Hubbry Logo
Calcium sulfiteCalcium sulfiteMain
Open search
Calcium sulfite
Community hub
Calcium sulfite
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Calcium sulfite
Calcium sulfite
Calcium sulfite
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Calcium sulfite
Names
IUPAC name
Calcium sulfite
Other names
  • Sulfurous acid, calcium salt (1:1)
  • E226
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
ChemSpider
ECHA InfoCard 100.030.529 Edit this at Wikidata
EC Number
  • 233-596-8
E number E226 (preservatives)
UNII
  • InChI=1S/Ca.H2O3S/c;1-4(2)3/h;(H2,1,2,3)/q+2;/p-2 checkY
  • InChI=1/Ca.H2O3S/c;1-4(2)3/h;(H2,1,2,3)/q+2;/p-2
    Key: GBAOBIBJACZTNA-NUQVWONBAU
  • [Ca+2].[O-]S([O-])=O
Properties
CaSO3
Molar mass 120.17 g/mol
Appearance White solid
Melting point 600 °C (1,112 °F; 873 K)
4.3 mg/100 mL (18 °C)
3.1×10−7[1]
Hazards
Flash point Non-flammable
Related compounds
Other anions
 Calcium sulfate
Other cations
 Sodium sulfite
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).
☒N verify (what is checkY☒N ?)

Calcium sulfite, or calcium sulphite, is a chemical compound, the calcium salt of sulfite with the formula CaSO3·x(H2O). Two crystalline forms are known, the hemihydrate and the tetrahydrate, respectively CaSO3·½(H2O) and CaSO3·4(H2O).[2] All forms are white solids. It is most notable as the product of flue-gas desulfurization.

Production

[edit]
Main article: Flue-gas desulfurization

It is produced on a large scale by flue gas desulfurization (FGD). When coal or other fossil fuel is burned, the byproduct is known as flue gas. Flue gas often contains SO2, whose emission is often regulated to prevent acid rain. Sulfur dioxide is scrubbed before the remaining gases are emitted through the chimney stack. An economical way of scrubbing SO2 from flue gases is by treating the effluent with Ca(OH)2 hydrated lime or CaCO3 limestone.[3]

Scrubbing with limestone follows the following idealized reaction:

SO2 + CaCO3 → CaSO3 + CO2

Scrubbing with hydrated lime follows the following idealized reaction:[4][5]

SO2 + Ca(OH)2 → CaSO3 + H2O

The resulting calcium sulfite oxidizes in air to give gypsum:

2 CaSO3 + O2 → 2 CaSO4

The gypsum, if sufficiently pure, is marketable as a building material.

Uses

[edit]

Water treatment

[edit]

Used in some shower filters to remove chlorine due to its reducing properties and slow dissolution in water.

Drywall

[edit]

Calcium sulfite is generated as the intermediate in the production of gypsum, which is the main component of drywall. A typical US home contains 7 metric tons of such drywall gypsum board.[6]

Food additive

[edit]

As a food additive it is used as a preservative under the E number E226. Along with other antioxidant sulfites, it is commonly used in preserving wine, cider, fruit juice, canned fruit and vegetables. Sulfites are strong reducers in solution, they act as oxygen scavenger antioxidants to preserve food, but labeling is required as some individuals might be hypersensitive.

Wood pulp production

[edit]

Chemical wood pulping is the removal of cellulose from wood by dissolving the lignin that binds the cellulose together. Calcium sulfite can be used in the production of wood pulp through the sulfite process, as an alternative to the Kraft process that uses hydroxides and sulfides instead of sulfites. Calcium sulfite was used, but has been largely replaced by magnesium and sodium sulfites and bisulfites to attack the lignin.[citation needed]

Gypsum

[edit]

There is a possibility to use calcium sulfite to produce gypsum by oxidizing (adding O2) it in water mixture with the manganese (Mn2+) cation or sulfuric acid catalyzers.[7][8]

Structure

[edit]
  • Structure of the [Ca3(SO3)2(H2O)12]2+ cage in calcium sulfite tetrahydrate.
    Structure of the [Ca3(SO3)2(H2O)12]2+ cage in calcium sulfite tetrahydrate.
  • Structure of anhydrous CaSO3.
    Structure of anhydrous CaSO3.

X-ray crystallography shows that anhydrous calcium sulfite has a complicated polymeric structure.[9] The tetrahydrate crystallizes as a solid solution of Ca3(SO3)2(SO4).12H2O and Ca3(SO3)2(SO3).12H2O. The mixed sulfite-sulfate represents an intermediate in the oxidation of the sulfite to the sulfate, as is practiced in the production of gypsum. This solid solution consists of [Ca3(SO3)2(H2O)12]2+ cations and either sulfite or sulfate as the anion.[2][10] These crystallographic studies confirm that sulfite anion adopts a pyramidal geometry.

Natural occurrence

[edit]

Calcium sulfite(III) hemihydrate occurs in the nature as the rare mineral hannebachite.[11][12]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Calcium sulfite

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Calcium sulfite is an inorganic compound with the chemical formula CaSO₃, formed as the salt of calcium ions and the sulfite anion (SO₃²⁻). It exists primarily as a white or off-white crystalline powder, often in hydrated forms such as the hemihydrate (CaSO₃·0.5H₂O), and exhibits low solubility in water (approximately 0.0043 g/100 mL at 20°C) but dissolves in acids due to reaction with the sulfite ion. Industrially, it is generated as a principal byproduct in wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems at coal-fired power plants, where sulfur dioxide (SO₂) emissions react with calcium hydroxide or limestone slurries to form calcium sulfite sludge, which is then often oxidized to gypsum or managed as waste for applications like road base stabilization. Additional uses include its role as a reducing agent, preservative in food and beverages (e.g., cider and juices), disinfectant in brewing, and bleaching agent in paper pulp and textile processing, leveraging its biocidal and reducing properties. While generally stable, calcium sulfite can decompose upon heating or react with oxidants, posing handling considerations in industrial contexts.

Properties

Physical properties

Calcium sulfite (CaSO₃) is a white crystalline solid or powder, typically odorless. The form has a of 3.01 g/cm³ and a ranging from 1.590 to 1.628. It decomposes upon heating at approximately 600 °C without a distinct . The compound exhibits low in , with 0.0043 g dissolving per 100 mL at 18 °C, decreasing further to 0.001 g/100 mL at 100 °C. It is slightly soluble in but readily dissolves in acidic solutions, evolving gas. Calcium sulfite occurs in multiple hydrated forms, including the hemihydrate (CaSO₃·0.5H₂O) and tetrahydrate (CaSO₃·4H₂O), both of which are also white solids with similar physical characteristics to the variant. The hemihydrate often forms hexagonal . These forms are non-flammable and stable under ambient conditions.

Chemical properties

Calcium sulfite displays limited reactivity under standard ambient conditions, remaining stable without significant decomposition or hazardous reactions when stored properly. However, its solubility in water is low, with a reported solubility of approximately 4.5 × 10^{-4} mol dm^{-3} (equivalent to 0.054 g dm^{-3}) for the hemihydrate form at 298.2 K and a solubility product constant (K_{sp}) of 3.1 × 10^{-7} mol² dm^{-6}. Solubility decreases with rising temperature and is minimized around pH 8.5, but increases markedly in acidic media, such as hydrochloric, phosphoric, or acetic acid solutions, due to protonation and release of sulfur dioxide. In the presence of oxidants, calcium sulfite readily converts to , a process accelerated in aqueous by factors including oxygen, , hydroxyl radicals, elevated temperatures (e.g., 60 °C), low (e.g., 3.5), and higher inputs like . Oxidation efficiencies can exceed 70% under optimized conditions, such as low slurry concentrations (0.01 mol L^{-1}) and air flow rates around 1.4 m³ h^{-1}, with acting as the dominant oxidant. This transformation forms an intermediate mixed sulfite-sulfate before complete conversion to (CaSO_4 · 2H_2O). Calcium sulfite reacts with strong acids to evolve gas, exemplified by the net ionic equation CaSO_3(s) + 2H^+(aq) → Ca^{2+}(aq) + SO_2(g) + H_2O(l), which underlies its increased solubility in acidic environments. Thermally, it decomposes upon heating to yield and via CaSO_3 → CaO + SO_2, with the process initiating above roughly 600 °C and proceeding more complexly in reducing atmospheres to also produce and mixed sulfur oxides.

Molecular structure

Calcium sulfite (CaSO₃) consists of Ca²⁺ cations and SO₃²⁻ anions in an ionic lattice. The sulfite anion (SO₃²⁻) adopts a trigonal pyramidal geometry, with sulfur centrally bonded to three oxygen atoms and a lone pair of electrons. The hemihydrate form, CaSO₃·0.5H₂O, which is the predominant solid phase, exhibits a layered crystal structure determined by X-ray diffraction. In this arrangement, calcium ions achieve six-fold coordination with oxygen atoms, comprising five from neighboring sulfite anions and one from a water molecule, resulting in distorted octahedral geometry around Ca²⁺. Anhydrous calcium sulfite possesses a more complex polymeric structure in the solid state.

Synthesis and production

Industrial production

Calcium sulfite (CaSO₃) is produced industrially primarily as a byproduct of wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems in coal-fired power plants, where it forms via the absorption of sulfur dioxide (SO₂) from emissions. In these processes, an aqueous slurry of limestone (calcium carbonate, CaCO₃) reacts with SO₂ according to the equation CaCO₃ + SO₂ → CaSO₃ + CO₂, typically at pH levels of 5–6 and temperatures around 50–60°C to favor sulfite formation over sulfate. The product is predominantly calcium sulfite hemihydrate (CaSO₃·0.5H₂O), which precipitates and is separated by filtration or centrifugation, with oxidation controlled to minimize conversion to gypsum (CaSO₄·2H₂O). Annual global production via FGD exceeds millions of tons, driven by environmental regulations mandating SO₂ reduction, though much of this material is landfilled or further processed due to disposal challenges. For applications requiring higher-purity calcium sulfite, such as in or chemical manufacturing, dedicated processes employ similar aqueous reactions but with refined feedstocks. gas is passed through a suspension of or hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂), yielding Ca(OH)₂ + SO₂ → CaSO₃ + H₂O, often under controlled agitation and temperature (below 80°C) to achieve particle sizes suitable for and . An alternative method involves adding elemental to a hot (70°C) concentrated solution of slaked lime to initially form calcium , followed by aeration to oxidize it selectively to calcium sulfite, minimizing impurities like excess . Patented refinements enhance crystal morphology and yield for industrial scalability. For instance, U.S. Patent 3,848,070 (1974) describes synthesizing semihydrate crystals (1–100 μm minor axis) by adding to an aqueous sulfite-bisulfite mixture at specific and controls, enabling efficiencies up to 80% solids content post-filtration. Manufacturing plants for non-FGD calcium sulfite, as outlined in industry feasibility reports, typically require 12–24 months for setup, with raw material costs dominated by SO₂ (sourced from smelters or ) and lime, alongside utilities for handling and drying to produce powdered or granular forms. These processes prioritize or low-hydrate forms for stability, with output purity exceeding 95% CaSO₃ when using purified reagents.

Laboratory methods

Calcium sulfite is commonly synthesized in laboratories via from aqueous solutions of and , following the double displacement reaction:
CaCl₂(aq) + Na₂SO₃(aq) → CaSO₃(s) + 2NaCl(aq).
The resulting white precipitate forms due to the low of calcium sulfite in water, allowing isolation by , washing with to remove , and subsequent drying under vacuum or mild heat to yield the hemihydrate form, CaSO₃·0.5H₂O. This method is straightforward for small-scale preparations and avoids handling gases. An alternative gas absorption technique involves passing gas through a suspension of (slaked lime) in water:
Ca(OH)₂(aq) + SO₂(g) → CaSO₃(s) + H₂O(l).
This reaction, typically conducted at under controlled (around 6-7) to minimize oxidation to , precipitates calcium sulfite hemihydrate directly, which can be collected similarly by and drying. The process requires a gas delivery system and inert atmosphere to prevent aerial oxidation, as calcium sulfite is prone to converting to (CaSO₄·2H₂O) in the presence of oxygen. A variant uses (Na₂S₂O₅) as a solid source of ions, reacting it with slurry to generate in situ, which then forms the sulfite precipitate; this avoids direct SO₂ handling but may introduce sodium impurities requiring additional purification steps. In all cases, the product should be stored under conditions or to maintain stability, as exposure to air leads to slow oxidation.

Natural occurrence

Calcium sulfite occurs in nature only rarely, primarily as the hydrated hannebachite (CaSO₃·½H₂O), which forms thin bladed orthorhombic crystals in volcanic environments. Hannebachite has been documented in porous basalt deposits at Hannebacher Ley, approximately one kilometer east-northeast of Hannebach in the volcanic region of . A related calcium -sulfate , orschallite (Ca₃(SO₃)₂SO₄·12H₂O), occurs at the same locality, crystallizing as colorless needles in cavities associated with basaltic . These occurrences are exceptional due to the instability of sulfite ions in oxidizing surface conditions, which typically favor conversion to more stable sulfate minerals like (CaSO₄·2H₂O). No significant commercial deposits or widespread natural sources of anhydrous or other forms of calcium sulfite have been identified.

Applications

Flue gas desulfurization

In wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) processes, commonly employed at coal-fired power plants, sulfur dioxide (SO₂) from exhaust gases reacts with a slurry of limestone (calcium carbonate, CaCO₃) in an absorber tower to form calcium sulfite hemihydrate (CaSO₃·0.5H₂O) as the primary reaction product, according to the simplified equation CaCO₃ + SO₂ → CaSO₃ + CO₂. This absorption step achieves SO₂ removal efficiencies typically exceeding 90% in optimized systems. The resulting calcium sludge, often comprising 20-90% CaSO₃ by weight depending on the sorbent and process conditions, collects at the tower base and requires for handling. In non-forced oxidation variants of wet limestone FGD, still utilized in some U.S. facilities as of the early 2000s, the sulfite remains largely unoxidized, yielding a thixotropic with high water content (up to 50% or more) that poses challenges for disposal due to poor settling and filterability. To mitigate these issues, many modern installations incorporate forced oxidation by injecting air or oxygen into the , converting CaSO₃ to marketable (CaSO₄·2H₂O) via the reaction CaSO₃ + ½O₂ + 1½H₂O → CaSO₄·2H₂O, with conversion rates approaching 100% in well-designed systems. This byproduct, produced in quantities estimated at over 30 million tons annually in the U.S. by the from FGD operations, supports applications in wallboard while reducing waste volume. Unoxidized CaSO₃ residues, however, demand landfilling or alternative management, as their reductive properties can inhibit microbial activity in disposal sites and complicate stabilization.

Water and wastewater treatment

Calcium sulfite is employed as a for dechlorination in , reacting with residual chlorine species such as (HOCl) and to form , chloride ions, and water, thereby neutralizing disinfectants that could harm sensitive membranes or biological processes. The primary reaction is SO₃²⁻ + HOCl → SO₄²⁻ + Cl⁻ + H⁺, enabling rapid removal with efficiencies often exceeding 99% within 0.2 seconds at typical dosages. This application is prevalent in point-of-use filters, including shower cartridges and pre-treatment systems, where granular or ceramic forms of calcium sulfite provide sustained release due to its low (approximately 0.0043 g/100 mL at 20°C). In , calcium sulfite facilitates the removal of residuals from disinfected effluents prior to discharge, mitigating toxicity to aquatic organisms in receiving waters where regulatory limits often require total residual below 0.1 mg/L. Its solid form allows for controlled dosing in packed-bed reactors or as a component in hybrid media, though liquid alternatives like are more common in large-scale plants due to easier metering. Emerging explores activated calcium sulfite systems, such as those enhanced with iron or , for simultaneous dechlorination and degradation of organic pollutants like , achieving up to 94% removal under optimized conditions.

Paper and pulp production

In the sulfite pulping process, a chemical method for producing wood pulp, calcium sulfite serves as a key component in calcium-based variants, where it contributes to the formation of the acidic cooking liquor used to delignify wood chips. The liquor is typically prepared by absorbing gas into water to generate (H₂SO₃), which then reacts with (limestone) in pressurized towers, yielding calcium (Ca(HSO₃)₂) as the primary active species alongside traces of calcium sulfite (CaSO₃). This setup maintains an acidic pH of approximately 1.5 to 5, enabling selective dissolution of while preserving fibers. Wood chips are cooked in this at temperatures ranging from 140°C to 170°C under pressure for several hours, breaking down bonds and to yield pulp with 40–50% efficiency, compared to higher yields in mechanical methods but with superior fiber purity. The resulting sulfite pulp exhibits high brightness (often 50–80% ISO without bleaching, depending on wood species and conditions) and tear strength, making it suitable for fine papers, tissues, , and specialty products like writing paper, though it has lower tensile strength than kraft pulp from the . Calcium-based systems were historically dominant due to the availability and low cost of but produce insoluble calcium salts in spent , complicating chemical recovery and compared to soluble-base alternatives like magnesium or . Although the calcium sulfite process peaked in the early , its use has declined since the – due to recovery inefficiencies and environmental challenges, with only a few specialized mills persisting globally as of the for niche high-brightness pulps. Spent liquors, containing calcium and unrecovered sulfites, were initially discarded but later valorized for byproducts like or dispersants, mitigating some waste issues. Modern adaptations occasionally incorporate calcium sulfite additives for buffering or as a kraft alternative in small-scale operations, though kraft dominates overall production at over 80% of global chemical pulp capacity.

Construction and materials

Calcium sulfite, often obtained as a hemihydrate (CaSO₃·0.5H₂O) from processes, serves as a retarder in production, delaying the setting time to improve workability and prevent flash set. This property arises from its interaction with compounds, similar to (CaSO₄·2H₂O), allowing semidry desulfurization ash containing calcium sulfite to partially substitute for traditional gypsum in cement manufacturing, with studies showing effective retardation at dosages up to 5% by weight without compromising early strength development. In road construction, fixated calcium sulfite scrubber material from wet systems is utilized as a base or subbase aggregate after stabilization with lime or to enhance load-bearing capacity and reduce permeability. The U.S. reports its application in pavement subgrades, where it meets engineering specifications for stabilized bases when properly processed, leveraging its fine and pozzolanic potential for binding with additives. Sulfite-rich scrubber sludge has been investigated for incorporation into , roofing materials, and road sealants, with research demonstrating viable compressive strengths in blended mixtures after oxidation or blending with fly ash to mitigate issues. However, its use remains limited due to variable composition from industrial sources and potential for long-term release, necessitating site-specific testing for .

Food preservation

Calcium sulfite (CaSO₃), designated as food additive E226 in the , functions primarily as an and in select food products by inhibiting enzymatic and non-enzymatic browning, microbial growth, and oxidation processes. It is commonly applied to dried fruits to maintain color and extend , as well as to wines, juices, and ciders where it prevents spoilage and acts as a against oxygen. In these applications, calcium sulfite releases (SO₂) under acidic conditions, which provides effects by disrupting bacterial enzymes and cell membranes. Regulatory bodies, including the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), have established a group (ADI) for sulfites—including calcium sulfite, calcium hydrogen sulfite, and others—expressed as SO₂ at 0–0.7 mg/kg body weight, based on no-observed-adverse-effect levels from animal studies adjusted for human sensitivity. In the United States, the permits sulfites like calcium sulfite in processed foods such as dried fruits and wine at levels up to 10–350 ppm (as SO₂), but banned their use on fresh fruits and intended for raw consumption since 1986 due to risks in asthmatics. The (EFSA) re-evaluated sulfites in 2022, concluding that while generally safe within limits, high consumers of preserved foods may exceed the ADI, potentially raising safety concerns without sufficient long-term data on chronic exposure. Despite its efficacy, calcium sulfite's use is limited by potential adverse reactions, including respiratory issues and in sulfite-sensitive individuals, affecting up to 1% of the population, particularly those with . Labeling requirements mandate disclosure of sulfites above 10 ppm in most jurisdictions to inform consumers. Industry adoption remains niche compared to sodium or sulfites, owing to calcium sulfite's lower solubility and specific formulation needs in beverages.

Safety and toxicity

General toxicity profile

Calcium sulfite (CaSO₃) demonstrates low across primary exposure routes, with limited quantitative toxicological data available from peer-reviewed or regulatory sources. Safety data sheets consistently report no classification for or dermal toxicity, indicating that exposure to vapors or contact does not produce severe effects under normal handling conditions. One supplier classifies it under acute oral toxicity category 4 (), implying an estimated LD₅₀ between 300 and 2000 mg/kg, though specific LD₅₀ values remain unreported in available documentation. primarily risks mild gastrointestinal irritation due to its low (approximately 0.0043 g/100 mL in ), limiting rapid release of ions. As a fine , calcium sulfite poses mechanical irritation risks to eyes, skin, and the via , potentially causing redness, tearing, or coughing, but without evidence of corrosive or systemic effects. It is not classified as a specific target organ toxicant for repeated exposure, , , or reproductive toxicant, with no observed aspiration . Chronic exposure data is sparse, but industrial handling in flue gas desulfurization contexts suggests minimal long-term health risks beyond nuisance dust effects, provided engineering controls mitigate airborne particulates. Hypersensitivity reactions linked to sulfite ions (e.g., asthma exacerbation in sensitive individuals) are theoretically possible but less pronounced than with highly soluble sulfites, given CaSO₃'s poor bioavailability; such risks are primarily documented for food-grade soluble forms rather than the insoluble industrial compound.

Health risks and sensitivities

Calcium sulfite dust can irritate the eyes, skin, and upon contact or , potentially causing redness, itching, coughing, or in exposed individuals. Inhalation of high concentrations may lead to respiratory irritation, though is generally low with an oral LD50 exceeding 2000 mg/kg in rats. Ingestion of calcium sulfite, often encountered as a food (E226), typically results in minimal systemic effects due to its low and rapid conversion to ions, but it may cause gastrointestinal discomfort such as or in larger amounts. Sulfite sensitivities, affecting approximately 1% of the general population and up to 5-10% of asthmatics, can be triggered by calcium sulfite through the release of sulfur dioxide or direct sulfite exposure, manifesting as bronchoconstriction, wheezing, urticaria, flushing, or hypotension. These reactions are more common in individuals with a history of asthma or atopic conditions, with symptoms ranging from mild dermatitis to severe anaphylaxis in rare cases, though true IgE-mediated allergies to sulfites are uncommon and most responses are non-immunologic. Regulatory bodies like the EFSA have noted potential safety concerns for high consumers of sulfite-containing foods, recommending avoidance in sensitive populations despite generally low toxicity profiles.

Environmental considerations

Pollution control benefits

In wet (FGD) processes, calcium sulfite serves as the primary reaction product for capturing (SO₂) from industrial emissions, particularly in coal-fired power plants. Limestone slurry (CaCO₃) absorbs SO₂, forming calcium sulfite hemihydrate (CaSO₃·0.5H₂O) via the reaction CaCO₃ + SO₂ → CaSO₃ + CO₂, achieving SO₂ removal efficiencies of 90–99% under optimized conditions such as 5–6 and sufficient contact time. This high efficiency stems from the favorable solubility and reactivity of calcium sulfite, which precipitates readily and minimizes SO₂ re-emission compared to dry methods. The formation of calcium sulfite in FGD systems directly mitigates atmospheric pollution by reducing SO₂ levels, a key contributor to , fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅), and respiratory ailments; for instance, U.S. implementations post-1990 Clean Air Act Amendments correlated with a 70–90% drop in regional SO₂ emissions and associated deposition. Further oxidation of calcium sulfite to (CaSO₄·2H₂O) via forced aeration enhances process viability by producing a stable, marketable byproduct, avoiding landfill disposal of wet and enabling . Beyond , calcium sulfite byproducts from FGD exhibit utility in remediation as a reductant and activator in . When activated by iron or , it generates sulfate radicals (SO₄⁻•) for degrading organic contaminants like (up to 90% removal in 60 minutes at pH 7) and oxidizing As(III) to less mobile As(V), with efficiencies exceeding 80% in simulated effluents. Similarly, it reduces (Cr(VI)) to trivalent Cr(III), precipitating it for removal, leveraging the ion's strong reducing potential (E° = -0.17 V). These applications repurpose FGD waste, minimizing secondary pollution while addressing heavy metal and discharges.

Waste management challenges

Calcium sulfite sludge, primarily generated as a byproduct of non-oxidized wet (FGD) systems, presents significant challenges due to its poor and properties. High concentrations result in thixotropic behavior, where the sludge liquefies under agitation during pumping or mixing, complicating mechanical processes and leading to high moisture content—often exceeding 50%—which increases handling, transport, and disposal volumes. Unlike oxidized (), which dewaters to a more stable, drier form, sulfite sludge requires additional stabilization, such as mixing with fly ash or lime, to achieve manageable consistency for landfilling or other disposal. Landfilling remains the predominant disposal method for calcium sulfite sludge, but it poses environmental risks including potential leaching of , sulfite ions, and alkaline components into if liners or stabilization fail. The sludge's reducing properties can inhibit oxidation in landfills, potentially exacerbating anaerobic conditions or mobilizing contaminants like mercury and adsorbed from flue gases or co-mingled fly ash. Regulatory frameworks, such as U.S. EPA Combustion Residuals (CCR) rules under 40 CFR Part 257, classify unoxidized FGD wastes as non-hazardous but mandate monitoring, leachate control, and structural integrity assessments for surface impoundments and landfills to mitigate risks from large-scale disposal—estimated at millions of tons annually from coal-fired plants. Recycling options for calcium sulfite are limited compared to , as its instability hinders applications in or without prior oxidation, driving research into forced oxidation or conversion processes to mitigate waste volumes. However, incomplete oxidation can leave residual , perpetuating dewatering and stability issues, while high for retrofits deter widespread adoption in older facilities. These challenges contribute to elevated disposal costs, with some plants reporting annual expenses exceeding $500,000 before optimizations, underscoring the need for site-specific management to balance pollution control efficacy with waste handling feasibility.

References

  1. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Calcium-sulfite
  2. https://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_EN_CB5874682.htm
  3. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1320&context=woca
  4. https://hero.epa.gov/hero/index.cfm/reference/details/reference_id/1708459
  5. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/10154041
  6. https://www.echemi.com/cms/427859.html
  7. https://www.atamanchemicals.com/calcium-sulfite_u34767/
  8. https://www.chemicalbook.com/ProductChemicalPropertiesCB5874682_EN.htm
  9. https://www.chembk.com/en/chem/Calcium%2520sulfite
  10. https://cameo.mfa.org/wiki/Calcium_sulfite
  11. https://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_US_CB5874682.aspx
  12. https://www.atamanchemicals.com/e226-calcium-sulfite_u27808/
  13. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ep.670050107
  14. https://www.chemos.de/import/data/msds/GB_en/10257-55-3-A0043446-GB-en.pdf
  15. https://srdata.nist.gov/solubility/IUPAC/SDS-26/SDS-26-pages_187.pdf
  16. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2018/ra/c7ra11503b
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016236110004369
  18. https://academic.oup.com/bcsj/article-abstract/51/1/121/7356614
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0040603172850196
  20. https://academic.oup.com/bcsj/article/57/4/1155/7361992
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/calcium-sulphite
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/calcium-sulphite-hemihydrate
  23. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3848070A/en
  24. https://www.imarcgroup.com/calcium-sulfite-manufacturing-plant-project-report
  25. https://www.procurementresource.com/production-cost-report-store/calcium-sulfite
  26. https://www.benchchem.com/product/b084615
  27. https://www.chemicalaid.com/tools/equationbalancer.php?equation=CaCl2%2B%252B%2BNa2SO3%2B%253D%2BCaSO3%2B%252B%2BNaCl&hl=en
  28. https://sites.utexas.edu/rochelle/files/2015/02/Tseng_Diss.pdf
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0008884699000824
  30. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ie960628b
  31. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBbpzlrNO0k
  32. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2009GL040792
  33. https://rruff.geo.arizona.edu/doclib/hom/hannebachite.pdf
  34. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01163095
  35. https://gypsum.org/fgd-gypsum-production-process/
  36. https://www.power-eng.com/coal/wet-limestone-fgd-byproduct-generation-and-limestone-consumption-calculations/
  37. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-05/documents/wet_and_dry_scrubbers_section_5_chapter_1_control_cost_manual_7th_edition.pdf
  38. https://rmrc.wisc.edu/fgd-scrubber-material/
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016236108002834
  40. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00022470.1978.10470565
  41. https://www.power-eng.com/operations-maintenance/wet-limestone-fgd-solids-analysis-by-thermogravimetry/
  42. https://www.wvmdtaskforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/99-hao.pdf
  43. https://aquatiere.co.uk/newsadvice/what-is-calcium-sulfite/
  44. https://www.eternalmineral.com/company-news/calcium-sulfite.html
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8874662/
  46. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/germany-calcium-sulfite-market-insight-revolution-4g7rf/
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S004313542200745X
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304389423020150
  49. https://www.gigkarasek.com/blog/innovative-use-side-streams-from-the-sulfite-process
  50. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-12/documents/pulpandpaper.pdf
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/sulfite-process
  52. https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/pdf2018/fpl_2018_houtman001.pdf
  53. https://magnesiaspecialties.com/blogs/magnesium-hydroxide-pulping-applications
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251890928_Effects_of_Calcium_Sulfite_on_Retarding_of_Cement
  55. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/97148/025.cfm
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S001623610600175X
  57. https://foodcom.pl/en/term-e/e226/
  58. https://apps.who.int/food-additives-contaminants-jecfa-database/chemical.aspx?chemID=1361
  59. https://www.mpbio.com/us/0520781080-calcium-sulfite
  60. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/news/sulfites-safety-concern-high-consumers-data-lacking
  61. https://aksci.com/sds/Y1796_SDS.pdf
  62. https://www.pfaltzandbauer.com/Files/SDSFile?fileName=C01900%20%20SDS%20030917.pdf
  63. https://www.guidechem.com/msds/10257-55-3.html
  64. https://www.biosynth.com/Files/MSDS/KA/A2/MSDS_KAA25755_4000_EN.pdf
  65. https://acaa-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/sds-materials/FGD_Gypsum_SDS_Guidance_Document.pdf
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4017440/
  67. https://www.echemi.com/sds/calcium-sulfite-pd180521114036.html
  68. https://food-detektiv.de/en/additives/?enummer=Calcium%20sulphite
  69. https://www.allergy.org.au/patients/other-allergy/sulfite-sensitivity
  70. https://www.allergyamulet.com/blog/sulfite-allergy-facts
  71. https://calciumhydroxidemanufacturer.com/calcium-hydroxide-flue-gas-desulfurization/
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0196890409002222
  73. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ie950322p
  74. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100GM18.TXT
  75. https://fossil.energy.gov/techline/techlines/1999/tl_fgdrpt.html
  76. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/787341
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7926685/
  78. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ChEnJ.42631917L/abstract
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304389423012384
  80. https://www.sdewes.org/jsdewes/pid6.0251
  81. https://www.epa.gov/coal-combustion-residuals/coal-combustion-residuals-ccr-basics
  82. https://www.powermag.com/improved-fgd-dewatering-process-cuts-solid-waste/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.