Hubbry Logo
Upper RhineUpper RhineMain
Open search
Upper Rhine
Community hub
Upper Rhine
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Upper Rhine
Upper Rhine
Upper Rhine
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Upper Rhine
(Oberrhein, Rhin Supérieur)
Upper Rhine near Iffezheim
Sections of the Rhine:
  Rhine–Meuse–Scheldt delta
  Lower Rhine
  Middle Rhine
  Upper Rhine
  High Rhine
  Lake Constance (Untersee, Seerhein, Obersee)
  Alpine Rhine, Vorderrhein, Hinterrhein
  Rhine sources
Location
CountryGermany
StatesBaden-Württemberg, Hesse, Rhineland-Palatine
CountryFrance
Region
Departments		Grand-Est
Bas-Rhin, Haut-Rhin
Country
Canton		Switzerland
Basel-Stadt
Physical characteristics
Source 
 • locationRhine knee at Basel, Switzerland, continuation of the High Rhine
 • coordinates47°33′37″N 7°35′23″E / 47.560148°N 7.589726°E / 47.560148; 7.589726
 • elevation252 m
Mouth 
 • location
Bingen am Rhein, confluence with the Nahe, continues as Middle Rhine
 • coordinates
49°58′11″N 7°53′21″E / 49.96972°N 7.88917°E / 49.96972; 7.88917
 • elevation
89 m
Length360 km (220 mi)
Basin size185,000 km2
Basin features
Tributaries 
 • leftBirsig, Ill, Lauter, Moder, Nahe
 • rightAcher, Alb, Elz, Kander, Kinzig, Main, Murg, Neckar, Pfinz, Queich, Rench, Sauer, Selz, Wiese

Upper Rhine (German: Oberrhein [ˈoːbɐˌʁaɪn] ⓘ; French: Rhin Supérieur is the section of the Rhine between the Middle Bridge in Basel, Switzerland, and the Rhine knee in Bingen, Germany. Representing kilometres 167 to 529 of the river[1][a] it is surrounded by the Upper Rhine Plain (Oberrheinische Tiefebene). Most of its upper section marks the France–Germany border.

The Upper Rhine is one of four sections of the river between Lake Constance and the North Sea, and is succeeded downstream by the Middle Rhine and Lower Rhine; only the High Rhine and Alpine Rhine lie above it. The countries and states along the Upper Rhine are Switzerland, France (Alsace) and the German states of Baden-Württemberg, Rhineland-Palatinate and Hesse. The largest cities along the river are Basel, Mulhouse, Strasbourg, Karlsruhe, Mannheim, Ludwigshafen and Mainz.

The Upper Rhine was straightened between 1817 and 1876 by Johann Gottfried Tulla and made navigable between 1928 and 1977. The Treaty of Versailles allows France to use the Upper Rhine for hydroelectricity in the Grand Canal d'Alsace.

On the left bank are the French region of Alsace and the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate; on the right bank are the German states of Baden-Württemberg and Hesse. The first few kilometres are in the Swiss city of Basel.

Geology

[edit]
Main article: Rhine Rift §  Formation

Around 35 million years ago, a rift valley of about 300 kilometres (190 mi) long and 50 kilometres (31 mi) wide came into being between the present cities of Basel and Frankfurt. This was due to tensile stresses in the Earth's crust and mantle, which resulted in lowering the earth's surface. The moat has been partially filled up again by sedimentation. On the edges we find mountain ridges, the so-called "rift flanks". On the eastern side, they are the Black Forest and Odenwald mountains, in the west the Vosges and Palatinate Forest. During the Tertiary, the High Rhine continued west from Basel and flowed via the Doubs and the Saône, into the Rhône. The rift diverted the Rhine into the newly formed Upper Rhine Valley.

The Rhine knee at Basel marks the transition from the High Rhine to the Upper Rhine with a change of direction from West to North and a change of landscape from the relatively small-chamber high-Rhine cuesta landscape to the wide rift zone of the Upper Rhine Rift Valley. The two largest tributaries come from the right: the Neckar in Mannheim, the Main across from Mainz. In the northwest corner of the Upper Rhine Valley, at Rhine-kilometre 529.1, near Bingen, where the Nahe flows into the Rhine, the Rhine flows into a gorge in the Rhenish Massif and thereby changes into the Middle Rhine.[3]

Geography

[edit]
Satellite View of the Upper Rhine Valley and the upper Rhine; on the top left are the Rhenish Slate Mountains; on the bottom right Lake Constance

Tributaries

[edit]

Tributaries are listed in direction of flow (bottom to top), with the nearest settlement to their confluence given in brackets.

Left tributaties:

Right tributaries:

Bordering regions

[edit]

Tri-national metropolitan region

[edit]

The Upper Rhine tri-national region (French: Région Métropolitaine Trinationale du Rhin Supérieur, German: Trinationale Metropolregion Oberrhein) is a Euroregion that covers the border areas of the Upper Rhine (the northern part of the Upper Rhine valley and the Palatinate are not included as they are not border areas) and parts of the High Rhine. As the name suggests, it is a tri-national region comprising parts of France, Germany and Switzerland. The regional Upper Rhine Conference is a framework for future political and administrative cooperation in the area.

The tripoint between France, Germany and Switzerland, called Dreiländereck, lies within the uppermost portion of the Upper Rhine. A monument in Basel, known as the Pylon, is located 160 m (520 ft) southeast of the actual tripoint.

Interventions

[edit]

Straightening

[edit]
Landschaft am Oberrhein, artwork by Hans Thoma, 1916
Straightening monument viewed from the north

In 1685, Louis XIV started a project to move the Upper Rhine, change its course and drain the floodplain, in order to gain land. By 1840, the river had been moved up to 1.5 kilometres (0.93 mi) to the east, taking territory away from Baden. Around 1790, large parts of the Rhine Valley were deforested, creating arable land, fields and pasture to feed the population. The Upper Rhine was straightened between 1817 and 1876 by Johann Gottfried Tulla and changed from a relatively sluggish meandering river with major and many smaller branches into a fast flowing stream flanked by embankments. The length of the Upper Rhine was reduced by 81 kilometres (50 mi). Some cut-off river arms and ox-bows remain; they are typically called the 'Old Rhine' (German: Altrhein) or Gießen (similar to the Old Rhine (Alter Rhein) in the Alpine Rhine Valley, where the Rhine was also straightened).

Canalising and dams

[edit]

The Rhine between Basel and Iffezheim is almost entirely canalised. On a stretch of 180 kilometres (110 mi), there are 10 dams, provided with hydropower stations and locks. Between Basel and Breisach, the old river bed carries hardly any water; almost all water is diverted through the Grand Canal d'Alsace on the French side, to ensure safe shipping and hydropower generation around the clock. Only when there is a large supply of water, then the old river bed will receive more water than the canal. France gained the right to do this in the 1919 Treaty of Versailles; the right applies to the segment between Basel and Neuburgweier/Lauterbourg, where the Rhine forms the border between France and Germany.

The straightening (1817–76) and channeling (1928–77) reduced the water table by up to 16 metres (52 ft) and thus had a negative effect on flora and fauna. Gravel is also missing from the river, due to the dams. This has caused erosion below the dam at Iffezheim. To counter this, 173,000 cubic metres (6,100,000 cu ft) per year of a mixture of sand and gravel with an average grain diameter of 20 millimetres (0.79 in) (corresponding to the local sediment transport capacity) has been dumped into the river, since 1978, using two motorized barges.

Weir at Breisach; to the left a lock; to the right a small power station under construction

Integrated Rhine Programme (IRP)

[edit]
Integrated Rhine Programme (IRP) Polder under construction near Efringen-Kirchen

The Upper Rhine plays a key role in flood control on the Middle and Lower Rhine. As a result of the straightening of the Upper Rhine, floods from the Alps now reach the Middle Rhine much faster than in the past. Thus, the risk of such a peak coinciding with a flood peak of Neckar, Moselle or Main has increased. About 123 square kilometres (47 sq mi) of floodplain have been lost. Authorities in riparian states of France, Baden-Württemberg and Rhineland-Palatinate have launched the Integrated Rhine Programme, a framework for designating water retention areas. to combat downstream flooding. A French-German treaty was concluded in 1982, in which the parties agreed to restore the retention capacity on the stretch below Iffezheim to the level it had before the area was developed.

This means: For the stretch between Iffezheim and the mouth of the Neckar, attenuation of the apex of a 200-year flood (i.e. a flood that statistically occurs once in 200 years) of the Rhine to a discharge of 5,000 cubic metres per second (180,000 cu ft/s) at the Maxau gauge station, that is, a reduction from 5,700 cubic metres per second (200,000 cu ft/s) to 5,000 cubic metres per second (180,000 cu ft/s).

  • for the stretch below the mouth of the Neckar, attenuation of the apex of a 220-year flood to a discharge of 6,000 cubic metres per second (210,000 cu ft/s) at the Worms gauge station, that is, a reduction from 6,800 cubic metres per second (240,000 cu ft/s) to 6,000 cubic metres per second (210,000 cu ft/s).

For this purpose the following measures are planned and partially implemented:

  • By France: Special operations power stations on the Rhine and construction of two polders Erstein and Moder
  • By Baden-Württemberg: construction of about 13 polders
  • By Rhineland-Palatinate: construction of polders and relocating levees

The effectiveness of the flood protection measures was verified using a computer model. The State Institute for the Environment, Nature Protection and Measurements in Baden-Württemberg carried out forecast calculations with the help of a mathematical "synoptic flood progression model". The analysis of the calculations and the evaluation of the results were made on the basis of the requirements and methods set by the international Flood Study Commission for the Rhine. The implementation of the proposed flood control measures on the Upper Rhine can prevent the occurrence of a 200-year-flood between Iffezheim and Bingen, with an overall economic loss estimated at around 6.2 billion euros.

Conservation

[edit]
Designations
Official nameOberrhein
Designated28 August 2008
Reference no.1809[4]
Official nameRhin Supérieur
Designated5 September 2008
Reference no.1810[5]

The floodplains between Mainz and Bingen are important for nature conservation. In this section, the so-called Island Rhine, there are many nature reserves and bird sanctuaries.

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Upper Rhine

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

The Upper Rhine constitutes the river section spanning from , , to , , measuring approximately 360 kilometers in length and traversing the tectonically active Upper Rhine Graben, a continental characterized by extensional faulting and . This segment originates downstream of the at the Basel central bridge and flows northward through a broad , initially forming the border between and for roughly 184 kilometers before entering German territory exclusively near Lauterbourg. The graben's geological structure, extending over 300 kilometers with an average width of 50 kilometers, results from to recent rifting, influencing the river's meandering path and sediment deposition patterns. Extensively modified through 19th- and 20th-century engineering projects, including channel straightening initiated by Johann Gottfried Tulla and the installation of ten barrages for canalization, the Upper Rhine supports heavy commercial navigation while enhancing flood protection, though these interventions have reduced floodplain dynamics and biodiversity. As a critical European waterway, it facilitates the transport of bulk goods such as coal, ores, and containers, underpinning industrial clusters in regions like Alsace, Baden-Württemberg, and Rhineland-Palatinate, with disruptions like low water levels demonstrating its outsized economic influence. The area's strategic location has historically shaped fortifications and conflicts, while modern efforts focus on ecological restoration amid ongoing tectonic and climatic pressures.

Geological and Physical Characteristics

Rift Valley Formation

![Satellite image of the Upper Rhine Graben from NASA][float-right] The Upper Rhine Graben, constituting the structural trough traversed by the Upper Rhine River, represents a key segment of the European Cenozoic Rift System, extending approximately 300 kilometers in length and averaging 50 kilometers in width from the Swiss Jura to the Hessian depression. Its formation initiated during the Late Eocene around 40 million years ago, driven by extensional tectonics linked to the distant effects of Alpine collisional compression, which induced crustal stretching and faulting in the foreland. Preexisting crustal weaknesses, inherited from the Variscan orogeny in the Paleozoic era (approximately 380-300 million years ago), particularly northeast-trending fault zones in the basement, exerted primary control on the graben's localization and asymmetry, facilitating reactivation under changing stress regimes. The primary rifting phase unfolded during the (33-23 million years ago), characterized by significant normal faulting along border faults such as the eastern Upper Rhine fault zone, leading to subsidence rates exceeding 100 meters per million years in depocenters and accumulation of up to 3-4 kilometers of syn-rift sediments including lacustrine, fluvial, and minor marine deposits. Extension persisted into the (23-5 million years ago) with a shift toward transtension in some segments, influenced by ongoing Alpine indentation and possible asthenospheric upwelling, though volcanic activity remained subdued compared to other rift arms, limited to alkali basalts and trachytes dated to around 68 million years ago in northern exposures but primarily post-dating main rifting. This evolution reflects a polyphase process where initial Eocene-Oligocene pure extension transitioned to Miocene oblique rifting, constrained by thermomechanical models indicating brittle-ductile crustal deformation under NE-SW directed extension. Post-Miocene development involved reduced extension rates, with Plio- depocenters signaling renewed tectonic activity along reactivated faults, evidenced by seismic reflection data revealing two major asymmetric units and ongoing filled by alluvial sediments up to 200 meters thick. The graben remains tectonically active, as demonstrated by historical including the 1356 of magnitude ~6.5, originating from faults within the southern Upper Rhine Graben, underscoring persistent intraplate deformation amid stable European cratonic conditions. Overall, the 's failed nature—lacking oceanic spreading—stems from insufficient extension magnitudes, estimated at 10-20% beta factors, ultimately arrested by isostatic and collisional feedbacks from the evolving Alpine belt.

Hydrological Features

The Upper Rhine, spanning approximately 350 km from to , features a hydrological shaped by alpine influences upstream and increasing dominance downstream, with mean annual discharges rising from 1059 m³/s at to 1588 m³/s near due to inflows such as the and . The river's longitudinal profile exhibits a low average bed slope of about 0.05% (0.5 m/km), facilitating historical deposition and meandering but also contributing to risks during high-flow events. Seasonal variations show a traditional nivo- pattern, with peaks from and winter rains, though 20th-century trends indicate rising winter runoff and stable or declining summer flows, reducing overall seasonality due to retreat, altered , and upstream reservoir regulation. Suspended in the Upper Rhine is characterized by downstream increases in and clay loads from tributaries, while varies with channel morphology; historical rates have been curtailed by interventions, leading to net deposition in impounded reaches and elsewhere. The basin's reflects higher in upstream alpine areas (contributing to runoff coefficients of 0.4–0.6) versus lower demands in the , where annual averages 700–900 mm, supporting the river's role as a conduit for transboundary . Extreme events underscore hydrological variability, with recorded peak discharges exceeding 10,000 m³/s during major floods, such as those in , driven by synchronized rainfall and melt across the catchment. ![Rhein-Karte2.png][center]

Tributaries and Channel Morphology

The Upper Rhine receives notable tributaries from both banks along its course from to Bingen, contributing to its hydrological regime within the Upper Rhine . The most significant left-bank tributary is the Ill River, which spans approximately 220 km and drains a catchment area of 4,760.5 km² through the region before joining the at kilometer 311.3 near , downstream of the Gambsheim barrage. On the right bank, inflows from the include the Elz, Kinzig, and Murg rivers, which add discharge from forested uplands and support local sediment transport into the main channel. These tributaries, influenced by Alpine meltwater cycles, peak in volume during early summer, enhancing the 's overall flow variability. In its geological context, the Upper Rhine's channel morphology reflects the setting of the Upper Rhine , featuring a low-gradient, -bed river system with historically dynamic planform adjustments. Prior to 19th-century interventions, the channel displayed a complex braided-anabranching pattern, characterized by multiple interwoven threads, extensive and bars, and lateral migration across a broad up to several kilometers wide. This configuration arose from high loads delivered during Late Glacial and phases, with paleochannel networks evidencing repeated avulsions and infilling in the French Upper Rhine . Downstream variations included sectorized patterns, where upper reaches showed more stable braiding while lower segments exhibited meandering tendencies modulated by and supply. Bed material primarily consists of coarse , facilitating riffle-pool sequences and bar formation under natural flows exceeding 1,000 m³/s during floods.

Historical Human Interactions

Ancient and Medieval Utilization

The Upper Rhine, stretching from to approximately Bingen, functioned primarily as a and nascent trade artery during antiquity. encountered the river in 58 BCE during campaigns against the tribe, designating it as the eastern boundary of and initiating Roman military presence in the region. Roman engineering emphasized defensive , including fortresses such as Moguntiacum (modern ), established around 13 BCE as a base for , and Argentoratum (), founded circa 12 BCE to secure the frontier against Germanic incursions. The river facilitated limited navigation for troop movements and commerce, transporting goods like grain, wine, and metals from into Roman provinces, though rapids and seasonal floods constrained upstream travel to shallow-draft vessels. By the late 3rd century CE, pressures from Germanic migrations prompted partial abandonment of forward defenses, with Emperor reinforcing the Rhine line around 370 CE through extended fortifications and fleet bases. In the medieval period, the Upper Rhine transitioned into a vital commercial waterway and settlement hub under Frankish and oversight, supporting trade in salt, timber, and agricultural produce from the fertile valley. Early medieval sites, including continuations of Roman-era nuclei at and , evidenced persistent occupation and economic activity, with archaeological data indicating land-use patterns focused on agriculture and riverine exchange from the onward. By the 10th-12th centuries, burgeoning urban centers like (founded as a bishopric in 1077) and Worms leveraged the river for inter-regional commerce, integrating with overland routes to the and . Navigation relied on oar- and sail-powered barges, though tolls—such as those documented in the mid-13th century upstream of —imposed economic controls, with at least several stations extracting fees on cargoes averaging 8 denari per vessel in the 1240s. Monastic foundations, including those near , further utilized the waterway for provisioning, underscoring the Rhine's role in sustaining feudal economies amid recurrent floods that necessitated adaptive embankment practices by the .

Pre-Modern Flood Patterns and Settlement

The Upper Rhine's pre-modern hydrological regime featured a dynamic, system prone to frequent due to high loads from Alpine tributaries, combined with and persistent rainfall. Documentary and proxy records reveal major flood events dating to at least the 13th century, including destructive inundations at in 1342, 1544, and 1682, which hydraulic modeling estimates reached discharges exceeding 5,000 cubic meters per second—far surpassing modern regulated flows. In the southern Upper Rhine, chronicles document clusters such as the July 1480 event affecting multiple tributaries and the December 1506 flood, with over 20 notable occurrences in the alone on the French () side, driven primarily by rain-on-snow mechanisms under westerly atmospheric patterns. Summer floods peaked in frequency during 1651–1750, correlating with elevated regional precipitation, while winter events dominated overall, reflecting the river's sensitivity to seasonal Alpine discharge variability. These floods caused extensive damage, including erosion of banks, deposition of coarse sediments, and prolonged inundation of lowlands, often lasting weeks and leading to drownings, bridge collapses, and crop failures across the valley floor. Impacts were spatially variable: Rhine-mainstem floods isolated settlements, while tributary-synced events amplified backwater effects in confluences like those of the Ill or Kinzig rivers. Geoarchaeological evidence from sites like the Gallo-Roman town of Oedenburg near Rheinau indicates repeated overbank flooding from the 1st to 4th centuries AD, burying structures under meters of and constraining urban expansion to slightly elevated alluvial fans. Pre-19th-century frequency estimates suggest decadal-scale major events, with minor floods annually in wet periods, exacerbating soil salinization and channel avulsions that reshaped the morphology. Settlement strategies adapted causally to this hazard-prone environment, prioritizing geomorphically stable locations to minimize exposure. and communities favored loess-covered terrace edges above the floor for defensibility and drainage, as evidenced by archaeological distributions avoiding active , where fertility from deposits was offset by recurrent destruction. By the medieval period, this evolved into clustered villages on higher rims—such as those along the and escarpments—while lowlands served for transient or forestry, with permanent habitation limited to natural levees or islands like the Maîche near . Early diking efforts, traceable to the via radiocarbon-dated organic layers beneath embankments, enabled piecemeal reclamation on the German (Baden) bank, promoting arable expansion and denser rural patterns despite breaches during peaks like 1524. In contrast, Alsatian territories enforced communal restraint on intrusion through legal bans on private dikes until the , preserving wetlands as buffers and curtailing settlement vulnerability compared to the engineered German side. This divergence highlights how local and technical capacity mediated risks, with dike proliferation inadvertently heightening exposure to extreme events by confining flows into narrower channels.

19th-Century Engineering Transformations

The primary 19th-century engineering transformation of the Upper Rhine involved the systematic rectification initiated by Johann Gottfried Tulla, a Badenese hydraulic , to address chronic flooding and improve along the meandering river course from to . Tulla's plans, outlined in detailed proposals such as his 1822 memorandum on the Rhine's regulation, advocated for cutting off oxbows and meanders through artificial channels while reinforcing banks with dikes and revetments to confine the flow. Construction began in 1817 under Tulla's direction, marking the start of large-scale interventions that shifted the river from its natural, braided morphology to a more linear and controlled . Key early works included the diversion near Ketsch in , where engineers excavated a channel to bypass a pronounced loop, shortening the local path and accelerating flow to prevent deposition and overflow. These measures were extended progressively through the mid-century, with and other states coordinating efforts to build parallel flood embankments and stabilize the , reducing the river's historical tendency to shift laterally during high discharges. By the late , the Upper Rhine had been modified into a regularly flowing, straight, and revetted course, substantially lowering flood peaks in the valley and enabling expanded settlement on reclaimed floodplains. The rectification's causal effects stemmed from increased channel gradient and post-straightening, which minimized reformation and enhanced downstream, though it also lowered regional levels and altered local ecosystems by confining dynamic braiding processes. Empirical observations from the period, including reduced inundation frequency in agricultural areas, validated the flood mitigation goals, as documented in state engineering reports, despite initial resistance from riparian communities concerned over disrupted fisheries and water access. Works continued until around , establishing a foundational framework for subsequent 20th-century modifications while prioritizing utilitarian outcomes over unaltered natural variability.

Modern Infrastructure and Modifications

Canalization and Barrage Systems

The canalization of the Upper Rhine transformed its braided, meandering course into a straightened, revetted channel primarily during the to mitigate recurrent flooding and enhance . Engineering efforts reduced the river's length by confining it within dikes and eliminating loops, resulting in a more uniform flow regime that accelerated discharge and minimized overflow onto adjacent floodplains. This phase, spanning from the early 1800s, involved systematic removal of side arms and islands, altering the natural morphology to prioritize human control over hydrological variability. In the 20th century, barrage systems supplemented initial canalization by introducing run-of-river dams equipped with locks and hydropower turbines, enabling consistent navigation depths amid seasonal low flows. The Grand Canal d'Alsace, developed parallel to the Rhine from Basel to Breisach starting in 1932 and operational by 1959, bypassed shallow rapids and incorporated multiple hydroelectric stations to harness the river's gradient while providing a controlled waterway for barge traffic. Downstream, German authorities constructed ten barrages between Rheinau and Iffezheim from the 1960s to 1977, each featuring ship lifts or locks to accommodate vessels up to 1,400 tons and maintain a minimum channel depth of 2.5–3 meters during droughts. These structures regulate water levels upstream, storing excess during high flows for controlled release, thereby balancing flood retention with uninterrupted commercial transport. The integrated barrage network, totaling over 300 kilometers of modified waterway, supports year-round navigation for push convoys while generating approximately 3,000 megawatts of electricity across facilities like those at Iffezheim, which alone produces 900 megawatts with an annual output exceeding 3.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Operational protocols prioritize minimum ecological flows in bypassed old riverbeds to sustain residual habitats, though retention volumes are capped to avoid exacerbating downstream scour. This engineering paradigm reflects a causal prioritization of economic utility—facilitating 200 million tons of annual freight—over unaltered dynamics, with barrages demonstrably reducing low-water interruptions from historical norms of several months to near-elimination. The navigation infrastructure of the Upper Rhine, spanning from to Iffezheim, features a canalized channel with ten barrages equipped with locks to maintain sufficient water depth and ensure year-round accessibility for commercial vessels despite the river's natural gradient. This system, developed primarily between the 1930s and 1970s, includes the Grand Canal d'Alsace for the initial stretch from to approximately , followed by direct river canalization. The locks accommodate large inland vessels, including self-propelled barges up to 185 meters in length and 11.4 meters in beam, as well as pushed convoys comprising multiple units for enhanced cargo capacity. Key installations include the twin locks at Kembs, operational since the with dimensions of 182.5 by 25 meters and a smaller 100 by 25 meters, alongside subsequent locks at sites such as Vogelgrün, Fessenheim, Marckolsheim, Gambsheim, , Rhinau, Gerstheim, and culminating at Iffezheim. These facilities regulate water levels to support a minimum depth of about 2.5 to 3 meters, critical for the transport of bulk goods like chemicals, aggregates, and containers originating from major ports including , , , and . The infrastructure adheres to standards set by the Central Commission for the of the (CCNR), which oversees uniform regulations for vessel traffic and safety along the waterway. Annual freight traffic on the Upper Rhine segment contributes substantially to the overall Rhine corridor's volume, with container throughput reaching 0.67 million TEU in , reflecting its role in European inland logistics despite occasional disruptions from low water levels or maintenance. The fleet includes approximately 6,900 vessels with a collective capacity exceeding 10 million tonnes, predominantly motor ships, tankers, and pushed barges optimized for the channel's constraints. Modernization efforts, such as lock expansions, continue to address bottlenecks and accommodate growing push convoy operations, which can exceed 10,000 tonnes per passage.

Hydropower Installations

The hydropower installations on the Upper Rhine primarily comprise run-of-the-river power plants integrated with the barrages erected during the river's canalization from the 1930s to the 1970s, aimed at improving navigation, flood control, and energy production. Spanning approximately 160 kilometers from near Basel (Rhine kilometer 170) to Iffezheim (Rhine kilometer 334), these ten facilities—eight operated by Électricité de France (EDF) along the Grand Canal d'Alsace and two further downstream under joint German-French management—harness the Rhine's steady flow to generate renewable electricity without large-scale reservoirs. Collectively, they produce around 9 billion kilowatt-hours annually, equivalent to the consumption of over 2.5 million households, underscoring their role in regional energy supply. The Grand Canal d'Alsace, constructed between 1932 and 1959 parallel to the border, diverts water through eight barrages equipped with turbines: Kembs (commissioned 1935, capacity approximately 60 MW), Ottmarsheim (1940s, 125 MW), Fessenheim (1950s, 180 MW), Vogelgrün (1959, 140 MW), and smaller stations at Marckolsheim, Rhinau, Gerstheim, and . These EDF-managed plants total an installed capacity exceeding 600 MW, yielding about 3,760 gigawatt-hours per year from the canal's controlled flow. Downstream, the Gambsheim barrage (Rhine kilometer 332, completed 1975) and Iffezheim barrage (1978) extend the system into German territory, with joint operation by and EDF. Iffezheim, the largest installation, features five Kaplan turbines with a total capacity of 148 MW following a 2013 modernization that added a 38 MW unit, enabling output of roughly 860 gigawatt-hours annually under average conditions. These plants utilize bulb or Kaplan turbines optimized for low-head, high-flow conditions typical of the straightened , with fish passes and sediment management features incorporated to mitigate ecological disruption.
BarrageApproximate Capacity (MW)Commissioning YearOperator
Kembs601935EDF
Ottmarsheim1251947EDF
Fessenheim1801957EDF
Vogelgrün1401959EDF
Iffezheim1481978 (expanded 2013)/EDF
Note: Capacities for French plants are approximate based on historical aggregates; total system output remains stable despite flow variations, supported by bilateral power exchange agreements dating to the .

Economic and Strategic Roles

Inland Freight Transport

The Upper Rhine, canalized through a series of barrages and deepened channels since the early , supports heavy inland freight traffic with vessels up to Class Va dimensions, enabling convoys carrying up to 11,000 tonnes. This facilitates efficient bulk transport from industrial hubs in the Upper Rhine Valley, including and , to downstream ports and vice versa. In 2023, total freight on the from to the reached 276.5 million tonnes, a 5.4% decline from 292.3 million tonnes in 2022, with the Upper Rhine section handling a substantial share due to its position as the primary entry point for southern European and Swiss cargoes. Principal commodities transported include dry bulk goods such as building materials, ores, and agricultural products; liquid cargoes like mineral oils and chemicals; and growing containerized freight linking to intermodal hubs. The fleet operating on the comprises approximately 6,900 vessels, including 1,200 pushed barges, 4,400 motor cargo vessels, and 1,300 tankers, optimized for the straightened and regulated channels of the Upper . benefits from low external costs compared to or rail, contributing to reduced emissions—estimated at 10-20 grams CO2 per tonne-kilometer versus 50-100 for trucks—though vulnerabilities to low levels periodically constrain draft and convoy sizes. Economic analyses highlight the Rhine's role in sustaining regional industries, with freight accounting for over 90% of intra-European bulk volumes in the corridor, supporting exports from chemical and sectors in and . throughput averaged 160,000 TEUs monthly pre-disruptions, but faced an 11.1% drop in 2022 due to drought-induced restrictions, shifting some loads to rail. By mid-2024, Rhine-wide volumes rebounded slightly to 143.11 million tonnes for the first half-year, reflecting stabilized water conditions and demand recovery in and sectors. Despite competition from rail, which captured over 52% more Rhine-related freight since 2017 amid shipping disruptions, remains dominant for high-volume, low-value goods due to its capacity advantages.

Energy Generation and Resource Extraction

The canalization of the Upper Rhine has enabled substantial generation through run-of-river plants integrated into barrage systems, contributing to production in , , and . These facilities harness the river's flow without large reservoirs, producing while supporting . Key installations include the Iffezheim barrage, operational since 1977 and modernized to generate over 860 million kWh annually, featuring Germany's largest turbine unit at 146 MW. The Albbruck-Dogern plant, with three 28 MW turbines, adds 660 million kWh per year from its run-of-river setup spanning and . Across the trinational Upper Rhine region and its tributaries, approximately 118 plants provide a combined capacity of 2,534 MW, underscoring the river's role in regional energy supply. Historically, the Rhine's flow has supported since the early , evolving with post-World War II to balance power output, flood control, and shipping. Resource extraction in the Upper Rhine focuses on aggregates and emerging minerals, leveraging the rift's sedimentary fill. The graben hosts one of Central Europe's largest and deposits, with exploitable layers up to 120 meters thick across a 300 km by 30-40 km area, historically mined for but now curtailed to address and ecological concerns. Riverbed mining and for flood protection have declined, limited primarily to the Rhine's outflow into , with artificial gravel feeding used downstream of barrages to counteract incision. Geothermal brines in the offer potential for extraction, with pilot projects targeting depths up to 5 km to recover the metal alongside heat for applications, aligning with Europe's push for domestic critical minerals. Historical production, such as the Scheibenhard-Niederlauterbach field discovered in 1956 at depths reaching 2,294 meters, represents past extraction, though current focus has shifted to renewables and minerals.

Border Region Development

The Upper Rhine border region, spanning approximately 20,000 square kilometers across France's (formerly ), Germany's and , and Switzerland's northwestern cantons, hosts a of around 6 million and exemplifies intensive trilateral initiated in the post-World War II era to overcome historical divisions. This development accelerated through institutional frameworks like the Upper Rhine Conference, established in 1975 as a platform for policy coordination in areas such as , , and among regional authorities. Cross-border initiatives have emphasized labor mobility, with tens of thousands of daily commuters—such as Swiss workers in German and French firms—driving , supported by harmonized vocational training programs in sectors like crafts and . Key structures include Eurodistricts and economic networks that facilitate joint projects; for instance, the , formalized in 2005 as a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC), integrates the metropolitan area with Germany's Ortenau district, enabling shared like the Kehl-Strasbourg line extension operational since 2017, which carries over 100,000 cross-border passengers annually. Similarly, the Regio TriRhena, launched in 1995 as a trinational platform linking Freiburg, , , and , promotes economic clustering in innovation, logistics, and tourism, fostering over 200 collaborative ventures by 2020 to enhance regional competitiveness without relying on supranational mandates. European Union funding via programs has channeled over €200 million into the Upper Rhine for 2014–2020 alone, supporting infrastructure like cross-border cycling paths and networks, while yielding measurable outcomes such as reduced administrative barriers for 150+ joint projects in and SME internationalization. These efforts have elevated the region's GDP per capita above national averages in participating areas, with volumes exceeding €50 billion yearly by 2023, though disparities persist due to varying tax regimes and regulatory densities across the three states. Ongoing VI (2021–2027) prioritizes , including flood-resilient , underscoring the evolution from reconciliation-driven pacts to pragmatic, evidence-based integration that leverages geographic proximity for mutual gains.

Environmental Dynamics and Debates

Impacts of Engineering on Ecosystems

The 19th-century straightening of the Upper Rhine, initiated by Johann Gottfried Tulla between 1817 and 1876, shortened the river by approximately 80 kilometers and eliminated numerous meanders, resulting in the drainage of extensive and the loss of dynamic habitats essential for . This intervention increased flow velocities and reduced natural retention areas, leading to the terrestrialization of former riparian zones and a decline in species dependent on periodic flooding, such as certain amphibians and . Empirical data indicate that areas along the Upper Rhine decreased by up to 90% due to these works, severely limiting ecological connectivity and diversity. Subsequent 20th-century canalization, including the construction of ten barrages between and Bingen from the 1930s to the 1970s, further fragmented the river continuum by impounding sections and altering flow regimes, which disrupted longitudinal connectivity for migratory species. (Salmo salar) populations, once abundant, collapsed due to barriers blocking upstream spawning migration, with reintroduction efforts since the yielding limited success as only a fraction of smolts survive turbine passage or ineffective fishways. (Anguilla anguilla) downstream migration similarly suffers high mortality rates, estimated at 40-90% per barrage, exacerbating declines noted in long-term monitoring data from the International Commission for the Protection of the (ICPR). These structures also homogenize water velocities and depths, reducing habitat suitability for rheophilic and benthic macroinvertebrates. Engineering-induced changes to the regime have compounded degradation by diminishing fine deposition in floodplains, which historically supported nutrient cycling and for vegetation communities. Post-straightening, the river's increased transport capacity eroded channel beds while upstream reservoirs trapped sediments, leading to armored beds with coarser substrates unsuitable for many aquatic organisms and contributing to simplification. Studies document reduced macroinvertebrate diversity and altered growth in impounded reaches, with cascading effects on food webs supporting piscivorous birds and mammals. Overall, these modifications have shifted the Upper Rhine from a braided, multi-thread system to a single-thread channel, diminishing lateral dynamics and resilience to disturbances like droughts or spills. While flood control benefits are cited in engineering rationale, the ecological trade-offs include heightened vulnerability to proliferation in uniform habitats and table lowering from accelerated drainage, affecting terrestrial-aquatic interfaces. Peer-reviewed analyses confirm that without these interventions, natural morphological processes would sustain higher beta-diversity, though empirical restoration trials in side channels show partial recovery potential for select taxa.

Conservation Programs and Restoration Efforts

The International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR) coordinates transboundary conservation efforts across the Upper Rhine, with the Rhine 2040 programme, adopted in 2020, targeting the restoration of 200 km² of alluvial zones and reconnection of 100 former river branches by 2040 to enhance habitat diversity and flood resilience. This builds on the 1987 Rhine Action Programme, which initiated comprehensive ecological recovery following the , emphasizing habitat preservation and pollution reduction. In the Upper Rhine specifically, restoration has focused on reversing 19th- and 20th-century canalization effects, including the creation of side channels and reconnection to support migratory fish like , whose populations have rebounded due to barrier removals and improvements since the . National and regional initiatives complement ICPR efforts, such as Germany's Integrated Rhine Programme (IRP), launched in the early 2000s, which has restored former north of Iffezheim through reactivation and rehabilitation, covering over 10 km² to mitigate flood risks while boosting . In , the Plan Rhin Vivant, implemented from 2019, provides €50 million in funding over a decade for Upper projects, including riparian forest expansion and sediment management to counteract erosion from dams. EU-funded projects, like the Wetlands near (2009–2014), have rehabilitated 150 hectares of floodplain habitats, improving for species such as otters and through topsoil removal and hydrological reconnection. These efforts have yielded measurable ecological gains, including a 50-fold increase in smolt production in the Upper Rhine since 2000, attributed to longitudinal connectivity restorations, though challenges persist from ongoing demands and climate-induced flow variability. An international established in the facilitates cross-border monitoring, drawing lessons from over 100 Upper Rhine projects since the to prioritize dynamic river processes over static engineering. Despite successes, restoration scales remain modest relative to the 320 km of heavily modified channel, with debates centering on balancing gains against output losses.

Controversies Over Utilization vs. Preservation

The engineering of the Upper Rhine for , flood control, and has generated persistent tensions between economic exploitation and ecological safeguarding, with critics arguing that channelization and barrages have severely degraded habitats while proponents emphasize benefits like reliable inland transport and . Between 1817 and 1876, the river's meandering course was straightened over 260 kilometers, reducing area by approximately 85 percent and converting dynamic wetlands into , which diminished and natural flood retention capacity. This transformation prioritized utilization, enabling consistent shipping volumes—now exceeding 200 million tons annually—but at the cost of interrupting longitudinal connectivity, particularly for migratory species. A focal point of contention arose with the construction of high-head barrages at Gambsheim in 1974 and Iffezheim in 1977, designed to maintain navigable depths for freight but which fragmented the riverine ecosystem and blocked upstream migration for anadromous fish like Atlantic salmon. Environmental advocates, including early grassroots movements in the 1970s, protested these structures as existential threats to aquatic life, coining slogans like "Today the fish, tomorrow us" to highlight broader human-river interdependencies, though such opposition was initially overshadowed by concurrent nuclear power debates along the Rhine. Salmon populations, extirpated by the mid-20th century due to barriers and pollution, have seen reintroduction efforts since the 1990s under the International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine, with over 1 million smolts released annually by 2020; however, turbine mortality rates for downstream migrants can reach 20-50 percent without optimized bypasses, fueling demands to retrofit or decommission facilities amid hydropower's contribution of about 1.5 billion kWh yearly from these sites. Restoration initiatives, such as the Integrated Rhine Programme launched in 1998, aim to rehabilitate 40 square kilometers of by 2020 for enhanced flood storage—capable of holding 1 billion cubic meters—and revival, yet face resistance from stakeholders prioritizing agricultural output and existing infrastructure. In the dry area, debates over "dry auen" management pit conservationists advocating dynamic inundation against farmers seeking stable , with studies indicating that engineered confinement exacerbates and deficits, reducing long-term . Cross-border coordination via the Action Programme has mitigated some conflicts through compensatory measures like fish passes, but unresolved issues persist, including the trade-off between hydropower's low-carbon output and the ecological imperative of restoring natural flow regimes to support wetland recovery, where only partial renaturation has occurred despite decades of . These disputes underscore causal linkages between historical utilization—driven by economic imperatives—and current preservation challenges, with empirical data from monitoring showing persistent declines in diversity downstream of impoundments.

Contemporary Issues and Projections

Climate Change Influences

The hydrological regime of the Upper Rhine is projected to shift under climate change scenarios, featuring increased winter discharges due to higher precipitation and reduced snowmelt retention, alongside decreased summer low flows from diminished rainfall and glacier retreat in Alpine tributaries. According to the International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR), low-flow events in summer are expected to become more frequent and severe by 2100, potentially mirroring or exceeding the 2018 Rhine low-water crisis that restricted navigation and economic activity. Conversely, flood risks from November to April are anticipated to rise, driven by intensified winter rainfall and earlier snowmelt, with basin-wide peak discharges potentially increasing by 8-17% by 2050 in some models. Water temperatures in the Upper Rhine are forecasted to warm substantially, with annual averages rising 2.9-4.2 °C by 2100 compared to the 1990-2010 baseline, accelerating oxygen depletion and altering aquatic habitats. This thermal rise, combined with hydrological variability, poses risks to engineered infrastructure like dams and canalized channels, where reduced summer flows could lower generation efficiency while elevated temperatures exacerbate from cooling water discharges. Ecosystem impacts include shifts in riparian and aquatic distributions, with studies indicating diminished dynamics and groundwater fluctuations in regulated sections. The trinational Upper Rhine region, spanning , , and , emerges as a central European hotspot for heat-related extremes, with disproportionate increases in and tropical nights projected to compound vulnerabilities, though data gaps persist beyond metrics. ICPR scenarios, derived from harmonized regional models, underscore the need for adaptive measures like enhanced management, yet emphasize uncertainties in extreme event frequencies tied to emission pathways.

Recent Technological and Policy Developments

The International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR) outlined the Rhine 2040 program in 2021, targeting a sustainably managed and climate-resilient river basin, including a reduction in risks by at least 15% along the and its tributaries by 2040 relative to 2020 levels through integrated measures such as retention basins and reactivation. This initiative coordinates national adaptation strategies, with a comprehensive plan scheduled for completion by 2025, emphasizing empirical modeling of water temperature increases—projected at 1.1–1.8°C by mid-century and up to 4.2°C by 2100 under certain scenarios. The Integrated Rhine Programme (IRP), implemented along the Upper since the early with ongoing phases, constructs 13 flood retention basins to enhance protection while restoring former , balancing navigation demands with ecological recovery based on assessments. In navigation policy, the Central Commission for the Navigation of the (CCNR) has pursued easing low-water restrictions, with a decision in December 2024 to reduce required patents (navigation permits) for the in 2025, aiming to improve freight amid variable flows. Technologically, the CCNR introduced an 8-step approval model for pilot projects in automated and remote-controlled shipping, facilitating trials of higher-automation applications to enhance safety and capacity on the regulated Upper channel. A 2025 study evaluated the ecological and morphological impacts of recent regulation works on an 11-km stretch near Offendorf, , confirming sustained navigation improvements from straightening and barrages but highlighting trade-offs in habitat fragmentation, informing targeted mitigation. Geothermal energy extraction in the Upper Rhine has advanced with projects leveraging the region's basin ; the Insheim plant, operational since 2012 with expansions, employs (ORC) technology to generate up to 4.8 megawatts of , powering about 5,000 households annually from enhanced geothermal systems. In 2023, secured a €104 million German grant for a - extraction initiative in the , integrating direct production with heat and power generation to support supply chains while minimizing surface disruption. These developments align with cross-border policies promoting low-carbon transitions, though extraction scalability depends on verified reservoir productivity data from peer-reviewed hydrological models.

Cross-Border Management Challenges

![Rhein-Karte2.png][center] The Upper Rhine, traversing , , and , necessitates coordinated management through international bodies such as the International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR) and the Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine (CCNR). The ICPR addresses , quantity, and ecological protection, while the CCNR focuses on safety and infrastructure. These organizations facilitate transboundary efforts, yet persistent challenges arise from differing national priorities and regulatory frameworks. Flood risk management exemplifies coordination difficulties, as upstream actions in and directly impact downstream flooding in . The 2021 floods, which caused significant damage along the , highlighted gaps in sharing and harmonized retention strategies, despite the International Flood Risk Management Plan for the (2022-2027) outlining dike reinforcements and activations across borders. Climate projections indicate rising winter flood risks by 2100, complicating joint planning amid varying national adaptation capacities. Navigation conflicts with environmental restoration pose another hurdle, as straightening and damming for shipping efficiency—accomplished largely between 1817 and 1876—have reduced floodplain capacity, exacerbating low-water events that halted cargo transport in 2018 and 2022. Efforts to restore meanders and retention areas, promoted by the ICPR's Action Plan on Flood Defence (since 1998), often clash with demands for deeper channels to maintain freight volumes exceeding 200 million tonnes annually. German and French interests in economic navigation diverge from Swiss emphases on ecological integrity, leading to protracted negotiations over projects like side-channel creations. Institutional asymmetries further impede progress, including uneven parliamentary involvement and resource allocation in cross-border councils like the Upper Rhine Council. For instance, post-Brexit EU dynamics and national fiscal constraints have strained funding for shared infrastructure, such as joint firefighting or water monitoring, despite successes in bilateral Franco-German accords. Overall, while treaties like the 1999 Rhine Convention provide a framework, achieving consensus on balancing utilization and remains challenged by concerns and evolving pressures like drought-induced navigation halts.

References

  1. https://www.iksr.org/en/topics/rhine/sub-basins/upper-rhine
  2. https://mapy.com/en/?source=area&id=1430931
  3. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2010TC002767
  4. https://www.french-waterways.com/waterways/north-east/river-rhine/
  5. https://hal.science/hal-02002992v1/file/S0169555X19300042.pdf
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169555X19300042
  7. https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/low-rhine-water-levels-another-drain-germanys-economy-2022-08-10/
  8. https://www.emerald.com/jwmee/article/148/3/123/443427/Comparison-of-river-training-measures-in-the-Rhine
  9. https://www.dw.com/en/the-wetlands-along-the-river-rhine-struggle-to-recover-from-human-engineering/a-37378532
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Upper-Rhine-Graben-central-part-of-the-European-Cenozoic-Rift-System-with_fig1_343306483
  11. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2001TC900022
  12. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/eurjmin/article/138259/The-onset-and-origin-of-differentiated-Rhine
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40661658_Evolution_and_structure_of_the_Upper_Rhine_Graben_Insights_from_three-dimensional_thermomechanical_modelling
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040195106003374
  15. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2004TC001654
  16. https://d-nb.info/1088795714/34
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324125447_Managing_Floods_in_Large_River_Basins_in_Europe_The_Rhine_River
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825216304585
  19. https://www.chr-khr.org/sites/default/files/chrpublications/discharge_regime_2010.pdf
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169555X13004534
  21. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/16/8/1121
  22. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/hydr/15/2/jhm-d-12-098_1.xml
  23. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/10/4/171
  24. https://egqsj.copernicus.org/articles/71/191/2022/
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/b-Downstream-sectorization-of-the-Upper-Rhine-channel-pattern-and-its-drastic_fig2_337951875
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X25001412
  27. https://www.livius.org/articles/place/rhenus-rhine/
  28. https://www.roemer.nrw/en/north-rhine-westphalia-roman-empire
  29. https://blog.nationalmuseum.ch/en/2021/04/roman-frontier/
  30. https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno=0201a01
  31. https://www.medievalists.net/2012/12/tolling-the-rhine-in-1254-complementary-monopoly-revisited/
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9891536/
  33. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02626667.2011.583613
  34. https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/19/4149/2015/hess-19-4149-2015.pdf
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1040618206000358
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9020700/
  37. https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/28279/
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339017344_EARLY_FLOODS_AND_EARLY_DIKES_RESEARCH_STRATEGY_IN_COMBINING_GEOARCHAEOLOGICAL_AND_HISTORICAL_SOURCES_IN_THE_UPPER_RHINE_VALLEY
  39. https://germanhistorydocs.org/en/from-vormaerz-to-prussian-dominance-1815-1866/johann-gottfried-tulla-the-rhine-from-basel-to-mannheim-1822
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291002277_The_rectification_of_the_river_Rhine_by_Johann_Gottfried_Tulla
  41. https://rp.baden-wuerttemberg.de/fileadmin/RP-Internet/Freiburg/Oeffentlichkeitsarbeit/_DocumentLibraries/Documents/rpf-ref53.3-kurz-irp-engl.pdf
  42. https://germanhistorydocs.org/en/from-vormaerz-to-prussian-dominance-1815-1866/ghdi:image-5013
  43. https://www.iksr.org/en/topics/rhine/sub-basins/upper-rhine/modifications
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330201817_Engineering_impacts_on_the_Upper_Rhine_channel_and_floodplain_over_two_centuries
  45. https://www.chr-khr.org/sites/default/files/extended_abstract_i_22_e.pdf
  46. https://rp.baden-wuerttemberg.de/fileadmin/RP-Internet/Themenportal/Wasser_und_Boden/Integriertes_Rheinprogramm/_DocumentLibraries/Rueckhalteraum/irp-en.pdf
  47. http://pianc-jp.org/news/images/Klingen_Navigation%2520and%2520waterways%2520in%2520Germany.pdf
  48. https://www.ccr-zkr.org/12030100-en.html
  49. https://safety4sea.com/european-inland-navigation-report-for-2018/
  50. https://www.enbw.com/unternehmen/themen/wasserkraft/standorte/
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/left-Location-of-Old-Rhine-River-between-Kembs-and-Breisach-dams-Rhine-is-flowing_fig1_325514933
  52. https://www.nature.com/articles/132235b0
  53. https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2020/09/run-of-river_hydropower_generation-_modernization_and_capacity_expansion_at_iffezheim_barrage_rhine_river.pdf
  54. https://www.enbw.com/company/topics/hydropower/iffezheim-rhine-power-plant/
  55. https://www.gem.wiki/Iffezheim_hydroelectric_plant
  56. https://www.iksr.org/de/themen/rhein/teileinzugsgebiete/oberrhein/veraenderungen
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4811295/
  58. https://www.enbw.com/company/topics/hydropower/iffezheim-rhine-power-plant/technology.html
  59. https://www.iksr.org/en/topics/uses/navigation
  60. https://inland-navigation-market.org/chapitre/2-transport-fluvial-de-marchandises/?lang=en
  61. https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ID-152-%25E2%2580%2593-Inland-waterway_final.pdf
  62. https://www.identecsolutions.com/news/rhine-transport-2022-barge-containers-volumes-and-outlook
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920924001470
  64. https://www.ccr-zkr.org/files/documents/cpresse/cp20250430en.pdf
  65. https://www.railfreight.com/business/2025/03/06/rhine-river-shipping-loses-freight-to-trains/
  66. https://www.bayern-innovativ.de/en/en/page/electricity-generation-from-hydropower-in-germany/
  67. https://www.rwe.com/en/the-group/countries-and-locations/rheinkraftwerk-albbruck-dogern-ag/
  68. https://www.power-technology.com/marketdata/power-plant-profile-albbruck-dogren-germany/
  69. https://www.res-tmo.com/en/default-title/detail-seite?tx_news_pi1%5Baction%5D=detail&tx_news_pi1%5Bcontroller%5D=News&tx_news_pi1%5Bnews%5D=44&cHash=b28b141c437d6db010f161ddaa2e6acd
  70. https://geoera.eu/blog/did-you-know-that-the-upper-rhine-rift-hosts-one-of-the-largest-gravel-and-sand-deposits-in-central-europe/
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Barge-artificially-feeding-gravel-into-the-River-Rhine-downstream-of-the-Barrage_fig3_225898396
  72. https://www.matthias-gastel.de/lithium-aus-deutschland-besuch-am-oberrhein/
  73. https://taz.de/Gefragter-Rohstoff-fuer-die-Energiewende/%215915239/
  74. https://geotouren-schwarzwald.de/category/erdoelfoerderung-am-oberrhein/
  75. https://www.bs.ch/en/pd/marketing/trinational
  76. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08865655.2025.2565559?src=exp-la
  77. https://www.regbas.ch/de/assets/File/downloads/Green_Paper_Summary.pdf
  78. https://www.deutschland.de/en/topic/life/joint-projects-on-the-german-french-border
  79. https://www.regiotrirhena.org/en/home-en/mission-vision
  80. https://synergyofcontradictions.wordpress.com/enonce-theorique/euroairport/catchment-area-trirhena/
  81. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/in-your-country/programmes/2014-2020/fr/2014tc16rfcb039_en
  82. https://www.interreg-rhin-sup.eu/wp-content/uploads/upper-rhine-fr-de-ch-v3-en.pdf
  83. https://eurhena.eu/de/verstehen/das-programm-von-interreg-oberrhein/
  84. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rra.4284
  85. https://www.iksr.org/fileadmin/user_upload/DKDM/Dokumente/Fachberichte/EN/rp_En_0179.pdf
  86. https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-021-00561-4
  87. https://www.iksr.org/fileadmin/user_upload/DKDM/Dokumente/Broschueren/EN/bro_En_2040_long.pdf
  88. https://salmoncomeback.org/rhine-restoration-conservation-efforts/
  89. https://www.iksr.org/en/icpr/predecessor-programmes/rhine-action-programme
  90. https://hal.science/hal-01410607v1
  91. https://www.graie.org/ISRivers/actes/pdf2012/2B201-234SCH.pdf
  92. https://switch.unistra.fr/en/living-labs/restore/
  93. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/life/publicWebsite/project/LIFE09-NAT-DE-000004/rhine-wetlands-near-rastatt
  94. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/greening-democracy/today-the-fish-tomorrow-us-the-threatened-upper-rhine-and-the-grassroots-origins-of-west-european-environmentalism/03D62EF82F7C0B31ED726C707545CA14
  95. https://theworld.org/stories/2023/08/24/salmon-are-returning-europes-rhine-river-key-barrier-remains
  96. https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/Tuexenia_BH_6_2013_0125-0169.pdf
  97. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290039612_Management_strategies_for_the_development_of_the_Upper_Rhine
  98. https://www.iksr.org/en/topics/climate-change-in-the-rhine-catchment
  99. https://www.iksr.org/en/press/press-releases/press-releases-individual-presentation/new-icpr-report-on-the-development-of-the-discharge-of-the-rhine-under-the-influence-of-climate-change
  100. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/climate/articles/10.3389/fclim.2022.1045466/full
  101. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2009WR007707
  102. https://www.iksr.org/en/press/press-releases/press-releases-individual-presentation/climate-change-on-the-rhine-water-temperature-expected-to-rise-by-up-to-42-c-by-the-end-of-the-century
  103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725031275
  104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857415300434
  105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221209632300102X
  106. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6323
  107. https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/2353/2021/hess-25-2353-2021.pdf
  108. https://thejobwave.com/blog/reduction-of-rhine-and-elbe-patents
  109. https://www.ccr-zkr.org/12050000-de.html
  110. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44438-025-00013-z
  111. https://www.thinkgeoenergy.com/tag/upper-rhine-valley/
  112. https://www.iksr.org/en/
  113. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329736935_Transboundary_flood_management_in_the_Rhine_basin_challenges_for_improved_cooperation
  114. https://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/environsci.2016.4.871
  115. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/monitoring-on-das/cluster/transport_transport-infrastructure/ve-i-1/indicator
  116. https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/border-focal-point-network/good-practices/cross-border-cooperation-water-management-upper-rhine
  117. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/59001
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.