Hubbry Logo
Walden TwoWalden TwoMain
Open search
Walden Two
Community hub
Walden Two
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Walden Two
Walden Two
Walden Two
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Walden Two is a utopian novel written by behavioral psychologist B. F. Skinner, first published in 1948. At that time, it was considered as science fiction since science-based methods for altering human behavior were not widespread.[1][2] Such methods are now known as applied behavior analysis. In this book B. F. Skinner is essentially putting forward his ideas as applied to practical everyday and communal problems, for instance how to raise children, balance work and life, or help people have happy and meaningful lives.

Key Information

The book is controversial because its characters speak of a rejection of free will,[3] including a rejection of the proposition that human behavior is controlled by a non-corporeal entity, such as a spirit or a soul.[4] It embraces the proposition that the behavior of organisms, including humans, is determined by environmental variables,[5] and that systematically altering environmental variables can generate a sociocultural system that very closely approximates utopia.[6]

Synopsis

[edit]

The first-person narrator and protagonist, Professor Burris, a university instructor of psychology, is approached by two young men (one a former student) in the late 1940s. The young men are recent veterans of World War II and, intrigued by utopianism, express interest in an old acquaintance of Burris, named T. E. Frazier, who in the 1930s founded an intentional community. Burris contacts Frazier, who invites them all to stay for several days to experience life in the supposedly utopian community. Venturing to the community, named Walden Two, the young men bring their girlfriends, and Professor Burris brings along his colleague Professor Castle, who teaches philosophy and ethics.

The rest of the book proceeds largely as a novel of ideas, mostly involving Frazier, a smug, talkative, and colorful character, guiding his new visitors around Walden Two and proudly explaining its socio-politico-economic structures and collectivist achievements. A wide range of intellectual topics—behavioral modification, political ethics, educational philosophy, sexual equality (specifically, advocacy for women in the workforce), the common good, historiography, freedom and free will, fascism, American democracy, and Soviet communism—is discussed and often debated among the self-satisfied Frazier, the skeptical and doubting Castle, and the quietly intrigued Burris.

Walden Two operates using a flexible design, by continually experimenting with the most successful, evidence-based strategies to organize the community. Praising Walden Two's decision-making system for not being authoritarian, anarchic, or even democratic, Frazier argues that Walden Two thus avoids the way that most societies collapse or grow dysfunctional: by remaining dogmatically rigid in their politics and social structure. Except for a small fluctuating group of community Planners (temporarily including Frazier), Walden Two has no real governing body or power to exercise violent force over its citizens. Each member is apparently self-motivated, with a relaxed work schedule of only four hours of work a day, on average. Any labor performed supports the common good and is accompanied by the freedom to select a fresh new place to work each day. Members then use their remaining free time to engage in creative, intellectual, or recreational activities of their own choosing, while automatically receiving ample food and sleep. The only currency is a simple system of points that buys greater leisure periods in exchange for less desirable forms of work. Certain radically unusual customs of Walden Two include: children raised communally, families being non-nuclear, free love, and personal expressions of thanks regarded as taboo. Such behavior is mandated by the community's individually self-enforced "Walden Code", a guideline that encourages members to credit all individual and other achievements to the larger community. Community counselors are also available to assist with better understanding and following the Code. A rigorous program of "behavioral engineering" is begun at birth and completed during childhood, yet the adults of Walden Two indeed appear to be legitimately peaceful, productive, happy, well-rounded, and self-directed people.

Excitedly, two of the young visitors sign up and are soon admitted as permanent members. Castle, though, has fostered a growing hunch that Frazier is somehow presenting a sham society or is in fact, secretly, a dictator. Defending the virtues of American-style democracy, he finally confronts Frazier directly, accusing him of despotism, though he has no definitive proof. Frazier rebuts, on the contrary, that the vision for Walden Two is as a place safe from all forms of despotism, even the "despotism of democracy". Frazier and Burris have pleasant talks in private, with Frazier revealing that other communities loosely associated with Walden Two have now cropped up. Although enticed by Walden Two's obvious success as a peaceful community, Burris finds it difficult to look past Frazier's irritating pride and boastfulness about the community. Frazier admits his pride but argues that his personality should not influence Burris's opinion of Walden Two and Burris's own observations. By the end of their stay, the remaining visitors leave the community in a mostly impressed state of wonder, except for Castle, who has stubbornly settled on the idea that, somehow, Frazier is a scoundrel and the community is fraudulent.

During the visitors' return to the university, Burris ultimately decides in an inspired moment that he wishes to fully embrace the Walden Two lifestyle. Quickly abandoning his professorial post, Burris travels back in a long and spiritually satisfying journey on foot; he is welcomed once again to Walden Two with open arms.

The community

[edit]

The novel describes "an experimental community called Walden Two".[7][8] The community is located in a rural area and "has nearly a thousand members".[9] The community encourages its members "to view every habit and custom with an eye to possible improvement" and to have "a constantly experimental attitude toward everything".[10] The culture of Walden Two can be changed if experimental evidence favors proposed changes. The community emulates (on a communal scale) the simple living and self-sufficiency that Henry David Thoreau practiced (on an individual scale) at Walden Pond, as described in his 1854 book Walden. Walden Two engages in behavioral engineering of young children that aims toward cooperative relationships and the erasure of competitive sentiments. The community has also dissolved the nuclear family through placing the responsibility of child-rearing in the hands of the larger community and not just the child's parents or immediate family.

Community governance

[edit]

Walden Two consists of four loose classes or groupings of people by occupation (though they are not akin to strict economic classes): Planners, Managers, Workers, and Scientists. Walden Two has a constitution that provides for a "Board of Planners", which is Walden Two's "only government",[11] though the power they wield only amounts to that, approximately, of community organizers. The idea for the "Board of Planners" was conceived while Walden Two was still in its earliest theoretical stages, and there are "six Planners, usually three men and three women",[11] who are "charged with the success of the community. They make policies, review the work of the Managers (heads of each area of labor), keep an eye on the state of the nation in general. They also have certain judicial functions."[11] A Planner "may serve for ten years, but no longer."[11] A vacancy on the Board of Planners is filled by the Board "from a pair of names supplied by the Managers".[11] Furthermore, the Walden Two constitution "can be changed by a unanimous vote of the Planners and a two-thirds vote of the Managers".[12]

Frazier and five other people constitute the current Board of Planners during Burris's visit to Walden Two. Planners hold office in staggered, limited terms. They do not rule with any kind of force and are so extremely opposed to creating a cult of personality, system of favoritism, or other possibilities for corruption going against the common good that they do not even publicly announce their office, and, likewise, most of the community members do not bother to know the Planners' identities. Due to this and also as a result of this, the Planners live as modestly as the other members of the community; ostentatious displays of wealth and status simply have no opportunity to arise from Walden Two's egalitarian cultural structure.

Managers, meanwhile, are "specialists in charge of the divisions and services of Walden Two".[11] A member of the community can "work up to be a Manager – through intermediate positions which carry a good deal of responsibility and provide the necessary apprenticeship".[13] The Managers are not elected by the members of Walden Two in any kind of democratic process.[13] The method of selecting Managers is not specified, though they are likely appointed by the Board of Planners.

The regular community members are known (though only for official reasons) as Workers, and they have the flexible option of changing their field and location of employment every single day, so as not to grow bored or stagnant during the week with their four-on-average daily hours of work. Available work often includes the necessary physical labor that goes into maintaining a community, such as basic building or repairing projects, cleaning duties, or agricultural work. Labor in Walden Two operates using a simple point system of units called "credits", in which more menial or unpleasant jobs (such as waste management) earn a Worker a higher number of credits than more relaxing or interesting jobs, ultimately allowing more free time for that Worker.

The final grouping within Walden Two is the Scientists, who conduct experiments "in plant and animal breeding, the control of infant behavior, educational processes of several sorts, and the use of some of [Walden Two's] raw materials".[14] Scientists are the least discussed group in the novel; little is said about the selection, total number, specific duties, or methods of the Scientists, though they presumably carry out the ongoing social experiments that help determine the most beneficial social strategies for the community.

Thoreau's Walden

[edit]

Walden Two's title is a direct reference to Henry David Thoreau's book Walden. In the novel, the Walden Two Community is mentioned as having the benefits of living in a place like Thoreau's Walden, but "with company". It is, as the book says, 'Walden for two'—meaning a place for achieving personal self-actualization, but within a vibrant community, rather than in a place of solitude. Originally, Skinner indicated that he wanted to title it The Sun is but a Morning Star, a quote of the last sentence of Thoreau's Walden,[citation needed] but the publishers suggested the current title as an alternative.[citation needed]

In theory and in practice, Thoreau's Walden Pond experiment and the fictive Walden Two experiment were very different from one another. For instance, Thoreau's book Walden espouses the virtues of self-reliance at the individual level, while Walden Two espouses

  1. the virtues of self-reliance at the community level, and
  2. Skinner's underlying premise that free will of the individual is weak compared to how environmental conditions shape behavior.

The cover of some editions of Walden Two shows the 'O' filled with yellow ink, with yellow lines radiating from the center of the 'O'. That Sun-like 'O' is an allusion to the proposition that The sun is but a morning star.[15]

News From Nowhere, 1984

[edit]

Skinner published a follow-up to Walden Two in an essay titled "News From Nowhere, 1984". It details the discovery of Eric Blair in the community who seeks out and meets Burris, confessing his true identity as George Orwell. Blair seeks out Frazier as the 'leader' and the two have discussions which comprise the essay. Blair was impressed by Walden Two's "lack of any institutionalized government, religion, or economic system", a state of affairs that embodied "the dream of nineteenth-century anarchism".[16]

Real-world efforts

[edit]

Many efforts to create a Walden Two in real life are detailed in Hilke Kuhlmann's Living Walden Two[17] and in Daniel W. Bjork's B.F. Skinner.[18]

Some of these efforts include:

  • 1953: In Lincoln, Massachusetts, a group of families from the MIT community, led by Ranulf (Rany) Gras and his wife Ann and inspired by Skinner's book, formed a corporation and built 23 homes on a 40-acre (16 ha) lot in what became known as the Brown's Wood neighborhood.[19]
  • 1955: In New Haven, Connecticut, a group led by Arthur Gladstone tried to start a community.
  • 1966: The Waldenwoods conference was held in Hartland, Michigan, comprising 83 adults and 4 children, coordinated through the Breiland list (a list of interested people who wrote to Skinner and were referred to Jim Breiland).
  • 1966: Matthew Israel formed the Association for Social Design (ASD), to promote a Walden Two,[20] which soon found chapters in Los Angeles, Albuquerque, and Washington, D.C.
  • 1967: Matthew Israel founded the Morningside House in Arlington, Massachusetts.[21] When it failed, he tried a second time.[22] Israel later went on to found the Judge Rotenberg Center, which has been condemned by the United Nations for the torture of children with disabilities.[23]
  • 1967: The Twin Oaks Community was started in Louisa County, Virginia.
  • 1969: Keith Miller in Lawrence, Kansas, founded a 'Walden house'[24] student collective that became the Sunflower House 11.
  • 1970: Walden 7, a 1,000-inhabitant community west of Barcelona (Spain), was created as a social and architectural experiment based on Walden Two, living in a building designed by Catalan architect Ricardo Bofill.
  • 1971: Roger Ulrich started "an experimental community named Lake Village in Kalamazoo, Michigan."[25][26]
  • 1971: Los Horcones was started in Hermosillo, Mexico.
  • 1971: Mary Louise Strum and David Nord started an experimental Jewish faith-based commune named "Jubilee Community" in Westphalia, Texas, based on Skinner's Walden Two utopian ideals.
  • 1972: Sunflower House 11 was (re)born in Lawrence, Kansas, from the previous experiment.
  • 1973: East Wind was started in south-central Missouri.[27]

Twin Oaks is detailed in Kat Kinkade's book, A Walden Two experiment: The first five years of Twin Oaks Community.[28] Originally started as a Walden Two community, it has since rejected its Walden Two position, however it still uses its modified Planner-Manager system as well as a system of labor credits based on the book.

Los Horcones does not use the Planner-Manager governance system described in Walden Two. They refer to their governance system as a "personocracy".[29] This system has been "developed through ongoing experimentation".[30] In contrast to Twin Oaks, Los Horcones "has remained strongly committed to an experimental science of human behavior and has described itself as the only true Walden Two community in existence."[31] In 1989, B. F. Skinner said that Los Horcones "comes closest to the idea of the 'engineered utopia' that he put forth in Walden Two".[32]

Cultural engineering

[edit]

Skinner wrote about cultural engineering in at least two books, devoting a chapter to it in both Science and Human Behavior and Beyond Freedom and Dignity. In Science and Human Behavior[33] a chapter is titled "Designing a Culture" and expands on this position as well as in other documents. In Beyond Freedom and Dignity there are many indirect references to Walden Two when describing other cultural designs.

Criticisms

[edit]

Hilke Kuhlmann's Living Walden Two possesses many subtle and not-so-subtle criticisms of the original Walden Two which are related to the actual efforts that arose from the novel. One criticism is that many of the founders of real-life Walden Twos identified with, or wanted to emulate, Frazier, the uncharismatic and implicitly despotic founder of the community.

In a critique of Walden Two, Harvey L. Gamble, Jr. asserted that Skinner's "fundamental thesis is that individual traits are shaped from above, by social forces that create the environment", and that Skinner's goal "is to create a frictionless society where individuals are properly socialized to function with others as a unit", and to thus "make the community [Walden Two] into a perfectly efficient anthill".[34] Gamble writes, "We find at the end of Walden Two that Frazier [a founding member of Walden Two]... has sole control over the political system and its policies. It is he who regulates food, work, education, and sleep, and who sets the moral and economic agenda."

There are several varieties of behaviorism, but only Skinner's radical behaviorism has proposed to redesign society. The relevant principles were expounded at length two decades later in Beyond Freedom and Dignity.

Walden Two was criticized in John Staddon's The New Behaviorism.[35] Skinner thought Walden Two an accomplishment comparable to two science-fiction classics: Aldous Huxley's Brave New World (1931) and George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949). He assigned all three in his Nat Sci 114 introductory psychology course at Harvard. There is some irony in Skinner's choice, because Orwell's and Huxley's novels are both dystopias. They portray not the supposed benefits of a technological approach to human society, but the evil consequences of either coercive (Nineteen Eighty-Four) or stealthy (Brave New World) efforts to control or gentle human beings. On the contrary, Walden Two is supposed to light the technological path to utopia.

Skinner's Walden proposal is in a tradition that goes back to Plato's philosopher king: a 'legislator' (monarch) and a set of guardians who are wiser than the common people. The guardians "are to be a class apart, like the Jesuits in old Paraguay, the ecclesiastics in the States of the Church until 1870 and the Communist Party in the U.S.S.R. at the present day," wrote Bertrand Russell, one of Skinner's heroes, in 1946. Not too different from Walden Two's Managers and Planners, and Frazier, Skinner's avatar and leader of the community. Skinner was quite explicit about the need for technocratic rule: "We must delegate control of the population as a whole to specialists – to police, priests, teachers, therapies, and so on, with their specialized reinforcers and their codified contingencies."[36]

Publication details

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Walden Two

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
is a utopian by American , first published in 1948, that portrays a self-sustaining experimental governed by principles of rather than coercive authority or monetary incentives. The narrative unfolds as a among visitors touring the community, led by its founder Frazier, who explains how and positive schedules produce cooperative behavior, high productivity, and personal fulfillment among residents, eschewing punishment, , and hierarchical leadership. Skinner drew from his behaviorist research to envision a society where human actions are shaped predictably through contingencies of , aiming to demonstrate that happiness and social harmony could be engineered scientifically without reliance on traditional moral or political systems.
The novel's core premise rests on , positing that all behavior is environmentally determined and modifiable via selective , rejecting innate drives or as explanatory fictions. Key features include communal child-rearing to instill prosocial habits early, labor credits redeemable for leisure rather than wages, and experimental practices to continually refine practices based on observable outcomes. Despite its optimistic portrayal, Walden Two sparked debates over its implications for individual , with critics arguing that such behavioral control resembles subtle , though Skinner maintained it promotes through effective design over aversive control. The work influenced attempts to establish real-world communes, such as Twin Oaks in , founded in 1967 explicitly on its model, though many such efforts faced practical challenges in sustaining Skinner's idealized contingencies.

Publication and Historical Context

Publication History

Walden Two was first published on August 20, 1948, by the Macmillan Company in New York as a edition consisting of 266 pages in format with black cloth binding. The originated from a draft Skinner composed during the summer of 1945, initially titled The Sun Is But a Morning Star, before undergoing revisions and facing multiple publisher rejections prior to Macmillan's acceptance. The first edition's was designed by F.G. Kuttner, and Skinner agreed to certain conditions from the publisher to secure its release, reflecting the era's toward behaviorist utopian . Following its initial printing, the book saw limited immediate reprints but experienced renewed interest in the , prompting a revised edition in 1976 by Macmillan that included minor updates while preserving the original text. This 1976 version formed the basis for subsequent reissues, including Hackett Publishing Company's 2005 edition, which has remained in print and contributed to the novel's ongoing academic availability. No major textual alterations have appeared across editions, maintaining Skinner's vision of a behaviorally engineered society.

B.F. Skinner's Background and Influences

Burrhus Frederic Skinner was born on March 20, 1904, in Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, into a stable family environment; his father worked as a lawyer and his mother as a homemaker, with Skinner having one younger brother. He attended Hamilton College, graduating in 1926 with an initial aspiration to pursue writing professionally, but after struggling to publish, he shifted focus to psychology, enrolling at Harvard University in 1928. There, under the guidance of physiologist William Crozier, Skinner earned his master's degree in 1930 and Ph.D. in experimental psychology in 1931, remaining as a researcher until 1936. His early experiments involved observing rat behavior in controlled environments, leading to the invention of the operant conditioning chamber, known as the Skinner box, which isolated environmental variables to study reinforcement effects. Skinner's scientific influences stemmed primarily from behaviorist predecessors, including Ivan Pavlov's demonstrations of through stimulus-response associations and Edward Thorndike's , which linked behavior to satisfying consequences. However, Skinner diverged by emphasizing operant , where voluntary actions are shaped by subsequent reinforcements rather than antecedent stimuli, as detailed in his 1938 book The Behavior of Organisms. This approach rejected internal mental states as explanatory, focusing instead on observable, environmentally contingent behaviors—a that critiqued John B. Watson's stimulus-response model for overlooking the organism's active role. During , Skinner's work on , training birds to guide missiles via conditioned pecking responses, reinforced his belief in scaling behavioral principles to complex systems, foreshadowing societal applications. Philosophically, Skinner embraced , asserting that human actions arise from prior causes in and environment, without autonomous , as he argued that "human behavior as a whole is fully determined" by such factors. This view, informed by and instrumentalist thinkers like , prioritized prediction and control over introspective or metaphysical explanations, enabling the utopian engineering in Walden Two where community practices are designed to foster desirable behaviors through arranged contingencies rather than appeals to or . Skinner's rejection of "autonomous man" as a cultural underpinned the novel's vision of cultural design as an extension of operant principles to eliminate maladaptive reinforcements from conventional societies.

Initial Reception

Upon its publication in 1948 by Macmillan, Walden Two encountered several publisher rejections and garnered a mixed initial response, with limited sales and scant widespread attention. Early reviewers, such as Miles A. in a 1949 assessment, expressed uncertainty about Skinner's intent, noting that "the careful reader will wonder whether the author of Walden Two is serious, or whether he is writing with his tongue in his cheek." While some acknowledged the novel's imaginative exploration of behavioral principles applied to society, others critiqued its depiction of engineered harmony as veering toward dystopian , questioning the feasibility and of such deterministic control over . The book received brief notices in outlets like and Sociology and Social Research in 1948, but it failed to achieve significant readership or debate among psychologists or the public at the time, remaining largely overlooked until renewed interest in utopian experiments during the era. This initial muted reception reflected broader skepticism toward behaviorism's extension into , amid post-World War II concerns over technocratic control echoing totalitarian regimes.

Narrative Structure and Content

Plot Synopsis

Walden Two is structured as a series of dialogues recounting a visit to an experimental utopian of approximately 1,000 residents, founded on principles of behavioral engineering. The narrative begins when two recent veterans, Rogers (Rodge) and Steve Jamnik, approach their former professor, T.E. Burris, seeking information about Walden Two, a mentioned in passing during a . Burris, intrigued, arranges a three-day visit and invites his colleague, Augustine , a skeptic of applied ; the group is completed by the veterans' girlfriends, Barbara and Mary. Upon arrival by train and bus, the visitors are greeted by T.E. Frazier, the community's founder and chief designer, who serves as their guide. The tour reveals a self-sufficient society with communal dwellings, shared dining halls, and nurseries emphasizing early behavioral conditioning through positive reinforcement rather than . Residents work only four hours daily, earning labor credits that equalize effort across tasks—less desirable jobs yield more credits to encourage participation—eliminating traditional wages and . Children are raised collectively, separated from parents after infancy, with integrated into practical activities and designed to foster cooperation and adaptability via experimental methods. The planners, a small group of rotating leaders, make decisions based on empirical data and behavioral observations, eschewing democratic voting in favor of to maximize and . Throughout the visit, debates ensue between Frazier, who defends the community's deterministic framework rejecting in favor of environmental control, and Castle, who charges it with subtle tyranny and . Burris remains ambivalent, probing Frazier on topics like child-rearing, pursuits (including music and sports without ), and the absence of or traditional authority. Visitors participate briefly in tasks, such as cleaning windows, experiencing the egalitarian labor system firsthand. In the conclusion, reactions diverge: and Mary elect to join, citing the appealing lifestyle; Barbara and Rogers depart unconvinced; dismisses it outright. Burris initially leaves but, as Frazier predicts based on behavioral analysis, returns to become a member. The frames the account as Burris's retrospective notes, discussed with Frazier, underscoring the community's ongoing .

Community Design and Daily Operations

Walden Two's community is designed to house approximately 1,000 members in buildings constructed from and stone, arranged in interconnected wings and levels that conform to the natural landscape for functional efficiency and weather protection. Key features include elevated passageways such as "The Ladder," which provides scenic views and rest alcoves, and covered corridors like "The Walk" to minimize congestion, alongside recreational elements like a reclaimed for and surrounding gardens. The layout emphasizes behavioral influences through , integrating work, living, and leisure spaces to promote and reduce conflict. Organizationally, the community operates without traditional government or elections, relying instead on a hierarchy of six Planners (three men and three women, serving up to 10 years) who set policies and review operations, nominated by Managers and approved internally. Managers oversee specialized divisions such as health, food, arts, and education, functioning as the most diligent workers while coordinating Scientists for problem-solving and Workers for general tasks. This structure prioritizes experimental adaptation over democratic processes, with Planners exempt from routine labor but required to earn credits through physical and intellectual contributions. Daily operations center on a labor system requiring about four hours of work per day, yielding 1,200 credits annually per member, with credits scaled by task difficulty—higher for unpleasant duties like sewer maintenance and lower for enjoyable ones like —to ensure equitable distribution without monetary exchange. All are provided freely, supported by efficient production, minimal consumption, and technological aids that stagger schedules for work, meals, and recreation to prevent overcrowding. Meals occur in specialized dining halls with ergonomic designs, such as elliptical trays for , fostering social interaction without hierarchy. Education and child-rearing emphasize communal nurturing from infancy, with infants in cubicles progressing to dormitories by ages 5–6 and private rooms by 13, guided by behavioral techniques to instill and through graded challenges rather than . Instruction occurs in laboratories, workshops, and reading rooms instead of traditional classrooms, focusing on learning methods without grades or forced curricula; advancement depends on individual readiness, aiming to eliminate competitive or negative emotions like . integrates arts, 50-minute concerts, and crafts, reinforced by a "Walden Code" promoting direct expression (e.g., voicing openly) and prohibiting , alongside preventive practices to sustain overall .

Key Characters and Dialogues

The novel's narrative centers on a tour of Walden Two led by its founder, T.E. Frazier, a behavioral engineer who expounds the community's principles of experimental design and positive reinforcement to achieve social harmony. Frazier serves as the primary advocate for the utopian model, emphasizing practical control of environments over abstract ideals. The tour group includes Professor Burris, the first-person narrator and a psychology professor who initiates the visit and gradually becomes persuaded by the community's efficacy, ultimately deciding to join. Also present is Augustine , a philosophy professor who acts as Frazier's intellectual foil, persistently challenging the community's rejection of autonomy, punishment, and traditional motivation structures. The visiting couples—Steve Jamnik and his wife Mary, along with Rogers (often called Rodge) and his fiancée Barbara—represent potential recruits disillusioned with external society; Steve and Mary commit to staying, while Rodge is swayed but Barbara remains hesitant. These characters largely observe and react, providing contrast to the dominant exchanges among Frazier, Castle, and Burris, which drive the philosophical content through Socratic-style debates during walks and meals. Central dialogues pit Frazier's behaviorist determinism against Castle's advocacy for individual agency and . Frazier asserts, "I deny that freedom exists at all," arguing that perceived arises from environments shaped by positive rather than or innate volition. Castle counters by accusing the system of subtle , questioning how labor credits and controlled choices—such as four hours of daily work yielding access to —avoid manipulation, to which Frazier replies that such designs minimize and maximize voluntary participation. On , Frazier rejects grades and competition as "administrative devices which do violence to the nature of the developmental process," favoring and environmental shaping; Castle worries this stifles exceptional achievement, prompting Frazier to claim the community fosters talents through tailored opportunities rather than rivalry. Further exchanges address and daily practices, with Frazier describing non-punitive "planners" who rotate anonymously to avoid power concentration, dismissing Castle's fears of hidden control by noting, "You can't propagandize and experiment at the same time." Burris often mediates, probing scientific validity, such as the empirical basis for averting through ongoing experimentation. These debates underscore the novel's core tension: Frazier's empirical optimism for engineered happiness versus Castle's defense of humanistic unpredictability, unresolved as Burris reflects on both positions' merits without full reconciliation.

Scientific and Philosophical Foundations

Behaviorism and Operant Conditioning

Walden Two embodies B. F. Skinner's , a framework asserting that arises from environmental contingencies rather than unobservable mental processes or . Published in , the novel depicts an experimental community where social structures are engineered to manipulate these contingencies systematically, promoting adaptive behaviors through observable and modifiable external stimuli. Skinner's approach rejects traditional notions of , positing instead that societal harmony emerges from designing environments that naturally elicit cooperative and productive actions. Central to the community's operations is , Skinner's experimental methodology for altering behavior via consequences—primarily positive reinforcement to increase the probability of desired responses. In the novel, residents' daily activities, such as labor and leisure, are structured around reinforcement schedules; for instance, productive work yields "labor credits" redeemable for personal time, thereby boosting efficiency and voluntary participation without mandates. This system exemplifies Skinner's emphasis on consequences shaping behavior, as articulated in his foundational work on the , where reinforcers like leisure or social approval strengthen habits over time. Environmental features, including and energy-efficient housing, further embed contingencies that reward resource conservation and communal effort. Child-rearing in Walden Two applies operant principles from infancy, utilizing communal nurseries with climate-controlled "air cribs" and group settings to reinforce , , and intellectual curiosity through consistent , eschewing or familial isolation. Skinner advocated this non-punitive model to cultivate habits amenable to continuous , as reflected in the planners' : "We encourage our people to view every habit and custom with an eye to possible ." By minimizing aversive controls like or penalties, the community achieves low conflict and high well-being, demonstrating Skinner's belief that enables scalable social engineering grounded in empirical data rather than ideological appeals.

Cultural Engineering Principles

In Walden Two, cultural engineering refers to the systematic design and modification of social practices through the application of behavioral principles, aiming to foster individual and collective well-being without reliance on punitive measures or appeals to . The community operates as an experimental pilot, where practices are conjectured, implemented, and refined based on observed consequences, prioritizing long-term over short-term expediency. This approach draws from , positing that behaviors and cultural norms emerge from environmental contingencies rather than innate drives or . Central to this is an empirical, iterative akin to scientific selection: practices are tested for their capacity to yield positive outcomes, such as reduced conflict or enhanced , and discarded if they fail to do so. Frazier, the community's founder-figure, embodies this by advocating an of perpetual experimentation—"Regard no practice as immutable. Experiment"—ensuring adaptations to emerging needs, like staggered schedules for meals and work to minimize crowding and friction. is accelerated deliberately, selecting practices that provide greater overall reinforcement and adaptability, much as favors viable traits in organisms. A rotating board of planners oversees this process, functioning not as authoritarian rulers but as facilitators who on practice efficacy and promote equity in resource distribution and labor. Governance emphasizes counter-control and democratic input to avert , with stability derived from non-coercive arrangements that align individual behaviors with group success, such as communal child-rearing to instill early. Planners avoid imposing immutable doctrines, instead fostering a culture where members contribute to refinement, exemplified by labor credits that reward voluntary effort while capping work at approximately four hours daily. Positive reinforcement dominates, with environments engineered to make prosocial behaviors inherently rewarding—through meaningful tasks, ample leisure, and group contingencies—while eschewing , which Skinner viewed as counterproductive for sustaining . Specific practices include climate-controlled nurseries for infant development, clear glass dishware to encourage tidiness via visibility, and training in to build resilience against aversive stimuli. These target both individual health (e.g., self-management for aging) and social harmony (e.g., free norms reducing ), yielding outcomes like low rates and high member satisfaction in the fictional design. This framework rejects traditional appeals to morality or leadership, substituting causal analysis of behavior-environment interactions for cultural redesign, as Skinner argued that advancing behavioral knowledge enables societies to supplant failing political structures with evidence-based alternatives. While presented as utopian, the principles underscore determinism in cultural dynamics, where "success" is measured by empirical metrics of reinforcement density and societal persistence rather than subjective ideals.

Determinism and Rejection of Free Will

In Walden Two, presents a philosophical foundation rooted in , positing that is fully determined by environmental contingencies and historical reinforcements rather than any autonomous inner agency. This framework rejects the traditional notion of as an illusion, arguing instead that what is perceived as voluntary action emerges from shaped behavioral repertoires selected through consequences. , through the character Frazier—the community's planner—asserts that denying is essential to the utopian design, as it enables systematic control via positive reinforcement to foster desirable outcomes without reliance on or . Frazier explicitly states, "I deny that freedom exists at all. I must deny it—or my program would be absurd. You can't have a rational plan for the future. Hence the importance of the educational program planned at Walden Two, and hence the great effort it will take to get traditional people to cooperate." This "hard determinism" view, elaborated in the novel's discussions (particularly Chapters 29–31), holds that all actions are causally necessitated by prior conditions, rendering moral responsibility for "choices" untenable since individuals do not originate their behaviors independently. Critics within the narrative, such as Castle, counter that this eliminates genuine autonomy, equating the community to a controlled mechanism devoid of true agency, yet Frazier redefines freedom as the maximization of positive behavioral options through environmental design, not libertarian indeterminacy. Skinner's approach aligns with operant conditioning principles, where reinforcements predictably alter probabilities of behavior recurrence, obviating any need for free will in explaining or engineering social harmony. Empirical support for this draws from Skinner's experimental work, such as pigeon studies demonstrating shaped responses via schedules of reinforcement, extrapolated to human societies in Walden Two. The novel thus advocates "cultural engineering" as a deterministic alternative to chaotic traditional governance, where unintended controls (e.g., via governments or markets) are supplanted by deliberate, scientifically informed ones to enhance well-being. This stance has drawn philosophical objection for undermining personal accountability, though Skinner maintained that recognizing determinism liberates society from ineffective punitive systems.

Comparative Analysis

Allusions to Thoreau's Walden

The title Walden Two (1948) directly alludes to Henry David Thoreau's Walden; or, Life in the Woods (1854), which chronicled Thoreau's two-year experiment in simple, self-reliant living at Walden Pond from July 4, 1845, to September 6, 1847. B.F. Skinner, the novel's author, explicitly framed Thoreau's work as "Walden One," portraying it as a successful but limited solution to individual existence amid societal pressures, while Walden Two proposes a scalable communal alternative governed by empirical behavioral design rather than personal introspection. Skinner initially preferred titling the book The Sun Is But a Morning Star, drawn from the concluding line of Thoreau's Walden—"The sun is but a morning star, which cannot be darkened by the night"—symbolizing renewal and possibility, but his publisher opted for the evocative "Walden Two" to highlight the sequential progression. Skinner admired Thoreau's premises that no societal arrangement is inevitable, that customs warrant scrutiny, and that deliberate change can yield improvement, principles he echoed in Walden Two's rejection of traditional economics, education, and governance. However, the allusion underscores stark contrasts: Thoreau's transcendentalist emphasis on solitary communion with nature, minimalism, and inner autonomy clashes with Skinner's behaviorist vision of a planner-controlled community of approximately 1,000 members, where reinforcements shape conduct collectively, eschewing individualism for engineered harmony. Skinner carried Thoreau's Walden during his formative years and addressed the Thoreau Society in 1973, positioning his utopia as an extension that addresses Thoreau's isolation by applying scientific contingencies to group dynamics, though critics note this supplants Thoreau's voluntary simplicity with deterministic control. Within Walden Two, character Frazier invokes Thoreauvian simplicity—such as reduced possessions to avoid "things owning you"—but repurposes it through , where labor is gamified via point systems and maximized via efficiency, inverting Thoreau's manual self-sufficiency into automated plenty. This thematic nod critiques conventional "quiet desperation" (a phrase Thoreau used for unexamined lives) by offering behavioral redesign over philosophical withdrawal, yet Skinner's framework prioritizes environmental causation over Thoreau's faith in innate , reflecting behaviorism's rejection of unobservable mental states.

Parallels and Contrasts with Other Utopian/Dystopian Literature

Walden Two shares thematic parallels with Aldous Huxley's (1932) in its depiction of a scientifically engineered society that prioritizes stability over individual autonomy, employing early conditioning to shape behavior and eliminate disruptive institutions like the and . Both narratives feature communities where is communal, serves ideological rather than , and is structured to prevent dissatisfaction, reflecting a deterministic view that human happiness derives from environmental design rather than innate drives. However, Skinner contrasts sharply with Huxley by portraying his community as a voluntary, positive achievement through and positive , eschewing Huxley's dystopian elements such as genetic castes, pervasive use for pacification, and hedonistic infantilism, which Huxley intended as a cautionary on dehumanizing control. In comparison to George Orwell's (1949), published the same year, Walden Two illustrates "soft" behavioral engineering via planners who guide society through experimental adjustments and incentive systems, without overt , , or ideological indoctrination by force, which define Orwell's totalitarian . Skinner's emphasizes cooperative labor quotas, shared childcare, and cultural practices that foster contentment—such as rotating jobs and immediate feedback on behavior—contrasting Orwell's emphasis on perpetual conflict, , and as mechanisms for suppressing dissent, thereby highlighting Walden Two's reliance on consent and empirical refinement over coercion. Walden Two also echoes earlier utopian literature like Thomas More's Utopia (1516) in advocating communal property, limited work hours (four hours daily in Walden Two versus six in More's isle), and elected governance without hereditary rulers, but diverges by grounding its design in empirical behaviorism rather than moral philosophy or divine order, rejecting More's tolerance of slavery and religious pluralism in favor of atheism and uniform cultural engineering. Unlike dystopias such as Yevgeny Zamyatin's We (1921), which critiques mathematical rationalism leading to transparent surveillance and collective identity erasure, Skinner's work presents transparency and collectivism as liberating, with private spaces and personal relationships intact, positioning Walden Two as a behaviorally optimized harmony rather than a mechanized oppression. These distinctions underscore scholarly classifications of Walden Two as utopian—achieving happiness through design—versus the cautionary dystopias that expose control's perils.

Real-World Implementations

Experimental Communities Inspired by the Novel

The publication of in spurred interest in applying its behaviorist principles to real-world communal living, leading to the establishment of approximately three dozen experimental communities during the and . These groups sought to implement elements such as communal property ownership, labor credit systems to distribute work equitably, reinforcement-based behavior shaping, and democratic or planner-manager governance structures modeled after the novel's descriptions. While varying in fidelity to Skinner's vision, they emphasized experimental design, data-driven adjustments to social practices, and rejection of traditional economic incentives like wages. Twin Oaks Community in , founded in by Kathleen Kinkade and seven others, stands as the most prominent and enduring example. Drawing directly from Walden Two, its charter initially mandated a weekly labor quota equivalent to 42 hours, tracked via credits similar to the novel's system, with work diversified across , , and services to foster self-sufficiency and behavioral reinforcement through positive outcomes like leisure time. The community experimented with planners and managers for , echoing the novel's non-electoral , though it later adopted a more consensus-based model amid ideological shifts. By 2023, Twin Oaks housed around 100 members and sustained itself through businesses like production and indexing, but had diversified beyond strict to include egalitarian and income-sharing principles. Los Horcones, established in 1973 near , , , by behavior analysts including Javier Virues-Ortega, represents a closer adherence to Skinner's scientific framework. The community applies principles systematically, using data collection and reinforcement contingencies to shape behaviors in child-rearing, labor allocation, and , with communal and property reflecting Walden Two's emphasis on environmental control over individual . Grounded in behaviorology—a radical extension of Skinner's ideas—it maintains hierarchical elements tied to expertise in behavioral , distinguishing it from more democratic experiments, and has persisted for over five decades with a focus on empirical validation of practices. Other short-lived or evolved groups included Sunflower House, a 1969 student in , initiated by psychologist , which incorporated token economies and behavioral contracts for household tasks before transitioning to standard co-op operations. , founded in 1974 in Missouri's by former Twin Oaks members, initially adopted Walden Two's planner-manager system and labor credits but later emphasized secular and businesses like nut butters, diverging from behaviorist orthodoxy. These efforts collectively tested the novel's premises through trial-and-error, often revealing tensions between theoretical design and practical human dynamics.

Empirical Outcomes and Failures

Twin Oaks Community, established in , in June 1967 by a small group explicitly inspired by Walden Two, represents the most prominent and enduring attempt to apply Skinner's behavioral principles on a communal scale. With a current membership fluctuating around 90-110 adults, it has sustained operations for over 55 years through egalitarian labor systems, including weekly labor credits allocated across diverse enterprises like production and indexing services, achieving partial economic self-sufficiency. However, empirical assessments reveal high membership turnover, with studies indicating that work motivation tied to communal incentives often fails to retain long-term residents, as many depart after initial enthusiasm wanes due to interpersonal conflicts and rigid equality quotas. Los Horcones, founded in 1973 in , , by behaviorist enthusiasts, has maintained a smaller scale of approximately 20-30 members while adhering more closely to Skinner's model through token economies, hierarchical planning, and in daily and education, including programs for autism treatment based on . This community reports low turnover, attributing stability to integrated family structures, religious elements, and consistent reinforcement of behavioral norms, which have enabled persistence without the democratic dilutions seen elsewhere. Yet, its isolation and limited growth—spanning only five decades with minimal expansion—underscore challenges in scalability, as external economic pressures and cultural resistance have confined its influence to niche applications rather than broader societal transformation. Earlier efforts, such as Lake Village in (circa 1965) and Sunflower House in (late 1960s), collapsed within months to a few years due to failures in implementing non-coercive behavioral control, exacerbated by leadership disputes and insufficient economic viability amid the era's countercultural flux. Across these implementations, common failures stem from individual demands for clashing with deterministic engineering, leading to dissent and exodus; most communes exhibited dissolution rates exceeding 90% within a , contrasting with mainstream societal structures. While survivors like Twin Oaks and Los Horcones demonstrate viability through adaptive compromises—such as incorporating non-behaviorist influences like or —no rigorous, comparative data confirms superior outcomes in metrics like resident or productivity relative to conventional communities, highlighting the model's practical limitations in fostering voluntary, large-scale adherence.

Criticisms and Controversies

Philosophical Critiques on Autonomy and Agency

Philosophers have critiqued Walden Two for its radical behaviorist denial of individual , positing that human actions arise solely from environmental contingencies and reinforcements rather than from endogenous agency or deliberate choice. In the , Frazier asserts that concepts like and an "inner man" are illusions perpetuated to assign credit for successes while evading responsibility for failures, with all behavior shaped predictably through . This deterministic framework, critics argue, erodes the foundational basis for , as individuals cannot be held accountable for traits or decisions not originating from self-directed volition but from external manipulations by planners. A primary objection centers on the novel's endorsement of "total control" over character development, where surface-level freedoms—such as voluntary participation in routines—mask deeper of preferences and beliefs via selective , rendering genuine illusory. Philosopher , in analyzing Skinner's vision, contends that this approach conflates behavioral predictability with the elimination of agency, ignoring the human capacity for reflective that underpins ethical life; without such agency, concepts like consent or personal growth become incoherent, as residents' apparent choices are preordained by designers. Similarly, literary critic lambasted Skinner for rejecting the autonomous individual, arguing that Walden Two's sacrifices human by conditioning away the unpredictability essential to , likening it to dystopian mechanisms that prioritize collective efficiency over personal sovereignty. Further critiques highlight a performative contradiction in Skinner's determinism: if agency is nonexistent, the novel's advocacy for behavioral engineering lacks normative force, as planners' designs and residents' endorsements stem from uncontrollable antecedents rather than reasoned endorsement. This undermines the utopian claim of superior well-being, as it precludes evaluating the society against alternatives chosen by autonomous agents; instead, it presupposes a paternalistic hierarchy where "good" outcomes are defined unilaterally by controllers, bypassing individual agency in moral or existential domains. Such views, echoed in broader philosophical resistance to strict behaviorism, maintain that empirical evidence of human deliberation—evident in resistance to conditioning within experimental communities inspired by Skinner—affirms agency as causally efficacious, not merely epiphenomenal.

Scientific Validity and Empirical Shortcomings

Walden Two posits a society engineered through the , relying on via positive reinforcement to foster cooperation, happiness, and efficiency while minimizing punishment and conflict. This approach assumes that can be fully predicted and controlled by manipulating environmental contingencies, dismissing innate cognitive structures or genetic influences as primary drivers. However, from subsequent has challenged the universality of these claims, highlighting radical behaviorism's inability to account for complex internal processes. A key shortcoming lies in radical behaviorism's rejection of mental states and , which empirical studies in have demonstrated play causal roles in behavior. Chomsky's 1959 critique of Skinner's Verbal Behavior argued that cannot be explained solely through reinforcement schedules, as children produce novel sentences beyond any prior conditioning, supported by evidence of innate linguistic universals. Neuroscientific findings since the 1970s, including brain imaging studies, reveal that decision-making involves activity reflecting internal representations and planning, not reducible to external reinforcements alone. Skinner's framework underemphasized , yet twin studies indicate estimates of 40-80% for traits like intelligence and personality, which resist environmental shaping at scale. Operant conditioning proves effective for discrete behaviors, as in for autism, where reinforcement schedules yield measurable improvements in targeted skills. Yet extrapolating this to societal design falters empirically: token economies in psychiatric institutions, akin to Walden Two's reinforcement systems, succeeded short-term under strict control but disintegrated upon relaxing contingencies, with relapse rates exceeding 50% due to unmodeled variables like motivation and social dynamics. Attempts at behaviorist communities inspired by the novel, such as Twin Oaks, deviated from pure operant principles, incorporating democratic elements and to sustain viability, underscoring the impracticality of total environmental control in human groups. The novel's aversion to aversive control ignores causal evidence that negative consequences, including , are integral to ; anthropological data from non-utopian societies show deterrence mechanisms reduce deviance more reliably than reinforcement alone in large populations. Walden Two's predictive claims lack longitudinal empirical validation, as no controlled experiments have demonstrated scalable, self-sustaining behaviorist utopias without external subsidies or ideological drift. These gaps reflect behaviorism's strength in micro-level interventions but empirical overreach when applied to macro-social , where emergent complexities—such as and —defy deterministic conditioning.

Ethical and Political Concerns

Critics of Walden Two have raised ethical concerns that the community's reliance on to shape behavior from infancy undermines individual and , reducing humans to entities whose preferences and actions are predetermined by environmental design rather than self-directed choice. This approach, while avoiding overt in favor of positive reinforcement, is argued to erode genuine agency by preempting unpredictability and personal struggle, which are seen as essential for and authentic . Philosopher Joseph Wood Krutch, for instance, critiqued the novel's dismissal of purpose, mind, and inner as enabling manipulative control over thought and emotion, potentially dehumanizing residents under the pretext of engineered . Politically, the novel's governance model—eschewing democratic voting for decisions by appointed planners who experimentally adjust social contingencies—invites accusations of technocratic , where an like founder Frazier imposes a singular vision of the good life without mechanisms for genuine or . Although Skinner portrayed Walden Two as anarchist, lacking a central and relying on self-sustaining cultural practices, analyses highlight decisive political inequalities, such as unequal influence over , that diverge from anarchist principles of non-domination and self-management. This structure contrasts sharply with liberal , fostering fears of by design, as behaviors incompatible with communal harmony are conditioned out rather than debated or tolerated. Early reviewers like Philip Jessup warned in 1948 that implementing such behavioral technologies could alter Western civilization more disastrously than atomic weapons, prioritizing collective engineering over historical contingency and personal liberty. Later utopian scholars, including Lyman Tower Sargent, have interpreted the community as a , where the absence of adversity leads to stagnation and the subtle tyranny of preemptive control, sacrificing ethical depth for superficial stability. These concerns underscore a causal tension: while Skinner's posits that all is environmentally controlled anyway, critics contend that consciously centralizing this control invites abuse by those defining "success," absent empirical safeguards against power concentration.

Legacy and Modern Evaluation

Impact on Psychology and Behavioral Science

Walden Two (1948) extended B.F. Skinner's principles to societal engineering, advocating an experimental approach to through and positive reinforcement, which influenced behavioral psychologists to prioritize empirical testing of social contingencies over traditional . This vision contributed to the emergence of (ABA) in the 1960s, where interventions target health, education, and community issues by manipulating antecedents and consequences to foster adaptive behaviors, as seen in treatments for autism and the Teaching-Family Model for juvenile rehabilitation. ABA's focus on verifiable outcomes reflects Skinner's call for a "constantly experimental attitude" toward habits and customs, validating the novel's emphasis on data-driven societal improvement. The novel's portrayal of reinforcement schedules in daily life, such as labor credits and incentives, inspired behavioral scientists to explore large-scale applications, including systems analysis, which uses to enhance productivity via self-managed teams and performance-based pay systems implemented in over 170 organizations. Experimental communities like Twin Oaks, founded in 1967, and Los Horcones applied these principles, yielding empirical data on cooperative but highlighting challenges in sustaining utopian contingencies without economic viability. These efforts provided behavioral with real-world case studies, demonstrating both the feasibility of positive for prosocial behaviors and the limits of ignoring individual variability. Modern evaluations position Walden Two as an antecedent to , with its depiction of community practices fostering , positive emotions through engagement, and character strengths like persistence and fairness via behavioral shaping, predating formal positive psychology by decades. Unlike Skinner's broader , which faced critique for neglecting , the novel's focus on empirically supported environmental designs for happiness aligns with contemporary interventions emphasizing automaticity in virtue development, bridging and strength-based approaches. However, its deterministic framework spurred debates in , contributing to the cognitive revolution's emphasis on internal processes, though ABA's persistence in clinical settings underscores enduring empirical utility.

Contemporary Critiques and Relevance

Contemporary evaluations of Walden Two emphasize its philosophical overreach in positing a fully engineered society devoid of individual agency, with critics like Anthony Burgess in 1982 decrying Skinner's dismissal of free will as enabling dystopian control mechanisms akin to those in A Clockwork Orange. This view aligns with broader rejections of radical behaviorism, as advancements in neuroscience and genetics since the 1970s have demonstrated persistent innate predispositions and cognitive autonomy that environmental shaping alone cannot override, rendering the novel's totalistic model empirically implausible. Ethical concerns persist regarding the potential for authoritarian drift, as Skinner himself conceded in 1970 interviews the absence of safeguards against malevolent leadership co-opting behavioral controls, a risk amplified in analyses of the novel's planner-centric governance. Real-world implementations, such as the Twin Oaks community established in 1967 explicitly drawing from Walden Two's principles of labor credits and positive reinforcement, illustrate these shortcomings: while surviving over five decades with adaptations like reduced emphasis on strict behaviorism, Twin Oaks has grappled with interpersonal conflicts and theoretical rigidity, with internal assessments noting human behavior's resistance to uniform conditioning protocols. Most other inspired communes dissolved within years, underscoring scalability failures tied to overlooked motivational variances and external economic pressures. Despite these critiques, Walden Two retains relevance in applied behavioral sciences, informing modern practices like in addiction treatment and token economies in organizational settings, where selective yields measurable outcomes without utopian overclaims. Parallels to emerge in the novel's advocacy for structured leisure and well-being optimization, as noted in 2018 analyses linking Skinner's happiness metrics to contemporary research. In 2024 discussions within behavior analysis, the text prompts reevaluation of systemic reinforcements for societal design, though tempered by evidence-based caveats against wholesale societal redesign.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2778813/
  2. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/walden-two-b-f-skinner
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2223170/
  4. https://www.twinoaks.org/walden-two-community
  5. https://www.biblio.com/book/walden-two-skinner-bf/d/1461767637
  6. https://www.psichi.org/page/202EyeWin16iHaas
  7. https://www.raptisrarebooks.com/product/walden-two-b-f-skinner-first-edition/
  8. https://hackettpublishing.com/walden-two
  9. https://books.google.com/books/about/Walden_Two.html?id=lMpgDwAAQBAJ
  10. https://www.verywellmind.com/b-f-skinner-biography-1904-1990-2795543
  11. https://www.appstate.edu/~steelekm/classes/psy3214/Documents/Brief_biography_of_B.F._Skinner.pdf
  12. https://psychology.fas.harvard.edu/people/b-f-skinner
  13. https://www.biography.com/scientists/bf-skinner
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2223164/
  15. https://www.nytimes.com/1970/03/15/archives/walden-two-three-many-more-walden-two.html
  16. https://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-2fd3ae53-0fe5-41ca-9359-05a812017e7b/c/Anglica_21-1_JJodlowska_61-74.pdf
  17. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mqr/act2080.0038.211/--walden-two-at-fifty?rgn=main%3Bview=fulltext
  18. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/walden2/summary/
  19. https://www.supersummary.com/walden-two/summary/
  20. https://www.scienceofbehavior.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/WalkingTourOfWaldenTwo-Fernald-updated2018-01-28.pdf
  21. https://www.gradesaver.com/walden-two/study-guide/character-list
  22. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1949-02469-000
  23. https://www.bfskinner.org/reflections-on-behaviorism-and-society-chapter-5-walden-two-revisited-quote-19/
  24. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119143673.ch14
  25. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mqr/act2080.0038.211/--walden-two-at-fifty?rgn=main;view=fulltext
  26. https://www.blackwellpublishing.com/content/bpl_images/content_store/sample_chapter/0631221018/kane.pdf
  27. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/291862
  28. http://old.dickmalott.com/behaviorism/dmc02.pdf
  29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392195
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Deborah-Altus/publication/271032314_Revisiting_Walden_Two_sustainability_from_a_natural_science_perspective/links/5641038108aec448fa603d65/Revisiting-Walden-Two-sustainability-from-a-natural-science-perspective.pdf
  31. https://www.bfskinner.org/reflections-on-behaviorism-and-society-chapter-16-walden-one-and-walden-two-quote-1/
  32. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeab.230
  33. https://www.bfskinner.org/reflections-on-behaviorism-and-society-chapter-16-walden-one-and-walden-two-quote-2/
  34. https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/889026.pdf
  35. https://ashesofacademia.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/a-brave-new-walden-two/
  36. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03392621
  37. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/walden2/context/
  38. https://medium.com/office-for-the-future/416-from-george-orwell-to-b-f-bf3623175c05
  39. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-07226-000
  40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/j.ctt1x74b1
  41. https://www.twinoaks.org/walden-two-community?showall=1
  42. https://www.loshorcones.org.mx/behavanalysis/
  43. https://ozarkcountytimes.com/east-wind-marks-40-years-local-community
  44. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/capstones/2494/
  45. https://www.twinoaks.org/twin-oaks-ecovillage/outsider-assessment
  46. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698230008403318
  47. https://www.loshorcones.org.mx/autism/
  48. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03406107
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314554662_Saving_the_World_With_Behavioral_Comunitarianism_Los_Horcones
  50. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01608060902874567
  51. https://time.com/archive/6843845/behavior-skinners-utopia-panacea-or-path-to-hell/
  52. https://www.academia.edu/189357/Whats_Wrong_With_Walden_Two
  53. https://www.anthonyburgess.org/blog-posts/the-clockwork-collection-utopia-dystopia-walden-two/
  54. https://reason.com/1975/01/01/skinner-vs-freedom-dignity-and/
  55. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-88943-001
  56. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1037/a0026439
  57. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-70082-001
  58. https://institute.centralreach.com/learning-paths/season-6-ep-6-revisiting-walden-two
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.