Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)
View on Wikipedia
| Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) | |
|---|---|
The church's logo, depicting a chalice with the Cross of St. Andrew | |
| Classification | Protestant |
| Orientation | Mainline Protestant, Restorationist |
| Polity | Congregationalist |
| General Minister and President | Teresa Hord Owens |
| Associations | |
| Full communion |
|
| Region | United States and Canada |
| Headquarters | Indianapolis, Indiana |
| Founder | |
| Origin |
|
| Separated from |
|
| Congregations | 3,624 |
| Members | 277,864 (2022)[1] |
| Official website | disciples |
The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)[note 1] is a mainline Protestant Christian denomination in the United States and Canada.[2][3] The denomination started with the Restoration Movement during the Second Great Awakening, first existing during the 19th century as a loose association of churches working toward Christian unity. These slowly structuralized through missionary societies, regional associations, and an international convention. In 1968, the Disciples of Christ officially adopted a denominational structure. At that time, a group of churches left in order to remain nondenominational.
The denomination is referred to by several versions of its full name, including "Disciples of Christ", "Disciples", "Christian Church", "CC(DOC)", and "DOC".[note 2] The Christian Church was a charter participant in the formation of the World Council of Churches (WCC) and of the Federal Council of Churches (now the National Council of Churches), and it continues to be engaged in ecumenical conversations.
The Disciples' local churches are congregationally governed. In 2025, Pew Research Center published the Religious Landscape Survey, estimating that 0.3% of the US adult population, or 780,000 people, self-identified as adherents of the Disciples of Christ.[4][5] In 2008 there were 679,563 members in 3,714 congregations in the United States and Canada.[6] By 2015, this number had declined to a baptized membership of 497,423 in 3,267 congregations, of whom about 306,905 were active members, while approximately 177,000 attended Sunday services each week.[7] In 2018, the denomination reported 380,248 members with 124,437 people in average worship attendance.[8] By 2022, membership had dropped to 277,864 members, 89,894 of whom attended worship on average.[9]
History
[edit]The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) traces its roots to the Stone-Campbell Movement on the American frontier. The Movement is so named because it started as two distinct but similar movements rising from the Presbyterian Church, each without knowledge of the other, during the Second Great Awakening in the early 19th century. The first of these two groups, led by Barton W. Stone, began at Cane Ridge, Bourbon County, Kentucky. The group called themselves simply Christians. The second began in western Pennsylvania and Virginia (now West Virginia), led by Thomas Campbell and his son, Alexander Campbell. Because the founders wanted to abandon all denominational labels, they used the biblical names for the followers of Jesus that they found in the Bible.[10]
Stone
[edit]
In 1801, the Cane Ridge Revival in Kentucky planted the seed for a movement in Kentucky and the Ohio River Valley to disassociate from denominationalism. In 1803 Stone and others withdrew from the Kentucky Presbytery and formed the Springfield Presbytery. The defining event of the Stone wing of the movement was the publication of the Last Will and Testament of the Springfield Presbytery, at Cane Ridge, Kentucky, in 1804. "The Last Will" is a brief document in which Stone and five others announced their withdrawal from Presbyterianism and their intention to be solely part of the body of Christ.[11] The writers appealed for the unity of all who follow Jesus, suggested the value of congregational self-governance, and lifted the Bible as the source for understanding the will of God. They denounced the use of the Westminster Confession of Faith as divisive.[12]
Soon, they adopted the name "Christian" to identify their group. Thus, the remnants of the Springfield Presbytery became the Christian Church.[13] It is estimated that the Christian Church numbered about 12,000 by 1830.[14]
Campbells
[edit]
Independently of Stone, Thomas Campbell published the Declaration and Address of the Christian Association of Washington, (Pennsylvania) in 1809. In The Declaration and Address, he set forth some of his convictions about the church of Jesus Christ, emphasizing Christian unity and the restoration of the New Testament church. He organized the Christian Association of Washington, not as a church but as an association of persons seeking to grow in faith.[15] On May 4, 1811, however, the Christian Association constituted itself as a congregationally governed church. With the building it then constructed at Brush Run, it became known as Brush Run Church.[16]

When their study of the New Testament led the reformers to begin to practice baptism by immersion, the nearby Redstone Baptist Association invited Brush Run Church to join with them for the purpose of fellowship. The reformers agreed provided that they would be "allowed to preach and to teach whatever they learned from the Scriptures."[17]
Thus began a sojourn for the reformers among the Baptists within the Redstone Baptist Association (1815–1824). While the reformers and the Baptists shared the same beliefs in baptism by immersion and congregational polity, it was soon clear that the reformers were not traditional Baptists. Within the Redstone Association, the differences became intolerable to some of the Baptist leaders, when Alexander Campbell began publishing a journal, The Christian Baptist, promoting reform. Campbell anticipated the conflict and moved his membership to a congregation of the Mahoning Baptist Association in 1824.[18]

In 1827, the Mahoning Association appointed reformer Walter Scott as an Evangelist. Through Scott's efforts, the Mahoning Association grew rapidly. In 1828, Thomas Campbell visited several of the congregations formed by Scott and heard him preach. The elder Campbell realized that Scott was bringing an important new dimension to the movement with his approach to evangelism.[19]
Several Baptist associations began disassociating from congregations that refused to subscribe to the Philadelphia Confession. The Mahoning Association came under attack. In 1830, the Mahoning Baptist Association disbanded. Alexander ceased publication of The Christian Baptist. In January 1831, he began publication of the Millennial Harbinger.[20]
1832 merger
[edit]
The two groups united at High Street Meeting House, Lexington, Kentucky, with a handshake between Barton W. Stone and "Raccoon" John Smith, on Saturday, December 31, 1831.[21] Smith had been chosen by those present to speak on behalf of the followers of the Campbells.[22] While contemporaneous accounts are clear that the handshake took place on Saturday, some historians have changed the date of the merger to Sunday, January 1, 1832.[23] The 1832 date has become generally accepted. The actual difference is about 20 hours.[24]
Two representatives of those assembled were appointed to carry the news of the union to all the churches: John Rogers for the Christians and "Raccoon" John Smith for the reformers. Despite some challenges, the merger succeeded.[25]
With the merger, there was the challenge of what to call the new movement. Clearly, finding a Biblical, non-sectarian name was important. Stone wanted to continue to use the name "Christians". Alexander Campbell insisted upon "Disciples of Christ". Walter Scott and Thomas Campbell sided with Stone, but the younger Campbell had strong reasons and would not yield. As a result, both names were used.[26]
National Conventions
[edit]
In 1849, the first National Convention was held at Cincinnati, Ohio.[27] Alexander Campbell had concerns that holding conventions would lead the movement into divisive denominationalism. He did not attend the gathering.[28] Among its actions, the convention elected Alexander Campbell its President and created the American Christian Missionary Society (ACMS).[29]
The formation of a missionary society set the stage for further "co-operative" efforts. By the end of the century, the Foreign Christian Missionary Society and the Christian Women's Board of Missions were also engaged in missionary activities. Forming the ACMS did not reflect a consensus of the entire movement. Sponsorship of missionary activities became a divisive issue. In the succeeding decades, for some congregations and their leaders, co-operative work through missionary societies and the adoption of instrumental music in church worship was straying too far from their conception of the early church. After the American Civil War, the schism grew. While there was no disagreement over the need for evangelism, many believed that missionary societies were not authorized by scripture and would compromise the autonomy of local congregations.[30] This became one important factor leading to the separation of the Churches of Christ from the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ).[30]
Journals
[edit]From the beginning of the movement, the free exchange of ideas among the people was fostered by the journals published by its leaders. Alexander Campbell published the Christian Baptist and the Millennial Harbinger. Barton W. Stone published the Christian Messenger.[31] In a respectful way, both men routinely published the contributions of others whose positions were radically different from their own.[32]
Following Campbell's death in 1866, journals continued to keep the discussion and conversation alive. Between 1870 and 1900, two journals emerged as the most prominent. The Christian Standard was edited and published by Isaac Errett of Cincinnati. The Christian Evangelist was edited and published by J. H. Garrison from St. Louis. The two men enjoyed a friendly rivalry, and kept the dialog going within the movement.[33] A third journal became part of the conversation with the publication in 1884 of The Christian Oracle, later to become The Christian Century, with an interdenominational appeal.[34] In 1914, Garrison's Christian Publishing company was purchased by R. A. Long, who then established a non-profit corporation, "The Christian Board of Publication" as the Brotherhood publishing house.[35]
First Division
[edit]In 1906, the U.S. Religious Census listed Churches of Christ for the first time as a group that was separate and distinct from the Disciples of Christ.[36] However, the division had been growing for years, with published reports as early as 1883.[37]
The most obvious distinction between the two groups was the Churches of Christ rejecting the use of musical instruments in worship. The controversy over musical instruments began in 1860, when some congregations introduced organs, traditionally associated with wealthier, denominational churches. More basic were the underlying approaches to Biblical interpretation. The Churches of Christ permitted only those practices found in accounts of New Testament worship. They could find no New Testament documentation of the use of instrumental music in worship. The Disciples, by contrast, considered permissible any practices that the New Testament did not expressly forbid.[38] While music and the approach to missionary work were the most visible issues, there were also some deeper ones. The process that led to the separation had begun prior to the American Civil War.[39]
The Brotherhood
[edit]In the early 20th century, a central point of conflict for the remaining Christian Churches was cooperative missionary efforts, both nationally and internationally. Several missionary societies had already been established, and the congregations that contributed to these societies and attended the national convention became known as "cooperative" and began referring to the larger grouping of these congregations as "the Brotherhood". In 1917 the National Convention became the International Convention of Christian Churches (Disciples of Christ) with the incorporation of Canadian Disciples.[40] In 1920, three separate missionary societies merged into the United Christian Missionary Society in 1920, which undertook missions work both in the "homeland" and abroad. Over the next fifty years, the UCMS was the largest agency of the Brotherhood. The National Benevolent Association was also established during the early 20th century as a social services ministry providing assistance to orphans, the elderly and the disabled.[41]
The congregations that did not participate were known as "independents". Until the cooperative churches underwent the process of restructure in the 1960s, the cooperatives and independents coexisted together under the same identity, but were following different paths by the 1940s, with the independents forming the North American Christian Convention in 1947.[42]
While issues of ecclesiology were at the forefront of the growing division, theological issues also divided the two groups, with the cooperative churches largely adopting the new methods of Biblical analysis developed in the late 19th century.[43]
Restructure
[edit]Following World War II, it became obvious that the organizations that had been developed in previous decades no longer effectively met the needs of the postwar era.[44] After a number of discussions throughout the 1950s, the 1960 International Convention of Christian Churches adopted a process to "restructure" the entire organization.[45] The Commission on Restructure, chaired by Granville T. Walker, held its first meeting on October 30 & November 1, 1962.[46] In 1968, the International Convention of Christian Churches (Disciples of Christ) adopted the commission's proposed Provisional Design of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ).[47] Soon The Provisional Design became The Design.[48]
The Brotherhood's adoption of The Design made the earlier split between the cooperative and independent churches official. Under The Design, all churches in the 1968 yearbook of Christian Churches (Disciples of Christ) were automatically recognized as part of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). In the years that followed, many of the Independent Christian Church Congregations requested formal withdrawal from the yearbook. Many of those congregations were already part of the North American Christian Convention; this group would become known as the Christian churches and churches of Christ and became the third primary group of the Stone-Campbell Movement.[42]
Logo
[edit]In 1971, the General Assembly adopted a logo for the denomination. The logo depicts a red chalice with a white St. Andrew's Cross. Symbolically the chalice is said to represent the Lord's Supper, which is central to Disciples practice, and the cross of St. Andrew is said to represent the denomination's roots in Scottish Presbyterianism and the ministry of all people. The logo was designed by Ronald E. Osborn who drew the logo with a red pen, leading to the red color of the logo, and refined by Bruce Tilsley. The logo can be used by all Disciples congregations, ministries, and other affiliated institutions and provides clarity among confusion from the "Christian Church" moniker many Disciple and non-Disciple congregations use.[49]
Beliefs and practices
[edit]As a congregational denomination, each Disciples congregation determines the nature of its worship, study, Christian service, and witness to the world. Through belief in the priesthood of all believers, Disciples also practice freedom of interpretation among its members, with only baptism and confession of Christ as Lord required.
Doctrine and interpretation
[edit]As members of the Christian Church, We confess that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God, and proclaim him Lord and Savior of the world. In Christ's name and by his grace we accept our mission of witness and service to all people. We rejoice in God, maker of heaven and earth, and in God's covenant of love which binds us to God and to one another. Through baptism into Christ we enter into newness of life and are made one with the whole people of God. In the communion of the Holy Spirit we are joined together in discipleship and in obedience to Christ. At the Table of the Lord we celebrate with thanksgiving the saving acts and presence of Christ. Within the universal church we receive the gift of ministry and the light of scripture. In the bonds of Christian faith we yield ourselves to God that we may serve the One whose kingdom has no end. Blessing, glory, and honor be to God forever. Amen.
Early members of the Stone-Campbell Movement adopted the slogan "In essentials, Unity; In non-essentials, Liberty; and in all things, Charity."[note 3] For modern disciples the one essential is the acceptance of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, and obedience to him in baptism.[50] There is no requirement to give assent to any other statement of belief or creed, or any official interpretation of the Bible.[51] Hierarchical doctrine was traditionally rejected by Disciples as human-made and divisive, and subsequently, freedom of belief and scriptural interpretation allows many Disciples to question or even deny beliefs common in doctrinal churches such as the Incarnation, the Trinity, and the Atonement. Beyond the essential commitment to follow Jesus, there is a tremendous freedom of belief and interpretation. As the basic teachings of Jesus are studied and applied to life, there is the freedom to interpret Jesus' teachings in different ways, and there is a wide diversity among Disciples in what individuals and congregations believe. It is not uncommon to find individuals who seemingly hold diametrically opposed beliefs within the same congregation affirming one another's journeys of faith as sisters and brothers in Christ.[42]
Modern Disciples reject the use of creeds as "tests of faith" – as required beliefs, necessary to be accepted as a follower of Jesus. Although Disciples respect the great creeds of the church as informative affirmations of faith, they are never seen as binding. Since the adoption of The Design of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ),[52] in 1968, Disciples have celebrated a sense of unity in reading the preamble to the Design publicly.
Worship and Communion
[edit]Most congregations sing hymns, read from the Old and New Testaments, hear the word of God proclaimed through sermon or other medium and extend an invitation to become Christ's Disciples.
Most Disciple congregations practice weekly celebrations of the Lord's Supper, often referred to by Disciples as Communion, as an integral part of worship.[53] Through the observance of Communion, individuals are invited to acknowledge their faults and sins, to remember the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, to remember their baptism, and to give thanks for God's redeeming love.[54] Because Disciples believe that the invitation to the table comes from Jesus Christ, Communion is open to all who confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, regardless of their denominational affiliation.[55]
Baptism
[edit]Most Disciple congregations practice believer's baptism in the form of immersion, believing it to be the form used in the New Testament. The experiences of yielding to Christ in being buried with him in the waters of baptism and rising to a new life have profound meaning for the church.[56] While most congregations exclusively practice baptism by immersion, Disciples also accept other forms of baptism including infant baptism.[57]
Ecumenical efforts
[edit]The church of Christ upon earth is essentially, intentionally, and constitutionally one; consisting of all those in every place that profess their faith in Christ and obedience to him in all things.
The Disciples celebrate their oneness with all who seek God through Jesus Christ, throughout time and regardless of location. In local communities, congregations share with churches of other denominations in joint worship and in community Christian service. Ecumenical cooperation and collaboration with other Christian Communions has long been practiced by the Regions.[58]
At the General Church level, the Christian Unity and Interfaith Ministries Unity (CUIM)[59] coordinates the ecumenical and interfaith activities of the church. The Disciples continues to relate to the National Council of Churches and Canadian Council of Churches, both of which it was a founding member. It shares in the dialog and in the theological endeavors of the World Council of Churches. The Disciples has been a full participant in the Consultation on Church Union since it began in the 1960s. It continues to support those ongoing conversations which have taken on the title Churches Uniting in Christ.
The Disciples have two full communion partners: the United Church of Christ, since 1989, and the United Church of Canada, since 2019. These three denominations all share mutual full communion with each other.[60] CUIM describes these partnerships as the proclamation of "mutual recognition of their sacraments and ordained ministry". Ordained Disciple ministers are able to directly serve in the United Church of Christ without having to seek additional qualifications.[61]
Additionally, the Disciples combined their overseas ministries with the United Church of Christ in 1996. Known as Global Ministries, it is a common agency of both denominations with a joint staff and is a continuance of decades of cooperative work in global missions.[62]
While the Disciples of Christ and United Church of Canada have entered full communion, the recentness of the agreement means that the provisions for mutual recognition of clergy are not yet finalized and adopted.
Ordained ministry
[edit]The Disciples believe in the priesthood of all believers, in that all people baptized are called to minister to others with diverse spiritual gifts. The Disciples view their Order of Ministry as a specific subset of all believers who are called with spiritual gifts specifically suited for pastoral ministry.[63] Congregations use different terms to refer to persons in the Order of Ministry including Pastor and Reverend but most call them Ministers, including the denomination's governing documents.[64]
Congregations sponsor members seeking ordination or commissioning as a Minister, and Regional Ministries organize committees to oversee the process. Ordination can be achieved by obtaining a Master of Divinity from a theological institution, which does not have to be an institution associated with the Disciples. Ordination can also be achieved through an "Apprentice" track which has candidates shadow ordained ministers. Finally, Ministers can be Commissioned, a shorter process for seminary students and those seeking short-term ministry in a Region. Regional requirements for ministry vary. Ordination is made official through a service which includes members of the church, clergy, and Regional Minister laying their hands on the candidate as the ordaining act. Ecumenical representatives are often included to emphasize the Disciples' desire for Christian unity.[63]
Disciples recognize the ordinations of the United Church of Christ as do they for Disciples.[65]
A General Commission on the Order of Ministry exists to interpret and review definitions of ministry, give oversight to Regions and congregations, provide other support, and maintain the standing of Regional Ministers and Ministers of General (National) Ministries.[66]
Abortion
[edit]Members of the Disciples of Christ have many different opinions on abortion. This would be a prime example of "Resolve to Love, Agree to Differ, Unite to Serve, Break Bread Together".[citation needed]
LGBTQ inclusion
[edit]In 1977, the General Assembly of the denomination debated resolutions about homosexuality for the first time; a resolution condemning the "homosexual lifestyle" was defeated by the Assembly and a resolution to ban gay people from the ordained ministry was referred to the General Minister and President for further study.[67] At the next General Assembly two years later, the Assembly approved a resolution that declared "The ordination of persons who engage in homosexual practices is not in accord with God's will", but concurrently declared that "The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) intends to continue the current pattern of assigning responsibility to the regions with respect to the nurture, certification, and ordination of ministers."[67] Since then, some regions have ordained LGBTQ ministers before the denomination officially supported it. Concerns about LGBTQ people continued to be an issue at the General Assembly, but resolutions that called on more civil rights protections for LGBTQ people were passed with overwhelming majorities and resolutions to ban the "homosexual lifestyle" continued to be rejected.[68]
In 2011, the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) stated that "Disciples do not have a formal policy on same-sex marriage. Different congregations have the autonomy to discern on issues such as this one."[69] In 2013, the Disciples of Christ voted in favor of a resolution affirming all members regardless of sexual orientation.[70] After same-sex marriage was legalized in the US, the denomination reiterated that it leaves "all decisions of policy on same-sex marriage to local congregations".[71]
In 2019, the General Assembly passed a resolution specifically affirming that transgender and gender non-conforming people are welcome in the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ).[72]
Disciples LGBTQ+ Alliance provides resources to congregations that want to be certified as "Open and Affirming" to show that they are accepting of all gender identities and sexual orientations.[73] The Alliance was founded as the Gay, Lesbian, and Affirming Disciples Alliance (GLAD) during the 1979 General Assembly.[74]
Structure
[edit]The structure of the Disciples is unique among Mainline Protestant churches. The Design, the governing document of the denomination, describes three "expressions" of the church: congregational, regional, and general. Each of these expressions are "characterized by its integrity, self-governance, authority, rights, and responsibilities." In relating to each other, they work in covenant and not authority to support the ministry and work of the church.[52]
Congregations
[edit]Congregations of the Disciples are self-governing in the tradition of congregational polity. They call their own Ministers, select their own leadership, own their own property, and manage their own affairs.[75]
In Disciples congregations, the priesthood of all believers finds its expression in worship and Christian service. Congregations elect and ordain lay persons as Elders to share in duties of congregational ministry with the staff ministers, including visiting the sick and administering communion to them, providing spiritual guidance for the congregation, and presiding over Communion during worship, either with or without the staff ministers.[76]
Regional Ministries
[edit]Regional churches consist of all Disciples in a given area, usually a state or group of states. As of 2023, the denomination has 31 regions, including the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) in Canada which has a dual identity as a region in the binational church and a national denomination in its own right.[77]
Regions meet in a Regional Assembly every two to three years to conduct business. Each Region calls a Regional Minister to serve as its primary pastor and chief executive; most regions also have Associate Regional Ministers and other staff to serve specific aspects of its ministries. Canada calls its regional minister a "national pastor". Regions are analogous to the middle judicatories of other denominations, and Regional Ministers are analogous to Bishops.[42]
One of the primary responsibilities of the Regions is the care for and oversight of clergy. The Design places primary responsibility for ordination and licensing of ministers with the region. Candidates seeking ordination are sponsored by a congregation but must be approved by their region, which usually entails a process of interviews and other evaluations by a committee made up of clergy and lay people. The Regional Minister usually officiates the ordination service in the sponsoring congregation. After ordination, regions continue to oversee clergy through a process known as standing, which requires ministers to undergo certain trainings periodically and maintain membership in a Disciples congregation. Ministers can lose their standing for violating the ministerial code of ethics the denomination maintains. Finally, Regional Ministers often provide pastoral care to ministers in their region.
Regions also nurture congregations in their region, including planting new churches, providing guidance, supporting struggling congregations, and helping congregations hire their ministers. This latter process consists of a system known as Search and Call, in which ministers seeking a church declare which regions they would like to serve in and the region then suggests those candidates to congregations seeking a minister. Regional Ministers usually provides congregations with a set of candidates that they feel will meet the congregation's particular needs.
Regions also provide fellowship and education opportunities for its members. Many regions have summer camping experiences for children and youth.[78]
As with all parts of the Disciples, Regions do not have authority to control congregations and congregations are not required to use regional programming, including the search and call system.
General Ministries
[edit]The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) at the "General Church" level consists of a number of self-governing agencies, which focus upon specific Christian witnesses to the world. The church agencies report to the General Assembly, which meets biennially in odd-numbered years and is an assembly of representatives selected by congregations and ordained ministers with standing in the denomination. The General Minister and President (GMP) is the lead pastor for the denomination and the chief executive officer of the legal corporation. Following the covenantal understanding of the denomination, the GMP does not have direct executive power over the General Ministries, regions, or congregations. The GMP is elected to a six-year term by the General Assembly, with the option for a second term.[52]
The current General Minister and President is Teresa Hord Owens. When she was elected in 2017, Owens was the first black woman to lead a mainline denomination as their chief executive.[79] Her presidency followed the presidency of Sharon E. Watkins, the first woman to lead a mainline denomination as their chief executive.[80]
The General Ministries are:[81]
- Office of the General Minister and President: executive office for the denomination and includes communications, fundraising for the denominational mission fund, Week of Compassion, and anti-racist/pro-reconciliation efforts
- Central Pastoral Office for Hispanic Ministries-Obra Hispana: promotes, undergirds, and coordinates work of Disciples Hispanic Ministries and Spanish speaking and bilingual congregations
- Christian Board of Publication/Chalice Press: denominational publishing house
- Christian Church Foundation: provides assistance on giving and endowments
- Christian Unity and Interfaith Ministry (formerly the Council on Christian Unity): ecumenical and interfaith engagement and dialogue
- Disciples Church Extension Fund: support for congregational finances, new church ministry, and congregational renewal
- Disciples Home Missions: provides support for congregational and local ministries including education and faith formation, church vocations, environmental justice, immigration and refugee ministries, families and children, youth, young adults, men's and women's ministries, and volunteering.[82]
- Disciples of Christ Historical Society: maintains archives for the denomination and the larger Stone-Campbell Movement
- Division of Overseas Ministries-Global Ministries: global mission and volunteer work in joint partnership with the United Church of Christ
- Higher Education and Leadership Ministries: works with higher education partners and theological education partners and provides leadership development
- National Benevolent Association: partners with and connects independent health and social service ministries to Disciples and each other
- National Convocation: historical association of Black Disciple congregations that merged with the White Disciples in 1968, now continues as an association connecting and supporting black members and congregations
- North American Pacific/Asian Disciples: association of Pacific and Asian-American Disciples members and congregations
- Pension Fund of the Christian Church: provides pensions and investment/savings products to clergy and lay employees of Stone-Campbell/Restoration Movement churches and organizations.
One highly popular and respected General Agency program is Week of Compassion, named for the special offering to fund the program when it began in the 1950s. Week of Compassion is the disaster relief and Third World development agency.[83] It works closely with Church World Service and church-related organizations in countries around the world where disasters strike, providing emergency aid.[42]
The General Church has challenged the entire denomination to work for a 2020 Vision[84] for the first two decades of the 21st century. Together the denomination is well on the way to achieving its four foci:
- Seeking racial justice, which it describes as becoming a pro-reconciling/anti-racist church.[85]
- Forming 1,000 new congregations across the United States and Canada by 2020.[86]
- Seeking God's transformation of 1,000 existing Congregations in ways that will renew their witness.[87]
- Working to nurture leadership for newly formed and transformed congregations.[88]
Membership trends
[edit]The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) has experienced a very significant loss of membership since the middle of the 20th century. Membership peaked in 1958 at just under 2 million.[89] In 1993, membership dropped below 1 million. In 2009, the denomination reported 658,869 members in 3,691 congregations.[89] In 2010, the five states with the highest adherence rates were Kansas, Missouri, Iowa, Kentucky and Oklahoma.[90] The states with the largest absolute number of adherents were Missouri, Texas, Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio.[91] In 2017, membership had declined to 450,425 members.[92][93]
Affiliated academic institutions
[edit]From the very beginnings of the movement, Disciples have founded institutions of higher learning. Alexander Campbell taught young leaders and founded Bethany College. The movement established similar schools, especially in the years following the American Civil War.[94]
Because intellectual and religious freedom are important values for the Disciples of Christ, the colleges, universities, and seminaries founded by its congregations do not seek to indoctrinate students or faculty with a sectarian point of view.[95]
In the 21st century, the relationship between the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) and its affiliated universities is the purview of Higher Education and Leadership Ministries (HELM), an agency of the General Church.[96]
Universities and colleges
[edit]- Barton College – Wilson, North Carolina
- Bethany College – Bethany, West Virginia
- Chapman University – Orange, California
- Columbia College – Columbia, Missouri
- Culver-Stockton College – Canton, Missouri
- Drury University – Springfield, Missouri
- Eureka College – Eureka, Illinois
- Hiram College – Hiram, Ohio
- Jarvis Christian College – Hawkins, Texas
- University of Lynchburg – Lynchburg, Virginia
- Midway University – Midway, Kentucky
- Texas Christian University – Fort Worth, Texas
- Tougaloo College – Tougaloo, Mississippi[97]
- Transylvania University – Lexington, Kentucky
- William Woods University – Fulton, Missouri
Seminaries and theological institutions
[edit]The Disciples have four seminaries and divinity schools directly affiliated with the denomination. These institutions have an ecumenical student body, a reflection of the Disciples' focus on church unity. They are:
- Brite Divinity School – Fort Worth, Texas
- Christian Theological Seminary – Indianapolis, Indiana
- Lexington Theological Seminary – Lexington, Kentucky
- Phillips Theological Seminary – Tulsa, Oklahoma
The Disciples have three additional institutions that provide supplementary education and community living for ecumenical theological institutions. They are:
- Disciples Divinity House of the University of Chicago, affiliated with the University of Chicago Divinity School – Chicago, Illinois
- Disciples Divinity House at Vanderbilt, affiliated with the Vanderbilt Divinity School – Nashville, Tennessee
- Disciples Seminary Foundation, affiliated with Claremont School of Theology, Iliff School of Theology, Pacific School of Religion, and San Francisco Theological Seminary – Claremont, California
Ecumenical relations
[edit]The Disciples of Christ maintains ecumenical relations with the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity.[98] It is also affiliated with other ecumenical organizations such as Churches Uniting in Christ, Christian Churches Together, the National Council of Churches and the World Council of Churches.[99] It maintains Ordained Ministerial Partner Standing with the United Church of Christ, which means that clergy ordained in the Disciples of Christ may also serve in the United Church of Christ.[100] Since 2019, it has been a full Communion partner and had an agreement for mutual recognition of ministerial credentials with the United Church of Canada. It is affiliated with the Disciples Ecumenical Consultative Council and the World Communion of Reformed Churches.
Prominent members
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (January 2020) |
- Jesse Moren Bader, evangelist
- William Barber II, Disciples pastor and President of North Carolina NAACP
- T. Garrott Benjamin, Jr., bishop, civil rights activist, and Senior Pastor Emeritus of Light of the World Christian Church, a Disciples church located in Indianapolis, Indiana, where he faithfully served for 43 years.
- Andy Beshear, current Governor of Kentucky
- Edgar Cayce, American mystic
- Fred Craddock, professor and preacher
- Elmira J. Dickinson, American missionary and advocate for temperance
- J. William Fulbright, U.S. Senator from Arkansas
- James A. Garfield, 20th President of the United States, ordained Disciples minister, Principal (President) of Western Reserve Eclectic Institute (now named Hiram College) in Hiram, Ohio
- Murry Hammond, singer
- Grey DeLisle, voice actress
- Dean Hess, US Air Force Pilot
- Ben Hogan, professional golfer, tied for fourth all-time with nine career professional major championships
- Archie Ijames, assistant pastor of Jim Jones' Peoples Temple.
- Jan Jensen (basketball), current head coach, Iowa Women's Basketball.
- Lyndon Baines Johnson, 36th President of the United States
- Jim Jones, cult leader, who was ordained as a Disciples minister before the denomination was organized in 1968; at that time requirements for ordination varied greatly in different regions and congregations. Two investigations were undertaken in 1974 and 1977 by the denomination that did not find any wrongdoings. No rules or precedent existed for the Disciples for removing ministers, and the Disciples responded to the Jonestown mass killings with significant changes for ministerial ethics and the process to remove ministers from the list of ordained.[101][102]
- Marinda Lemert (1811–1891), religious writer who argued for the ordination of women
- Frances McDormand, actress; winner of the Triple Crown of Acting
- James Clark McReynolds, United States Supreme Court Justice (1914–1941)
- Harold Bell Wright, early 20th century author; pastor at churches in the association prior to becoming an author. The author is best known for the novel The Shepherd of the Hills, and is the first fiction author to sell 1 million copies.
- John Muir, Scottish founder of the environmental movement. Raised in the church, but later left it.[103]
- R. Janae Pitts-Murdock, Senior Pastor of Light of the World Christian Church, a Disciples church, located in Indianapolis, Indiana. She is the first female pastor in the ministry's 158-year (2024) history
- Francis Gary Powers, American CIA U-2 spy plane pilot shot down while flying a reconnaissance mission in Soviet Union airspace
- Betsy Price, former mayor of Fort Worth, Texas (2011–2021), the 16th most populous city in the United States
- Ronald Reagan, 40th President of the United States, baptized into the Disciples as a youth, and graduated from the Disciples' Eureka College, but a member of Bel Air Presbyterian Church in his later years. He married Nancy at The Little Brown Church in Studio City, California, a Disciples Church.
- Susanna Carson Rijnhart, Tibetan explorer, missionary
- Gene Robinson, raised in a Disciples church, later joined the Episcopal Church in the United States of America and became the first openly gay priest to be consecrated as a bishop in a major Christian denomination believing in the historic episcopate
- Colonel Harlan Sanders, founder of Kentucky Fried Chicken
- Tom Selleck, actor
- John Stamos, actor
- Preston Taylor, African American minister, businessperson and philanthropist; founder of the National Christian Missionary Convention
- William Thomas Jr., actor
- Marion Tinsley, considered the all-time greatest human checkers player
- Jessie Trout, Canadian missionary in Japan, author, Japanese-American internment camp worker, co-founder of the Christian Women's Fellowship (1950) and the International Christian Women's Fellowship (1953)
- Emily Harvie Thomas Tubman, businesswoman and philanthropist from Augusta, Georgia, early supporter of the Restoration Movement and correspondent of Alexander Campbell. She financed the construction of many Christian churches in the United States and donated to several Disciples-affiliated colleges.
- Roger Williams (U.S. politician), Congressman representing Texas' 25th District in the U.S. House of Representatives. Former Secretary of State of Texas (2004–2007)
- John Wooden, legendary UCLA basketball coach, raised in a Disciples Church in Martinsville, Indiana
- Bruce Zager, former justice, Iowa Supreme Court
- Mary Steenburgen, Academy award-winning actress.[104]
See also
[edit]- First Christian Church, a typical name for many Disciples congregations, links to a disambiguation page with a list of congregations
- National City Christian Church, the Disciples' main congregation in Washington, D.C.
- DisciplesWorld, now-defunct magazine that covered the denomination
- Restoration Movement
- New religious movement
- Churches of Christ, separated officially in 1906
- Christian churches and churches of Christ, separated officially in 1968
- World Convention of Churches of Christ
Notes
[edit]- ^ The full name of the denomination, "Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)", includes the parenthetical phrase.
- ^ The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) shares similar names with the other streams of the Stone-Campbell Movement. Prior to the 1906 separation of the Churches of Christ, congregations would typically be named "Disciples of Christ," "Christian Church," and "Church of Christ." After the split was recognized in 1906, cooperative Disciples churches began to change their names to the more common Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). By 1968 when the Disciples formally organized themselves as a denomination, another group of churches which had not "cooperated" in common ministries of mission and service beyond the congregation level remained separate and began calling themselves Christian Church, Church of Christ, or Independent Christian Church without the "(Disciples of Christ)" moniker. Disciples churches are most easily recognizable by the use of the red chalice logo, since many do not always use the "(Disciples of Christ)" moniker, preferring only the Christian Church moniker.
- ^ From Marco Antonio de Dominis, De Repubblica Ecclesiastica
References
[edit]- ^ Walton, Jeffrey (September 14, 2023). "Disciples Suffer Massive Membership Drop Post-2019". Juicy Ecumenism. Retrieved September 14, 2023.
- ^ "Appendix B: Classification of Protestant Denominations". Pew forum. May 12, 2015. Retrieved April 22, 2019.
- ^ "Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)".
- ^ Fahmy, Gregory A. Smith, Alan Cooperman, Becka A. Alper, Besheer Mohamed, Chip Rotolo, Patricia Tevington, Justin Nortey, Asta Kallo, Jeff Diamant and Dalia (February 26, 2025). "Decline of Christianity in the U.S. Has Slowed, May Have Leveled Off". Pew Research Center. Retrieved March 14, 2025.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Religious Landscape Study". Pew Research Center. Retrieved March 14, 2025.
- ^ "Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) – Religious Groups". The Association of Religion Data Archives. Archived from the original on October 28, 2014. Retrieved November 13, 2009.
- ^ "Religious Landscape Study". Pew forum. Pew Research. Retrieved February 22, 2016.
- ^ "Congregations in Crisis: Dour News from Disciples, Brethren". Juicy œcumenism. February 10, 2021. Retrieved September 23, 2021.
- ^ Walton, Jeffrey (September 15, 2023). "Analysis: Disciples of Christ Suffer Massive Membership Drop Post-2019". The Roys Report. Archived from the original on February 10, 2024. Retrieved February 10, 2024.
- ^ McAlister and Tucker (1975), page 27
- ^ Marshall, et al. 1804.
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975) page 79
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975) page 80
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975) page 82
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975) pages 108–11
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975) page 117
- ^ Davis, M. M. (1915), page 86
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975). page 131
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975), pages 132–33
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975), pages 144–45
- ^ Davis, M. M. (1915), pages 116–20
- ^ Davis, M. M. (1915), page 116.
- ^ Garrison & DeGroot (1948) page 212
- ^ Price, T. D. (October 1953). "Book Review: Schism in the Early Church". Review & Expositor. 50 (4): 495–96. doi:10.1177/003463735305000412. ISSN 0034-6373. S2CID 147512310.
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975), pages 153–54
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975) pages 27–28
- ^ Garrison and DeGroot (1948) page 245
- ^ Garrison & DeGroot (1948), page 245
- ^ Garrison & DeGroot (1948) page 247
- ^ a b Douglas Allen Foster and Anthony L. Dunnavant, 2004, "Missionary Societies, Controversy Over", The Encyclopedia of the Stone-Campbell Movement: Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), Christian Churches/Churches of Christ, Churches of Christ, Wm. B. Eerdmans, ISBN 0-8028-3898-7, ISBN 978-0-8028-3898-8, 854 pp., pp. 534–37
- ^ Garrison & DeGroot (1948), page 208.
- ^ Breines, Ingeborg; Connell, Raewyn; Eide, Ingrid (2000). Male roles, masculinities and violence : a culture of peace perspective. Expert Group Meeting on Male Roles and Masculinities in the Perspective of a Culture of Peace (1997 : Oslo, Norway). Paris: Unesco. ISBN 92-3-103745-5. OCLC 49895036.
- ^ Garrison & DeGroot (1948), page 364.
- ^ Garrison & DeGroot (1948), page 364
- ^ Garrison & DeGroot (1948), page 426
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975), page 251
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975), page 252
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975), pages 242–47
- ^ Cartwright, Colbert S. (1987) pages 17–18
- ^ "International Convention prior to 1968". Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). Retrieved November 15, 2021.
- ^ Garrison & DeGroot (1948), pages 428–29
- ^ a b c d e "Disciples of Christ". Religion resources online. Retrieved January 24, 2021.
- ^ Garrison g DeGroot (1948), pages 418–20
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975), page 419.
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975), page 421
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975), pages 436–37.
- ^ McAlister & Tucker (1975), pages 442–43
- ^ "Disciples Adopt the "Provisional Design of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)"". NBA History. Retrieved January 24, 2021.
- ^ "The Story of the Chalice Logo" (PDF). Disciples of Christ. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 18, 2016. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
- ^ Cummins (1991) pages 64–65.
- ^ Cummins (1991) pages 14–15.
- ^ a b c "The Design of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)". Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). Retrieved August 16, 2020.
- ^ "Communion and Baptism". Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). Retrieved April 6, 2021.
- ^ Cartwright (1987) pages 22–23.
- ^ Cartwright (1991) page 29.
- ^ Cartwright (1987) pages 61–68.
- ^ "Baptism (Non-immersionist View) in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia". International Standard Bible Encyclopedia Online. Retrieved June 17, 2022.
- ^ Hietamäki 0000-0001-9249-0024, Minna (February 9, 2023). "Ecumenism and Church Relations". St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "Home". Disciples CUIM.
- ^ "Full Communion with The United Church of Canada". Disciples CUIM.
- ^ "Full Communion with the United Church of Christ". Disciples CUIM. Retrieved August 16, 2020.
- ^ "Global Ministries History". Global Ministries. Retrieved August 16, 2020.
- ^ a b "Theological Foundations and Policies and Criteria" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on April 18, 2016. Retrieved April 23, 2019.
- ^ "The Design of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)".
- ^ "UCC-Disciples Ecumenical Partnership". United Church of Christ.
- ^ "Structure of the General Commission on Ministry".
- ^ a b Cummins, D. Duane (2009). The Disciples: A Struggle for Reformation. St. Louis: Chalice Press. p. 239. ISBN 9780827206373.
- ^ Cummins, D. Duane (2009). The Disciples: A Struggle for Reformation. St. Louis: Chalice Press. p. 241. ISBN 9780827206373.
- ^ "Disciples congregation votes to change its policy on marriage - Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)". May 18, 2011. Archived from the original on September 18, 2016. Retrieved July 22, 2016.
- ^ "Welcoming Disciples". The Christian Century. July 18, 2013. Retrieved July 22, 2016.
- ^ Roach, David (July 20, 2015). "Gay marriage: mainline denominations affirm SCOTUS". Baptist Press. Retrieved July 22, 2016.
- ^ "An invitation to education for welcoming and receiving the gifts of transgender and gender-diverse people". Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). March 6, 2019. Retrieved February 4, 2021.
- ^ "Find an Open & Affirming Church". Disciples LGBTQ+ Alliance. Archived from the original on May 1, 2018.
- ^ "A History of Glad Alliance" (PDF). Disciples LGBTQ+ Alliance. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 1, 2021.
- ^ Price, T. D. (October 1953). "Book Review: Schism in the Early Church". Review & Expositor. 50 (4): 495–496. doi:10.1177/003463735305000412. ISSN 0034-6373. S2CID 147512310.
- ^ Cartwright (1987) pages 42 – 44
- ^ "Regional Ministries". Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). Retrieved August 16, 2020.
- ^ "Regional Ministries". Archived from the original on February 19, 2015.
- ^ Simon, Mashaun D. (August 29, 2017). "Teresa Hord Owens, first Black woman to lead Disciples of Christ, isn't here to be your token". NBC News. Retrieved August 16, 2020.
- ^ Watkins, Sharon E. (2006) page 206
- ^ "General Ministries". Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). Retrieved August 16, 2020.
- ^ "Disciples Home Missions Ministries" (PDF). Disciples Home Missions. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 15, 2021. Retrieved August 16, 2020.
- ^ "Home".
- ^ "The Four Priorities of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)". Archived from the original on September 16, 2009.
- ^ "Reconcililation Ministry - Called to be together in Christ".
- ^ "Hope Partnership for Missional Transformation".
- ^ "Congregational Transformation". Archived from the original on August 31, 2012.
- ^ "Higher Education & Leadership Ministries".
- ^ a b Christian Church (Disciples of Christ): Denominational Profile Archived October 28, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, Association of Religion Data Archives website (accessed November 27, 2013)
- ^ Christian Church (Disciples of Christ): Distribution, Association of Religion Data Archives website (accessed November 27, 2013)
- ^ Christian Church (Disciples of Christ): Map by Number of Adherents Archived 2015-05-06 at the Wayback Machine, Association of Religion Data Archives website (accessed November 27, 2013)
- ^ "Teresa Hord Owens, first Black woman to lead Disciples of Christ, isn't here to be your token". NBC News. August 29, 2017. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
- ^ Gryboski, Michael (August 25, 2019). "Disciples of Christ on track to lose half of its membership in 10 years". The Christian Post. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
- ^ "Alexander Campbell | American clergyman". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved May 29, 2020.
- ^ Ringenberg, William C. (2016). The Christian College and the Meaning of Academic Freedom. doi:10.1057/9781137398338. ISBN 978-1-349-57457-5.
- ^ "Higher Education". Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). Retrieved January 24, 2021.
- ^ "Tougaloo College formalizes affiliation with Disciples". Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). February 22, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2020.
- ^ "THE PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN UNITY". www.vatican.va. Retrieved January 24, 2021.
- ^ "Ecumenical Partners". Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). Retrieved January 24, 2021.
- ^ "UCC-Disciples Ecumenical Partnership". United Church of Christ. Archived from the original on August 23, 2017. Retrieved August 23, 2017.
- ^ "Johnstown Project at SDSU". Retrieved February 23, 2016.
- ^ Vecsey, George (November 29, 1978). "Parent Church is Chagrined by Evolution of Jone's Cult". The New York Times. Retrieved April 24, 2019.
- ^ White, Graham Introduction, in Journeys in the Wilderness, A John Muir Reader, Birlinn, 2009, Edinburgh; p7
- ^ Danson, Ted. "Mary Steenburgen, Part 2". Where Everybody Knows Your Name Featuring Ted Danson and Woody Harrelson (Podcast). Team Coco. Retrieved November 21, 2024.
Sources
[edit]- Boring, M. Eugene (1997). Disciples And The Bible. Chalice Press. ISBN 0-8272-0623-2.
- Campbell, Thomas (1809). The Declaration and Address
- Cartwright, Colbert S. (1987). People of the Chalice, Disciples of Christ in Faith and Practice. St Louis, MO: Chalice Press. ISBN 0-8272-2938-0.
- Challen, James (editor), Biographical Sketch of Alexander Campbell, Ladies' Christian Annual, March, 1857 (Volume VI, No. 3), Philadelphia: James Challen, Publisher. Pages 81–90.Online Edition
- Corey, Stephen (1953). Fifty Years of Attack and Controversy St. Louis, MO: Committee on the publication of the Corey manuscript
- Cummins, Duane D. (1991). A handbook for Today's Disciples in the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) Revised Edition. St Louis, MO: Chalice Press. ISBN 0-8272-1425-1.
- Davis, M. M. (1915). How the Disciples Began and Grew, A Short History of the Christian Church, Cincinnati: The Standard Publishing Company
- Garrison, Winfred Earnest and DeGroot, Alfred T. (1948). The Disciples of Christ, A History, St Louis, Missouri: The Bethany Press
- Green, F. M. (1904). "James A. Garfield". John T. Brown's Churches of Christ. Memorial University of Newfoundland. Archived from the original on December 15, 2005. Retrieved December 8, 2005.
- "The Design of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)" (PDF). Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). July 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 14, 2008. Retrieved April 18, 2008.
- Marshall, Robert; Dunlavy, John; M'Nemar, Richard; Stone, B. W.; Thompson, John; and Purviance, David (1804). The Last Will and Testament of the Springfield Presbytery
- McAlister, Lester G. and Tucker, William E. (1975), Journey in Faith: A History of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) - St. Louis, Chalice Press, ISBN 978-0-8272-1703-4
- "Religion and President Johnson". Lyndon B. Johnson Library and Museum. Archived from the original on November 21, 2013. Retrieved December 8, 2005.
- "Ronald Reagan Facts". Ronald Reagan Presidential Library. Archived from the original on October 16, 2014. Retrieved December 8, 2005.
- Watkins, Sharon E. (publisher) (2006). Yearbook & Directory of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) - 2006, Indianapolis: The Office of The General Minister and President
- Williams, D. Newell (2008). The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ): A Reformed North American Mainstream Moderate Denomination, presentation given during the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) Consultation on "Becoming a Multicultural and Inclusive Church", March 27, 2008. Retrieved January 4, 2010.
Further reading
[edit]- Butchart, Reuben. The Disciples of Christ in Canada Since 1930... in series, Canadian Headquarters' Publications. Toronto, Ont.: Churches of Christ (Disciples), 1949. xv, 674 p.
External links
[edit]Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)
View on GrokipediaIt formed through the 1832 merger of two frontier revival movements led by Barton W. Stone in Kentucky, emphasizing Christian unity apart from denominational labels, and Thomas and Alexander Campbell in Pennsylvania, advocating rational inquiry into biblical authority and rejection of sectarian divisions.[1] This union aimed to transcend party spirit by prioritizing believer's baptism, weekly Lord's Supper open to all professing Christians, and congregational autonomy, though tensions over innovations like instrumental music in worship and centralized missionary societies led to a 1906 split with the more conservative Churches of Christ.[1]
A further division occurred after the 1968 restructuring, which formalized a denominational structure with 31 regional bodies, a General Assembly, and general ministries focused on ecumenism, social justice, and global partnerships, distinguishing it from independent Christian Churches that retained looser affiliations.[1] Core practices include open communion celebrated weekly as a sign of unity, baptism by immersion for believers as the normative entry to membership while accepting other modes, and no confessional tests beyond acceptance of Jesus as Lord, fostering theological flexibility that has aligned the denomination with progressive stances on issues like racial reconciliation and interfaith dialogue.[2]
The denomination maintains ties to 15 colleges and seven seminaries, and pursues ecumenical relations, such as full communion with the United Church of Christ in 1989, yet has experienced significant membership decline—reporting around 2,887 congregations in 2023 amid broader mainline Protestant trends—attributed in part to its embrace of liberal theology and structural centralization, which prompted withdrawals by congregations favoring traditionalist or independent expressions.[3][4][5]
Origins in the Restoration Movement
Barton W. Stone and the Christian Connection
Barton W. Stone, ordained as a Presbyterian minister in 1798, emerged as a key figure in early 19th-century Kentucky religious awakenings through his leadership in the Cane Ridge Revival, which began on August 6, 1801, and drew an estimated 10,000 to 30,000 attendees over several days.[6][7] The event featured preaching by Stone and associates like Richard McNemar, resulting in thousands of reported conversions amid physical manifestations such as falling, jerking, and barking, which transcended denominational boundaries among Presbyterians, Methodists, and Baptists.[8][7] This revival intensified Stone's preexisting skepticism toward Calvinist doctrines like predestination and human creeds, which he had begun rejecting as early as 1796 in favor of New Testament patterns emphasizing faith, repentance, and scriptural primitivism.[6][8] By September 10, 1803, Stone and four colleagues withdrew from the Synod of Kentucky, protesting its authority and forming the independent Springfield Presbytery to escape hierarchical oversight.[6][7] On June 28, 1804, this presbytery dissolved itself via the "Last Will and Testament of the Springfield Presbytery," a document signed by Stone, McNemar, and others, which repudiated creeds, confessions, and party names as divisive, declaring the Bible alone as the "only sure guide to heaven."[9][7] The signers adopted the name "Christian," citing its biblical origin in Acts 11:26 as divinely appointed for disciples of Christ, thereby establishing independent congregations known as the "Christian Church" or "Christian Connection" that prioritized scriptural authority over denominational labels.[10][7] Stone's movement emphasized republican simplicity in church governance, opposing Presbyterian synods and delegated authority in favor of local congregational autonomy where members selected and supported preachers without imposed creeds or external laws.[7] The "Last Will and Testament" explicitly willed that "our power of making laws for the government of the church, and executing them by delegated authority, forever cease," reflecting a commitment to biblical patterns over human hierarchies to foster unity among believers.[9][7] These churches, forming primarily in Kentucky and spreading westward by 1811, sought to restore primitive Christianity by rejecting sectarianism and promoting fellowship based solely on New Testament teachings.[6][8]Thomas and Alexander Campbell's Reforms
Thomas Campbell, arriving in Pennsylvania in 1807 from Ireland, encountered pronounced sectarian divisions among Presbyterian congregations that exceeded those in his homeland, prompting a critique rooted in the need for scriptural unity over denominational labels.[11] He formed the Christian Association of Washington in 1808 to address these fractures, emphasizing restoration of primitive Christianity through adherence to the Bible alone, rejecting human creeds and party spirits as barriers to fellowship.[12] In August 1809, Campbell drafted the Declaration and Address, presented on September 7 to the association, which articulated thirteen propositions advocating Christian unity as essential to the church's constitution, condemning sectarianism as anti-Christian for dividing the body of Christ, and calling for believers to unite on the apostles' doctrine without auxiliary tests of faith.[13] Alexander Campbell, Thomas's son, immigrated in 1809 and soon relocated to Virginia (now West Virginia), where he expanded the reformist vision through rational inquiry into Scripture, prioritizing evidence-based faith over the emotional excesses of contemporary revivalism.[14] He immersed himself in debates defending believer's baptism by immersion as a scriptural ordinance for remission of sins, notably against Presbyterian W.L. McCalla in Washington, Kentucky, in 1823, arguing immersion's necessity from New Testament precedents and rejecting infant baptism as unsubstantiated tradition. Launching the Christian Baptist journal on August 3, 1823, Alexander critiqued clerical hierarchies, missionary societies, and revivalist excesses, urging a return to apostolic patterns via inductive Bible study and common-sense reasoning to discern divine commands.[15] By 1830, amid growing tensions over baptismal practice and rejection of Baptist associational authority, the reformers severed formal ties with Baptist bodies; the Mahoning Baptist Association disbanded, and congregations aligned with the Campbells' vision emerged as independent Disciples, emphasizing rational scriptural restoration and congregational autonomy over denominational affiliation.[16] This shift underscored a commitment to faith grounded in propositional truth and historical precedent, distancing from experiential emotionalism prevalent in the Second Great Awakening.[17]The 1832 Merger and Early Unity Efforts
In January 1832, representatives from Barton W. Stone's independent Christian churches and Alexander Campbell's Reformers (Disciples) convened in Lexington, Kentucky, to formalize their union into a single movement committed to restoring primitive Christianity without creeds or denominational divisions.[18] The agreement emphasized "no creed but the Bible" as the sole standard of faith, mutual recognition of baptisms by immersion, and rejection of sectarian names in favor of biblical terms like "Christians" or "Disciples."[1] This merger symbolized a pragmatic alliance between parallel restorationist efforts, uniting an estimated 10,000-12,000 adherents from Stone's group with Campbell's growing network amid the religious fervor of the Second Great Awakening on the frontier.[19] The union was dramatically sealed with a public handshake at the Hill Street (or High Street) Meeting House between Stone and "Raccoon" John Smith, a key Campbellite evangelist dispatched to represent the Disciples, underscoring the leaders' optimism for non-sectarian fellowship.[19] Early unity efforts promoted weekly communion, congregational autonomy, and evangelism focused on scriptural primitivism, fostering rapid growth; by the mid-1840s, the combined movement reported over 118,000 members across scattered congregations, aided by itinerant preaching and cooperative associations.[1] Alexander Campbell's Millennial Harbinger, launched in 1830 and continued post-merger, played a central role by articulating restoration principles, reporting merger developments, and shaping doctrinal consensus without imposing hierarchy.[20] To support education in these ideals, the movement established Bacon College in Georgetown, Kentucky, in 1836 as its inaugural higher education institution, named in honor of Francis Bacon to evoke empirical and scriptural reasoning over traditional theology.[21] Though regional tensions, including slavery debates in border states, surfaced in the 1830s— with Campbell critiquing the institution's moral and economic harms while urging restraint to preserve unity—leaders subordinated such issues to core primitivist goals, avoiding formal positions that might fracture the nascent alliance.[20] This deliberate focus on essentials enabled sustained expansion and local cooperation, delaying deeper divisions until later decades.[22]Historical Development and Schisms
19th-Century Expansion and National Conventions
The first National Convention of the Restoration Movement convened in Cincinnati, Ohio, in October 1849, drawing 156 delegates from 11 states to address the need for coordinated evangelism amid westward expansion.[23] This gathering established the American Christian Missionary Society (ACMS), with Alexander Campbell elected as its first president, to facilitate missionary efforts on the frontier and abroad by pooling resources from autonomous congregations while respecting local independence.[24][16] The ACMS focused on supporting evangelists in underserved regions, marking a shift toward structured cooperation without centralized authority over doctrine or polity.[25] Post-Civil War missionary enthusiasm propelled further organizational development, with annual ACMS conventions serving as forums for reporting progress and planning outreach, including the establishment of foreign missions in Jerusalem by 1852.[26] Publications like the Christian Standard, founded in 1866, amplified these efforts by disseminating reports, sermons, and debates on cooperative strategies, reaching thousands of readers and shaping discourse on balancing congregational autonomy with collective action.[27] Leaders such as Isaac Errett, who edited the Christian Standard from 1866 to 1888 and advocated for women's missionary boards, exemplified this tension by promoting societies for evangelism while defending local governance against charges of innovation.[28][29] By the late 19th century, the movement had experienced significant expansion, becoming the fifth-largest U.S. denomination through frontier church planting and immigration-driven growth in states like Kentucky, Ohio, and Texas.[30] Membership approached one million by 1900, fueled by ACMS-supported evangelists, though debates in conventions and journals hinted at strains between cooperative institutions and strict restorationist principles.[31] These gatherings, held annually after 1849, fostered unity on missions but also exposed differences over organizational scope, setting the stage for later frictions without yet fracturing the fellowship.[23]20th-Century Divisions Over Instruments and Missionary Societies
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, tensions within the Restoration Movement escalated over the introduction of instrumental music in worship and centralized missionary societies, which opponents viewed as unauthorized innovations violating the New Testament's silence on such practices. Alexander Campbell, a foundational figure, explicitly opposed instrumental accompaniment, arguing it aligned more with Jewish temple worship than the apostolic pattern of vocal singing alone, as exemplified in Ephesians 5:19 and Colossians 3:16, and could hinder heartfelt spiritual engagement.[32][33] Missionary societies, such as the American Christian Missionary Society founded in 1849, were similarly criticized for interposing human organizations between local congregations and direct evangelism, contrary to the primitive church's autonomous model.[1] These disputes reflected a broader commitment among conservatives to scriptural primitivism, prioritizing explicit biblical authorization over expediency. The divisions culminated in the 1906 U.S. Religious Census, which for the first time enumerated Churches of Christ as a distinct body separate from the Disciples of Christ, reporting approximately 159,658 members for the former—predominantly non-instrumental and anti-society congregations concentrated in rural Southern strongholds like Tennessee, Texas, and Alabama.[34][35] This official recognition formalized a de facto separation that had developed over decades, driven by periodicals like the Gospel Advocate advocating strict adherence to New Testament precedents amid growing urban adoption of organs and cooperative boards by progressive Disciples factions.[31] By the 1920s, further alienation emerged among non-cooperative independents, who resisted escalating centralization and premillennialist influences within progressive conventions, leading to the formation of alternative gatherings like the 1927 North American Christian Convention to preserve congregational autonomy and biblical literalism.[36] These groups, often retaining instrumental music but opposing denominational oversight, maintained stricter primitivist leanings and rural memberships, while the Disciples pursued urban expansion and institutional reforms, evidenced by membership data showing Churches of Christ stabilizing at over 500,000 by mid-century in agrarian regions versus Disciples' shift toward Northern and Western cities.[37][38] This bifurcation underscored causal divergences: conservative retention of rural, tradition-bound adherents contrasted with progressive gravitation to cosmopolitan settings amenable to innovation.[39]The 1968 Restructure and Shift to Denominationalism
The 1968 Restructure formalized the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) as a denomination through adoption of the Provisional Design at the International Convention in Kansas City, Missouri, establishing a General Assembly as the primary policy-making body, regional manifestations for oversight, and centralized administrative units like the Board of Church Extension and the Council on Christian Unity.[40] Proponents argued the changes enhanced efficiency in mission work and resource allocation amid growing national scope, replacing ad hoc conventions with structured governance.[41] However, critics contended this hierarchical framework eroded the Restoration Movement's founding emphasis on congregational autonomy, where local churches operated independently without binding denominational authority, marking a departure from the non-sectarian, voluntary brotherhood model envisioned by leaders like Barton Stone and Alexander Campbell.[5][39] Accompanying the restructure, the church adopted the red chalice logo featuring a white St. Andrew's cross, intended to signify the centrality of communion and an openness to diverse expressions of faith, reflecting the era's ecumenical aspirations.[42] This symbol, while unifying for adherents, underscored the shift toward institutional identity over loose affiliation, as it became a marker distinguishing the restructured body from independent congregations rejecting the changes.[43] The restructure correlated with immediate membership losses, including over 1,100 congregations and approximately 430,000 members withdrawing between 1967 and 1969, as opponents formed autonomous networks like the Independent Christian Churches and Churches of Christ to preserve congregational sovereignty.[44][45] Critics attribute this exodus, and subsequent plateaus in growth despite broader cultural expansions, to increased institutional overhead—such as administrative costs and top-down directives—that diverted resources from local evangelism and exacerbated theological drifts toward liberalism, contrasting with the movement's scriptural primitivism.[5][1] Empirical data show membership peaking near 2 million in 1958 before stabilizing post-restructure amid these withdrawals, with institutional centralization cited as a causal factor in reduced adaptability to evangelical imperatives.[5][44]Theological Foundations and Practices
Core Distinctives: No Creed but Christ and Scriptural Authority
The Restoration Movement, from which the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) emerged, articulated its foundational commitment through the slogan "No creed but Christ, no book but the Bible," emphasizing the rejection of human-authored creeds as binding tests of faith in favor of direct allegiance to Jesus as Lord and the Scriptures as the sole authoritative guide for doctrine and practice.[46] This principle, rooted in the efforts of leaders like Thomas and Alexander Campbell and Barton W. Stone following their 1832 merger, sought to foster Christian unity by focusing on essentials such as the confession of Christ (Romans 10:9) while discarding denominational formularies that had historically divided believers.[47] Early adherents viewed creeds not as summaries of biblical truth but as innovations that elevated human interpretation over plain scriptural commands, arguing that true unity arises from shared obedience to the New Testament pattern rather than extra-biblical statements.[48] Central to this distinctive was an insistence on scriptural authority as the supreme and sufficient rule, informed by Enlightenment-era rationalism that prioritized empirical evidence from the text over speculative doctrines like the Trinity's "mysteries," which Alexander Campbell critiqued as unverifiable philosophical accretions lacking explicit biblical warrant.[49] Campbell, in publications such as the Christian Baptist (1823–1830), advocated a methodical, inductive approach to Bible study—treating it as a factual document amenable to logical analysis—rejecting Calvinist predestination and infant baptism on grounds of insufficient scriptural support while affirming believer's baptism by immersion as a clear apostolic ordinance.[50] This biblicism demanded fidelity to the "ancient order" of the first-century church, with unity pursued through restoration of primitive practices rather than compromise on non-essentials, as Stone and Campbell declared in their merger that "the Bible shall be our only creed."[51] Over time, however, this original commitment to unadulterated scriptural primacy eroded within the Disciples of Christ tradition, particularly from the 1880s onward, as leaders increasingly adopted German higher criticism—a historical-critical method questioning the Bible's inerrancy and authorship—which introduced allowances for interpretive doubt and experiential theology over literal biblicism.[41] By the early 20th century, segments of the movement shifted toward liberal influences, diluting the rejection of creeds into a broader non-creedalism that tolerated doctrinal pluralism and de-emphasized the Bible's propositional authority in favor of personal faith experiences, contributing to internal schisms like the 1906 separation of more conservative Churches of Christ.[47] While the denomination retains a formal affirmation of Scripture in its identity statement, historical analyses note that this evolution marked a departure from the Campbells' rational, evidence-based biblicism toward accommodations with modernist skepticism, undermining the movement's initial aim of scriptural sufficiency as the basis for unity.[52]Ordinances of Baptism and Communion
The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), rooted in the Restoration Movement, observes baptism and the Lord's Supper as ordinances—non-sacramental acts of obedience commanded in Scripture, rather than means of conferring grace ex opere operato.[53] These practices emphasize restoration of New Testament patterns, with baptism symbolizing burial and resurrection in Christ (Romans 6:3-4) and the Lord's Supper recalling his sacrificial death (1 Corinthians 11:23-26).[54] Unlike sacramental traditions, ordinances here function as public testimonies of faith and discipleship, rejecting any inherent salvific efficacy apart from personal response to the gospel.[53] Baptism is restricted to believers who profess faith in Jesus Christ, performed exclusively by immersion to reenact death to sin and new life in him, as modeled by Jesus' own baptism (Matthew 3:13-17).[53] The denomination rejects infant baptism as an unbiblical innovation lacking scriptural warrant, viewing it as presuming faith on behalf of the child rather than requiring a conscious response to God's grace.[54] This mode serves as the normative entry into church membership, underscoring individual autonomy and scriptural fidelity over inherited or proxy commitments.[2] Historically, this stance distinguished Restoration adherents from paedobaptist denominations like Presbyterians and Methodists, who practiced sprinkling or pouring on infants, prompting early debates and separations in the 19th century.[55] The Lord's Supper, observed weekly during worship gatherings, replicates the apostolic pattern inferred from Acts 20:7 and 1 Corinthians 16:2, positioning it as a central, unifying act rather than an occasional ritual.[56] Elements include unleavened bread and fruit of the vine, distributed to foster remembrance of Christ's body and blood, with an open table extended to all professing Christians regardless of denominational affiliation, embodying the movement's unity ethos.[53] This frequency and inclusivity, uncommon among 19th-century Protestants, reinforced the Disciples' identity as restorers of primitive Christianity, though empirical surveys indicate irregular observance in some congregations amid broader membership declines exceeding 50% since 1968.[57]Worship Styles and Congregational Autonomy
Congregational autonomy grants each local church in the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) the freedom to shape its worship practices independently, without imposed denominational mandates on style or form. This principle, rooted in the Restoration Movement's emphasis on restoring New Testament patterns, allows diversity in musical accompaniment: some congregations maintain a cappella singing, while others incorporate instruments such as organs or bands.[52][58] The movement's founders, including Barton W. Stone and Alexander Campbell, favored unaccompanied vocal music, viewing mechanical instruments as unauthorized additions absent from New Testament worship descriptions, akin to Old Testament practices superseded by the church age. Instruments nonetheless appeared in some Disciples congregations by the mid-19th century, reflecting autonomy's practical outworking amid debates that later contributed to schisms with a cappella adherents.[59][60] Worship services generally prioritize simplicity and active participation over elaborate liturgy, featuring extended preaching from Scripture, extemporaneous prayer, weekly observance of the Lord's Supper, and congregational involvement in singing and responses. This participatory ethos aims to replicate early church gatherings, fostering direct engagement with biblical content rather than ritualistic forms.[52] Over time, many congregations have shifted toward contemporary worship elements, including praise teams, projected lyrics, and upbeat modern songs, often to appeal to younger attendees amid cultural changes. This innovation correlates with broader denominational trends toward doctrinal flexibility, as evidenced by accelerated membership losses: from 411,140 members in 2017 to 382,248 by 2019, with worship attendance dropping 11% in the same period.[4] In comparison, conservative Restorationist holdouts—such as a cappella Churches of Christ congregations preserving traditional forms—have experienced less severe declines, with rates trailing the Disciples' 2-7% annual losses, indicating relative stability tied to adherence to original simplicities over adaptive innovations.[57][61]Organizational Governance
Congregational and Regional Structures
The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) operates under a covenantal polity emphasizing congregational autonomy as its foundational principle, wherein each local congregation functions as self-governing under the lordship of Jesus Christ. Congregations independently adopt their own names, governing documents, and statements of purpose; determine membership practices, worship styles, and mission priorities; own, control, and manage their property without external interference; establish budgets and financial policies; and call or dismiss ministers, often with advisory input from regional bodies. This structure reflects the denomination's historical commitment to local independence, rooted in the Restoration Movement's rejection of hierarchical creeds and centralized authority.[62] Regional ministries, numbering 31 across the United States and Canada, provide oversight and support functions that complement congregational self-rule, particularly in areas requiring broader coordination. Established in their current form following the 1968 restructuring, these regions—formerly known as conferences or districts—nurture congregational growth, offer pastoral care to ministers and churches, facilitate cooperative mission programs, and handle ordination, licensing, and credentialing of clergy in partnership with calling congregations. Regions also address disciplinary matters involving ministers, promote ecumenical relations at the local level, and coordinate shared resources for evangelism, social services, and global outreach, fostering a network of voluntary financial contributions from congregations to sustain these efforts.[63][62] This bottom-up model, while preserving local property rights and decision-making, introduces tensions through its covenantal framework of mutual accountability, where regional and general expressions of the church sustain congregations amid occasional conflicts over alignment with denominational policies. The denomination encompasses approximately 2,887 congregations as of 2023, displaying significant variability in theological emphases and practices; urban settings often feature more progressive interpretations of scripture and social engagement, contrasting with rural congregations that may prioritize traditional doctrines and resist perceived top-down influences on issues like worship or ethics. Such dynamics have historically prompted debates on the balance between unfettered autonomy and collaborative mission, with some congregations opting for disaffiliation to maintain stricter independence.[3][62]General Assembly and Administrative Bodies
The General Assembly serves as the highest legislative and representative body of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), convening biennially to facilitate discernment, worship, and decision-making on denominational matters. Delegates, comprising lay and ordained representatives from congregations (at minimum two per congregation, with additional slots based on membership size) and regions, elect the Moderator and other officers, approve budgets for global ministries through mechanisms like the Disciples Mission Fund, and adopt resolutions guiding policy on mission, education, and ecumenical engagement.[62][64] This assembly coordinates the church's unified witness while ostensibly respecting congregational autonomy, though its policy outputs influence resource allocation and programmatic priorities across affiliated entities.[65] Supporting the General Assembly are administrative bodies such as the Administrative Committee, a 21-member subset of the General Board elected to manage inter-assembly operations, including long-range planning, budget reviews, grievance handling, and agenda preparation for future gatherings.[62] The General Board itself, comprising up to 250 members, oversees covenantal accountability for general ministries, reviewing and endorsing financial objectives and policies between assemblies.[66] Specialized boards, including those under Higher Education and Leadership Ministries (HELM), administer relationships with 14 undergraduate institutions and seven seminaries, fostering leadership development and theological education while aligning them with denominational goals.[67] These entities centralize oversight of educational endowments and programs, directing funds and standards that shape institutional missions.[68] The 1968 restructure, formalized in "The Design of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)," marked a pivotal shift from the prior advisory framework of the International Convention—where cooperative societies operated with limited central authority—to a more authoritative structure empowering the General Assembly and its boards to establish binding policies and ministries.[62][40] Previously voluntary associations yielded to covenanted general ministries accountable to the assembly, enabling coordinated budgeting and directive influence over global initiatives.[64] Critics, including conservative factions, have argued this evolution prioritized denominational uniformity in doctrine and practice over the Restoration Movement's historic congregational diversity, effectively imposing top-down coherence that eroded local independence and prompted over 1,100 congregations to disaffiliate by 1969.[44][5] While official documents emphasize non-binding guidance on congregations, the centralized policy hubs have facilitated a progressive tilt in social and theological stances, fostering perceptions of enforced consensus rather than pluralistic autonomy.[62]Recent Reforms and the 2025 General Assembly Changes
The Covenant Project, launched in the early 2020s, sought to restructure the denomination's operations emphasizing relational justice and structural equity, aiming to foster deeper connections among congregations and administrative bodies while addressing perceived inequities in governance. This initiative culminated in General Assembly resolutions, including GA-2343, which proposed revisions to the church's foundational Design document to enhance collaborative decision-making and resource allocation.[69][70] At the 2025 General Assembly held in Memphis, Tennessee, from July 12 to 15, delegates adopted GA-2517, enacting amendments to the Design that modified the General Board's composition and operational protocols to promote greater agility and responsiveness. These changes reduced certain board sizes, streamlined meeting frequencies, and adjusted representation formulas to prioritize efficiency amid fiscal constraints, with the assembly frequency shifting to every third year starting post-2025. The assembly also elected a new moderator team to oversee implementation, focusing on covenantal partnerships between regions and national entities.[71][72][73] While these reforms targeted administrative inefficiencies, they coincided with persistent membership losses, as data through 2022 recorded a 21% decline from 2019 levels, dropping to approximately 278,000 members—a trend predating but unmitigated by the Covenant efforts. Observers note that such governance tweaks, while potentially easing bureaucratic hurdles, have not stemmed the exodus linked to broader denominational shifts, underscoring limits in structural fixes absent reevaluation of doctrinal priorities.[57][74]Controversial Social Positions
Abortion Policies: Endorsements, Justifications, and Biblical Critiques
The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) first formally addressed abortion through Resolution 7524 at its 1975 General Assembly in San Antonio, Texas, affirming the right of women and their physicians to terminate pregnancies without legal interference, framing this as an expression of individual conscience and freedom in reproductive decisions.[75] This stance evolved into repeated endorsements of reproductive freedom, including opposition to restrictive legislation; for instance, in 1989, the General Assembly critiqued the Supreme Court's Webster v. Reproductive Health Services decision for permitting states to impose barriers on abortion access, reiterating support for unfettered choice as aligned with personal autonomy.[75] By 2022, following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling, the denomination issued a statement decrying the overturn of Roe v. Wade, positioning abortion rights within a broader framework of "reproductive justice" that emphasizes systemic equity, women's bodily autonomy, and the social conditions affecting family well-being over fetal protection.[76] These positions are justified by denominational leaders through a lens of justice theology, which prioritizes liberation from oppressive structures and the moral agency of individuals, particularly women, in contexts of poverty, health disparities, and coercion, rather than imposing uniform ethical mandates derived from scripture.[76] Official resolutions underscore that abortion decisions involve complex personal, medical, and relational factors, advocating for access to counseling and contraception as preventive measures while rejecting governmental overreach that curtails choice, as seen in Resolution 8749 (1987), which balanced affirmation of reproductive freedom with calls for ethical reflection on the procedure's implications.[77] This approach aligns with the denomination's emphasis on congregational autonomy and non-creedal discernment, allowing diverse interpretations of moral dilemmas without binding prohibitions. Biblical critiques from conservative interpreters, including some within Restoration Movement traditions, argue that such endorsements contradict scriptural affirmations of life's sanctity from conception, as in Psalm 139:13-16, which describes divine formation in the womb ("For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb"), and Jeremiah 1:5 ("Before I formed you in the womb I knew you"). These passages, alongside Exodus 20:13's prohibition against murder and Exodus 21:22-25's valuation of fetal life equivalent to bodily harm penalties, are cited as establishing the unborn as bearers of inherent dignity under God's sovereignty, rendering elective abortion incompatible with commands to protect the vulnerable. Critics contend that prioritizing women's autonomy over fetal rights represents a departure from the denomination's founding commitment to scriptural authority without creeds, effectively elevating contemporary justice paradigms above first-order biblical ethics on human life. Internal dissent has manifested in resolutions like 8749, which acknowledged abortion's failure to uphold justice for the unborn and urged pastoral sensitivity, reflecting unease among some members and clergy who view pro-choice policies as eroding Restoration principles of biblical fidelity.[77] Conservative voices have linked these stances to broader theological drift, contributing to member attrition and congregational affiliations shifting toward independent Christian Churches or other groups emphasizing pro-life interpretations, though precise exodus figures tied solely to abortion remain undocumented in official records. This tension underscores ongoing debates over whether denominational progressivism honors or undermines the Stone-Campbell legacy of scripture-centered unity.LGBTQ Affirmation: Inclusion Measures, Theological Debates, and Conservative Dissent
The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) adopted formal inclusion measures for LGBTQ individuals at its 2013 General Assembly in Orlando, passing Resolution GA-1327, which affirmed welcoming such persons into all aspects of church life, including ordination to ministry and the celebration of same-sex covenants or marriages, while deferring implementation to autonomous regions and congregations.[78][79] This built on regional practices, as some areas had begun ordaining openly LGBTQ clergy by 2011, reflecting the denomination's congregational polity that avoids centralized mandates on such matters.[80] In 2019, the General Assembly further advanced these policies via Resolution GA-1929, inviting education to welcome and receive the gifts of transgender and gender-diverse people, emphasizing their inclusion in ministry and worship.[81] Theological debates within and about the denomination contrast progressive hermeneutics, which reinterpret biblical texts through lenses of cultural context and radical inclusivity—arguing passages like Romans 1:26–27 critique idolatrous exploitation rather than consensual same-sex unions—with adherence to literal scriptural authority, a core Disciples distinctive, viewing those verses alongside 1 Corinthians 6:9–10 and Leviticus 20:13 as unequivocal prohibitions of homosexual conduct as violations of God's created order for male-female complementarity (Genesis 2:24).[82][83] Affirmation advocates, often drawing from mainline academic sources, prioritize Jesus' ethic of love over specific prohibitions, yet critics contend this selectively dismisses empirical biblical patterns equating same-sex acts with other sexual immoralities warranting exclusion from leadership (1 Timothy 3:2).[84] Conservative dissent has manifested in congregational autonomy enabling non-affirmation, financial withholding from denominational bodies, and individual or group departures, accelerating membership losses amid broader cultural shifts.[79] From 2019 to 2022, reported membership plummeted 21%, from 350,618 to 277,864, with average attendance dropping from 126,217 to 89,894—a steeper rate than prior decades—causally linked by independent analysts to progressive stances alienating biblically traditional families and youth, unlike more stable conservative Restoration counterparts.[57] While official denominational reports attribute declines mainly to secularization and pandemic effects, conservative critiques, from sources like the Institute on Religion and Democracy, highlight affirmation as a key driver of doctrinal erosion and retention failures, noting no offsetting gains from targeted LGBTQ outreach.[4]Broader Progressive Stances and Internal Tensions
The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) has embraced environmental stewardship as a core progressive commitment, establishing the Green Chalice ministry in the early 2000s to promote congregational sustainability practices such as energy audits and waste reduction, with over 1,000 congregations certified by 2023 for achieving environmental benchmarks.[85] This initiative stems from General Assembly resolutions dating back to 1970, including calls for carbon neutrality by 2030 adopted in 2017 and endorsements of policies urging policymakers to prioritize clean energy transitions.[86] Similarly, the denomination has pursued anti-racism efforts through its Pro-Reconciliation/Anti-Racism (PR/AR) Initiative, launched in 1998 following a General Assembly mandate to eliminate racism as a barrier to the "beloved community," mandating anti-racism training for clergy and requiring regions to integrate reconciliation practices into governance.[87] These positions draw from a historical social gospel emphasis within the denomination, prioritizing systemic justice alongside evangelism, as articulated in mid-20th-century Disciples leaders who viewed societal reform as integral to Christian witness.[88] In the realm of international policy, the Disciples have adopted stances critical of Israeli actions in the occupied territories, with General Assembly resolutions in 2017 condemning the detention of Palestinian children by Israeli authorities and, in 2025, affirming World Council of Churches calls to end the occupation while opposing violence on all sides.[89][90] Joint statements with partners like the United Church of Christ in 2023 pledged reduced support for policies deemed enabling "Israeli apartheid," though stopping short of full economic divestment from Israel itself, focusing instead on advocacy for human rights and peace negotiations.[91] Progressive advocates within the denomination credit these efforts with heightening awareness of global inequities and fostering interfaith solidarity, aligning with a vision of Christianity as transformative social action.[92] These stances have fueled internal tensions, particularly among conservatives who argue that an overemphasis on political activism supplants the core gospel imperative of personal conversion and scriptural fidelity, effectively idolizing ideological causes over eternal truths.[93] Empirical data reveals a stark correlation: while evangelical counterparts in the Restoration Movement, such as independent Christian Churches, have maintained relative stability or modest growth through evangelism-focused ministries, the Disciples experienced a 25% membership drop from 2019 to 2023 alone, amid broader mainline Protestant declines averaging 30-50% since 1990, attributable in analyses to diluted doctrinal distinctives and cultural accommodation.[94][5] Conservative dissenters, including those who departed for more orthodox fellowships in the 20th century, contend that causal realism demands prioritizing undisrupted proclamation of Christ's redemptive work, as empirical retention patterns favor congregations upholding traditional authority over those integrating progressive social priorities.[93] Mainline sources often frame such critiques as resistance to justice, yet data from denominational yearbooks underscore the tensions' role in accelerating disaffiliation.[95]Ecumenical Relations and Unity Initiatives
Interdenominational Partnerships and Councils
The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) joined the National Council of Churches (NCC) as a founding member in 1950, participating in its assemblies and collaborative initiatives focused on domestic social concerns and interchurch cooperation.[96] The denomination also became a charter member of the World Council of Churches (WCC) upon its establishment in 1948, contributing to international assemblies, such as the 11th Assembly in Karlsruhe, Germany, in 2022, where Disciples representatives advocated for global unity amid fragmentation.[97][98] In efforts toward structural union, the Disciples engaged in the Consultation on Church Union (COCU) from its inception in the early 1960s, with formal involvement documented by 1963, leading to the formation of Churches Uniting in Christ (CUIC) in 2002 as a covenantal framework among nine denominations.[99][100] These partnerships enable joint missionary endeavors, including humanitarian aid through Church World Service—an NCC affiliate—for disaster response and poverty alleviation, as well as coordinated advocacy on peace and racial justice.[101] Critics within and outside the Restoration tradition contend that such ecumenical ties, including COCU/CUIC consensus statements on ministry recognition from the 1970s and 1980s, erode doctrinal distinctives by equating incompatible ordination practices and promoting a lowest-common-denominator theology that undermines the movement's scriptural primitivism.[102] These observers argue that while partnerships yield practical gains in resource-sharing for missions—such as amplified social witness on issues like economic inequality—the prioritization of visible unity risks relativizing core commitments to Bible-only authority and rejection of extra-scriptural creeds, fostering internal compromises over time.[101]Dialogues with Other Restoration Groups
Efforts to reconcile the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) (DOC) with other Restoration Movement groups, particularly the Churches of Christ and independent Christian Churches/Churches of Christ, have persisted since the mid-20th century but consistently failed to achieve structural unity. Informal forums and conferences emerged in the 1960s among Churches of Christ leaders and cooperative Christian Churches, aiming to bridge gaps from earlier separations over instrumental music and missionary societies, yet these initiatives dissolved without merger due to deepening theological divergences.[103] The 1968 DOC restructuring, which formalized a denominational hierarchy, prompted the independent Christian Churches to disaffiliate, viewing it as a departure from congregational autonomy central to Restoration primitivism.[39] Subsequent panels, including the Stone-Campbell Dialogues initiated in 1999 involving representatives from all three streams, sought to build trust and explore common ground but stalled on core impasses. These centered on DOC positions regarding ordination and sexuality, where progressive endorsements—such as women's ordination (practiced since 1888 but increasingly normative) and later affirmations of LGBTQ+ inclusion—clashed with conservative adherence to scriptural patterns excluding such practices.[104][105] Conservatives in the Churches of Christ and independents argued that DOC General Assembly resolutions on these issues imposed extra-biblical tests of fellowship, constituting creedal drift that contradicted the Movement's "no creed but the New Testament" ethos.[47][106] From a causal standpoint, these failures reflect deviations from shared primitivist commitments: while all groups originated in the Stone-Campbell plea for apostolic restoration, DOC prioritization of ecumenical unity over strict doctrinal conformity enabled accommodations to modern cultural shifts, alienating counterparts wedded to biblical literalism. Critics within conservative Restoration circles attribute this to broader liberalism infiltrating DOC institutions, evidenced by endorsements of positions like same-sex marriage (affirmed in 2015 resolutions) that independents and Churches of Christ deem incompatible with New Testament ethics.[5][37] No formal reconciliations have materialized, with dialogues yielding only relational goodwill rather than organic reunion, underscoring how doctrinal concessions undermined the original unity vision.[107]Evaluations of Ecumenism's Impact on Doctrinal Integrity
Proponents of ecumenism within the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) highlight its role in facilitating interdenominational dialogue and collaborative ministries, which have reduced historical hostilities among Protestant groups and enabled shared resources for mission work.[108] For instance, participation in broader ecumenical bodies has allowed access to joint educational programs and relief efforts, fostering a sense of Christian fellowship without formal mergers. These achievements are credited with softening sectarian divides inherited from the Restoration Movement's emphasis on primitive Christianity.[41] Critics, however, argue that such engagements have compelled accommodations to liberal theologies, diluting core doctrinal commitments like sola scriptura and believer's baptism as essential to salvation, in pursuit of superficial unity.[109] This erosion of confessional boundaries is evident in the denomination's post-1960s shift toward theological revisionism, where "no creed but Christ" evolved into reluctance to enforce orthodox tests of fellowship, enabling influx of heterodox views.[5] Analysts attribute this to ecumenical pressures prioritizing relational harmony over propositional truth, leading to internal debates where doctrinal precision yielded to inclusivity.[110] Empirical data underscores the costs: following intensified ecumenical partnerships in the late 20th century, such as the 1989 accord with the United Church of Christ, the Disciples experienced accelerated membership losses, dropping from over 500,000 in 2017 to 278,000 by 2022—a roughly 44% decline in five years—amid orthodox departures to conservative alternatives.[5][4] In comparison, non-ecumenical Restoration counterparts like the Churches of Christ, which maintained stricter isolation to preserve doctrinal integrity against modernist influences, reported slower proportional erosion; membership fell from approximately 1.6 million in 2010 to around 1.2 million by the mid-2010s, retaining a larger adherent base through confessional rigor.[111][112] This contrast suggests that conservative boundary-maintenance has better safeguarded orthodoxy, even amid broader cultural secularization, while ecumenism's dialogic gains failed to offset integrity losses.[113]Membership Trends and Denominational Decline
Historical Growth Patterns Through the 20th Century
The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) exhibited steady expansion in the early 20th century, building on its Restoration Movement roots through cooperative missions, evangelism campaigns, and the proliferation of affiliated colleges and seminaries that trained clergy and laity. By the 1920s, the denomination had adapted to urbanization by establishing city congregations and engaging in social reform initiatives, which sustained growth amid rural-to-urban migrations. Membership figures, drawn from denominational yearbooks, reflected this trajectory, with reported adherents increasing from approximately 500,000 in the early 1900s to over 1 million by the 1930s, supported by foreign mission boards active in Asia, Africa, and Latin America that reported thousands of converts annually.[114][38] Post-World War II prosperity accelerated growth, coinciding with the baby boom and suburban church planting. Evangelistic efforts, including revivals and youth programs, contributed to a surge, with membership climbing to 1,922,484 in 1956 across 7,523 congregations and peaking at 1,943,599 in 1957-1958 with 8,617 congregations.[115] This era saw intensified domestic missions, such as the "Commission on Brotherhood Finance" campaigns that funded new church starts, and international outreach that established over 1,000 mission points by the 1950s. Cultural Protestantism played a role, as the denomination's emphasis on unity, reason, and experiential faith aligned with mid-century American optimism and civic religion, fostering broad appeal in growing Sun Belt and Midwestern regions.[41] However, even during this peak, subtle shifts emerged in urban centers, where liberal theological influences—prioritizing social gospel priorities over strict Restorationist doctrines—began attracting progressive intellectuals while occasionally alienating rural conservatives. These patterns set the stage for the 1968 structural reorganization, which aimed to centralize missions and administration but marked an inflection point after decades of decentralized expansion. Overall, 20th-century growth relied on institutional momentum and evangelistic zeal, achieving numerical highs before broader mainline trends altered trajectories.[38][41]Sharp Declines from 2000 to 2025: Statistics and Contributing Factors
Membership in the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) declined from approximately 820,000 in 2000 to 277,864 in 2022, representing a loss of over 65% in confirmed members over two decades.[115][57] By 2018, the figure stood at 380,248, with average weekly worship attendance at 124,437, already reflecting accelerated erosion from prior years.[4] The denomination experienced a particularly steep 21% drop between 2019 (around 350,000 members) and 2022, outpacing other mainline Protestant bodies and earning it the distinction of the fastest-declining major U.S. denomination during this period.[74][4]| Year | Confirmed Membership | Average Worship Attendance |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 411,140 | 139,936 |
| 2018 | 380,248 | 124,437 |
| 2019 | ~350,000 | N/A |
| 2022 | 277,864 | 89,894 |
Comparisons with Conservative Restoration Counterparts
The Churches of Christ, emerging from the same 19th-century Restoration Movement as the Disciples of Christ but adhering to a non-instrumental worship pattern and rejecting centralized denominational structures, have sustained a global membership of approximately 1.5 million adherents, with U.S. figures hovering around 1.2 million as reported in recent directories.[111] [118] This stability stems from a rigorous biblicist commitment to replicating New Testament church practices without creeds or external authorities, fostering congregational autonomy that insulates against top-down doctrinal shifts.[119] Such adherence prioritizes scriptural silence on practices like instrumental music in worship, which conservatives interpret as prohibitive, thereby maintaining doctrinal uniformity across independent congregations.[120] Independent Christian Churches (also known as Christian Churches/Churches of Christ), which diverged by accepting instrumental music while upholding Restorationist principles of believer's baptism and weekly communion, have demonstrated growth through aggressive missionary outreach, particularly in Africa and Asia, contrasting with stagnation in progressive counterparts.[37] Their emphasis on evangelism and avoidance of formal denominational ties—opting instead for voluntary associations like missions boards—has supported expansion, with U.S. attendance metrics showing resilience amid broader Protestant declines.[121] This trajectory reflects a causal link between conservative theological boundaries, such as opposition to cultural accommodations on issues like ordination practices, and retention of core demographics, including families valuing unaltered biblical fidelity.[47] In both groups, the rejection of denominationalism—eschewing hierarchical governance for local elder-led autonomy—has preserved base retention by preventing the imposition of evolving social positions that might alienate traditionalists.[37] Strict biblicism, demanding explicit scriptural warrant for all practices, serves as a bulwark against progressive reinterpretations, enabling these branches to sustain or grow their constituencies through internal cohesion and external appeals to scriptural literalism, unlike trajectories marked by liberalization.[122] This first-principles orientation to Restoration ideals, uncompromised by ecumenical or societal pressures, underscores conservatism's role in averting the membership erosion seen when doctrinal adaptation accelerates.[123]Affiliated Educational Institutions
Universities and Colleges Founded or Affiliated
The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) established numerous institutions of higher education in the 19th and early 20th centuries to train clergy, educators, and lay leaders in a liberal arts framework informed by Restoration Movement ideals of scriptural authority and Christian unity.[67] These colleges initially served as centers for denominational propagation amid frontier expansion, but post-World War II secular pressures, including federal funding dependencies and cultural shifts toward pluralism, prompted many to loosen ecclesiastical oversight, fostering environments where doctrinal distinctives yielded to broader academic norms.[124] This evolution reflects causal dynamics in mainline Protestant education, where institutional autonomy prioritized enrollment growth and accreditation over confessional fidelity, contributing to the denomination's progressive detachment from its formative evangelical ethos.[125] Prominent examples include Texas Christian University (TCU), founded in 1873 as Add-Ran Male and Female College by brothers Addison and Randolph Clark, who transferred control to the Disciples in 1889; it remains the largest affiliated institution, hosting campus ministry programs but operating with minimal doctrinal requirements for faculty or curriculum.[124] [126] Butler University, chartered in 1855 as North Western Christian University by Disciples leaders seeking an antislavery educational hub, officially severed formal church ties in 1978 amid rising secular governance demands, though it retains historical nomenclature and occasional cooperative ventures like joint seminary partnerships.[127] [128] Drake University, established in 1881 through consolidation of Disciples colleges in Iowa to counter economic decline, explicitly avowed broad liberal foundations at inception but abandoned religious affiliation by the late 20th century, exemplifying the shift from confessional training to nondenominational scholarship.[129] [130] Other affiliated bodies, such as Bethany College (founded 1840 by Alexander Campbell as a hub for Restoration theology) and Hiram College (1850, emphasizing practical Christian education), persist with nominal ties via campus chaplaincies, yet enrollment data and policy shifts indicate eroded religious identity, with mandatory chapel attendance long discontinued and curricula increasingly aligned with secular accreditation standards.[67] Culver-Stockton College (1853) and Columbia College (1851) follow similar trajectories, where founding charters invoked Disciples support for moral and intellectual formation, but contemporary operations prioritize inclusivity over creedal adherence, correlating with the denomination's broader membership erosion as alumni disengage from ecclesiastical roots.[67] This pattern underscores empirical trends: from 1960 to 2020, affiliated institutions' religious course requirements declined by over 70% on average in mainline-founded schools, per analyses of Protestant higher education, weakening pipelines for doctrinally committed leaders.[125]| Institution | Year Founded | Location | Key Affiliation Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Christian University | 1873 (formal Disciples control 1889) | Fort Worth, TX | Largest affiliate; supports campus ministry but no doctrinal mandates.[126] |
| Butler University | 1855 | Indianapolis, IN | Ties severed 1978; historical Christian heritage retained in name only.[127] |
| Drake University | 1881 | Des Moines, IA | Founded for Disciples consolidation; fully secularized post-20th century.[129] |
| Bethany College | 1840 | Bethany, WV | Campbell's foundational seminary-college hybrid; nominal ties via chaplaincy.[67] |
| Hiram College | 1850 | Hiram, OH | Early liberal arts focus; shifted to elective religious studies.[67] |