Hubbry Logo
MorioriMorioriMain
Open search
Moriori
Community hub
Moriori
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Moriori
Moriori
Moriori
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Moriori is located in Chatham Islands
Landing of the Chatham
Landing of the Chatham
Kōpinga Marae
Kōpinga Marae
Māori landing from the Rodney
Māori landing from the Rodney
class=notpageimage|
Map of the Chatham Islands. Chatham Island is the largest, Pitt Island the second largest, and South East Island the small island to the right of Pitt.

The Moriori are the first settlers of the Chatham Islands (Rēkohu in Moriori; Wharekauri in Māori).[3] Moriori are Polynesians who came from the New Zealand mainland around 1500 AD,[4][5] which was close to the time of the shift from the archaic to the classic period of Polynesian Māori culture on the mainland.[6][7] Oral tradition records migration to the Chathams in the 16th century.[8][9] The settlers' culture diverged from mainland Māori, and they developed a distinct Moriori language, mythology, artistic expression and way of life.[10] Currently there are around 700 people who identify as Moriori, most of whom no longer live on the Chatham Islands.[11] During the late 19th century some prominent anthropologists proposed that Moriori were pre-Māori settlers of mainland New Zealand, and possibly Melanesian in origin;[12][13] this hypothesis has been discredited by archaeologists since the early 20th century,[14] but continued to be referred to by critics of the Treaty of Waitangi settlement process into the 21st century.[15]

Early Moriori formed tribal groups based on eastern Polynesian social customs and organisation. Later, a prominent pacifist culture emerged; this was known as the law of nunuku, based on the teachings of the 16th century Moriori leader Nunuku-whenua.[16] This culture made it easier for Taranaki Māori invaders to massacre them in the 1830s during the Musket Wars. This was the Moriori genocide, in which the Moriori were either murdered or enslaved by members of the Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama iwi,[17] killing or displacing nearly 95% of the Moriori population.

The Moriori, however, were not extinct, and gained recognition as New Zealand's second indigenous people during the next century. Their culture and language underwent a revival, and Moriori names for their islands were prioritised. In February 2020, the New Zealand government signed a treaty with tribal leaders, giving them rights enshrined in law and the Moriori people at large an apology for the past actions of Māori and European settlers. The Crown returned stolen remains of those killed in the genocide, and gifted NZ$18 million in reparations.[18][3] On 23 November 2021, the New Zealand government passed in law the treaty between Moriori and the Crown.[19] The law is called the Moriori Claims Settlement Act. It includes an agreed summary history that begins with the words "Moriori karāpuna (ancestors) were the waina-pono (original inhabitants) of Rēkohu, Rangihaute, Hokorereoro (South East Island), and other nearby islands (making up the Chatham Islands). They arrived sometime between 1000 and 1400 AD."[20]

History

[edit]

Origin

[edit]

The Moriori were hunter-gatherers[21] who lived on the Chatham Islands in isolation from the outside world until the arrival of HMS Chatham in 1791. They came to the Chathams from mainland New Zealand,[citation needed] and were descendants of the same Polynesians who settled New Zealand and from whom Māori descended.[citation needed] Uncertainty surrounds the time of the Moriori arrival. Some artefacts from Pitt Island date from the Māori archaic period, estimated to be before AD 1500, but all carbon dating of evidence elsewhere on the islands gives dates after AD 1500. Linguistic similarity and genealogical comparisons with Māori on the South Island indicate the Moriori settlers were from south of Cook Strait.[citation needed] We know Moriori lack genetic diversity, which points to there being only one arrival, possibly with just one canoe.[citation needed] Further educated guesswork points to that arrival being a trading (not war) canoe or canoes (women must have been on board) from the far south that was blown off course while travelling northwards: it could have been taken eastward along the existing ocean current to the Chathams,[22] with archaeological discoveries implying they settled first on Pitt Island before later moving to Chatham Island.[23][22][24][25][excessive citations] The Chathams were the last islands in the Pacific to be settled by Polynesians.[26]

Most of what else is known about the Moriori, their culture and their language, is a matter of speculation. This is because so much evidence has been lost. After the 1835 Māori invasion, all Moriori were either killed, died of newly introduced diseases, or were enslaved. The language and culture of the survivors became intermingled with the Māori language and society before records were made by Europeans. This makes most of what is now known of the pre-contact Moriori the subject of conjecture.[23][page needed]

Adapting to local conditions

[edit]
Moriori designs carved into trees and rock

The Chathams are colder and less hospitable than the land the original settlers left behind, and although abundant in resources, these were different from those available where they had come from. The Chathams proved unsuitable for the cultivation of most crops known to Polynesians, and the Moriori adopted a hunter-gatherer lifestyle. Food was almost entirely marine-sourced — protein and fat from fish, fur seals, and the fatty young of sea birds.[citation needed] The islands supported about 2,000 people.[27] This lifestyle is confirmed by early European accounts, with one recording that:

"They were idle in the extreme, only seeking food when pressed by hunger, and depending mostly on what was cast ashore by the sea, a stranded whale, grampus, or porpoise being an especial delicacy, as was also a seal or mass of whale blubber, which being often cast ashore was looked upon as the gift of a good spirit who supplied their wants."[28]

Moriori tree carving or dendroglyph

Lacking resources of cultural significance such as greenstone and plentiful timber, they found outlets for their ritual needs in the carving of dendroglyphs (incisions into tree trunks, called rakau momori). Typically, most Moriori dendroglyphs depict a human form, but there are also other patterns depicting fish and birds.[29] Some of these carvings are protected by the Hāpūpū / J M Barker Historic Reserve.[29]

As a small and precarious population, Moriori embraced a pacifist culture that rigidly avoided warfare, replacing it with dispute resolution in the form of ritual fighting and conciliation.[30] The ban on warfare and cannibalism is attributed to their ancestor Nunuku-whenua.

...because men get angry and during such anger feel the will to strike, that so they may, but only with a rod the thickness of a thumb, and one stretch of the arms length, and thrash away, but that on an abrasion of the hide, or first sign of blood, all should consider honour satisfied.

— Oral tradition[30]

This enabled the Moriori to preserve what limited resources they had in their harsh climate, avoiding waste through warfare. However, this lack of training in warfare also led to their later near-destruction at the hands of invading North Island Māori.

Moriori castrated some male infants in order to control population growth.[31]

European contact (1791–1835)

[edit]

The first Europeans to make contact with the Moriori were the crew of HMS Chatham on 29 November 1791, while on its voyage to the northern Pacific from England, via Dusky Sound. The Chatham's captain, William R. Broughton, named the island after John Pitt, 2nd Earl of Chatham and claimed it for Great Britain. The landing party came to shore in Kaingaroa Harbour on the far Northeast coast of Chatham Island.[32][33] The Moriori at first retreated into the forest once the Europeans landed. Seventy years later the Europeans would be recalled in Moriori oral tradition as containing the god of fire, given the pipes they were smoking and likely female from the clothes they were wearing. It was this interpretation that led to the men returning from the forest to meet the landing party. A brief period of hostility was quickly calmed by the crew putting gifts on the end of Moriori spears, though attempts at trade were unsuccessful. After exploring the area for water the crew again became fearful of Moriori aggression.[34] Some misunderstanding led to an escalation of violence and one Moriori was shot and killed.[33][35] HMS Chatham then left the island with all its crew. Both the diary of Broughton and local oral tradition record that both sides regretted the incident and to some extent blamed themselves for overreacting.[35]

It was this regret in part that led to good relations when the next ships arrived in the islands sometime between 1804 and 1807. They were sealers from Sydney and word of their welcome soon gave the Moriori a reputation of being friendly. During this time at least one Moriori visited the New Zealand mainland and returned home with knowledge of the Māori. As more ships came, sealing gangs were also left behind on the islands for months at a time. Sealers and whalers soon made the islands a centre of their activities, competing for resources with the native population. Pigs and potatoes were introduced to the islands. However, the seals that had religious significance and provided food and clothing to the Moriori were all but wiped out.[36] European men intermarried with Moriori. Māori arrivals created their own village at Wharekauri which became the Māori name for the Chatham Islands.[37]

The local population was estimated at 1,600 in the mid-1830s with about 10% and 20% of the population having died from infectious diseases such as influenza.

Invasion by Taranaki Māori (1835–1868)

[edit]
Main article: Moriori genocide
Moriori people in the late 19th century: these three men (standing) are wearing a mix of traditional and European clothing. They carry defensive staffs and wear flax mats around the waist and shoulders, feathers on the front of the head, and albatross tufts in their beards.

In 1835 some Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama, originally from Taranaki, but living in Wellington for about a decade, invaded the Chathams. On 19 November 1835, the brig Lord Rodney, a hijacked[38] European ship, arrived carrying 500 Māori (men, women and children) with guns, clubs and axes, and loaded with 78 tonnes of potatoes for planting, followed by another load, by the same ship, of 400 more Taranaki Māori on 5 December 1835. With the arrival of the second group "parties of warriors armed with muskets, clubs and tomahawks, led by their chiefs, walked through Moriori tribal territories and settlements without warning, permission or greeting. If the districts were wanted by the invaders, they curtly informed the inhabitants that their land had been taken and the Moriori living there were now vassals."[39]

A hui or council of all Moriori men was convened at the settlement called Te Awapatiki. Despite knowing that the Māori did not share their pacifism, and despite the argument by younger men that the principle of Nunuku was not appropriate now, two chiefs — Tapata and Torea — declared that "the law of Nunuku was not a strategy for survival, to be varied as conditions changed; it was a moral imperative."[39] Although this council decided in favour of peace, the invading Māori inferred it was a prelude to war, as was common practice during the Musket Wars. This precipitated a massacre, most complete in the Waitangi area, followed by an enslavement of the Moriori survivors.[40]

A Moriori survivor recalled: "[The Taranaki invaders] commenced to kill us like sheep.... [We] were terrified, fled to the bush, concealed ourselves in holes underground, and in any place to escape our enemies. It was of no avail; we were discovered and killed – men, women and children indiscriminately." A Taranaki Māori conqueror explained, "We took possession... in accordance with our customs and we caught all the people. Not one escaped....."[41] The invaders ritually killed some 10% of the population.[38] Stakes were driven into some of the women, who were left to die in pain.[42]

During the following enslavement the Taranaki Māori invaders forbade the speaking of the Moriori language. They forced Moriori to desecrate their sacred sites by urinating and defecating on them.[38] Moriori were forbidden to marry Moriori or the Taranaki Māori, or to have children with each other. This was different from the customary form of slavery practised on mainland New Zealand.[43] However, many Moriori women had children by their Māori masters. A small number of Moriori women eventually married either Māori or European men. Some were taken from the Chathams and never returned. In 1842 a small party of Māori and their Moriori slaves migrated to the subantarctic Auckland Islands, surviving for some 20 years on sealing and flax growing.[44][45] Only 101 Moriori out of a population of about 2,000 were left alive by 1862, making the Moriori genocide one of the deadliest in history by percentage of the victim group.[46]

Dispersal and assimilation

[edit]
Tommy Solomon, acknowledged as the last Moriori of unmixed ancestry

The Moriori were free from slavery by the end of the 1860s which gave them opportunities for self determination, but their small population led to a gradual dilution of their culture. Only a handful of men still understood the Moriori language and culture from before the invasion. The younger generation spoke Māori, while still identifying themselves as Moriori. While attempts were made to record the Moriori culture for posterity, it was generally believed that it would never again be a living way of life. By 1900 there would only be twelve people in the Chatham Islands who identified themselves as Moriori.[47] Although the last Moriori of unmixed ancestry, Tommy Solomon, died in 1933,[48] there are several thousand mixed ancestry Moriori alive today.

In the 2001 New Zealand census, 585 people identified as Moriori. The population increased to 942 in the 2006 census and declined to 738 in the 2013 census.[49] The 2018 census estimated the Moriori population as 996.[1]

Waitangi Tribunal claim

[edit]

In the late 1980s some Moriori descendants made claims against the New Zealand government through the Waitangi Tribunal.[50][51] The Tribunal is charged with making recommendations on claims brought by Māori relating to actions or omissions of the Crown in the period since 1840 that breach the promises made in the Treaty of Waitangi. These claims were the first time the Tribunal had to choose between competing claims of two indigenous groups. The main focus of the claim was the British annexation of the islands in 1842, the inaction of the Government to reports of Moriori being kept in slavery and the awarding of 97% of the islands to Ngāti Mutunga in 1870 by the Native Land Court.[51]

In 1992, while the Moriori claim was active, the Sealords fisheries deal ceded a third of New Zealand's fisheries to Māori, but prevented any further treaty fishery claims. This occurred against the backdrop of Māori, Moriori and Pākehā Chatham Islanders all competing for fishing rights, while working together to exclude international and mainland interests. Therefore, it was believed that the result of the Tribunal's verdict on the ownership of the Chatham Islands may improve the Moriori ability to acquire some of the allotted fishing rights from the Sealords deal. The Moriori claims were heard between May 1994 and March 1996 and the verdict was strongly in favour of the Moriori case.[52]

This led to an NZ$18 million deal between the Crown and Moriori in 2017. The two parties signed a Deed of Settlement on 13 August 2019.[53][54] In November 2021, the New Zealand Parliament passed the Moriori Claims Settlement Bill, which completed the Treaty of Waitangi process of the Moriori. Under the terms of the legislation, the settlement package includes a formal Crown apology, the transfer of culturally and spiritually significant lands to Moriori as cultural redress, financial compensation of NZ$18 million, and shared redress such as the vesting of 50 percent of Te Whanga Lagoon.[55][56]

Culture and marae

[edit]
A repatriation ceremony at Te Papa, bringing home Māori and Moriori skeletal remains that were removed from New Zealand in the 19th century (2018)

Today, despite the difficulties that the Moriori have faced, their culture is enjoying a renaissance, both in the Chatham Islands and New Zealand's mainland. This has been symbolised with the renewal of the Covenant of Peace at the new Kōpinga marae in January 2005 on Chatham Island.[57] As of 2016, the marae has registered almost 800 Moriori descendants, with more than 3000 associated children.[58] The Kopinga meeting place and Hokomenetai meeting house are based in the town of Waitangi, also on Chatham Island.[59]

In 2001, work began on preserving the vocabulary and songs of the Moriori people.[60][61] They also received a $6 million grant from the Government to preserve their culture and language.[62] The albatross remains important in Moriori culture: it is seen in the design of the Kōpinga marae and its feathers are worn in the hair of some Moriori as a sign of peace.[60][61] The relationship between the Moriori and Ngāti Mutunga is improving, and non-violence remains a cornerstone of the Moriori self image.[60][63]

In 2002, land on the east coast of Chatham Island was purchased by the Crown (the Taia property). It is now a reserve and jointly managed by Moriori and the Crown. The Moriori are also actively involved with preserving the rakau momori (tree carvings) on the islands.[61]

Language

[edit]
Main article: Moriori language

The now extinct Moriori language was Eastern Polynesian and closely related to Māori and Cook Island Māori with which it was mutually intelligible. It shared about 70% of its vocabulary with Māori; however, there were significant differences in grammar and pronunciation.[64][65] There are modern attempts at creating learning materials to ensure the survival of what remains of the language.[60][66]

Political organisation

[edit]

In 2001, the two main political groups of Moriori united to form the Hokotehi Moriori Trust;[61][67] however, some internal disputes remain.[68] The New Zealand Government recognises the Hokotehi Moriori Trust as having the mandate to represent Moriori in Treaty of Waitangi settlement negotiations. It is also a mandated iwi organisation under the Māori Fisheries Act 2004 and a recognised iwi aquaculture organisation in the Māori Commercial Aquaculture Claims Settlement Act 2004. The trust represents Moriori as an "iwi authority" for resource consents under the Resource Management Act 1991, and is a Tūhono organisation. The charitable trust is managed by ten trustees, with representation from both the Chatham Islands, and the North Island and South Island. It is based at Owenga on Chatham Island.[59]

[edit]

Based on the writing of Percy Smith and Elsdon Best from the late 19th century, theories grew up that the Māori had displaced a more primitive pre-Māori population of Moriori (sometimes described as a small-statured, dark-skinned race of possible Melanesian origin) in mainland New Zealand – and that the Chatham Island Moriori were the last remnant of this earlier race. These theories also favoured the supposedly more recent and more technically able Māori. This was used to justify racist stereotyping, colonisation, and conquest by cultural "superiors".[69][70] From the view of European settlers this served the purpose of undermining the notion of the Māori as the indigenous people of New Zealand, making them just one in a progression of waves of migration and conquest by increasingly more civilised people.[69][70]

The hypothesis of a racially distinct pre-Māori Moriori people was criticised in the 20th century by a number of historians, anthropologists and ethnologists; among them anthropologist H. D. Skinner in 1923,[71] ethnologist Roger Duff in the 1940s,[72] historian and ethnographer Arthur Thomson in 1959,[73] as well as Michael King in Moriori: A People Rediscovered in 2000, James Belich in 2002,[74] and K. R. Howe in Te Ara: The Encyclopedia of New Zealand.[72]

The idea of Moriori arriving earlier and being vastly distinct from Māori was widely published in the early 20th century.[75] Crucially, this story was also promoted in a series of three articles in the New Zealand School Journal of 1916,[12] and the 1934 A. W. Reed schoolbook The Coming of the Maori to Ao-tea-roa[12]—and therefore became familiar to generations of schoolchildren. This in turn has been repeated by the media and politicians.[76] However, at no point has this idea completely dominated the discussion, with the academic consensus slowly gaining more public awareness over the 20th century.[77]

The 2004 David Mitchell novel Cloud Atlas and its 2012 film adaption both featured the enslavement of Moriori by the Māori on the Chatham Islands in the mid-19th century. The film adaption stars David Gyasi as "Autua", a Moriori slave, in spite of the fact Gyasi is British of Ghanaian descent and bears no physical resemblance to Moriori people. Scholar Gabriel S. Estrada criticised the depiction of Māori slave culture as being incorrectly depicted in a similar manner to slavery in the United States, featuring enslaved Moriori working on plantations similar to those in the American South.[78] The interchangeability of these two practices has been noted by historians as being a common misconception in popular culture.[79]

Notable Moriori people

[edit]
Main category: Moriori people

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Moriori

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Moriori are the indigenous Polynesian people of the Chatham Islands (Rēkohu), located approximately 800 kilometres east of New Zealand's South Island, whose ancestors established permanent settlement there by the thirteenth century AD following migration from eastern Polynesia. Developing a distinct culture marked by rākau momori (elaborate tree carvings), a unique Eastern Polynesian language closely related to but divergent from Māori, and strict adherence to Nunuku-whenua's covenant—a fifteenth-century prohibition on warfare, killing, and cannibalism imposed after intertribal conflict—the Moriori maintained relative isolation until European contact in the early nineteenth century. In 1835, two Māori iwi, Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama, displaced by intertribal wars and facilitated by European ships, invaded the islands, killing around 300 Moriori (about 15% of the estimated 2,000 population) in the initial conquest, enslaving the remainder, and imposing a regime of subjugation that reduced their numbers to 101 by 1863 through death, disease, and intermarriage prohibitions. This event, characterized by scholars as colonial genocide involving acquired European racial ideologies, nearly eradicated Moriori society, with their language falling out of use by the early twentieth century and the last fluent speaker, Tommy Solomon, dying in 1933. Despite this devastation, Moriori descendants have pursued cultural revival since the 1980s, achieving legal recognition as a distinct iwi in 2020 with treaty settlements affirming their indigenous status independent of Māori claims.

Origins and Prehistory

Settlement of the Chatham Islands

The Chatham Islands, located approximately 800 kilometers east of New Zealand's South Island, were colonized by Polynesian voyagers who arrived via ocean-going canoes from the New Zealand mainland between roughly 1300 and 1500 AD. These migrants, ancestral to the Moriori, represented an extension of East Polynesian expansion, departing from groups in New Zealand shortly after the main waves of Māori settlement there. Archaeological investigations, including radiocarbon dating of early midden deposits and occupation layers on Rēkohu (Chatham Island), corroborate initial human presence in this timeframe, with calibrated dates from charcoal and shell samples indicating the onset of systematic resource use and site establishment. Moriori oral traditions narrate the settlement as voyages undertaken by small parties in waka (canoes), guided by navigational knowledge and ancestral figures who identified the islands during exploratory trips from New Zealand's eastern regions. These accounts emphasize deliberate migration rather than accidental drift, aligning with broader Polynesian patterns of intentional eastward expansion using double-hulled vessels capable of open-ocean travel. While some traditions reference pre-existing inhabitants (termed Maruiwi), empirical evidence from dated sites shows no prior human modification of the landscape, supporting the view that the Moriori progenitors were the islands' first human occupants. Post-arrival demographic expansion was marked, with the population growing to an estimated 2,000–2,500 by the early 19th century, prior to significant external disruptions. This increase from likely small founding groups (tens to low hundreds) over 300–500 years demonstrates effective colonization, facilitated by the islands' productive marine and terrestrial resources, though exact growth rates remain inferred from later historical records and site densities rather than continuous archaeological proxies.

Archaeological and Genetic Evidence

Archaeological excavations on Rēkohu (Chatham Island) have uncovered midden deposits, village sites, and artifacts including stone adzes, bone fish hooks, and woodworking tools, consistent with Polynesian material culture. Radiocarbon dating of charcoal and shell from these sites, particularly middens associated with forest clearance and resource use, places initial settlement between approximately 1450 and 1500 CE, aligning with a post-colonization migration from mainland New Zealand. These dates refute earlier estimates and confirm no pre-Polynesian occupation, as tool typologies—such as quadrangular adzes and barbed hooks—match those of Māori assemblages from the Archaic period without Melanesian or archaic traits. Genetic analyses of Polynesian populations, including limited Moriori-descended samples, reveal mtDNA haplogroups (e.g., B4a1a1) and Y-chromosome markers (e.g., C-M208) characteristic of East Polynesian ancestry, shared directly with Māori and tracing to Taiwan via Island Southeast Asia. Isolation on the Chathams induced minor genetic drift, evident in reduced heterozygosity, but no distinct pre-Māori or Melanesian admixture; rat (kiore) DNA from sites corroborates a single founding event around 1500 CE from a New Zealand source population. This evidence aligns with linguistic ties to South Island Māori dialects, contradicting 19th-century claims by ethnologists like Percy Smith of a primitive, pre-Polynesian Moriori stock displaced from mainland New Zealand. Those pseudoscientific theories, rooted in craniometric misinterpretations and colonial narratives to undermine primacy, lacked empirical support even contemporaneously; modern re-evaluations emphasize causal continuity from voyagers adapting to insular conditions, with no archaeological or genomic trace of separate indigeneity.

Environmental Adaptation and Cultural Evolution

Resource Utilization and Technological Innovations

The Moriori adapted Polynesian techniques to the ' limited terrestrial resources, which lacked large game mammals beyond introduced rats and bats, shifting emphasis to marine and coastal exploitation including seals, fish, and seabirds. Primary protein sources derived from fur seals selectively—targeting only old males to avoid deterring breeding herds—and gathering fatty young seabirds for meat and oil preservation. (toroa) were harvested seasonally from predator-free offshore islands using wooden clubs to target the neck, with meat preserved in bags or stone ovens for storage. Terrestrial supplementation involved processing kopi (Corynocarpus laevigatus) kernels, an introduced tree whose nuts required steaming and pounding to neutralize toxins, forming a caloric staple amid root and other gathering. Moriori promoted dense kopi groves, altering forest composition to enhance in a nutrient-poor environment. Fishing occurred via nearshore methods, augmented by small, unstable watercraft such as wash-through raft-canoes buoyed by inflated for accessing rocky shores and bird colonies. Technological adaptations included rakau momori, incisions carved into living kopi bark using stone or shell tools to depict motifs marking burials, genealogies, or resource loci, providing a persistent, non-perishable record in an isolated setting devoid of . Harvesting protocols incorporated rituals limiting access and tools—prohibiting metal and excess waste—to regulate yields from finite populations, reflecting pragmatic responses to ecological constraints. Over 200 such carvings persist across sites like Hapupu, underscoring their role in resource-oriented cultural documentation.

Development of Pacifist Traditions

The Moriori, having settled the around 1500 AD, initially faced intertribal conflicts among their nine tribes, which escalated to include warfare, , and due to cycles of . These disputes, arising in the resource-abundant but isolated environment, threatened the viability of their small society, prompting high-ranking chief in the to convene the tribes and declare a binding covenant—known as Nunuku's —that explicitly banned killing, the consumption of human flesh, and the building of fortified pā (defensive villages). This prohibition stemmed from pragmatic recognition that ongoing feuds in a limited population of roughly 2,000 could lead to self-extinction, shifting toward non-violent means such as verbal and ritualized disputes without lethal outcomes. The covenant's enforcement marked a causal turning point, halting intertribal hostilities and fostering long-term societal cohesion in an environment where defensive fortifications had previously exacerbated divisions. Traditional and historical records indicate it was largely honored, enabling cultural elaboration—including distinctive tree carvings (rākau momori) as symbolic expressions of genealogy and peace—while sustaining population levels without the demographic drains of perpetual warfare. In small, kin-based groups isolated from larger Polynesian networks, this non-violence aligned with adaptive strategies to minimize kin-group annihilation risks, prioritizing collective survival over hierarchical or martial dominance. However, the deliberate forswearing of weaponry and fortifications, while stabilizing internal dynamics, empirically curtailed capacities for organized defense against unforeseen external aggression, as the society's martial skills atrophied over generations of adherence. This trade-off underscores how the pacifist framework, effective for endogenous threats in a contained , rested on assumptions of isolation that proved untenable when breached, though it preserved core social norms amid adversity.

Pre-Contact Society and Governance

Social Structure and Economy

Moriori society was divided into nine tribal groups—Hamata, Wheteina, Eitara, Etiao, Harua, Makao, Matanga, Poutama, and Rauru—organized along descent lines from ancestral migrants, with no evidence of centralized chiefdoms or hierarchical kingdoms. These kin-based units, numbering perhaps a few hundred each in a total population of around 2,000, operated autonomously across the ' dispersed settlements, adapting to environmental scarcity through flexible, localized governance. Leadership fell to ieriki, individuals chosen for proven competence in vital skills like deep-sea or bird snaring rather than , underscoring a meritocratic and relatively egalitarian compared to continental Polynesian polities. Family structures prioritized and , forbidding marriages between first-, second-, or third-degree cousins to mitigate risks in isolation; some male infants underwent as a form of birth regulation, aligning with resource constraints and the pacifist kōrero pono (Nunuku's covenant) that proscribed violence and emphasized communal harmony. The pre-contact economy depended on intensive, cooperative exploitation of marine and terrestrial foods, with groups collaboratively harvesting seals (targeting surplus old males to avoid depleting breeding stocks), seabirds, fish via large waka pahi rafts over 12 meters long, eels, fern roots, and karaka berries requiring multi-stage detoxification through steaming, pounding, and leaching for edibility and storage. Poor soils limited kumara cultivation to small plots, prompting adaptations like ring-barking forest trees to boost karaka yields and reliance on seasonal captures or strandings for protein surges, all managed under tapu rules conserving resources for sustainability. Tool production involved adzes for and gear, exchanged informally within tribes but with no broader trade networks until European contact. This cooperative model, integrating gender-typical labor—men in hunting and raft-building, women in gathering and preservation—reinforced interdependence, causal to the society's endurance amid isolation and climatic challenges.

Spiritual Beliefs and Practices

Moriori cosmology paralleled broader Polynesian traditions, recounting the separation of Rangi, the , and Papa, the earth mother, by their offspring to dispel primordial darkness and enable life. This foundational narrative underscored a polytheistic framework involving , or gods, such as Hatitimatangi, whose wooden , discovered in a 19th-century , featured drilled chin holes possibly for attaching symbolic attributes like a . Ancestor veneration manifested in rakau momori, intricate tree carvings on living kopi trees executed with stone tools, interpreted as memorials to deceased kin or tributes to divine entities, carrying profound emotional and spiritual weight for the . Oral traditions preserved these practices, linking carvings to rituals that honored forebears and invoked their guidance. Karakia, ritual incantations, integrated spirituality into subsistence activities; for instance, specific chants accompanied eel net fishing, as in "Ko ro karakii punga tuna," and extended to planting to ensure bountiful yields amid sparse soils. These invocations sought divine favor for resource procurement, reflecting a pragmatic fusion of belief and survival imperatives. An elaborate system of prohibitions and rituals, akin to tapu, enforced resource conservation, prohibiting overexploitation of foods like certain seabirds or plants during vulnerable periods to sustain island ecosystems. Such practices, rooted in spiritual imperatives, promoted equilibrium with the environment's constraints, evidenced by sustained populations on limited arable land until external disruptions. The pacifist ethos, formalized around 1835 under Nunuku's covenant, entailed ritually depositing weapons on tūahu altars as a sacred pact with the gods, renouncing perpetual conflict to preserve communal harmony and avert ecological strain from warfare. This spiritual commitment empirically aligned with the islands' , prioritizing non-violent adaptation over expansionist strife.

European Contact Era

Initial Encounters and Trade (1791–1835)

The first European contact with the Moriori occurred on 29 November 1791, when Lieutenant William Broughton, commanding HMS Chatham, sighted Rēkohu (Chatham Island) after being blown off course during a voyage to the Pacific. Broughton landed parties on the island, formally claiming it for King George III by planting the British flag and naming it after his ship. The expedition's records described the Moriori as a distinct Polynesian people, estimating their population at over 1,000 individuals across the islands. Interactions during the visit were initially marked by mutual curiosity, but a fatal misunderstanding ensued when a Moriori man, Tamakaroro, defended his nets from interference, leading to him being shot dead by a —the first recorded Moriori death from European gunfire. In reflection, Moriori elders instituted a formal for future outsiders, attributing shared responsibility for the incident and aiming to uphold their pacifist norms of under Nunuku's covenant. No trade occurred during this brief exploratory stop, though the encounter introduced the Moriori to European presence and technology. From the early 1800s, sporadic visits by Sydney-based sealers and whalers increased contact, with crews establishing temporary camps and seeking local provisions like , seals, and . Moriori extended consistent with their traditions of non-violence and welcoming strangers, earning a reputation among Europeans for friendliness despite competition for . Limited ensued, primarily exchanging food and labor for iron tools and other goods, though the Moriori's aversion to weaponry precluded significant uptake of muskets and prevented formation of defensive alliances. These exchanges remained intermittent and non-committal, reflecting the islands' isolation and the visitors' transient nature until the mid-1830s.

Effects of Introduced Diseases and Technologies

The Moriori's isolation on the Chatham Islands rendered them highly susceptible to Old World diseases introduced via sporadic European contact starting in 1791 with the arrival of HMS Chatham. Interactions with whalers, sealers, and traders facilitated the transmission of pathogens like influenza, measles, and venereal diseases (including syphilis), to which the population had no prior exposure or immunity. Historical accounts indicate these outbreaks caused significant morbidity, with estimates suggesting a population reduction of up to 25% by the early 1830s, exacerbating vulnerabilities in a society already adapted to a harsh subantarctic environment. European technologies, traded for local resources such as sealskins and , included iron tools like axes and nails, which Moriori incorporated into , , and practices. These implements offered greater durability and efficiency compared to traditional stone and tools, enabling improved resource utilization in the short term—such as faster processing of karaka berries and construction of kopinga (tree houses). However, reliance on imported metal disrupted self-sufficient craft traditions, fostering dependency on external supply chains. Firearms, including muskets, were acquired similarly but remained underutilized due to entrenched pacifist norms derived from Nunuku's covenant, limiting their role to hunting rather than defensive armament. This selective adoption provided marginal survival benefits pre-invasion but later amplified asymmetries when confronted by technologically and militarily advanced groups equipped through mainland .

The 1835 Invasion and Immediate Aftermath

Context of Māori Inter-Tribal Conflicts

The Musket Wars, spanning roughly 1807 to the 1840s, marked a phase of escalated intertribal warfare among Māori iwi, fueled by European-introduced muskets that amplified the destructiveness of endemic conflicts over land, captives, and revenge (utu). Northern iwi such as Ngāpuhi, gaining early access to these weapons through trade with sealers and whalers, launched southward raids that inflicted heavy casualties and forced migrations, with an estimated 20,000 Māori deaths between 1818 and the early 1830s. Warfare patterns involved fortified pā defenses, ambushes, and slave-taking, reshaping tribal boundaries as victors consolidated gains and losers sought refuge or retaliation. Taranaki-based iwi Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama suffered displacement from their traditional rohe due to incursions by Waikato invaders and broader Musket Wars pressures, compelling alliances and southward relocation to Port Nicholson (present-day Wellington). These dynamics reflected a realist inter-tribal system where resource scarcity and vendettas drove opportunistic expansion, unmitigated by centralized authority or non-aggression norms among competitive iwi. In November–December 1835, around 900 and members, leveraging European maritime knowledge, chartered the Lord Rodney for a voyage to the , aiming to claim unoccupied or vulnerable territory amid mainland instability. This exodus underscored how Musket Wars-induced upheavals prompted weaker to pursue distant conquests for survival and prestige, bypassing saturated battlegrounds.

Invasion Dynamics and Moriori Response

In November 1835, approximately 900 warriors and their families from the Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama iwi arrived at Whangaroa Harbour (modern Waitangi Bay) on the Chatham Islands (Rekohu) aboard the brig Lord Rodney, marking the start of the invasion. The Moriori, following customary protocols of hospitality toward strangers, initially provided food and shelter to the newcomers, who presented themselves as migrants rather than aggressors. This gesture of goodwill was swiftly exploited; within days, the Māori groups launched coordinated attacks on Moriori settlements, resulting in massacres that included cannibalism and the killing of non-combatants. Faced with the onslaught, Moriori leaders convened at Te Awapatiki and invoked Nunuku-whenua's covenant—a 600-year-old prohibition against taking human life or manufacturing weapons—opting unanimously against retaliation. Although some Moriori possessed muskets obtained through prior European trade, these were not deployed, as the covenant's tenets prioritized pacifism over self-defense, reflecting a cultural strategy rooted in avoiding cycles of vengeance observed in ancestral Māori conflicts. This restraint stemmed from first-hand knowledge of inter-tribal warfare's destructiveness, reinforced by Moriori oral traditions, rather than any perceived military inferiority; Moriori numbers exceeded the invaders initially, and their familiarity with the terrain could have enabled guerrilla resistance. The absence of organized Moriori counterattacks enabled the invaders to overrun key sites across Rekohu and Rangihaute (Chatham and Pitt Islands) within weeks, declaring the islands nohoanga (territories) under their control and imposing enslavement on survivors. The Māori strategy emphasized domination for resource access and relocation from mainland pressures, not systematic annihilation, as evidenced by the selective sparing of laborers and subsequent intermarriage prohibitions that preserved a subjugated Moriori underclass. This dynamic conquest highlighted the causal interplay between Moriori non-violence and Māori opportunism, yielding uncontested territorial gains without prolonged warfare.

Enslavement, Violence, and Population Collapse

Following the 1835 invasion, and warriors massacred Moriori communities in targeted assaults, killing approximately 300 individuals—about one-sixth of the estimated 1,800 Moriori —including chiefs and resistors to assert dominance. Survivor accounts and Māori oral traditions document instances of during these killings, consistent with inter-tribal warfare practices of the era, as well as rapes and mutilations to terrorize the . The remaining 1,500 or so Moriori were enslaved as manual laborers for food production and resource extraction, subjected to beatings and selective executions for perceived defiance, though no evidence indicates a deliberate policy of total extermination akin to systematic ; rather, the invaders sought subservient workers and land control. Enslavement conditions exacerbated demographic collapse: Moriori were prohibited from marrying one another or reproducing freely, with Māori enforcing infanticide on Moriori offspring to prevent population recovery, diverging from mainland Māori slavery norms that allowed limited family formation. Introduced diseases, to which Moriori lacked immunity, interacted with malnutrition, overwork, and psychological despair, contributing to high mortality; by 1848, numbers fell below 300, and by 1861 to 160. British colonial authorities tolerated this servitude until 1863, when Resident Magistrate William Thomas issued a proclamation abolishing slavery on the Chatham Islands, freeing the roughly 100 surviving full-blooded Moriori recorded in contemporaneous censuses. Census data from the 1860s and 1870s attribute over 90% of the pre-invasion Moriori population decline to combined effects of initial violence, enslavement-induced hardships, and secondary diseases, rather than natural causes alone, with only isolated full-blooded survivors enduring into the late 19th century. This collapse distinguished verifiable direct atrocities—mass killings, cannibalistic rituals, and reproductive suppression—from broader interpretive claims of intent, as invaders integrated some Moriori labor into their society while eradicating organized resistance.

19th–Early 20th Century Survival

Coexistence with Invaders and European Settlers

Following the assertion of British colonial authority over the Chatham Islands in the mid-19th century, Moriori survivors, numbering around 100 by the early 1860s, began integrating into a hybrid economy dominated by Māori invaders and incoming European settlers. Māori from the Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama iwi, who had seized control in 1835, allocated portions of land to European farmers arriving from the 1860s onward, who leased from Māori owners and developed sheep runs and wool production. Moriori were frequently employed as laborers on these Māori-owned and European-operated farms, performing tasks such as shearing and general farm work under conditions that reflected their marginalized status, though Crown oversight gradually introduced some regulatory protections against outright enslavement. Intermarriages between Moriori and Māori, initially prohibited by the invaders to prevent population recovery, occurred sporadically in the late 19th century, fostering mixed descent lines amid ongoing social subordination. These unions were often pragmatic responses to demographic pressures and economic interdependence, with Moriori women particularly involved, though records indicate they were neither systematically forced nor widespread enough to alter power dynamics significantly. European settlers, focusing on commercial agriculture, interacted with Moriori primarily through employment rather than marriage, maintaining ethnic boundaries while relying on Moriori labor for low-wage roles in the expanding pastoral economy. The Native Land Court hearings of June 1870 marked a tentative step toward legal recognition, awarding Moriori title to seven small reserves totaling a minor fraction of island land—contrasting sharply with the 98% allocated to Māori—providing limited secure holdings for subsistence amid broader dispossession. These rulings, while affirming pre-invasion customary rights in principle, were constrained by the court's acceptance of conquest as valid title transfer, yet they enabled some Moriori families to retain plots for gardening and fishing, sustaining endurance in peripheral communities. European missionary influences during this era introduced literacy through general native schooling initiatives, which offered practical skills but coincided with cultural dilution, as Moriori adapted to coexist within a settler-Māori framework rather than revive autonomy.

Suppression of Moriori Identity and Practices

Following the 1835 invasion by Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama, Moriori survivors endured enslavement until 1863, during which invaders systematically prohibited core elements of Moriori culture to enforce subjugation. Speaking the Moriori language was banned, traditional customs were suppressed, and intermarriage among Moriori was forbidden, preventing population recovery and cultural transmission. Sacred sites faced deliberate desecration, including acts of urination and defecation upon them, aimed at eradicating spiritual practices tied to Nunuku's covenant of pacifism. These measures extended to halting distinctive practices like rākau momori, the engraving of memorial figures into living kōpi trees to honor the deceased, which ceased publicly as Moriori avoided drawing attention under threat of violence. By 1862, only 101 Moriori remained from a pre-invasion population of approximately 2,000, with cultural continuity reliant on clandestine oral transmission among elders. Emancipation via British proclamation in 1863 ended formal slavery but did not restore autonomy; the invaders' descendants, numbering over 500, retained land control and social dominance, compelling many Moriori to assimilate linguistically and socially into Māori or European norms for survival. Into the early 20th century, pervasive prejudice reinforced self-suppression, as Moriori descendants hid their ancestry to evade discrimination in employment, land access, and community standing amid European settlement growth. Pseudoscientific accounts from figures like Percy Smith portrayed Moriori as an inferior "Melanesian" relic displaced by superior Māori, embedding narratives that delegitimized their Polynesian origins and distinct identity in colonial historiography. This era saw near-total abandonment of public cultural markers, with the language falling out of daily use by the 1920s and traditional governance structures supplanted by settler institutions, leaving identity revival dependent on isolated family knowledge until mid-century efforts.

Mid-20th Century to Modern Revival

Post-War Recognition Efforts

![Tommy Solomon (Tame Horomona Rehe)][float-right] In the mid-20th century, Moriori descendants increasingly advocated for recognition of their distinct identity, countering narratives of and assimilation into society. Efforts included the of oral histories by individuals such as Christina Jefferson in the 1950s and Rhys Richards in the 1960s, which helped preserve cultural knowledge amid declining speakers of the . These initiatives represented an empirical challenge to the prevailing assimilationist policies, emphasizing Moriori's unique Polynesian heritage separate from mainland . By the 1980s, descendant-led organizations formalized these preservation efforts. The Solomon family, tracing descent from Tame Horomona Rehe (Tommy Solomon), established the Tommy Solomon Memorial Trust Foundation in January 1984 following a 1983 family reunion in Temuka, New Zealand. The trust raised funds to erect a statue of Tommy Solomon on the Chatham Islands, unveiled in 1987, symbolizing Moriori resilience and serving as a focal point for cultural remembrance and oral history collection. These advocacy steps contributed to a broader shift in public and educational perceptions, gradually eroding the 19th-century —perpetuated in texts—that depicted Moriori as a primitive pre-Māori race displaced to the Chathams. Descendants' petitions and historical research prompted partial acceptance of Moriori as a distinct indigenous group with living progeny, aligning New Zealand's bicultural framework toward inclusion beyond the Māori-Pākehā binary, though full acknowledgment remained contested. In February 1988, Moriori representatives filed claim Wai 64 with the , asserting rights to lands and fisheries based on pre-invasion occupation.

Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings and 2020 Settlement

In February 1988, representatives of Moriori lodged claim Wai 64 with the Waitangi Tribunal, alleging that the Crown had breached the Treaty of Waitangi by failing to protect them from the 1835 invasion by Māori from Taranaki, permitting their subsequent enslavement, and contributing to the loss of their lands and suppression of their identity through inadequate post-invasion policies. Hearings commenced in May 1994 on Rēkohu (Chatham Islands), where evidence was presented on Moriori customary rights and Crown omissions. The Waitangi Tribunal's 2001 report, Rekohu: A Report on Moriori and Ngāti Mutunga Claims in the Chatham Islands, substantiated key elements of the claim, finding that Moriori qualified as tangata whenua under the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 and that the Crown bore a protective duty that it neglected by not intervening against the invasion and enslavement, which violated contemporary international law standards prohibiting slavery. The report criticized the Crown's post-1865 land policies for allocating only about 3% of Chatham Islands land to Moriori despite their pre-invasion occupancy, recommending remedies including recognition of their status and enhanced resource access, though it stopped short of full land restoration due to evidential complexities in overlapping claims with Ngāti Mutunga. Negotiations between Moriori (mandated to the Hokotehi Moriori Trust) and the Crown, authorized in 2003 following the report's release, culminated in a Deed of Settlement signed on 14 February 2020. The deed provided NZ$18 million in financial redress (including interest from prior on-account payments), a formal Crown apology for failures to end enslavement, mitigate land alienation, prevent language erosion, and counter myths of Moriori inferiority, as well as cultural redress such as statutory acknowledgements, protocols for engagement on matters like minerals and fisheries, and co-management arrangements with the Department of Conservation over sites including the Waipaua Conservation Area and J. M. Barker (Owenga) Historic Reserve. It incorporated an agreed historical account affirming Moriori's distinct tangata whenua status and the invasion's devastating impacts, while settling all historical Treaty claims arising before 21 September 1992. The settlement's redress has faced scrutiny for not effecting comprehensive land returns or equivalent compensation, aligning with the Tribunal's earlier observation that Moriori received disproportionately little relative to their historical estate, and it explicitly reserves post-1992 claims for future adjudication without prejudice. The Moriori Claims Settlement Act 2021, enacting the deed, was passed on 23 November 2021, formalizing these terms amid acknowledgements of the settlement's role in rebuilding Crown-Moriori relations despite incomplete rectification of colonial-era dispossessions.

Contemporary Moriori Identity

Cultural and Community Revival Initiatives

The Hokotehi Moriori Trust, established in 2001, coordinates descendant-led projects to revive tangible elements of Moriori heritage, including the documentation and protection of traditional carvings known as rākau momori etched into living trees. These efforts emphasize archaeological recording of cultural landscapes on Rēkohu (Chatham Island), integrating multi-layer databases that link sites to historical practices while ensuring cultural integrity in land management. The Trust also promotes education on Nunuku-whenua's 16th-century covenant of peace, which prohibited violence and shaped Moriori social norms, through community programs that highlight its enduring principles. Youth initiatives under the Trust foster hands-on learning in carving techniques and ecological stewardship, drawing on regenerative practices to restore island biodiversity in alignment with ancestral land-care customs. Collaborations, such as with Ata Regenerative Design, apply holistic ecosystem restoration to Rēkohu, reviving values tied to sustainable resource use while balancing limited tourism to avoid overexploitation of sensitive sites. Exhibitions like Hou Rongo, launched in 2024 at Tūhura Otago Museum, enhance visibility through immersive displays of Moriori traditions, though these remain constrained by a small affiliate base of approximately 1,806 individuals as of 2023. The routine use of indigenous place names, such as Rēkohu for the main island, in official and community contexts further embeds revival efforts in everyday recognition.

Internal Divisions and Challenges

The Hokotehi Moriori Trust, formed in 2001 to represent Moriori interests, has experienced significant internal schisms, particularly in the 2010s, centered on leadership and governance. In 2012, executive chairman Maui Solomon faced allegations of rigging trust elections to remove a trustee, leading to his temporary suspension and an Employment Relations Authority ruling in his favor with compensation awarded. By 2015, ongoing disunity prompted the High Court to remove all trustees, mandating new elections amid accusations of centralized power concentration. These conflicts reflect factional tensions in a small organization managing cultural and economic assets for approximately 1,800 registered members. Employment disputes have exacerbated divisions, often linked to trust operations. In 2017, general manager David Prater was dismissed from his role, prompting a personal grievance claim for unjustified dismissal against Solomon, with the Employment Relations Authority later addressing related procedural issues. Multiple staff departures or dismissals during this period, including at least three formal grievances, highlight workplace frictions tied to leadership styles and resource allocation in a constrained environment. Debates over enrollment criteria have fueled identity-based frictions, with critics arguing that rapid membership growth dilutes traditional Moriori lineage for Treaty settlement benefits. A 2010 Māori Land Court case questioned an individual's eligibility, though the court declined jurisdiction, underscoring unresolved tensions around intermarriage and descent definitions in post-invasion contexts where historical prohibitions on Moriori-Māori unions persisted into the 19th century. Economic pressures compound these issues, as limited opportunities on the Chatham Islands—primarily in fishing and farming—drive migration to the mainland, where most of the roughly 700 self-identifying Moriori reside. High living costs and subdued tourism in this remote location foster dependency on trust funding and government support, straining internal cohesion in small, kin-based groups vulnerable to personal disputes that impede collective advocacy.

Language

Linguistic Characteristics and Historical Use

Ta Re Moriori, the indigenous language of the Chatham Islands, belongs to the East Polynesian subgroup and represents a divergent dialect of Proto-Eastern Polynesian, closely related to but distinct from te reo Māori due to prolonged isolation following ancestral settlement around the 16th century. It retains core Polynesian grammatical structures, such as verb-subject-object word order and the use of particles for tense and aspect, while developing lexical and phonological innovations adapted to the local environment. Key phonological features include vowel shifts, with Moriori a often corresponding to Māori e (e.g., the definite article ta in Moriori versus te in Māori, and the preposition a versus e), and variations in consonant realization that alter mutual intelligibility despite shared roots. Vocabulary reflects ecological specificity, incorporating terms for endemic species like the hakaroa (a tree) and unique marine resources absent from mainland Māori lexicons. Lexical comparisons of surviving Moriori wordlists with Māori reveal over 70% similarity in core vocabulary, confirming common Polynesian origins while highlighting divergence through sound substitutions and semantic shifts; for instance, approximately 1,200 documented Moriori terms show consistent cognates in basic nouns and verbs, though environmental terms diverge more sharply. These characteristics underscore Ta Re Moriori's status as a distinct lect, not a mere subdialect, with empirical divergence estimated through comparative linguistics rather than political assertion. Prior to European contact, Ta Re Moriori functioned primarily as an oral medium for cultural transmission, integral to karakia (ritual incantations and prayers) recited during resource gathering and navigation, and whakapapa (genealogical chants) that encoded migration histories and kinship ties across generations. It underpinned oral literature, including narratives of ancestral voyages from mainland Aotearoa and mythological accounts tied to the islands' formation, preserved through mnemonic recitation in communal settings. Written documentation emerged in the late 19th century, with settler Alexander Shand systematically recording vocabulary, phrases, and texts from elders such as Hirawanu Tapu during fieldwork from 1868 to 1900, yielding dictionaries and ethnographic notes that captured pre-invasion usage before widespread language shift. These records, drawn from fluent speakers, provide the primary textual evidence of its structure and application in traditional contexts.

Decline, Extinction, and Revitalization Efforts

The Moriori language, known as ta rē Moriori, became extinct as a community language in the early 20th century following the death of the last native speakers, with no fluent transmission occurring by the 1960s due to population decline and assimilation pressures after the 1835 Māori invasion and subsequent European settlement. Elements of the language persisted in dormant form through oral traditions, including songs, chants (karakii), and recorded phrases preserved by elders like Tommy Solomon, who died in 1933 as the last full-blooded Moriori. Revitalization efforts intensified in the 21st century under the Hokotehi Moriori Trust, which launched a mobile app in 2021 providing introductory lessons, pronunciation guides, and basic vocabulary to facilitate learner access to reconstructed forms derived from historical records and songs. The trust organized wānanga (immersion workshops) featuring language lessons, storytelling, and cultural practices, alongside a 2023 petition for official recognition of Moriori Language Week to promote public engagement and policy support. These initiatives culminated in New Zealand's first Moriori Language Week in November 2025, emphasizing online and community-based activities to build foundational speaking skills. Key challenges include the absence of living fluent elders, necessitating reconstruction from limited 19th-century texts and audio fragments, which risks inaccuracies in phonology and syntax. Digital tools like apps and online resources have mitigated this by enabling scalable practice, with progress gauged by youth participation in workshops and self-reported conversational attempts, though full fluency remains a long-term aspiration amid resource constraints.

Political Organization

Traditional Decision-Making Processes

Moriori society operated without centralized coercive authority, featuring decentralized governance where local communities maintained autonomy under the advisory influence of elders and (chiefs). roles were consultative, drawing on and to guide rather than dictate outcomes, as absolute power was absent in pre-invasion structures. Decision-making occurred through hui, communal assemblies convened for collective deliberation on matters such as resource allocation and interpersonal conflicts, prioritizing consensus over hierarchy. These gatherings, verified in accounts from surviving elders like Hirawanu Tapu interviewed in the late 19th century, embedded pacifist principles by focusing on dialogue and mutual accommodation rather than force. Pacifism, formalized in the 16th-century covenant of Nunuku-whenua, prohibited killing and lethal weaponry, replacing potential violence with ritualistic non-lethal combat using thumb-thick wooden staffs (patu tou) only as a last resort after failed mediation; disputes were typically settled by elders in council to preserve social harmony. This approach demonstrated empirical efficacy, sustaining internal peace across tribes for approximately 300 years—from Nunuku's era around 1500 until the 1835 Māori invasion disrupted it—without recorded inter-tribal wars.

Modern Governance and Treaty Negotiations

The Hokotehi Moriori Trust serves as the mandated iwi authority for Moriori, representing descendants in interactions with the New Zealand Crown and managing cultural, social, and educational initiatives across Rēkohu (Chatham Islands) and mainland New Zealand. Its governance structure comprises eight trustees, with three residing on Rēkohu to address island-specific matters and five representing the broader membership, facilitating a unified voice in post-settlement affairs. Following the 2020 Treaty settlement, the Moriori Imi Settlement Trust (MIST) was established as the post-settlement governance entity responsible for holding and administering settlement assets, including financial redress and transferred properties. The settlement enables co-management arrangements between MIST and the Department of Conservation over key Chatham Islands reserves, such as the Hāpūpū/J.M. Barker Historic Reserve, which protects significant Moriori rakau momori (tree carvings) and kopi forest ecosystems. These protocols involve joint development of management plans, wāhi tapu (sacred site) protections, and statutory reserve strategies, granting Moriori input into conservation decisions while integrating tikane (customary principles) with Crown environmental policies. Such arrangements extend to ecological restoration efforts, including collaborations with the Chatham Islands Council and other entities under initiatives like the Chatham Islands Landscape Restoration Trust. Signed on 14 February 2020 and enacted via the Moriori Claims Settlement Act 2021, the agreement provides $18 million in financial redress, Crown apologies for historical failures, an agreed historical narrative, and statutory acknowledgements of Moriori cultural associations with specific areas. These elements empower ongoing Moriori participation in Crown processes related to natural resources, including fisheries allocations and health service provisions tailored to iwi needs, alongside rights of first refusal for certain Crown-owned lands. The framework recognizes Moriori as a distinct iwi, supporting representation in parliamentary select committees on relevant legislation and resource management under the Resource Management Act 1991. Post-settlement dynamics reveal tensions between Moriori aspirations for tino rangatiratanga (self-determination) and Crown oversight, as embedded in settlement entities' accountability to government protocols. In June 2025, MIST sought High Court intervention to enforce Crown neutrality in overlapping iwi claims on Rēkohu, citing 2020 assurances against actions undermining Moriori rights during negotiations with other groups like Ngāti Mutunga o Wharekauri. These disputes highlight ongoing efforts to expand autonomy amid shared island governance, where Hokotehi collaborates with local councils on strategic priorities like infrastructure and economic development, yet navigates limitations imposed by Treaty settlement structures.

Historical Controversies and Debates

Myths of Mainland Origins

In the late 19th century, European scholars including Edward Tregear advanced the theory that Moriori constituted a pre-Māori population on mainland New Zealand, characterized as a more primitive, possibly Melanesian-derived group displaced by aggressive Polynesian Māori migrants around the 14th century. Tregear's comparative ethnography in works like The Maori Race posited linguistic and cultural links suggesting Moriori as earlier settlers pushed to the Chatham Islands, framing Māori arrival as an invasion akin to European colonization. This narrative aligned with colonial strategies to portray Māori land claims as non-indigenous by highlighting their supposed displacement of prior inhabitants, thereby justifying British settlement as a continuation of historical conquest patterns. Archaeological evidence refutes any pre-Polynesian human presence on the New Zealand mainland, with radiocarbon dates from over 1,000 sites indicating initial settlement by East Polynesian voyagers between 1250 and 1350 AD, marked by deforestation, moa hunting, and artifact assemblages absent before this period. No skeletal, tool, or ecological traces support a distinct pre-Māori mainland population, as confirmed by systematic surveys yielding only Polynesian-derived material culture post-1300 AD. Radiocarbon dating from Chatham Islands middens, tree carvings, and forest clearance sites places Moriori arrival at approximately 1500 AD, postdating mainland colonization by about two centuries and deriving from Māori ancestral groups via deliberate or accidental voyages. Linguistic analysis reveals the extinct Moriori language as an Eastern Polynesian dialect closely related to Māori, with shared vocabulary and mutual intelligibility underscoring common ancestry rather than separate origins. The myth endured in educational materials and popular histories until the 1980s, despite accumulating empirical contradictions, before being systematically dismantled by mid-20th-century scholarship emphasizing first-principles verification over anecdotal ethnography. Its modern dismissal affirms the Polynesian settlement sequence, positioning Māori as tangata whenua without prior displacement of a mainland Moriori precursor.

Interpretations of Pacifism and the Invasion's Legacy

The Nunuku covenant, instituted by the 16th-century Moriori leader Nunuku-whenua following intertribal conflicts, explicitly prohibited the killing of humans, warfare, and cannibalism, thereby enforcing non-violence as a cultural norm that sustained internal peace among the Moriori for approximately 400 years. This principle, while fostering social cohesion and averting self-destructive cycles of vengeance seen in other Polynesian societies, rendered the Moriori unprepared for organized external aggression, as evidenced by their collective decision in November 1835 to abstain from armed resistance against invading Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama warriors numbering around 900. Scholars debating the covenant's implications contrast its merits in promoting long-term societal stability—evident in the absence of recorded internecine wars post-enactment—with its causal role in accelerating subjugation, positing that absolute pacifism, absent credible defensive capabilities, fails to deter opportunistic conquerors in realist international dynamics akin to pre-modern tribal interactions. The 1835 invasion's demographic toll, reducing the Moriori population from an estimated 1,400 to 2,000 to fewer than 100 pure descendants by the 1870s through systematic killings, enslavement, and forced labor, has fueled disputes over labeling it a genocide under frameworks like the 1948 UN Convention, which requires demonstrable intent to destroy a group as such. Proponents of the genocide classification emphasize the scale of targeted violence and cultural erasure, including cannibalism of victims and prohibitions on Moriori language and practices, yet causal analysis reveals primary motives of territorial domination and resource extraction rather than total extermination, as invaders integrated surviving Moriori into their society via enslavement and eventual intermarriage without pursuing remnant annihilation. This aligns with patterns in pre-colonial Polynesian conquests, where victors typically subsumed defeated groups for labor and alliances rather than eradicating them outright. From Māori viewpoints, particularly those of Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama descendants, the invasion exemplified normative utu (revenge) and expansionist raiding common in 19th-century iwi conflicts, driven by displacement from European pressures on the North Island and viewed not as aberration but as legitimate assertion of strength in a zero-sum tribal landscape. Contemporary Moriori reflections, however, uphold the covenant's enduring moral framework—rooted in unity and conflict resolution through rākaui (resource sharing)—as a source of resilience and identity, arguing its internal successes in curbing violence outweighed tactical failures against asymmetrically aggressive foes, informing modern revival efforts centered on peacemaking principles despite the near-demise it permitted. This duality underscores a core interpretive tension: pacifism's potential for harmonious self-governance versus its empirical inadequacy in preserving autonomy amid expansionist threats, without resolving whether deterrence mechanisms could have reconciled the two.

Notable Individuals

Historical Figures

Nunuku-whenua, a revered Moriori leader of the 16th century, instituted the covenant of peace that defined Moriori society by prohibiting killing, warfare, and cannibalism. This pact, building on earlier ancestral renewals, mandated ritualized conflict resolution using wooden weapons to avert lethal violence, fostering a culture of pacifism sustained for centuries until the 1835 Māori invasion. Hirawanu Tapu, a prominent 19th-century Moriori elder born around 1820, exemplified resilience by preserving cultural knowledge amid post-invasion enslavement and population collapse. In 1862, he convened a council at Te Awapātiki to document genealogies, traditions, and grievances against the Ngāti Mutunga and Ngāti Tama conquerors, culminating in a petition to Governor George Grey seeking emancipation and land restoration. From the late 1860s, Tapu collaborated with ethnographer Alexander Shand to record Moriori language, karakia, hokopapa, and historical narratives, supplying approximately 90 percent of extant cultural documentation. Tame Horomona Rehe, known as Tommy Solomon (1884–1933), represented the enduring Moriori lineage as the last individual of unmixed ancestry, safeguarding oral histories that underscored survival against near-extinction. Despite intermarriage and cultural erosion following the 1835 invasion, which reduced the Moriori population from around 2,000 to 101 by 1870, Solomon's retention and transmission of ancestral knowledge via storytelling sustained elements of identity into the 20th century.

Modern Leaders and Contributors

Maui Solomon, executive chairman of the Hokotehi Moriori Trust since the early 2000s, has led advocacy for Moriori rights, including spearheading negotiations that culminated in the 2020 Deed of Settlement with the New Zealand Crown, which provided redress for historical grievances such as the 1835 invasion and subsequent Crown failures to protect Moriori interests. As a lawyer specializing in Treaty law and indigenous rights, Solomon, a descendant of historical figure Tommy Solomon, has also contributed to cultural preservation efforts, including the documentation and revival of Moriori traditions like rākau momori (tree carvings), emphasizing their role in education and public awareness programs. Susan Thorpe, a linguist and collaborator with the Hokotehi Moriori Trust, has advanced language revitalization through projects like "Taonga Moriori: Recording and Revival," which compiles historical recordings and develops resources for teaching ta rē Moriori, a language dormant since the early 20th century. Similarly, John Middleton, working with the Trust, has focused on practical tools for language acquisition, including apps and community workshops aimed at fostering fluent speakers among descendants and Chatham Islanders. These efforts have produced educational materials used in schools and cultural centers to integrate Moriori phrases into daily use. In arts and education, descendants such as Ajay Peni have promoted rākau momori through music and public exhibitions, blending traditional motifs with contemporary media to educate wider audiences on Moriori identity. Contributors to Waitangi Tribunal evidence, including Trust trustees like Grace Le Gros and Tom Lanauze, have provided expert testimony on cultural continuity, supporting legal claims that affirm Moriori distinctiveness from Māori iwi and bolstering revival initiatives. These individuals have collectively driven a resurgence in Moriori pride, with the 2021 Moriori Claims Settlement Act enshrining statutory recognition of their tino rangatiratanga (self-determination).

Representation in Culture and Media

Depictions in Literature and Film

Michael King's Moriori: A People Rediscovered (1989) offers a seminal non-fiction account, drawing on archaeological, oral, and archival evidence to refute earlier misconceptions portraying Moriori as a primitive or extinct offshoot of Māori, instead affirming their Polynesian origins and cultural adaptations like Nunuku's covenant of non-violence. The book challenges romanticized narratives of passive victimhood by highlighting Moriori agency in resource management and adaptation to the Chatham Islands' environment, earning acclaim for restoring their historical place without undue sentimentality. Documentaries frequently accentuate the tragic dimensions of Moriori history, such as the 1835 Māori invasion and subsequent enslavement, often framing pacifism under Nunuku's law as a fatal vulnerability rather than a deliberate societal choice. The 2000 dramatized documentary The Feathers of Peace, directed by Barry Barclay, traces European and Māori incursions from 1791 onward, portraying Moriori as a peaceful people whose non-violent code enabled their near-destruction, though it incorporates reenactments that blend historical fact with interpretive emphasis on cultural loss. Similarly, the 1980 Feltex Award-winning Moriori follows descendants revisiting the Chatham Islands, underscoring survival amid genocide narratives but critiqued for reinforcing myths of total passivity over evidence of pre-invasion martial traditions. Fictional representations remain sparse, with passing references in broader Polynesian epics like Adam Johnson's 2025 novel The Wayfinder, which invokes Moriori non-violence as a societal model post-conflict but subordinates it to invented ancient narratives, potentially distorting specifics of their isolated Chatham existence. Recent shorts like Hou Rongo: Reviving Moriori Culture (2024) counter older media myths of intellectual inferiority by showcasing language revival efforts, yet prioritize inspirational recovery over analytical scrutiny of historical agency. These depictions collectively perpetuate lessons on pacifism's perils, sometimes at the expense of nuanced causal factors like geographic isolation and demographic imbalance during invasions.

Influence on Broader Historical Narratives

The erroneous portrayal of Moriori as pre-Māori inhabitants of New Zealand's mainland, propagated in early 20th-century school texts and ethnographies, was invoked to undermine Māori claims to indigeneity and parallel European colonization as a natural progression of conquest, suggesting Māori themselves displaced an earlier peaceful people. This narrative, fabricated by colonial scholars to deflect grievances over land loss, has been refuted by linguistic, genetic, and archaeological evidence confirming Moriori descent from East Polynesian voyagers who settled the Chatham Islands around 1500 CE, distinct from but related to Māori ancestors. Its persistence in popular discourse highlights how selective historical interpretations can fuel anti-indigenous arguments, though debunking it has reinforced demands for accurate tribal distinctions in policy. Moriori's recognition as tangata whenua (people of the land) of Rekohu (Chatham Islands) via the 2020 Deed of Settlement with the Crown—encompassing NZ$18 million redress, Crown forest land transfers, and statutory acknowledgments—establishes precedents for addressing genocide and assimilation in treaty negotiations, separate from Māori iwi claims under the Treaty of Waitangi. This framework underscores the causal role of state failures in protecting isolated groups post-invasion, informing Australasian approaches to multi-layered indigeneity where subgroup autonomy counters assimilation narratives. The 1835 Māori invasion, where Moriori adherence to Nunuku-whenua's 16th-century covenant prohibiting warfare enabled rapid subjugation—reducing their population from approximately 2,000 to 100 through killings, enslavement, and disease—exemplifies how unilateral pacifism in small, isolated societies invites exploitation by expansionist actors, prioritizing moral restraint over defensive capacity. This outcome aligns with analyses of non-state societies, where shifts to non-violence prove maladaptive against warlike intruders, echoing Darwinian critiques that cultural pacifism yields to competitive selection absent reciprocal restraint or geographic barriers. Analogies extend to global debates on non-violence efficacy, as in Jared Diamond's examination of societal choices amplifying vulnerability, cautioning against idealism in interstate realism where preparedness trumps isolation.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352409X16305077
  2. https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/afternoons/audio/2018966333/a-commitment-to-non-violence-600-years-strong
  3. https://www.nzgeo.com/stories/moriori-a-pride-reborn/
  4. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14623528.2015.1027073
  5. https://teara.govt.nz/en/chatham-islands/print
  6. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/14/after-more-than-150-years-new-zealand-recognises-extinct-moriori-people
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273050350_Evaluating_new_radiocarbon_dates_from_midden_deposits_near_Moriori_Tree_carvings_Rekohu_Chatham_Island
  8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20700920
  9. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstreams/0b61820b-a2ea-4754-9f07-e6ff982e11ec/download
  10. https://www.thecollector.com/moriori-aotearoa-people-peace/
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310819254_A_radiocarbon_investigation_of_Moriori_forest_use_on_Rekohu_Chatham_Island_southwestern_Polynesia
  12. https://thepolynesiansociety.org/jps/index.php/JPS/article/download/JPS.121.1.03/58/213
  13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41705907
  14. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11295824/
  15. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/23/11/2234/1333210
  16. https://teara.govt.nz/en/speech/47712/tackling-the-moriori-myth
  17. https://teara.govt.nz/en/moriori/print
  18. https://www.doc.govt.nz/documents/science-and-technical/SR35.pdf
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318742276_Conservation_and_Restoration_of_a_Cultural_Forest_Landscape_Protecting_the_Forests_Created_by_Moriori_on_Chatham_Island
  20. https://www.doc.govt.nz/documents/science-and-technical/docts20.pdf
  21. https://www.govt.nz/assets/Documents/OTS/Moriori/Moriori-Deed-of-Settlement-initialling-version.pdf
  22. https://teara.govt.nz/en/moriori/page-3
  23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20705461
  24. https://teara.govt.nz/en/photograph/1615/the-god-hatitimatangi
  25. https://www.moriori-imi-trust.nz/ahurea/
  26. https://www.sustainableseaschallenge.co.nz/assets/dms/Reports/Moriori-case-study/Moriori-of-Rekohu.pdf
  27. https://www.sfu.ca/ipinch/sites/default/files/resources/reports/moriori_final_report_2014.pdf
  28. https://teara.govt.nz/en/moriori/page-4
  29. https://teara.govt.nz/en/1966/chatham-islands
  30. https://teara.govt.nz/en/moriori
  31. https://www.elocal.co.nz/Articles/2535
  32. https://press.uchicago.edu/books/hoc/HOC_V2_B3/HOC_VOLUME2_Book3_chapter14.pdf
  33. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/war/musket-wars/overview
  34. https://www.armymuseum.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/PDF_TRB_Conflict_MusketWars_Shaun_EDIT.pdf
  35. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ndownloader/files/50489442
  36. https://chathamislandsmuseum.nz/collections/
  37. https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=64OTAGO_INST&filePid=13397191780001891&download=true
  38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20701278
  39. https://e-tangata.co.nz/reflections/moriori-still-setting-the-record-straight/
  40. https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/350599841/taranaki-iwi-fights-to-keep-moriori-land-it-invaded
  41. https://www.govt.nz/assets/Documents/OTS/Moriori/moriori-deed-of-settlement-initialled.pdf
  42. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2021/0049/latest/whole.html
  43. https://www.govt.nz/assets/Documents/OTS/Moriori/moriori-deed-of-settlement-initialling-version.pdf
  44. https://mro.massey.ac.nz/bitstreams/f8f34213-2196-4dc4-b208-e8ad4a690844/download
  45. https://teara.govt.nz/en/photograph/37796/moriori-farm-workers-at-owenga
  46. https://www.govt.nz/assets/Documents/OTS/Moriori/Moriori-Deed-of-Settlement-Summary_13-July-2020.pdf
  47. https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2021/0049/latest/096be8ed81b7ab1c.pdf
  48. https://teara.govt.nz/en/photograph/37797/native-land-court-waitangi
  49. https://newsroom.co.nz/2020/02/24/setting-aside-the-moriori-myth
  50. https://www.academia.edu/14930188/Moriori_Cultural_Database
  51. https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/TUTANG19870201.2.24
  52. https://www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz/assets/Te-Manutukutuku/Te-Manutukutuku-Issue-53.pdf
  53. https://waitangitribunal.govt.nz/en/publications/tribunal-reports/by-wai-number
  54. https://whakatau.govt.nz/te-tira-kurapounamu-treaty-settlements/find-a-treaty-settlement/moriori
  55. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/moriori-claims-settlement-bill-passes-first-reading
  56. https://www.whakatau.govt.nz/assets/Treaty-Settlements/FIND_Treaty_Settlements/Moriori/DOS_documents/1.-Moriori-Deed-of-Settlement-Historical-Claims.pdf
  57. https://www.sfu.ca/ipinch/project-components/community-based-initiatives/moriori-cultural-database/
  58. https://www.sfu.ca/ipinch/outputs/blog/partnerships-perpetuation-culture-interview-hokotehi-moriori-trust/
  59. https://savory.global/new-zealand-hub-working-with-indigenous-moriori-to-restore-health-to-the-island/
  60. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/ourchangingworld/547399/helping-to-revitalise-moriori-culture
  61. https://tewhata.io/moriori/social/people/demographics/
  62. https://www.otago.ac.nz/news/newsroom/bringing-moriori-exhibition-hou-rongo-to-life
  63. https://nit.com.au/14-10-2025/20707/moriori-people-prepare-for-first-ever-language-week-on-rekohu
  64. https://interactives.stuff.co.nz/2019/01/divided-tribe/
  65. https://www.employment.govt.nz/assets/elawpdf/2018/2018-NZERA-Wellington-67.pdf
  66. https://www.maorilandcourt.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Decisions/Preece-v-Hokotehi-Moriori-Trust-2010-5-Te-Waipounamu-MB-83-5-TWP-83.pdf
  67. https://www.cic.govt.nz/assets/CIC/Documents/Chatham-Islands-Economic-Profile-Report-2017.pdf
  68. https://maorilanguage.info/moriori-language/
  69. https://theconversation.com/waking-a-sleeping-language-our-plan-to-revive-the-speaking-of-ta-re-moriori-218023
  70. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/moriori.htm
  71. https://www.taiuru.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/Dictionary-of-Moriori.pdf
  72. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/5/article/716986/pdf
  73. https://evols.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstreams/9a33db69-755a-4923-a2f3-94d1980de92b/download
  74. https://www.twswa.org.nz/blog/post/62951/app-for-learning-moriori/
  75. https://pacific.scoop.co.nz/2023/09/moriori-language-week/
  76. https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/books/ALMA1911-9917503443502836-The-Moriori-people-of-the-Chatha
  77. https://teara.govt.nz/en/traditional-maori-warfare-riri/page-2
  78. https://www.moriori.co.nz/our-story
  79. https://www.moriori-imi-trust.nz/moriori-imi-settlement-trust/faqs/
  80. https://www.doc.govt.nz/about-us/our-partners/our-alliances/chatham-islands-landscape-restoration-trust/
  81. https://www.whakatau.govt.nz/te-tira-kurapounamu-treaty-settlements/find-a-treaty-settlement/moriori
  82. https://www.tkm.govt.nz/iwi/moriori/
  83. https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO2506/S00080/moriori-challenge-crown-over-tino-rangatiratanga.htm
  84. https://www.teaonews.co.nz/2025/06/18/battle-over-tino-rangatiratanga-on-rekohu-wharekauri-back-in-court/
  85. https://www.cic.govt.nz/your-council/news-and-events/2024/a-collective-approach-to-priority-projects
  86. https://teara.govt.nz/en/document/1753/frontispiece-of-the-maori-race
  87. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2207609119
  88. https://teara.govt.nz/en/when-was-new-zealand-first-settled/print
  89. https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/afternoons/audio/2018657356/debunking-the-myth-about-the-moriori
  90. https://teara.govt.nz/en/moriori/page-1
  91. https://tepapa.govt.nz/repatriation-and-return-karapuna-rekohu
  92. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/26/long-fight-for-justice-ends-as-new-zealand-treaty-recognises-moriori-people
  93. https://tepapa.govt.nz/visit/exhibitions/moriori-people-peace
  94. https://teara.govt.nz/en/biographies/1t12/tapu-hirawanu
  95. https://www.moriori-imi-trust.nz/hunau/hirawanu-tapu/
  96. https://teara.govt.nz/en/biographies/2s35/solomon-tommy
  97. https://www.academia.edu/5261898/Taonga_Moriori_Recording_and_Revival_by_M_Solomon_and_S_Thorpe
  98. https://www.stuff.co.nz/pou-tiaki/301014617/meet-the-people-hoping-to-revitalise-the-moriori-language-in-aotearoa
  99. https://www.moriori-imi-trust.nz/moriori-imi-settlement-trust/our-people/
  100. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/456394/moriori-praised-for-dedication-patience-as-settlement-with-crown-becomes-law
  101. https://books.google.com/books/about/Moriori.html?id=6ZZLPgAACAAJ&hl=en
  102. https://www.penguin.co.nz/books/moriori-9780143771289
  103. https://www.acmi.net.au/works/92316--the-feathers-of-peace-widescreen/
  104. https://www.nzonscreen.com/title/moriori-1980
  105. https://lithub.com/adam-johnson-on-writing-a-novel-of-ancient-polynesia/
  106. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt34989810/
  107. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4JMLhM3KfA
  108. https://thespinoff.co.nz/atea/03-08-2018/the-moriori-myth-and-why-its-still-with-us
  109. https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/121809536/the-moriori-myth-has-enabled-racism-against-maori-in-aotearoa-for-generations
  110. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/07/world/australia/moriori-new-zealand.html
  111. https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/moriori-people-genocide-history-chatham-islands
  112. https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/138256141/Warlike_Peaceful_Societies.pdf
  113. https://www.escapeartist.com/blog/the-lesson-of-chatham/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.