Hubbry Logo
ChimaeraChimaeraMain
Open search
Chimaera
Community hub
Chimaera
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Chimaera
Chimaera
Chimaera
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Chimaeras
Temporal range: Early Carboniferous–Present
Hydrolagus colliei (Chimaeridae)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Chondrichthyes
Subclass: Holocephali
Order: Chimaeriformes
Obruchev, 1953
Subgroups

Chimaeras[1] are cartilaginous fish in the order Chimaeriformes (/kɪˈmɛrɪfɔːrmiːz/), known informally as ghost sharks, rat fish (not to be confused with rattails), spookfish, or rabbit fish; the last two names are also applied, respectively, to the ray-finned fish groups of Opisthoproctidae and Siganidae.

At one time a "diverse and abundant" group (based on the fossil record), their closest living relatives are sharks and rays, though their last common ancestor with them lived nearly 400 million years ago.[2] Living species (aside from plough-nose chimaeras) are largely confined to deep water.[3]

Anatomy

[edit]
Deep-sea chimaera photographed by the NOAAS Okeanos Explorer. Visible on its snout are tiny pores which lead to electroreceptor cells.

Chimaeras are soft-bodied, shark-like fish with bulky heads and long, tapered tails; measured from the tail,[clarification needed] they can grow up to 150 cm (4.9 ft) in length. Like other members of the class Chondrichthyes, chimaera skeletons are entirely cartilaginous, or composed of cartilage. Males use forehead denticles to grasp a female by a fin during copulation.[4] The gill arches are condensed into a pouch-like bundle covered by a sheet of skin (an operculum), with a single gill-opening in front of the pectoral fins.[5]

The pectoral fins are large enough to generate lift at a relaxed forward momentum, giving the chimaera the appearance of "flying" through the water. Further back on the body are also a pair of smaller pelvic fins, and some genera bear an anal fin in front of the tail. In chimaerids and rhinochimaerids, the tail is leptocercal, meaning that it is thin and whip-like, edged from above and below by fins of similar size. In callorhinchids, the tail is instead heterocercal, with a larger upper lobe inclined upwards, similar to many sharks. There are two dorsal fins: a large triangular first dorsal fin and a low rectangular or depressed second dorsal fin. For defense, some chimaeras have a venomous spine on the front edge of the dorsal fin.[4]

In many species, the bulbous snout is modified into an elongated sensory organ, capable of electroreception to find prey.[5][6] The cartilaginous skull is holostylic, meaning that the palatoquadrate (upper jaw cartilage) is completely fused to the neurocranium (cranial cartilage). This contrasts with modern sharks, where the palatoquadrate is movable and detachable, a trait known as hyostyly. The back of the head is supported by a complex of fused vertebrae called the synarcual, which also connects to the dorsal fin spine.[4]

Instead of sharks' many sharp, consistently-replaced teeth, chimaeras have just six large, permanent tooth-plates, which grow continuously throughout their entire life. These tooth-plates are arranged in three pairs, with one pair at the tip of the lower jaws and two pairs along the upper jaws. They together form a protruding, beak-like crushing and grinding mechanism, comparable to the incisor teeth of rodents and lagomorphs (hence the name "rabbit fish").[4] Chimaera teeth are unique among vertebrates, due to their mode of mineralization. Most of each plate is formed by relatively soft osteodentin, but the active edges are supplemented by a unique hypermineralized tissue called pleromin. Pleromin is an extremely hard enamel-like tissue, arranged into sheets or beaded rods, but it is deposited by mesenchyme-derived cells similar to those that form bone. In addition, pleromin's hardness is due to the mineral whitlockite, which crystalizes within the teeth as the animal matures. Other vertebrates with hypermineralized teeth rely on enamel, which is derived from ameloblasts and encases round crystals of the mineral apatite.[7]

Chimaeras also differ from sharks in that they have separate anal and urogenital openings.

Behavior

[edit]

Chimaeras live in temperate ocean floors, with some species inhabiting depths exceeding 2,000 m (6,600 ft),[8] with relatively few modern species regularly inhabiting shallow water. Exceptions include the members of the genus Callorhinchus, the rabbit fish and the spotted ratfish, which locally or periodically can be found at shallower depths. Consequently, these are also among the few species kept in public aquaria.[9] They live in all the oceans except for the Arctic and Antarctic oceans.

Diet

[edit]

The usual diet of chimaeras consists of crustaceans, ophiuroids, and molluscs.[10] Modern species are demersal durophages, but they used to be more diverse. The Carboniferous period had forms that lived as specialised suction feeders in the water column.[11]

Reproduction

[edit]

Chimaera reproduction resembles that of sharks in some ways: males employ claspers for internal fertilization of females and females lay eggs within spindle-shaped, leathery egg cases.[1]

Unlike sharks, male chimaeras have retractable sexual appendages (known as tentacula) to assist mating.[12][5] The frontal tentaculum, a bulbous rod which extends out of the forehead, is used to clutch the females' pectoral fins during mating. The prepelvic tentacula are serrated hooked plates normally hidden in pouches in front of the pelvic fins, and they anchor the male to the female. Lastly, the pelvic claspers (sexual organs shared by sharks) are fused together by a cartilaginous sheathe before splitting into a pair of flattened lobes at their tip.[4]

Parasites

[edit]

As other fish, chimaeras have a number of parasites. Chimaericola leptogaster (Chimaericolidae) is a monogenean parasite of the gills of Chimaera monstrosa; the species can attain 50 mm (2.0 in) in length.

Conservation and threats

[edit]

Despite their secluded habits, some chimaera species may be threatened by overfishing through bycatch or commercial exploitation. No species are listed as Endangered according to the IUCN, but four are listed as Vulnerable, four more as Near Threatened, and many more as Data Deficient (too rare to evaluate). Many species have restricted ranges and practically none have had their movement patterns studied. In addition, bycatch reports are usually insufficiently precise to the species or even genus level, so it is difficult to keep track of bycatch on a species-by-species basis. This lack of data renders chimaera species especially susceptible to overlooked population declines.[13]

Several near-shore species are purposefully caught for their meat, especially callorhinchids, Hydrolagus bemisi (pale ghost shark), and Hydrolagus novaezealandiae (dark ghost shark). Modern quotas have helped to moderate collection of these species to a sustainable level, though Callorhinchus milii (the Australian ghostshark) experienced severe overfishing in the 20th century before protections were enacted. Neoharriotta pinnata (sicklefin chimaera) is targeted along the coast of India for its liver oil, and a recent decline of catch rates may indicate a population crash. Even species without commercial exploitation can fall victim to bycatch: Callorhinchus callorynchus (American elephantfish), Neoharriotta carri (dwarf sicklefin chimaera), Chimaera monstrosa (rabbit fish), Chimaera ogilbyi (Ogilby's ghostshark), Hydrolagus colliei (spotted ratfish), and Hydrolagus melanophasma (eastern Pacific black ghostshark) all have bycatch rates exceeding 10% in certain parts of their range, and some are experiencing steep declines. Chimaeras have mostly avoided harvesting for the fin trade, which threatens many true sharks.[13]

Another threat is habitat destruction of coastal nurseries (by urban development) or deepwater reefs (by deep sea mining and trawling). Near-shore species such as Callorhinchus milii are vulnerable to the effects of climate change: stronger storms and warmer seawater are predicted to increase egg mortality by disrupting the stable environments necessary to complete incubation.[13]

Classification

[edit]
Main article: List of chimaeras
Callorhinchus callorynchus
Chimaera monstrosa
Hydrolagus affinis
Harriotta raleighana

In some classifications, the chimaeras are included (as subclass Holocephali) in the class Chondrichthyes of cartilaginous fishes; in other systems, this distinction may be raised to the level of class. Chimaeras also have some characteristics of bony fishes.

A renewed effort to explore deep water and to undertake taxonomic analysis of specimens in museum collections led to a boom during the first decade of the 21st century in the number of new species identified.[2] A preliminary study found 8% of species to be threatened.[14] There are over 50 extant species in six genera and three families, with other genera known from fossils. The extant species fall into three families—the Callorhinchidae, Rhinochimaeridae and Chimaeridae with the callorhinchids being the most basal clade.

Suborder Chimaeroidei Patterson 1965

Evolution

[edit]

Tracing the evolution of these species has been problematic given the paucity of good fossils. DNA sequencing has become the preferred approach to understanding speciation.[15]

The group containing chimaeras and their close relatives (Holocephali) is thought to have diverged from Elasmobranchii (the group containing modern sharks and rays) during the Devonian, over 380 million years ago. The oldest known chimaeriform is Protochimaera from the Early Carboniferous (338–332 million years ago) of Russia, which is more closely related to modern chimeras (Chimaeroidei) than any other known extinct groups of Chimaeriformes.[16] The earliest known remains attributable to modern chimaeras are known from the Early Jurassic (Pliensbachian) of Europe, but egg cases from the Late Triassic of Yakutia, Russia and New Zealand[17] that resemble those of rhinochimaerids and callorhinchids respectively indicates that they had a global distribution prior to the end of the Triassic. Unlike modern chimaeras, Mesozoic representatives are often found in shallow water settings.[18] Most modern chimaera groups appear to have originated during the Mesozoic Marine Revolution.[19] Modern chimaeras reached their highest ecological diversity during the mid-Cretaceous (Albian to Cenomanian), when they acquired a variety of different dentition types.[20][21]

It has commonly been assumed that due to being an evolutionarily basal group that is largely found in the deep ocean, modern chimaeras likely colonized the deep ocean during the Mesozoic and used it as a refugium to survive mass extinction events. However, more recent studies indicate that chimaeras were likely a shallow-water group for most of their existence, and only colonized the deep ocean in the aftermath of the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event. The plough-nosed chimaeras are the only group to still inhabit shallower waters, in the manner of ancestral chimaera groups.[19]

Taxonomy

[edit]

Extinct chimaeriforms include:

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Chimaera

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Chimaeras comprise the order Chimaeriformes, a lineage of cartilaginous fishes classified under the subclass Holocephali within the class Chondrichthyes, encompassing three families—Callorhinchidae, Chimaeridae, and Rhinochimaeridae—with roughly 50 extant species. These fishes are defined by key autapomorphies including a holostylic jaw suspension fusing the upper jaw rigidly to the cranium, reduction of teeth to permanent grinding plates, and coverage of the single external gill slit by an operculum. Predominantly deep-sea inhabitants, chimaeras occupy benthic and benthopelagic zones in temperate and tropical oceans globally, typically at depths from 200 to 2,000 meters, though some venture shallower seasonally. Morphologically, chimaeras exhibit elongated, tadpole-like bodies with disproportionately large heads, prominent sensory canals on the for prey detection, and bearing placoid denticles that provide a raspy texture despite appearing smooth. They possess a venomous spine preceding the anterior , serving a defensive function, and large, laterally placed eyes suited to dim conditions. Dietarily, they target hard-shelled benthic such as mollusks and crustaceans, pulverizing them with mandibular and palatal tooth plates rather than seizing with conical teeth as in elasmobranchs. Chimaeras reproduce via , with males featuring claspers and frontal tenacula for grasping females, and females producing leathery cases that develop slowly in the depths. The group's evolutionary history traces to the late , with fossils documenting chimaeroid forms from the period over 300 million years ago, underscoring their basal divergence from other chondrichthyans and remarkable morphological stasis through geological time. Though not commercially significant, incidental captures in deep-sea fisheries pose risks, prompting assessments of due to slow growth and low fecundity. Their study illuminates early adaptations to abyssal niches and the persistence of holocephalan traits amid chondrichthyan .

Taxonomy and Classification

Phylogenetic Position

Chimaeras, comprising the order Chimaeriformes, are classified within the subclass of the class , the cartilaginous fishes. represents the sister group to (sharks, skates, and rays) within , forming a monophyletic of jawed vertebrates () characterized by a cartilaginous and lack of endochondral . This phylogenetic placement is supported by both morphological traits, such as the fusion of the upper jaw to the cranium (holostyly) and reduced , and molecular data from mitochondrial genomes. The divergence of from is estimated to have occurred approximately 410–420 million years ago during the Silurian-Devonian transition, based on fossil-calibrated molecular clocks and the earliest unambiguous holocephalan fossils from the period. Mitogenomic analyses indicate that modern holocephalans originated around 420 Ma, surviving the end-Permian mass extinction and achieving peak diversity in the before declining to three extant families: Callorhinchidae, , and Rhinochimaeridae. Fossil relatives, including iniopterygians like Iniopteryx, are positioned as basal to or sister to crown-group Holocephali, highlighting the deep evolutionary roots of the lineage within chondrichthyans. Recent phylogenetic reconstructions incorporating extensive fossil data affirm the early assembly of the holocephalan body plan, with crown-group divergences predating the and emphasizing 's role as a key outgroup for understanding chondrichthyan and development. While molecular phylogenies robustly resolve inter-family relationships within , uncertainties persist in the exact placement of some extinct orders relative to extant chimaeriforms due to incomplete preservation.

Recognized Species

The order Chimaeriformes encompasses 53 recognized extant species across , reflecting ongoing taxonomic revisions based on morphological and molecular data. The Callorhinchidae (plow-nose chimaeras) includes one , Callorhinchus, with three valid : C. callorynchus (southern hemisphere populations), C. milii ( and Australian elephant shark), and C. capensis (), all restricted to coastal and shelf waters of the . The Rhinochimaeridae (longnose chimaeras) comprises three genera—Harriotta, Neoharriota, and Rhinochimaera—totaling eight , such as Harriotta raleighana (narrowhead ) and Rhinochimaera atlantica (Atlantic knifefish), characterized by elongate snouts and deep-sea distributions. The most speciose family, (shortnose chimaeras or ratfishes), accounts for 42 in two genera: Chimaera (approximately 11 , including C. monstrosa, the European ) and Hydrolagus (approximately 31 , including H. colliei, the spotted ratfish), predominantly inhabiting deep continental slopes worldwide.
FamilyGeneraValid Species CountDistribution Notes
CallorhinchidaeCallorhinchus (1)3Temperate coasts
RhinochimaeridaeHarriotta, Neoharriota, Rhinochimaera (3)8Mostly deep-sea, global oceans
ChimaeridaeChimaera, Hydrolagus (2)42Deep slopes, worldwide

Anatomy and Morphology

External Features

Chimaeras possess elongated, soft-bodied forms lacking scales, with total lengths reaching up to 1.5 meters in some species. Their bodies taper gradually toward a slender, filamentous , exhibiting a smooth, often iridescent skin devoid of dermal denticles typical in other chondrichthyans. Coloration varies by and environment, ranging from silvery with iridescent hues and spotted patterns in shallow-water forms like the spotted ratfish (Hydrolagus colliei) to darker shades of black, blue, or gray in deep-sea species. The head is disproportionately large and bulbous, comprising 20-30% of body length, featuring a blunt or duckbill-shaped , large eyes adapted for low-light conditions, and a small ventral armed with grinding plates rather than sharp teeth. canals appear as prominent external grooves on the head and body, aiding mechanosensory detection. A single external per side is covered by an operculum, distinguishing chimaeras from and rays. Pectoral fins are large, triangular, and wing-like, facilitating locomotion, while pelvic fins are smaller and positioned ventrally. The first dorsal fin arises anteriorly with a stout, venomous spine for defense, followed by a smaller second dorsal fin; the anal and caudal fins often merge seamlessly with the tail, forming a continuous structure. Sexual dimorphism is pronounced in external morphology, with adult males bearing specialized clasping structures: a frontal —a mallet-shaped, sometimes toothed appendage on the head—and paired pelvic claspers for , alongside occasional prepelvic tenacula. These features are absent in females, which exhibit smoother head profiles.

Internal Anatomy

The of chimaeras is entirely cartilaginous, lacking any , with the upper firmly fused to the in a condition termed holostyly, which contrasts with the more mobile suspension in elasmobranchs. The cranium is sutureless, and the persists with cartilaginous vertebral centra that do not fully enclose it, supporting a shark-like but compressed . The digestive tract is specialized for a diet heavy in crustaceans, featuring no , a short intestine equipped with a spiral valve to enhance nutrient absorption, and a present for storage. The shows exceptionally high chitinase activity to break down exoskeletal , while a recently described palatal organ in species like Chimaera monstrosa may aid in or defense through glandular secretions. Respiration occurs via four internal gill slits, fewer than the typical five in elasmobranchs, with external openings consolidated under an operculum-like flap that directs water flow efficiently over the gills. The circulatory system follows the elasmobranch pattern, including a two-chambered heart with sinus venosus, atrium, and ventricle, supplemented by a large liver that provides buoyancy through lipid storage. The urogenital system includes opisthonephric kidneys with numerous uriniferous tubules for in marine environments, and reproductive structures adapted for . Females possess a single functional , oviducts with glandular regions for eggshell formation, a , and , while males have paired claspers on the pelvic fins and a unique frontal —a toothed cartilaginous on the head for grasping during . The thymus remains well-developed in adults, supporting lymphomyeloid functions distinct from those in other chondrichthyans.

Specialized Structures

Chimaeras exhibit distinctive adapted for crushing hard-shelled prey, consisting of hypermineralized plates fused into upper and lower beak-like structures rather than discrete teeth found in most elasmobranchs. These plates feature tritural (grinding) surfaces with vascularized cores, enabling efficient processing of mollusks, crustaceans, and echinoderms in deep-sea environments. Male chimaeras possess specialized grasping appendages called tenacula, which facilitate external attachment during . The frontal tenaculum, a club-shaped structure on the , bears rows of retractable, fang-like teeth that develop from odontogenic tissues sharing genetic pathways with oral , allowing males to grip the female's pectoral fin. These teeth, which emerge postnatally and fully form only in sexually mature individuals, exhibit flexibility and for secure hold without causing excessive injury. A secondary prepelvic tenaculum, comprising serrated, hooked plates housed in pouches anterior to the pelvic fins, provides additional anchorage by latching onto the female's body. These structures represent evolutionary specializations unique to holocephalans, enhancing in low-light, low-density habitats. The first dorsal fin is supported by a stout, serrated spine equipped with glands, delivering toxic proteins upon puncture to deter predators. This defensive apparatus, absent in the second dorsal fin, inflicts painful wounds and is a shared trait with some elasmobranchs but proportionally larger in chimaeras relative to body size. Skin denticles, resembling tiny teeth with enameloid caps, cover the body and contribute to hydrodynamic efficiency and sensory feedback, though they lack the placoid scales of .

Habitat and Distribution

Global Range

Chimaeriformes are distributed across temperate and tropical marine waters of the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Oceans, excluding polar regions such as the and . They primarily inhabit continental slopes, shelves, and seamounts near landmasses, with no truly oceanic or pelagic species recorded. Over 50 extant occur worldwide, with higher diversity in deeper waters off continental margins. The families and Rhinochimaeridae exhibit cosmopolitan ranges in non-polar seas, including examples such as Chimaera monstrosa in the northeastern Atlantic from to and the Mediterranean, and Hydrolagus colliei in the northeastern Pacific from to . In contrast, the family Callorhinchidae is endemic to the , with species like Callorhinchus callorynchus ranging from southern and to and in the Atlantic and Pacific, respectively. This distribution pattern reflects adaptations to stable deep-sea conditions rather than broad surface migrations.

Depth and Environmental Adaptations

Chimaeras occupy a wide depth range, from coastal shallows in some species to abyssal zones exceeding 2,000 meters in others, with most preferring temperate deep waters below 500 meters. For example, Hydrolagus colliei inhabits depths from the to 900 m, while Hydrolagus alphus occurs between 630 and 1,450 m, and certain longnose chimaeras extend to 2,600 m. Adaptations to high hydrostatic pressures include liver oils with compressibility nearly matching , which preserves and prevents excessive volume reduction at depths up to 3,500 m. Low temperatures (typically 2–4°C) and limited food availability are countered by reduced metabolic rates, slow growth, and long lifespans exceeding 30 years, enhancing survival in oligotrophic deep-sea conditions. In perpetual darkness, enlarged translucent-green eyes maximize light capture, supplemented by advanced electrosensory systems for detecting prey and navigating demersal habitats under low-oxygen, high-pressure regimes. Cardiac structures lacking may further support function at subzero-equivalent pressures and cold temperatures.

Behavior and Physiology

Sensory Systems and Locomotion

Chimaeras exhibit sensory adaptations suited to dimly lit, deep-sea environments, with vision, electroreception, and mechanoreception playing primary roles. Their eyes are disproportionately large relative to body size, positioned laterally on the head to maximize light capture. Deep-sea species, such as Rhinochimaera pacifica and Chimaera lignaria, possess pure-rod retinae featuring elongated photoreceptor outer segments that enhance sensitivity to low light levels, though this comes at the cost of acuity and color discrimination. In contrast, vertically migrating species like Callorhinchus milii have duplex retinae incorporating both rods and cones, supporting limited color vision in shallower waters via adaptations in opsin genes, including losses of shortwave-sensitive variants. The electrosensory system relies on , jelly-filled canals radiating from the head that detect bioelectric fields from prey muscular activity or buried organisms, functioning similarly to those in elasmobranchs but with species-specific variations in distribution and density. In Chimaera monstrosa, these organs project to a dedicated nucleus, enabling precise localization of weak electric signals in turbid or low-visibility conditions. The mechanosensory system complements this, with neuromasts embedded in canals across the head and body to sense water displacement, vibrations, and pressure gradients; deep-sea chimaeras show interspecific differences in neuromast size, number, and arrangement, potentially tuned to habitat-specific flow regimes. Olfaction and taste are also present, with well-developed nares and —first documented in chimaeroids in 2012—though less studied than visual and electroreceptive modalities. Locomotion in chimaeras emphasizes efficient, low-energy cruising via undulatory and oscillatory movements of enlarged pectoral fins, which generate lift and akin to in steady-state . In the spotted ratfish Hydrolagus colliei, kinematic analyses reveal transitions from pectoral-fin-dominated —resembling planing or at low speeds—to increased caudal fin undulation for bursts, reflecting ontogenetic scaling where juvenile fins grow disproportionately to support larger bodies. The heterocercal provides stability and minor , while the rigid spine aids maneuverability; muscle architecture, including red oxidative fibers in fin bases, supports sustained activity without high metabolic costs, adaptive for over vast benthic expanses.

Diet and Foraging Strategies

Chimaeras primarily consume benthic , including crustaceans such as and shrimps, mollusks like bivalves and gastropods, echinoderms including sea urchins, and worms, supplemented occasionally by small fishes. These hard-shelled prey items are processed using hypertrophied mandibular and dental plates adapted for crushing and grinding, rather than tearing, which aligns with their durophagous feeding mode observed across the order. Foraging occurs close to the seafloor, with individuals swimming slowly while probing the substrate for prey, often in deep-water environments ranging from continental slopes to abyssal plains. Prey detection relies on chemosensory capabilities, including olfaction, augmented by an electrosensory system that detects bioelectric fields from buried or hidden , facilitating opportunistic predation in low-visibility conditions. In species such as Chimaera monstrosa, diet composition shows ontogenetic shifts, with larger specimens ingesting more substantial prey due to enhanced buccal suction efficiency, though no marked seasonal dietary changes occur. Empty stomachs are common, suggesting intermittent feeding bouts tied to prey availability on soft sediments.

Reproduction and Life History

Mating and Fertilization

Chimaeras undergo , a characteristic shared with other chondrichthyans, wherein males utilize paired pelvic claspers—modified extensions of the pelvic fins—as intromittent organs to deposit directly into the female's reproductive tract. This process ensures efficient transfer in deep-sea environments where would be inefficient due to low population densities and water currents. Mating behaviors in chimaeras remain poorly documented, primarily owing to their deep-water habitats that limit direct observations, though available accounts indicate complex involving tactile cues. Males possess supplementary structures, including frontal and prepelvic tentaculae—denticle-studded appendages anterior to the claspers—that aid in grasping and positioning during copulation, facilitating sperm transfer by stabilizing the pair. In like the elephantfish Callorhinchus callorhynchus, occurs seasonally in spring and early summer, with males forming spermatophores that are transferred to females, evidenced by the presence of these masses in gravid individuals. Post-mating, females retain fertilized eggs within spindle-shaped capsules, which are oviparous and laid individually on the seafloor, where embryonic development proceeds externally over several months depending on and . storage in the female oviducts may occur, enhancing in sparse populations by decoupling mating from egg-laying events, as observed in deep-sea chimaerids like Harriotta raleighana. This strategy aligns with the order's lecithotrophic development, where provides all nutrition, minimizing beyond provision.

Embryonic Development

Chimaeriform fishes are oviparous, with females producing eggs encased in a durable, leathery capsule formed by glandular secretions in the . These capsules, often spindle- or flask-shaped and measuring 10-20 cm in length depending on the species, feature apical and posterior tendrils that anchor the egg to substrates such as , , or , minimizing displacement by currents. precedes oviposition, facilitated by the male's frontal , a specialized clasping structure; the eggs are typically laid in pairs during seasonal breeding periods, with extrusion processes lasting from hours to several days per . Embryonic development occurs entirely within the impermeable egg case, relying on a substantial yolk reserve for nutrition without supplemental maternal provisioning, distinguishing chimaeras from viviparous elasmobranchs. Progression follows conserved chondrichthyan patterns: rapid cleavage yields a blastodisc atop the yolk, followed by gastrulation, neurulation, somitogenesis, and organogenesis, with the embryo elongating and absorbing yolk via a vitelline circulation. Early stages feature transient external structures, such as a prominent rostral bulb in species like Callorhinchus milii, which supports initial head morphogenesis before regressing; visceral arches and cranial elements develop progressively, with the hyomandibular arch retaining plesiomorphic features reflective of holocephalan ancestry. Detailed staging for C. milii delineates approximately 36-39 external morphological stages, from initial yolk cleavage (stage 1) through pharyngeal arch formation, pectoral fin bud outgrowth, and caudal fin development to pre-hatching (stage 36+), often benchmarked against elasmobranch models like Squalus acanthias for comparative homology.1097-4687(199804)236:1%3C25::AID-JMOR2%3E3.0.CO;2-N) Sex-specific differentiation emerges mid-development, with male embryos developing the precursor from the anterior dorsal rostral cartilage, initially toothless and elongating post- under hormonal influence; this structure attains functional only in . develops gradually, with embryos accumulating for and ionic balance akin to adults, peaking in late stages to match marine salinities. Environmental factors, particularly temperature (typically 9-20°C in natural habitats), modulate developmental rates; lower temperatures extend timelines, as evidenced in C. milii where stage progression from yolk-dependent phases to spans extended periods under cooler conditions. Hatching times vary by species and locale, generally ranging 6-12 months post-oviposition, with Hydrolagus colliei requiring about 12 months and C. milii 8-10 months under ambient conditions; juveniles emerge as miniatures of adults, measuring 10-15 cm in total length, fully formed but immature, and immediately independent without . This protracted development contributes to low and vulnerability in early life, with embryos susceptible to predation on exposed egg cases despite their protective capsules.

Ecology and Interactions

Predators and Parasites

Chimaeras, inhabiting deep waters where predator density is low, primarily face threats from larger cartilaginous and bony fishes. Species such as the spotted ratfish (Hydrolagus colliei), which occurs in shallower continental shelf depths up to 900 meters, are preyed upon by bluntnose sixgill sharks (Hexanchus griseus) and Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis), among other medium-sized sharks and large teleosts. Deeper-water chimaeras, including Chimaera monstrosa, are consumed by squalid sharks (family Squalidae), reflecting limited overlap with apex deep-sea predators. Shallower chimaera species may also encounter pinniped predation, such as from harbor seals, though documented instances are sparse due to the group's elusive nature and bioluminescent camouflage. Humans contribute indirectly through bycatch in deep-sea trawl fisheries targeting other species, with no targeted commercial harvest but incidental mortality reported across global ranges. Chimaeras possess defensive adaptations against predators, including a venomous dorsal spine capable of inflicting wounds; records exist of such spines impaling attempting predators, deterring attacks in the resource-scarce . Chimaeras host diverse metazoan parasite communities, many of which represent ancient lineages co-evolved with their holocephalan hosts over millions of years. Monogenean trematodes of the family Chimaericolidae, such as Chimaericola leptogaster on the gills of C. monstrosa and Holocephalocotyle monstrosae on related rabbitfishes, are gill-specific ectoparasites that exploit the chimaeras' cartilaginous gill structures. Endoparasitic cestodes of the order Gyrocotylidea are obligate to Chimaeriformes, residing in the spiral intestine and demonstrating host-specificity across genera like Hydrolagus and Chimaera. Studies on deep-water sympatric reveal 7–9 metazoan parasite taxa per host, including nematodes, copepods, and additional digeneans, with varying by depth and host condition but generally low due to the hosts' solitary habits and low population densities. Across 18 chimaera examined, at least 54 parasite taxa have been documented, underscoring the group's role in hosting relict parasite faunas with minimal spillover to other clades. Parasite loads appear higher on benthic foragers, correlating with exposure to invertebrate intermediate hosts in sediments.

Trophic Role

Chimaeroid fishes occupy a mesopredatory role in benthic and benthopelagic marine ecosystems, functioning primarily as secondary to tertiary consumers that regulate populations. Their diets are dominated by hard-shelled benthic prey, including crustaceans (e.g., decapods and isopods), mollusks (e.g., bivalves and gastropods), polychaetes, and echinoderms, with occasional fish and ; for instance, in Chimaera monstrosa, crustaceans comprise the majority of the diet by index of relative importance (IRI). Specialized pharyngeal grinding plates enable efficient processing of shelled organisms, distinguishing their feeding apparatus from the piercing of most elasmobranchs and allowing exploitation of prey niches otherwise underutilized in deep-sea habitats. Trophic levels for chimaeroids typically range from 3.0 to 4.0, as determined by stomach content analysis and stable isotope ratios (δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N); for example, Callorhinchus callorynchus exhibits a of 3.15, while Hydrolagus colliei shows elevated δ¹⁵N values indicative of mid-level predation, potentially augmented by deeper foraging or physiological factors like . such as C. monstrosa often surpass the trophic positions of co-occurring catsharks or skates, reflecting greater specialization on prey and contributing to trophic niche separation within chondrichthyan communities. In deep-sea environments, chimaeroids play a stabilizing role by controlling abundances of detritivorous and scavenging , thereby influencing benthic community structure and potentially facilitating energy transfer to higher predators; their opportunistic on post-disturbance prey underscores resilience in low-productivity systems. Overfishing targeting chimaeroids or their prey can disrupt these interactions, as evidenced by observed shifts in Mediterranean assemblages where reduced chimaeroid densities correlate with altered dynamics.

Conservation and Threats

Human Impacts

Chimaeras face significant threats from commercial fishing, primarily through incidental capture as bycatch in deep-sea trawl operations targeting teleost fishes and other demersal species. These fisheries, which expanded globally since the mid-20th century, have led to population declines across many chimaera species due to their slow growth rates, late maturity, and low reproductive output, rendering them particularly susceptible to even moderate levels of mortality. For instance, the rabbitfish (Chimaera monstrosa), classified as Vulnerable by the IUCN, has exhibited documented abundance reductions in regions like the Mediterranean Sea, where deep-water trawling overlaps with its range. Targeted fishing for chimaeras occurs sporadically, mainly for their livers, which yield high-value oil used in and pharmaceuticals. In areas such as and parts of the Atlantic, retention of bycatch for this trade exacerbates pressures, though catch volumes remain lower than for or rays. Bottom trawling also inflicts damage by disrupting deep-sea benthic environments, where many chimaeras reside at depths of 200–2,000 meters, altering structure and prey availability. Globally, chondrichthyan populations, including chimaeras, have declined by approximately 50% since 1970, with accounting for over 99% of assessed threats. Emerging risks include deep-sea for polymetallic nodules, which could disturb chimaera habitats in abyssal plains through sediment plumes and direct seafloor removal, potentially affecting up to 30 chondrichthyan species via plume dispersion and 25 via equipment impacts. While current is limited, planned operations in areas like the Clarion-Clipperton Zone overlap with chimaera distributions, amplifying cumulative pressures from . Conservation responses, such as bycatch reduction devices and fishery quotas in regions like the , have shown variable efficacy, with ongoing monitoring needed given data deficiencies for many of the 52 chimaera species.

Species Status and Research

As of 2024, Chimaeriformes comprises approximately 55 recognized across (Chimaeridae, Rhinochimaeridae, and Callorhinchidae), with ongoing taxonomic revisions adding new taxa, such as the narrow-nosed spookfish (Chimaera scandica) described from waters in 2024. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assesses chondrichthyans collectively, including chimaeras, with 37% of evaluated classified as threatened (Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable) in the 2024 Global Status Report, though chimaeras exhibit a higher proportion of designations due to their deep-sea habitats limiting population data. Specific chimaera assessments reveal no as Critically Endangered or Endangered, but several as Vulnerable (e.g., the whitespotted chimaera Hydrolagus colliei) or Near Threatened, driven by vulnerabilities rather than targeted fisheries. Primary threats to chimaera populations stem from incidental capture in deep-sea trawl fisheries, which operate in habitats from 200 to over 2,000 meters depth where many species reside, leading to unreported mortality and potential population declines exceeding 30% in fished areas over three generations for some taxa. Emerging risks include deep-sea mining for polymetallic nodules, which overlaps with the ranges of at least 30 chimaera species; sediment plumes and habitat disruption could affect egg-laying sites, as chimaeras deposit leathery cases on seafloors, with modeling indicating exposure for 25 of these species to mining discharges. Conservation measures remain limited, with no species commercially targeted at scale, but calls for bycatch mitigation in regional fisheries management organizations and moratoriums on mining in high-biodiversity zones have intensified post-2024 IUCN findings. Research on chimaeras has accelerated since 2020, emphasizing , , and evolutionary adaptations to inform status assessments. Ontogenetic studies, such as those on the male —a denticle-covered frontal used in —reveal tooth-like structures developing via pathways akin to oral , confirmed through histological and genetic analyses of specimens from in 2025. Deep-sea surveys using remotely operated vehicles have facilitated new species descriptions and distribution mapping, enhancing IUCN resolutions, while genomic sequencing efforts highlight low in isolated populations, underscoring vulnerability to localized threats. Future priorities include long-term monitoring of impacts and modeling mining effects, with collaborative initiatives like the IUCN Specialist Group advocating for expanded protected areas in chimaera hotspots.

Evolutionary History

Fossil Record

The fossil record of holocephalans, the subclass including chimaeras (Chimaeriformes), extends to the period, with the earliest known specimens dating to the Middle around 385 million years ago, though complete skeletons are rare due to the cartilaginous nature of their endoskeletons, resulting in a preponderance of dental remains such as tooth plates and isolated . Holocephalan diversity peaked during the period (359–299 million years ago), encompassing extinct orders like Eugeneodontiformes (e.g., ) and Petalodontiformes, alongside early chimaeroid-like forms such as Debeerius ellefseni and Iniopteryx, which exhibited grinding dentition adapted for durophagous feeding but recent analyses indicate some were suction feeders rather than shell crushers. A key Permian from , dated to approximately 280 million years ago, preserves a symmoriiform chondrichthyan with CT-scanned features transitional to chimaeroids, illuminating the evolutionary bridge from stem-group holocephalans to modern lineages. Post- records show a decline in diversity, with Mesozoic appearances of chimaeriform tooth plates and egg cases, such as Laffonia from the , providing insights into reproductive morphology. Crown-group Chimaeriformes, comprising extant genera, diversified primarily in deep-sea habitats following the Cretaceous-Paleogene around 66 million years ago, as evidenced by molecular and congruence. Regional records, such as Late to chimaeroid teeth in , underscore patchy preservation but confirm persistence into modern times.

Phylogenetic Insights

Holocephali, the group encompassing modern chimaeras, occupy a basal position within crown-group Chondrichthyes as the sister taxon to Elasmobranchii (sharks, rays, and skates), a relationship supported by both molecular and morphological phylogenies. This divergence is estimated to have occurred around 410 million years ago, based on the earliest fossils assignable to the respective lineages. Molecular analyses, including sequences such as subunit I and genes, consistently recover the of and the Holocephali-Elasmobranchii split with high bootstrap support, often exceeding 100% in concatenated datasets. Whole-genome assemblies from elasmobranch species further corroborate this topology, highlighting conserved genomic features like clusters that distinguish chondrichthyans from osteichthyans while underscoring holocephalan divergence early in chondrichthyan evolution. Fossil evidence from the , including forms like Iniopteryx, reveals a diverse stem-holocephalan radiation that predates the modern Chimaeriformes, with recent phylogenetic placements indicating living holocephalans represent a surviving amid extensive ancient . High-resolution CT scans of 280-million-year-old specimens confirm the early assembly of the holocephalan , including hypermineralized cranial structures, supporting a deep split from elasmobranch lineages rather than a derived position. These insights challenge earlier views of holocephalans as a minor offshoot, emphasizing their role in illuminating primitive chondrichthyan traits such as reduced gill supports and opercular modifications.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11257016/
  2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20551041/
  3. https://www.iucnssg.org/uploads/5/4/1/2/54120303/2015_-_deep%25E2%2580%2593sea_cartilaginous_fishes_of_the_southeastern_atlantic_ocean_4.pdf
  4. https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/order/12
  5. https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/discover-fish/species-profiles/ghost-shark/
  6. https://www.fao.org/3/i3477e/i3477e.pdf
  7. https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/2005-029.pdf
  8. https://www.wits.ac.za/news/latest-news/research-news/2017/2017-01/280-million-year-old-fossil-reveals-origins-of-chimaeroid-fishes.html
  9. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/27/11/2576/1121974
  10. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2024.1824
  11. https://bioone.org/journalArticle/Download?urlid=10.1643%252FOT-03-275
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7872578/
  13. https://lkcnhm.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2024/03/RBZ-2024-0006.pdf
  14. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/FamilySummary.php?ID=24
  15. https://issuu.com/iucnsharkspecialistgroup/docs/iucn_ssc_ssg_shark_news_issue_03_october_2021-l/s/14340491
  16. https://www.fishbase.se/identification/SpeciesList.php?genus=Chimaera
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/chimaeriformes
  18. https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/discover-fish/species-profiles/spotted-ratfish/
  19. https://www.sharktrust.org/chimaera
  20. https://biogeodb.stri.si.edu/caribbean/en/thefishes/species/5577
  21. https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/chimaeriformes-chimaeras
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8388383/
  23. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.23280
  24. https://www.brainkart.com/article/Chimaeras---Subclass-Holocephali_22141/
  25. https://www.gdcollegebegusarai.com/course_materials/hindi/zol11.pdf
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/chimaera-monstrosa
  27. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ar.23280
  28. https://www.lkouniv.ac.in/site/writereaddata/siteContent/202004021912558038manoj_kumar_zool_Holocephali.pdf
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29314892/
  30. https://saveourseas.com/update/discovering-the-hidden-life-of-the-pacific-spotted-ratfish-a-journey-into-washingtons-marine-ecosystems/
  31. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2508054122
  32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40906772/
  33. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.04.04.647311v1.full-text
  34. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/this-gloriously-weird-fish-has-teeth-on-its-forehead-for-sex/
  35. https://www.reddit.com/r/PrehistoricLife/comments/1ir676s/a_300millionyearold_survivor_the_spotted_ratfish/
  36. https://news.fullerton.edu/2022/10/creature-of-the-deep-sea-marine-biology-researcher-studies-ghost-sharks/
  37. https://animalfact.com/chimaeras/
  38. https://www.fao.org/4/x2401e/x2401e14.pdf
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319311886_New_species_of_Chimaera_Chondrichthyes_Holocephali_Chimaeriformes_Chimaeridae_from_the_Southwestern_Indian_Ocean
  40. https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/family/117
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230452554_On_the_South_Atlantic_distribution_of_Callorhinchus_callorhynchus_Holocephali_Callorhynchidae
  42. https://shark-references.com/species/view/Callorhinchus-callorynchus
  43. https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/8/10/522
  44. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/935dadf8-09f7-4984-bcb1-3deb12a81dad/content
  45. https://biogeodb.stri.si.edu/sftep/en/thefishes/species/5265
  46. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/223/9/jeb222943/223816/Near-equal-compressibility-of-liver-oil-and
  47. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/environmental-conservation/article/limited-potential-to-recover-from-overfishing-raises-concerns-for-deepsea-sharks-rays-and-chimaeras/C0228E27E2C30E6E347A9E4EAB12B91F
  48. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-14076-2
  49. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-87499-2
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327161386_Retinal_Morphology_and_Visual_Specializations_in_Three_Species_of_Chimaeras_the_Deep-Sea_R_pacifica_and_C_lignaria_and_the_Vertical_Migrator_C_milii_Holocephali
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698911000873
  52. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-62544-w
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9198096/
  54. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9011492cb1e4d67645963ad9fdaba67cb99ffb2b
  55. https://biomechanics.ucr.edu/Foster_Higham_2010.pdf
  56. https://sicb.org/abstracts/the-curious-case-of-chimaera-kinematics-gait-transitions-in-the-spotted-ratfish-hydrolagus-colliei/
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327456759_The_ontogenetic_scaling_of_form_and_function_in_the_spotted_ratfish_Hydrolagus_colliei_Chondrichthyes_Chimaeriformes_Fins_muscles_and_locomotion
  58. https://www.fao.org/4/y4160e/y4160e41.pdf
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233089384_Feeding_habits_of_Chimaera_monstrosa_L_Chimaeridae_in_relation_to_its_ontogenetic_development_on_the_southern_Portuguese_continental_slope
  60. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rsif.2007.1325
  61. https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-pdf/39/1/26/2173026/39-1-26.pdf
  62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290104257_Feeding_ecology_and_trophic_level_of_Chimaera_monstrosa_Linnaeus_1758_Holocephali_Chimaeridae_in_the_Eastern_Mediterranean
  63. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfb.13284
  64. https://faculty.lsu.edu/maruskalab/files/publications/23_hormones_and_reproduction_in_chondricthyan_fishes.pdf
  65. https://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/pdf-content/1994/923/digiacomo.pdf
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311087738_Reproductive_biology_of_the_two_deep-sea_chimaerids_longnose_spookfish_Harriotta_raleighana_and_Pacific_spookfish_Rhinochimaera_pacifica
  67. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/Hydrolagus-colliei.html
  68. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29852708/
  69. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Callorhinchus_milii/
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9782884/
  71. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/217/8/1353/13137/Urea-based-osmoregulation-in-the-developing-embryo
  72. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/Callorhinchus-milii
  73. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00288330.2010.535496
  74. https://oceana.org/marine-life/spotted-ratfish/
  75. https://www.fishbase.se/TrophicEco/PredatorList.php?ID=2503&GenusName=Chimaera&SpeciesName=monstrosa
  76. https://a-z-animals.com/animals/chimaera/
  77. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/new-species-ghost-sharks-new-zealand
  78. https://www.parasite-journal.org/articles/parasite/full_html/2019/01/parasite190059/parasite190059.html
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6753859/
  80. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-84613-y
  81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394983837_Metazoan_Parasite_Communities_of_Two_Sympatric_Shortnose_Chimeras_Holocephali_Chimaeridae_from_Deep_Waters_Associated_with_the_Humboldt_Current_System_Ancient_Fishes_Harbor_Ancient_Parasites
  82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233196276_Some_parasites_of_the_small-eyed_rabbitfish_Hydrolagus_affinis_Capello_1867_Holocephali_caught_in_deep_waters_off_SW_Greenland
  83. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09397140.2015.1132560
  84. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jai.14241
  85. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/416886/
  86. https://www.ni.bio.br/1982-0224-2018-0126/
  87. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377472109_Trophic_ecology_of_Chimaera_Hydrolagus_colliei_inferred_from_stable_isotope_analysis
  88. https://www.ebd.csic.es/en/node/21086
  89. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250219712_Feeding_habits_and_niche_separation_among_the_deep-sea_chimaeroid_fishes_Harriotta_raleighana_Hydrolagus_bemisi_and_Hydrolagus_novaezealandiae
  90. https://sanctuarysimon.org/regional_docs/monitoring_projects/100373_Kramp_2012.pdf
  91. https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article/57/3/476/635915
  92. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3897121/
  93. https://www.globalseafood.org/advocate/study-overfishing-has-halved-shark-and-ray-populations-since-1970/
  94. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982221011982
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982225011893
  96. https://www.hawaii.edu/news/2025/10/02/deep-sea-mining-threats/
  97. https://iucn.org/press-release/202412/third-sharks-rays-and-chimaeras-are-threatened-extinction-new-report-narrows
  98. https://divemagazine.com/scuba-diving-news/new-species-of-chimaera-discovered-in-new-zealand
  99. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2017-035.pdf
  100. https://www.sharktrust.org/pups-chimaera
  101. https://phys.org/news/2025-10-deep-sea-poses-threat-shark.html
  102. https://news.mongabay.com/2025/10/mining-the-deep-sea-could-further-threaten-endangered-sharks-and-rays/
  103. https://phys.org/news/2025-09-ghost-sharks-forehead-teeth-sex.html
  104. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/10/251015231009.htm
  105. https://www.iucnssg.org/news/a-third-of-sharks-rays-and-chimaeras-are-threatened-with-extinction-as-new-report-narrows-in-on-solutions
  106. https://animalkingdoms2015.weebly.com/class-holocephali.html
  107. https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/976693
  108. https://www.uchicagomedicine.org/forefront/biological-sciences-articles/2017/january/280-million-year-old-fossil-reveals-origins-of-chimaeroid-fishes
  109. https://sjpp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13358-025-00352-x
  110. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08912963.2022.2067994
  111. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Chondricthyan-phylogeny-after-Coates-et-al-2018-1-Crown-group-Chondrichthyes_fig8_347187162
  112. https://boussau.github.io/tutorials/Projects/Inoue.pdf
  113. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24293104/
  114. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-018-0673-5
  115. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.08.01.606185v1.full.pdf
  116. https://www.nearlab.org/uploads/1/3/3/7/133700440/187_brownstein_et_al2024holocephalans.pdf
  117. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3029744/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.