Hubbry Logo
Undertone seriesUndertone seriesMain
Open search
Undertone series
Community hub
Undertone series
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Undertone series
Undertone series
Undertone series
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Undertone series on C.[1]

In music, the undertone series or subharmonic series is a sequence of notes that results from inverting the intervals of the overtone series. While overtones naturally occur with the physical production of music on instruments, undertones must be produced in unusual ways. While the overtone series is based upon arithmetic multiplication of frequencies, resulting in a harmonic series, the undertone series is based on arithmetic division.[1]

Terminology

[edit]

The hybrid term subharmonic is used in music in a few different ways. In its pure sense, the term subharmonic refers strictly to any member of the subharmonic series (1⁄1, 1⁄2, 1⁄3, 1⁄4, etc.). When the subharmonic series is used to refer to frequency relationships, it is written with f representing some highest known reference frequency (f⁄1, f⁄2, f⁄3, f⁄4, etc.). As such, one way to define subharmonics is that they are "... integral submultiples of the fundamental (driving) frequency".[2] The complex tones of acoustic instruments do not produce partials that resemble the subharmonic series, unless they are played or designed to induce non-linearity. However, such tones can be produced artificially with audio software and electronics. Subharmonics can be contrasted with harmonics. While harmonics can "... occur in any linear system", there are "... only fairly restricted conditions" that will lead to the "nonlinear phenomenon known as subharmonic generation".[2]

In a second sense, subharmonic does not relate to the subharmonic series, but instead describes an instrumental technique for lowering the pitch of an acoustic instrument below what would be expected for the resonant frequency of that instrument, such as a violin string that is driven and damped by increased bow pressure to produce a fundamental frequency lower than the normal pitch of the same open string. The human voice can also be forced into a similar driven resonance, also called "undertone singing" (which similarly has nothing to do with the undertone series), to extend the range of the voice below what is normally available. However, the frequency relationships of the component partials of the tone produced by the acoustic instrument or voice played in such a way still resemble the harmonic series, not the subharmonic series. In this sense, subharmonic is a term created by reflection from the second sense of the term harmonic, which in that sense refers to an instrumental technique for making an instrument's pitch seem higher than normal by eliminating some lower partials by damping the resonator at the antinodes of vibration of those partials (such as placing a finger lightly on a string at certain locations).

In a very loose third sense, subharmonic is sometimes used or misused to represent any frequency lower than some other known frequency or frequencies, no matter what the frequency relationship is between those frequencies and no matter the method of production.

Methods for producing an undertone series

[edit]

The overtone series can be produced physically in two ways – either by overblowing a wind instrument, or by dividing a monochord string. If a monochord string is lightly damped at the halfway point, then at 1⁄3, then 1⁄4, 1⁄5, etc., then the string will produce the overtone series, which includes the major triad. If instead, the length of the string is multiplied in the opposite ratios, the undertones series is produced.

Vocal subharmonics or subharmonic singing is a vocal technique that lets singers produce notes below the fundamental and follows the undertone series. It can extend down from the regular vocal range an octave and further below when well controlled. It can be described as having a stable vocal fry-like sound. These pitches are produced by a combination of oscillations of turbulent airflow in the vocal tract. Coming from multiple sound sources such as the true and false vocal cords[citation needed]. Singers often describe it as feeling like stable points below regularly sung notes where it snaps or jumps specific intervals. This technique might also happen by accident when talking or singing in a fry voice.

String quartets by composers George Crumb and Daniel James Wolf,[citation needed] as well as works by violinist and composer Mari Kimura,[3] include undertones, "produced by bowing with great pressure to create pitches below the lowest open string on the instrument."[4] These require string instrument players to bow with sufficient pressure that the strings vibrate in a manner causing the sound waves to modulate and demodulate by the instrument's resonating horn with frequencies corresponding to subharmonics.[5]

The tritare, a guitar with Y-shaped strings, cause subharmonics too. This can also be achieved by the extended technique of crossing two strings as some experimental jazz guitarists have developed. Also third bridge preparations on guitars cause timbres consisting of sets of high pitched overtones combined with a subharmonic resonant tone of the unplugged part of the string.

Subharmonics can be produced by signal amplification through loudspeakers.[6] They are also a common effect in both digital and analog signal processing. Octave effect processors synthesize a subharmonic tone at a fixed interval to the input. Subharmonic synthesizer systems used in audio production and mastering work on the same principle.

By a similar token, analog synthesizers such as the Serge synthesizer and many modern Eurorack synthesizers can produce undertone series as a side effect of the solid state timing circuits (e.g. the 555 timer IC) in their envelope generators not being able to re-trigger until their cycle is complete.[7] As an example, sending a clock of period N into an envelope generator where the sum of the rise and fall time is greater than 2 N and less than 3 N would result in an output waveform that tracks at 1⁄3 of the frequency of the input clock.

Comparison to the overtone series

[edit]
5-limit Otonality and Utonality: overtone and "undertone" series,[8] partials 1–5 numbered

OtonalityUtonalityMajor chord on CMinor chord on F
The inversional symmetry of the two series is visible in notation

Subharmonic frequencies are frequencies below the fundamental frequency of an oscillator in a ratio of 1/n, with n a positive integer. For example, if the fundamental frequency of an oscillator is 440 Hz, sub-harmonics include 220 Hz (1⁄2), ~146.6 Hz (1⁄3) and 110 Hz (1⁄4). Thus, they are a mirror image of the harmonic series, the overtone series.

Notes in the series

[edit]

In the overtone series, if we consider C as the fundamental, the first five notes that follow are: C (one octave higher), G (perfect fifth higher than previous note), C (perfect fourth higher than previous note), E (major third higher than previous note), and G (minor third higher than previous note).

The pattern occurs in the same manner using the undertone series. Again we will start with C as the fundamental. The first five notes that follow will be: C (one octave lower), F (perfect fifth lower than previous note), C (perfect fourth lower than previous note), A♭ (major third lower than previous note), and F (minor third lower than previous note).

Undertone 12tET interval Note Variance
(cents) 		Audio
1 2 4 8 16 prime (octave) C 0
17 major seventh B −5
9 18 minor seventh A♯, B♭ −4
19 major sixth A +2
5 10 20 minor sixth G♯, A♭ +14
21 fifth G +29
11 22 tritone F♯, G♭ +49
23 −28
3 6 12 24 fourth F −2
25 major third E +27
13 26 −41
27 minor third D♯, E♭ −6
7 14 28 major second D +31
29 −30
15 30 minor second C♯, D♭ +12
31 −45

Triads

[edit]

If the first five notes of both series are compared, a pattern is seen:

  • Overtone series: C C G C E G
  • Undertone series: C C F C A♭ F

The undertone series in C contains the F minor triad. Elizabeth Godley argued that the minor triad is also implied by the undertone series and is also a naturally occurring thing in acoustics.[9] "According to this theory the upper and not the lower tone of a minor chord is the generating tone on which the unity of the chord is conditioned."[10] Whereas the major chord consists of a generator with upper major third and perfect fifth, the minor chord consists of a generator with lower major third and fifth.[10]

Resonance

[edit]

Hermann von Helmholtz observed in On the Sensations of Tone that the tone of a string tuned to C on a piano changes more noticeably when the notes of its undertone series (C, F, C, A♭, F, D, C, etc.) are struck than those of its overtones. Helmholtz argued that sympathetic resonance is at least as active in under partials as in over partials.[11] Henry Cowell discusses a "Professor Nicolas Garbusov of the Moscow Institute for Musicology" who created an instrument "on which at least the first nine undertones could be heard without the aid of resonators."[12] The phenomenon is described as occurring in resonators of instruments;

"the original sounding body does not produce the undertones but it is difficult to avoid them in resonation ... such resonators under certain circumstances respond to only every other vibration producing a half tone ... even if the resonator responds normally to every vibration ... under other circumstances the body resonates at only every third vibration ... the fact that such underpartials are often audible in music makes them of importance in understanding certain musical relationships ... the subdominant ... the minor triad."[12]

Importance in musical composition

[edit]
Minor as upside down major
The Istrian scale may be tuned as subharmonics 14 through 7[13][failed verification][14]
On D7 upside-down-

First proposed by Zarlino in Instituzione armoniche (1558)[page needed], the undertone series has been appealed to by theorists such as Riemann and D'Indy to explain phenomena such as the minor chord, that they thought the overtone series would not explain.[1] However, while the overtone series occurs naturally as a result of wave propagation and sound acoustics, musicologists such as Paul Hindemith considered the undertone series to be a purely theoretical 'intervallic reflection' of the overtone series. This assertion rests on the fact that undertones do not sound simultaneously with its fundamental tone as the overtone series does.[15]

In 1868, Adolf von Thimus showed that an indication by a 1st-century Pythagorean, Nicomachus of Gerasa, taken up by Iamblichus in the 4th century, and then worked out by von Thimus, revealed that Pythagoras already had a diagram that could fill a page with interlocking over- and undertone series.[16]

Kathleen Schlesinger pointed out, in 1939, that since the ancient Greek aulos, or reed-blown flute, had holes bored at equal distances, it must have produced a section of the undertone series.[14] She said that this discovery not only cleared up many riddles about the original Greek modes, but indicated that many ancient systems around the world must have also been based on this principle.

One area of conjecture is that the undertone series might be part of the compositional design phase of the compositional process. The overtone and undertone series can be considered two different arrays, with smaller arrays that contain different major and minor triads.[17] Most experiments with undertones to date have focused largely upon improvisation and performance not compositional design (for example the recent use of negative harmony[18] in jazz, popularised by Jacob Collier and stemming from the research of Ernst Levy), although in 1985/86 Jonathan Parry used what he called the Inverse Harmonic Series (identical to the Undertone Series) as one stage in his process of Harmonic Translation.[19]

Harry Partch argued that the overtone series and the undertone series are equally fundamental, and his concepts of Otonality and Utonality is based on this idea.[20]

Similarly, in 2006 G.H. Jackson suggested that the overtone and undertone series must be seen as a real polarity, representing on the one hand the outer "material world" and on the other, our subjective "inner world".[21] This view is largely based on the fact that the overtone series has been accepted because it can be explained by materialistic science, while the prevailing conviction about the undertone series is that it can only be achieved by taking subjective experience seriously. For instance, the minor triad is usually heard as sad, or at least pensive, because humans habitually hear all chords as based from below. If feelings are instead based on the high "fundamental" of an undertone series, then descending into a minor triad is not felt as melancholy, but rather as overcoming, conquering something. The overtones, by contrast, are then felt as penetrating from outside. Using Rudolf Steiner's work, Jackson traces the history of these two series, as well as the main other system created by the circle of fifths, and argues that in hidden form, the series are balanced out in Bach's harmony.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Undertone series

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The undertone series, also known as the subharmonic series, is a theoretical construct in music theory that consists of a descending sequence of pitches obtained by inverting the intervals of the overtone series, providing a speculative acoustic foundation for the minor triad. Proposed by German musicologist in the late , the undertone series aimed to establish between harmonies by mirroring the physically real overtone series, which generates major triads through integer multiples of a (e.g., C–E–G from C). In contrast, the undertone series derives from integer divisions, yielding a minor triad such as F–A♭–C when starting from the perceived fundamental C, thus labeling the minor chord as an "under-chord" (-c) relative to the major "over-chord" (c+). Riemann's 1875 experiments sought to demonstrate its audibility, but results were unreproducible, leading contemporaries like to criticize it as lacking empirical support and inconsistent with observed acoustics. Despite its theoretical nature and absence of natural acoustic occurrence—unlike overtones produced by vibrating strings or air columns—the undertone series advanced Riemann's doctrine of harmonic dualism, which posits equal status for tonal systems and influenced his functional of , where chords are defined by their relational roles rather than absolute roots. It gained prominence in German before but declined in Anglo-American contexts due to , only to experience rehabilitation in the late 20th century through , as explored by scholars like David Lewin and Richard Cohn, who applied it to transformational analyses of chromatic music by composers such as Wagner and Liszt. Key partials of the undertone series up to the fifth, analogous to the overtone series, include the octave below (1/2), below (1/3), and below (1/5), though higher partials deviate further from and , complicating practical applications. While physical subharmonics (integer divisions) can occur in nonlinear systems like certain electronic or distorted guitar sounds, Riemann's series remains a cognitive and structural , valued for its explanatory power in tonal rather than empirical .

Fundamentals

Definition

The undertone series, also known as the subharmonic series, is a theoretical sequence of pitches in music theory generated by taking integer divisions of a , yielding frequencies f, f/2, f/3, f/4, and so forth, where f represents the fundamental. This construct provides a downward-extending counterpart to the upward harmonic naturally present in acoustic sounds. The term "undertone series" was coined by German music theorist in the late as part of his harmonic dualism framework, positing the series as a symmetric basis for triads in contrast to the series for triads; it differs from acoustically perceived "undertones," which refer to subjective low-frequency sensations rather than verifiable subharmonic components. A basic example begins with a fundamental pitch of C (frequency f ≈ 261.63 Hz), descending through approximations in just intonation: C (f/1), the octave below at C (f/2), a perfect fifth below that at F (f/3), another octave below at C (f/4), and a major third below at A♭ (f/5), with ratios such as 3:2 inverted to 2:3 for key intervals. Acoustically, subharmonics underlying the undertone series can emerge in nonlinear systems, including vocal production through self-oscillating mechanisms, certain percussion instruments under specific excitations, and electronic signal processing, though they are rare and weak compared to overtones; in Western music theory, the series functions predominantly as an abstract model rather than a physically dominant phenomenon.

Mathematical Representation

The undertone series, or subharmonic series, is mathematically defined by frequencies that are successive divisions of a ff, yielding components at f/nf/n for positive s n=1,2,3,…n = 1, 2, 3, \dots. This contrasts with the overtone series, where frequencies are multiples nfnf. In musical contexts using , these subharmonics are approximated with simple rational frequency ratios relative to the fundamental, such as 1/11/1, 1/21/2, 1/31/3, along with interval ratios between consecutive partials such as 2/32/3 (from f/2f/2 to f/3f/3) and 4/54/5 (from f/4f/4 to f/5f/5), derived from inverting harmonic intervals. For instance, the ratio 2/32/3 (corresponding to a descending perfect fifth) deviates by approximately 701.96 cents from equal temperament when measured below the fundamental, calculated as 1200log⁡2(2/3)1200 \log_2(2/3). From the perspective of , the subharmonic series appears as frequency components inversely related to those in the series. A periodic signal exhibiting the undertone series can be expressed in the as the infinite sum S(t)=∑n=1∞Ansin⁡(2πfnt),S(t) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} A_n \sin\left(2\pi \frac{f}{n} t\right), where AnA_n represents the of the nnth subharmonic. Unlike harmonics, which emerge naturally from linear resonances in physical systems like vibrating strings or air columns, undertones do not occur spontaneously and require targeted energy input at the lower subharmonic frequencies, typically through nonlinear acoustic interactions or forced oscillations to sustain them.

Generation Methods

Theoretical Construction

The theoretical construction of the undertone series relies on inverting the intervals of the series to generate a descending sequence of pitches from a given fundamental. This inversion process transforms ascending intervals, such as the (3:2 ratio), into their descending equivalents, like a descending , creating a mirror image that emphasizes and minor harmonic tendencies. In , these inversions preserve pure frequency ratios, allowing for a systematic build that parallels the series but in reverse direction. To build the series step by step, begin with the fundamental pitch, for example C. Successively apply inverted intervals in descending order: first a perfect octave down (inversion of the ascending octave) to C, followed by a perfect fifth down to F, then a perfect fourth down to C, a major third down to A♭, a minor third down to F, and continuing with further inversions such as minor thirds or seconds to extend the series. This cumulative process yields the undertone sequence C, C, F, C, A♭, F, among others, forming a theoretical lattice of pitches that supports minor triads and related harmonies like C–A♭–F. The specific interval sequence—perfect octave down, perfect fifth down, perfect fourth down, major third down, and so forth—mirrors the proportional structure of the overtone partials while adapting for descending motion. Tuning considerations in this construction prioritize to maintain consonance, employing adjustments like the (81:80 ratio, approximately 21.5 cents) to align chains of fifths and thirds without introducing wolf intervals. For instance, successive descending fifths may accumulate comma discrepancies, resolved by sharpening or flattening notes to fit the pure ratios of the 5-limit system. This ensures the series remains theoretically coherent within a closed harmonic space. While the undertone series provides a cognitive framework for comprehending inverted functions, it exists primarily as an abstract theoretical tool rather than an auditory , as subharmonics do not arise naturally from vibrating bodies in standard acoustics. This perceptual distinction underscores its role in mental tone representation, where musicians imagine descending structures to analyze and compose minor-mode progressions.

Practical Production Techniques

In electronic synthesis, subharmonics forming the undertone series are generated by dividing a by integers, often using dedicated oscillators or clock dividers in modular systems. The Mixtur-Trautonium, developed by in 1952, exemplifies this approach by employing subharmonic mixture circuits to produce up to four subharmonics from a given fundamental, enabling polyphonic textures based on inverted harmonic intervals. Modern instruments like the Moog Subharmonicon utilize a multi-layered to drive six-tone engines, creating polyrhythmic subharmonic progressions through programmable dividers that explore undertone relationships. Acoustic approximations of the undertone series arise from nonlinear vibrations in instruments, where energy transfer produces frequencies below the fundamental. In Tibetan singing bowls, rubbing the rim with a or finger excites axial waves that couple with edge-induced Faraday waves, generating subharmonics at half the forcing frequency due to parametric in the fluid-structure interaction. Similarly, rubbing a wetted finger along the rim of a thin tumbler or can elicit subharmonic notes through frictional nonlinearities at the contact point, as observed in early acoustic experiments. In string instruments such as acoustic guitars, subharmonics emerge from nonlinear string dynamics during plucking or , typically at integer fractions like 1/2 or 1/3 of the fundamental, with greater prevalence on higher-pitched strings due to material stiffness and tension effects. Digital methods simulate the undertone series by synthesizing additive waveforms with oscillators tuned to subharmonic ratios (f/n, where n is an integer greater than 1), often in real-time patching environments. These approaches draw from historical electronic principles, such as those in the lineage, to create programmable undertone progressions without physical nonlinearities. Producing true subharmonics poses challenges, as they require nonlinear coupling in the system to transfer energy from higher to lower frequencies, exceeding a threshold intensity determined by dissipation, detuning, and medium properties—conditions rarer than those yielding natural overtones in linear resonators. In acoustic contexts, factors like or misalignment must be avoided, while electronic and digital methods mitigate this via controlled division but demand precise to avoid inharmonic artifacts. Perceptually, undertones can be evoked through illusions like difference tones from higher partials, approximating the effect in reverse.

Comparison with Overtone Series

Interval Inversion

The undertone series is derived from the series through interval inversion, where each frequency rr in the overtone series is replaced by its reciprocal 1/r1/r, resulting in a descending sequence of intervals from a generating tone. For instance, the overtone of 2:12:1 (ascending) inverts to 1:21:2 (descending octave), and the of 3:23:2 (ascending) inverts to 2:32:3 (descending ). This mathematical reciprocity transforms the upward-building structure of into a downward one for undertones, preserving the harmonic relationships while reversing their direction. Both series exhibit parallel structures in their ratio patterns, but the undertone series operates in reverse direction relative to the series, creating a symmetrical counterpart around the fundamental tone. In the series, intervals ascend from the fundamental, generating sonorities; in the undertone series, they descend, yielding sonorities as mirrors of the former. For example, the ascending (3:2) in the series from C to G inverts to a descending (2:3) from C to F in the undertone series, highlighting how the same interval class appears in opposed orientations. The following table compares the first six intervals of each series, reduced to their simplest octave-equivalent forms, starting from a fundamental C (intervals measured from C downward for and upward for ):
PositionOvertone Series Interval (Ascending)RatioUndertone Series Interval (Descending)Ratio
1 (P1)1:1 (P1)1:1
2 (P8)2:1 (P8d)1:2
3 (P5)3:2 (P5d)2:3
4 (P4)4:3 (P4d)3:4
5 (M3) (m3d)4:5
6 (m3)6:5 (M3d)5:6
These sequences demonstrate the inverted parallelism, with undertone intervals complementing their overtone counterparts to sum to an octave (e.g., P5 + P4 = P8). This inversion process underpins the theoretical concept of negative harmony, as developed by Ernst Levy, where undertones represent the "negative" or minor pole mirroring the "positive" or major pole of overtones around a central fundamental, establishing a polar symmetry in tonal harmony. In Levy's framework, major and minor modes arise as reciprocal expressions of this duality, with undertones providing the descending gravitational pull analogous to the ascending overtones.

Resulting Notes and Chords

The undertone series, when constructed in with C as the fundamental (ratio ), generates a descending sequence of pitches based on reciprocal integer adjusted to lie within an . The initial terms are 1/1 (C), 1/2 (C an below), 2/3 (F an below), 3/4 (F♯/G♭ an below), 4/5 (A♭ an below), 5/6 (A an below), and continuing with 8/7 (B an below), 7/8 (B♭ an below), 9/8 (D an below), among others. Unlike the physically observable series, the undertone series is a theoretical construct without natural acoustic occurrence in linear systems. When normalized to the octave below the fundamental for staff notation, the sequence appears as descending pitches such as C4, F3, A♭3, , B3, G3, and so on, forming a theoretical spectrum that mirrors the overtone series but in reverse order. The first three distinct notes in this series—C (1/1), F (2/3), and A♭ (4/5)—comprise the pitches of a minor triad. Voiced from lowest to highest as A♭–F–C, this represents the first inversion of the F minor triad, where the root F is in the middle position and the third A♭ serves as the bass note. This structure contrasts sharply with the overtone series, in which the corresponding notes C (1/1), E (5/4), and G (3/2) form the root-position major triad ascending from the bass. When approached from below in the undertone context, the A♭–F–C voicing evokes a minor harmonic texture due to the leading major third (A♭ to F, ratio 5/4, adjusted) followed by a minor third (F to C, ratio 6/5), with the overall pitches those of the minor triad. Extending the series further yields a diatonic-like scale in descending order, incorporating pitches that approximate the when selected appropriately for modal contexts. For instance, selecting key partials such as C (1/1), B♭ (16/15 approx.), A♭ (4/5), F (2/3), E (8/5 approx.), D (9/8 adjusted), and others produces a sequence akin to the descending (C B♭ A♭ G F E♭ D), useful for exploring modal symmetries and inverted harmonic progressions. In , the just intonation ratios of the undertone series introduce deviations that produce audible beats and perceived roughness, particularly in chordal contexts. For example, the interval (, 386.31 cents) deviates by about 13.69 cents from the equal-tempered (400 cents), while the (3/2, 701.96 cents) deviates by 1.96 cents from 700 cents; these mismatches cause interference patterns, with larger discrepancies in thirds leading to a less , "wobbly" sound compared to pure .

Musical Significance

Role in Harmony

The undertone series contributes to harmonic by providing a for the consonance of triads, which arise naturally from the inversion of overtone intervals. Specifically, the 5:4 from the overtone series inverts to a 6:5 in the undertone series, positioning the triad as a symmetric counterpart to the major triad and justifying its perceptual stability through shared harmonic principles like perfect fifths and reduced roughness. This dualistic view, rooted in spectral mirroring, explains why chords evoke a sense of inherent consonance comparable to major chords, though slightly less due to interval properties, as supported by psychoacoustic models of harmonicity and smoothness. In Riemann's theory of harmonic dualism, the undertone series underpins "negative harmony," where musical structures are reflected over the tonic axis to create descending resolutions that parallel ascending overtone-based progressions. Major-key melodies and harmonies (e.g., I-IV-V-I) invert to minor-key counterparts (e.g., i-iv-v-i), with undertones generating the minor tonic and functions for downward motion, emphasizing between positive (major, ascending) and negative (minor, descending) tonal domains. This reflection fosters balanced , particularly in minor keys, by treating the minor triad as the perceptual inverse of the major, promoting resolutions that feel grounded and rather than directive. Psychoacoustically, the undertone series influences consonance perception in functions by reinforcing virtual pitch salience and tonal stability, where minor (e.g., iv in minor keys) derive stability from inverted harmonic cues that align with auditory expectations of resolution. This perceived stability arises from reduced and familiarity in key profiles, with subharmonics contributing to the emotional neutrality of chords compared to dominant tension, thus supporting their role in smooth progressions toward the tonic.

Applications in Composition

The undertone series serves as a foundational tool in microtonal and composition, particularly through Harry Partch's concepts of otonality (derived from the series) and utonality (derived from the undertone series), where he overlaid symmetrical undertone and progressions to generate scales and structures beyond . In Partch's works, such as his 43-tone scale system, utonal chords—built from the first few subharmonics—create descending interval progressions that mirror ascending overtones, enabling complex, non-tempered harmonies that emphasize acoustic purity and ritualistic expression. This approach influenced subsequent microtonal composers by providing a theoretical basis for inverting traditional progressions to explore and minor-key resolutions. Contemporary composers have integrated the undertone series into spectral and electroacoustic practices by simulating subharmonics to extend timbral and harmonic spectra. For instance, in Dane Rudhyar's Granites (1929), a seed-tone dyad expands symmetrically via an undertone series on the lower pitch alongside an overtone series on the upper, generating dissonant harmonies that evolve through spectral interpolation and emphasize acoustic interference patterns. In electroacoustic music, subharmonic synthesis techniques—rooted in undertone principles—allow for the artificial generation of frequencies below the fundamental, enriching low-end timbres and creating polyrhythmic textures, as seen in modular synthesizer compositions that divide oscillator frequencies to mimic subharmonic cascades. These methods prioritize perceptual fusion over melodic linearity, drawing on the undertone series to blur boundaries between harmony and timbre. Pedagogically, the undertone series aids in teaching interval inversion and the acoustic rationale for minor triads, as the first three subharmonics (fundamental, descending , descending ) outline a minor chord, contrasting the major triad from overtones. This inversion facilitates exercises focused on recognizing functions and symmetric harmonies, often visualized in software tools like tuning matrices that display overtone-undertone overlays for interactive exploration. By inverting overtone-based themes, students generate melodies that highlight modal interchange, enhancing conceptual understanding of harmonic duality without relying on empirical overtones alone.

Historical Development

Origins in Music Theory

The concept of the undertone series emerged in the 19th century as part of broader investigations into acoustics and musical harmony, with early discussions rooted in the physics of sound production. Hermann von Helmholtz, in his seminal 1863 treatise On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music, explored subharmonics—frequencies that are integer divisions of a fundamental tone—as potential components of complex sounds, observing their presence in the spectrum of bells and questioning their perceptual role in consonance. Helmholtz distinguished these from overtones, noting that subharmonics arise theoretically from nonlinear interactions but are not generated by simple linear vibrations of strings or air columns in the same manner. Pre-19th-century foundations for the undertone series can be traced to theory and ancient tuning practices, where interval inversions implicitly suggested downward harmonic progressions. Gioseffo Zarlino's Le Istitutioni harmoniche (1558) presented consonant ratios such as the (6:5) and sixth (3:5), which align with subharmonic divisions when considering arithmetic progressions of string lengths, providing an early theoretical basis for minor intervals without explicit reference to undertones.) These ratios built upon systems from antiquity, where inverting the circle of fifths (3:2 ratios stacked downward) yields intervals mirroring the undertone series, such as descending perfect fifths producing a minor triad structure. A pivotal advancement came in the 1880s through Hugo Riemann's theory of harmonic dualism, which posited the undertone series as the acoustic foundation for the minor mode to parallel the overtone series for the major mode. In works like Musikalisches Logik (1872, expanded in the 1880s) and Harmony Simplified (1893 English translation), Riemann argued that the minor triad (e.g., F–A♭–C) derives from the undertone series partials analogous to the overtone series, with C as the perceived fundamental, yielding the "under-chord" (-c) structure contrasting the major "over-chord" (c+), contrasting Moritz Hauptmann's earlier view in Die Natur der Harmonik und Metrik (1853) that the minor triad is merely an inverted major triad lacking independent acoustic legitimacy. Riemann's dualism sought to establish symmetry between major and minor, grounding minor harmony in a perceived undertone paradigm despite physical challenges. By the 1890s, the undertone series sparked controversy in acoustics journals, centering on whether subharmonics represented physical realities or mere theoretical constructs. Debates in publications like the and German acoustical periodicals questioned Riemann's claims, with physicists like Lord Rayleigh in The Theory of Sound (1877, revised 1894) affirming that true subharmonics occur only in nonlinear systems (e.g., organ pipes under high pressure) but not in standard musical instruments, dismissing widespread undertone production as illusory. These exchanges highlighted the tension between empirical observation and theoretical utility, influencing ongoing discussions in music theory without resolving the series' acoustic validity.

Modern Interpretations

In the , acoustic research advanced the understanding of subharmonics, which underpin the undertone series, through studies on their generation in nonlinear systems. Early experiments demonstrated subharmonic production in electrical oscillators, where high-frequency inputs led to lower-frequency outputs at fractional multiples of the driving frequency. These findings provided empirical support for undertones as physically realizable phenomena beyond mere theoretical constructs. Complementing this, investigations in the 1980s explored virtual pitch perception, revealing how listeners infer missing fundamental frequencies from harmonic complexes, with parallels drawn to undertone-like structures in auditory processing. In the late 20th century, the undertone series experienced revival through , pioneered by David Lewin and Richard Cohn, which uses geometric transformations to analyze tonal relations symmetrically between , influencing studies of 19th-century . In 1985 (posthumously), Swiss musicologist Ernst Levy introduced "negative harmony" in his seminal work A Theory of Harmony, building on Hugo Riemann's dualistic theory by positing an inverted tonal axis where dominant relations mirror ones, effectively incorporating undertones as a symmetric counterpart to overtones. This concept gained renewed prominence in the 2010s through multi-instrumentalist , who popularized negative harmony in educational contexts, demonstrating its application in improvisational and compositional techniques via the undertone series to create symmetrical chord progressions. Scientific advancements in nonlinear dynamics have further validated undertones via , particularly in the 1990s through analyses of circuits exhibiting subharmonic bifurcations. Leon Chua's circuit, a simple nonlinear electronic system, produces subharmonics as part of its chaotic attractors, where period-doubling routes lead to fractional components observable in oscillatory behavior. Perceptual neuroscience has corroborated these acoustic realities using functional MRI, showing distinct brain activation in regions during processing of harmonic and subharmonic stimuli, with subcortical structures like the integrating low-frequency undertone cues for pitch perception. In global musical contexts, the undertone series has influenced microtonal explorations, notably in the with scales like the Bohlen-Pierce system, which incorporates odd-harmonic ratios akin to subharmonic inversions to generate novel tonal frameworks beyond .

References

  1. https://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.05.11.2/mto.05.11.2.harrison.pdf
  2. https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/ec1f2dcc-9150-4299-8514-6878aaea3cc4/content
  3. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2288&context=etdarchive
  4. https://hal.science/hal-05287347v1/file/ipotones.pdf
  5. https://assets.cambridge.org/97805218/20738/sample/9780521820738ws.pdf
  6. https://ncvs.org/can-the-production-of-subharmonics-in-vocalization-be-considered-a-form-of-self-organization/
  7. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0725604.pdf
  8. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.08904
  9. https://hal.science/hal-05287347/document
  10. https://masa.plainsound.org/pdfs/Pantonality.pdf
  11. https://online.ucpress.edu/jams/article/77/2/447/202823/The-Global-Tonnetz
  12. https://hasegawa.research.mcgill.ca/pdf/Hasegawa-Dissertation_Just_Intervals_and_Tone_Representation_2008.pdf
  13. https://westfield.org/public/IMT.pdf
  14. https://www.moogmusic.com/synthesizers/subharmonicon/
  15. https://www.nature.com/articles/116901b0
  16. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/etdarchive/1208
  17. https://120years.net/the-mixturtrautonium-oskar-sala-germany-1936/
  18. https://www.beyondmusictheory.org/the-harmonic-series
  19. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/322583522.pdf
  20. https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1614&context=honors
  21. https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph-pdf/2333001/book_9780262377362.pdf
  22. https://direct.mit.edu/books/oa-monograph/chapter-pdf/2333016/c006900_9780262377362.pdf
  23. https://www.kylegann.com/NavigatingPitchSpace.pdf
  24. https://juhanpuhmmusic.ca/Juhan-Puhm-Compendium-Musica-Otonality-and-Utonality.pdf
  25. https://mtosmt.org/issues/mto.14.20.2/mto.14.20.2.trinastic.pdf
  26. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/organised-sound/article/structuring-spectra-in-electroacoustic-music/D466FF966D96AC1D04B02717964C7707
  27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/729740
  28. https://people.ucsc.edu/~dej/migrated/Tibiae/temp.pdf
  29. https://archive.org/details/onsensationsofto00helmrich
  30. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/on-the-sensations-of-tone-as-a-physiological-basis-for-the-theory-of-music/6B5630E5D439286A8946CEB9D62BE6EC
  31. https://www.britannica.com/art/Pythagorean-tuning
  32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/738814
  33. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/mhz8-kj61/download
  34. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/musa.12233
  35. https://direct.mit.edu/comj/article/48/2/19/131098/On-the-Application-of-Negative-Harmony-to-Melody
  36. http://crossgroup.caltech.edu/Chaos_Course/Chua/Chua.html
  37. https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article/34/8/bhae316/7725436
  38. https://georghajdu.de/wp-content/uploads/Starting-over.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.