Hubbry Logo
Bloom EnergyBloom EnergyMain
Open search
Bloom Energy
Community hub
Bloom Energy
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bloom Energy
Bloom Energy
Bloom Energy
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Bloom Energy (formerly, Ion America) is an American public company that designs and manufactures solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) which independently produce electricity onsite for power generation in data centers, manufacturing, and other commercial sectors. Founded in 2001 and headquartered in San Jose, California; its fuel cell technology generates electricity through a chemical conversion process, which differs from most other power sources reliant on combustion, and can use natural gas, biogas or hydrogen as fuel. Its SOFCs are deployed on-site where energy is consumed, reducing reliance on central power grid. Bloom also developed electrolyzers for hydrogen production, and holds more than 1000 patents globally.[3]

Key Information

The company raised more than $1 billion in venture capital funding before going public in 2018, and has received significant government incentives that promote clean energy. By 2025, the company had installed about 1.4 gigawatts (GW) of Bloom Energy Server systems at over 1,000 locations across nine countries,[4] and developed low-emission, always-on, near zero-carbon green energy and carbon capture technologies for high-energy consumption industries.

History

[edit]

The company was founded in 2001[5] as Ion America, then was renamed Bloom Energy in 2006.[6] Bloom traces its roots to the work of KR Sridhar who created a technology to convert Martian atmospheric gases to oxygen for propulsion and life support, using a solid oxide fuel cell electrolyzer (SOEC),[7] while director of the Space Technologies Laboratory at the University of Arizona.[8] Sridhar and his team built an electrochemical cell for NASA that is capable of producing air and fuel from electricity generated by a solar panel.[9] Bloom shipped its first 5 KW (kilowatt) unit to the University of Tennessee, where two years of field trials conducted in three U.S. states validated the technology. The first 100 KW commercial units, ES-5000 Energy Servers,[7] were shipped to Google in July 2008.[10]

The company worked in secret for eight years before coming out of stealth mode in February 2010,[9] and introducing its Bloom Energy Server, or "Bloom Box", a fuel-cell technology that enables on-site carbon-neutral electricity generation.[6] Bloom Energy was featured on 60 Minutes,[11] supported by political figures[12] and named one of 26 "2010 Tech Pioneers" by the World Economic Forum.[13] The Bloom Box generator was also chosen among Time's "Best 50 Inventions of 2010".[9] The company raised $400 million in funding that year, and had 300 employees.[6] The San Francisco Chronicle later reported that Bloom had "a coming-out party packed with politicians and Silicon Valley elite".[5][14]

In 2011, the company also began selling electricity produced by Bloom Energy Servers, rather than selling the units themselves, underwriting manufacture of the fuel cells.[15][16][17] A federal subsidy for fuel cells expired in 2016,[18] and the California Self-Generation Incentive Program was discontinued the following year,[18][19] as the state focused its subsidies on batteries.[14]

Bloom was valued at $2.9 billion in 2011,[20][18] then producing about one Bloom Box per day,[21] until opening a factory in Newark, Delaware, in April 2012.[22] By 2013, it had raised $1.1 billion in funding,[23] which was followed by additional funding rounds, in 2014 and 2015.[23] Company revenues grew rapidly, though its development phase was unprofitable,[24] in some years losing more than $200 million.[5][17]

Federal subsidies that had expired in 2016 were restored in 2018.[18] Bloom Energy filed an IPO that July, stating that it did not expect to be profitable in the near future, and disclosing a legal settlement with some of its investors.[23][25][26] Later that year, Bloom moved headquarters from Sunnyvale to San Jose.[27] By 2020, shares had lost nearly 50% in value. Though not profitable in its first 19 years of operation, the company had raised over $1.7 billion in capital for its technology.[28] In July 2019, Duke Energy corporation announced the intention of acquiring a 37 MW portfolio of distributed SOFC technology projects from Bloom Energy.[29][30] later reselling the distributed fuel-cell projects managed by Bloom to ArcLight Capital Partners, in October 2023.[31]

In 2020, in preparation of a possible critical demand for ventilators during the COVID-19 pandemic; Bloom pivoted its operation to repair and refurbish ventilators for the state of California.[32] and helped provide a mobile vaccination clinic to about 80,000 individuals.[33] After generating hydrogen from its SOEC at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Mountain View, California,[34] to excellent results, generating hydrogen with 20–25% more efficiency than traditional methods;[35] in November 2022,[36] Bloom Energy's Delaware factory began manufacturing its high-volume commercial electrolyzer, the largest and most efficient in the world to date, producing 20-25% more hydrogen per MW than either proton exchange membrane (PEM) or alkaline electrolyzers.[34]

In November 2024, Bloom Energy partnered with SK Eternix to power two Eco Parks with Bloom SOFCs by Spring 2026, in Chungju, North Chungcheong Province, South Korea,[37] the largest fuel cell installation in history.[38] The same month, the company agreed to expand its existing SOFC installation with Quanta Computers by 150%, in order to power critical artificial intelligence (AI) industry hardware,[39] and was contracted by American Electric Power (AEP) to provide a GW of fuel cell capacity to industrial customers on-site,[40] supporting an increasing demand for energy to fuel the needs of data centers, especially those powering AI.[41]

In February 2025, digital infrastructure company Equinix increased its Bloom contract to exceed 100 MW of combined electricity to power its International Business Exchange (IBX) data centers throughout the U.S.[42][43] That month, the company also entered a carbon capture partnership with Chart Industries to provide low-emission, always-on, near zero-carbon power using natural gas and carbon sequestration technology for high-energy consumption industries,[42] to meet the increasing demands of AI and cryptocurrency.[44][45]

Products and services

[edit]
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Bloom Energy refurbished ventilators for the State of California to use in treatment of the virus in 2020.

Bloom Energy leverages natural gas and other fuels to create electricity through chemical reactions without combustion, and builds decentralized energy systems that produce electricity. The company designs, manufactures, markets, and installs SOFC power generators, branded as Bloom Energy Servers (also known as Bloom Boxes) that use fuel cells to convert natural gas, or biogas, into electricity for on-site power generation.[18][46] According to The New York Times, SOFCs are "considered the most efficient but most technologically challenging fuel-cell technology."[47] Instead of precious metals, Bloom Energy's fuel cells use wafers made from sand that are stained with proprietary ink.[46][47] As fuel passes over the sand wafers, it mixes with oxygen, creating a chemical reaction that produces electricity.[47][48] The chemical reaction takes place at about 800 degrees Celsius (1,500 degrees Fahrenheit).[6][48]

Bloom Energy Server systems are typically installed at customer locations, with long-term contracts to supply electricity.[49] The units can be installed as a micro power grid in a small community, or be clustered together to create an energy farm for large-scale utility.[50] Bloom Boxes are often used for on-site power generation at data centers, being a primary driver of rising electricity demand,[51] as well as health centers,[5] manufacturing facilities, and other large buildings.[27][49] Power produced by company-owned distributed power generators is offered at a rate 5-15% lower than the local power grid.[5]

The fuel cells are housed in metal cabinets,[17] with each producing about 200 to 300 kilowatts (KW) of electricity.[5] As of 2018, Bloom had installed about 300 megawatts of units.[52] Delaware state data found, in 2014, that Bloom's fuel cells produce about 823 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt hour (MWh),[53] less than the approximately 1,000 pounds produced when power is taken from the electrical grid, and higher than the 777 Bloom used to advertise, without calculating the decline in efficiency of the appliances as they age.[53] As of 2018 data, the U.S. Energy Information Administration reports coal producing 2,210 pounds of CO2 per MWh, and natural gas at 920 pounds per MWh.[54]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bloom Energy

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Bloom Energy Corporation is an American manufacturer of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) systems designed for distributed onsite power generation, converting fuels like natural gas, biogas, and hydrogen into electricity through an electrochemical process without combustion. Founded in 2001 by K. R. Sridhar, drawing from his prior NASA research on fuel cell technology, the company is headquartered in San Jose, California, and went public on the New York Stock Exchange in 2018 under the ticker BE. Bloom's Energy Servers have been deployed for clients such as Google, Apple, and AT&T, with cumulative installations approaching 300 megawatts as of earlier reports, and recent expansions include the world's largest 80-megawatt SOFC project in South Korea and multi-gigawatt commitments for AI data centers via partnerships like a $5 billion deal with Brookfield. The technology achieves up to 60% electrical efficiency on pure hydrogen and supports low-carbon operations, positioning Bloom in the hydrogen economy and data center resilience markets. Despite these advancements, Bloom has incurred cumulative losses exceeding $2 billion since inception, never recorded annual profits, and encountered controversies including a 2020 revenue restatement for an admitted accounting error affecting multiple years, alongside investor allegations of misleading projections and service cost concealment that prompted SEC scrutiny and short-seller reports.

History

Founding and Early Development

Bloom Energy was founded in 2001 as Ion America by K. R. Sridhar, an engineer with prior experience developing regenerative fuel cell systems for NASA's Mars exploration program, where his team created technology to generate oxygen from Martian carbon dioxide for potential human habitats. Sridhar, who holds a PhD in nuclear engineering, adapted this electrolysis concept into a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) design capable of producing electricity directly from fuels like natural gas and air, reversing the process to combine fuel and oxygen to generate power with water and heat as byproducts. Co-founder Jim McElroy contributed foundational expertise from his work on hydrogen fuel cells during NASA's Gemini program in the 1960s. The company operated in for nearly a decade, focusing on refining its SOFC stack technology, which featured thin ceramic membranes operating at high temperatures to enable efficient electrochemical reactions without catalysts like . Ion America secured early from firms including Caufield & Byers, raising undisclosed sums to scale prototype development and secure patents—Bloom later amassed 19 related to electrolyzers and fuel cells by the . Rebranded as Bloom Energy around , the firm prioritized modular "Energy Servers" designed for on-site, distributed power generation, targeting commercial and industrial applications where grid reliability was insufficient. Early commercialization efforts gained traction in 2009 with pilot installations for high-profile clients, including a 400-kilowatt system at , which demonstrated the technology's ability to provide continuous, low-emission power equivalent to hundreds of solar panels but operable 24/7. and followed as early adopters, validating the servers' efficiency in reducing carbon emissions compared to traditional combustion-based generation while maintaining high uptime. By February 2010, Bloom publicly debuted its Energy Server platform, marking the transition from R&D to broader market entry, with the systems achieving up to 60% on —higher than conventional turbines—through combined heat and power capabilities.

Expansion and Initial Commercialization

Bloom Energy achieved its initial commercialization milestone in July 2008 with the shipment of the first 100 kW ES-5000 Energy Servers to , marking the company's transition from secretive R&D to market deployment. These units, installed at Google's Mountain View , represented a 400 kW installation that powered portions of the facility using , demonstrating the technology's viability for on-site generation. This deployment followed a 2006 pilot field trial of a 5 kW unit at the , which served as an early validation but was not classified as full commercial scale. Following the Google installation, Bloom Energy expanded its customer base rapidly, securing contracts with major corporations that adopted the Energy Servers for reliable, distributed power. In February 2010, the company publicly announced early adopters including , , , , , Staples, and , alongside Google, with these systems collectively generating over 11 million kilowatt-hours by that date. These deployments targeted high-energy users seeking alternatives to grid dependency, such as data centers and retail operations, where the fuel cells provided continuous power with efficiencies claimed at up to 65% in combined heat and power configurations. By 2011, Bloom shifted toward service models, offering electricity sales from its servers rather than just hardware, which facilitated broader adoption by reducing upfront capital barriers for customers. Manufacturing and operational expansion accompanied these commercial gains, as Bloom ramped up production to meet demand post-2008. The company initiated sales and manufacturing scale-up in 2009, transitioning from prototype-scale output in , to larger facilities. In 2011, Bloom announced a major manufacturing center in , projected to create up to 900 jobs and support co-located suppliers, backed by state incentives for clean energy production. This facility's 2012 groundbreaking underscored the company's commitment to domestic scaling, enabling deployments like the first installation at in 2011, which integrated fuel cells for resilient, off-grid-capable power. By mid-2010s, cumulative installations exceeded 130 MW across diverse sectors, though early growth relied heavily on venture exceeding $1 billion to subsidize high initial costs and achieve .

Public Offering and Growth Phase

Bloom Energy Corporation priced its initial public offering of 18 million shares of Class A at $15 per share on July 24, 2018, generating net proceeds of approximately $270 million after discounts and commissions. Trading commenced on the under the symbol "BE" on July 25, 2018, initially valuing the company at roughly $1.6 billion on a fully diluted basis. The offering included a 30-day underwriter option for up to 2.7 million additional shares, which was partially exercised, and the funds were allocated primarily to expanding manufacturing capacity at its facility, advancing , and supporting sales and operational scaling. Post-IPO, the company pursued aggressive growth through increased customer deployments and revenue expansion, with annual revenues rising from $785.4 million in to $1.199 billion in 2022—a compound annual growth rate of about 11 percent—fueled by demand for on-site power generation in commercial, utility, and sectors. This period featured record quarterly performances, including $292.3 million in revenue for the third quarter of 2022 (up 41.1 percent year-over-year) and $462.6 million in the fourth quarter (up 35.1 percent), driven by higher product and service acceptances. Deployments expanded internationally, with strengthened operations in and , alongside entry into new markets like for initial installations planned in 2023, building on pre-IPO cumulative capacity of 312 megawatts. The growth phase emphasized manufacturing enhancements and strategic partnerships, enabling Bloom Energy to secure large-scale orders from utilities and technology firms, which supported scaling toward gigawatt-level installations. However, persistent net losses persisted due to elevated costs for capacity investments and scaling, with the company projecting long-term growth of 30-35 percent over the subsequent decade as of early 2022.

Major Challenges and Restructuring

Following its 2018 , Bloom Energy grappled with escalating financial losses and operational hurdles that threatened its viability. The company reported cumulative net losses exceeding $2.7 billion through September 2019, despite raising approximately $1.7 billion in capital and generating $668 million in sales over the prior nine months, with a $195 million net loss in that period alone. These deficits stemmed partly from high costs and the fuel cells' unsubsidized at around 13.5 cents per , exceeding the U.S. grid average of 10 cents per and far surpassing unsubsidized solar or at about 4 cents per . Additionally, the technology exhibited efficiency degradation over time, with older units emitting up to 960 pounds of CO2 per megawatt-hour compared to 679 pounds when new, undermining claims of superior environmental performance. A pivotal crisis emerged in early 2020 when Bloom disclosed an accounting error in its , necessitating a restatement of for nearly four years prior to its IPO. Announced on February 12, 2020, the restatement reduced reported revenue by up to $180 million and increased losses by $75 million, prompting a class-action alleging and a more than 20% plunge in share price that day. This followed a pattern of scrutiny, including CEO K.R. Sridhar's erroneous claim of profitability on IPO day, July 25, 2018, which was retracted the next day, and a 2012 SEC action barring bankers for misleading investors during a $150 million round with fabricated claims like $3 billion in CIA orders. In response, Bloom pursued and workforce reductions to stem cash burn amid $300 million in debt maturing by late 2020, enlisting Jefferies for refinancing efforts. The company implemented layoffs in its manufacturing facility around February 2020, coinciding with the accounting revelations, as part of broader cost-control measures. Further cuts followed in 2023, affecting approximately 95 employees across Fremont and facilities—bringing Bay Area reductions to over 100—as economic pressures intensified, reflecting ongoing efforts to align operations with revenue realities despite heavy reliance on subsidies and select customers like and . These actions, while stabilizing short-term finances, highlighted persistent challenges in transitioning from subsidized pilots to competitive, unsubsidized markets.

Technology

Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Fundamentals

A (SOFC) is an electrochemical conversion device that generates directly from oxidizing a , typically or hydrocarbons, at the while reducing oxygen at the , with the two electrodes separated by a solid oxide that conducts oxygen s. Unlike combustion-based systems, SOFCs produce power through transport and flow without intermediate mechanical steps, achieving theoretical efficiencies up to 60% in electrical output and higher in combined heat and power configurations. The basic structure comprises three primary layers: a porous for oxidation and conduction, a dense impermeable to gases but conductive to s, and a porous for oxygen reduction and collection, often stacked in series as repeating units within a cell or module. The , central to SOFC operation, is usually (), a doped with 8-10 mol% yttria to create oxygen vacancies that enable O²⁻ conduction via a vacancy mechanism, requiring no management as in lower-temperature cells. This solid-state transport demands high operating temperatures of 600-1000°C to achieve sufficient conductivity (around 0.1 S/cm), though intermediate-temperature variants (400-700°C) employ alternatives like scandia-stabilized zirconia or ceria-based materials to reduce thermal stresses and material costs. Anodes are commonly nickel-YSZ cermets, providing catalytic sites for reforming and oxidation while matching the electrolyte's ; cathodes use structures such as (LSM) for oxygen dissociation and incorporation into the lattice. These materials ensure and compatibility under conditions, though challenges include at high temperatures and sensitivity to contaminants in fuels. Electrochemical reactions drive the process: at the cathode, molecular oxygen dissociates and combines with electrons from the external circuit (½ O₂ + 2e⁻ → O²⁻), forming ions that migrate across the under an gradient. At the , these ions oxidize the , as in (H₂ + O²⁻ → H₂O + 2e⁻) or reformed hydrocarbons (e.g., CH₄ → CO + 3H₂ via internal , followed by stepwise oxidation to CO₂ and H₂O), liberating electrons to complete the circuit and produce . The high temperature facilitates direct internal reforming of diverse s without external preprocessors and enhances tolerance to impurities like CO or up to parts-per-million levels, though it imposes requirements for robust interconnects and seals to manage thermal cycling and stack integrity. Overall cell voltage under load is approximately 0.7-1.0 V, with efficiencies influenced by utilization, (typically 0.5-2 A/cm²), and ohmic losses minimized by thin-film s in advanced designs.

Operational Principles and Efficiency

Bloom Energy's solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) operate through an electrochemical process that directly converts chemical energy from fuel into electricity, bypassing combustion. Fuel, such as natural gas, biogas, or hydrogen, is introduced to the anode, while air is supplied to the cathode; at operating temperatures of approximately 800°C, oxygen ions generated at the cathode migrate through a solid ceramic electrolyte—typically yttria-stabilized zirconia—to the anode, where they oxidize the fuel, producing electrons that flow through an external circuit to generate direct current electricity, along with byproducts of water and carbon dioxide. The cells employ proprietary thin-film electrodes fabricated from inexpensive, non-precious metal inks applied to flat plates, enabling stackable modules within the Energy Server platform; this design avoids corrosive liquids or molten components found in lower-temperature fuel cells, while the elevated temperature facilitates internal reforming of fuels into and directly on the , reducing the need for external preprocessing and enhancing system simplicity. Electrical efficiency for Bloom's systems typically ranges from 50% to 65% on a lower heating value basis, surpassing combined-cycle gas turbines due to the elimination of thermal inefficiencies inherent in combustion-based generation; recent advancements in hydrogen-compatible SOFCs have achieved 60% electrical efficiency, with combined heat and power (CHP) configurations reaching 90% total efficiency by capturing high-grade waste heat for industrial processes. Average lifetime efficiency stands at 54%, with ongoing improvements reflecting a 24% compound annual growth rate since 2014, though real-world performance depends on fuel quality, load conditions, and maintenance.

Fuel Inputs and Adaptability

Bloom Energy's solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) primarily operate using as the input fuel, which is reformed internally within the stack to generate for the electrochemical reaction, producing , , and without . The system includes integrated fuel processing capabilities that handle pipeline-quality , enabling efficient on-site power generation with electrical efficiencies up to 65%. The demonstrates significant fuel adaptability, supporting , pure , and blended hydrogen-natural gas mixtures, which allows deployment in diverse applications from renewable integration to decarbonization pathways. This flexibility arises from the SOFC's high operating temperatures, typically around °C, which facilitate endothermic reforming reactions for various hydrocarbons directly on the , reducing the need for external preprocessing equipment. For operation, recent advancements have achieved 60% , with potential for 90% total efficiency in combined heat and power configurations using high-temperature exhaust. Adaptability extends to operational resilience, as the fuel cells can transition between fuel types with minimal modifications, supporting applications and load-following capabilities to match variable demand while maintaining low emissions compared to traditional combustion-based systems. utilization, for instance, enables carbon-neutral operation when sourced from waste streams, though it requires purification to remove contaminants like siloxanes that could degrade stack performance. This multi-fuel capability positions Bloom's Energy Servers as a bridge technology for transitions, though reliance on in current deployments has drawn scrutiny for ongoing absent carbon capture integration.

Products and Services

Core Energy Server Platforms

The constitutes the company's foundational platform for distributed power generation, employing modular (SOFC) stacks to electrochemically convert fuels into without . Each server unit integrates multiple stacks, balance-of-plant components, and power conditioning electronics, enabling scalable deployments from individual 200-350 kW modules to aggregated systems exceeding 20 MW. The architecture relies on repeating electrochemical elements—thin cells coated with proprietary catalysts—that operate at temperatures above 800°C, facilitating direct oxidation of fuels at the while oxygen reduction occurs at the , yielding DC subsequently inverted to AC for grid compatibility. Current models, such as the Energy Server 6.5, deliver a nominal 325 kW of continuous electrical output at 50/60 Hz and 380-480 V three-phase, with dimensions of approximately 29'5" x 4'4" x 8'2" including the skid base, and operational ambient temperatures up to 104°F. These units support fuel inputs including pipeline natural gas, biogas (with >95% methane content), and up to 100% hydrogen, achieving electrical efficiencies of 50-65% depending on fuel and load, with potential combined heat and power (CHP) efficiencies surpassing 90% via exhaust heat recovery at 350-400°C for applications like steam or hot water generation. The platform's non-combustion process minimizes NOx emissions to near-zero levels and produces a concentrated CO2 stream amenable to capture, contrasting with traditional gas turbines that rely on high-temperature combustion and yield broader pollutant profiles. Deployment flexibility defines the platform's core utility, with units configurable for primary baseload power, integration, or resilient backup in sectors like data centers and , where rapid startup (under 10 minutes from cold) and 99.999% uptime have been reported in operational fleets totaling over 1 GW since initial commercialization in 2008. Modular stacking allows customization for site-specific needs, such as 100% operation demonstrated at 60% efficiency in 2024 testing, supporting decarbonization pathways without infrastructure overhauls. involves periodic stack replacement every 5-10 years, with the system's validated through exceeding 50,000 hours per stack under continuous duty.

Deployment Models and Applications

Bloom Energy's Energy Servers are primarily deployed as modular, on-site generation systems, enabling scalable configurations that operate in grid-parallel or islanded modes to provide continuous without reliance on external grid . These units, typically ranging from hundreds of kilowatts to multi-megawatt installations, support rapid deployment timelines, such as delivering full capacity within 90 days, by stacking standardized modules side-by-side for customized power output. Deployment often occurs behind-the-meter at customer facilities or front-of-meter for utility integration, with fuel-flexible operation on , , or to adapt to site-specific energy needs and regulatory environments. Contracting models include direct sales, power purchase agreements, and strategic partnerships, as exemplified by a $5 billion collaboration with Brookfield announced in October 2025 to deploy fuel cells across AI data centers. Key applications center on high-reliability sectors requiring uninterrupted power, such as data centers, where over 300 MW have been installed to meet surging AI computational demands by providing resilient, low-latency onsite generation. In commercial and industrial settings, the systems serve primary power for , retail, and healthcare facilities, with more than 1.4 GW deployed globally across eight countries as of 2024. configurations enhance resilience in remote or grid-vulnerable areas, while integrated heat capture variants produce steam or cooling alongside electricity, improving overall site efficiency in applications like or district energy. Emerging uses include load-following for utilities to balance intermittent renewables and support carbon capture processes, leveraging the technology's high efficiency and ability to co-generate heat for industrial decarbonization.
Application CategoryKey FeaturesExample Deployments
Data CentersScalable onsite power, rapid ramp-up, grid independencePartnerships with (2025) and (2024) for AI/
Commercial/IndustrialFuel-flexible primary power, heat recovery optionsRetailers, sites with >1.4 GW total capacity
Utilities/MicrogridsLoad following, resilient backup, front-of-meter scalability>40 MW portfolio in Northeast U.S. communities (2021)
Emerging (e.g., /Capture)Adaptable to low-carbon fuels, co-generationHydrogen-ready systems for decarbonization across healthcare and

Integration with Emerging Technologies

Bloom Energy's solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology has been adapted for integration with (AI) infrastructure, particularly to address the surging power demands of data centers. In October 2025, Bloom announced a $5 billion partnership with Brookfield Asset Management to deploy fuel cells for powering global AI data centers, enabling rapid onsite generation to bypass grid constraints and support AI training and inference workloads. Similarly, in July 2025, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure selected Bloom's fuel cells for select U.S. data centers, integrating them into a diversified energy portfolio to provide reliable, low-emission power deployable in as little as 90 days and scalable from 20 MW to 500 MW per site. These integrations leverage the fuel cells' 3-9s to 5-9s reliability and electrochemical efficiency, reducing dependency on intermittent renewables or delayed grid upgrades amid projected electricity demand growth from AI operations. The company's SOFC platforms also facilitate hydrogen utilization as an emerging input, enhancing adaptability to decarbonization trends. Bloom's fuel cells can operate on 100% , achieving up to 60% electrical efficiency in August 2024 demonstrations, surpassing traditional combustion-based systems and supporting the without requiring full overhauls. This capability stems from the SOFC's high-temperature operation, which enables direct internal reforming of hydrogen-rich fuels, positioning Bloom for applications in production and storage integration, such as the 2021 collaboration with Heliogen to pair with for low-cost generation. Furthermore, Bloom's systems integrate with sources and hybrid setups to form resilient s, combining fuel cells with solar photovoltaics and battery storage for baseload support and peak shaving. Deployments like the Taylor Farms in incorporate 6 MW of Bloom fuel cells alongside 2 MW solar and 2 MW/4 MWh batteries, enabling off-grid operation and for industrial sites. At institutions such as Caltech, fuel cells complement 1.3 MW of onsite solar, optimizing dispatchable power with variable renewables to achieve higher overall system efficiency and grid resilience. These configurations address challenges in emerging renewable-dominated grids, with Bloom's non-combustion process minimizing emissions during hybrid operation.

Business and Operations

Market Position and Key Customers

Bloom Energy maintains a leading position in the stationary (SOFC) market, holding approximately 44% of global among top providers as of 2023, ahead of competitors such as Doosan-HyAxiom, , and . The company's focus on scalable, onsite power generation positions it advantageously amid rising demand for reliable, non-intermittent energy solutions, particularly for centers supporting AI workloads, which have driven a surge in deployments since 2024. Competitors like and primarily emphasize (PEM) or molten carbonate technologies, which often yield lower efficiencies or require hydrogen infrastructure that Bloom's fuel-flexible SOFCs can bypass by operating on or . Bloom's SEC filings affirm its status as the world leader in stationary fuel cell power generation by , bolstered by over 1 gigawatt of cumulative installations across the U.S., , , and other regions. Key customers span utilities, data centers, , and institutional sectors, reflecting Bloom's appeal for applications requiring high uptime and fuel adaptability. Notable deployments include (AEP), a major U.S. utility, for grid-supporting installations, and , a leading data center operator, which adopted Bloom servers for resilient power in hyperscale facilities. In , Honda utilizes Bloom systems for automotive production sites emphasizing energy reliability, while Owens Corning employs them in fiberglass operations; semiconductor firm Unimicron, Bloom's inaugural Taiwanese customer, installed a 600 kW hydrogen-capable system in 2024 with plans for expansion. Additional clients include Partners HealthCare for hospital backup, the arena for event-critical power, and JSA Micro for precision . The segment has emerged as a growth driver, exemplified by a 2025 partnership with Brookfield committing up to $5 billion for AI infrastructure powered by Bloom's s, targeting rapid deployment to address power shortages in high-demand regions. Taiwanese firms now represent about 30% of Bloom's orders, underscoring geographic diversification beyond . These relationships underscore Bloom's in environments where grid constraints or risks—such as those posed by variable renewables—necessitate distributed, , though customer economics remain tied to fuel costs and incentives.

Financial Performance and Metrics

Bloom Energy has demonstrated consistent growth since its in 2018, driven primarily by sales of its Energy Server systems and related services. Annual reached $1,473.9 million in 2024, marking a 10.5% increase from $1,333.5 million in 2023. Trailing twelve-month as of October 2025 stood at $1.63 billion, reflecting a 22.72% year-over-year rise, with second-quarter 2025 hitting $401.2 million, up 19.5% from $335.8 million in the prior year's corresponding quarter. The company projects full-year 2025 between $1.65 billion and $1.85 billion, supported by expanding deployments in data centers and industrial applications. Despite revenue expansion, Bloom Energy remains unprofitable on a GAAP basis, with net losses persisting due to high operating expenses, research and development costs, and scaling investments. In the first half of 2025, the company reported a net loss of $66 million. For the second quarter of 2025, GAAP net income was negative $42.6 million, compared to a $23.8 million loss in the prior quarter, while gross profit reached $107.1 million on revenue of $401.2 million, yielding a gross margin of approximately 26.7%. Non-GAAP earnings per share for the quarter was $0.10, surpassing analyst expectations of $0.01, indicating some progress in adjusted profitability metrics amid cost controls. Historical net profit margins have hovered near 0%, with the company achieving sporadic quarterly breakeven but no sustained annual profitability. Key financial ratios highlight valuation pressures and growth potential. As of late 2025, Bloom Energy's price-to-sales ratio stood at 14.56x, significantly above a peer estimate of 6.76x, reflecting market optimism tied to demand for AI infrastructure despite ongoing losses. growth accelerated to 75.48% in the second quarter of 2025, supporting operational scaling, though dependency on external financing and potential subsidies underscores economic viability risks.
Metric2024 Full YearQ2 2025
Revenue$1,473.9M$401.2M (YoY +19.5%)
Gross Margin~30.3%
GAAP Net IncomeNegative (specific figure not detailed in aggregates)
Non-GAAP EPSN/A$0.10
Stock performance in 2025 has been volatile yet strongly upward, with shares rising over 300% year-to-date as of early October, fueled by partnerships in power solutions and broader AI energy hype. The stock reached an all-time high of $116.58 on , 2025, before a minor pullback, with analysts' average price target at $65.70 amid mixed ratings. This surge contrasts with fundamental challenges, as the elevated valuation anticipates rapid adoption of Bloom's technology without guaranteed profitability.

Manufacturing and Supply Chain

Bloom Energy conducts manufacturing of its solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stacks primarily at facilities in Fremont, California, and Newark, Delaware. The Fremont plant, opened in July 2022 after outgrowing a prior Sunnyvale site with 200 MW capacity, spans 164,300 square feet and enables multi-gigawatt-scale production of fuel cell components, supported by up to $75 million in federal tax credits for expansion. The Newark facility, established in 2013, serves as an additional manufacturing center focused on core SOFC assembly. In response to surging demand from AI data centers, Bloom announced in August 2025 plans to double annual manufacturing capacity from 1 GW to 2 GW by the end of 2026, backed by a $100 million investment in production scaling and process improvements. SOFC fabrication involves high-temperature sintering of ceramic electrolytes and electrodes, which poses challenges including elevated costs, material degradation risks, and scalability limitations inherent to planar stack designs. Bloom's supply chain draws from diverse sectors, including automotive suppliers, with enhancements such as the addition of Vital & FHR in June 2023 to bolster component reliability. Taiwanese firms supply approximately 30 percent of components, while provides end-to-end across 27 global facilities. Dependencies on specialized materials like and rare earths expose the chain to geopolitical risks, including U.S.- trade tensions and regional concentrations. To address ethical and compliance issues, Bloom implements responsible sourcing policies, including conflict minerals reporting and risk assessments, though supply chain operations carry inherent vulnerabilities such as potential child labor incidents in extended tiers. These measures aim to mitigate disruptions, but durability concerns and pressures in SOFC production remain ongoing hurdles to economic viability.

Controversies and Criticisms

Short-Seller Allegations and Investigations

In September 2019, , a firm disclosing a short position in Bloom Energy, published a report alleging the company engaged in deceptive accounting practices to conceal unsustainable debt levels exceeding $2 billion, overstated its clean energy benefits by claiming emissions reductions that were marginal compared to plants (e.g., approximately 839 pounds of CO2 per MWh for Bloom's systems versus 896 pounds for modern gas plants), and had a history of executive misstatements requiring retractions. The report also highlighted a prior $16.7 million settlement in 2015 over allegations that Bloom misled brokers regarding product performance and financial projections. Bloom Energy responded the following day, dismissing the claims as "factual inaccuracies" and "misleading allegations" while defending its financial reporting and environmental metrics as compliant with standards. Hindenburg rebutted, arguing Bloom's response failed to address core issues like liabilities and product reliability data. The report triggered an immediate stock decline of over 20% on September 17, 2019, pushing shares toward record lows. The Hindenburg allegations prompted shareholder scrutiny, including a 2020 books-and-records demand under law by Dennis Jacob, who cited the report's claims of hidden , irregularities, and exaggerated clean energy assertions as providing a credible basis for investigating potential mismanagement. In February 2021, the partially granted the demand, permitting inspection of documents related to Bloom's practices and environmental claims but denying broader access, noting that short-seller reports warrant consideration when supported by specific, non-conclusory suspicions of wrongdoing. This ruling underscored the report's role in elevating concerns without endorsing its full validity. Subsequent investigations included securities class actions alleging misleading disclosures in Bloom's IPO registration statement, particularly around revenue recognition and operational trends, with references to Hindenburg's focus on unrecorded liabilities. In February 2020, Bloom announced restatements of prior financials, reducing reported revenue by up to $180 million over four years due to errors in lease accounting and product sales recognition, aligning with some short-seller critiques of opaque financials though not directly attributing causation to the report. A related Forbes analysis detailed Bloom's cumulative losses exceeding $1.7 billion in invested capital amid repeated profitability shortfalls and prior 2012 banker misconduct in misleading investors on projections. No formal SEC enforcement actions directly stemming from these allegations were publicly confirmed as of 2025, though class action settlements addressed investor claims without admitting liability. These events highlighted ongoing debates over Bloom's transparency, with short-seller incentives for negativity balanced against validated concerns in judicial and financial reviews.

Technical Reliability and Durability Concerns

Early deployments of Bloom Energy's (SOFC) systems encountered significant reliability challenges, with initial servers from the mid-2010s lasting less than two years on average before requiring replacement due to degradation and failure. By 2020, the company reported median lifespans improving to 4.9 years for units installed in 2014 and 2015, representing a near-tripling of over first-generation through and refinements. However, independent analyses have questioned whether these gains suffice for commercial viability, citing ongoing issues with high operating temperatures accelerating degradation, such as and microstructural changes in ceramic electrolytes and electrodes. Durability concerns persist in Bloom's SOFC stacks, which operate at 700–1000°C and exhibit degradation rates that limit practical lifespans to under five years in many cases, falling short of the 10-year targets needed for cost-competitive power generation. Experts interviewed in investigative reports have expressed skepticism about achieving even five-year reliability without continuous operation, noting that intermittent use exacerbates cracking and poisoning from fuel impurities like sulfur, leading to voltage decay and stack failures. A 2024 assessment highlighted temperature sensitivity as a core limitation, with stacks prone to thermal cycling stress that hastens electrolyte thinning and interconnect oxidation, resulting in efficiency drops of 2–3% annually under real-world conditions. Failure rates in early commercial installations contributed to elevated maintenance costs, as frequent stack replacements—estimated at 20–30% of system expenses—offset initial efficiency advantages of 50–60% over turbines. While Bloom has iterated on scandium-stabilized zirconia electrolytes to mitigate evaporation and coarsening, third-party modeling of SOFC s indicates inherent trade-offs between power density and longevity, with Bloom's designs prioritizing output at the expense of extended durability. These technical hurdles have drawn from analysts, who argue that unproven long-term performance in diverse applications, such as centers with variable loads, risks operational exceeding 5% annually.

Subsidy Dependence and Economic Viability

Bloom Energy's deployment of systems has historically depended on substantial government subsidies to achieve commercial traction. As of 2019, the company and its customers had collectively received over $1.1 billion in federal, state, and local incentives, with early examples including $218.5 million in 2010 under California's Self-Generation Incentive Program, which Bloom dominated that year. These incentives, often structured as rebates or tax credits passed to end-users, have offset high upfront , enabling installations that might otherwise prove uneconomical. Without subsidies, Bloom's fuel cells generate at an estimated cost of 13-14 cents per , comprising roughly 9 cents from capital amortization and 5 cents from fuel, exceeding the U.S. national grid average of about 10 cents per kWh. Maintenance expenses alone have been cited at 13.3 cents per kWh in analyses of early systems, further eroding viability absent external support. Tax credits under programs like the Investment Tax Credit have reduced customer acquisition costs by 20-30%, making systems more competitive for high-reliability applications such as data centers. Recent federal awards underscore ongoing reliance, including up to $75 million in s awarded in April 2024 for expanding manufacturing at the facility to produce solid oxide electrolyzers and fuel cells. Starting in 2026, fuel cells qualify for the Section 48E clean electricity investment under the , potentially bolstering pricing power but highlighting sustained policy dependence. Financial performance reflects these challenges, with the company posting a net loss of $23.8 million in the first quarter of and an operating loss in the second quarter despite gross margins improving to 26.7%. While analysts forecast breakeven proximity and a potential $20 million profit in , cumulative losses since —exacerbated by high operating expenses—indicate that subsidies remain integral to scaling and customer economics, as unsubsidized levelized costs exceed alternatives like combined-cycle gas turbines. Short-seller reports and industry experts have contended that such support has been existential, with one former employee stating Bloom "probably wouldn't exist today" without it.

Environmental Claims and Impacts

Efficiency Gains and Emission Reductions

Bloom Energy's solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) achieve net electrical efficiencies of approximately 47.8% when generating power from , based on lower heating value inputs, outperforming the 30-40% efficiencies typical of conventional combustion turbines. This gain stems from the electrochemical process inherent to SOFCs, which directly converts to with minimal losses, reducing consumption by 15-20% relative to gas turbines for equivalent output. On , recent prototypes have demonstrated 60% electrical efficiency, escalating to 90% in high-temperature combined heat and power (CHP) modes where is captured for secondary uses. These efficiencies contribute to emission reductions primarily through lower fuel use per kilowatt-hour generated, displacing higher-emission grid sources such as coal or less efficient peaker plants. Cumulative deployments through 2019 avoided 2.33 million metric tons of CO2 emissions globally by substituting for marginal grid generation. In waste-to-energy applications, 2023 installations reduced 196 metric tons of CO2-equivalent emissions. SOFCs also emit negligible nitrogen oxides (NOx <10 parts per billion across operating ranges), virtually eliminating NOx, SOx, and particulate matter compared to combustion-based systems.
Fuel TypeElectrical EfficiencyKey Emission Benefit
Natural Gas~47.8% (net AC/LHV)Reduced CO2 via displacement; <10 ppb NOx
Hydrogen60%Near-zero operational CO2/NOx in CHP up to 90%
However, on fossil fuels like , operational CO2 emissions persist proportional to efficiency gains—lower per kWh than less efficient alternatives but not zero—necessitating or carbon capture for deeper decarbonization. Company analyses indicate a 1 MW SOFC displaces over twice the carbon of a 1 MW solar photovoltaic system when accounting for grid marginal emissions.

Fuel Source Dependencies and Lifecycle Analysis

Bloom Energy's solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) primarily operate on as the default fuel source, converting it electrochemically into without combustion, which enables high efficiency but ties the technology to the natural gas supply chain's availability, pricing volatility, and reliability. The cells can also utilize from or , either in pure form or blended with natural gas, providing fuel flexibility to mitigate some dependencies; however, biogas production remains limited by organic waste availability and processing facilities, while hydrogen deployment hinges on expanding production , much of which currently relies on steam reforming from natural gas, perpetuating upstream linkages. In practice, as of 2024, most installations run on natural gas due to its widespread pipeline access and lower costs compared to , exposing operations to geopolitical risks in gas supply and leakage concerns in extraction and . Lifecycle analyses of Bloom's SOFCs reveal operational advantages in emissions reduction—achieving 679–833 pounds of CO2 per megawatt-hour when fueled by , lower than many grid baselines—but underscore dependencies on fuel production emissions and impacts that offset some gains in full cradle-to-grave assessments. Upstream fuel processing for involves extraction, (if applicable), and distribution, contributing estimated at 1–2% leakage rates industry-wide, which amplify over direct alternatives; hydrogen variants, while zero-emission at the stack, inherit 70–90% of lifecycle CO2 from gray unless sourced renewably. SOFC stacks demands energy-intensive processes for high-temperature ceramics and rare earth materials like and zirconia, with one study estimating environmental burdens from material sourcing and comparable to 10–20% of operational lifecycle emissions over 10-year deployments. Independent field data from 2024 operations confirm low and particulate outputs during use (near-zero without ), but total lifecycle reductions of up to 36% versus gas turbines hold only if upstream efficiencies improve; decommissioning remains underdeveloped, potentially adding end-of-life waste challenges.
Lifecycle StageKey Dependencies and ImpactsEstimated CO2 Contribution (Natural Gas Fuel)
Fuel Production & SupplyMethane extraction leaks, reforming for H2 blends40–60% of total lifecycle (varies by source purity)
ManufacturingHigh-energy sintering, rare materials mining10–20% over stack lifetime
OperationElectrochemical conversion efficiency (50–60%)30–40%, reduced vs. combustion baselines
DecommissioningMaterial recovery rates low<5%, but unquantified in most studies

Debates on True Sustainability

Critics argue that Bloom Energy's fuel cells, primarily fueled by , fail to achieve true due to ongoing emissions from internal reforming processes, estimating operational CO2 output at approximately 1,030 pounds per megawatt-hour in certain deployments, which exceeds the average U.S. grid emissions of around 850 pounds per MWh in fossil-heavy regions. , in a 2019 report, contended that this renders Bloom's "clean energy" claims misleading, particularly in states like where grid decarbonization via renewables has lowered baseline emissions below fuel cell levels. Bloom counters that its systems emit 50-65% less CO2 than equivalent combustion-based generation and consistently undercut local grid averages across operational states, supported by third-party validations from environmental groups like the . Independent analyses, such as a 2025 techno-economic study, affirm up to 36% lifecycle carbon reductions compared to gas turbines or , but emphasize variability based on fuel sourcing and grid context. A core debate revolves around natural gas dependency, with most Bloom installations relying on pipeline-supplied rather than zero-emission alternatives like , perpetuating infrastructure and methane leakage risks despite partnerships for "certified responsibly sourced gas" that reduce upstream emissions by 30% via lower flaring and venting. Environmental advocates, including local analyses in , highlight that such fuels still produce combustion-equivalent CO2 at the stack, questioning whether efficiency gains (around 60% ) justify entrenching gas use over direct or renewables. Bloom positions its technology as fuel-flexible, capable of or blends to approach net-zero, but as of 2025, natural gas constitutes over 90% of deployments, drawing criticism for delaying full decarbonization. Lifecycle assessments further complicate sustainability claims, incorporating manufacturing impacts from rare materials like and ceramics, which entail high upfront embodied carbon (estimated at 20-30% of a system's total over 10-year life) and potential vulnerabilities, alongside end-of-life challenges for solid oxide stacks. While Bloom's 2024 Impact Report touts scope 1-3 emissions reductions via displacement of coal or gas peakers, skeptics like investigators note that without widespread —currently costing 3-5 times more than —the technology's environmental edge erodes against falling solar-plus-storage costs, which achieved levelized costs below $30/MWh in sunny regions by 2025. True , per first-principles evaluation, demands verifiable zero-net emissions pathways; Bloom's bridge role is acknowledged in high-reliability applications like data centers, yet long-term viability hinges on maturation, absent which it risks subsidizing transitional rather than transformative decarbonization.

Recent Developments and Outlook

AI-Driven Demand Surge

The explosive growth in workloads has driven unprecedented demands for s, with global consumption projected to more than double to approximately 945 terawatt-hours by 2030 according to the . In the U.S., AI-related power needs could rise to 8-12% of total by 2030, escalating from 3-4% today, exacerbating grid constraints and permitting delays that hinder new facility builds. Bloom Energy's solid oxide fuel cells address this by enabling rapid onsite deployment of scalable, high-efficiency power—up to 60% —using fuel-flexible inputs like , , or , thereby bypassing transmission bottlenecks and providing resilient, low-emission generation. A pivotal catalyst occurred on October 13, 2025, when Bloom Energy secured a $5 billion with Brookfield to integrate fuel cells into Brookfield's global AI data center portfolio. This agreement designates Bloom as the preferred onsite power provider, initiating a joint platform for "AI power factories" that prioritize to meet hyperscale operators' urgent needs for gigawatt-scale capacity without grid dependency. The announcement propelled Bloom's stock price up over 20%, reflecting investor confidence in fuel cells' role amid AI's power crunch. Bloom has already supplied more than 400 megawatts of capacity to data centers worldwide, with expansions including a with for up to 1 gigawatt dedicated to AI and off-grid applications. These deployments capitalize on fuel cells' non-combustive , which minimizes emissions and captures for cooling—critical for dense AI —while offering deployment timelines of months versus years for grid upgrades. However, sustained demand hinges on Bloom's ability to scale amid raw material volatilities and from alternatives like batteries or small modular reactors.

Strategic Partnerships and Expansions

In October 2025, Bloom Energy announced a strategic partnership with Brookfield Asset Management, under which Brookfield committed up to $5 billion to deploy Bloom's systems for powering AI data centers globally, marking one of the company's largest deals to date. This agreement targets off-grid, resilient power solutions amid surging AI infrastructure demands, with initial deployments planned across multiple sites. Earlier in July 2025, Bloom Energy partnered with to supply onsite power for Oracle's AI data centers, enabling deployment within 90 days to meet rapid scaling needs for . Complementing this, in February 2025, Bloom expanded its agreement with , increasing total capacity to over 100 MW for Equinix's International Business Exchange data centers in the United States, enhancing reliability for hyperscale operations. Bloom also advanced carbon-focused collaborations, including a February 2025 partnership with Chart Industries to integrate fuel cells with carbon capture technology, aiming for near-zero emissions using and sequestration for industrial applications. Internationally, in November 2024, Bloom secured a supply agreement with for up to 1 GW of fuel cells to support AI centers, the largest such commercial in company history. Building on this, in January 2026, an unregulated subsidiary of American Electric Power signed a $2.65 billion unconditional purchase agreement with Bloom Energy for solid oxide fuel cells to develop a fuel cell generation facility near Cheyenne, Wyoming. The agreement includes a 20-year offtake arrangement with a high investment grade third-party customer for 100% of the facility's output, subject to conditions expected to be satisfied by Q2 2026. To support these partnerships, Bloom Energy initiated manufacturing expansions in 2025, allocating $100 million to double annual production capacity from 1 GW to 2 GW by the end of 2026 at its facility, driven by AI and demand. This scaling addresses supply constraints, with additional focus on modular deployments for global markets, including an 80 MW installation in completed in late 2024—the largest project worldwide at the time.

Projections and Risks

Bloom Energy has guided for 2025 revenue between $1.65 billion and $1.85 billion, representing growth of approximately 20-40% from 2024 levels, primarily driven by demand from s supporting AI workloads. The company anticipates non-GAAP operating profit of $135 million to $165 million for the year, reflecting improved margins from scaled production and product mix shifts toward higher-efficiency systems. capacity expansion to 2 gigawatts by the end of 2026 is expected to support this trajectory, enabling fulfillment of backlog orders amid projections that AI-related power needs could consume 8-12% of U.S. by 2030. Analyst consensus forecasts further acceleration, with cash flows projected at $189 million in 2026 and scaling to $784 million by 2029, contingent on sustained adoption of solid oxide fuel cells for onsite generation. However, these projections face execution risks, including delays in capacity ramp-up and vulnerabilities for specialized materials like ceramics and metals used in stacks. Bloom's SEC filings highlight dependencies on supply stability and potential volatility in fuel prices, which could erode margins if hedging strategies prove insufficient. Competition from alternative onsite technologies, such as batteries paired with renewables or reciprocating engines, poses market share threats, particularly if operators prioritize lower upfront costs over long-term efficiency. Financial risks include ongoing operating losses if revenue growth underperforms, with the company reporting a $3.5 million operating loss in Q2 2025 despite revenue gains. Analyst price targets average $65-80 per share, implying potential downside from recent highs above $100, reflecting concerns over valuation sustainability amid a consensus "Hold" rating from 20 analysts. Regulatory risks encompass changes in incentives for clean energy or emissions standards, which could impact viability given fuel cells' reliance on reforming. Broader market adoption hinges on demonstrating stack durability beyond short-term pilots, with historical concerns about degradation rates potentially resurfacing under high-utilization AI loads.

References

  1. https://www.bloomenergy.com/
  2. https://www.bloomenergy.com/how-fuel-cells-work/
  3. https://www.bloomenergy.com/company/
  4. https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2025/10/14/bloom-energy-founder-worth-500-million-after-brookfield-datacenter-deal/
  5. https://fchea.org/fchea_members/bloom-energy/
  6. https://investor.bloomenergy.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2024/Bloom-Energy-Announces-Worlds-Largest-Fuel-Cell-Installation-in-History/default.aspx
  7. https://investor.bloomenergy.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/Brookfield-and-Bloom-Energy-Announce-5-Billion-Strategic-AI-Infrastructure-Partnership/default.aspx
  8. https://interestingengineering.com/energy/bloom-energy-fuel-cell-delivers-60-percent-efficiency
  9. https://www.bloomenergy.com/hydrogen-fuel-cells/
  10. https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/business/fuel-cell-maker-bloom-energy-misreported-nearly-four-years-of-revenue
  11. https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2020/02/13/the-forbes-investigation-how-bloom-energy-blew-through-billions-promising-cheap-green-tech-that-falls-short/
  12. https://www.axios.com/2019/10/30/bloom-energy-questionable-numbers
  13. https://investor.bloomenergy.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2010/Bloom-Energy-Debuts-Advanced-Fuel-Cell-to-Provide-Clean-Reliable-and-Affordable-Power-24-7/default.aspx
  14. https://www.bloomenergy.com/team/board-kr-sridhar/
  15. https://www.crunchbase.com/person/k-r-sridhar
  16. https://canvasbusinessmodel.com/blogs/brief-history/bloom-energy-brief-history
  17. https://markets.financialcontent.com/wral/article/marketminute-2025-7-10-the-history-of-bloom-energy-nysebe-from-green-startup-to-powerhouse
  18. https://www.bloomenergy.com/news/bloom-energy-debuts-advanced-fuel-cell-to-provide-clean-reliable-and-affordable-power-24-7/
  19. https://www.datamation.com/applications/bloom-energy-unveils-its-green-power-secret/
  20. https://investor.bloomenergy.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2010/Bloom-Energy-Announces-Industry-Leading-Customers/default.aspx
  21. https://www.cnbc.com/2013/10/04/fuel-cell-businesses-resurgent-a-decade-after-early-hype.html
  22. https://matrixbcg.com/blogs/brief-history/bloomenergy
  23. https://www.controlledair.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Bloom-Energy-package2.pdf
  24. https://whyy.org/articles/bloom-energy-to-bring-hundreds-of-jobs-to-delaware/
  25. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/facing-questions-fuel-cell-maker-bloom-energy-sets-sights-on-big-power-use/302423/
  26. https://www.bloomenergy.com/news/bloom-energy-corporation-announces-pricing-of-initial-public-offering/
  27. https://www.investors.com/news/bloom-energy-ipo-price-first-day-trade/
  28. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1664703/000119312518190488/d96446ds1.htm
  29. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/BE/bloom-energy/revenue
  30. https://www.bloomenergy.com/news/bloom-energy-announces-third-quarter-2022-financial-results/
  31. https://www.bloomenergy.com/news/bloom-energy-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2022-financial-results/
  32. https://www.bloomenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2022-bloom-energy-sustainability-report.pdf
  33. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4732298-bloom-energy-stock-overpriced-even-if-it-can-grow-quickly-beyond-breakeven-levels
  34. https://investor.bloomenergy.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2022/Bloom-Energy-Announces-Fourth-Quarter-2021-and-Full-Year-2021-Financial-Results-and-Updates-Long-term-Growth-Prospects/default.aspx
  35. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/bloom-energy-has-provided-incorrect-financial-results-since-ipo-stock-sinks-more-than-20-2020-02-12
  36. https://www.delawareonline.com/story/money/business/2020/02/13/blooms-latest-blemishes-delaware-job-cuts-and-multimillion-dollar-accounting-error/4741488002/
  37. https://www.siliconvalley.com/2023/11/02/bloom-energy-san-jose-fremont-layoff-job-cut-green-tech-economy/
  38. https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2023/10/25/bloom-lays-off-97-workers-in-fremont-sunnyvale.html
  39. https://www.energy.gov/fecm/articles/appendix-sofc-primer
  40. https://netl.doe.gov/carbon-management/sofc/operating-principle
  41. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11581-024-05824-7
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002007120304925
  43. https://www.bloomenergy.com/blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about-solid-oxide-fuel-cells/
  44. https://thundersaidenergy.com/downloads/bloom-energy-solid-oxide-fuel-cell-technology/
  45. https://www.bloomenergy.com/resource/the-bloom-energy-server-brochure/
  46. https://investor.bloomenergy.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2024/Bloom-Energy-Announces-Hydrogen-Solid-Oxide-Fuel-Cell-with-60-Electrical-Efficiency-and-90-High-Temperature-Combined-Heat-and-Power-Efficiency/default.aspx
  47. https://www.utilitydive.com/spons/7-ways-fuel-cells-future-proof-utility-energy-strategies/751224/
  48. https://www.bloomenergy.com/blog/blooms-fuel-cells-provide-highly-efficient-power-generation-for-the-marine-ecosystem-and-now-have-abs-type-approval/
  49. https://www.bloomenergy.com/technology/
  50. https://www.bloomenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/bloom-energy-server-brochure-2024.pdf
  51. https://www.bloomenergy.com/resource/load-following-solid-oxide-fuel-cell/
  52. https://www.synapse-energy.com/sites/default/files/Bloom-Energy-Fuel-Cell-Brief-18-105.pdf
  53. https://www.bloomenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/bloom-energy-server-datasheet-2024.pdf
  54. https://www.bloomenergy.com/resource/bloom-energy-server/
  55. https://www.microgridknowledge.com/data-center-microgrids/news/55305376/oracle-cloud-infrastructure-contracts-for-bloom-energy-fuel-cells-on-site
  56. https://www.bloomenergy.com/resources/
  57. https://www.bloomenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/load-following-solid-oxide-fuel-cell.pdf
  58. https://fuelcellsworks.com/news/bloom-energy-announces-largest-silicon-valley-data-center-power-capacity-agreement
  59. https://www.bloomenergy.com/news/bloom-energy-to-power-communities-with-sustainable-and-resilient-electricity-consumers-benefit-from-increased-choice-lower-cost/
  60. https://www.esgtoday.com/brookfield-bloom-energy-sign-5-billion-deal-to-power-ai-data-centers-with-fuel-cells/
  61. https://investor.bloomenergy.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/Oracle-and-Bloom-Energy-Collaborate-to-Deliver-Power-to-Data-Centers-at-the-Speed-of-AI/default.aspx
  62. https://www.bloomenergy.com/industries/data-center-power/
  63. https://www.heliogen.com/press-releases/bloom-energy-and-heliogen-join-forces-to-harness-the-power-of-the-sun-to-produce-low-cost-green-hydrogen/
  64. https://www.ameresco.com/taylor-farms-taps-bloom-energy-ameresco-and-concept-clean-energy-to-take-california-fresh-vegetable-production-facility-off-the-grid/
  65. https://www.bloomenergy.com/resource/bloom-energy-powers-caltech-with-fuel-cell-technology/
  66. https://www.bloomenergy.com/technology/powering-the-future/
  67. https://www.bloomenergy.com/blog/bloom-deemed-leader-in-growing-stationary-fuel-cell-market/
  68. https://fortune.com/2025/10/16/bloom-energy-stock-fuel-cells-ai-data-center-power/
  69. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/ResearchInsight/fuel-cell-market.asp
  70. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/plug-power-vs-bloom-energy-which-fuel-cell-stock-should-you-bet
  71. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1664703/000162828025008747/be-20241231.htm
  72. https://www.latitudemedia.com/news/can-bloom-energy-capitalize-on-the-data-center-frenzy/
  73. https://www.bloomenergy.com/customers/
  74. https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=3781
  75. https://www.reddit.com/r/Vitards/comments/1hh913w/why_are_bloom_energy_customers_paying_around/
  76. https://investor.bloomenergy.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/Bloom-Energy-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2024-Financial-Results-with-Record-Full-Year-Revenues/default.aspx
  77. https://companiesmarketcap.com/bloom-energy/revenue/
  78. https://investor.bloomenergy.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/Bloom-Energy-Reports-Second-Quarter-2025-Financial-Results/default.aspx
  79. https://www.jerseycountygrain.com/news/story/34901196/can-bloom-energy-stock-hit-85-in-2025
  80. https://www.investing.com/equities/bloom-energy-corp-financial-summary
  81. https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-bloom-energy-q2-2025-beats-forecasts-stock-dips-93CH-4164679
  82. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/BE/bloom-energy/profit-margins
  83. https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nyse-be/bloom-energy/news/evaluating-bloom-energys-rally-after-its-recent-internationa
  84. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BE/financials/
  85. https://www.fool.com/investing/2025/10/03/why-bloom-energy-stock-all-time-highs-300-2025/
  86. https://dividendstocks.cash/stock-profile/Bloom%2520Energy-Stock
  87. https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NYSE/BE/forecast/
  88. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/assessing-bloom-energy-366-7-191312907.html
  89. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/new-bloom-energy-fuel-cell-factory-expected-to-produce-over-1-gw-a-year-ami/628175/
  90. https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/energy-storage/bloom-expands-electrolyzer-production-capacity-to-2-gw/
  91. https://www.bloomenergy.com/industries/manufacturing-energy/
  92. https://www.bloomenergy.com/resource/bloom-energy-celebrates-opening-its-delaware-manufacturing-center/
  93. https://fuelcellsworks.com/2025/08/05/hydrogen-economy/bloom-energy-reports-record-q2-revenue-targets-2gw-fuel-cell-expansion-amid-ai-data-centre-boom
  94. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032117300229
  95. https://www.bloomenergy.com/blog/bloom-enhances-supply-chain-by-adding-vital-fhr-north-america-as-supplier/
  96. https://www.jabil.com/dam/jcr:004bd7e1-1381-4924-a914-fcbae214edd5/022618-bloom-jabil-case-study.pdf
  97. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4773694-bloom-energy-2024-record-breaking-results-fail-to-wow-investors-reduce-volatility
  98. https://www.bloomenergy.com/supplychain/
  99. https://www.bloomenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/cy-2020-conflict-minerals-report.pdf
  100. https://www.bloomenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024-bloom-energy-impact-report.pdf
  101. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4708448-bloom-energy-more-likely-to-bottom-due-to-its-unpromising-tech-and-model
  102. https://hindenburgresearch.com/bloom-energy-a-clean-energy-darling-wilting-to-its-demise/
  103. https://www.bloomenergy.com/news/bloom-energy-responds-to-inaccurate-and-misleading-statements-in-report-published-by-hindenburg-research/
  104. https://hindenburgresearch.com/our-reply-to-blooms-woefully-inadequate-response/
  105. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/bloom-energy-stock-tanks-as-short-seller-calls-for-its-demise-2019-09-17
  106. https://law.justia.com/cases/delaware/court-of-chancery/2021/c-a-no-2020-0023-jrs.html
  107. https://www.morrisjames.com/p/102jfvz/chancery-grants-inspection-demand-relying-on-a-short-sellers-report/
  108. https://www.potteranderson.com/insights/cases/Jacob-v-Bloom-Energy-Corporation
  109. https://www.ktmc.com/new-cases/bloom-energy-corporation
  110. https://bloomenergysettlement.com/Content/Documents/Second%2520Amended%2520Complaint.pdf
  111. https://www.bloomenergy.com/blog/reaching-new-milestones-in-the-field-proven-bloom-energy-server-longevity-and-reliability/
  112. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122002520
  113. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00614
  114. https://www.wired.com/2011/04/bloom-pro-subsidy-game/
  115. https://grist.org/article/2010-02-24-the-economics-of-the-bloom-box/
  116. https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/renewable/the-bloom-is-off-bloom-energy/
  117. https://tickeron.com/blogs/be-stock-analysis-bloom-energy-s-263-rally-in-the-ai-driven-clean-energy-era-11485/
  118. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-finance-reporting/bloom-energy-receive-75-million-tax-credits-fremont-manufacturing-plant-2024-04-08/
  119. https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/jp-morgan-upgrades-bloom-energy-155206140.html
  120. https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NYSE/BE/financials/
  121. https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nyse-be/bloom-energy/news/bloom-energy-corporation-nysebe-could-be-less-than-a-year-aw
  122. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1177117
  123. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/bloom-energy-signs-5bn-partnership-with-brookfield-to-deploy-fuel-cell-tech-across-ai-data-centers/
  124. https://www.bloomenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/bloom-energy-whitepaper-how-fuel-cells-reduce-carbon-emissions-as-effectively-as-renewables-new.pdf
  125. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1664703/000166470319000037/ex992_emissionstechnote.htm
  126. https://www.responsibilityreports.com/HostedData/ResponsibilityReportArchive/b/NYSE_BE_2023.pdf
  127. https://herd.engr.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1832/2022/08/Mastropasqua_et_al_2017_Solid-oxide-fuel-cell-short-stack-performance-testing-Part-A_-Experimental-analysis-and-%25CE%25BC-combined-heat-and-power-unit-comparison.pdf
  128. https://www.bloomenergy.com/resource/how-a-fuel-cell-works/
  129. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/bloom-energy-adds-variable-load-ability-to-its-fuel-cells/
  130. https://www.bloomenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/bloom-energy-how-bloom-reduces-emissions-technical-note.pdf
  131. https://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/35841/1/tesi.pdf
  132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479725031470
  133. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319924034979
  134. https://miq.org/bloom-energy-partners-with-eqt-to-bring-certified-responsibly-sourced-natural-gas-to-current-and-future-customers/
  135. https://www.svvoice.com/bloom-energy-misrepresents-its-technology-and-santa-claras-ghg-profile-says-city/
  136. https://enkiai.com/direct-air-capture/bloom-energy-hydrogen-data-center-growth-in-2025
  137. https://fchea.org/how-fuel-cells-help-solve-the-growing-data-center-and-ai-challenge/
  138. https://www.bloomenergy.com/blog/powering-ai/
  139. https://www.bloomenergy.com/blog/the-ai-revolution-how-fuel-cells-are-solving-the-data-center-power-challenge/
  140. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/brookfield-bloom-energy-launch-up-5-billion-ai-infrastructure-partnership-2025-10-13/
  141. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/13/bloom-energy-shares-soar-after-striking-deal-with-brookfield-to-provide-fuel-cells-to-ai-data-centers.html
  142. https://www.bloomenergy.com/blog/ai-data-centers/
  143. https://esgnews.com/brookfield-bloom-energy-launch-5b-partnership-to-power-next-generation-ai-factories/
  144. https://www.bloomenergy.com/news/bloom-energy-expands-data-center-power-agreement-with-equinix-surpassing-100mw/
  145. https://www.bloomenergy.com/news/bloom-energy-and-chart-industries-announce-groundbreaking-carbon-capture-partnership/
  146. https://www.bloomenergy.com/news/bloom-energy-announces-gigawatt-fuel-cell-procurement-agreement-with-aep-to-power-ai-data-centers/
  147. https://ng.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/bloom-energy-stock-soars-after-aep-inks-265-billion-fuel-cell-deal-93CH-2280519
  148. https://enkiai.com/bloom-energy-fuel-cell-initiatives-for-2025-key-projects-strategies-and-partnerships
  149. https://www.bloomenergy.com/news/bloom-energy-announces-worlds-largest-fuel-cell-installation-in-history/
  150. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/why-bloom-energy-stock-hit-all-time-highs-week-and-300-2025
  151. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4831833-bloom-energy-price-correction-not-surprising
  152. https://www.reddit.com/r/Vitards/comments/1mk5xou/bloom_energy_q2_2025_earnings_thoughts_and_price/
  153. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1664703/000162828025016212/a202410kars.pdf
  154. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1664703/000162828024005035/be-20231231.htm
  155. https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/be/forecast/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.