Hubbry Logo
Fold (geology)Fold (geology)Main
Open search
Fold (geology)
Community hub
Fold (geology)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Fold (geology)
Fold (geology)
Fold (geology)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Folds of alternate layers of limestone and chert occur in Greece. The limestone and chert were originally deposited as flat layers on the floor of a deep sea basin. These folds were produced by Alpine deformation.

In structural geology, a fold is a stack of originally planar surfaces, such as sedimentary strata, that are bent or curved ("folded") during permanent deformation. Folds in rocks vary in size from microscopic crinkles to mountain-sized folds. They occur as single isolated folds or in periodic sets (known as fold trains). Synsedimentary folds are those formed during sedimentary deposition.

Folds form under varied conditions of stress, pore pressure, and temperature gradient, as evidenced by their presence in soft sediments, the full spectrum of metamorphic rocks, and even as primary flow structures in some igneous rocks. A set of folds distributed on a regional scale constitutes a fold belt, a common feature of orogenic zones. Folds are commonly formed by shortening of existing layers, but may also be formed as a result of displacement on a non-planar fault (fault bend fold), at the tip of a propagating fault (fault propagation fold), by differential compaction or due to the effects of a high-level igneous intrusion e.g. above a laccolith.

Kink band folds in the Permian of New Mexico, USA
Rainbow Basin syncline in the Barstow Formation near Barstow, California

Fold terminology

[edit]
Fold sketch 3D model

The fold hinge is the line joining points of maximum curvature on a folded surface. This line may be either straight or curved. The term hinge line has also been used for this feature.[1]

A fold surface seen perpendicular to its shortening direction can be divided into hinge and limb portions; the limbs are the flanks of the fold, and the limbs converge at the hinge zone. Within the hinge zone lies the hinge point, which is the point of minimum radius of curvature (maximum curvature) of the fold. The crest of the fold represents the highest point of the fold surface whereas the trough is the lowest point. The inflection point of a fold is the point on a limb at which the concavity reverses; on regular folds, this is the midpoint of the limb.

Flank & hinge

The axial surface is defined as a plane connecting all the hinge lines of stacked folded surfaces. If the axial surface is planar, it is called an axial plane and can be described in terms of strike and dip.

Folds can have a fold axis. A fold axis "is the closest approximation to a straight line that when moved parallel to itself, generates the form of the fold".[2] (Ramsay 1967). A fold that can be generated by a fold axis is called a cylindrical fold. This term has been broadened to include near-cylindrical folds. Often, the fold axis is the same as the hinge line.[3][4]

Descriptive features

[edit]

Fold size

[edit]

Minor folds are quite frequently seen in outcrop; major folds seldom are except in the more arid countries. Minor folds can, however, often provide the key to the major folds they are related to. They reflect the same shape and style, the direction in which the closures of the major folds lie, and their cleavage indicates the attitude of the axial planes of the major folds and their direction of overturning [5]

Fold shape

[edit]
Chevron folds, Ireland

A fold can be shaped like a chevron, with planar limbs meeting at an angular axis, as cuspate with curved limbs, as circular with a curved axis, or as elliptical with unequal wavelength.

Fold tightness

[edit]
Interlimb angles

Fold tightness is defined by the size of the angle between the fold's limbs (as measured tangential to the folded surface at the inflection line of each limb), called the interlimb angle. Gentle folds have an interlimb angle of between 180° and 120°, open folds range from 120° to 70°, close folds from 70° to 30°, and tight folds from 30° to 0°.[6] Isoclines, or isoclinal folds, have an interlimb angle of between 10° and zero, with essentially parallel limbs.

Fold symmetry

[edit]

Not all folds are equal on both sides of the axis of the fold. Those with limbs of relatively equal length are termed symmetrical, and those with highly unequal limbs are asymmetrical. Asymmetrical folds generally have an axis at an angle to the original unfolded surface they formed on.

Facing and vergence

[edit]

Vergence is calculated in a direction perpendicular to the fold axis.

Deformation style classes

[edit]
Ramsay classification of folds by convergence of dip isogons (red lines).[7]

Folds that maintain uniform layer thickness are classed as concentric folds. Those that do not are called similar folds. Similar folds tend to display thinning of the limbs and thickening of the hinge zone. Concentric folds are caused by warping from active buckling of the layers, whereas similar folds usually form by some form of shear flow where the layers are not mechanically active. Ramsay has proposed a classification scheme for folds that often is used to describe folds in profile based upon the curvature of the inner and outer lines of a fold and the behavior of dip isogons. that is, lines connecting points of equal dip on adjacent folded surfaces:[8]

Ramsay classification scheme for folds
Class Curvature C Comment
1 Cinner > Couter Dip isogons converge
1A Orthogonal thickness at hinge narrower than at limbs
1B Parallel folds
1C Orthogonal thickness at limbs narrower than at hinge
2 Cinner = Couter Dip isogons are parallel: similar folds
3 Cinner < Couter Dip isogons diverge

Types of fold

[edit]
An anticline in New Jersey
A monocline at Colorado National Monument
Recumbent fold, King Oscar Fjord

Linear

[edit]
  • Anticline: linear, strata normally dip away from the axial center, oldest strata in center irrespective of orientation.
  • Syncline: linear, strata normally dip toward the axial center, youngest strata in center irrespective of orientation.
  • Antiform: linear, strata dip away from the axial center, age unknown, or inverted.
  • Synform: linear, strata dip toward the axial center, age unknown, or inverted.
  • Monocline: linear, strata dip in one direction between horizontal layers on each side.
  • Recumbent: linear, fold axial plane oriented at a low angle resulting in overturned strata in one limb of the fold.

Other

[edit]
  • Dome: nonlinear, strata dip away from center in all directions, oldest strata in center.
  • Basin: nonlinear, strata dip toward center in all directions, youngest strata in center.
  • Chevron: angular fold with straight limbs and small hinges
  • Slump: typically monoclinal, the result of differential compaction or dissolution during sedimentation and lithification.
  • Ptygmatic: Folds are chaotic, random and disconnected. Typical of sedimentary slump folding, migmatites and decollement detachment zones.
  • Parasitic: short-wavelength folds formed within a larger wavelength fold structure - normally associated with differences in bed thickness[9]
  • Disharmonic: Folds in adjacent layers with different wavelengths and shapes[9]

(A homocline involves strata dipping in the same direction, though not necessarily any folding.)

Causes of folding

[edit]

Folds appear on all scales, in all rock types, at all levels in the crust. They arise from a variety of causes.

Layer-parallel shortening

[edit]
Box fold in La Herradura Formation, Morro Solar, Peru

When a sequence of layered rocks is shortened parallel to its layering, this deformation may be accommodated in a number of ways, homogeneous shortening, reverse faulting or folding. The response depends on the thickness of the mechanical layering and the contrast in properties between the layers. If the layering does begin to fold, the fold style is also dependent on these properties. Isolated thick competent layers in a less competent matrix control the folding and typically generate classic rounded buckle folds accommodated by deformation in the matrix. In the case of regular alternations of layers of contrasting properties, such as sandstone-shale sequences, kink-bands, box-folds and chevron folds are normally produced.[10]

Rollover anticline
Ramp anticline
Fault-propagation fold
[edit]

Many folds are directly related to faults, associated with their propagation, displacement and the accommodation of strains between neighboring faults.

Fault bend folding

[edit]

Fault-bend folds are caused by displacement along a non-planar fault. In non-vertical faults, the hanging-wall deforms to accommodate the mismatch across the fault as displacement progresses. Fault bend folds occur in both extensional and thrust faulting. In extension, listric faults form rollover anticlines in their hanging walls.[11] In thrusting, ramp anticlines form whenever a thrust fault cuts up section from one detachment level to another. Displacement over this higher-angle ramp generates the folding.[12]

Fault propagation folding

[edit]

Fault propagation folds or tip-line folds are caused when displacement occurs on an existing fault without further propagation. In both reverse and normal faults this leads to folding of the overlying sequence, often in the form of a monocline.[13]

Detachment folding

[edit]

When a thrust fault continues to displace above a planar detachment without further fault propagation, detachment folds may form, typically of box-fold style. These generally occur above a good detachment such as in the Jura Mountains, where the detachment occurs on middle Triassic evaporites.[14]

Folding in shear zones

[edit]
Dextral sense shear folds in mylonites within a shear zone, Cap de Creus

Shear zones that approximate to simple shear typically contain minor asymmetric folds, with the direction of overturning consistent with the overall shear sense. Some of these folds have highly curved hinge-lines and are referred to as sheath folds. Folds in shear zones can be inherited, formed due to the orientation of pre-shearing layering or formed due to instability within the shear flow.[15]

Folding in sediments

[edit]

Recently deposited sediments are normally mechanically weak and prone to remobilization before they become lithified, leading to folding. To distinguish them from folds of tectonic origin, such structures are called synsedimentary (formed during sedimentation).

Slump folding: When slumps form in poorly consolidated sediments, they commonly undergo folding, particularly at their leading edges, during their emplacement. The asymmetry of the slump folds can be used to determine paleoslope directions in sequences of sedimentary rocks.[16]

Dewatering: Rapid dewatering of sandy sediments, possibly triggered by seismic activity, can cause convolute bedding.[17]

Compaction: Folds can be generated in a younger sequence by differential compaction over older structures such as fault blocks and reefs.[18]

Igneous intrusion

[edit]

The emplacement of igneous intrusions tends to deform the surrounding country rock. In the case of high-level intrusions, near the Earth's surface, this deformation is concentrated above the intrusion and often takes the form of folding, as with the upper surface of a laccolith.[19]

Flow folding

[edit]
Flow folding: depiction of the effect of an advancing ramp of rigid rock into compliant layers. Top: low drag by a ramp: layers are not altered in thickness; Bottom: high drag: lowest layers tend to crumple.[20]

The compliance of rock layers is referred to as competence: a competent layer or bed of rock can withstand an applied load without collapsing and is relatively strong, while an incompetent layer is relatively weak. When rock behaves as a fluid, as in the case of very weak rock such as rock salt, or any rock that is buried deeply enough, it typically shows flow folding (also called passive folding, because little resistance is offered): the strata appear shifted undistorted, assuming any shape impressed upon them by surrounding more rigid rocks. The strata simply serve as markers of the folding.[21] Such folding is also a feature of many igneous intrusions and glacier ice.[22]

Folding mechanisms

[edit]

Folding of rocks must balance the deformation of layers with the conservation of volume in a rock mass. This occurs by several mechanisms.

Flexural slip

[edit]

Flexural slip allows folding by creating layer-parallel slip between the layers of the folded strata, which, altogether, result in deformation. A good analogy is bending a phone book, where volume preservation is accommodated by slip between the pages of the book.

The fold formed by the compression of competent rock beds is called "flexure fold".

Buckling

[edit]

Typically, folding is thought to occur by simple buckling of a planar surface and its confining volume. The volume change is accommodated by layer parallel shortening the volume, which grows in thickness. Folding under this mechanism is typical of a similar fold style, as thinned limbs are shortened horizontally and thickened hinges do so vertically.

Mass displacement

[edit]

If the folding deformation cannot be accommodated by a flexural slip or volume-change shortening (buckling), the rocks are generally removed from the path of the stress. This is achieved by pressure dissolution, a form of metamorphic process, in which rocks shorten by dissolving constituents in areas of high strain and redepositing them in areas of lower strain. Folds generated in this way include examples in migmatites and areas with a strong axial planar cleavage.

Mechanics of folding

[edit]

Folds in the rock are formed about the stress field in which the rocks are located and the rheology, or method of response to stress, of the rock at the time at which the stress is applied.

The rheology of the layers being folded determines characteristic features of the folds that are measured in the field. Rocks that deform more easily form many short-wavelength, high-amplitude folds. Rocks that do not deform as easily form long-wavelength, low-amplitude folds.

Economic implications

[edit]

Mining industry

[edit]
anticline oil trap

Layers of rock that fold into a hinge need to accommodate large deformations in the hinge zone. This results in voids between the layers. These voids, and especially the fact that the water pressure is lower in the voids than outside of them, act as triggers for the deposition of minerals. Over millions of years, this process is capable of gathering large quantities of trace minerals from large expanses of rock and depositing them at very concentrated sites. This may be a mechanism that is responsible for the veins. To summarize, when searching for veins of valuable minerals, it might be wise to look for highly folded rock, and this is the reason why the mining industry is very interested in the theory of geological folding.[23]

Oil industry

[edit]

Anticlinal traps are formed by folding of rock. For example, if a porous sandstone unit covered with low permeability shale is folded into an anticline, it may form a hydrocarbons trap, oil accumulating in the crest of the fold. Most anticlinal traps are produced as a result of sideways pressure, folding the layers of rock, but can also occur from sediments being compacted.[24]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Fold (geology)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In , a fold is a geologic formed when originally planar layers of rock, such as sedimentary strata, are bent or curved during ductile deformation, typically under compressional tectonic forces that shorten the . Folds develop primarily at depth where elevated temperatures and pressures enable rocks to behave plastically without fracturing, resulting from mechanisms such as , , or flow in response to stress oriented relative to the rock layers. They vary widely in scale, from microscopic structures to features spanning hundreds of kilometers, and are classified by , , and orientation, with key types including anticlines (upward-arching, convex-up folds where older rocks occupy ), synclines (downward-troughing, concave-up folds with younger rocks in ), monoclines (step-like bends in otherwise horizontal strata), domes (broad, circular upwarps), and basins (circular downwarps filled with sediments). Folds play a crucial role in understanding tectonic history, as their —defined by elements like the axial plane, fold axis, line, and limbs—reveals the direction and intensity of past deformations, and they often control the distribution of resources, hydrocarbons, and landscapes through subsequent .

Terminology and Basic Concepts

Definition

In structural geology, a fold is a stack of originally planar surfaces, such as sedimentary strata, that are bent or curved as a result of permanent deformation due to tectonic forces. These structures form when rocks respond to compressional stresses by undulating rather than breaking, preserving the continuity of the layers while altering their geometry. Folds are fundamental indicators of deformational history in the and are commonly observed in orogenic belts where tectonic plates converge. The concept of folds was first systematically described in the 19th century by geologists studying mountain belts, such as in his examinations of deformed rocks in and James Hall in the . Sedgwick's work on highly folded and faulted sequences contributed to early understandings of rock deformation, while Hall linked folding to the evolution of geosynclines into mountain ranges. Folds typically develop through ductile deformation, where rocks behave plastically under sufficient and , in contrast to brittle faulting that occurs at shallower depths and results in fractures. This ductile behavior predominates below the brittle-ductile transition zone in the crust, generally at depths of 10–20 km, where temperatures surpass approximately 250–400°C (depending on and rock composition), allowing minerals to flow without rupturing. Below this transition, more intense ductile flow can occur, but surface-expressed folds often originate from shallower ductile regimes. Such structures can range from minor undulations observable in outcrops to vast regional features spanning hundreds of kilometers.

Key Terminology

In structural geology, the description of folds relies on a standardized set of terms that capture their geometric elements and orientations. The hinge line is the line along a folded surface where curvature is maximum, connecting successive hinge points on adjacent layers. The axial plane (or axial surface) is the plane that bisects the fold, passing through all hinge points and dividing the structure into its two limbs. The limb refers to each of the two flanks of the fold, extending from the hinge to the inflection point where curvature changes sign. Additional terms describe specific features of fold profiles. The crest is the highest point along the trace of an anticline in cross-sectional view, while the trough is the lowest point along the trace of a syncline. The plunge measures the angle between the hinge line and the horizontal plane, indicating the tilt of the fold axis downward into the Earth. To fully characterize fold orientations, geologists use planar descriptors applicable to the axial plane or bedding surfaces. Strike is the compass direction of a horizontal line lying within the plane, perpendicular to the direction of maximum slope. Dip is the acute angle of inclination of the plane measured downward from the horizontal, in the direction perpendicular to strike. These terms, along with others, were systematized in seminal works such as Ramsay's Folding and Fracturing of Rocks (1967), which established much of the modern vocabulary for fold analysis.

Descriptive Characteristics

Size and Scale

Folds in geology are classified by size based on their wavelength, spanning a vast range from microscopic structures to vast regional features. Microfolds typically exhibit wavelengths less than 1 cm and are often observed in thin sections or hand samples, such as those in evaporite formations where buckling occurs at millimeter scales. Mesofolds have wavelengths ranging from centimeters to about 1 meter, visible in outcrops or hand specimens, while megafolds possess wavelengths exceeding 1 km, forming prominent landscape features in orogenic belts. The primary measurements for assessing fold size are and . is defined as the distance between adjacent hinges of similar orientation along the fold axis, providing a measure of the periodicity in fold trains. represents the maximum from the crest of an to the trough of the adjacent , quantifying the vertical extent of the deformation. These parameters are essential for characterizing fold trains and distinguishing hierarchical nesting, where smaller folds may develop within larger ones. The scale of folds bears significant geological implications, as larger wavelengths generally correlate with greater depths of formation under more ductile conditions. According to Biot's theory of folding in stratified viscoelastic media, the dominant wavelength is influenced by layer thickness and contrasts, which increase with burial depth due to elevated temperatures and pressures promoting ductile behavior. Thus, megafolds reflect deformation in thicker, more competent layers at deeper crustal levels, whereas microfolds form in thinner, less viscous materials closer to the surface. Tightness can influence the perceived dimensions by altering hinge sharpness, but wavelength remains the fundamental scale indicator. Representative examples illustrate this spectrum. In the Appalachian Valley and Ridge province, megafolds dominate with wavelengths of 10–20 km and amplitudes up to several hundred meters, shaping the regional through sedimentary layering. In contrast, microfolds in hand samples from lab studies or field collections, such as those in fine-grained metasediments, display wavelengths under 1 cm, allowing detailed analysis of local strain in experimental simulations of .

Shape and Geometry

The shape of a fold in is fundamentally described by its profile in a cross-section to the line or fold axis, which reveals the and configuration of the deformed layers. This fold profile distinguishes between rounded, sinusoidal forms—where layers exhibit smooth, wave-like bends—and angular forms, characterized by straight limbs connected by sharp s. These profiles provide insight into the deformational history, with sinusoidal shapes often resulting from ductile deformation in homogeneous materials, while angular profiles are typical in layered sequences with contrasting competencies. Basic fold shapes are classified based on the orientation and of the limbs relative to the axial plane, which bisects the fold and contains the line. Symmetrical folds feature an axial plane that evenly divides the interlimb angle, producing two limbs of equal length and dip angle, often appearing as mirror images in cross-section. Asymmetrical folds, in contrast, have an axial plane that does not bisect the interlimb angle, resulting in one steeper limb (the ) and one gentler limb (the back limb), which can indicate directional shear during formation. Overturned folds occur when both limbs dip in the same direction, with one limb inclined beyond vertical, leading to inverted on the overturned side. Recumbent folds exhibit a nearly horizontal axial plane, with the line approaching parallelism to the ground surface; large-scale examples form fold nappes extending over kilometers. More specialized geometries include chevron folds, which display straight limbs joined at acute, sharply defined s, creating a pattern in cross-section and commonly developing in alternations of competent and incompetent layers. Box folds are characterized by parallel outer limbs and internal box-like structures formed by multiple hinge lines and sub-parallel axial planes, often with rounded hinge zones. Isoclinal folds have nearly parallel limbs converging to an interlimb angle approaching 0°, producing a pencil-like profile that reflects intense shortening, typically in high-strain environments like shear zones. The interlimb angle itself serves as a key metric for assessing fold openness, with classifications including gentle folds (180°–120°), open folds (120°–70°), closed folds (70°–30°), tight folds (30°–0°), and isoclinal folds (≈0°); these angles quantify the degree of limb convergence independent of overall symmetry.

Tightness and Symmetry

Tightness in geological folds refers to the degree of curvature between the fold limbs, primarily measured by the interlimb —the smaller angle formed between tangent lines to the limbs at their inflection points in a cross-section to the hinge line. This provides a quantitative metric for classifying fold tightness, as established in the seminal classification by Fleuty (1964). Gentle folds exhibit interlimb angles of 180° to 120°, indicating minimal curvature; open folds range from 120° to 70°; closed folds from 70° to 30°; tight folds from 30° to 0°; and isoclinal folds have interlimb angles approaching 0°, with limbs nearly parallel. Tighter folds, such as closed, tight, and isoclinal types, generally reflect higher levels of strain accumulation during deformation, as progressive shortening reduces the interlimb angle in or similar folding processes. Symmetry describes the balance between a fold's limbs relative to its axial plane, assessed by comparing limb lengths or dip angles on either side. Symmetrical folds have equal or nearly equal limb dips, with the axial plane bisecting the interlimb angle evenly, resulting in mirror-like geometry. Asymmetrical folds, in contrast, feature unequal limb dips or lengths, where one limb dips more steeply than the other, often indicating non-uniform stress distribution. For minor folds within shear zones, asymmetry is further characterized as S-folds or Z-folds based on their profile shape: S-folds exhibit a sinistral (left-handed) sense of asymmetry, while Z-folds show a dextral (right-handed) sense, revealing the direction of shear during formation. These characteristics are measured in the field or from cross-sections by determining the interlimb angle for tightness and the difference in limb dips (typically >10°-20° for ) relative to the axial plane. Geologically, increasing tightness correlates with greater finite strain, often exceeding 50% in layered rocks, while fold provides evidence of the shear sense, aiding in reconstructing deformation . also relates briefly to vergence, the overall inclination direction of the fold.

Facing, Vergence, and Style

In , the facing of a fold refers to the direction of stratigraphic younging relative to the axial plane, measured perpendicular to the fold axis within that plane. Upward-facing folds, such as typical anticlines and synclines, exhibit normal stratigraphic succession pointing away from the , while downward-facing folds, like antiformal synclines or synformal anticlines, show inverted stratigraphy due to overturning or refolding. This property is crucial for interpreting the structural history, particularly in distinguishing primary from superimposed deformations. Vergence describes the directional of a fold, specifically the apparent movement direction of the longer, relative to the shorter limb in asymmetric structures. In fold-thrust belts, vergence indicates the sense of dip of the steeper limb, such as northeast-vergent folds where limbs incline toward the northeast. This arises from differential and is used to map regional tectonic transport directions; for instance, in the Eastern , dominant southeast vergence reflects top-to-the-southeast transport during Oligo-Miocene along thrusts like the Valsugana and systems. Vergence patterns thus provide insights into the of orogenic wedges without relying on metrics alone. Deformation styles in folds are classified geometrically, with John Ramsay's scheme distinguishing classes based on the curvature of inner and outer fold arcs relative to layer thickness changes. Class 1A folds feature strongly convergent dip isogons, where orthogonal layer thickness increases from to limbs, resulting in thinner hinges; Class 1B, or parallel folds, maintain constant orthogonal thickness with perpendicular isogons; and Class 1C show weakly convergent isogons, with thicker hinges than limbs. These contrast with Class 2 similar folds, where isogons are parallel to the axial trace and thickness is constant parallel to the axial plane, leading to limb thinning and hinge thickening due to ductile flow. Concentric folds, a subset of parallel styles, exhibit layers with a common , as seen in the Jura Mountains of the Alpine foreland, while similar folds persist uniformly across layers in high-strain settings.

Classification of Folds

Linear Folds

Linear folds, also referred to as cylindrical folds, are the most common type of folds in , characterized by a straight line that remains parallel to the fold axis throughout its length, generating a uniform cross-sectional profile perpendicular to the . This implies that any plane normal to the line intersects in an identical manner, distinguishing them from non-cylindrical variants. The fold axis serves as the unique generating line around which the layered rock surfaces are bent, often resulting from consistent deformation directions in regional tectonic regimes. Subtypes of linear folds are classified primarily by the attitude of their axial plane relative to the horizontal. Upright linear folds possess a vertical axial plane (dipping 80–90°), with limbs symmetrically dipping away from the at equal angles. Inclined linear folds have an axial plane dipping between 10° and 80°, subdivided into gently inclined (10–30°), moderately inclined (30–60°), and steeply inclined (60–80°); in these, the limbs dip asymmetrically relative to the . Recumbent linear folds feature an axial plane dipping 0–10°, where the limbs are sub-parallel and dip gently, with the hinge line often plunging along the axial plane. These attitudes reflect variations in the direction and intensity of the deforming stress relative to . Key characteristics of linear folds include their consistent three-dimensional geometry, where all fold elements—such as lines, lines, and crest or trough lines—remain parallel, facilitating straightforward mapping and using stereographic projections. They typically exhibit parallel or concentric internal structures, maintaining constant layer thickness orthogonal to , though minor variations may occur due to local strain. Linear folds are prevalent in compressional tectonic settings, where horizontal parallel to bedding planes induces in competent layers embedded within less resistant sequences, often above detachment horizons. Their tightness, ranging from open to tight or isoclinal, provides into the degree of shortening, as detailed in the section on Tightness and Symmetry. Prominent examples of linear folds include those in the of and , where thin-skinned, parallel anticlines and synclines trend northeast-southwest, parallel to the regional strike of the , formed during to compression associated with the . These folds display upright to inclined attitudes with wavelengths of several kilometers, exemplifying classic cylindrical geometry in a fold-and-thrust belt.

Non-Linear and Special Folds

Non-cylindrical folds, also known as non-linear folds, are characterized by curved or irregular lines that deviate from the straight, parallel generators typical of cylindrical folds, resulting in variable geometry across the structure. These folds arise when deformation is not uniform, often leading to lines that converge, diverge, or form closed loops, and they are commonly analyzed using apical lines or surfaces rather than a single axial plane. In geological mapping, non-cylindrical folds can be subdivided into segments approximating cylindrical portions for practical description, though their overall form reflects complex strain patterns. Conical folds represent a subtype where the hinge line converges toward a point, approximating the of a , with fold limbs radiating outward and maintaining a constant amplitude-to-width ratio toward the apex. This configuration implies a point of termination for the fold structure, often observed in areas of radial strain distribution, though some analyses suggest such ideal conical forms may be approximations or artifacts of simplified of more complex irregular folds. Fan folds, in contrast, feature radiating hinge lines that diverge like spokes, typically forming in zones of extensional or divergent shear where limbs splay outward, creating a fan-like in view. Sheath folds exhibit highly elongated, cylindrical s that curve into near-closed loops, appearing eye-shaped in cross-sections perpendicular to the elongation direction and tube-like in three dimensions, indicative of extreme non-uniform strain in high-shear environments. These structures develop in ductile shear zones, such as mylonites, where the hinge wraps around itself due to intense simple shear or constrictional flow. Among special fold variants, mushroom folds manifest as dome-like structures with radially plunging hinges, often resulting from interference between fold generations where axial planes intersect at high angles, producing a characteristic "" or "boomerang" pattern in map view. Parasitic folds are minor, short-wavelength structures superimposed on the limbs of larger folds of the same deformation phase, typically displaying opposite vergence (S- and Z-shapes) to accommodate differential slip between layers of contrasting competency. These subordinate folds help reveal the sense of shear and layering without altering the overall of the host fold. Disharmonic folds occur where adjacent layers exhibit mismatched wavelengths, amplitudes, or profiles, often due to decoupling at incompetent horizons like shales, leading to abrupt changes in fold style across boundaries. Such disharmony highlights mechanical stratification during deformation, with stiffer layers forming tighter folds while softer ones broaden or detach. Collectively, non-linear and special folds signal heterogeneous strain fields or polyphase deformation histories, contrasting with the uniformity of linear folds; for instance, sheath folds in mylonitic shear zones like those in the ophiolite complex exemplify extreme localization of strain. Their recognition aids in reconstructing regional tectonics, though scale can vary from outcrop to regional features as noted in broader fold classifications.

Formation Processes

Layer-Parallel Shortening

Layer-parallel shortening (LPS) refers to the compressive deformation of sedimentary layers parallel to their planes, which initiates and subsequent folding under horizontal tectonic stress without the involvement of major faults. This process accommodates strain through mechanisms such as intragranular deformation (e.g., twinning and sliding), pressure solution along , and minor intrafolial shear, resulting in a reduction in layer length that promotes the development of anticlinal and synclinal structures. The shortening typically precedes visible folding, preserving early strain fabrics in the limbs of developing folds. LPS commonly occurs in foreland basin settings ahead of advancing thrust belts, where distal parts of the sedimentary cover experience compression from the propagating orogenic wedge. In such environments, the process reflects the initial stages of orogenic deformation, with shortening directions often aligning with the regional tectonic transport. For instance, in the Sevier fold-thrust belt of , LPS fabrics record early deformation histories across both thin-skinned and thick-skinned domains. This tectonic context allows for distributed strain in competent layers, leading to buckle folds as the primary structural response. Evidence for LPS includes minor conjugate contractional faults, strike-slip faults, and spaced cleavage or tectonic oriented perpendicular to the eventual fold axes, which indicate horizontal shortening prior to and during fold amplification. These mesostructures, such as deformed fossils, mudcracks, and oolites, quantify strain with shortening estimates ranging from 1% to 21% depending on , with carbonates showing lower values (1-13%) than clastics (3-21%). Such features are dated through associated mineralization or , revealing LPS timing that brackets fold initiation. A prominent example of LPS-driven folding is observed in the Zagros Mountains of Iran and Iraq, where convergence between the Arabian and Eurasian plates since the Miocene has caused initial layer-parallel shortening followed by major fold development. In the northwestern Zagros, this early deformation phase involved southwest-vergent shear and up to 10-15% shortening in Mesozoic carbonates, predating the growth of prominent anticlines like the Kirkuk structure. Similar patterns appear in the Appalachian foreland, such as the Glen Lyn syncline, where LPS directions (average 316°) reflect pre-folding strain at the junction of central and southern segments. Fault-related folding refers to a class of structures in which folds develop directly in association with fault displacement, particularly in contractional tectonic settings where strata are deformed above or adjacent to active faults. These folds typically grow incrementally with fault slip, accommodating through the bending of layered rocks in thrust and reverse fault systems. This process is prevalent in fold-thrust belts worldwide, where fault activity controls the geometry and evolution of the overlying folds. Key subtypes of fault-related folds include fault-bend, fault-propagation, and detachment folds, each distinguished by their kinematic relationship to the underlying fault geometry. Fault-bend folds form when a flat-lying thrust sheet is displaced up and over a ramp segment in the fault plane, creating angular kinks at the bend locations that propagate upward into the hanging wall strata. This model assumes conservation of bed length and slip across the fault bend, resulting in symmetric or asymmetric anticlines depending on the ramp angle. In contrast, fault-propagation folds develop ahead of a propagating fault tip, where slip diminishes upward and is transferred into folding of the strata beyond the fault termination, often producing box-like or fan-shaped anticlines with a splay of minor faults at the tip. Detachment folds arise above a weak, bedding-parallel décollement layer, such as evaporites or salt, where fault displacement at depth is accommodated by broad, upright folding in the cover sequence without significant faulting in the fold itself. These structures are common in regions with thick, mobile basal layers that facilitate decoupling. The of fault-related folding involve the transfer of slip from the fault plane to the deformation of fold limbs, maintaining volume conservation in competent layers while allowing passive flow in weaker units. In fault-bend models, slip is partitioned along fixed axial surfaces at the fault bends, with the fold limbs rotating as the hanging wall advances, leading to progressive tightening. Fault-propagation kinematics often incorporate a zone of distributed shear (trishear) ahead of the tip, where strain is concentrated in a triangular region, resulting in non-cylindrical fold shapes. For detachment folds, is achieved through limb and amplification above the mobile detachment, with fault slip indirectly driving the fold growth via basal drag. Vergence in these folds generally aligns with the direction of fault polarity. Representative examples of fault-related folding occur in fold-thrust belts, such as the triangle zones of the Canadian Rockies in , where oppositely verging thrusts sole into a common décollement, forming wedge-shaped structures that trap hydrocarbons and illustrate the interplay of fault slip and folding. These zones, developed during , exemplify how multiple fault-related fold subtypes can interact to accommodate regional shortening.

Shear Zone and Sedimentary Folding

Shear zones are regions of intense ductile deformation where rocks undergo significant strain under high temperatures and pressures, leading to the formation of folds through non-coaxial flow. In these environments, folds often develop as a result of progressive shearing, with pre-existing structures being rotated and modified or new folds nucleating directly from the shear process. For instance, in sinistral shear zones, S-folds form clockwise relative to the direction of transport, exhibiting asymmetric geometries that reflect the sense of shear. These folds are commonly associated with mylonitic fabrics, where fine-grained rocks like mylonites display contorted, non-cylindrical shapes due to varying strain rates and lithological contrasts between competent and incompetent layers. Characteristics of shear zone folds include curvilinear hinges and attenuated limbs, particularly in weaker pelitic layers that host tighter, more irregular forms compared to open folds in psammitic units. Sheath folds, a common subtype, develop with hinges elongating parallel to the shear direction, resulting in tube-like or spiral morphologies that indicate high . An example occurs in the Cap de Creus shear belt, where late-stage folds nucleate on stretched bands, producing synthetic drag-like structures with axes rotated toward the shear plane. In the Western Alps, such as the Susa Shear Zone, folded mylonites exhibit similar contorted features within orthogneiss and units, highlighting the role of in fold amplification during ductile shearing. Sedimentary folding encompasses syn-sedimentary structures that form contemporaneously with deposition, primarily through gravitational instabilities like slumping, loading, or differential compaction in unlithified s. These folds arise in soft, water-saturated layers where is low, allowing plastic deformation without . Slump folds, for example, develop as contractional features during downslope mass movement, often showing irregular, recumbent geometries with hinges swinging from steep angles at the flow toe to sub-parallel orientations upslope. In deltaic settings, growth folds form above or adjacent to syn-sedimentary faults, where rapid sediment accumulation leads to thickening toward fold flanks as outpaces crestal uplift during compaction. Key characteristics of sedimentary folds include discontinuous , flame-like disruptions, and variable shortening (up to 35% in slump toes), influenced by nucleators like concretions or organic debris in soft sediments. These structures are prevalent in sequences, where ing of fine-grained layers produces contorted, overturned folds preserved within coarser Bouma divisions. A representative example is found in Miocene of , featuring recumbent slump folds triggered by oversteepening or seismic activity on continental slopes. In delta systems like the , growth folds associated with loading exhibit asymmetric profiles, with thicker sediments on the down-dip side, reflecting ongoing depositional asymmetry.

Igneous and Flow Folding

Igneous intrusion folding occurs when intrudes into sedimentary layers as sills or laccoliths, forcing the overlying strata to deform into anticlinal or dome-like structures known as forced folds. These intrusions create space by elastic bending and uplift of the host rock, resulting in monoclinal or anticlinal geometries above the intrusion. Laccoliths, which are mushroom-shaped bodies that thicken upward, particularly induce doming by expanding against the roof of the intrusion chamber. A classic example is the laccolithic domes of the in , where Tertiary igneous intrusions uplifted and folded sedimentary layers into broad anticlines. Flow folding arises from the viscous deformation of weak, ductile materials under differential stress, leading to passive folding without significant brittle . In rocks like salt or , this process involves slow, plastic flow driven by or gravitational forces, producing irregular, recumbent structures. Salt domes exemplify this, where mobile layers rise diapirically through overlying sediments, deforming them into concentric folds. In the Basin, over 500 such salt domes have pierced strata, creating radial forced folds that serve as traps. Similarly, in migmatites—partially molten metamorphic rocks—flow folding manifests as ptygmatic structures, where viscous leucosomes (melt-rich layers) contort within more rigid melanosomes due to high-temperature shear. These folds typically exhibit rounded hinges and limbs with smooth, non-planar geometries, distinguishing them from angular tectonic folds. Unlike compressional folds, they lack axial plane cleavage, as deformation occurs through ductile flow rather than shortening and fracturing. Glacier ice provides an accessible analog, where viscous flow under gravity produces undulating without penetrative fabrics.

Deformation Mechanisms

Flexural Slip

Flexural slip is a kinematic mechanism of folding in which individual competent layers within a stratified rock sequence slide relative to one another along bedding-parallel planes, enabling the overall structure to accommodate while preserving the original thickness of the layers. This produces parallel or concentric folds, where the displacement is concentrated in the fold limbs and directed toward the hinges, with minimal deformation within the individual layers themselves. The sliding occurs as discrete shear events along pre-existing weaknesses, such as bedding interfaces, allowing the rock stack to flex without significant internal straining of the competent units. This mechanism typically develops in anisotropic sequences consisting of alternating competent (stiff) and incompetent (ductile) layers, where the incompetent layers act as shear boundaries facilitating slip. It predominates under low-temperature and low-pressure conditions in the upper crust, where rocks exhibit brittle along discontinuities but remain coherent overall, often during early stages of deformation when interbedding cohesion is low. Flexural slip is particularly effective in multilayered sediments or metasediments subjected to compressional stresses, contributing to the development of tight folds without substantial thickening or thinning. Field evidence for flexural slip includes slickensided surfaces and striations on bedding planes within fold limbs, indicating shear movement parallel to the layers, as well as fibrous mineral growth or vein fills oriented along the slip direction. Strain markers, such as offset , deformed fossils, or small-scale faults, often show consistent reverse dip-slip offsets that increase toward fold inflection points, confirming the hingeward transport of material. These features are commonly observed in folded sandstone-shale sequences in orogenic belts.

Buckling and Bending

Buckling represents a fundamental deformation mechanism in geological folding, characterized by the instability of a competent layer under layer-parallel , which initiates the formation of periodic folds. This process occurs when the compressive load exceeds a critical threshold, causing the layer to deviate from its planar configuration and amplify small initial perturbations into coherent fold trains. Analogous to the Euler buckling of elastic beams, geological buckling applies to viscoelastic materials and requires a significant contrast between the folding layer and the surrounding matrix to facilitate . In layered media, leads to the selection of a characteristic fold that grows most rapidly, known as the dominant or critical . According to Biot's theoretical framework, this λc\lambda_c is determined by the equation λc=2πh(μr)1/3,\lambda_c = 2\pi h (\mu_r)^{1/3}, where hh is the thickness of the competent layer and μr\mu_r is the ratio of the layer to . This relationship underscores how thicker layers and higher contrasts promote , influencing the scale of folds observed in compressional tectonic settings such as orogenic belts. The assumes small-amplitude deformations in viscous media, providing a foundational model for predicting fold from material properties. Bending complements as a passive wherein layers undergo primarily through flexural deformation, without substantial slip along layer interfaces. This mechanism dominates in scenarios where the induces orthogonal of the layers, preserving their continuity while the matrix accommodates the overall shortening. and together explain the development of symmetrical, upright folds in multilayers with pronounced rheological contrasts, as verified through analog experiments and field observations of fold trains in sedimentary sequences.

Mass Displacement

Mass displacement is a deformation mechanism in folding where rock volumes undergo internal redistribution through flow, resulting in thickening or of layers without significant change overall. This involves the of within the deforming rock mass, often under ductile conditions where rocks behave viscously, allowing particles to move relative to one another. Unlike mechanisms relying on interlayer slip or rigid bending, mass displacement accommodates strain by rearranging constituents, typically in response to compressive or shear stresses in multilithologic sequences. In this mechanism, material transport can occur perpendicular to the layering in passive folding, where the layers are mechanically weak or isotropic relative to and deform passively with the surrounding flow, leading to similar fold shapes across scales. Conversely, tangential displacement characterizes active folding, where competent layers resist deformation and exert control over the fold , causing differential thickening in hinges and in limbs. These processes are particularly evident in high-strain environments where viscosity contrasts drive inhomogeneous flow. Ramsay's geometric classification highlights mass displacement through variations in layer thickness: class 1B folds maintain constant thickness along parallel folds, while class 1C folds exhibit limb thinning due to extensional flow, indicating active material evacuation from stretched regions. Evidence for this mechanism includes strain gradients, where finite strain increases progressively from fold hinges to limbs, reflecting non-uniform flow, and , which forms as competent layers fragment under layer-parallel extension during progressive deformation. Prominent examples of mass displacement occur in migmatites, where reduces , enabling viscous flow and folding with significant leucosome redistribution perpendicular to during orogenic deformation. In , passive flow within layers facilitates diapirism and associated folding, with mass transport driven by density instabilities and overburden loading, often resulting in thickened salt stocks and thinned overlying sediments. Mass displacement may also contribute to folding in shear zones through enhanced ductile flow.

Mechanical Analysis

Stress and Strain in Folding

In geological folding, the stress field is dominated by the principal compressive stress σ1\sigma_1, which acts perpendicular to the fold hinge line, promoting layer-parallel shortening of rock layers. This orientation of σ1\sigma_1 arises during regional compression, where forces are applied orthogonal to the eventual fold axis, leading to differential stresses that vary across the fold geometry. In hinge zones, the maximum compressive stress aligns parallel to the layer on concave sides, facilitating shortening, while on convex sides, it becomes roughly perpendicular to the layer, inducing elongation. These stress distributions evolve as folds develop, with principal stresses rotating in the limbs to maintain high angles relative to bedding in steeper sections. The corresponding deformation manifests primarily as shortening strain, a measure of the fractional reduction in due to compression, calculated as ε=Lf−LiLi\varepsilon = \frac{L_f - L_i}{L_i}, where LfL_f is the final deformed and LiL_i is the initial undeformed . This finite strain metric quantifies the overall contraction in the direction of σ1\sigma_1, often reaching values of -10% to -50% in typical fold-thrust belts, though it varies with fold tightness. strain is inhomogeneous, with greater contraction on inner arcs and extension on outer arcs relative to a neutral surface of zero strain. The magnitude and distribution of this strain directly influence fold shape and . Several factors govern the transition from stress to observable strain in folding, including rock rheology, temperature, and strain rate. Rheology, determined by mineral composition and viscosity contrasts between layers and matrix (often ratios of 25 to 500), controls how rocks accommodate deformation, with stiffer competent layers resisting shortening more than ductile matrix. Higher temperatures, typically above 200–300°C in mid-crustal settings, enhance ductile flow by reducing viscosity, enabling fold amplification without fracturing, whereas low temperatures promote elastic or brittle responses. Strain rate, on the order of 10^{-12} to 10^{-14} s^{-1} in tectonic regimes, further modulates rheology; slower rates favor viscous flow and folding, while faster rates increase effective strength and limit ductility. A key process in fold development is the amplification of initial perturbations, such as minor sinusoidal irregularities in layering, under sustained constant stress. These perturbations grow exponentially with time, A=A0ePtA = A_0 e^{P t}, where AA is the current , A0A_0 the initial , tt time, and PP the amplification rate dependent on contrast and shortening direction. Amplification initiates when deviatoric stresses exceed thresholds for , leading to rapid limb steepening and tightening, particularly in conditions with high ratios. This mechanism explains the progression from gentle undulations to mature observed in many orogenic settings.

Modeling and Simulation

Analog modeling techniques, particularly sandbox experiments, have been instrumental in simulating the development of thrust-related folds by replicating the mechanical behavior of sedimentary layers under compression. These models typically use dry quartz sand or glass microbeads to represent brittle upper crustal layers, often layered with weaker materials like silicone putty to mimic décollement zones, allowing of fault and fold nucleation in controlled settings. For instance, high-resolution sandbox models of wedge-type setups demonstrate how thrust fault-related folds evolve through sequential imbrication and fault-bend mechanisms, providing insights into the geometric progression of fold-thrust belts. Such experiments reveal that fold styles, such as fault-propagation or detachment folds, depend on factors like initial layer thickness and basal friction, with results validated against natural examples like the Canadian Rockies. Numerical methods, especially finite element modeling (FEM), enable detailed prediction of stress distributions and deformation during fold formation by solving continuum mechanics equations for complex rheological behaviors. In FEM simulations, geological layers are discretized into elements with assigned visco-elastic or poro-elastic properties, allowing computation of strain localization and fold amplification under tectonic loading. Seminal work using FEM has shown that single-layer folding propagates through progressive amplification of initial perturbations, with stress concentrations highest at fold hinges. More recent applications, such as 2D FEM analyses of fault-related folds, illustrate how varying fault geometries and host rock rheology influence fold mechanics, including the transition from symmetric to asymmetric profiles. These models often reference strain equations from prior theoretical frameworks to quantify deformation paths without deriving them anew. Advancements since 2020 have integrated 3D seismic data with (ML) algorithms to enhance fold prediction in subsurface environments, improving accuracy over traditional interpretations. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on seismic volumes can automatically detect fold axes and amplitudes by classifying seismic attributes like and coherence, reducing manual bias in complex basins. For example, workflows applied to synthetic and real 3D seismic datasets have successfully characterized paleokarst collapse features in systems involving folded structures, achieving nearly 99% accuracy on synthetic validation data. ML methods, such as those using matching on geological maps, further enable fold detection in thrust belts, facilitating probabilistic forecasting of undeformed regions. Recent modeling efforts in overpressured basins incorporate inclusion data to account for pore pressure effects on development, particularly in hydrocarbon-prone settings. inclusions trapped in fracture-filling minerals provide direct evidence of paleo-overpressures of 32.9–43.0 MPa, which drive bedding-parallel fractures and influence amplification in shales like those of the Permian Fengcheng Formation. in the Longmaxi Formation arises from episodic release during maturation, promoting migration pathways and enhancing pore development for storage. These studies, including a 2022 analysis of the , underscore the role of in stabilizing structures against tectonic stresses, with implications for resource assessment in similar basins.

Practical Applications

Mineral Exploration

Folds play a critical role in exploration by acting as structural traps that concentrate mineralizing s, leading to the formation of economically viable deposits. In particular, folds facilitate the localization of veins and stratabound ores through the development of permeable pathways that channel hydrothermal fluids into favorable host rocks. For instance, anticlinal structures serve as traps for orogenic deposits, where fold hinges and limbs provide sites for fluid focusing and , as observed in locked-up anticlinal folds with apical angles of approximately 30 degrees across various gold districts. Similarly, in sandstone-hosted deposits, folds create structural barriers that promote uranium under reducing conditions, often bounded by impermeable units. Exploration techniques heavily rely on mapping axes to identify potential shoots, particularly in plunging folds where mineralization aligns with the fold plunge direction. Geologists use stereographic projections and cross-sectional analysis to determine axis trends and plunges, enabling targeted along these orientations for efficient delineation. This approach is essential in lode deposits, where shoots plunge steeply, guiding underground strategies to follow the structural continuity of the deposit. Prominent examples include fold-hosted deposits in basins, such as those in the Lodève District of and the Franceville Basin in , where tectonic folding enhances fluid migration and mineralization within permeable sandstones. In hard-rock settings, the Betze deposit in Nevada's Carlin trend exemplifies shear folding (F3) that concentrates gold along fold axes synchronous with deformation. A recent discovery in 2024 at the Birch-Uchi in , , highlights high-grade gold mineralization (up to 57.8 g/t Au) associated with shallowly plunging folds and shear structures in Archean clastic sediments, expanding known occurrences through geophysical targeting of fold-related resistivity lows. Economically, folds enhance permeability for hydrothermal fluids by creating dilated zones and fractures along fold limbs and hinges, which act as conduits for mineral-bearing solutions and significantly boost the prospects for viable operations. This structural enhancement is a key factor in the formation of large-scale deposits, as seen in the Jinlongshan deposit in , where anticline axes host ore along permeable fold structures.

Hydrocarbon Reservoirs

In , folds serve as critical structural traps for hydrocarbons, where buoyant oil and gas accumulate beneath impermeable cap rocks. Anticlinal traps, formed by upward-arching folds creating structural highs, are among the most common types, allowing hydrocarbons to migrate upward and pool at the crest due to density differences. These traps typically require an impermeable seal, such as or evaporites, overlying the porous rock to prevent leakage. Fault-bend folds, which develop above non-planar fault segments during compressional deformation, also form effective traps by sealing reservoirs along fault planes and fold limbs, particularly in foreland thrust belts. A key characteristic of fold traps is the preservation of in the fold limbs, where reservoir rocks like sandstones or carbonates maintain sufficient void space for hydrocarbon storage despite deformation. Studies of fractured reservoirs indicate that fracture porosity and permeability show no direct with the degree of folding, enabling preservation even in moderately deformed limbs. This preservation is vital, as it supports fluid flow and storage without significant compaction or cementation reducing quality. Exploration of fold traps relies heavily on 3D seismic , which provides detailed subsurface visualizations to fold geometries and identify potential traps with high resolution. Recent advancements include AI-assisted detection of structural features, such as folds and associated faults, using on seismic data; for instance, lightweight models have enhanced fault identification in basins like the Permian, improving efficiency in 2024–2025 exploration workflows. Prominent examples include compactional anticlines in the , where Paleocene deep-sea sands drape over horsts, trapping hydrocarbons in fold structures. Globally, anticlinal and other fold traps account for approximately 80% of discovered oil in major fields, underscoring their economic significance.

References

  1. https://geo.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Geology/Book%3A_An_Introduction_to_Geology_(Johnson_Affolter_Inkenbrandt_and_Mosher)/09%3A_Crustal_Deformation_and_Earthquakes/9.04%3A_Folds
  2. https://www.files.ethz.ch/structuralgeology/jpb/files/english/7folding.pdf
  3. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/12-113-structural-geology-fall-2005/8b4d8d84619cfaa0fbd44ab4d52f3edf_lab_folds.pdf
  4. https://www.uh.edu/~geos6g/1330/struct.html
  5. https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/sedgwick.html
  6. https://opentextbc.ca/physicalgeologyh5p/chapter/global-geological-models-of-the-early-20th-century/
  7. https://www2.tulane.edu/~sanelson/eens1110/deform.pdf
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/ductile-brittle-transition
  9. https://geo.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Geology/Geological_Structures_-_A_Practical_Introduction_%28Waldron_and_Snyder%29/01%253A_Topics/1.05%253A_Folds
  10. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/12-113-structural-geology-fall-2005/aeaf9179b2348f732f9bd84a68ccd0e7_notes11.pdf
  11. https://earth.sdsu.edu/visualgeology/geology101/Geology101Labs/structureLab9.pdf
  12. https://books.google.com/books/about/Folding_and_Fracturing_of_Rocks.html?id=IicUAQAAIAAJ
  13. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-abstract/81/11/3259/6696/Microfolding-in-the-Castile-and-Todilto-Evaporites
  14. https://www.geokniga.org/bookfiles/geokniga-es2e-ch10.pdf
  15. https://www.files.ethz.ch/structuralgeology/jpb/files/english/8folds.pdf
  16. https://ajsonline.org/article/59227.pdf
  17. https://geoexpro.com/folds-and-folding-part-ii/
  18. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article/16/5/1276/589664/Quantifying-shortening-across-the-central
  19. https://geo.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Geology/Geological_Structures_-_A_Practical_Introduction_(Waldron_and_Snyder)/01%3A_Topics/1.05%3A_Folds
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016787864800237
  21. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/10/12/490
  22. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2023TC008013
  23. https://geo.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Geology/Geological_Structures_-_A_Practical_Introduction_(Waldron_and_Snyder)/02%3A_Labs/2.10%3A_Lab_10_-_Fold_and_Thrust_Belts
  24. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0314e/report.pdf
  25. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229292844.pdf
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191814119300069
  27. https://blogs.egu.eu/divisions/ts/2021/10/04/features-from-the-field-sheath-folds/
  28. https://people.wou.edu/~taylors/es406_structure/TM_chap4_Faults.pdf
  29. https://www.geological-digressions.com/s-and-z-folds/
  30. https://cmbailey.pages.wm.edu/2014/01/30/omans-mega-sheath-folds/
  31. https://geology.yale.edu/~ajs/1999/03.1999.03Whitaker.pdf
  32. https://se.copernicus.org/articles/12/2145/2021/se-12-2145-2021.pdf
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012821X12005171
  34. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gpl/geoarabia/article/17/2/81/567078/Structural-evolution-of-the-northwestern-Zagros
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012825214001160
  36. http://activetectonics.asu.edu/ActiveFaultingSeminar/Papers/1983_Suppe_AJoS.pdf
  37. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/aapg/aapgbull/article-abstract/74/6/921/38574/Fault-Propagation-Folds-Geometry-Kinematic
  38. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/aapg/books/edited-volume/2742/chapter/150899957/1B-3Detachment-folds
  39. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article/19/6/1690/627986/Structural-geometry-and-kinematic-evolution-of-the
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814125002196
  41. https://homepage.uni-tuebingen.de/paul.bons/paul/fieldtrips/Cadaques/Carreras_2005.pdf
  42. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17445647.2019.1698473
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191814119304468
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376736108700864
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264817222001970
  46. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2019.00037/full
  47. https://australian.museum/learn/minerals/shaping-earth/igneous-intrusions/
  48. https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey-notes/geosights/the-henry-mountains/
  49. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/salt-tectonics/salt-structures/858CE214408629F91A5A8F46B156718F
  50. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0773/report.pdf
  51. https://pubs.usgs.gov/mf/1213/report.pdf
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191814198001011
  53. https://www.mindat.org/glossary/ptygmatic_folding
  54. https://www.usgs.gov/geology-and-ecology-of-national-parks/geology-glacier-national-park
  55. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017JB013966
  56. https://sp.lyellcollection.org/content/specpubgsl/127/1/149.full.pdf
  57. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article/75/1/45/5665/Folds-and-Folding
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012825221003135
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/A-Fold-classification-scheme-after-Ramsay-1967-based-on-dip-isogon-layer-thickness_fig5_354353628
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191814117302766
  61. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/earth-and-environmental-science-transactions-of-royal-society-of-edinburgh/article/significance-of-viscous-folding-in-the-migmatites-of-chotanagpur-granite-gneiss-complex-eastern-india/2AF80CC20B7BB31EFF809477C94DA2F5
  62. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/salt-tectonics/internal-deformation-in-salt-bodies/B8C3F3D9EF5CD8EC96314734EB87DDEE
  63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2019.06.009
  64. https://maps.unomaha.community/Maher/GEOL3300/week6/strain.html
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814197830295
  66. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015JB012397
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0040195177902190
  68. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1295898/full
  69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191814124000166
  70. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020JB019685
  71. https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/18/939/2025/gmd-18-939-2025.pdf
  72. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article/51/1/115/619169/Fluid-inclusion-evidence-for-overpressure-induced
  73. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2533
  74. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.918898/full
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Collage-of-cross-sections-and-plan-views-of-anticlinal-folds-hosting-orogenic-gold_fig8_323010192
  76. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/uranium-resources/geology-of-uranium-deposits
  77. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/0151/pdf/of01-151.pdf
  78. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/9/4/214
  79. https://www.firstmininggold.com/news/first-mining-expands-and-advances-high-grade-gold--discovery-at-its-birch-uchi-greenstone-belt-exploration-project
  80. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/aapg/aapgbull/article/40/4/547/34236/Habitat-of-Some-Oil1
  81. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/uwyo/rmg/article/47/2/133/141084/Evolution-of-fracture-porosity-and-permeability
  82. https://wiki.seg.org/wiki/Introduction_to_3-D_seismic_exploration
  83. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2025JH000933
  84. https://www.geoinsights.com/machine-and-deep-learning-applications-in-the-permian-basin/
  85. https://people.wou.edu/~taylors/es486_petro/text/Ch7_traps_seals.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.