Hubbry Logo
Sonian ForestSonian ForestMain
Open search
Sonian Forest
Community hub
Sonian Forest
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sonian Forest
Sonian Forest
Sonian Forest
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Sonian Forest or Sonian Wood (Dutch: Zoniënwoud, pronounced [ˈzoːnijə(ɱ)ʋʌut]; French: Forêt de Soignes, pronounced [fɔ.ʁɛ d(ə) swaɲ]) is a 4,421-hectare (10,920-acre) forest at the south-eastern edge of Brussels, Belgium. It is connected to the Bois de la Cambre/Ter Kamerenbos, an urban public park which enters the city up to 4 kilometres (2.5 mi) from the city centre.

Key Information

The forest lies in the Flemish municipalities of Sint-Genesius-Rode, Hoeilaart, Overijse, and Tervuren, in the Brussels-Capital Region municipalities of Uccle, Watermael-Boitsfort, Auderghem, and Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, and in the Walloon towns of La Hulpe and Waterloo. Thus, it stretches out over the three Belgian Regions. It is maintained by Flanders (56%), Brussels (38%), and Wallonia (6%). There are some contiguous tracts of privately held forest and the Kapucijnenbos, the "Capuchin Wood", which belongs to the Royal Trust.

As of 2017, parts of the Sonian Forest have been inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, the only Belgian component to the multinational inscription 'Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe', because of their undisturbed nature and testimony to the ecological processes governing forests in Europe since the Last Glacial Period.[1]

History

[edit]
Painted map of the Sonian Forest (Ignatius van der Stock, 1661)

The forest is part of the scattered remains of the ancient Silva Carbonaria or Charcoal Forest. Originally, it was part of the Forest of Ardennes, the Romans' Arduenna Silva. The first mention of the Sonian Forest (Soniaca Silva)[2] dates from the early Middle Ages. Then the forest south of Brussels was crossed by the river Senne/Zenne and extended as far as Hainaut, covering most of the high ground between the Senne and the Dyle/Dijl. The 9th-century vita of Saint Foillan mentions "the forest, next to the abbey of Saint Gertrude, called the Sonesian".[3] In the Middle Ages, the forest extended over the southern part of Brabant up to the walls of Brussels and is mentioned, under the name of Ardennes, in Byron's Childe Harold.[4] In the 16th century, it was still seven leagues in circumference, and even at the time of the French Revolution, it was very extensive.

At the start of the 19th century, the area of the wood was still about 25,000 acres (100 km2), but due to deforestation, it diminished to its current 10,920 acres (44.2 km2). A major blow towards this 19th-century contraction was struck when Napoleon ordered 22,000 oaks to be cut down to build the Boulogne flotilla intended for the invasion of England. King William I of the Netherlands continued to harvest the woods, and from 29,000 acres (120 km2) in 1820, the forest was reduced to 11,200 acres (45 km2) in 1830. Rights to a considerable portion of the forest in the neighbourhood of Waterloo was assigned in 1815 to the Duke of Wellington, who was also Prince of Waterloo in the Dutch nobility, and received the equivalent of about $140,000 today from his Belgian properties.[5] This portion of the forest was only converted into farms in the time of the second duke. The Bois de la Cambre/Ter Kamerenbos (456 acres or 185 hectares) on the outskirts of Brussels was formed out of the forest in 1861. In 1911, the forest still stretched to Tervuren, Groenendaal, and Argenteuil close to Mont-Saint-Jean and Waterloo.[6]

Formerly, the forest held Saint Foillan Abbey not far from Nivelles.[7] The forest served for a long period as an exclusive hunting ground for the nobility, but today is open to the general public.

Ecology

[edit]
Even, dense old-growth stand of beech trees (Fagus sylvatica) prepared to be regenerated by their saplings in the understorey, in the Brussels part of the Sonian Forest

The Sonian Forest consists mainly of European beeches and oaks. Several trees are more than 200 years old, dating from the Austrian period.[citation needed]

The forest contains a somewhat reduced fauna and flora. Due to human influence (encroachment from all sides of the outer edges as well as the long-established thoroughfare roads and highways cutting deep through the forest) and impoverishment of the ecosystem, various plants and animals have become extinct. The forest was home to 46 different mammal species. Of these, seven have disappeared altogether: the brown bear (around 1000), the wolf (around 1810), the hazel dormouse (around 1842), the red deer, the badger and the hare. Stag beetles have also disappeared from the forest.[8] The boar was thought to have been extinct since 1957, but in 2007, new specimens were discovered roaming the wood.[9] According to the Flemish Agency for Nature and Forest (ANB), this is unlikely to be a natural spread, but probably two to four animals that most likely were either released or escaped from captivity.

The many species of bat in the forest led to it being classified as a Natura 2000 protected site.[10] This includes five endangered species: the mouse-eared bat, Geoffroy's bat, the barbastelle bat, the pond bat and Bechstein's bat. Other animal species found in the forest, including the black woodpecker and the great crested newt, are considered endangered and are protected by the European Habitats Directive.[8]

In 2016, the Sonian Forest joined the "European Rewilding Network", an initiative of the Rewilding Europe organisation.[11] The project aims to enable the growth in numbers of natural fauna such as roe deer and wild boar. Various types of wildlife crossings have been or are due to be constructed to reconnect the areas of the forest that are currently divided by large roads. A 60-metre-wide (200 ft) wildlife crossing ('Ecoduct') has been built across the Brussels Ring (R0);[12] construction started in 2016[13] and it was opened in June 2018.[14]

Real estate projects

[edit]

The edge of the Soignes forest is the subject of ongoing legal proceedings initiated by the Friends of the Soignes forest against real estate projects threatening this natural heritage.[15]

Attractions

[edit]
  • A museum has been set up in the building of the old farm of the Groenendael Priory. The Bosmuseum Jan van Ruusbroec or Musée de la Forêt ('Forest Museum') presents displays about the flora, fauna, history of the forest, and forest management.[16]
  • The remains of the Château de Trois-Fontaines. In this location, at the time unsafe, Duke John III of Brabant had a fortified refuge built in 1323, surrounded by a moat and flanked by a keep and a chapel. At the beginning of the 15th century, after the addition of a new building, the small fort became the residence of the gruyer, the officer responsible for watching over the dukes' hunting grounds. Poachers were locked up there and a small garrison also had its quarters there. In 1584, a fire destroyed the keep, which was rebuilt. The current building dates from this period. The keep and other buildings were destroyed at the beginning of the 19th century.
  • The memorial to the forest rangers. This monument, consisting of a dolmen surrounded by a circle of eleven standing stones, was erected in 1920 in memory of eleven forest rangers killed during the First World War.
  • The Tervuren Arboretum, which can be considered a living monument since it is made up of numerous species of trees imported in the 19th century from various countries to be acclimatised in Belgium.
  • The memorial to the victims of the 2016 Brussels bombings at Maelbeek metro station and Brussels Airport called Memorial 22/03, located on the Drève de l'Infante/Infantedreef. 32 birches (one for each victim) were planted in their memory. The memorial's designer is the landscaper Bas Smets. Smets describes the memorial as "a place of silence and meditation." The birches are connected by a circular structure and separated from the rest of the forest by a small round canal.[17]
  • The only remaining building of the Château de Trois-Fontaines
    The only remaining building of the Château de Trois-Fontaines
  • Memorial to the eleven forest rangers
    Memorial to the eleven forest rangers
  • Memorial to the victims of the 2016 Brussels bombings
    Memorial to the victims of the 2016 Brussels bombings

Monasteries and contemplative traditions

[edit]
Small chapel in the Sonian Forest near the site of the monastery of John of Ruysbroeck at Groenendaal

Amongst the contemplative monks and nuns who lived and prayed in the forest, the most notable was John of Ruysbroeck who established a Monastery near Groenendaal at Vauvert. At this time, the forest also held a house of Cistercian nuns at Pennebeek (founded 1201 on land given by Duke Henry I of Brabant to Sister Gisle); a convent of Benedictine nuns at Forest (founded in 1107 by Gilbert de Gand) and a cloister of Dominican sisters at Val Duchesne (founded 1262 the Duchess Aleyde).[18]

[edit]

Art

[edit]

Literature

[edit]

The forest features is several works of literature including:

Battle of Waterloo

[edit]
The Battle of Waterloo

The Forest of Soignes lay behind the Anglo-allied army of the Duke of Wellington at the Battle of Waterloo. From Roman times, it had generally been seen as a tactical blunder to position troops for battle in front of woodland because it hampers their ability to retreat. Napoleon in Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire de France en 1815, avec le plan de la bataille de Mont-Saint-Jean repeatedly criticised the Duke of Wellington's choice of battle field because of the forest to his rear.

On page 124, Bonaparte wrote, "He had in his rear the denies of the forest of Soignes, so that, if beaten, retreat was impossible", and on page 158 — "The enemy must have seen with affright how many difficulties the field of battle he had chosen was about to throw in the way of his retreat", and again on page 207 — "The position of Mont-Saint-Jean was ill-chosen. The first requisite of a field of battle, is, to have no defiles in its rear. The injudicious choice of his field of battle, rendered all retreat impossible."[25][26] However, Napoleon's view was contradicted by Jomini, who pointed out that Wellington had good roads behind his centre and each wing which would have made a retreat through the forest safer than across an open field:[27] Napoleon's cavalry would have been hampered by the forest in their attempts to turn any retreat into a rout. Some have argued that there was no bottom to the forest and it would not have hampered an extraction given Wellington's superlative expertise in handling an army disengaging from the enemy,[28] while others have suggested that Wellington if pressed intended to retreat eastwards towards Blücher's Prussian army so the interior of the wood was of little military significance.[29]

[edit]
  • A path in the Sonian Forest
    A path in the Sonian Forest
  • The Sonian Forest in the autumn
    The Sonian Forest in the autumn
  • Winter light in the Sonian Forest
    Winter light in the Sonian Forest

See also

[edit]
Wikivoyage has a travel guide for the Sonian Forest.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sonian Forest

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

The Sonian Forest (Dutch: Zoniënwoud; French: Forêt de Soignes) is a beech-dominated woodland spanning approximately 4,400 hectares on the southeastern periphery of Brussels, Belgium, extending across the Brussels-Capital Region, Flemish Region, and Walloon Region.
Composed primarily of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees, many exceeding 200 years in age, the forest features extensive stands of mature timber, abundant dead wood, and diverse understory flora, contributing to its role as a key habitat for native wildlife in an urban-adjacent setting.
In 2017, specific integral reserves within the Sonian Forest were inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List as components of the transnational serial property "Ancient and Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe," recognizing their representation of near-natural beech forest development since the last Ice Age with limited human intervention.
Managed by three regional authorities due to its cross-border location, the forest faces pressures from recreational use, climate change impacts such as drought and pests, and infrastructure encroachment, yet sustains ecological functions including carbon sequestration and biodiversity preservation.

Geography and Physical Characteristics

Location and Boundaries

The Sonian Forest lies immediately south and southeast of , , serving as a major green expanse adjacent to the capital's urban core. It spans three administrative regions: the , the , and the , with portions managed by each according to their jurisdictional shares—approximately 38% in , 56% in , and 6% in . The forest's central coordinates are approximately 50°47′N 4°25′E, encompassing an area of roughly 4,400 hectares across multiple municipalities. In the , it covers parts of and ; in the , it includes sections of Hoeilaart, , , and Sint-Genesius-Rode; and in , smaller extensions reach into communes such as . The northern boundaries of the Sonian Forest directly abut the southern edges of ' urban districts, including and , functioning as a peri-urban buffer that mitigates and provides recreational access to city residents. To the south and east, the forest transitions into more rural Flemish landscapes around and , while its southwestern fringes approach Walloon areas near Waterloo and , integrating it into the broader regional ecosystem south of the capital. These boundaries have remained relatively stable in physical extent since the , following Belgium's in when the forest transitioned from royal to state oversight, though administrative divisions formalized by the federal reforms of the and apportioned management across the newly delineated regions without significant territorial reallocation or land claims altering the core forested area.

Size, Topography, and Hydrology

The Sonian Forest encompasses a total area of approximately 4,421 hectares, distributed across the Brussels-Capital Region (about 1,650 hectares), (2,500 hectares), and Walloon Region (the remainder). Within this expanse, the , inscribed in 2017 as part of the Ancient and Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other , designates core protected zones totaling 269.31 hectares across five components, emphasizing undisturbed beech-dominated stands. The forest's topography features gently undulating plateaus and shallow valleys formed over bedrock, with an average elevation of 120 meters above and a range spanning roughly 65 to 150 meters. This planar to slightly rolling terrain, shaped by and periglacial processes, includes subtle ridges reaching up to 144 meters in localized highs, influencing microclimates and drainage patterns that support the forest's hydrological stability. Hydrologically, the forest serves as a catchment for multiple perennial and intermittent streams originating from its springs and seeps, which converge to form headwaters for the Woluwe River—arising from three primary streams within the Sonian—and contribute to the Maalbeek (Maelbeek) system through sources exceeding 100 in the broader area, many linked to the forest's permeable soils. These networks facilitate regulation and subsurface flow into adjacent aquifers, with the plateau's loamy soils promoting infiltration over rapid overland flow.

Historical Development

Geological and Prehistoric Formation

The Sonian Forest lies on the Brabant Plateau in central , underlain primarily by the Eocene Brussels Sand Formation, which consists of glauconitic sands deposited in a shallow marine environment approximately 50 million years ago. These sands form the geological substrate, with local variations including Tertiary calcium-rich sandstones that contribute to the development of dry loamy Luvisols as the dominant soil type. The soils exhibit leached profiles typical of the Belgian loess belt's influence, where loess covers overlay the sands in patches, fostering acidic, nutrient-poor conditions through podzolization and brunification processes since the Pleistocene. Post-glacial recolonization shaped the forest's prehistoric vegetation, with records from indicating the establishment of deciduous woodlands following the retreat of Weichselian ice sheets around 12,000 years ago. European beech () expanded significantly during the mid-Holocene, circa 6,000–4,000 years , as evidenced by continuous sequences showing its migration northward from southern refugia without major interruptions. In the Sonian region, this led to beech dominance in suitable sandy substrates, reflecting climatic warming and edaphic suitability rather than uniform primeval continuity, with the forest preserving intact soil profiles untouched by agriculture since the . Archaeological reveals early human interventions exerting selective pressures on the woodland, including a socketed axe discovered in the sector, typologically attributable to the late or early [Iron Age](/page/Iron Age) based on and composition. Additional prehistoric traces encompass potential production sites, with optically stimulated of remnants in comparable ancient European forests confirming activities from the onward that altered local stand composition through repeated clearing and . These findings indicate opportunistic exploitation tied to availability, without of sustained or comprehensive , as human populations remained sparse until the transition around 7,000 years ago.

Medieval Exploitation and Management

In the 11th to 15th centuries, the Sonian Forest functioned primarily as a royal hunting preserve under the feudal control of the Dukes of Brabant, who treated it as personal property documented in contemporary charters granting exclusive vénerie rights for pursuing large game such as Cervus elaphus () and . The Tribunal du Cor, established around 1294, enforced seasonal regulations and penalties for , reflecting structured stewardship to maintain game populations amid noble hunts; for instance, Duke John IV recorded killing 84 deer over five years. This emphasis on coexisted with resource extraction, as the forest's extension—four to five times larger than today—supported lower human density and sustained yields through feudal allocations. Timber and charcoal harvesting targeted beech-dominated stands, with the forest's inclusion in the ancient Silva Carbonaria ("") evidenced by archaeological remains of early medieval (c. 650–1250 AD) pit kilns in central , including sites near Sterrebeek within or adjacent to its bounds. Abbeys such as La Cambre (founded 1201) and Groenendael (1304) held documented concessions for wood collection, (e.g., up to 100 sheep per community under 1547 registers, though rooted in earlier medieval privileges), and , often via (taillis) in younger parcels to regenerate shoots every 15–25 years for poles, firewood, and charcoal batches standardized at 60–64 cubic feet by the . Regulated annual cuts, such as 54 bonniers (approximately 57 hectares) before 1545, aimed at sustained yield, but archival edicts reveal tensions, including fines for unauthorized felling by monastic tenants. Coppicing and limited shifting cultivation fragmented the canopy, promoting understory diversity while preserving high forest (futaie) for timber, as inferred from pollen records showing beech dominance persisting from early medieval phases (c. 600–900 AD) despite extraction. Regional wars, including 14th-century conflicts like the spillovers and 1580s raids pillaging abbeys such as Rouge-Cloître, temporarily curtailed exploitation through depopulation and infrastructure damage (e.g., burning of hunting lodges), fostering regeneration intervals; plagues like the 1348 further eased pressure by reducing labor for intensive harvesting. However, extraordinary wartime levies—e.g., timber for fortifications—occasionally tipped toward , as critiqued in later inventories contrasting regulated feudal norms with opportunistic clearances, underscoring archival evidence of resilient yet vulnerable management.

Modern Restructuring and Plantations

During the late 18th century, under Habsburg Austrian rule in the Austrian Netherlands, forestry officials initiated systematic replanting of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) to counteract prior overexploitation and restore productive capacity, with efforts intensifying from the 1770s onward. These plantations, guided by emerging scientific forestry principles, prioritized beech for its high-quality timber suitable for construction and fuel, covering substantial areas that now constitute the majority of the forest's mature stands. Planting campaigns persisted into the (1795–1815), when French administrators imposed structured management regimes emphasizing sustained yield, including selective thinning and compartmented to balance harvest with regeneration. By the 1820s, under Dutch United Kingdom control, these interventions had established as the dominant across approximately 80% of the extant forest area, enhancing both economic output—through increased timber volumes—and aesthetic uniformity aligned with ideals of the period. Following Belgian independence in 1830, the new began reacquiring fragmented forest parcels from private holders, starting systematically in 1843 and continuing through the mid-19th century to consolidate ownership and prevent further for urban expansion. This restructuring incorporated zoning for designated public recreation zones alongside production areas, reflecting Enlightenment-era utilitarian that sought to harmonize timber extraction with societal benefits such as accessible green spaces for urban dwellers. The forest faced significant disruptions during under German occupation, with intensified logging for wartime demands reducing stand densities in affected sectors. Postwar recovery efforts in the 1950s involved targeted replanting and density restoration to rebuild timber stocks, leveraging lessons from earlier plantation successes to prioritize resilient monocultures.

Recent Historical Events and Preservation Efforts

In the mid-20th century, rapid suburban expansion around exerted significant pressure on the Sonian Forest, with infrastructure developments such as motorways and railways fragmenting its ecological structure and threatening further encroachment on its boundaries. To counter this shrinkage, the forest received legal designation as a "Preserved Landscape" in 1959, establishing restrictions on development and enabling sustained practices focused on maintaining beech-dominated stands. These measures were reinforced in the through regional forest policies aligned with environmental directives, including incorporation into the network, which mandated habitat protection and biodiversity monitoring amid ongoing peri-urban growth. A major milestone occurred in July 2017, when five core areas totaling 269.31 hectares were inscribed on the World Heritage List as components of the "Ancient and Primeval Forests of the Carpathians and Other ," selected under criteria (ix) for their outstanding value in illustrating ecological processes of beech forest evolution and representativeness of near-primeval conditions despite historical human influence. This transboundary recognition, spanning 18 countries, elevated the forest's international profile, facilitating access to conservation funding while highlighting vulnerabilities to and recreational overuse, though inscription emphasized empirical ecological criteria over purely pristine status. In the 2020s, preservation efforts integrated promotion with safeguards, exemplified by the inauguration of the 6.5 km Sonian Forest Trail on October 20, 2024, featuring informational panels on and history to educate visitors and generate revenue for maintenance. Complementing this, a comprehensive guide released on March 25, 2025, outlined 20 walking and routes, incorporating practical advice on minimizing environmental impact to balance visitor access with long-term . These initiatives reflect policy shifts prioritizing adaptive amid fiscal constraints, rather than solely ecological , as supports operational costs for the forest's 4,442-hectare expanse.

Ecological Composition

Dominant Flora and Vegetation Types

The Sonian Forest features beech (Fagus sylvatica) as the overwhelmingly dominant canopy species, comprising approximately 70% of the forest's deciduous trees according to inventory data. Pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) constitutes 13% of the canopy, with sessile oak (Quercus petraea) and common maple (Acer campestre) each at around 2%. In core stands classified as pure beech forests, F. sylvatica accounts for over 90% of basal area, reflecting successional climax dynamics in this temperate Atlantic climate where beech outcompetes other hardwoods in shaded, humid conditions. Mixed oak-beech zones occur in transitional areas, but empirical surveys confirm beech's hierarchical dominance across most phytosociological associations, such as variants of the Melico-Fagetum community. The understory vegetation is characteristically sparse and shade-adapted due to the dense beech canopy, which intercepts up to 95% of incident light in mature stands. Dominant herbaceous layers include ferns such as Blechnum spicant (deer fern), alongside mosses and liverworts that thrive on the acidic, humus-rich soils. Ancient woodland indicator species, verified through phytosociological mapping and ground flora inventories, feature prominently; dog's mercury (Mercurialis perennis), a slow-colonizing perennial herb, persists in interior glades and confirms continuity of woodland cover dating to pre-1800 mappings. Other indicators like Paris quadrifolia (herb-Paris) further delineate long-established communities, with surveys documenting their prevalence in undisturbed plots where soil stability favors relic populations over invasive successors. Vegetation zonation progresses from closed-canopy interiors, where successional stability reinforces monocultures with minimal diversity, to peripheral ecotones influenced by . Increased light penetration at boundaries—up to 50% more than in cores—supports transitional herbaceous growth, including opportunistic forbs and reduced cover, as mapped in grid-based phytosociological studies. This underscores causal dynamics of canopy closure driving suppression, with empirical plot data from reserves like Kersselaerspleyn revealing dominance hierarchies stable over decades absent disturbance.

Fauna and Biodiversity Metrics

The Sonian Forest supports a diverse mammalian , including approximately 40 indigenous , with (Sus scrofa) re-established since 2006 and exhibiting population growth despite hunting prohibitions across the forest. Exact densities remain challenging to quantify due to elusive behavior and fragmented monitoring, though foresters report increasing presence prompting considerations for population control interventions. (Capreolus capreolus) populations have declined markedly, dropping 50% between 2010 and 2018, with surveys indicating a further reduction from 1.07 individuals per kilometer (2009–2013) to lower averages by 2023, attributed partly to predation pressures from foxes and alongside habitat factors. Avian diversity includes woodland specialists such as the (Strix aluco), a nocturnal predator reliant on mature beech stands for nesting and foraging, contributing to the forest's role as a site designated for bird habitats under EU directives. The forest hosts seven species, the highest concentration in , alongside 18 species—Europe's most threatened mammals—five of which are endangered, underscoring its protected status for chiropteran roosting and foraging sites. Biodiversity metrics from ongoing inventories, including bioblitz efforts launched in , reveal hotspots in and assemblages, though quantitative indices like Shannon diversity remain underreported in public surveys; for mammals exceeds 40, with declines noted in understory-dependent taxa due to historical overbrowsing by ungulates prior to recent deer reductions. play critical roles in , facilitating , while mycorrhizal fungal networks, predominant in beech-dominated soils, enhance resilience by interconnecting roots for resource sharing, as observed in analogous European temperate forests.

Soil, Climate Interactions, and Natural Processes

The soils of the Sonian Forest primarily comprise acidic podzols and related profiles such as Abc types, with cambisols occurring on less leached sites, exhibiting low base saturation and fertility that limits mineral nutrient availability. These soils depend heavily on annual leaf litter inputs from dominant beech (Fagus sylvatica) and oak (Quercus robur) canopies to form and sustain thin humus-rich Ah horizons, which decompose slowly under the forest floor's moist, shaded conditions to recycle essential elements like nitrogen and phosphorus. Soil pH typically ranges from 4.5 to 6.0 in upper horizons, as measured in cores, reflecting ongoing acidification trends in northern Belgian podzols influenced by atmospheric deposition and organic acid production. Prevailing temperate oceanic climate conditions feature average annual temperatures of 10.7°C and totals around 854 mm, distributed relatively evenly but with increasing variability in recent decades, including drier springs and summers. The 2020s droughts, compounded by elevated , have induced beech dieback through hydraulic failure and carbon in mature stands, yet these episodes align with historical fluctuations rather than unprecedented , as evidenced by recovery patterns in wind-disturbed patches. Interactions between soil and climate manifest in feedback loops, where eluviation and illuviation processes are modulated by precipitation-driven leaching, while accumulation buffers against nutrient leaching during wet periods. Natural disturbances, including episodic —evident in old-growth gaps—and herbivory, drive and regeneration cycles, fostering patch dynamics that enhance resilience without reliance on external interventions. Unmanaged areas persist as net carbon sinks, sequestering and amid stresses, as older stands maintain positive balances through sustained litter inputs and mycorrhizal efficiencies, countering narratives of uniform climatic vulnerability.

Management Practices and Policies

The Sonian Forest spans Belgium's three administrative regions, with ownership divided among public entities: the Brussels-Capital Region holds approximately 44% of the 4,421-hectare area, while the Flemish and Walloon Regions manage the balance, reflecting the of forest policy to regional competence since the . This fragmentation necessitates inter-regional coordination for effective governance, as the forest's transboundary location precludes unilateral control, yet enables shared enforcement of property rights that prioritize long-term ecological viability over short-term exploitation. A joint structural vision, developed collaboratively by the regions, provides overarching , supplemented by regional decrees that align with federal environmental laws, though the absence of centralized federal authority has occasionally highlighted inefficiencies in unified policy execution. Since 1959, Belgian has designated the entire forest as a , with stricter protections under the EU as a site, mandating habitat conservation measures and species safeguards that reinforce regional property stewardship. Post-2017 World Heritage inscription of key beech forest reserves, buffer zones impose minimal intervention thresholds, binding all owners to international standards that curb development and promote for sustained viability. Historical shifts from partial privatizations in the 18th and 19th centuries, which facilitated selective and uneven exploitation, underscore the risks of fragmented private holdings, as critiqued in analyses of state transitions; in contrast, the forest's predominant status since the early has stabilized , averting further degradation through enforced collective rights and enabling adaptive preservation amid pressures. This public framework has proven resilient, as evidenced by successful trans-regional initiatives that mitigate jurisdictional disputes while upholding causal links between secure tenure and forest persistence.

Active Interventions and Sustainable Harvesting

Selective and targeted constitute core active interventions in the Sonian Forest, implemented to promote regeneration of younger trees, reduce competition, and prevent overmaturity in dominant stands. These practices, guided by regional management plans, involve removing select overstory trees to open the canopy and stimulate growth, ensuring long-term vitality without large-scale clearcuts. Since the , such interventions have emphasized uneven-aged structures, with thinnings calibrated to mimic natural gap formation and sustain structural heterogeneity. Sustainable harvesting targets low annual removal rates to align yields with increment, typically harvesting around 10,000 cubic meters of timber per year across the forest's expanse. This volume yields approximately 600,000 euros in annual revenue, funding maintenance while preserving standing stock and regeneration capacity. Coppice rotations, though less prevalent in the beech-dominated core, are applied selectively in mixed or peripheral zones to regenerate broadleaf species like , with cycles adjusted to local growth rates and goals. Post-disturbance replanting follows events, such as those from European storms, where damaged timber is cleared and native or mixed stock is introduced to fill gaps and accelerate recovery. These efforts prioritize species suited to the forest's sandy soils and climate, avoiding plantations to enhance resilience and emulate natural succession. Debates on even-aged versus uneven-aged systems highlight that managed uneven-aged approaches in the Sonian Forest sustain higher structural diversity, with metrics from comparable indicating greater tree size variation and layering than uniform even-aged cohorts. Data from long-term monitoring show that selective interventions yield balanced regeneration rates—often exceeding 1:1 replacement—outpacing strict non-intervention, which risks and reduced vitality in aging stands. This model prioritizes causal dynamics of disturbance and renewal over preservation, supported by standards ensuring harvests do not exceed sustainable limits.

Monitoring, Research, and Adaptive Strategies

The Sonian Forest is integrated into the International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Effects on Forests (ICP Forests), featuring a Level II intensive monitoring plot that tracks parameters such as crown condition, ground vegetation, growth, and mortality rates. This plot, located in a strict reserve, has documented 31.3% mortality over nine years of ending around 2023, with specific assessments in the Sonian site highlighting dynamics influenced by and . Long-term data from these plots quantify growth rates and resilience, contributing to Europe-wide evaluations of health under the 2024 and 2025 ICP Forests technical reports. Research employs dendrochronological analysis to assess drought resilience in dominant beech (Fagus sylvatica) populations, revealing divergent post-drought recovery patterns in large, old trees. A 2023 study of wind-thrown beeches in the Sonian Forest analyzed ring-width chronologies, identifying pre-disturbance growth declines as predictors of structural failure under compounded stress, with implications for stand-level vulnerability. These findings underscore phenotypic variability in response, informing selection for replanting to enhance adaptability to projected climate variability, though empirical trials remain limited to observational data rather than broad interventions. Adaptive strategies are embedded in updated management frameworks, such as Environment's multifunctional plan for the Sonian Forest, which incorporates measures like diversified to mitigate and recreational pressures. EU-funded initiatives, including the LIFE Prognoses project, evaluate intervention efficacy through comparative assessments of managed versus unmanaged stands, quantifying above-ground carbon stocks and metrics to support cost-effective conservation. These efforts prioritize evidence from plot data over speculative projections, with ROI analyses focusing on sustained gains—estimated via inventories—against maintenance costs, though full-scale trials have not been implemented due to hydrological constraints.

Threats, Controversies, and Debates

Environmental Pressures from Climate and Urbanization

The Sonian Forest, dominated by European beech (), faces heightened drought stress from prolonged dry periods, particularly during summers from 2018 to 2022, which have induced premature leaf senescence, branch dieback, and crown degradation in affected trees. Assessments indicate that nearly one in five beech trees exhibits degradation, characterized by branch mortality and reduced foliage density, with isolated and edge trees suffering disproportionately due to limited water access and heightened . Interior stands, however, demonstrate relative resilience, as retention and canopy shading mitigate impacts compared to exposed margins. These events align with broader European trends of intensified drought frequency since the , yet empirical monitoring reveals limited outright mortality rates, challenging narratives of imminent collapse in mature beech woodlands. Urbanization amplifies these climate stressors through stemming from the forest's proximity to —beginning approximately 5 km south of the city center—which promotes and pollutant ingress. The severs the woodland into segments, reducing connectivity for and elevating susceptibility to shifts, such as warmer edge temperatures and wind exposure that exacerbate water deficits. Elevated deposition from urban emissions favors nitrophilous species at forest borders, altering composition and potentially suppressing native , with studies documenting pronounced assemblage shifts within 50-100 meters of edges. Such fragmentation metrics underscore causal links to reduced interior buffering, though the forest's status highlights its enduring ecological integrity despite these incursions. Recreational pressures compound these dynamics, with annual visitor numbers surpassing 2 million in this peri-urban expanse, leading to and vegetation trampling along paths and off-trail zones. Compaction increases , impairs infiltration, and stresses shallow-rooted species, with field data linking human foot traffic to diminished microbial activity and herbaceous cover in high-use areas. While these localized erosive forces intensify vulnerability by altering , forest-wide persists, partially bolstered by CO2 fertilization enhancing in surviving , which offsets some growth declines per regional sink analyses. This resilience tempers exaggerated projections of systemic failure, as the woodland's —rooted in its ancient structure—sustains net carbon uptake amid multifaceted stressors.

Conflicts Over Development and Resource Use

In the and , proposals for residential developments on the fringes and buffer zones of the Sonian Forest have sparked tensions between advocates and conservationists. For instance, in 2017, filed legal challenges against a project for five apartment buildings along the forest edge in the Tenreuken area, citing risks to and landscape integrity, leading to its suspension. More recently, in October 2025, the Flemish Council for Permit Disputes annulled a permit for the Middenhut project within the forest, ruling that provincial authorities failed to adequately assess its compatibility with the site's protected status as a World Heritage . Proponents, including developers and local officials, argue such builds address ' acute shortage—exacerbated by and limited land—potentially easing affordability pressures without encroaching on the core forest. Opponents, such as residents' groups and environmental NGOs, contend these encroachments fragment habitats and undermine the forest's ecological role, often prevailing through court rulings that prioritize partial restrictions or denials over full approvals. Debates over resource extraction, particularly selective logging in peripheral areas, pit sustainable yield advocates against strict preservationists. Annual wood harvests from the Sonian Forest total around 10,000 cubic meters, generating approximately €600,000 in revenue, with practices certified under the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) emphasizing minimal disturbance to the core habitat. Logging supporters highlight its role in funding maintenance and providing biofuel feedstock, arguing that controlled peripheral cuts—focused on overmature trees—enhance forest health without significant biodiversity loss, as evidenced by stable ecological indicators in managed zones. Critics, including some conservation groups, warn of cumulative habitat fragmentation and question biofuel's net environmental benefits amid climate pressures, advocating for reduced harvesting to align with zero-growth preservation ideals. Stakeholder perspectives reveal broader land-use divides, with economic interests favoring balanced utilization and environmentalists emphasizing absolute protection. Local businesses and right-leaning voices, such as those promoting private land stewardship models, underscore tourism's contributions—drawing 750,000 annual visitors and supporting ancillary economies potentially worth tens of millions in euros through and related services—against what they view as inefficient over-regulation that stifles growth. Conservation advocates counter that such activities, while beneficial, risk escalating urban pressures, prioritizing long-term ecological integrity over short-term gains and critiquing public management for underutilizing private incentives for sustainable oversight. These tensions often resolve via legal and compromises, reflecting the forest's dual role as a protected natural asset and peri-urban resource amid Belgium's competing priorities for , energy, and .

Evaluations of Conservation Efficacy

The Sonian Forest's conservation measures, including its integration into the World Heritage serial property "Ancient and Primeval Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe" since 2011, have sustained key attributes such as old-growth stands exceeding 200 years in age and high structural diversity. plans emphasizing natural regeneration and minimal intervention have supported this, with documented natural regeneration of species like sycamore maple in protected zones. Periodic state of conservation reporting requires updates on factors affecting outstanding , with the property overall assessed as having a favorable in components like the Sonian Forest, though ongoing monitoring addresses localized pressures. Evaluations of efficacy reveal mixed outcomes when weighed against inherent forest resilience. Longitudinal studies on European temperate forests, including beech-dominated systems, indicate strong recovery potential post-disturbance, with canopy regrowth often exceeding 70% loss thresholds through natural processes, suggesting that the Sonian Forest's persistence may partly stem from beech ' adaptive traits rather than protection alone. Comparative analysis with less intensively managed primeval beech forests in the Carpathians shows analogous structural integrity and , challenging claims of unique vulnerability requiring exceptional regulatory stringency. Successes include defiance of acute climate stressors, as evidenced by maintained vitality amid regional drought events, attributed to like selective tree retention. Opportunity costs arise from restrictive policies limiting sustainable harvesting, which generates modest revenue—approximately 600,000 euros annually from 10,000 cubic meters of wood—while broader services such as and support remain unquantified at scale for the Sonian but align with high values in analogous old-growth systems. Failures include persistent recreational overuse eroding and , despite infrastructure investments, highlighting inefficiencies in enforcement under multi-jurisdictional . Overall, while protections have averted large-scale degradation, evidence of comparable resilience in peer forests implies that lighter-touch approaches could yield similar ecological outcomes with reduced administrative burdens.

Human Interactions and Cultural Role

Recreational Uses and Infrastructure

The Sonian Forest accommodates approximately 2 million visitors annually, primarily for walking, , and horseback riding along its extensive network of designated paths. A 2025 guide highlights 20 specific walking and routes, integrating historical markers with natural scenery to guide recreational users while directing traffic away from sensitive ecological cores. These paths include pedestrian trails, bike lanes, and equestrian routes, with access points featuring parking lots to manage influx from nearby urban areas. Infrastructure supports these activities through zoned recreational areas equipped with picnic tables, benches, waste bins, and dog zones, strategically placed to concentrate use and reduce off-trail trampling in undisturbed sections. Management zoning limits intensive recreation to peripheral zones, preserving central beech woodlands from fragmentation, though high foot and vehicle traffic necessitates ongoing maintenance of paths to prevent widening from erosion. Visitor patterns contribute to local by drawing day-trippers and supporting adjacent businesses in and Flemish regions, generating indirect economic value through expenditures on , , and equipment rentals, though precise figures remain undocumented in public management reports. Rising attendance, particularly post-2020, has amplified enforcement needs, with fines for infractions like littering and unauthorized use increasing 12% from 2019 to 2020, signaling overuse pressures including waste accumulation and in high-traffic corridors. These downsides prompt adaptive measures, such as expanded signage and patrols, to sustain infrastructure without compromising the forest's primary conservation mandate.

Historical and Religious Sites

The Sonian Forest's proximity to the Waterloo Battlefield played a strategic role during the on June 18, 1815, where the woodland served as the rear position for the Anglo-allied army under the Duke of Wellington, providing cover and camping areas for troops prior to the engagement. Armies encamped in the forest engaged in activities that strained local resources, as documented in contemporary military accounts of the campaign. Religious heritage in the Sonian Forest centers on the remnants of Groenendaal Priory, established in 1343 by the mystic Jan van Ruysbroec and his companions seeking a contemplative life amid the woodland isolation. The priory, formally recognized in 1350, granted the community resource rights over surrounding areas but contributed to localized timber extraction pressures typical of medieval monastic economies. A small dedicated to Ruysbroec persists near the priory's former site, marking the authentic locus of his spiritual writings and eremitic tradition. Other historical structures include the Château de Trois-Fontaines, originally constructed as a hunting lodge by the Dukes of Brabant near natural springs within the , with only fragmentary ruins remaining today. These sites, including farmsteads now housing interpretive museums, draw visitors for their tangible links to medieval and early modern , underscoring the forest's enduring role in regional heritage preservation despite ongoing maintenance demands.

Depictions in Art, Literature, and Media

The , known locally as the Forêt de Soignes or Zoniënwoud, has been a recurring subject in 17th-century Flemish , particularly among the Brussels-based artists associated with the informal "Sonian Forest school." Painters such as Jacques d'Arthois, Lodewijk de Vadder, and Lucas Achtschellinck specialized in wooded scenes drawn from the forest's environs, depicting dense groves, sunken paths, travelers, and parties to evoke the area's untamed yet accessible wilderness. These works, produced during a period of growing interest in local topography amid the Dutch Golden Age's influence, balanced naturalistic detail with atmospheric effects, often highlighting the forest's role as a backdrop for activity rather than pure romantic sublimity. Later artistic representations include 20th-century oils like Louis Gustave Cambier's La forêt de Soignes (1918), which captures the forest's enduring beech-dominated landscapes in a more impressionistic style. Such depictions served to reinforce the forest's cultural significance in Belgian identity, portraying it as a verdant to urban , though primarily as observed scenery rather than symbolic propaganda. In literature, the Sonian Forest appears sparingly as a setting or motif, often tied to its historical proximity to events like the ; for instance, it frames narrative prehistories in modern Flemish novels such as Paul Verhuyten's The Battle with the Angel (translated 2015), where a country estate within the woods anchors a of familial and regional legacy. Earlier references contrast poetic refuge imagery with pragmatic accounts, as in treatises emphasizing economic yields over aesthetic idealization, reflecting the forest's dual utilitarian and inspirational roles without overt nationalistic embellishment. Contemporary media portrayals surged following the forest's partial inscription on UNESCO's World Heritage List in 2017 as part of ancient forests, with documentaries like Lapavision's The Sonian Forest (circa 2020) exploring its and challenges. Coverage in outlets such as UNRIC's 2022 highlights resilience amid stressors, yet some analyses question the narrative's optimism by underscoring urban encroachment's underreported impacts, avoiding unsubstantiated hype around "primeval" status. Films like Hello, Are We in the Show? (2022) offer grounded glimpses of dynamics influenced by proximity to , prioritizing observational realism over dramatized conservation advocacy.

References

  1. https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/en/metadata/case-studies/climate-change-adaptation-in-a-peri-urban-beech-forest-with-a-high-number-of-visitors-sonian-forest-belgium
  2. https://www.sonianforest.be/the-sonianforest/unesco-world-heritage/
  3. https://www.europeanbeechforests.org/world-heritage-beech-forests/belgium/sonian-forest
  4. https://www.sonianforest.be/the-sonianforest/forest-management/
  5. https://www.eustafor.eu/excursion-sonian-forest/
  6. https://renature.brussels/nl/natuurverslag/zonienwoud
  7. https://natura2000.vlaanderen.be/sites/default/files/9_zonienwoud_s-ihd-rapport.pdf
  8. https://mapcarta.com/Brussels/Sonian_Forest
  9. https://document.leefmilieu.brussels/opac_css/elecfile/Brochure_Zonienwoud_Structuur_NL.pdf
  10. https://leefmilieu.brussels/burgers/documentatie-en-tools/leefmilieu-stand-van-zaken/zonienwoud
  11. https://pureportal.inbo.be/files/14212508/Tallier_stateforestry_uncorrectedprintproof.pdf
  12. https://www.lifeb4b.be/area6b
  13. https://environnement.brussels/sites/default/files/content/foret_soignes_fr.pdf
  14. https://deims.org/0fa0d44f-5314-405f-a647-a7dda423031f
  15. https://www.routeyou.com/en-be/route/view/787449
  16. https://www.brabantsekouters.be/assets/afbeeldingen/rl-brabantsekouters/Publicaties/Thesis_Vanrusselt_Ona_2023-2024.pdf
  17. https://www.routeyou.com/en-be/route/view/6729491
  18. https://ncs.naturalsciences.be/lithostratigraphy/brussels-formation/
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348435985_Sonian_Forest_a_case_from_Brussels
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315671297_The_Zonian_Forest_-_A_unique_site_for_earth_science_and_archaeology_Understanding_soilscape_evolution_of_the_Belgian_loess_belt_-_a_review_of_30_years_research_Excursion_German_Soils_Science_Society_-
  21. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17445647.2016.1197613
  22. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01803.x
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440320300984
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278963784_La_foret_de_Soignes_site_unique_pour_les_sciences_de_la_terre_et_l%27archeologie
  25. https://focusonbelgium.be/en/facts/did-you-know-sonian-forest-was-originally-much-larger
  26. https://sylvabrosella.blogspot.com/2023/06/soignes-forestiers-et-trompes-de-chasse.html
  27. https://pureportal.inbo.be/files/34504727/Deforce_etal_medievalcharcoalproduction_YENVprintproof.pdf
  28. https://ia600309.us.archive.org/28/items/histoiredelafore00pier/histoiredelafore00pier.pdf
  29. https://pureportal.inbo.be/files/14318682/Vandekerkhove_Deforce_Bastiaens_2018_HistoricEcologicalPositionOfBeechInTheArea.pdf
  30. https://www.belganewsagency.eu/the-sonian-forest-brussels-green-lung-shaped-by-history
  31. https://whc.unesco.org/document/159695
  32. https://pureportal.inbo.be/files/29084119/Derks_etal_2020_SonianForest_OForest_book.pdf
  33. https://journals.openedition.org/brussels/1101
  34. https://eustafor.eu/excursion-sonian-forest/
  35. https://unric.org/en/belgian-unesco-recognised-primeval-sonian-forest-defies-climate-change/
  36. https://unric.org/en/united-nations-sonian-soignes-zonienwoud-walking-trail/
  37. https://www.thebulletin.be/new-guide-sonian-forest-reveals-fascinating-history-plus-20-walking-and-cycling-trails
  38. https://www.sonianforest.be/the-sonianforest/fauna-flora/
  39. https://pastforward.ugent.be/publications/Vandekerkhove%25202018.pdf
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1290079601900069
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277475362_Bosreservaat_Kersselaerspleyn_Zonienwoud_-_Monitoringrapport_-_Monitoring_van_de_vegetatie_en_de_dendrometrische_gegevens_in_de_kernvlakte_en_de_steekproefcirkels_Vegetation_monitoring_and_dendrometry
  42. https://www.zonienwoud.be/de-aanwezigheid-van-het-everzwijn-in-het-zonienwoud/
  43. https://www.thebulletin.be/deer-population-sonian-forest-plummets
  44. https://www.thebulletin.be/deer-gradually-disappearing-sonian-forest
  45. https://unric.org/en/the-magnificent-world-of-forests-the-belgian-sonian-forest/
  46. https://www.foret-de-soignes.be/participez-au-lancement-officiel-du-grand-bioblitz-le-17-mai-au-rouge-cloitre/
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337534267_The_Abc_soil_types_Podzoluvisols_Albeluvisols_or_Retisols_A_review
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969705004535
  49. https://b2share.eudat.eu/records/d3ce0dc1f55a4cc4b89521a8e426c567
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969723047733
  51. https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/22/4291/2025/bg-22-4291-2025.pdf
  52. https://www.foret-de-soignes.be/pourquoi-abattre-des-arbres-en-foret-de-soignes/
  53. https://environnement.brussels/citoyen/nos-actions/projets-et-resultats/politique-de-gestion-de-la-foret-de-soignes-bruxelles
  54. https://www.foret-de-soignes.be/la-foret-de-soignes/gestion/
  55. https://www.zonienwoud.be/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Projet_PA_SoignesRW.pdf
  56. https://informa-forests.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/20231707_INFORMA_M2_Final.pdf
  57. https://pureportal.inbo.be/files/116659121/ICPForests_TR2024.pdf
  58. https://icp-forests.org/pdf/ICPForests_TR2025.pdf
  59. https://naturadapt.com/groups/communaute/documents/633/get
  60. https://www.sonianforest.be/fieldwork-in-the-sonian-forest-to-investigate-the-ecosystem-services-of-ancient-forests/
  61. https://environnement.brussels/citoyen/documentation-et-outils/etat-des-lieux-de-lenvironnement/foret-de-soignes
  62. https://www.foret-de-soignes.be/secheresse-on-garde-les-hetres/
  63. https://www.dhnet.be/regions/bruxelles/2025/08/23/foret-de-soignes-il-manque-250-litres-deau-par-metre-carre-ZS5DY6GTAREADDXJZTZTT34CCM/
  64. https://rewildingeurope.com/news/sonian-forest-to-see-fragmented-habitat-connected-by-new-ecoduct/
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169204603000136
  66. https://www.werkenaandering.be/en/reading-material/news/fragmented-nature-reserves-connected-once-more
  67. https://www.thebulletin.be/sonian-forest-feels-pressure-stressed-citizens-flee-city
  68. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/add177
  69. https://www.dhnet.be/regions/bruxelles/2017/08/30/watermael-boitsfort-le-projet-tenreuken-mis-en-suspens-7AJHPHZSOBBWHFAEDZIXUHKDKE/
  70. https://www.lesoir.be/705330/article/2025-10-16/un-projet-immobilier-dans-la-foret-de-soignes-au-coeur-dun-bras-de-fer
  71. https://www.reddit.com/r/brussels/comments/1dxinqj/translation_in_comments_the_five_concrete_barons/
  72. https://www.rtbf.be/article/des-riverains-s-opposent-a-un-projet-immobilier-a-la-limite-d-auderghem-et-de-watermael-boitsfort-11605539
  73. https://bx1.be/categories/news/des-auderghemois-mobilises-contre-un-projet-immobilier-sur-un-ancien-complexe-sportif-il-a-ete-reconquis-par-la-nature/
  74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312300652_When_you_can%27t_see_the_city_for_the_trees_A_joint_analysis_of_the_Sonian_Forest_and_urban_reality
  75. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1133/
  76. https://pureportal.inbo.be/files/4230304/81.pdf
  77. https://whc.unesco.org/en/soc/3902/
  78. https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/node/1157
  79. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17159
  80. https://foresteurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/9MC-Implementation-Report.pdf
  81. https://www.sonianforest.be/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2021/04/laymans-report-2018_ENG_LR.pdf
  82. https://efi.int/sites/default/files/files/thinkforest/2015/20150910-handout-zonienwoud-booklet.pdf
  83. https://www.foret-de-soignes.be/la-foret-de-soignes/carte-de-la-foret-de-soignes/
  84. https://gardens.brussels/fr/espaces-verts/foret-de-soignes
  85. https://www.thebulletin.be/increase-visitors-sonian-forest-results-more-fines-warnings
  86. https://www.brusselstimes.com/202737/why-the-forest-is-belgiums-unsung-treasure
  87. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/RPPO/SIM-10729.xml?language=en
  88. https://monasticbelgium.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-mystic-from-sonian-forest.html
  89. https://evendo.com/locations/belgium/duchy-of-brabant/landmark/chateau-de-trois-fontaines
  90. https://www.sonianforest.be/discover-experience/visit/
  91. https://www.mskgent.be/en/collection/1882-e
  92. https://onlineonly.christies.com/s/old-master-paintings-sculpture-online/lucas-achtschellinck-brussels-1626-1699-137/137668
  93. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/93191/9789461665980.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  94. https://www.codart.nl/publications/new-edition-on-painters-of-the-sonian-forest-school-ignatius-van-der-stock-1636-1668/
  95. https://www.mutualart.com/Artwork/La-foret-de-Soignes/EC12CA064BF616F71D47BFDD9CFD8C48
  96. https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/journals/spanish-journal-of-soil-science/articles/10.3389/sjss.2025.14834/full
  97. https://www.flandersliterature.be/books-and-authors/book/the-battle-with-the-angel
  98. https://www.foret-de-soignes.be/documentation/litterature/
  99. https://lapavision.com/the-sonian-forest-2/
  100. https://sfgreen2022.eventive.org/films/6230c353157bcc00a5f654f9
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.