Hubbry Logo
Reactivity seriesReactivity seriesMain
Open search
Reactivity series
Community hub
Reactivity series
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Reactivity series
Reactivity series
Reactivity series
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In chemistry, a reactivity series (or reactivity series of elements) is an empirical, calculated, and structurally analytical progression[1] of a series of metals, arranged by their "reactivity" from highest to lowest.[2][3][4] It is used to summarize information about the reactions of metals with acids and water, single displacement reactions and the extraction of metals from their ores.[5]

Table

[edit]
Metal Ion Reactivity Extraction
Caesium Cs Cs+ reacts with cold water Electrolysis (a.k.a. electrolytic refining)
Rubidium Rb Rb+
Potassium K K+
Sodium Na Na+
Lithium Li Li+
Barium Ba Ba2+
Strontium Sr Sr2+
Calcium Ca Ca2+
Magnesium Mg Mg2+ reacts very slowly with cold water, but rapidly
in boiling water, and very vigorously with acids
Beryllium Be Be2+ reacts with acids and steam
Aluminium Al Al3+
Titanium Ti Ti4+ reacts with concentrated mineral acids pyrometallurgical extraction using magnesium,
or less commonly other alkali metals, hydrogen or calcium in the Kroll process
Manganese Mn Mn2+ reacts with acids; very poor reaction with steam smelting with coke
Zinc Zn Zn2+
Chromium Cr Cr3+ aluminothermic reaction
Iron Fe Fe2+ smelting with coke
Cadmium Cd Cd2+
Cobalt Co Co2+
Nickel Ni Ni2+
Tin Sn Sn2+
Lead Pb Pb2+
Antimony Sb Sb3+ may react with some strong oxidizing acids heat or physical extraction
Bismuth Bi Bi3+
Copper Cu Cu2+ reacts slowly with air
Tungsten W W3+[citation needed] may react with some strong oxidizing acids
Mercury Hg Hg2+
Silver Ag Ag+
Gold Au Au3+[6][7]
Platinum Pt Pt4+

Going from the bottom to the top of the table the metals:

  • increase in reactivity;
  • lose electrons (oxidize) more readily to form positive ions;
  • corrode or tarnish more readily;
  • require more energy (and different methods) to be isolated from their compounds;
  • become stronger reducing agents (electron donors).

Defining reactions

[edit]

There is no unique and fully consistent way to define the reactivity series, but it is common to use the three types of reaction listed below, many of which can be performed in a high-school laboratory (at least as demonstrations).[6]

Reaction with water and acids

[edit]

The most reactive metals, such as sodium, will react with cold water to produce hydrogen and the metal hydroxide:

2 Na (s) + 2 H2O (l) → 2 NaOH (aq) + H2 (g)

Slightly less reactive metals, such as magnesium and zinc, do not react readily with cold water, but will react with steam to produce hydrogen and the metal oxide:

Mg (s) + H2O (g) → MgO (s) + H2 (g)

Metals in the middle of the reactivity series, such as iron, will react with acids such as sulfuric acid (but not water at normal temperatures) to give hydrogen and a metal salt, such as iron(II) sulfate:

Fe (s) + H2SO4 (aq) → FeSO4 (aq) + H2 (g)

There is some ambiguity at the borderlines between the groups. Magnesium, aluminium and zinc can react with water, but the reaction is usually very slow unless the metal samples are specially prepared to remove the surface passivation layer of oxide which protects the rest of the metal. Copper and silver will react with nitric acid; but because nitric acid is an oxidizing acid, the oxidizing agent is not the H+ ion as in normal acids, but the NO3− ion.

Comparison with standard electrode potentials

[edit]

The reactivity series is sometimes quoted in the strict reverse order of standard electrode potentials, when it is also known as the "electrochemical series".[8]

The following list includes the metallic elements of the first six periods. It is mostly based on tables provided by NIST.[9][10] However, not all sources give the same values: there are some differences between the precise values given by NIST and the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. In the first six periods this does not make a difference to the relative order, but in the seventh period it does, so the seventh-period elements have been excluded. (In any case, the typical oxidation states for the most accessible seventh-period elements thorium and uranium are too high to allow a direct comparison.)[11]

Hydrogen has been included as a benchmark, although it is not a metal. Borderline germanium, antimony, and astatine have been included. Some other elements in the middle of the 4d and 5d rows have been omitted (Zr–Tc, Hf–Os) when their simple cations are too highly charged or of rather doubtful existence. Greyed-out rows indicate values based on estimation rather than experiment.

Z Sym Element Reaction E° (V)
3 Li lithium Li+ + e− → Li −3.04
55 Cs caesium Cs+ + e− → Cs −3.03
37 Rb rubidium Rb+ + e− → Rb −2.94
19 K potassium K+ + e− → K −2.94
56 Ba barium Ba2+ + 2 e− → Ba −2.91
38 Sr strontium Sr2+ + 2 e− → Sr −2.90
20 Ca calcium Ca2+ + 2 e− → Ca −2.87
11 Na sodium Na+ + e− → Na −2.71
57 La lanthanum La3+ + 3 e− → La −2.38
39 Y yttrium Y3+ + 3 e− → Y −2.38
12 Mg magnesium Mg2+ + 2 e− → Mg −2.36
59 Pr praseodymium Pr3+ + 3 e− → Pr −2.35
58 Ce cerium Ce3+ + 3 e− → Ce −2.34
68 Er erbium Er3+ + 3 e− → Er −2.33
67 Ho holmium Ho3+ + 3 e− → Ho −2.33
60 Nd neodymium Nd3+ + 3 e− → Nd −2.32
69 Tm thulium Tm3+ + 3 e− → Tm −2.32
62 Sm samarium Sm3+ + 3 e− → Sm −2.30
61 Pm promethium Pm3+ + 3 e− → Pm −2.30
66 Dy dysprosium Dy3+ + 3 e− → Dy −2.29
71 Lu lutetium Lu3+ + 3 e− → Lu −2.28
65 Tb terbium Tb3+ + 3 e− → Tb −2.28
64 Gd gadolinium Gd3+ + 3 e− → Gd −2.28
70 Yb ytterbium Yb3+ + 3 e− → Yb −2.19
21 Sc scandium Sc3+ + 3 e− → Sc −2.09
63 Eu europium Eu3+ + 3 e− → Eu −1.99
4 Be beryllium Be2+ + 2 e− → Be −1.97
13 Al aluminium Al3+ + 3 e− → Al −1.68
22 Ti titanium Ti3+ + 3 e− → Ti −1.37
25 Mn manganese Mn2+ + 2 e− → Mn −1.18
23 V vanadium V2+ + 2 e− → V −1.12
24 Cr chromium Cr2+ + 2 e− → Cr −0.89
30 Zn zinc Zn2+ + 2 e− → Zn −0.76
31 Ga gallium Ga3+ + 3 e− → Ga −0.55
26 Fe iron Fe2+ + 2 e− → Fe −0.44
48 Cd cadmium Cd2+ + 2 e− → Cd −0.40
49 In indium In3+ + 3 e− → In −0.34
81 Tl thallium Tl+ + e− → Tl −0.34
27 Co cobalt Co2+ + 2 e− → Co −0.28
28 Ni nickel Ni2+ + 2 e− → Ni −0.24
50 Sn tin Sn2+ + 2 e− → Sn −0.14
82 Pb lead Pb2+ + 2 e− → Pb −0.13
1 H hydrogen 2 H+ + 2 e− → H2 0.00
32 Ge germanium Ge2+ + 2 e− → Ge +0.1
51 Sb antimony Sb3+ + 3 e− → Sb +0.15
83 Bi bismuth Bi3+ + 3 e− → Bi +0.31
29 Cu copper Cu2+ + 2 e− → Cu +0.34
84 Po polonium Po2+ + 2 e− → Po +0.6
44 Ru ruthenium Ru3+ + 3 e− → Ru +0.60
45 Rh rhodium Rh3+ + 3 e− → Rh +0.76
47 Ag silver Ag+ + e− → Ag +0.80
80 Hg mercury Hg2+ + 2 e− → Hg +0.85
46 Pd palladium Pd2+ + 2 e− → Pd +0.92
77 Ir iridium Ir3+ + 3 e− → Ir +1.0
85 At astatine At+ + e− → At +1.0
78 Pt platinum Pt2+ + 2 e− → Pt +1.18
79 Au gold Au3+ + 3 e− → Au +1.50

The positions of lithium and sodium are changed on such a series.

Standard electrode potentials offer a quantitative measure of the power of a reducing agent, rather than the qualitative considerations of other reactive series. However, they are only valid for standard conditions: in particular, they only apply to reactions in aqueous solution. Even with this proviso, the electrode potentials of lithium and sodium – and hence their positions in the electrochemical series – appear anomalous. The order of reactivity, as shown by the vigour of the reaction with water or the speed at which the metal surface tarnishes in air, appears to be

Cs > K > Na > Li > alkaline earth metals,

i.e., alkali metals > alkaline earth metals,

the same as the reverse order of the (gas-phase) ionization energies. This is borne out by the extraction of metallic lithium by the electrolysis of a eutectic mixture of lithium chloride and potassium chloride: lithium metal is formed at the cathode, not potassium.[1]

Comparison with electronegativity values

[edit]

The image shows a periodic table extract with the electronegativity values of metals.[12]

Wulfsberg[13] distinguishes:
   very electropositive metals with electronegativity values below 1.4
   electropositive metals with values between 1.4 and 1.9; and
   electronegative metals with values between 1.9 and 2.54.

From the image, the group 1–2 metals and the lanthanides and actinides are very electropositive to electropositive; the transition metals in groups 3 to 12 are very electropositive to electronegative; and the post-transition metals are electropositive to electronegative. The noble metals, inside the dashed border (as a subset of the transition metals) are very electronegative.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Reactivity series

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The reactivity series, also known as the activity series, is a list of metals arranged in descending order of their reactivity, based on their tendency to lose electrons and form positive ions in chemical reactions. This empirical series enables chemists to predict the feasibility and products of reactions such as single displacement, where a more reactive metal displaces a less reactive one from its compound, as well as reactions with , acids, and oxygen. The position of a metal in the series reflects its reducing power; metals at the top are strong reducing agents that readily donate electrons, while those at the bottom are weaker and more stable as ions. A standard reactivity series, derived from experimental observations, typically includes the following metals (from most to least reactive, with hydrogen included for reference):
MetalSymbolCommon Ion
PotassiumKK⁺
SodiumNaNa⁺
CalciumCaCa²⁺
MagnesiumMgMg²⁺
AlAl³⁺
ZnZn²⁺
IronFeFe²⁺
TinSnSn²⁺
LeadPbPb²⁺
HH⁺
CuCu²⁺
SilverAgAg⁺
AuAu³⁺
In practical applications, the series is crucial for understanding metal behavior in extraction processes, prevention, and industrial reactions; for instance, metals above react with dilute acids to produce gas. For example, when 2.00 g of magnesium reacts with excess acid according to the reaction Mg + 2H⁺ → Mg²⁺ + H₂, the volume of hydrogen formed at 20.0°C and 100000 Pa is 2.00 dm³ (or 2.00 L), based on the molar mass of magnesium (24 g/mol) and a molar volume of 24 dm³/mol at RTP (room temperature and pressure, often 20°C and 1 bar = 100000 Pa in educational contexts). Metals below hydrogen do not undergo this reaction. Highly reactive metals like and sodium also react vigorously with cold water to form hydroxides and , whereas less reactive ones like show no such reaction. This tool underpins chemistry by correlating reactivity with standard electrode potentials, aiding in the design of batteries and electrochemical cells.

Overview and Definition

Core Concept

The reactivity series is a qualitative of common metals, arranged in a vertical list in decreasing order of their reactivity, based on their tendency to lose electrons and form positive ions during chemical reactions. It typically begins with the most reactive metal, , and descends to the least reactive, , while including as a reference point to compare metal reactivity with non-metals. This ordering reflects the relative ease with which these elements undergo oxidation, serving as a foundational tool in for understanding metal behavior. The primary purpose of the reactivity series is to predict the outcomes of displacement reactions, where a more reactive element can liberate a less reactive one from its compounds in solution. For instance, , positioned higher in the series than , readily displaces ions from solution to form and deposit metal, demonstrating the directional nature of such reactions. Conversely, , being less reactive, cannot displace from compounds, highlighting the series' utility in forecasting reaction feasibility without quantitative calculations. This qualitative framework correlates with quantitative indicators like standard electrode potentials, where metals with more negative reduction potentials exhibit greater reactivity and align with their position in the series. Educational resources often employ mnemonic aids to facilitate memorization of the order—potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium, aluminum, , iron, tin, lead, , , silver, .

Historical Context

The concept of the reactivity series originated from early 18th-century observations of metal behaviors in chemical reactions. In 1772, conducted experiments repeating Henry Cavendish's work on metals dissolved in , noting the production of different "airs" (gases) such as nitrous air from various metals, which highlighted qualitative differences in their reactivity with acids. These findings laid initial groundwork for understanding relative metal reactivities through empirical observations rather than theoretical frameworks. The formalization of a structured series began in the early 19th century, spurred by advances in electrochemistry. Alessandro Volta's invention of the voltaic pile in 1800 provided a reliable source of electrical current, enabling systematic studies of metal interactions and influencing ideas about chemical affinity based on electrical properties. Shortly thereafter, in 1800, Johann Wilhelm Ritter established the first electrochemical series by observing the order in which metals precipitate one another from solutions of their salts, such as zinc displacing copper, marking an early quantitative approach to reactivity ordering. Further refinement came through Humphry Davy's electrolysis experiments in 1807–1808, where he isolated highly reactive alkali metals like and sodium using Volta's battery, demonstrating their position at the top of the reactivity and linking reactivity to electrochemical . These 19th-century developments evolved into a more comprehensive tool by the , integrating qualitative observations with the electrochemical series based on standard electrode potentials for precise predictions. By the mid-20th century, the reactivity series had become a standard educational aid in chemistry curricula worldwide for teaching metal reactivity patterns.

Construction of the Series

Standard Table

The standard reactivity series lists metals in descending order of their reactivity, primarily determined by their observed ability to displace less reactive metals from compounds in displacement reactions, rather than relying on quantitative electrochemical . This empirical ordering serves as a practical tool for predicting reaction outcomes in aqueous solutions. For instance, the top placements of alkali metals like and sodium reflect their vigorous reactions with , producing gas and metal hydroxides. The following table presents a version of the series, adapted for clarity with reactivity levels categorized as high (typically react with cold ), medium (react with dilute acids but not cold ), and low (do not react appreciably with dilute acids). is included for reference, positioned between lead and .
Metal/SymbolReactivity LevelBrief Notes
(K)HighMost reactive; displaces all below it, including .
Sodium (Na)HighHighly reactive; reacts vigorously with .
Lithium (Li)HighReacts with but less vigorously than K or Na.
(Ca)HighReacts with cold to form .
Magnesium (Mg)MediumReacts slowly with cold , readily with acids.
(Al)MediumReacts with acids; protected by oxide layer in air.
Zinc (Zn)MediumDisplaces from acids; used in galvanizing.
Iron (Fe)MediumReacts with acids; prone to rusting in moist air.
Tin (Sn)MediumWeak reaction with acids; corrosion-resistant.
Lead (Pb)MediumVery slow reaction with acids; .
(H)-Reference point; non-metal for comparison.
(Cu)LowDoes not displace from acids; reddish metal.
Silver (Ag)LowUnreactive; used in jewelry due to tarnish resistance.
Gold (Au)LowLeast reactive; inert to most acids except .
Common variations in the series include the occasional insertion of carbon between and , as it can reduce certain metal oxides in high-temperature reactions relevant to , though it is not a metal. Additionally, highly reactive but rare metals like (Cs) or (Fr) are often excluded from standard lists due to their scarcity and extreme handling difficulties.

Key Reactions for Ordering

The reactivity series of metals is primarily determined through experimental observations of their reactions with (both and hot/steam), dilute acids, and in displacement scenarios, which provide a basis for ordering metals from most to least reactive. The most reactive metals, particularly the alkali metals such as (K), sodium (Na), and (Li), react vigorously with cold water to produce gas and the corresponding . For instance, sodium reacts according to the equation: 2Na (s)+2H2O (l)→2NaOH (aq)+H2(g)2\text{Na (s)} + 2\text{H}_2\text{O (l)} \rightarrow 2\text{NaOH (aq)} + \text{H}_2\text{(g)} This reaction is highly exothermic, often igniting the gas evolved, and demonstrates the high reactivity of these metals, which readily lose their outer to form positive ions. Less reactive alkali earth metals like calcium also react with cold water but more slowly, producing and , while magnesium shows no visible reaction under cold conditions. Metals lower in the series, such as magnesium, do not react appreciably with cold but can react with or hot to displace and form the metal . The reaction for magnesium with is: Mg (s)+H2O (g)→MgO (s)+H2(g)\text{Mg (s)} + \text{H}_2\text{O (g)} \rightarrow \text{MgO (s)} + \text{H}_2\text{(g)} This observation places magnesium above metals like or iron, which require even more forcing conditions or different reagents to react with . Such experiments highlight the increasing stability of metal-water bonds as reactivity decreases down the series. A key test for reactivity involves the reaction of metals with dilute acids, such as , where metals positioned above in the series displace gas to form a soluble metal salt. For example, reacts with dilute as follows: Zn (s)+2HCl (aq)→ZnCl2(aq)+H2(g)\text{Zn (s)} + 2\text{HCl (aq)} \rightarrow \text{ZnCl}_2\text{(aq)} + \text{H}_2\text{(g)} The vigor of this reaction decreases down the series; highly reactive metals like magnesium produce rapid and , while less reactive ones like iron react slowly. Metals below , such as , show no reaction, confirming their position relative to . These acid reactions provide a reliable ordering for mid-series metals. Displacement reactions further refine the series by showing that a more reactive metal can displace a less reactive one from its salt solution in aqueous media. For instance, iron displaces copper from copper(II) sulfate solution: Fe (s)+CuSO4(aq)→FeSO4(aq)+Cu (s)\text{Fe (s)} + \text{CuSO}_4\text{(aq)} \rightarrow \text{FeSO}_4\text{(aq)} + \text{Cu (s)} This single displacement occurs because iron has a greater tendency to form ions than copper, leading to observable changes like color shifts and metal deposition. Experiments with pairs of metals systematically build the relative order, with no reaction indicating the displacing metal is less reactive.

Theoretical Foundations

The , denoted as E∘E^\circ, quantifies the tendency of a species to gain electrons and undergo reduction in an , measured relative to the (SHE) under standard conditions of 25°C, 1 M concentration, and 1 atm pressure. The SHE is assigned an E∘E^\circ value of 0 V for the \ce2H++2e−−>H2\ce{2H^+ + 2e^- -> H2}. A more positive E∘E^\circ indicates a greater propensity for reduction (acting as a stronger oxidizing agent), while a more negative E∘E^\circ signifies a stronger tendency for oxidation (acting as a better reducing agent). For metals, this is particularly relevant in their ionic forms, where E∘E^\circ reflects the ease with which the metal can lose electrons to form cations. In the context of the reactivity series, the order of metals aligns closely with their standard reduction potentials, arranged from most reactive (most negative E∘E^\circ) to least reactive (most positive E∘E^\circ). For instance, lithium has an E∘E^\circ of -3.04 V for \ceLi++e−−>Li\ce{Li^+ + e^- -> Li}, indicating high reactivity as it readily oxidizes, whereas gold exhibits an E∘E^\circ of +1.50 V for \ceAu3++3e−−>Au\ce{Au^{3+} + 3e^- -> Au}, showing low reactivity due to its resistance to oxidation. Hydrogen serves as the reference point at 0 V, dividing the series into metals above it (more reactive, displace H₂ from acids) and below it (less reactive). This correlation stems from the half-cell reduction reaction for metals: \ceMn++ne−−>M(E∘)\ce{M^{n+} + n e^- -> M} \quad (E^\circ) The position in the reactivity series is determined by the ease of the reverse oxidation process, \ceM−>Mn++ne−\ce{M -> M^{n+} + n e^-}, where a more negative E∘E^\circ corresponds to a more spontaneous oxidation and thus higher reactivity. While the reactivity series provides a qualitative ordering based on observed displacement reactions, standard electrode potentials offer a quantitative measure that underpins this arrangement, allowing prediction of reaction spontaneity via the cell potential Ecell∘=Ecathode∘−Eanode∘E^\circ_\text{cell} = E^\circ_\text{cathode} - E^\circ_\text{anode}. However, electrode potentials focus on thermodynamic feasibility and do not account for kinetic barriers, such as activation energies or overpotentials, which can prevent reactions from occurring at appreciable rates despite favorable E∘E^\circ values. Thus, the series remains a simplified tool, while potentials enable more precise electrochemical analysis.

Influence of Electronegativity

, as defined on the Pauling scale, quantifies an atom's tendency to attract shared electrons in a , with values typically ranging from about 0.7 to 4.0 for elements. In the context of metals, lower indicates a weaker hold on valence electrons, correlating with greater ease in losing those electrons to form cations and thus higher reactivity. This trend is evident across the reactivity series, where alkali metals at the top exhibit notably low electronegativities—for instance, at 0.98 and cesium at 0.79—enabling rapid and pronounced reactivity with substances like or acids. In contrast, noble metals positioned lower in the series, such as with an electronegativity of 2.54, retain electrons more strongly, contributing to their chemical inertness under standard conditions. The inverse relationship between electronegativity and metal reactivity broadly underpins the ordering in the series, as metals with diminished electron attraction donate electrons more readily, aligning with observed displacement behaviors. Nonetheless, electronegativity serves as an imperfect predictor, overlooking influences like successive ionization energies, which leads to deviations especially among transition metals where d-orbital effects dominate. It remains particularly valuable for elucidating reactivity trends within periodic groups, such as the increasing reactivity down the alkali metal group due to progressively lower electronegativities. This concept complements interpretations based on standard electrode potentials by highlighting underlying atomic electron affinities.

Practical Applications

Predicting Displacement Reactions

The reactivity series serves as a predictive tool for single displacement reactions in aqueous solutions, where a more reactive metal can displace a less reactive metal from the solution of its salt. According to this principle, a metal positioned higher in the series will replace one lower in the series in a compound, while the reverse reaction does not occur due to differences in reactivity. This rule stems from the relative tendencies of metals to lose electrons, enabling straightforward forecasting of reaction outcomes without performing experiments. A classic example is the displacement of silver by magnesium: when magnesium is added to a silver nitrate solution, the reaction proceeds as Mg(s)+2AgNO3(aq)→Mg(NO3)2(aq)+2Ag(s),\mathrm{Mg(s) + 2AgNO_3(aq) \rightarrow Mg(NO_3)_2(aq) + 2Ag(s)}, producing solid silver and , as magnesium ranks higher in the reactivity series than silver. In contrast, iron, which is below magnesium but above silver, cannot displace magnesium from solution, resulting in no observable reaction. These examples illustrate the series' utility in anticipating whether a displacement will occur based solely on the metals' positions. Hydrogen's placement in the reactivity series extends predictions to reactions with acids: metals above can displace it from dilute acids to form hydrogen gas, whereas those below cannot. For instance, , positioned below hydrogen, shows no reaction with (Cu + 2HCl → no reaction), as copper lacks the reactivity to liberate hydrogen. A practical illustration is observed in a mixture of aluminium (Al), iron (Fe), and copper (Cu) treated with excess dilute hydrochloric acid, where Al and Fe react to produce hydrogen gas and soluble metal chlorides (AlCl₃ and FeCl₂), leaving Cu as the undissolved solid residue. This aspect highlights the series' role in distinguishing reactive from noble metals in acidic environments. The reactivity series also enables quantitative predictions of product volumes in such reactions. For example, when 2.00 g of magnesium reacts completely with excess dilute acid at 20.0°C and 100000 Pa according to the equation Mg + 2H⁺ → Mg²⁺ + H₂, the volume of hydrogen gas produced is 2.00 dm³ (2.00 L). This result follows from stoichiometric calculation: the molar mass of magnesium is 24 g/mol, giving 2.00 / 24 = 0.0833 mol of Mg and thus 0.0833 mol of H₂; at RTP (room temperature and pressure, commonly taken as 20°C and 100000 Pa in educational contexts), the molar volume of an ideal gas is 24 dm³/mol, yielding 0.0833 × 24 = 2.00 dm³. This example shows how the series supports not only qualitative predictions of reaction occurrence but also quantitative assessments of product amounts in acid displacement reactions. In education, the reactivity series underpins laboratory experiments designed to verify and reinforce these predictions, such as microscale displacement tests using spotting tiles to observe reactions between metals and salt solutions. These activities help students develop an intuitive understanding of reactivity trends through direct observation, often incorporating word equations and formative assessments like reactivity series strips.

Uses in Metallurgy and Industry

In metallurgy, the reactivity series guides the selection of reduction methods for extracting metals from their ores, ensuring efficient industrial processes. For extraction purposes, carbon is included in an extended reactivity series, positioned between aluminum and zinc; metals below carbon, such as iron, can be extracted through thermal reduction using carbon or carbon monoxide in a blast furnace. Here, iron(III) oxide reacts with carbon monoxide to produce molten iron and carbon dioxide:
\ceFe2O3+3CO−>2Fe+3CO2\ce{Fe2O3 + 3CO -> 2Fe + 3CO2}
This approach leverages the relative positions in the series, where carbon acts as a reducing agent capable of displacing iron from its oxide, making it a cornerstone of steel production worldwide. For more reactive metals above carbon, like , carbon reduction is ineffective due to aluminum's higher affinity for oxygen, necessitating electrolytic methods. The Hall-Héroult process dissolves aluminum oxide in molten and uses to reduce it at the :
\ce2Al2O3−>[electrolysis]4Al+3O2\ce{2Al2O3 ->[electrolysis] 4Al + 3O2}
This energy-intensive technique, operating at around 950°C, accounts for nearly all primary production and highlights how the series dictates the shift from chemical to electrochemical extraction for highly reactive metals. The reactivity series also informs corrosion prevention in industrial settings, particularly through using sacrificial s. , being more reactive than iron, is commonly applied as a coating or on structures like ship hulls, where it corrodes preferentially:
\ceZn−>Zn2++2e−\ce{Zn -> Zn^{2+} + 2e^-}
This galvanic action supplies electrons to prevent iron oxidation, extending the lifespan of marine and assets in corrosive environments. In alloy design, the series aids metallurgists in tailoring stability for challenging conditions, such as acidic soils where reactive components may corrode faster. By combining metals of differing reactivities, s like certain aluminum-magnesium series achieve enhanced resistance to localized attack, optimizing performance in agricultural or environmental applications.

References

  1. https://chem.libretexts.org/Ancillary_Materials/Reference/Reference_Tables/Electrochemistry_Tables/P3:_Activity_Series_of_Metals
  2. https://flexbooks.ck12.org/cbook/cbse-chemistry-class-10/section/3.3/primary/lesson/reactivity-series-of-metals/
  3. https://employees.csbsju.edu/cschaller/Reactivity/redox/ROredoxrxn.htm
  4. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zy7dgdm/revision/1
  5. https://dept.harpercollege.edu/chemistry/chm/100/dgodambe/thedisk/series/3back.htm
  6. https://people.wou.edu/~courtna/ch412/activity.htm
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4360083/
  8. https://www.electrochem.org/birth-of-electrochemistry
  9. https://www.peacta.org/articles_upload/PEA_7_2_1989_195_220.pdf
  10. https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/science-and-celebrity-humphry-davys-rising-star/
  11. https://chem.libretexts.org/Ancillary_Materials/Reference/Reference_Tables/Electrochemistry_Tables/P3%253A_Activity_Series_of_Metals
  12. https://edu.rsc.org/experiments/where-is-carbon-in-the-reactivity-series/1787.article
  13. https://edu.rsc.org/resources/reactivity-and-displacement-reactions/4011107.article
  14. https://edu.rsc.org/practical/reactivity-of-metals-practical-videos-14-16-years/4012974.article
  15. https://edu.rsc.org/experiments/exothermic-metal-acid-reactions/1731.article
  16. https://edu.rsc.org/experiments/displacement-reactions-between-metals-and-their-salts/720.article
  17. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Mount_Royal_University/Chem_1202/Unit_6%253A_Electrochemistry/6.2%253A_Standard_Electrode_Potentials
  18. https://chem.libretexts.org/Ancillary_Materials/Reference/Reference_Tables/Electrochemistry_Tables/P1%3A_Standard_Reduction_Potentials_by_Element
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/standard-electrode-potential
  20. https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/EJC97422
  21. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/periodic-table/electronegativity
  22. https://edu.rsc.org/cpd/displacement-reactions/4011106.article
  23. https://www.chemedx.org/activity/demonstration-reaction-magnesium-and-silver-nitrate
  24. https://www.studocu.com/ph/messages/question/3467673/iron-fe-reaction-with-mgcl2-observation-no-reaction-explain-why-300-words-of-explanation
  25. https://www.ck12.org/flexi/chemistry/acids-naming-and-formulas/does-copper-react-with-hydrochloric-acid/
  26. https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/16507/why-doesnt-copper-react-with-hydrochloric-acid-while-the-other-metals-do
  27. https://www.tsfx.edu.au/resources/N_-_Chemistry_Clinic_-_igcse-redox-displacements.pdf
  28. https://www.chemguide.co.uk/inorganic/extraction/aluminium.html
  29. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Corrosion%2BResistance%2Bof%2BAluminum%2Band%2BMagnesium%2BAlloys%253A%2BUnderstanding%252C%2BPerformance%252C%2Band%2BTesting-p-9780470531761
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.