Hubbry Logo
TainuiTainuiMain
Open search
Tainui
Community hub
Tainui
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tainui
Tainui
Tainui
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The korupe (carving over the window frame) at Mahina-a-Rangi meeting house at Turangawaewae Marae, Ngāruawāhia showing the Tainui canoe with its captain Hoturoa. Above the canoe is Te Hoe-o-Tainui, a famous paddle, the kete (basket) given to Whakaotirangi by a tohunga of Hawaiki, the bird Parakaraka (front) who was able to see in the dark, and another bird who warned of approaching daylight.[1] Photograph by Albert Percy Godber circa 1930s

Tainui is a tribal waka confederation of New Zealand Māori iwi. The Tainui confederation comprises four principal related Māori iwi of the central North Island of New Zealand: Hauraki, Ngāti Maniapoto, Ngāti Raukawa and Waikato.[2] There are other Tainui iwi whose tribal areas lay outside the traditional Tainui boundaries – Ngāi Tai in the Auckland area, Ngāti Raukawa ki Te Tonga and Ngāti Toa in the Horowhenua, Kāpiti region, and Ngāti Rārua and Ngāti Koata in the northern South Island.

History

[edit]

Early history

[edit]

The Tainui iwi share a common ancestry from Polynesian migrants who arrived in New Zealand on the Tainui waka, which voyaged across the Pacific Ocean from Hawaiki to Aotearoa (North Island) approximately 800 years ago. According to Pei Te Hurinui Jones, a Tainui historian, Tainui first entered the Waikato around the year 1400 bringing with them kumara plants. By the end of the seventeenth century, Tainui had conquered much of the Waikato region following the conclusion of the Siege of Pōhatu-roa.[3]

Contact with Europeans

[edit]

During the late 1840s and early 1850s European missionaries introduced Tainui to modern inventions such as the water mill and gave then instruction in how to raise various European crops: potatoes were particularly widely planted. They set up a trade school in Te Awamutu to educate young Tainui so they became literate and taught the basics of numeracy and farming skills. Two mills were built to grind the wheat into flour – one near Cambridge on a stream leading to the Waikato River, parts of the mill being still visible. Later in the 1850s, six others were built in the general area. Produce was exported as far as Victoria and California.[4][5]

The relationship was far from one-sided. The Tainui tribe provided food to the European settlers, and "the present European population…would have been literally starved out of the country but for the extraordinary exertions made by the aboriginal inhabitants to supply them with cheap provisions", as the Southern Cross newspaper reported in 1844. A year later, when the less than 4,000 settlers of Auckland were under threat from an attack by Ngāpuhi from the south, Tainui rangatira Te Wherowhero responded to a request to assist with the planned attack, "You must fight me if you come on to Auckland; for these Europeans are under my protection", referring to Auckland as the "hem of his cloak" and placing it under his personal tapu.[5]

During this time large numbers of new migrants came to Auckland and Te Wherowhero established a house in Māngere so he could oversee trade and get advice from the government.[citation needed] For a brief period until the mid-1850s, Tainui made a good return from selling food to the new settlers but this came to a sudden end when traders realised they could get food – especially flour – much cheaper from New South Wales. Tainui set up a bank at Cambridge to take the deposits of Māori traders; it was burnt down by the people when it was found that chiefs were using the money as their own.[4]

Relationships between Europeans and Tainui soured as Europeans began to outnumber Māori (around 1858, across all of New Zealand), stopping them from being dependent on friendly tribes for food and protection. At the same time as respect for even high-ranking Māori waned, desire for land settled by them grew among Europeans.[5] At the outbreak of the First Taranaki War, "friendly Māori" in Auckland had to be issued with arm badges to protect them from assault.[5]

Tainui people were expelled from the Auckland area in 1863 because of their refusal to take the oath of allegiance to the Crown and hand in their weapons, which the governor thought posed a threat to Auckland and the new settlers as it had done in Taranaki.[4]

Kīngitanga

[edit]
Main article: Māori King movement

Tainui were the tribe responsible for setting up the Kīngitanga in 1858 – a pan-Māori movement of mainly central North Island iwi who aimed at establishing a separate Māori nation with a Māori king. The key aim was the refusal of the Kingites to sell land to the government. The first Māori king was the Waikato warrior Te Wherowhero, who came from a line of prominent rangatira. Tainui, who had conquered much Taranaki land, sent warriors to help fight the settlers and British soldiers in Taranaki to prevent minor chiefs selling land to the government. Missionaries at Te Awamutu told the Kīngitanga they would be considered rebels by the government after they refused to take an oath of allegiance to the Crown. Te Awamutu was a missionary settlement built by the missionaries and Māori Christians in July 1839 after they observed Tainui cannibals who had been fighting at Rotorua return with 60 backpacks of human remains and proceed to cook and eat them in the Otawhao pa.[6]

British invasion of the Waikato

[edit]
Main article: Invasion of the Waikato
Tainui forces repulse a British attack at the Battle of Rangiriri, 1863.
Ngāti Maniapoto survivors of the war, at the jubilee gathering on the battlefield of Ōrākau, 1 April 1914.

The growth of the king movement led Governor Thomas Gore Browne to conclude that they would have to be compelled to submit to British rule.[7] After attempting to achieve a peace settlement through "kingmaker" Wiremu Tamihana,[8][9] in mid-1861 he sent an ultimatum to the movement's leaders. When it was rejected he began drawing up plans to invade the Waikato and depose the king. After a pause, these plans were continued by his successor Governor George Grey, who used troops from the newly formed Commissariat Transport Corps to start construction work on the so-called Great South Road from Drury to the Kingite border at the Mangatāwhiri Stream near Pōkeno.[7]

Events in early 1863 brought tensions to a head. In March Kingites obstructed the construction of a police station at Te Kohekohe, near Meremere. Rewi Maniapoto, accompanied by Wiremu Kīngi Te Rangitāke, led a raid on the property at Te Awamutu occupied by magistrate and Commissioner John Gorst.[10][11] The raiders sent a message to Gorst—who was absent at the time—to quit the property or risk death; Grey recalled Gorst to Auckland soon after. On 4 June, British troops attacked Tainui Māori at Tataraimaka.[11]

On 9 July 1863 Grey issued a new ultimatum, ordering that all Māori living between Auckland and the Waikato take an oath of allegiance to Queen Victoria or be expelled south of the river.[7] British forces under Duncan Cameron crossed the Mangatāwhiri Stream and invaded the Waikato on 12 July 1863. The kingitangi forces were defeated at the Battle of Rangiriri on 20–21 November 1863 and on 8 December the Kingite capital at Ngāruawāhia was abandoned to Cameron's troops.[12] A new defensive line was built to the south, centered on Paterangi, the largest system of Māori fortifications built during the New Zealand Wars, which was designed to block the main approaches to the agriculturally rich Rangiaowhia district, east of Te Awamutu.[13][14][15] On 20 February 1864, Cameron by-passed the fortress and attacked Te Awamutu directly,[16] where he massacred civilians.[17] The kingite forces withdrew; Wiremu Tamihana went east to Maungatautari to block a British advance up the Waikato River into Ngati Raukawa territory.[14] Rewi Maniapoto moved south into the Hangitiki Valley to defend Ngati Maniapoto bases.[14] He was encircled at Ōrākau on 30 March 1864 and forced to withdraw to the south on 1 April.[18]

After their defeat at the hands of the British and kūpapa Māori, who fought alongside the troops, King Tāwhiao and his people were forced to retreat into the heartland of Ngāti Maniapoto, establishing a quasi-autonomous community based around the Kīngitanga, known as the King Country, south of a border known as the aukati ('boundary'). Under the New Zealand Settlements Act, which had been passed in December 1863, Governor Grey confiscated more than 480,000 hectares of land from the Tainui iwi (tribe) in the Waikato as punishment for their "rebellion". The war and confiscation of land caused heavy economic, social and cultural damage to Waikato-Tainui. The Maniapoto, by contrast, had been more zealous for war than the Waikato, yet suffered no loss of land because its territory was too remote to be of use to white settlers.[19][20] Some Tainui, such as Wiremu Te Wheoro of Ngati Naho, who was a magistrate for the Pokeno area and later became a Māori MP, fought with the British during the invasion.[21]

Living in the King Country

[edit]

They established their own press, police force, laws and governing body. Europeans who entered the Kīngitanga area were killed. However, because the country was unproductive and the people cut themselves off from European civilization they struggled to develop the Kīngitanga ideal. A number of Pākehā had lived with Ngāti Maniapoto since 1842 such as the French trader Louis Hetet. All of them married Māori women. Drunkenness became a problem among the Kingitanga supporters south of the Puniu, particularly after the arrival of Te Kooti, who had a long established drinking problem from his youth. Friction broke out between the Maniapoto hosts who wanted to engage with the European settlers and the conservative Kīngitanga adherents who wanted to retain power and remain isolated.[citation needed]

Peace

[edit]

Over time the more forward thinking ideas of Maniapoto prevailed, land was sold to the government and work was given to Tainui men on roads and on the main trunk line railway. Māori men were given the vote and Māori were given four Members in Parliament who all argued strongly for modernisation and acceptance of the benefits of Pākehā civilization. Following this schools, stores and churches were built. Some of the Tainui leaders were employed by the government as advisors or given government pensions in recognition of their change of heart and willingness to engage with the government. Tainui continued to work behind the scenes to recover the remainder of the land they believed was wrongly confiscated (120,000 acres (490 km2) was returned by 1873) from them after their defeat during the land wars. Some land or reserves were given back to Tainui but this act caused intra-tribal friction for many years because most of the land retained by the government was in the north and central Waikato. None of the Maniapoto land was confiscated, despite the fact they were the most actively hostile iwi in Taranaki and during the Waikato campaign, and this annoyed the other Tainui iwi.[citation needed]

Return of confiscated land and compensation

[edit]

120,000 acres (490 km2) of land was returned to the rebels a few months after the British victory. In 1926 a government commission agreed to pay an annual payment of £3000. Te Puea, the main force in Tainui leadership, indicated to the government that the tribe was prepared to accept money in compensation for the confiscated land. In April 1946 an additional payment of £5000 (later $15,000) per annum was made in perpetuity – this was considered a full and final payment by the Crown, but although accepted by the Kingitanga royalty some members remained discontented as they wanted land. This was a deal worked out directly between Tainui leadership and the Prime Minister Fraser after a hui at Turangawaewae. The deal was accepted by Roore Edwards speaking for Te Puea. Tainui have been actively seeking a resolution to their ongoing grievance over the 1863 confiscation of lands, water rights, and harbour rights. Tribal members were annoyed that the leadership appeared to be frittering away the large annual income on expensive hui. Most of the funds were spent on administration costs, grants to marae for functions such as tangi and entertaining visitors.[22] In 1995 as part of the Treaty of Waitangi settlement the tribe received a second lot of compensation[23] amounting to $195 million, made up of cash and parcels of land in and around Hamilton such as the former air force base at Te Rapa, now called The Base. The compensation is a little over 1 percent of the value of the lands taken as a result of the 1863 invasion.

Tainui business

[edit]

At first many of the investments made were poor such as a fisheries deal, the purchase of the Auckland Warriors rugby league team and a hotel in Singapore, which all failed.[citation needed] A financial overhaul and the separation of the Kīngitanga from Tainui business enterprise has paid dividends. The construction of The Base shopping complex has been a winner for the iwi, drawing many retail customers from the Hamilton central business district.[24][25] Tainui business supports the Kīngitanga financially, as well as fostering tertiary education for tribal members with grants. Tainui has very close links with Waikato University and each year the university closes down during major Tainui celebrations.[26] From 2002 until 2008 Tainui was also the name of a Māori electorate in Parliament. It was replaced by the Hauraki-Waikato electorate.

In 2009 it was announced that Tainui Group Holdings was to develop farm land adjacent to the Ruakura Research Station and University of Waikato and plan to establish an inland hub for the redistribution and repackaging of containerized products complementing the ports of Auckland and Tauranga. Ruakura will be centered around the existing and planned infrastructure being the East Coast Main Trunk railway line and the proposed Waikato Expressway. Ruakura is intended to support more freight by rail versus road, thus reducing CO2 emissions and congestion around the ports of Auckland and Tauranga. Tainui have said that this may provide up to 12,000 jobs and will be a 30–50 year project.[27][28] The project will include a 195ha Logistics precinct, 262ha Light Industrial precinct, 108ha Innovation precinct, 3 retail areas, 1,800 mixed density houses and over 60ha of public open space for walk and cycle ways, ecological and storm water functions.

The project has been approved by an independent Board of Inquiry, which will enable development to start in 2015 which will provide much needed employment and amenities to the eastern side of Hamilton.

In 2008 Tainui started work on developing a luxury $10 million resort at Lake Taupō. The business failed with the onset of the recession and the assets were valued by Jones, Lang, Lasalle registered valuers, at about $3 million. The failure of this venture under the direction of Mike Pohio Tainui Holdings CEO has raised questions about the ability of the iwi to develop the $3 billion inland port. Few details of the Taupō disaster have been made public. The Waikato Times in September 2014 reported internal friction in the tribe between those who see the Port development as risky and those favouring a higher risk model. After the failure of the Taupō venture the tribe is uneasy about risking its asset base on such a huge venture. In November 2014 a new marae based management structure was voted in designed to rein in risky development.[29]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tainui

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
![Mahina-a-Rangi meeting house, Turangawaewae Marae, Ngaruawahia][float-right] Tainui is a confederation of Māori iwi in New Zealand, comprising Waikato, Hauraki, Ngāti Maniapoto, and Ngāti Raukawa, all tracing ancestry to the Polynesian crew of the Tainui waka that voyaged to Aotearoa around 1350. The Tainui peoples initially settled regions including Auckland, Hauraki, Waikato, and Maniapoto following the waka's arrival and subsequent migrations. In 1858, Waikato-Tainui leaders established the Kīngitanga, or Māori King movement, with Pōtatau Te Wherowhero as the first monarch, aiming to unify tribes and resist land alienation by settlers. This confederation played a central role in the Kīngitanga, which continues under descendants like the current Kiingi Tuuheitia, installed in 2006. Tainui faced significant conflict during the 1863 invasion of , resulting in military defeat by December and the of 1.2 million acres of , profoundly impacting subsequent generations. -Tainui, the largest branch with over 90,000 registered members and 68 , achieved a 1995 settlement with the , receiving $170 million in compensation and a formal apology for the raupatu (). This has enabled economic growth, expanding tribal assets to $2.1 billion while supporting cultural, educational, and environmental initiatives under Te Whakakitenga o governance. Further settlements, such as the 2008 River agreement, underscore ongoing efforts to restore resources and authority.

Origins and Pre-Colonial History

The Tainui Waka Migration

The Tainui waka departed from , the ancestral Polynesian homeland traditionally identified with regions in the such as Raiatea or , under the command of the and Hoturoa, who consulted celestial bodies like the star Matari-i-Arero for departure timing. The double-hulled voyaging canoe carried a crew of roughly 100-150 individuals, including Hoturoa's family—such as his wife Whakaotirangi, who transported kumara tubers in a sacred basket, and sons like Hotunui and Kohorotiu—along with navigator-priest Rakatāura and provisions for the trans-Pacific crossing exceeding 2,000 kilometers. techniques employed included stellar paths, wave patterns, wind directions, and seabird observations to maintain course without instruments. Oral traditions, preserved through genealogies spanning 25-30 generations, place the migration around 1300 CE, aligning with radiocarbon dates from early settlement sites indicating arrivals between 1250 and 1300. Upon reaching , the Tainui waka made its first landfall at Whangaparāoa near the East Cape, where traditions record encounters with stranded whales providing food and omens. The vessel then proceeded westward along the northern coasts, entering harbors like Kaipara before turning south to explore the western seaboard, facing adverse conditions that prompted rituals at sites such as Mokau. Ultimately, it reached Kāwhia Harbour, deemed suitable by Hoturoa for its sheltered waters and resources, where the canoe was hauled ashore at Te Ahurei point and ritually dismantled or concealed, with its anchor stone left at Mokau as a marker. These events are detailed in iwi-specific oral narratives recited by Tainui descendants, emphasizing practical decision-making based on harbor geography and freshwater access over supernatural elements alone. Archaeological correlations substantiate the traditions' historical core, with East Polynesian-style Type 1A basalt adzes found in early sites matching quarried sources from the , indicating direct cultural continuity from the migration era. Similarly, preserved kumara storage pits and records from Waikato-Tainui territories date to the , confirming the crop's introduction via waka like Tainui and its rapid adaptation in temperate soils through techniques such as ridging and windbreaks derived from tropical Polynesian . These material traces, combined with genetic studies of modern linking to East Polynesian populations, support the Tainui voyage as a deliberate, skilled event rather than accidental drift.

Early Settlement and Territorial Expansion

The Tainui waka, commanded by the captain Hoturoa, made landfall at Kāwhia Harbour on the west coast of the around 1350 AD, marking the initial settlement point for its passengers and their descendants. From this base, early Tainui groups established coastal and inland communities, leveraging the harbor's resources for fishing and initial agriculture while exploring adjacent river systems like the Waipā and for expansion. This foundational phase involved small-scale (sub-tribal) formations centered on ties to Hoturoa, with settlements typically located on riverbanks, lakesides, and hilltops to optimize access to fertile soils and defensive positions. Territorial growth accelerated from the 14th to 18th centuries as Tainui descendants migrated northward into Hauraki and districts, eastward across the basin, and southward toward the Mokau region, forming core such as , , , and Hauraki through processes of intermarriage with local groups and conquest of preexisting populations. Absorption of earlier inhabitants, often via military campaigns or strategic alliances, enabled control over resource-rich areas, with oral genealogies () recording key figures like the explorer Turi who facilitated inland penetration. This expansion was not uniform but driven by demographic pressures and competition for , resulting in a network of interconnected spanning approximately 1.2 million hectares by the late pre-contact era. Adaptations to the temperate environment underpinned this growth, particularly the intensified cultivation of kūmara (, Ipomoea batatas), introduced via Polynesian voyagers in the 13th century and refined through storage pits and mounding techniques to extend growing seasons in Waikato's cooler soils. These horticultural practices, combined with fern-root processing and bird hunting, supported larger populations and seasonal surpluses, causal factors in enabling sustained settlement density. Concurrently, the construction of fortified —earthwork enclosures on elevated sites with palisades and ditches—evidenced organized defensive strategies, with archaeological surveys identifying over 5,000 such structures across Tainui territories by the , reflecting societal investment in protection amid resource scarcity. Pre-contact intertribal dynamics further propelled territorial consolidation, with Tainui engaging in raids for captives, food stores, and utu (retaliation), as documented in and corroborated by site evidence of conflict-related trauma in skeletal remains. Alliances forged through marriage often followed victories, stabilizing gains against rivals like those from other waka migrations, while recurrent warfare—estimated at intervals of 5–10 years per group—functioned as a mechanism for population control and boundary enforcement rather than . This pattern of aggressive expansion, rooted in ecological limits and kinship imperatives, contrasted with notions of isolation, as Tainui interactions with neighboring shaped identities and up to European arrival.

Social Structure and Inter-Tribal Dynamics

The Tainui social structure operated through a kinship-based of (extended families), (sub-tribes), and the iwi confederation, with authority vested in (chiefs) responsible for protection, dispute resolution, and resource management derived from (genealogy) and demonstrated capability. maintained social order via mana (prestige and authority), which they accrued through leadership in warfare, oratory, and generosity, while utu—a principle of reciprocity—ensured equilibrium by mandating responses to favors or harms, thereby preserving group cohesion and preventing unchecked dominance or disorder. This framework was stratified, featuring and (high chiefs) above commoners (tūpuna or tauwareware) and mōkai (slaves), the latter typically war captives compelled to menial labor like cultivation and fishing, with limited rights and integration possible only through chiefly favor or marriage, refuting notions of broad in favor of empirical evidence of inherited and conquest-based hierarchies. Economic activities fostered hapū self-sufficiency and inter-group interdependence, centered on systematic kūmara (sweet potato) farming in fortified , supplemented by fern root and cultivation, riverine and coastal with woven nets and weirs, and seasonal snaring for feathers and meat, all coordinated by to sustain populations estimated in the thousands per before 1800. Trade networks extended reciprocity beyond kin, exchanging Tainui-region fish and birds for distant resources like (greenstone) tools from the or feathers, reinforcing alliances while utu governed exchanges to avoid exploitation. Inter-tribal dynamics among Tainui hapū, such as Waikato and Ngāti Maniapoto, involved marriages and raids with neighbors like Hauraki or Taranaki groups for resource control, but the Musket Wars (c. 1810–1839) profoundly altered these relations as Tainui acquired European firearms through coastal trade, enabling Waikato forces to repel Ngāpuhi incursions from the north in the 1820s and exact utu via southward campaigns, expanding influence over central North Island territories at the cost of an estimated 20,000 Māori deaths nationwide, including heavy Tainui losses, enslaved captives, and refugee displacements that reshaped hapū demographics and boundaries.

European Contact and Colonial Era

Initial Interactions and Trade

The initial European contacts with Tainui occurred in the early , primarily through whalers and traders accessing coastal areas such as Kāwhia Harbour and the Manukau Harbour, where Tainui supplied provisions like potatoes and pigs in exchange for iron tools, axes, and later muskets. These interactions, beginning around the 1800s, enabled Tainui to acquire durable metal implements that enhanced traditional and agriculture, while European vessels provided access to global markets for local resources. Tainui participated vigorously in the burgeoning flax trade, harvesting and processing harakeke ( flax) into fiber for ship rigging and cordage, which was bartered or sold to European traders for textiles, hardware, and firearms; by the , this commerce had expanded to include and , fostering economic prosperity and inter-hapū specialization in production until the early 1840s. The influx of potatoes, introduced via these exchanges, diversified Tainui and supported by providing a reliable, high-yield crop resilient to local soils. Alliances with Church Missionary Society personnel strengthened from the 1830s, as missionaries established outposts in the region, teaching via printed Māori Bibles and primers that achieved widespread adoption among Tainui, with schools emphasizing reading and writing in te reo Māori. These partnerships also conveyed practical knowledge on and disease management, aiding Tainui adaptation to introduced illnesses like and ; missionary records note approximately 1,000 baptisms among by 1846, indicating robust community engagement and relative demographic stability compared to more exposed to early northern trading ports.

Formation of the Kīngitanga

In the mid-1850s, Māori leaders in the region, particularly among Tainui such as and , faced escalating pressures from rapid European settlement and individual land sales by some , which fragmented tribal holdings and heightened inter-iwi tensions. These dynamics prompted discussions at runanga (tribal councils) for a unifying figure to centralize authority, curb unauthorized sales, and mediate disputes, reflecting both defensive strategies against colonial expansion and efforts to consolidate influence amid eroding customary controls. Proposals for a Māori king gained traction from around 1854, inspired partly by biblical and British monarchical models adapted to tikanga Māori, with envoys like Mātene Te Whiwhi and Tamati Ngapora promoting the idea after their 1851-1853 visit to , where they petitioned on land and governance issues. In 1857, at a hui at Rangiriri pā, senior chiefs selected Pōtatau Te Wherowhero, a respected Tainui ariki with mana from his warrior past and neutral stance in recent conflicts, as the inaugural king to symbolize unity without hereditary succession in principle. His anointing and crowning occurred on 17 June 1858 at Ngāruawāhia, attended by representatives from allied iwi including those from , Maniapoto, and further afield, marking the formal inception of Te Kīngitanga as a pan-tribal alliance rejecting piecemeal land alienation. The movement forged alliances beyond Tainui, drawing support from like Ngāti Hauā and Tuhoe through correspondence and oaths of loyalty, while explicitly opposing purchases that bypassed collective consent, as articulated in petitions to Governor Gore Browne in 1858 emphasizing rangatiratanga over alienated lands. Early successes included Pōtatau's arbitration in inter-hapū feuds, such as quelling rivalries over resources in the district, which stabilized internal relations and reinforced the king's role as a arbiter rather than absolute sovereign, though adherence varied and some pursued independent agendas. These outcomes demonstrated the Kīngitanga's utility in fostering cohesion amid existential threats, yet its formation also amplified debates over centralized versus distributed chiefly power within society.

The Waikato War and Land Confiscations

The Waikato War arose from tensions over land alienation, with the Kīngitanga movement, centered among Tainui iwi in Waikato, resisting individual land sales that fragmented communal holdings and facilitated transfers to settlers. Pre-war legislation like the Native Lands Act 1862 initiated processes for individualized titles, sparking disputes among Māori kin groups and accelerating alienation without broad consent, which heightened Kīngitanga efforts to assert unified control over land disposals. The colonial government viewed the Kīngitanga's aukati (prohibited boundary) along the Mangatāwhiri Stream as a challenge to sovereignty, particularly after Waikato support for Taranaki Māori resistance, prompting Governor George Grey to target the region as the source of broader defiance. British forces, numbering around 10,000 troops including imperial regiments, colonial militia, and kūpapa allies, invaded on 12 July 1863 by crossing the Mangatāwhiri Stream, bypassing initial defenses at Meremere pā where forces under leaders like Te Whiti-o-Rongomai withdrew strategically to avoid direct confrontation. The campaign progressed south, capturing the Kīngitanga capital at on 8 December 1863 after the king's flight, but encountered fierce resistance at Rangiriri pā on 20 November, where entrenched defenders repelled assaults using swamp-surrounded earthworks and rifle pits. British casualties at Rangiriri totaled 130, including 47 or from wounds, while losses were approximately 35-50 killed, with survivors surrendering after a white flag misunderstanding led to the pā's fall. Further engagements culminated in the three-day of Ōrākau pā from 31 March to 2 April 1864, where around 300 , including women and children under Rewi Maniapoto, refused surrender and fought from improvised defenses; British forces suffered 17 killed and 50 wounded, while casualties reached up to 160 during the fighting and a desperate bush escape. The war concluded in mid-1864 with Kīngitanga forces dispersing into interior strongholds, having inflicted disproportionate casualties relative to their smaller numbers through guerrilla tactics and pā fortifications, though superior British artillery and logistics ultimately prevailed. Under the New Zealand Settlements Act 1863, enacted preemptively to justify military aims, the Crown confiscated approximately 1.2 million acres of Waikato land from late 1863 onward, targeting areas deemed held by "rebels" to secure settler frontiers and fund war costs via land sales. This raupatu stripped Waikato-Tainui of nearly all fertile alluvial plains central to their agriculture, including wheat fields and stock rearing that had sustained pre-war economic self-sufficiency, forcing survivors into marginal lands and disrupting traditional food production systems.

Post-War Isolation and Resilience

The King Country Policy

Following the Māori defeat in the Waikato War of 1863–1864, King and Kīngitanga supporters retreated into the interior region spanning from to Kāwhia, establishing it as Te Rohe Pōtae, or the King Country, an prohibited to and government agents. This self-imposed policy, initiated in 1864, aimed to preserve Kīngitanga autonomy and avoid further military confrontations after territorial losses in Waikato. , dominant in the area, enforced the boundaries through tribal vigilance, deterring unauthorized entries that risked expulsion or conflict. The exclusion persisted until 1883, when Tāwhiao abandoned isolation, permitting surveys for infrastructure like the railway and engaging directly with colonial authorities. Internally, communities shifted to , relying on traditional cultivation and limited illicit to evade the ban, which contributed to stagnant economic conditions amid broader colonial expansion. While this isolation curtailed opportunities for labor and market integration available elsewhere, it functioned as a calculated retreat, enabling demographic stabilization by shielding inhabitants from immediate war-related casualties and ongoing settler pressures. Māori population in the region, part of the national decline to approximately 42,000 by the 1890s due to prior wars and epidemics, began showing recovery signs by the late , attributable in part to the policy's role in reducing exposure to further . However, the deliberate , while preserving cultural and political cohesion, delayed adaptation to economic modernization, underscoring trade-offs in prioritizing over integration.

Internal Governance and Adaptation

During the isolation period in the King Country following the Waikato War's conclusion in 1864, King reinforced Kīngitanga authority through adapted runanga (tribal councils) and chiefly assemblies, which served as mechanisms for local administration, law-making, and dispute mediation among Tainui . These structures, building on pre-war precedents where runanga functioned as advisory bodies to chiefs, enabled decentralized yet unified governance by integrating traditional tikanga with the King's prophetic influence to enforce communal decisions on and . 's , sustained until his death in 1894, prevented fragmentation by positioning the Kīngitanga as a supra-hapū arbiter, with councils convening at key such as those in the Pōtae district to allocate resources and uphold mana. Agricultural adaptation was evident in the persistence and modification of cultivation practices, where Tainui communities blended traditional Polynesian crops like kūmara with European introductions such as potatoes, suited to the region's volcanic soils and cooler climate. Archaeological surveys in the inland , from southward, have identified storage pit sites and garden remnants dating to the late , indicating resilient horticultural systems that supported population recovery despite restricted access to external markets. Limited technologies, including metal hoes and axes retained from pre-isolation stocks or obtained via selective inter-hapū exchanges, facilitated earthworks and , underscoring pragmatic under self-imposed seclusion. Inter-hapū disputes over boundaries and resources were managed through Kīngitanga-overseen whakawā (judgments) at hui (assemblies), where or designated applied principles of utu (balance) and whanaungatanga (kinship) to achieve consensus, thereby preserving territorial cohesion amid external pressures. This approach, rooted in pre-colonial chiefly , resolved conflicts without resorting to warfare, as documented in oral traditions and early settler accounts of mediated settlements in the 1870s–1880s, ensuring the movement's survival until the policy's end around 1890 with railway incursions.

Emergence from Isolation

The policy of isolation in the King Country, enforced after the Waikato War to protect Māori autonomy, began to lift in the early 1880s through negotiated access for infrastructure. In 1883, following discussions between Kīngitanga leaders and , agreements permitted the extension of the railway southward, with chiefs formally consenting in 1885 to its route through their lands; the line reached by 1887, enabling controlled settler entry while retaining Māori veto over broader alienation. King 's 1884 delegation to sought direct intervention from via a demanding an independent Māori parliament and a commission to investigate confiscations, framing these as breaches of protections. The referred the matter back to the without endorsement, yielding no substantive redress but signaling a diplomatic pivot from confrontation; upon return, Tāwhiao emphasized peaceful engagement over seclusion, facilitating further incremental openings. By the early 1900s, Tainui in the opened regions pursued through voluntary land leasing to European tenants, primarily for pastoral and emerging , to secure rental income amid limited capital for independent development. These arrangements, often on 21-year terms, generated funds for communal purposes without outright sales; initiatives proliferated in lowlands by the 1920s, with Māori-owned blocks contributing to the region's transformation into a key production area, supported by cooperative factories and government extension services.

Treaty Settlements and Modern Revival

Negotiations and the 1995 Deed of Settlement

The Wai 30 claim, addressing the raupatu confiscations of approximately 1.2 million acres of Waikato land following the 1863–1864 Waikato War, was lodged with the Waitangi Tribunal in 1987 by Robert Te Kotahi Mahuta, the Tainui Māori Trust Board, and Ngā Marae Tōpu on behalf of Waikato-Tainui. This initiated formal processes under the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975, though substantive negotiations accelerated in the early 1990s amid the Crown's fiscal envelope policy, which imposed a $1 billion cap on all historical settlements to prioritize pragmatic resolutions over exhaustive reparations. Waikato-Tainui negotiators, including Te Arikinui Te Atairangikaahu and representatives from the Tainui Māori Trust Board, emphasized asset transfers and commercial viability, drawing on empirical assessments of historical land values equivalent to around $3–4 billion in modern terms but accepting a capped package to enable economic rebuilding. Negotiations focused on balancing historical grievances with fiscal constraints, resulting in the Deed of Settlement signed on 22 May 1995 between and Waikato-Tainui, valued at $170 million in total redress comprising cash payments and returned lands totaling approximately 17,000 hectares, including sites of cultural significance. The package included mechanisms like rights of first refusal on surplus properties and relativity clauses to adjust for larger subsequent settlements, reflecting a strategic shift from litigation to direct bargaining under Minister Douglas Graham's oversight. This approach privileged verifiable loss data—such as the 1865 Waikato Waste Lands Act's formalization of confiscations—over intangible claims like loss of life or full economic multipliers, excluding reparations for war casualties or pre-1860 grievances. A key element was the Crown's formal apology, delivered personally by Queen Elizabeth II on 23 May 1995 during her visit to Turangawaewae Marae, acknowledging the invasions and confiscations as "wrongful" and contrary to the principles of the , though without admitting legal liability to avoid precedent-setting precedents. The settlement explicitly barred relitigation of raupatu claims in courts or tribunals, channeling future disputes into specified governance structures, and was enacted via the Waikato Raupatu Claims Settlement Act 1995, which transferred lands while maintaining commercial tenancies to preserve fiscal impacts. This pragmatic framework, informed by actuarial valuations rather than moral absolutism, marked the first major post-1985 Treaty settlement, setting a model for iwi-Crown pacts amid New Zealand's neoliberal reforms.

Subsequent Settlements and Apologies

Following the 1995 Deed of Settlement, Waikato-Tainui negotiated a specific settlement for historical claims related to the , which had been partially addressed but not fully resolved in the initial agreement. On 17 December 2009, and Waikato-Tainui signed a revised Deed of Settlement in relation to the , recognizing the river's spiritual and cultural significance to the and acknowledging Crown actions that contributed to its degradation. This was enacted through the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims () Settlement Act 2010, which came into force on 14 January 2011. The Act established the Waikato River Authority as a co-governance entity with equal representation from and Waikato-Tainui, tasked with developing a vision and strategy for restoring the river's health and wellbeing, including integrated management across environmental, cultural, and economic dimensions. The settlement included provisions for a $210 million fund to support river clean-up and restoration initiatives, alongside protocols for consultation on resource consents and planning affecting the river. Co-governance arrangements emphasized collaborative , with the Authority overseeing long-term objectives such as improved and protection, though implementation has involved ongoing coordination with local authorities and agencies. Apologies in subsequent settlements reinforced the symbolic redress from 1995, where the Crown had formally acknowledged breaches of the and the wrongful confiscations during the 1860s wars. The 2009 river deed included Crown expressions of regret for historical harm to the river, framing restoration as a to heal intergenerational impacts, though without a standalone new apology ceremony. Waikato-Tainui leadership has described these elements as advancing , with compliance monitored through joint entities; for instance, the River Authority's strategies have been credited with influencing regional plans, though iwi reports note variable progress on tangible outcomes like reduction. These agreements highlight iterative negotiations addressing specific unresolved aspects of the raupatu claims, without implying comprehensive finality.

Economic Transformation and Business Development

Following the 1995 Waikato-Tainui Deed of Settlement, which provided initial redress capital, the established Tainui Group Holdings (TGH) as its commercial arm to manage and grow investments independently of government dependency. By 2017, tribal assets had reached $1.07 billion, reflecting compounded returns from prudent portfolio management rather than redistribution narratives. This growth accelerated, with total assets valued at $2.4 billion by 2024, driven by fair value gains of $75 million in managed investments and overall financial asset increases of $56 million that year. TGH's portfolio emphasizes self-sustaining sectors, including approximately 2,590 hectares of farmland supporting , sheep, , and operations, such as those integrated into the Ruakura Superhub development in Hamilton. Property remains dominant, with strategic holdings enabling long-term yield; for instance, in April 2025, TGH announced a $1 billion with Brookfield Asset Management for urban and logistics developments, leveraging global capital markets while retaining iwi control. Tourism and fisheries contribute ancillary returns, funding distributions to over 70,000 registered members without eroding principal. These investments generated a $137.8 million net profit in 2017 alone, underscoring causal links between settlement seed capital and market-driven expansion. Economic diversification intensified in amid volatile global conditions, with TGH prioritizing resilient assets like and over speculative ventures. The launched the $40 million Kotahitanga Fund to foster Māori-led enterprises, aiming for enhanced self-reliance through targeted equity stakes and advisory support. Job creation remains a core metric, with TGH initiatives like career pathways and cadetships in and retail generating opportunities tied to commercial operations, though precise figures vary annually with market cycles. This model contrasts with subsidy-reliant approaches, as evidenced by sustained dividends—historically around $20 million annually in earlier decades—reinvested for intergenerational wealth.

Cultural and Political Significance

Role in Māori Identity and Traditions

The Tainui waka occupies a pivotal role in oral histories of migration from to , dated approximately 800 years ago, representing one of the principal voyaging canoes that carried ancestors and established foundational settlements. These narratives, preserved through (genealogies), inform Tainui-specific traditions while contributing to pan- cultural motifs in waiata (songs) and (posture dances) that evoke collective ancestral journeys across . Accounts centered on the waka's captain, Hoturoa, highlight unique Tainui elements, such as the planting of sacred seeds upon landing at Kāwhia Harbour around 1300 CE, distinguishing them from variations in other descent lines. Waikato-Tainui's 68 function as enduring hubs for transmitting cultural knowledge, hosting rituals, storytelling, and practices that sustain identity amid iwi diversity. These communal spaces facilitate efforts, including Te Ataarangi programs that have engaged roughly 6,500 adults in te reo immersion over the past 30 years within the . Marae-based initiatives emphasize tikanga (customs) tied to Tainui heritage, such as specific karanga (calls) and powhiri (welcomes), fostering continuity while adapting to contemporary needs without supplanting distinct practices of other iwi. The Kīngitanga upholds symbolic regalia and protocols that reinforce Tainui's place in traditions, including flags featuring the Tainui waka, the rainbow deity , and the star cluster, adopted since the to signify unity and celestial guidance. These emblems, alongside ceremonial items like the Order of King regalia established in the 1850s, preserve oral histories and ritual observances central to Tainui worldview, influencing broader ceremonial aesthetics while rooted in waka-specific lore.

Influence on New Zealand Politics

The Kīngitanga movement, encompassing Tainui , has maintained a non-partisan stance since its inception in 1858, positioning itself as a unifying political institution independent of electoral parties to advocate for interests under the . This approach has influenced national Treaty settlement processes by demonstrating direct negotiation models, as seen in Waikato-Tainui's 1995 Deed of Settlement, which provided $170 million in redress for historical confiscations and bypassed the to establish precedents for iwi-Crown agreements. Such settlements have shaped legislative frameworks, including co-governance arrangements that grant iwi input into without formal veto powers. A notable empirical impact is the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, which created the Waikato River Authority as a co-governance entity where Waikato-Tainui holds equal decision-making shares with to oversee river restoration and health objectives. This model has informed subsequent co-management protocols, such as those for fisheries regulations under authority, emphasizing partnership over unilateral control while prioritizing environmental outcomes like water quality improvements. Under Kīngi (reigned 2006–2024), the movement engaged in national dialogues on resource rights, convening hui to address policy challenges and promoting inclusive frameworks that contrast with partisan divides, though these efforts often intersected with broader advocacy against perceived erosions of principles. Critiques of Tainui's influence highlight concerns over co-governance fostering ethnic separatism, with some observers arguing that shared authority in entities like the Authority risks prioritizing perspectives in ways that undermine national unity and equal . Proponents of these models counter that they operationalize obligations through practical collaboration, as evidenced by joint initiatives yielding measurable health gains, yet public debates persist on whether such arrangements inadvertently entrench dual structures amid evolving demographic and economic pressures. The Kīngitanga's enduring role thus balances policy advancements with ongoing scrutiny of its implications for a cohesive .

Educational and Social Initiatives

Waikato-Tainui provides a range of scholarships and grants to support among registered tribal members, including the Tertiary Education Grant for NZQA Levels 1-7, the Tumate Mahuta Memorial Grant for postgraduate studies up to Level 9, and Doctoral Grants for Level 10 qualifications, each available for up to three years with applications closing annually in November. These programs, funded through post-settlement assets, prioritize fields aligned with tribal development goals such as environmental management and cultural preservation, requiring evidence of prior academic performance like a 75% pass rate for continued funding. Partnership scholarships, such as those with Tainui Group Holdings and Ravensdown, supplement these for priority subjects, aiming to build member capacity while emphasizing personal academic effort and tribal priorities. Health initiatives include the Kaumātua Grant, offering $500 for members aged 60-69 and $1,000 for those 70 and older to cover age-related medical costs, alongside partnerships with providers like Triton Hearing and for additional services. The Raukura Hauora o Tainui Trust delivers kaupapa clinical and community health services, encompassing early years programs, wellness support, and holistic care models that integrate physical, spiritual, and cultural elements for . The broader Koiora Strategy focuses on -driven health leadership and innovation, seeking sustainable outcomes through data-informed practices and advocacy, though specific metrics on improved health indicators remain tied to ongoing tribal monitoring rather than external benchmarks. Social services address housing and family welfare via entities like Te Korowai Kāinga, which coordinates affordable housing initiatives and support for safe living conditions, and Te Whāinga Ltd., applying Whānau Ora principles to aid vulnerable families. Tribal enterprises under Tainui Group Holdings provide employment pathways, internships, and cadetships, contributing to member self-sufficiency by linking education to practical opportunities in sectors like and engineering. These efforts, bolstered by settlement-derived revenues exceeding $14 million in education grants since 2003, promote reduced reliance on state welfare through skill-building and economic participation, underscoring the role of individual initiative alongside structured tribal support.

Controversies and Critical Perspectives

Internal Disputes and Leadership Challenges

In the years following the 1995 settlement, Waikato-Tainui experienced significant leadership instability, exemplified by the 2000 crisis involving and executive figures such as Sir Robert Mahuta. Mahuta, the principal negotiator of the settlement and a key director, faced sacking from directorships amid allegations of mismanagement that contributed to a NZ$40 million decline in assets by 1999, prompting proceedings over authority. The Te Arikinui's intervention to support Mahuta and challenge the dismissal of Te Kaumaatua members was deemed unconstitutional by the , which ruled against royal interference in elected structures, highlighting ambiguities in the separation of custodial trusteeship (held by the royal family), via Te Kauhanganui, and operational management under Te Arataura. These disputes stemmed from structural tensions between traditional Kingitanga authority and post-settlement democratic mechanisms, including the marginalization of -level decision-making in favor of pan- control as formalized in the Waikato Raupatu Claims Settlement Act 1995. Limited consultation with during negotiations exacerbated conflicts over representation, leading to calls for constitutional reviews to clarify roles and promote consensus-based rather than centralized elite control. Similar patterns persisted into the , as seen in the sacking of Te Kauhanganui chair Tania Martin by Te Arikinui Kingi Tūheitia over spending concerns, which the overturned, reinstating her and underscoring ongoing power struggles between the iwi parliament and executive board. The internal conflicts imposed tangible economic costs, including delayed commercial investments such as a proposed and casino in Hamilton, as leadership turmoil and asset losses neared by 2000, requiring external advisors and governance overhauls to achieve recovery, such as an NZ$8.3 million profit by 2003. These episodes reflected dynamics, where key figures resisted accountability, hindering the iwi's ability to leverage settlement funds effectively during the 1990s and 2000s.

Critiques of Settlement Outcomes

Critics have argued that the Waikato-Tainui Deed of Settlement, signed on May 22, 1995, fell short of providing full reparations for historical losses stemming from the 1863–1864 invasion and subsequent Raupatu land confiscations, offering only $170 million in cash alongside Crown-valued land equivalents against an estimated $12 billion in total land value lost. While the deed explicitly acknowledged the war's toll, including loss of life among , it focused compensation on property and economic redress without direct monetary provisions for human casualties, a limitation decried as incomplete by some scholars who view settlements as capping accountability at 1–2% of actual harms. The Crown's contemporaneous fiscal envelope policy, which proposed a $1 billion aggregate cap on all settlements over a , drew sharp rebukes for imposing arbitrary fiscal constraints that undervalued claims relative to fiscal precedents like bank bailouts, prompting widespread protests and its eventual abandonment in 1996. Settlement outcomes have also faced scrutiny for uneven internal distribution, with (sub-tribal groups) often sidelined as assets were vested at the level under Kīngitanga trusteeship, subordinating localized claims and enhancing centralized leadership authority, including that of the royal family. This structure contributed to intra- tensions, evidenced by a mere 40.4% beneficiary turnout in ratification voting (3,029 approvals versus 1,608 rejections out of 11,600 eligible) and a subsequent $40 million asset depreciation by 1999 amid allegations of mismanagement and . Even former Tainui executive Tukoroirangi Momōtau Morgan has critiqued the process for creating an "uneven playing field" among , where early settlers like Waikato-Tainui secured relativity top-ups—totaling $293 million since 2012 to maintain proportionality against larger post-1995 deals—leaving later groups without equivalent mechanisms and alienating some individual members from tangible benefits. Beyond distributional inequities, the settlements have been faulted for promoting corporatism that concentrates wealth in tribal entities—such as Waikato-Tainui's $1.4 billion asset base by 2019—over fostering individual enterprise or autonomy, as redress frameworks compel negotiation within Crown-imposed parameters like co-governance arrangements that dilute exclusive iwi control. This corporate model, while yielding commercial successes, incurs opportunity costs by entrenching collective structures that may disincentivize personal initiative and perpetuate dependency on settlement-derived assets rather than market-driven , according to analyses emphasizing causal links to reduced . Fiscal conservatives further contend that such outcomes burden taxpayers with ongoing liabilities—exemplified by relativity payments—without commensurate national returns, potentially straining public resources and complicating efforts toward unified governance.

Debates on Iwi Autonomy versus National Unity

Waikato-Tainui has advocated for greater rangatiratanga, or chiefly authority, over resources and territories following its 1995 Treaty settlement, exemplified by the establishment of the Authority in 2010, a co-governance entity equally shared between representatives and appointees to manage the river's health and allocation. Proponents argue this model honors Article 2 of the , enabling to exercise (guardianship) and address historical disenfranchisement from resource decisions, as seen in Tainui's successful investments yielding assets exceeding $1.8 billion by mid-2024. Critics contend that such arrangements foster dual structures that undermine the principle of one law for all citizens, potentially prioritizing interests over democratic equality and national cohesion. Organizations like have highlighted relativity payments—additional funds to align larger settlements like Tainui's $390 million total cash redress with fiscal equity formulas—as exacerbating perceptions of ongoing racial favoritism, arguing they distort post-settlement finality and fuel . This perspective posits that rangatiratanga claims, while culturally affirming, causally impede broader assimilation benefits, such as unified economic policies that could enhance integration into national prosperity beyond iwi-specific gains. Public opinion on co-governance remains divided, with polls indicating a racial and partisan split: a 2023 Horizon Research survey found 26% of voters viewed halting co-governance as a top electoral priority, particularly among non-, while an RNZ-curated poll showed 49% supporting enhanced Māori input on natural resources but 70% favoring equal citizen say in Treaty-derived decisions. These tensions peaked during the 2023 election, where co-governance critiques influenced coalition policy to limit race-based local governance, reflecting empirical wariness of 50:50 splits disproportionate to Māori's 17% share. Comparatively, Waikato-Tainui's robust outcomes contrast with smaller , many receiving settlements under $50 million amid the $2.6 billion total redress for 86 groups, raising equity concerns that autonomy amplifies disparities in governance capacity and investment returns for less-resourced tribes. While Tainui's model demonstrates -led growth, detractors question whether devolved powers equitably serve all or inadvertently entrench elite iwi dominance, potentially at the expense of national unity under egalitarian frameworks.

References

  1. https://waikatotainui.com/about-us/history/
  2. https://www.waikatodistrict.govt.nz/your-district/iwi-in-our-district
  3. https://www.tgh.co.nz/our-iwi/
  4. https://teara.govt.nz/en/canoe-traditions/page-5
  5. https://www.facebook.com/himamanz/posts/hoturoa-kerr-explains-the-special-connection-the-tainui-waka-and-its-people-have/953473206785845/
  6. https://ohinemuri.org.nz/journals/journal-18-june-1974/a-tainui-whakapapa
  7. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/page/pacific-voyaging-and-discovery
  8. https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/esploro/fulltext/journalArticle/Genealogies-and-oral-histories-as-chronological/9926721360801891
  9. https://teara.govt.nz/en/map/2340/landing-places-of-the-tainui-and-te-arawa-canoes
  10. https://teara.govt.nz/en/photograph/4248/the-anchor-of-the-tainui-canoe
  11. http://haurakiiwihistory.blogspot.com/p/the-journey-of-tainui-in-hauraki.html
  12. https://teara.govt.nz/en/waikato-region/page-4
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371508773_An_archaeological_review_of_Polynesian_adze_quarries_and_sources
  14. https://www.academia.edu/120348633/Early_preserved_Polynesian_kumara_cultivations_in_New_Zealand
  15. https://www.geni.com/projects/Maori-Migration-Tainui-Waka/16159
  16. http://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/n9214/pdf/ch02.pdf
  17. https://teara.govt.nz/en/tribal-organisation
  18. https://mukatangata.workforceskills.nz/assets/Documents/Maori-Leadership-Literature-Review.pdf
  19. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/culture/frontier-of-chaos/maori-values
  20. https://maoridictionary.co.nz/search?&keywords=utu
  21. https://teara.govt.nz/en/1966/maori-social-structure/page-2
  22. https://www.theprow.org.nz/maori/slavery-in-colonial-times/
  23. https://teara.govt.nz/en/economic-history/page-2
  24. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/war/musket-wars/overview
  25. https://teara.govt.nz/en/musket-wars
  26. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/page/history-new-zealand-1769-1914
  27. https://www.aucklandmuseum.com/discover/stories/maori/he-wataka-english
  28. https://www.teaonews.co.nz/2024/07/26/we-used-to-live-in-the-castle-waikato-tainui-tells-its-story/
  29. https://www.nzgeo.com/stories/flax-the-enduring-fibre/
  30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20112383
  31. https://academic.oup.com/book/32813/chapter/274823912
  32. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/politics/the-maori-king-movement/te-kingitanga/introduction
  33. https://waikatotainui.com/about-us/kiingitanga/
  34. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/politics/treaty/the-treaty-in-practice/slide-to-war
  35. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/politics/the-maori-king-movement/potatau-te-wherowhero
  36. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/war/war-in-waikato
  37. https://waikatotainui.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Waikato-War-Education-resource-2014.pdf
  38. https://teara.govt.nz/en/te-tango-whenua-maori-land-alienation/page-5
  39. https://teara.govt.nz/en/new-zealand-wars
  40. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/war/war-in-waikato/opening-phase
  41. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/british-forces-invade-the-waikato
  42. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/war/war-in-waikato/rangiriri
  43. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/war/war-in-waikato/battle-of-orakau
  44. https://teara.govt.nz/en/new-zealand-wars/print
  45. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/land-confiscation-law-passed
  46. https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/resources/447-raupatu-confiscation-and-the-waikato-river-settlement
  47. https://openaccess.wgtn.ac.nz/articles/thesis/_At_the_arbitrary_disposal_of_the_Government_Loyal_M_ori_confiscation_and_the_operation_of_the_Compensation_Court_in_South_Auckland_and_Waikato_1865-67_/23916492
  48. https://teara.govt.nz/en/king-country-region
  49. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/politics/maori-king-movement-1860-94/maintaining-te-kingitanga
  50. https://teara.govt.nz/en/kingitanga-the-maori-king-movement
  51. https://www.doc.govt.nz/documents/science-and-technical/sap235.pdf
  52. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-61071-5_3
  53. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/politics/the-maori-king-movement/troubled-times-1860-94
  54. https://www.govt.nz/assets/Documents/OTS/Waikato-Tainui-Remaining-Claims-Draft-Mandate-Strategy-FINAL.pdf
  55. http://phanza.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NZJPH-7-1-2020.pdf
  56. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/politics/the-maori-king-movement-1860-94/tensions-ease
  57. https://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/resources/2095-new-zealand-dairy-farming-timeline
  58. https://teara.govt.nz/en/waikato-region/page-8
  59. https://whakatau.govt.nz/assets/Treaty-Settlements/FIND_Treaty_Settlements/Co-management-of-Waikato-and-Waipa-rivers/Waikato-Tainui/DOS_SUPPORT/Waikato-Tainui-Agreement-in-Principle.pdf
  60. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/politics/treaty/the-treaty-in-practice/waikato-tainui
  61. https://openaccess.wgtn.ac.nz/ndownloader/files/31466981
  62. https://www.govt.nz/assets/Documents/OTS/Waikato-Tainui-Raupatu/Waikato-Tainui-Deed-of-Settlement-22-May-1995.pdf
  63. https://waikatotainui.com/about-us/settlements/
  64. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/page/waikato-tainui-sign-deed-settlement-crown
  65. https://maorilawreview.co.nz/1995/05/may-1995-contents/
  66. https://teara.govt.nz/en/video/33050/royal-apology-to-tainui-1995
  67. https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1995/0058/latest/whole.html
  68. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2010/0024/latest/whole.html
  69. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/waikato-river-deed-settlement-signed-waikato-tainui
  70. https://oag.parliament.nz/2016/co-governance/appendix1.htm
  71. https://www.govt.nz/assets/Documents/OTS/Waikato-Tainui/Waikato-Tainui-Deed-of-Settlement-in-relation-to-the-Waikato-River-17-Dec-2009.pdf
  72. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2010/0024/71.0/DLM1630125.html
  73. https://www.tgh.co.nz/
  74. https://rotokauri.co.nz/news/article/record-annual-results-achievements-for-waikato-tainui
  75. https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/08/31/happy-and-thriving-the-economic-powerhouse-behind-the-kiingitanga/
  76. https://www.tdb.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/TDB-Iwi-Investment-Report-2024-1.pdf
  77. https://www.tgh.co.nz/media/m4ia45gr/tgh-corporate-brochure-2024-final.pdf
  78. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/557925/tainui-group-holdings-announces-1b-development-with-major-investment-firm-brookfield
  79. https://waikatotainui.com/vacancies/
  80. https://www.tdb.co.nz/2024-iwi-investment-report-tdb-advisory/
  81. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/waikato-tainui-40m-fund-aims-to-build-maori-economic-independence-editorial/VAMMPYK7ZVBTNA2R6HD3JMODJ4/
  82. https://www.tgh.co.nz/media/m0mpvqhd/final_22-july-2024_waikato-tainui-annual-report-1-ktd2.pdf
  83. https://teara.govt.nz/en/nga-haumi-a-iwi-maori-investment/print
  84. https://kmko.nz/stories
  85. https://teara.govt.nz/en/canoe-traditions/print
  86. http://www.kawhia.maori.nz/tainui
  87. https://waikatotainui.com/about-us/our-marae/
  88. https://www.tematawai.maori.nz/assets/Research-Reports/Te-Matarere-o-te-Reo-A-Foresight-Report-on-the-Future-State-of-Te-Reo-Maori-in-the-Waikato-Tainui-Rohe-2038.pdf
  89. https://teara.govt.nz/en/nga-haki-maori-and-flags/page-4
  90. https://www.teaonews.co.nz/2023/05/06/king-tuheitia-presents-king-charles-with-taonga-ahead-of-coronation/
  91. https://www.environmentguide.org.nz/regional/waikato-tainui-raupatu-claims-waikato-river/
  92. https://theconversation.com/room-for-everyone-how-kingi-tuheitias-message-of-unity-offered-an-alternative-to-divisive-treaty-politics-237852
  93. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/transnational-environmental-law/article/river-cogovernance-and-comanagement-in-aotearoa-new-zealand-enabling-indigenous-ways-of-knowing-and-being/0A49B922A46ED4D74ACB55C1D74DF50E
  94. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-61071-5_7
  95. https://waikatotainui.com/grants/tertiary-education/
  96. https://waikatotainui.com/grants/
  97. https://waikatotainui.com/grants/partnership-scholarship/
  98. https://www.raukura.org.nz/
  99. https://waikatotainui.com/hapori/health-wellbeing-koiora/
  100. https://waikatotainui.com/pakihi/te-korowai-kainga/
  101. https://waikatotainui.com/pakihi/te-whaainga-ltd/
  102. https://waikatotainui.com/hapori/careers-and-pathways/
  103. https://tetai.nz/en/waikato-tainui-raupatu-5
  104. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/63096/63096.pdf
  105. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/tainui-ructions-highlight-clash-of-old-and-new/3E526BFAL5LTXCGY6QMKIDH5GA/
  106. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/64156/waikato-tainui-executive-backs-down-over-sacking
  107. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/10/152
  108. https://www.facebook.com/WaikatoTainu1/posts/the-unfortunate-thing-about-treaty-settlements-is-that-it-has-created-an-uneven-/1130733972533272/
  109. https://www.tdb.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/TDB-Advisory-Iwi-Investment-Report-2023.pdf
  110. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/economic-juggernaut-waikato-tainui-the-14-billion-iwi/7T5KGNN4O7V5BHC76YQRS6ZBPQ/
  111. https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/unintended_consequences_of_treaty_settlements
  112. https://www.waikatotimes.co.nz/nz-news/360694801/tainui-eyes-more-small-business-starters-plus-big-projects-30-year-settlement-anniversary
  113. https://waikatotainui.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Waikato-Tainui-Five-Year-Plan-2025.pdf
  114. https://newsroom.co.nz/2023/02/14/co-governance-its-nothing-like-you-think/
  115. https://www.hobsonspledge.nz/tags/waikato_tainui
  116. https://www.horizonpoll.co.nz/page/683/the-racial-and-political-divide-opening-over-co-governance
  117. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/503066/poll-70-percent-of-new-zealanders-want-equal-say-in-te-tiriti-o-waitangi-decisions
  118. https://theloop.ecpr.eu/new-zealand-election-2023-a-missed-opportunity-for-indigenous-co-governance/
  119. https://www.stuff.co.nz/waikato-times/news/130785206/latest-waikatotainui-treaty-settlement-payment-takes-iwi-total-to-390-million
  120. https://tetai.nz/en/about-treaty-settlements
  121. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/ten-biggest-iwi-have-82b-assets-tdb-advisory/C3PQ7EBJUJD5FHEQRFCPW2WX7A/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.