Hubbry Logo
Fundamental groupFundamental groupMain
Open search
Fundamental group
Community hub
Fundamental group
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Fundamental group
Fundamental group
from Wikipedia

In the mathematical field of algebraic topology, the fundamental group of a topological space is the group of the equivalence classes under homotopy of the loops contained in the space. It records information about the basic shape, or holes, of the topological space. The fundamental group is the first and simplest homotopy group. The fundamental group is a homotopy invariant—topological spaces that are homotopy equivalent (or the stronger case of homeomorphic) have isomorphic fundamental groups. The fundamental group of a topological space is denoted by .

Intuition

[edit]

Start with a space (for example, a surface), and some point in it, and all the loops both starting and ending at this point—paths that start at this point, wander around and eventually return to the starting point. Two loops can be combined in an obvious way: travel along the first loop, then along the second. Two loops are considered equivalent if one can be deformed into the other without breaking. The set of all such loops with this method of combining and this equivalence between them is the fundamental group for that particular space.

History

[edit]

Henri Poincaré defined the fundamental group in 1895 in his paper "Analysis situs".[1] The concept emerged in the theory of Riemann surfaces, in the work of Bernhard Riemann, Poincaré, and Felix Klein. It describes the monodromy properties of complex-valued functions, as well as providing a complete topological classification of closed surfaces.

Definition

[edit]

Throughout this article, is a topological space. A typical example is a surface such as the one depicted at the right. Moreover, is a point in called the base-point. (As is explained below, its role is rather auxiliary.) The idea of the definition of the homotopy group is to measure how many (broadly speaking) curves on can be deformed into each other. The precise definition depends on the notion of the homotopy of loops, which is explained first.

Homotopy of loops

[edit]

Given a topological space , a loop based at is defined to be a continuous function (also known as a continuous map)

such that the starting point and the end point are both equal to .

Homotopy of loops

A homotopy is a continuous interpolation between two loops. More precisely, a homotopy between two loops (based at the same point ) is a continuous map

such that

  • for all that is, the starting point of the homotopy is for all (which is often thought of as a time parameter).
  • for all that is, similarly the end point stays at for all t.
  • for all .

If such a homotopy exists, and are said to be homotopic. The relation " is homotopic to " is an equivalence relation so that the set of equivalence classes can be considered:

.

This set (with the group structure described below) is called the fundamental group of the topological space at the base point . The purpose of considering the equivalence classes of loops up to homotopy, as opposed to the set of all loops (the so-called loop space of ) is that the latter, while being useful for various purposes, is a rather big and unwieldy object. By contrast the above quotient is, in many cases, more manageable and computable.

Group structure

[edit]
Addition of loops

By the above definition, is just a set. It becomes a group (and therefore deserves the name fundamental group) using the concatenation of loops. More precisely, given two loops , their product is defined as the loop

Thus the loop first follows the loop with "twice the speed" and then follows with "twice the speed".

The product of two homotopy classes of loops and is then defined as . It can be shown that this product does not depend on the choice of representatives and therefore gives a well-defined operation on the set . This operation turns into a group. Its neutral element is the equivalence (homotopy) class of the constant loop, which stays at for all times (i.e. this class consists of all loops that can be continuously deformed into the constant loop; intuitively speaking of all the loops that do not "wrap around a hole"). The inverse of a (homotopy class of a) loop is the same loop, but traversed in the opposite direction (which is in a different homotopy class). More formally,

Given three based loops the product

is the concatenation of these loops, traversing and then with quadruple speed, and then with double speed. By comparison,

traverses the same paths (in the same order), but with double speed, and with quadruple speed. Thus, because of the differing speeds, the two paths are not identical. The associativity axiom

therefore crucially depends on the fact that paths are considered up to homotopy. Indeed, both above composites are homotopic, for example, to the loop that traverses all three loops with triple speed. The set of based loops up to homotopy, equipped with the above operation therefore does turn into a group.

Dependence of the base point

[edit]

Although the fundamental group in general depends on the choice of base point, it turns out that, up to isomorphism, this choice makes no difference as long as the space is path-connected: more precisely, one obtains an isomorphism by pre- and post-concatenating with a path between the two basepoints. This isomorphism is, in general, not unique: it depends on the choice of path up to homotopy. However changing the path results in changing the isomorphism between the two fundamental groups only by composition with an inner automorphism. It is therefore customary to write instead of when the choice of basepoint does not matter.

Concrete examples

[edit]
A star domain is simply connected since any loop can be contracted to the center of the domain, denoted .

This section lists some basic examples of fundamental groups. To begin with, in Euclidean space () or any convex subset of there is only one homotopy class of loops, and the fundamental group is therefore the trivial group with one element. More generally, any star domain – and yet more generally, any contractible space – has a trivial fundamental group. Thus, the fundamental group does not distinguish between such spaces.

The 2-sphere

[edit]
A loop on a 2-sphere (the surface of a ball) being contracted to a point

A path-connected space whose fundamental group is trivial is called simply connected. For example, the 2-sphere depicted on the right, and also all the higher-dimensional spheres, are simply-connected. The figure illustrates a homotopy contracting one particular loop to the constant loop. This idea can be adapted to all loops such that there is a point that is not in the image of However, since there are loops such that (constructed from the Peano curve, for example), a complete proof requires more careful analysis with tools from algebraic topology, such as the Seifert–van Kampen theorem or the cellular approximation theorem.

The circle

[edit]
Elements of the homotopy group of the circle

The circle (also known as the 1-sphere)

is not simply connected. Instead, each homotopy class consists of all loops that wind around the circle a given number of times (which can be positive or negative, depending on the direction of winding). The product of a loop that winds around times and another that winds around times is a loop that winds around times. Therefore, the fundamental group of the circle is isomorphic to the additive group of integers. This fact can be used to give proofs of the Brouwer fixed point theorem[2] and the Borsuk–Ulam theorem in dimension 2.[3]

The figure eight

[edit]
The fundamental group of the figure eight is the free group on two generators a and b.

The fundamental group of the figure eight is the free group on two letters. The idea to prove this is as follows: choosing the base point to be the point where the two circles meet (dotted in black in the picture at the right), any loop can be decomposed as

where a and b are the two loops winding around each half of the figure as depicted, and the exponents are integers. Unlike the fundamental group of the figure eight is not abelian: the two ways of composing and are not homotopic to each other:

More generally, the fundamental group of a bouquet of circles is the free group on letters.

The fundamental group of a wedge sum of two path connected spaces and can be computed as the free product of the individual fundamental groups:

This generalizes the above observations since the figure eight is the wedge sum of two circles.

The fundamental group of the plane punctured at points is also the free group with generators. The -th generator is the class of the loop that goes around the -th puncture without going around any other punctures.

Graphs

[edit]

The fundamental group can be defined for discrete structures too. In particular, consider a connected graph , with a designated vertex in . The loops in are the cycles that start and end at .[4] Let be a spanning tree of . Every simple loop in contains exactly one edge in ; every loop in is a concatenation of such simple loops. Therefore, the fundamental group of a graph is a free group, in which the number of generators is exactly the number of edges in . This number equals .[5]

For example, suppose has 16 vertices arranged in 4 rows of 4 vertices each, with edges connecting vertices that are adjacent horizontally or vertically. Then has 24 edges overall, and the number of edges in each spanning tree is 16 − 1 = 15, so the fundamental group of is the free group with 9 generators.[6] Note that has 9 "holes", similarly to a bouquet of 9 circles, which has the same fundamental group.

Knot groups

[edit]
A trefoil knot.

Knot groups are by definition the fundamental group of the complement of a knot embedded in For example, the knot group of the trefoil knot is known to be the braid group which gives another example of a non-abelian fundamental group. The Wirtinger presentation explicitly describes knot groups in terms of generators and relations based on a diagram of the knot. Therefore, knot groups have some usage in knot theory to distinguish between knots: if is not isomorphic to some other knot group of another knot , then can not be transformed into . Thus the trefoil knot can not be continuously transformed into the circle (also known as the unknot), since the latter has knot group . There are, however, knots that can not be deformed into each other, but have isomorphic knot groups.

Oriented surfaces

[edit]

The fundamental group of a genus-n orientable surface can be computed in terms of generators and relations as

This includes the torus, being the case of genus 1, whose fundamental group is

Topological groups

[edit]

The fundamental group of a topological group (with respect to the base point being the neutral element) is always commutative. In particular, the fundamental group of a Lie group is commutative. In fact, the group structure on endows with another group structure: given two loops and in , another loop can defined by using the group multiplication in :

This binary operation on the set of all loops is a priori independent from the one described above. However, the Eckmann–Hilton argument shows that it does in fact agree with the above concatenation of loops, and moreover that the resulting group structure is abelian.[7][8]

An inspection of the proof shows that, more generally, is abelian for any H-space , i.e., the multiplication need not have an inverse, nor does it have to be associative. For example, this shows that the fundamental group of a loop space of another topological space , is abelian. Related ideas lead to Heinz Hopf's computation of the cohomology of a Lie group.

Functoriality

[edit]

If is a continuous map, and with then every loop in with base point can be composed with to yield a loop in with base point This operation is compatible with the homotopy equivalence relation and with composition of loops. The resulting group homomorphism, called the induced homomorphism, is written as or, more commonly,

This mapping from continuous maps to group homomorphisms is compatible with composition of maps and identity morphisms. In the parlance of category theory, the formation of associating to a topological space its fundamental group is therefore a functor

from the category of topological spaces together with a base point to the category of groups. It turns out that this functor does not distinguish maps that are homotopic relative to the base point: if are continuous maps with , and and are homotopic relative to , then . As a consequence, two homotopy equivalent path-connected spaces have isomorphic fundamental groups:

For example, the inclusion of the circle in the punctured plane

is a homotopy equivalence and therefore yields an isomorphism of their fundamental groups.

The fundamental group functor takes products to products and coproducts to coproducts. That is, if and are path connected, then

and if they are also locally contractible, then

(In the latter formula, denotes the wedge sum of pointed topological spaces, and the free product of groups.) The latter formula is a special case of the Seifert–van Kampen theorem, which states that the fundamental group functor takes pushouts along inclusions to pushouts.

Abstract results

[edit]

As was mentioned above, computing the fundamental group of even relatively simple topological spaces tends to be not entirely trivial, but requires some methods of algebraic topology.

Relationship to first homology group

[edit]

The abelianization of the fundamental group can be identified with the first homology group of the space.

A special case of the Hurewicz theorem asserts that the first singular homology group is, colloquially speaking, the closest approximation to the fundamental group by means of an abelian group. In more detail, mapping the homotopy class of each loop to the homology class of the loop gives a group homomorphism

from the fundamental group of a topological space to its first singular homology group This homomorphism is not in general an isomorphism since the fundamental group may be non-abelian, but the homology group is, by definition, always abelian. This difference is, however, the only one: if is path-connected, this homomorphism is surjective and its kernel is the commutator subgroup of the fundamental group, so that is isomorphic to the abelianization of the fundamental group.[9]

Gluing topological spaces

[edit]

Generalizing the statement above, for a family of path connected spaces the fundamental group is the free product of the fundamental groups of the [10] This fact is a special case of the Seifert–van Kampen theorem, which allows to compute, more generally, fundamental groups of spaces that are glued together from other spaces. For example, the 2-sphere can be obtained by gluing two copies of slightly overlapping half-spheres along a neighborhood of the equator. In this case the theorem yields is trivial, since the two half-spheres are contractible and therefore have trivial fundamental group. The fundamental groups of surfaces, as mentioned above, can also be computed using this theorem.

In the parlance of category theory, the theorem can be concisely stated by saying that the fundamental group functor takes pushouts (in the category of topological spaces) along inclusions to pushouts (in the category of groups).[11]

Coverings

[edit]
The map is a covering: the preimage of (highlighted in gray) is a disjoint union of copies of . Moreover, it is a universal covering since is contractible and therefore simply connected.

Given a topological space , a continuous map

is called a covering or is called a covering space of if every point in admits an open neighborhood such that there is a homeomorphism between the preimage of and a disjoint union of copies of (indexed by some set ),

in such a way that is the standard projection map [12]

Universal covering

[edit]

A covering is called a universal covering if is, in addition to the preceding condition, simply connected.[13] It is universal in the sense that all other coverings can be constructed by suitably identifying points in . Knowing a universal covering

of a topological space is helpful in understanding its fundamental group in several ways: first, identifies with the group of deck transformations, i.e., the group of homeomorphisms that commute with the map to , i.e., Another relation to the fundamental group is that can be identified with the fiber For example, the map

(or, equivalently, ) is a universal covering. The deck transformations are the maps for This is in line with the identification in particular this proves the above claim

Any path connected, locally path connected and locally simply connected topological space admits a universal covering.[14] An abstract construction proceeds analogously to the fundamental group by taking pairs , where is a point in and is a homotopy class of paths from to . The passage from a topological space to its universal covering can be used in understanding the geometry of . For example, the uniformization theorem shows that any simply connected Riemann surface is (isomorphic to) either or the upper half-plane.[15] General Riemann surfaces then arise as quotients of group actions on these three surfaces.

The quotient of a free action of a discrete group on a simply connected space has fundamental group

As an example, the real -dimensional real projective space is obtained as the quotient of the -dimensional unit sphere by the antipodal action of the group sending to As is simply connected for , it is a universal cover of in these cases, which implies for .

Lie groups

[edit]

Let be a connected, simply connected compact Lie group, for example, the special unitary group , and let be a finite subgroup of . Then the homogeneous space has fundamental group , which acts by right multiplication on the universal covering space . Among the many variants of this construction, one of the most important is given by locally symmetric spaces , where

  • is a non-compact simply connected, connected Lie group (often semisimple),
  • is a maximal compact subgroup of
  • is a discrete countable torsion-free subgroup of .

In this case the fundamental group is and the universal covering space is actually contractible (by the Cartan decomposition for Lie groups).

As an example take , and any torsion-free congruence subgroup of the modular group .

From the explicit realization, it also follows that the universal covering space of a path connected topological group is again a path connected topological group . Moreover, the covering map is a continuous open homomorphism of onto with kernel , a closed discrete normal subgroup of :

Since is a connected group with a continuous action by conjugation on a discrete group , it must act trivially, so that has to be a subgroup of the center of . In particular is an abelian group; this can also easily be seen directly without using covering spaces. The group is called the universal covering group of .

As the universal covering group suggests, there is an analogy between the fundamental group of a topological group and the center of a group; this is elaborated at Lattice of covering groups.

Fibrations

[edit]

Fibrations provide a very powerful means to compute homotopy groups. A fibration the so-called total space, and the base space has, in particular, the property that all its fibers are homotopy equivalent and therefore can not be distinguished using fundamental groups (and higher homotopy groups), provided that is path-connected.[16] Therefore, the space can be regarded as a "twisted product" of the base space and the fiber The great importance of fibrations to the computation of homotopy groups stems from a long exact sequence

provided that is path-connected.[17] The term is the second homotopy group of , which is defined to be the set of homotopy classes of maps from to , in direct analogy with the definition of

If happens to be path-connected and simply connected, this sequence reduces to an isomorphism

which generalizes the above fact about the universal covering (which amounts to the case where the fiber is also discrete). If instead happens to be connected and simply connected, it reduces to an isomorphism

What is more, the sequence can be continued at the left with the higher homotopy groups of the three spaces, which gives some access to computing such groups in the same vein.

Classical Lie groups

[edit]

Such fiber sequences can be used to inductively compute fundamental groups of compact classical Lie groups such as the special unitary group with This group acts transitively on the unit sphere inside The stabilizer of a point in the sphere is isomorphic to It then can be shown[18] that this yields a fiber sequence

Since the sphere has dimension at least 3, which implies

The long exact sequence then shows an isomorphism

Since is a single point, so that is trivial, this shows that is simply connected for all

The fundamental group of noncompact Lie groups can be reduced to the compact case, since such a group is homotopic to its maximal compact subgroup.[19] These methods give the following results:[20]

Compact classical Lie group G Non-compact Lie group
special unitary group 1
unitary group
special orthogonal group for and for
compact symplectic group 1

A second method of computing fundamental groups applies to all connected compact Lie groups and uses the machinery of the maximal torus and the associated root system. Specifically, let be a maximal torus in a connected compact Lie group and let be the Lie algebra of The exponential map

is a fibration and therefore its kernel identifies with The map

can be shown to be surjective[21] with kernel given by the set of integer linear combination of coroots. This leads to the computation

[22]

This method shows, for example, that any connected compact Lie group for which the associated root system is of type is simply connected.[23] Thus, there is (up to isomorphism) only one connected compact Lie group having Lie algebra of type ; this group is simply connected and has trivial center.

Edge-path group of a simplicial complex

[edit]

When the topological space is homeomorphic to a simplicial complex, its fundamental group can be described explicitly in terms of generators and relations.

If is a connected simplicial complex, an edge-path in is defined to be a chain of vertices connected by edges in . Two edge-paths are said to be edge-equivalent if one can be obtained from the other by successively switching between an edge and the two opposite edges of a triangle in . If is a fixed vertex in , an edge-loop at is an edge-path starting and ending at . The edge-path group is defined to be the set of edge-equivalence classes of edge-loops at , with product and inverse defined by concatenation and reversal of edge-loops.

The edge-path group is naturally isomorphic to , the fundamental group of the geometric realisation of .[24] Since it depends only on the 2-skeleton of (that is, the vertices, edges, and triangles of ), the groups and are isomorphic.

The edge-path group can be described explicitly in terms of generators and relations. If is a maximal spanning tree in the 1-skeleton of , then ' is canonically isomorphic to the group with generators (the oriented edge-paths of not occurring in ) and relations (the edge-equivalences corresponding to triangles in ). A similar result holds if is replaced by any simply connected—in particular contractible—subcomplex of . This often gives a practical way of computing fundamental groups and can be used to show that every finitely presented group arises as the fundamental group of a finite simplicial complex. It is also one of the classical methods used for topological surfaces, which are classified by their fundamental groups.

The universal covering space of a finite connected simplicial complex can also be described directly as a simplicial complex using edge-paths. Its vertices are pairs where is a vertex of and γ is an edge-equivalence class of paths from to . The -simplices containing correspond naturally to the -simplices containing . Each new vertex of the -simplex gives an edge and hence, by concatenation, a new path from to . The points and are the vertices of the "transported" simplex in the universal covering space. The edge-path group acts naturally by concatenation, preserving the simplicial structure, and the quotient space is just .

It is well known that this method can also be used to compute the fundamental group of an arbitrary topological space. This was doubtless known to Eduard Čech and Jean Leray and explicitly appeared as a remark in a paper by André Weil;[25] various other authors such as Lorenzo Calabi, Wu Wen-tsün, and Nodar Berikashvili have also published proofs. In the simplest case of a compact space with a finite open covering in which all non-empty finite intersections of open sets in the covering are contractible, the fundamental group can be identified with the edge-path group of the simplicial complex corresponding to the nerve of the covering.

Realizability

[edit]
  • Every group can be realized as the fundamental group of a connected CW-complex of dimension 2 (or higher). As noted above, though, only free groups can occur as fundamental groups of 1-dimensional CW-complexes (that is, graphs).
  • Every finitely presented group can be realized as the fundamental group of a compact, connected, smooth manifold of dimension 4 (or higher). But there are severe restrictions on which groups occur as fundamental groups of low-dimensional manifolds. For example, no free abelian group of rank 4 or higher can be realized as the fundamental group of a manifold of dimension 3 or less. It can be proved that every group can be realized as the fundamental group of a compact Hausdorff space if and only if there is no measurable cardinal.[26]
[edit]

Higher homotopy groups

[edit]

Roughly speaking, the fundamental group detects the 1-dimensional hole structure of a space, but not higher-dimensional holes such as for the 2-sphere. Such "higher-dimensional holes" can be detected using the higher homotopy groups , which are defined to consist of homotopy classes of (basepoint-preserving) maps from to . For example, the Hurewicz theorem implies that for all the -th homotopy group of the n-sphere is

[27]

As was mentioned in the above computation of of classical Lie groups, higher homotopy groups can be relevant even for computing fundamental groups.

Loop space

[edit]

The set of based loops (as is, i.e. not taken up to homotopy) in a pointed space , endowed with the compact open topology, is known as the loop space, denoted The fundamental group of is in bijection with the set of path components of its loop space:[28]

Fundamental groupoid

[edit]

The fundamental groupoid is a variant of the fundamental group that is useful in situations where the choice of a base point is undesirable. It is defined by first considering the category of paths in i.e., continuous functions

,

where is an arbitrary non-negative real number. Since the length is variable in this approach, such paths can be concatenated as is (i.e., not up to homotopy) and therefore yield a category.[29] Two such paths with the same endpoints and length , resp. ' are considered equivalent if there exist real numbers such that and are homotopic relative to their end points, where [30][31]

The category of paths up to this equivalence relation is denoted Each morphism in is an isomorphism, with inverse given by the same path traversed in the opposite direction. Such a category is called a groupoid. It reproduces the fundamental group since

.

More generally, one can consider the fundamental groupoid on a set of base points, chosen according to the geometry of the situation; for example, in the case of the circle, which can be represented as the union of two connected open sets whose intersection has two components, one can choose one base point in each component. The van Kampen theorem admits a version for fundamental groupoids which gives, for example, another way to compute the fundamental group(oid) of [32]

Local systems

[edit]

Generally speaking, representations may serve to exhibit features of a group by its actions on other mathematical objects, often vector spaces. Representations of the fundamental group have a very geometric significance: any local system (i.e., a sheaf on with the property that locally in a sufficiently small neighborhood of any point on , the restriction of is a constant sheaf of the form ) gives rise to the so-called monodromy representation, a representation of the fundamental group on an -dimensional -vector space. Conversely, any such representation on a path-connected space arises in this manner.[33] This equivalence of categories between representations of and local systems is used, for example, in the study of differential equations, such as the Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov equations.

Étale fundamental group

[edit]

In algebraic geometry, the so-called étale fundamental group is used as a replacement for the fundamental group.[34] Since the Zariski topology on an algebraic variety or scheme is much coarser than, say, the topology of open subsets in it is no longer meaningful to consider continuous maps from an interval to . Instead, the approach developed by Grothendieck consists in constructing by considering all finite étale covers of . These serve as an algebro-geometric analogue of coverings with finite fibers.

This yields a theory applicable in situations where no great generality classical topological intuition whatsoever is available, for example for varieties defined over a finite field. Also, the étale fundamental group of a field is its (absolute) Galois group. On the other hand, for smooth varieties over the complex numbers, the étale fundamental group retains much of the information inherent in the classical fundamental group: the former is the profinite completion of the latter.[35]

Fundamental group of algebraic groups

[edit]

The fundamental group of a root system is defined in analogy to the computation for Lie groups.[36] This allows to define and use the fundamental group of a semisimple linear algebraic group , which is a useful basic tool in the classification of linear algebraic groups.[37]

Fundamental group of simplicial sets

[edit]

The homotopy relation between 1-simplices of a simplicial set is an equivalence relation if is a Kan complex but not necessarily so in general.[38] Thus, of a Kan complex can be defined as the set of homotopy classes of 1-simplices. The fundamental group of an arbitrary simplicial set are defined to be the homotopy group of its topological realization, i.e., the topological space obtained by gluing topological simplices as prescribed by the simplicial set structure of .[39]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In algebraic topology, the fundamental group of a pointed (X,x0)(X, x_0), denoted π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0), is the group consisting of classes of loops in XX based at the point x0x_0, where loops are continuous maps from the unit interval [0,1][0,1] to XX with endpoints fixed at x0x_0, and the group operation is defined by of loops followed by equivalence. This encodes essential information about the 1-dimensional holes or "tunnels" in the space, allowing distinctions between topologically distinct spaces that cannot be deformed into each other. The concept was introduced by in his seminal 1895 paper "Analysis Situs," where it served as a tool to classify two-dimensional surfaces and mark the origins of as a field. 's work laid the groundwork for using to study geometric invariants, predating more formal developments in , such as proofs around 1910 that implicitly relied on similar loop-based ideas. Over time, the fundamental group has become a cornerstone for computing topological invariants, with key theorems like Seifert–van Kampen enabling its calculation for spaces built from simpler components via free products or amalgamations. Among its basic properties, the fundamental group is functorial: a continuous map f:(X,x0)(Y,y0)f: (X, x_0) \to (Y, y_0) induces a f:π1(X,x0)π1(Y,y0)f_*: \pi_1(X, x_0) \to \pi_1(Y, y_0) by applying ff to loops and preserving classes. In path-connected spaces, the group is independent of the basepoint choice, up to , and for the product of path-connected spaces, π1(X×Y)π1(X)×π1(Y)\pi_1(X \times Y) \cong \pi_1(X) \times \pi_1(Y). Notable examples include the circle S1S^1, where π1(S1)Z\pi_1(S^1) \cong \mathbb{Z} generated by the of loops, and higher-dimensional spheres SnS^n for n2n \geq 2, where π1(Sn)\pi_1(S^n) is the , reflecting the absence of 1-dimensional holes. These properties make the fundamental group particularly useful in applications like theory, where connected covering spaces correspond bijectively to subgroups of π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0).

Overview and History

Intuition

The fundamental group provides an intuitive way to capture the presence of "holes" in a by studying loops—continuous paths that start and end at the same fixed basepoint—up to , which is a continuous deformation of one loop into another without tearing or leaving the . These loops can be thought of as excursions that return to their origin, and homotopy equivalence means two loops can be stretched or shrunk into each other while keeping endpoints fixed, much like deforming a on a surface. In spaces without holes, such as a simply connected one like the or a , every loop can be continuously contracted to a single point via , resulting in a trivial fundamental group containing only the . Conversely, spaces with holes, like a or a ring, admit loops that encircle the hole and cannot be shrunk to a point without breaking the continuity, leading to a non-trivial fundamental group that classifies these distinct loop types. For instance, a looped around a ring (representing a ) stays encircling the hole and resists contraction, whereas the same on a smooth can be freely shrunk to a point. This structure forms a group because loops can be composed by following one after another, creating a new loop from their , with the constant (stationary) loop as the identity and the inverse of a loop obtained by traversing it in reverse. This algebraic framework encodes the topological complexity of the space, distinguishing it from others based on how loops interact with its holes.

Historical development

The concept of the fundamental group originated with Henri Poincaré's seminal 1895 paper "Analysis Situs," where he introduced it as a multiplicative invariant to classify orientable surfaces, distinguishing them based on the group generated by loops that cannot be continuously deformed into one another. This work laid the groundwork for by associating algebraic structures to geometric objects, emphasizing the role of closed paths in capturing topological differences among surfaces. In the early 1910s, advanced the theory by incorporating notions, proving key results such as the for the disk, which relied on deformations of paths akin to those in the fundamental group. 's developments during 1909–1913, including the invariance of dimension and degree theory, solidified as a central tool for studying the fundamental group and its applications to manifold classification. During the 1920s and 1930s, Eduard Čech extended the framework by defining abstract higher homotopy groups in 1932 at the in , generalizing Poincaré's fundamental group to higher dimensions and providing a more abstract algebraic structure for homotopy invariants. These contributions, alongside work on covering spaces, highlighted the fundamental group's role in broader . Post-World War II advancements included Witold Hurewicz's 1935 paper establishing the relationship between the fundamental group and homology groups for simply connected spaces, via the Hurewicz homomorphism that links π₁ to H₁ under abelianization. Covering space theory, inspired by Galois theory's subgroup correspondences, was formalized in the 1930s by Herbert Seifert and William Threlfall, revealing the fundamental group as the deck transformation group acting on universal covers. Poincaré first applied the fundamental group to manifolds in 1904 within the fifth complement to "Analysis Situs," using it to differentiate three-dimensional spaces. By the 1950s, influential textbooks such as and Norman Steenrod's Foundations of (1952) helped formalize the axiomatic foundations of the field, incorporating the fundamental group as a key invariant.

Formal Definition

Loops and homotopy

In algebraic topology, a path in a topological space XX is defined as a continuous map γ:[0,1]X\gamma: [0,1] \to X, where [0,1][0,1] denotes the unit interval. The points γ(0)\gamma(0) and γ(1)\gamma(1) are called the initial point and terminal point of the path, respectively. This parametrization by the unit interval provides a standard way to model directed trajectories within the space, allowing for the study of connectivity and deformation properties. A loop based at a point x0Xx_0 \in X is a special case of a path where the initial and terminal points coincide, that is, γ:[0,1]X\gamma: [0,1] \to X with γ(0)=γ(1)=x0\gamma(0) = \gamma(1) = x_0. The point x0x_0 serves as the basepoint for the loop, fixing a reference location from which closed paths emanate and return. Loops capture the idea of circuits or closed trajectories in the space, which are central to understanding its one-dimensional holes or non-trivial topology. Two loops γ0,γ1\gamma_0, \gamma_1 based at the same point x0x_0 are homotopic if there exists a continuous H:[0,1]×[0,1]XH: [0,1] \times [0,1] \to X such that H(s,0)=γ0(s)H(s,0) = \gamma_0(s), H(s,1)=γ1(s)H(s,1) = \gamma_1(s) for all s[0,1]s \in [0,1], and H(0,t)=H(1,t)=x0H(0,t) = H(1,t) = x_0 for all t[0,1]t \in [0,1]. This HH represents a continuous family of loops γt(s)=H(s,t)\gamma_t(s) = H(s,t), where tt parametrizes the deformation from γ0\gamma_0 to γ1\gamma_1 while keeping the basepoint fixed throughout. Homotopy thus formalizes the intuitive notion of continuously deforming one loop into another without leaving the space or altering the endpoints. Homotopy defines an on the set of loops based at x0x_0: reflexivity holds via the constant homotopy H(s,t)=γ(s)H(s,t) = \gamma(s); symmetry by reversing the deformation parameter t1tt \mapsto 1-t; and transitivity by concatenating homotopies along the tt-direction. The equivalence class of a loop γ\gamma is denoted [γ][\gamma], consisting of all loops homotopic to γ\gamma. These classes form the building blocks for the fundamental group, partitioning loops according to their deformability. Within this framework, loops are considered up to reparametrization, meaning that if α:[0,1][0,1]\alpha: [0,1] \to [0,1] is a fixing 0 and 1 (a monotonic reordering of the parameter that preserves orientation and endpoints), then γ\gamma and γα\gamma \circ \alpha are via a linear homotopy in the parameter space. This equivalence accounts for constant-speed traversals or other uniform rescalings, ensuring that the topological essence of the loop—its path through space—prevails over arbitrary parametrizations. Such reparametrizations are absorbed into the relation, focusing analysis on the geometric rather than metric properties of the loops.

Group structure

The set of homotopy classes of based loops in a topological space XX at a basepoint x0x_0, as defined in the preceding section, is equipped with a group structure via an operation known as . This operation takes two loops γ,δ:[0,1]X\gamma, \delta: [0,1] \to X with γ(0)=γ(1)=δ(0)=δ(1)=x0\gamma(0) = \gamma(1) = \delta(0) = \delta(1) = x_0 and produces a new loop γδ:[0,1]X\gamma * \delta: [0,1] \to X defined piecewise by (γδ)(t)={γ(2t)if 0t12,δ(2t1)if 12<t1.(\gamma * \delta)(t) = \begin{cases} \gamma(2t) & \text{if } 0 \leq t \leq \frac{1}{2}, \\ \delta(2t - 1) & \text{if } \frac{1}{2} < t \leq 1. \end{cases} The concatenation is well-defined on homotopy classes, meaning that if γγ\gamma \simeq \gamma' and δδ\delta \simeq \delta' via homotopies fixing the basepoint, then γδγδ\gamma * \delta \simeq \gamma' * \delta'. This operation satisfies the group axioms. Associativity holds because the concatenation (γδ)ε(\gamma * \delta) * \varepsilon is homotopic to γ(δε)\gamma * (\delta * \varepsilon) for any loops γ,δ,ε\gamma, \delta, \varepsilon, via a straight-line homotopy that reparametrizes the interval [0,1][0,1] to adjust the transition points between the three loops. The identity element is the constant loop e:[0,1]Xe: [0,1] \to X given by e(t)=x0e(t) = x_0 for all tt, which satisfies γeeγγ\gamma * e \simeq e * \gamma \simeq \gamma. Each loop γ\gamma has an inverse γ1:[0,1]X\gamma^{-1}: [0,1] \to X defined by γ1(t)=γ(1t)\gamma^{-1}(t) = \gamma(1 - t), such that γγ1γ1γe\gamma * \gamma^{-1} \simeq \gamma^{-1} * \gamma \simeq e. These properties verify that the homotopy classes form a group under concatenation, denoted π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0). In general, π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0) is non-abelian, meaning that γδ\gamma * \delta need not be homotopic to δγ\delta * \gamma; for instance, the fundamental group of the configuration space of nn unordered points in the plane is the Artin braid group on nn strands, which fails to commute.

Basepoint dependence

The fundamental group of a topological space XX, denoted π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0), depends on the choice of basepoint x0Xx_0 \in X. In a path-connected space, however, the groups π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0) and π1(X,x1)\pi_1(X, x_1) for distinct points x0,x1Xx_0, x_1 \in X are isomorphic via a change-of-basepoint map induced by any path α\alpha in XX from x0x_0 to x1x_1. This isomorphism, often called path conjugation, sends the homotopy class [γ][\gamma] of a loop γ\gamma based at x0x_0 to the class [γ]α=α1γα[\gamma]^\alpha = \alpha^{-1} * \gamma * \alpha, where * denotes path concatenation and α1\alpha^{-1} is the reverse of α\alpha. The resulting map ϕα:π1(X,x0)π1(X,x1)\phi_\alpha: \pi_1(X, x_0) \to \pi_1(X, x_1) is a group isomorphism, and it depends only on the homotopy class of α\alpha; composing with the inverse path yields the inverse isomorphism. In spaces that are not path-connected, the fundamental group is determined separately by the path component containing the basepoint, with π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0) coinciding with the fundamental group of that component. Different path components may have non-isomorphic fundamental groups, so the choice of basepoint across components yields distinct invariants. For instance, if XX has multiple path components, each equipped with its own basepoint, the overall homotopy type reflects these independent structures without interconnections via paths. A space XX is simply connected if it is path-connected and π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0) is the trivial group for some (equivalently, any) basepoint x0x_0. In this case, basepoint dependence vanishes entirely, as all loops are homotopic to the constant loop regardless of the starting point. This triviality implies a unique homotopy class of paths between any two points in XX. The isomorphism across basepoints in path-connected spaces can also be understood through the universal cover X~\tilde{X} of XX, where π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0) acts freely and transitively on the fiber over x0x_0 via deck transformations. This free action extends to fibers over other points x1x_1, inducing the path conjugation isomorphisms and ensuring that the fundamental group is well-defined up to natural isomorphism independent of basepoint choice.

Basic Examples

Circle

The circle S1S^1 is the unit circle in the complex plane, defined as the set S1={zC:z=1}S^1 = \{ z \in \mathbb{C} : |z| = 1 \}, with basepoint chosen as 11. The fundamental group π1(S1,1)\pi_1(S^1, 1) captures the homotopy classes of loops based at this point, and it is isomorphic to the integers Z\mathbb{Z} under addition. Loops in S1S^1 based at 1 are classified by their winding number, an integer nZn \in \mathbb{Z} that measures how many times the loop wraps around the origin in the complex plane; this corresponds to the degree of the induced map S1S1S^1 \to S^1. The standard generator of this group is the loop γ1:[0,1]S1\gamma_1: [0,1] \to S^1 given by γ1(θ)=e2πiθ\gamma_1(\theta) = e^{2\pi i \theta}, which traces the circle once counterclockwise and has winding number 1. More generally, the loop γn(θ)=e2πinθ\gamma_n(\theta) = e^{2\pi i n \theta} has winding number nn, representing nn full rotations (positive for counterclockwise, negative for clockwise). The group structure arises from concatenation of loops, under which winding numbers add: the homotopy class [γn][γm]=[γn+m][\gamma_n] \cdot [\gamma_m] = [\gamma_{n+m}]. Thus, powers of the generator satisfy [γ1]k=[γk][\gamma_1]^k = [\gamma_k] for kZk \in \mathbb{Z}, with inverses given by loops of opposite winding number, confirming the isomorphism π1(S1,1)Z\pi_1(S^1, 1) \cong \mathbb{Z}. Loops with winding number 0 are precisely the trivial elements, homotopic to the constant loop at 1; such a loop can be contracted to a point via a straight-line homotopy in the disk it bounds, though care is needed to keep the homotopy within S1S^1 by projecting radially. A proof that winding numbers fully classify the homotopy classes relies on the universal cover p:RS1p: \mathbb{R} \to S^1, defined by p(t)=e2πitp(t) = e^{2\pi i t}, which is a covering map with deck transformations by integer translations. For any loop γ:[0,1]S1\gamma: [0,1] \to S^1 with γ(0)=γ(1)=1\gamma(0) = \gamma(1) = 1, there is a unique lift γ~:[0,1]R\tilde{\gamma}: [0,1] \to \mathbb{R} starting at γ~(0)=0\tilde{\gamma}(0) = 0, and the endpoint γ~(1)=nZ\tilde{\gamma}(1) = n \in \mathbb{Z} is the winding number. A homotopy HH between two loops lifts to a homotopy between their lifts, preserving endpoints, so two loops are homotopic if and only if their lifts end at the same point in R\mathbb{R}, i.e., they have the same winding number. This establishes the bijection between homotopy classes and Z\mathbb{Z}, with the group structure matching addition.

2-sphere

The 2-sphere, denoted S2S^2, is defined as the unit sphere in R3\mathbb{R}^3, consisting of all points (x,y,z)(x, y, z) satisfying x2+y2+z2=1x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1. As a path-connected space, the fundamental group π1(S2)\pi_1(S^2) is independent of the choice of basepoint. To demonstrate that π1(S2)\pi_1(S^2) is trivial, consider any loop γ:[0,1]S2\gamma: [0,1] \to S^2 based at a point pS2p \in S^2. Since the image of γ\gamma is a compact 1-dimensional subset of the 2-dimensional manifold S2S^2, there exists a point qS2q \in S^2 not lying on γ\gamma, by general position arguments in dimension theory. Apply the stereographic projection from the point qq to the equatorial plane, which provides a homeomorphism between S2{q}S^2 \setminus \{q\} and R2\mathbb{R}^2. Under this homeomorphism, the loop γ\gamma maps to a closed curve in R2\mathbb{R}^2, which is contractible via radial homotopy to the origin (or any point) in the plane, as R2\mathbb{R}^2 is simply connected. This contraction in R2\mathbb{R}^2 pulls back through the homeomorphism to a homotopy on S2{q}S^2 \setminus \{q\}, continuously deforming γ\gamma to the constant loop at pp, thus showing γ\gamma is nullhomotopic. An alternative proof uses the Seifert-van Kampen theorem. Cover S2S^2 by two open hemispheres UU and VV, each homeomorphic to the open disk D2\mathbb{D}^2 (hence contractible, with trivial fundamental group), such that their intersection UVU \cap V is homeomorphic to an open cylinder S1×RS^1 \times \mathbb{R}, which has fundamental group isomorphic to Z\mathbb{Z}. However, the inclusion maps induce trivial homomorphisms from π1(UV)\pi_1(U \cap V) to both π1(U)\pi_1(U) and π1(V)\pi_1(V). By the theorem, π1(S2)\pi_1(S^2) is the amalgamated free product of π1(U)\pi_1(U) and π1(V)\pi_1(V) over π1(UV)\pi_1(U \cap V), yielding the trivial group. A direct homotopy argument reinforces this: any loop on S2S^2 bounds a disk in the ambient R3\mathbb{R}^3, and the disk can be pushed onto S2S^2 via a homotopy, contracting the loop. This triviality extends to higher dimensions: π1(Sn)=0\pi_1(S^n) = 0 for all n2n \geq 2, as analogous coverings by contractible sets apply, contrasting with the circle S1S^1 where π1(S1)Z\pi_1(S^1) \cong \mathbb{Z}. Consequently, S2S^2 is simply connected, indicating the absence of 1-dimensional holes that could support non-trivial loops.

Figure eight

The figure eight space, denoted X=S1S1X = S^1 \vee S^1, is the wedge sum of two circles joined at a single basepoint x0x_0. This topological space can be visualized as two loops attached at a common point, forming a path-connected graph with one vertex and two edges. Loops in XX based at x0x_0 can traverse either circle independently or combine traversals in arbitrary sequences, capturing the space's non-simply connected nature beyond a single loop. The fundamental group π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0) is generated by two homotopy classes of loops: aa, which winds once around the first circle, and bb, which winds once around the second circle. These generators freely generate the group, yielding π1(X,x0)F2\pi_1(X, x_0) \cong F_2, the free group on two generators. Elements of F2F_2 consist of all reduced words formed from aa, bb, a1a^{-1}, and b1b^{-1}, where reduction eliminates cancellations like aa1aa^{-1} or bb1bb^{-1}, but no further relations exist. In F2F_2, the loops do not commute— for instance, abbaab \neq ba—nor do they cancel across circles, allowing nontrivial elements like aba1b1aba^{-1}b^{-1} that reflect independent windings. This non-abelian structure contrasts with the single circle's abelian Z\mathbb{Z}, highlighting how attaching a second loop introduces freedom without imposed relations. Geometrically, paths in XX can be imagined as braiding around two distinct holes, where sequences of traversals around each hole combine without simplification beyond local inverses. As a specific graph, this example illustrates free groups arising from graph topology, a pattern generalized later.

Graphs

Graphs in topology are modeled as one-dimensional CW-complexes, consisting of 0-cells representing vertices and 1-cells representing edges attached along their boundaries to the vertices. This structure allows the application of algebraic topology tools, such as the fundamental group, to capture the connectivity and loops within the graph. The fundamental group of a connected graph is a free group whose rank equals the first b1b_1, which is the number of edges minus the number of vertices plus one, or equivalently, the number of edges not contained in a spanning tree. To compute it, select a spanning tree of the graph; the edges outside this tree serve as generators for the free group, corresponding to independent loops that cannot be contracted within the graph. Any connected graph deformation retracts onto a bouquet of circles (a wedge sum of S1S^1), where the number of circles matches the rank of the free group; this retraction is achieved by collapsing the spanning tree to a single point while preserving the non-tree edges as loops. For instance, the θ-graph, formed by two vertices connected by three edges, has fundamental group the free group on two generators F2F_2, as it retracts to a bouquet of two circles. In contrast, acyclic graphs, such as trees, possess a trivial fundamental group, since they contain no non-contractible loops and deformation retract to a point. The figure eight, a special case of a graph as a bouquet of two circles, exemplifies this with π1\pi_1 isomorphic to F2F_2.

Applications to Spaces

Surfaces

The classification of compact surfaces up to homeomorphism relies on their orientability and, for orientable surfaces, their genus gg, which counts the number of "handles" or tori sewn together. The fundamental group of such a surface captures its 1-dimensional holes and is computed using cell complexes or polygonal models, where the 1-skeleton yields a free group on the edges, and the 2-cell attachment imposes a single relation from the boundary word. For the 2-sphere S2S^2, which has genus 0, the fundamental group is trivial, π1(S2)={e}\pi_1(S^2) = \{e\}, as any loop can be contracted to a point due to the absence of non-trivial 1-cycles. This follows from its CW-complex structure with one 0-cell and one 2-cell, and no 1-cells, confirming simply connectedness. The torus, the orientable surface of genus 1, has fundamental group π1(T2)Z×Z\pi_1(T^2) \cong \mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z}, generated by two commuting loops corresponding to the standard meridional and longitudinal circles. Its presentation is a,baba1b1=e\langle a, b \mid aba^{-1}b^{-1} = e \rangle, where the relation arises from attaching a single 2-cell to the wedge of two circles (the 1-skeleton). For a closed orientable surface of genus g2g \geq 2, the fundamental group is given by the presentation a1,b1,,ag,bgi=1g[ai,bi]=e\langle a_1, b_1, \dots, a_g, b_g \mid \prod_{i=1}^g [a_i, b_i] = e \rangle, where [ai,bi]=aibiai1bi1[a_i, b_i] = a_i b_i a_i^{-1} b_i^{-1} is the commutator; this group is non-abelian and has 2g2g generators with one defining relation. The CW-complex has one 0-cell, 2g2g 1-cells (loops ai,bia_i, b_i), and one 2-cell attached along the boundary word [ai,bi]\prod [a_i, b_i], yielding the free group on 2g2g generators quotiented by that relation via Seifert-van Kampen theorem. Equivalently, the surface is modeled as a 4g4g-gon with paired edge identifications a1b1a11b11agbgag1bg1a_1 b_1 a_1^{-1} b_1^{-1} \cdots a_g b_g a_g^{-1} b_g^{-1}, where the boundary loop provides the relator. Non-orientable surfaces, such as the real projective plane RP2\mathbb{RP}^2 (equivalent to a sphere with a cross-cap), have fundamental group π1(RP2)Z/2Z\pi_1(\mathbb{RP}^2) \cong \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}, presented as aa2=e\langle a \mid a^2 = e \rangle. This arises from its cell structure with one 0-cell, one 1-cell, and one 2-cell attached along the double loop a2a^2, or from a 2-gon (disk) with antipodal boundary points identified. The Klein bottle, another non-orientable surface, has fundamental group presented as a,babab1=e\langle a, b \mid aba b^{-1} = e \rangle (or equivalently a,bab=ba1\langle a, b \mid ab = b a^{-1} \rangle), which is non-abelian with Z×Z/2Z\mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z} as its abelianization. Its polygonal model is a 4-gon with edges identified as a,b,a,b1a, b, a, b^{-1}, and the cell complex mirrors the torus but with a twisted attachment yielding the non-commuting relation.

Knot groups

In knot theory, the knot group of a knot KS3K \subset S^3 is defined as the fundamental group G(K)=π1(S3K)G(K) = \pi_1(S^3 \setminus K), where the basepoint is chosen in the complement of the knot. This group captures the topological complexity of the knot complement, a 3-manifold obtained by removing the embedded circle from the 3-sphere. A standard way to compute the knot group from a knot diagram is via the Wirtinger presentation, introduced by Wilhelm Wirtinger in 1905. In this presentation, one assigns a generator to each arc of the diagram (underpass segments between crossings), and imposes relations at each crossing based on the local topology: for an over-arc generator ww crossing under-arcs xx and yy, the relation is w1xw=yw^{-1} x w = y (or conjugates thereof, depending on orientation). This yields a finite presentation of G(K)G(K), though it may not be minimal. For the trefoil knot, a simple example, the Wirtinger presentation simplifies to x,yx2=y3\langle x, y \mid x^2 = y^3 \rangle. Within the knot group, the meridian is represented by a loop in the complement that bounds a disk punctured by the knot (encircling it once), while the longitude is a loop parallel to the knot along a , null-homologous in the complement. These generate the peripheral subgroup, isomorphic to ZZ\mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}, which encodes framing information essential for Dehn surgery and other constructions. For the trivial knot (unknot), the complement S3US^3 \setminus U deformation retracts to a circle, so G(U)ZG(U) \cong \mathbb{Z}, generated by the meridian. Knot groups serve as complete invariants in the sense that non-isomorphic groups imply non-equivalent knots under ambient isotopy, though the converse does not hold (some distinct knots share isomorphic groups). This distinguishes, for example, the trefoil from the unknot, as the former's group is non-abelian while the latter's is cyclic.

Topological groups

In the context of topological groups, particularly connected Lie groups, the fundamental group π1(G)\pi_1(G) of a connected Lie group GG is isomorphic to a discrete central subgroup of its universal cover G~\tilde{G}. This discrete subgroup captures the "holes" in the topology of GG as a manifold, and since Lie groups are H-spaces, π1(G)\pi_1(G) is always abelian. A classic example is the special orthogonal group SO(3)SO(3), which consists of 3×3 orthogonal matrices with determinant 1 and is diffeomorphic to the real projective space RP3\mathbb{RP}^3. The fundamental group π1(SO(3))\pi_1(SO(3)) is isomorphic to Z/2Z\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}, reflecting that SO(3)SO(3) is doubly covered by the simply connected spin group Spin(3)SU(2)Spin(3) \cong SU(2). Similarly, the circle group U(1)U(1), which is the group of complex numbers with modulus 1 and homeomorphic to the circle S1S^1, has fundamental group π1(U(1))Z\pi_1(U(1)) \cong \mathbb{Z}, generated by loops winding around the origin. The connection to universal covers is central: for a connected Lie group GG, the fundamental group π1(G)\pi_1(G) is isomorphic to the group of deck transformations of the universal covering map G~G\tilde{G} \to G, where G~\tilde{G} is a simply connected Lie group. This identifies π1(G)\pi_1(G) with the kernel of the covering homomorphism, acting freely and properly discontinuously on G~\tilde{G}. Representative examples illustrate this structure. The additive group Rn\mathbb{R}^n is contractible and thus simply connected, so π1(Rn)\pi_1(\mathbb{R}^n) is trivial. In contrast, the nn-torus Tn=(S1)nT^n = (S^1)^n, a compact abelian Lie group, has π1(Tn)Zn\pi_1(T^n) \cong \mathbb{Z}^n, generated by the loops along each circle factor. For non-abelian cases, the special linear group SL(2,R)SL(2,\mathbb{R}) of 2×2 real matrices with determinant 1 deformation retracts onto a solid torus, yielding π1(SL(2,R))Z\pi_1(SL(2,\mathbb{R})) \cong \mathbb{Z}..pdf)

Algebraic Structure and Functoriality

Induced homomorphisms

A continuous map f:(X,x0)(Y,y0)f: (X, x_0) \to (Y, y_0) between pointed topological spaces induces a group homomorphism f:π1(X,x0)π1(Y,y0)f_*: \pi_1(X, x_0) \to \pi_1(Y, y_0) on their fundamental groups, defined by f([γ])=[fγ]f_*([\gamma]) = [f \circ \gamma] for each homotopy class [γ][\gamma] of loops γ\gamma based at x0x_0, where fγf \circ \gamma is the composite loop based at y0=f(x0)y_0 = f(x_0). This construction is well-defined because if two loops γ0\gamma_0 and γ1\gamma_1 in XX are homotopic relative to the basepoint, then fγ0f \circ \gamma_0 and fγ1f \circ \gamma_1 are homotopic relative to y0y_0 in YY. The induced homomorphism preserves the group operation, as f([γ1γ2])=[f(γ1γ2)]=[(fγ1)(fγ2)]=f([γ1])f([γ2])f_*([\gamma_1 \cdot \gamma_2]) = [f \circ (\gamma_1 \cdot \gamma_2)] = [ (f \circ \gamma_1) \cdot (f \circ \gamma_2) ] = f_*([\gamma_1]) \cdot f_*([\gamma_2]), where \cdot denotes loop concatenation. For the identity map idX:(X,x0)(X,x0)\mathrm{id}_X: (X, x_0) \to (X, x_0), the induced homomorphism is the identity on π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0), ensuring idempotence. Homotopy invariance holds: if two pointed maps f,g:(X,x0)(Y,y0)f, g: (X, x_0) \to (Y, y_0) are homotopic via a basepoint-preserving homotopy, then f=gf_* = g_*. More generally, for a homotopy ϕt:(X,x0)(Y,y0)\phi_t: (X, x_0) \to (Y, y_0) with t[0,1]t \in [0,1], the induced homomorphisms satisfy ϕ0=ϕ1\phi_{0*} = \phi_{1*}. The induced homomorphisms respect composition: for pointed maps f:(X,x0)(Y,y0)f: (X, x_0) \to (Y, y_0) and g:(Y,y0)(Z,z0)g: (Y, y_0) \to (Z, z_0), (gf)=gf(g \circ f)_* = g_* \circ f_*. This property, combined with the identity preservation, establishes the fundamental group functor π1\pi_1 as a covariant functor from the category of pointed topological spaces and basepoint-preserving continuous maps to the category of groups. Changing the basepoint in XX from x0x_0 to x1x_1 via a path γ:IX\gamma: I \to X with γ(0)=x0\gamma(0) = x_0 and γ(1)=x1\gamma(1) = x_1 induces an isomorphism βγ:π1(X,x1)π1(X,x0)\beta_\gamma: \pi_1(X, x_1) \to \pi_1(X, x_0) given by conjugation: βγ([δ])=[γ1δγ]\beta_\gamma([\delta]) = [\gamma^{-1} \cdot \delta \cdot \gamma] for loops δ\delta based at x1x_1, where γ1\gamma^{-1} is the reverse path. For an induced homomorphism f:π1(X,x0)π1(Y,y0)f_*: \pi_1(X, x_0) \to \pi_1(Y, y_0), changing the basepoint in XX to x1x_1 yields fβγ1=βγ~ff_* \circ \beta_{\gamma^{-1}} = \beta_{\tilde{\gamma}} \circ f_*', where ff_*' is the homomorphism from π1(X,x1)\pi_1(X, x_1) and γ~\tilde{\gamma} is the image path fγf \circ \gamma in YY, ensuring compatibility with conjugation. In path-connected spaces, such basepoint changes yield isomorphisms, making the fundamental group independent of basepoint choice up to isomorphism.

Invariance properties

The fundamental group is invariant under homeomorphisms, meaning that if f:XYf: X \to Y is a homeomorphism between pointed topological spaces (X,x0)(X, x_0) and (Y,y0)(Y, y_0), then the induced homomorphism f:π1(X,x0)π1(Y,y0)f_*: \pi_1(X, x_0) \to \pi_1(Y, y_0) is an isomorphism. This follows from the fact that ff is a continuous bijection with a continuous inverse f1f^{-1}, so both ff_* and (f1)(f^{-1})_* are isomorphisms, establishing that homeomorphic spaces share the same fundamental group up to isomorphism. More generally, the fundamental group is preserved under homotopy equivalences. A map f:XYf: X \to Y between pointed spaces is a homotopy equivalence if there exists g:YXg: Y \to X such that gfg \circ f is homotopic to the identity on XX and fgf \circ g is homotopic to the identity on YY; in this case, ff_* is an isomorphism. Homotopy equivalences capture essential topological features while allowing for deformations, and the induced maps on the fundamental group reflect this by being bijective, ensuring that homotopy equivalent spaces have isomorphic fundamental groups. Deformation retracts provide a concrete instance of homotopy equivalence. If AXA \subset X is a subspace such that there exists a deformation retraction rt:XXr_t: X \to X (a homotopy from the identity on XX to a retraction onto AA) with rt(a)=ar_t(a) = a for all aAa \in A and all tt, then the inclusion i:AXi: A \hookrightarrow X induces an isomorphism i:π1(A)π1(X)i_*: \pi_1(A) \to \pi_1(X). This implies π1(A)π1(X)\pi_1(A) \cong \pi_1(X), as the retraction and inclusion form mutual homotopy inverses. In modern homotopy theory, these properties extend to weak homotopy equivalences in model categories, where a morphism inducing isomorphisms on all homotopy groups (including π1\pi_1) is inverted in the homotopy category, preserving the fundamental group structure. For example, consider a graph retracting onto a wedge of circles; the deformation retraction ensures the fundamental group of the graph is isomorphic to that of the wedge, which is the free group on the number of circles.

Relations to Other Topological Invariants

Homology connection

The first homology group H1(X)H_1(X) of a path-connected topological space XX is isomorphic to the abelianization of the fundamental group π1(X)\pi_1(X), obtained by quotienting π1(X)\pi_1(X) by its commutator subgroup [π1(X),π1(X)][\pi_1(X), \pi_1(X)]. This isomorphism is induced by the Hurewicz homomorphism h:π1(X,x0)H1(X)h: \pi_1(X, x_0) \to H_1(X), which sends a loop to its class in homology and has the commutator subgroup as its kernel. This connection endows H1(X)H_1(X) with a universal property: for any abelian group AA and any group homomorphism ϕ:π1(X)A\phi: \pi_1(X) \to A, there exists a unique abelian group homomorphism ϕˉ:H1(X)A\bar{\phi}: H_1(X) \to A such that ϕˉh=ϕ\bar{\phi} \circ h = \phi. For path-connected XX, the rank of H1(X;Z)H_1(X; \mathbb{Z}) (as a free abelian group) equals the rank of the abelianization of π1(X)\pi_1(X), which is the first Betti number b1(X)b_1(X). Examples illustrate this relation clearly. For the circle S1S^1, π1(S1)Z\pi_1(S^1) \cong \mathbb{Z} and H1(S1)ZH_1(S^1) \cong \mathbb{Z}. For the figure eight (wedge sum of two circles), π1\pi_1 is the free group on two generators and H1ZZH_1 \cong \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}. On closed orientable surfaces of genus gg, H1Z2gH_1 \cong \mathbb{Z}^{2g}, so b1=2gb_1 = 2g, consistent with the Euler characteristic χ=22g\chi = 2 - 2g. However, abelianization discards non-abelian structure, so π1(X)\pi_1(X) detects distinctions invisible to H1(X)H_1(X). For instance, the complements of the and the in S3S^3 both have H1ZH_1 \cong \mathbb{Z}, but their fundamental groups differ: the unknot complement has π1Z\pi_1 \cong \mathbb{Z}, while the trefoil complement has the non-abelian group with presentation a,ba2=b3\langle a, b \mid a^2 = b^3 \rangle.

Covering spaces

A covering space of a pointed topological space (X,x0)(X, x_0) is a pointed space (E,e0)(E, e_0) together with a continuous surjective map p:(E,e0)(X,x0)p: (E, e_0) \to (X, x_0) such that pp is a local homeomorphism and the fibers p1(x)p^{-1}(x) are discrete for all xXx \in X. More precisely, for every xXx \in X, there exists an evenly covered open neighborhood UU of xx such that p1(U)p^{-1}(U) is a disjoint union of open sets in EE, each homeomorphic to UU via pp. This structure allows loops in XX to lift uniquely to paths in EE starting at any point in the fiber, provided XX is path-connected, locally path-connected, and semilocally simply-connected. The fundamental group π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0) acts on the fiber p1(x0)p^{-1}(x_0) via the monodromy action, defined by lifting loops based at x0x_0 to paths in EE starting at e0e_0; the endpoint of the lifted path determines the image of e0e_0 under the action of the loop's homotopy class. This action is transitive if EE is connected and induces a homomorphism from π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0) to the symmetric group on the fiber. The image pπ1(E,e0)p_* \pi_1(E, e_0) is a subgroup of π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0), and there is a bijective correspondence between subgroups of π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0) and isomorphism classes of pointed connected covering spaces of (X,x0)(X, x_0), up to basepoint-preserving isomorphisms. When the subgroup pπ1(E,e0)p_* \pi_1(E, e_0) is normal in π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0), the covering is regular (also called Galois), and the monodromy action is free and transitive on the fiber, with the deck transformation group Aut(p)\mathrm{Aut}(p) isomorphic to the quotient π1(X,x0)/pπ1(E,e0)\pi_1(X, x_0) / p_* \pi_1(E, e_0). In general, for any covering space, the orbits of the monodromy action on p1(x0)p^{-1}(x_0) correspond to the connected components of EE, and the number of these components equals the index [π1(X,x0):pπ1(E,e0)][\pi_1(X, x_0) : p_* \pi_1(E, e_0)]. Thus, disconnected covers arise as disjoint unions of connected ones, each corresponding to a coset of the subgroup. The universal cover is the simply connected connected covering space (X~,x~0)(\tilde{X}, \tilde{x}_0) of (X,x0)(X, x_0), corresponding to the trivial subgroup of π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0); the induced map p:π1(X~,x~0)π1(X,x0)p_*: \pi_1(\tilde{X}, \tilde{x}_0) \to \pi_1(X, x_0) is injective, and π1(X,x0)\pi_1(X, x_0) is isomorphic to the deck transformation group Aut(p)\mathrm{Aut}(p), which acts freely and properly discontinuously on X~\tilde{X}. This isomorphism sends the homotopy class [γ]π1(X,x0)[\gamma] \in \pi_1(X, x_0) of a loop γ:(S1,1)(X,x0)\gamma: (S^1, 1) \to (X, x_0) to the unique deck transformation ϕAut(p)\phi \in \mathrm{Aut}(p) with ϕ(x~0)=γ(1)\phi(\tilde{x}_0) = \overline{\gamma}(1), where γ:IX~\overline{\gamma}: I \to \tilde{X} is the lift of γ\gamma (viewed as a path) starting at x~0\tilde{x}_0. Well-definedness on homotopy classes follows since homotopic loops lift to paths with the same endpoint; existence and uniqueness of ϕ\phi arise from the lifting criterion for covering spaces applied to the covering map p:(X~,γ(1))(X,x0)p: (\tilde{X}, \overline{\gamma}(1)) \to (X, x_0), yielding a deck transformation sending γ(1)\overline{\gamma}(1) to x~0\tilde{x}_0 (whose inverse is ϕ\phi), with equality of such transformations guaranteed by connectedness if they agree at a point. These are automorphisms, as the inverse loop yields the inverse map, and the assignment is a group isomorphism. Every other connected covering space factors through the universal cover via an intermediate covering, establishing a Galois-like correspondence where subgroups index the lattice of covers.

Fibrations

In algebraic topology, a Serre fibration is a continuous map p:EBp: E \to B between topological spaces that satisfies the homotopy lifting property with respect to all disks DnD^n for n0n \geq 0. This property states that for any map f:DnEf: D^n \to E and homotopy G:Dn×IBG: D^n \times I \to B such that pf=G(idDn×{0})p \circ f = G \circ (id_{D^n} \times \{0\}), there exists a lift H:Dn×IEH: D^n \times I \to E with H(idDn×{0})=fH \circ (id_{D^n} \times \{0\}) = f and pH=Gp \circ H = G. This definition, introduced by , generalizes fiber bundles and ensures that fibers behave well up to homotopy, allowing the extraction of algebraic invariants like . Associated to a Serre fibration FEpBF \to E \xrightarrow{p} B
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.