 1S-cis-bifenthrin and 1R-cis-bifenthrin. 1S-cis-Bifenthrin is 3-4 times more toxic to humans than 1R-cis-bifenthrin, while the latter is more than 300 times more effective as a pesticide.[2]

Toxicity

[edit]

Toxicodynamics

[edit]

There are two types of pyrethroids: those with and without α-cyanogroup. The neurotoxicity of bifenthrin is based on the affinity to the voltage-gated sodium channels (in insects as well as mammals). The pyrethroids with an α-cyanogroup block the sodium-channel permanently, causing the membrane to be permanently hyperpolarized. The resting potential will not be restored, and no further action potential can be generated. The pyrethroids without an α-cyanogroup, to which bifenthrin belongs, are only able to bind to the sodium channel transiently. This will result in after potentials and eventual continuous firing of axons. The resting potential is not affected by these pyrethroids.[2]

Bifenthrin will open the sodium channel for a shorter period than other pyrethroids. The mechanism in mammals and invertebrates is not different, but the effect on mammals is much less due to higher body temperature, higher body volume, and lower affinity of bifenthrin to sodium channels.[3]

Toxicokinetics

[edit]

Numerous studies have been conducted on the half life of bifenthrin in soil, water, and air under different conditions, such as aerobic or anaerobic, and at different temperatures and pH.[4] It is more likely to remain in the soil and not so much in water (it is hydrophobic), nor in the air (it is unlikely to volatilize because of its physical properties). Because of the water-insolubility of bifenthrin, it will not rapidly cause contamination of ground water. However, some contamination might occur by soil bound bifenthrin to surface water through runoff. For an overview of the environmental degradation of bifenthrin, see figure below. The main path of degradation results in 4'-hydroxy bifenthrin.

Biotransformation

[edit]

Pyrethroids are much less toxic in mammals than they are in insects and fish, because mammals have the ability to rapidly break the ester bond in bifenthrin and break the substance into its inactive acid and alcohol components.[2] In humans and rats, bifenthrin is degraded by the cytochrome p450-family.[5]

Toxicology

[edit]

Toxicity in animals

[edit]
Mosquitoes

Bifenthrin is an effective pesticide to use against malaria and filaria vector mosquitoes. It is still effective when resistance to other pyrethroids is found. Mosquito nets and indoor walls can be treated with bifenthrin[6] to keep more mosquitoes away.[7] Bifenthrin is an effectively used insecticide, but the risk is high of it working only for a short time. Mosquitoes can develop a resistance to it, as well.[8]

Aquatic life

Bifenthrin is hardly soluble in water, so nearly all bifenthrin will stay in the sediment, but it is very harmful to aquatic life. Even in small concentrations, fish and other aquatic animals are affected by bifenthrin.[4] One of the reasons for the high sensitivity of fish is fish have a slow metabolism. Bifenthrin will stay longer in the system of the fish. Another reason for the high sensitivity of fish is the effect of bifenthrin as ATPase-inhibitor. The gills need ATP to control the osmotic balance of oxygen. If the fish is no longer capable of taking up oxygen because ATP can no longer be used, the fish will die.[9] In cold water, bifenthrin is even more dangerous. pH and calcium concentration are also factors that influence the toxicity.[10] Vertebrates are less sensitive to the effects of bifenthrin as ATPase-inhibitor.

Bees

In bees, the lethal concentration (LC50) of bifenthrin is about 17 mg/L.[11] At sublethal concentrations, bifenthrin reduces the fecundity of bees, decreases the rate at which bee larvae develop into adults, and increases their immature periods.[11]

Table of LD50 values[4]
Species LD50
Female rats 54 mg/kg
Male rats 70 mg/kg
Mice 43 mg/kg
Mallard ducks 2150 mg/kg
Bobwhite quail 1800 mg/kg
Rainbow trout 0.00015 mg/L
Bluegill 0.00035 mg/L
Daphnia 0.0016 mg/L

Toxicity in humans

[edit]

Bifenthrin and other synthetic pyrethroids are being used in agriculture in increasing amounts because of the high efficiency of these substances in killing insects, the low toxicity for mammals, and good biodegradability.[12] However, because of its success, they are being used more often (also indoors) and high exposure of bifenthrin to humans can occur.[13][14]

Carcinogenicity
[edit]

The U.S. EPA classified bifenthrin as a Category C, possible human carcinogen. This rating is based on an increased rate of urinary bladder tumors in mice, adenoma and adenocarcinoma of the liver in male mice, and bronchoalveolar adenomas and adenocarcinomas of the lung in some female mice.[15]

Potential for neurotoxicity
[edit]

Bifenthrin can be absorbed by humans either by skin contact or ingestion. Skin contact is not toxic, causing only a slight tingling sensation at the point of contact. Ingestion in concentrations below 10−4 M is not toxic. However, commercially available bifenthrin products formulated for household use (such as Ortho Home Defense Max, sold as a liquid pump spray), can induce toxic effects due to other chemicals added to improve the sustainability of bifenthrin[which?] or are toxic on their own.[which?] Symptoms of excessive exposure are nausea, headaches, hypersensitivity for touch and sound, and irritation of the skin and the eyes.[16]

Regulation

[edit]

The EPA monitors and regulates the use of pesticides in the United States. Because of its high toxicity to aquatic organisms, bifenthrin is classified as a restricted-use pesticide, meaning it may only be sold to certified pesticide applicators. However, the EPA allows lower concentrations of bifenthrin to be sold to the general public.[citation needed]

Bifenthrin has been approved for use against the Rasberry crazy ant in the Houston, Texas, area, under a special "crisis exemption" from the Texas Department of Agriculture and the EPA. The chemical is only approved for use in Texas counties experiencing "confirmed infestations" of the newly imported, invasive ant species.[17]

The EPA has classified bifenthrin as a class C carcinogen, a possible human carcinogen based on a test with mice, which showed increased development of certain tumors.[4]

An acute and chronic reference dose (RfD) for bifenthrin has been established, based on animal studies. The reference dose resembles the estimated quantity of a chemical which a person could be exposed to every day (or a one-time exposure for the acute RfD) without any appreciable risk of adverse health effects. The acute reference dose (RfD) for bifenthrin is 0.328 mg/kg bodyweight/day. The chronic reference dose (RfD) for bifenthrin is 0.013 mg/kg bodyweight/day.[4]

Bifenthrin was included in a biocide ban proposed by the Swedish Chemicals Agency, because of its carcinogenic effect.[18] This was approved by the European Parliament in 2009.[19] Pesticides containing bifenthrin were withdrawn from use in the European Union.[20] They have since been reinstated.[21]

Bifenthrin is banned for agricultural use in European union countries since July 2019[22] but is still approved for the preservation of chopped wood.

Use

[edit]

On a large scale, bifenthrin is often used against invasive red fire ants. It is also effective against aphids, worms, other ants, gnats, moths, beetles, earwigs, grasshoppers, mites, midges, spiders, ticks, yellow jackets, maggots, thrips, caterpillars, flies, fleas, spotted lanternflies[23] and termites. It is mostly used in orchards, nurseries, and homes. In the agricultural sector, it is used in great amounts on certain crops, such as corn. About 70% of all hops and raspberries cultured in the United States are treated with bifenthrin.[1]

Bifenthrin is used by the textile industry to protect woollen products from insect attack. It was introduced as an alternative to permethrin-based agents, due to greater efficacy against keratinophagous insects, better wash-fastness, and lower aquatic toxicity.[24]

Products

[edit]

Products containing bifenthrin include Sevin, Transport, Talstar, Maxxthor, Biforce, Capture, Brigade, Bifenthrine, DuoCide insect control, Ortho Home Defense Max, Bifen XTS, Bifen IT, Bifen L/P, Torant, Zipak, Scotts Turf Builder SummerGuard, Wisdom TC Flowable, FMC 54800, Allectus, Ortho Max Pro, OMS3024, Mega Wash, Fortune Ultra, Hovex Ultra Low Odor and Surefire Fivestar.[1]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bifenthrin

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Bifenthrin is a synthetic and with the molecular formula C23H22ClF3O2, appearing as an off-white to pale tan waxy solid with a faint, slightly sweet , employed as a broad-spectrum agent for controlling and mites. Introduced commercially in , it functions by disrupting sodium channels in the nervous systems of target arthropods, leading to and death, and is formulated for applications in , turf, structural pest management, and public health . While effective against pests such as , , and , bifenthrin exhibits high toxicity to aquatic organisms, , and bees, with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency classifying it as a Group C possible based on increased urinary tumors observed in mice, though not in rats. Its environmental persistence and potential to induce trophic cascades in aquatic ecosystems, as demonstrated in stream studies, underscore ongoing regulatory scrutiny and risk assessments for non-target impacts.

History

Development and Introduction

Bifenthrin, a synthetic , was developed by in the late and early as part of efforts to create more photostable and potent analogs of natural pyrethrins, incorporating fluorine chemistry to enhance pesticidal activity against a broad spectrum of pests, including mites. This innovation built on prior pyrethroid modifications, such as those involving trifluoromethyl-substituted acid moieties, which improved environmental persistence compared to earlier, light-sensitive compounds. A key U.S. patent (US 4235927) covering bifenthrin's structure and synthesis was filed by FMC in 1980, reflecting the culmination of laboratory synthesis processes that avoided solvents to boost efficiency. The compound's alcohol component features a 2-methylbiphenyl , paired with a derivative, enabling Type I characteristics like repetitive excitation in target . FMC's development emphasized agricultural applications, targeting crops vulnerable to lepidopteran and other pests, with early testing demonstrating superior residual efficacy over predecessors. Bifenthrin was first introduced commercially in , marking FMC's entry into expanded markets. Regulatory approval followed swiftly, with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency registering bifenthrin for use in , enabling widespread adoption in crop protection and control formulations. This registration affirmed its profile for labeled uses, based on toxicity data showing low mammalian risk relative to insecticidal potency, though subsequent evaluations noted potential carcinogenicity in studies. By the late , FMC had scaled production at its , facility, solidifying bifenthrin's role in global pest management.

Commercial Adoption and Expansion

Bifenthrin was commercially introduced by circa 1984, following its synthesis as a fourth-generation , with initial U.S. Agency (EPA) registration in 1985 for agricultural and residential uses. Early adoption centered on crop protection against lepidopteran and other chewing insects in high-value commodities like , corn, almonds, and pistachios, where its contact toxicity and residual persistence offered advantages over organophosphates amid growing resistance concerns. By the late and , bifenthrin expanded rapidly into urban and structural pest management, particularly for subterranean and , marketed under brands such as Talstar and Brigade, filling gaps left by phased-out chemicals like . This shift was propelled by its low mammalian toxicity profile, allowing homeowner and professional applications on lawns, ornamentals, and building perimeters, with formulations enabling soil treatments and barrier applications that provided multi-year efficacy. Global commercial expansion accelerated in the through additional regulatory approvals, including European reapproval in , and adaptations for emerging markets in and , where integrated pest management programs boosted demand for broad-spectrum pyrethroids. Market analyses indicate steady growth, with the global bifenthrin sector valued at approximately USD 246 million in 2024 and forecasted to reach USD 393 million by 2031 at a (CAGR) of around 6.8%, driven by agricultural intensification and urban pest pressures despite environmental scrutiny. FMC's ongoing innovations, such as a 2024 termite-focused formulation, reflect continued investment in efficacy enhancements and to sustain .

Chemical and Physical Properties

Molecular Structure and Classification

Bifenthrin possesses the molecular formula C23_{23}H22_{22}ClF3_{3}O2_{2} and a molecular weight of 422.87 g/mol. Its systematic IUPAC name is (2-methyl[1,1'-biphenyl]-3-yl)methyl 3-[(1Z)-2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoro-1-propen-1-yl]-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, reflecting a cyclopropanecarboxylic acid ester core with a biphenyl substituent and a (Z)-chlorotrifluoropropenyl side chain. The molecule features chirality at the cyclopropane ring carbons, with technical-grade bifenthrin typically comprising a mixture of stereoisomers, predominantly the more active trans configuration. As a synthetic , bifenthrin belongs to the class of insecticides modeled on natural pyrethrins from flowers but modified for enhanced stability and potency. It is specifically classified as a Type I pyrethroid due to the absence of an α-cyano group on the alcohol moiety, which differentiates it from Type II pyrethroids that exhibit greater mammalian toxicity and prolonged neurotoxic effects. This structural feature contributes to its primary via modulation in membranes, though some studies indicate mixed Type I/II neurotoxic profiles in . Bifenthrin represents a third-generation , notable for its biphenyl-methyl ester subclass, developed to improve photostability and residual activity.

Solubility, Stability, and Formulation

Bifenthrin has very low solubility in , measured at less than 1 μg/L or approximately 0.1 mg/L at 20°C, which limits its leaching potential and mobility in aqueous environments. In contrast, it shows high solubility in organic solvents, including acetone, , , , , , and , facilitating its incorporation into formulations. The compound exhibits strong hydrolytic stability across 5–9 at 21–25°C, with negligible degradation over , though hydrolysis accelerates under extreme conditions such as high temperatures or low . Thermally, technical bifenthrin remains stable for two years at both 25°C and 50°C. is slow, with aqueous photolysis half-lives of 276–416 days under natural or simulated conditions, and approximately 408 days in buffered at 7; in , the half-life shortens to about 97 days due to surface exposure effects. Commercial formulations of bifenthrin are designed for diverse delivery methods, including emulsifiable concentrates (EC), suspension concentrates (SC) such as 25% SC, flowable liquids (e.g., 7.9F), wettable powders (WP) like 25% or 50% WP, and granules for broadcast or targeted applications. These forms improve handling, adhesion to surfaces, and controlled release, with liquids and suspensions suited for foliar sprays and WP/granules for soil treatments or structural barriers.

Mechanism of Action

Neurotoxic Effects on Insects

Bifenthrin, a Type I pyrethroid insecticide, targets the nervous system of insects by binding to voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) in neuronal membranes, thereby disrupting normal ion flux and action potential propagation. This interaction modifies channel gating kinetics, shifting the voltage dependence of activation toward more hyperpolarized potentials and slowing inactivation, which prolongs sodium influx during depolarization. The resulting repetitive spontaneous discharges in axons lead to synaptic failure and neuromuscular blockade, manifesting as initial hyperexcitation followed by paralysis. In exposed , these molecular disruptions translate to observable neurotoxic symptoms, including tremors, hyperactivity, uncoordinated movement, and convulsions, often within minutes of contact or ingestion. For instance, studies on and house flies demonstrate that bifenthrin induces rapid knockdown through overstimulation of central and peripheral nerves, with lethality occurring via respiratory and circulatory arrest due to sustained neural overload. VGSCs exhibit higher affinity for bifenthrin compared to mammalian counterparts, enhancing potency and selectivity, though resistance can emerge via target-site mutations like the kdr that reduce binding. The neurotoxic cascade is dose-dependent, with low concentrations eliciting repetitive firing without initial blockade (characteristic of Type I pyrethroids), while higher doses amplify to cause tetanic contractions. Empirical data from electrophysiological assays on neurons confirm bifenthrin's prolongation of sodium tail currents by factors of 2–10 times baseline, directly correlating with immobilization times in bioassays against pests like and . This mechanism underpins bifenthrin's broad-spectrum efficacy against arthropods, though sublethal exposures may induce behavioral alterations such as increased avoidance or reduced fecundity prior to mortality.

Species-Specific Variations in Toxicity

Bifenthrin, a type II , displays pronounced species-specific variations attributable to differences in voltage-gated sensitivity, metabolic detoxification rates, and physiological factors such as body and body size. In target , bifenthrin binds with high affinity to sodium channels, causing repetitive firing, , and death at low doses due to limited esterase and activity for ester and oxidation. Mammals exhibit lower susceptibility primarily because their higher core (approximately 37°C) accelerates enzymatic breakdown—via carboxylesterases hydrolyzing the ester linkage and enzymes facilitating further metabolism—coupled with reduced channel affinity and larger body size diluting exposure effects. Aquatic species, including and , demonstrate extreme sensitivity, with acute LC50 values often in the nanograms-to-micrograms per liter range, stemming from ectothermic slowed by ambient water temperatures, minimal enzymes, and high leading to rapid uptake across gills or exoskeletons. For instance, bifenthrin is very highly toxic to bluegill sunfish (LC50 0.00035 mg/L) and (LC50 0.00015 mg/L), rendering it among the most potent pyrethroids against aquatic life. In contrast, birds show low acute oral toxicity, with LD50 values exceeding 1000–2150 mg/kg in species like bobwhite quail and mallard ducks, reflecting efficient avian and lower target site potency. These disparities underscore bifenthrin's selectivity for arthropods over vertebrates, though pollinators like honey bees remain highly vulnerable (topical LD50 around 0.1–0.2 μg/bee), with modulated by dietary factors influencing expression. Within mammals, rats exhibit moderate acute oral (LD50 >70 mg/kg), classifying bifenthrin as EPA Toxicity Category II, while dermal exposure yields LD50 values >2000 mg/kg, indicating low skin absorption risk. Such variations inform regulatory risk assessments, prioritizing protections for aquatic and beneficial insect species.
Species GroupExample SpeciesToxicity MetricValueSource
InsectsTopical LD50~0.1–0.2 μg/bee
FishBluegill sunfish96-h LC500.00035 mg/L
Fish96-h LC500.00015 mg/L
BirdsBobwhite Acute oral LD50>1800 mg/kg
MammalsAcute oral LD50>70 mg/kg
Mammals/RabbitAcute dermal LD50>2000 mg/kg

Uses and Applications

Agricultural and Crop Protection

Bifenthrin, a synthetic , is registered for use on a broad array of agricultural in the United States, including row crops such as corn and , as well as specialty crops like soybeans, fruits (e.g., fruits, peaches, avocados, pomegranates), , nuts, and leafy greens. It is primarily applied via foliar sprays to control chewing and sucking pests, with EPA tolerances established for residues on these commodities to ensure safe harvest intervals. The compound targets a wide spectrum of agricultural pests, including lepidopteran larvae (e.g., caterpillars), hemipterans such as s and tarnished plant bugs, coleopterans like beetles, and other arthropods such as and mites. Field studies demonstrate its efficacy in reducing pest populations; for instance, bifenthrin applications timed to coincide with brown nymphal stages in soybeans achieved significant control, with mortality rates exceeding 80% in treated plots compared to untreated controls. Similarly, tank mixes with bifenthrin have shown high efficacy against tarnished plant bugs in , suppressing both adults and nymphs effectively under field conditions. In (IPM) programs, bifenthrin is valued for its rapid knockdown effect and residual activity, often lasting 14-21 days post-application depending on environmental factors like UV exposure and rainfall. Usage data from market surveys indicate substantial application on high-value crops, with annual pounds applied varying by crop type—for example, over 1 million pounds on corn and combined in surveyed years—reflecting its role in protecting yields from economic losses due to pest damage. However, its broad-spectrum nature necessitates careful integration to minimize impacts on beneficial .

Residential, Urban, and Public Health Uses

Bifenthrin is registered for residential applications targeting a range of pests, including , , fleas, ticks, and , through treatments on , turf, ornamental , and indoor surfaces such as cracks and crevices. Formulations include emulsifiable concentrates, wettable powders, and granules, with typical application rates for lawn pests at 0.06% dilution or 1 per 1,000 square feet to achieve contact and residual knockdown. These uses support homeowner and professional pest management, emphasizing low-volatility properties for prolonged efficacy on non-porous surfaces. In urban settings, bifenthrin is applied to managed landscapes like parks, courses, and sod farms for broad-spectrum control of sod webworms, chinch bugs, and other turf-infesting arthropods, often via broadcast sprays or granular distributions integrated with . Structural urban pest control employs it in commercial and multi-family buildings for perimeter barriers against crawling , with EPA assessments confirming its role in non-agricultural outdoor and indoor exposures without requiring new mitigation beyond label directives. Public health applications focus on , particularly adulticiding in wide-area programs to curb diseases like , using ultra-low volume (ULV) sprays or barrier treatments on vegetation that provide residual mortality for up to several weeks post-application. Field evaluations demonstrate significant reductions in abundance on treated properties compared to untreated controls, attributed to bifenthrin's contact toxicity and low mammalian risk profile in dilute public sprays. Indoor residual spraying with 10% bifenthrin wettable powder, applied biannually, has shown efficacy in malaria-endemic areas by killing resting vectors and inhibiting blood feeding.

Industrial and Textile Applications

Bifenthrin is applied in industrial settings for pest in non-agricultural areas, including facilities, warehouses, and plants such as and cheese operations, where it targets structural pests like , , and . These applications often involve broadcast treatments on industrial sites to control in turf, ornamentals, and surrounding , providing residual protection against infestations that could disrupt operations. Additionally, bifenthrin supports industrial by suppressing weeds and associated pests around facilities, reducing risks to and . In textile applications, bifenthrin is incorporated into wool-based products, particularly carpets, as an insect-resist treatment to protect against moths, beetles, and other fabric-damaging pests prevalent in regions like New Zealand and Australia. Effective concentrations typically require 9.4 ppm of bifenthrin residual in the finished carpet to meet regulatory standards for durability post-processing. It has also been evaluated in treated cloth fabrics for vector control, demonstrating high initial mortality rates (up to 100%) against mosquito species like Anopheles farauti and Aedes aegypti via tarsal contact, though efficacy diminishes after repeated washing. This positions bifenthrin as a pyrethroid alternative in fabric impregnation for protective gear and nets, offering comparable insecticidal performance to permethrin in laboratory assays.

Efficacy and Benefits

Field Trial Results and Pest Control Effectiveness

Field trials have consistently demonstrated bifenthrin's efficacy as a contact and stomach poison , providing rapid knockdown and residual control against various pests in agricultural settings, often achieving mortality rates exceeding 90% within hours of application. In , applications of Capture 2EC (bifenthrin) effectively controlled major pests such as bollworms and , with field efficacy trials showing significant reductions in pest populations compared to untreated controls over multiple seasons. Similarly, foliar treatments in corn fields targeted western bean cutworm larvae, yielding infestation reductions of up to 95% in treated plots during 2015 trials conducted in . In horticultural applications, bifenthrin-impregnated long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLITNs) reduced densities of pests like and in and field environments, with semi-field and full-field studies confirming compatibility with biological controls such as Amblyseius swirskii predatory mites, maintaining pest suppression for weeks without disrupting natural enemies. For soil-dwelling pests, bifenthrin applications against seedcorn s in dry bulb onion fields showed promising control when applied via , limiting maggot damage to below economic thresholds in 2023 trials. Tank-mix formulations with bifenthrin in fields enhanced control of stink bugs and other defoliators, extending residual effects beyond standalone pyrethroids in 2025 evaluations. Against scale insects in ornamental and fruit crops, bifenthrin provided rapid mortality of immature stages and ovipositing adults, outperforming other insecticides in field studies by achieving long-lasting suppression through contact exposure. Aerial applications against tarnished plant bugs in resulted in 100% mortality across all tested rates and instars in 2019 trials, confirming baseline susceptibility in susceptible populations. However, efficacy can vary with resistance development; field-evolved resistance to bifenthrin in western corn rootworm populations has reduced control in pyrethroid-exposed areas, with bioassays showing survival rates up to 50% higher in resistant strains compared to susceptible ones. In non-agricultural contexts relevant to , bifenthrin barrier treatments around structures provided 100% protection against red imported fire ants for 7 weeks in zone applications, with overall ant reductions persisting for 15 weeks in 2003 field trials. These results underscore bifenthrin's role in targeted , though outcomes depend on application timing, formulation, and local resistance profiles.

Economic Impacts on Agriculture and Public Health

In agricultural applications, bifenthrin, as a key , contributes to substantial economic benefits by mitigating pest-induced losses and stabilizing yields across major commodities. Analysis of pyrethroid use in from 2005 to 2015, where bifenthrin is widely applied in s such as tree nuts, grapes, and processing tomatoes, estimates annual benefits of $1.66 billion, equivalent to $563 per acre, for select s representing 56% of the state's $46 billion farm-gate value. In processing tomatoes, bifenthrin has been the dominant pyrethroid since 2007, averting approximately 12% yield losses and delivering a per-acre benefit of $583 through reduced pest and lower alternative control costs. Similarly, in strawberries, pyrethroids including bifenthrin prevent up to 15% yield reductions, yielding $3,690 per acre in benefits, while in tree nuts, they safeguard against 5% losses at $372–450 per acre. These gains stem from bifenthrin's contact and residual efficacy against pests like lepidopterans and hemipterans, enabling cost-effective that enhances net returns despite rising resistance concerns in prolonged-use scenarios. The global bifenthrin market, valued at $902.84 million in , reflects its economic role in , with projections to reach $1.08 billion by 2031 at an 8.89% CAGR, driven by demand for high-efficacy amid population-driven needs. Without such interventions, unchecked pest pressures could escalate production costs by $54–180 per acre in vulnerable crops, amplifying economic risks for growers. In , bifenthrin supports programs targeting es, reducing incidence of s like and dengue, which impose significant healthcare and burdens. Barrier sprays of bifenthrin (e.g., 7.9% formulations) have demonstrated sustained reductions in populations for up to 6 weeks, lowering vector density in treated areas compared to controls and thereby curtailing transmission risks. Pyrethroids, including bifenthrin, underpin cost-effective interventions, with median annual provider costs for ranging from $1.18 to $5.70 per protected person, yielding high returns through averted medical expenses and lost —estimated at 10:1 for dengue prevention in affected regions. In areas reliant on , such as Maryland's tourism-dependent zones, bifenthrin-enabled suppression is deemed an economic imperative, preventing losses from nuisance biting and outbreaks. While resistance in vectors poses challenges to long-term efficacy, bifenthrin's low application costs and broad-spectrum activity maintain its value in integrated strategies, particularly where alternatives like organophosphates entail higher expenses.

Environmental Fate

Degradation Pathways and Persistence

Bifenthrin undergoes degradation in the environment primarily via aerobic microbial metabolism in soils, involving oxidation of the gem-dimethyl groups and hydrolysis of the ester linkage, leading to metabolites such as 4'-hydroxybifenthrin (up to 8.2% of applied radioactivity) and TFP acid (up to 3.7%). Under aerobic conditions, mineralization to CO₂ can reach up to 49.7%, though degradation is slower in sterile soils, indicating microbial activity as a dominant pathway. Photodegradation on soil surfaces or water involves cis-to-trans isomerization and formation of biphenyl alcohol, while hydrolysis predominates under alkaline conditions (DT₅₀ of 33 days at pH 9 and 25°C), but the compound remains stable (>1 year DT₅₀) at neutral to acidic pH (5–7). Anaerobic degradation in flooded soils or sediments proceeds more slowly, primarily through ester hydrolysis and limited microbial action, yielding minor metabolites like 2-methyl-3-phenylbenzyl alcohol and 2-methyl-3-phenylbenzoic . In water-sediment systems under aerobic conditions, persistence is extended due to to sediments, with photolysis on surfaces accelerating breakdown compared to dark conditions. Bifenthrin demonstrates moderate to high persistence in aerobic s, with laboratory DT₅₀ values ranging from 50 days in to 205 days in at 25°C and 65% field moisture capacity, and field dissipation DT₅₀ of 80–215 days. Anaerobic half-lives in sediments extend to 8–16 months at 20°C or longer at lower temperatures (25–65 months at 4°C). Photolytic DT₅₀ on surfaces varies from 17–25 days under to 83.5–123.5 days in natural conditions, while in it shortens to 7–14 days with exposure. Overall persistence (97–250 days aerobic DT₅₀) is influenced by , , and microbial populations, with slower rates in finer-textured soils.

Bioaccumulation and Mobility in Ecosystems

Bifenthrin exhibits significant potential in aquatic organisms due to its high , characterized by an (log Kow) of approximately 6.0–6.4. This property facilitates uptake and concentration in fatty tissues, with factors (BCF) in reaching up to 21,000 in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) exposed to 0.0037 μg/L bifenthrin. Experimental BCF values in are reported as 506, accompanied by delayed elimination, supporting risks through food chains. Field studies confirm in wild-caught , with tissue concentrations ranging from 0.64 to 81 ng/g wet weight. In ecosystems, bifenthrin's primarily affects aquatic invertebrates and , where it concentrates via direct exposure or trophic transfer, potentially disrupting predator-prey dynamics. Enantioselective accumulation occurs, with the 1R-cis showing higher uptake and compared to 1S-cis, which may exhibit estrogenic effects. Body burdens in exposed have been measured at 4,500–8,890 ng/kg, correlating with behavioral impairments such as reduced swimming performance. While rapid in mammals limits long-term retention, slower depuration in ectothermic aquatic heightens ecological concerns, though some assessments note elimination half-lives akin to other pyrethroids, tempering absolute persistence. Regarding mobility, bifenthrin demonstrates low leaching potential in owing to strong , with organic carbon-water partition coefficients (Koc) ranging from 239,080 to 301,611 mL/g, classifying it as immobile. Its low water solubility (<0.1 μg/L) further restricts dissolution and vertical migration, with residues predominantly retained in the top 0–15 cm layer even under simulated heavy rainfall. Consequently, contamination risk is minimal, but entry via soil runoff remains a pathway, particularly in erosion-prone areas, facilitating indirect exposure in aquatic ecosystems. In terrestrial ecosystems, tight binding to limits broader dispersal, concentrating impacts on soil-dwelling .

Toxicity Profiles

Mammalian and Human Toxicity Data

Bifenthrin exhibits moderate acute oral toxicity in mammals, with reported LD50 values in rats ranging from 53 to 210 mg/kg body weight, depending on formulation and administration method such as gavage in diluted solution versus undiluted. Inhalation toxicity is low, with an acute LC50 in rats of 0.8 to 1.10 mg/L air over 4 hours. Dermal toxicity is minimal, with rabbit LD50 values exceeding 2,000 mg/kg, though contact may induce transient paresthesia or tingling due to sodium channel modulation in sensory neurons. As a Type I pyrethroid, bifenthrin primarily affects the nervous system by prolonging sodium channel opening, leading to symptoms such as tremors, hypersensitivity to stimuli, and aggressive behavior in acutely poisoned rodents at doses near the LD50. Chronic mammalian studies indicate low systemic at environmentally relevant exposures. In 2-year rat feeding trials, the (NOAEL) was 1 mg/kg/day, with effects like decreased body weight and increased liver enzymes observed only at higher doses (e.g., 5 mg/kg/day). Developmental toxicity assessments in rats and rabbits showed no teratogenic effects, though maternal toxicity (reduced ) occurred at doses above 5 mg/kg/day orally; the NOAEL for was 3 mg/kg/day. Bifenthrin is classified by the U.S. EPA as a possible human , based on increased urinary tumors in male mice at doses of 6.75 mg/kg/day, though no such effects were seen in rats and the mechanism involves species-specific alpha-2u-globulin nephropathy unlikely in humans. Human toxicity data derive primarily from occupational and accidental exposures, with low overall due to rapid via ester hydrolysis and oxidation, enhanced by mammalian body temperature and liver efficiency compared to insects. Reported effects include localized skin , eye irritation, or mild gastrointestinal upset following dermal or inhalational contact, resolving without intervention; systemic symptoms like tremors are rare and linked to intentional of large quantities. No epidemiological evidence supports carcinogenicity or reproductive harm in s, and acute poisonings typically lack sequelae beyond supportive care. Subacute animal models suggest potential inflammatory responses, such as elevated interleukin-1β in organs at 10-20 mg/kg doses, but relevance remains unestablished absent confirmatory data.

Toxicity to Non-Target Wildlife and Aquatic Organisms

Bifenthrin exhibits very high to aquatic organisms, particularly and , due to its disrupting sodium channels in nerve cells. For , 96-hour LC50 values range from 0.10 μg/L in (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to 0.78 μg/L in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas), while marine species like sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus) show LC50 values of 17.5–19.8 μg/L. Aquatic are even more sensitive, with 48-hour EC50 of 1.6 μg/L for and 96-hour LC50 of 0.00397 μg/L for mysid shrimp (Americamysis bahia); the amphipod Hyalella azteca displays an acute LC50 as low as 1.9 ng/L and chronic NOAEC of 0.17 ng/L for . These values indicate potential for both acute mortality and chronic effects like reduced at environmentally relevant concentrations exceeding bifenthrin's solubility (0.014 μg/L), though factors up to 28,000 in amplify risks via food chain transfer. Among terrestrial non-target wildlife, bifenthrin is very highly toxic to pollinators such as honeybees (Apis mellifera), with contact LD50 values of 0.015–0.1 μg/bee and oral LD50 around 0.1 μg/bee, leading to rapid and upon exposure. Earthworms (Eisenia andrei) experience moderate to high in , evidenced by 28-day LC50 values of 5.52–6.22 mg /kg dry , with sublethal effects including reduced burrowing and alterations at lower concentrations. In contrast, to birds is low, with acute oral LD50 exceeding 1800 mg/kg in bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) and 2150 mg/kg in mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos), and no reproductive effects observed at dietary levels up to 75 ppm over 24 weeks; however, smaller birds foraging on treated vegetation may face moderate chronic risks. Wild mammals show variable sensitivity akin to , with acute oral LD50 of 53.8–70.1 mg/kg in rats, but empirical field data on non-target mammals remain limited. Overall, while avian and mammalian hazards are lower, the compound's persistence in sediments and high potency against underscore risks to services like and aeration.

Health and Safety Considerations

Exposure Routes and Risk Assessments

Bifenthrin exposure in humans occurs primarily through dermal absorption, of aerosols or vapors during application, and incidental via hand-to-mouth contact or residues on treated surfaces. Occupational handlers, such as agricultural applicators and operators, face the highest dermal and exposures during mixing, loading, and spraying activities, with potential for short- to intermediate-term contact in crops like and . Residential users encounter lower-level exposures, mainly dermal post-application on turf or indoors, incidental of granules by children, or from foggers, though these are episodic and mitigated by product labels. Dietary exposure arises from residues on treated fruits, vegetables, and grains, regulated via tolerance levels under 40 CFR §180.442. Toxicity profiles vary by route: bifenthrin exhibits low acute dermal toxicity in rats and rabbits (LD50 >2,000 mg/kg), low toxicity (LC50 0.8–1.10 mg/L in rats), and moderate oral toxicity (LD50 53.4–210.4 mg/kg in rats, though higher in mice at 43 mg/kg). Systemic effects from high dermal or exposure may include , respiratory irritation, or tremors, while can lead to gastrointestinal distress or neurological symptoms like convulsions in animal models. The U.S. EPA classifies bifenthrin as a possible (Category C) based on urinary tumors in mice, but chronic reference doses (cRfD 0.013 mg/kg/day) account for this with uncertainty factors. EPA risk assessments for bifenthrin employ a margin of exposure (MOE) approach, with levels of concern (LOC) at MOE=100 for dermal/ingestion and MOE=30 for , incorporating points of departure from studies (e.g., exaggerated hind limb flexion in rats). Occupational risks for handlers without PPE yielded MOEs as low as 54 ( application) or 79 (), but chemical-resistant gloves elevate MOEs above LOC, eliminating concerns. Residential handler risks (e.g., turf application) show no exceedances (MOE>30), while post-application dermal/ingestion MOEs for high-rate turf uses (initially 17–69 at 2.3 lbs ai/A) were resolved by capping rates at 0.23 lbs ai/A and requiring granule watering-in (>0.34 lbs ai/A), yielding MOEs ≥85. Acute dietary risks occupy <100% of the acute population-adjusted dose (aPAD 0.328 mg/kg/day), with no chronic aggregate risks quantified due to low exposures. The Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety factor was reduced from 10x to 1x in 2019, reflecting robust data on developmental endpoints. Overall, EPA's 2020 interim registration review concludes no human health risks of concern when mitigation measures—such as PPE, rate limits, and labeling—are followed, balancing efficacy against empirical exposure data.

Epidemiological Studies and Long-Term Effects

A review of available epidemiological data by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2017 found no evidence suggesting a clear causal relationship between bifenthrin exposure and observed health outcomes in humans, based on occupational and general population studies. This assessment incorporated data from agricultural workers and other exposed cohorts, where bifenthrin levels were typically low due to its formulation as a low-volatility insecticide primarily applied via dermal or inhalation routes in controlled settings. Cross-sectional analyses have identified biomarker associations, such as a 2022 study of 1,696 Chinese urban adults linking urinary bifenthrin metabolites to dose-dependent disruptions in glucose homeostasis, including elevated fasting glucose and insulin resistance indices, independent of confounders like age and BMI. However, prospective cohort studies specifically isolating bifenthrin are scarce, with broader pyrethroid epidemiology (e.g., from the Agricultural Health Study) showing inconsistent links to endocrine or metabolic endpoints, often confounded by co-exposures to other pesticides. Regarding carcinogenicity, the EPA classifies bifenthrin as a Group C possible human carcinogen, derived from increased liver adenomas in female mice at doses exceeding 1 mg/kg/day, but no epidemiological evidence confirms elevated cancer incidence in exposed humans, including applicators monitored over decades. Long-term occupational surveillance reports no confirmed chronic effects like neuropathy or reproductive toxicity attributable to bifenthrin alone, contrasting with acute paresthesia cases from misuse. Neurodevelopmental epidemiology remains understudied for bifenthrin specifically; while pyrethroid class reviews note prenatal exposure correlations with behavioral deficits in some cohorts (e.g., odds ratios of 1.2-2.0 for ADHD-like symptoms), these lack bifenthrin isolation and rely on proxy biomarkers prone to exposure misclassification. Overall, human data indicate low long-term risk at registered use levels, with effects primarily observed in high-dose animal models not reflective of typical environmental or occupational exposures.

Regulation and Policy

U.S. EPA Approvals and Restrictions

Bifenthrin was first registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1988 for non-food uses, with subsequent approvals for food crop applications following the establishment of residue tolerances. The EPA's reregistration process, completed prior to the 2000s pyrethroid batch, confirmed its eligibility under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), affirming that benefits from pest control outweighed identified risks when used as labeled. As of 2025, bifenthrin remains registered for agricultural, residential, and structural pest control applications, including on crops such as cotton, vegetables, and fruits, as well as for termite prevention and turf management. In September 2020, the EPA issued an Interim Registration Review Decision (Case 7402) maintaining bifenthrin's registration status while mandating label amendments and mitigation measures to address ecological risks, particularly to aquatic invertebrates and fish. This decision required reductions in maximum application rates for turf uses (e.g., liquid applications capped at 0.23 lbs active ingredient per acre) and mandatory watering-in for granular turf products exceeding 0.34 lbs active ingredient per acre to minimize runoff. Perimeter treatments were limited to 7 feet from structures for urban settings, with spot treatments restricted to 2 square feet per site. No product cancellations were ordered, as post-mitigation risks were deemed acceptable relative to benefits. To protect non-target species, labels must include buffer zones prohibiting applications within 25 feet of aquatic habitats for ground-based uses (reducible to 15 or 10 feet under specific vegetative filter strip conditions), 150 feet for non-ultra-low volume aerial applications, and 450 feet for ultra-low volume aerial uses. Pollinator protections require pollinator stewardship language, incident reporting to [email protected], and data call-ins for honey bee toxicity studies under Guideline 850.3020. Certain formulations, due to acute toxicity to fish and aquatic organisms, are classified as restricted-use pesticides (RUPs), limiting sale and use to certified applicators. Residue tolerances are codified in 40 CFR 180.442, permitting levels up to 20 ppm on commodities like cottonseed and 3 ppm on leafy greens, with a general 0.05 ppm default for unspecified items; these ensure dietary exposures remain below levels of concern based on toxicological data. Additional label requirements include chemical-resistant gloves for handlers, disposal instructions, and resistance management advisories classifying bifenthrin in Insecticide Resistance Action Committee Group 3A. Full registration review remains open pending endangered species assessments and endocrine disruptor screening, with no indications of revocation as of 2025.

International Regulations and Trade Implications

Bifenthrin is not approved as an active substance for plant protection products in the European Union, with approval expiring on July 31, 2019, following initial approval on August 1, 2012; it remains approved as a biocide for wood preservation under Biocidal Products Regulation (EU) No 528/2012. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has recommended lowering or removing existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for bifenthrin in various commodities due to its non-approved status and potential consumer exposure risks, influencing import controls on agricultural products. Under the Codex Alimentarius Commission, administered by the FAO and WHO, bifenthrin has established MRLs for international trade harmonization, such as 0.5 mg/kg for avocados, 0.1 mg/kg for bananas, and 3 mg/kg for blueberries, facilitating global pesticide residue standards while allowing national variations. These Codex MRLs serve as reference points for WTO disputes and sanitary/phytosanitary measures, though countries like those in the EU enforce stricter limits or defaults to limits of detection for non-approved substances, potentially rejecting imports exceeding them. Trade implications arise from regulatory divergences: bifenthrin remains approved for agricultural use in countries including the United States, Canada, Australia, India, and China, enabling exports from these regions but creating barriers for shipments to the EU, where residues trigger non-compliance and destruction or return of goods. For instance, the EU's non-approval has led to targeted MRL reviews, with proposals to reduce levels (e.g., to 0.05 mg/kg for maize), heightening scrutiny on imports from bifenthrin-using exporters and prompting some producers to adopt residue-minimizing practices or alternative pesticides to access EU markets. Globally, such asymmetries contribute to "pesticide export" dynamics, where substances restricted in high-regulation markets like the EU are traded to regions with permissive standards, though bifenthrin's persistence in approved markets sustains its international commerce without outright bans elsewhere.

Controversies and Debates

Environmental Impact Claims vs. Empirical Evidence

Bifenthrin, a synthetic pyrethroid insecticide, faces frequent claims from environmental advocacy groups and certain studies asserting it causes widespread ecological disruption, including trophic cascades in aquatic systems, population declines in pollinators, and persistent contamination of waterways. For instance, research has documented altered insect emergence, increased algal growth, and reduced macroinvertebrate diversity in contaminated streams at concentrations as low as 0.1 μg/L, attributing these effects to runoff from urban and agricultural applications. Similarly, detections in sediments and surface waters have been linked to local impairments in benthic communities, with some reports highlighting bifenthrin as a contributor to toxicity in urban stormwater. These claims often emphasize laboratory-derived acute toxicity metrics, such as LC50 values below 1 μg/L for aquatic invertebrates and contact LD50 of 0.014 μg/bee for honeybees, to argue for broad ecosystem harm. Empirical field evidence, however, reveals a more nuanced profile, moderated by bifenthrin's environmental fate properties: its extremely low water solubility (0.0001 mg/L), high octanol-water partition coefficient (log Kow 6.2), and strong soil sorption (Koc > 10,000 mL/g) limit aqueous exposure and beyond immediate application sites. half-life ranges from 7 days under aerobic conditions to 8 months under anaerobic, with rapid on surfaces ( <1 day), reducing long-term persistence and groundwater leaching risks. Field monitoring studies confirm low detection frequencies in most surface waters, with concentrations rarely exceeding chronic no-effect levels (e.g., <0.01 μg/L NOEC for fish) when best management practices are followed, contrasting claims of ubiquitous poisoning. Regulatory assessments by agencies like the U.S. EPA and EFSA integrate these data, concluding low ecological risk to terrestrial non-targets such as birds (acute oral LD50 >2000 mg/kg in species like mallards and bobwhite quail), earthworms, and soil macroorganisms, with no need for additional mitigations beyond standard pyrethroid label requirements like vegetated buffers for aquatic habitats. For pollinators, while lab toxicity is high, real-world exposure via residues on flowers or soil is minimized by application restrictions (e.g., avoiding bloom periods), and no large-scale field studies link bifenthrin alone to colony-level declines amid multifactorial stressors like varroa mites. Aquatic risks, though elevated for sediment-dwelling invertebrates, are deemed acceptable with runoff mitigation, as evidenced by continued registration post-review without pyrethroid-specific bans. This discrepancy underscores how claims often prioritize worst-case lab scenarios over integrated field and fate data; for example, while urban runoff studies detect bifenthrin-linked effects, agricultural field trials show rapid dissipation and no cascading at labeled rates, supporting causal realism that exposure pathways, not inherent alone, determine impacts. Peer-reviewed characterizations emphasize that proper use—via granular formulations or directed sprays—yields negligible population-level effects on wildlife, challenging narratives of inevitable environmental devastation.

Regulatory Scrutiny and Alleged Overregulation

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initiated formal registration review of bifenthrin in 2010, culminating in draft risk assessments released on December 15, 2017, which identified no human health risks of concern from dietary, residential, or occupational exposures after application of mitigation measures, while flagging ecological risks to aquatic invertebrates, fish, and terrestrial species like bees from runoff, drift, and direct overspray. These assessments prompted proposed label amendments and use restrictions to address potential impacts on under the Endangered Species Act, including buffer zones and application timing limits. On September 29, 2020, the EPA issued an Interim Registration Review Decision affirming the pesticide's continued registration with no changes to human health tolerances or the Food Quality Protection Act safety factor (reduced to 1x based on robust children's data), but requiring enhanced ecological mitigations effective via label submissions by January 27, 2021. Key measures include mandatory 25-foot vegetative filter strips (reducible to 10-15 feet in specific scenarios like western irrigated fields or small plots) or equivalent sediment basins for agricultural runoff reduction; spray drift buffers of 25 feet (ground applications), 150 feet (non-ultra-low volume aerial), or 450 feet (ultra-low volume aerial) from aquatic habitats; wind speed caps at 15 mph; pollinator protection labeling with incident reporting protocols; and reduced perimeter treatments for residential uses (from 10 to 7 feet). The decision acknowledges residual ecological risks post-mitigation but deems them acceptable given bifenthrin's benefits in controlling pests resistant to alternatives, with annual U.S. agricultural usage exceeding 1 million pounds on over 14 million acres. Agricultural stakeholders have alleged overregulation in these requirements, contending that uniform mitigations fail to incorporate bifenthrin's low water solubility (0.1 mg/L) and high adsorption coefficient (log Koc >6), which empirically limit leaching and beyond what filter strips achieve, thereby imposing disproportionate costs without site-specific justification. For example, EPA-estimated vegetative filter strip implementation ranges from $40 to $240 per acre annually, with potential untreated border losses equating to $1,800 per acre in or $3,500 per acre in strawberries, prompting farming groups in 2017 to criticize preliminary risk assessments for undervaluing the pesticide's role in amid few viable substitutes. Such critiques posit that precautionary ecological protections prioritize modeled worst-case exposures over field monitoring data, exacerbating regulatory burdens on growers while bifenthrin's mammalian profile (acute oral LD50 >70 mg/kg in rats) supports its utility as a targeted .

References

  1. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Bifenthrin
  2. https://www.solutionsstores.com/bifenthrin
  3. https://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/bifgen.html
  4. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/12/01/2021-25091/bifenthrin-pesticide-tolerances
  5. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.6b02761
  6. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-10/documents/bifenthrin-reg-review-id.pdf
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6861428/
  8. https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/Reports/78.htm
  9. https://www.aepma.com.au/News/31003/FMC_has_a_new_team_but_their_product_development_is_still_historic
  10. https://www.agserv.com.au/brand/fmc/
  11. http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/archive/biftech.html
  12. https://apps.who.int/pesticide-residues-jmpr-database/Document/95
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/bifenthrin
  14. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fmc-corporations-bifenthrin-insecticide-reapproved-in-europe-161773155.html
  15. https://reports.valuates.com/market-reports/QYRE-Auto-26T390/global-bifenthrin
  16. https://www.globalgrowthinsights.com/market-reports/bifenthrin-market-109266
  17. https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=82657-04-3
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6590159/
  19. https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0352-0006/content.pdf
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/bifenthrin
  21. https://hardyhenryservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/TDS-Termitrix-Bifenthrin-25-SC.pdf
  22. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/Specs/Bifenthrin_2012.pdf
  23. https://www.inchem.org/documents/ukpids/ukpids/ukpid46.htm
  24. https://www.epa.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Documents/Hazardous-Substances/Synthetic-Pyrethroids-consultation/APP203936-Draft-Hazard-classification-and-endpoint-memo-Bifenthrin.pdf?vid=2
  25. https://www.controlsolutionsinc.com/quali-pro/products/bifenthrin-it-79-f-qp
  26. https://xlwelds.com/blog/bifenthrin:-an-effective-pesticide-with-powerful-formulations/
  27. https://specialistsales.com.au/information-advice/bifenthrin-guide/
  28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25521199/
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3218237/
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6005695/
  31. http://extoxnet.orst.edu/pips/bifenthr.htm
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11399171/
  33. https://www.fbn.com/community/blog/bifenthrin
  34. https://academic.oup.com/amt/article/44/1/tsy115/5300166
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344944009_Efficacy_of_Insecticide_Tank_Mixes_With_Bifenthrin_Against_Tarnished_Plant_Bug_in_Cotton_2018
  36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28066972/
  37. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA508310.pdf
  38. https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0384-0276/content.pdf
  39. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-10/documents/pyrethroids-pyrethrins-revised-eco-risk-mitigation-response-23-chemicals.pdf
  40. https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/54/6/1659/4159357
  41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20578456/
  42. https://www.health.mn.gov/communities/environment/risk/docs/guidance/dwec/screening/bifenthrin.pdf
  43. https://assets.greenbook.net/L94171.pdf
  44. https://www.sgs.com/en/-/media/sgscorp/documents/corporate/technical-documents/wool-testing-info-bulletins/SGSAGRI_Insect-resist-treatments_511A4EN1403.cdn.en.pdf
  45. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14524552/
  46. https://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/getPDF.cfm?year=2001&paper=409.pdf
  47. https://cropwatch.unl.edu/2018/research-efficacy-foliar-insecticide-treatments-western-bean-cutworm-corn/
  48. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ps.4515
  49. https://ir4.cals.ncsu.edu/Fooduse/Protocols/P13485.pdf
  50. https://www.lsuagcenter.com/articles/page1756781039535
  51. https://journals.ashs.org/view/journals/horttech/28/3/article-p267.xml
  52. https://academic.oup.com/jee/article/112/6/2915/5557745
  53. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0142299
  54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12650351/
  55. https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0480-0252/attachment_4.pdf
  56. https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/industry-reports/bifenthrin-market
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6595667/
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8324482/
  59. https://www.ivcc.com/downloads/market-access-landscape-report-indonesia/
  60. https://mda.maryland.gov/plants-pests/pages/mosquito_control.aspx
  61. https://malariajournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-2875-12-77
  62. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/IPM_Pesticide/JMPR/Evaluations/2010/Bifenthrin.pdf
  63. https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/thurstoncountywa.gov.if-us-west-2/s3fs-public/2023-01/EH_HW_Health-basic-61-PDF-34_bifenthrin.pdf
  64. https://chm.pops.int/Implementation/NationalImplementationPlans/Guidance/tabid/7730/ctl/Download/mid/20999/Default.aspx?id=18&ObjID=33064
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9354086/
  66. https://academic.oup.com/conphys/article/13/1/coaf055/8219508
  67. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20083092592
  68. https://www.[researchgate](/page/ResearchGate).net/publication/328637905_Leaching_of_Termiticide_Containing_Bifenthrin_Fipronil_and_Imidacloprid_In_Different_Types_of_Soils_Under_Laboratory_Conditions
  69. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/JMPR/Report09/bifenthrin.pdf
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8077818/
  71. http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/bifgen.html
  72. https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/[risk](/page/Risk)/docs/guidance/dwec/screening/bifenthrin.pdf
  73. https://www.fs.usda.gov/foresthealth/pesticide/pdfs/056-12-02c_Bifenthrin.pdf
  74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312023322_ACUTE_AND_CHRONIC_TOXICITY_OF_BIFLEX_R_TC_ON_EARTHWORM_EISENIA_ANDREI
  75. https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0384-0251/content.pdf
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0269749122015664
  77. https://ehesp.hal.science/hal-03752712v1/document
  78. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100XZAB.TXT
  79. https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/registration-review-pyrethrins-and-pyrethroids
  80. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-E/part-180/subpart-C/section-180.442
  81. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2025-03/rups-rpt.pdf
  82. https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/start/screen/active-substances/details/460
  83. https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7864
  84. https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/dbs/pestres/pesticide-detail/en/?p_id=178
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/bifenthrin
  86. https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/2020/09/where-do-pesticides-banned-in-europe-go-mostly-to-poorer-countries-while-two-thirds-of-those-sent-to-richer-counties-head-for-the-u-s/
  87. https://www.farmprogress.com/farm-business/usgs-study-finds-bifenthrin-is-harmful-to-aquatic-ecosystems
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11614517/
  89. https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2159
  90. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969722017909
  91. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2017-12-15/pdf/2017-27098.pdf
  92. https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0384-0275/content.pdf
  93. https://www.agalert.com/california-ag-news/archives/january-18-2017/pesticide-active-ingredient-comes-under-epa-scrutiny/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.