Hubbry Logo
ResuscitatorResuscitatorMain
Open search
Resuscitator
Community hub
Resuscitator
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Resuscitator
Resuscitator
Resuscitator
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A resuscitator is a device using positive pressure to inflate the lungs of an unconscious person who is not breathing, in order to keep them oxygenated and alive.[citation needed] There are three basic types: a manual version (also known as a bag valve mask) consisting of a mask and a large hand-squeezed plastic bulb using ambient air, or with supplemental oxygen from a high-pressure tank. The second type is the expired air or breath powered resuscitator. The third type is an oxygen powered resuscitator. These are driven by pressurized gas delivered by a regulator, and can either be automatic or manually controlled. The most popular type of gas powered resuscitator are time cycled, volume constant ventilators. In the early days of pre-hospital emergency services, pressure cycled devices like the Pulmotor were popular but yielded less than satisfactory results. Most modern resuscitators are designed to allow the patient to breathe on his own should he recover the ability to do so. All resuscitation devices should be able to deliver more than 85% oxygen when a gas source is available.

Mechanism and function

[edit]

Manual resuscitators

[edit]
Main article: Bag valve mask

Manual resuscitators, also known as bag valve masks, consist of a flexible oro-nasal face-mask with non-return valves and a large hand-squeezed plastic bulb using ambient air, or with supplemental oxygen from a high-pressure tank. The mask covers the mouth and nose, and has a peripheral seal that fits most face shapes, and is generally held in place by the operator.[citation needed]

Expired air resuscitators

[edit]
Main article: Pocket mask

A pocket mask, or pocket face mask or CPR mask, is an expired air resuscitation device used to safely deliver rescue breaths during a cardiac arrest or respiratory arrest. It is a small portable device used in the pre-hospital setting to provide emergency ventilation to a patient who is either in respiratory failure or cardiac arrest. The pocket mask is designed to be placed over the lower face of the patient, creating a seal enclosing both the mouth and nose. Air is then administered to the patient by the responder who exhales through a one-way filter valve. The system is capable of delivering up to 16% oxygen with exhaled air.[citation needed]

Modern pocket masks have either a built in one-way valve or a disposable filter to protect the operator responder from potentially infectious bodily fluids, such as vomit or blood.[1] Many masks also have a built-in oxygen addition tube, allowing for administration of 50-60% oxygen.

Oxygen powered resuscitator

[edit]

An oxygen powered resuscitator is a resuscitator that is powered automatically or manually, transmitting oxygen to the patient that is not breathing or having difficulty breathing. Automatic resuscitators allow the operator to set a fixed rate and amount of positive pressure. Manual resuscitators may require a bag to squeeze or valve to operate.

History

[edit]

Resuscitators began in 1907 [2] when Heinrich Dräger, owner of the Drägerwerk AG Company, produced the "Pulmotor" Resuscitator. Considered to be the first practical device for delivering oxygen to unconscious patients or patients in respiratory distress, the Pulmotor influenced resuscitators for many years.

Early "Lungmotor" resuscitation device

When ambulance services began to form in major cities around the world, such as in London, New York and Los Angeles, Emergency medical services or EMS was developed. In these early days, perhaps[weasel words] the most advanced piece of equipment carried on these ambulances were devices for delivering supplemental oxygen to patients in respiratory distress.[citation needed] The Pulmotor and later models, such as the Emerson Resuscitator, used heavy cylinders of oxygen to power a device which forced air into the patient's lungs.[clarification needed][citation needed] While better than no oxygen at all, these old units were problematic. Aside from often failing to sense obstructions in the airway, the Emerson, and to a lesser degree the Pulmotor, were large, bulky and heavy. The Emerson Resuscitator required two strong men to carry it from the ambulance to the victim. Perhaps the greatest defect, however, was that these units "cycled".[citation needed]

Cycling was a feature that was built into most resuscitators built before the 1960s, including the Pulmotor and Emerson models. To ensure that the victim's lungs were not injured from being over-inflated, the resuscitator was pre-set to provide what was considered a safe pressure of oxygen. Once the unit reached this limit, it ceased to pump oxygen. For patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or any form of obstructive lung disease, the delivered pressure was insufficient pressure to fill the lungs with oxygen, meaning that, for patients with any sort of obstructive lung disease, units that pressure cycled did more harm than good.[clarification needed] Pressure cycling also meant that cardiopulmonary resuscitation was impossible to perform if a patient's respiration was being supported by one of these units. If chest compressions were to be done, the cycle would be retarded and the resuscitator would be unable to provide oxygen as long as the chest was being compressed. For victims of smoke inhalation and drowning, however, the benefits outweighed the negatives, so these units found a home on ambulances around the world. The devices that cycled on the basis of upper and lower pressure limits are known as pressure cycled automatic resuscitators. In the UK the introduction of BS6850:1987 Ventilatory Resuscitators confirmed that "....automatic pressure-cycled gas-powered resuscitators are not considered suitable for such use (closed chest cardiac compression)..." and confirmed the standards required for gas powered resuscitators and operator powered resuscitators.[3] The following year a similar ISO standard was introduced.[4] Around this date most manufacturers supplied or introduced time - volume cycled resuscitators and pressure cycled devices were discontinued.

Both the Pulmotor and the Emerson depended to a large extent upon the patient's ability to breathe the oxygen in order to be beneficial. Due to the limitations imposed by the cycling feature, this meant that patients in need of rescue breathing benefited little from the application of these devices. The Emerson and Pulmotor were utilized until the mid-1960s, when a breakthrough in the history of oxygen delivery was made: the demand valve.[5]

The first appearance of the expired air resuscitator type was the Brooke Airway introduced in 1957.[citation needed]

The demand valve was a revolutionary new piece of equipment.[citation needed] At the push of a button, high-flow oxygen could be delivered into the lungs of the patient without the complication of the device cycling and, the associated chance of ceasing to administer oxygen. Any amount of pressure that might be required to inflate the lungs could be achieved,[clarification needed] and the demand valve was better able to detect obstructions in the lungs and more able to "work with the patient" than the Emerson and Pulmotor could.[clarification needed] The demand valve could also provide oxygen at any flow rate required to a conscious patient in respiratory distress. Conserving the often limited reserves of oxygen was easier with a demand valve, as oxygen was designed only to flow when either the button was depressed or the casualty inhaled. Later medical opinion decided that getting high flow oxygen into a patient's airway was a factor in causing vomiting and aspiration. Demand valve resuscitators were introduced with restrictors to limit flow rates to 40 lpm. Use of the demand valve resuscitator in Europe was limited by the lack of pressure relief valve or audible alarm for high pressure.[citation needed][clarification needed]

One of the first modern resuscitation ventilators was the HARV, later called the PneuPac 2R or Yellow Box.[citation needed][clarification needed]

Modern day

[edit]

[clarification needed]The ambu-bag was a further advancement in resuscitation. Introduced in the 1960s by the Danish company Ambu, this device allowed two rescuers to perform CPR and ventilation on a non-breathing patient with an acceptable chance of success. The ambu-bag has now mostly replaced the demand valve as the primary method of ventilation, largely due to concerns of potential over-inflation with the demand valve by untrained rescuers. The ambu-bag, unlike the older version of the demand valve (all new models of demand valve now have pressure relief valves set at 60 cm of water to prevent accidental overinflation of the lungs), has a "pop-off" valve to prevent inflation at greater than 40 pounds -per-square-inch (275.79 kilo-pascals), with the result being that it is generally more common in the pre-hospital setting than the demand valve. However, the demand valve remains popular with BLS providers, and in situations where conserving supplies of oxygen is of paramount importance. The demand valve, while less popular today than it was previously, still remains in service, albeit with important safety features added, including the addition of a pressure-relief valve to prevent over-inflation and the restriction of its flow to 40 liters a minute.

Newer products have been developed and are available. In 1992 the Genesis(R) II time/volume cycled resuscitator (now upgraded to meet the current, international, resuscitation guidelines and called the CAREvent(R) ALS and CA)provide the SIMV[clarification needed] automatic ventilation mode with demand breathing for the spontaneously breathing patient. These devices work like full blown transport ventilators yet are simple enough to operate that they can be used in an emergency situation by pre-hospital healthcare providers and are small enough to be easily transportable. Having a manual override control for use during mask CPR they meet the requirements of the current resuscitation standards. The Oxylator (R) EM-100 introduced in the late 1990s and subsequently replaced by the more flexible Oxylator (R) EMX and HD are pressure cycled devices that utilize pressure, rather than time, cycling to ventilate the patient. More recently the microVENT resuscitator range introduced two new models, the microVENT(R) CPR and the microVENT(R)World. These two new time/volume resuscitators meet the latest requirements for resuscitation and are claimed to be lighter and smaller than most similar products.[6]

Most established automatic resuscitator manufacturers developed time/volume cycled resuscitators as these are acknowledged[by whom?] as preferable to pressure cycled resuscitators.[citation needed][clarification needed]

Response considerations

[edit]

A manual resuscitator[clarification needed] should be used on a victim only in an environment where the air is unquestionably safe to breathe.[clarification needed]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Resuscitator

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A resuscitator, also known as a bag-valve- (BVM), is a portable, hand-operated designed to deliver positive pressure ventilation to patients experiencing or apnea, by manually inflating their lungs with oxygen-enriched air. It typically consists of a self-inflating bag, a one-way to prevent rebreathing of exhaled gases, and an interface such as a face or endotracheal tube, enabling providers to and ventilate individuals who cannot breathe spontaneously. These devices are essential in settings like (CPR), trauma care, and , where immediate respiratory support can be lifesaving. The modern resuscitator was invented in 1953 by Danish anesthesiologist Henning Ruben and engineer Holger Hesse amid a epidemic in , which created a surge in demand for manual ventilation tools during an oxygen shortage caused by a national truck drivers' strike. Launched commercially in as the Ambu bag by Testa-Laboratorium (later renamed Ambu), it was the first self-inflating manual resuscitator, featuring a simple design with a latex bulb reinforced by bicycle spokes (later replaced by foam rubber) that required no external power source or oxygen supply for basic function. This innovation addressed the limitations of earlier bellows-style devices from the early 20th century, such as the Dräger Pulmotor of 1907, which were bulky, oxygen-dependent, and prone to fatigue during prolonged use. By the , the Ambu bag had largely supplanted these predecessors, becoming a standard in due to its reliability, portability, and ease of sterilization. Resuscitators are classified primarily into self-inflating and flow-inflating types, with the former—exemplified by the Ambu bag—relying on to automatically refill the bag with ambient air after compression, making it ideal for prehospital and resource-limited environments. Flow-inflating models, in contrast, require a continuous oxygen source to inflate the bag and are often used in controlled clinical settings for more precise delivery. Available in adult and pediatric sizes, with the latter incorporating pop-off valves to limit pressure and prevent in infants and children, resuscitators are constructed from durable, latex-free materials to minimize infection risks and ensure single-patient use in disposable variants. In clinical practice, resuscitators facilitate positive pressure ventilation at rates of 10–12 breaths per minute for adults, delivering tidal volumes of 400–600 mL while monitoring for chest rise and avoiding , which can complicate CPR outcomes. They integrate with advanced airway devices like supraglottic airways or laryngoscopes and are often equipped with accessories such as (PEEP) valves to improve oxygenation in conditions like (ARDS). Despite their simplicity, effective use demands training to achieve proper mask seal and ventilation technique, underscoring their role as a foundational tool in global emergency response protocols.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

A resuscitator is a portable that delivers positive pressure ventilation to patients with inadequate or absent spontaneous , helping to prevent hypoxia and maintain adequate oxygenation. These devices function by forcing oxygen-enriched air into the lungs via a , tube, or other interface, restoring respiratory function in critical situations where normal has ceased. The primary purposes of resuscitators encompass immediate during , acute , or trauma, where rapid intervention is essential to sustain life. They also serve as a temporary bridge to more advanced systems in clinical settings and are employed by emergency medical responders in both pre-hospital and environments to support patients until definitive care is available. In global emergency protocols, such as those from the , bag-valve-mask resuscitators are the standard for initial ventilation during out-of-hospital , forming a core component of .

Basic Components

A standard resuscitator, also known as a bag-valve-mask (BVM) device, comprises several core components that enable manual positive pressure ventilation to support breathing in unable to ventilate adequately. These include a self-inflating bag serving as the primary reservoir for air or oxygen, one-way valves to direct gas flow and prevent rebreathing, a patient interface for delivering gas to the airway, and an oxygen inlet port for supplemental oxygen delivery. The self-inflating bag is the central element, constructed to recoil automatically after compression, drawing in fresh gas from the environment or an oxygen source to refill itself. It typically has a capacity of 500 mL for pediatric use and 1,500–1,600 mL for adults, allowing delivery of tidal volumes around 300–800 mL depending on squeeze force and patient size. This design ensures reliable inflation without external power, facilitating intermittent or continuous ventilatory support. One-way valves are integral to unidirectional gas flow: the intake valve, often featuring flap or disc membranes, admits or oxygen into the bag while blocking ; the patient valve, including non-rebreathing mechanisms like duckbill or single-shutter valves, directs exhaled gas away from the patient to prevent re-inhalation of carbon dioxide-enriched air. These valves maintain low resistance—typically 2–4 cmH₂O for inspiration and expiration—to minimize during operation. The patient interface consists of a face mask that seals over the and or a standard 15 mm connector for attachment to an endotracheal tube, ensuring targeted delivery of ventilatory gases directly to the airway. Masks are sized variably (e.g., sizes 0–5 for infants to adults) to achieve an airtight seal without excessive pressure on facial tissues. An oxygen inlet port, usually a nipple or tubing connector, allows attachment to an external oxygen supply, often with a bag (600 mL pediatric, 2,600 mL adult) to achieve FiO₂ levels up to 100% at flows of 10–15 L/min. Without oxygen, the device delivers room air (21% FiO₂); with a and high flow, oxygenation improves significantly for hypoxic patients. Resuscitators are typically fabricated from biocompatible, durable materials such as for reusable models, which can withstand autoclaving for sterilization, or (PVC) for disposable versions to ensure single-use sterility and cost-effectiveness. These materials provide flexibility for bag compression, chemical resistance, and latex-free composition to reduce risks. Bag capacities and valve dead spaces (around 7 mL) are standardized to support safe ventilation across age groups. In terms of flow dynamics, squeezing the bag manually generates , commonly 10–40 cmH₂O, to inflate the lungs with tidal volumes of 6–7 mL/kg ideal body weight, delivered over 1–2 seconds at rates under 12 breaths per minute. This creates a that drives gas through the valves and interface, with exhalation occurring passively as the bag refills and chest recoil expels CO₂ via the outlet valve. Excessive squeeze can exceed safe limits, risking . Variations in setup enhance safety in advanced models: a pop-off , often set at 35–60 cmH₂O, automatically vents excess to protect against lung overdistension, particularly in pediatric devices; some integrate a manometer to monitor real-time airway pressures, aiding precise control during use. These features are optional but recommended for high-risk scenarios to maintain pressures below 30–40 cmH₂O.

Types of Resuscitators

Manual Resuscitators

Manual resuscitators, commonly known as bag-valve- (BVM) devices, are hand-operated tools designed for providing positive pressure ventilation to patients who are not adequately. These devices consist of a self-inflating bag connected to a one-way valve system and a face , allowing a single operator or team to deliver controlled breaths without relying on external power sources. The Ambu bag, a widely recognized proprietary example, exemplifies this design and has become synonymous with manual resuscitation efforts in emergency settings. The core design features a compressible, self-inflating made from durable, medical-grade materials like SEBS, with an adult-sized bag typically holding a of 1.5 to 2 liters. Integrated non-rebreathing valves ensure unidirectional , preventing exhaled gases from re-entering the bag while allowing intake from ambient air or an attached oxygen . When squeezed, the bag delivers a of approximately 500-600 mL for adults, adjustable based on squeeze force and duration, which supports effective inflation without excessive . This configuration enables compatibility with various sizes for airtight seals over the and . In operation, the rescuer rhythmically squeezes the bag to force air or oxygen-enriched gas into the patient's lungs via the mask, with the bag automatically refilling upon release through intake valves drawing from the environment or . For adult patients, ventilations are typically administered at a rate of 10-12 breaths per minute, each lasting 1 second to mimic natural respiration and minimize risks like . The device's simplicity allows for immediate use in diverse scenarios, from prehospital care to operating rooms, bridging the gap until is available. Key advantages of manual resuscitators include their portability and reliability in resource-limited environments, as they require no electricity or batteries and can function solely with room air if oxygen is unavailable. Production costs are low, with disposable adult units often priced under $20, making them accessible for widespread deployment in emergency kits and ambulances. When used correctly, they achieve effective ventilation in the majority of cases, supporting oxygenation and until more definitive interventions, though operator skill is crucial to avoid complications like gastric . The invention of the manual resuscitator traces back to Danish anesthesiologist Henning Ruben, who invented the first self-inflating bag in 1953 amid an oxygen supply crisis in , with commercial launch in 1956, revolutionizing portable manual ventilation by eliminating the need for compressed gases or electrical power.

Expired Air Resuscitators

Expired air resuscitators are basic ventilation devices designed for mouth-to-mask or mouth-to-barrier delivery, utilizing the rescuer's exhaled breath to provide positive pressure ventilation to a non-breathing . These devices feature a transparent mask that seals over the patient's mouth and nose, incorporating a one-way and outflow valve to direct the rescuer's expired air into the patient's airway while preventing reverse flow of the patient's exhaled gases back to the rescuer. An inflow valve allows the rescuer to draw in fresh room air between breaths, and some early designs included a relief valve to limit pressure and avoid ; modern devices rely on proper rescuer technique for pressure control. Unlike powered or bag-based systems, these resuscitators require no external equipment or power source, relying entirely on the rescuer's manual exhalation and lung capacity to generate tidal volumes typically limited to 500-800 mL per breath, though effective delivery of approximately 500 mL (6-7 mL/kg for adults) is recommended to ensure adequate ventilation without excessive gastric insufflation. In operation, the rescuer places the mask securely on the patient's face and exhales steadily through the device at a controlled rate of 10-12 breaths per minute, observing chest rise to confirm effective delivery. The exhaled air provides an oxygen concentration of approximately 16-17%, sufficient for short-term oxygenation in emergencies, as it maintains alveolar oxygen tension around 80 mm Hg. One-way valves and optional bacterial/viral filters (with up to 99.8% efficiency) minimize cross-infection risks by blocking pathogens from the patient's . This method is particularly suited to resource-limited settings, such as layperson interventions during or . The primary advantages of expired air resuscitators include their immediate availability in standard CPR kits, portability, and zero risk of mechanical failure, making them ideal for bystander resuscitation as endorsed by (AHA) guidelines since the . They enable rapid initiation of ventilation without specialized training beyond basic CPR instruction, historically validated for maintaining oxygenation in scenarios like or . However, prolonged use carries a risk of in the patient due to the 3.5-4.1% content in the rescuer's exhaled air, which can inhibit cardiac function and elevate blood CO2 levels over time. Additionally, in infectious disease outbreaks, these devices are unsuitable without robust barriers, as the close proximity increases transmission potential despite valves, with rare documented cases of pathogens like or crossing during mouth-to-mask contact.

Oxygen-Powered Resuscitators

Oxygen-powered resuscitators are medical devices that utilize compressed oxygen or air from a to automate the delivery of positive ventilation, making them ideal for scenarios requiring sustained or hands-free support in critical care settings. These systems typically employ a demand mechanism or continuous flow design connected directly to an oxygen source, such as an E- regulator, enabling the provision of high-concentration oxygen—ranging from 40% to 100%—at adjustable flow rates up to 30 liters per minute (L/min). The lightweight and compact construction, often weighing under 0.5 kg and measuring around 140 x 63 x 73 mm, facilitates portability without reliance on batteries or electrical power. In operation, these resuscitators initiate ventilation through patient-triggered demand or fixed-time cycling, with modes selectable for manual override or delivery at rates of 10-20 breaths per minute (BPM). Pressure is inherently limited to 40-60 cmH₂O to prevent , achieved via built-in relief valves that terminate flow upon reaching the threshold, accompanied by an audible alarm for high pressure or obstructions. Additional safety features include (PEEP) options of 2-4 cmH₂O and compatibility with masks, endotracheal tubes, or tracheostomies for patients over 10 kg. Low-pressure alarms may activate if the oxygen supply drops below 30 L/min, ensuring reliable performance during use. Key advantages of oxygen-powered resuscitators include significant reduction in rescuer fatigue by automating consistent delivery, precise control over inspiratory flows to minimize gastric , and their suitability for transport where hands-free operation allows focus on other interventions. These devices support minute volumes of 9-18 /min in automatic mode, enhancing oxygenation efficiency in prehospital environments. is determined by the equation: Tidal volume=Flow rate×Inspiratory time\text{Tidal volume} = \text{Flow rate} \times \text{Inspiratory time} For instance, at a flow rate of 15 L/min (0.25 L/s) and an inspiratory time of 1 second, this yields approximately 250 mL, scalable to adult needs of 500 mL or more by adjusting parameters. Early models from the 1960s, such as those developed by companies like Bird and Bennett, began integrating oxygen-powered features with basic ventilatory systems to improve reliability in emergency settings.

Historical Development

Early Innovations

Early efforts in mechanical resuscitation predated the , with devices emerging as rudimentary tools for , particularly in response to accidents where asphyxiation from toxic gases was common. These , often paired with simple masks, were used to force air into victims' lungs, marking an initial shift from manual methods toward mechanical assistance in industrial emergencies. In the 1740s, English physician John Fothergill advanced these concepts by advocating the use of to distend the lungs of apparently drowned individuals, reporting William Tossach's successful 1744 case of mouth-to-mouth to restore breathing in a suffocated coal miner, while advocating mouth-to-mouth respiration as a preferred method for reviving apparently individuals over due to its availability and controlled force. Fothergill's work emphasized the physiological need for lung inflation to revive asphyxiated patients, influencing subsequent European resuscitation practices focused on and suffocation. The early 20th century saw the introduction of more sophisticated mechanical resuscitators, exemplified by the 1907 Pulmotor developed by Heinrich Dräger in . This portable device, powered by pressurized oxygen, alternated positive and negative airway pressures to simulate breathing for asphyxiation victims, and it was the first commercially produced ventilator of its kind. Mass production ramped up in the 1910s, with widespread deployment during for treating gas poisoning and battlefield injuries. By the , precursors to the iron lung, such as earlier negative-pressure chamber designs, began influencing the evolution toward more reliable portable resuscitators, though these early innovations suffered from significant limitations including bulkiness, which hindered mobility, and unreliability in consistent pressure delivery, often leading to inadequate ventilation or . Despite these challenges, the adoption of such devices in regions with high incidences of and industrial accidents contributed to substantial reductions in mortality rates for respiratory emergencies, transforming outcomes from near-certain fatality to viable recovery in many cases.

Mid-20th Century Advancements

In the , a pivotal advancement in resuscitator design emerged with the invention of the self-inflating bag by Danish anesthesiologist Henning Ruben and engineer Holger Hesse, introduced commercially in 1956 as the Ambu bag. This device represented the first portable, disposable resuscitator featuring non-rebreathing valves, including the innovative Ruben valve, which allowed for efficient one-way airflow without the need for external gas sources or electricity, enabling reliable manual ventilation in resource-limited settings. Unlike earlier bellows-based systems, the Ambu bag's lightweight rubber construction—initially weighing around 500 grams—facilitated immediate use by a single operator, marking a shift toward user-friendly, field-deployable tools that enhanced emergency response capabilities post-World War II. During the and , further refinements focused on improving safety, monitoring, and compatibility, including the integration of oxygen inlet ports to deliver enriched air mixtures up to 100% oxygen, which addressed limitations in hypoxic environments. A significant material transition occurred from durable but cumbersome metals and rubbers to lightweight plastics like (PVC), promoting disposability, easier sterilization, and reduced infection risk in clinical and prehospital settings. These changes drastically lowered device weight from over 5 kg in prior metal-framed models, such as early 20th-century Pulmotors, to under 1 kg, boosting portability for crews and . Key milestones in standardization came in the 1970s, when the (AHA) endorsed the inclusion of BVM resuscitators in () protocols as part of training, building on its 1963 formal adoption of techniques. This endorsement, alongside the 1979 National Conference on CPR and Emergency Cardiac Care, accelerated the integration of BVMs into global emergency guidelines, emphasizing their role in maintaining oxygenation during . By the late 1970s, these portable, reliable devices had achieved widespread adoption in , contributing to enhanced survival outcomes in out-of-hospital s through more effective ventilation support.

Clinical Applications

Indications for Use

Resuscitators, such as bag-valve-mask (BVM) devices, are primarily indicated for managing apnea during , where immediate ventilatory support is essential to maintain oxygenation and circulation. They are also deployed in cases of severe hypoxia, such as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) below 90% despite supplemental oxygen, to prevent further deterioration in tissue perfusion. Additional primary indications include airway obstruction from foreign bodies or anatomical issues, and respiratory compromise induced by trauma, such as chest injuries impairing ventilation. In specific clinical scenarios, resuscitators play a in out-of-hospital (OHCA), where BVM ventilation is a standard component of protocols to deliver oxygen during chest compression pauses. Perioperative emergencies, including during induction or recovery, often necessitate their use to bridge until or recovery of spontaneous breathing. For , positive pressure ventilation via resuscitator is recommended if heart rate remains below 100 beats per minute after initial and , with particular considerations for preterm infants who may require adjusted oxygen concentrations. Evidence-based criteria for initiation include absent respirations (apnea) or severe in adults that compromises . Ventilation should continue until spontaneous breathing resumes, an advanced airway is secured, or is achieved, with monitoring for chest rise and improving SpO2 to confirm efficacy. Contraindications to resuscitator use include an intact gag reflex without prior , as this increases the risk of and aspiration during mask application. Resuscitators are not suitable for chronic or long-term ventilation, as they are designed for acute, intermittent support rather than sustained mechanical assistance.

Operation Techniques

Operation of a resuscitator, such as a bag-valve-mask (BVM) device, begins with proper setup to ensure airway patency and effective delivery of oxygen-enriched air. Select the appropriate mask size based on the patient's age—adult masks for patients over 8 years or weighing more than 20 kg, pediatric for younger children, and masks for neonates and small infants—to achieve a secure seal without excessive pressure on the face. Attach the mask to the self-inflating bag and connect an oxygen source if available, delivering at least 15 L/min to achieve high inspired oxygen concentrations up to 100%. Position the patient and perform the head-tilt/chin-lift maneuver to open the airway, or use jaw thrust if cervical spine injury is suspected; insert an in unresponsive patients without a reflex or a if semi-conscious to prevent obstruction. The ventilation sequence involves delivering controlled breaths to mimic normal respiration while avoiding . Squeeze the bag firmly but slowly over approximately 1 second to deliver a of 6-7 mL/kg of ideal body weight—typically 400–600 mL for adults, 4–8 mL/kg (e.g., 15–30 mL for term neonates) for newborns, and 6–7 mL/kg for older infants and children—observing for visible chest rise as the primary indicator of adequate delivery. Administer breaths at a rate of 10–12 per minute for adults (one every 5–6 seconds), 20–30 per minute for infants and children, and 30–60 per minute for neonates (as of 2025 AHA guidelines). Allow full between breaths by releasing the bag completely, and avoid excessive force to prevent gastric . Continuous monitoring during operation is essential to adjust technique and prevent complications. Assess for symmetric chest rise and bilateral breath sounds after each breath to confirm inflation; watch for signs of gastric distension, such as abdominal movement or regurgitation, which may indicate improper seal or excessive pressure. Check for air leaks around the by listening for hissing sounds and readjust the seal as needed, using or if available to target above 94% and end-tidal CO2 between 35-45 mm Hg. If leaks persist, reposition the head or switch to a two-person technique. For advanced scenarios, employ a two-person technique to enhance seal efficacy and reduce operator fatigue, where one provider maintains the mask seal using both hands (e.g., thumbs on the mask connector and fingers lifting the ) while the second squeezes the bag. This method delivers more consistent tidal volumes compared to one-person operation. When integrating with (CPR), deliver two breaths after every 30 chest compressions in adults (30:2 ratio) until an advanced airway is placed, then transition to asynchronous ventilation at 10 breaths per minute without interrupting compressions. In pediatric CPR (infants and children), use a 15:2 ratio for two rescuers or 30:2 for one rescuer (as of 2025 AHA guidelines).

Modern Innovations and Guidelines

Recent Technological Advances

In response to the , significant innovations in automated resuscitators emerged post-2010, focusing on low-cost, portable designs to bridge ventilator shortages in overwhelmed healthcare systems. These devices automate the compression of bag-valve masks (BVMs), providing consistent ventilation without requiring constant manual effort. Notable examples include the MIT Emergency-Vent, a robotic gripper-based system developed in 2020 to deliver controlled breaths at a production cost of approximately $100–$200, and the RepRapable automated BVM, which uses off-the-shelf and 3D-printed components for rapid assembly in resource-limited environments. Other NIH-supported research highlighted designs like the ABCD , costing around $400–$800 in production, emphasizing portability and ease of assembly for use. Modern automated resuscitators incorporate smart features such as integrated pressure and flow sensors for real-time monitoring, achieving accuracies of ±8% or better in validated systems, which helps prevent over- or under-ventilation. Battery-powered models, like the AuRes automatic resuscitator, offer 2 hours of continuous operation on battery, suitable for short-term field or transport scenarios. While AI-driven rate adjustments remain more prevalent in full ventilators, resuscitator prototypes have adopted automated feedback loops to maintain respiratory rates based on sensor data, enhancing reliability during crises. Key innovations include hybrid manual-automatic modes, as seen in devices like the OP-Vent, which allow seamless switching between operator-squeezed and mechanized compression for adaptive clinical needs. Disposable single-use variants, such as the Ambu SPUR II and Dispo-Bag resuscitators, utilize medical-grade, latex-free materials to minimize risks, proving essential for pandemic protocols and single-patient applications. Additionally, 3D-printable prototypes, exemplified by the AIR (Automated Inflating Resuscitator), enable on-demand production in disaster zones using accessible printers and materials. These advances have facilitated greater adoption in low-resource settings, where manual ventilation often leads to inconsistent delivery. Field trials and bench evaluations, including a 2022 biological study on mechanical resuscitators, demonstrated stable tidal volumes and effective oxygenation maintenance in porcine models, outperforming manual methods in consistency and reducing clinician fatigue. A 2024 implementation study in resource-constrained areas, such as on the Unisabana-HERONS low-cost mechanical ventilator in , further confirmed stable arterial blood gases (PaO2 ~69-80 mmHg, PaCO2 ~38-40 mmHg) and SpO2 levels (~94-96.8%) comparable to standard ventilators, supporting their role in improving outcomes during outbreaks and emergencies.

Current Standards and Training

Current international guidelines for resuscitator use emphasize standardized protocols to optimize outcomes in scenarios. The 2025 () guidelines recommend bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation as a primary strategy during out-of-hospital (OHCA), delivering sufficient (approximately 500–600 mL) to achieve visible chest rise while avoiding excessive ventilation that could lead to gastric insufflation or reduced . Similarly, the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Guidelines 2025 endorse BVM as essential equipment for standard CPR in OHCA, prioritizing it alongside chest compressions in the initial response algorithm. In low-income settings, the (WHO) standards advocate for manual resuscitators, such as self-inflating bag-and-mask devices, as the cornerstone of basic neonatal and adult resuscitation due to their simplicity, reusability, and minimal resource requirements. Training protocols for resuscitator proficiency are integrated into (BLS) certification programs, which mandate hands-on sessions to build competency. AHA-accredited BLS courses typically include approximately 2 hours of practical training using simulation manikins to practice BVM techniques, , and scenario-based application, ensuring rescuers can maintain an airtight seal and deliver appropriate ventilation rates of 10 breaths per minute without interrupting compressions. These sessions emphasize retention through deliberate practice, with certification requiring demonstrated competence in adult, child, and infant scenarios. Recertification is required every 2 years to reinforce these skills, as proficiency can decline without regular refreshers. Regulatory frameworks ensure resuscitators meet safety and performance benchmarks. In the United States, the (FDA) classifies manual resuscitators as Class II devices, subjecting them to 510(k) premarket notification and general controls to mitigate moderate risks associated with ventilation delivery. Internationally, the ISO 80601-2-84:2023 standard specifies requirements for basic safety and essential performance of ventilators, including resuscitators, through rigorous testing of flow accuracy, pressure limits, and alarm functions to support reliable use in prehospital environments. Following the , virtual reality (VR) training modules for resuscitation skills have gained traction, with over 30% of programs incorporating them by 2025 to enhance realism and accessibility while reducing infection risks during hands-on practice.

Limitations and Safety Considerations

Potential Risks

The use of resuscitators, particularly bag-valve-mask (BVM) devices, carries risks of , defined as lung injury resulting from excessive airway pressure during ventilation. Clinical studies indicate that , including and , occurs in approximately 13% of cases involving positive pressure ventilation over several days, with manual BVM contributing to acute instances through vigorous squeezing or inadequate pressure monitoring. This risk is heightened when peak inspiratory pressures exceed safe thresholds, potentially leading to alveolar rupture. Gastric insufflation represents another common complication, where air enters the instead of the lungs, increasing the likelihood of regurgitation and aspiration. In scenarios involving BVM ventilation, gastric insufflation has been observed in up to 30% of cases, particularly with high tidal volumes or short inspiratory times, and can result in aspiration rates of 2.5% during procedures. Untrained operators exacerbate this issue, as improper mask seal or excessive force promotes esophageal airflow. Device-specific risks include valve malfunctions in manual resuscitators, which can lead to rebreathing of exhaled and subsequent hypoxia. Mis-assembly or defective non-rebreathing valves can cause inadequate ventilation or complete failure, resulting in and elevated levels. In powered resuscitators, prolonged delivery of high fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2 >60%) poses a risk of , manifesting as pulmonary damage from and impaired . This is particularly relevant in extended use, where can induce bronchitis-like symptoms and . Patient-specific factors amplify these risks; pediatric patients, with their smaller and more compliant airways, face higher susceptibility to and overdistension from standard adult devices. Additionally, expired air resuscitation methods historically carried transmission risks, but post-2020 guidelines incorporating have significantly mitigated this concern during scenarios. Complications during resuscitation are predominantly due to improper mask seals leading to hypoventilation or aspiration, as evidenced by observational data from emergency interventions.

Best Practices for Mitigation

To minimize risks associated with resuscitator use, preventive measures focus on device configuration and operational techniques. Pop-off valves on bag-valve-mask (BVM) resuscitators, particularly for pediatric use, should be set to limit peak inspiratory pressure to approximately 35 cmH₂O, preventing barotrauma while ensuring adequate tidal volumes (higher limits of 45-60 cmH₂O apply for adults). Implementing a two-rescuer technique, where one provider maintains a tight mask seal using both hands while the other squeezes the bag, reduces mask leaks by approximately 50% compared to single-rescuer methods, thereby improving ventilation efficacy. Regular device checks, including inspection for cracks, valve functionality, and mask integrity as per manufacturer guidelines (typically quarterly for reusable components and after each use for cleaning), ensure reliability and prevent equipment failure during emergencies. Infection control protocols have been strengthened following the , emphasizing disposable components to reduce cross-contamination. Single-use masks are recommended for BVM resuscitators in high-risk scenarios, as they eliminate the need for disinfection and minimize aerosol transmission of pathogens. For powered resuscitators, incorporating high-efficiency particulate air () filters on the exhalation port captures viral particles, aligning with guidelines for aerosol-generating procedures. Monitoring protocols integrate continuous waveform to verify effective ventilation, targeting an end-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂) level greater than 10 mmHg, which confirms adequate pulmonary blood flow and chest compression quality during . If BVM ventilation is required for more than 10 minutes without achieving stable oxygenation or if complications arise, transitioning to an advanced airway device, such as a supraglottic airway or endotracheal tube, is advised to sustain long-term support. In disaster settings, where resource is common, manual resuscitators like self-inflating BVMs are prioritized over powered units to conserve oxygen supplies and avoid dependency on or compressed gas, which may be depleted or unavailable.

References

  1. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpcd/classification.cfm?id=QOU
  2. https://medevis.who-healthtechnologies.org/devices/CSD_307
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10201401/
  4. https://www.ambuusa.com/ambu-bag-65/history
  5. https://museum.aarc.org/galleries/resuscitators/
  6. https://accessanesthesiology.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=974&sectionid=61586908
  7. https://www.globalspec.com/learnmore/specialized_industrial_products/medical_equipment_supplies/resuscitators
  8. https://www.bjaed.org/article/S2058-5349%2823%2900042-2/fulltext
  9. https://www.emcare.co.nz/resuscitation-equipment-and-their-uses.html
  10. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/resuscitator
  11. https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/critical-care-medicine/how-to-do-basic-airway-procedures/how-to-do-bag-valve-mask-bvm-ventilation
  12. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001369
  13. https://laerdal.com/us/products/medical-devices/airway-management/laerdal-silicone-resuscitator/
  14. http://laerdalcdn.blob.core.windows.net/downloads/f2541/laerdal_silicone_resuscitator.pdf
  15. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441924/
  16. https://media.path.org/documents/TS_nnr_global_inventory.pdf
  17. https://litfl.com/bag-valve-mask-bvm-ventilation/
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7604178/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7234703/
  20. https://acls-bls-columbus.com/what-is-the-correct-volume-of-air-to-deliver-during-bvm-ventilations/
  21. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/80184-technique
  22. https://www.heartsmart.com/bag-valve-masks-bvms-s
  23. https://litfl.com/henning-ruben/
  24. https://www.woodlibrarymuseum.org/museum/ambu-bag/
  25. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/328420
  26. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.102.suppl_1.i-95
  27. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7137688/
  28. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.CIR.96.6.2102
  29. https://cpr.heart.org/en/resources/history-of-cpr
  30. https://www.cprmedic.com/Oxylator-Product-Series/Oxylator-EMX/Operating-Manual/EMX-Operating-Manual.pdf
  31. http://otwo.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CAREVENT-ALS-IFU-01CV3000-REV19-JUL-2023.pdf
  32. https://alliedmedicalllc.com/en-us/product/emt-resuscitator/
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342530519_The_Effectiveness_of_Oxygen-Powered_Inhalation_Devices_in_Prehospital_Care
  34. https://respiratory-therapy.com/products-treatment/diagnostics-testing/training/transport-ventilation/
  35. https://museum.aarc.org/galleries/early-icu-ventilators/
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363805772_Breathing_Apparatus_for_Mine_Rescue_in_the_UK_1890s-1920s
  37. https://www.woodlibrarymuseum.org/wp-content/uploads/rare-books/S_AFBQ.pdf
  38. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/B34824746CB23F22E7F66E93B749DD95/S0025727300016896a.pdf/artificial_respiration_the_history_of_an_idea.pdf
  39. https://www.draeger.com/Content/Documents/Content/pulmotor-bk-9097434-en.pdf
  40. https://www.woodlibrarymuseum.org/museum/draeger-pulmotor/
  41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2205164/
  42. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2014/762053
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316366743_Bellows_and_Self-Inflating_Bags
  44. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/370975
  45. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.106.610907
  46. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482316/
  47. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065561
  48. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001367
  49. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001370
  50. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/154981/MIT_Emergency-Vent_An_Automated_Resuscitator_Bag_for_the_COVID-19_Crisis.pdf
  51. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/22/mit-volunteers-created-open-source-low-cost-ventilator-for-covid-19.html
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8636583/
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520423001789
  54. https://polbionica.com/en/projekty/aures-automatic-resuscitator/
  55. https://www.ambu.com/emergency-care-and-training/resuscitators/product/ambu-spur-ii
  56. https://www.galemed.com/en/product/dispo-bag-manual-resuscitator
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7418495/
  58. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0264774
  59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024067021
  60. https://www.resuscitationjournal.com/article/S0300-9572(25)00282-5/fulltext
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2875104/
  62. https://cpr.heart.org/en/courses/basic-life-support-course-options
  63. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPCD/classification.cfm?id=157
  64. https://www.iso.org/standard/83438.html
  65. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001374
  66. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/296625-treatment
  67. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8637092/
  68. https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/fulltext/2017/05050/a_randomized_comparison_of_volume__and.23.aspx
  69. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1812405
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8521700/
  71. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.4187/respcare.01696
  72. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001179
  73. https://publications.aap.org/aapbooks/book/694/chapter/8463274/Positive-Pressure-Ventilation
  74. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Face-mask-ventilation%3A-a-comparison-of-three-Hart-Reardon/c8e1bc77d912b18079a6084fdc491f05a6de8fc6
  75. https://www.dansa.org/blog/2018/06/06/oxygen-unit-maintenance
  76. https://cpr.heart.org/-/media/cpr-files/resources/covid-19-resources-for-cpr-training/interim-guidance-march-19-2020.pdf
  77. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047260
  78. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240010959
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.