Hubbry Logo
Hundred (county division)Hundred (county division)Main
Open search
Hundred (county division)
Community hub
Hundred (county division)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hundred (county division)
Hundred (county division)
from Wikipedia

A hundred is an administrative division that is geographically part of a larger region. It was formerly used in England, Wales, some parts of the United States, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, and in Cumberland County in the British Colony of New South Wales. It is still used in other places, including in Australia (in South Australia and the Northern Territory). Other terms for the hundred in English and other languages include wapentake, herred (Danish and Bokmål Norwegian), herad (Nynorsk Norwegian), härad or hundare (Swedish), Harde (German), hiird (North Frisian), kihlakunta (Finnish), and cantref (Welsh). In Ireland, a similar subdivision of counties is referred to as a barony, and a hundred is a subdivision of a particularly large townland (most townlands are not divided into hundreds).

Etymology

[edit]

The origin of the division of counties into hundreds is described by the Oxford English Dictionary as "exceedingly obscure". It may once have referred to an area of 100 hides; in early Anglo-Saxon England a hide was the amount of land farmed by and required to support a peasant family, but by the 11th century in many areas it supported four families.[1] Alternatively the hundred may have been an area originally settled by one "hundred" men at arms, or the area liable to provide one "hundred" men under arms.[2] In this early medieval use, the number term "hundred" can be unclear, meaning the "short" hundred (100) or in some contexts the long hundred of 120.

There was an equivalent traditional Germanic system. In Old High German a huntari is a division of a gau, but the Oxford English Dictionary states that the link between the two is not established.[2]

England

[edit]
Hundred
  • Also known as:
  • Wapentake
  • Ward
CategoryCounty subdivision
LocationEngland
Found inShires
Possible status
Government
  • Hundred court
Subdivisions

Administrative functions

[edit]
Hundreds of Cornwall in the early 19th century

From the 11th century in England—and to a lesser extent from the 16th century in Wales—to the middle of the 19th century, the annual assemblies had varying degrees of power at a local level in the feudal system.[3] Of chief importance was their more regular use for taxation, and six centuries of taxation returns for the divisions survive to this day.[3]

Groupings of divisions, small shires, were used to define parliamentary constituencies from 1832 to 1885. On the redistribution of seats in 1885 a different county subdivision, the petty sessional division, was used. Hundreds were also used to administer the first five[3] national censuses from 1801 to 1841.[3]

The system of county divisions was not as stable as the system of counties being established at the time, and lists frequently differ on how many hundreds a county had. In many parts of the country, the Domesday Book contained a radically different set of divisions from that which later became established. The numbers of divisions in each county varied widely. For example Leicestershire had six (up from four at Domesday), whereas Devon, nearly three times the size, had 32.

By the end of the 19th century, several single-purpose subdivisions of counties, such as poor law unions, sanitary districts, and highway districts, had sprung up, which, together with the introduction of urban districts and rural districts in 1894, mostly replaced the role of the parishes, and to a lesser extent the less extensive role of hundreds. The division names gave their name to multiple modern local government districts.

Description

[edit]
Map of the Hundreds of Staffordshire, c. 1650. North is to the right.

In southern and western England, a hundred was the division of a shire for military and judicial purposes under the common law, which could have varying extent of common feudal ownership, from complete suzerainty to minor royal or ecclesiastical prerogatives and rights of ownership.[4] Until the introduction of districts by the Local Government Act 1894, hundreds were the only widely used assessment unit intermediate in size between the parish, with its various administrative functions, and the county, with its formal, ceremonial functions.[3]

The term "hundred" is first recorded in the 10th century laws of King Edmund I as a measure of land and the area served by a hundred court. In the Midlands, they often covered an area of about 100 hides, but this did not apply in the south; this may suggest that it was an ancient West Saxon measure that was applied rigidly when Mercia became part of the newly established English kingdom in the 10th century. The Hundred Ordinance, which dates to the middle of the 10th century, provides that the court was to meet monthly, and thieves were to be pursued by all the leading men of the district.[5]

During Norman times, the hundred would pay geld based on the number of hides.[6] To assess how much everyone had to pay, a clerk and a knight were sent by the king to each county; they sat with the shire-reeve (or sheriff) of the county and a select group of local knights.[6] There would be two knights from each hundred. After it was determined what geld had to be paid, the bailiff and knights of the hundred were responsible for getting the money to the sheriff and the sheriff for getting it to the Exchequer.[6]

Above the hundred was the shire, under the control of a sheriff. Hundred boundaries were independent of both parish and county boundaries, although often aligned, meaning that a hundred could be split between counties, or a parish could be split between hundreds. Exceptionally, in the counties of Kent and Sussex, there was a subdivision intermediate in size between the hundred and the shire: several hundreds were grouped together to form lathes in Kent and rapes in Sussex. At the time of the Norman Conquest, Kent was divided into seven lathes and Sussex into four rapes.

Hundred courts

[edit]

Over time, the principal functions of the hundred became the administration of law and the keeping of the peace. By the 12th century, the hundred court was held twelve times a year.[7] This was later increased to fortnightly, although an ordinance of 1234 reduced the frequency to once every three weeks. In some hundreds, courts were held at a fixed place; while in others, courts moved with each sitting to a different location. The main duty of the hundred court was the maintenance of the frankpledge system. The court was formed of twelve freeholders, or freemen.[8] According to a 13th-century statute, freeholders did not have to attend their lord's manorial courts, thus any suits involving them would be heard in a hundred court.[8][9]

For especially serious crimes, the hundred was under the jurisdiction of the Crown; the chief magistrate was a sheriff, and his circuit was called the sheriff's tourn.[8] However, many hundreds came into private hands, with the lordship of the hundred being attached to the principal manor of the area and becoming hereditary. Historian Helen Cam estimates that even before the Conquest, over 130 hundreds were in private hands; while an inquest of 1316 found that by that date 388 of 628 named hundreds were held by the king's subjects.[10] Where a hundred was under a lord, a steward—acting as a judge and the chief official of the lord of the manor—was appointed in place of a sheriff.[11]

The importance of the hundred courts declined from the 17th century, and most of their powers were extinguished with the establishment of county courts in 1867.[12] The remaining duty of the inhabitants of a hundred to make good damages caused by riot was ended by the Riot (Damages) Act 1886, when the cost was transferred to the county police rate.[13] The jurisdiction of hundred courts was curtailed by the Administration of Justice Act 1977.[14]

Chiltern Hundreds

[edit]

By law in the United Kingdom, a member of parliament (MP) cannot resign their seat, but will be disqualified from sitting if appointed to an "office of profit under the Crown". A Crown Steward of the Chiltern Hundreds was appointed to maintain law and order in the area, but these duties ceased to be performed in the 16th century, and the holder ceased to gain any benefits during the 17th century. The position remains in use as a procedural device, with MPs wishing to resign appointed as Crown Stewards.

Wapentake

[edit]

A wapentake, an Old Norse–derived term as common in Northern England,[a] was the equivalent of the Anglo-Saxon hundred in the northern Danelaw. In the Domesday Book the term is used instead of hundreds in Yorkshire, the Five Boroughs of Derby, Leicester, Lincoln, Nottingham and Stamford, and also sometimes in Northamptonshire. The laws in wapentakes were similar to those in hundreds with minor variations.

According to 1st-century historian Tacitus, in Scandinavia the wapentake referred to a vote passed at an assembly by the brandishing of weapons.[16] In some counties, such as Leicestershire, the wapentakes recorded at the time of Domesday Book later evolved into hundreds. In others, such as Lincolnshire, the term remained in use.[17] Although no longer part of local government, there is some correspondence between the rural deanery and the former wapentake or hundred; especially in the East Midlands, the Buckingham Archdeaconry and the York Diocese.[18]

Wales

[edit]
Medieval cantrefi of Wales

In Wales an ancient Celtic system of division called cantrefi (a hundred farmsteads; singular cantref) had existed for centuries and was of particular importance in the administration of the Welsh law. The antiquity of the cantrefi is demonstrated by the fact that they often mark the boundary between dialects. Some were originally kingdoms in their own right; others may have been artificial units created later.[19] With the coming of Christianity, the llan (similar to the parish) based Celtic churches often took the borders of the older cantrefi, and the same happened when Norman 'hundreds' were enforced on the people of Wales.

Each cantref had its own court, which was an assembly of the uchelwyr, the main landowners of the cantref. This would be presided over by the king if he happened to be present, or if he was not present, by his representative. Apart from the judges there would be a clerk, an usher and sometimes two professional pleaders. The cantref court dealt with crimes, the determination of boundaries, and inheritance.[20]

Nordic countries

[edit]
Map of medieval Denmark, showing herreder and sysler. The entire country was divided into herreder, shown outlined in red. Coloured areas show Jutland's syssel divisions. Zealand's four ecclesiastic sysler are not included.

The term hundare (hundred) was used in Svealand and present-day Finland. The name is assumed to mean an area that should organise 100 men to crew four rowed war boats, which each had 12 pairs of oars and a commander.[citation needed] Eventually, that division was superseded by introducing the härad or Herred, which was the term in the rest of the Nordic countries. This word was either derived from Proto-Norse *harja-raiðō (warband) or Proto-Germanic *harja-raiða (war equipment, cf. wapentake).[21] Similar to skipreide, a part of the coast where the inhabitants were responsible for equipping and manning a war ship.

Hundreds were not organized in Norrland, the northern sparsely populated part of Sweden. In Sweden, a countryside härad was typically divided in a few socken units (parish), where the ecclesiastical and worldly administrative units often coincided. This began losing its basic significance through the Swedish municipal reform of 1862. A härad was originally a subdivision of a landskap (province), but since the government reform of 1634, län ("county") took over all administrative roles of the province. A härad functioned also as electoral district for one peasant representative during the Riksdag of the Estates (Swedish parliament 1436–1866). The häradsrätt (assize court) was the court of first instance in the countryside, abolished in 1971 and superseded by tingsrätt (modern district courts).

Today, the hundreds serve no administrative role in Sweden, although some judicial district courts still bear the name (e.g. Attunda tingsrätt) and the hundreds are occasionally used in expressions, e.g. Sjuhäradsbygden (district of seven hundreds).

It is not entirely clear when hundreds were organised in the western part of Finland. The name of the province of Satakunta, roughly meaning hundred (sata meaning "one hundred" in Finnish), hints at influences from the times before the Northern Crusades, Christianization, and incorporation into Sweden.

As kihlakunta, hundreds remained the fundamental administrative division for the state authorities until 2009. Each was subordinated to a lääni (province/county) and had its own police department, district court and prosecutors. Typically, cities would comprise an urban kihlakunta by themselves, but several rural municipalities would belong to a rural kihlakunta. In a rural hundred the lensmann (chief of local state authorities) was called nimismies ("appointed man"), or archaically vallesmanni (from Swedish). In the Swedish era (up to 1809), his main responsibilities were maintenance of stagecoach stations and coaching inns, supplying traveling government personnel with food and lodging, transport of criminal prisoners, police responsibilities, arranging district court proceedings (tingsrätt), collection of taxes, and sometimes arranging hunts to cull the wolf and bear population. Following the abolition of the provinces as an administrative unit in 2009, the territory for each authority could be demarcated separately, i.e. police districts need not equal court districts in number. The title "härad" survives in the honorary title of herastuomari (Finnish) or häradsdomare (Swedish), which can be given to lay judges after 8–10 years of service.

The term herred or herad was used in Norway between 1863 and 1992 for rural municipalities, besides the term kommune (heradskommune). Today, only four municipalities in western Norway call themselves herad, as Ulvik and Kvam. Some Norwegian districts have the word herad in their name, of historical reasons – among them Krødsherad and Heradsbygd in eastern Norway.

United States

[edit]

Counties in Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania were divided into hundreds in the 17th century, following the English practice familiar to the colonists. They survive in Delaware and were used as tax reporting and voting districts until the 1960s but now serve no administrative role: their only official legal use is in real estate title descriptions.[22] Following American independence, the term "hundred" fell out of favor and was replaced by "election district". However, the names of the old hundreds continue to show up in deeds for another 50 years.

Some plantations in Colonial Virginia used the term hundred in their names, such as Martin's Hundred, Flowerdew Hundred, and West and Shirley Hundred.[23] Bermuda Hundred was the first incorporated town in Virginia; it was founded by Sir Thomas Dale in 1613, six years after Jamestown. While debating what became the Land Ordinance of 1785, Thomas Jefferson's committee wanted to divide the public lands in the west into "hundreds of ten geographical miles square, each mile containing 6086 and 4-10ths of a foot".[24] The legislation instead introduced the six-mile square township of the Public Land Survey System.

The hundred was used as a division of the county in Maryland. Carroll County was formed in 1836 by taking hundreds from Baltimore County and from Frederick County. Somerset County, which was established in 1666, was initially divided into six hundreds: Mattapony, Pocomoke, Boquetenorton, Wicomico, and Baltimore Hundreds; later subdivisions of the hundreds added five more: Pitts Creek, Acquango, Queponco, Buckingham, and Worcester Hundreds. The original borders of Talbot County (founded at some point prior to 12 February 1661[25]) contained nine hundreds: Treadhaven Hundred, Bolenbroke Hundred, Mill Hundred, Tuckahoe Hundred, Worrell Hundred, Bay Hundred, Island Hundred, Lower Kent Island Hundred, Chester Hundred.[26] In 1669 Chester Hundred was given to Kent County.[26][27] In 1707 Queen Anne's County was created from the northern parts of Talbot County, reducing the latter to seven hundreds (Lower Kent Island Hundred becoming a part of the former). Of these, only Bay Hundred legally remains in existence, as District 5 in Talbot County.[28][29] The geographic region, which includes several unincorporated communities and part of present-day Saint Michaels, continues to be known by the name Bay Hundred, with state and local governments using the name in ways ranging from water trail guides[30] to community pools,[31] while local newspapers regularly use the name in reporting news.[32][33][34][35][36]

Australia

[edit]

In South Australia, land titles record in which hundred a parcel of land is located. Similar to the notion of the South Australian counties listed on the system of titles, hundreds are not generally used when referring to a district and are little known by the general population, except when transferring land title. When the land in the region of the present Darwin, in the Northern Territory, was first surveyed, the territory was administered by South Australia, and the surveyed land was divided up into hundreds.[37] The Cumberland County (Sydney) was also allocated hundreds in the nineteenth century, although these were later repealed. A hundred is traditionally one hundred square miles or 64,000 acres (26,000 ha), although this is often not exact as boundaries often follow local topography.[38]

See also

[edit]

Explanatory notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A hundred was an administrative and judicial subdivision of the English , intermediate between the and the , originating in the Anglo-Saxon period and persisting until the late . It typically encompassed an area notionally supporting around 100 households or hides of land, serving as the basis for local , including periodic assemblies known as the hundred court or moot. These courts convened every four weeks, attended by the freemen of the hundred, to adjudicate minor disputes, impose fines, regulate trade, and organize military posses for . Emerging around AD 900 amid West Saxon defenses against Viking incursions, hundreds formed a dense network of roughly 800 districts south of the , often centered on assembly sites and superseding earlier territorial units. The institution's first documented reference appears in the Hundred Ordinance, dated approximately 939–961, which outlined procedural guidelines for these local courts. In regions of Danish influence, equivalents called wapentakes fulfilled similar roles, while their functions evolved to include taxation, , and mustering by the medieval and early modern periods. Administrative significance waned after 1834 with the advent of petty sessional divisions and other reforms, culminating in effective abolition under the Local Government Act 1894, which restructured intermediate without explicit provision for retaining .

Etymology and Terminology

Etymology

The English term "hundred" for an administrative subdivision originates from Old English hundræd (also spelled hundred or hundredes), a compound of hund ("hundred," akin to the numeral) and -ræd or -red (from Germanic radą, meaning "reckoning," "counsel," or "count"). This etymon reflects a literal sense of "a thing reckoned by hundreds" or "hundred-count," inherited from Proto-Germanic hundaradą, with cognates in other Germanic languages denoting grouped units for assessment or assembly. In its administrative application during the Anglo-Saxon period, "hundred" denoted a territorial division of a comprising roughly 100 hides of , where a hide represented the acreage sufficient to sustain one free family (typically 120 acres, though varying by soil quality and region). Alternatively, some sources interpret it as grouping 100 households or warriors for military and fiscal purposes, emphasizing functional equivalence over strict numerical precision. The association with 100 units facilitated taxation, organization, and local governance, as evidenced in early records like the (1086), though actual hundreds often deviated from exact 100-hide boundaries due to geographic and historical factors. The precise mechanism linking the numerical term to territorial units remains debated among historians, with the describing the division's origins as "exceedingly obscure," potentially influenced by pre-Anglo-Saxon Celtic or Germanic tribal assemblies rather than pure arithmetic. First attested in legal contexts during the reign of King (939–946), the term underscores a pragmatic of subdividing shires for judicial and administrative efficiency, evolving from earlier folk-moot traditions. In regions of England settled by Danes during the , the equivalent to the Anglo-Saxon hundred was the wapentake, particularly in counties such as , , and . This division facilitated similar judicial, military, and fiscal functions, with assemblies held for local governance. The term wapentake derives from vápnatak, literally "weapon-taking," alluding to the custom in Scandinavian assemblies where participants touched or raised weapons to signal assent or vote. Other terminological variants for grouping or subdividing hundreds regionally included the in , where five or seven such units each comprised multiple hundreds for administrative oversight by the , and the in , six territorial divisions post-Norman Conquest that bundled hundreds under a for defense and taxation, possibly rooted in pre-Conquest boundaries.

Historical Origins

Anglo-Saxon Establishment

The hundred emerged in Anglo-Saxon as a fundamental subdivision of the shire, serving as a unit for local governance, judicial proceedings, and mutual surety among free men. It likely originated from a customary grouping of approximately 100 households or hides—units of land sufficient to sustain a single —facilitating for maintaining order and executing . This structure reflected the decentralized nature of early Anglo-Saxon society, where local assemblies, or moots, enforced through communal oaths and fines rather than centralized authority. Archaeological findings, such as meeting sites in regions like , indicate that some hundred boundaries and assembly locations trace back to early or middle Saxon settlements, predating written records and suggesting organic development from post-Roman tribal territories. The first explicit documentary evidence of the hundred appears in the laws promulgated by King between 939 and 946, which reference it as an established entity for legal oversight. This is corroborated by the anonymous Hundred Ordinance, composed circa 939–961 and attributed variably to or his successor , which formalized its operations. The ordinance mandated that hundreds convene biweekly (every four weeks in practice) under the supervision of the shire reeve or to hear disputes, collect sureties for good behavior, and impose penalties for breaches of the peace, such as or . It emphasized communal accountability, requiring freemen to pledge for one another and prohibiting private vengeance in favor of public resolution, thereby institutionalizing a proto-police function rooted in group liability. Although the written record begins in the mid-10th century, the hundred's framework probably evolved earlier, during the 7th to 9th centuries, as shires coalesced from smaller folk-lands under kings like or , who reorganized territories for defense against Viking incursions. By Edgar's reign (959–975), the system was sufficiently entrenched to underpin fiscal assessments and military levies, with each hundred contributing proportionally to the shire's obligations. This establishment marked a shift toward standardized local administration, bridging informal kin-based with royal oversight, though variations persisted in Danish-influenced areas where equivalents like wapentakes appeared.

Medieval Evolution

The hundred system, inherited from Anglo-Saxon , underwent adaptation rather than wholesale replacement after the of 1066, as the new rulers preserved its utility for local administration, justice, and resource mobilization within the feudal framework. William I and his successors retained the shire-and-hundred structure, employing it for the Domesday survey of 1086, which enumerated lands, resources, and liabilities by hundred to facilitate royal oversight and feudal accountability. This continuity stemmed from the system's proven efficiency in subdividing counties into manageable units, typically encompassing 100 hides of land or households, though actual sizes varied regionally from dozens to over 200 hides. Hundred courts evolved into periodic assemblies, generally every four weeks, handling minor civil disputes among freemen not subject to manorial , enforcing the surety system for collective responsibility in , and imposing fines for breaches of peace or neglect of communal duties like road maintenance. By the , royal sheriffs delegated much operation to bailiffs, while accelerated: lords purchased or inherited hundred franchises, converting courts into private ones yielding profits via amercements, though periodically reasserted control through itinerant justices. This shift reflected feudal decentralization, where hundreds bridged royal prerogatives and seignorial rights, but also introduced tensions over , as manorial courts encroached on hundred competencies for matters. Fiscally and militarily, hundreds served as assessment units for evolving taxation, including 12th-century scutage payments commuting knight service—levied per hundred based on hidage—and 13th-14th century parliamentary subsidies apportioned by local wealth inquiries. Militarily, they organized the post-fyrd levies, conducting "views of arms" to inspect freeholders' equipment and muster militiamen for campaigns, as seen in Edward I's Welsh and Scottish wars where hundreds supplied quotas of archers and infantry. The 1274-1279 Hundred Rolls inquiry under Edward I exposed systemic abuses like unauthorized enclosures and franchise overreaches, prompting legislative reforms via statutes like (1289) to curb private aggrandizement and reaffirm hundreds' role in royal domain integrity. These developments underscored the hundred's resilience amid feudal pressures, maintaining it as a linchpin of county governance until early modern shifts toward parishes and justices of the peace.

In England

Administrative Functions

The hundred functioned as an intermediate administrative unit between the shire and the , primarily responsible for fiscal assessments, military levies, and local oversight within English counties. Taxation, particularly the geld or land tax, was apportioned by hundreds based on the hide system, where a hide represented the land required to support one family and its obligations; this framework is evidenced in the of 1086, which detailed hidage assessments for villages within hundreds, such as those in where specific hundreds like the Geldable covered half of royal taxes. In Norman times, clerks and knights appointed per hundred collaborated with the to determine and collect these payments, with records of such returns persisting for centuries. Militarily, hundreds organized the fyrd, the Anglo-Saxon citizen militia, by mustering forces proportional to their hide counts, a practice originating around the 10th century and continuing post-Conquest under modified knight-service quotas allocated to barons' honors. The hundredman, or later bailiff, led these efforts, ensuring troop supply and coordination at the local level. Hundred courts, convening monthly or more frequently by the (e.g., every three weeks after the ordinance), handled administrative enforcement including the system, where tithings of ten households provided mutual surety for good behavior and peace-keeping. These courts, often held at fixed sites like mounds or fords, also facilitated inquiries such as the Domesday juries, comprising locals testifying on and fiscal matters. In private hundreds under ecclesiastical or baronial control, stewards assumed these duties in place of sheriffs, adapting the structure to feudal holdings.

Judicial Role and Courts

The hundred court constituted the principal local judicial body in medieval , convening periodically to adjudicate minor civil disputes, enforce , and address breaches of the peace within its . Originating in the Anglo-Saxon , its functions were formalized in the Hundred Ordinance of approximately 939–961, which required assemblies every four weeks where participants rendered justice to one another, declared in suits, and set deadlines for fulfillment, with penalties of up to 50 shillings for delays unless authorized by a superior . A core responsibility involved pursuing thieves and resolving theft-related claims, such as compensating owners for stolen from the offender's property while dividing fines between the hundred and its ; failure to assist in cross-hundred pursuits incurred a 30-shilling penalty to the king, and repeated defiance of judgments escalated from 30 pence fines to outlawry after the fourth offense. Post-Norman Conquest, these courts retained authority over petty criminal and civil matters, including presentments of wrongdoing, with the or his summoning meetings—typically monthly—and overseeing proceedings to uphold royal writs and collect amercements. Central to the court's operations was the enforcement of , a mutual system grouping free and servile males over age 12 into tithings of roughly ten households responsible for each other's conduct and for presenting suspects; the view of , conducted biannually or annually at by 1217, verified enrollment and compliance, exempting only wealthy freemen deemed self-sufficient . Breaches triggered collective hundred liability for unproduced offenders, reinforcing communal policing under the sheriff's execution of sentences. By the , professional bailiffs increasingly supplanted traditional suitors as judges, shifting from theoretical communal judgment to delegated expertise amid declining attendance obligations.

Variants and Special Cases

In , particularly in counties with significant Scandinavian influence from the such as , , and , the hundred was replaced by the wapentake, a functionally equivalent subdivision derived from vápnatak, referring to an assembly where participants showed or touched weapons to signify agreement. Wapentakes performed identical administrative, judicial, and military roles but reflected Norse customary practices in areas of Viking settlement from the 9th to 11th centuries. Kent featured lathes as larger territorial divisions, each encompassing multiple hundreds and tracing origins to the Jutish kingdom of Kent (c. 616–825 AD), with seven lathes recorded in the Domesday Book of 1086: Aylesford, Borough, Eastry, Lest, Scray, Shepway, and Sutton-at-Hone. These lathes handled broader fiscal and military obligations, such as ship service (trinoda necessitas), while deferring local matters to subordinate hundreds. Sussex employed rapes as analogous super-divisions, with six established by the , Bramber, , , , and —each organized around a principal for defensive purposes and subdivided into hundreds for routine . Rapes originated pre-1066, possibly as Anglo-Saxon hǣræd districts, and persisted for taxation and muster until the , differing from standard hundreds by their emphasis on feudal baronial control. Special cases arose in liberties and sokes, where royal prerogatives were delegated to ecclesiastical or lay lords, often suppressing or privatizing hundred courts; by the late , approximately half of England's hundreds were held privately, granting holders powers over justice, markets, and tolls that bypassed oversight. Such arrangements, rooted in Anglo-Saxon grants of soke (local ), created jurisdictional enclaves like the Liberty of Durham or ancient manors, where customary hundred functions were curtailed in favor of seigneurial courts.

Decline and Abolition

The judicial authority of hundred courts began to wane in the medieval period as these courts increasingly passed into the control of private lords, diminishing their role in collective responsibilities such as pursuing criminals or maintaining order. By the , their significance further eroded with the expansion of justices of the peace, who assumed oversight of local administration and minor judicial matters through petty sessions, rendering monthly hundred meetings largely obsolete for everyday governance. The County Courts Act 1867 marked a pivotal step in the abolition process by establishing a network of county courts that absorbed the bulk of the hundred courts' remaining civil and minor criminal jurisdictions, effectively extinguishing their practical judicial functions across . This reform addressed longstanding inefficiencies in the fragmented system of local courts, centralizing small claims and debt recovery under professional judges rather than lay assemblies. Administrative remnants of the hundred persisted longer, particularly for purposes like poor law relief and highway maintenance, but these were swept away by the Local Government Act 1894, which reorganized local governance into urban and rural districts under elected councils, formally dissolving the hundred as a unit of division. Although some rating liabilities tied to hundreds lingered into the early 20th century in isolated cases, the Act's provisions ensured their comprehensive obsolescence by transferring fiscal and oversight duties to modern parish and district bodies.

In Wales

The (plural cantrefi) constituted the primary territorial division in medieval , serving administrative, judicial, and military functions under . Etymologically derived from cant ("hundred") and tref ("homestead" or ""), it nominally encompassed around 100 such basic settlements, though actual sizes varied by region and period. Cantrefi originated in the early medieval era, possibly tracing to pre-Norman principalities, and were integral to princely governance, with each maintaining a central (llys) for resolving disputes over , , and offenses. Subdivisions of the included the (cwmwd or cymwd, plural cymydau), typically numbering two or more per cantref, which functioned as intermediate units for local administration. Each possessed its own court and was responsible for mustering defenses, collecting renders, and adjudicating minor cases, often comprising 38 to 50 trefi. The smallest units were the tref or maenor, agrarian townships integrating freeholders' lands (tref gwyddel) with bond tenants' holdings (tref bond), centered on communal facilities like mills or plow teams. In practice, cantrefi boundaries reflected geographic features, ancient kin groups, and strategic needs, as seen in Gwynedd's 15 cantrefi spanning diverse terrains from Arfon to Penllyn. While structurally akin to the English hundred—both rooted in a "hundred" of households or hides for fiscal and judicial purposes—the Welsh often exceeded the hundred in scale, sometimes equating to multiple post- hundreds. After Edward I's (completed by 1283) and the Laws in Wales Acts (1536 and 1543), native divisions were reorganized into shires subdivided into English-style hundreds, yet many names and alignments persisted, influencing boundaries in counties like and . For instance, the of Arwystli was apportioned into upper and lower commotes that informed later hundred delineations. This transition marked the assimilation of Welsh territories into the English legal framework, diminishing but not erasing pre-existing divisions.

In Nordic Countries

Herred and Equivalents

In Denmark, the herred (plural: herreder) functioned as a minor jurisdictional district, serving administrative and judicial roles subordinate to the counties (amter). First attested in records from at least 1232, each herred generally included several parishes and handled local matters such as courts (ting), taxation, and militia organization. This structure originated in the early medieval period, likely the 11th century, paralleling the English hundred in scale and purpose as a subdivision for governance between parish and county levels. The herred system endured from the Middle Ages until 1919 for administrative functions, after which it was phased out amid broader municipal reforms, with Denmark maintaining around 170 herreder prior to the 1970 consolidation. Norway employed the cognate term herred (Bokmål) or herad (Nynorsk) for similar rural judicial districts, which organized local assemblies and legal proceedings from onward. These units formed the basis for early rural municipalities (kommuner), with the designation persisting in administrative nomenclature until 1992. In practice, Norwegian herred districts managed inheritance, disputes, and community obligations, akin to Danish counterparts, and were grouped under larger fogderier (bailiwicks) for oversight. Sweden's equivalent, härad, divided provinces (landskap) into judicial and electoral subdivisions, predominantly in central and southern regions, while northern areas used tingslag or bergslag. Established by the medieval period, härad units convened local courts for civil and criminal cases and elected peasant representatives to the until the 1860s reforms. These districts typically aligned with clusters of parishes, facilitating land tenure records and fiscal assessments until their judicial roles ended around 1920. In , early variants known as hundare reflected direct linguistic ties to the "hundred" concept during the transition to formalized divisions.

In North America

Adoption in Colonial United States

The hundred system was adopted in the southern British colonies of and during the early to mid-17th century as a mechanism for subdividing land, organizing settlement, and enabling rudimentary local administration, directly emulating the English model of county subdivisions to manage dispersed populations in frontier conditions. In , the Virginia Company of London formalized hundreds around 1610–1620 to attract investors and settlers, offering 100 acres per share to those funding "particular plantations" that functioned as semi-autonomous units nominally supporting about 100 households or soldiers. This approach aimed to promote rapid colonization and production by decentralizing authority, allowing hundreds limited self-rule prior to the 1619 assembly. Bermuda Hundred, established on July 26, 1613, by acting governor Sir Thomas Dale near the James and Appomattox rivers junction, exemplified early implementation; it encompassed approximately 8,000 acres and served as a fortified settlement hub until severely damaged in the March 22, 1622, uprising, which killed over 300 colonists across and accelerated ' decline. By the 1630s–1640s, reorganized into larger counties—such as James City and Charles City—supplanting hundreds for taxation, muster, and court functions, as the latter proved inefficient amid population growth and native conflicts. Maryland incorporated hundreds more systematically from the 1650s onward, pairing them with Anglican parishes for civil and religious oversight; a 1696 provincial act delineated hundreds within counties like Anne Arundel and for land patents, poor relief, and constable appointments. Examples include Spesutia Hundred in Harford County, active from 1681 with records of vital statistics, taxation, and through 1799, and Bogerternorton Hundred encompassing much of modern Worcester County. In Prince George's County, formed in 1695, hundreds handled secular administration like maintenance and stray regulation alongside parish vestries. Though enduring into the early 1700s for surveys and levies, Maryland's hundreds faded by mid-century as counties centralized authority under proprietary governors, yielding to better suited to expanded estates and population exceeding 100,000 by 1750.

In Australia

Land Survey Divisions

In South Australia, hundreds functioned as key cadastral subdivisions within counties, enabling systematic land surveys, sales, and settlement from the colonial era onward. The system was introduced in following proposals by Charles Bonney, with the first hundreds proclaimed that year in the counties of and to organize into manageable units for alienation. Each hundred typically covered approximately 100 square miles, though sizes varied slightly, and was further partitioned into numbered sections originally around 80 acres (32 hectares) each—later enlarged to suit expanding agricultural needs—allowing for grid-based surveying and precise property descriptions like "Section 10, Hundred of Talunga." This structure supported efficient record-keeping and integration with policies such as the system, legislated via the Real Property Act 1861, which mandated registration by county and hundred for all land transfers post-enactment. Surveyor-General George Goyder, appointed in 1855, standardized the hundred's use in cadastral work, notably incorporating it into the delineation of Goyder's Line between 1864 and 1866 to demarcate arable land from arid zones. Expansion accelerated in the 1870s amid the wheat boom, doubling surveyed hundred areas in a decade, and continued from 1895 to 1930 with hundreds added in peripheral regions like the Murray Mallee and Eyre Peninsula. Over 540 hundreds were eventually proclaimed across 49 counties by 1971, with five annulled in 1870; the divisions persist as official boundaries under Land Management Act 2009, underpinning modern land titles and local governance foundations.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.