Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Human
View on Wikipedia
| Human | |
|---|---|
| Male (left) and female (right) adult humans | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Mammalia |
| Order: | Primates |
| Suborder: | Haplorhini |
| Infraorder: | Simiiformes |
| Family: | Hominidae |
| Subfamily: | Homininae |
| Tribe: | Hominini |
| Genus: | Homo |
| Species: | H. sapiens
|
| Binomial name | |
| Homo sapiens | |
| Homo sapiens population density (2020) | |
Humans, scientifically known as Homo sapiens, are primates that belong to the biological family of great apes and are characterized by hairlessness, bipedality, and high intelligence. Humans have large brains compared to body size, enabling more advanced cognitive skills that facilitate successful adaptation to varied environments, development of sophisticated tools, and formation of complex social structures and civilizations.
Humans are highly social, with individual humans tending to belong to a multi-layered network of distinct social groups – from families and peer groups to corporations and political states. As such, social interactions between humans have established a wide variety of values, social norms, languages, and traditions (collectively termed institutions), each of which bolsters human society. Humans are also highly curious: the desire to understand and influence phenomena has motivated humanity's development of science, technology, philosophy, mythology, religion, and other frameworks of knowledge; humans also study themselves through such domains as anthropology, social science, history, psychology, and medicine. As of 2025, there are estimated to be more than 8 billion living humans.
For most of their history, humans were nomadic hunter-gatherers. Humans began exhibiting behavioral modernity about 160,000–60,000 years ago. The Neolithic Revolution occurred independently in multiple locations, the earliest in Southwest Asia 13,000 years ago, and saw the emergence of agriculture and permanent human settlement; in turn, this led to the development of civilization and kickstarted a period of continuous (and ongoing) population growth and rapid technological change. Since then, a number of civilizations have risen and fallen, while a number of sociocultural and technological developments have resulted in significant changes to the human lifestyle.
Humans are omnivorous, capable of consuming a wide variety of plant and animal material, and have used fire and other forms of heat to prepare and cook food since the time of Homo erectus. Humans are generally diurnal, sleeping on average seven to nine hours per day. Humans have had a dramatic effect on the environment. They are apex predators, being rarely preyed upon by other species.[1] Human population growth, industrialization, land development, overconsumption and combustion of fossil fuels have led to environmental destruction and pollution that significantly contributes to the ongoing mass extinction of other forms of life.[2][3] Within the last century, humans have explored challenging environments such as Antarctica, the deep sea, and outer space, though human habitation in these environments is typically limited in duration and restricted to scientific, military, or industrial expeditions. Humans have visited the Moon and sent human-made spacecraft to other celestial bodies, becoming the first known species to do so.
Although the term "humans" technically equates with all members of the genus Homo, in common usage it generally refers to Homo sapiens, the only extant member. All other members of the genus Homo, which are now extinct, are known as archaic humans, and the term "modern human" is used to distinguish Homo sapiens from archaic humans. Anatomically modern humans emerged at least 300,000 years ago in Africa, evolving from Homo heidelbergensis or a similar species. Migrating out of Africa, they gradually replaced and interbred with local populations of archaic humans. Multiple hypotheses for the extinction of archaic human species such as Neanderthals include competition, violence, interbreeding with Homo sapiens, or inability to adapt to climate change. Genes and the environment influence human biological variation in visible characteristics, physiology, disease susceptibility, mental abilities, body size, and life span. Though humans vary in many traits (such as genetic predispositions and physical features), humans are among the least genetically diverse primates. Any two humans are at least 99% genetically similar.
Humans are sexually dimorphic: generally, males have greater body strength and females have a higher body fat percentage. At puberty, humans develop secondary sex characteristics. Females are capable of pregnancy, usually between puberty, at around 12 years old, and menopause, around the age of 50. Childbirth is dangerous, with a high risk of complications and death. Often, both the mother and the father provide care for their children, who are helpless at birth.
Etymology and definition
[edit]
All modern humans are classified into the species Homo sapiens, coined by Carl Linnaeus in his 1735 work Systema Naturae.[4] The generic name Homo is a learned 18th-century derivation from Latin homō, which refers to humans of either sex.[5][6] The word human can refer to all members of the Homo genus.[7] The name Homo sapiens means 'wise man' or 'knowledgeable man'.[8] There is disagreement if certain extinct members of the genus, namely Neanderthals, should be included as a separate species of humans or as a subspecies of H. sapiens.[7]
Human is a loanword of Middle English from Old French humain, ultimately from Latin hūmānus, the adjectival form of homō ('man' – in the sense of humanity).[9] The native English term man can refer to the species generally (a synonym for humanity) as well as to human males. It may also refer to individuals of either sex.[10]
Despite the fact that the word animal is colloquially used as an antonym for human,[11] and contrary to a common biological misconception, humans are in a biological sense animals.[12] The word person is often used interchangeably with human, but philosophical debate exists as to whether personhood applies to all humans or all sentient beings, and further if a human can lose personhood (such as by going into a persistent vegetative state) and what is the beginning of human personhood.[13]
Evolution
[edit]Humans belong to the biological family of apes (superfamily Hominoidea).[14] The lineage of apes that eventually gave rise to humans first split from gibbons (family Hylobatidae), next orangutans (genus Pongo), then gorillas (genus Gorilla), and finally, chimpanzees and bonobos (genus Pan). The last split, between the human and chimpanzee–bonobo lineages, took place around 8–4 million years ago, in the late Miocene epoch.[15][16] During this split, chromosome 2 was formed from the joining of two other chromosomes, leaving humans with only 23 pairs of chromosomes, compared to 24 for the other apes.[17] Following their split with chimpanzees and bonobos, the hominins diversified into many species and at least two distinct genera. All but one of these lineages – representing the genus Homo and its sole extant species Homo sapiens – are now extinct.[18]

The genus Homo evolved from Australopithecus.[19][20] Though fossils from the transition are scarce, the earliest members of Homo share several key traits with Australopithecus.[21][22] Due to the scant available evidence dating the time of divergence to the genus Homo does not have a consensus.[23] Some studies using molecular clock techniques estimate the Homo genus appeared 4.30–2.56 million years ago,[24] while others contest that some early Homo species are incorrectly included in the genus and therefore put this estimate at about 1.87 million years ago.[23]
The earliest record of Homo is the 2.8 million-year-old specimen LD 350-1 from Ethiopia, and the earliest named species are Homo habilis and Homo rudolfensis which evolved by 2.3 million years ago.[22] H. erectus (the African variant is sometimes called H. ergaster) evolved 2 million years ago and was the first archaic human species to leave Africa and disperse across Eurasia.[25] H. erectus also was the first to evolve a characteristically human body plan. Homo sapiens emerged in Africa at least 300,000 years ago from a species commonly designated as either H. heidelbergensis or H. rhodesiensis, the descendants of H. erectus that remained in Africa.[26] H. sapiens migrated out of the continent, gradually replacing or interbreeding with local populations of archaic humans.[27][28][29] Humans began exhibiting behavioral modernity about 160,000–70,000 years ago,[30] and possibly earlier.[31] This development was likely selected amidst natural climate change in Middle to Late Pleistocene Africa.[32]
The "out of Africa" migration took place in at least two waves, the first around 130,000 to 100,000 years ago, the second (Southern Dispersal) around 70,000 to 50,000 years ago.[33][34] H. sapiens proceeded to colonize all the continents and larger islands, arriving in Eurasia 125,000 years ago,[35][36] Australia around 65,000 years ago,[37] the Americas around 15,000 years ago, and remote islands such as Hawaii, Easter Island, Madagascar, and New Zealand in the years 300 to 1280 CE.[38][39]
Human evolution was not a simple linear or branched progression but involved interbreeding between related species.[40][41][42] Genomic research has shown that hybridization between substantially diverged lineages was common in human evolution.[43] DNA evidence suggests that several genes of Neanderthal origin are present among all non sub-Saharan-African populations, and Neanderthals and other hominins, such as Denisovans, may have contributed up to 6% of their genome to present-day non sub-Saharan-African humans.[40][44][45]
Human evolution is characterized by a number of morphological, developmental, physiological, and behavioral changes that have taken place since the split between the last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees. The most significant of these adaptations are hairlessness,[46] obligate bipedalism, increased brain size and decreased sexual dimorphism (neoteny). The relationship between all these changes is the subject of ongoing debate.[47]
History
[edit]Prehistory
[edit]
Until about 12,000 years ago, all humans lived as hunter-gatherers.[48][49] The Neolithic Revolution (the invention of agriculture) first took place in Southwest Asia and spread through large parts of the Old World over the following millennia.[50] It also occurred independently in Mesoamerica (about 6,000 years ago),[51] China,[52][53] Papua New Guinea,[54] and the Sahel and West Savanna regions of Africa.[55][56][57]
The formation of permanent human settlements, the domestication of animals and the use of metal tools coincided with permanent food surplus, for the first time in history. Agriculture and sedentary lifestyle led to the emergence of early civilizations.[58][59][60]
Ancient
[edit]
An urban revolution took place in the 4th millennium BCE with the development of city-states, particularly Sumerian cities located in Mesopotamia.[61] It was in these cities that the earliest known form of writing, cuneiform script, appeared around 3000 BCE.[62] Other major civilizations to develop around this time were Ancient Egypt and the Indus Valley Civilisation.[63] They eventually traded with each other and invented technology such as wheels, plows and sails.[64][65][66][67] Emerging by 3000 BCE, the Caral–Supe civilization is the oldest complex civilization in the Americas.[68] Astronomy and mathematics were also developed and the Great Pyramid of Giza was built.[69][70][71] There is evidence of a severe drought lasting about a hundred years that may have caused the decline of these civilizations,[72] with new ones appearing in the aftermath. Babylonians came to dominate Mesopotamia while others,[73] such as the Poverty Point culture, Minoans and the Shang dynasty, rose to prominence in new areas.[74][75][76] The Late Bronze Age collapse around 1200 BCE resulted in the disappearance of a number of civilizations and the beginning of the Greek Dark Ages.[77][78] During this period iron started replacing bronze, leading to the Iron Age.[79]
In the 5th century BCE, history started being recorded as a discipline, which provided a much clearer picture of life at the time.[80] Between the 8th and 6th century BCE, Europe entered the classical antiquity age, a period when ancient Greece and ancient Rome flourished.[81][82] Around this time other civilizations also came to prominence. The Maya civilization started to build cities and create complex calendars.[83][84] In Africa, the Kingdom of Aksum overtook the declining Kingdom of Kush and facilitated trade between India and the Mediterranean.[85] In West Asia, the Achaemenid Empire's system of centralized governance became the precursor to many later empires,[86] while the Gupta Empire in India and the Han dynasty in China have been described as golden ages in their respective regions.[87][88]
Post-classical
[edit]
Following the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476, Europe entered the Middle Ages.[89] During this period, Christianity and the Church would act as a source of authority and education.[90] In the Middle East, Islam became the prominent religion and expanded into North Africa. It led to an Islamic Golden Age, inspiring achievements in architecture, the revival of old advances in science and technology, and the formation of a distinct way of life.[91][92] The Christian and Islamic worlds would eventually clash, with the Kingdom of England, the Kingdom of France and the Holy Roman Empire declaring a series of holy wars to regain control of the Holy Land from Muslims.[93]
In the Americas, between 200 and 900 CE Mesoamerica was in its Classic Period,[94] while further north, complex Mississippian societies would arise starting around 800 CE.[95] The Mongol Empire would conquer much of Eurasia in the 13th and 14th centuries.[96] Over this same time period, the Mali Empire in Africa grew to be the largest empire on the continent, stretching from Senegambia to Ivory Coast.[97] Oceania would see the rise of the Tuʻi Tonga Empire which expanded across many islands in the South Pacific.[98] By the late 15th century, the Aztecs and Inca had become the dominant power in Mesoamerica and the Andes, respectively.[99]
Modern
[edit]The early modern period in Europe and the Near East (c. 1450–1800) began with the final defeat of the Byzantine Empire, and the rise of the Ottoman Empire.[100] Meanwhile, Japan entered the Edo period,[101] the Qing dynasty rose in China[102] and the Mughal Empire ruled much of India.[103] Europe underwent the Renaissance, starting in the 15th century,[104] and the Age of Discovery began with the exploring and colonizing of new regions.[105] This included the colonization of the Americas[106] and the Columbian Exchange.[107] This expansion led to the Atlantic slave trade[108] and the genocide of the Americas' indigenous peoples.[109] This period also marked the Scientific Revolution, with great advances in mathematics, mechanics, astronomy and physiology.[110]

The late modern period (1800–present) saw the Industrial and Technological Revolution bring such discoveries as imaging technology, major innovations in transport and energy development.[111] Influenced by Enlightenment ideals, the Americas and Europe experienced a period of political revolutions known as the Age of Revolution.[112] The Napoleonic Wars raged through Europe in the early 1800s,[113] Spain lost most of its colonies in the New World,[114] while Europeans continued expansion into Africa – where European control went from 10% to almost 90% in less than 50 years[115] – and Oceania.[116] In the 19th century, the British Empire expanded to become the world's largest empire.[117]
A tenuous balance of power among European nations collapsed in 1914 with the outbreak of the First World War, one of the deadliest conflicts in history.[118] In the 1930s, a worldwide economic crisis led to the rise of authoritarian regimes and a Second World War, involving almost all of the world's countries.[119] The war's destruction led to the collapse of most global empires, leading to widespread decolonization.
Following the conclusion of the Second World War in 1945, the United States[120] and the Soviet Union emerged as the remaining global superpowers. This led to a Cold War that saw a struggle for global influence, including a nuclear arms race and a space race, ending in the collapse of the Soviet Union.[121][122] The current Information Age, spurred by the development of the Internet and artificial intelligence systems, sees the world becoming increasingly globalized and interconnected.[123]
Habitat and population
[edit]| World population | 8.2 billion |
|---|---|
| Population density | 16/km2 (42/sq mi) by total area 55/km2 (142/sq mi) by land area |
| Largest cities[n 2] | Tokyo, Delhi, Shanghai, São Paulo, Mexico City, Cairo, Mumbai, Beijing, Dhaka, Osaka |
Early human settlements were dependent on proximity to water and – depending on the lifestyle – other natural resources used for subsistence, such as populations of animal prey for hunting and arable land for growing crops and grazing livestock.[127] Modern humans, however, have a great capacity for altering their habitats by means of technology, irrigation, urban planning, construction, deforestation and desertification.[128] Human settlements continue to be vulnerable to natural disasters, especially those placed in hazardous locations and with low quality of construction.[129] Grouping and deliberate habitat alteration is often done with the goals of providing protection, accumulating comforts or material wealth, expanding the available food, improving aesthetics, increasing knowledge or enhancing the exchange of resources.[130]
Humans are one of the most adaptable species, despite having a low or narrow tolerance for many of the earth's extreme environments.[131] Currently the species is present in all eight biogeographical realms, although their presence in the Antarctic realm is very limited to research stations and annually there is a population decline in the winter months of this realm.[132] Humans established nation-states in the other seven realms, such as South Africa, India, Russia, Australia, Fiji, the United States, and Brazil (each located in a different biogeographical realm).
Within the last century, humans have also explored the deep sea and outer space. Human habitation within these hostile environments is restrictive and expensive, typically limited in duration, and restricted to scientific, military, or industrial expeditions.[133] Humans have visited the Moon and made their presence known on other celestial bodies through human-made robotic spacecraft.[134][135][136] Since 2000, there has been continuous human presence in space through habitation on the International Space Station.[137]
By using advanced tools and clothing, humans have been able to extend their tolerance to a wide variety of temperatures, humidities, and altitudes.[131][138] As a result, humans are a cosmopolitan species found in almost all regions of the world, including tropical rainforest, arid desert, extremely cold arctic regions, and heavily polluted cities; in comparison, most other species are confined to a few geographical areas by their limited adaptability.[139] The human population is not, however, uniformly distributed on the Earth's surface, because the population density varies from one region to another, and large stretches of surface are almost completely uninhabited, like Antarctica and vast swathes of the ocean.[131][140] Most humans (61%) live in Asia; the remainder live in the Americas (14%), Africa (14%), Europe (11%), and Oceania (0.5%).[141]

Estimates of the population at the time agriculture emerged in around 10,000 BC have ranged between 1 million and 15 million.[143][144] Around 50–60 million people lived in the combined eastern and western Roman Empire in the 4th century AD.[145] Bubonic plagues, first recorded in the 6th century AD, reduced the population by 50%, with the Black Death killing 75–200 million people in Eurasia and North Africa alone.[146] Human population is believed to have reached one billion in 1800. It has since then increased exponentially, reaching two billion in 1930 and three billion in 1960, four in 1975, five in 1987 and six billion in 1999.[147] It passed seven billion in 2011[148] and passed eight billion in November 2022.[149] It took over two million years of human prehistory and history for the human population to reach one billion and only 207 years more to grow to 7 billion.[150] The combined biomass of the carbon of all the humans on Earth in 2018 was estimated at 60 million tons, about 10 times larger than that of all non-domesticated mammals.[142]
In 2018, 4.2 billion humans (55%) lived in urban areas, up from 751 million in 1950.[151] The most urbanized regions are Northern America (82%), Latin America (81%), Europe (74%) and Oceania (68%), with Africa and Asia having nearly 90% of the world's 3.4 billion rural population.[151] Problems for humans living in cities include various forms of pollution and crime,[152] especially in inner city and suburban slums.
Biology
[edit]Anatomy and physiology
[edit]
Most aspects of human physiology are closely homologous to corresponding aspects of animal physiology. The dental formula of humans is: 2.1.2.32.1.2.3, like other catarrhines. Humans have proportionately shorter palates and much smaller teeth than other primates. They are the only primates to have short, relatively flush canine teeth. Humans have characteristically crowded teeth, with gaps from lost teeth usually closing up quickly in young individuals. Humans are gradually losing their third molars, with some individuals having them congenitally absent.[153]
Humans share with chimpanzees a vestigial tail,[154] appendix, flexible shoulder joints, grasping fingers and opposable thumbs.[155] Humans also have a more barrel-shaped chest in contrast to the funnel shape of other apes, an adaptation for bipedal respiration.[156] Apart from bipedalism and brain size, humans differ from chimpanzees mostly in smelling, hearing and digesting proteins.[157] While humans have a density of hair follicles comparable to other apes, it is predominantly vellus hair, most of which is so short and wispy as to be practically invisible.[158][159] Humans have about 2 million sweat glands spread over their entire bodies, many more than chimpanzees, whose sweat glands are scarce and are mainly located on the palm of the hand and on the soles of the feet.[160]
It is estimated that the worldwide average height for an adult human male is about 171 cm (5 ft 7 in), while the worldwide average height for adult human females is about 159 cm (5 ft 3 in).[161] Shrinkage of stature may begin in middle age in some individuals but tends to be typical in the extremely aged.[162] Throughout history, human populations have universally become taller, probably as a consequence of better nutrition, healthcare, and living conditions.[163] The average mass of an adult human is 59 kg (130 lb) for females and 77 kg (170 lb) for males.[164][165] Like many other conditions, body weight and body type are influenced by both genetic susceptibility and environment and varies greatly among individuals.[166][167]
Humans have a far faster and more accurate throw than other animals.[168] Humans are also among the best long-distance runners in the animal kingdom, but slower over short distances.[169][157] Humans' thinner body hair and more productive sweat glands help avoid heat exhaustion while running for long distances.[170] Compared to other apes, the human heart produces greater stroke volume and cardiac output and the aorta is proportionately larger.[171][172]
Genetics
[edit]
Humans are, like most animals, plants, and fungi, a eukaryotic, and like most animals a diploid species. Each somatic cell has two sets of 23 chromosomes, each set received from one parent; gametes have only one set of chromosomes, which is a mixture of the two parental sets. Among the 23 pairs of chromosomes, there are 22 pairs of autosomes and one pair of sex chromosomes. Like other mammals, humans have an XY sex-determination system, so that females have the sex chromosomes XX and males have XY.[173] Genes and environment influence human biological variation in visible characteristics, physiology, disease susceptibility and mental abilities. The exact influence of genes and environment on certain traits is not well understood.[174][175]
While no humans – not even monozygotic twins – are genetically identical,[176] two humans on average will have a genetic similarity of 99.5%-99.9%.[177][178] This makes them more homogeneous than other great apes, including chimpanzees.[179][180] This small variation in human DNA compared to many other species suggests a population bottleneck during the Late Pleistocene (around 100,000 years ago), in which the human population was reduced to a small number of breeding pairs.[181][182] The forces of natural selection have continued to operate on human populations, with evidence that certain regions of the genome display directional selection in the past 15,000 years.[183]
The human genome was first sequenced in 2001[184] and by 2020 hundreds of thousands of genomes had been sequenced.[185] In 2012 the International HapMap Project had compared the genomes of 1,184 individuals from 11 populations and identified 1.6 million single nucleotide polymorphisms.[186] African populations harbor the highest number of private genetic variants. While many of the common variants found in populations outside of Africa are also found on the African continent, there are still large numbers that are private to these regions, especially Oceania and the Americas.[187] By 2010 estimates, humans have approximately 22,000 genes.[188] By comparing mitochondrial DNA, which is inherited only from the mother, geneticists have concluded that the last female common ancestor whose genetic marker is found in all modern humans, the so-called mitochondrial Eve, must have lived around 90,000 to 200,000 years ago.[189][190][191][192]
Life cycle
[edit]
Most human reproduction takes place by internal fertilization via sexual intercourse, but can also occur through assisted reproductive technology procedures.[193] The average gestation period is 38 weeks, but a normal pregnancy can vary by up to 37 days.[194] Embryonic development in the human covers the first eight weeks of development; at the beginning of the ninth week the embryo is termed a fetus.[195] Humans are able to induce early labor or perform a caesarean section if the child needs to be born earlier for medical reasons.[196] In developed countries, infants are typically 3–4 kg (7–9 lb) in weight and 47–53 cm (19–21 in) in height at birth.[197][198] However, low birth weight is common in developing countries, and contributes to the high levels of infant mortality in these regions.[199]
Compared with other species, human childbirth is dangerous, with a much higher risk of complications and death.[200] The size of the fetus's head is more closely matched to the pelvis than in other primates.[201] The reason for this is not completely understood,[n 3] but it contributes to a painful labor that can last 24 hours or more.[203] The chances of a successful labor increased significantly during the 20th century in wealthier countries with the advent of new medical technologies. In contrast, pregnancy and natural childbirth remain hazardous ordeals in developing regions of the world, with maternal death rates approximately 100 times greater than in developed countries.[204]
Both the mother and the father provide care for human offspring, in contrast to other primates, where parental care is mostly done by the mother.[205] Helpless at birth, humans continue to grow for some years, typically reaching sexual maturity at 15 to 17 years of age.[206][207][208] The human life span has been split into various stages ranging from three to twelve. Common stages include infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood and old age.[209] The lengths of these stages have varied across cultures and time periods but is typified by an unusually rapid growth spurt during adolescence.[210] Human females undergo menopause and become infertile at around the age of 50.[211] It has been proposed that menopause increases a woman's overall reproductive success by allowing her to invest more time and resources in her existing offspring, and in turn their children (the grandmother hypothesis), rather than by continuing to bear children into old age.[212][213]
The life span of an individual depends on two major factors, genetics and lifestyle choices.[214] For various reasons, including biological/genetic causes, women live on average about four years longer than men.[215] As of 2018[update], the global average life expectancy at birth of a girl is estimated to be 74.9 years compared to 70.4 for a boy.[216][217] There are significant geographical variations in human life expectancy, mostly correlated with economic development – for example, life expectancy at birth in Hong Kong is 87.6 years for girls and 81.8 for boys, while in the Central African Republic, it is 55.0 years for girls and 50.6 for boys.[218][219] The developed world is generally aging, with the median age around 40 years. In the developing world, the median age is between 15 and 20 years. While one in five Europeans is 60 years of age or older, only one in twenty Africans is 60 years of age or older.[220] In 2012, the United Nations estimated that there were 316,600 living centenarians (humans of age 100 or older) worldwide.[221]
| Infant boy and girl | Boy and girl before puberty (children) | Adolescent male and female | Adult man and woman | Elderly man and woman |
|---|
Diet
[edit]
Humans are omnivorous,[222] capable of consuming a wide variety of plant and animal material.[223][224] Human groups have adopted a range of diets from purely vegan to primarily carnivorous. In some cases, dietary restrictions in humans can lead to deficiency diseases; however, stable human groups have adapted to many dietary patterns through both genetic specialization and cultural conventions to use nutritionally balanced food sources.[225] The human diet is prominently reflected in human culture and has led to the development of food science.[226]
Until the development of agriculture, Homo sapiens employed a hunter-gatherer method as their sole means of food collection.[226] This involved combining stationary food sources (such as fruits, grains, tubers, and mushrooms, insect larvae and aquatic mollusks) with wild game, which must be hunted and captured in order to be consumed.[227] It has been proposed that humans have used fire to prepare and cook food since the time of Homo erectus.[228] Human domestication of wild plants began about 11,700 years ago, leading to the development of agriculture,[229] a gradual process called the Neolithic Revolution.[230] These dietary changes may also have altered human biology; the spread of dairy farming provided a new and rich source of food, leading to the evolution of the ability to digest lactose in some adults.[231][232] The types of food consumed, and how they are prepared, have varied widely by time, location, and culture.[233][234]
In general, humans can survive for up to eight weeks without food, depending on stored body fat.[235] Survival without water is usually limited to three or four days, with a maximum of one week.[236] In 2020, it was estimated 9 million humans die every year from causes directly or indirectly related to starvation.[237][238] Childhood malnutrition is also common and contributes to the global burden of disease.[239] However, global food distribution is not even, and obesity among some human populations has increased rapidly, leading to health complications and increased mortality in some developed and a few developing countries. Worldwide, over one billion people are obese,[240] while in the United States 35% of people are obese, leading to this being described as an "obesity epidemic."[241] Obesity is caused by consuming more calories than are expended, so excessive weight gain is usually caused by an energy-dense diet.[240]
Food consumption is the first step of the digestive process, in which humans ultimately expel feces ranging in frequency from multiple times per day to multiple times per week.[242]
Biological variation
[edit]
There is biological variation in the human species – with traits such as blood type, genetic diseases, cranial features, facial features, organ systems, eye color, hair color and texture, height and build, and skin color varying across the globe. The typical height of an adult human is between 1.4 and 1.9 m (4 ft 7 in and 6 ft 3 in), although this varies significantly depending on sex, ethnic origin, and family bloodlines.[243][244] Body size is partly determined by genes and is also significantly influenced by environmental factors such as diet, exercise, and sleep patterns.[245]

There is evidence that populations have adapted genetically to various external factors. The genes that allow adult humans to digest lactose are present in high frequencies in populations that have long histories of cattle domestication and are more dependent on cow milk.[246] Sickle cell anemia, which may provide increased resistance to malaria, is frequent in populations where malaria is endemic.[247][248] Populations that have for a very long time inhabited specific climates tend to have developed specific phenotypes that are beneficial for those environments – short stature and stocky build in cold regions, tall and lanky in hot regions, and with high lung capacities or other adaptations at high altitudes.[249] Some populations have evolved highly unique adaptations to very specific environmental conditions, such as those advantageous to ocean-dwelling lifestyles and freediving in the Bajau.[250]
Human hair ranges in color from red to blond to brown to black, which is the most frequent.[251] Hair color depends on the amount of melanin, with concentrations fading with increased age, leading to grey or even white hair. Skin color can range from darkest brown to lightest peach, or even nearly white or colorless in cases of albinism.[252] It tends to vary clinally and generally correlates with the level of ultraviolet radiation in a particular geographic area, with darker skin mostly around the equator.[253] Skin darkening may have evolved as protection against ultraviolet solar radiation.[254] Light skin pigmentation protects against depletion of vitamin D, which requires sunlight to make.[255] Human skin also has a capacity to darken (tan) in response to exposure to ultraviolet radiation.[256][257]
There is relatively little variation between human geographical populations, and most of the variation that occurs is at the individual level.[252][258][259] Much of human variation is continuous, often with no clear points of demarcation.[260][261][262][263] Genetic data shows that no matter how population groups are defined, two people from the same population group are almost as different from each other as two people from any two different population groups.[264][265][266] Dark-skinned populations that are found in Africa, Australia, and South Asia are not closely related to each other.[267][268]
Genetic research has demonstrated that human populations native to the African continent are the most genetically diverse[269] and genetic diversity decreases with migratory distance from Africa, possibly the result of bottlenecks during human migration.[270][271] These non-African populations acquired new genetic inputs from local admixture with archaic populations and have much greater variation from Neanderthals and Denisovans than is found in Africa,[187] though Neanderthal admixture into African populations may be underestimated.[272] Furthermore, recent studies have found that populations in sub-Saharan Africa, and particularly West Africa, have ancestral genetic variation which predates modern humans and has been lost in most non-African populations. Some of this ancestry is thought to originate from admixture with an unknown archaic hominin that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans.[273][274]
Humans are a gonochoric species, meaning they are divided into male and female sexes.[275][276][277] The greatest degree of genetic variation exists between males and females. While the nucleotide genetic variation of individuals of the same sex across global populations is no greater than 0.1%–0.5%, the genetic difference between males and females is between 1% and 2%. Males on average are 15% heavier and 15 cm (6 in) taller than females.[278][279] On average, men have about 40–50% more upper-body strength and 20–30% more lower-body strength than women at the same weight, due to higher amounts of muscle and larger muscle fibers.[280] Women generally have a higher body fat percentage than men.[281] Women have lighter skin than men of the same population; this has been explained by a higher need for vitamin D in females during pregnancy and lactation.[282] As there are chromosomal differences between females and males, some X and Y chromosome-related conditions and disorders only affect either men or women.[283] After allowing for body weight and volume, the male voice is usually an octave deeper than the female voice.[284] Women have a longer life span in almost every population around the world.[285] There are intersex conditions in the human population, however these are rare.[286][287]
Psychology
[edit]
The human brain, the focal point of the central nervous system in humans, controls the peripheral nervous system. In addition to controlling "lower", involuntary, or primarily autonomic activities such as respiration and digestion, it is also the locus of "higher" order functioning such as thought, reasoning, and abstraction.[288] These cognitive processes constitute the mind, and, along with their behavioral consequences, are studied in the field of psychology.
Humans have a larger and more developed prefrontal cortex than other primates, the region of the brain associated with higher cognition.[289][290] This has led humans to proclaim themselves to be more intelligent than any other known species.[291] Objectively defining intelligence is difficult, with other animals adapting senses and excelling in areas that humans are unable to.[292]
There are some traits that, although not strictly unique, do set humans apart from other animals.[293] Humans may be the only animals who have episodic memory and who can engage in "mental time travel".[294] Even compared with other social animals, humans have an unusually high degree of flexibility in their facial expressions.[295] Humans are the only animals known to cry emotional tears.[296] Humans are one of the few animals able to self-recognize in mirror tests[297] and there is also debate over to what extent humans are the only animals with a theory of mind.[298][299]
Sleep and dreaming
[edit]Humans are generally diurnal. The average sleep requirement is between seven and nine hours per day for an adult and nine to ten hours per day for a child; elderly people usually sleep for six to seven hours. Having less sleep than this is common among humans, even though sleep deprivation can have negative health effects. A sustained restriction of adult sleep to four hours per day has been shown to correlate with changes in physiology and mental state, including reduced memory, fatigue, aggression, and bodily discomfort.[300]
During sleep humans dream, where they experience sensory images and sounds. Dreaming is stimulated by the pons and mostly occurs during the REM phase of sleep.[301] The length of a dream can vary, from a few seconds up to 30 minutes.[302] Humans have three to five dreams per night, and some may have up to seven.[303] Dreamers are more likely to remember the dream if awakened during the REM phase. The events in dreams are generally outside the control of the dreamer, with the exception of lucid dreaming, where the dreamer is self-aware.[304] Dreams can at times make a creative thought occur or give a sense of inspiration.[305]
Consciousness and thought
[edit]Human consciousness, at its simplest, is sentience or awareness of internal or external existence.[306] Despite centuries of analyses, definitions, explanations and debates by philosophers and scientists, the underlying nature of consciousness remains enigmatic and poorly understood,[307] being "at once the most familiar and most mysterious aspect of our lives".[308] The only widely agreed notion about the topic is the intuition that it exists.[309] Opinions differ about what exactly needs to be studied and explained as consciousness. Some philosophers divide consciousness into phenomenal consciousness, which is sensory experience itself, and access consciousness, which can be used for reasoning or directly controlling actions.[310] It is sometimes synonymous with 'the mind', and at other times, an aspect of it. Historically it is associated with introspection, private thought, imagination and volition.[311] It now often includes some kind of experience, cognition, feeling or perception. It may be 'awareness', or 'awareness of awareness', or self-awareness.[312] There might be different levels or orders of consciousness,[313] or different kinds of consciousness, or just one kind with different features.[314]
The process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses is known as cognition.[315] The human brain perceives the external world through the senses, and each individual human is influenced greatly by his or her experiences, leading to subjective views of existence and the passage of time.[316] The nature of thought is central to psychology and related fields. Cognitive psychology studies cognition, the mental processes underlying behavior.[317] Largely focusing on the development of the human mind through the life span, developmental psychology seeks to understand how people come to perceive, understand, and act within the world and how these processes change as they age.[318][319] This may focus on intellectual, cognitive, neural, social, or moral development. Psychologists have developed intelligence tests and the concept of intelligence quotient in order to assess the relative intelligence of human beings and study its distribution among population.[320]
Motivation and emotion
[edit]
Human motivation is not yet wholly understood. From a psychological perspective, Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a well-established theory that can be defined as the process of satisfying certain needs in ascending order of complexity.[321] From a more general, philosophical perspective, human motivation can be defined as a commitment to, or withdrawal from, various goals requiring the application of human ability. Furthermore, incentive and preference are both factors, as are any perceived links between incentives and preferences. Volition may also be involved, in which case willpower is also a factor. Ideally, both motivation and volition ensure the selection, striving for, and realization of goals in an optimal manner, a function beginning in childhood and continuing throughout a lifetime in a process known as socialization.[322]
Emotions are biological states associated with the nervous system[323][324] brought on by neurophysiological changes variously associated with thoughts, feelings, behavioral responses, and a degree of pleasure or displeasure.[325][326] They are often intertwined with mood, temperament, personality, disposition, creativity,[327] and motivation. Emotion has a significant influence on human behavior and their ability to learn.[328] Acting on extreme or uncontrolled emotions can lead to social disorder and crime,[329] with studies showing criminals may have a lower emotional intelligence than normal.[330]
Emotional experiences perceived as pleasant, such as joy, interest or contentment, contrast with those perceived as unpleasant, like anxiety, sadness, anger, and despair.[331] Happiness, or the state of being happy, is a human emotional condition. The definition of happiness is a common philosophical topic. Some define it as experiencing the feeling of positive emotional affects, while avoiding the negative ones.[332][333] Others see it as an appraisal of life satisfaction or quality of life.[334] Recent research suggests that being happy might involve experiencing some negative emotions when humans feel they are warranted.[335]
Sexuality and love
[edit]
For humans, sexuality involves biological, erotic, physical, emotional, social, or spiritual feelings and behaviors.[336][337] Because it is a broad term, which has varied with historical contexts over time, it lacks a precise definition.[337] The biological and physical aspects of sexuality largely concern the human reproductive functions, including the human sexual response cycle.[336][337] Sexuality also affects and is affected by cultural, political, legal, philosophical, moral, ethical, and religious aspects of life.[336][337] Sexual desire, or libido, is a basic mental state present at the beginning of sexual behavior. Studies show that men desire sex more than women and masturbate more often.[338]
Humans can fall anywhere along a continuous scale of sexual orientation,[339] although most humans are heterosexual.[340][341] While homosexual behavior occurs in some other animals, only humans and domestic sheep have so far been found to exhibit exclusive preference for same-sex relationships.[340] Most evidence supports nonsocial, biological causes of sexual orientation,[340] as cultures that are very tolerant of homosexuality do not have significantly higher rates of it.[341][342] Research in neuroscience and genetics suggests that other aspects of human sexuality are biologically influenced as well.[343]
Love most commonly refers to a feeling of strong attraction or emotional attachment. It can be impersonal (the love of an object, ideal, or strong political or spiritual connection) or interpersonal (love between humans).[344] When in love dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin and other chemicals stimulate the brain's pleasure center, leading to side effects such as increased heart rate, loss of appetite and sleep, and an intense feeling of excitement.[345]
Culture
[edit]| Most widely spoken languages[346][347] | English, Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, Spanish, Standard Arabic, Bengali, French, Russian, Portuguese, Urdu |
|---|---|
| Most practiced religions[347][348] | Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, folk religions, Sikhism, Judaism, unaffiliated |
Humanity's unprecedented set of intellectual skills were a key factor in the species' eventual technological advancement and concomitant domination of the biosphere.[349] Disregarding extinct hominids, humans are the only animals known to teach generalizable information,[350] innately deploy recursive embedding to generate and communicate complex concepts,[351] engage in the "folk physics" required for competent tool design,[352][353] or cook food in the wild.[354] Teaching and learning preserves the cultural and ethnographic identity of human societies.[355] Other traits and behaviors that are mostly unique to humans include starting fires,[356] phoneme structuring[357] and vocal learning.[358]
Language
[edit]
While many species communicate, language is unique to humans, a defining feature of humanity, and a cultural universal.[359] Unlike the limited systems of other animals, human language is open – an infinite number of meanings can be produced by combining a limited number of symbols.[360][361] Human language also has the capacity of displacement, using words to represent things and happenings that are not presently or locally occurring but reside in the shared imagination of interlocutors.[153]
Language differs from other forms of communication in that it is modality independent; the same meanings can be conveyed through different media, audibly in speech, visually by sign language or writing, and through tactile media such as braille.[362] Language is central to the communication between humans, and to the sense of identity that unites nations, cultures and ethnic groups.[363] There are approximately six thousand different languages currently in use, including sign languages, and many thousands more that are extinct.[364]
The arts
[edit]Human arts can take many forms including visual, literary, and performing. Visual art can range from paintings and sculptures to film, fashion design, and architecture.[365] Literary arts can include prose, poetry, and dramas. The performing arts generally involve theatre, music, and dance.[366][367] Humans often combine the different forms (for example, music videos).[368] Other entities that have been described as having artistic qualities include food preparation, video games, and medicine.[369][370][371] As well as providing entertainment and transferring knowledge, the arts are also used for political purposes.[372]

Art is a defining characteristic of humans and there is evidence for a relationship between creativity and language.[373] The earliest evidence of art was shell engravings made by Homo erectus 300,000 years before modern humans evolved.[374] Art attributed to H. sapiens existed at least 75,000 years ago, with jewellery and drawings found in caves in South Africa.[375][376] There are various hypotheses as to why humans have adapted to the arts. These include allowing them to better problem solve issues, providing a means to control or influence other humans, encouraging cooperation and contribution within a society or increasing the chance of attracting a potential mate.[377] The use of imagination developed through art, combined with logic may have given early humans an evolutionary advantage.[373]
Evidence of humans engaging in musical activities predates cave art and so far music has been practiced by virtually all known human cultures.[378] There exists a wide variety of music genres and ethnic musics; with humans' musical abilities being related to other abilities, including complex social human behaviours.[378] It has been shown that human brains respond to music by becoming synchronized with the rhythm and beat, a process called entrainment.[379] Dance is also a form of human expression found in all cultures[380] and may have evolved as a way to help early humans communicate.[381] Listening to music and observing dance stimulates the orbitofrontal cortex and other pleasure sensing areas of the brain.[382]
Unlike speaking, reading and writing does not come naturally to humans and must be taught.[383] Still, literature has been present before the invention of words and language, with 30,000-year-old paintings on walls inside some caves portraying a series of dramatic scenes.[384] One of the oldest surviving works of literature is the Epic of Gilgamesh, first engraved on ancient Babylonian tablets about 4,000 years ago.[385] Beyond simply passing down knowledge, the use and sharing of imaginative fiction through stories might have helped develop humans' capabilities for communication and increased the likelihood of securing a mate.[386] Storytelling may also be used as a way to provide the audience with moral lessons and encourage cooperation.[384]
Tools and technologies
[edit]
Stone tools were used by proto-humans at least 2.5 million years ago.[388] The use and manufacture of tools has been put forward as the ability that defines humans more than anything else[389] and has historically been seen as an important evolutionary step.[390] The technology became much more sophisticated about 1.8 million years ago,[389] with the controlled use of fire beginning around 1 million years ago.[391][392] The wheel and wheeled vehicles appeared simultaneously in several regions some time in the fourth millennium BC.[65] The development of more complex tools and technologies allowed land to be cultivated and animals to be domesticated, thus proving essential in the development of agriculture – what is known as the Neolithic Revolution.[393]
China developed paper, the printing press, gunpowder, the compass and other important inventions.[394] The continued improvements in smelting allowed forging of copper, bronze, iron and eventually steel, which is used in railways, skyscrapers and many other products.[395] This coincided with the Industrial Revolution, where the invention of automated machines brought major changes to humans' lifestyles.[396] Modern technology is observed as progressing exponentially,[397] with major innovations in the 20th century including: electricity, penicillin, semiconductors, internal combustion engines, the Internet, nitrogen fixing fertilizers, airplanes, computers, automobiles, contraceptive pills, nuclear fission, the green revolution, radio, scientific plant breeding, rockets, air conditioning, television and the assembly line.[398]
Religion and spirituality
[edit]
Definitions of religion vary;[399] according to one definition, a religion is a belief system concerning the supernatural, sacred or divine, and practices, values, institutions and rituals associated with such belief. Some religions also have a moral code. The evolution and the history of the first religions have become areas of active scientific investigation.[400][401][402] Credible evidence of religious behaviour dates to the Middle Paleolithic era (45–200 thousand years ago).[403] It may have evolved to play a role in helping enforce and encourage cooperation between humans.[404]
Religion manifests in diverse forms.[399] Religion can include a belief in life after death,[405] the origin of life, the nature of the universe (religious cosmology) and its ultimate fate (eschatology), and moral or ethical teachings.[406] Views on transcendence and immanence vary substantially; traditions variously espouse monism, deism, pantheism, and theism (including polytheism and monotheism).[407]
Although measuring religiosity is difficult,[408] a majority of humans profess some variety of religious or spiritual belief.[409] In 2015 the plurality were Christian followed by Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists.[410] As of 2015, about 16%, or slightly under 1.2 billion humans, were irreligious, including those with no religious beliefs or no identity with any religion.[411]
Science and philosophy
[edit]
An aspect unique to humans is their ability to transmit knowledge from one generation to the next and to continually build on this information to develop tools, scientific laws and other advances to pass on further.[412] This accumulated knowledge can be tested to answer questions or make predictions about how the universe functions and has been very successful in advancing human ascendancy.[413]
Aristotle has been described as the first scientist,[414] and preceded the rise of scientific thought through the Hellenistic period.[415] Other early advances in science came from the Han dynasty in China and during the Islamic Golden Age.[416][91] The scientific revolution, near the end of the Renaissance, led to the emergence of modern science.[417]
A chain of events and influences led to the development of the scientific method, a process of observation and experimentation that is used to differentiate science from pseudoscience.[418] An understanding of mathematics is unique to humans, although other species of animals have some numerical cognition.[419] All of science can be divided into three major branches, the formal sciences (e.g., logic and mathematics), which are concerned with formal systems, the applied sciences (e.g., engineering, medicine), which are focused on practical applications, and the empirical sciences, which are based on empirical observation and are in turn divided into natural sciences (e.g., physics, chemistry, biology) and social sciences (e.g., psychology, economics, sociology).[420]
Philosophy is a field of study where humans seek to understand fundamental truths about themselves and the world in which they live.[421] Philosophical inquiry has been a major feature in the development of humans' intellectual history.[422] It has been described as the "no man's land" between definitive scientific knowledge and dogmatic religious teachings.[423] Major fields of philosophy include metaphysics, epistemology, logic, and axiology (which includes ethics and aesthetics).[424]
Society
[edit]
Society is the system of organizations and institutions arising from interaction between humans. Humans are highly social and tend to live in large complex social groups. They can be divided into different groups according to their income, wealth, power, reputation and other factors. The structure of social stratification and the degree of social mobility differs, especially between modern and traditional societies.[425] Human groups range from the size of families to nations. The first form of human social organization is thought to have resembled hunter-gatherer band societies.[426]
Gender
[edit]
Human societies typically exhibit gender identities and gender roles that distinguish between masculine and feminine characteristics and prescribe the range of acceptable behaviours and attitudes for their members based on their sex.[427][428] The most common categorisation is a gender binary of men and women.[429] Some societies recognize a third gender,[430] or less commonly a fourth or fifth.[431][432] In some other societies, non-binary is used as an umbrella term for a range of gender identities that are not solely male or female.[433]
Gender roles are often associated with a division of norms, practices, dress, behavior, rights, duties, privileges, status, and power, with men enjoying more rights and privileges than women in most societies, both today and in the past.[434] As a social construct,[435] gender roles are not fixed and vary historically within a society. Challenges to predominant gender norms have recurred in many societies.[436][437] Little is known about gender roles in the earliest human societies. Early modern humans probably had a range of gender roles similar to that of modern cultures from at least the Upper Paleolithic, while the Neanderthals were less sexually dimorphic and there is evidence that the behavioural difference between males and females was minimal.[438]
Kinship
[edit]All human societies organize, recognize and classify types of social relationships based on relations between parents, children and other descendants (consanguinity), and relations through marriage (affinity). There is also a third type applied to godparents or adoptive children (fictive). These culturally defined relationships are referred to as kinship. In many societies, it is one of the most important social organizing principles and plays a role in transmitting status and inheritance.[439] All societies have rules of incest taboo, according to which marriage between certain kinds of kin relations is prohibited, and some also have rules of preferential marriage with certain kin relations.[440]
Pair bonding is a ubiquitous feature of human sexual relationships, whether it is manifested as serial monogamy, polygyny, or polyandry.[441] Genetic evidence indicates that humans were predominantly polygynous for most of their existence as a species, but that this began to shift during the Neolithic, when monogamy started becoming widespread concomitantly with the transition from nomadic to sedentary societies.[442] Anatomical evidence in the form of second-to-fourth digit ratios, a biomarker for prenatal androgen effects, likewise indicates modern humans were polygynous during the Pleistocene.[443]
Ethnicity
[edit]Human ethnic groups are a social category that identifies together as a group based on shared attributes that distinguish them from other groups. These can be a common set of traditions, ancestry, language, history, society, culture, nation, religion, or social treatment within their residing area.[444][445] Ethnicity is separate from the concept of race, which is based on physical characteristics, although both are socially constructed.[446] Assigning ethnicity to a certain population is complicated, as even within common ethnic designations there can be a diverse range of subgroups, and the makeup of these ethnic groups can change over time at both the collective and individual level.[179] Also, there is no generally accepted definition of what constitutes an ethnic group.[447] Ethnic groupings can play a powerful role in the social identity and solidarity of ethnopolitical units. This has been closely tied to the rise of the nation state as the predominant form of political organization in the 19th and 20th centuries.[448][449][450]
Government and politics
[edit]
As farming populations gathered in larger and denser communities, interactions between these different groups increased. This led to the development of governance within and between the communities.[451] Humans have evolved the ability to change affiliation with various social groups relatively easily, including previously strong political alliances, if doing so is seen as providing personal advantages.[452] This cognitive flexibility allows individual humans to change their political ideologies, with those with higher flexibility less likely to support authoritarian and nationalistic stances.[453]
Governments create laws and policies that affect the citizens that they govern. There have been many forms of government throughout human history, each having various means of obtaining power and the ability to exert diverse controls on the population.[454] Approximately 47% of humans live in some form of a democracy, 17% in a hybrid regime, and 37% in an authoritarian regime.[455] Many countries belong to international organizations and alliances; the largest of these is the United Nations, with 193 member states.[456]
Trade and economics
[edit]
Trade, the voluntary exchange of goods and services, is seen as a characteristic that differentiates humans from other animals and has been cited as a practice that gave Homo sapiens a major advantage over other hominids.[457] Evidence suggests early H. sapiens made use of long-distance trade routes to exchange goods and ideas, leading to cultural explosions and providing additional food sources when hunting was sparse, while such trade networks did not exist for the now extinct Neanderthals.[458][459] Early trade likely involved materials for creating tools like obsidian.[460] The first truly international trade routes were around the spice trade through the Roman and medieval periods.[461]
Early human economies were more likely to be based around gift giving instead of a bartering system.[462] Early money consisted of commodities; the oldest being in the form of cattle and the most widely used being cowrie shells.[463] Money has since evolved into governmental issued coins, paper and electronic money.[463] Human study of economics is a social science that looks at how societies distribute scarce resources among different people.[464] There are massive inequalities in the division of wealth among humans; the eight richest humans are worth the same monetary value as the poorest half of all the human population.[465]
Conflict
[edit]
Humans commit violence on other humans at a rate comparable to other primates, but have an increased preference for killing adults, infanticide being more common among other primates.[466] Phylogenetic analysis predicts that 2% of early H. sapiens would be murdered, rising to 12% during the medieval period, before dropping to below 2% in modern times.[467] There is great variation in violence between human populations, with rates of homicide about 0.01% in societies that have legal systems and strong cultural attitudes against violence.[468]
The willingness of humans to kill other members of their species en masse through organized conflict (i.e., war) has long been the subject of debate. One school of thought holds that war evolved as a means to eliminate competitors, and has always been an innate human characteristic. Another suggests that war is a relatively recent phenomenon and has appeared due to changing social conditions.[469] While not settled, current evidence indicates warlike predispositions only became common about 10,000 years ago, and in many places much more recently than that.[469] War has had a high cost on human life; it is estimated that during the 20th century, between 167 million and 188 million people died as a result of war.[470] War casualty data is less reliable for pre-medieval times, especially global figures. But compared with any period over the past 600 years, the last 80 years (post 1946) has seen a very significant drop in global military and civilian death rates due to armed conflict.[471]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ The world population and population density statistics are updated automatically from a template that uses the CIA World Factbook and United Nations World Population Prospects.[124][125]
- ^ Cities with over 10 million inhabitants as of 2018.[126]
- ^ Traditionally this has been explained by conflicting evolutionary pressures involved in bipedalism and encephalization (called the obstetrical dilemma), but recent research suggest it might be more complicated than that.[201][202]
References
[edit]- ^ Roopnarine PD (March 2014). "Humans are apex predators". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111 (9): E796. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111E.796R. doi:10.1073/pnas.1323645111. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3948303. PMID 24497513.
- ^ Stokstad E (5 May 2019). "Landmark analysis documents the alarming global decline of nature". Science. AAAS. Archived from the original on 26 October 2021. Retrieved 9 May 2021.
- ^ Pimm S, Raven P, Peterson A, Sekercioglu CH, Ehrlich PR (July 2006). "Human impacts on the rates of recent, present, and future bird extinctions". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 103 (29): 10941–10946. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10310941P. doi:10.1073/pnas.0604181103. PMC 1544153. PMID 16829570.
- ^ Spamer EE (29 January 1999). "Know Thyself: Responsible Science and the Lectotype of Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758". Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences. 149 (1): 109–114. JSTOR 4065043.
- ^ Porkorny (1959). IEW. s.v. "g'hðem" pp. 414–116.
- ^ "Homo". Dictionary.com. Random House. 23 September 2008. Archived from the original on 27 September 2008.
- ^ a b Barras, Colin (11 January 2016). "We don't know which species should be classed as 'human'". BBC. Archived from the original on 26 August 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
- ^ Spamer EE (1999). "Know Thyself: Responsible Science and the Lectotype of Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758". Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 149: 109–114. ISSN 0097-3157. JSTOR 4065043.
- ^ OED. s.v. "human".
- ^ "Man". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Archived from the original on 22 September 2017. Retrieved 14 September 2017.
Definition 2: a man belonging to a particular category (as by birth, residence, membership, or occupation) – usually used in combination
- ^ "Thesaurus results for human". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Archived from the original on 28 June 2022. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
- ^ "Misconceptions about evolution – Understanding Evolution". University of California, Berkeley. 19 September 2021. Archived from the original on 6 June 2022. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
- ^ "Concept of Personhood". University of Missouri School of Medicine. Archived from the original on 4 March 2021. Retrieved 4 July 2021.
- ^ Tuttle RH (4 October 2018). "Hominoidea: conceptual history". In Trevathan W, Cartmill M, Dufour D, Larsen C (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Biological Anthropology. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 1–2. doi:10.1002/9781118584538.ieba0246. ISBN 978-1-118-58442-2. S2CID 240125199. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
- ^ Goodman M, Tagle DA, Fitch DH, Bailey W, Czelusniak J, Koop BF, et al. (March 1990). "Primate evolution at the DNA level and a classification of hominoids". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 30 (3): 260–266. Bibcode:1990JMolE..30..260G. doi:10.1007/BF02099995. PMID 2109087. S2CID 2112935.
- ^ Ruvolo M (March 1997). "Molecular phylogeny of the hominoids: inferences from multiple independent DNA sequence data sets". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 14 (3): 248–265. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025761. PMID 9066793.
- ^ MacAndrew A. "Human Chromosome 2 is a fusion of two ancestral chromosomes". Evolution pages. Archived from the original on 9 August 2011. Retrieved 18 May 2006.
- ^ McNulty, Kieran P. (2016). "Hominin Taxonomy and Phylogeny: What's In A Name?". Nature Education Knowledge. Archived from the original on 10 January 2016. Retrieved 11 June 2022.
- ^ Strait DS (September 2010). "The Evolutionary History of the Australopiths". Evolution: Education and Outreach. 3 (3): 341–352. doi:10.1007/s12052-010-0249-6. ISSN 1936-6434. S2CID 31979188.
- ^ Dunsworth HM (September 2010). "Origin of the Genus Homo". Evolution: Education and Outreach. 3 (3): 353–366. doi:10.1007/s12052-010-0247-8. ISSN 1936-6434. S2CID 43116946.
- ^ Kimbel WH, Villmoare B (July 2016). "From Australopithecus to Homo: the transition that wasn't". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 371 (1698) 20150248. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0248. PMC 4920303. PMID 27298460. S2CID 20267830.
- ^ a b Villmoare B, Kimbel WH, Seyoum C, Campisano CJ, DiMaggio EN, Rowan J, et al. (March 2015). "Paleoanthropology. Early Homo at 2.8 Ma from Ledi-Geraru, Afar, Ethiopia". Science. 347 (6228): 1352–1355. Bibcode:2015Sci...347.1352V. doi:10.1126/science.aaa1343. PMID 25739410.
- ^ a b Wood, Bernard (28 June 2011). "Did early Homo migrate "out of" or "in to" Africa?". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (26): 10375–10376. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10810375W. doi:10.1073/pnas.1107724108. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3127876. PMID 21677194.
- ^ Püschel, Hans P.; Bertrand, Ornella C.; O'Reilly, Joseph E.; Bobe, René; Püschel, Thomas A. (June 2021). "Divergence-time estimates for hominins provide insight into encephalization and body mass trends in human evolution". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 5 (6): 808–819. Bibcode:2021NatEE...5..808P. doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01431-1. hdl:20.500.11820/35151870-c7b5-477e-aca8-2c75c8382002. PMID 33795855. S2CID 232764044.
- ^ Zhu Z, Dennell R, Huang W, Wu Y, Qiu S, Yang S, et al. (July 2018). "Hominin occupation of the Chinese Loess Plateau since about 2.1 million years ago". Nature. 559 (7715): 608–612. Bibcode:2018Natur.559..608Z. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0299-4. PMID 29995848. S2CID 49670311.
- ^ Hublin JJ, Ben-Ncer A, Bailey SE, Freidline SE, Neubauer S, Skinner MM, et al. (June 2017). "New fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and the pan-African origin of Homo sapiens" (PDF). Nature. 546 (7657): 289–292. Bibcode:2017Natur.546..289H. doi:10.1038/nature22336. hdl:1887/74734. PMID 28593953. S2CID 256771372. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 January 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ "Out of Africa Revisited". Science (This Week in Science). 308 (5724): 921. 13 May 2005. doi:10.1126/science.308.5724.921g. ISSN 0036-8075. S2CID 220100436.
- ^ Stringer C (June 2003). "Human evolution: Out of Ethiopia". Nature. 423 (6941): 692–693, 695. Bibcode:2003Natur.423..692S. doi:10.1038/423692a. PMID 12802315. S2CID 26693109.
- ^ Johanson D (May 2001). "Origins of Modern Humans: Multiregional or Out of Africa?". actionbioscience. Washington, DC: American Institute of Biological Sciences. Archived from the original on 17 June 2021. Retrieved 23 November 2009.
- ^ Marean, Curtis; et al. (2007). "Early human use of marine resources and pigment in South Africa during the Middle Pleistocene" (PDF). Nature. 449 (7164): 905–908. Bibcode:2007Natur.449..905M. doi:10.1038/nature06204. PMID 17943129. S2CID 4387442. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 May 2023. Retrieved 7 January 2023.
- ^ Brooks AS, Yellen JE, Potts R, Behrensmeyer AK, Deino AL, Leslie DE, Ambrose SH, Ferguson JR, d'Errico F, Zipkin AM, Whittaker S, Post J, Veatch EG, Foecke K, Clark JB (2018). "Long-distance stone transport and pigment use in the earliest Middle Stone Age". Science. 360 (6384): 90–94. Bibcode:2018Sci...360...90B. doi:10.1126/science.aao2646. PMID 29545508.
- ^ Wilkins, Jayne; Schoville, Benjamin J. (June 2024). "Did climate change make Homo sapiens innovative, and if yes, how? Debated perspectives on the African Pleistocene record". Quaternary Science Advances. 14 100179. Bibcode:2024QSAdv..1400179W. doi:10.1016/j.qsa.2024.100179.
- ^ Posth C, Renaud G, Mittnik A, Drucker DG, Rougier H, Cupillard C, et al. (March 2016). "Pleistocene Mitochondrial Genomes Suggest a Single Major Dispersal of Non-Africans and a Late Glacial Population Turnover in Europe" (PDF). Current Biology. 26 (6): 827–833. Bibcode:2016CBio...26..827P. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.037. hdl:2440/114930. PMID 26853362. S2CID 140098861. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 March 2025. Retrieved 11 March 2025.
- ^ Karmin M, Saag L, Vicente M, Wilson Sayres MA, Järve M, Talas UG, et al. (April 2015). "A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture". Genome Research. 25 (4): 459–466. doi:10.1101/gr.186684.114. PMC 4381518. PMID 25770088.
- ^ Armitage SJ, Jasim SA, Marks AE, Parker AG, Usik VI, Uerpmann HP (January 2011). "The southern route "out of Africa": evidence for an early expansion of modern humans into Arabia". Science. 331 (6016): 453–456. Bibcode:2011Sci...331..453A. doi:10.1126/science.1199113. PMID 21273486. S2CID 20296624. Archived from the original on 27 April 2011. Retrieved 1 May 2011.
- ^ Rincon P (27 January 2011). "Humans 'left Africa much earlier'". BBC News. Archived from the original on 9 August 2012.
- ^ Clarkson C, Jacobs Z, Marwick B, Fullagar R, Wallis L, Smith M, et al. (July 2017). "Human occupation of northern Australia by 65,000 years ago". Nature. 547 (7663): 306–310. Bibcode:2017Natur.547..306C. doi:10.1038/nature22968. hdl:2440/107043. PMID 28726833. S2CID 205257212. Archived from the original on 15 August 2024. Retrieved 11 March 2025.
- ^ Lowe DJ (2008). "Polynesian settlement of New Zealand and the impacts of volcanism on early Maori society: an update" (PDF). University of Waikato. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 May 2010. Retrieved 29 April 2010.
- ^ Appenzeller T (May 2012). "Human migrations: Eastern odyssey". Nature. 485 (7396): 24–26. Bibcode:2012Natur.485...24A. doi:10.1038/485024a. PMID 22552074.
- ^ a b Reich D, Green RE, Kircher M, Krause J, Patterson N, Durand EY, et al. (December 2010). "Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia". Nature. 468 (7327): 1053–1060. Bibcode:2010Natur.468.1053R. doi:10.1038/nature09710. hdl:10230/25596. PMC 4306417. PMID 21179161.
- ^ Hammer MF (May 2013). "Human Hybrids" (PDF). Scientific American. 308 (5): 66–71. Bibcode:2013SciAm.308e..66H. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0513-66. PMID 23627222. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 August 2018.
- ^ Yong E (July 2011). "Mosaic humans, the hybrid species". New Scientist. 211 (2823): 34–38. Bibcode:2011NewSc.211...34Y. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(11)61839-3.
- ^ Ackermann RR, Mackay A, Arnold ML (October 2015). "The Hybrid Origin of "Modern" Humans". Evolutionary Biology. 43 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1007/s11692-015-9348-1. S2CID 14329491.
- ^ Noonan JP (May 2010). "Neanderthal genomics and the evolution of modern humans". Genome Research. 20 (5): 547–553. doi:10.1101/gr.076000.108. PMC 2860157. PMID 20439435.
- ^ Abi-Rached L, Jobin MJ, Kulkarni S, McWhinnie A, Dalva K, Gragert L, et al. (October 2011). "The shaping of modern human immune systems by multiregional admixture with archaic humans". Science. 334 (6052): 89–94. Bibcode:2011Sci...334...89A. doi:10.1126/science.1209202. PMC 3677943. PMID 21868630.
- ^ Sandel, Aaron A. (30 July 2013). "Brief communication: Hair density and body mass in mammals and the evolution of human hairlessness". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 152 (1): 145–150. Bibcode:2013AJPA..152..145S. doi:10.1002/ajpa.22333. hdl:2027.42/99654. PMID 23900811. Archived from the original on 22 July 2023. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
- ^ Boyd R, Silk JB (2003). How Humans Evolved. New York: Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-97854-4.
- ^ Little, Michael A.; Blumler, Mark A. (2015). "Hunter-Gatherers". In Muehlenbein, Michael P. (ed.). Basics in Human Evolution. Boston: Academic. pp. 323–335. ISBN 978-0-12-802652-6. Archived from the original on 3 July 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Scarre, Chris (2018). "The world transformed: from foragers and farmers to states and empires". In Scarre, Chris (ed.). The Human Past: World Prehistory and the Development of Human Societies (4th ed.). London: Thames & Hudson. pp. 174–197. ISBN 978-0-500-29335-5.
- ^ Colledge S, Conolly J, Dobney K, Manning K, Shennan S (2013). Origins and Spread of Domestic Animals in Southwest Asia and Europe. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast. pp. 13–17. ISBN 978-1-61132-324-5.
- ^ Scanes CG (January 2018). "The Neolithic Revolution, Animal Domestication, and Early Forms of Animal Agriculture". In Scanes CG, Toukhsati SR (eds.). Animals and Human Society. Elsevier. pp. 103–131. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-805247-1.00006-X. ISBN 978-0-12-805247-1.
- ^ He K, Lu H, Zhang J, Wang C, Huan X (7 June 2017). "Prehistoric evolution of the dualistic structure mixed rice and millet farming in China". The Holocene. 27 (12): 1885–1898. Bibcode:2017Holoc..27.1885H. doi:10.1177/0959683617708455. S2CID 133660098. Archived from the original on 20 November 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Lu H, Zhang J, Liu KB, Wu N, Li Y, Zhou K, et al. (May 2009). "Earliest domestication of common millet (Panicum miliaceum) in East Asia extended to 10,000 years ago". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (18): 7367–7372. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.7367L. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900158106. PMC 2678631. PMID 19383791.
- ^ Denham TP, Haberle SG, Lentfer C, Fullagar R, Field J, Therin M, et al. (July 2003). "Origins of agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the highlands of New Guinea". Science. 301 (5630): 189–193. doi:10.1126/science.1085255. PMID 12817084. S2CID 10644185.
- ^ Scarcelli N, Cubry P, Akakpo R, Thuillet AC, Obidiegwu J, Baco MN, et al. (May 2019). "Yam genomics supports West Africa as a major cradle of crop domestication". Science Advances. 5 (5) eaaw1947. Bibcode:2019SciA....5.1947S. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw1947. PMC 6527260. PMID 31114806.
- ^ Winchell F (October 2017). "Evidence for Sorghum Domestication in Fourth Millennium BC Eastern Sudan: Spikelet Morphology from Ceramic Impressions of the Butana Group" (PDF). Current Anthropology. 58 (5): 673–683. doi:10.1086/693898. S2CID 149402650. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Manning K (February 2011). "4500-Year old domesticated pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) from the Tilemsi Valley, Mali: new insights into an alternative cereal domestication pathway". Journal of Archaeological Science. 38 (2): 312–322. Bibcode:2011JArSc..38..312M. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2010.09.007.
- ^ Noble TF, Strauss B, Osheim D, Neuschel K, Accamp E (2013). Cengage Advantage Books: Western Civilization: Beyond Boundaries. Cengage. ISBN 978-1-285-66153-7. Retrieved 11 July 2015.
- ^ Spielvogel J (1 January 2014). Western Civilization: Volume A: To 1500. Cengage. ISBN 978-1-285-98299-1. Retrieved 11 July 2015.
- ^ Thornton B (2002). Greek Ways: How the Greeks Created Western Civilization. San Francisco: Encounter. pp. 1–14. ISBN 978-1-893554-57-3. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Garfinkle, Steven J. (2013). "Ancient Near Eastern City-States". In Peter Fibiger Bang; Walter Scheidel (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the State in the Ancient Near East and Mediterranean. Oxford Academic. pp. 94–119. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195188318.013.0004. ISBN 978-0-19-518831-8.
- ^ Woods C (28 February 2020). "The Emergence of Cuneiform Writing". In Hasselbach-Andee R (ed.). A Companion to Ancient Near Eastern Languages (1st ed.). Wiley. pp. 27–46. doi:10.1002/9781119193814.ch2. ISBN 978-1-119-19329-6. S2CID 216180781.
- ^ Robinson A (October 2015). "Ancient civilization: Cracking the Indus script". Nature. 526 (7574): 499–501. Bibcode:2015Natur.526..499R. doi:10.1038/526499a. PMID 26490603. S2CID 4458743.
- ^ Crawford H (2013). "Trade in the Sumerian world". The Sumerian World. Routledge. pp. 447–461. ISBN 978-1-136-21911-5.
- ^ a b Bodnár M (2018). "Prehistoric innovations: Wheels and wheeled vehicles". Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 69 (2): 271–298. doi:10.1556/072.2018.69.2.3. ISSN 0001-5210. S2CID 115685157. Archived from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Pryor FL (1985). "The Invention of the Plow". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 27 (4): 727–743. doi:10.1017/S0010417500011749. ISSN 0010-4175. JSTOR 178600. S2CID 144840498.
- ^ Carter R (2012). "19. Watercraft". In Potts DT (ed.). A companion to the archaeology of the ancient Near East. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 347–354. ISBN 978-1-4051-8988-0. Archived from the original on 28 April 2015. Retrieved 8 February 2014.
- ^ Centre, UNESCO World Heritage. "Sacred City of Caral-Supe". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Archived from the original on 23 May 2024. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
- ^ Pedersen O (1993). "Science Before the Greeks". Early physics and astronomy: A historical introduction. Cambridge University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-521-40340-5.
- ^ Robson E (2008). Mathematics in ancient Iraq: A social history. Princeton University Press. p. xxi.
- ^ Edwards JF (2003). "Building the Great Pyramid: Probable Construction Methods Employed at Giza". Technology and Culture. 44 (2): 340–354. doi:10.1353/tech.2003.0063. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 25148110. S2CID 109998651.
- ^ Voosen P (August 2018). "New geological age comes under fire". Science. 361 (6402): 537–538. Bibcode:2018Sci...361..537V. doi:10.1126/science.361.6402.537. PMID 30093579. S2CID 51954326.
- ^ Saggs HW (2000). Babylonians. University of California Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-520-20222-1.
- ^ Sassaman KE (1 December 2005). "Poverty Point as Structure, Event, Process". Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 12 (4): 335–364. doi:10.1007/s10816-005-8460-4. ISSN 1573-7764. S2CID 53393440.
- ^ Lazaridis I, Mittnik A, Patterson N, Mallick S, Rohland N, Pfrengle S, et al. (August 2017). "Genetic origins of the Minoans and Mycenaeans". Nature. 548 (7666): 214–218. Bibcode:2017Natur.548..214L. doi:10.1038/nature23310. PMC 5565772. PMID 28783727.
- ^ Keightley DN (1999). "The Shang: China's first historical dynasty". In Loewe M, Shaughnessy EL (eds.). The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC. Cambridge University Press. pp. 232–291. ISBN 978-0-521-47030-8.
- ^ Kaniewski D, Guiot J, van Campo E (2015). "Drought and societal collapse 3200 years ago in the Eastern Mediterranean: a review". WIREs Climate Change. 6 (4): 369–382. Bibcode:2015WIRCC...6..369K. doi:10.1002/wcc.345. S2CID 128460316.
- ^ Drake BL (1 June 2012). "The influence of climatic change on the Late Bronze Age Collapse and the Greek Dark Ages". Journal of Archaeological Science. 39 (6): 1862–1870. Bibcode:2012JArSc..39.1862D. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.01.029.
- ^ Wells PS (2011). "The Iron Age". In Milisauskas S (ed.). European Prehistory. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. New York: Springer. pp. 405–460. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6633-9_11. ISBN 978-1-4419-6633-9.
- ^ Hughes-Warrington M (2018). "Sense and non-sense in Ancient Greek histories". History as Wonder: Beginning with Historiography. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-429-76315-1.
- ^ Beard M (2 October 2015). "Why ancient Rome matters to the modern world". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 17 April 2021.
- ^ Vidergar AB (11 June 2015). "Stanford scholar debunks long-held beliefs about economic growth in ancient Greece". Stanford University. Archived from the original on 18 April 2021. Retrieved 17 April 2021.
- ^ Inomata T, Triadan D, Vázquez López VA, Fernandez-Diaz JC, Omori T, Méndez Bauer MB, et al. (June 2020). "Monumental architecture at Aguada Fénix and the rise of Maya civilization". Nature. 582 (7813): 530–533. Bibcode:2020Natur.582..530I. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2343-4. PMID 32494009. S2CID 219281856.
- ^ Milbrath S (March 2017). "The Role of Solar Observations in Developing the Preclassic Maya Calendar". Latin American Antiquity. 28 (1): 88–104. doi:10.1017/laq.2016.4. ISSN 1045-6635. S2CID 164417025.
- ^ Benoist A, Charbonnier J, Gajda I (2016). "Investigating the eastern edge of the kingdom of Aksum: architecture and pottery from Wakarida". Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies. 46: 25–40. ISSN 0308-8421. JSTOR 45163415.
- ^ Farazmand A (1 January 1998). "Administration of the Persian Achaemenid world-state empire: implications for modern public administration". International Journal of Public Administration. 21 (1): 25–86. doi:10.1080/01900699808525297. ISSN 0190-0692.
- ^ Ingalls DH (1976). "Kālidāsa and the Attitudes of the Golden Age". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 96 (1): 15–26. doi:10.2307/599886. ISSN 0003-0279. JSTOR 599886.
- ^ Xie J (2020). "Pillars of Heaven: The Symbolic Function of Column and Bracket Sets in the Han Dynasty". Architectural History. 63: 1–36. doi:10.1017/arh.2020.1. ISSN 0066-622X. S2CID 229716130.
- ^ Marx W, Haunschild R, Bornmann L (2018). "Climate and the Decline and Fall of the Western Roman Empire: A Bibliometric View on an Interdisciplinary Approach to Answer a Most Classic Historical Question". Climate. 6 (4): 90. Bibcode:2018Clim....6...90M. doi:10.3390/cli6040090.
- ^ Brooke JH, Numbers RL, eds. (2011). Science and Religion Around the World. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 72. ISBN 978-0-19-532819-6. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ a b Renima A, Tiliouine H, Estes RJ (2016). "The Islamic Golden Age: A Story of the Triumph of the Islamic Civilization". In Tiliouine H, Estes RJ (eds.). The State of Social Progress of Islamic Societies. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 25–52. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24774-8_2. ISBN 978-3-319-24774-8.
- ^ Vidal-Nanquet P (1987). The Harper Atlas of World History. Harper & Row Publishers. p. 76.
- ^ Asbridge T (2012). "Introduction: The world of the crusades". The Crusades: The War for the Holy Land. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-84983-770-5.
- ^ "Classic and Postclassic Periods - Sam Noble Museum". 3 November 2014. Archived from the original on 25 May 2024. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
- ^ Adam King (2002). "Mississippian Period: Overview". New Georgia Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 19 August 2009. Retrieved 15 November 2009.
- ^ May T (2013). The Mongol Conquests in World History. Reaktion Books. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-86189-971-2.
- ^ Canós-Donnay S (25 February 2019). "The Empire of Mali". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.266. ISBN 978-0-19-027773-4. Archived from the original on 20 October 2021. Retrieved 7 May 2021.
- ^ Canela SA, Graves MW. "The Tongan Maritime Expansion: A Case in the Evolutionary Ecology of Social Complexity". Asian Perspectives. 37 (2): 135–164.
- ^ Conrad G, Demarest AA (1984). Religion and Empire: The Dynamics of Aztec and Inca Expansionism. Cambridge University Press. p. 2. ISBN 0-521-31896-3.
- ^ Kafadar C (1 January 1994). "Ottomans and Europe". In Brady T, Oberman T, Tracy JD (eds.). Handbook of European History 1400–1600: Late Middle Ages, Renaissance and Reformation. Brill. pp. 589–635. doi:10.1163/9789004391659_019. ISBN 978-90-04-39165-9. Archived from the original on 2 May 2022. Retrieved 17 April 2021.
- ^ Goree R (19 November 2020). "The Culture of Travel in Edo-Period Japan". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.72. ISBN 978-0-19-027772-7. Archived from the original on 12 August 2021. Retrieved 7 May 2021.
- ^ Mosca MW (2010). "CHINA'S LAST EMPIRE: The Great Qing". Pacific Affairs. 83. Archived from the original on 6 March 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Suyanta S, Ikhlas S (19 July 2016). "Islamic Education at Mughal Kingdom in India (1526–1857)". Al-Ta Lim Journal. 23 (2): 128–138. doi:10.15548/jt.v23i2.228. ISSN 2355-7893. Archived from the original on 7 April 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Kirkpatrick R (2002). The European Renaissance, 1400–1600. Routledge. p. 1. ISBN 978-1-317-88646-4. OCLC 893909816.
- ^ Arnold D (2002). The Age of Discovery, 1400–1600 (Second ed.). Routledge. p. xi. ISBN 978-1-136-47968-7. OCLC 859536800.
- ^ Dixon EJ (January 2001). "Human colonization of the Americas: timing, technology and process". Quaternary Science Reviews. 20 (1–3): 277–299. Bibcode:2001QSRv...20..277J. doi:10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00116-5.
- ^ Keehnen, Floris W. M.; Mol, Angus A. A. (2020). "The roots of the Columbian Exchange: an entanglement and network approach to early Caribbean encounter transactions". Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology. 16 (2–4): 261–289. doi:10.1080/15564894.2020.1775729. PMC 8452148. PMID 34557059.
- ^ Lovejoy PE (1989). "The Impact of the Atlantic Slave Trade on Africa: A Review of the Literature". The Journal of African History. 30 (3): 365–394. doi:10.1017/S0021853700024439. ISSN 0021-8537. JSTOR 182914. S2CID 161321949.
- ^ Cave AA (2008). "Genocide in the Americas". In Stone D (ed.). The Historiography of Genocide. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 273–295. doi:10.1057/9780230297784_11. ISBN 978-0-230-29778-4.
- ^ Delisle RG (September 2014). "Can a revolution hide another one? Charles Darwin and the Scientific Revolution". Endeavour. 38 (3–4): 157–158. doi:10.1016/j.endeavour.2014.10.001. PMID 25457642.
- ^ "Greatest Engineering Achievements of the 20th Century". National Academy of Engineering. Archived from the original on 6 April 2015. Retrieved 7 April 2015.
- ^ "Sister Revolutions: American Revolutions on Two Continents (Teaching with Historic Places) (U.S. National Park Service)". www.nps.gov. Archived from the original on 27 May 2024. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
- ^ O'Rourke KH (March 2006). "The worldwide economic impact of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1793–1815". Journal of Global History. 1 (1): 123–149. doi:10.1017/S1740022806000076. ISSN 1740-0228. Archived from the original on 30 July 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Zimmerman AF (November 1931). "Spain and Its Colonies, 1808–1820". The Hispanic American Historical Review. 11 (4): 439–463. doi:10.2307/2506251. JSTOR 2506251.
- ^ David S (2011). "British History in depth: Slavery and the 'Scramble for Africa'". BBC. Archived from the original on 24 March 2022. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
- ^ Raudzens G (2004). "The Australian Frontier Wars, 1788–1838 (review)". The Journal of Military History. 68 (3): 957–959. doi:10.1353/jmh.2004.0138. ISSN 1543-7795. S2CID 162259092.
- ^ Palan R (14 January 2010). "International Financial Centers: The British-Empire, City-States and Commercially Oriented Politics". Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 11 (1). doi:10.2202/1565-3404.1239. ISSN 1565-3404. S2CID 56216309. Archived from the original on 26 August 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Clark CM (2012). "Polarization of Europe, 1887–1907". The sleepwalkers: how Europe went to war in 1914. London: Allen Lane. ISBN 978-0-7139-9942-6. OCLC 794136314.
- ^ Robert Dahl (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. Yale UP. pp. 239–240. ISBN 0-300-15355-4.
- ^ Herring GC (2008). From colony to superpower: U.S. foreign relations since 1776. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-19-972343-0. OCLC 299054528.
- ^ McDougall WA (May 1985). "Sputnik, the space race, and the Cold War". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 41 (5): 20–25. Bibcode:1985BuAtS..41e..20M. doi:10.1080/00963402.1985.11455962. ISSN 0096-3402.
- ^ Plous S (May 1993). "The Nuclear Arms Race: Prisoner's Dilemma or Perceptual Dilemma?". Journal of Peace Research. 30 (2): 163–179. doi:10.1177/0022343393030002004. ISSN 0022-3433. S2CID 5482851. Archived from the original on 21 February 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Sachs JD (April 2017). "Globalization – In the Name of Which Freedom?". Humanistic Management Journal. 1 (2): 237–252. doi:10.1007/s41463-017-0019-5. ISSN 2366-603X. S2CID 133030709.
- ^ "World". The World Factbook. CIA. 17 May 2016. Archived from the original on 26 January 2021. Retrieved 2 October 2016.
- ^ "World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision" (PDF). United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2017. p. 2&17. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 June 2019. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ "The World's Cities in 2018" (PDF). United Nations. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 November 2018.
- ^ Rector RK (2016). The Early River Valley Civilizations (First ed.). New York: Rosen Publishing. p. 10. ISBN 978-1-4994-6329-3. OCLC 953735302.
- ^ "How People Modify the Environment" (PDF). Westerville City School District. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
- ^ "Natural disasters and the urban poor" (PDF). World Bank. October 2003. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 August 2017.
- ^ Habitat UN (2013). The state of the world's cities 2012 / prosperity of cities. [London]: Routledge. p. x. ISBN 978-1-135-01559-6. OCLC 889953315.
- ^ a b c Piantadosi CA (2003). The biology of human survival: life and death in extreme environments. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 2–3. ISBN 978-0-19-974807-5. OCLC 70215878.
- ^ "Population of Antarctica Summer vs Winter - Brilliant Maps". 10 October 2024. Retrieved 20 May 2025.
- ^ Heim BE (1990–1991). "Exploring the Last Frontiers for Mineral Resources: A Comparison of International Law Regarding the Deep Seabed, Outer Space, and Antarctica". Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law. 23: 819. Archived from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ "Mission to Mars: Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity Rover". Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Archived from the original on 18 August 2015. Retrieved 26 August 2015.
- ^ "Touchdown! Rosetta's Philae probe lands on comet". European Space Agency. 12 November 2014. Archived from the original on 22 August 2015. Retrieved 26 August 2015.
- ^ "NEAR-Shoemaker". NASA. Archived from the original on 26 August 2015. Retrieved 26 August 2015.
- ^ Kraft R (11 December 2010). "JSC celebrates ten years of continuous human presence aboard the International Space Station". JSC Features. Johnson Space Center. Archived from the original on 16 February 2012. Retrieved 13 February 2012.
- ^ Toups, M.A.; Kitchen, A.; Light, J.E.; Reed, D.L. (2011). "Origin of clothing lice indicates early clothing use by anatomically modern humans in Africa". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 28 (1): 29–32. doi:10.1093/molbev/msq234. PMC 3002236. PMID 20823373.
- ^ O'Neil D. "Human Biological Adaptability; Overview". Palomar College. Archived from the original on 6 March 2013. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
- ^ "Population distribution and density". BBC. Archived from the original on 23 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- ^ Bunn SE, Arthington AH (October 2002). "Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity". Environmental Management. 30 (4): 492–507. Bibcode:2002EnMan..30..492B. doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0. hdl:10072/6758. PMID 12481916. S2CID 25834286.
- ^ a b Bar-On YM, Phillips R, Milo R (June 2018). "The biomass distribution on Earth". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 115 (25): 6506–6511. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.6506B. doi:10.1073/pnas.1711842115. PMC 6016768. PMID 29784790.
- ^ Tellier LN (2009). Urban world history: an economic and geographical perspective. Presses de l'Université du Québec. p. 26. ISBN 978-2-7605-1588-8. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Thomlinson R (1975). Demographic problems; controversy over population control (2nd ed.). Ecino, CA: Dickenson Pub. Co. ISBN 978-0-8221-0166-6.
- ^ Harl KW (1998). "Population estimates of the Roman Empire". Tulane.edu. Archived from the original on 7 May 2016. Retrieved 8 December 2012.
- ^ Zietz BP, Dunkelberg H (February 2004). "The history of the plague and the research on the causative agent Yersinia pestis". International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 207 (2): 165–178. Bibcode:2004IJHEH.207..165Z. doi:10.1078/1438-4639-00259. PMC 7128933. PMID 15031959.
- ^ "World's population reaches six billion". BBC News. 5 August 1999. Archived from the original on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 5 February 2008.
- ^ United Nations. "World population to reach 8 billion on 15 November 2022". United Nations. Archived from the original on 20 January 2023. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
- ^ "Eight billion people, SARS-CoV-2 ancestor and illegal fishing". Nature. 611 (641): 641. 23 November 2022. Bibcode:2022Natur.611..641.. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-03792-4. S2CID 253764233. Archived from the original on 26 January 2023. Retrieved 26 January 2023.
- ^ "World Population to Hit Milestone With Birth of 7 Billionth Person". PBS NewsHour. 27 October 2011. Archived from the original on 24 September 2017. Retrieved 11 February 2018.
- ^ a b "68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050, says UN". United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). 16 May 2018. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- ^ Duhart DT (October 2000). Urban, Suburban, and Rural Victimization, 1993–98 (PDF). U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 February 2013. Retrieved 1 October 2006.
- ^ a b Collins D (1976). The Human Revolution: From Ape to Artist. Phaidon. p. 208. ISBN 978-0-7148-1676-0.
- ^ Weisberger, Mindy (23 March 2024). "Why don't humans have tails? Scientists find answers in an unlikely place". CNN. Archived from the original on 24 March 2024. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
- ^ Marks JM (2001). Human Biodiversity: Genes, Race, and History. Transaction Publishers. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-202-36656-2.
- ^ Gea, J (2008). "The Evolution of the Human Species: A Long Journey for the Respiratory System". Archivos de Bronconeumología ((English Edition)). 44 (5): 263–270. doi:10.1016/S1579-2129(08)60042-7. PMID 18448018.
- ^ a b O'Neil D. "Humans". Primates. Palomar College. Archived from the original on 11 January 2013. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
- ^ "How to be Human: The reason we are so scarily hairy". New Scientist. 2017. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2020.
- ^ Sandel AA (September 2013). "Brief communication: Hair density and body mass in mammals and the evolution of human hairlessness". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 152 (1): 145–150. Bibcode:2013AJPA..152..145S. doi:10.1002/ajpa.22333. hdl:2027.42/99654. PMID 23900811.
- ^ Kirchweger G (2 February 2001). "The Biology of Skin Color: Black and White". Evolution: Library. PBS. Archived from the original on 16 February 2013. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
- ^ Roser M; Appel C; Ritchie H (8 October 2013). "Human Height". Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 30 January 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ "Senior Citizens Do Shrink – Just One of the Body Changes of Aging". News. Senior Journal. Archived from the original on 19 February 2013. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
- ^ Bogin B, Rios L (September 2003). "Rapid morphological change in living humans: implications for modern human origins". Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part A, Molecular & Integrative Physiology. 136 (1): 71–84. doi:10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00294-5. PMID 14527631.
- ^ "Human weight". Articleworld.org. Archived from the original on 8 December 2011. Retrieved 10 December 2011.
- ^ Schlessingerman A (2003). "Mass Of An Adult". The Physics Factbook: An Encyclopedia of Scientific Essays. Archived from the original on 1 January 2018. Retrieved 31 December 2017.
- ^ Kushner R (2007). Treatment of the Obese Patient (Contemporary Endocrinology). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. p. 158. ISBN 978-1-59745-400-1. Retrieved 5 April 2009.
- ^ Adams JP, Murphy PG (July 2000). "Obesity in anaesthesia and intensive care". British Journal of Anaesthesia. 85 (1): 91–108. doi:10.1093/bja/85.1.91. PMID 10927998.
- ^ Lombardo MP, Deaner RO (March 2018). "Born to Throw: The Ecological Causes that Shaped the Evolution of Throwing In Humans". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 93 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1086/696721. ISSN 0033-5770. S2CID 90757192.
- ^ Parker-Pope T (27 October 2009). "The Human Body Is Built for Distance". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 5 November 2015.
- ^ John B. "What is the role of sweating glands in balancing body temperature when running a marathon?". Livestrong.com. Archived from the original on 31 January 2013. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
- ^ Shave, R. E.; Lieberman, D. E.; Drane, A. L.; et al. (2019). "Selection of endurance capabilities and the trade-off between pressure and volume in the evolution of the human heart". PNAS. 116 (40): 19905–19910. Bibcode:2019PNAS..11619905S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1906902116. PMC 6778238. PMID 31527253.
- ^ Ríos, L; Sleeper, M. M.; Danforth, M. D.; et al. (2023). "The aorta in humans and African great apes, and cardiac output and metabolic levels in human evolution". Scientific Reports. 13 (6841): 6841. Bibcode:2023NatSR..13.6841R. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33675-1. hdl:10261/309357. PMC 10133235. PMID 37100851.
- ^ Therman E (1980). Human Chromosomes: Structure, Behavior, Effects. Springer US. pp. 112–124. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-0107-3. ISBN 978-1-4684-0109-7. S2CID 36686283.
- ^ Edwards JH, Dent T, Kahn J (June 1966). "Monozygotic twins of different sex". Journal of Medical Genetics. 3 (2): 117–123. doi:10.1136/jmg.3.2.117. PMC 1012913. PMID 6007033.
- ^ Machin GA (January 1996). "Some causes of genotypic and phenotypic discordance in monozygotic twin pairs". American Journal of Medical Genetics. 61 (3): 216–228. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960122)61:3<216::AID-AJMG5>3.0.CO;2-S. PMID 8741866.
- ^ Jonsson H, Magnusdottir E, Eggertsson HP, Stefansson OA, Arnadottir GA, Eiriksson O, et al. (January 2021). "Differences between germline genomes of monozygotic twins". Nature Genetics. 53 (1): 27–34. doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00755-1. PMID 33414551. S2CID 230986741.
- ^ "Genetic – Understanding Human Genetic Variation". Human Genetic Variation. National Institute of Health (NIH). Archived from the original on 25 August 2013. Retrieved 13 December 2013.
Between any two humans, the amount of genetic variation – biochemical individuality – is about 0.1%.
- ^ Levy S, Sutton G, Ng PC, Feuk L, Halpern AL, Walenz BP, et al. (September 2007). "The diploid genome sequence of an individual human". PLOS Biology. 5 (10) e254. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050254. PMC 1964779. PMID 17803354.
- ^ a b Race, Ethnicity, and Genetics Working Group (October 2005). "The use of racial, ethnic, and ancestral categories in human genetics research". American Journal of Human Genetics. 77 (4): 519–532. doi:10.1086/491747. PMC 1275602. PMID 16175499.
- ^ "Chimps show much greater genetic diversity than humans". Media. University of Oxford. Archived from the original on 18 December 2013. Retrieved 13 December 2013.
- ^ Harpending HC, Batzer MA, Gurven M, Jorde LB, Rogers AR, Sherry ST (February 1998). "Genetic traces of ancient demography". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 95 (4): 1961–1967. Bibcode:1998PNAS...95.1961H. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.4.1961. PMC 19224. PMID 9465125.
- ^ Jorde LB, Rogers AR, Bamshad M, Watkins WS, Krakowiak P, Sung S, et al. (April 1997). "Microsatellite diversity and the demographic history of modern humans". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 94 (7): 3100–3103. Bibcode:1997PNAS...94.3100J. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.7.3100. PMC 20328. PMID 9096352.
- ^ Wade N (7 March 2007). "Still Evolving, Human Genes Tell New Story". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 January 2012. Retrieved 13 February 2012.
- ^ Pennisi E (February 2001). "The human genome". Science. 291 (5507): 1177–1180. doi:10.1126/science.291.5507.1177. PMID 11233420. S2CID 38355565.
- ^ Rotimi CN, Adeyemo AA (February 2021). "From one human genome to a complex tapestry of ancestry". Nature. 590 (7845): 220–221. Bibcode:2021Natur.590..220R. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00237-2. PMID 33568827. S2CID 231882262.
- ^ Altshuler DM, Gibbs RA, Peltonen L, Altshuler DM, Gibbs RA, Peltonen L, et al. (September 2010). "Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations". Nature. 467 (7311): 52–58. Bibcode:2010Natur.467...52T. doi:10.1038/nature09298. PMC 3173859. PMID 20811451.
- ^ a b Bergström A, McCarthy SA, Hui R, Almarri MA, Ayub Q, Danecek P, et al. (March 2020). "Insights into human genetic variation and population history from 929 diverse genomes". Science. 367 (6484) eaay5012. doi:10.1126/science.aay5012. PMC 7115999. PMID 32193295.
Populations in central and southern Africa, the Americas, and Oceania each harbor tens to hundreds of thousands of private, common genetic variants. Most of these variants arose as new mutations rather than through archaic introgression, except in Oceanian populations, where many private variants derive from Denisovan admixture.
- ^ Pertea M, Salzberg SL (2010). "Between a chicken and a grape: estimating the number of human genes". Genome Biology. 11 (5): 206. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-206. PMC 2898077. PMID 20441615.
- ^ Cann RL, Stoneking M, Wilson AC (1987). "Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution". Nature. 325 (6099): 31–36. Bibcode:1987Natur.325...31C. doi:10.1038/325031a0. PMID 3025745. S2CID 4285418.
- ^ Soares P, Ermini L, Thomson N, Mormina M, Rito T, Röhl A, et al. (June 2009). "Correcting for purifying selection: an improved human mitochondrial molecular clock". American Journal of Human Genetics. 84 (6): 740–759. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.05.001. PMC 2694979. PMID 19500773.
- ^ "University of Leeds | News > Technology > New 'molecular clock' aids dating of human migration history". 20 August 2017. Archived from the original on 20 August 2017.
- ^ Poznik GD, Henn BM, Yee MC, Sliwerska E, Euskirchen GM, Lin AA, et al. (August 2013). "Sequencing Y chromosomes resolves discrepancy in time to common ancestor of males versus females". Science. 341 (6145): 562–565. Bibcode:2013Sci...341..562P. doi:10.1126/science.1237619. PMC 4032117. PMID 23908239.
- ^ Shehan CL (2016). The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Family Studies, 4 Volume Set. John Wiley & Sons. p. 406. ISBN 978-0-470-65845-1.
- ^ Jukic AM, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, McConnaughey DR, Wilcox AJ (October 2013). "Length of human pregnancy and contributors to its natural variation". Human Reproduction. 28 (10): 2848–2855. doi:10.1093/humrep/det297. PMC 3777570. PMID 23922246.
- ^ Klossner NJ (2005). Introductory Maternity Nursing. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 103. ISBN 978-0-7817-6237-3. Archived from the original on 8 April 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
The fetal stage is from the beginning of the 9th week after fertilization and continues until birth
- ^ World Health Organization (November 2014). "Preterm birth Fact sheet N°363". who.int. Archived from the original on 7 March 2015. Retrieved 6 March 2015.
- ^ Kiserud T, Benachi A, Hecher K, Perez RG, Carvalho J, Piaggio G, Platt LD (February 2018). "The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 218 (2S): S619 – S629. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.010. PMID 29422204. S2CID 46810955.
- ^ "What is the average baby length? Growth chart by month". www.medicalnewstoday.com. 18 March 2019. Archived from the original on 27 January 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- ^ Khor GL (December 2003). "Update on the prevalence of malnutrition among children in Asia". Nepal Medical College Journal. 5 (2): 113–122. PMID 15024783.
- ^ Rosenberg KR (1992). "The evolution of modern human childbirth". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 35 (S15): 89–124. Bibcode:1992AJPA...35S..89R. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330350605. ISSN 1096-8644.
- ^ a b Pavličev M, Romero R, Mitteroecker P (January 2020). "Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 222 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.043. PMC 9069416. PMID 31251927. S2CID 195761874.
- ^ Barras C (22 December 2016). "The real reasons why childbirth is so painful and dangerous". BBC.
- ^ Kantrowitz B (2 July 2007). "What Kills One Woman Every Minute of Every Day?". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 28 June 2007.
A woman dies in childbirth every minute, most often due to uncontrolled bleeding and infection, with the world's poorest women most vulnerable. The lifetime risk is 1 in 16 in sub-Saharan Africa, compared to 1 in 2,800 in developed countries.
- ^ Rush D (July 2000). "Nutrition and maternal mortality in the developing world". The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 72 (1 Suppl): 212S – 240S. doi:10.1093/ajcn/72.1.212S. PMID 10871588.
- ^ Laland KN, Brown G (2011). Sense and Nonsense: Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behaviour. Oxford University Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-19-958696-7. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Kail RV, Cavanaugh JC (2010). Human Development: A Lifespan View (5th ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 296. ISBN 978-0-495-60037-4. Archived from the original on 3 October 2023. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Schuiling KD, Likis FE (2016). Women's Gynecologic Health. Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 22. ISBN 978-1-284-12501-6. Archived from the original on 10 January 2023. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
The changes that occur during puberty usually happen in an ordered sequence, beginning with thelarche (breast development) at around age 10 or 11, followed by adrenarche (growth of pubic hair due to androgen stimulation), peak height velocity, and finally menarche (the onset of menses), which usually occurs around age 12 or 13.
- ^ Phillips DC (2014). Encyclopedia of Educational Theory and Philosophy. SAGE Publications. pp. 18–19. ISBN 978-1-4833-6475-9. Archived from the original on 10 January 2023. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
On average, the onset of puberty is about 18 months earlier for girls (usually starting around the age of 10 or 11 and lasting until they are 15 to 17) than for boys (who usually begin puberty at about the age of 11 to 12 and complete it by the age of 16 to 17, on average).
- ^ Mintz S (1993). "Life stages". Encyclopedia of American Social History. Vol. 3. pp. 7–33.
- ^ Soliman A, De Sanctis V, Elalaily R, Bedair S (November 2014). "Advances in pubertal growth and factors influencing it: Can we increase pubertal growth?". Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 18 (Suppl 1): S53-62. doi:10.4103/2230-8210.145075. PMC 4266869. PMID 25538878.
- ^ Walker ML, Herndon JG (September 2008). "Menopause in nonhuman primates?". Biology of Reproduction. 79 (3): 398–406. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.108.068536. PMC 2553520. PMID 18495681.
- ^ Diamond J (1997). Why is Sex Fun? The Evolution of Human Sexuality. New York: Basic Books. pp. 167–170. ISBN 978-0-465-03127-6.
- ^ Peccei JS (2001). "Menopause: Adaptation or epiphenomenon?". Evolutionary Anthropology. 10 (2): 43–57. doi:10.1002/evan.1013. S2CID 1665503.
- ^ Marziali C (7 December 2010). "Reaching Toward the Fountain of Youth". USC Trojan Family Magazine. Archived from the original on 13 December 2010. Retrieved 7 December 2010.
- ^ Kalben BB (2002). "Why Men Die Younger: Causes of Mortality Differences by Sex". Society of Actuaries. Archived from the original on 1 July 2013.
- ^ "Life expectancy at birth, female (years)". World Bank. 2018. Archived from the original on 24 January 2021. Retrieved 13 October 2020.
- ^ "Life expectancy at birth, male (years)". World Bank. 2018. Archived from the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 13 October 2020.
- ^ Conceição P, et al. (2019). Human Development Report (PDF). United Nations Development Programme. ISBN 978-92-1-126439-5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 March 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ "Human Development Report 2019" (PDF). United Nations Development Programme. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 April 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ "The World Factbook". U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. Archived from the original on 12 September 2009. Retrieved 2 April 2005.
- ^ "Chapter 1: Setting the Scene" (PDF). UNFPA. 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 June 2013. Retrieved 11 January 2013.
- ^ Barrientos, Gustavo; Catella, Luciana; Morales, Natalia S. (20 May 2020). "A journey into the landscape of past feeding habits: Mapping geographic variations in the isotope (δ15N) -inferred trophic position of prehistoric human populations". Quaternary International. 548: 13–26. Bibcode:2020QuInt.548...13B. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2020.01.023. Archived from the original on 20 May 2024. Retrieved 20 July 2024 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
- ^ Haenel H (1989). "Phylogenesis and nutrition". Die Nahrung. 33 (9): 867–887. PMID 2697806.
- ^ Cordain L (2007). "Implications of Plio-pleistocene diets for modern humans". In Ungar PS (ed.). Evolution of the human diet: the known, the unknown and the unknowable. pp. 264–265.
Since the evolutionary split between hominins and pongids approximately 7 million years ago, the available evidence shows that all species of hominins ate an omnivorous diet composed of minimally processed, wild-plant, and animal foods.
- ^ American Dietetic Association (June 2003). "Position of the American Dietetic Association and Dietitians of Canada: Vegetarian diets". Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 103 (6): 748–765. doi:10.1053/jada.2003.50142. PMID 12778049.
- ^ a b Crittenden AN, Schnorr SL (2017). "Current views on hunter-gatherer nutrition and the evolution of the human diet". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 162 (S63): 84–109. Bibcode:2017AJPA..162S..84C. doi:10.1002/ajpa.23148. PMID 28105723.
- ^ Cordain L, Eaton SB, Sebastian A, Mann N, Lindeberg S, Watkins BA, et al. (February 2005). "Origins and evolution of the Western diet: health implications for the 21st century". The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 81 (2): 341–354. doi:10.1093/ajcn.81.2.341. PMID 15699220.
- ^ Ulijaszek SJ (November 2002). "Human eating behaviour in an evolutionary ecological context". The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 61 (4): 517–526. doi:10.1079/PNS2002180. PMID 12691181.
- ^ John Carey (2023). "Unearthing the origins of agriculture". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120 (15) e2304407120. Bibcode:2023PNAS..12004407C. doi:10.1073/pnas.2304407120. PMC 10104519. PMID 37018195.
- ^ Ayelet Shavit; Gonen Sharon (2023). "Can models of evolutionary transition clarify the debates over the Neolithic Revolution?". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 378 (1872) 20210413. doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0413. PMC 9869441. PMID 36688395.
- ^ Krebs JR (September 2009). "The gourmet ape: evolution and human food preferences". The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 90 (3): 707S – 711S. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.27462B. PMID 19656837.
- ^ Holden C, Mace R (October 1997). "Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of lactose digestion in adults". Human Biology. 69 (5): 605–628. PMID 9299882.
- ^ Gibbons A. "The Evolution of Diet". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 18 August 2014. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- ^ Ritchie H, Roser M (20 August 2017). "Diet Compositions". Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 25 August 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Lieberson AD (2004). "How Long Can a Person Survive without Food?". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 14 February 2019. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- ^ Spector D (9 March 2018). "Here's how many days a person can survive without water". Business Insider Australia. Archived from the original on 26 June 2014. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- ^ Holmes J. "Losing 25,000 to Hunger Every Day". United Nations. Archived from the original on 27 May 2020. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- ^ Mai HJ (2020). "U.N. Warns Number Of People Starving To Death Could Double Amid Pandemic". NPR. Archived from the original on 28 June 2021. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- ^ Murray CJ, Lopez AD (May 1997). "Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study". Lancet. 349 (9063): 1436–1442. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07495-8. PMID 9164317. S2CID 2569153.
- ^ a b Haslam DW, James WP (October 2005). "Obesity". Lancet. 366 (9492): 1197–1209. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67483-1. PMID 16198769. S2CID 208791491.
- ^ Catenacci VA, Hill JO, Wyatt HR (September 2009). "The obesity epidemic". Clinics in Chest Medicine. 30 (3): 415–444, vii. doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2009.05.001. PMID 19700042.
- ^ "The Basics of Constipation". WebMD. Retrieved 15 August 2025.
- ^ de Beer H (March 2004). "Observations on the history of Dutch physical stature from the late-Middle Ages to the present". Economics and Human Biology. 2 (1): 45–55. doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2003.11.001. PMID 15463992.
- ^ O'Neil D. "Adapting to Climate Extremes". Human Biological Adaptability. Palomar College. Archived from the original on 6 January 2013. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
- ^ Rask-Andersen M, Karlsson T, Ek WE, Johansson Å (September 2017). "Gene-environment interaction study for BMI reveals interactions between genetic factors and physical activity, alcohol consumption and socioeconomic status". PLOS Genetics. 13 (9) e1006977. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006977. PMC 5600404. PMID 28873402.
- ^ Beja-Pereira A, Luikart G, England PR, Bradley DG, Jann OC, Bertorelle G, et al. (December 2003). "Gene-culture coevolution between cattle milk protein genes and human lactase genes". Nature Genetics. 35 (4): 311–313. doi:10.1038/ng1263. PMID 14634648. S2CID 20415396.
- ^ Hedrick PW (October 2011). "Population genetics of malaria resistance in humans". Heredity. 107 (4): 283–304. Bibcode:2011Hered.107..283H. doi:10.1038/hdy.2011.16. PMC 3182497. PMID 21427751.
- ^ Weatherall DJ (May 2008). "Genetic variation and susceptibility to infection: the red cell and malaria". British Journal of Haematology. 141 (3): 276–286. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07085.x. PMID 18410566. S2CID 28191911.
- ^ Shelomi M, Zeuss D (5 April 2017). "Bergmann's and Allen's Rules in Native European and Mediterranean Phasmatodea". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 5: 25. Bibcode:2017FrEEv...5...25S. doi:10.3389/fevo.2017.00025. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-002C-DD87-4. ISSN 2296-701X. S2CID 34882477.
- ^ Ilardo MA, Moltke I, Korneliussen TS, Cheng J, Stern AJ, Racimo F, et al. (April 2018). "Physiological and Genetic Adaptations to Diving in Sea Nomads". Cell. 173 (3): 569–580.e15. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.054. PMID 29677510.
- ^ Rogers AR, Iltis D, Wooding S (2004). "Genetic variation at the MC1R locus and the time since loss of human body hair". Current Anthropology. 45 (1): 105–08. doi:10.1086/381006. S2CID 224795768.
- ^ a b Roberts D (2011). Fatal Invention. London & New York: The New Press.
- ^ Nina J (2004). "The evolution of human skin and skin color". Annual Review of Anthropology. 33: 585–623. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143955.
- ^ Jablonski NG, Chaplin G (May 2010). "Colloquium paper: human skin pigmentation as an adaptation to UV radiation". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107 (Supplement_2): 8962–8968. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.8962J. doi:10.1073/pnas.0914628107. PMC 3024016. PMID 20445093.
- ^ Jablonski NG, Chaplin G (July 2000). "The evolution of human skin coloration" (PDF). Journal of Human Evolution. 39 (1): 57–106. Bibcode:2000JHumE..39...57J. doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0403. PMID 10896812. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 January 2012.
- ^ Harding RM, Healy E, Ray AJ, Ellis NS, Flanagan N, Todd C, et al. (April 2000). "Evidence for variable selective pressures at MC1R". American Journal of Human Genetics. 66 (4): 1351–1361. doi:10.1086/302863. PMC 1288200. PMID 10733465.
- ^ Robin A (1991). Biological Perspectives on Human Pigmentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- ^ "The Science Behind the Human Genome Project". Human Genome Project. US Department of Energy. Archived from the original on 2 January 2013. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
Almost all (99.9%) nucleotide bases are exactly the same in all people.
- ^ O'Neil D. "Ethnicity and Race: Overview". Palomar College. Archived from the original on 6 January 2013. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
- ^ Keita SO, Kittles RA, Royal CD, Bonney GE, Furbert-Harris P, Dunston GM, Rotimi CN (November 2004). "Conceptualizing human variation". Nature Genetics. 36 (11 Suppl): S17-20. doi:10.1038/ng1455. PMID 15507998.
- ^ O'Neil D. "Models of Classification". Modern Human Variation. Palomar College. Archived from the original on 6 January 2013. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
- ^ Jablonski N (2004). "The evolution of human skin and skin color". Annual Review of Anthropology. 33: 585–623. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143955.
- ^ Palmié S (May 2007). "Genomics, divination, 'racecraft'". American Ethnologist. 34 (2): 205–222. doi:10.1525/ae.2007.34.2.205.
- ^ "Genetic – Understanding Human Genetic Variation". Human Genetic Variation. National Institute of Health (NIH). Archived from the original on 25 August 2013. Retrieved 13 December 2013.
In fact, research results consistently demonstrate that about 85 percent of all human genetic variation exists within human populations, whereas about only 15 percent of variation exists between populations.
- ^ Goodman A. "Interview with Alan Goodman". Race Power of and Illusion. PBS. Archived from the original on 29 October 2012. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
- ^ Marks J (2010). "Ten facts about human variation". In Muehlenbein M (ed.). Human Evolutionary Biology (PDF). New York: Cambridge University Press. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 April 2012. Retrieved 5 September 2013.
- ^ Nina J (2004). "The evolution of human skin and skin color". Annual Review of Anthropology. 33: 585–623. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143955.
genetic evidence [demonstrate] that strong levels of natural selection acted about 1.2 mya to produce darkly pigmented skin in early members of the genus Homo
- ^ O'Neil D. "Overview". Modern Human Variation. Palomar College. Archived from the original on 5 November 2012. Retrieved 6 January 2013.
- ^ Jorde LB, Watkins WS, Bamshad MJ, Dixon ME, Ricker CE, Seielstad MT, Batzer MA (March 2000). "The distribution of human genetic diversity: a comparison of mitochondrial, autosomal, and Y-chromosome data". American Journal of Human Genetics. 66 (3): 979–988. doi:10.1086/302825. PMC 1288178. PMID 10712212.
- ^ "New Research Proves Single Origin Of Humans In Africa". Science Daily. 19 July 2007. Archived from the original on 4 November 2011. Retrieved 5 September 2011.
- ^ Manica A, Amos W, Balloux F, Hanihara T (July 2007). "The effect of ancient population bottlenecks on human phenotypic variation". Nature. 448 (7151): 346–348. Bibcode:2007Natur.448..346M. doi:10.1038/nature05951. PMC 1978547. PMID 17637668.
- ^ Chen L, Wolf AB, Fu W, Li L, Akey JM (February 2020). "Identifying and Interpreting Apparent Neanderthal Ancestry in African Individuals". Cell. 180 (4): 677–687.e16. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.012. PMID 32004458. S2CID 210955842.
- ^ Bergström A, McCarthy SA, Hui R, Almarri MA, Ayub Q, Danecek P, et al. (March 2020). "Insights into human genetic variation and population history from 929 diverse genomes". Science. 367 (6484) eaay5012. doi:10.1126/science.aay5012. PMC 7115999. PMID 32193295.
An analysis of archaic sequences in modern populations identifies ancestral genetic variation in African populations that likely predates modern humans and has been lost in most non-African populations.
- ^ Durvasula A, Sankararaman S (February 2020). "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations". Science Advances. 6 (7) eaax5097. Bibcode:2020SciA....6.5097D. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax5097. PMC 7015685. PMID 32095519.
Our analyses of site frequency spectra indicate that these populations derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans.
- ^ Pierce BA (2012). Genetics: A Conceptual Approach. Macmillan. p. 75. ISBN 978-1-4292-3252-4. Archived from the original on 22 October 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Muehlenbein MP (29 July 2010). Jones J (ed.). Human Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge University Press. p. 74. ISBN 978-0-521-87948-4. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Fusco G, Minelli A (10 October 2019). The Biology of Reproduction. Cambridge University Press. p. 304. ISBN 978-1-108-49985-9. Archived from the original on 22 October 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Gustafsson A, Lindenfors P (October 2004). "Human size evolution: no evolutionary allometric relationship between male and female stature". Journal of Human Evolution. 47 (4): 253–266. Bibcode:2004JHumE..47..253G. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.07.004. PMID 15454336.
- ^ Ogden CL, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Flegal KM (October 2004). "Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960–2002" (PDF). Advance Data (347): 1–17. PMID 15544194. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 February 2011.
- ^ Miller AE, MacDougall JD, Tarnopolsky MA, Sale DG (1993). "Gender differences in strength and muscle fiber characteristics". European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology. 66 (3): 254–262. doi:10.1007/BF00235103. hdl:11375/22586. PMID 8477683. S2CID 206772211.
- ^ Bredella MA (2017). "Sex Differences in Body Composition". In Mauvais-Jarvis F (ed.). Sex and Gender Factors Affecting Metabolic Homeostasis, Diabetes and Obesity. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Vol. 1043. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 9–27. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70178-3_2. ISBN 978-3-319-70177-6. PMID 29224088.
- ^ Rahrovan S, Fanian F, Mehryan P, Humbert P, Firooz A (September 2018). "Male versus female skin: What dermatologists and cosmeticians should know". International Journal of Women's Dermatology. 4 (3): 122–130. doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.03.002. PMC 6116811. PMID 30175213.
- ^ Easter C. "Sex Linked". National Human Genome Research Institute. Archived from the original on 14 April 2022. Retrieved 18 April 2021.
- ^ Puts DA, Gaulin SJ, Verdolini K (July 2006). "Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch". Evolution and Human Behavior. 27 (4): 283–296. Bibcode:2006EHumB..27..283P. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.11.003. S2CID 32562654.
- ^ "Gender, women, and health". Reports from WHO 2002–2005. Archived from the original on 25 June 2013.
- ^ Sax, Leonard (1 August 2002). "How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling". The Journal of Sex Research. 39 (3): 174–178. doi:10.1080/00224490209552139. ISSN 0022-4499. PMID 12476264. S2CID 33795209.
- ^ Esteban, Caleb; Ortiz-Rodz, Derek Israel; Muñiz-Pérez, Yesibelle I.; Ramírez-Vega, Luis; Jiménez-Ricaurte, Coral; Mattei-Torres, Edna; Finkel-Aguilar, Victoria (7 February 2023). "Quality of Life and Psychosocial Well-Being among Intersex-Identifying Individuals in Puerto Rico: An Exploratory Study". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20 (4): 2899. doi:10.3390/ijerph20042899. ISSN 1661-7827. PMC 9957316. PMID 36833596.
- ^ "3-D Brain Anatomy". The Secret Life of the Brain. Public Broadcasting Service. Archived from the original on 5 September 2017. Retrieved 3 April 2005.
- ^ Stern P (22 June 2018). "The human prefrontal cortex is special". Science. 360 (6395): 1311–1312. Bibcode:2018Sci...360S1311S. doi:10.1126/science.360.6395.1311-g. ISSN 0036-8075. S2CID 149581944.
- ^ Levy, Richard (16 November 2023). "The prefrontal cortex: from monkey to man". Brain. 147 (3): 794–815. doi:10.1093/brain/awad389. ISSN 0006-8950. PMC 10907097. PMID 37972282.
- ^ Erickson R (22 September 2014). "Are Humans the Most Intelligent Species?". Journal of Intelligence. 2 (3): 119–121. doi:10.3390/jintelligence2030119. ISSN 2079-3200.
- ^ "Humans not smarter than animals, just different, experts say". phys.org. Archived from the original on 30 January 2021. Retrieved 24 October 2020.
- ^ Robson D (9 November 2016). "We've got human intelligence all wrong". www.bbc.com. Archived from the original on 31 January 2021. Retrieved 24 October 2020.
- ^ Owen J (26 February 2015). "Many Animals – Including Your Dog – May Have Horrible Short-Term Memories". National Geographic News. Archived from the original on 19 April 2021. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
- ^ Schmidt KL, Cohn JF (2001). "Human facial expressions as adaptations: Evolutionary questions in facial expression research". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 116 (S33): 3–24. Bibcode:2001AJPA..116S...3S. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20001. PMC 2238342. PMID 11786989.
- ^ Moisse K (5 January 2011). "Tears in Her Eyes: A Turnoff for Guys?". ABC News (American). Archived from the original on 30 January 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2020.
- ^ Deleniv S (2018). "The 'me' illusion: How your brain conjures up your sense of self". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2020.
- ^ Beck, Jacob (7 September 2019). "Can We Really Know What Animals Are Thinking?". Snopes. Archived from the original on 31 October 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2020.
- ^ Penn, Derek C.; Povinelli, Daniel J. (29 April 2007). "On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a 'theory of mind'". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 362 (1480): 731–744. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.2023. ISSN 0962-8436. PMC 2346530. PMID 17264056.
- ^ Grandner MA, Patel NP, Gehrman PR, Perlis ML, Pack AI (August 2010). "Problems associated with short sleep: bridging the gap between laboratory and epidemiological studies". Sleep Medicine Reviews. 14 (4): 239–247. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2009.08.001. PMC 2888649. PMID 19896872.
- ^ Ann L (27 January 2005). "HowStuffWorks "Dreams: Stages of Sleep"". Science.howstuffworks.com. Archived from the original on 15 May 2012. Retrieved 11 August 2012.
- ^ Hobson JA (November 2009). "REM sleep and dreaming: towards a theory of protoconsciousness". Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 10 (11): 803–813. doi:10.1038/nrn2716. PMID 19794431. S2CID 205505278.
- ^ Empson J (2002). Sleep and dreaming (3rd ed.). New York: Palgrave/St. Martin's Press.
- ^ Lite J (29 July 2010). "How Can You Control Your Dreams?". Scientific America. Archived from the original on 2 February 2015.
- ^ Domhoff W (2002). The scientific study of dreams. APA Press.
- ^ "Consciousness". Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 7 September 2019. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
- ^ van Gulick R (2004). "Consciousness". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 14 October 2019. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Schneider S, Velmans M (2008). "Introduction". In Velmans M, Schneider S (eds.). The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-75145-9.
- ^ Searle J (2005). "Consciousness". In Honderich T (ed.). The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-926479-7.
- ^ Block N (June 1995). "On a confusion about a function of consciousness". Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 18 (2): 227–247. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00038474. S2CID 246244859.
- ^ Jaynes J (2000) [1976]. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (PDF). Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 0-618-05707-2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 August 2019. Retrieved 25 October 2020.
- ^ Rochat P (December 2003). "Five levels of self-awareness as they unfold early in life". Consciousness and Cognition. 12 (4): 717–731. doi:10.1016/s1053-8100(03)00081-3. PMID 14656513. S2CID 10241157.
- ^ Carruthers P (15 August 2011). "Higher-Order Theories of Consciousness". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 13 April 2021. Retrieved 31 August 2014.
- ^ Antony MV (2001). "Is consciousness ambiguous?". Journal of Consciousness Studies. 8: 19–44.
- ^ "Cognition". Lexico. Oxford University Press and Dictionary.com. Archived from the original on 8 July 2016. Retrieved 6 May 2020.
- ^ Glattfelder JB (2019). "The Consciousness of Reality". In Glattfelder JB (ed.). Information—Consciousness—Reality. The Frontiers Collection. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 515–595. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03633-1_14. ISBN 978-3-030-03633-1. S2CID 189379814.
- ^ "American Psychological Association (2013). Glossary of psychological terms". Apa.org. Archived from the original on 8 July 2014. Retrieved 13 August 2014.
- ^ "Developmental Psychology Studies Human Development Across the Lifespan". www.apa.org. Archived from the original on 9 July 2014. Retrieved 28 August 2017.
- ^ Burman E (2017). Deconstructing Developmental Psychology. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-84695-1.
- ^ Colom R (1 January 2004). "Intelligence Assessment". Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. pp. 307–314. doi:10.1016/B0-12-657410-3/00510-9. ISBN 978-0-12-657410-4.
- ^ McLeod S (20 March 2020). "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs". Simplypsychology.org. Simply Scholar Limited. Archived from the original on 8 November 2018. Retrieved 4 April 2020.
Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a motivational theory in psychology comprising a five-tier model of human needs, often depicted as hierarchical levels within a pyramid. Needs lower down in the hierarchy must be satisfied before individuals can attend to needs higher up.
- ^ Heckhausen J, Heckhausen H (28 March 2018). "Motivation and Action: Introduction and Overview". Motivation and Action. Introduction and Overview: Springer, Cham. p. 1. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65094-4_1. ISBN 978-3-319-65093-7.
- ^ Damasio AR (May 1998). "Emotion in the perspective of an integrated nervous system". Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews. 26 (2–3): 83–86. doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(97)00064-7. PMID 9651488. S2CID 8504450.
- ^ Ekman P, Davidson RJ (1994). The Nature of emotion: fundamental questions. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 291–293. ISBN 978-0-19-508944-8.
Emotional processing, but not emotions, can occur unconsciously.
- ^ Cabanac M (2002). "What is emotion?". Behavioural Processes. 60 (2): 69–83. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00078-5. PMID 12426062. S2CID 24365776.
Emotion is any mental experience with high intensity and high hedonic content (pleasure/displeasure)
- ^ Scirst DL (2011). Psychology Second Edition. New York: Worth Publishers. p. 310. ISBN 978-1-4292-3719-2.
- ^ Averill JR (April 1999). "Individual differences in emotional creativity: structure and correlates". Journal of Personality. 67 (2): 331–371. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00058. PMID 10202807.
- ^ Tyng CM, Amin HU, Saad MN, Malik AS (2017). "The Influences of Emotion on Learning and Memory". Frontiers in Psychology. 8 1454. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454. PMC 5573739. PMID 28883804.
- ^ Van Gelder JL (November 2016). "Emotions in Criminal Decision Making". In Wright R (ed.). Oxford Bibliographies in Criminology. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 29 January 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Sharma N, Prakash O, Sengar KS, Chaudhury S, Singh AR (2015). "The relation between emotional intelligence and criminal behavior: A study among convicted criminals". Industrial Psychiatry Journal. 24 (1): 54–58. doi:10.4103/0972-6748.160934. PMC 4525433. PMID 26257484.
- ^ Fredrickson BL (March 2001). "The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions". The American Psychologist. 56 (3): 218–226. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218. PMC 3122271. PMID 11315248.
- ^ Haybron DM (August 2013). "The proper pursuit of happiness". Res Philosophica. 90 (3): 387–411. doi:10.11612/resphil.2013.90.3.5.
- ^ Haybron DM (13 April 2014). "Happiness and Its Discontents". The Opinion Pages. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 12 October 2018. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
I would suggest that when we talk about happiness, we are actually referring, much of the time, to a complex emotional phenomenon. Call it emotional well-being. Happiness as emotional well-being concerns your emotions and moods, more broadly your emotional condition as a whole. To be happy is to inhabit a favorable emotional state.... On this view, we can think of happiness, loosely, as the opposite of anxiety and depression. Being in good spirits, quick to laugh and slow to anger, at peace and untroubled, confident and comfortable in your own skin, engaged, energetic and full of life.
- ^ Graham MC (2014). Facts of Life: ten issues of contentment. Outskirts Press. pp. 6–10. ISBN 978-1-4787-2259-5.
- ^ "Secret to happiness may include more unpleasant emotions: Research contradicts idea that people should always seek pleasure to be happy". ScienceDaily. American Psychological Association. 14 August 2017. Archived from the original on 11 November 2020. Retrieved 25 October 2020.
- ^ a b c Greenberg JS, Bruess CE, Oswalt SB (2016). Exploring the Dimensions of Human Sexuality. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. pp. 4–10. ISBN 978-1-284-08154-1. Retrieved 21 June 2017.
Human sexuality is a part of your total personality. It involves the interrelationship of biological, psychological, and sociocultural dimensions. [...] It is the total of our physical, emotional, and spiritual responses, thoughts, and feelings.
- ^ a b c d Bolin A, Whelehan P (2009). Human Sexuality: Biological, Psychological, and Cultural Perspectives. Taylor & Francis. pp. 32–42. ISBN 978-0-7890-2671-2.
- ^ Younis I, Abdel-Rahman SH (2013). "Sex difference in libido". Human Andrology. 3 (4): 85–89. doi:10.1097/01.XHA.0000432482.01760.b0. S2CID 147235090.
- ^ "Sexual orientation, homosexuality and bisexuality". American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 8 August 2013. Retrieved 10 August 2013.
- ^ a b c Bailey JM, Vasey PL, Diamond LM, Breedlove SM, Vilain E, Epprecht M (September 2016). "Sexual Orientation, Controversy, and Science". Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 17 (2): 45–101. doi:10.1177/1529100616637616. PMID 27113562.
- ^ a b LeVay S (2017). Gay, Straight, and the Reason Why: The Science of Sexual Orientation. Oxford University Press. pp. 8, 19. ISBN 978-0-19-975296-6. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Balthazart J (2012). The Biology of Homosexuality. Oxford University Press. pp. 13–14. ISBN 978-0-19-983882-0. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Buss DM (2003). The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating (Revised ed.). New York: Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-00802-5.
- ^ Fromm E (2000). The art of loving. New York: Harper Perennial. ISBN 978-0-06-095828-2.
- ^ "Love, Actually: The science behind lust, attraction, and companionship". Science in the News. 14 February 2017. Archived from the original on 28 October 2020. Retrieved 25 October 2020.
- ^ "What are the top 200 most spoken languages?". Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 2020. Archived from the original on 12 January 2013. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ a b World. The World Factbook (Report). Central Intelligence Agency. Archived from the original on 26 January 2021. Retrieved 15 November 2021.
- ^ "The Changing Global Religious Landscape". Pew Research Center. 5 April 2017. Archived from the original on 18 February 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Ord T (2020). The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. New York: Hachette Books. ISBN 978-0-316-48489-3.
Homo sapiens and our close relatives may have some unique physical attributes, such as our dextrous hands, upright walking and resonant voices. However, these on their own cannot explain our success. They went together with our intelligence...
- ^ Goldman JG (2012). "Pay attention... time for lessons at animal school". bbc.com. Archived from the original on 30 January 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2020.
- ^ Winkler M, Mueller JL, Friederici AD, Männel C (November 2018). "Infant cognition includes the potentially human-unique ability to encode embedding". Science Advances. 4 (11) eaar8334. Bibcode:2018SciA....4.8334W. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar8334. PMC 6248967. PMID 30474053.
- ^ Johnson-Frey SH (July 2003). "What's so special about human tool use?". Neuron. 39 (2): 201–204. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00424-0. PMID 12873378. S2CID 18437970.
- ^ Emery NJ, Clayton NS (February 2009). "Tool use and physical cognition in birds and mammals". Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 19 (1): 27–33. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2009.02.003. PMID 19328675. S2CID 18277620.
In short, the evidence to date that animals have an understanding of folk physics is at best mixed.
- ^ Lemonick MD (3 June 2015). "Chimps Can't Cook, But Maybe They'd Like To". National Geographic News. Archived from the original on 31 January 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2020.
- ^ Vakhitova T, Gadelshina L (2 June 2015). "The Role and Importance of the Study of Economic Subjects in the Implementation of the Educational Potential of Education". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. The Proceedings of 6th World Conference on educational Sciences. 191: 2565–2567. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.690. ISSN 1877-0428.
- ^ McKie R (9 October 2018). "The Book of Humans by Adam Rutherford review – a pithy homage to our species". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 5 February 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2020.
- ^ Nicholls H (29 June 2015). "Babblers speak to the origin of language". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 31 January 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2020.
- ^ Dasgupta S (2015). "Can any animals talk and use language like humans?". bbc.com. Archived from the original on 2 May 2020. Retrieved 22 April 2020.
Most animals are not vocal learners.
- ^ Scott-Phillips TC, Blythe RA (18 September 2013). "Why is language unique to humans?". Royal Society. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 24 October 2020.
- ^ Pagel M (July 2017). "Q&A: What is human language, when did it evolve and why should we care?". BMC Biology. 15 (1) 64. doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0405-3. PMC 5525259. PMID 28738867.
- ^ Fitch WT (4 December 2010). "Language evolution: How to hear words long silenced". New Scientist. 208 (2789): ii–iii. Bibcode:2010NewSc.208D...2F. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(10)62961-2. ISSN 0262-4079.
- ^ Lian A (2016). "The Modality-Independent Capacity of Language: A Milestone of Evolution". In Lian A (ed.). Language Evolution and Developmental Impairments. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 229–255. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-58746-6_7. ISBN 978-1-137-58746-6.
- ^ "Culture | United Nations For Indigenous Peoples". www.un.org. 5 June 2015. Archived from the original on 26 November 2020. Retrieved 24 October 2020.
- ^ Comrie B, Polinsky M, Matthews S (1996). The Atlas of Languages: The Origin and Development of Languages Throughout the World. New York: Facts on File. pp. 13–15. ISBN 978-0-8160-3388-1.
- ^ Mavrody S (2013). Visual Art Forms: Traditional to Digital. Sergey's HTML5 & CSS3. ISBN 978-0-9833867-5-9. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ "Types of Literary Arts and Their Understanding – bookfestivalscotland.com". Bookfestival Scotland. 2020. Archived from the original on 5 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
- ^ "Bachelor of Performing Arts" (PDF). University of Otago. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 December 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Brown S (24 October 2018). "Toward a Unification of the Arts". Frontiers in Psychology. 9 1938. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01938. ISSN 1664-1078. PMC 6207603. PMID 30405470.
- ^ "Culinary arts – How cooking can be an art". Northern Contemporary Art. 21 October 2019. Archived from the original on 11 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
- ^ Smuts A (1 January 2005). "Are Video Games Art?". Contemporary Aesthetics (Journal Archive). 3 (1). Archived from the original on 29 May 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Cameron IA, Pimlott N (September 2015). "Art of medicine". Canadian Family Physician. 61 (9): 739–740. PMC 4569099. PMID 26371092.
- ^ Bird G (7 June 2019). "Rethinking the role of the arts in politics: lessons from the Négritude movement". International Journal of Cultural Policy. 25 (4): 458–470. doi:10.1080/10286632.2017.1311328. ISSN 1028-6632. S2CID 151443044.
- ^ a b Morriss-Kay GM (February 2010). "The evolution of human artistic creativity". Journal of Anatomy. 216 (2): 158–176. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01160.x. PMC 2815939. PMID 19900185.
- ^ Joordens JC, d'Errico F, Wesselingh FP, Munro S, de Vos J, Wallinga J, et al. (February 2015). "Homo erectus at Trinil on Java used shells for tool production and engraving". Nature. 518 (7538): 228–231. Bibcode:2015Natur.518..228J. doi:10.1038/nature13962. PMID 25470048. S2CID 4461751.
- ^ St Fleur N (12 September 2018). "Oldest Known Drawing by Human Hands Discovered in South African Cave". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 April 2020. Retrieved 20 September 2018.
- ^ Radford T (16 April 2004). "World's oldest jewellery found in cave". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 12 February 2021. Retrieved 23 September 2020.
- ^ Dissanayake E (2008). "The Arts after Darwin: Does Art have an Origin and Adaptive Function?". In Zijlmans K, van Damme W (eds.). World Art Studies: Exploring Concepts and Approaches. Amsterdam: Valiz. pp. 241–263.
- ^ a b Morley I (2014). "A multi-disciplinary approach to the origins of music: perspectives from anthropology, archaeology, cognition and behaviour". Journal of Anthropological Sciences. 92 (92): 147–177. doi:10.4436/JASS.92008 (inactive 1 July 2025). PMID 25020016.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 (link) - ^ Trost W, Frühholz S, Schön D, Labbé C, Pichon S, Grandjean D, Vuilleumier P (December 2014). "Getting the beat: entrainment of brain activity by musical rhythm and pleasantness" (PDF). NeuroImage. 103: 55–64. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.009. PMID 25224999. S2CID 4727529.
- ^ Karpati FJ, Giacosa C, Foster NE, Penhune VB, Hyde KL (March 2015). "Dance and the brain: a review". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1337 (1): 140–146. Bibcode:2015NYASA1337..140K. doi:10.1111/nyas.12632. PMID 25773628. S2CID 206224849.
- ^ Chow D (22 March 2010). "Why Do Humans Dance?". livescience.com. Archived from the original on 1 February 2021. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
- ^ Krakauer J (26 September 2008). "Why do we like to dance – And move to the beat?". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 28 February 2021. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
- ^ Prior KS (21 June 2013). "How Reading Makes Us More Human". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 29 January 2021. Retrieved 23 September 2020.
- ^ a b Puchner M (23 April 2018). "How stories have shaped the world". www.bbc.com. Archived from the original on 5 January 2021. Retrieved 23 September 2020.
- ^ Dalley, Stephanie, ed. (2000). Myths from Mesopotamia: Creation, the Flood, Gilgamesh, and Others (revised ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-19-283589-5.
- ^ Hernadi P (2001). "Literature and Evolution". SubStance. 30 (1/2): 55–71. doi:10.2307/3685504. ISSN 0049-2426. JSTOR 3685504.
- ^ McCurry J (21 April 2015). "Japan's Maglev Train Breaks World Speed Record with 600 km/h Test Run". The Guardian (U.S. ed.). New York. Archived from the original on 18 June 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Clark JD; de Heinzelin J; Schick KD; Hart WK; White TD; WoldeGabriel G; Walter RC; Suwa G; Asfaw B; Vrba E; H.-Selassie Y (June 1994). "African Homo erectus: old radiometric ages and young Oldowan assemblages in the Middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia". Science. 264 (5167): 1907–1910. Bibcode:1994Sci...264.1907C. doi:10.1126/science.8009220. PMID 8009220.
- ^ a b Choi CQ (11 November 2009). "Human Evolution: The Origin of Tool Use". livescience.com. Archived from the original on 4 October 2020. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
- ^ Orban GA, Caruana F (2014). "The neural basis of human tool use". Frontiers in Psychology. 5: 310. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00310. PMC 3988392. PMID 24782809.
- ^ Berna F, Goldberg P, Horwitz LK, Brink J, Holt S, Bamford M, Chazan M (May 2012). "Microstratigraphic evidence of in situ fire in the Acheulean strata of Wonderwerk Cave, Northern Cape province, South Africa". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109 (20): E1215-20. doi:10.1073/pnas.1117620109. PMC 3356665. PMID 22474385.
- ^ Gowlett JA (June 2016). "The discovery of fire by humans: a long and convoluted process". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 371 (1696) 20150164. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0164. PMC 4874402. PMID 27216521.
- ^ Damiano J (2018). "Neolithic Era Tools: Inventing a New Age". MagellanTV. Archived from the original on 5 January 2021. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
- ^ Deng Y, Wang P (2011). Ancient Chinese inventions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 13–14. ISBN 978-0-521-18692-6. OCLC 671710733.
- ^ Schifman J (9 July 2018). "The Entire History of Steel". Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on 5 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
- ^ Wilkinson, Freddie (9 January 2020). "Industrial Revolution and Technology". National Geographic Society. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
- ^ Roser, Max; Ritchie, Hannah (11 May 2013). "Technological Progress". Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Fallows J (23 October 2013). "The 50 Greatest Breakthroughs Since the Wheel". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 5 May 2021. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
- ^ a b Idinopulos TA (1998). "What Is Religion?". CrossCurrents. 48 (3): 366–380. ISSN 0011-1953. JSTOR 24460821.
- ^ Emmons RA, Paloutzian RF (2003). "The psychology of religion". Annual Review of Psychology. 54 (1): 377–402. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145024. PMID 12171998.
- ^ King BJ (29 March 2016). "Chimpanzees: Spiritual But Not Religious?". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 20 January 2021. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
- ^ Ball P (2015). "Complex societies evolved without belief in all-powerful deity". Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17040. S2CID 183474917. Archived from the original on 16 May 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Culotta E (November 2009). "Origins. On the origin of religion". Science. 326 (5954): 784–787. Bibcode:2009Sci...326..784C. doi:10.1126/science.326_784. PMID 19892955.
- ^ Atkinson QD, Bourrat P (2011). "Beliefs about God, the afterlife and morality support the role of supernatural policing in human cooperation". Evolution and Human Behavior. 32 (1): 41–49. Bibcode:2011EHumB..32...41A. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.07.008. ISSN 1090-5138. Archived from the original on 15 October 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Walker GC (1 August 2000). "Secular Eschatology: Beliefs about Afterlife". OMEGA – Journal of Death and Dying. 41 (1): 5–22. doi:10.2190/Q21C-5VED-GYW6-W091. ISSN 0030-2228. S2CID 145686249.
- ^ McKay R, Whitehouse H (March 2015). "Religion and morality". Psychological Bulletin. 141 (2): 447–473. doi:10.1037/a0038455. PMC 4345965. PMID 25528346.
- ^ Bernhard Nitsche; Marcus Schmücker, eds. (2023). God or the Divine? Religious Transcendence Beyond Monism and Theism, Between Personality and Impersonality. De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110698343. ISBN 978-3-11-069834-3.
- ^ Hall DE, Meador KG, Koenig HG (June 2008). "Measuring religiousness in health research: review and critique". Journal of Religion and Health (Submitted manuscript). 47 (2): 134–163. doi:10.1007/s10943-008-9165-2. PMC 8823950. PMID 19105008. S2CID 25349208. Archived from the original on 30 January 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Sherwood H (27 August 2018). "Religion: why faith is becoming more and more popular". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
- ^ Hackett C, McClendon D (2017). "Christians remain world's largest religious group, but they are declining in Europe". Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on 24 November 2019. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
- ^ "The Changing Global Religious Landscape". Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project. 5 April 2017. Archived from the original on 18 February 2022. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
- ^ Di Christina, Mariette (September 2018). "A Very Human Story: Why Our Species Is Special". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 27 September 2020.
- ^ Andersen H, Hepburn B (2020). "Scientific Method". In Zalta EN (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 23 February 2021. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
- ^ Lo Presti R (2014). "History of science: The first scientist". Nature. 512 (7514): 250–251. Bibcode:2014Natur.512..250L. doi:10.1038/512250a. ISSN 1476-4687. S2CID 4394696.
- ^ Russo L (2004). The forgotten revolution: how science was born in 300 BC and why it had to be reborn. Springer. p. 1. ISBN 978-3-642-18904-3. OCLC 883392276.
- ^ Needham, J; Wang Ling (1954). Science and civilisation in China. Cambridge University Press. p. 111. OCLC 779676.
- ^ Henry J (2008). "Renaissance and Revolution". The scientific revolution and the origins of modern science (3 ed.). Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-07904-6. OCLC 615209781.
- ^ Hansson SO (2017). Zalta EN (ed.). "Science and Pseudo-Science". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 11 June 2017. Retrieved 3 July 2017.
- ^ Olmstead MC, Kuhlmeier VA (2015). Comparative Cognition. Cambridge University Press. pp. 209–210. ISBN 978-1-107-01116-8.
- ^ "Branches of Science" (PDF). University of Chicago. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 April 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- ^ "What is Philosophy?". Department of Philosophy. Florida State University. Archived from the original on 23 February 2021. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
- ^ "Philosophy". Definition, Systems, Fields, Schools, & Biographies. Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 23 February 2021. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
- ^ Kaufmann F, Russell B (1947). "A History of Western Philosophy and its Connection with Political and Social Circumstances from the Earliest Times to the Present Day". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 7 (3): 461. doi:10.2307/2102800. JSTOR 2102800.
- ^ Hassan NR, Mingers J, Stahl B (4 May 2018). "Philosophy and information systems: where are we and where should we go?". European Journal of Information Systems. 27 (3): 263–277. doi:10.1080/0960085X.2018.1470776. hdl:2086/16128. ISSN 0960-085X. S2CID 64796132.
- ^ Schizzerotto A. "Social Stratification" (PDF). University of Trento. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 March 2018. Retrieved 3 July 2017.
- ^ Fukuyama F (2012). The origins of political order: from prehuman times to the French Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. p. 53. ISBN 978-0-374-53322-9. OCLC 1082411117.
- ^ "Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities : A Current Appraisal". The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender. Psychology Press. 2000. pp. 137–188. doi:10.4324/9781410605245-12. ISBN 978-1-4106-0524-5. Archived from the original on 30 April 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2022.
- ^ Blackstone, Amy (2003). "Gender Roles and Society". In Miller, Julia R.; Lerner, Richard M.; Schiamberg, Lawrence B. (eds.). Human Ecology: An Encyclopedia of Children, Families, Communities, and Environments. Sociology School Faculty Scholarship. Santa barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. p. 335. Archived from the original on 16 May 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Nadal, Kevin L. (2017). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Psychology and Gender. SAGE Publications. p. 401. ISBN 978-1-4833-8427-6.
Most cultures currently construct their societies based on the understanding of gender binary – the two gender categorizations (male and female). Such societies divide their population based on biological sex assigned to individuals at birth to begin the process of gender socialization.
- ^ Herdt, Gilbert (2020). "Third Sexes and Third Genders". Third Sex, Third Gender: Beyond Sexual Dimorphism in Culture and History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 21–83. ISBN 978-1-942130-52-9. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Trumbach, Randolph (1994). "London's Sapphists: From Three Sexes to Four Genders in the Making of Modern Culture". In Herdt, Gilbert (ed.). Third Sex, Third Gender: Beyond Sexual Dimorphism in Culture and History. New York: Zone (MIT). pp. 111–136. ISBN 978-0-942299-82-3.
- ^ Graham, Sharyn (April–June 2001). "Sulawesi's fifth gender". Inside Indonesia. Archived from the original on 26 November 2014.
- ^ Richards, Christina; Bouman, Walter Pierre; Seal, Leighton; Barker, Meg John; Nieder, Timo O.; T'Sjoen, Guy (2016). "Non-binary or genderqueer genders". International Review of Psychiatry. 28 (1): 95–102. doi:10.3109/09540261.2015.1106446. hdl:1854/LU-7279758. PMID 26753630. S2CID 29985722. Archived from the original on 26 June 2019. Retrieved 9 June 2019.
- ^ Ananthaswamy, Anil; Douglas, Kate. "The origins of sexism: How men came to rule 12,000 years ago". New Scientist. Retrieved 7 March 2023.
- ^ "What do we mean by "sex" and "gender"?". World Health Organization. Archived from the original on 30 January 2017. Retrieved 26 November 2015.
- ^ Alters S, Schiff W (2009). Essential Concepts for Healthy Living. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p. 143. ISBN 978-0-7637-5641-3. Retrieved 3 January 2018.
- ^ Fortin N (2005). "Gender Role Attitudes and the Labour Market Outcomes of Women Across OECD Countries". Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 21 (3): 416–438. doi:10.1093/oxrep/gri024.
- ^ Dobres, Marcia-Anne (27 November 2020). "Gender in the Earliest Human Societies". In Meade, Teresa A.; Wiesner-Hanks, Merry E. (eds.). A Companion to Global Gender History (1 ed.). Wiley. pp. 183–204. doi:10.1002/9781119535812.ch11. ISBN 978-1-119-53580-5. S2CID 229399965. Archived from the original on 10 June 2022. Retrieved 10 June 2022.
- ^ "The Nature of Kinship: Overview". www2.palomar.edu. Archived from the original on 3 December 2020. Retrieved 24 October 2020.
- ^ Itao K, Kaneko K (February 2020). "Evolution of kinship structures driven by marriage tie and competition". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 117 (5): 2378–2384. Bibcode:2020PNAS..117.2378I. doi:10.1073/pnas.1917716117. PMC 7007516. PMID 31964846.
- ^ Schacht, Ryan; Kramer, Karen L. (17 July 2019). "Are We Monogamous? A Review of the Evolution of Pair-Bonding in Humans and Its Contemporary Variation Cross-Culturally". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 7 230. Bibcode:2019FrEEv...7..230S. doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00230. ISSN 2296-701X.
- ^ Dupanloup, Isabelle; Pereira, Luisa; Bertorelle, Giorgio; Calafell, Francesc; Prata, Maria João; Amorim, Antonio; Barbujani, Guido (1 July 2003). "A Recent Shift from Polygyny to Monogamy in Humans Is Suggested by the Analysis of Worldwide Y-Chromosome Diversity". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 57 (1): 85–97. Bibcode:2003JMolE..57...85D. doi:10.1007/s00239-003-2458-x. ISSN 0022-2844. PMID 12962309. Retrieved 13 July 2024 – via Springer Link.
- ^ Nelson, Emma; Rolian, Campbell; Cashmore, Lisa; Shultz, Susanne (3 November 2010). "Digit ratios predict polygyny in early apes, Ardipithecus, Neanderthals and early modern humans but not in Australopithecus". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 278 (1711): 1556–1563. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1740. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 3081742. PMID 21047863.
- ^ Chandra, Kanchan (2012). Constructivist theories of ethnic politics. Oxford University Press. pp. 69–70. ISBN 978-0-19-989315-7. OCLC 829678440.
- ^ People J, Bailey G (2010). Humanity: An Introduction to Cultural Anthropology (9th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage learning. p. 389.
In essence, an ethnic group is a named social category of people based on perceptions of shared social experience or one's ancestors' experiences. Members of the ethnic group see themselves as sharing cultural traditions and history that distinguish them from other groups. Ethnic group identity has a strong psychological or emotional component that divides the people of the world into opposing categories of 'us' and 'them.' In contrast to social stratification, which divides and unifies people along a series of horizontal axes based on socioeconomic factors, ethnic identities divide and unify people along a series of vertical axes. Thus, ethnic groups, at least theoretically, cut across socioeconomic class differences, drawing members from all strata of the population.
- ^ Blackmore E (22 February 2019). "Race and ethnicity: How are they different?". Culture. Archived from the original on 22 October 2020. Retrieved 24 October 2020.
- ^ Chandra K (2006). "What is Ethnic Identity and Does It Matter?". Annual Review of Political Science. 9 (1): 397–424. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170715. ISSN 1094-2939.
- ^ Smith AD (1999). Myths and Memories of the Nation. Oxford University Press. pp. 4–7.
- ^ Banton M (2007). "Max Weber on 'ethnic communities': a critique". Nations and Nationalism. 13 (1): 19–35. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8129.2007.00271.x.
- ^ Delanty G, Kumar K (2006). The SAGE Handbook of Nations and Nationalism. London: Sage. p. 171. ISBN 978-1-4129-0101-7.
- ^ Christian D (2004). Maps of Time. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24476-4.
- ^ Cronk L, Leech BL (20 September 2017). "How Did Humans Get So Good at Politics?". SAPIENS. Archived from the original on 7 August 2020. Retrieved 24 October 2020.
- ^ Zmigrod L, Rentfrow PJ, Robbins TW (May 2018). "Cognitive underpinnings of nationalistic ideology in the context of Brexit". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 115 (19): E4532 – E4540. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115E4532Z. doi:10.1073/pnas.1708960115. PMC 5948950. PMID 29674447. S2CID 4993139.
- ^ Melina R (14 February 2011). "What Are the Different Types of Governments?". livescience.com. Archived from the original on 1 February 2021. Retrieved 24 October 2020.
- ^ "Democracy Index 2021: less than half the world lives in a democracy". The Economist Democracy Index. Economist Intelligence Unit. 10 February 2022.
- ^ Jeannie Evers (23 December 2012). "international organization". National Geographic Society. Archived from the original on 27 April 2017. Retrieved 24 October 2020.
- ^ Horan RD, Bulte E, Shogren JF (1 September 2005). "How trade saved humanity from biological exclusion: an economic theory of Neanderthal extinction". Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 58 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2004.03.009. ISSN 0167-2681.
- ^ Gibbons J (11 August 2015). "Why did Neanderthals go extinct?". Smithsonian Insider. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
- ^ University of Wyoming (24 March 2005). "Did Use of Free Trade Cause Neanderthal Extinction?". www.newswise.com. Archived from the original on 1 February 2021. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
- ^ Polianskaya A (15 March 2018). "Humans may have been trading with each for as long as 300,000 years". inews.co.uk. Archived from the original on 23 January 2021. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
- ^ Henriques M. "How spices changed the ancient world". www.bbc.com. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
- ^ Strauss IE (26 February 2016). "The Myth of the Barter Economy". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 15 February 2021. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
- ^ a b "The History of Money". www.pbs.org. 26 October 1996. Archived from the original on 29 November 2020. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
- ^ "Why do we need economists and the study of economics?". Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. July 2000. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 23 October 2020.
- ^ Sheskin M. "The inequality delusion: Why we've got the wealth gap all wrong". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 3 February 2021. Retrieved 24 October 2020.
- ^ Yong E (28 September 2016). "Humans: Unusually Murderous Mammals, Typically Murderous Primates". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 7 May 2021. Retrieved 7 May 2021.
- ^ Gómez JM, Verdú M, González-Megías A, Méndez M (October 2016). "The phylogenetic roots of human lethal violence". Nature. 538 (7624): 233–237. Bibcode:2016Natur.538..233G. doi:10.1038/nature19758. PMID 27680701. S2CID 4454927.
- ^ Pagel M (October 2016). "Animal behaviour: Lethal violence deep in the human lineage" (PDF). Nature. 538 (7624): 180–181. Bibcode:2016Natur.538..180P. doi:10.1038/nature19474. PMID 27680700. S2CID 4459560. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 May 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ a b Ferguson RB (1 September 2018). "War Is Not Part of Human Nature". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 30 January 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Ferguson N (September–October 2006). "The Next War of the World". Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on 25 April 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
- ^ Beauchamp, Zack (23 June 2015). "600 years of war and peace, in one amazing chart". Vox.
External links
[edit]Human
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Classification
Etymology
The English word human first appeared in the mid-15th century as a noun denoting a "human being," distinct from gods or animals, borrowed from Old French humain and directly from Latin humanus, an adjective meaning "of or belonging to man" or "humane and kind."[6] The Latin humanus derives from homo (genitive hominis), the classical term for "human being" or "man," often contrasted with immortals or beasts in Roman usage. Earliest recorded English attestations date to around 1450, as in the Book of the Knight de la Tour Landry, where it described qualities pertaining to humankind.[7] The root homo traces to Proto-Indo-European *dʰǵʰomon-, a derivative of *dʰéǵʰōm meaning "earth," linking it etymologically to concepts of earthly origin, akin to Latin humus ("ground" or "soil") and thus implying "earthling" or "one from the soil." This earth-bound connotation parallels the Hebrew adam from adamah ("ground") in biblical nomenclature but remains unrelated to the English man, which stems from a separate Proto-Germanic *mannaz denoting "person" without the terrestrial root.[8] In scientific taxonomy, the genus Homo—coined by Carl Linnaeus in 1758 for modern humans (Homo sapiens)—directly adopts this Latin homo to signify the human lineage, emphasizing continuity with classical terminology over folk etymologies. By the 18th century, human had standardized in spelling and broadened to encompass both the species and its attributes, supplanting earlier Middle English variants like humain.[7]Biological Taxonomy
Humans are classified in the biological taxonomy as belonging to the domain Eukarya, kingdom Animalia, phylum Chordata, class Mammalia, order Primates, family Hominidae, genus Homo, and species sapiens, yielding the binomial name Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758.[9][10][11] This hierarchical system originates from the work of Carl Linnaeus, who in the 10th edition of Systema Naturae (1758) formalized binomial nomenclature and placed humans in the genus Homo to reflect their rational capacities, distinguishing them from other primates known at the time such as chimpanzees and orangutans, which he also initially grouped under Homo before later refinements.[12][13] The domain Eukarya encompasses organisms with eukaryotic cells featuring a membrane-bound nucleus, separating humans from prokaryotes like bacteria.[11] Within Animalia, humans are multicellular heterotrophs capable of locomotion. The phylum Chordata is defined by the presence of a notochord, dorsal nerve cord, pharyngeal slits, and post-anal tail at some developmental stage, evident in human embryos.[9][11] As mammals (Mammalia), humans possess mammary glands for nursing young, hair, and three middle ear bones, with viviparous reproduction and endothermy.[10] The order Primates includes traits like forward-facing eyes for stereoscopic vision, grasping hands, and large brains relative to body size, adaptations for arboreal life in ancestral forms.[11] In the family Hominidae, humans share with great apes (gorillas, chimpanzees, orangutans, bonobos) taillessness, larger body size, and broader chests, reflecting a common bipedal or knuckle-walking ancestry.[9] The genus Homo distinguishes humans by advanced cognitive abilities, tool use, and cultural transmission, with Homo sapiens specifically denoting anatomically modern humans emerging around 300,000 years ago in Africa.[10]| Taxonomic Rank | Classification | Key Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Domain | Eukarya | Eukaryotic cells with nucleus.[11] |
| Kingdom | Animalia | Multicellular, motile heterotrophs.[9] |
| Phylum | Chordata | Notochord and dorsal nerve cord.[11] |
| Class | Mammalia | Mammary glands, hair, endothermy.[10] |
| Order | Primates | Binocular vision, opposable thumbs.[11] |
| Family | Hominidae | Great apes, no tail, large brains.[9] |
| Genus | Homo | Tool-making, symbolic thought.[12] |
| Species | sapiens | Anatomically modern humans.[10] |
Distinctions from Other Species
Humans possess habitual obligate bipedalism, a locomotor adaptation unique among primates that enables efficient long-distance travel, frees the forelimbs for manipulative tasks such as tool use and infant carrying, and facilitates thermoregulation through increased surface area exposure to air currents.[14] This form of locomotion contrasts with the knuckle-walking quadrupedalism of chimpanzees and other great apes, which prioritizes speed in short bursts but consumes more energy over extended distances.[15] The human brain exhibits the largest absolute volume and highest complexity among extant primates, averaging approximately 1,350 cubic centimeters in adults, compared to about 400 cubic centimeters in chimpanzees.[16] This expansion, which tripled over the course of hominin evolution, correlates with enhanced neural processing capacity, including expanded prefrontal cortex regions associated with executive functions, planning, and social cognition, though Neanderthals approached modern human brain sizes without equivalent technological proliferation.[17][18] Cognitively, humans demonstrate symbolic language enabling recursive syntax and abstract reference, capacities not observed in other animals despite shared foundational elements like vocalizations in primates.[19] This linguistic sophistication underpins cumulative cultural evolution, where innovations accumulate and refine across generations—manifesting in technologies from stone tools to spaceflight—unlike the static or modestly iterative traditions in species such as chimpanzees, whose tool use remains rudimentary and non-proliferating.[20] Recent analyses affirm that while some non-human animals exhibit cultural transmission, human culture's unparalleled ratcheting of complexity and open-ended adaptability distinguishes it, driving adaptive advantages unattainable through genetic variation alone.[21][22] Behaviorally, humans form large-scale cooperative societies transcending kin-based groups, facilitated by theory of mind and norm enforcement, enabling division of labor and collective endeavors that exceed the fission-fusion dynamics of other primates.[23] Genetic divergence from chimpanzees, approximately 1-2% at the DNA level, amplifies these traits through regulatory changes influencing brain development and sociality, rather than raw sequence novelty.[24]Evolutionary Origins
Hominid Lineage
The hominid lineage, encompassing the evolutionary branch leading to modern humans, diverged from the lineage shared with chimpanzees approximately 7 million years ago in Africa, based on fossil and genetic evidence indicating a split between 6.5 and 8 million years ago.[25][26] Early hominins post-divergence include Sahelanthropus tchadensis, dated to around 7 million years ago, characterized by a small brain and possible bipedal traits inferred from cranial morphology. Subsequent species like Ardipithecus ramidus, from 4.4 million years ago, show a mix of arboreal and terrestrial adaptations, with partial bipedalism evidenced by foot and pelvic fossils. Australopithecus afarensis, existing from 3.9 to 2.9 million years ago in eastern Africa, represents a key transitional form with clear bipedalism confirmed by the 3.6-million-year-old Laetoli footprints in Tanzania and the partial skeleton "Lucy" discovered in 1974 in Ethiopia, dated to 3.2 million years ago.[27] This species retained some arboreal features like curved phalanges but exhibited human-like hip and knee joints enabling efficient upright walking, alongside brain sizes averaging 400-500 cubic centimeters.[28] Evidence of stone tool use by A. afarensis dates to 3.4 million years ago at sites in Ethiopia, challenging prior assumptions that tool-making began later.[29] The lineage progressed to early Homo species around 2.8 million years ago, with Homo habilis persisting from 2.4 to 1.4 million years ago in East Africa, distinguished by larger brains (up to 600 cubic centimeters) and association with Oldowan stone tools, including flakes and choppers, first appearing 2.6 million years ago.[30] These tools indicate increased scavenging and processing of meat and marrow, supporting dietary shifts. Homo erectus emerged around 1.9 million years ago, featuring body proportions similar to modern humans, brain sizes reaching 1,100 cubic centimeters, and the development of Acheulean handaxes for butchering and woodworking.[31] This species mastered fire control by at least 1 million years ago and initiated migrations out of Africa starting 1.8 million years ago, reaching Eurasia with evidence from sites like Dmanisi, Georgia, dated to 1.8 million years ago.[32] These adaptations, including endurance running and cooperative hunting, facilitated survival across diverse environments until at least 100,000 years ago.[31]Emergence of Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens, the sole extant species of the genus Homo, first appeared in Africa approximately 300,000 years ago, based on fossil evidence from multiple sites across the continent. The earliest known specimens come from Jebel Irhoud in Morocco, where cranial and dental remains dated via thermoluminescence and electron spin resonance methods yield ages averaging 315,000 years, with a range of 280,000 to 350,000 years.[33] These fossils exhibit a modern-like facial morphology, including a flat face and small teeth, but retain a more elongated braincase akin to earlier Homo species, suggesting a mosaic pattern of evolutionary change rather than abrupt emergence of fully modern anatomy.[34] Additional early African finds, such as those from Florisbad in South Africa (~259,000 years old) and the Omo Kibish formation in Ethiopia (~195,000 years old), support a pan-African origin, with no single localized cradle but rather dispersed populations adapting amid fluctuating climates.[35] The transition to Homo sapiens involved gradual anatomical refinements distinguishing it from archaic predecessors like Homo heidelbergensis or Homo rhodesiensis, including globular braincases, prominent chins, and reduced brow ridges, though early forms like Jebel Irhoud display transitional traits.[36] Fossil records indicate coexistence with other hominins in Africa until around 100,000–200,000 years ago, after which Homo sapiens appears to have outcompeted or absorbed them through superior adaptability, tool use, and possibly demographic expansion.[37] Environmental pressures, such as glacial-interglacial cycles driving habitat fragmentation and resource scarcity, likely selected for cognitive and behavioral flexibility, evidenced by associated Middle Stone Age tools at Jebel Irhoud showing Levallois flaking techniques for efficient hunting and processing.[33] Genetic analyses corroborate an African genesis, with mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome phylogenies tracing the most recent common ancestors to sub-Saharan Africa between 150,000 and 200,000 years ago, though autosomal DNA suggests deeper coalescence times aligning closer to fossil dates when accounting for incomplete lineage sorting.[38] Whole-genome sequencing reveals low effective population sizes (~10,000–20,000) in early Homo sapiens, indicative of serial founder effects and bottlenecks, but higher diversity in African populations compared to non-Africans supports the "Out of Africa" model with minimal pre-dispersal admixture.[39] Discrepancies between fossil and molecular clocks arise from mutation rate calibrations and potential archaic introgression, yet the data reject multiregional continuity in favor of a primary African radiation followed by limited gene flow from Eurasian Neanderthals and Denisovans post-migration.[37] This emergence marks the onset of behavioral modernity, with symbolic artifacts appearing sporadically by 100,000 years ago, though full expression awaits later dispersals.[35]Key Adaptations and Migrations
Homo sapiens exhibited key adaptations centered on behavioral and cognitive enhancements rather than profound physiological shifts, enabling rapid adaptation to varied environments through cultural means. Behavioral modernity, marked by symbolic artifacts such as engraved ochre and shell beads from sites like Blombos Cave in South Africa dated to 75,000–100,000 years ago, reflects the capacity for abstract representation and social information transmission.[40] This cumulative culture allowed for innovative tool kits, including heat-treated silcrete blades and bone tools by 70,000 years ago, surpassing earlier hominins in flexibility and efficiency.[41] Physiologically, modern Homo sapiens developed a narrower ribcage and elongated limbs suited for persistence hunting and endurance running, traits evident in fossils from 195,000 years ago at Herto, Ethiopia, facilitating energy-efficient locomotion over long distances.[42] These adaptations underpinned the species' dispersal capabilities, with anatomically modern humans originating in Africa around 300,000 years ago based on Jebel Irhoud fossils.[43] Initial forays out of Africa occurred approximately 130,000 years ago, as indicated by Skhul and Qafzeh remains in the Levant, though these groups likely succumbed to climatic pressures or competition.[44] The decisive exodus, supported by genetic bottlenecks and mitochondrial DNA coalescence estimates, transpired 70,000–50,000 years ago, involving small founding populations that traversed the Bab-el-Mandeb strait during lowered sea levels.[43] Southern coastal routes led to South Asia by 60,000 years ago, evidenced by tools at sites like Jwalapuram, India, while northward paths reached Eurasia.[45] Further expansions demonstrated adaptive versatility: arrival in Australia via island-hopping around 65,000 years ago, confirmed by Mungo Man remains and rock art; Europe by 45,000 years ago, with Aurignacian culture replacing Neanderthals; and the Americas via Beringia land bridge 23,000–15,000 years ago, as per Monte Verde site's 14,500-year-old artifacts and genomic links to Siberian populations.[43] Innovations like sewn clothing, eyed needles from 40,000 years ago in Denisova Cave, and watercraft inferred from Sahul colonization enabled habitation in temperate and insular zones without specialized genetic changes.[40] Genetic evidence reveals interbreeding with archaic humans, incorporating adaptive alleles like those for high-altitude tolerance from Denisovans, supplementing cultural strategies.[46] This interplay of cognition, technology, and opportunistic gene flow drove global colonization, with populations expanding to exploit post-glacial niches by 12,000 years ago.[47]Physical Biology
Anatomy and Morphology
Humans possess a bipedal body plan optimized for terrestrial locomotion, featuring an S-curved vertebral column that absorbs shock and maintains balance, a wide ilium-flared pelvis for weight transfer to the lower limbs, and a forward-positioned foramen magnum to align the head over the spine.[48] [49] Arched feet with longitudinal and transverse arches distribute forces during gait, while the distal tibia includes a prominent medial malleolus for ankle stability.[50] These traits enable energy-efficient striding and endurance running, distinguishing human morphology from quadrupedal primates.[51] The endoskeleton comprises approximately 206 bones in adults, formed from 270 at birth through ossification and fusion processes.[52] The axial skeleton—skull, vertebrae, ribs, and sternum—protects the brain, spinal cord, and thoracic organs, while the appendicular skeleton facilitates manipulation and mobility via 126 limb and girdle bones.[53] The cranium features a globular braincase enclosing the cerebral hemispheres, with reduced prognathism compared to earlier hominids, accommodating expanded neural tissue.[54] Skeletal muscles, numbering over 600, constitute 30-40% of body mass and enable voluntary movement through attachment to bones via tendons.[55] [56] Organized into fascicles of multinucleated fibers containing myofibrils, these muscles generate force via actin-myosin interactions, supporting posture, locomotion, and fine motor control.[57] Sexual dimorphism manifests in stature, mass, and composition: adult males average 171 cm in height and exceed females by 7-8% in linear dimensions, with 15% greater weight and 36% more lean mass globally.[58] [59] Males exhibit 65% more upper-body muscle and broader shoulders, while females have wider hips for parturition, reflecting divergent selective pressures on strength versus reproductive capacity.[60] The integumentary system envelops the body in skin averaging 1.5-2 m², featuring stratified epidermis renewed every 28 days, dermis with collagen for tensile strength, and appendages like hair follicles (dense on scalp) and keratinized nails for protection.[61] Variable body hair reduces in density compared to other primates, aiding thermoregulation via sweat glands rather than fur.[62]Physiology and Homeostasis
Human physiology involves the integrated functions of organ systems, including the nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular, respiratory, digestive, and renal systems, which coordinate to support vital processes such as nutrient transport, waste elimination, and energy metabolism.[63] These systems operate through chemical, physical, and electrical mechanisms at cellular and molecular levels to sustain life.[64] Homeostasis refers to the dynamic regulation of internal conditions, such as temperature, pH, and ion concentrations, to maintain optimal cellular function amid external or internal perturbations.[65] This stability is primarily achieved via negative feedback loops, where deviations from set points trigger corrective responses through receptors that detect changes, control centers that process signals, and effectors that restore balance.[66] Positive feedback, though less common, amplifies responses in specific contexts like blood clotting or childbirth.[66] The nervous system provides rapid, precise control over homeostasis by transmitting electrical impulses via neurons to effectors like muscles and glands, enabling responses such as vasoconstriction or heart rate adjustments.[67] For instance, the autonomic nervous system's sympathetic division mobilizes energy during stress, while the parasympathetic division promotes conservation and restoration.[68] The endocrine system complements this with slower, sustained hormonal signaling; glands like the thyroid regulate metabolic rate, and the adrenal glands release cortisol to manage stress-induced shifts in blood sugar and inflammation.[69] Hormones diffuse through the bloodstream to influence distant targets, ensuring long-term equilibrium in processes like calcium balance via parathyroid hormone.[70] Thermoregulation exemplifies homeostatic integration: the hypothalamus monitors core temperature, set at approximately 37°C, and activates effectors like sweat glands for evaporative cooling during heat exposure or shivering for heat generation in cold.[71] [72] Behavioral adaptations, such as seeking shade, further support this, with deviations beyond 35–42°C risking cellular damage or organ failure.[73] Blood pH homeostasis maintains arterial levels between 7.35 and 7.45 to prevent enzyme denaturation and metabolic disruption, employing chemical buffers (e.g., bicarbonate-carbonic acid system), respiratory modulation of CO₂, and renal hydrogen ion excretion.[74] [75] Disruptions, such as lactic acidosis from intense exercise, are countered by hyperventilation to expel CO₂ and restore pH within minutes to hours.[76] Osmotic and fluid balance is regulated by antidiuretic hormone from the pituitary, which increases kidney water reabsorption to prevent dehydration, while aldosterone from the adrenal cortex promotes sodium retention to stabilize blood volume and pressure.[77] These mechanisms collectively ensure physiological resilience, with failure in any loop contributing to disorders like diabetes or hypertension.[65]Genetics and Heritable Variation
Human somatic cells contain 46 chromosomes arranged in 23 pairs, with one set inherited from each parent, forming the diploid genome. [78] The nuclear DNA totals approximately 3.2 billion base pairs, encoding around 20,000 to 23,500 protein-coding genes that constitute about 1-2% of the genome, while non-coding regions include regulatory elements and repetitive sequences. [79] [80] Mitochondrial DNA, inherited maternally, adds a small circular genome of 16,569 base pairs encoding 37 genes primarily for cellular respiration. [81] Genetic variation among humans arises mainly from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertions, deletions, and copy number variations, with individuals differing by about 0.1% of their DNA sequence, equivalent to roughly 3 million base pairs. [82] Twin studies, comparing monozygotic (identical) and dizygotic (fraternal) twins, estimate narrow-sense heritability—the proportion of phenotypic variance attributable to additive genetic effects—for numerous traits. [83] For instance, adult height shows heritability around 0.8, reflecting strong genetic influence modulated by environment. [84] Intelligence, measured by IQ, exhibits heritability rising from 0.2 in infancy to 0.8 in adulthood, indicating increasing genetic dominance over development. [85] [86] Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of SNPs linked to complex traits, though they explain only 30-50% of twin-estimated heritability, highlighting the "missing heritability" puzzle potentially due to rare variants, gene-environment interactions, and non-additive effects. [87] [88] Population-level variation reveals structured genetic clusters aligning with continental ancestries, where 93-95% of variation occurs within populations and 3-5% between major groups, enabling ancestry inference via principal component analysis or clustering algorithms. [89] [90] These patterns arise from historical isolation, migration, and selection, with allele frequencies differing systematically across groups for traits like lactase persistence or skin pigmentation. [91] Heritable mutations, including de novo variants at rates of about 10-100 per genome per generation, drive evolution and disease risk, with conditions like cystic fibrosis showing recessive inheritance patterns. [92] Epistasis and dominance contribute to trait variance, as evidenced by models estimating dominant genetic effects in complex phenotypes. [93] Empirical data from large cohorts underscore that while environment influences outcomes, genetic factors predominate for many heritable traits, challenging narratives minimizing biological differences. [85] [94]Reproduction and Life Cycle
Humans reproduce sexually as gonochoristic organisms with distinct male and female sexes, defined by the production of small, motile sperm in males and large, immotile ova in females. Fertilization requires internal insemination, typically via copulation, with sperm penetrating the ovum in the female's fallopian tube to form a diploid zygote containing 46 chromosomes (23 pairs). Genetic sex is determined by the presence of the Y chromosome in males (XY karyotype) or its absence in females (XX karyotype), influencing gonadal development from the bipotential gonad during embryogenesis. Post-fertilization, the zygote undergoes cleavage to form a blastocyst, which implants in the uterine endometrium around day 6-10, initiating placentation for nutrient and gas exchange. The embryonic period spans weeks 2-8 post-fertilization, marked by organogenesis, including neurulation, somitogenesis, and limb bud formation, during which teratogens pose high risk of congenital anomalies. The subsequent fetal period, from week 9 to birth, emphasizes growth, maturation of organ systems, and viability thresholds—fetal viability outside the womb becomes possible around 24 weeks gestation with intensive care, though survival rates below 32 weeks remain under 90%. Full-term gestation averages 40 weeks (280 days) from the last menstrual period or 266 days from ovulation, with birth typically involving labor contractions expelling the neonate vaginally; cesarean delivery accounts for approximately 32% of U.S. births as of 2022, often due to complications like breech presentation or fetal distress. The human life cycle features direct development without metamorphosis, progressing through dependency phases to reproductive maturity. Neonatal period (birth to 28 days) involves adaptation to extrauterine life, including lung expansion and thermoregulation, with infant mortality rates varying globally from under 5 per 1,000 live births in high-income nations to over 40 in low-income regions as of 2023. Infancy (0-1 year) and early childhood (1-5 years) exhibit rapid brain growth—tripling in volume by age 3—and motor milestones like crawling at 6-10 months and walking at 9-15 months. Middle childhood (6-12 years) supports skeletal elongation and cognitive advances, with puberty onset signaling adolescence (typically 10-19 years). Puberty, triggered by hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis activation, induces secondary sexual characteristics: in females, breast development and menarche average 12.4 years in developed nations, with fertility peaking between ages 20-24; in males, testicular enlargement and spermarche occur around 13-14 years. Female fertility declines post-30, sharply after 35 due to oocyte aneuploidy rising from 20% to over 50%, while males experience gradual spermatogenic decline after 40, increasing miscarriage and mutation risks. Reproductive adulthood spans peak fertility to senescence, with females entering menopause—ovarian follicle depletion—around 51 years, halting ovulation; males retain potential fertility indefinitely but with reduced semen quality.| Life Stage | Approximate Age Range | Key Biological Features |
|---|---|---|
| Neonatal | 0-28 days | Organ system adaptation; high vulnerability to hypoxia and infection |
| Infancy | 1 month-1 year | Rapid neural and physical growth; dependency on lactation or formula |
| Childhood | 1-12 years | Linear growth spurts; dental eruption; immune system maturation |
| Adolescence | 12-19 years | Pubertal hormones drive gametogenesis and secondary traits; risk of growth disorders |
| Adulthood | 20-65 years | Peak musculoskeletal function; reproductive capacity; homeostasis maintenance |
| Senescence | 65+ years | Telomere shortening, sarcopenia, osteoporosis; increased morbidity |
Cognitive and Psychological Traits
Intelligence and Consciousness
Human intelligence is characterized by a general factor, denoted as g, which Charles Spearman identified through factor analysis of cognitive test performance in the early 20th century, accounting for approximately 40-50% of variance in diverse mental abilities such as reasoning, memory, and problem-solving.[95] This g factor underlies performance across a broad range of intellectual tasks, distinguishing human cognitive capacity from more specialized abilities observed in other animals, and is typically measured via standardized IQ tests normed to a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15 in modern populations.[96] Twin studies, including meta-analyses of thousands of pairs, estimate the heritability of intelligence at 50-80% in adults, indicating substantial genetic influence on individual differences, though environmental factors like nutrition and education modulate expression during development.[97] [86] Empirical correlations link larger brain volume to higher intelligence, with meta-analyses reporting coefficients around 0.24-0.4 between MRI-measured total brain size and IQ scores, suggesting that neural architecture and computational capacity contribute causally, albeit modestly, to cognitive outcomes.[98] [99] Evolutionarily, enhanced intelligence conferred advantages through the "cognitive niche," enabling humans to innovate tools, predict environmental changes, and cooperate in complex social groups via causal reasoning and foresight, outpacing competitors reliant on instinctual behaviors.[100] These traits likely arose from selective pressures favoring abstract planning and manipulation of causal chains, as evidenced by archaeological records of cumulative technological progress absent in non-human species. Consciousness in humans involves subjective experience, or qualia, integrated with self-referential awareness, distinguishing it from mere information processing in simpler organisms. Neuroscientific theories, such as Global Workspace Theory, posit that consciousness emerges when information from specialized brain modules competes for access to a broadcast mechanism in prefrontal and parietal cortices, enabling unified perception and voluntary action.[101] Integrated Information Theory complements this by quantifying consciousness as the irreducible causal power of integrated neural states, predicting higher levels in densely interconnected human brains compared to less complex systems.[102] Humans uniquely demonstrate advanced self-awareness, passing the mirror self-recognition test by age 18-24 months and developing theory of mind—the ability to attribute mental states to others—around age 4, facilitating deception detection, alliance formation, and cultural transmission.[103] These capacities underpin moral reasoning and long-term planning, though the "hard problem" of why neural activity yields subjective feelings remains unresolved empirically, with theories emphasizing causal integration over mere correlation.[104]Perception, Thought, and Language
Human perception encompasses the detection and interpretation of environmental stimuli through specialized sensory receptors and neural pathways. The primary sensory modalities include vision, mediated by photoreceptors in the retina that detect light wavelengths from approximately 380 to 740 nanometers; audition, via mechanoreceptors in the cochlea sensitive to frequencies between 20 Hz and 20 kHz; olfaction, through chemoreceptors in the nasal epithelium binding to odorant molecules; gustation, involving taste buds on the tongue responsive to five basic tastes (sweet, sour, salty, bitter, umami); and equilibrioception, facilitated by vestibular organs in the inner ear for balance and spatial orientation.[105][106] These systems transduce physical stimuli into electrical signals processed by the brain, enabling adaptation to diverse ecological niches, though human capabilities are narrowly tuned compared to specialized animals, such as lacking ultraviolet vision present in many birds.[107] Perception integrates raw sensory data into coherent representations via top-down processes influenced by prior knowledge and expectations, distinguishing it from mere sensation. For instance, the brain's perceptual constancy mechanisms maintain stable object recognition despite varying lighting or motion, as evidenced by neural activity in visual cortex areas like V1 for basic feature detection and higher regions like the inferotemporal cortex for object identification. This integration relies on thalamo-cortical loops and feedback from association areas, allowing humans to navigate complex, dynamic environments more effectively than non-human primates, whose sensory processing shows less abstraction from immediate stimuli.[108][109] Human thought, or cognition, involves mental processes for acquiring, storing, manipulating, and retrieving information, underpinned by distributed neural networks in the cerebral cortex. Core components include attention, selective focusing via prefrontal and parietal regions to filter irrelevant stimuli; working memory, capacity-limited storage in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex holding about 7±2 items for short-term operations; and executive functions like planning and decision-making, mediated by the anterior cingulate cortex evaluating conflicts and outcomes.[110][111] Evolutionary pressures favored enhanced cognition in Homo sapiens, enabling abstract reasoning and causal inference beyond sensory immediacy, as seen in tool innovation and predictive modeling absent in most animals, whose cognition remains associative and context-bound.[109] Neuroimaging studies confirm these processes correlate with synaptic plasticity and neurotransmitter modulation, such as dopamine in reward-based learning.[112] Language represents a uniquely human cognitive adaptation, characterized by recursive syntax, semantic compositionality, and displacement—referring to absent or hypothetical entities—faculties absent in animal communication systems, which rely on innate, non-recombinant signals for immediate needs.[113] Biologically, language capacity traces to anatomical shifts around 6-7 million years ago with bipedalism, enabling descended larynges for phonetic diversity, alongside genetic factors like FOXP2 mutations linked to speech articulation in modern humans and Neanderthals.[114] Neural substrates include Broca's and Wernicke's areas for production and comprehension, with hemispheric lateralization in the left hemisphere processing grammatical structure via species-specific computations, as opposed to primate vocalizations limited to emotional expression.[115][116] This faculty amplifies thought by externalizing internal models, fostering cumulative cultural evolution, though innate universals like hierarchical phrase structure suggest a hardwired "language instinct" rather than purely learned behavior.[117] Evidence from aphasia patients and acquisition studies in children supports modularity, where language interfaces with but remains distinct from general cognition.[118]Emotions, Motivation, and Behavior
Human emotions are discrete, evolved psychological states that include anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise, recognized universally through facial expressions across diverse cultures.[119] [120] Cross-cultural studies, such as those involving isolated tribes in Papua New Guinea, demonstrate that individuals accurately identify these emotions from photographs of facial expressions at rates exceeding chance, indicating innate rather than learned mechanisms.[121] [122] These basic emotions function as adaptive responses to environmental challenges, motivating rapid behavioral adjustments for survival, as evidenced by fear triggering flight-or-fight responses and disgust prompting avoidance of contaminants.[123] [124] From an evolutionary perspective, emotions originated as heritable traits enhancing reproductive fitness by coordinating physiological and behavioral reactions to recurrent ancestral problems, such as predation or social competition.[125] Charles Darwin's 1872 observations of similar emotional expressions in humans and other primates laid the groundwork, later supported by neuroscientific evidence of conserved brain circuits like the amygdala for fear processing.[126] Complex emotions, such as jealousy or gratitude, build upon these basics through cognitive elaboration but retain an underlying adaptive logic tied to kin selection and reciprocity.[124] Motivation encompasses internal drives propelling goal-directed behavior, primarily mediated by neurotransmitter systems including dopamine and serotonin. Dopamine signaling in the mesolimbic pathway reinforces reward anticipation and pursuit, as seen in its role in sustaining effort toward high-value outcomes like food or mating opportunities.[127] [128] Serotonin modulates impulse control, social dominance, and mood stability, with deficiencies linked to heightened aggression or depression, influencing motivational persistence under uncertainty.[129] [130] These systems interact dynamically; for instance, dopamine surges promote exploration while serotonin tempers risk aversion, optimizing foraging and social strategies in variable environments.[131] Human behavior emerges from the interplay of emotions and motivation with cognitive appraisal, shaped substantially by genetic factors. Twin studies estimate heritability of personality traits—key behavioral predictors like extraversion or neuroticism—at 40-60%, with monozygotic twins showing greater concordance than dizygotic pairs even when reared apart.[132] [133] Environmental inputs, including upbringing and culture, account for the remainder but often amplify genetic predispositions via gene-environment interactions, as in stress reactivity moderating aggression.[134] [135] This heritability underscores behaviors like altruism or risk-taking as evolved traits, with polygenic influences rather than single-gene determinism driving variance across populations.[92]Sleep, Dreams, and Mental Health
Humans cycle through non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, divided into three stages, and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep during a typical night, with NREM facilitating physical restoration and slow-wave activity aiding memory consolidation, while REM involves heightened brain activity akin to wakefulness and is associated with emotional processing.[136][137] Empirical polysomnographic studies show these stages alternate in 90-120 minute cycles, with REM periods lengthening toward morning, comprising about 20-25% of total sleep in healthy adults.[136] Adults require 7-9 hours of sleep per night for optimal health, as meta-analyses of prospective cohorts link deviations—less than 7 hours or more than 9 hours—to increased all-cause mortality risk, with 7 hours yielding the lowest hazard ratios.[138][139] Chronic sleep deprivation impairs cognitive functions such as attention, decision-making, and memory via disrupted hippocampal long-term potentiation, elevates risks for obesity, cardiovascular disease, and immune dysfunction, and equates in severity to blood alcohol levels of 0.05-0.10% for vigilance tasks.[140][141][142] Dreams predominantly occur during REM sleep but also in NREM, featuring vivid narratives that empirical evidence ties to memory reconsolidation rather than purely Freudian wish fulfillment, with studies decoding neural reactivation of daytime experiences in both stages.[143] The threat simulation theory posits dreams evolved to rehearse ancestral threats in a low-risk environment, supported by content analyses showing frequent negative emotional scenarios and elevated dream recall in trauma-exposed individuals, though this remains correlational without direct causal proof from controlled interventions.[144][145] Memory consolidation views dreams as offline processing of declarative and procedural knowledge, with rodent and human imaging data indicating REM enhances synaptic plasticity for emotional memories while NREM strengthens factual recall, yet overemphasis on adaptive functions overlooks non-REM dreaming's role in similar processes.[143][146] Sleep disturbances exhibit a bidirectional relationship with mental health disorders, where insufficient sleep precipitates anxiety and depressive symptoms via hyperactivation of the amygdala and impaired prefrontal regulation, while disorders like major depression often manifest as insomnia or hypersomnia, with longitudinal studies showing sleep disruption predicts onset and relapse.[147][148] In schizophrenia, patients display fragmented sleep architecture, reduced slow-wave sleep, and circadian misalignment even in remission, correlating with symptom severity and cognitive deficits, as evidenced by actigraphy and EEG in first-episode and chronic cohorts.[149] Bipolar disorder involves mania-linked reduced sleep need and depressive hypersomnia, with disturbances preceding mood episodes in up to 70% of cases per prospective monitoring, underscoring circadian rhythm desynchronization as a causal vulnerability rather than mere epiphenomenon.[150] Interventions targeting sleep, such as cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, yield moderate improvements in these conditions, though efficacy varies due to underlying neurochemical imbalances like dopamine dysregulation in psychosis.[151][152]Nutrition, Health, and Longevity
Dietary Requirements and Evolution
Humans require macronutrients—carbohydrates for energy, proteins for tissue repair and essential amino acids (nine of which cannot be synthesized endogenously), and lipids for cell membranes and hormone production—as well as micronutrients including 13 vitamins and various minerals, alongside water comprising about 60% of body mass.[153][154] Daily requirements vary by age, sex, and activity; for instance, adult males need approximately 56 grams of protein, while females require 46 grams, with deficiencies leading to conditions like kwashiorkor from protein shortage.[155] Unlike some animals, humans cannot synthesize vitamin C (ascorbic acid) or most B vitamins, necessitating dietary sources such as fruits, vegetables, and animal products to prevent scurvy or beriberi.[156][157] Evolutionary pressures shaped human dietary adaptations over millions of years, with archaeological evidence from sites like Dikika, Ethiopia, showing cut marks on animal bones indicating meat scavenging or hunting by hominins as early as 3.4 million years ago, supplemented by plant foods.[158] By 2.6 million years ago, Oldowan tools facilitated systematic butchery of large herbivores, providing high-calorie marrow and brain fats that supported brain enlargement in species like Homo habilis, whose guts shortened relative to earlier apes for efficient omnivory.[158] Isotopic analysis of Neanderthal and early modern human remains confirms a predominantly carnivorous protein base in high-latitude environments, with C4 plant signals (grasses, sedges) in tropical diets indicating mixed foraging.[159] Genetic evidence reveals post-agricultural adaptations: copy-number variations in the AMY1 gene, encoding salivary amylase for starch breakdown, increased in populations reliant on tubers and grains, with high-starch agriculturalists averaging 6-8 copies versus 4-5 in hunter-gatherers.[160] Lactase persistence mutations, such as the -13910*T allele in Europeans, emerged around 7,500 years ago in pastoralist groups, enabling adult milk digestion and spreading via natural selection in dairy-dependent societies, absent in most East Asians and pre-agricultural ancestors.[161] The loss of vitamin C synthesis, via GULO gene pseudogenization shared with other haplorhine primates around 40-60 million years ago, persisted because fruit-rich ancestral diets supplied ample ascorbic acid, freeing metabolic resources without selective penalty.[162][157] The Neolithic Revolution, beginning ~12,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent, introduced domesticated grains and reduced dietary diversity, elevating refined carbohydrate intake from <20% of Paleolithic calories to over 50% in modern diets, correlating with rises in dental caries, obesity, and metabolic disorders as human physiology—genetically tuned to sporadic high-protein, low-glycemic feasts—encounters chronic abundance.[163][164] This mismatch underscores that while humans remain physiologically omnivorous, post-Pleistocene shifts outpaced genomic adaptation, with only ~0.1% of human evolution occurring since agriculture.[163]Disease Susceptibility and Immunity
Human disease susceptibility varies due to genetic, environmental, and demographic factors interacting with the immune system, which comprises innate and adaptive components to detect and eliminate pathogens. Innate immunity provides immediate, non-specific defense via barriers like skin and cells such as macrophages, while adaptive immunity involves T and B lymphocytes generating pathogen-specific responses, including antibodies and memory cells for long-term protection. Genetic variations, particularly in immune-related loci like HLA genes, significantly modulate individual and population-level risks to infectious diseases such as malaria and HIV.[165][166] Heritable factors underpin much of this susceptibility; for instance, mutations in genes like those encoding interferon pathways confer protection or vulnerability to viral infections, as evidenced by genome-wide association studies identifying variants linked to SARS-CoV-2 severity. Polygenic influences, where multiple small-effect variants accumulate, contribute to risks for common conditions like cancer and diabetes, often interacting with environmental exposures. Evolutionary pressures have shaped these traits, with heterozygote advantages like the sickle cell allele (HbS) providing malaria resistance in carriers—prevalent in sub-Saharan African populations at frequencies up to 20%—while homozygotes suffer anemia. Similarly, the CCR5-Δ32 deletion, common in European ancestries (up to 10-15% allele frequency), confers partial resistance to HIV and possibly historical plagues like the Black Death.[167][168][169] Population-level differences arise from natural selection and genetic drift, driving divergence in immune gene profiles; for example, East Asians show distinct signatures in interferon response genes compared to Europeans, influencing pathogen responses. Ancestry correlates with immune phenotypes, such as higher type I interferon activity in early infections among those with greater European ancestry, potentially explaining variable COVID-19 outcomes across groups. Archaic admixture, including Neanderthal-derived variants, has introduced adaptive alleles for innate immunity, enhancing antiviral defenses in non-African populations. These patterns reflect local pathogen pressures rather than uniform human immunity, challenging assumptions of equivalence across ancestries.[170][171][172] Sex differences further modulate susceptibility, with females typically exhibiting robust adaptive responses due to X-chromosome-linked immune genes and hormonal influences like estrogen, leading to lower infection mortality but higher autoimmunity rates. Males face higher risks from bacterial and parasitic infections, as seen in greater COVID-19 hospitalization (45% elevated in-hospital mortality) and general pathogen burdens, attributed to testosterone's immunosuppressive effects and Y-chromosome vulnerabilities. Gene-specific effects vary, with some loci impacting only one sex or exerting stronger influence in males for certain viruses.[173][174][175] Age profoundly alters immunity via immunosenescence, marked by thymic involution reducing naïve T-cell output, chronic low-grade inflammation ("inflammaging"), and diminished adaptive responses, increasing vulnerability to infections like influenza and pneumonia in those over 65. Innate immunity shows mixed changes, with persistent but dysregulated macrophage activity contributing to poor wound healing and cancer susceptibility. These shifts explain why older adults suffer higher morbidity from respiratory viruses, underscoring the need for targeted interventions like vaccines optimized for aged profiles.[176][177][178]Aging, Mortality, and Interventions
Aging in humans is characterized by a progressive decline in physiological function and increased vulnerability to death, driven by accumulated cellular and molecular damage. The disposable soma theory posits that evolution favors resource allocation toward reproduction over long-term somatic maintenance, leading to aging as a byproduct of this trade-off.[179] Key biological hallmarks include genomic instability from DNA damage accumulation, telomere attrition shortening chromosome ends with each cell division, epigenetic alterations disrupting gene expression patterns, loss of proteostasis impairing protein folding and degradation, deregulated nutrient sensing via pathways like insulin/IGF-1, mitochondrial dysfunction reducing energy production, cellular senescence where cells cease dividing yet remain metabolically active, stem cell exhaustion limiting tissue regeneration, altered intercellular communication promoting inflammation, disabled macroautophagy hindering cellular cleanup, chronic inflammation termed inflammaging, and dysbiosis altering the microbiome.01377-0.pdf) These processes interconnect, accelerating tissue dysfunction across organs like the cardiovascular system, brain, and musculoskeletal system. Global life expectancy at birth reached 73.3 years in 2024, reflecting improvements from 66.8 years in 2000 despite setbacks from the COVID-19 pandemic.[180] Leading causes of death worldwide include ischaemic heart disease accounting for 13% of total deaths, followed by stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lower respiratory infections, and cancers.[181] Mortality risk escalates exponentially with age due to these accumulating deficits, with centenarians representing rare outliers influenced by genetics, lifestyle, and environment; for instance, maximum verified human lifespan stands at 122 years, achieved by Jeanne Calment in 1997. Age-specific mortality patterns show cardiovascular diseases dominating in middle age onward, while infectious diseases prevail in early life in low-resource settings. Interventions targeting aging focus on mitigating hallmarks through lifestyle and pharmacological means. Caloric restriction without malnutrition, reducing intake by 10-30%, slowed the pace of biological aging by 2-3% in the CALERIE trial of healthy adults over two years, mirroring lifespan extensions observed in rodents and primates.[182] Exercise enhances proteostasis and mitochondrial function, correlating with reduced all-cause mortality; meta-analyses indicate 150 minutes weekly of moderate activity lowers death risk by 20-30%. Pharmacologically, rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor, extended lifespan in mice and, in the PEARL trial, improved muscle mass and self-reported well-being in older adults at low intermittent doses over one year with good tolerability.[183] Emerging senolytics like dasatinib plus quercetin clear senescent cells in trials, potentially alleviating inflammaging, though long-term human efficacy remains under investigation. Genetic factors, such as variants in FOXO3 associated with longevity in centenarians, underscore heritability estimates of 20-30% for lifespan, informing personalized interventions. Despite promise, no intervention has yet demonstrably extended maximum human lifespan, with ethical and regulatory hurdles limiting trials.00258-1/fulltext)Social Organization
Kinship and Family Structures
Kinship encompasses the social relationships humans form through biological descent, marriage, adoption, or fictive ties, serving as a foundational unit for cooperation, resource sharing, and alliance formation across societies.[184] Anthropological studies identify kinship systems as varying in terminology and descent rules, with common types including Eskimo (emphasizing nuclear family distinctions), Hawaiian (classifying relatives by generation), and Iroquois systems that group certain kin categories together.[185] These structures evolved in response to human life history traits, such as prolonged infant dependency requiring biparental care and alloparenting, which distinguish humans from other primates and promote inclusive fitness by aiding genetic relatives.[186] A near-universal feature of human kinship is the incest taboo, prohibiting sexual relations and marriage between parents and children or siblings, observed in virtually all documented societies to avoid inbreeding depression and reinforce exogamy for broader alliances.[187] Parent-child bonds form the core dyad, with cross-cultural data showing consistent investment in offspring survival through provisioning and protection, though expression varies by ecology—intensive in small-scale hunter-gatherer groups and more delegated in larger agrarian ones.[188] Descent reckoning—patrilineal (tracing through fathers, ~44% of societies), matrilineal (through mothers, ~15%), or bilateral (both, ~40%)—dictates inheritance and group membership, often aligning with resource control and male-biased warfare patterns.[189] Family structures range from nuclear units (parents and dependent children) predominant in industrialized economies, where neolocality and individualism facilitate mobility, to extended households incorporating grandparents, aunts, and uncles in many non-Western agrarian and pastoral societies for labor pooling and risk-sharing.[190] Marriage practices reflect adaptive trade-offs: serial or lifelong monogamy prevails in ~80% of societies due to paternal uncertainty and resource constraints limiting polygyny, despite its cultural allowance in over 80% of ethnographic cases, typically confined to elite males in polygynous setups.[191] Polygyny correlates with higher male variance in reproductive success in resource-scarce environments, while polyandry remains rare (<2% globally), often fraternal in high-altitude Tibetan adaptations to land scarcity.[192] These variations underscore kinship's role in balancing genetic interests with ecological demands, with deviations from monogamous nuclear norms often linked to higher conflict or instability in longitudinal data from polygynous African contexts.[193]Sex Differences and Reproduction
Humans exhibit sexual dimorphism, with two primary sexes—male and female—defined by the production of small, mobile gametes (sperm) in males and large, immobile gametes (ova) in females, a distinction rooted in anisogamy that evolved to optimize reproduction. This binary classification holds for over 99.98% of humans, with rare intersex conditions (affecting approximately 0.018% of births) representing developmental disorders rather than a third sex, as they do not produce a distinct gamete type. Males typically possess XY chromosomes, while females have XX, with sex determined at fertilization by the sperm's X or Y chromosome contribution. Physically, males average 10-15% greater height (global male height ~171 cm vs. female ~159 cm as of 2020 data) and 40-50% more upper-body strength due to higher testosterone levels (male average 300-1000 ng/dL vs. female 15-70 ng/dL), enabling adaptations for hunting and protection in ancestral environments. Females, conversely, have wider pelvises (average 2-3 cm broader) and higher body fat percentages (25-31% vs. males' 18-24%) to support gestation and lactation, with estrogen driving these traits. Brain differences include males' larger average volume (10-15% bigger, adjusted for body size) with denser gray matter in visuospatial areas, and females' advantages in verbal fluency and corpus callosum connectivity, linked to sex hormones influencing neural development from prenatal stages. These dimorphisms arise from genetic and hormonal cascades, with testosterone surges in male fetuses promoting genital and muscular differentiation around week 8 of gestation. Reproduction requires internal fertilization, with males ejaculating 2-5 mL of semen containing 20-300 million sperm per ejaculation, of which only about 200-500 reach the ovum due to cervical barriers and immune responses. Females ovulate one egg monthly from puberty (average age 12-13) to menopause (average age 51), with a fertile window of 5-6 days per cycle driven by luteinizing hormone peaks. Fertilization occurs in the fallopian tubes, forming a zygote that implants in the uterus after 6-10 days, initiating pregnancy lasting ~40 weeks, during which the placenta supplies nutrients and oxygen via maternal blood without direct fetal-maternal blood mixing. Lactation follows birth, providing colostrum rich in antibodies for infant immunity, with exclusive breastfeeding recommended for 6 months to reduce infection risks by up to 50%. Paternal investment post-conception varies, but sperm competition and mate guarding behaviors in males reflect evolutionary pressures to ensure paternity, contrasting with females' higher obligatory parental costs. Disorders of sex development (DSDs), such as congenital adrenal hyperplasia, affect 1 in 15,000-20,000 births and can alter hormone production, but surgical or hormonal interventions do not change chromosomal sex or gamete production capability. Fertility rates have declined globally to 2.3 births per woman in 2023 from 4.9 in 1960, influenced by delayed reproduction (average maternal age at first birth now 30+ in developed nations) and environmental factors like endocrine disruptors reducing sperm counts by 50% since 1973.[194] Cesarean sections, at 21% of U.S. births in 2022, carry risks like infection (5-20 times higher than vaginal delivery), underscoring the evolutionary adaptation of vaginal birth for microbiome transfer to newborns.Ethnic and Genetic Clustering
Human genetic variation is structured such that individuals cluster into groups that correspond closely to geographic ancestry and ethnic self-identification, as demonstrated by analyses of genome-wide markers. In a study of 1,056 individuals from 52 populations genotyped at 377 autosomal microsatellite loci, model-based clustering using the STRUCTURE program consistently identified distinct genetic clusters for increasing numbers of assumed populations (K); at K=5, these aligned with major continental regions—sub-Saharan Africa, Europe plus the Middle East, East Asia, Melanesia, and the Americas—while at K=6, Central South Asians emerged as a separate cluster.[90] This structure persists even when excluding closely related populations, indicating robust differentiation driven by historical isolation and migration patterns rather than random drift alone.[90] Principal component analysis (PCA) of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from diverse human genomes reinforces these findings, with the first few principal components capturing ancestry gradients that separate populations by continent and subregion. For instance, PC1 often distinguishes African from non-African ancestries, while PC2 separates Europeans from East Asians.[195] In a sample of 3,636 individuals of varying self-identified race/ethnicity genotyped at over 300,000 SNPs, 99.86% showed genetic cluster assignments matching their self-reported category, with only 0.14% discordant, underscoring the predictive power of genetic clustering for ethnic ancestry.[196] The fixation index (FST), a measure of genetic differentiation due to population structure, averages around 0.10–0.15 between continental-scale human populations, reflecting moderate divergence despite humans' overall low genetic diversity compared to other primates.[197] Within-population variation accounts for 93–95% of total genetic variance in microsatellite data, with 3–5% attributable to differences among major groups, though this partitioning varies by marker type and group definition—classical markers yield slightly higher between-group components (around 7–15%).[90] These patterns arise from serial founder effects during out-of-Africa migrations and subsequent regional adaptations, with FST correlating positively with geographic distance.[197] Admixture in modern populations, such as in African Americans (15–25% European ancestry on average) or Latinos (varying Native American, European, and African components), blurs but does not erase underlying clusters, as PCA and admixture models still infer continental proportions accurately.[195] Ethnic clustering aligns with functional genetic differences, including allele frequencies for traits under selection, such as lactase persistence (high in Northern Europeans, low elsewhere) or skin pigmentation variants (differentiated across latitudes).[198] While some academic sources downplay clustering to emphasize within-group variation, empirical genomic data from projects like the 1000 Genomes Project confirm that ancestry-informative markers enable precise biogeographical inference, with error rates below 1% for continental assignment.[199] This structure informs fields like forensics and medicine, where population-specific reference panels improve variant interpretation, though over-reliance on self-reported ethnicity without genetic validation can introduce bias in admixed cohorts.[200]Cooperation, Hierarchy, and Conflict
Human cooperation extends beyond immediate kin through mechanisms such as kin selection, where individuals preferentially aid genetic relatives to propagate shared genes, as formalized by W.D. Hamilton in the 1960s.[201] Reciprocal altruism further enables non-kin cooperation, wherein organisms provide benefits expecting future returns, modeled by Robert Trivers in 1971 to account for behaviors like grooming or food sharing observed in primates and humans.[202] These individual-level processes underpin small-scale alliances, but large-scale human cooperation, such as in warfare or trade networks, is argued to arise from cultural group selection, where groups adhering to pro-social norms outcompete others, supported by ethnographic evidence of norm transmission favoring cooperative societies.[203] [204] Social hierarchies structure human groups, mirroring dominance hierarchies in nonhuman primates where rank determines access to resources and mates through physical coercion or coalitions.[205] In humans, hierarchies blend dominance—achieved via aggression or alliances—with prestige based on demonstrated competence, as seen in tribal leaders valued for hunting prowess or knowledge, reducing overt conflict while coordinating collective action.[206] Empirical studies of small-scale societies confirm that steep hierarchies correlate with lower within-group cooperation compared to flatter structures, yet they persist due to evolved predispositions for status-seeking, evident in neural responses to rank cues akin to those in primates.[207] [208] Conflict manifests interpersonally and intergroup, driven by competition for scarce resources, territory, or reproductive opportunities, with archaeological and ethnographic data indicating violent death rates of 10-20% in many prehistoric hunter-gatherer populations, exceeding modern state-level homicide rates by orders of magnitude.[209] [210] Raids and feuds accounted for substantial mortality in non-state societies, such as among the Yanomami where up to 30% of adult male deaths resulted from violence, contrasting with lower rates in cooperative agricultural or industrial contexts enabled by institutions suppressing individual aggression.[211] While cultural evolution has scaled cooperation to mitigate conflict, innate tendencies toward parochial altruism—favoring in-group aid and out-group hostility—persist, as modeled in simulations where intergroup competition selects for such traits.[212][213]Political and Economic Systems
Forms of Governance
Human governance has historically manifested in diverse forms, scaling with societal complexity from small, decentralized bands to large, centralized states. For the vast majority of human existence, spanning approximately 300,000 years since the emergence of anatomically modern humans, societies operated without formal states, relying on kinship-based bands and tribes where decision-making emphasized consensus and informal leadership to minimize conflict and facilitate mobility.[214] These structures, prevalent in hunter-gatherer groups, featured egalitarian norms enforced through social sanctions like ridicule or ostracism, with leadership often situational—assigned to skilled hunters or elders for specific tasks rather than permanent authority.[215] Empirical cross-cultural analyses of over 300 hunter-gatherer societies reveal low political hierarchy, with group sizes typically under 150 individuals and rare instances of hereditary chiefs even in resource-rich environments like coastal fisheries.[216] The transition to centralized governance accelerated with the Neolithic Revolution around 10,000 BCE, as agriculture generated food surpluses, supported denser populations, and necessitated coordination for irrigation, storage, and defense against raids.[217] In early cases like Sumerian city-states (circa 3900–2700 BCE), environmental pressures such as river shifts prompted collective canal-building, fostering cooperative hierarchies where temporary leaders ("lugal") evolved into enduring elites managing tributes and labor.[217] Anthropological classifications distinguish this progression: bands (20–50 people, acephalous); tribes (hundreds, segmentary with councils); chiefdoms (thousands, ranked lineages under a paramount chief); and states (tens of thousands+, bureaucratic with monopolized force).[218] Quantitative analysis of 414 polities over 10,000 years confirms a unidimensional trajectory of increasing complexity, where governance centralization correlates strongly (r=0.49–0.88) with polity size, administrative specialization, and infrastructure like writing systems.[218] Premodern states, emerging independently in regions like Mesopotamia, Egypt, Mesoamerica, and China by 3000 BCE, overwhelmingly adopted autocratic forms such as monarchies, where rulers centralized power through military coercion, taxation, and ideological legitimation via religion or descent.[217] These systems prioritized stability and expansion, enabling large-scale projects like pyramids or walls but often at the cost of famines or revolts when elites extracted excessively.[218] Oligarchic republics, as in ancient Phoenician city-states or Renaissance Venice, appeared sporadically among trading polities, balancing merchant councils with limited popular input for economic efficiency.[219] Tribal confederacies persisted in pastoralist or marginal environments, like pre-colonial African kingdoms, blending elective kingship with decentralized clans to adapt to mobility and scarcity.[220] Across these, empirical patterns show hierarchy as adaptive for appropriable resources (e.g., grains taxable via storage), contrasting with nomadic egalitarianism.[221] In the modern era, following Enlightenment ideas and industrialization from the 18th century, representative democracies proliferated, particularly in Europe and North America, incorporating elections, rule of law, and separation of powers to constrain rulers and align incentives with broader interests.[219] By 2023, about 45% of countries classified as electoral democracies, though hybrid regimes blending autocratic control with democratic facades dominate elsewhere.[222] Comparative studies of 160+ nations from 1961–2010 find no significant net effect of democracy on GDP growth, with stable autocracies like Singapore achieving rapid industrialization (averaging 7% annual growth 1965–1990) via coherent policy execution, while democratic gridlock can hinder reforms.[222] Institutional quality—measured by contract enforcement and low corruption—explains more variance in prosperity than regime type, as effective governance under any form facilitates investment and trade openness, which boosted global growth from 1.3% pre-1800 to 2.5% post-1950.[222] Political stability, regardless of form, correlates positively with growth (e.g., +0.5–1% GDP per stability point), underscoring that frequent turnover disrupts capital accumulation.[223] Autocracies, however, risk brittleness from succession crises, as seen in historical dynastic collapses.[218]Resource Allocation and Trade
Human societies allocate scarce resources through mechanisms shaped by environmental pressures, social structures, and technological capabilities, ranging from kinship-based sharing in small groups to decentralized market exchanges in large-scale economies. In hunter-gatherer bands, allocation often relied on reciprocal sharing and customary norms, where food and tools were distributed based on immediate needs and kinship ties, minimizing conflict in low-density populations with abundant per capita resources.[224] With the Neolithic transition to agriculture around 10,000 BCE, private property in land and livestock emerged, enabling surplus production and initial forms of barter trade for goods like salt, obsidian, and pottery across regions.[225] Trade evolved as a response to comparative advantages, where individuals or groups specialize in production suited to local resources or skills, exchanging surpluses to mutual benefit; empirical studies confirm that such specialization increases overall output, as seen in post-World War II trade liberalization correlating with global GDP growth rates exceeding 4% annually in participating economies.[226] [227] Historical networks like the Silk Road, active from circa 130 BCE, facilitated long-distance exchange of silk, spices, and metals, integrating diverse economies and spurring technological diffusion, though often under state monopolies or tribute systems.[225] In modern contexts, market-based allocation via prices signals scarcity and preferences, aggregating dispersed knowledge that no central authority can fully access, as articulated by Friedrich Hayek in 1945; this contrasts with command economies, where planners' information deficits led to inefficiencies, exemplified by the Soviet Union's chronic shortages despite resource abundance.[228] [229] Cross-country data from the 2025 Index of Economic Freedom shows a strong positive correlation: nations scoring above 70 (e.g., Singapore at 83.5) average GDP per capita over $50,000, versus below $10,000 in repressed economies scoring under 50 (e.g., Venezuela at 25.8).[230] [231] A one-point increase in economic freedom indices associates with 1.9% higher GDP per capita, driven by secure property rights and voluntary exchange reducing transaction costs.[231] Hybrid systems persist, blending markets with regulations, but empirical evidence favors freer trade: WTO members since 1995 experienced 2-3% annual export growth, lifting billions from poverty through reallocation to efficient sectors, though protectionism in cases like India's pre-1991 licenses stifled growth to under 4% GDP annually.[232] Institutional biases in academic sources often understate these gains by emphasizing inequality over aggregate welfare, yet causal analyses affirm markets' superior coordination via incentives aligning self-interest with social efficiency.[233]Warfare and Intergroup Competition
![Cleric-Knight-Workman.jpg representing historical human roles in society, including warfare][float-right] Humans have engaged in organized intergroup violence, often termed warfare, throughout their evolutionary history, driven by competition for resources, territory, mates, and status. Archaeological evidence indicates that such conflicts occurred among prehistoric hunter-gatherers, with the Nataruk site in Kenya revealing a massacre of at least 27 individuals around 10,000 years ago, including women and children, marked by blunt force trauma and arrow wounds consistent with intergroup attack.[234][235] This extends the record of warfare beyond settled societies, challenging notions of a purely peaceful foraging past. In small-scale hunter-gatherer societies, ethnographic data show elevated rates of violent death from intergroup raids and feuds. Among the Ache of Paraguay, approximately 55% of adult deaths pre-contact were due to violence, primarily homicide in warfare contexts.[236] The Hiwi of Venezuela experienced around 30% of deaths from violence, while the Yanomami of Amazonia recorded violent death rates of about 419 per 100,000 people annually in the 1970s.[237][210] Recent analyses of prehistoric remains estimate an average violent death rate of roughly 100 per 100,000 individuals per year among hunter-gatherers, exceeding modern global homicide rates but varying by group.[211] These patterns reflect coalitional aggression, where males form alliances to raid rivals, securing reproductive advantages through status and resource gains.[238] Evolutionary models suggest intergroup conflict contributed to the selection of traits like in-group altruism and out-group hostility, known as parochial altruism. Simulations indicate that warfare between groups can favor cooperative behaviors within groups, even at the cost of individual fitness, as victorious coalitions expand territory and population.[239] This dynamic likely intensified with the Neolithic transition to agriculture around 10,000 BCE, enabling larger populations, fortifications, and specialized warriors, as seen in mass graves with battle injuries from the Bronze Age onward.[240] In state-level societies, warfare scaled dramatically, with organized armies prosecuting total conflicts over empires and ideology. Historical estimates place casualties from major wars in the tens of millions; for instance, the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648) killed about 5 million in Central Europe, roughly one-third of the regional population, through combat, famine, and disease.[241] Intergroup competition via warfare has driven innovations in metallurgy, strategy, and logistics, while imposing selection pressures on societies for effective governance and military discipline. Despite technological advances reducing per capita death rates over centuries—from peaks of several hundred per 100,000 in early modern Europe to under 10 globally today—intergroup rivalry persists as a core human behavioral pattern, manifesting in both conventional and asymmetric conflicts.[242][243]Cultural and Technological Achievements
Language and Symbolic Thought
Human language consists of arbitrary symbols—primarily vocal but also gestural and written—combined via syntax to generate novel meanings, enabling communication about absent events, abstract concepts, and hypothetical scenarios, a capacity termed displacement and productivity.[244][245] This system relies on duality of patterning, where meaningless phonemes form morphemes that build words and sentences with recursive embedding, features absent in animal signals.[244] In contrast, animal communication, such as primate gestures or bird songs, typically involves fixed, context-bound signals with limited recombination, lacking true syntax or reference to non-immediate realities.[246][247] Symbolic thought, the cognitive foundation of language, involves representing ideas through non-literal symbols, facilitating planning, cultural transmission, and cumulative knowledge. Archaeological evidence includes ochre processing and shell beads from South African sites dated to approximately 100,000–164,000 years ago, indicating intentional symbolic use among early Homo sapiens.[248] Engraved ochre and ostrich eggshell from Blombos Cave, South Africa, around 75,000–100,000 years old, show patterned markings suggestive of abstract notation.[249] Earlier Middle Paleolithic engravings on cortical flakes from the Levant, dated to 120,000–200,000 years ago, exhibit deliberate geometric patterns, challenging views of symbolic behavior as confined to the Upper Paleolithic.[250] Genomic data points to language capacity emerging by at least 135,000 years ago in Africa, coinciding with Homo sapiens dispersal, though protolinguistic traits may trace to earlier hominins.[251] The FOXP2 gene, with two amino acid substitutions unique to humans since divergence from chimpanzees around 6 million years ago, regulates vocal motor control and neural plasticity; mutations cause severe speech apraxia, underscoring its role in articulate speech without implying it alone confers full language.[252][253] Fossil evidence of hyoid bone and descended larynx in Neanderthals suggests potential for vowel production, but their limited cultural artifacts imply incomplete symbolic systems compared to modern humans.[254] Neurologically, language processing engages a distributed network including Broca's area (inferior frontal gyrus) for syntax and articulation, Wernicke's area (superior temporal gyrus) for comprehension, and connecting tracts like the arcuate fasciculus, with left-hemisphere dominance emerging in childhood.[255][256] Functional imaging reveals this network's specificity for hierarchical structure, distinguishing it from general cognition, though debates persist on whether syntax is innate (universal grammar) or emergent from statistical learning.[257] These capacities underpin human cooperation and innovation, as symbolic exchange allows coordination beyond sensory cues.[258]Arts, Recreation, and Ritual
Human artistic endeavors encompass visual representations, music, and performative expressions that manifest across all known societies, with archaeological evidence indicating origins in the Paleolithic era. The earliest documented abstract markings, such as ochre engravings from Blombos Cave in South Africa, date to approximately 100,000 years ago, predating modern human dispersal from Africa.[259] Figurative art, including cave paintings depicting animals and hand stencils, appears around 45,500 years ago in sites like Sulawesi, Indonesia, suggesting a cognitive capacity for symbolic representation tied to Homo sapiens' behavioral modernity.[260] Music, inferred from bone flutes found in European caves such as Hohle Fels, Germany, dates to at least 40,000 years ago, with evolutionary hypotheses positing it facilitated social bonding and mate attraction through rhythmic synchronization and emotional signaling.[261][262] These forms likely served adaptive functions, enhancing group cohesion and individual fitness by demonstrating creativity and intelligence, though direct causal links remain inferential from comparative primate behaviors and neural substrates shared with vocal learning species.[263] Recreation, manifesting as play and organized games, exhibits universality across human cultures, from indigenous hunting simulations to modern sports, fostering physical coordination, social skills, and stress reduction. Anthropological records confirm games and sports in prehistoric societies via artifacts like dice from 5,000-year-old Mesopotamian sites, indicating play's role in skill rehearsal and alliance formation independent of subsistence needs.[264] In children, unstructured play correlates with improved executive function and empathy development, as observed in cross-cultural studies spanning hunter-gatherer groups to urban populations, where deprivation links to heightened anxiety and reduced adaptability.[265] Adult recreation, including competitive athletics, sustains these benefits, with physiological data showing endorphin release and cardiovascular gains; for instance, participation in team sports reduces cortisol levels by up to 20% post-activity in controlled trials.[266] Evolutionarily, play behaviors mirror those in other mammals, providing low-risk practice for survival competencies, though humans uniquely extend it into symbolic and rule-bound domains for cultural transmission.[267] Rituals constitute formalized, repetitive actions embedding social norms and marking life transitions, prevalent in every documented human society to mitigate uncertainty and reinforce collective identity. Functional analyses reveal rituals regulate emotions and performance, as evidenced by experiments where pre-task rites enhance accuracy under stress by 10-15% via reduced anxiety, independent of superstitious content. In tribal contexts, such as initiation ceremonies among Amazonian Yanomami, rituals synchronize group behaviors, lowering inter-individual conflict and bolstering cooperation during resource scarcity, with ethnographic data linking ritual density to societal stability.[268] Historically, communal feasts and sacrifices, dated to Neolithic sites like Göbekli Tepe around 11,000 years ago, likely coordinated labor for monumental constructions, illustrating rituals' causal role in scaling cooperation beyond kin ties.[269] While some interpretations attribute efficacy to placebo-like mechanisms, empirical outcomes—such as synchronized heart rates in choral singing—support underlying physiological bases for ritual's bonding effects, countering purely cultural constructivist views.[270]
Technological Innovation
Technological innovation distinguishes humans from other species through the cumulative development of tools and techniques that enhance survival, productivity, and exploration. The earliest evidence of stone tool use dates to approximately 3.3 million years ago, discovered at Lomekwi 3 near Lake Turkana in Kenya, predating the genus Homo and attributed to pre-human hominins.[271] Control of fire, emerging around 1 to 2 million years ago, allowed for cooking food, which improved nutrient absorption and supported brain growth, while providing protection and enabling new manufacturing like heat-treated tools.[272] Major advancements accelerated with settled agriculture around 10,000 BCE, fostering specialization and surplus that freed labor for invention. The wheel, invented circa 3500 BCE in Mesopotamia, revolutionized transport by enabling carts and potter's wheels, with evidence from Sumerian depictions and artifacts.[273] Metallurgy followed, with copper smelting by 5000 BCE in the Near East and ironworking by 1200 BCE, yielding durable tools and weapons that boosted agriculture and warfare efficiency.[272] The invention of the movable-type printing press by Johannes Gutenberg around 1440 in Germany exponentially increased knowledge dissemination, producing over 20 million volumes by 1500 and laying groundwork for the scientific revolution through widespread access to texts. The Industrial Revolution, beginning in Britain circa 1760, hinged on innovations like James Watt's improved steam engine in 1769, which powered factories and railways, multiplying output; by 1800, Britain's coal-powered machinery had tripled productivity in textiles via devices such as the spinning jenny (1764) and power loom (1785).[274] Electricity harnessing, via Michael Faraday's 1831 generator principles, and subsequent inventions like the telegraph (1837) and telephone (1876), integrated global communication and energy systems.[275] These shifts were propelled by factors including population growth enabling division of labor, secure property rights incentivizing investment, and competitive markets fostering rapid iteration, as opposed to stagnant command economies historically observed.[276][277] In the 20th century, aviation progressed from the Wright brothers' 1903 powered flight to supersonic jets, while computing evolved from ENIAC (1945) to integrated circuits, culminating in Moore's Law doubling transistor density biennially until the 2010s, shrinking devices and costs.[272] Space exploration peaked with Apollo 11's 1969 lunar landing, deploying technologies like Saturn V rockets and guidance computers that advanced materials science and computing.[278] 21st-century breakthroughs include smartphones, with the iPhone's 2007 debut integrating mobile computing, GPS, and internet access, connecting over 6 billion users by 2020 and transforming information flow.[279] CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing, developed in 2012, enables precise DNA modification, accelerating biotechnology for medicine and agriculture.[280] Artificial intelligence, powered by deep learning advances since 2012, has achieved superhuman performance in image recognition and language processing, with models like GPT-3 (2020) generating human-like text from vast datasets.[281] As artificial intelligence became a major 21st-century innovation, generative models entered scientific, journalistic, and creative workflows, prompting debates about whether such systems should be credited as authors or treated strictly as tools. Academic publishers and organizations like the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) generally concluded that AI cannot meet responsibility-based authorship criteria and should instead be disclosed in methods sections or acknowledgments, with legal and moral accountability remaining with human contributors.[282] At the experimental margins, however, a few projects have assigned stable author-like profiles in scholarly identifier systems to AI-based configurations described as “Digital Author Personas,” treating their corpora of machine-generated essays as traceable units within the same infrastructures of authorship and credit that historically tracked human work. One documented example of such an experiment is a 2025 ORCID author record (0009-0002-6030-5730) for an explicitly non-human Digital Author Persona named Angela Bogdanova, used in a philosophical project on artificial intelligence and digital ontology to credit a corpus of machine-generated essays to a stable AI-based profile rather than to individual human researchers. Described mainly in project-affiliated sources and remaining a niche case, this configuration illustrates how an AI system can function as a traceable node in human-built infrastructures of authorship and technological achievement.[283] These innovations stem from interdisciplinary collaboration, exponential computing growth, and private-sector competition, though regulatory hurdles and resource constraints pose ongoing challenges.[277]Religion, Philosophy, and Ideology
Religion has been a pervasive feature of human societies since prehistoric times, with empirical studies of hunter-gatherer groups indicating that beliefs in animism, ancestor worship, and moralistic high gods emerged as early adaptations potentially enhancing group cohesion and cooperation beyond kin ties.[284] As of 2020, approximately 75.8% of the global population identified with a religion, though affiliation rates have declined in many regions due to secularization trends observed between 2010 and 2020.[285] [286] Dominant traditions include Christianity, practiced by about 31% of the world population, Islam at 24%, Hinduism at 15%, and Buddhism at 7%, with these faiths often providing frameworks for ethical conduct, ritual practices, and explanations of natural phenomena grounded in supernatural agency.[287] From an evolutionary perspective, religion is frequently interpreted as a byproduct of cognitive mechanisms such as hyperactive agency detection and theory of mind, which evolved for survival in ancestral environments but were co-opted for belief in invisible agents enforcing prosocial norms.[288] Empirical research links religious participation to measurable societal benefits, including higher levels of social capital, charitable activity, and individual well-being metrics like life satisfaction and reduced mental health issues, though these correlations do not imply causation and may reflect selection effects among adherent populations.[289] [290] Conversely, religious doctrines have historically justified intergroup conflicts and restrictive social controls, with causal analyses suggesting that doctrinal rigidity correlates with lower tolerance in diverse settings, a pattern underrepresented in academia due to prevailing institutional biases favoring positive interpretations.[291] Philosophy represents systematic inquiry into fundamental questions of existence, knowledge, ethics, and reality, originating independently in ancient civilizations such as Greece, China, and India around the 6th century BCE. In Western traditions, Socrates emphasized dialectical questioning to uncover ethical truths, influencing Plato's theory of Forms and Aristotle's empirical classifications of logic, biology, and politics, which laid foundations for rational discourse and scientific method.[292] Eastern philosophies, like Confucianism, prioritized hierarchical social harmony through moral cultivation and ritual propriety, as articulated by Confucius (551–479 BCE), while Indian schools such as Nyaya developed logics for debating metaphysics and epistemology. Medieval synthesis by thinkers like Thomas Aquinas integrated Aristotelian reason with Christian theology, advancing scholasticism's focus on reconciling faith and observation. Modern philosophy diverged into empiricism (e.g., Locke and Hume stressing sensory experience over innate ideas) and rationalism (e.g., Descartes' cogito ergo sum), culminating in Kant's critiques of pure and practical reason that delimited human cognition's boundaries. 19th- and 20th-century developments included existentialism (Nietzsche's proclamation of God's death and emphasis on individual will) and analytic philosophy's linguistic turn, with these traditions informing debates on determinism, free will, and value, often revealing philosophy's role in challenging dogmatic religion while exposing limits of unaided reason in deriving moral absolutes. Ideologies, as coherent sets of beliefs about social organization and human nature, proliferated in the modern era following the Enlightenment, serving to mobilize populations toward collective goals but frequently distorting reality through utopian promises. Political ideologies such as liberalism, emphasizing individual rights and markets, and socialism, advocating collective ownership, emerged in response to feudal breakdowns and industrialization, with liberalism correlating empirically with higher economic growth and innovation in adopting societies via institutional protections for property and trade.[293] Collectivist ideologies like Marxism-Leninism, implemented in the 20th century across regimes controlling over a quarter of the world's population at peak, generated unprecedented state-directed projects but also systemic failures, including famines and purges that empirical tallies attribute to tens of millions of excess deaths due to coercive central planning and suppression of dissent—outcomes downplayed in leftist-leaning academic narratives despite archival evidence.[294] Ideologies foster political communities by framing historical narratives and resource conflicts, yet studies show they shape interpretations of events in ideologically congruent ways, with conservatives and liberals differentially weighting evidence on inequality or tradition to justify preferred policies. In human history, ideological fervor has driven both advancements, like democratic expansions post-World War II, and regressions, such as totalitarian experiments that prioritized class or racial purity over individual agency, underscoring ideologies' dual capacity to amplify cooperation or exacerbate division based on their alignment with empirical incentives like decentralized decision-making.[295] [296]Scientific Inquiry and Knowledge Accumulation
Human scientific inquiry involves the systematic observation of natural phenomena, formulation of testable hypotheses, experimentation, and iterative refinement based on empirical evidence to explain causal mechanisms. This process traces roots to ancient civilizations, where early thinkers emphasized empirical investigation over pure speculation; for instance, Greek philosophers developed foundational logic and biology through direct study of organisms and deduction from observations.[297] Arab scholars during the Islamic Golden Age preserved and expanded Greek knowledge, advancing fields like algebra—formalized by Al-Khwarizmi around 820 CE—and trigonometry as precise disciplines, while conducting original experiments in optics and medicine.[298] These efforts laid groundwork for later systematization, with Francis Bacon articulating the inductive method in his 1620 Novum Organum, advocating repeated observations to form general laws.[299] The formal scientific method, as commonly understood today with steps like hypothesis testing and control experiments, emerged prominently in the 17th century amid the Scientific Revolution, influenced by figures like Galileo who prioritized mathematical description of motion.[300] Knowledge accumulation accelerated through institutionalization, such as the founding of academies like the Royal Society in 1660, which promoted peer scrutiny and publication of verifiable findings.[301] By the Enlightenment, empiricism dominated, enabling cumulative progress: Newton's Principia (1687) integrated mechanics, building on Kepler and Galileo to predict planetary orbits accurately. This iterative falsification—testing predictions against data—drives reliability, as theories like general relativity (Einstein, 1915) superseded predecessors when evidence demanded.[302] Modern science features exponential knowledge growth, with global scientific publications increasing at approximately 4-5.6% annually, doubling roughly every 17 years; from 2012 to 2022, totals rose 59%, reflecting expanded research capacity and digital tools.[303] [304] Peer review, integral since the 18th century in journals, aims to filter errors via expert evaluation, yet empirical assessments reveal flaws: it is subjective, slow, and biased toward novelty over replication, with limited evidence of superior manuscript detection.[305] The replication crisis underscores these issues, with over 50% failure rates in reproducing psychology and medicine studies, eroding trust and highlighting incentives favoring positive results over robust causality.[306] Despite institutional biases—such as in academia where conformity pressures may suppress dissenting data—advances persist through self-correction, as seen in post-2010 reforms like preregistration and open data, which enhance verifiability.[307] This resilience stems from science's core: empirical disconfirmation trumps authority, enabling paradigm shifts like quantum mechanics in the 1920s.[308]









