Hubbry Logo
Base end stationBase end stationMain
Open search
Base end station
Community hub
Base end station
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Base end station
Base end station
Base end station
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Base end stations were used by the United States Army Coast Artillery Corps as part of fire control systems for locating the positions of attacking ships and controlling the firing of seacoast guns, mortars, or mines to defend against them.[1] A British equivalent was the position finding cell.[2]

Types of base end stations

[edit]

A "true" base end station was one of a pair of stations at either end of a precisely measured (surveyed) baseline.[note 1][3] Once simultaneous bearings from each base end station to a target were taken, since the distance between the stations (the baseline) was known, the range to the target from either station could be calculated through triangulation. If the target's bearing from each station was sent to a plotting room and input to a plotting board, the position of the target could be estimated and firing coordinates for a gun battery could be calculated.

Some base end stations were located in tall fire control towers (FCTs)[note 2] Sometimes, the terms "base end station" and "fire control tower" were used interchangeably. In general, however, a fire control tower (FCT) was a structure built to raise one or more base end, spotting, or observation stations high above ground level. Some fire control towers contained several base end stations, one on top of another on different stories of the tower, with each station being at one end of a different baseline and being assigned primarily to a different gun battery in a harbor's defensive scheme. Other base end stations resembled pillboxes or small bunkers dug into the ground or on the surface overlooking coastal waters. Still others were camouflaged to resemble seaside homes or cottages. Some base end stations had anti-aircraft observation positions on their top levels, or harbor observation radar antennas on platforms above their roofs.

Typical equipment

[edit]

Almost all base end stations were equipped at least with an azimuth telescope (similar to a surveyor's theodolite) to enable them to sight accurate bearings to a target. In addition, some base end stations held a depression position finder (DPF) or a coincidence range finder (CRF) that could be used by itself (without reference to another station) to produce fire control data for the gun(s). Sometimes a space holding one of these instruments (if not located on a baseline and paired with a second station) was referred to simply as an observation station.

These stations were used between the 1890s and 1946. At the end of the war almost all of them were declared surplus and were sold off to public and private owners. More than 100 of these stations still survive today on the coasts of the United States, as part of state preserves or under private ownership, although many have been razed to clear sites for new development.

Horizontal Base Systems

[edit]

In a horizontal base system (like that in the diagram above), two base end stations were located at precisely surveyed points,[note 3] one at each end of a base line, or a line between them of known length and azimuth.[note 4] At each of these stations was an observation instrument (such as an azimuth telescope or a depression position finder (DPF) capable of making a precise measurement of the bearing of a distant target (usually a ship) from the station. When the stations at each end of the baseline had made their measurements, they communicated these to a plotting room (or fire control center) which used an analog tracking device called a plotting board to locate the position of the target.[note 5] Later in World War II, the target bearings could be input to an electro-mechanical gun data computer, which calculated the position of the target and the required adjustments for things like ballistic factors and the locations of the guns that were to be fired.

Making this system work properly required the two base end stations to take bearings on the target at precisely the same time. To enable this, a bell or buzzer (called the time-interval bell) was rung automatically at fixed intervals (usually every 15 or 20 seconds) in all observing stations across a harbor defense system[note 6] (note the dashed communications lines in the diagram above). One soldier, using the telescope or DPF, would track the target. At the sound of the bell, a second soldier would read the azimuth (at which the instrument was pointed) off a scale on the instrument and telephone this reading to the plotting room.

Spotting Stations

[edit]

In World War II, each base end station was often combined with a spotting station. This meant that a second spotting instrument (usually an azimuth telescope) on a separate pedestal (or tripod) was included in the observing room, alongside the primary one (which was usually a depression position finder [DPF]).

A depression position finder next to an azimuth scope.
A Depression Position Finder (on the left) and an Azimuth Scope at Fort Standish MA

While the primary observer (and perhaps the azimuth reader who assisted him) tracked the target, the role of the spotter was to observe the fall of fire from the guns of the supported battery, telephoning back to the plotting room whether the shells were falling short or over, left or right.

In harbor defense plans and other documents, such as survey data sheets prepared by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey (USC&GS) and maintained by its successors,[4] these combined stations were often labeled according to the tactical numbers[note 7] of the gun batteries they were designed primarily to serve and their number in the series of stations serving that battery. Thus a station marked B 4/2 S 4/2 referred to base end station #4 for battery #2 and spotting station #4 for battery #2.

Vertical Base and Self-Contained Systems

[edit]

These systems used instruments such as the depression position finder (DPF) or the coincidence rangefinder (CRF) to measure the range and/or azimuth to the target.[note 8]

Either of these two types of range finding stations could function effectively by itself, measuring both range and bearing (azimuth) to the target, without the need for a second base end station (as with the horizontal base system). Using one of these position-finding systems, while not as accurate as using the horizontal base method, had certain advantages.[note 9]

Some examples

[edit]

Base end stations (also called observation stations) took a variety of forms. Some were multi-story fire control (FC) towers, either square or round in plan (or both), and rising from 20 to 100 feet above the ground. Some looked like forest fire watch towers. Others appeared to be small buildings, or were disguised as seaside cottages to camouflage their purpose. Still other base end stations resembled small pillboxes, dug into the ground, and usually positioned to look down on the channels they defended.

Base end stations were often assigned to particular batteries of guns or mine fields in a harbor defense system. In some U.S. harbors during WW2 there were 20 or more of these base end stations, often from 10,000 to 15,000 yards apart, and tied together by telephone lines running through switchboards. These stations could be used flexibly in different combinations or by different gun batteries as ships moved through the area, or in case a given station was damaged by enemy action.

Fire Control Towers (FCTs)

[edit]
Pt. Allerton fire control
7-Story FCT at Point Allerton MA
Ft. Miles Round FCT
Ft. Miles Round FCT
Steel fire control tower
Steel FCT, Ft. Story, VA
Rear view of brick 2-story FCT from 1904 at Fort Andrews in Boston Harbor.
Front view of brick FCT at Ft. Andrews.
Emerson Point FCT
8-Story FCTs Nahant MA

Base End Stations (Lower Elevation)

[edit]
Low base end station, Ft. Andrews west ridge.
Base end station cottage
Base End Station Cottage in Minot MA
Report of Completed Works Point Allerton MR

DPF and CRF Stations

[edit]
CRF Station at Fort Strong in Boston MA
Mine base end station
Mine Command Station at Fort Revere
Base end station dug into the ground

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Base end station

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A base end station is a fortified , typically constructed as a embedded into coastal cliffs or hillsides, designed for use in fire control systems to detect, track, and triangulate the positions of enemy ships at sea. These stations formed critical components of early 20th-century to II-era seacoast defenses, particularly in the United States, where they enabled precise targeting for batteries by measuring azimuths (horizontal angles) and elevations from known baselines between multiple stations. Equipped with optical instruments such as the M1910A1 azimuth-reading telescope and depression position finders, operators could observe targets up to 29 miles on the horizon under clear conditions, relaying data via or radio to plotting rooms for predictive calculations on ship movements. During , base end stations like those in the Harbor Defenses of served dual roles as command centers and living quarters for crews, featuring narrow vision slits for concealed observation, communication equipment, and basic amenities such as bunkrooms with metal-framed beds. Their design emphasized and protection, often including structures with staircases, gates, and support for netting to blend into the landscape. By the mid-20th century, advancements in and electronic fire control largely supplanted these manual systems, rendering many stations obsolete, though preserved examples today highlight their role in safeguarding major harbors from naval threats.

Overview and Historical Context

Definition and Purpose

A base end station refers to an utilized by the Coast Artillery Corps within coastal defense fire control systems to detect and precisely locate enemy naval vessels approaching harbors. These stations operated either as paired units or individually, employing methods such as or rangefinding to establish the position of targets for subsequent artillery engagement. The primary purpose of base end stations was to generate critical targeting data—including range, bearing, and estimates of target speed—which was relayed to plotting rooms or directly to crews, thereby facilitating accurate from coastal batteries against hostile ships. Observers at these stations would track vessels at regular intervals, typically 15 to 30 seconds, and transmit their readings via lines to central plotting facilities where the information was used to predict trajectories and compute firing solutions. Central to the horizontal base system, a common configuration, base end stations were strategically placed at opposite ends of a precisely surveyed baseline—a known distance and on the ground—allowing for geometric by intersecting lines of sight from each station to pinpoint the target's location. In contrast, British coastal defenses employed equivalent position finding cells, which similarly relied on separated shore-based points to achieve horizontal base for . These stations formed an integral component of overarching fire control networks by delivering foundational position data essential for coordinated defensive operations.

Development and Use

The development of base end stations originated in the as a key component of the Endicott Board's recommendations for modernizing U.S. harbor defenses, which emphasized concealed fortifications, rapid-fire guns, and improved fire control to counter emerging naval threats from steel-hulled warships. This initiative, authorized by in 1888, led to the construction of initial observation posts integrated into battery structures, with separate base end stations emerging shortly after the to enable precise for artillery targeting. The subsequent Taft Board in 1905-1906 expanded these efforts, incorporating advanced and additional stations to support longer-range batteries, marking a shift toward a more systematic coastal defense network across major ports. Base end stations reached their peak operational use during (1939–1945), serving as critical observation points for anti-ship defense amid fears of Axis naval incursions along U.S. coasts. Approximately 300 such stations were constructed or upgraded nationwide, often in clusters of five to six per harbor defense command, integrating with fire control systems to track vessel positions via visual instruments and telephone lines. These facilities played a vital role in the Harbor Defense Commands, manned by Coast Artillery Corps personnel who provided real-time data on range, bearing, and speed to plotting rooms, enhancing the effectiveness of fixed gun batteries against potential surface threats. Following the war's end, most base end stations were declared surplus in as part of the rapid of coastal defenses, with many sold to private owners or repurposed for use. In select locations, however, they transitioned to auxiliary roles, such as monitoring sites or submarine lookout posts, to support ongoing maritime surveillance during the early . By the 1950s, the rise of aircraft carriers and guided missiles rendered fixed obsolete, leading to the disbandment of the Coast Artillery Corps in 1950 and the systematic dismantling of remaining defenses. Today, numerous base end stations survive as historical sites, primarily within national parks, state reservations, and private properties along the Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf coasts. These structures, often preserved through efforts by organizations like the and the Coast Defense Study Group, offer insights into mid-20th-century .

Design and Equipment

Structural Types

Base end stations were classified into several structural types based on terrain requirements, concealment priorities, and construction eras, primarily fire control towers for elevated , pillbox or styles for low-profile , and camouflaged cottages for subtle integration into the landscape. Fire control towers, often constructed as multi-story wooden or structures reaching 50 to 90 feet in height, were deployed in forested or low-lying coastal areas to overcome obstructions like dunes. Pillbox and designs featured with thick walls—typically 2 feet or more—and were partially buried or positioned on reverse slopes of cliffs, incorporating vision slits and steel shutters for minimal exposure. Camouflaged cottages mimicked civilian seaside homes, using wood framing and natural coverings to blend with surroundings, particularly on wooded islands or low-elevation sites. Design considerations emphasized elevation for unobstructed line-of-sight, often placing stations 40 to 120 feet above to account for earth's and terrain features like bluffs or . construction provided bomb resistance in bunkers and towers, with multi-story layouts allowing separate levels for and support functions. These structures housed essential instruments, such as depression position finders, within protected interiors. Later variations adapted stations for dual roles, incorporating anti-aircraft platforms or antennas into tower tops and extensions during expansions. Each type offered distinct advantages: towers extended range over flat or obstructed , and pillboxes enhanced survivability through and low visibility, and camouflaged cottages prioritized stealth by evading aerial detection.

Typical Equipment

Base end stations were equipped with specialized optical and mechanical instruments designed for precise measurement of target positions in coastal defense scenarios. The primary device for determining , or horizontal bearing, was the azimuth telescope, a theodolite-like instrument mounted on a stable pedestal. It featured vertical crosshairs for aligning with the target and provided readings in mils or degrees, typically achieving accuracies of 0.01 degrees with trained operators. Models such as the M1910A1 offered 15x magnification and visibility up to 29 miles under clear conditions, enabling reliable bearing measurements from elevated positions. For range estimation in vertical configurations, the depression position finder (DPF) combined measurements of vertical and horizontal angles to compute target distance and direction from a single station. This instrument mechanically solved trigonometric relationships using the station's effective height above sea level as the vertical baseline, with the depression angle θ measured below the horizontal to the target's waterline. The basic geometric range was calculated as: range=heighttan⁡θ\text{range} = \frac{\text{height}}{\tan \theta} Precise variants accounted for curvature and using quadratic solutions to achieve errors as low as 10 yards at typical ranges. The (CRF) served as a self-contained optical tool for direct range determination without requiring a separate baseline. It operated by aligning two split images of the target through eyepieces, using the principle to measure ; the base length b and parallax angle α yielded range R via R=b/tan⁡αR = b / \tan \alpha, with effective lengths up to several meters for accuracies suitable for targeting. Spotting telescopes, often mounted on separate adjustable pedestals, facilitated observation of shell splashes and target tracking. These high-magnification devices, such as 25-power models, allowed for angular deviation measurements to 0.02 degrees, aiding in fire corrections by identifying over- or under-shots relative to the aiming point. Communication within and between stations relied on reliable, low-profile tools to transmit measurements promptly. Standard setups included field telephones connected via buried cables for voice of azimuth, range, and spotting data, supplemented by signal lamps for visual signaling in case of line failures. Operations in base end stations typically involved a three-man : an observer to align instruments and read angles, a recorder to log data, and a communicator to information via or signals. This configuration ensured efficient division of labor in the confined spaces, with personnel trained to minimize errors through repetitive practice.

Fire Control Systems

Horizontal Base Systems

Horizontal base systems utilized a paired-station triangulation approach for target location in coast artillery fire control, relying on two base end stations positioned at the extremities of a known, surveyed baseline typically several miles in length to enable precise simultaneous bearing measurements from fixed observation points. This setup allowed for the determination of a naval target's range and azimuth by leveraging the geometric intersection of lines of sight, providing essential data for directing long-range gunfire without direct rangefinding at individual stations. In operation, observers at each station tracked the target using azimuth-reading telescopes within instruments such as depression position finders, aligning vertical crosshairs on the target and recording angular bearings upon synchronized signals. These azimuth readings were then transmitted—usually by —to a central , where operators manually adjusted arms on a scaled plotting board (e.g., models M1915 or M1925) to represent the bearings from both stations, with their intersection yielding the target's polar coordinates relative to the battery. For moving targets, repeated observations at fixed intervals enabled the plotting of successive positions to estimate speed, course, and future location, feeding corrected data into gun data computers for firing solutions. Synchronization between stations was maintained through time interval (TI) bells or electrical signals that rang simultaneously every 15 to 30 seconds, ensuring bearings captured the target's position at the identical moment to avoid errors in . This temporal coordination, combined with the extended baseline, delivered high angular precision—often within a few milliradians—for ranges exceeding 20,000 yards, minimizing propagation of measurement errors and supporting effective control of heavy-caliber batteries. Despite these strengths, horizontal base systems were susceptible to limitations such as or structural obstructions masking from one station, which could invalidate the entirely, or desynchronization from signal failures, leading to divergent bearing lines and positional inaccuracies. The method also demanded clear atmospheric conditions for optical observations, becoming unreliable in , , or without integration of overlays, though it remained a of pre-World War II coast defenses until supplemented by more autonomous technologies.

Vertical and Self-Contained Systems

Vertical base systems in fire control employed a single elevated base end station equipped with a depression position finder (DPF) to independently determine target range and . The DPF, typically mounted at a known above , allowed an observer to measure the angular depression (α) from the horizontal to the target's , enabling range via the geometric relation range = / tan(α), where is the effective station corrected for and curvature. This method solved a vertical , with the station as the vertical leg, the as the , and the range as the horizontal leg, providing standalone position without requiring a second station. Self-contained systems, by contrast, integrated range and measurement into a single , most commonly a (CRF) with a baseline of 9 to 30 feet and magnification of 15 to 30 power. The CRF operated by aligning two offset images of the target through eyepieces until they coincided, directly yielding the range based on the optical baseline and , while was determined via the instrument's mounted or auxiliary sight. Stereoscopic rangefinders, such as the M1 model adopted as standard, offered an alternative by fusing binocular images to perceive depth, further simplifying operation in a compact unit housed at the base end station. These systems emphasized operational simplicity, requiring only one to four personnel—an observer, tracker, and reader—without the synchronization challenges of multi-station setups, making them ideal for remote or isolated coastal locations where communication lines were limited. Data transmission occurred via at timed intervals of 15 to 30 seconds using TI bells, directly feeding azimuth and range to the battery plotting room for target prediction and fire direction on modified plotting boards with a single arm. Accuracy in vertical systems hinged on precise depression measurement, typically achieving angular errors of about 0.013 degrees at 6,000 yards—equivalent to a 1.4-yard displacement—but was inherently less precise than horizontal baselines due to reliance on station (often 25 to 1,395 feet) and environmental factors like , limiting effective ranges to 1,500 to 55,000 yards. Self-contained CRFs traded some precision for portability, with performance varying by baseline length and visibility, though they enabled faster deployment and direct optical ranging without geometric assumptions. Both approaches integrated seamlessly with fire control centers, where plotters used polar coordinates to track moving targets and compute firing solutions, prioritizing reliability in standalone scenarios over the higher fidelity of coordinated systems.

Spotting Stations

Spotting stations in coast artillery systems fulfilled a dual role, integrating target with the critical task of monitoring shell splashes to refine accuracy using dedicated optical instruments such as telescopes. These stations extended the functions of base end operations by focusing on post-impact , where observers tracked deviations to inform subsequent adjustments. Labeling conventions distinguished these roles clearly, with "B" denoting base end capabilities and "S" indicating spotting functions, often linked to specific battery designations such as B 4/2 for base end station number 4 of battery 2 and S 4/2 for its spotting counterpart. This nomenclature ensured coordinated operations across multiple stations in a fire control network. In the correction process, spotting observers rapidly assessed splash deviations—measuring range errors as over or short in yards or percentages, and lateral errors as right or left in degrees or mils—typically within 10 seconds of impact to enable precise adjustments to range and deflection. These observations were relayed immediately to plotting rooms via headsets or, in some configurations, voice radio for real-time fire direction. Spotting stations were strategically placed, often co-located or immediately adjacent to base end stations, to maintain uninterrupted visibility and seamless data integration across the observation chain. This proximity minimized delays in transitioning from to while optimizing for clear lines of sight and protection from interference. During , spotting stations underwent adaptations to support faster correction cycles amid fluid naval threats, including integration with emerging systems that supplemented optical spotting for enhanced precision in low-visibility conditions. These modifications allowed for quicker responses to moving targets, bolstering overall defensive effectiveness against dynamic engagements.

Examples of Installations

Fire Control Towers

Fire control towers, as a subtype of elevated base end stations, provided critical height advantages for spotting and ranging targets in U.S. coastal defenses, enabling more precise horizontal and vertical fire control over harbors. A prime example is the 7-story fire control tower at Point Allerton, , constructed in 1942 as a cornerstone of Boston Harbor's defenses. Situated on the northeast elbow of the Nantasket Peninsula in Hull, this concrete structure rose from a base of 124 feet, with its uppermost observation level at 179 feet above —the highest in the harbor's network. It served as the South Group command post, coordinating artillery fire from the 16-inch guns at Fort Duvall on Hog Island (now Spinnaker Island) and featured multiple observation levels, including a 6th-floor slit designed for mounting a Depression Position Finder marked by a geodetic disk. In , the fire control towers at exemplified mid-war adaptations for bay oversight. Built between 1941 and 1945 as part of the fort's expansion, these tall, cylindrical concrete structures—typically four to five stories high—equipped crews for horizontal base operations, triangulating targets across to direct 8-inch, 12-inch, and 16-inch guns in nearby bunkers. Located within what is now east of , the towers enhanced visibility for the entrance defenses but remained untested in combat. Earlier designs evolved into wartime roles at sites like Fort Andrews, . Completed in 1904 on Peddocks Island's north , the fort's primary fire control tower (Structure #F-101) was a 2-story building with a concrete roof, measuring 20 by 20 feet and serving as the first edifice in the Endicott-era complex. Reactivated in 1940 amid escalating threats, the installation received upgrades including a new observation station (#F-104) by 1945 on the south , adapting the system for vertical basing to better integrate with evolving plotting and ranging techniques in protection. Common design elements across these towers included robust steel-frame reinforcements within concrete exteriors to endure harsh coastal exposure, along with rotating steel cupolas atop observation decks for 360-degree scanning. Many incorporated compact living quarters below the instrument levels, allowing crews of 4 to 6 personnel to maintain continuous watches with minimal relief, supported by basic bunks, plotting tables, and communication lines in confined interiors. Post-World War II, as the Coast Artillery Corps disbanded in 1950, most fire control towers faced repurposing or neglect; some, like those at Point Allerton, hosted successive radar arrays into the era before deactivation. Others at transitioned to use, while broader abandonment led to deterioration from rusting steel and spalling concrete. Preservation efforts, led by organizations such as the Coast Defense Study Group and partners, have focused on stabilizing structures at sites like Fort Michie and Fort Wool to prevent further decay and support public interpretation.

Base End Stations at Lower Elevations

Base end stations at lower elevations served as concealed posts in coastal defense networks, positioned at ground level or within natural to support horizontal fire control systems without compromising stealth. These installations were typically constructed from in a pillbox configuration, with narrow slit windows allowing operators to acquire visual bearings on targets while limiting vulnerability to . Often partially buried or integrated into the landscape, they provided ballistic protection and blended seamlessly with surrounding features, such as ridges or dunes, to evade detection by enemy . A representative example is the bunker-style base end station on the west ridge at Fort Andrews, , built in as a single-story structure for horizontal basing in the defenses. Camouflaged amid the terrain to resemble natural outcrops, it housed plotting equipment and observation instruments to track naval threats, exemplifying the emphasis on low-profile design in areas with moderate natural elevation. Similarly, the World War II base end station at Minot, , was disguised as a civilian cottage to facilitate covert spotting duties near , allowing operators to monitor shipping lanes while maintaining the appearance of innocuous seaside architecture. The advantages of these lower-elevation stations included significantly reduced construction costs compared to elevated fire control towers, as well as superior concealment that minimized against the horizon—critical in regions leveraging existing for visibility. They were particularly suited to sites where natural rises provided sufficient height for seaward observation, enabling widespread deployment along vulnerable coastlines. Today, many such stations are preserved within national parks; for instance, the base end station at in has undergone ongoing restoration as of 2024, including structural repairs and reinstallation of period furnishings to highlight its role in defenses.

Depression Position Finder and Coincidence Rangefinder Stations

Depression Position Finder (DPF) stations were specialized base end facilities designed for vertical base fire control systems, employing a single elevated instrument to measure the depression angle of a target relative to the horizon, thereby calculating range through trigonometric computation based on the station's known height above . These stations typically featured a dedicated DPF instrument, such as the M1 or later models, mounted in a concrete bunker or the lower level of a fire control tower, allowing operators to track targets by aligning crosshairs and transmitting range and data at 15- to 30-second intervals via telephone lines to a central . A representative example is the DPF installation at Fort Andrews, , part of the Harbor Defenses of , where a second depression position finder was housed in a small 1925 pillbox structure to support Battery McCook's long-range guns during operations. Coincidence Rangefinder (CRF) stations, in contrast, supported self-contained fire control by integrating optical principles to independently determine both range and from a single position, often using stereoscopic or optics to merge split images of the target for precise measurements up to 20,000 yards. These setups were commonly installed in compact bunkers with vision slits or atop low towers, equipped with a CRF instrument like the M1910 model alongside an telescope, and connected directly to nearby battery plotting rooms through dedicated wire lines for rapid data relay. An illustrative case is the CRF station at Battery Point Loma, California, within the Harbor Defenses of , where the instrument was positioned at 100 feet elevation to provide independent ranging for the battery's four 155mm mount guns, operational from 1941 until replaced in 1943. Both DPF and CRF stations shared unique features tailored for instrument precision, including vibration-dampening mounts to stabilize during tracking, narrow observation slits to minimize exposure while maintaining fields of view, and often integrated electrical systems for instrument illumination and communication, typically housed in smaller, camouflaged structures rather than full towers to facilitate quick setup and low visibility. These configurations enabled faster compared to horizontal base systems, with operators focusing on tracking for DPF or image alignment for CRF, sending corrected positions to batteries within seconds. During , such specialized DPF and CRF stations were established along the Pacific and Atlantic coasts to bolster harbor defenses, particularly in key areas like and , where they adapted to threats from surface vessels by integrating with spotting boards for continuous tracking and fire correction. Examples proliferated in networks such as the eight base-end stations operational by 1920 in (four on Point Loma alone), expanded during the war to support rapid response against potential naval incursions. In the postwar era, many of these stations were decommissioned and repurposed for civilian surveying applications, leveraging their elevated positions and stable mounts for topographic mapping, while remnants of instruments and bunkers have drawn archaeological interest, with sites like those at undergoing preservation efforts to highlight their role in coastal defense history.

References

  1. https://www.nps.gov/cabr/learn/historyculture/photographic-tour-of-the-base-end-station1.htm
  2. https://cdsg.org/coast-artillery-fire-control/
  3. https://npshistory.com/publications/guis/13th-coast-artillery.pdf
  4. https://pinkroutes.org/research/artillery/position-finding/
  5. https://www.nps.gov/gate/learn/historyculture/endicotteradefenses.htm
  6. https://cdsg.org/modern-u-s-harbor-defense-construction-1886-191-the-endicott-and-taft-boards/
  7. https://www.nps.gov/goga/learn/historyculture/harbor-defenses.htm
  8. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/worldwarii/coastaldefense.htm
  9. https://cdsg.org/short-history/
  10. https://mwi.westpoint.edu/the-army-eliminated-the-coast-artillery-corps-in-1950-its-time-to-bring-it-back/
  11. https://www.poa.usace.army.mil/Portals/34/docs/engineering/TheKodiakCoastalDefenseSystem.pdf
  12. https://www.sealevelsitka.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Lisianski-Searchlight-Stations-Booklet.pdf
  13. http://www.6thcorpscombatengineers.com/docs/Field%20Manuals%20to%201940/FM%204-10%20%28%20Coast%20Artillery%20Field%20Manual%20Seacoast%20Artillery%20Gunnery%20%29.pdf
  14. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0830809.pdf
  15. http://www.6thcorpscombatengineers.com/docs/Field%20Manuals%20to%201940/FM%204-15%20%28%20Coast%20Artillery%20Field%20Manual%20Seacoast%20Artillery%20Fire%20Control%20and%20Position%20Finding%20%29.pdf
  16. https://pointallerton.org/Tower.html
  17. https://sah-archipedia.org/buildings/DE-01-ES27
  18. https://archivesfiles.delaware.gov/ebooks/Delawares_Coastal_Defenses.pdf
  19. https://www.bostonharbornow.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/BOHA_Peddocks-CLI_06_5_2018-FOR-RFI.pdf
  20. https://cdsg.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/CDSGN1122.pdf
  21. https://cdsg.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/CDSGN223.pdf
  22. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Fort_Andrews
  23. https://npshistory.com/publications/cabr/guns-san-diego-hrs/chap6.htm
  24. https://cdsg.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/CDSG/CDSG%20WEBSITE%20UPDATES/CDSG%20Downloads/Cabrillo_NM__The_Guns_of_San_Diego_-_Historic_Resource_Study.pdf
  25. https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/cabr/hrs6.htm
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.