Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Creed
View on Wikipedia
A creed, also known as a confession of faith, a symbol, or a statement of faith, is a statement of the shared beliefs of a community (often a religious community) which summarizes its core tenets.
Many Christian denominations use three creeds: the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed, the Apostles' Creed and the Athanasian Creed. Some Christian denominations do not use any of those creeds.
The term creed is sometimes extended to comparable concepts in non-Christian theologies. The Islamic concept of ʿaqīdah (literally "bond, tie") is often rendered as "creed".[1]
History
[edit]The earliest known creed in Christianity, "Jesus is Lord", originated in the writings of Paul the Apostle.[2] One of the most significant and widely used Christian creeds is the Nicene Creed, first formulated in AD 325 at the First Council of Nicaea[3] to affirm the deity of Christ and revised at the First Council of Constantinople in AD 381 to affirm the trinity as a whole.[4] The creed was further affirmed in 431 by the Chalcedonian Definition, which clarified the doctrine of Christ.[4] Affirmation of this creed, which describes the Trinity, is often taken as a fundamental test of orthodoxy by many Christian denominations, and was historically purposed against Arianism.[5] The Apostles' Creed, another early creed which concisely details the trinity, virgin birth, crucifixion, and resurrection, is most popular within western Christianity, and is widely used in Christian church services.
In Islamic theology, the term most closely corresponding to "creed" is ʿaqīdah (عقيدة).[1]
Terminology
[edit]The word creed is particularly used for a concise statement which is recited as part of liturgy. The term is anglicized from Latin credo "I believe", the incipit of the Latin texts of the Apostles' Creed and the Nicene Creed. A creed is sometimes referred to as a symbol in a specialized meaning of that word (which was first introduced to Late Middle English in this sense), after Latin symbolum "creed" (as in Symbolum Apostolorum = the "Apostles' Creed", a shorter version of the traditional Nicene Creed), after Greek symbolon "token, watchword".[6]
Some longer statements of faith in the Protestant tradition are instead called "confessions of faith", or simply "confession" (as in e.g. Helvetic Confession). Within Evangelical Protestantism, the terms "doctrinal statement" or "doctrinal basis" tend to be preferred. Doctrinal statements may include positions on lectionary and translations of the Bible, particularly in fundamentalist churches of the King James Only movement.[citation needed]
Christianity
[edit]| Part of a series on |
| Christianity |
|---|
The first confession of faith established within Christianity was the Nicene Creed by the Early Church in 325.[7] It was established to summarize the foundations of the Christian faith and to protect believers from false doctrines. Various Christian denominations from Protestantism and Evangelical Christianity have published confession of faith as a basis for fellowship among churches of the same denomination.[8][9]
Many Christian denominations did not try to be too exhaustive in their confessions of faith and thus allow different opinions on some secondary topics.[10] In addition, some churches are open to revising their confession of faith when necessary. Moreover, Baptist "confessions of faith" have often had a clause such as this from the First London Baptist Confession (Revised edition, 1646):[11]
Also we confess that we now know but in part and that are ignorant of many things which we desire to and seek to know: and if any shall do us that friendly part to show us from the Word of God that we see not, we shall have cause to be thankful to God and to them.
Excommunication
[edit]Excommunication is a practice of the Bible to exclude members who do not respect the Church's confession of faith and do not want to repent.[12] It is practiced by most Christian denominations and is intended to protect against the consequences of heretics' teachings and apostasy.[13]
Christians without creeds
[edit]Some Christian denominations do not profess a creed. This stance is often referred to as "non-creedalism".
Anabaptism, with its origins in the 16th century Radical Reformation, spawned a number of sects and denominations that espouse "No creed, but the Bible/New Testament".[14] This was a common reason for Anabaptist persecution from Catholic and Protestant believers.[15] Anabaptist groups that exist today include the Amish, Hutterites, Mennonites, Schwarzenau Brethren (Church of the Brethren), River Brethren, Bruderhof, and the Apostolic Christian Church.
The Religious Society of Friends, the group known as the Quakers, was founded in the 17th century and is similarly non-creedal. They believe that such formal structures, “be they written words, steeple-houses or a clerical hierarchy,” cannot take the place of communal relationships and a shared connection with God.[16]
Similar reservations about the use of creeds can be found in the Restoration Movement and its descendants, the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), the Churches of Christ, and the Christian churches and churches of Christ. Restorationists profess "no creed but Christ".[17]
The Seventh-day Adventist Church also shares this sentiment.[18]
Jehovah's Witnesses contrast "memorizing or repeating creeds" with acting to "do what Jesus said".[19]
Christian creeds
[edit]Several creeds originated in Christianity.
- 1 Corinthians 15:3–7 includes an early creed about Jesus' death and resurrection which was probably received by Paul. The antiquity of the creed has been located by most biblical scholars to no more than five years after Jesus' death, probably originating from the Jerusalem apostolic community.[20]
- The Old Roman Creed is an earlier and shorter version of the Apostles' Creed. It was based on the 2nd century Rules of Faith and the interrogatory declaration of faith for those receiving baptism, which by the 4th century was everywhere tripartite in structure, following Matthew 28:19.
- The Apostles' Creed is used in Western Christianity for both liturgical and catechetical purposes.
- The Nicene Creed reflects the concerns of the First Council of Nicaea in 325 which had as their chief purpose to establish what Christians believed.[21]
- The Chalcedonian Creed was adopted at the Council of Chalcedon in 451 in Asia Minor. It defines that Christ is 'acknowledged in two natures', which 'come together into one person and hypostasis'.
- The Athanasian Creed (Quicunque vult) is a Christian statement of belief focusing on Trinitarian doctrine and Christology. It is the first creed in which the equality of the three persons of the Trinity is explicitly stated and differs from the Nicene and Apostles' Creeds in the inclusion of anathemas, or condemnations of those who disagree with the Creed.
- The Tridentine Creed was initially contained in the papal bull Iniunctum Nobis, issued by Pope Pius IV on 13 November 1565. The creed was intended to summarise the teaching of the Council of Trent (1545–1563).
- The Maasai Creed is a creed composed in 1960 by the Maasai people of East Africa in collaboration with missionaries from the Congregation of the Holy Ghost. The creed attempts to express the essentials of the Christian faith within the Maasai culture.
- The Credo of the People of God is a confession of faith that Pope Paul VI published with the motu proprio Solemni hac liturgia of 30 June 1968. Pope Paul VI spoke of it as "a creed which, without being strictly speaking a dogmatic definition, repeats in substance, with some developments called for by the spiritual condition of our time, the creed of Nicea, the creed of the immortal tradition of the holy Church of God."
Christian confessions of faith
[edit]
Protestant denominations are usually associated with confessions of faith, which are similar to creeds but usually longer.
- The Sixty-seven Articles of the Swiss reformers, drawn up by Zwingli in 1523
- The Schleitheim Confession of the Anabaptist Swiss Brethren in 1527
- The Augsburg Confession of 1530, the work of Martin Luther and Philip Melanchthon, which marked the breach with Rome
- The Tetrapolitan Confession of the German Reformed Church, 1530
- The Smalcald Articles of Martin Luther, 1537
- The Guanabara Confession of Faith, 1558
- The Gallic Confession, 1559
- The Scots Confession, drawn up by John Knox in 1560
- The Belgic Confession[22] drawn up by Guido de Bres[23] in 1561
- The Thirty-nine Articles of the Church of England in 1562
- The Formula of Concord and its Epitome in 1577
- The Irish Articles in 1615[24]
- The Remonstrant Confession in 1621
- The Dordrecht Confession of Faith of Dutch Mennonites in 1632
- The Baptist Confession of Faith in 1644 (upheld by Particular Baptists)
- The Westminster Confession of Faith in 1647 was the work of the Westminster Assembly of Divines and has commended itself to the Presbyterian Churches of all English-speaking peoples, and also in other languages.
- The Savoy Declaration[25] of 1658 which was a modification of the Westminster Confession to suit Congregationalist polity
- The Standard Confession in 1660 (upheld by General Baptists)[26]
- A Catechism and Confession of Faith in 1673 upheld by the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers)[27][28]
- The Orthodox Creed in 1678 (upheld by General Baptists)[26]
- The Baptist Confession in 1689 (upheld by Reformed Baptists)
- The Confession of Faith of the Calvinistic Methodists (Presbyterians) of Wales[29] of 1823
- The New Hampshire Confession in 1833 (upheld by Landmark Baptists)[30]
- The Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral of the Anglican Communion in 1870
- The Richmond Declaration in 1887, upheld by Orthodox Gurneyite Quakers
- The Assemblies of God Statement of Fundamental Truths in 1916
- The Confession of Faith of the United Methodist Church, adopted in 1968
Controversies
[edit]In the Swiss Reformed Churches, there was a quarrel about the Apostles' Creed in the mid-19th century. As a result, most cantonal reformed churches stopped prescribing any particular creed.[31]
In 2005, Bishop John Shelby Spong, retired Episcopal Bishop of Newark, has written that dogmas and creeds were merely "a stage in our development" and "part of our religious childhood." In his book, Sins of the Scripture, Spong wrote that "Jesus seemed to understand that no one can finally fit the holy God into his or her creeds or doctrines. That is idolatry."[32]
Latter Day Saint Movement
[edit]Within the sects of the Latter Day Saint movement, the Articles of Faith are contained in a list which was composed by Joseph Smith as part of an 1842 letter which he sent to John Wentworth, editor of the Chicago Democrat. It is canonized along with the King James Version of the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine & Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price, as a part of the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.[33]
In Islam (aqīdah)
[edit]In Islamic theology, the term most closely corresponding to "creed" is ʿaqīdah (عقيدة).[who?] The first such creed was written as "a short answer to the pressing heresies of the time" is known as Al-Fiqh Al-Akbar and ascribed to Abū Ḥanīfa.[34][35] Two well known creeds were the Fiqh Akbar II[36] "representative" of the al-Ash'ari, and Fiqh Akbar III, "representative" of the Ash-Shafi'i.[34]
Iman (Arabic: الإيمان) in Islamic theology denotes a believer's religious faith.[37][38] Its most simple definition is the belief in the six pilars of faith, known as arkān al-īmān.
Similarly in other Religions like Jewish Shema Yisrael
[edit]Rabbi Milton Steinberg wrote that "By its nature Judaism is averse to formal creeds which of necessity limit and restrain thought"[39] and asserted in his book Basic Judaism (1947) that "Judaism has never arrived at a creed."[39] The 1976 Centenary Platform of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, an organization of Reform rabbis, agrees that "Judaism emphasizes action rather than creed as the primary expression of a religious life."[40]
Still, the opening lines of the prayer Shema Yisrael can be read as a creedal statement of strict monotheism: "Hear O Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is One" (Hebrew: שמע ישראל אדני אלהינו אדני אחד; transliterated Shema Yisrael Adonai Eloheinu Adonai Echad).[41][42][43]
A notable statement of Jewish principles of faith was drawn up by Maimonides as his 13 Principles of Faith.[44]
Religions without creeds
[edit]Following a debate that lasted more than twenty years, the National Conference of the American Unitarian Association passed a resolution in 1894 that established the denomination as non-creedal.[45] The Unitarians later merged with the Universalist Church of America to form the Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA). Instead of a creed, the UUA abides by a set of principles, such as “a free and responsible search for truth and meaning”.[46] It cites diverse sources of inspiration, including Christianity, Judaism, Humanism, and Earth-centered traditions.[47]
See also
[edit]- Covenant
- Credo
- Mission statement
- The American's Creed – a 1917 statement about Americans' belief in democracy
- The Five Ks
- Pesher
References
[edit]- ^ a b Halverson, J. (2010). Theology and Creed in Sunni Islam: The Muslim Brotherhood, Ash'arism, and Political Sunnism. New York, NY: Springer. p. 39. ISBN 978-1-349-28721-5.
- ^ Harn, Roger van (2004). Exploring and Proclaiming the Apostles' Creed. A&C Black. p. 58. ISBN 9780819281166.
- ^ Hanson, Richard Patrick Crosland; Hanson, R. P. (2005). The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God: The Arian Controversy 318-381 AD. London: A&C Black. ISBN 978-0-567-03092-4.
- ^ a b Cone, Steven D.; Rea, Robert F. (2019). A Global Church History: The Great Tradition through Cultures, Continents and Centuries. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. lxxx. ISBN 978-0-567-67305-3.
- ^ Johnson, Phillip R. "The Nicene Creed." Archived 2009-03-14 at the Wayback Machine Accessed 17 May 2009
- ^ Justo L. Gonzalez, The Story of Christianity, 2nd ed., Vol. 1, p. 77.
- ^ Everett Ferguson, Encyclopedia of Early Christianity, Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames, 2013, p. 418
- ^ J. Gordon Melton, Encyclopedia of Protestantism, Infobase Publishing, USA, 2005, p. 170
- ^ Walter A. Elwell, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Baker Academic, USA, 2001, p. 286-289
- ^ Walter A. Elwell, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Baker Academic, USA, 2001, p. 289
- ^ Barrington Raymond White, Pilgrim Pathways: Essays in Baptist History, Mercer University Press, USA, 1999, p. 275
- ^ Ronald F. Youngblood, Nelson's Illustrated Bible Dictionary: New and Enhanced Edition, Thomas Nelson Inc, USA, 2014, p. 378
- ^ Chad Brand, Eric Mitchell, Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary, B&H Publishing Group, USA, 2015, p. 521-522
- ^ "1979 Biblical Inspiration Authority – Annual Conference".
- ^ Swora, Mathew (24 April 2019). "Of creeds and confessions". Retrieved 11 March 2023.
- ^ "Creeds and Quakers". quaker.org. Retrieved 11 March 2023.
- ^ Scott, Harp. "George A. Klingman". Restoration History. Buford Church of Christ. Retrieved 2015-09-19.
- ^ "Creeds".
- ^ "Creeds—Any Place in True Worship?", Awake!, October 8, 1985, ©Watch Tower, page 23, "The opening words of a creed invariably are, “I believe” or, “We believe.” This expression is translated from the Latin word “credo,” from which comes the word “creed.” ...What do we learn from Jesus’ words? That it is valueless in God’s eyes for one merely to repeat what one claims to believe. ...Thus, rather than memorizing or repeating creeds, we must do what Jesus said"
- ^ see Wolfhart Pannenberg, Jesus—God and Man translated Lewis Wilkins and Duane Pribe (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1968) p. 90; Oscar Cullmann, The Early church: Studies in Early Christian History and Theology, ed. A. J. B. Higgins (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1966) p. 66; R. E. Brown, The Virginal Conception and Bodily Resurrection of Jesus (New York: Paulist Press, 1973) p. 81; Thomas Sheehan, First Coming: How the Kingdom of God Became Christianity (New York: Random House, 1986) pp. 110, 118; Ulrich Wilckens, Resurrection translated A. M. Stewart (Edinburgh: Saint Andrew, 1977) p. 2; Hans Grass, Ostergeschen und Osterberichte, Second Edition (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1962) p. 96; Grass favors the origin in Damascus.
- ^ Kiefer, James E. "The Nicene Creed." Archived 2009-03-14 at the Wayback Machine Accessed 17 May 2009
- ^ "The Belgic Confession". Reformed.org. Archived from the original on November 9, 2020. Retrieved 2013-01-23.
- ^ "Guido de Bres". Prca.org. 2000-04-20. Archived from the original on October 6, 2020. Retrieved 2013-01-23.
- ^ Ford, Alan (2007). James Ussher: Theology, History, and Politics in Early-Modern Ireland and England. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199274444. Archived from the original on 13 May 2022. Retrieved November 19, 2020.
- ^ "The Savoy Declaration 1658 – Contents". Reformed.org. Archived from the original on May 26, 2020. Retrieved 2013-01-23.
- ^ a b Chute, Anthony L.; Finn, Nathan A.; Haykin, Michael A. G. (2015). The Baptist Story: From English Sect to Global Movement. B&H Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-4336-8316-9.
- ^ Coffey, John (29 May 2020). The Oxford History of Protestant Dissenting Traditions, Volume I: The Post-Reformation Era, 1559-1689. Oxford University Press. p. 399. ISBN 978-0-19-252098-2.
- ^ A Short Account of the Life and Writings of Robert Barclay. Tract Association of the Society of Friends. 1827. p. 22.
- ^ "Confession of Faith of the Calvinistic Methodists or Presbyterians of Wales". Archived from the original on 2018-07-06. Retrieved 2013-07-18.
- ^ Hill, Samuel S., ed. (1997). Encyclopedia of Religion in the South (Paperback ed.). Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press. p. 533. ISBN 0-86554-588-X. LCCN 97214301. OCLC 37706204. OL 305677M.
- ^ Rudolf Gebhard: Apostolikumsstreit in German, French and Italian in the online Historical Dictionary of Switzerland, 27 January 2011.
- ^ John Shelby Spong, The Sins of Scripture: Exposing the Bible's Texts of Hate to Reveal the God of Love, Harper Collins, USA, 2005, p. 227
- ^ Morrison, Alexander B., "The Latter-day Saint Concept of Canon", Historicity and the Latter-day Saint Scriptures, Brigham Young University Religious Studies Center
- ^ a b Glasse, Cyril (2001). New Encyclopedia of Islam (Revised ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 105.
- ^ Abu Hanifah An-Nu^man. "Al- Fiqh Al-Akbar" (PDF). aicp.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2009-08-16. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
- ^ "Al-Fiqh Al-Akbar II With Commentary by Al-Ninowy". Archived from the original on 2014-03-15. Retrieved 2017-09-08.
- ^ Farāhī, Majmū‘ah Tafāsīr, 2nd ed. (Faran Foundation, 1998), 347.
- ^ Frederick M. Denny, An Introduction to Islam, 3rd ed., p. 405
- ^ a b Steinberg, Milton; World, Harcourt, Brace & (1947). Basic Judaism. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 35. ISBN 978-0-15-610698-6.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "The Tenets of Reform Judaism". www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org. Retrieved 2020-11-19.
- ^ "Shema - Judaism 101 (JewFAQ)". www.jewfaq.org. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
- ^ "The Shema". www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
- ^ "The Opening of the Shema Prayer Explained". www.brandeis.edu. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
- ^ "Maimonides' Principles: The Fundamentals of Jewish Faith", in The Aryeh Kaplan Anthology, Volume I, Mesorah Publications, 1994
- ^ Meyer, Carol D. (1996). Anastos, M. Elizabeth (ed.). Our Unitarian Universalist Story: A Six-session Program for Adults. Boston, Mass: Unitarian Universalist Association. p. 41. ISBN 978-1558963429. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
- ^ "Principles". Unitarian Universalist Association. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
- ^ "Sources of Our Living Tradition". Unitarian Universalist Association. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
Further reading
[edit]- Christian Confessions: a Historical Introduction, [by] Ted A. Campbell. First ed. xxi, 336 p. Louisville, Ky.: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1996. ISBN 0-664-25650-3
- Creeds and Confessions of Faith in the Christian Tradition. Edited by Jaroslav Pelikan and Valerie Hotchkiss. Yale University Press 2003.
- Creeds in the Making: a Short Introduction to the History of Christian Doctrine, [by] Alan Richardson. Reissued. London: S.C.M. Press, 1979, cop. 1935. 128 p. ISBN 0-334-00264-8
- Ecumenical Creeds and Reformed Confessions. Grand Rapids, Mich.: C.R.C. [i.e. Christian Reformed Church] Publications, 1987. 148 p. ISBN 0-930265-34-3
- The Three Forms of Unity (Heidelberg Catechism, Belgic Confession, [and the] Canons of Dordrecht), and the Ecumenical Creeds (the Apostles' Creed, the Athanasian Creed, [and the] Creed of Chalcedon). Reprinted [ed.]. Mission Committee of the Protestant Reformed Churches in America, 1991. 58 p. Without ISBN
External links
[edit]- The Creeds of Christendom – A website linking to many formal Christian declarations of faith.
- Creeds and Canons – A Guide to Early Church Documents from Internet Christian Library
- ICP Website International Creed for Peace
Creed
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Fundamentals
Etymology and Terminology
The word creed derives from the Latin credo, meaning "I believe," the first word of the Apostles' Creed and Nicene Creed, which originates from the verb credere, "to believe" or "to trust."[8] This entered Old English as crēda, denoting a statement of Christian belief, and evolved into Middle English crede by the 12th century.[9] The term's roots trace to Proto-Indo-European *kred-dhe-, an early form implying trust or belief, reflecting its foundational role in articulating faith commitments.[10] In Christian theology, a creed constitutes a concise, formal summary of essential doctrines, serving as an authorized declaration of communal beliefs, particularly those concerning God, Christ, and salvation.[2] Often recited in liturgy or baptism, it functions as a "rule of faith" to affirm orthodoxy and guard against heresy, with the plural credimus ("we believe") underscoring collective adherence.[1] Creeds are distinguished from broader confessions of faith, which may expand into detailed systematic expositions like the Westminster Confession of Faith (1646), whereas creeds prioritize brevity and universality for ecumenical use.[11] Historically, the term symbol—from Greek symbolon, meaning a token or sign of recognition—has been synonymous with creed in patristic and medieval contexts, denoting a creed as a "symbol of faith" that unites believers through shared propositional affirmations.[12] This usage, evident in references to the "Old Roman Symbol" as a precursor to the Apostles' Creed, emphasizes creeds' role as authenticating markers of doctrinal fidelity rather than mere personal creeds or ethical codes.[13] Unlike catechisms, which employ question-and-answer formats for instruction, creeds maintain declarative structure for confessional purposes.[14]Core Characteristics and Functions
A creed is a formal, concise declaration of essential beliefs, typically articulated in propositional statements that outline core doctrines about God, salvation, and the nature of reality as understood within a religious tradition. Unlike casual affirmations, creeds exhibit structured brevity, often designed for memorization and recitation, enabling communal profession of faith without elaboration. They prioritize declarative assertions over narrative or exhortatory forms, focusing on metaphysical and soteriological truths verifiable through scriptural exegesis and theological reasoning. In function, creeds serve as epistemic anchors, distilling complex theological insights into accessible summaries that guard against doctrinal deviation by providing a benchmark for orthodoxy. Historically, they emerged to counter heresies, such as Arianism in the 4th century, by explicitly affirming propositions like the consubstantiality of the Son with the Father. This role fosters doctrinal clarity and unity, as adherents publicly align with the creed's claims, reinforcing communal identity through shared intellectual commitment rather than mere emotional allegiance. Liturgically, creeds function in worship to enact corporate confession, integrating belief with practice; for instance, recitation during baptism or Eucharist symbolizes the believer's incorporation into the covenant community bound by these truths. They also pedagogical ends, instructing catechumens in foundational tenets, thereby transmitting orthodoxy across generations with minimal interpretive variance. Empirically, adherence to creeds correlates with institutional stability in traditions like Catholicism and Orthodoxy, where they underpin sacramental validity, contrasting with more fluid confessional forms in Protestantism.Distinctions from Related Concepts
Creeds differ from confessions of faith primarily in scope and authority: creeds are concise, ecumenical summaries of essential Christian doctrines, such as the Trinity and incarnation, intended for universal use across denominations, while confessions are longer, tradition-specific documents that expand on scriptural interpretations for particular groups, like the Westminster Confession of 1646 for Presbyterians or the Augsburg Confession of 1530 for Lutherans.[15][16] This distinction arises because creeds emerged from early councils to define orthodoxy against heresies, serving as boundaries of the faith, whereas confessions apply theology to ecclesial practices and controversies within a reformational or denominational context.[15] In contrast to catechisms, which are instructional tools structured in question-and-answer format to teach doctrine systematically—often to converts, children, or laity—creeds employ a direct, declarative "I believe" or "we believe" phrasing for communal recitation in worship, emphasizing personal and collective affirmation over pedagogical explanation.[15] For instance, the Heidelberg Catechism of 1563 uses over 100 questions to expound beliefs derived from creeds, functioning as an applied extension rather than a standalone summary.[15] Creeds are also set apart from dogmas, which denote specific, authoritatively proclaimed truths considered divinely revealed and infallible within a tradition, such as the Immaculate Conception defined by Pope Pius IX in 1854; creeds encapsulate multiple dogmas in a unified statement but are not themselves the dogmas, serving instead as liturgical vehicles for their profession.[17][18] Unlike broader doctrines—which encompass all teachings on faith and morals—creeds focus narrowly on core soteriological elements, avoiding exhaustive theological detail.[17] Modern statements of faith, often produced by contemporary churches or organizations, lack the historical, consensual weight of creeds; they represent provisional, group-specific affirmations tailored to current contexts, whereas creeds like the Nicene Creed of 325 (revised 381) command enduring, cross-denominational adherence as tests of orthodoxy.[19][20] This renders statements more flexible but less authoritative, prioritizing immediate applicability over timeless universality.[19]Historical Development
Ancient and Pre-Christian Precursors
In ancient Egyptian religion, the Negative Confession from Spell 125 of the Book of the Dead represented an early form of confessional declaration, dating to the New Kingdom period (c. 1550–1070 BCE). This text consists of 42 statements in which the deceased soul affirms innocence before 42 divine judges in the afterlife, denying commission of specific sins such as murder, theft, or lying, thereby seeking justification and entry into the realm of Osiris.[21] Such recitations functioned ritually to affirm ethical adherence and divine order (ma'at), paralleling later creedal emphases on moral and theological orthodoxy, though oriented toward personal vindication rather than communal doctrine.[22] Within ancient Judaism, foundational precursors emerged in the Torah, serving as liturgical affirmations of monotheism and covenantal history. The Shema Yisrael, drawn from Deuteronomy 6:4—"Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one"—constituted a central confessional formula, recited daily in worship and inscribed on phylacteries and doorposts as commanded in Deuteronomy 6:6–9. Originating in the Mosaic tradition (traditionally dated to c. 13th century BCE), it encapsulated Israel's exclusive devotion to Yahweh, countering polytheistic influences in the ancient Near East and forming the core of Jewish liturgical identity.[23] Scholars identify it as a proto-creed due to its role in unifying belief and practice, directly influencing early Christian affirmations of God's unity.[24] Complementing the Shema, Deuteronomy 26:5–9 presents what biblical scholars term the "small historical creed," a narrative confession recited during the offering of first fruits in the Temple cult. This passage summarizes Israel's origins—"A wandering Aramean was my ancestor; he went down into Egypt and sojourned there... The Lord brought us out of Egypt with a mighty hand"—linking patriarchal promise, enslavement, exodus deliverance, and conquest of Canaan as acts of divine fidelity. Attributed to the Deuteronomic composition (c. 7th–6th century BCE redaction), it reinforced communal memory and gratitude, functioning analogously to creeds by encapsulating salvific history for ritual recitation and identity formation.[25] These Jewish elements, embedded in covenant renewal ceremonies, provided the scriptural and liturgical framework from which early Christian creeds adapted monotheistic and historical affirmations.[26]Origins in Early Christianity
The earliest formalized expressions of Christian belief in the post-apostolic era emerged in the second century amid challenges from Gnostic and Marcionite heresies, which denied core elements of apostolic teaching such as the unity of the Old and New Testaments or the incarnation of Christ.[7] Irenaeus of Lyons, writing Against Heresies around 180 AD, articulated the "Rule of Faith" (regula fidei) as a summary of orthodox doctrine derived from apostolic tradition preserved through episcopal succession, emphasizing one God as creator, the virgin birth and passion of Jesus Christ as the incarnate Son, and the prophetic role of the Holy Spirit.[27] This rule functioned not as a rigid text but as a flexible standard for interpreting Scripture and refuting innovations, with Irenaeus stating that heretics "refer them to that tradition which originates from the apostles, which is preserved by means of the succession of elders in the churches."[27] Tertullian, in works like Prescription Against Heretics around 200 AD, further developed the Rule of Faith as an expanded Trinitarian confession tied to baptismal practice, describing it as "a somewhat ampler pledge than the Lord has appointed in the Gospel" to safeguard against modalism and other distortions.[27] These summaries were oral and varied by region, serving to unify believers by affirming the creator God, Christ's historical incarnation and resurrection, and the church's continuity with apostolic witness, rather than imposing a universal formula.[7] By the early third century, baptismal rites incorporated interrogatory creeds, as detailed in Hippolytus of Rome's Apostolic Tradition (circa 215 AD), where candidates professed belief in response to questions: "Do you believe in God, the Father Almighty?"; "Do you believe in Christ Jesus, the Son of God...?"; and "Do you believe in the Holy Spirit and the Holy Church and the resurrection of the flesh?"[28] This tripartite structure, rooted in Matthew 28:19's baptismal formula, ensured doctrinal orthodoxy and moral commitment during immersion, marking a shift from simple personal confessions (e.g., Acts 8:37) to structured affirmations memorized after catechesis.[7] A key example from this period is the Old Roman Creed, originating in second-century Roman baptismal liturgy as a declarative summary, later attested in Greek by Marcellus of Ancyra around 340 AD but predating formal councils.[29] Its text reads: "I believe in God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth; and in Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord, who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead, and buried; he descended into hell; the third day he rose again from the dead; he ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty; from thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead. I believe in the Holy Ghost, the holy catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting."[29] This creed, akin to interrogatory forms elsewhere, emphasized Christ's historical reality against docetism and served as a precursor to the Apostles' Creed, prioritizing empirical apostolic witness over speculative theology.[29]Evolution Through Ecumenical Councils
The evolution of Christian creeds advanced significantly through the early ecumenical councils, which convened to resolve theological disputes and articulate orthodox doctrine against emerging heresies. These assemblies, attended by bishops from across the Roman Empire, produced or refined creedal statements to safeguard core beliefs about the Trinity and Christ's nature, emphasizing empirical fidelity to scriptural witness over speculative innovations.[30][31] The First Council of Nicaea, held in 325 AD under Emperor Constantine's auspices, marked the initial pivotal development. Approximately 300 bishops gathered to address Arianism, the teaching of presbyter Arius that the Son was a created being subordinate to the Father, denying co-eternality and consubstantiality. The council condemned Arius and his doctrine, excommunicating him, and formulated the original Nicene Creed. This creed explicitly affirmed the Son as "begotten, not made, consubstantial (homoousios) with the Father," countering Arian subordinationism by grounding Christ's divinity in shared essence with God the Father.[32][33][31] Subsequent councils built upon this foundation. The First Council of Constantinople in 381 AD, convened by Emperor Theodosius I, reaffirmed the Nicene faith amid persistent Arian influences and Macedonianism, which questioned the Holy Spirit's divinity. Attended by around 150 bishops, it expanded the creed to include a robust Trinitarian clause on the Spirit: "the Lord, the Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father, who with the Father and the Son is worshiped and glorified." This revision, known as the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed, integrated earlier baptismal creeds while enhancing pneumatology, establishing the form recited in most Christian liturgies today.[34][35][36] Later ecumenical councils, such as Ephesus (431 AD) and Chalcedon (451 AD), primarily affirmed the Nicene-Constantinopolitan framework without substantive creedal alterations, focusing instead on Christological precision against Nestorianism and Monophysitism. These gatherings underscored creeds' role as binding tests of orthodoxy, with non-adherence often leading to exclusion from communion, thereby preserving doctrinal unity through collective episcopal consensus rather than individual interpretation.[37][38]Medieval and Reformation Adaptations
The Nicene Creed underwent a significant adaptation in the Western Church during the early Middle Ages with the addition of the Filioque clause, which specifies that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father "and the Son" (et Filioque). This insertion originated at the Third Council of Toledo in 589, convened to counter Arian influences among Visigothic converts by emphasizing the Son's equality with the Father in the Spirit's procession.[39] The clause gradually disseminated across Western liturgical practices, reaching Rome around 1014 during the reign of Pope Benedict VIII, who approved its inclusion at the request of Emperor Henry II.[40] This unilateral change contributed to escalating tensions with Eastern Christianity, culminating in the Great Schism of 1054, as Orthodox theologians viewed it as an unauthorized alteration violating the Council of Constantinople's (381) prohibition on creed modifications.[41] The Apostles' Creed, meanwhile, retained its form and prominence in Western liturgy, serving as the standard for baptismal professions and integration into monastic daily offices by the early Middle Ages.[42] Medieval theologians, including scholastics like Thomas Aquinas, treated ecumenical creeds as authoritative summaries of orthodox doctrine, embedding their Trinitarian and Christological content into systematic theology without proposing textual changes, as evidenced by Aquinas's alignment of Summa Theologica arguments with Nicene formulations on divine essence and incarnation.[43] Reformation leaders affirmed the antiquity and scriptural fidelity of the Apostles' and Nicene Creeds while supplementing them with confessional documents to clarify doctrines amid disputes with Rome. Martin Luther's Small Catechism, published in 1529, expounds each article of the Apostles' Creed as a concise biblical exposition, linking belief in God the Father to creation and providence, the Son to redemption, and the Holy Spirit to sanctification through the church.[44] The Augsburg Confession, drafted chiefly by Philipp Melanchthon and presented on June 25, 1530, at the Diet of Augsburg to Emperor Charles V, explicitly endorses the three ecumenical creeds while articulating 28 articles on justification by faith, sacraments, and church order, positioning itself as a defense of apostolic teaching against perceived Catholic innovations.[45] In Reformed traditions, John Calvin echoed this approach in his Institutes of the Christian Religion (first edition 1536), upholding Nicene Trinitarianism but subordinating creeds to direct scriptural exegesis to avoid tradition's potential for error. These adaptations prioritized creeds' role in doctrinal unity and catechesis, reflecting reformers' commitment to sola scriptura while leveraging historical symbols against contemporary heresies.[46]Creeds in Christianity
The Apostles' Creed
The Apostles' Creed constitutes a concise summary of essential Christian doctrines, articulating belief in God the Father as creator, Jesus Christ as the incarnate Son who suffered, died, rose, and ascended, and the Holy Spirit as sanctifier of the church, culminating in the resurrection of the body and eternal life.[47] Its structure reflects trinitarian theology, with sections devoted to each person of the Godhead, followed by affirmations of ecclesial and eschatological realities.[48] Unlike the Nicene Creed, which expands on Christological details to combat specific heresies, the Apostles' Creed prioritizes brevity for catechetical and liturgical purposes, tracing its roots to early baptismal interrogations rather than conciliar formulation.[49] Historical evidence indicates the creed's precursor, known as the Old Roman Creed or Roman Symbol, emerged in the Roman church by the mid-second century as a baptismal confession recited by converts before immersion.[48] This interrogatory form—posing questions like "Do you believe in God the Father Almighty?"—evolved into a declarative statement by the third century, with the earliest extant version appearing in a Greek translation in a letter from Marcellus of Ancyra to Pope Julius I around 341 AD.[50] The full Latin text in its modern form stabilized by the eighth century, incorporating phrases like "descendit ad inferos" (descended into hell) and "communionem sanctorum" (communion of saints), which were absent or variant in earlier iterations.[47] Medieval attribution to the Apostles themselves—claiming each contributed one of twelve articles—lacks historical substantiation and stems from a fourth-century legend popularized by Rufinus of Aquileia in his commentary circa 404 AD, serving more as pious tradition than factual origin.[50] The traditional English text, as standardized in Protestant and Catholic liturgies, reads:I believe in God, the Father almighty,Liturgical variations exist; for instance, some Anglican and Lutheran rites omit "He descended into hell" due to interpretive disputes over its meaning—whether referring to Christ's descent to the dead or a metaphorical triumph—while ecumenical adaptations from the 1980s by bodies like the English Language Liturgical Consultation replace "catholic" with "universal" for clarity, though retaining the original intent of the undivided church.[52] In practice, it features prominently in Western Christian rites, including Roman Catholic baptismal professions since the fourth century, Anglican Morning and Evening Prayer as prescribed in the 1662 Book of Common Prayer, and Methodist and Reformed worship for affirming shared orthodoxy against doctrinal drift.[51] Eastern Orthodox churches, emphasizing the Nicene Creed, rarely employ it, reflecting divergent liturgical traditions post-schism.[53] Its enduring role underscores a commitment to apostolic teaching as derived from Scripture, functioning as both personal confession and communal boundary against heterodoxies like Arianism or Gnosticism that prompted its doctrinal precision.[54]
creator of heaven and earth. I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord.
He was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit
and born of the Virgin Mary.
He suffered under Pontius Pilate,
was crucified, died, and was buried.
He descended into hell.
On the third day he rose again.
He ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again to judge the living and the dead. I believe in the Holy Spirit,
the holy catholic Church,
the communion of saints,
the forgiveness of sins,
the resurrection of the body,
and the life everlasting. Amen.[51]
The Nicene Creed
The Nicene Creed originated from the First Council of Nicaea, convened by Roman Emperor Constantine I in 325 AD to address the Arian controversy, which questioned the full divinity of Jesus Christ. Arius, a presbyter from Alexandria, taught that the Son was created by the Father and thus subordinate, not co-eternal or consubstantial. The council, attended by approximately 318 bishops, rejected Arianism and formulated a creed affirming the Son's eternal generation from the Father.[55][56][57] The original 325 creed states: "We believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of all things visible and invisible; And in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten from the Father, only-begotten, that is, from the substance of the Father, God from God, light from light, true God from true God, begotten not made, consubstantial with the Father." This use of homoousios (of one substance) directly countered Arian subordinationism by declaring the Son's full equality and shared essence with the Father, while also affirming incarnation, crucifixion, and resurrection.[57][58][56] In 381 AD, the First Council of Constantinople expanded the creed, adding details on the Holy Spirit as "the Lord and Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father, who with the Father and the Son is worshiped and glorified," and affirming the church as "one, holy, catholic, and apostolic." This revised form, known as the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed, became the standard version recited in liturgies across Eastern and Western Christianity, though the Western addition of filioque (and the Son) for the Spirit's procession emerged later and contributed to schisms.[37][59] The creed serves as a foundational doctrinal summary in Nicene Christianity, accepted by Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Anglican, and most Protestant traditions as authoritative for orthodoxy. It functions in liturgy during Eucharistic services as a communal profession of faith, reinforcing Trinitarian belief and unity against heresies, and in baptismal teaching to outline core tenets derived from Scripture and apostolic tradition.[60][61][62]Other Historical Christian Creeds
The Athanasian Creed, also known as the Quicumque vult from its opening words, emerged in Western Christianity during the fifth or early sixth century, likely composed in Latin in southern Gaul or Spain as a detailed exposition of Trinitarian doctrine and Christology.[63] Despite its traditional attribution to Athanasius of Alexandria (d. 373), modern scholarship attributes it to an anonymous author influenced by Augustine's writings, with no direct link to Athanasius himself.[63] It affirms the unity of the Godhead in three coequal, coeternal persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—while emphasizing their distinct persons, stating that "the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God; and yet they are not three Gods, but one God."[63] The creed also addresses the Incarnation, declaring Christ as perfect God and perfect man, consubstantial with the Father in divinity and with humanity in taking a rational soul and human flesh.[63] Historically recited in liturgical settings, particularly on Trinity Sunday in Western churches, it served to combat Arianism and Nestorianism but fell into disuse among Eastern Orthodox traditions due to its filioque clause implying the Holy Spirit proceeds from both Father and Son.[63] The Chalcedonian Definition, promulgated at the Council of Chalcedon in 451 AD, represents a pivotal conciliar statement on the person of Christ rather than a full creed, though it is often categorized as such for its doctrinal precision.[64] Convened by Emperor Marcian with over 500 bishops, primarily from the Eastern churches, the council responded to Eutyches' monophysitism, which merged Christ's divine and human natures into one, and affirmed the orthodox view against earlier heresies like Apollinarianism.[64] It declares Jesus Christ as "one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood; truly God and truly man, of a reasonable soul and body; consubstantial with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood," united in one person without confusion, change, division, or separation.[65] This formulation built on the Nicene Creed and the writings of Cyril of Alexandria, influencing subsequent Christological debates and remaining authoritative in Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and most Protestant traditions, though rejected by Oriental Orthodox churches adhering to miaphysitism.[64] The definition's enduring role underscores the church's commitment to maintaining the integrity of Christ's dual natures as essential to soteriology, ensuring salvation through a fully divine and fully human mediator.[65] Other notable historical statements include regional creeds like the Creed of the Council of Toledo (589 AD), which incorporated the filioque into the Nicene framework to affirm Trinitarian orthodoxy against Arian Visigoths in Spain, but these lacked the ecumenical scope of the Athanasian or Chalcedonian formulations.[66] Early baptismal professions, such as the Old Roman Creed (ca. 150-180 AD), prefigure the Apostles' Creed but represent proto-creedal summaries rather than standalone historical creeds.[66] These documents collectively reinforced doctrinal boundaries amid theological controversies, prioritizing scriptural fidelity over innovation.Role in Doctrine, Liturgy, and Discipline
Creeds function as authoritative summaries of core Christian doctrines, providing a standardized articulation of beliefs essential to orthodoxy and serving as a bulwark against theological deviations. The Nicene Creed, established at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD and revised at Constantinople in 381 AD, defines key Trinitarian and Christological tenets, such as the consubstantiality of the Son with the Father, directly countering Arian subordinationism by affirming Christ's full divinity.[67][60] The Apostles' Creed, tracing to early baptismal formulas around the 2nd century AD, encapsulates apostolic teachings on God's creative sovereignty, Christ's incarnation, death, resurrection, and ascension, and the Holy Spirit's sanctifying work, thereby instructing believers in foundational truths derived from Scripture.[68] These documents enable doctrinal clarity and unity across denominations, functioning as teaching tools in catechesis to transmit faith from generation to generation without reliance on individual interpretation.[69] In liturgy, creeds integrate believers into communal worship, reinforcing doctrinal assent through recitation during sacraments and services. The Apostles' Creed holds particular prominence in baptismal rites, where candidates publicly profess faith as a prerequisite for initiation into the church, a practice rooted in early Christian customs of interrogating converts on core beliefs before immersion.[70][71] The Nicene Creed features routinely in Eucharistic liturgies, such as the Catholic Mass following the homily and in Eastern Orthodox Divine Liturgy, where its proclamation unites participants in a collective affirmation of faith, historically serving as both prayer and hymn-like confession during worship.[72] This liturgical embedding, dating to the 5th-6th centuries for the Nicene Creed's widespread adoption, fosters spiritual formation by embedding doctrine in ritual, ensuring worship aligns with scriptural orthodoxy rather than subjective experience.[73] Regarding church discipline, creeds enforce boundaries of acceptable belief, acting as criteria for membership, ordination, and exclusion of heterodoxy to preserve communal fidelity to revealed truth. Early church fathers utilized creedal formulas as tests of orthodoxy during heresy trials, with non-assent leading to excommunication, as seen in post-Nicene anathemas against deviations.[38] In Protestant traditions, subscription to creeds like the Apostles' or Nicene remains a requirement for clergy vows in bodies such as Lutheran and Anglican churches, verifying alignment with historic faith before granting authority.[74] This disciplinary role extends to modern contexts, where creedal adherence distinguishes confessional communities from those permitting doctrinal pluralism, thereby safeguarding against erosion of biblical essentials through rigorous affirmation.[75]Controversies in Christian Creedal History
Heresies and Excommunications
The emergence of doctrinal heresies in the early Christian church prompted the formulation of creeds to delineate orthodoxy, often culminating in formal anathemas, depositions, and excommunications at ecumenical councils.[76] Arianism, taught by the Alexandrian presbyter Arius (c. 256–336), asserted that the Son was created by the Father and thus not co-eternal or consubstantial, challenging the Trinity's unity.[77] This view gained traction among some Eastern bishops but was condemned at the First Ecumenical Council of Nicaea in 325, where Arius and his supporters, including bishops Theonas and Secundus, were anathematized, excommunicated, and exiled by imperial decree under Constantine I.[78] The council's creed explicitly affirmed the Son as "of the same substance" (homoousios) with the Father to refute Arian subordinationism.[77] Subsequent heresies targeted Christology, prompting further creedal refinements and disciplinary actions. Nestorianism, associated with Patriarch Nestorius of Constantinople (d. c. 451), emphasized a sharp division between Christ's divine and human natures, rejecting the title Theotokos (God-bearer) for Mary as implying confusion of natures.[79] The Council of Ephesus in 431, the Third Ecumenical Council, deposed and excommunicated Nestorius as a heretic, affirming the hypostatic union in one person and upholding Cyril of Alexandria's orthodox position.[80] Canons from the council mandated deposition or excommunication for adherents, solidifying creedal language on Christ's unified personhood.[80] Monophysitism, or Eutychianism, advanced by the monk Eutyches (c. 378–454), posited that Christ had only one nature after the incarnation, effectively absorbing the human into the divine. Eutyches was initially deposed and excommunicated by a local synod in Constantinople in 448 under Patriarch Flavian for refusing to affirm two natures.[81] The Fourth Ecumenical Council at Chalcedon in 451 reaffirmed the doctrine of two natures in one person against this view, issuing a creed-like definition and condemning Eutyches' teachings, though his formal handling shifted to broader miaphysite disputes; Dioscorus of Alexandria, a supporter, was deposed for related irregularities.[82] These councils' anathemas preserved creedal integrity by excluding divergent views, enforcing orthodoxy through ecclesiastical and imperial sanctions, though Arian and Nestorian communities persisted in schismatic forms like Germanic tribes and the Church of the East.[79]Reformation-Era Disputes
The Protestant Reformation initiated significant disputes over the authority and interpretation of early Christian creeds, primarily through the principle of sola scriptura, which positioned Scripture as the sole infallible rule of faith, subordinating creeds to its normative test. Reformers such as Martin Luther affirmed the Apostles' Creed and Nicene Creed as faithful summaries of biblical doctrine but rejected their elevation to co-equal status with Scripture alongside ecclesiastical tradition, as maintained by the Roman Catholic Church.[83][66] Luther's Small Catechism (1529) expounded the Apostles' Creed article by article, emphasizing its alignment with Scripture while critiquing Catholic accretions like indulgences that deviated from creedal orthodoxy.[44] This stance fueled conflicts, as Catholics viewed creeds within an unbroken tradition interpreted by the magisterium, whereas Protestants insisted on direct scriptural verification to guard against doctrinal drift.[84] A pivotal moment occurred at the Diet of Augsburg in 1530, where Philipp Melanchthon presented the Augsburg Confession on behalf of Lutheran princes and theologians, explicitly invoking the Nicene Creed in its first article on the Trinity and affirming the ecumenical creeds as consistent with Scripture.[83][66] The confession outlined 28 articles, defending Reformation doctrines like justification by faith alone while rejecting perceived Catholic abuses, such as mandatory celibacy and the mass as a propitiatory sacrifice, which Reformers argued contradicted the creeds' soteriological emphasis.[85] Emperor Charles V demanded recantation, leading to the papal confutation and Melanchthon's defense (Apology of the Augsburg Confession, 1531), which further entrenched creedal disputes by prioritizing scriptural exegesis over conciliar or papal decrees.[83] These documents became confessional standards, illustrating how Reformers repurposed creeds to challenge rather than uphold undivided Catholic authority. The Catholic Counter-Reformation responded decisively at the Council of Trent (1545–1563), which reaffirmed the Nicene Creed's filioque clause and condemned Protestant innovations under anathemas, particularly targeting sola fide as incompatible with creedal affirmations of faith working through love.[86] Trent's decrees on justification (Session VI, 1547) and Scripture (Session IV, 1546) upheld Tradition and the Vulgate's authority alongside creeds, viewing sola scriptura as disruptive to the church's interpretive role.[87] This crystallized the divide: Protestants like John Calvin, in his Institutes (1536 onward), endorsed creeds but subjected them to scriptural critique, producing Reformed confessions such as the Geneva Confession (1536) that echoed Nicene Trinitarianism while emphasizing predestination.[88] Intra-Protestant tensions arose, with Anabaptists and radical reformers often dismissing formal creeds altogether in favor of personal biblical interpretation, prompting Lutherans and Reformed to defend creedal summaries against perceived antinomianism.[89] These disputes extended to sacramental theology, where Reformers contested Catholic transubstantiation as unscriptural, despite the creeds' silence on eucharistic mechanics, leading to confessions like the Smalcald Articles (1537) that prioritized biblical realism over scholastic elaborations.[83] By the Schmalkaldic War (1546–1547), creedal fidelity became a casus belli, with Protestants forming leagues based on confessional adherence to test scriptural orthodoxy amid escalating confessionalization.[90] Ultimately, the Reformation-era conflicts reframed creeds not as static ecumenical bonds but as dynamic tools for doctrinal accountability, subordinate to Scripture's causal primacy in revealing divine truth.[84][91]Modern Challenges to Creedal Authority
In the twentieth century, liberal theology posed a significant challenge to creedal authority by reinterpreting or rejecting core doctrines such as the virgin birth, miracles, and bodily resurrection as non-literal or ethically symbolic rather than historical facts essential to creeds like the Nicene and Apostles' Creeds.[92] This approach, rooted in Enlightenment rationalism and historical-critical biblical scholarship, prioritized human experience and moral teachings over supernatural claims, viewing creeds as outdated products of a pre-scientific era.[92] For example, initiatives like the Jesus Seminar (1985–2006), comprising liberal scholars who employed voting methodologies to authenticate Jesus' sayings and deeds, dismissed much of the creedal portrayal of Christ as divine and miracle-working, reducing him to a wisdom teacher whose resurrection was metaphorical.[93] Secularism further undermined creedal authority by fostering a cultural shift toward empirical scientism, where creeds' affirmations of divine incarnation and trinitarian ontology were dismissed as incompatible with modern cosmology and evolutionary biology, leading to declining adherence in Western mainline denominations.[94] By the late twentieth century, surveys indicated that only a minority of members in bodies like the United Church of Christ or Episcopal Church affirmed creedal statements literally, with many treating them as poetic expressions rather than binding truths, reflecting broader societal privatization of faith.[95] This erosion paralleled a loss of classical Nicene orthodoxy, as theologians influenced by process thought and open theism questioned immutable divine attributes like omnipotence and foreknowledge enshrined in creeds.[96] Postmodern skepticism of metanarratives amplified these pressures, portraying creeds not as universal revelations but as contingent cultural constructs serving historical power dynamics, thereby relativizing their doctrinal claims.[97] Within evangelical circles, a strict adherence to sola scriptura manifested as "no creed but the Bible," rejecting creeds as extra-biblical impositions that risked elevating tradition over Scripture, a stance evident in some Restorationist and low-church Protestant groups.[98] These challenges, often advanced by academic theologians in institutions predisposed to naturalistic assumptions, have prompted denominational fractures, such as those over biblical inerrancy in the Southern Baptist Convention during the 1970s–1980s, where creedal summaries were subordinated to direct scriptural interpretation.[99]Creeds and Confessions in Other Religions
Judaism: Shema and Thirteen Principles
The Shema Yisrael ("Hear, O Israel"), originating from Deuteronomy 6:4 in the Torah, declares: "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one," encapsulating Judaism's core monotheistic affirmation and rejection of polytheism.[100] This verse, commanded for recitation in Deuteronomy 6:7, forms the opening of a liturgical unit recited twice daily—morning and evening—by observant Jews as a perpetual biblical obligation, with additional paragraphs from Deuteronomy 11:13–21 (stressing obedience and consequences) and Numbers 15:37–41 (recalling the Exodus and fringes as reminders).[101][102] The practice, dating to at least the Second Temple period (circa 516 BCE–70 CE), underscores covenantal loyalty, with reciters covering their eyes to focus inwardly, and it holds ritual significance at deathbeds, circumcisions, and in phylacteries (tefillin) and doorpost scrolls (mezuzot).[101][100] Unlike formalized Christian creeds, the Shema functions less as a doctrinal test and more as a performative vow of allegiance, historically invoked in battle (e.g., by Joshua in Joshua 6) and persecution to assert identity.[100] Its emphasis on God's oneness counters ancient Near Eastern idolatry, with rabbinic tradition (e.g., Talmud Berakhot 13a, circa 500 CE) mandating its utterance upon waking and retiring to frame daily life around divine sovereignty.[102] In the medieval period, Rabbi Moses ben Maimon (Maimonides, 1138–1204 CE) systematized Jewish belief in his Commentary on the Mishnah (Sanhedrin 10, circa 1168 CE), enumerating Thirteen Principles to delineate orthodoxy amid philosophical challenges from Aristotelianism and Islam.[103] These principles state: (1) God exists as the universe's primary cause; (2) God is one, without composite nature; (3) God is incorporeal, beyond physical attributes; (4) God is eternal, preceding creation; (5) only God merits worship, rejecting intermediaries; (6) prophecy exists, with prophets conveying divine will; (7) Moses holds supreme prophetic authority; (8) the Torah originates wholly from God; (9) the Torah is immutable, with no successor; (10) God perceives human actions and thoughts; (11) God metes reward and punishment; (12) the Messiah will redeem Israel; and (13) the dead will resurrect in the world to come.[103][104] Maimonides deemed adherence essential for salvation, viewing denial—even doubt—as heresy excluding one from the afterlife, though he derived them from scriptural inference rather than explicit enumeration.[104] These gained liturgical traction by the 15th century, appearing as the "Ani Ma'amin" ("I believe") acrostic in prayer books and recited daily in some rites, yet Judaism's non-creedal ethos—prioritizing halakhic observance over confessional formulas—means they lack enforcement akin to Christian anathemas.[103][105] Critics, including some medieval rabbis like Rabad, contested their rigidity, arguing belief defies full articulation, while modern streams (e.g., Reform) adapt or de-emphasize them.[104] Together, the Shema and Thirteen Principles represent Judaism's closest analogs to creeds, anchoring monotheism and Torah-centric faith without supplanting orthopraxy.[106][105]Islam: Aqidah and Six Articles of Faith
Aqidah, derived from the Arabic root ʿaqada meaning "to tie firmly" or "to knot securely," refers to the firm, unwavering convictions held in the heart regarding the foundational doctrines of Islam, as derived exclusively from the Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad.[107] These beliefs form the basis of a Muslim's faith (iman), distinguishing orthodox adherence from innovation or deviation, and are considered essential for salvation, with denial of any core element constituting disbelief (kufr).[108] In Sunni Islam, aqidah is systematized without reliance on rational speculation (kalam), prioritizing textual evidence over philosophical constructs that emerged later in response to sects like the Mu'tazila during the 8th-9th centuries CE.[109] The core components of aqidah are encapsulated in the Six Articles of Faith (Arkan al-Iman), articulated by the Prophet Muhammad in the Hadith of Jibril, a foundational narration recorded in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim. In this hadith, the angel Jibril (in human form) questions the Prophet on faith, prompting the response: "Faith is to believe in Allah, His angels, His books, His messengers, the Last Day, and to believe in the divine decree (qadar), both the good and the evil thereof." This enumeration, affirmed by the Prophet as part of teaching religion itself, underscores that true belief entails affirmation without doubt, supported by Quranic verses such as Al-Baqarah 2:285, which states: "The Messenger has believed in what was revealed to him from his Lord, and [so have] the believers. All of them believe in Allah, His angels, His books, and His messengers." These articles apply universally to all Muslims, though Shia traditions sometimes emphasize five while incorporating similar concepts under wilayah (guardianship of Ali).[110]- Belief in Allah (Tawhid): The absolute oneness of God, who is eternal, uncreated, and without partners, associates, or anthropomorphic attributes beyond those described in revelation. This rejects polytheism (shirk) and affirms Allah as the sole creator, sustainer, and object of worship, as in Surah Al-Ikhlas (112:1-4): "Say, He is Allah, [who is] One, Allah, the Eternal Refuge. He neither begets nor is born, nor is there to Him any equivalent." Tawhid encompasses lordship (rububiyyah), divinity (uluhiyyah), and names/attributes (asma wa sifat), forming the unassailable foundation of aqidah.[111]
- Belief in Angels: Invisible, obedient creations of light who execute Allah's commands without free will to disobey, serving roles like revelation (e.g., Jibril), recording deeds (Kiraman Katibin), or bearing the Throne. Their existence is affirmed in Quran 2:285 and detailed in hadiths, countering denials by early rationalists.
- Belief in Books: Divine scriptures revealed to prophets for guidance, with the Quran as the final, unaltered revelation abrogating prior texts like the Torah, Psalms, and Gospel, though Muslims hold that earlier books were distorted over time. Quran 2:285 mandates belief in all, emphasizing their role in establishing law and monotheism.
- Belief in Messengers: Prophets and apostles sent sequentially, culminating in Muhammad as the Seal, all infallible in conveying revelation. Key figures include Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad, with belief required in their miracles and missions, per Quran 2:285 and the hadith. This article upholds prophetic authority without divinizing messengers.
- Belief in the Last Day: The resurrection, judgment, paradise, and hell, where deeds are weighed and eternal recompense given. Signs include the Antichrist (Dajjal), Jesus's return, and cosmic upheavals, rooted in Quran 2:285 and extensive eschatological hadiths.
- Belief in Divine Decree (Qadar): Allah's comprehensive knowledge, will, and predestination of all events, balancing human responsibility with divine omnipotence. Good and evil occur by His decree, yet individuals act freely within it, as in Quran 57:22: "No disaster strikes upon the earth or among yourselves except that it is in a register before We bring it into being." This counters fatalism by affirming accountability.