Hubbry Logo
Binomial nomenclatureBinomial nomenclatureMain
Open search
Binomial nomenclature
Community hub
Binomial nomenclature
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Binomial nomenclature
Binomial nomenclature
from Wikipedia

Orcinus orca, the orca or the killer whale
Trichocereus macrogonus var. pachanoi, the San Pedro cactus

In taxonomy, binomial nomenclature ("two-term naming system"), also called binary nomenclature, is a formal system of naming species of living things by giving each a name composed of two parts, both of which use Latin grammatical forms, although they can be based on words from other languages. Such a name is called a binomial name (often shortened to just "binomial"), a binomen,[1] binominal name, or a scientific name; more informally, it is also called a Latin name. In the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), the system is also called binominal nomenclature,[2] with an "n" before the "al" in "binominal", which is not a typographic error, meaning "two-name naming system".[1]

The first part of the name – the generic name – identifies the genus to which the species belongs, whereas the second part – the specific name or specific epithet – distinguishes the species within the genus. For example, modern humans belong to the genus Homo and within this genus to the species Homo sapiens. Tyrannosaurus rex is likely the most widely known binomial.[3] The formal introduction of this system of naming species is credited to Carl Linnaeus, effectively beginning with his work Species Plantarum in 1753.[4] But as early as 1622, Gaspard Bauhin introduced in his book Pinax theatri botanici (English, Illustrated exposition of plants) containing many names of genera that were later adopted by Linnaeus.[5] Binomial nomenclature was introduced in order to provide succinct, relatively stable and verifiable names that could be used and understood internationally, unlike common names which are usually different in every language.[6]

The application of binomial nomenclature is now governed by various internationally agreed codes of rules, of which the two most important are the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) for animals and the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICNafp or ICN). Although the general principles underlying binomial nomenclature are common to these two codes, there are some differences in the terminology they use and their particular rules.

In modern usage, the first letter of the generic name is always capitalized in writing, while that of the specific epithet is not, even when derived from a proper noun such as the name of a person or place. Similarly, both parts are italicized in normal text (or underlined in handwriting). Thus the binomial name of the annual phlox (named after botanist Thomas Drummond) is now written as Phlox drummondii. Often, after a species name is introduced in a text, the generic name is abbreviated to the first letter in subsequent mentions (e.g., P. drummondii).

In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually given, at least when it is first mentioned, and the year of publication may be specified.

  • In zoology
    • "Patella vulgata Linnaeus, 1758". The name "Linnaeus" tells the reader who published the name, and description for this species; 1758 is the year the name and original description were published (in this case, in the 10th edition of the book Systema Naturae).
    • "Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758)". The original name given by Linnaeus was Fringilla domestica; the parentheses indicate that the species is now placed in a different genus. The ICZN does not require that the name of the person who changed the genus be given, nor the date on which the change was made, although nomenclatorial catalogs usually include such information.
  • In botany
    • "Amaranthus retroflexus L." – "L." is the standard abbreviation used for "Linnaeus".
    • "Hyacinthoides italica (L.) Rothm." – Linnaeus first named this bluebell species Scilla italica; Rothmaler transferred it to the genus Hyacinthoides; the ICNafp does not require that the dates of either publication be specified.

Etymology

[edit]

The word binomial is composed of two elements: bi- (Latin prefix meaning 'two') and nomial (the adjective form of nomen, Latin for 'name'). In Medieval Latin, the related word binomium was used to signify one term in a binomial expression in mathematics.[7] In fact, the Latin word binomium may validly refer to either of the epithets in the binomial name, which can equally be referred to as a binomen (pl. binomina).[8]

History

[edit]
Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778), a Swedish botanist, physician, and zoologist, invented the modern system of binomial nomenclature

Before the adoption of the modern binomial system of naming species, a scientific name consisted of a generic name combined with a specific name that was from one to several words long. Together they formed a system of polynomial nomenclature.[9] These names had two separate functions: to designate or label the species, and to be a diagnosis or description. These two goals were eventually found to be incompatible.[10] In a simple genus that contained few species, it was easy to tell them apart with a one-word genus and a one-word specific name; but as more species were discovered, the names necessarily became longer and unwieldy—for instance, Plantago foliis ovato-lanceolatus pubescentibus, spica cylindrica, scapo tereti ("plantain with pubescent ovate-lanceolate leaves, a cylindric spike and a terete scape"), which we know today as Plantago media.[11]

Such "polynomial names" may sometimes look like binomials, but are different. For example, Gerard's herbal (as amended by Johnson) describes various kinds of spiderwort: "The first is called Phalangium ramosum, Branched Spiderwort; the second, Phalangium non ramosum, Unbranched Spiderwort. The other ... is aptly termed Phalangium Ephemerum Virginianum, Soon-Fading Spiderwort of Virginia".[12] The Latin phrases are short descriptions, rather than identifying labels.

The Bauhins, in particular Caspar Bauhin (1560–1624), took some important steps towards the binomial system by pruning the Latin descriptions, in many cases to two words.[13] The adoption by biologists of a system of strictly binomial nomenclature is due to Swedish botanist and physician Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778). It was in his 1753 Species Plantarum that Linnaeus began consistently using a one-word trivial name (nomen triviale) after a generic name (genus name) in a system of binomial nomenclature.[14] Trivial names had already appeared in his Critica Botanica (1737) and Philosophia Botanica (1751). This trivial name is what is now known as a specific epithet (ICNafp) or specific name (ICZN).[14] The Bauhins' genus names were retained in many of these, but the descriptive part was reduced to a single word.

Linnaeus's trivial names introduced the idea that the function of a name could simply be to give a species a unique label, meaning that the name no longer needed to be descriptive. Both parts could, for example, be derived from the names of people. Thus Gerard's Phalangium ephemerum virginianum became Tradescantia virginiana, where the genus name honoured John Tradescant the Younger,[note 1] an English botanist and gardener.[15] A bird in the parrot family was named Psittacus alexandri, meaning "Alexander's parrot", after Alexander the Great, whose armies introduced eastern parakeets to Greece.[16] Linnaeus's trivial names were much easier to remember and use than the parallel polynomial names, and eventually replaced them.[4]

Value

[edit]
The bacterium Escherichia coli, commonly shortened to E. coli

The value of the binomial nomenclature system derives primarily from its economy, its widespread use, and the uniqueness and stability of names that the Codes of Zoological and Botanical, Bacterial and Viral Nomenclature provide:

  • Economy. Compared to the polynomial system which it replaced, a binomial name is shorter and easier to remember.[4] It corresponds to the noun-adjective form many vernacular names take to indicate a species within a group (for example, 'brown bear' to refer to a particular type of bear),[6] as well as the widespread system of family name plus given name(s) used to name people in many cultures.[13]
  • Widespread use. The binomial system of nomenclature is governed by international codes and is used by biologists worldwide.[17] A few binomials have also entered common speech, such as Homo sapiens, E. coli, Boa constrictor, Tyrannosaurus rex, and Aloe vera.
  • Uniqueness. Provided that taxonomists agree as to the limits of a species, it can have only one name that is correct under the appropriate nomenclature code, generally the earliest published if two or more names are accidentally assigned to a species.[18] This means the species a binomial name refers to can be clearly identified, as compared to the common names of species which are usually different in every language.[6] However, establishing that two names actually refer to the same species and then determining which has priority can sometimes be difficult, particularly if the species was named by biologists from different countries. Therefore, a species may have more than one regularly used name; all but one of these names are "synonyms".[19] Furthermore, within zoology or botany, each species name applies to only one species. If a name is used more than once, it is called a homonym.
Erithacus rubecula superbus, the Tenerife robin or petirrojo
  • Stability. Although stability is far from absolute, the procedures associated with establishing binomial names, such as the principle of priority, tend to favor stability.[20] For example, when species are transferred between genera (as not uncommonly happens as a result of new knowledge), the second part of the binomial is kept the same (unless it becomes a homonym). Thus, there is disagreement among botanists as to whether the genera Chionodoxa and Scilla are sufficiently different for them to be kept separate. Those who keep them separate give the plant commonly grown in gardens in Europe the name Chionodoxa siehei; those who do not give it the name Scilla siehei.[21] The siehei element is constant. Similarly, if what were previously thought to be two distinct species are demoted to a lower rank, such as subspecies, the second part of the binomial name is retained as a trinomen (the third part of the new name). Thus, the Tenerife robin may be treated as a different species from the European robin, in which case its name is Erithacus superbus, or as only a subspecies, in which case its name is Erithacus rubecula superbus.[22] The superbus element of the name is constant, as are its authorship and year of publication.

Problems

[edit]

Binomial nomenclature for species has the effect that when a species is moved from one genus to another, sometimes the specific name or epithet must be changed as well. This may happen because the specific name is already used in the new genus, or to agree in gender with the new genus if the specific epithet is an adjective modifying the genus name. Some biologists have argued for the combination of the genus name and specific epithet into a single unambiguous name, or for the use of uninomials (as used in nomenclature of ranks above species).[23][24]

Because genus names are unique only within a nomenclature code, it is possible for homonyms (two or more species sharing the same genus name) to happen, and even the same binomial if they occur in different kingdoms. At least 1,258 instances of genus name duplication occur (mainly between zoology and botany).[25][26]

Relationship to classification and taxonomy

[edit]

Nomenclature (including binomial nomenclature) is not the same as classification, although the two are related. Classification is the ordering of items into groups based on similarities or differences; in biological classification, species are one of the kinds of item to be classified.[27] In principle, the names given to species could be completely independent of their classification. This is not the case for binomial names, since the first part of a binomial is the name of the genus into which the species is placed. Above the rank of genus, binomial nomenclature and classification are partly independent; for example, a species retains its binomial name if it is moved from one family to another or from one order to another, unless it better fits a different genus in the same or different family, or it is split from its old genus and placed in a newly created genus. The independence is only partial since the names of families and other higher taxa are usually based on genera.

Taxonomy includes both nomenclature and classification. Its first stages (sometimes called "alpha taxonomy") are concerned with finding, describing and naming species of living or fossil organisms.[28] Binomial nomenclature is thus an important part of taxonomy as it is the system by which species are named. Taxonomists are also concerned with classification, including its principles, procedures and rules.[29]

Derivation of binomial names

[edit]

A complete binomial name is always treated grammatically as if it were a phrase in the Latin language (hence the common use of the term "Latin name" for a binomial name). However, the two parts of a binomial name can each be derived from a number of sources, of which Latin is only one. These include:

The first part of the name, which identifies the genus, must be a word that can be treated as a Latin singular noun in the nominative case. It must be unique within the purview of each nomenclatural code, but can be repeated between them. Thus Huia recurvata is an extinct species of plant, found as fossils in Yunnan, China,[39] whereas Huia masonii is a species of frog found in Java, Indonesia.[40]

The second part of the name, which identifies the species within the genus, is also treated grammatically as a Latin word. It can have one of a number of forms:

  • The second part of a binomial may be an adjective. If so, the form of the adjective must agree with the genus name in gender. Latin nouns can have three genders, masculine, feminine and neuter, and many Latin adjectives will have two or three different endings, depending upon the gender of the noun they refer to. The house sparrow has the binomial name Passer domesticus. Here domesticus ("domestic") simply means "associated with the house". The sacred bamboo is Nandina domestica[41] rather than Nandina domesticus, since Nandina is feminine whereas Passer is masculine. The tropical fruit langsat is a product of the plant Lansium parasiticum, since Lansium is neuter. Some common endings for Latin adjectives in the three genders (masculine, feminine, neuter) are -us, -a, -um (as in the previous example of domesticus); -is, -is, -e (e.g., tristis, meaning "sad"); and -or -or -us (e.g., minor, meaning "smaller"). For further information, see Latin declension: Adjectives.
  • The second part of a binomial may be a noun in the nominative case. An example is the binomial name of the lion, which is Panthera leo. Grammatically the noun is said to be in apposition to the genus name and the two nouns do not have to agree in gender; in this case, Panthera is feminine and leo is masculine.
Magnolia hodgsonii
  • The second part of a binomial may be a noun in the genitive (possessive) case. The genitive case is constructed in a number of ways in Latin, depending on the declension of the noun. Common endings for masculine and neuter nouns are -ii or -i in the singular and -orum in the plural, and for feminine nouns -ae in the singular and -arum in the plural. The noun may be part of a person's name, often the surname, as in the Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii), the shrub Magnolia hodgsonii, or the olive-backed pipit (Anthus hodgsoni). The meaning is "of the person named", so Magnolia hodgsonii means "Hodgson's magnolia". The -ii or -i endings show that in each case Hodgson was a man (not the same one); had Hodgson been a woman, hodgsonae would have been used. The person commemorated in the binomial name is not usually (if ever) the person who created the name; for example, Anthus hodgsoni was named by Charles Wallace Richmond, in honour of Hodgson. Rather than a person, the noun may be related to a place, as with Latimeria chalumnae, meaning "of the Chalumna River". Another use of genitive nouns is in, for example, the name of the bacterium Escherichia coli, where coli means "of the colon". This formation is common in parasites, as in Xenos vesparum, where vesparum means "of the wasps", since Xenos vesparum is a parasite of wasps.

Whereas the first part of a binomial name must be unique within the purview of each nomenclatural code, the second part is quite commonly used in two or more genera (as is shown by examples of hodgsonii above), but cannot be used more than once within a single genus. The full binomial name must be unique within each code.

Codes

[edit]

From the early 19th century onwards it became ever more apparent that a body of rules was necessary to govern scientific names. In the course of time these became nomenclature codes. The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) governs the naming of animals,[42] the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICNafp) that of plants (including cyanobacteria), and the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (ICNB) that of bacteria (including Archaea). Virus names are governed by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), a taxonomic code, which determines taxa as well as names. These codes differ in certain ways, e.g.:

  • "Binomial nomenclature" is the correct term for botany,[43] although it is also used by zoologists.[44] Since 1961,[45] "binominal nomenclature" is the technically correct term in zoology.[2] A binomial name is also called a binomen (plural binomina) or binominal name.[1]
  • Both codes consider the first part of the two-part name for a species to be the "generic name". In the zoological code (ICZN), the second part of the name is a "specific name". In the botanical code (ICNafp), it is a "specific epithet". Together, these two parts are referred to as a "species name" or "binomen" in the zoological code: or "species name", "binomial", or "binary combination" in the botanical code. "Species name" is the only term common to the two codes.
  • The ICNafp, the plant code, does not allow the two parts of a binomial name to be the same (such a name is called a tautonym), whereas the ICZN, the animal code, does. Thus the American bison has the binomen Bison bison; a name of this kind would not be allowed for a plant.
  • The starting points, the time from which these codes are in effect (retroactively), vary from group to group. In botany the starting point will often be in 1753 (the year Carl Linnaeus first published Species Plantarum). In zoology the starting point is 1758 (1 January 1758 is considered the date of the publication of Linnaeus's Systema Naturae, 10th Edition, and also Clerck's Aranei Svecici). Bacteriology started anew, with a starting point on 1 January 1980.[46]
Summary of terminology for the names of species in the ICZN and ICNafp
Code Full name First part Second part
ICZN species name, binomen, binominal name generic name, genus name specific name
ICNafp species name, binary combination, binomial (name) generic name specific epithet

Unifying the different codes into a single code, the "BioCode", has been suggested,[47] although implementation is not in sight. (There is also a published code for a different system of biotic nomenclature, which does not use ranks above species, but instead names clades. This is called PhyloCode.)

Differences in handling personal names

[edit]

As noted above, there are some differences between the codes in how binomials can be formed; for example the ICZN allows both parts to be the same, while the ICNafp does not. Another difference is in how personal names are used in forming specific names or epithets. The ICNafp sets out precise rules by which a personal name is to be converted to a specific epithet. In particular, names ending in a consonant (but not "er") are treated as first being converted into Latin by adding "-ius" (for a man) or "-ia" (for a woman), and then being made genitive (i.e. meaning "of that person or persons"). This produces specific epithets like lecardii for Lecard (male), wilsoniae for Wilson (female), and brauniarum for the Braun sisters.[48] By contrast, the ICZN does not require the intermediate creation of a Latin form of a personal name, allowing the genitive ending to be added directly to the personal name.[49] This explains the difference between the names of the plant Magnolia hodgsonii and the bird Anthus hodgsoni. Furthermore, the ICNafp requires names not published in the form required by the code to be corrected to conform to it,[50] whereas the ICZN is more protective of the form used by the original author.[51]

Writing binomial names

[edit]

By tradition, the binomial names of species are usually typeset in italics; for example, Homo sapiens.[52] Generally, the binomial should be printed in a font style different from that used in the normal text; for example, "Several more Homo sapiens fossils were discovered." When handwritten, a binomial name should be underlined; for example, Homo sapiens.[53]

The first part of the binomial, the genus name, is always written with an initial capital letter. Older sources, particularly botanical works published before the 1950s, used a different convention: if the second part of the name was derived from a proper noun, e.g., the name of a person or place, a capital letter was used. Thus, the modern form Berberis darwinii was written as Berberis Darwinii. A capital was also used when the name is formed by two nouns in apposition, e.g., Panthera Leo or Centaurea Cyanus.[54][note 3] In current usage, the second part is never written with an initial capital.[56][57]

When used with a common name, the scientific name often follows in parentheses, although this varies with publication.[58] For example, "The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) is decreasing in Europe."

The binomial name should generally be written in full. The exception to this is when several species from the same genus are being listed or discussed in the same paper or report, or the same species is mentioned repeatedly; in which case the genus is written in full when it is first used, but may then be abbreviated to an initial (and a period/full stop).[59] For example, a list of members of the genus Canis might be written as "Canis lupus, C. aureus, C. simensis". In rare cases, this abbreviated form has spread to more general use; for example, the bacterium Escherichia coli is often referred to as just E. coli, and Tyrannosaurus rex is perhaps even better known simply as T. rex, these two both often appearing in this form in popular writing even where the full genus name has not already been given.

The abbreviation "sp." is used when the actual specific name cannot or need not be specified. The abbreviation "spp." (standing for species pluralis, Latin for "multiple species") indicates "several species". These abbreviations are not italicised (or underlined).[60][61] For example: "Canis sp." means "an unspecified species of the genus Canis", while "Canis spp." means "two or more species of the genus Canis". (These abbreviations should not be confused with the abbreviations "ssp." (zoology) or "subsp." (botany), plurals "sspp." or "subspp.", referring to one or more subspecies. See trinomen (zoology) and infraspecific name.)

The abbreviation "cf." (i.e., confer in Latin) is used to compare individuals/taxa with known/described species. Conventions for use of the "cf." qualifier vary.[62] In paleontology, it is typically used when the identification is not confirmed.[63] For example, "Corvus cf. nasicus" was used to indicate "a fossil bird similar to the Cuban crow but not certainly identified as this species".[64] In molecular systematics papers, "cf." may be used to indicate one or more undescribed species assumed to be related to a described species. For example, in a paper describing the phylogeny of small benthic freshwater fish called darters, five undescribed putative species (Ozark, Sheltowee, Wildcat, Ihiyo, and Mamequit darters), notable for brightly colored nuptial males with distinctive color patterns,[65] were referred to as "Etheostoma cf. spectabile" because they had been viewed as related to, but distinct from, Etheostoma spectabile (orangethroat darter).[66] This view was supported to varying degrees by DNA analysis. The somewhat informal use of taxa names with qualifying abbreviations is referred to as open nomenclature and it is not subject to strict usage codes.

In some contexts, the dagger symbol ("†") may be used before or after the binomial name to indicate that the species is extinct.

Authority

[edit]

In scholarly texts, at least the first or main use of the binomial name is usually followed by the "authority" – a way of designating the scientist(s) who first published the name. The authority is written in slightly different ways in zoology and botany. For names governed by the ICZN the surname is usually written in full together with the date (normally only the year) of publication. One example of author citation of scientific name is: "Amabela Möschler, 1880."[note 4] The ICZN recommends that the "original author and date of a name should be cited at least once in each work dealing with the taxon denoted by that name."[67] For names governed by the ICNafp the name is generally reduced to a standard abbreviation and the date omitted. The International Plant Names Index maintains an approved list of botanical author abbreviations. Historically, abbreviations were used in zoology too.

When the original name is changed, e.g., the species is moved to a different genus, both codes use parentheses around the original authority; the ICNafp also requires the person who made the change to be given. In the ICNafp, the original name is then called the basionym. Some examples:

  • (Plant) Amaranthus retroflexus L. – "L." is the standard abbreviation for "Linnaeus"; the absence of parentheses shows that this is his original name.
  • (Plant) Hyacinthoides italica (L.) Rothm. – Linnaeus first named the Italian bluebell Scilla italica; that is the basionym. Rothmaler later transferred it to the genus Hyacinthoides.
  • (Animal) Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758) – the original name given by Linnaeus was Fringilla domestica; unlike the ICNafp, the ICZN does not require the name of the person who changed the genus (Mathurin Jacques Brisson[68]) to be given.

Other ranks

[edit]

Binomial nomenclature, as described here, is a system for naming species. Implicitly, it includes a system for naming genera, since the first part of the name of the species is a genus name. In a classification system based on ranks, there are also ways of naming ranks above the level of genus and below the level of species. Ranks above genus (e.g., family, order, class) receive one-part names, which are conventionally not written in italics. Thus, the house sparrow, Passer domesticus, belongs to the family Passeridae. Family names are normally based on genus names, such as in zoology,[69] although the endings used differ between zoology and botany.

Ranks below species receive three-part names, conventionally written in italics like the names of species. There are significant differences between the ICZN and the ICNafp. In zoology, the only formal rank below species is subspecies and the name is written simply as three parts (a trinomen). Thus, one of the subspecies of the olive-backed pipit is Anthus hodgsoni berezowskii. Informally, in some circumstances, a form may be appended, though such names are unavailable, and have no formal standing in zoological nomenclature (i.e., they have no recognized author or date, and do not compete for homonymy). For example Harmonia axyridis f. spectabilis is the harlequin ladybird in its black or melanic forms having four large orange or red spots. In botany, there are many ranks below species and although the name itself is written in three parts, a "connecting term" (not part of the name) is needed to show the rank. Thus, the American black elder is Sambucus nigra subsp. canadensis; the white-flowered form of the ivy-leaved cyclamen is Cyclamen hederifolium f. albiflorum.[70]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Binomial nomenclature is a standardized system for naming of living organisms, consisting of two Latin or Latinized words: the first, the name, which is capitalized and denotes a group of closely related , and the second, the specific , which is lowercase and distinguishes the particular within that , with both parts italicized or underlined. This two-part , such as sapiens for humans, provides a unique and universal identifier for each , replacing earlier lengthy descriptive phrases and reducing across languages and regions. The system was developed by the Swedish botanist and physician (1707–1778) during the as part of his broader taxonomic framework to organize the natural world hierarchically. first applied binomial nomenclature systematically in his seminal work (1753) for plants and later in the 10th edition of Systema Naturae (1758) for animals, drawing on earlier traditions from ancient scholars like and medieval botanists but innovating a concise, consistent method based on observable characteristics such as reproductive structures. Through expeditions and collaborations with his "apostles"—students who collected specimens worldwide— cataloged thousands of species, establishing a foundation that accommodated the influx of new discoveries during the Age of Exploration. Key rules of binomial nomenclature include that names are conventionally derived from Latin or Greek roots or latinized forms from other languages, the genus name functioning as a and the specific epithet typically acting as an agreeing in with the genus name or as a (such as in the ), and the inclusion of an author's name () after the binomial to indicate the original describer, though this is often abbreviated or omitted in general use. For hybrids, a (×) precedes the name, as in Fragaria × ananassa for the garden strawberry. Subsequent to Linnaeus, international codes govern its application: the (ICZN) for animals, the International Code of Nomenclature for , fungi, and (ICN) for and fungi, and the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) for , ensuring stability while allowing revisions based on new evidence like genetic data. This nomenclature remains the cornerstone of biological , facilitating global scientific communication, documentation, and conservation efforts by providing precise references that transcend common names, which vary culturally and can refer to multiple species. Despite advances in and , which sometimes challenge traditional groupings, binomial names continue to integrate with modern cladistic approaches, underscoring Linnaeus's enduring legacy in systematizing life's diversity.

Origins

Etymology

The term "binomial nomenclature" derives from the Latin roots "bi-" meaning "two" and "nōmen" meaning "name," highlighting the system's use of exactly two words to designate each species. The word "" itself originates from the Latin "nōmenclātūra," a compound of "nōmen" (name) and "calāre" (to call), denoting the act of assigning and calling names. This terminology was applied to the naming convention formalized by Swedish naturalist in the 18th century, first systematically in his (1753) for plants and in the 10th edition of his (1758) for animals, where he consistently employed a two-part Latin naming structure. Linnaeus described the second component of these names as the "trivial name" (nomen triviale), a concise descriptor appended to the name to uniquely identify the species. In subsequent scientific literature, the phrase "binomial nomenclature" emerged as the standard label for Linnaeus's method, evolving from his concept of the nomen triviale to emphasize the dual-name format's role in systematic biology.

History

Prior to the development of binomial nomenclature, the naming of and animals relied on lengthy descriptions in Latin, often consisting of multiple words detailing morphological characteristics, , or other attributes to distinguish . Early botanists such as Caspar Bauhin (1560–1624) advanced toward simplification in his major work Pinax theatri botanici (1623), where he frequently reduced these polynomials to two-word phrases, serving as a precursor to the binomial system by emphasizing generic and specific identifiers. Swedish naturalist formalized binomial nomenclature in his (1753), applying two-part Latin names consistently to approximately 5,900 plant species, and extended it to animals in the tenth edition of (1758). Linnaeus's rationale centered on replacing the cumbersome polynomial system with a concise, shorthand method that facilitated easier memorization, communication, and cataloging among naturalists worldwide. By the nineteenth century, binomial nomenclature had become the standard in biological , with influential naturalists such as and employing it extensively in their zoological works to describe and organize . Lamarck utilized binomials in texts like Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres (1816–1822), while Cuvier applied Linnaean forms in his anatomical and paleontological studies, evaluating and expanding taxonomic monographs accordingly. A pivotal milestone in standardization occurred in 1842, when the British Association for the Advancement of Science formed a committee—including figures like and —to address inconsistencies in zoological naming, laying the foundation for the .

Principles and Importance

Core Principles

Binomial nomenclature provides a standardized system for naming in , utilizing a two-part scientific name known as a binomen. The first part, the genus name, is a noun that identifies the to which the species belongs and is always capitalized. The second part, the specific epithet, describes the particular species within that genus and is written in lowercase. Both components are treated as Latin words and are italicized in print or underlined when handwritten to distinguish them from common names. This applies specifically to the species level of biological , where each receives a unique binomen within its to ensure unambiguous identification across and global communication. No two species within the same genus may share the same specific epithet, promoting precision and avoiding confusion in taxonomic descriptions. Introduced by in the , this system forms the foundation of modern biological naming. A key principle is that of priority, which establishes that the valid name for a is the oldest available name that was validly published and meets the criteria of , thereby resolving potential conflicts arising from multiple names proposed for the same . This rule fosters stability by discouraging the proliferation of synonyms and ensuring that evolves predictably based on historical publication dates, with exceptions allowed only when strictly necessary to preserve nomenclatural stability. Central to the stability of binomial names is the principle of typification, where each name is objectively linked to a type specimen—a physical example of the that serves as the permanent reference point for the taxon's identity. For species-group names, this is typically a (a single designated specimen) or syntypes (a series of specimens if no holotype is fixed), ensuring that the application of the name remains anchored regardless of future taxonomic revisions or reinterpretations. This method provides an empirical basis for verifying and maintaining the integrity of scientific names over time.

Value in Biology

Binomial nomenclature revolutionized following its introduction by in the mid-18th century, replacing cumbersome polynomial descriptions—often lengthy phrases in Latin—with concise, two-part names that standardized identification. This shift, fully articulated in works like (1758) and (1753), facilitated the cataloging of thousands of newly discovered amid global exploration, enabling scientists to communicate efficiently and build hierarchical classifications without ambiguity. By assigning unique and names, Linnaeus's system reduced confusion from varying regional descriptions and laid the foundation for modern , influencing biological research for over two centuries. The universality of binomial nomenclature lies in its provision of a stable, language-independent framework for identifying species across borders and disciplines, ensuring that a name like Panthera leo unambiguously refers to the regardless of local vernaculars. This global standardization promotes unambiguous scientific communication, minimizing errors in , collaborations, and among researchers worldwide. As a result, it underpins international efforts by allowing consistent referencing of organisms in diverse contexts, from field studies to policy documents. In research, binomial nomenclature supports efficient indexing and retrieval in biological databases, where scientific names act as unique labels linking specimens, genetic data, and ecological records to facilitate comprehensive analyses. It enables phylogenetic studies by providing stable identifiers for taxa, allowing evolutionary relationships to be mapped accurately through comparative morphology, , and without nomenclature-induced disruptions. For biodiversity inventories, the system streamlines species documentation in global assessments, such as those by the IUCN, by offering a shared reference for cataloging and monitoring ecosystems. Binomial nomenclature enhances educational efforts by simplifying the teaching of , as its structured format helps students grasp organismal relationships and identification principles through memorable, standardized examples. In conservation, it plays a critical role in tracking by ensuring name stability in legal frameworks, such as the U.S. Endangered Species Act and , where precise identification prevents misapplication of protections—for instance, conserving names like Thamnophis sirtalis tetrataenia for the to maintain its endangered status. This precision aids monitoring, habitat management, and international agreements, directly contributing to species preservation.

Challenges and Limitations

Common Problems

One of the primary challenges in binomial nomenclature is synonymy, where multiple valid names have been proposed for the same , often arising from independent descriptions by different researchers before standardized codes were widely adopted. This historical overlap can lead to confusion in and databases, as synonyms must be tracked to ensure accurate identification. For instance, the plant species now known as Solanum tuberosum (the ) has accumulated numerous synonyms over time due to varying classifications in early . Homonymy presents another significant issue, occurring when identical binomial names are applied to distinct , typically because the second description was published without of the prior one. In such cases, the later name becomes invalid and must be replaced to maintain uniqueness, a process governed by nomenclatural codes that prioritize the earliest valid publication. Binomial nomenclature also faces instability from taxonomic reclassifications, particularly when a species is transferred to a new , necessitating a change in the generic name while retaining the specific if it remains valid. Such shifts, driven by advances in genetic and morphological evidence, can disrupt long-established usage and require extensive literature updates. For example, certain previously classified under Ochrobactrum have been reclassified into based on phylogenetic data, altering their binomials and affecting medical and microbiological references. A notable case illustrating these problems is the ongoing debate over the nomenclature of Homo sapiens and related hominins, such as Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis). Historically treated as a subspecies (H. sapiens neanderthalensis), recent genetic analyses have prompted arguments for recognizing them as a distinct , highlighting synonymy risks and reclassification instability in studies. The principle of priority helps resolve such conflicts by favoring the earliest valid name.

Relationship to Taxonomy

Binomial nomenclature serves as the foundational element of hierarchical taxonomy by assigning each species a unique two-part Latin name—comprising a genus and a specific epithet—that situates the species within a broader classificatory framework. This system, initiated by Carl Linnaeus, enables the organization of organisms into nested ranks, including family, order, class, phylum (or division), and kingdom, where species are grouped under genera that share common characteristics, and genera are further aggregated into higher taxa based on shared traits or evolutionary descent. For instance, the binomial Homo sapiens places humans within the genus Homo (family Hominidae, order Primates), illustrating how these names facilitate the construction of a universal hierarchical tree of life. In the context of cladistics and phylogenetics, binomial nomenclature supports the naming of clades—monophyletic groups sharing a common ancestor—by providing stable identifiers that can be mapped onto phylogenetic trees derived from molecular and morphological data. This integration allows taxonomists to reflect evolutionary relationships more accurately; for example, advances in DNA analysis have reinforced the placement of birds within the clade Dinosauria, prompting alignments of binomials with these inferred ancestries. However, nomenclature itself remains tied to Linnaean ranks, which may not always correspond perfectly to phylogenetic branching patterns, as phylogenetics emphasizes descent over rigid categories. A key limitation arises from the distinction between nomenclature and taxonomy: the former is an artificial convention for stable naming governed by priority and rules, while the latter aims to delineate natural groupings based on empirical evidence of relationships. Taxa under binomial names are abstract entities rather than concrete biological units, potentially leading to mismatches when new evidence reveals that traditional groupings do not reflect true evolutionary history. This interplay manifests in taxonomic revisions, where emerging phylogenetic data—such as genetic sequences or fossil discoveries—drives reclassifications that alter binomials or their hierarchical positions to better represent . For example, studies incorporating molecular phylogenies have resulted in numerous reassignments of species in regional floras, underscoring nomenclature's adaptability to scientific progress while maintaining stability through codified rules. Such changes ensure that names evolve with understanding but avoid arbitrary renaming to preserve scientific communication.

Name Formation

Derivation of Names

Genus names in binomial nomenclature are typically derived from Latin or Greek roots to describe physical characteristics, habitats, geographic locations, or to honor notable individuals. For instance, the Panthera, which encompasses big cats like lions and tigers, originates from the Greek word pánthēr (πάνθηρ), combining pan- meaning "all" and thēr meaning "beast" or "wild animal," reflecting the perceived predatory nature of these felids. Similarly, genus names may draw from other languages when Latinized, such as for a prehistoric genus, formed from Greek tyrannos ("") and sauros (""), evoking its dominant, fearsome form. Specific epithets, the second component of a binomial name, are often adjectives, , or genitive forms that provide further description or commemoration, and they must grammatically agree in with the genus name—masculine, feminine, or neuter—to maintain linguistic consistency. Adjectival epithets, for example, adjust endings accordingly; the lion's leo in Panthera leo is a masculine derived from Latin leo meaning "," directly referencing the animal's identity without inflection since it functions as a in apposition. In contrast, descriptive adjectives like indica in Mangifera indica () derive from Latin Indicus ("of "), feminized to match the feminine Mangifera. When forming names for hybrid organisms, particularly in , a multiplication sign (×) precedes the binomial to indicate interspecific or intergeneric parentage, with the resulting name often combining elements of the parental taxa or newly coined in Latin form; for example, ×Cupressocyparis leylandii denotes a hybrid between genera Cupressus and Chamaecyparis. Zoological hybrids may receive standard binomials without the × if treated as distinct species, but derivation follows the same Latinized principles to ensure descriptiveness. Guidelines emphasize creating euphonious, memorable names in Latin form that avoid confusion with existing taxa. Contemporary practices also incorporate rules to avoid offensive, derogatory, or unethical terms in name derivations, prompted by efforts to eliminate racist or colonial references; for instance, botanists in voted to replace over 200 plant epithets deemed derogatory, such as those rooted in slurs, favoring neutral descriptive or honoring terms instead. This aligns with broader recommendations to prioritize inclusive, non-harmful etymologies while preserving nomenclatural stability. Illustrative examples highlight these derivations: rex combines the genus (" ") with the specific rex from Latin for "," underscoring the dinosaur's imposing stature and regal dominance as perceived by its namer in 1905. Such etymologies not only convey biological insights but also embed cultural and linguistic heritage into scientific naming.

Writing Conventions

In , binomial names are conventionally presented in italics to distinguish them from surrounding text, while in , underlining is used as a substitute due to the lack of italic capability. This typographical convention applies across disciplines governed by codes such as the (ICZN) and the International Code of Nomenclature for , fungi, and plants (ICN). The name begins with a capital letter, whereas the specific starts with a lowercase letter, regardless of its derivation—often from Latin or Greek , personal names, or descriptive terms. For example, the binomial name for the gray is written as Canis lupus. Subsequent mentions of the same may abbreviate it to a single capital letter followed by a period, such as C. lupus, to enhance readability without ambiguity. Binomial names contain no spaces between the genus and specific epithet, and punctuation like hyphens, apostrophes, or numbers is generally avoided except in rare orthographic cases. For infraspecific taxa such as , a format is used, with the subspecific appended without spaces or additional punctuation, also in italics—for instance, Canis lupus familiaris for the domestic subspecies. In non-scientific contexts, such as popular media or casual writing, binomial names may appear without italics to simplify presentation, though this deviates from formal standards; common names, like "gray wolf," are neither italicized nor capitalized unless they form a .

Regulatory Frameworks

Naming Codes

Binomial nomenclature is regulated by distinct international codes tailored to major biological domains, ensuring uniformity, validity, and stability in scientific naming. These codes establish rules for the formation, publication, and application of binomial names, with adaptations for specific organismal groups. The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), in its fourth edition published in 1999 and effective from January 1, 2000, governs the naming of animals, including both extant and extinct species. This code has undergone amendments, including Declarations 46 (2023) and 47 (2024), with earlier ones like 44 (2003) and 45 (2017), which address electronic publication and other procedural updates to enhance accessibility and precision. Key requirements include publication in works that are permanently preserved and widely distributed, ensuring names are spelled using the Latin alphabet (including j, k, w, and y) and follow Latin grammatical rules for latinization. Stability is maintained through mechanisms like the principle of priority, which favors the earliest valid name, and provisions for conserving names to prevent disruptive changes. For , fungi, and , the International Code of Nomenclature (ICN), known as the Madrid Code (2025), was adopted at the Twentieth International Botanical Congress in 2024 and published on September 4, 2025, superseding the previous Shenzhen Code. It applies to non-fossil and fossil organisms in these groups, including and certain protists, with specific provisions for fungi modifiable by mycological congresses. Publication must occur in formats that guarantee long-term availability and accessibility, effective from the adoption date for relevant provisions. The Madrid Code includes provisions to reject names derogatory to groups of and replace offensive epithets (e.g., with "afra," "afrorum," and "afrum"). Names adhere to a Latin or latinized form, promoting euphonious and non-confusing binomials. Stability is achieved via priority and rules allowing typification adjustments to resolve ambiguities, fostering consistent global usage. Prokaryotes, primarily and , are regulated by the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP), with its 2022 revision published in 2023 and a proposed 2025 revision under discussion following emendations ratified in 2024. Unlike other codes, it emphasizes the designation of type strains—culturable reference specimens—as essential for validating new taxa, providing tangible anchors for identification. Names require publication in the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM) or through validation lists, ensuring permanence. Binomials must be in Latinized form, drawing from botanical traditions, to maintain universality. Stability mechanisms include priority for the first validly published name and safeguards against name changes unless supported by type strain evidence, supporting reliable taxonomic communication. Across these codes, shared principles underpin binomial nomenclature: rigorous publication standards prevent ephemeral or inaccessible introductions, the Latin form ensures linguistic consistency and international recognition, and stability tools like priority—where the senior name prevails—minimize nomenclature upheaval while allowing corrections for accuracy. These frameworks collectively promote a stable, verifiable system for naming biodiversity.

Authority and Personal Names

In binomial nomenclature, the authority refers to the scientist or scientists who first validly published a specific name for a taxon, and it is typically cited immediately following the binomial name to attribute the original description and provide a reference point for taxonomic history. This citation usually consists of an abbreviated form of the author's name, often followed by the year of publication, such as Homo sapiens L. 1758, where "L." denotes Carl Linnaeus and "1758" is the year of the original description in Systema Naturae. The format of authority citations varies between the major naming codes: the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) for animals and the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN) for plants, algae, and fungi. Under the ICZN, when a species is transferred to a different genus by a subsequent author, the original author's name is placed in parentheses followed by the transferring author's name without parentheses, as in Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758) if transferred, to indicate the change in combination. In contrast, the ICN generally omits the publication year in routine citations for legitimate names and uses parentheses only for certain cases like new combinations, with examples such as Rosa canina L. where the year is optional in non-specialist contexts but required for precision in taxonomic works. Personal names in authorities are abbreviated according to standardized conventions, such as using initials to distinguish homonyms (e.g., J. Smith vs. A. Smith), and in species epithets, they often appear in genitive form to honor individuals, as in Helianthus darwinii Hook. f., derived from Charles Darwin's surname with the Latin genitive ending "-ii" for males. However, cultural sensitivities have led to guidelines discouraging eponyms that could perpetuate harmful stereotypes, with recommendations in both codes to favor descriptive or neutral names over potentially offensive personal tributes, though such changes are not retroactively applied to existing names. Taxonomic revisions can necessitate changes to authority citations, particularly when a name is transferred to a new or rank, requiring the addition or adjustment of parenthetical authors to reflect the of the . For instance, if a species originally described as Genus1 species Author1 1800 is later recombined as Genus2 species by Author2 in 1900, the full citation becomes Genus2 species (Author1, 1800) Author2, 1900 under the ICZN, ensuring traceability while acknowledging all contributors to the name's validity. Such updates are documented in taxonomic databases and publications to maintain nomenclatural stability.

Extensions and Variations

Other Taxonomic Ranks

While binomial nomenclature is fundamentally applied at the species level, taxonomic codes extend similar principles to higher and lower ranks, adapting the system of genus and specific epithets into uninomial or polynomial formats to denote hierarchical relationships. For higher taxonomic ranks above the genus, such as family and order, names are uninomial—consisting of a single word derived from the stem of a type genus name, without the binomial structure. In zoological nomenclature, the (ICZN) regulates family-group names (encompassing superfamilies, families, subfamilies, tribes, and subtribes) by mandating specific suffixes: -oidea for superfamilies, -idae for families, -inae for subfamilies, -ini for tribes, and -ina for subtribes. For example, the family name (cats) is formed from the stem of the type genus . Orders and higher ranks in zoology lack mandatory suffixes under the ICZN but often follow conventional endings like -iformes (e.g., Passeriformes for the order of perching birds). In botanical nomenclature, the (ICN) prescribes suffixes such as -aceae for families (e.g., from Faba) and -ales for orders (e.g., ), ensuring these names remain single words based on a generic stem. At infraspecific ranks below the species, nomenclature employs additional epithets to form polynomial names, extending the binomial by appending a subspecific or lower descriptor. Both the ICZN and ICN recognize subspecies as a primary infraspecific rank, denoted by a trinomial name: the genus name, specific epithet, and a subspecific epithet, often abbreviated as "ssp." or "subsp." For instance, the Siberian tiger is named Panthera tigris altaica, where altaica indicates the subspecies. Lower ranks like variety (var.) and form (f.) add further epithets, forming quadrinomials or more (e.g., Solanum melongena var. insanum for a eggplant variety), with the rank indicated by a connecting term; these must agree grammatically with the generic name if adjectival. Under the ICZN, names at ranks below subspecies (e.g., variety or form) are typically considered infrasubspecific and unregulated for priority unless elevated. In botany, the ICN permits multiple infraspecific ranks including subvariety and subform, though subspecies, variety, and form are most common. Infraspecific nomenclature, including for cultivated plants, is governed by specific provisions in the codes to maintain stability and avoid confusion with wild taxa. For cultivars—selectively bred varieties—the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP) supplements the ICN, requiring epithets in single quotes appended to the botanical name (e.g., Rosa hybrida 'Peace'), with rules emphasizing uniqueness and registration through International Cultivar Registration Authorities. These extensions ensure consistent naming across the taxonomic hierarchy while adapting the binomial foundation to diverse ranks.

Modern Applications

Binomial nomenclature forms the backbone of digital biodiversity databases, enabling standardized name resolution and data integration across global platforms. The Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) aggregates occurrence records using binomial names as keys, resolving them against its taxonomic backbone derived from the Catalogue of Life to ensure consistent identification of over 3.1 billion records spanning millions of species (as of September 2025). Similarly, the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) maintains a curated database of binomial names for North American and global taxa, providing authoritative synonyms and hierarchies that support cross-referencing in ecological studies. The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Taxonomy database links binomial names to genetic sequences in GenBank, facilitating molecular systematics by assigning unique identifiers to over 180,000 species. In April 2025, NCBI added binomial species names to more than 7,000 viruses, further integrating traditional nomenclature with viral genomics. Tools like the Taxonomic Name Resolution Service (TNRS) automate standardization of plant binomials by cross-matching against ITIS and NCBI sources, increasing name overlap by up to fivefold and aiding integration with GBIF datasets for large-scale analyses. The R package taxadb further enhances this by offering local, high-speed queries to ITIS, NCBI, and GBIF, mapping ambiguous binomials to identifiers for reproducible research. The (BOLD) exemplifies interdisciplinary application by associating binomial names with DNA barcode sequences, primarily the 648-base-pair I (COI) gene region for animals, to enable precise identification. Users upload sequences from specimens, which BOLD matches against a library of over 17.8 million public records, assigning or confirming binomials based on divergence thresholds below 1% for conspecific matches. Essential data elements for formal barcodes include the binomial name, details, and sequence traces, ensuring taxonomic linkage even for provisional names. (BINs) cluster similar sequences into operational taxonomic units, often aligning with -level binomials and supporting discovery of cryptic diversity without immediate formal description. This approach has revolutionized identification in fields like forensics and conservation, where traditional morphology fails, by providing a genetic proxy tied to Linnaean . Global biodiversity challenges highlight limitations in applying binomial nomenclature, particularly with undescribed species estimated to comprise up to 90% of marine biodiversity in regions like the Clarion-Clipperton Zone. These "dark taxa," detected via molecular methods, rely on temporary placeholders that vary inconsistently (e.g., "sp. A" or provisional binomials), impeding database interoperability and legal protections under conventions like . intensifies these issues by driving range shifts and hybridization, potentially necessitating new binomials or designations while straining taxonomic capacity amid expert shortages and time lags from discovery to formal description averaging 13–21 years. Stable nomenclature remains crucial for monitoring such impacts, as synonymy in databases can obscure trends in species . In the 2020s, amendments to have adapted to digital realities, prioritizing open-access publication to expedite naming and accessibility. The (ICZN) proposed constitutional updates in 2020 to mandate broader electronic dissemination via its website, building on the 2012 amendment that validated electronic publications registered in ZooBank, provided they include / and archival details; these amendments were adopted in 2023. For , , and fungi, the International Code of Nomenclature (ICN) saw procedural enhancements in 2020 for Chapter F amendments, encouraging open-access venues to align with global biodiversity initiatives like the ; further updates were approved at the 2024 in . These changes ensure nomenclatural acts are freely available, reducing barriers for researchers in low-resource settings and accelerating descriptions amid accelerating species discovery rates.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.