Hubbry Logo
Animal lossAnimal lossMain
Open search
Animal loss
Community hub
Animal loss
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Animal loss
Animal loss
Animal loss
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Wealthy Ancient Egyptian families would mummify their treasured pets, believing that the spirit would travel with them to the afterlife.

The loss of a pet or an animal to which one has become emotionally bonded oftentimes results in grief[1] which can be comparable with the death of a human loved one, or even greater, depending on the individual. The death can be felt more intensely when the owner has decided to end the pet's life through euthanasia.[2] While there is strong evidence that animals can feel such loss for other animals,[3] this article focuses on human feelings when an animal is lost, dies, or otherwise is departed.

Effect of animal loss on humans

[edit]
King George IV and the Marchioness of Conyngham grieve over the body of a dead giraffe, which had been sent to them by Mehmet Ali, Pasha of Egypt. Lithograph attributed to J. Doyle, 1829.

There is no set amount of time for the grieving process to occur. However, mourning is much more intense for a pet upon whom the owner was emotionally dependent. Additionally, some pet owners may feel unable to express their grieving due to social customs and norms surrounding pets. If the pet owner internalizes the grief, the suffering increases.[4]

The stages of grief proposed by Elizabeth Kübler-Ross were designed in relation to human death but can be adapted to describe the grief process for the death of a pet.[5] Indeed, pet death includes several lessons: 1) the relationship rather than the object (the animal) is central to understanding the loss; 2) the manner of death/loss will affect the grieving process; 3) the age and living situation of the bereaved will affect the grieving process.[6]

The University of Michigan did a study of grief involving 174 adults who had deceased pets. Participants were administered a modified CENSHARE Pet Attachment Survey. Results indicate that 85.7% of owners initially experienced at least one symptom of grief, but the occurrence decreased to 35.1% at six months and 22.4% at one year. Males and females reported different rates on six of the 12 symptoms surveyed. The severity and length of symptoms were significantly correlated with the degree of attachment to the deceased pet. These findings indicate that pet loss can be a potential clinical concern, especially if the person's attachment to the pet is strong.

Seeking Support and Moving Forward

[edit]

Grieving a pet is a deeply personal experience, and healing takes time. Some people find comfort in joining pet lover support groups, while others turn to professional grief counseling. Additionally, volunteering at an animal shelter or fostering a pet in need can help transform grief into a positive action, ensuring that a pet's love continues to inspire even after they are gone.[7]

Coping with death

[edit]

Though well-meaning phrases like "time heals all wounds" can upset the grieving pet owner, the one factor required for all coping strategies is indeed time.[8] Coping also involves understanding the emotions surrounding the loss of a pet, and then accepting the emotions to focus towards positive solutions.

Coping strategies may include:[9]

  • Going through the grieving process
  • Strengthening positive memories
  • Seeking support from resources, organizations, and individuals
  • Seeking solace from one's own spiritual beliefs
  • Preparing for a pet's death in advance

Pet owners may also seek to memorialize their pets by placing their remains in a cremation urn or jewelry.[10] Other traditions include erecting stone memorials or other commemorative plaques for deceased pets, or by nicknaming objects like stars after them.[11][12] Additionally, a 2020 report found that 19% of Americans wanted to be buried with their pet's remains after passing.[13]

Types of loss

[edit]
Typical posting for a lost pet

There are several particular types of loss:[14][15]

Getting a new animal

[edit]

Before bringing a new pet into the home following the death of a previous pet, some advise people to consider the timing carefully.[17] Additionally, it is recommended to consider where the bereaved are in the grieving process,[18] and to choose the new pet for its own unique qualities rather than trying to replace the former pet.[19]

Workplace issues

[edit]

Pet illness and death are gradually becoming recognized as similar to other forms of sickness and death in the family. In the U.K., a variety of companies provide paid leave for such eventualities,[20] with employment tribunals backing this in some instances in which employment terms did not specifically mention pet loss.[21]

Recent studies by insurers suggest that up to one in four pet owners are sufficiently affected by pet loss or illness to take time off, but many feel this will be treated lightly and, hence, state they were sick. According to Petplan, 35% of people admitted to taking time off work to settle new pets into the home or care for sick pets, and half admitted to taking a whole week off.[22] According to Direct Line, one in four pet owners, "said they have been too upset to go into the workplace when their four legged friend died" and, "many of those who did go into work after the death of their pet said they were unproductive."[23] The latter survey also noted that pet owners in the U.K. take "around 8 days off" due to grief at the death of a pet and that "seventy-nine percent of people responding to the survey admitted they did not think their boss would be sympathetic, and the only way they could get time off work was by... pretending to be ill."[22]

Pet loss resources

[edit]

Resources for pet loss change regularly but include grief counseling, support groups, online forums, hotlines, and books. The Pet Loss Support Page maintains an updated list of recommended resources.[24]

Resources include:

  • Hotlines: Several veterinary schools and nonprofit agencies in the United States have pet loss support hotlines.
  • Online forums: Internet search engines using "pet loss support" as a search term will locate several online forums for grieving pet owners. Also, there are digital memorial websites for pets. The online community allows one to create a profile, compiling images, details, and memories of the lost pet in one place.[citation needed]
  • Books: Books on pet loss are published regularly.[25]
  • Grief Counseling: Therapists with grief therapy training can be found in local communities. In addition, therapists may also include support groups that meet regularly to discuss issues surrounding pet loss.
  • Hospices: Some animal hospices offer grief support.
  • Websites: Organizations may have webpages with various resources for grieving pet owners[citation needed]

Beliefs about non-human death

[edit]
A mummified cat

Some world religions have held that beloved pets will join their families in an afterlife. Animal worship was common in the ancient world, influencing the burial practices of animals. Animal mummification was practiced in ancient Egypt and gave special significance to cats in some areas. Egyptians believed that mummification was imperative in order to gain admittance to the afterlife, ensuring the animals' immortality.[26]

Some ancient Egyptian families believed mummified pets would keep the deceased company in the afterlife.[27] The most common Egyptian pets included cats, dogs, mongooses, monkeys, gazelles, and birds. Many Egyptians loved their pets, and, according to the Greek observer Herodotus, the customary process of mourning the loss of a loved pet included crying and shaving one's eyebrows.[citation needed] Ancient Egyptian pets were given names like humans name pets today, evidenced by over 70 names deciphered in inscriptions identifying mummified pet dog remains.[28]

Modern religions are divided as to whether non-human animals have souls, the ability to reincarnate, or existence in the afterlife.

In the absence of a common religious belief, many pet owners have embraced the concept of the Rainbow Bridge. The origin of which is not clearly known, speaks of a metaphorical or mythical place of reunion where deceased pets live in a paradisical version of limbo, rejuvenated and free of pain and suffering until their human companions arrive upon their own deaths.[29][30] At this point, the pet(s) run to their human companions and they enter Heaven together never to be parted again.

A number of deathbed visions and dreams involve sightings of deceased pets; hence, some link these reports with the existence of animal souls. Such experiences may be effective in easing one's grief.[31][32]

In Mormonism, all organisms (as well as the entire planet Earth) are believed to have a spirit, but that beings without the gift of free agency—the ability to know and choose between right and wrong—are innocent, unblemished spirits who go straight to Heaven when they die.[33] According to Mormon beliefs, animals will be resurrected along with humans at the end of days.[34]

Animal chaplains are becoming increasingly popular for helping bereaved family members deal with the loss of their pet by providing memorial services, spiritual reassurance, and grief counseling.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Animal loss

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Animal loss denotes the widespread reduction in the abundance and diversity of wild animal populations across terrestrial, freshwater, and marine , driven chiefly by human-induced factors such as , , , , and , which collectively threaten ecosystem stability and services essential to welfare. This phenomenon, often quantified through indices tracking monitored populations, reveals an average 73% decline in global abundances from 1970 to 2020, with steeper losses—exceeding 90% in —underscoring regional vulnerabilities tied to and . While some species exhibit localized recoveries through conservation interventions, the overarching trend reflects systemic pressures outpacing natural resilience, prompting debates over measurement methodologies that aggregate diverse taxa and habitats, yet empirical data from long-term monitoring affirm the trajectory's severity. emerges as the dominant causal driver, fragmenting ranges and amplifying risks for habitat specialists, compounded by direct harvesting that depletes apex predators and alike. Consequences extend to trophic imbalances, reduced resilience against perturbations, and diminished provisioning services like and fisheries yields, with projections indicating accelerated losses absent policy reforms prioritizing land-use restraint and sustainable .

Definition and Scope

Definition of Animal Loss

Animal loss refers to the involuntary and permanent separation from an animal, most often through , disappearance, , or forced relinquishment, which triggers emotional distress and in humans who have formed attachments to the animal. This experience is distinct from broader ecological declines in animal populations, centering instead on individual bonds, particularly with companion animals like dogs and cats. Psychological research identifies animal loss as encompassing not only mortality but also non-death separations, such as those resulting from relocation, , or abandonment, each capable of eliciting bereavement responses akin to those from human relationships. In clinical and veterinary contexts, the term highlights the profound attachment humans develop toward animals, rooted in daily companionship and unconditional , leading to symptoms including , anxiety, and disrupted routines following . For instance, the of a is frequently documented as prompting acute phases similar to human bereavement models, though often disenfranchised due to societal underrecognition of animal bonds' depth. Disappearance cases, where animals run away or are lost, add that prolongs distress, as owners grapple with unresolved searching and faint hopes of reunion. Empirical studies emphasize that animal loss affects diverse demographics, with attachment strength—measured by factors like pet ownership duration and perceived reciprocity—predicting grief intensity. While not limited to pets, the phenomenon extends to working animals or wildlife encounters yielding bonds, but empirical focus remains on domestic companions due to their prevalence in human households.

Scope: Focus on Companion Animals

Companion animals, commonly referred to as pets, are domesticated species kept primarily for emotional companionship and mutual affection rather than utilitarian roles such as labor, food production, or sport. These include dogs (Canis familiaris), cats (Felis catus), and to a lesser extent birds, fish, rabbits, and rodents, whose physical and behavioral needs are met within human households. The human-animal bond with companion animals is characterized by reciprocal interactions, including play, grooming, and daily routines, fostering attachments akin to familial relationships. Focusing on companion animals in discussions of animal loss highlights the personal and widespread nature of bereavement from their or involuntary separation, as opposed to losses in , , or working animals where emotional bonds are typically weaker or less studied. Globally, the companion animal exceeds 1 billion, with approximately 900 million dogs and 370 million cats owned as ; in the United States, 94 million households—about 66% of the total—own at least one , predominantly dogs (68 million) and cats. Given average lifespans of 10–15 years for dogs and cats, owners face recurrent loss, with surveys indicating over 50% of individuals experiencing pet during childhood alone. This scope is particularly relevant for understanding grief dynamics, as companion animal loss triggers responses comparable in intensity to human bereavement for 85% of owners, including symptoms of depression, anxiety, and social withdrawal. Empirical data from veterinary and psychological studies underscore that factors like ownership duration (often exceeding 6–10 years) and unexpected deaths amplify distress, affecting physical health such as reduced activity in 38% of older adults post-loss. Research prioritizes this category due to its prevalence in modern societies and the availability of longitudinal data from pet-owning demographics, enabling causal insights into bonding mechanisms absent in broader animal loss contexts.

Causes of Animal Loss

Natural Causes

Natural causes of animal loss in companion animals, such as dogs and cats, encompass age-related physiological decline and non-traumatic diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disorders, and organ , which account for the majority of deaths in veterinary records excluding or accidents. In a study of elderly dogs, malignant neoplasms represented the primary cause of mortality at 46.3%, followed by at 18.2% and cardiovascular . These causes often manifest progressively, with genetic predispositions and environmental factors within the home influencing onset, though they stem from inherent biological processes rather than external human intervention. Cancer emerges as the predominant disease-related natural cause across species, responsible for approximately 47% of deaths in dogs and 32% in cats, according to data from the Veterinary Cancer Society. Common forms include , in dogs, and lymphosarcoma or in cats, frequently diagnosed in animals over 10 years old and leading to , organ dysfunction, or . Cardiovascular conditions, such as and , constitute another key natural pathway, particularly in sudden unexpected deaths, where they underlie up to 44% of cases in postmortem analyses of dogs and cats. Breeds like Dobermans and Boxers in dogs show higher susceptibility due to hereditary factors, resulting in arrhythmias, , or without prior symptoms. In cats, ranks as a leading natural cause, accounting for 13.6% of deaths in animals over 5 years, often progressing to and imbalances from glomerular sclerosis and . , or , independently contributes through multisystem degeneration, including immune senescence and frailty, with studies indicating it as the direct attribution in 25.2% of pet deaths across . These processes reflect evolutionary limits on lifespan, with median ages at death around 10-13 years for dogs and 12-15 years for cats, varying by and . Veterinary autopsies confirm that such causes predominate in non-euthanized cases, underscoring the role of inherent over modifiable risks. Human-related causes of animal loss among companion animals, such as dogs and cats, predominantly arise from direct actions, negligence, or decisions by owners and society, including , trauma, toxic exposures, and relinquishment leading to outcomes. These factors account for a substantial portion of premature deaths and permanent separations, often exacerbated by inadequate pet management, , and economic pressures. Unlike natural causes, human-influenced losses are preventable through responsible , yet they persist due to causal chains like impulsive adoptions without preparation or failure to implement safety measures. Euthanasia represents one of the most prevalent human-related contributors, encompassing both owner-initiated veterinary procedures for medical or behavioral reasons and -based decisions amid . In U.S. animal shelters, approximately 6.5 million dogs and cats entered in 2023, with around 607,000 euthanized in 2024—a rate of about 9-10% of intakes, down from higher figures in prior decades but still reflecting relinquishments driven by owner inability to care for animals due to costs, moves, or incompatibility. Owner-requested outside shelters, often for end-stage illness or , adds unquantified but significant numbers, as veterinary data indicate it as a common endpoint for aging or injured pets where treatment is deemed uneconomical or futile. , in particular, traces causally to human behaviors like unplanned breeding and abandonment, with dogs facing elevated rates post-pandemic due to intake surges from returns and strays. Trauma from accidents, frequently involving human environments or negligence, ranks as a leading cause of sudden death in s, including vehicular collisions, falls, and fights with other animals. Veterinary analyses of unexpected fatalities list trauma fourth overall but prominent in younger animals, with incidents implicated in up to 87% of severe urban cases in sampled studies, though national annual deaths from cars remain underreported due to lack of centralized tracking—estimates suggest hundreds of thousands globally, scaled by pet populations. Failure to restrain pets during travel or supervise in traffic directly enables these losses, underscoring causal links to owner oversight rather than inevitability. Toxicosis, stemming from access to household hazards, constitutes another major human-factors category, with human medications, , xylitol, and rodenticides topping exposure lists and ranking second in sudden dog deaths. The ASPCA documented over 400,000 poisoning cases in pets annually as of recent years, with , foods, and pharmaceuticals comprising 15-20% of incidents; many prove fatal without prompt intervention, particularly in curious puppies or unsecured homes. These exposures arise from inadequate storage or ignorance of pet-specific risks, not inherent animal behavior alone. Neglect, abuse, and abandonment further drive losses, often culminating in death or shelter euthanasia. Direct cruelty accounts for estimated thousands of companion animal deaths yearly, though underreporting inflates uncertainties; broader —like or untreated injuries—feeds into shelter intakes, where behavioral fallout from prior mistreatment elevates euthanasia risks. Permanent separations via or unrecovered escapes, facilitated by absent microchipping or enclosures, compound these, with relinquishment statistics implying millions of annual disruptions from owner choices. Empirical trends show declines in overall rates with spay/neuter programs and , yet persistent human elements like economic hardship sustain vulnerabilities.

Biological and Evolutionary Foundations

Evolutionary Basis of Human-Animal Bonding

The process of animal domestication, beginning with dogs from gray ancestors approximately 15,000 to 40,000 years ago, initiated the evolutionary foundations of human-animal bonding through mutual survival advantages. Early humans benefited from proto-dogs' assistance in , guarding against predators, and alerting to threats, while wolves gained access to human food refuse and shelter near settlements, fostering tolerance and for sociability. This co-evolution extended to other species like and cats around 10,000 years ago during the transition to , where animals provided labor, , and , reinforcing interspecies dependencies that enhanced human fitness in resource-scarce environments. Biologically, these bonds leverage conserved neurochemical pathways, particularly oxytocin, which facilitates attachment across social contexts. Interactions such as petting or between humans and dogs elevate plasma oxytocin levels in both parties, akin to mechanisms in human parental bonding or pair formation, promoting affiliation and reducing stress via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis modulation. Experimental from intranasal oxytocin administration in dogs demonstrates heightened motivation to approach human partners, suggesting amplified endogenous oxytocin sensitivity, distinguishing pets from wild counterparts. Similar effects occur with cats, where correlates with oxytocin surges during owner interactions, underscoring physiological reciprocity as a driver of enduring bonds. From an standpoint, human-animal attachments represent an extension of innate social instincts originally honed for kin and group alliances, repurposed for non-human companions that proxy caregiving roles or provide emotional buffering against isolation. This adaptation likely conferred selective advantages in societies, where cooperative animals augmented group cohesion and resource acquisition, with modern pet-keeping reflecting vestigial traits of these ancient mutualisms. Empirical models posit that prior of human and anthropomorphic tendencies enabled the symbiotic shifts during , as individuals predisposed to form such bonds gained indirect fitness benefits through enhanced survival probabilities.

Mechanisms of Grief in Humans and Animals

Grief in humans following the loss of a companion animal activates neural circuits associated with attachment and emotional regulation, including disrupted activity during emotion processing, akin to responses observed in bereavement from human deaths. These mechanisms involve heightened intrusive thoughts, yearning, and sadness, mediated by the brain's , where from pet loss correlates with altered and persistent emotional numbness. Physiologically, such grief triggers endocrine changes, including elevated levels and dysregulation, comparable to other stressors, which can persist for months and contribute to cardiovascular strain. In companion animals, empirical studies document grief-like behavioral mechanisms primarily through observable changes following the death of conspecifics, such as in domestic dogs, where surviving dogs exhibit reduced play, increased , and heightened attachment-seeking toward owners for up to six months post-loss. These responses suggest underlying emotional distress, potentially involving fluctuations like corticosteroids, though direct neurobiological confirmation remains limited compared to human data. Domestic cats display analogous patterns, including decreased activity and altered social interactions after the death of cohabiting cats, indicating conserved mammalian mechanisms for responding to social loss, albeit inferred from rather than subjective experience. Cross-species comparisons reveal evolutionary parallels in mechanisms, rooted in attachment bonds that promote through pair or group cohesion; however, evidence relies on proxies like prolonged vigilance or avoidance of cues, without verified internal states equivalent to cognitive rumination. In equines, for instance, survivors show distress vocalizations and separation anxiety after conspecific , pointing to involvement, but these may reflect adaptive responses to disrupted social structures rather than maladaptive . Overall, while encompasses complex cognitive and neuroendocrine elements verifiable via and biomarkers, manifestations emphasize behavioral adaptations, with ongoing research needed to delineate causal physiological pathways.

Psychological and Physical Impacts on Humans

Emotional and Grief Responses

The loss of a companion animal often elicits profound emotional responses in humans, including intense sadness, shock, and a sense of emptiness, comparable in affective depth to bereavement over relationships for many individuals due to the strong attachment bonds formed. These reactions stem from the pet's role as a consistent source of companionship and unconditional affection, disrupting daily routines and emotional security upon death. Common grief manifestations mirror aspects of human bereavement models, such as initial or disbelief, followed by —often directed at oneself, veterinarians, or circumstances—and guilt, particularly if the owner authorized or perceived lapses in care. , depression, and eventual may occur non-linearly, with guilt amplified by retrospective rumination on the pet's or the decision-making process. Empirical data indicate that recent pet loss triples the likelihood of depressive symptoms compared to the general , with intensity correlating directly to pre-loss attachment strength. Factors modulating response severity include the pet's lifespan (longer bonds yield deeper ), cause of death (sudden losses provoke sharper shock than anticipated declines), and owner characteristics like prior trauma or style. High —viewing the pet as family—exacerbates emotional investment but can prolong recovery if it fosters idealized continuing bonds without resolution. Social disenfranchisement, where is minimized by others, further isolates owners, hindering normalization. In children, pet death heightens risks of anxiety or complicated , underscoring developmental vulnerabilities. Duration varies, with acute phases lasting weeks to months, though subclinical distress persists in 10-20% of cases beyond six months, influenced by absent social validation. Strong mitigates intensity, while isolation or concurrent stressors compound it, as evidenced in longitudinal surveys of bereaved owners.

Physical and Long-Term Health Effects

The bereavement following the death of a companion animal often produces acute physical symptoms stemming from the associated stress response, such as fatigue, disrupted sleep patterns including , somatic complaints like chest tightness or a hollow sensation in the stomach, and changes in appetite. These manifestations parallel those observed in human grief processes, where acute emotional distress activates physiological pathways involving elevated activity and initial surges in . In a survey of older adults, 38.1% reported reduced levels after their companion animal's death, potentially initiating a cascade of long-term health risks including , diminished , and heightened vulnerability to conditions like or metabolic disorders. This decline in activity may compound preexisting vulnerabilities in aging populations, where pet ownership typically correlates with higher baseline mobility and exercise adherence. Chronic from loss, experienced by a subset of owners as prolonged stress, has been linked to sustained psychological strain that indirectly affects physical through mechanisms such as immune suppression or disrupted regulation, though direct longitudinal studies on pet-specific outcomes remain limited compared to human bereavement research. For instance, severe reactions occurred in 30% of participants in one analysis of owners, mirroring patterns where unresolved loss elevates risks for or inflammatory responses over time. Empirical data emphasize that while ownership generally buffers cardiovascular risks via stress reduction, the abrupt termination of this bond can transiently reverse such benefits, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to mitigate enduring physiological tolls.

Coping Strategies and Support

Self-Directed Coping Methods

Following the death of a pet dog at home, immediate practical steps include confirming the death by contacting a veterinarian if there is any doubt, placing the body in a cool place wrapped in a towel or box with the head elevated on its side, and using ice packs in warm conditions to delay decomposition. Individuals grieving the loss of an animal companion, such as a , often turn to self-directed strategies to process emotions without professional intervention. indicates these methods can mitigate acute distress by fostering and maintaining attachment bonds. A of pet bereavement literature identified continuing bonds—such as revisiting memories or engaging in symbolic rituals—as a prevalent self-initiated approach that helps sustain connection to the deceased animal, potentially reducing intensity over time. Similarly, thematic analyses of bereaved owners highlight personal rituals, including creating memorials or reflecting on shared experiences, as adaptive mechanisms that provide structure and validation during . Journaling emerges as an evidence-supported technique, allowing individuals to articulate feelings of sadness, guilt, or relief associated with the loss. Studies on processing note that writing about the animal's facilitates cognitive reorganization, helping mourners reframe the experience from one of rupture to continuity. practices, such as affirming one's right to grieve without judgment, have been linked in pet loss research to lower levels of complicated , as they counteract often amplified by societal minimization of animal bereavement. Engaging in routine physical activities, like walking routes once shared with the , serves as a self-directed strategy to counteract withdrawal and restore daily functioning. Empirical findings from bereavement studies adapted to pet loss suggest such actions promote endorphin release and habit reformation, easing physical symptoms of such as or appetite changes. However, avoidance-based , including premature replacement of the animal or suppression of , correlates with prolonged distress in longitudinal , underscoring the value of deliberate, methods over .
  • Memorialization: Crafting personal tributes, such as photo albums or planting a , enables symbolic closure while honoring the bond; owners report sustained emotional benefits from these acts in qualitative accounts.
  • Mindful reflection: Techniques like guided self-talk or visualization of positive memories align with cognitive-behavioral principles, aiding in gradual acceptance without external facilitation.
  • Routine maintenance: Preserving pre-loss habits, adjusted for absence, prevents secondary disruptions like , as evidenced by patterns in pet owners' recovery trajectories.
These approaches vary in efficacy by individual factors, including attachment strength and prior trauma, with stronger evidence for their role in uncomplicated rather than pathological cases requiring further support.

External Resources and Interventions

External resources for with animal loss include nonprofit organizations offering hotlines and support groups staffed by trained volunteers. The Association for Pet Loss and Bereavement (APLB), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit founded in the 1990s, provides free telephone and email counseling, online chat support, and monthly video support groups, with volunteers certified in pet bereavement counseling to address emotions like guilt and denial. Similarly, the (AVMA) endorses hotlines available evenings and weekends for immediate client support, emphasizing that these services mirror responses to human family member deaths, though they are not substitutes for . Professional interventions often involve structured counseling tailored to pet bereavement. Lap of Love Veterinary Hospice offers free weekly virtual group sessions and paid individual counseling or journaling groups, focusing on processing and euthanasia-related decisions, with sessions limited to 90 minutes to facilitate peer validation without overwhelming participants. Evidence-based approaches include a six-session cognitive-behavioral (CBT) protocol combining , resilience-building exercises, and skills training, which has shown efficacy in reducing prolonged symptoms by addressing attachment bonds and avoidance behaviors specific to animal companions. A 2023 systematic review of 15 studies graded interventions from levels I to VII, finding group support and CBT-derived methods effective for normalizing intensity, though individual outcomes vary based on factors like sudden loss or owner-pet attachment strength, with limited randomized controlled trials highlighting a need for more rigorous data. Veterinary institutions and societies provide specialized resources, such as UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine's 90-minute Zoom-based support groups, which connect participants via video for shared experiences, reporting high attendance from owners facing or unexpected deaths. The American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP) lists management tools, including referrals to counselors trained in complicated from animal loss, noting that interventions bridging the " gap"—where societal dismissal exacerbates isolation—improve emotional recovery through evidence-informed techniques like for memorializing bonds. While these resources validate pet as comparable to human bereavement in duration and intensity per longitudinal studies, their effectiveness depends on ; rural owners may rely more on platforms, with urban programs like those from offering videos and books alongside groups to extend reach.

Cultural, Ethical, and Societal Views

Historical and Cross-Cultural Perspectives

In , animal loss was addressed through extensive mummification practices, reflecting deep cultural reverence for certain species as embodiments of deities or companions. Pets such as cats, dogs, and monkeys were often mummified and buried alongside their owners to ensure companionship in the , with archaeological evidence from sites like yielding millions of such remains. Votive animal mummies, including over four million ibises from a single cemetery, were dedicated to gods like , indicating ritual responses to animal death beyond mere utility. Families mourned pet cats by shaving their eyebrows, a practice underscoring emotional attachment akin to human bereavement. During the Roman Empire, elite pet owners commemorated canine companions with inscribed epitaphs on tombs, expressing grief and loyalty that paralleled human memorials. Examples include inscriptions lamenting a dog's death with phrases like "I am in tears while I place these words upon your tomb," and pleas such as "Laugh not... because it is a mere dog's grave." These artifacts, dating from the 1st to 3rd centuries CE, reveal that dogs were valued for protection, hunting, and affection, with burial practices extending to fostering children or faithful hounds. Such customs were primarily among the affluent, highlighting class-based variations in animal loss responses. In medieval , animal loss was generally viewed through a lens of utility and divine , with pets like dogs receiving care but rarely formalized mourning rituals documented outside noble circles. Upper-class women and clerics maintained emotional bonds with lapdogs and falcons, as evidenced by illuminated manuscripts and testaments, yet Church doctrine emphasized animals' subservience to humans, limiting equivalence to human death. Archaeological finds of buried pets in domestic contexts suggest informal attachments, but systemic records prioritize livestock losses tied to economic impacts over sentimental responses. Cross-culturally, responses to animal loss vary by societal structure and animistic beliefs. In , pet death prompts elaborate rituals including home shrines with photos and offerings, supported by 600-900 dedicated cemeteries where annual services honor deceased companions. Indigenous North American traditions often involve gratitude rituals for hunted animals, such as addressing the spirit to apologize and ensure rebirth, viewing animals as kin with souls requiring release to prevent haunting. These practices contrast with utilitarian Western historical norms, emphasizing ecological reciprocity over individual pet .

Ethical Debates on Animal Status and Loss

Utilitarian philosophers such as Peter Singer argue that non-human animals possess moral status insofar as they are capable of suffering, warranting equal consideration of their interests with those of humans when the capacity for pain or pleasure is comparable. In this view, the death of a sentient animal constitutes a harm by depriving it of future experiences, though the weight of that harm depends on the animal's cognitive sophistication and anticipated welfare, rather than species membership alone. This framework implies ethical duties to minimize animal suffering and loss, such as opposing factory farming practices that lead to premature deaths for trivial human benefits, as these violate impartial benevolence. Rights-based theorists like extend moral status further, positing that animals qualifying as "subjects-of-a-life"—possessing beliefs, desires, perceptions, and a of welfare—hold inherent value independent of utility to humans, entailing against being treated as mere resources. Consequently, the loss of such animals through killing for , experimentation, or convenience is ethically impermissible unless justified by overriding violations, elevating pet euthanasia debates to questions of respecting animal over owner convenience. critiques utilitarian approaches for potentially permitting if it maximizes aggregate welfare, insisting instead on deontological protections that treat animal lives as ends in themselves. Opposing views, rooted in , maintain that animals lack direct moral status as they cannot participate in rational moral legislation or recognize others as ends, yielding only indirect duties to avoid cruelty, which safeguards moral character rather than per se. , in his Lectures on Ethics, held that violent treatment of animals coarsens sensibilities, potentially leading to inhumanity toward people, but affirmed no intrinsic obligations to animals themselves. Contractualist arguments, as advanced by Peter Carruthers, reinforce this by denying animals moral standing absent capacity for reciprocity or , rendering their deaths ethically neutral unless they impact agreements or contracts; thus, pet loss evokes emotional response but imposes no comparable moral tragedy to death. These debates intersect with animal loss in evaluating practices like or veterinary , where pro-status positions demand stringent justifications for ending life—e.g., irremediable —while skeptics prioritize interests, viewing animal as biologically inevitable without the metaphysical of lost rational projects. Empirical evidence of in mammals and birds supports baseline against gratuitous , yet philosophical disagreement persists on whether this extends to prohibiting deaths in contexts like predation or , highlighting tensions between anthropocentric realism and expansive . Critics of strong animal status warn that equating animal loss with bereavement risks distorting , as deaths involve irreplaceable agents capable of reciprocity and legacy.

Controversies and Criticisms

Anthropomorphism and Its Downsides

, the attribution of human-like emotions, thoughts, and social roles to animals, often intensifies the associated with loss by elevating the perceived emotional reciprocity in the human-animal bond. indicates that owners who strongly anthropomorphize their pets experience attachment levels that predict higher severity, with anthropomorphic traits serving as a significant predictor alongside perceived and infantile features (paedomorphism). This mediation effect means that viewing pets as members with human-equivalent inner lives correlates with responses akin to those for human relatives, including prolonged rumination and separation anxiety. A key downside emerges in the potential for maladaptive outcomes, such as complicated grief, where anthropomorphic projections amplify feelings of guilt, especially in cases of . Owners may interpret the pet's behaviors through a lens—such as ascribing "guilt" to unrelated actions—leading to misjudged needs during life and retrospective regret over health declines or end-of-life decisions. For instance, anthropomorphic practices like feeding foods contribute to in 20-50% of dogs, exacerbating conditions like that necessitate earlier interventions, thereby heightening owner responsibility narratives in bereavement. Critics highlight that fosters inaccurate understandings of and biology, distorting the asymmetry of interspecies relationships where human emotional investment far exceeds the animal's capacity for equivalent . This can result in being more isolating, as societal validation for pet mourning assumes human-like loss without accounting for the pet's shorter lifespan (typically 10-15 years for dogs) and instinct-driven behaviors, potentially delaying adaptive like of natural mortality. Empirical data from attachment studies underscore that while such bonds provide interim , the resultant intensity (e.g., β=0.54 with trauma) risks overpathologizing routine pet death without evidence of mutual human-level in animals.

Comparisons to Human Bereavement and Overstated Equivalence

Studies examining self-reported severity have found comparable levels between the loss of a loved one and a companion animal. For instance, a 2018 Australian study of 50 participants reported no statistically significant differences in quantitative severity scores, though qualitative responses highlighted nuances such as varying emotional connections and social validation. Similarly, on continuing bonds—ongoing psychological ties to the deceased—indicates that pet owners experience symptoms akin to those following , including intense yearning and functional impairment. These parallels are attributed to strong attachment bonds, with pet owners often describing pets as family members providing unconditional companionship. However, such comparisons risk overstating equivalence by conflating subjective emotional intensity with relational and existential depth. bereavement involves of a reciprocal, cognitively complex being capable of shared , , and future-oriented planning, elements absent in human-animal bonds where interactions are asymmetrical and anthropomorphically projected. Clinical frameworks reinforce this distinction: the DSM-5-TR defines exclusively for the of a , excluding pet loss despite symptomatic overlaps, as pet relationships lack the mutual that amplifies 's societal and psychological ramifications. Prior studies have also noted lower average intensity for animal loss compared to , particularly in cases of distant human relationships, underscoring that pet , while profound, is often more contained to the individual without broader kinship disruptions. Equating the two overlooks causal differences in grief's origins and impacts. Pet loss frequently evokes due to societal prioritization of human life, reflecting a realistic acknowledgment of rooted in advanced and ethical reciprocity, rather than mere . Overemphasis on similarity can pathologize normal pet attachment without addressing unique factors like guilt or the pet's shorter lifespan, potentially inflating therapeutic interventions while diminishing the irreplaceable facets of , such as collective rituals and inherited legacies. Empirical thus supports validation of pet bereavement but cautions against full equivalence, as qualitative complexities— including differing social networks and grief trajectories—persist across comparisons.

Economic and Practical Realities

Financial Costs of Animal Care and Loss

The annual cost of routine pet care in the United States varies by species and includes expenses for , veterinary visits, grooming, and supplies. For dogs, owners spent an average of $598 on veterinary care in 2025, while cat owners averaged $529. Cat owners typically allocate $310 yearly to , $253 to veterinary services, and $50 to toys. Over a pet's lifetime, these expenses accumulate significantly; the midpoint estimate for a dog (assuming a 10-year lifespan) is approximately $34,550, and for a cat (16-year lifespan), $32,170. Upfront costs for acquiring a dog in 2025 range from $1,150 to $4,420, encompassing or purchase fees, initial vaccinations, and basic supplies. End-of-life care imposes additional financial burdens, often involving emergency veterinary interventions, , and disposition of remains. Veterinary bills for terminal illnesses or emergencies can escalate rapidly, with some cases exceeding $3,000 within days for diagnostics, treatments, and hospitalization. Economic constraints frequently influence decisions to pursue , particularly among lower-income households unable to afford advanced care. The average cost of for a ranges from $100 to $300, though it can reach $800 depending on the animal's size, location, and whether performed in-clinic or at home. Private cremation or adds further expense; pet cemetery averages $755 (ranging $597–$1,295), while overall costs can hit $1,500–$2,000 including memorials. Pet insurance may mitigate some end-of-life costs, with many policies reimbursing 70–100% of , , or related expenses if tied to covered illnesses, though premiums average $53 monthly for dogs and $32 for cats. However, coverage exclusions for pre-existing conditions and rising veterinary limit its effectiveness, as owners often forgo or face premiums exceeding claims for routine care. These financial realities underscore the causal link between commitments and potential , with untreated or terminally managed conditions amplifying out-of-pocket expenditures.

Broader Implications for Pet Ownership Decisions

The prospect of enduring pet loss shapes pet ownership decisions by compelling individuals to evaluate their emotional tolerance for , which equates in intensity to bereavement over relatives for many owners. Prospective adopters, particularly those with histories of complicated , may hesitate or abstain altogether, citing fears of repeated psychological distress, including symptoms persisting up to a year post-loss in approximately 20% of cases. This reluctance aligns with first-hand accounts where traumatic circumstances of prior loss—such as sudden death or —amplify avoidance, as owners anticipate diminished capacity to bond anew without preempting pain. Despite such deterrents, data from owner surveys and longitudinal studies indicate that most bereaved individuals ultimately reaffirm pet ownership, often adopting replacements within months to restore companionship benefits that empirical analyses link to improved metrics, albeit with short-term fluctuations around acquisition or loss events. For instance, reports highlight that acquiring a successor aids coping for nearly three-quarters of owners, countering through renewed purpose and attachment formation. This trend reflects a rational wherein the net of pet-derived joys—encompassing daily routines, physical , and emotional support—prevails over foreseeable sorrow, especially for those without preexisting vulnerabilities to prolonged . Beyond , broader incorporates lifecycle mismatches, such as pets' average lifespans (10-13 years for dogs, 12-15 for cats) against owners' remaining years, prompting older adults to favor low-maintenance or temporary arrangements like fostering to sidestep outliving a dependent animal. Families may also deliberate impacts on children, where pet loss serves as an early lesson in mortality but risks amplifying familial distress if unprepared. Alternatives to full , including at or short-term care, emerge as viable hedges, allowing experiential benefits without irrevocable commitments, particularly amid systemic shelter strains where unadopted animals face high rates. Ultimately, these implications favor to pet mortality as inherent to the human-animal bond, prioritizing evidence-based assessments of personal fortitude over idealized avoidance.

References

  1. https://www.worldwildlife.org/publications/2024-living-planet-report/
  2. https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife-Guide/Threats-to-Wildlife/Habitat-Loss
  3. https://www.worldwildlife.org/news/press-releases/catastrophic-73-decline-in-the-average-size-of-global-wildlife-populations-in-just-50-years-reveals-a-system-in-peril/
  4. https://ourworldindata.org/2024-living-planet-index
  5. https://www.livingplanetindex.org/about_index
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12024182/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12066695/
  8. https://ebusiness.avma.org/ProductCatalog/product.aspx?ID=101
  9. https://www.today.com/life/relationships/processing-pet-loss-grief-rcna213472
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11017691/
  11. https://www.aspca.org/about-us/aspca-policy-and-position-statements/definition-companion-animal
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/veterinary-science-and-veterinary-medicine/companion-animals
  13. https://habri.org/international-hab-survey/
  14. https://globalpetindustry.com/news/global-pet-population-at-1-billion-cats-lead-the-way/
  15. https://www.thezebra.com/resources/research/pet-ownership-statistics/
  16. https://worldanimalfoundation.org/advocate/pet-ownership-statistics/
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7943653/
  18. https://news.sky.com/story/pet-loss-and-grief-my-world-crashed-the-rising-number-of-people-seeking-support-over-the-deaths-of-their-animals-12974903
  19. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/hai.2023.0017
  20. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/hai.2020.0017
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3659171/
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9798575/
  23. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-77385-8
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9387675/
  25. https://www.uoguelph.ca/ahl/content/causes-sudden-unexpected-death-dogs-and-cats-%25E2%2580%2593-it%25E2%2580%2599s-not-neighbour
  26. https://avmajournals.avma.org/display/post/news/when-death-comes-suddenly-to-a-pet.xml
  27. https://skeptvet.com/2015/03/longevity-causes-of-death-in-pet-cats/
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787825000449
  29. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1082102/full
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10535394/
  31. https://www.avma.org/news/when-death-comes-suddenly-pet
  32. https://www.shelteranimalscount.org/sac-releases-2023-annual-analysis/
  33. https://www.aspca.org/helping-shelters-people-pets/us-animal-shelter-statistics
  34. https://avmajournals.avma.org/view/journals/javma/aop/javma.25.06.0412/javma.25.06.0412.xml
  35. https://www.shelteranimalscount.org/shelter-crowding-leads-to-high-euthanasia-rates-for-dogs/
  36. https://naids.org/car-safety/how-many-dogs-die-in-car-accidents-data-and-statistics/
  37. https://www.avma.org/news/data-safety-regulations-lacking-when-it-comes-pets-and-vehicles
  38. https://www.aspca.org/news/official-top-10-toxins-2024
  39. https://www.avma.org/resources-tools/pet-owners/petcare/household-hazards
  40. https://www.shelteranimalscount.org/animal-abuse-facts-and-statistics-2024/
  41. https://bestfriends.org/stories/julie-castle-blog/34-fewer-animals-were-killed-shelters-so-far-2024
  42. https://cvm.msu.edu/news/perspectives-magazine/perspectives-fall-2018/the-human-animal-bond-throughout-time
  43. https://academic.oup.com/af/article/4/3/5/4638692
  44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3872511/
  45. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219727/
  46. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1322868111
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6826447/
  48. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234/full
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016815912500022X
  50. https://academic.oup.com/af/article/4/3/32/4638688
  51. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/hai.2023.0028
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9597799/
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4668712/
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7442719/
  55. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK217841/
  56. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-05669-y
  57. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-venn-diagram-life/202311/does-your-pet-grieve-the-way-you-do
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016815912400203X
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5824781/
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002977
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2782609/
  62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6912713/
  63. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381807563_Are_Pain_and_Mourning_for_a_Pet_and_for_a_Family_Member_the_Same
  64. https://lindnercenterofhope.org/blog/understanding-the-grieving-process-when-a-pet-dies-support-for-individuals-families-and-therapists/
  65. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/4/431
  66. https://rarebreedvet.com/team/navigating-the-impact-on-mental-health-after-the-loss-of-a-pet/
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11776356/
  68. https://www.theveterinarynurse.com/content/education/the-impact-of-pet-loss-an-update-on-the-research-and-evidence-based-ways-to-help-grieving-clients/
  69. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10888705.2021.1934839
  70. https://www.northwestpharmacy.com/askthedoctor/grieving-the-loss-of-a-pet
  71. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-we-need-to-take-pet-loss-seriously/
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4991891/
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1558787815000118
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6499429/
  75. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-43851-x
  76. https://www.thesprucepets.com/if-your-dog-dies-at-home-1118473
  77. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/context/etd_projects/article/2284/viewcontent/cervantesruth_4290795_72695079_Pet_loss_and_grieving_strategies_a_Systematic_Review_of_Literature.pdf
  78. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/11876-2017062211876
  79. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/hai.2014.0007
  80. https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12877-021-02410-8
  81. https://jkms.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e305
  82. https://www.aplb.org/
  83. https://www.samhsa.gov/resource/dbhis/association-pet-loss-bereavement
  84. https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/2023-12/2024W_Resolution6_Loss_Support_attch1.pdf
  85. https://www.avma.org/resources-tools/pet-owners/petcare/coping-loss-pet
  86. https://www.lapoflove.com/our-services/pet-loss-support
  87. https://www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/hospital/pet-loss-support/pet-loss-support-group
  88. https://aaep.org/resource/pet-loss-and-grief-management-resources/
  89. https://bestfriends.org/pet-care-resources/grieving-loss-pet-resources-coping
  90. https://www.brooklynmuseum.org/exhibitions/soulful_creatures_animal_mummies
  91. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-32685945
  92. https://www.thecollector.com/ancient-egyptian-mummified-animals/
  93. https://mymodernmet.com/ancient-roman-epitaphs-dogs/
  94. https://www.thedodo.com/9-touching-epitaphs-ancient-gr-589550486.html
  95. https://www.wantedinrome.com/news/how-the-ancient-romans-buried-their-dogs.html
  96. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1446154/1/U593483.pdf
  97. https://www.medievalists.net/2023/11/medieval-pet-care/
  98. https://www.bereavementjournal.org/index.php/berc/article/download/960/968
  99. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAnthropology/comments/8fa4wn/examples_of_rituals_expressing_gratitude_towards/
  100. https://utilitarianism.net/peter-singer-animal-liberation/
  101. http://www.princeton.edu/~eharman/AnimalPainDeathFinalVersion.pdf
  102. https://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/animals/rights/moralstatus_1.shtml
  103. https://rintintin.colorado.edu/~vancecd/phil308/Regan.pdf
  104. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/context/acwp_awap/article/1003/viewcontent/Case_for_animal_rights.pdf
  105. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-3331-6_15
  106. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=philosfacpub
  107. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7919796/
  108. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9710398/
  109. https://humanities.uct.ac.za/media/251903
  110. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8614365/
  111. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/15/anthropomorphism-danger-humans-animals-science
  112. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016815912400203X
  113. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30216137/
  114. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26766186/
  115. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327668750_Grief_severity_A_comparison_between_human_and_companion_animal_death
  116. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/202203/can-bereaved-pet-owners-suffer-prolonged-grief-disorder
  117. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1526302/full
  118. https://www.griefhealingblog.com/2024/04/in-grief-comparing-pet-loss-to-loss-of.html
  119. https://www.avma.org/news/evolving-pet-owner-economics-what-data-reveal-veterinary-teams
  120. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/pet-insurance/pet-ownership-statistics/
  121. https://www.petplace.com/article/general/pet-care/cost-of-owning-a-pet
  122. https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2025/03/23/dog-cat-ownership-costs-2025/82516821007/
  123. https://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/comments/1o5scfn/a_look_at_the_cost_of_a_pet_emergency_emergency/
  124. https://face4pets.org/articles/the-mental-toll-of-economic-euthanasia
  125. https://www.pawlicy.com/blog/dog-euthanasia-cost/
  126. https://www.carecredit.com/well-u/pet-care/dog-euthanasia-cost/
  127. https://www.furevermemorials.com/pet-loss/how-much-does-a-pet-burial-cost-data-from-15-pet-cemeteries/
  128. https://www.bankrate.com/insurance/pet-insurance/end-of-life-pet-insurance-coverage/
  129. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/pet-insurance/pet-insurance-statistics/
  130. https://www.pawlicy.com/blog/is-pet-insurance-worth-it/
  131. https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/7/16/20694851/pet-insurance-sick-dog-cat-pets-vet-cost
  132. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-06987-7
  133. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/fluent-in-fur/202307/adopting-a-new-pet-after-losing-one
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.