Hubbry Logo
Modern South Arabian languagesModern South Arabian languagesMain
Open search
Modern South Arabian languages
Community hub
Modern South Arabian languages
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Modern South Arabian languages
Modern South Arabian languages
Modern South Arabian languages
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Modern South Arabian
Eastern South Semitic, Southeastern Semitic
Geographic
distribution		Yemen and Oman
Linguistic classificationAfro-Asiatic
Subdivisions
Language codes
Glottologmode1252

The Modern South Arabian languages,[1][2] also known as Eastern South Semitic languages, are a group of endangered languages spoken by small populations inhabiting the Arabian Peninsula, in Yemen (including Socotra) and Oman. Together with the Ethiosemitic and Sayhadic languages, the Western branch, they form the South Semitic sub-branch of the Afroasiatic language family's Semitic branch.

Mehri and Hobyot are spoken in both Yemen and Oman. Soqotri is only spoken in the Yemeni archipelago of Socotra, and the Harsusi, Bathari, and Shehri languages are only spoken in Oman.[3]

Classification

[edit]

In his glottochronology-based classification, Alexander Militarev presents the Modern South Arabian languages as a South Semitic branch opposed to a North Semitic branch that includes all the other Semitic languages.[4][5] They are no longer considered to be descendants of the Old South Arabian language, as was once thought,[citation needed] but instead "nephews".

Languages

[edit]

Phonology

[edit]

Modern South Arabian languages are known for their apparent archaic Semitic features, especially in their system of phonology. For example, they preserve the lateral fricatives *ś [ɬ] and *ṣ́/ḏ̣ [ɬʼ] of Proto-Semitic.

Modern South Arabian languages maintain the distinction which is lost in all spoken Arabic dialects but preserved in Classical Arabic between the two coronal emphatics represented by the Arabic letters ض /dˤ/ ḍād and ظ /ðˤ/ ẓāʾ. In contrast to Arabic, where this distinction is represented by a stop-continuant contrast at the alveolar or pre-dental place of articulation, Modern South Arabian languages preserve a lateral-central distinction (ض /ɬʼ/ vs. ظ /θʼ ~ ðʼ/). The lateral ض /ɬʼ/ is the emphatic counterpart to the lateral /ɬ/, which has become iconic of the Modern South Arabian languages, owing to its relative rarity in the world’s languages.[8]

Semiticists are nearly unanimous in the opinion that Proto-Semitic contained three plain sibilants, referred to by the shorthand *s1, *s2, and *s3, and confusing also as š, ś, and s. The realizations of these phonemes in earlier times is debated, these three plain sibilants have been preserved in Mehri and Shehri, on the other hand in Arabic *s and *š merged into Arabic /s/ ⟨س⟩ and *ś became Arabic /ʃ/ ⟨ش⟩.

Proto-Semitic Soqotri Mehri Shehri (Jibbali) Standard Arabic
s₁ (š) [ʃ] / [s] [ʃ]
(sometimes [h], [jʱ]) 		[ʃ]
(sometimes [h]) 		[ʃ], [ç] [s] س‎
s₃ (s) [s] / [ts] [s]
s₂ (ś) [ɬ] [ɬ] [ʃ] ش‎
ṣ́ [ɬʼ] / [tɬʼ] [ɬʼ] [dˤ] ض‎
ṯ̣ [θʼ] [tʼ] [θʼ ~ ðʼ] [ðˤ] ظ‎
ṯ [θ] [t] [θ] ث‎
ḏ [ð] [d] [ð] ذ‎

Origins

[edit]

Militarev identified a Cushitic substratum in Modern South Arabian, which he proposes is evidence that Cushitic speakers originally inhabited the Arabian Peninsula alongside Semitic speakers (Militarev 1984, 18–19; cf. also Belova 2003). According to Václav Blažek, this suggests that Semitic peoples assimilated their original Cushitic neighbours to the south who did not later emigrate to the Horn of Africa. He argues that the Levant would thus have been the Proto-Afro-Asiatic Urheimat, from where the various branches of the Afro-Asiatic family subsequently dispersed. To further support this, Blažek cites analysis of rock art in Central Arabia by Anati (1968, 180–84), which notes a connection between the shield-carrying "oval-headed" people depicted on the cave paintings and the Arabian Cushites from the Old Testament, who were similarly described as carrying specific shields.[9]

Reconstruction

[edit]

Proto-Modern South Arabian reconstructions by Roger Blench (2019):[10]

Gloss singular plural
one *tʕaad, *tʕiit
two *ṯrooh, *ṯereṯ
three *ʃahṯayt
four *ʔorbaʕ, *raboot
five *xəmmoh
six m. *ʃɛɛt, f. *ʃətəət
seven m. *ʃoobeet, f. *ʃəbət
eight m. θəmoonit, f. θəmoonit
nine m. *saʕeet, f. *saaʕet
ten m. *ʕɔ́ɬər, f. *ʕəɬiireet
head *ḥəəreeh
eye *ʔaayn *ʔaayəəntən
ear *ʔeyðeen *ʔiðānten
nose *nəxreer *nəxroor
mouth *xah *xwuutən
hair *ɬəfeet *ɬéef
hand/arm *ḥayd *ḥaadootən
leg *faaʕm *fʕamtən
foot *géedəl *(ha-)gdool
blood *ðoor *ðiiriín
breast *θɔɔdɛʔ *θədií
belly *hóofəl *hefool
sea *rɛ́mrəm *roorəm
path, road *ḥóorəm *ḥiiraám
mountain *kərmām *kərəəmoom
rock, stone *ṣar(fét) *ṣeref
rock, stone *ṣəwər(fet) *ṣəfáyr
rock, stone *ʔoobən
rock, stone *fúdún
fish *ṣódəh *ṣyood
hyena *θəbiiriin
turtle *ḥameseh *ḥoms(tə)
louse *kenemoot *kenoom
man *ɣayg *ɣəyuug
woman *teeθ
male child *ɣeg
child *mber
water *ḥəmooh
fire *ɬəweeṭ *ɬewṭeen
milk *ɬxoof *ɬxefən
salt *məɮḥɔ́t
night *ʔaṣeer *leyli
day *ḥəyoomet PWMSA *yiim
net PWMSA *liix *leyuux
wind *mədenut *medáyten
I, we *hoh *nəhan
you, m. *heet *ʔəteem
you, f. *hiit *ʔeteen
he, they m. *heh *həəm
she, they f. *seeh *seen

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Modern South Arabian languages

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Modern South Arabian languages (MSAL) are a group of six endangered spoken by an estimated 200,000 people primarily in southeastern , southern , and the archipelago. These languages—Mehri, Soqotri, Jibbali (also known as Śḥerɛ̄t or Shehri), Harsusi, Baṭḥari, and Hobyot—form a distinct of South Semitic, retaining archaic features such as dual pronouns and unique consonants not found in . Mehri is the largest by number of speakers, with approximately 100,000 to 180,000 users mainly among the Mahra tribes, while others like Baṭḥari have fewer than 30 speakers. Linguistically, MSAL belong to the Western South Semitic subgroup, showing closer affinities to Ethiopian Semitic languages than to the Central Semitic , with no between MSAL and despite bilingualism among most speakers. Their classification as "modern" is a , as they represent a pre-Arabic substratum in southern Arabia, with oral traditions including and tales documented since the but lacking indigenous writing systems until recent revitalization efforts. Systematic study began in the late , revealing rich dialectal variation and contributions to understanding Semitic phylogeny. The MSAL face severe endangerment due to the dominance of in , governance, and media, leading to especially among younger generations, though documentation projects by institutions like the and the Soqotri Language Center aim to preserve them through corpora, glossaries, and emerging orthographies. Smaller languages like Hobyot and Harsusi are particularly vulnerable, with speaker numbers under 1,000, underscoring the urgency of these initiatives for cultural and linguistic heritage.

Classification

Position within the Semitic Family

The Modern South Arabian languages form a distinct subgroup within the Semitic branch of the Afroasiatic , traditionally classified under the South Semitic division of West Semitic. This placement groups them with Ethio-Semitic languages (such as and Tigrinya) and the extinct Epigraphic South Arabian languages (like ), distinguishing them from such as and , as well as the East Semitic Akkadian. Phylogenetic analyses, including Bayesian methods applied to lexical data from Swadesh lists and phonological correspondences, support this structure, estimating the divergence of Modern South Arabian from other Semitic branches around 4650 years (with a range of 3300–6250 YBP). Key evidence for their South Semitic affiliation includes shared retentions of Proto-Semitic phonological features, such as distinct and lateral fricatives (*ś, *ṯ̣, *ṣ́), which have merged or shifted in most other but persist in Modern South Arabian. These languages exhibit deep internal diversification, with their common ancestor predating the breakup into individual varieties like Mehri and Soqotri by approximately 2050 YBP (1100–3100 YBP range). Unlike , which dominates the and shows innovations like the merger of certain Proto-Semitic emphatics, Modern South Arabian languages maintain greater in consonant inventories and root structures, underscoring their early split. Classification debates persist, with some scholars questioning the coherence of South Semitic as a genetic and proposing Modern South Arabian as an independent primary branch within West Semitic, parallel to Ethio-Semitic rather than coordinate with it or Ancient South Arabian. This view, advanced in works by linguists like Aaron Rubin, emphasizes morphological and lexical divergences, suggesting possible areal influences or separate migrations from a Proto-West Semitic ancestor. Nonetheless, the South Semitic grouping remains the consensus in comparative studies, bolstered by computational phylogenetics that recover it with strong posterior probability.

Internal Subgrouping and Debates

The Modern South Arabian (MSA) languages comprise six endangered spoken primarily in eastern , western , and the : Mehri, Hobyot, Harsusi, Bathari, Jibbali (Śḥerɛt), and Soqotri. Linguists generally accept MSA as a genetic within the Western Semitic branch, distinct from both Ethiosemitic and Old South Arabian languages, based on shared retentions like the preservation of certain Proto-Semitic lateral fricatives and innovations in verbal morphology. However, internal subgrouping is not fully resolved, owing to sparse historical documentation, ongoing to , and reliance on modern fieldwork data collected since the late . Comparative studies emphasize phonological, morphological, and lexical evidence, but debates persist over whether the reflects strict bifurcations or incorporates areal diffusion from prolonged contact among speakers. A common proposal divides MSA into two main branches: one comprising Jibbali and Soqotri, and the other including Mehri, Harsusi, Hobyot, and Bathari (often termed the "Mehri group"). This bifurcation is supported by shared morphological traits, such as specific verbal patterns (e.g., -m for third-person masculine perfect in the Mehri group) and that inflect like nouns, which align the Mehri languages against Jibbali and Soqotri. Phonological evidence further bolsters this, including the consistent shift of Proto-Semitic *s to /h/ in the Mehri group (e.g., "name" as *hum versus Jibbali šum), absent in the Jibbali-Soqotri branch. Aaron has advocated for this structure, labeling the Jibbali-Soqotri pair as the "eastern" subgroup and the Mehri cluster as "western," based on comparative reconstructions from fieldwork lexica. Debates center on transitional languages like Hobyot, spoken along the Yemen-Oman border in proximity to both Mehri and Jibbali varieties, raising questions of versus discrete genetic splits. Early classifications sometimes positioned Hobyot as intermediate or affiliated with Jibbali due to geographic overlap and shared areal features from substrate influence, but recent analyses prioritize genetic markers: Hobyot shares Mehri's lexical items for core vocabulary (e.g., "be" as wīḳǝʾ versus Jibbali kun) and morphological alignments in tense-aspect systems, confirming its place within the Mehri . Lexical cladistic studies, on Swadesh-style lists, reinforce MSA's overall coherence as a but highlight uneven divergence rates, with Soqotri showing the greatest isolation (up to 30-40% lexical divergence from continental MSA) potentially due to island geography rather than deep-time branching. Alternative wave models suggest contact-induced convergence, particularly in , complicates tree-based subgrouping, though proponents argue insufficient precludes rejecting the binary branch . Ongoing documentation projects, including those since 2010, aim to refine these through expanded corpora, but —with speaker numbers below 200,000 total—limits verification.

Individual Languages

Mehri

Mehri is a Semitic language of the Modern South Arabian branch, spoken mainly by Mehri tribes in Yemen's Al-Mahra Governorate and Oman's Dhofar Governorate, with smaller communities in southeastern and Gulf states like . Speaker numbers are estimated between 100,000 and 200,000, making it the largest Modern South Arabian language by population, though precise census data is lacking due to the nomadic of many speakers and political instability in the region. The language serves as a marker of ethnic identity for the Mahra people, who historically engaged in herding and trade across the Arabian Peninsula's southeastern deserts. Mehri remains primarily oral, lacking a standardized , though recent efforts in have proposed adaptations of the or ancient Musnad for writing the language. Dialects are broadly classified into eastern Yemeni varieties and western Omani ones, with phonological variations such as the presence of a palato-alveolar /d͡ʒ/ in Yemeni Mehri corresponding to /ɟ/ or other realizations in Omani speech, alongside lexical and morphological differences. These dialects form a continuum, with greater within or than across the border. Linguistically, Mehri retains archaic Semitic traits, including a root-and-pattern morphology where tri-consonantal generate verbs, nouns, and adjectives through vowel infixation and prefixation, and a verbal system marking aspect and mood via prefixes and suffixes. Its features ejective consonants like /kʼ/ and /tʼ/, pharyngeal fricatives /ħ/ and /ʕ/, and an eight-vowel system with short /ə/ and /ɐ/. Basic is verb-subject-object, though pragmatic factors allow flexibility. Despite bilingualism with dialects, which exerts shift pressure especially among youth, Mehri's documentation through grammars and texts has progressed via fieldwork, preserving its structure amid risks common to the Modern South Arabian group.

Jibbali (Shehri)

Jibbali, endonymically Śḥərɛ̄́t and also known as Shehri, is a Modern South Arabian Semitic language spoken mainly by semi-nomadic communities in the Dhofar Governorate of southern , with some presence in adjacent Yemeni territories. The language functions primarily as an oral vernacular, lacking a standardized , and is used in daily interactions, , and among its speakers, who identify ethnically as Jibbali or "mountain people." As of the early 2020s, Jibbali has an estimated 50,000 to 70,000 speakers, concentrated in mountainous and coastal districts of Dhofar, though exact figures vary due to limited census data and migration patterns. The language faces endangerment from the dominance of Omani Arabic and in education, media, and administration, leading to intergenerational transmission challenges, yet it retains vitality in rural, kin-based settings with relatively limited Arabic lexical borrowing compared to other Modern South Arabian varieties. Jibbali's phonology includes a distinctive eight-vowel system comprising /i, e, ɛ, a, ɔ, o, u, y/ and features emphatic (pharyngealized) consonants such as /ṭ, ḍ, ṣ/, alongside fricatives and glides typical of the Semitic family but with MSAL-specific realizations. Morphologically, it preserves Semitic triconsonantal with internal modifications for tense and aspect, a category in nouns and verbs, and non-cumulative exponence where subject number is marked separately from verb agreement in certain paradigms. Syntactically, it exhibits verb-subject-object basic , influenced minimally by contact with dialects. Detailed grammatical descriptions, such as those based on fieldwork in the 2000s, highlight its retention of archaic Semitic features alongside innovations unique to the eastern Modern South Arabian subgroup.

Soqotri

Soqotri is a Modern South Arabian Semitic language spoken primarily by the indigenous population of the Archipelago, an island group in the administered by . The language serves as the vernacular for approximately 50,000 to 60,000 individuals, who comprise the majority of the archipelago's residents, though estimates vary up to 100,000 when including communities. Soqotri lacks a standardized , relying historically on oral transmission, with recent efforts in 2024 to develop a unified to aid documentation and preservation. Linguistically, Soqotri exhibits archaic Semitic traits, including a consonantal inventory that preserves distinctions such as three plain voiceless lost in many other Semitic branches. Its system, analyzed phonemically, features a contrastive set including front, central, and back qualities, with dialectal variations in realization; for instance, long s may diphthongize or shorten contextually. Morphologically, Soqotri employs non-concatenative derivation typical of , evident in root-based processes where verbs convert to nouns via patterns or affixes, as in forms denoting abstract actions or instruments. Syntax includes complement clauses marked by specific subordinators, allowing embedded structures for reported speech or perception, which align with broader Semitic patterns but show unique Soqotri innovations in and tense-aspect marking. Dialectal variation exists across Socotra's regions, with northern and southern varieties differing in and , such as mergers in emphatic consonants or vowel shifts, informing reconstructions of Proto-Modern South Arabian. Sociolinguistically, Soqotri is classified as severely endangered by criteria, spoken fluently mainly by older generations, with intergenerational transmission declining due to dominance in , media, and administration; younger speakers often exhibit or incomplete proficiency. Documentation efforts, including lexical archives from fieldwork since 2010, have compiled thousands of entries, aiding comparative studies but highlighting the urgency of revitalization amid geopolitical instability in .

Harsusi

Harsusi (also spelled Ḥarsūsi) is a Modern South Arabian language spoken exclusively in the Jiddat al-Harasis desert region of south-central by members of the Harasis tribal community. Estimates place the number of speakers between 600 and 1,000, primarily older individuals, with the language undergoing a shift toward due to increasing bilingualism and limited intergenerational transmission. It is classified as endangered, with direct evidence indicating vulnerability from societal pressures favoring Omani Arabic as the dominant vernacular. Linguistically, Harsusi belongs to the Semitic family and shares close genetic ties with Mehri, forming a subgroup within the Modern South Arabian branch distinguished by retained archaic features such as triadic sibilant contrasts (/s/, /ʃ/, /ɬ/ or emphatic equivalents) absent in most other . Its phonological inventory includes a single voiced labial /b/ without a voiceless counterpart /p/, and emphatic consonants like /ṣ/ and /ṭ/, reflecting conservative Semitic traits but with notable substrate influence, including loanwords and phonetic adaptations more pronounced than in neighboring MSA varieties. Morphologically, it exhibits verbal roots with prefixes for tense and aspect, alongside a pronominal system preserving dual forms, though documentation remains sparse, with primary data derived from field recordings since the mid-20th century. Sociolinguistically, Harsusi faces acute vitality challenges, as younger Harasis increasingly prioritize for , media, and , leading to passive rather than fluent production among youth; revitalization efforts include audio-visual projects initiated around 2010 to preserve oral traditions and ethnolinguistic . Despite its isolation in a gravel plain habitat, the language's lags behind better-studied MSA tongues like Mehri or Soqotri, with phonetic and phonological analyses relying on small speaker corpora that highlight allophonic variations in and emphatics influenced by adjacent dialects.

Hobyot

Hobyot, also known as Ḥobyōt or Weyheybyot, is a Modern South Arabian language classified within the Western subgroup of , alongside Mehri, Harsusi, and Bathari. It exhibits phonological and lexical affinities with Mehri, including the shift of Proto-Semitic *s to /h/ in certain verb forms and shared morphological suffixes such as -i for dual marking. First documented in the late 1970s by linguist T. M. Johnstone, Hobyot was long overlooked due to its restricted and overlap with Mehri-speaking areas, but subsequent fieldwork, including Aki'o Nakano's 2013 , has clarified its distinct status. The language is spoken by semi-nomadic communities in the mountainous border region between eastern (primarily Mahra Governorate, around Hawf and Jadib) and western , with Haberut marking an approximate northern limit. Speaker estimates vary but indicate severe endangerment: approximately 400 in as of 2007 and 100 in per 1998 SIL data, with totals under 1,000 overall and potentially as few as fewer than 100 fluent speakers in recent assessments. These communities traditionally herd camels, cows, and goats, residing in caves during rainy seasons and branch-covered round houses otherwise, though increasing urbanization accelerates . Linguistically, Hobyot preserves archaic Semitic traits, including voiced pharyngeals (/ʕ/), interdentals (e.g., mŧɛniyōt 'tooth'), retroflex consonants (e.g., beɽʂɛn 'they are here'), diphthongs (e.g., ħōf 'Hawf'), and oppositions in vocalic quantity. Morphologically, it features external feminine plurals in -tə/-tɛ/-te (e.g., ħadūte 'hands') and lacks a definite article, while syntax employs periphrastic futures (e.g., mɛd-ək tənkaʕ ħōf 'When will you go to Hawf?') and via laʔ or (v)l-…laʔ. Mutual influences with neighboring Mehri and Jibbali are evident, yet Hobyot maintains independent innovations, such as specific plural formations. Hobyot faces imminent extinction risk, with younger generations favoring Mehri or amid migration to urban centers and lack of formal transmission; children rarely acquire it fluently. Documentation efforts, including initiatives and community-based fieldwork since 2013, have yielded vocabularies and grammatical sketches, underscoring its value for reconstructing Proto-MSAL despite data limitations from inconsistent speaker proficiency.

Bathari

Bathari, natively termed Bəṭaḥrēt, is a Semitic language of the Modern South Arabian group, spoken exclusively by members of the Baṭḥari tribe along Oman's southeastern coast in the Dhofar Governorate, facing the Khuriya Muriya Islands and extending inland to adjacent desert plateaus. The language remains unwritten, with its speakers historically reliant on oral traditions tied to maritime livelihoods such as sea harvesting, which form a core of documented ethnographic content. Closely related to Mehri and Harsusi, Bathari shares phonological traits like emphatic consonants but exhibits distinct lexical and morphological patterns, as evidenced in limited phonetic studies. The language is critically endangered, with fluent speakers numbering fewer than 10 elderly individuals as of recent assessments, rendering it effectively moribund and no longer transmitted to younger generations. Factors accelerating its decline include pervasive dominance through , media, and ; migration to urban centers; and intergenerational , where even heritage speakers struggle with cultural practices once described in Bathari. Documentation efforts, initiated in the , have captured naturalistic narratives, descriptive texts, and ethnographic data from a dwindling pool of consultants—initially around 30 in the mid-2010s, reduced to about 15 by 2017—focusing on topics like , personal life histories, and traditional attire to preserve linguistic and cultural knowledge before total loss. Ongoing research includes phonetic analyses of emphatic sounds, which reveal pharyngealized realizations differing from neighboring MSAL varieties, and forthcoming descriptive grammars based on fieldwork corpora. These resources underscore Bathari's value for Semitic subgrouping debates, particularly its position within the western MSAL cluster, though sparse data limits reconstructions. Preservation challenges persist due to the language's isolation from revitalization initiatives, with experts emphasizing the urgency of archiving remaining speech to inform broader Afroasiatic linguistics.

Linguistic Features

Phonological Characteristics

The Modern South Arabian languages (MSALs) are characterized by consonant inventories that preserve Proto-Semitic pharyngeals (/ħ/, /ʕ/) and emphatics, alongside innovations such as glottalized or ejective-like realizations in certain dialects. Unlike , which merges *q into /q/ or /ʔ/, MSALs typically reflect it as /g/, and they maintain three series of alveolar/ fricatives (e.g., /s/, /ś/ or /š/, /ṯ/). Glottal stops (/ʔ/) are retained but often lost intervocalically in languages like Mehri. Emphatic consonants, realized as pharyngealized or glottalized (e.g., /tˤ/, /sˤ/, /dˤ/), occur across the family, with post-glottalized variants like [t’], [s’] in some varieties akin to Ethiopian Semitic. Interdentals (/θ/, /ð/) are present but may be lost or fricativized in Soqotri dialects, where they merge with stops or other fricatives. Palatalization affects velars (e.g., /k/ > [tʃ] or /g/ > [ɟ]) in Soqotri and Jibbali, while retroflex clusters appear in Mehri and Hobyot. In Mehri, the system includes voiceless stops /t, k/, voiced /b, d, g/, glottalic /ṭ, ḳ/, voiceless s /f, θ, s, ś, ʃ, x, ħ, h/, voiced /ð, z, ɣ, ʕ/, glottalic emphatics /ðˤ, sˤ, śˤ, ʃˤ/, nasals /m, n/, trill /r/, /w, j/, and lateral /l/ (which may shift to /w/ or vocalize). Jibbali features a labialized velar /w̄/ contrasting with /w/, and a glottalized palato-alveolar /ɕʼ/ or similar. Harsusi, closely related to Mehri, lacks a voiceless labial stop /p/, relying solely on voiced /b/ for labials. Soqotri emphatics include a pharyngealized alveolar /sˤ/, with historical ejectives shifting to pharyngeals or glottal stops word-finally (e.g., /d/ > [tˤ]). Vowel systems in MSALs are richer than in , with contrasts and mid vowels prominent; short vowels often reduce to schwa (/ə/) in unstressed positions. Mehri distinguishes 5-6 short vowels (/a, ɛ, ə, i, u/) and 6 long (/ā, ɛ̄, ē, ī, ō, ū/), plus diphthongs /ay, aw, əy, əw/, where glottalic consonants trigger shifts (e.g., /ī/ > /ay/ near emphatics). Jibbali and Soqotri exhibit broader qualitative distinctions (e.g., /i, e, ɔ, a, o, u/), with 8 vowels in Jibbali and minimal opposition in Soqotri, where the system comprises at least /i, e, a, o, u/. Diphthongs are common in Mehri, Harsusi, and Hobyot subgroups but rare or absent in Soqotri and Jibbali. affects vowels adjacent to nasals in Mehri, Hobyot, and Soqotri. Phonotactics permit initial and final consonant clusters, especially involving glottalized or series, but restrict schwa between certain "idle " consonants in Mehri. Stress typically falls on long vowels or diphthongs, or the nearest heavy to the word end, influencing vowel quality and quantity; in Soqotri, it often lands on the penultimate or antepenultimate . is lexical or phonetic rather than morphologically productive, as in Mehri examples like /dikk/ "he sprung up." Dialectal variation is pronounced, with vs. Omani varieties differing in realization of emphatics and s.

Morphological and Syntactic Traits

Modern South Arabian languages (MSAL) exhibit a root-and-pattern morphology characteristic of , with triconsonantal roots modified by vowel patterns and affixes to derive nouns, verbs, and other forms. Nouns distinguish singular, dual, and numbers, with dual marked by suffixes like -i (often alongside the numeral "two") or obsolete in some dialects such as western Mahri Mehri; plurals include external sound forms (e.g., -Vt for feminine or -In) and internal broken plurals (e.g., CCv:C patterns resembling Ethiopic Semitic). Feminine gender is typically indicated by -(V)t in Mehri, Harsusi, Hobyot, Bathari, and Jibbali, or -h in Soqotri. Pronouns include independent and suffixed forms, with object suffixes influencing stress and triggering metaphony, such as in Jibbali perfect forms like tiʔiféš ("he broke it"). Verbal morphology features two primary conjugations: a suffixing perfect (e.g., Mehri ktūb "he wrote") and a prefixing /subjunctive (e.g., Jibbali yɛktəb "he writes"), with vocalic melodies distinguishing persons and aspects. Basic stems include Type A (active, e.g., CÍCOC) and Type B (middle/passive, e.g., CICÍC), alongside derived stems via t-infixation (e.g., CátCÍC for intensive/) or prefixes like h- (), ʔ- (factitive), or n- (reciprocal). Passives often employ internal vocalism (e.g., CE/CÍC in Mehri, CíC in Jibbali), with innovations like resyllabification in Jibbali. is prevalent, particularly merging 1st/2nd person forms or gender distinctions in certain tenses across MSAL, though Mehri and Jibbali show less fusion than Soqotri or Harsusi; for instance, Omani Mehri varies in dual perfect endings (-éh vs. -óh for masculine dual). is periphrastic, using active participles in Mehri, Harsusi, and Bathari or preverbs like ©a- in Jibbali. These traits preserve Proto-Semitic complexities, including dual agreement and suppletive allomorphy conditioned by gutturals, diverging from Central Semitic simplification. Syntactically, MSAL favor verb-subject (VS) order in verbal clauses (e.g., 83% VS in Mehri, 67% in Jibbali, 82% in Soqotri), with verb-object (VO) predominant; rare trivalent clauses show VSO or occasional SVO, aligning with conservative Semitic VSO but showing pragmatic flexibility. Nominal clauses follow subject-predicate order, while noun phrases place determiners after heads ( + ; possessed + possessor, except Soqotri's di-/mÍn + possessor + possessed). Verbs agree with subjects in person, , and number, with dual nouns often triggering plural agreement outside Soqotri; pronouns precede verbs, and argument via affixes is common, reducing full nominal expressions. Stress-sensitive rules influence morphology-syntax interfaces, such as raising in unstressed positions, reflecting archaic Proto-MSA resistant to substrate effects.

Historical Development

Origins and Relation to Ancient South Arabian

The Modern South Arabian languages (MSAL) constitute a distinct branch of the Semitic language family, diverging early from Proto-West Semitic alongside but independently of the Old South Arabian (OSA) languages, which were epigraphically attested in from approximately the 8th century BCE to the 6th century CE. Unlike earlier assumptions of direct descent, comparative linguistic analysis reveals no phylogenetic clade linking MSAL directly to OSA; instead, both represent parallel developments from a shared Proto-South Semitic ancestor, with MSAL preserving certain archaic features such as lateral fricatives and enhanced vocalic inventories (e.g., like ×i, ×ø, ×e derived via stress-induced metaphony) absent in OSA derivations. Low lexical cognacy rates between MSAL and OSA further support this separation, indicating minimal shared innovations post-divergence. Linguistic subgrouping places MSAL within West Semitic, partitioned from Central Semitic (including and OSA in some classifications) and Ethio-Semitic, with internal MSAL structure dividing into Western (Mehri, Harsusi, Bathari) and Eastern (Hobyot, Jibbali, Soqotri) subgroups based on morphological and phonological criteria like stem formations and stress patterns. OSA, by contrast, exhibits innovations such as specific verbal prefixes aligned more closely with Central Semitic patterns (e.g., yaqtulu forms), underscoring their independent trajectories despite geographic overlap in southern Arabia. This distinction arises from MSAL's peripheral retention of Proto-Semitic traits, including quality-sensitive stress favoring *a over *i/*u, which influenced morphophonological evolution in ways not paralleled in OSA . Origins of MSAL trace to prehistoric South Semitic diversification, likely predating OSA attestation, with speakers maintaining oral traditions in marginal regions of , , and where expansion arrived later (post-7th century CE). While a minority hypothesis posits a reverse migration from around 500 CE based on pastoralist archaeology and lexical clustering, mainstream evidence favors development from ancient southern Semitic substrates, corroborated by diachronic reconstructions and syntactic retentions diverging from OSA.

Proto-MSAL Reconstruction

Reconstruction of Proto-Modern South Arabian (Proto-MSAL), the hypothetical ancestor of the six Modern South Arabian languages, employs the to identify regular sound correspondences and shared innovations, though efforts remain preliminary due to uneven and lexical primarily from early 20th-century sources. Key works establish phonological inventories and morphological traits diverging from Central Semitic branches while preserving archaic Semitic features, such as distinct and emphatic consonants. Proto-MSAL phonology includes a seven-vowel system: mid *ɛ and *ɔ, low *a, high back *o and *u, and high front *e and *i, with distinctions clearest in stressed positions. High front vowels show regular reflexes, as Jibbali *e corresponds to Omani Mehri *ii (e.g., *kVnséd 'shoulder': Jibbali kenséd, Omani Mehri kənsiid), while Jibbali *i matches Omani Mehri *ay (e.g., *ḏVríʔ 'stranger': Jibbali ḏíríʔ, Omani Mehri ḏəráyʔ). Unstressed vowels underwent reduction, often to schwa-like forms in descendants like Mehri and Jibbali, with final Proto-Semitic vowels lost entirely. Stress was quality-sensitive, favoring the rightmost non-final *a over *i or *u (with *a before gutturals as intermediate), driving metaphony and vowel shifts observable in verbal inflections, such as imperfect 2fs forms (e.g., Omani Mehri təreekəz vs. Jibbali tiqdir reflecting *e). Morphological reconstruction highlights retention of the Semitic triconsonantal -and-pattern system, with non-concatenative derivations and alternating thematic vowels (*a ~ *i) shaping paradigms. Verbal forms exhibit stress-driven allomorphy, as in G-stem imperfects where Proto-MSAL *tVC1C2aC3 yields Jibbali tfðơɎr 'you scatter'. Nominal patterns include *C₁aC₂aC₃ > Jibbali/Shehri C₁eC₂əʔC₃, contrasting with *C₁iC₂aC₃ > C₁iC₂əʔC₃, indicating inherited vocalic melodies sensitive to . The verbal dual ending reconstructs as *-óh, distinguishing dual from plural in finite verbs across MSAL. Lexical reconstruction draws on comparative lists, positing proto-forms for core vocabulary like *məlsɛQ 'rain' (Omani Mehri məwsee, Jibbali mósɛQ) and *ḏVhéb 'flood water' (Omani Mehri ḏəhiib, Jibbali ḏhéb), though broader etymologies require further verification against Proto-Semitic cognates. These efforts underscore Proto-MSAL's position as a South Semitic outlier, with phonological conservatism aiding Semitic-wide reconstructions but limited by Arabic substrate influences in attested languages.

Sociolinguistic Status

Speaker Populations and Geographic Distribution

The Modern South Arabian languages are confined to the southern , primarily in the Dhofar Governorate of and the Al-Mahra Governorate of , with Soqotri restricted to the archipelago administered by . Mehri and Hobyot extend across the - border, while smaller languages like Harsusi, Bathari, and Shehri/Jibbali are localized in 's interior and coastal areas. Limited Mehri-speaking communities exist in southern and Gulf states due to migration. Speaker populations vary significantly, with Mehri having the largest at an estimated 180,000–200,000, distributed mainly in Yemen's Al-Mahra region and Oman's Dhofar. Soqotri counts approximately 70,000–100,000 speakers, nearly all on Island. Shehri/Jibbali has 50,000–70,000 speakers in Oman's and coast. The remaining languages are critically small: Harsusi with 600–1,000 in Oman's Jiddat al-Harasis desert; Hobyot under 1,000 along the Yemen-Oman border; and Bathari with fewer than 100, mostly elderly, in eastern Dhofar.
LanguageEstimated SpeakersPrimary Locations
Mehri180,000–200,000 (Al-Mahra), (Dhofar),
Soqotri70,000–100,000 archipelago ()
Shehri/Jibbali50,000–70,000 (Dhofar)
Harsusi600–1,000 (Jiddat al-Harasis)
Hobyot<1,000- border
Bathari<100 (eastern Dhofar coast)
These figures derive from linguistic surveys and projects, though exact censuses are lacking due to remote terrains and . Populations are declining from dominance and .

Endangerment Factors and Arabic Influence

The Modern South Arabian languages (MSAL) are universally regarded as endangered, with speaker populations ranging from a few hundred for moribund varieties like Hobyot and Bathari to approximately 50,000–100,000 for larger ones such as Mehri and Soqotri, though exact figures remain uncertain due to limited censuses and mobility of communities. Primary endangerment factors include rapid , economic modernization, and the erosion of semi-nomadic lifestyles, which historically sustained monolingual MSAL use in isolated regions of southern and . These shifts, accelerated since the 1970s oil-driven development in , have confined MSAL to domestic and informal domains, disrupting intergenerational transmission as younger speakers increasingly adopt for , , and social mobility. in further exacerbates vulnerability, limiting and community cohesion, while the absence of standardized orthographies or institutional support hinders revitalization efforts. Arabic exerts the dominant external pressure on MSAL vitality, functioning as the prestige language of administration, schooling, and across the , which fosters diglossic patterns where dominates public spheres. This contact promotes , with bilingualism often evolving into passive MSAL knowledge among youth, as evidenced by declining fluency in remote dialects like those of Soqotri highland communities. assessments classify key MSAL such as Mehri and Soqotri as "definitely endangered," reflecting reduced transmission rates amid 's role in and Islamic practices. Beyond shift, Arabic profoundly influences surviving MSAL varieties through lexical borrowing, particularly in semantic fields like , , and ; for example, Soqotri incorporates terms such as beïdh ('eggs') directly from Arabic bayḍ, while coastal dialects exhibit denser integration than inland ones. In Omani MSAL like Harsusi and Hobyot, proximity to Arabic-speaking populations has amplified phonological adaptations and , though core Semitic morphological structures persist, indicating substrate retention rather than wholesale replacement. Harsusi shows comparatively heavier Arabic substrate effects, including expanded vocabulary for settled life, underscoring how geographic and socioeconomic integration accelerates hybridity and accelerates erosion in smaller speech communities.

Documentation and Preservation

Historical Documentation Efforts

The earliest documented efforts to record Modern South Arabian languages (MSALs) date to the mid-19th century, primarily through incidental observations by European explorers rather than systematic linguistic analysis. In 1835, British naval officer James R. Wellsted compiled a 236-word Soqotri vocabulary list during a visit to , published in his "Memoir on the Island of Socotra," marking the first attested lexical data for any MSAL, though limited to basic terms in Latin and scripts with English and translations. Similarly, in 1838, French scholar Fulgence Fresnel described aspects of the Ehhkili variety of Jibbali, providing early but fragmentary insights into mainland Omani varieties. These initial records were constrained by brief encounters and lack of trained linguists, yielding vocabularies insufficient for grammatical reconstruction. A pivotal advancement occurred in 1898 with the Südarabische Expedition, sponsored by the Imperial Academy of Sciences in , which initiated the first systematic collection of MSAL texts. Led by David Heinrich Müller, with assistance from Hermann Jahn and Eduard Heinrich Müller, the expedition targeted Mehri, Šxauri (a Jibbali dialect), and Soqotri, gathering oral narratives, proverbs, poems, and from informants across Socotra's regions, including Qalansiya, Abd al-Kuri, and Hawlaf. Müller's findings, published in volumes from 1902 to 1907, distinguished eastern and western Soqotri dialects and highlighted the languages' retention of archaic Semitic features, establishing a foundation for subsequent analysis despite challenges from regional isolation and political instability in and . Early 20th-century scholarship built on these materials through grammatical and lexical studies by European Semiticists. Between and , Austrian linguist Ludwig Bittner produced detailed grammars and dictionaries for Mehri, Soqotri, and Jibbali, drawing heavily from expedition texts to elucidate morphology and . 1915 works further refined phonetic and lexical inventories. In 1929, British explorer Bertram Thomas documented Harsusi and Bathari during travels in , identifying them as distinct MSALs and publishing vocabularies in 1937, expanding coverage beyond previously known varieties. These efforts, often reliant on colonial-era access, prioritized textual corpora over sociolinguistic depth, with data quality varying due to informant variability and transcription inconsistencies. Mid-century contributions solidified MSAL documentation, particularly through Ethiopian-American linguist Wolf Leslau's fieldwork and compilations. In 1938, Leslau released a comprehensive Soqotri incorporating dialectal variants from Müller's and Bittner's sources, followed by his 1946 cataloging over 200 items on MSALs and a 1947 comparative grammar of four languages (Mehri, Harsusi, Jibbali, Soqotri). Leslau's works emphasized phonological archaisms and genetic links to ancient South Arabian, though they critiqued earlier transcriptions for inaccuracies in and distinctions. Overall, pre-1950 documentation remained fragmentary, focused on elite expeditionary , and underrepresented lesser-known varieties like Hobyot, reflecting the logistical barriers of accessing Mahra and regions.

Modern Projects and Challenges

Recent documentation efforts for Modern South Arabian languages (MSAL) include the Leverhulme Trust-funded project (2013–2016), which provided audio, audiovisual, photographic, and textual records of five MSAL varieties spoken in and , emphasizing community involvement to capture ethnolinguistic data amid rapid cultural shifts. Complementary initiatives, such as the ANR-funded study of Omani Mehri and Jibbali since 2013, have focused on phonological, morphological, and syntactic analysis through fieldwork, producing descriptive grammars and lexical resources. The DFG-supported project on toponymic and orientation systems in MSAL environments, ongoing as of 2023, documents how speakers encode landscape features, aiding reconstruction of pre-Arabic cognitive frameworks. Grassroots and activities have gained traction, exemplified by activist Said Baquir's work since 2022, which disseminates folktales, poetry, and educational materials in Mehri and related languages via platforms like to foster intergenerational transmission. The Soqotri Lexicon Online (SLOnline) project, initiated in the 2010s, compiles comprehensive dictionaries and texts for Soqotri, with extensions planned for Mehri in Yemen's Mahra province, addressing gaps in standardized orthographies. Interdisciplinary efforts, such as the ' "Language and Nature in Southern and " project, integrate MSAL documentation with ecological studies, recording terms for to preserve knowledge systems vulnerable to . Challenges persist due to severe , with Bathari documented as having only 15 fluent speakers as of recent surveys, and broader MSAL populations declining from among youth in and the UAE. Logistical barriers include restricted access to remote speakers in Yemen's conflict zones and 's Dhofar region, compounded by the absence of governmental programs for MSAL maintenance, leading to and lexical attrition from dominance. Political instability and socioeconomic pressures exacerbate documentation difficulties, as younger generations prioritize for and , resulting in uneven and limited institutional support beyond sporadic academic grants.

Cultural and Extralinguistic Aspects

Oral Traditions and Literature

The oral traditions of Modern South Arabian languages (MSAL) constitute a vital repository of , encompassing , songs, proverbs, riddles, folktales, and ethnographic narratives transmitted exclusively through spoken performance across generations. These forms encode genealogical knowledge, environmental adaptations, social norms, and historical events, often intertwined with practical functions such as work chants for communal labor or lullabies for child-rearing. Lacking indigenous writing systems, MSAL relies on mnemonic devices like and to ensure fidelity in recitation, with performances typically occurring in social gatherings, camps, or ritual contexts. Mehri oral poetry exemplifies the qasida form—a multi-line, mono-rhymed narrative structure—focusing on themes of romantic love, self-boasting (fakhr), natural landscapes, hunting expeditions, elegies for the deceased, and episodic historical accounts. Distinct from contemporaneous Arabic nabati poetry, Mehri compositions eschew pious invocations, Quranic references, and the "messenger" motif, instead incorporating geographic markers like the "mountaintop" vantage point in approximately 18% of documented poems, which underscores a pre-seventh-century divergence from Arabic literary influences. Poets such as ‘Ali bir ‘Awźet Ǧēdeḥ compose and improvise verses during live recitations, preserving communal identity amid nomadic lifestyles. Soqotri traditions feature an extensive corpus exceeding 2,000 poetical texts alongside prose folktales that draw on motifs including variants (ATU 510A), the (ATU 560), animal bridegrooms (ATU 552.1), and predestined deaths (ATU 934A), reflecting ties to Near Eastern, Eurasian, and select South Asian narrative archetypes while retaining archaic Semitic elements like female personifications of celestial bodies. These narratives, collected from early twentieth-century expeditions and recent fieldwork, often serve etiological purposes—explaining natural phenomena or social customs—and exhibit limited mythological depth compared to continental Yemeni traditions, prioritizing moral and observational wisdom. In smaller MSAL such as Bathari and Harsusi, manifests in ethnographic texts depicting marine subsistence, , and proverbial wisdom, with over 400 Bathari narratives transcribed to capture daily lore and community rituals. Proverbs and coded messages in these languages frequently employ poetic couplets to convey survival strategies tied to arid or coastal ecologies, reinforcing intergenerational transmission despite pressures from dominance. Overall, MSAL oral genres prioritize functional realism over cosmological speculation, mirroring the languages' speakers' adaptation to marginal terrains.

Broader Societal Impacts

The Modern South Arabian languages (MSAL) underpin the ethnic and tribal identities of their speakers, who form semi-nomadic communities in , , and , distinct from the broader Arab cultural milieu despite shared Semitic roots. These languages preserve specialized lexicons for local ecologies, such as toponyms and terms for arid landscapes, , and , which encode practical knowledge essential for traditional , , and practices. This linguistic specificity fosters social cohesion within tribes like the Mehri and Soqotri, where oral transmission reinforces communal bonds and differentiates them from Arabic-speaking majorities. Endangerment through Arabic shift, accelerated by post-1970s modernization, , and state-driven in , threatens these identities by disrupting intergenerational and eroding traditional lifestyles. In , where MSAL varieties like Mehri and Jibbali are spoken alongside , the languages' decline risks , diminishing the diversity that underpins national narratives of pluralism despite official policies promoting heritage. Similarly, in Yemen's Mahra Governorate and , Soqotri and Mehri serve as markers of regional autonomy, with speakers invoking them in and to assert heritage against centralizing influences from -dominant . Politically, MSAL bolster tribal affiliations that persist as key social structures in the , influencing local power dynamics and resistance to pan-Arab assimilation. Initiatives like Oman's Mehri Language Center, established to promote research and awareness, aim to mitigate these losses by integrating into societal , though limited official status hampers broader institutional support. Overall, the vitality of MSAL correlates with sustained cultural resilience, while their attrition could exacerbate identity fragmentation in conflict-prone areas like .

References

  1. https://llacan.cnrs.fr/fichiers/Senelle/SAMLanguages.pdf
  2. https://www.friendsofsoqotra.org/Soq_Archipelago/pdfs/2019%2520UNESCO%2520International%2520Year%2520of%2520Indigenous%2520Languages_The%2520Modern%2520South%2520Arabian%2520Languages%2520%28MSAL%29.pdf
  3. https://ahc.leeds.ac.uk/download/downloads/id/743/modern_south_arabian_languages_bibliography_2022.pdf
  4. https://soqotralanguage.org/en
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2839953/
  6. https://www.academia.edu/43019644/Semitic_upside_down_a_new_proposal_for_the_origins_of_Modern_South_Arabian_languages
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343583910_Modern_South_Arabian_languages
  8. https://linguistics.uga.edu/directory/people/aaron-rubin
  9. https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004300156/B9789004300156_017.xml
  10. https://brill.com/view/journals/zal/59/1/article-p25.xml
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220531571_The_Subgrouping_of_the_Semitic_Languages
  12. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00044.x
  13. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00907743/document
  14. https://brill.com/display/title/16635
  15. https://eldp.access.preservica.com/dk0307/
  16. https://mcsr.mhru.edu.ye/en/news/1864/
  17. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9783447192552_A26564709/preview-9783447192552_A26564709.pdf
  18. https://www.academia.edu/96106574/_Open_Access_Omani_Mehri_A_New_Grammar_with_Texts
  19. https://www.isca-archive.org/interspeech_2022/ridouane22_interspeech.pdf
  20. https://linguistics.stonybrook.edu/faculty/robert.hoberman/files/publications/Gragg_Hoberman_2012_Semitic.pdf
  21. https://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/E0/04/64/75/00001/ALROWSA_W.pdf
  22. https://pjlss.edu.pk/pdf_files/2024_2/1219-1230.pdf
  23. https://repository.aus.edu/bitstreams/cec7b53d-3ceb-45d8-83b7-d96f70e477de/download
  24. https://www.academia.edu/18566157/The_Vowel_System_of_Jibbali
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383063957_Analysis_of_Tense_System_in_Jibbali_Shehri_Language
  26. https://www.academia.edu/29793303/The_development_of_non_cumulative_exponence_for_number_in_the_Jibbali_%25C5%259A%25E1%25B8%25A5r%25C3%25AD_Modern_South_Arabian_verbal_morphology
  27. https://commons.und.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5466&context=theses
  28. https://repository.digital.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/1068383
  29. https://www.academia.edu/38638524/Soqotri
  30. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/safeguarding-soqotri-language-first-workshop-unified-alphabet
  31. https://www.friendsofsoqotra.org/Soq_Archipelago/pdfs/2019%20UNESCO%20International%20Year%20of%20Indigenous%20Languages_The%20Modern%20South%20Arabian%20Languages%20%28MSAL%29.pdf
  32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43782851
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327179035_Complement_Clause_Types_in_Soqotri
  34. https://www.academia.edu/82420352/Soqotri_dialectology_and_the_evaluation_of_the_language_endangerment
  35. https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/apr/15/language-extinct-endangered
  36. http://search.proquest.com/openview/8043309bcaf5489e4f2ab4e56cd6c08c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
  37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13173/zeitdeutmorggese.163.1.0061
  38. https://eldp.access.preservica.com/dk0314/
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349490618_The_Phonology_of_Modern_South_Arabian_Harsusi_of_Oman
  40. https://www.ethnologue.com/language/hss/
  41. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/items/0720ffc8-74bc-4c62-95fa-6a459d304a11
  42. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/35494/1/Al-Balushi_H_LCS_PhD_2023.pdf
  43. https://www.academia.edu/19191656/The_Classification_of_Hobyot
  44. https://eldp.access.preservica.com/dk0309/
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381584768_Ethnographic_texts_in_the_Bathari_language_of_Oman
  46. https://www.academia.edu/35484893/Phonetics_of_Emphatics_in_Bathari
  47. https://ahc.leeds.ac.uk/modern-south-arabian-languages/news/article/1222/language-and-culture-the-documentation-of-the-modern-south-arabian-languages
  48. https://eldp.access.preservica.com/dk0364/
  49. https://www.geschkult.fu-berlin.de/en/e/semiarab/semitistik/publikationen/2025-gasparini-2/index.html
  50. https://langsci-press.org/catalog/view/235/1818/1844-1
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318161111_Some_thoughts_on_studying_the_endangered_Modern_South_Arabian_Languages
  52. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004362475/BP000003.xml
  53. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03988300/document
  54. https://www.academia.edu/2603460/The_subgrouping_of_the_Semitic_languages
  55. https://www.academia.edu/41301167/Reconstructing_Modern_South_Arabian
  56. https://www.mhahn.info/files/hahn_msa_vowels.pdf
  57. https://bnuyaminim.wordpress.com/2025/10/22/reconstructing-the-modern-south-arabian-dual-endings/
  58. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429025563-12/soqotri-leonid-kogan-maria-bulakh
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379873406_BECAUSE_I_SPEAK_JIBBALI_A_CASE_STUDY_OF_THE_USE_OF_MINORITY_LANGUAGES_IN_DHOFARI_EDUCATIONAL_SETTINGS
  60. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/198550/7/10.4324_9781003096078-18_chapterpdf.pdf
  61. https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/10.3828/ejlp.2025.2
  62. https://mhru.edu.ye/mujounrals/index.php/mjh/article/view/207/242
  63. https://llacan.cnrs.fr/fichiers/Senelle/SoqotriDial.pdf
  64. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/bitstream/123456789/37221/1/South_Arabian_loanwords.PDF
  65. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00338711/file/Soqotri_Dialectology-2003.pdf
  66. https://ahc.leeds.ac.uk/modern-south-arabian-languages
  67. https://anr.fr/Project-ANR-13-BSH2-0001
  68. https://www.geschkult.fu-berlin.de/en/e/semiarab/semitistik/forschung/aktuelle-projekte/DFG-Projekt-_Naming-the-landscape-in-the-Modern-South-Arabian-languages_/index.html
  69. https://medium.com/wikitongues/tales-of-dhofar-beauty-the-revitalization-of-modern-south-arabian-languages-9e95e74266bb
  70. https://wikitongues.org/fellows/said-baquir/
  71. http://soqotri-lexicon.ru/pages/moreabout
  72. https://ahc.leeds.ac.uk/languages/dir-record/research-projects/801/language-and-nature-in-southern-and-eastern-arabia
  73. https://www.academia.edu/106547399/Some_thoughts_on_studying_the_endangered_Modern_South_Arabian_Languages
  74. https://ochrdoman.org/en/indigenous-languages-2/
  75. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/105/article/957601
  76. https://journals.openedition.org/arabianhumanities/2973
  77. https://www.ub.edu/ipoa/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/20162AuOrBerezkin.pdf
  78. https://www.sup.org/books/middle-east-studies/islands-heritage/excerpt/introduction
  79. https://south24.net/news/newse.php?nid=3569
  80. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/21st-century-bedouin-politics-considering-the-modern-power-of-tribes-in-the-arabian-peninsula/
  81. https://mcsr.mhru.edu.ye/en/about/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.