Hubbry Logo
Valuation ringValuation ringMain
Open search
Valuation ring
Community hub
Valuation ring
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Valuation ring
Valuation ring
from Wikipedia

In abstract algebra, a valuation ring is an integral domain D such that for every non-zero element x of its field of fractions F, at least one of x or x−1 belongs to D.

Given a field F, if D is a subring of F such that either x or x−1 belongs to D for every nonzero x in F, then D is said to be a valuation ring for the field F or a place of F. Since F in this case is indeed the field of fractions of D, a valuation ring for a field is a valuation ring. Another way to characterize the valuation rings of a field F is that valuation rings D of F have F as their field of fractions, and their ideals are totally ordered by inclusion; or equivalently their principal ideals are totally ordered by inclusion. In particular, every valuation ring is a local ring.

The valuation rings of a field are the maximal elements of the set of the local subrings in the field partially ordered by dominance or refinement,[1] where

dominates if and .[2]

Every local ring in a field K is dominated by some valuation ring of K.

An integral domain whose localization at any prime ideal is a valuation ring is called a Prüfer domain.

Definitions

[edit]

There are several equivalent definitions of valuation ring (see below for the characterization in terms of dominance). For an integral domain D and its field of fractions K, the following are equivalent:

  1. For every non-zero x in K, at least one of x or x−1 is in D.
  2. The ideals of D are totally ordered by inclusion.
  3. The principal ideals of D are totally ordered by inclusion (i.e. the elements in D are, up to units, totally ordered by divisibility.)
  4. There is a totally ordered abelian group Γ (called the value group) and a valuation ν: K → Γ ∪ {∞} with D = { xK | ν(x) ≥ 0 }.

The equivalence of the first three definitions follows easily. A theorem of (Krull 1939) states that any ring satisfying the first three conditions satisfies the fourth: take Γ to be the quotient K×/D× of the unit group of K by the unit group of D, and take ν to be the natural projection. We can turn Γ into a totally ordered group by declaring the residue classes of elements of D as "positive".[a]

Even further, given any totally ordered abelian group Γ, there is a valuation ring D with value group Γ (see Hahn series).

From the fact that the ideals of a valuation ring are totally ordered, one can conclude that a valuation ring is a local domain, and that every finitely generated ideal of a valuation ring is principal (i.e., a valuation ring is a Bézout domain). In fact, it is a theorem of Krull that an integral domain is a valuation ring if and only if it is a local Bézout domain.[3] It also follows from this that a valuation ring is Noetherian if and only if it is a principal ideal domain. In this case, it is either a field or it has exactly one non-zero prime ideal; in the latter case it is called a discrete valuation ring. (By convention, a field is not a discrete valuation ring.)

A value group is called discrete if it is isomorphic to the additive group of the integers, and a valuation ring has a discrete valuation group if and only if it is a discrete valuation ring.[4]

Very rarely, valuation ring may refer to a ring that satisfies the second or third condition but is not necessarily a domain. A more common term for this type of ring is uniserial ring.

Examples

[edit]
  • Any field is a valuation ring. For example, the field of rational functions on an algebraic variety .[5][6]
  • A simple non-example is the integral domain since the inverse of a generic is .
  • The field of power series:
has the valuation . The subring is a valuation ring as well.
  • the localization of the integers at the prime ideal (p), consisting of ratios where the numerator is any integer and the denominator is not divisible by p. The field of fractions is the field of rational numbers
  • The ring of meromorphic functions on the entire complex plane which have a Maclaurin series (Taylor series expansion at zero) is a valuation ring. The field of fractions are the functions meromorphic on the whole plane. If f does not have a Maclaurin series then 1/f does.
  • Any ring of p-adic integers for a given prime p is a local ring, with field of fractions the p-adic numbers . The integral closure of the p-adic integers is also a local ring, with field of fractions (the algebraic closure of the p-adic numbers). Both and are valuation rings.
  • Let k be an ordered field. An element of k is called finite if it lies between two integers n < x < m; otherwise it is called infinite. The set D of finite elements of k is a valuation ring. The set of elements x such that xD and x−1D is the set of infinitesimal elements; and an element x such that xD and x−1D is called infinite.
  • The ring F of finite elements of a hyperreal field *R (an ordered field containing the real numbers) is a valuation ring of *R. F consists of all hyperreal numbers differing from a standard real by an infinitesimal amount, which is equivalent to saying a hyperreal number x such that −n < x < n for some standard integer n. The residue field, finite hyperreal numbers modulo the ideal of infinitesimal hyperreal numbers, is isomorphic to the real numbers.
  • A common geometric example comes from algebraic plane curves. Consider the polynomial ring and an irreducible polynomial in that ring. Then the ring is the ring of polynomial functions on the curve . Choose a point such that and it is a regular point on the curve; i.e., the local ring R at the point is a regular local ring of Krull dimension one or a discrete valuation ring.
  • For example, consider the inclusion . These are all subrings in the field of bounded-below power series .

Dominance and integral closure

[edit]

The units, or invertible elements, of a valuation ring are the elements x in D such that x −1 is also a member of D. The other elements of D – called nonunits – do not have an inverse in D, and they form an ideal M. This ideal is maximal among the (totally ordered) ideals of D. Since M is a maximal ideal, the quotient ring D/M is a field, called the residue field of D.

In general, we say a local ring dominates a local ring if and ; in other words, the inclusion is a local ring homomorphism. Every local ring in a field K is dominated by some valuation ring of K. Indeed, the set consisting of all subrings R of K containing A and is nonempty and is inductive; thus, has a maximal element by Zorn's lemma. We claim R is a valuation ring. R is a local ring with maximal ideal containing by maximality. Again by maximality it is also integrally closed. Now, if , then, by maximality, and thus we can write:

.

Since is a unit element, this implies that is integral over R; thus is in R. This proves R is a valuation ring. (R dominates A since its maximal ideal contains by construction.)

A local ring R in a field K is a valuation ring if and only if it is a maximal element of the set of all local rings contained in K partially ordered by dominance. This easily follows from the above.[b]

Let A be a subring of a field K and a ring homomorphism into an algebraically closed field k. Then f extends to a ring homomorphism , D some valuation ring of K containing A. (Proof: Let be a maximal extension, which clearly exists by Zorn's lemma. By maximality, R is a local ring with maximal ideal containing the kernel of f. If S is a local ring dominating R, then S is algebraic over R; if not, contains a polynomial ring to which g extends, a contradiction to maximality. It follows is an algebraic field extension of . Thus, extends g; hence, S = R.)

If a subring R of a field K contains a valuation ring D of K, then, by checking Definition 1, R is also a valuation ring of K. In particular, R is local and its maximal ideal contracts to some prime ideal of D, say, . Then since dominates , which is a valuation ring since the ideals are totally ordered. This observation is subsumed to the following:[7] there is a bijective correspondence the set of all subrings of K containing D. In particular, D is integrally closed,[8][c] and the Krull dimension of D is the number of proper subrings of K containing D.

In fact, the integral closure of an integral domain A in the field of fractions K of A is the intersection of all valuation rings of K containing A.[9] Indeed, the integral closure is contained in the intersection since the valuation rings are integrally closed. Conversely, let x be in K but not integral over A. Since the ideal is not ,[d] it is contained in a maximal ideal . Then there is a valuation ring R that dominates the localization of at . Since , .

The dominance is used in algebraic geometry. Let X be an algebraic variety over a field k. Then we say a valuation ring R in has "center x on X" if dominates the local ring of the structure sheaf at x.[10]

Ideals in valuation rings

[edit]

We may describe the ideals in the valuation ring by means of its value group.

Let Γ be a totally ordered abelian group. A subset Δ of Γ is called a segment if it is nonempty and, for any α in Δ, any element between −α and α is also in Δ (end points included). A subgroup of Γ is called an isolated subgroup if it is a segment and is a proper subgroup.

Let D be a valuation ring with valuation v and value group Γ. For any subset A of D, we let be the complement of the union of and in . If I is a proper ideal, then is a segment of . In fact, the mapping defines an inclusion-reversing bijection between the set of proper ideals of D and the set of segments of .[11] Under this correspondence, the nonzero prime ideals of D correspond bijectively to the isolated subgroups of Γ.

Example: The ring of p-adic integers is a valuation ring with value group . The zero subgroup of corresponds to the unique maximal ideal and the whole group to the zero ideal. The maximal ideal is the only isolated subgroup of .

The set of isolated subgroups is totally ordered by inclusion. The height or rank r(Γ) of Γ is defined to be the cardinality of the set of isolated subgroups of Γ. Since the nonzero prime ideals are totally ordered and they correspond to isolated subgroups of Γ, the height of Γ is equal to the Krull dimension of the valuation ring D associated with Γ.

The most important special case is height one, which is equivalent to Γ being a subgroup of the real numbers under addition (or equivalently, of the positive real numbers under multiplication.) A valuation ring with a valuation of height one has a corresponding absolute value defining an ultrametric place. A special case of this are the discrete valuation rings mentioned earlier.

The rational rank rr(Γ) is defined as the rank of the value group as an abelian group,

Places

[edit]

General definition

[edit]

A place of a field K is a ring homomorphism p from a valuation ring D of K to some field such that, for any , . The image of a place is a field called the residue field of p. For example, the canonical map is a place.

Example

[edit]

Let A be a Dedekind domain and a prime ideal. Then the canonical map is a place.

Specialization of places

[edit]

We say a place p specializes to a place p, denoted by , if the valuation ring of p contains the valuation ring of p'. In algebraic geometry, we say a prime ideal specializes to if . The two notions coincide: if and only if a prime ideal corresponding to p specializes to a prime ideal corresponding to p in some valuation ring (recall that if are valuation rings of the same field, then D corresponds to a prime ideal of .)

Example

[edit]

For example, in the function field of some algebraic variety every prime ideal contained in a maximal ideal gives a specialization .

Remarks

[edit]

It can be shown: if , then for some place q of the residue field of p. (Observe is a valuation ring of and let q be the corresponding place; the rest is mechanical.) If D is a valuation ring of p, then its Krull dimension is the cardinarity of the specializations other than p to p. Thus, for any place p with valuation ring D of a field K over a field k, we have:

.

If p is a place and A is a subring of the valuation ring of p, then is called the center of p in A.

Places at infinity

[edit]

For the function field on an affine variety there are valuations which are not associated to any of the primes of . These valuations are called the places at infinity.[1] For example, the affine line has function field . The place associated to the localization of

at the maximal ideal

is a place at infinity.

Notes

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Bourbaki, Nicolas (1972). Commutative Algebra. Elements of Mathematics (First ed.). Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-020100644-5.
  • Cohn, P. M. (1968), "Bezout rings and their subrings" (PDF), Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 64 (2): 251–264, Bibcode:1968PCPS...64..251C, doi:10.1017/s0305004100042791, ISSN 0008-1981, MR 0222065, S2CID 123667384, Zbl 0157.08401
  • Efrat, Ido (2006), Valuations, orderings, and Milnor K-theory, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 124, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 0-8218-4041-X, Zbl 1103.12002
  • Fuchs, László; Salce, Luigi (2001), Modules over non-Noetherian domains, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 84, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 978-0-8218-1963-0, MR 1794715, Zbl 0973.13001
  • Hartshorne, Robin (1977), Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 52, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90244-9, MR 0463157
  • Krull, Wolfgang (1939), "Beiträge zur Arithmetik kommutativer Integritätsbereiche. VI. Der allgemeine Diskriminantensatz. Unverzweigte Ringerweiterungen", Mathematische Zeitschrift, 45 (1): 1–19, doi:10.1007/BF01580269, ISSN 0025-5874, MR 1545800, S2CID 121374449, Zbl 0020.34003
  • Matsumura, Hideyuki (1989), Commutative ring theory, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 8, Translated from the Japanese by Miles Reid (Second ed.), ISBN 0-521-36764-6, Zbl 0666.13002
  • Zariski, Oscar; Samuel, Pierre (1975), Commutative algebra. Vol. II, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90171-8, MR 0389876
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In , a valuation ring is defined as an AA with fraction field KK such that for every nonzero element xKx \in K, either xAx \in A or x1Ax^{-1} \in A. This condition ensures that AA is a with a unique consisting of non-units, and it is maximal among local subrings of KK under the domination relation, where one local ring dominates another if their maximal ideals intersect appropriately. Equivalently, AA can be characterized as a domain in which the nonzero elements are totally ordered by divisibility, meaning for any two nonzero a,bAa, b \in A, either aa divides bb or bb divides aa. Valuation rings arise naturally from valuations on fields: given a valuation v:K×Γv: K^\times \to \Gamma (where Γ\Gamma is a totally ordered abelian group) satisfying v(xy)=v(x)+v(y)v(xy) = v(x) + v(y) and v(x+y)min(v(x),v(y))v(x + y) \geq \min(v(x), v(y)) for x,y0x, y \neq 0, the associated valuation ring is A={xKv(x)0}A = \{ x \in K \mid v(x) \geq 0 \}, with maximal ideal m={xKv(x)>0}\mathfrak{m} = \{ x \in K \mid v(x) > 0 \}. Key properties include being integrally closed in KK (hence normal), and every finitely generated ideal being principal, though AA need not be Noetherian in general. Localizations and quotients of valuation rings are again valuation rings, and they play a crucial role in algebraic geometry and number theory, such as in the study of discrete valuation rings (where ΓZ\Gamma \cong \mathbb{Z}), which are one-dimensional Noetherian local domains with principal maximal ideals.

Definitions and Characterizations

Formal Definitions

A valuation ring is defined as follows: let KK be a field and RR a of KK. Then RR is a valuation ring (with respect to KK) if RR is an and for every nonzero xKx \in K, either xRx \in R or x1Rx^{-1} \in R. Here, KK serves as the field of fractions of RR, which is the ambient field containing RR as a proper unless R=KR = K (in which case RR is trivially a valuation ring). An equivalent formulation emphasizes the local ring structure of RR: RR is a valuation ring if it is a local ring with unique maximal ideal m\mathfrak{m}, and every element of KK lies in either RR or the fractional ideal m1\mathfrak{m}^{-1} excluding RR itself, i.e., K=R(m1R),K = R \cup (\mathfrak{m}^{-1} \setminus R), where m1={yKymR}\mathfrak{m}^{-1} = \{ y \in K \mid y \cdot \mathfrak{m} \subseteq R \}. This description highlights how the non-elements of RR in KK are precisely those whose inverses belong to m\mathfrak{m}, underscoring the dichotomy between elements and their reciprocals dictated by the ring's structure. Valuation rings are integrally closed in their KK, meaning that every element of KK that is over RR already belongs to RR. This property follows from the maximal domination of RR among local subrings of KK and ensures that RR has no "holes" with respect to extensions within KK.

Equivalent Conditions

A valuation ring RR with fraction field KK can be characterized equivalently as an in which the set of non-units forms a unique (i.e., RR is local), and the lattice of ideals of RR is totally ordered by inclusion. To see this, note that the local property ensures a unique m\mathfrak{m} consisting of all non-units, as the condition xKRx \in K \setminus R implies x1Rx^{-1} \in R forces units to be precisely RmR \setminus \mathfrak{m}. The total ordering of ideals follows from the valuation property: for any ideals a,b\mathfrak{a}, \mathfrak{b}, either ab\mathfrak{a} \subseteq \mathfrak{b} or ba\mathfrak{b} \subseteq \mathfrak{a}, because generators satisfy divisibility relations derived from the trichotomy for elements in KK. Conversely, if ideals are totally ordered and RR is local, then for any x,yRx, y \in R nonzero, the principal ideals (x)(x) and (y)(y) are comparable, so one divides the other, implying the ring satisfies the standard dichotomy for elements in KK. The residue field R/mR/\mathfrak{m} enters in the proof via the natural map, ensuring that the ordering respects the field structure without introducing additional primes. Another equivalent characterization is that RR is a Bézout domain that is . A Bézout domain is an where every finitely generated ideal is principal; when combined with the property (unique ), this forces the total ordering of all ideals, as principal ideals (a)(a) and (b)(b) are comparable under divisibility, extending to arbitrary ideals by generation. The proof proceeds by showing that in a Bézout domain, any two elements a,bRa, b \in R have (a,b)=(d)(a, b) = (d) for some dd, and the unique ensures no other primes disrupt the chain of ideals. The is involved in verifying that the by the remains a field, confirming the domain structure and preventing non-comparable ideals in the . Conversely, a valuation ring is Bézout because finitely generated ideals are principal (generated by an element of minimal "size" under the implicit ordering), and by the non-units forming the . An additional equivalent condition is that RR is an such that the nonzero elements are totally ordered by divisibility: for any nonzero a,bRa, b \in R, either aa divides bb or bb divides aa. These ring-theoretic conditions are linked to the underlying valuation structure via Krull's theorem, which establishes that the value group Γ\Gamma of the associated valuation on KK is a totally ordered under addition. The ordering on Γ\Gamma mirrors the ideal ordering in RR, while the is R/mR/\mathfrak{m}, the quotient by the . These structures confirm the equivalences via the valuation correspondence.

Examples and Applications

Classical Examples

One of the fundamental examples of a discrete valuation ring is the ring of k[]k[] over a field kk, where the associated valuation vv on the fraction field k((t))k((t)) is defined by v(i=naiti)=nv\left( \sum_{i=n}^\infty a_i t^i \right) = n for the lowest index nn with an0a_n \neq 0. The valuation ring consists of all series with non-negative exponents, the unique is (t)(t), generated by the uniformizer tt with v(t)=1v(t) = 1, and the is kk. This structure illustrates the principal ideal property typical of discrete valuation rings. Another classical discrete valuation ring arises from the pp-adic valuation on the rational numbers Q\mathbb{Q}, for a prime pp. The valuation vp(a/b)=vp(a)vp(b)v_p(a/b) = v_p(a) - v_p(b), where vpv_p counts the exponent of pp in the prime factorization, yields the valuation ring Z(p)={m/nQpn}\mathbb{Z}_{(p)} = \{ m/n \in \mathbb{Q} \mid p \nmid n \}, with maximal ideal pZ(p)p \mathbb{Z}_{(p)} and residue field Fp\mathbb{F}_p. The completion of this ring with respect to the pp-adic topology gives the pp-adic integers Zp\mathbb{Z}_p, which shares the same valuation ring properties in the extended pp-adic field Qp\mathbb{Q}_p. The ring of formal Laurent series k((t))k((t)) over a field kk provides another example, where the valuation ring is precisely k[]k[], the subring of series with non-negative powers. This is the intersection of k((t))k((t)) with elements of non-negative valuation under the tt-adic valuation vtv_t, emphasizing how valuation rings capture elements "integral" with respect to the valuation. In number theory, valuation rings appear as localizations of Dedekind domains. For the ring of integers OK\mathcal{O}_K of a number field KK, which is a Dedekind domain, the localization OK,p\mathcal{O}_{K, \mathfrak{p}} at a nonzero prime ideal p\mathfrak{p} is a discrete valuation ring with maximal ideal pOK,p\mathfrak{p} \mathcal{O}_{K, \mathfrak{p}} and residue field OK/p\mathcal{O}_K / \mathfrak{p}. The valuation corresponds to the p\mathfrak{p}-adic valuation on KK, and every nonzero ideal factors uniquely into such local components. A contrasting non-example is the kk over a field kk, whose fraction field is k(x)k(x). This ring fails to be a valuation ring because it is not : it possesses infinitely many distinct s (xa)(x - a) for each aka \in k, violating the unique maximal ideal property inherent to valuation rings. Equivalently, elements like x/(x+1)k(x)x / (x + 1) \in k(x) satisfy neither x/(x+1)kx / (x + 1) \in k nor its inverse (x+1)/xk(x + 1) / x \in k.

Geometric and Analytic Examples

In , discrete valuation rings frequently arise as local rings at smooth points on . For a smooth projective CC over an kk, the local ring OC,P\mathcal{O}_{C,P} at a point PCP \in C is a with fraction field the function field k(C)k(C). This structure reflects the one-dimensional nature of the curve, where the maximal ideal corresponds to functions vanishing at PP, and the valuation measures order of vanishing. For example, on a smooth elliptic curve given by a Weierstrass equation y2=x3+ax+by^2 = x^3 + ax + b with nonzero discriminant over C\mathbb{C}, the local ring at the origin (or any smooth affine point) is a , and its completion is isomorphic to the power series ring C[]\mathbb{C}[], where tt is a uniformizing parameter. Valuation rings also emerge from completions and henselizations of s in the context of schemes. The henselization of a in a scheme, which adjoins roots of polynomials modulo the while preserving the , extends valuation rings while maintaining their structure. Specifically, if AA is a valuation ring, its henselization AhA^h is again a valuation ring, essential for studying étale covers and deformations in arithmetic geometry. In schemes over discrete valuation rings, such as models of curves, the henselization facilitates lifting properties from the special fiber to the generic fiber. In non-archimedean analysis, rings of convergent power series provide key examples of valuation rings. Over a complete non-archimedean valued field KK with valuation ring RR, the Tate algebra KT1,,TnK\langle T_1, \dots, T_n \rangle consists of power series aITI\sum a_I T^I with aIKa_I \in K such that the Gauss norm f=supIaI\|f\| = \sup_I |a_I| is finite, forming a valuation ring under the Gauss valuation. These rings underpin rigid analytic geometry, where they model analytic spaces analogous to Stein spaces in complex analysis, with maximal ideals corresponding to points in the Berkovich spectrum. Puiseux series rings serve as valuation rings over algebraically closed fields of characteristic zero. For such a field kk, the ring k{{tQ0}}k\{ \{ t^{\mathbb{Q}_{\geq 0}} \} \} of Puiseux series qQ0aqtq\sum_{q \in \mathbb{Q}_{\geq 0}} a_q t^q with aqka_q \in k and well-ordered support is the valuation ring associated to the order valuation on the Puiseux series field k{{tQ}}k\{ \{ t^{\mathbb{Q}} \} \}, whose value group is Q\mathbb{Q}. This ring is integrally closed and plays a role in resolving singularities and studying algebraic closures of Laurent series fields. A prominent non-discrete valuation ring arises in p-adic analysis as the ring of algebraic integers in the p-adic complex numbers Cp\mathbb{C}_p. Here, Cp\mathbb{C}_p is the completion of an of Qp\mathbb{Q}_p with respect to the , and the ring {xCp:xp1}\{ x \in \mathbb{C}_p : |x|_p \leq 1 \} is the valuation ring for the unique extension of the , with a dense value group in R\mathbb{R}, rendering it non-discrete. This structure is fundamental in p-adic for comparing étale and de Rham cohomologies.

Ideal and Ring Structure

Ideal Ordering and Principal Ideals

In a valuation ring RR, the set of all ideals is totally ordered by inclusion, meaning that for any two ideals II and JJ of RR, either IJI \subseteq J or JIJ \subseteq I. This property follows from the intrinsic structure of RR as the ring of elements with non-negative valuation in its fraction field, ensuring that the valuation induces a comparable order on the "sizes" of ideals. Every finitely generated ideal in a valuation ring is principal, generated by a single element. To see this, suppose I=(a1,,an)I = (a_1, \dots, a_n) is a finitely generated with n2n \geq 2. Among the generators, select aka_k such that v(ak)=min{v(ai)1in}v(a_k) = \min\{v(a_i) \mid 1 \leq i \leq n\}, where vv is the associated valuation. Then, for each ii, ai=riaka_i = r_i a_k for some riRr_i \in R, so I=(ak)I = (a_k). This principal nature distinguishes valuation rings among integral domains and aligns with their local structure. The ideals of a valuation ring RR correspond bijectively to the initial segments of the value group Γ\Gamma, the totally ordered consisting of values v(R{0})v(R \setminus \{0\}). Specifically, every ideal of RR is of the form {xRv(x)γ}\{ x \in R \mid v(x) \geq \gamma \} for some γΓ{}\gamma \in \Gamma \cup \{\infty\}, where the case γ=\gamma = \infty yields the zero ideal {0}\{0\}, and γ=0\gamma = 0 yields RR itself. This correspondence preserves the total order: if γ1<γ2\gamma_1 < \gamma_2, then {xRv(x)γ2}{xRv(x)γ1}\{ x \in R \mid v(x) \geq \gamma_2 \} \subsetneq \{ x \in R \mid v(x) \geq \gamma_1 \}. Thus, the lattice of ideals mirrors the order structure of Γ\Gamma. The prime ideals of a valuation ring are likewise totally ordered by inclusion and correspond to the proper convex subgroups of the value group Γ\Gamma. The zero ideal (0)(0) is the unique minimal prime ideal, corresponding to the trivial convex subgroup {0}\{0\}. Height-one prime ideals are those immediately containing (0)(0), corresponding to the minimal proper convex subgroups of Γ\Gamma; in a chain of prime ideals, these are the primes of height one, with no nonzero prime ideal strictly between them and (0)(0). In rank-one valuation rings, the unique nonzero prime ideal (the maximal ideal) is precisely of height one.

Bézout and Local Properties

Valuation rings are Bézout domains, meaning that every finitely generated ideal is principal. This follows from the total ordering of ideals induced by the valuation: for a finitely generated ideal I=(f1,,fn)I = (f_1, \dots, f_n), select fif_i with minimal valuation v(fi)v(f_i); then I=(fi)I = (f_i), as any other fjf_j satisfies v(fj)v(fi)v(f_j) \geq v(f_i), so fj(fi)f_j \in (f_i). A valuation ring RR is a local ring with a unique maximal ideal m\mathfrak{m}, consisting precisely of the non-units of RR. Elements outside m\mathfrak{m} are units because, for any xmx \notin \mathfrak{m}, the principal ideal (x)(x) is not contained in m\mathfrak{m}, implying xx divides 1 in the fraction field and thus has an inverse in RR. The residue field κ=R/m\kappa = R / \mathfrak{m} is a field, and in the context of field extensions, the degree of the residue field extension is related to the index of the value group by the fundamental equality of valuation theory. Valuation rings are normal domains, i.e., integrally closed in their fraction fields. To see this, suppose xx in the fraction field KK of RR is integral over RR. Let AA' be the subring generated by RR and xx; then AA' is integral over RR, so localizing at a prime m\mathfrak{m}' over the maximal ideal m\mathfrak{m} of RR yields a local ring dominating RR. By maximality of RR among local subrings of KK, this localization equals RR, forcing xRx \in R. Moreover, by Krull's theorem, the integral closure of any integral domain DD is the intersection of all valuation rings containing DD. Not all valuation rings are Noetherian. A valuation ring is Noetherian if and only if it is a discrete valuation ring (with value group isomorphic to Z\mathbb{Z}) or a field; in the discrete case, it is a principal ideal domain, hence Noetherian, but non-discrete valuation rings, such as those with value group Q\mathbb{Q}, fail to be Noetherian due to ascending chains of principal ideals corresponding to unbounded increasing sequences in the value group.

Connections to Valuations

A Krull valuation on a field KK is a surjective function v:K×Γv: K^\times \to \Gamma, where Γ\Gamma is a totally ordered abelian group under addition, satisfying the properties v(xy)=v(x)+v(y)v(xy) = v(x) + v(y) for all x,yK×x, y \in K^\times and v(x+y)min{v(x),v(y)}v(x + y) \geq \min\{v(x), v(y)\} for all x,yK×x, y \in K^\times, with the convention that v(0)=+v(0) = +\infty. This generalizes earlier discrete valuations by allowing Γ\Gamma to be any ordered abelian group rather than restricting to Z\mathbb{Z}. Given such a Krull valuation vv, the associated valuation ring is defined as Rv={xKv(x)0}{0}R_v = \{ x \in K \mid v(x) \geq 0 \} \cup \{0\}, which forms an integral domain containing the elements of non-negative valuation, and its unique maximal ideal is mv={xKv(x)>0}m_v = \{ x \in K \mid v(x) > 0 \}. The of RvR_v is then Rv/mvR_v / m_v, and the valuation induces a on the nonzero elements of KK via the value group Γ=v(K×)\Gamma = v(K^\times). There exists a between the set of all valuation rings of KK (integral domains RKR \subseteq K such that for every xK×x \in K^\times, either xRx \in R or x1Rx^{-1} \in R) and the set of all Krull valuations on KK, where each valuation ring RR corresponds to the unique Krull valuation vv such that R=RvR = R_v, with the inverse map sending vv to RvR_v. This correspondence is and preserves the ring structure, ensuring that every valuation ring arises uniquely from a Krull valuation on its fraction field. The value group Γ\Gamma of a Krull valuation plays a central role in classifying the valuation, distinguishing cases where Γ\Gamma is divisible (e.g., R\mathbb{R}, allowing scalings) from those where it is not (e.g., Z\mathbb{Z}, corresponding to discrete valuations). The rank of the valuation is defined as the of the associated valuation ring, which equals the number of isolated subgroups in a of convex subgroups of Γ\Gamma, measuring the "" or complexity of the valuation. Krull valuations were introduced by Wolfgang Krull in 1932 to provide a unified framework generalizing discrete valuations from to arbitrary ordered abelian value groups, facilitating applications in and field extensions.

Discrete and Non-Discrete Cases

Valuation rings are classified based on the structure of their associated value groups, which determine key algebraic properties such as Noetherianity and ideal structure. In the discrete case, the value group is isomorphic to the integers Z\mathbb{Z}, leading to particularly well-behaved rings known as discrete valuation rings (DVRs). A DVR is a (PID) with exactly one nonzero , which is maximal and principal, generated by a uniformizer π\pi such that every nonzero ideal is of the form (πn)(\pi^n) for some nNn \in \mathbb{N}. This structure arises because the discrete value group allows for a natural grading by powers of π\pi, ensuring that all ideals are principal and the ring satisfies the ascending chain condition on ideals. A canonical example of a DVR is the localization of a at a nonzero ; such localizations inherit the integrally closed property of the while becoming local PIDs of 1. For instance, the ring Z(p)\mathbb{Z}_{(p)} of integers localized at the prime pp is a DVR with uniformizer pp and Fp\mathbb{F}_p. These rings play a fundamental role in and , serving as local models for points on curves. In contrast, non-discrete valuation rings feature value groups denser than Z\mathbb{Z}, such as Q\mathbb{Q} or R\mathbb{R}, which preclude the ring from being Noetherian or a PID in general. For example, the Hahn series ring k[[tR]]k[[t^\mathbb{R}]] over a field kk, consisting of formal series iSaitγi\sum_{i \in S} a_i t^{\gamma_i} with well-ordered support SRS \subseteq \mathbb{R} and coefficients aika_i \in k, forms a valuation ring with value group R\mathbb{R}. Such rings exhibit infinite chains of prime ideals corresponding to the density of the value group, and their maximal ideals are not principal. Non-discrete cases often appear in the study of ordered fields and generalized power series, where the lack of discreteness allows for more flexible embeddings but complicates ideal factorization. The rank of a valuation, defined as the length of a in the value group (i.e., the number of isolated subgroups in a of convex subgroups), equals the of the corresponding valuation ring. For DVRs, this rank is 1, matching their dimension as local PIDs. In higher-rank or non-discrete settings, the can be infinite if the value group has infinite rank (i.e., admits an infinite of convex subgroups).

Dominance and Closure Properties

Dominance Relations

In , dominance provides a partial order on the set of local subrings of a field KK, which is particularly useful for comparing valuation rings associated to different valuations on KK. A valuation ring RR dominates another valuation ring SS if SRS \subseteq R and the extension of the mS\mathfrak{m}_S to RR equals mR\mathfrak{m}_R, or equivalently, mS=SmR\mathfrak{m}_S = S \cap \mathfrak{m}_R. This relation implies that RR is "coarser" than SS in the sense that its associated valuation takes values in a of the value group of the valuation for SS. This dominance condition is equivalent to the valuation vSv_S associated to SS refining the valuation vRv_R associated to RR, meaning that the value group ΓvS\Gamma_{v_S} surjects onto ΓvR\Gamma_{v_R} (isomorphic to a quotient by a convex subgroup) and the residue field of SS surjects onto that of RR. In particular, when the refinement is by a positive integer multiple, i.e., vR=nvSv_R = n \cdot v_S for some nZ>0n \in \mathbb{Z}_{>0}, the valuation rings coincide despite the scaling in the value groups. For proper dominance, the value groups must differ in a way that allows strict containment of the rings, often requiring valuations of higher rank where the value group of the finer valuation contains a proper convex subgroup whose quotient is the value group of the coarser one. Chains of dominance among valuation rings in KK correspond to chains in the of the value groups, reflecting successive refinements of valuations. A totally ordered collection of such rings under dominance has a union that is again a local subring dominating all members in the chain, by applied to the poset of local subrings ordered by dominance. Maximal chains in this poset terminate at maximal elements, which are precisely the valuation rings, and their lengths relate to the structure of the value groups. The of a maximal of prime ideals in a valuation ring equals its , which coincides with the rank of the associated valuation—the minimal number of proper isolated convex subgroups needed to generate the value group as a under inclusion. This rank measures the "depth" of successive refinements possible within the valuation, with ideals in the ring bijecting to convex subgroups of the value group. For instance, rank-1 valuations, like discrete ones, have 1, corresponding to a single maximal of 1. A classical example occurs in the field of rational numbers Q\mathbb{Q}, where for a prime pp, the pp-adic valuation ring Zp\mathbb{Z}_p dominates Z(p)\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}, the localization of Z\mathbb{Z} at the prime ideal (p)(p); here, both coincide as the set {a/bQpb}\{a/b \in \mathbb{Q} \mid p \nmid b\} with maximal ideal pZpp \mathbb{Z}_p, illustrating a rank-1 case where the valuation ring is maximal under dominance.

Integral Closure in Fields

A fundamental result in , known as Krull's theorem, asserts that if AA is an with fraction field KK, then the integral closure Aˉ\bar{A} of AA in KK is equal to the of all valuation rings RR in KK such that ARKA \subseteq R \subseteq K. This characterization emphasizes the role of valuation rings in capturing the normalization process, as each valuation ring is itself integrally closed, and their inherits this property. Proofs of this theorem vary, but one approach leverages the lying-over theorem for ring extensions, which ensures that integral elements map appropriately under localizations, combined with normalization techniques in where the spectrum of the closure resolves singularities birationally, and the relevant local rings at generic points are valuation rings dominating AA. Specifically, an element xKx \in K is over AA it belongs to every such valuation ring, since non-integral elements lead to a contradiction via the existence of a valuation where the corresponding value is negative. In , this theorem applies directly to algebraic number fields: for a number field KK with OK\mathcal{O}_K, we have OK\mathcal{O}_K as the of the discrete valuation rings Op\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{p}} at all finite (non-archimedean) prime ideals p\mathfrak{p} of OK\mathcal{O}_K, since the archimedean places do not restrict the elements further. For non-normal domains, valuation rings provide a concrete way to compute the closure; for instance, consider the domain A=k[t2,t3]kA = k[t^2, t^3] \subset k over an kk, where AA is not normal, but its closure is kk, obtained as the of valuation rings dominating AA corresponding to the branches of the associated singularity. The theorem also connects to broader structural results, such as the Mori-Nagata theorem, which states that the integral closure of a Noetherian domain is a Krull domain—a domain that is precisely the of rank-one (discrete) valuation rings—and this excellence property ensures finite generation of the closure in many cases.

Places and Extensions

General Places

In , a place of an integral domain AA with fraction field KK is defined as a ring homomorphism ϕ:AR\phi: A \to R, where RR is a valuation ring of KK (i.e., the fraction field of RR is KK) and the center p=ϕ1(mR)\mathfrak{p} = \phi^{-1}(\mathfrak{m}_R) is a prime ideal of AA, with mR\mathfrak{m}_R the maximal ideal of RR. This construction generalizes the notion of a valuation by embedding AA (modulo a prime) into a valuation ring without prescribing a specific value group for the associated valuation on KK. The center p\mathfrak{p} identifies the place with a prime ideal, and the image ϕ(A)\phi(A) is an integral domain lying between A/pA/\mathfrak{p} and RR. Associated to such a place ϕ\phi is the residue map, obtained by composing ϕ\phi with the canonical quotient homomorphism RR/mRR \to R/\mathfrak{m}_R, where mR\mathfrak{m}_R is the unique of the local ring RR. This yields a field homomorphism ϕ:Ak\overline{\phi}: A \to k, where k=R/mRk = R/\mathfrak{m}_R is the of RR, with kernel p\mathfrak{p} and image a subfield of kk. The kk thus provides the "residue class field" at the place, analogous to the residue field at a in classical localizations, but realized through the valuation structure of RR. Places differ from full Krull valuations on KK, which are surjective group homomorphisms v:K×Γv: K^\times \to \Gamma (with Γ\Gamma a totally ordered ) satisfying the non-Archimedean , together with the associated valuation ring {xKv(x)0}{0}\{x \in K \mid v(x) \geq 0\} \cup \{0\}. A place corresponds to the ring-theoretic data of such a valuation (the domain and its embedding into the valuation ring) but omits the explicit value group Γ\Gamma, focusing instead on the p\mathfrak{p} and the domination properties of RR over subrings of KK. Each place induces a valuation on KK up to equivalence ( of value groups), but the converse requires specifying the ordering on the value . A concrete example arises in . For a AA (a Noetherian, integrally closed in which every nonzero is maximal), the places of AA are in one-to-one correspondence with its nonzero . Specifically, for each nonzero pA\mathfrak{p} \subset A, the natural localization homomorphism ϕ:AAp\phi: A \to A_\mathfrak{p} is a place, where ApA_\mathfrak{p} is a discrete valuation ring (DVR) with uniformizer a generator of pAp\mathfrak{p} A_\mathfrak{p}, fraction field KK, and kernel {0}\{0\} (since localization is injective for domains). The center of this place is p=AmAp\mathfrak{p} = A \cap \mathfrak{m}_{A_\mathfrak{p}}, where mAp=pAp\mathfrak{m}_{A_\mathfrak{p}} = \mathfrak{p} A_\mathfrak{p} is the maximal ideal of ApA_\mathfrak{p}, and the residue field is A/pA/\mathfrak{p}. This correspondence highlights how places capture the local valuation structure at each in such domains. Places satisfy a universal property with respect to integral closure. Let A\overline{A} denote the integral closure of AA in KK. Since every valuation ring RR of KK is integrally closed in KK, for any place ϕ:AR\phi: A \to R, the canonical extension ϕ~:KK\tilde{\phi}: K \to K (unique by the of fraction fields) maps A\overline{A} into RR, yielding a ring homomorphism ϕ:AR\overline{\phi}: \overline{A} \to R such that ϕ=ϕi\phi = \overline{\phi} \circ i, where i:AAi: A \hookrightarrow \overline{A} is the inclusion. This follows from Krull's theorem that A={VV a valuation ring of K containing A}\overline{A} = \bigcap \{ V \mid V \text{ a valuation ring of } K \text{ containing } A \}, ensuring that places "factor through" the normalization of AA.

Specialization and Refinement

In the context of field extensions, a valuation v:K×Γ{0}v: K^\times \to \Gamma \cup \{0\} (corresponding to a place via its valuation ring) on a field KK extends to a valuation w:L×Δ{0}w: L^\times \to \Delta \cup \{0\} on an extension field L/KL/K if the valuation rings satisfy OvOwO_v \subseteq O_w and the residue fields embed compatibly, ensuring that ww extends vv while preserving the order on the value groups. This extension captures how the valuation structure of the base field refines or decomposes in the larger field, often visualized through the inclusion of the valuation ring of vv in that of ww. Refinement of valuations arises in chains corresponding to successive extensions, where a valuation ww refines vv if the value group Δ\Delta of ww contains Γ\Gamma as a proper subgroup, leading to a composite valuation v=cwv = c \cdot w for some positive constant cc, or more generally through isolated subgroups in the value group that decompose the valuation into coarser and finer components. Such refinements are crucial in understanding the structure of valuation rings in towers of extensions, where the rational rank and height of the valuation may increase, forming totally ordered sets of valuations under inclusion. In a finite extension L/KL/K of fields, a place p\mathfrak{p} of KK (corresponding to a valuation) decomposes into several places Pi\mathfrak{P}_i of LL lying above it, characterized by the ramification index e(Pi/p)e(\mathfrak{P}_i / \mathfrak{p}), which measures the extension of the value groups as the index [ΓPi:Γp][ \Gamma_{\mathfrak{P}_i} : \Gamma_{\mathfrak{p}} ], and the inertia degree f(Pi/p)f(\mathfrak{P}_i / \mathfrak{p}), which is the degree of the extension [κ(Pi):κ(p)][ \kappa(\mathfrak{P}_i) : \kappa(\mathfrak{p}) ]. The ramification index quantifies how the prime ideal "ramifies" or extends multiplicatively, while the inertia degree reflects the unramified part of the residue field behavior. For Galois extensions L/KL/K, the decomposition is uniform: all places above p\mathfrak{p} have the same ee and ff, and if gg is the number of such places, the fundamental equality efg=[L:K]e f g = [L : K] holds, ensuring the total degree is accounted for across ramification, inertia, and splitting. This formula arises from the action of the on the places, where the decomposition group has order efe f and the number of conjugates gives g=[G:D]g = [G : D], with DD the decomposition group. A representative example occurs in quadratic extensions of Q\mathbb{Q}, such as L=Q(d)L = \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{d})
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.