Hubbry Logo
W bandW bandMain
Open search
W band
Community hub
W band
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
W band
W band
W band
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
IEEE W band
Frequency range
75 – 110 GHz
Wavelength range
4 – 2.73 mm
Related bands
Radio bands
ITU
1 (ELF) 2 (SLF) 3 (ULF) 4 (VLF)
5 (LF) 6 (MF) 7 (HF) 8 (VHF)
9 (UHF) 10 (SHF) 11 (EHF) 12 (THF)
EU / NATO / US ECM
IEEE
Other TV and radio

The W band of the microwave part of the electromagnetic spectrum ranges from 75 to 110 GHz, wavelength ≈2.7–4 mm. It sits above the U.S. IEEE-designated V band (40–75 GHz) in frequency, and overlaps the NATO designated M band (60–100 GHz). The W band is used for satellite communications, millimeter-wave radar research, military radar targeting and tracking applications, and some non-military applications.

Radar

[edit]

A number of passive millimeter-wave cameras for concealed weapons detection operate at 94 GHz. A frequency around 77 GHz is used for automotive cruise control radar. The atmospheric radio window at 94 GHz is used for imaging millimeter-wave radar applications in astronomy, defense, and security applications.

Heat ray

[edit]

Less-than-lethal weaponry exists that uses millimeter waves to heat a thin layer of human skin to an intolerable temperature so as to make the targeted person move away. A two-second burst of the 95 GHz focused beam heats the skin to a temperature of 130 °F (54 °C) at a depth of 1⁄64 of an inch (0.40 mm). The United States Air Force and Marines are currently using this type of Active Denial System.[1]

Communications

[edit]

In terms of communications capability, W band offers high data rate throughput when used at high altitudes and in space. (The 71–76 GHz / 81–86 GHz segment of the W band is allocated by the International Telecommunication Union to satellite services.) Because of increasing spectrum and orbit congestion at lower frequencies, W-band satellite allocations are of increasing interest to commercial satellite operators, especially the Starlink satellite constellations which have implemented capabilities in these bands.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

W band

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The W band is a designated segment of the , spanning frequencies from 75 to 110 GHz, as defined by the IEEE Std 521-2019 standard for letter-band nomenclature. This millimeter-wave range, corresponding to wavelengths of approximately 2.7 to 4 mm, is positioned above the (40–75 GHz) and below the higher millimeter-wave allocations. It is characterized by high atmospheric due to absorption, which limits long-range propagation but enables precise, short-range applications requiring high resolution. Key applications of the W band leverage its ability to support high data rates and fine . In radar systems, it is widely employed for automotive sensing, such as and collision avoidance, due to its superior capabilities compared to lower-frequency bands. and defense uses include high-resolution targeting, tracking, and radars, where the band's narrow beamwidth enhances accuracy in cluttered environments. In communications, the W band facilitates satellite links and backhaul networks, offering bandwidths exceeding several gigabits per second for and beyond, though atmospheric absorption from oxygen and necessitates line-of-sight or near-line-of-sight deployments. Additionally, it supports astronomical observations, particularly in radio telescopes for detecting molecular emissions, and screening systems for non-invasive . Ongoing research focuses on overcoming propagation challenges through advanced and integrated circuits to expand its role in integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) paradigms.

Definition and Characteristics

Frequency Range and Designation

The W band, as designated by the IEEE Standard 521-2002 for radar-frequency bands, covers a frequency range of 75 to 110 GHz within the portion of the . This allocation positions the W band as a key segment of the millimeter-wave regime, enabling high-resolution applications due to its short wavelengths. The corresponding wavelengths for the W band span approximately 4 mm at the lower frequency of 75 GHz to 2.7 mm at the upper frequency of 110 GHz, calculated using the relation λ = c/f where c is the . It lies between the (40–75 GHz) and higher frequencies entering the sub-millimeter wave range above 110 GHz, distinguishing it as an intermediate band in the (EHF) classification. International variations in W band designations exist, particularly under the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) framework, which allocates segments such as 71–76 GHz and 81–86 GHz primarily for fixed and mobile services, including point-to-point communications. In the United States, the (FCC) has designated specific sub-bands for commercial use, including 71–75.5 GHz, 81–86 GHz, 92–100 GHz, and 102–109.5 GHz, to support and backhaul services while coordinating with federal operations. These allocations reflect regulatory efforts to balance sharing across , scientific, and needs without overlapping the core IEEE range. The letter-based naming convention for the W band, like other radar bands, originated from World War II-era U.S. military designations intended to obscure details from adversaries, and was later standardized by the IEEE to provide consistent across and scientific communities.

Physical Properties and

The W band, spanning 75–110 GHz, corresponds to s of approximately 4 mm to 2.7 mm, which confer high to the electromagnetic waves due to their short relative to lower bands. This results in narrow beam widths, typically on the order of degrees for practical antenna apertures, enabling high in applications but necessitating precise alignment between transmitter and receiver to maintain link integrity. The short also contributes to inherently limited ranges, often constrained to a few kilometers in terrestrial scenarios, primarily because of increased and environmental interactions. Propagation in the W band is characterized by significant losses from atmospheric constituents, though less severe than the oxygen absorption peak near 60 GHz (which reaches up to 15 dB/km). Gaseous in the 75–110 GHz range arises mainly from residual oxygen and absorption, with specific values under standard conditions (15°C, 1013.25 hPa, 7.5 g/m³ density) totaling approximately 0.27 dB/km at 75 GHz, 0.37 dB/km at 90 GHz, and 0.48 dB/km at 110 GHz. introduces more variable and dominant losses, scaling with rainfall rate R (mm/h) via the specific model γ_R = k R^α (dB/km), where coefficients k and α increase with ; for example, at 90 GHz and moderate (10 mm/h), attenuations can exceed 5–10 dB/km, far higher than in clear-air conditions. Overall, clear-air losses in the W band range from 0.3–1 dB/km when including minor contributions from or aerosols, limiting unmitigated ranges compared to lower bands. Free-space path loss (FSPL) in the W band exacerbates these environmental effects, given by the equation FSPL=(4πdfc)2\text{FSPL} = \left( \frac{4\pi d f}{c} \right)^2 where d is the (m), f is the (Hz) in the 75–110 GHz range, and c is the (3 × 10^8 m/s); this yields a quadratic increase with frequency, approximately 9–12 dB higher than in the Ka band (20–40 GHz) for equivalent distances and apertures. In comparison to the , where gaseous attenuation is negligible (<0.1 dB/km) and rain fade is milder (e.g., 1–3 dB/km at 10 mm/h), W-band signals experience 2–5 times greater total attenuation under similar conditions, primarily due to elevated rain and interactions, though offering superior bandwidth potential. These properties underscore the W band's suitability for high-resolution, short-haul links while highlighting its sensitivity to weather.

Technical Challenges and Components

Operating in the W-band (75–110 GHz) presents significant challenges due to the , which exacerbates atmospheric from oxygen and absorption, limiting link ranges to short distances unless line-of-sight conditions are ideal. is critical yet difficult, as dimensions must scale to wavelengths of approximately 3 mm, requiring precise fabrication techniques to avoid performance degradation in integrated systems. Power efficiency remains a hurdle, with operation leading to increased losses in active devices, necessitating advanced cooling and bias schemes to maintain output without excessive heat. Additionally, in oscillators poses a challenge, as and material imperfections amplify , impacting in modulation schemes. Key components for W-band systems include WR-10 waveguides, the standard rectangular size with inner dimensions of 2.54 mm × 1.27 mm, which support the full band while minimizing modal dispersion. Monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMICs) are essential for amplifiers and mixers, often fabricated in GaAs or GaN technologies to achieve gains of 15–20 dB and low noise figures below 5 dB. Antennas typically employ horn designs or phased arrays, providing gains exceeding 20 dBi to compensate for path losses, with beamwidths around 10 degrees for focused radiation patterns. Material selection emphasizes low-loss dielectrics like PTFE or ceramics and metals such as gold-plated for waveguides, achieving insertion losses under 0.5 dB/cm to preserve signal strength across the 75–110 GHz range. Power handling in transmitters is typically limited to 10–100 mW due to breakdown risks in high-frequency junctions, influencing system design for reliable operation. The for W-band links is calculated as
Pr=Pt+Gt+Gr−FSPL−Latm−LotherP_r = P_t + G_t + G_r - \text{FSPL} - L_{\text{atm}} - L_{\text{other}}
where PrP_r is received power, PtP_t is transmit power, GtG_t and GrG_r are transmit and receive antenna gains, FSPL is , and losses include atmospheric and miscellaneous effects, highlighting the need for high-gain components to achieve viable margins. As of 2025, advancements in silicon-based transceivers using SiGe BiCMOS and processes have reduced costs for commercial applications by enabling higher integration levels and lower fabrication expenses compared to III-V semiconductors.

History and

Origins in Systems

The letter designation system for frequency bands originated during as a security measure employed by Allied forces to conceal technical details from during communications and documentation. This was devised to replace explicit frequency or descriptions with arbitrary letters, facilitating secure collaboration among scientists and engineers while minimizing the risk of interception and reverse-engineering by enemies. The system was initially developed by British researchers in the late 1930s and early 1940s, and rapidly adopted by the upon entry into the war, with key contributions from the U.S. Army Signal Corps Laboratories at , . British and U.S. radar efforts during the war emphasized centimeter-wave technologies to enhance resolution for detection, targeting, and fire control applications, marking a shift from longer-wave early warning systems to more precise radars. For instance, the (2–4 GHz, corresponding to roughly 7.5–15 cm wavelengths) was utilized in search radars like the British ASV Mark II for , providing reliable performance over water despite atmospheric challenges. The (8–12 GHz, about 2.5–3.75 cm wavelengths) became prominent for high-resolution systems, exemplified by the U.S. SCR-584 antiaircraft developed at the , which achieved angular accuracies of 0.1 degrees and was deployed from 1943 onward in both European and Pacific theaters. These advancements were driven by innovations in oscillators, such as the invented by British physicists in , which enabled efficient generation of centimeter waves. The U.S. Army pursued experimental work on wavelengths approaching 3 cm and shorter in the early , motivated by the need for even greater resolution in for applications like proximity fuzes and , though practical limitations in power output and component reliability from technology restricted widespread implementation. Between 1943 and 1945, Allied laboratories, including the ' Evans Signal Laboratory in , advanced prototype microwave radars for fire control, incorporating early explorations of higher centimeter-wave regimes that foreshadowed millimeter-wave capabilities; however, these prototypes faced severe constraints from atmospheric absorption and inadequate signal amplification, preventing broad deployment before the war's end. This wartime push into shorter wavelengths laid the conceptual groundwork for subsequent band extensions, including the W band, within the established letter .

Post-War Standardization and Evolution

Following , the informal letter designations for frequency bands, originally developed during wartime to obscure communications, were formalized to address inconsistencies in . In 1976, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) issued Standard 521 to standardize these designations, providing a rationalized framework for frequencies up to the millimeter-wave range. This built on post-war efforts, such as the U.S. Department of Commerce's 1946 establishment of standards extending to 33 GHz, which aimed to support peacetime applications like communications and sensing. The 1984 revision of IEEE Std 521 extended the nomenclature to higher frequencies, defining the W band as 75–110 GHz to accommodate emerging millimeter-wave technologies while preserving earlier bands. During the and 1970s, research expanded the band's scope through studies for communications and millimeter-wave systems, with compiling key experimental results on atmospheric effects and signal viability up to 110 GHz. In the 1980s, the (ITU) advanced global harmonization via updates to the Radio Regulations, aligning allocations for fixed and mobile services in the 75–110 GHz range to facilitate international and terrestrial uses. These efforts ensured consistent nomenclature and reduced interference across regions. Key milestones in the 1990s and 2000s included regulatory allocations for unlicensed operations, with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 2004 adopting rules for the 92–95 GHz portion of the W band, enabling short-range imaging and data links under Part 15. The 2010s saw further evolution tied to 5G millimeter-wave deployments, where the W band supported high-capacity backhaul and extended-range sensing, with ITU World Radiocommunication Conferences (WRC-15 and WRC-19) identifying adjacent spectrum for international mobile telecommunications. By 2025, commercial spectrum in the W band has expanded, notably the 92–95 GHz allocation for unlicensed imaging applications under FCC rules. Cold War-era military research significantly influenced this evolution, with U.S. Department of Defense investments in millimeter-wave for precision guidance—such as seekers operating near 95 GHz—driving advancements in component reliability and bandwidth utilization. This R&D established the foundational 35 GHz bandwidth (110–75 GHz) now available for diverse applications, emphasizing high-resolution targeting that informed subsequent civilian standards.

Applications in Radar

Military Targeting and Tracking

W-band radars are essential in military applications for precise targeting, tracking, and , leveraging their millimeter-wave frequencies to achieve exceptional angular and range resolution. These systems excel at detecting small, low-radar-cross-section such as drones and incoming missiles, where sub-centimeter resolution—around 1.2 cm in advanced configurations—enables of fine details even at standoff distances. Prominent systems include 94 GHz fire control radars, such as the integrated on the AH-64 , which supports automatic target detection, classification, and prioritization for engagements. W-band (SAR) configurations further enhance ground mapping for tactical , providing high-fidelity terrain imagery from UAV platforms to support real-time mission planning. Notable implementations feature W-band seekers in precision-guided munitions, exemplified by the Brimstone missile's 94 GHz , which delivers all-weather targeting against armored vehicles. In naval contexts, these radars facilitate vessel and small-threat tracking, bolstering perimeter defense in littoral operations. Under clear atmospheric conditions, W-band systems typically achieve detection ranges of up to 8 km, as exemplified by the Longbow's operational envelope. Velocity assessment relies on Doppler processing, with the shift calculated as
fd=2vfcf_d = \frac{2 v f}{c}
where fdf_d denotes the Doppler frequency, vv the target velocity, ff the transmit frequency (e.g., 94 GHz), and cc the , yielding fine-grained motion discrimination. By 2025, W-band radar advancements incorporate AI-driven algorithms for autonomous targeting, enabling rapid signal interpretation, clutter rejection, and engagement prioritization in contested environments.

Scientific and Civil Sensing

In scientific applications, the W band (75–110 GHz) is employed in radio telescopes equipped with heterodyne receivers to observe interstellar molecular clouds through spectral lines in this frequency range, enabling detailed imaging of molecular distributions and dynamics in astrophysical environments. For instance, adaptations of superconducting-insulator-superconductor (SIS) receivers, such as those from the Institute for Radio Astronomy in the Millimeter Range (IRAM), have been integrated into facilities like the Sardinia Radio Telescope to detect emissions from complex molecules in star-forming regions. These systems leverage the band's high resolution to map structures at scales of arcseconds, contributing to understandings of star formation processes. In civil sensing, W-band radars support advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) in automotive applications, operating primarily around 77 GHz to detect vehicles, pedestrians, and obstacles with sub-meter resolution for collision avoidance and . Interferometric W-band radars are also used for , such as measuring bridge vibrations with micrometer accuracy over distances up to several hundred meters, allowing non-contact assessment of dynamic responses to traffic or wind loads. These ground-based systems benefit from the band's short , which provides fine but limits effective range to line-of-sight scenarios. For weather monitoring, 94–95 GHz radars estimate cloud content by measuring radar reflectivity factor Z, which quantifies backscattered power from hydrometeors. At these mm-wave frequencies, the backscattering cross-section for individual particles under the Rayleigh approximation is given by σ=π5∣K∣2D6λ4\sigma = \frac{\pi^5 |K|^2 D^6}{\lambda^4} where σ\sigma is the radar cross-section, ∣K∣2|K|^2 is the dielectric factor, DD is the particle diameter, and λ\lambda is the wavelength, enhancing sensitivity to small ice particles and non-precipitating clouds. Such radars, like those in airborne or ground-based profilers, profile vertical cloud structures with resolutions down to 30 meters, aiding in precipitation forecasting and climate studies. Notable examples include European-developed W-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems for high-resolution terrain and infrastructure imaging, achieving centimeter-scale detail in urban or forested areas. Emerging applications in 2025 involve W-band radars for urban traffic monitoring, integrating with smart city infrastructure to track vehicle flows and densities in real-time with minimal electromagnetic interference. The band's propagation limitations, including high atmospheric attenuation, make it ideal for short-range, ground-based civil setups rather than long-distance sensing.

Applications in Communications

The W band (75–110 GHz) offers a substantial bandwidth of up to 35 GHz, enabling terabit-per-second (Tbps) data rates in satellite communications while supporting low-latency links for both geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) and (LEO) constellations. This frequency range is particularly advantageous for high-throughput satellite systems, where the wide spectrum allocation addresses the growing demand for connectivity in space-to-ground and inter-satellite links, outperforming lower bands like Ku and Ka in capacity potential. Prominent examples include the European Space Agency's (ESA) W-band experiments, such as the 2021 launch of the first satellite with an onboard W-band transmitter under the ARTES program, which demonstrated initial high-frequency transmissions from space. More recently, ESA's W-Cube mission in 2025 achieved the world's first 75 GHz beacon transmission from LEO, evaluating W-band performance for global broadband applications. For deep space, NASA's analyses highlight the W band's utility in probes, leveraging the 75–110 GHz range to achieve higher antenna gains for long-distance links, as explored in studies on deep-space feasibility. Key challenges in W-band satellite links include maintaining precise beam pointing accuracy below 0.01° to compensate for the narrow beamwidths resulting from high frequencies, which demand advanced tracking systems on both satellites and ground stations. The carrier-to-noise ratio (C/N) governs link performance and is given by: C/N=PtGtGrλ2kTBLC/N = \frac{P_t G_t G_r \lambda^2}{k T B L} where PtP_t is transmit power, GtG_t and GrG_r are transmit and receive antenna gains, λ\lambda is , kk is Boltzmann's constant, TT is system , BB is bandwidth, and LL encompasses total losses (e.g., ). Higher frequencies enhance gain GG (proportional to (fD/c)2(f D / c)^2) but increase losses LL (path loss scales with f2f^2), necessitating optimized power and antenna designs for reliable operation. As of 2025, commercial constellations like Starlink have filed for W-band use, including SpaceX's 2023 application for up to 30,000 W-band LEO satellites to boost network capacity. International regulations, including ITU allocations post-WRC-23, support W-band for high-altitude platform stations and non-geostationary satellites, facilitating global high-throughput applications.

Terrestrial Backhaul and 5G

The W band, encompassing frequencies around 75–110 GHz, plays a significant role in terrestrial backhaul for networks by enabling high-capacity point-to-point links in urban environments. These links operate primarily in sub-bands such as 81–86 GHz, supporting data rates exceeding 10 Gbps over distances of 1–5 km, which is essential for connecting and aggregating traffic in dense deployments where fiber installation is impractical. Such capabilities address the surging backhaul demands of , where macro sites may require up to 100 Gbps to handle aggregated user traffic from multiple low-power nodes. Integration of W band into extends millimeter-wave beyond the more common 28 GHz range, targeting ultra-dense urban areas for enhanced capacity. A notable example is the 2025 trial by Drei Austria and , which tested W-band frequencies near 100 GHz to boost urban connectivity, demonstrating reliable performance in line-of-sight scenarios with minimal interference. This approach leverages the band's wide bandwidth—up to several GHz per channel—to support fronthaul and midhaul connections, complementing lower-frequency backhaul while mitigating congestion in sub-6 GHz bands. Key advantages of W band for terrestrial backhaul include access to unlicensed or lightly licensed , facilitating rapid deployment for enterprise and carrier networks without extensive regulatory hurdles. However, challenges, particularly exceeding 10–20 dB/km at these frequencies, restrict reliable link distances to under 10 km, necessitating adaptive and site planning in temperate climates. To achieve high spectral efficiency in W-band communications, orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) is widely employed, dividing the wide channel into subcarriers to combat frequency-selective fading and phase noise inherent at these wavelengths. This modulation scheme enables efficiencies up to 4.64 bit/s/Hz in experimental setups, approaching theoretical limits described by the Shannon capacity formula: C=Blog⁡2(1+SNR)C = B \log_2(1 + \text{SNR}) where CC is the channel capacity in bits per second, BB is the bandwidth in Hz, and SNR is the signal-to-noise ratio. The U.S. allocates portions of the W band for fixed point-to-point operations under Part 101 and unlicensed low-power use above 92 GHz under Part 15, enabling deployments in enterprise networks, campus environments, and infrastructures. These approvals align with global efforts to expand mmWave backhaul, with initial commercial rollouts focusing on hybrid fiber-wireless architectures to ensure 99.999% availability.

Directed Energy Applications

Active Denial System

The (ADS) is a U.S. that employs a 95 GHz millimeter-wave beam in the W band to provide non-lethal and area denial capabilities. The system delivers a focused, invisible beam that induces an intense heating sensation on the target's , compelling individuals to instinctively retreat without inflicting lasting harm. Developed under the Department of Defense's Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Program, the ADS bridges the gap between verbal warnings and lethal force, offering a reversible effect that ends immediately when exposure stops. The ADS operates by emitting millimeter waves that are strongly absorbed by molecules in the skin, achieving a shallow of approximately 0.4 mm and rapidly elevating the surface temperature to 44–50°C in less than 1 second. This heating activates receptors (nociceptors) in the , producing a burning sensation equivalent to touching a hot lightbulb, which motivates evasion while avoiding deeper tissue damage or burns under controlled exposure. The beam maintains effectiveness at ranges of 500–1000 meters, enabling standoff engagement in scenarios. Initiated in the early 2000s with foundational research dating to 1993, the ADS progressed through the Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration from 2002 to 2007, culminating in its first public demonstration in January 2007 at Moody Air Force Base, Georgia. A vehicle-mounted prototype was deployed to Afghanistan in 2010 for operational testing but was withdrawn within months without engaging in combat, primarily due to logistical and political challenges. In the 2020s, military leaders have revisited the ADS for potential use in domestic civil unrest, including considerations for deployment during protests in Washington, D.C., in 2020. Technical specifications include a transmitter generating up to 100 kW of output power, which projects a beam with ranging from 1 to 10 /cm², varying by distance and beam focus. The skin heating rate derives from the absorbed power density SS, approximated by the relation dTdt≈Sρcd,\frac{dT}{dt} \approx \frac{S}{\rho c d}, where ρ\rho is skin , cc is , and dd is ; at S=1S = 1–10 /cm², this yields a temperature rise to the pain threshold in fractions of a second. Human effects testing, involving over 13,000 exposures on more than 700 volunteers, has demonstrated that the ADS repels nearly all subjects (over 99% in controlled scenarios) while maintaining safety thresholds with an injury risk below 0.1%, including limits on exposure duration and intensity to prevent second-degree burns.

Emerging Non-Lethal and Security Uses

In recent years, advancements in solid-state technology have enabled more compact and deployable versions of millimeter-wave directed energy systems operating in the W band, particularly at 95 GHz, for non-lethal crowd control and perimeter defense. The Solid-State Active Denial Technology (SS-ADT), developed by the U.S. Army and Department of Defense, uses radio frequency millimeter waves to produce a focused beam that penetrates the skin to a depth of approximately 1/64 inch, inducing a brief heating sensation that repels individuals without causing permanent harm. This system offers 360-degree coverage, silent operation, and integration onto tactical vehicles, making it suitable for urban mobility, convoy protection, and entry control points where de-escalation is needed. A U.S. patent for a solid-state non-lethal directed energy weapon further describes a configuration with a high-power millimeter-wave source, main reflector, and sub-reflector to direct the beam effectively for such applications. Demonstrations of vehicle-mounted millimeter-wave prototypes in 2012 have highlighted their potential in hostile scenarios, providing warfighters with a non-lethal option that delivers a heat beam to create an irresistible urge to flee, bridging the gap between verbal commands and lethal force. These systems, mounted on heavy expanded-mobility tactical trucks or Humvees, utilize gyrotron-generated power equivalent to 100 times that of a , shaped by mirrors for precise targeting, with safety features ensuring only temporary effects like tingling or tenderness lasting 10-15 minutes. Independent studies, including those from M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, have confirmed no long-term risks such as cancer from exposure. In security applications, passive W-band radiometric has emerged as a key non-invasive tool for detecting concealed threats, leveraging natural thermal emissions at 80-100 GHz to produce high-resolution images through . Systems like close-range W-band imagers, using lens-fed radiometers and linear scanning actuators, achieve detection at distances of about 1 meter, revealing metallic and non-metallic objects such as weapons or explosives without . These technologies offer advantages over by penetrating obscurants like or , with sensitivity levels as low as 0.8 for distinguishing from contraband. Emerging integrations of artificial intelligence in W-band security screening enhance threat recognition by automating the analysis of millimeter-wave interactions with the body and clothing, enabling high-throughput portal and stand-off systems for airports, borders, and public venues. Such passive and active radar-based setups detect items like guns, knives, or bombs at ranges up to tens of meters, supporting non-cooperative screening in crowds or vehicle inspections for human trafficking prevention, while preserving privacy through software that highlights only anomalies. These developments represent a shift toward safer, more efficient security protocols, with ongoing research focusing on larger optics and improved resolution to overcome wavelength limitations.

References

  1. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/521/7649/
  2. https://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedias/frequency-letter-bands
  3. https://portal.powertec.com.au/technical-library/wireless/core-concepts/ieee-bands/w-band
  4. https://www.everythingrf.com/community/w-band
  5. https://terasense.com/terahertz-technology/w-band-technology/
  6. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/17/7414
  7. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9179318
  8. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/521/768/
  9. https://atmos.washington.edu/~houze/FrequencyAndWavelengthDesignations.html
  10. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Spectrum-Broadcasting/Documents/Publications/Guidelines-NTFA-E.pdf
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/w-band
  12. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2004/01/23/04-1246/allocations-and-service-rules-for-the-71-76-ghz-81-86-ghz-and-92-95-ghz-bands-loea-communications
  13. https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/iet-com.2018.5044
  14. https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-P.676/en
  15. https://ntrs.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/api/citations/20120016067/downloads/20120016067.pdf
  16. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20120016067/downloads/20120016067.pdf
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239937558_W-band_atmospheric_radiowave_propagation_A_challenge_for_satellite_TLC_systems
  18. https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ctnguyen/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/mtt99.ctnguyen.pdf
  19. https://eureka.patsnap.com/report-optimizing-phased-array-for-satellite-communication
  20. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/site/research/media/posters/2023/R23210p.pdf
  21. https://www.miwv.com/w-band-standard-gain-horn-antennas-wr-10-75-110-ghz/
  22. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5296076/
  23. https://www.pasternack.com/wr-10-waveguide-gain-horn-antenna-25dbi-ug-387-mod-round-flange-pewan1020-p.aspx
  24. https://read.nxtbook.com/ieee/antennas_propagation/antennas_propagation_apr_2023/manufacturing_guidelines_for_.html
  25. https://ntrs.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/citations/20110012954
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/link-budget-analysis
  27. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11432-024-4145-y
  28. https://www.radartutorial.eu/07.waves/Waves%20and%20Frequency%20Ranges.en.html
  29. https://www.britannica.com/technology/radar/Advances-during-World-War-II
  30. https://ethw.org/Radar_during_World_War_II
  31. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/wefo/13/2/1520-0434_1998_013_0219_hoouow_2_0_co_2.xml
  32. https://www.ll.mit.edu/impact/commemorating-scr-584-radar-historical-pioneer
  33. https://www.nytimes.com/1946/02/18/archives/new-standards-are-set-on-radio-plan-covers-microwave-range-up-to.html
  34. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19780021366/downloads/19780021366.pdf
  35. https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/fcctable.pdf
  36. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA324120.pdf
  37. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA393327.pdf
  38. https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-21-12-14109
  39. https://idstch.com/technology/electronics/radar-technologies-for-high-performance-of-civilian-and-military-missions/
  40. https://www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/08.airborne/pubs/longbow.pdf
  41. https://elib.dlr.de/136628/1/Multichannel_W-Band_SAR_System_on_a_Multirotor_UAV_Platform_With_Real-Time_Data_Transmission_Capabilities.pdf
  42. https://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/dual-mode-brimstone-missile-proves-itself-in-combat/
  43. https://www.ship-technology.com/comment/why-w-band-radar-is-a-viable-supplement-to-gnss/
  44. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/an-apg-78.htm
  45. https://www.radartutorial.eu/11.coherent/co06.en.html
  46. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/how-artificial-intelligence-is-disrupting-radar-systems-designed-for-military-defense-ops-302521223.html
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10490592/
  48. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-microwave-and-wireless-technologies/article/technology-developments-for-a-largeformat-heterodyne-mmic-array-at-wband/93C107CA8340AB72A9D8999389EFB15B
  49. https://www.gb.nrao.edu/wfpa/sci_wfpa.pdf
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383808964_Automotive_W-Band_SAR_System_Construction_by_Using_77_GHz_FMCW_Radar_with_Stereo_Camera
  51. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/17/3323
  52. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atot/12/2/1520-0426_1995_012_0201_aeoagr_2_0_co_2.xml
  53. https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5799/2020/
  54. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9924714/
  55. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/21/5416
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224698954_Perspectives_of_W-Band_for_Space_Communications
  57. https://scispace.com/pdf/experimental-missions-in-w-band-a-small-leo-satellite-325wcsftuv.pdf
  58. https://connectivity.esa.int/news/first-wband-transmission-space
  59. https://www.iaf.fraunhofer.de/en/media-library/press-releases/esa-cubesat-demonstrates-worlds-first-75-ghz-beacon-and-safe-deorbit.html
  60. https://tda.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_report/42-154/154E.pdf
  61. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12567-025-00614-x
  62. https://www.satsig.net/satellite-links.htm
  63. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/starlink-files-for-30000-w-band-leo-satellites/
  64. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/space/Pages/WRC-23.aspx
  65. https://www.ceragon.com/what-is-5g-wireless-backhaul
  66. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-24-16A1.pdf
  67. https://bbcmag.com/momentum-growing-for-gigabit-wireless-access-and-backhaul-using-v-band-and-e-band-spectrum-4/
  68. https://www.ericsson.com/en/press-releases/3/2025/drei-and-ericsson-test-w-band-frequencies-to-enhance-urban-5g-connectivity
  69. https://www.thefastmode.com/technology-solutions/40644-drei-and-ericsson-test-w-band-frequencies-to-boost-urban-5g
  70. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-415049A1.pdf
  71. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/04/29/2024-05390/modernizing-and-expanding-access-to-the-708090-ghz-bands-report-and-order
  72. https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-21-14-16615
  73. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10056140/
  74. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-15
  75. https://www.ursi.org/proceedings/procGA21/papers/URSIGASS2021-We-F05-AM1-3.pdf
  76. https://jifco.defense.gov/Press-Room/Fact-Sheets/Article-View-Fact-sheets/Article/577989/active-denial-technology/
  77. https://digitalcommons.ndu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1043&context=defense-tech-papers
  78. https://www.amc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/785917/non-lethal-weapons-technology-demonstrated-on-macdill
  79. https://bundesstiftung-friedensforschung.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/berichtaltmann2.pdf
  80. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6297149.stm
  81. https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-10765863
  82. https://www.npr.org/2020/09/16/913748800/military-police-leaders-weighed-deploying-heat-ray-against-d-c-protesters
  83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0042207X13001516
  84. https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/122302/test-results-show-active-denial-system-as-nonlethal-weapon/
  85. https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/30885-solid-state-active-denial-techno
  86. https://patents.google.com/patent/US7784390B1/en
  87. https://www.dvidshub.net/news/511253/dod-demonstrates-nonlethal-directed-energy-prototypes
  88. https://www.highfrequencyelectronics.com/Mar12/1203_HFE_homelandSecurity.pdf
  89. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/4032/1/Close-range-high-resolution-W-band-radiometric-imaging-system-for/10.1117/12.391837.full
  90. https://www.mmw-sensors.org/millimetre-wave-security-screening.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.