Hubbry Logo
G20G20Main
Open search
G20
Community hub
G20
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
G20
G20
G20
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The G20 or Group of 20 is an intergovernmental forum comprising 19 sovereign countries, the European Union (EU), and the African Union (AU).[2][3] It works to address major issues related to the global economy, such as international financial stability, climate change mitigation and sustainable development, through annual meetings of heads of state and heads of government.[4]

Key Information

The sovereign states of the G20 (without its international members, like the EU or AU) account for around 85% of gross world product (GWP),[5] 75% of international trade, 56% of the global population,[5] and 60% of the world's land area. Including the EU and AU, the G20 comprises 78.9% of global population and 83.9% of global CO2 emissions from fossil energy.[6]

The G20 was founded in 1999 in response to several world economic crises.[7] Since 2008, it has convened at least once a year, with summits involving each member's head of government or state, finance minister, or foreign minister, and other high-ranking officials; the EU is represented by the European Commission and the European Central Bank.[8][9][b] Other countries, international organizations, and nongovernmental organizations are invited to attend the summits, some permanently. The African Union joined as the 21st member at the 2023 summit in India and was officially represented at the 2024 summit in Brazil.

In its 2009 summit, the G20 declared itself the primary venue for international economic and financial cooperation.[10] The group's stature has risen during the subsequent decade, and it is recognised by analysts as exercising considerable global influence;[11] it is also criticised for its limited membership,[12] lack of enforcement powers,[13] and for the alleged undermining of existing international institutions.[12] Summits are often met with protests, particularly by anti-globalization groups.[14][15]

History

[edit]

The G20 is the latest in a series of post–World War II initiatives aimed at international coordination of economic policy, which include institutions such as the "Bretton Woods twins", the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, and what is now the World Trade Organization.[16]

The G20 was foreshadowed at the Cologne summit of the G7 in June 1999, and formally established at the G7 Finance Ministers' meeting on 26 September 1999 with an inaugural meeting on 15–16 December 1999 in Berlin. Canadian finance minister Paul Martin was chosen as the first chairman and German finance minister Hans Eichel hosted the meeting.[17]

A 2004 report by Colin I. Bradford and Johannes F. Linn of the Brookings Institution asserted the group was founded primarily at the initiative of Eichel, the concurrent chair of the G7.[18] However, Bradford later described then-Finance Minister of Canada (and future Prime Minister of Canada) Paul Martin as "the crucial architect of the formation of the G20 at finance minister level", and as the one who later "proposed that the G20 countries move to leaders level summits".[19] Canadian academic and journalistic sources have also identified the G20 as a project initiated by Martin and his American counterpart then-Treasury Secretary Larry Summers.[20][21][22][23] All acknowledge, however, that Germany and the United States played a key role in bringing their vision into reality.[citation needed]

Martin and Summers conceived of the G20 in response to the series of massive debt crises that had spread across emerging markets in the late 1990s, beginning with the Mexican peso crisis and followed by the 1997 Asian financial crisis, the 1998 Russian financial crisis, and eventually impacting the United States, most prominently in the form of the collapse of the prominent hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management in the autumn of 1998.[20][21][22] It illustrated to them that in a rapidly globalizing world, the G7, G8, and the Bretton Woods system would be unable to provide financial stability, and they conceived of a new, broader permanent group of major world economies that would give a voice and new responsibilities in providing it.[20][22]

The G20 membership was decided by Eichel's deputy Caio Koch-Weser and Summers's deputy Timothy Geithner. According to the political economist Robert Wade:

"Geithner and Koch-Weser went down the list of countries saying, Canada in, Portugal out, South Africa in, Nigeria and Egypt out, and so on; they sent their list to the other G7 finance ministries; and the invitations to the first meeting went out."[24]

Early topics

[edit]

The G20's primary focus has been governance of the global economy. Summit themes have varied from year to year. The theme of the 2006 G20 ministerial meeting was "Building and Sustaining Prosperity". The issues discussed included domestic reforms to achieve "sustained growth", global energy and resource commodity markets, reform of the World Bank and IMF, and the impact of demographic changes.

In 2007, South Africa hosted the secretariat with Trevor A. Manuel, South African Minister of Finance as chairperson of the G20.

In 2008, Guido Mantega, Brazil's Minister of Finance, was the G20 chairman and proposed dialogue on competition in financial markets, clean energy, economic development and fiscal elements of growth and development.

On 11 October 2008 after a meeting of G8 finance ministers, US President George W. Bush stated that the next meeting of the G20 would be important in finding solutions to the burgeoning economic crisis of 2008.

Summits

[edit]
Main article: List of G20 summits
class=notpageimage|
Host cities of G20 summit

The Summit of G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, who prepare the leaders' summit and implement their decisions, was created as a response both to the 2008 financial crisis and to a growing recognition that key emerging powers were not adequately included in the core of global economic discussion and governance. Additionally, G20 summits of heads of state or government were held.

After the 2008 debut summit in Washington, DC, G20 leaders met twice a year: in London and Pittsburgh in 2009, and in Toronto and Seoul in 2010.[25]

Since 2011, when France chaired and hosted the G20, the summits have been held only once a year.[26] The 2016 summit was held in Hangzhou, China,[27] the 2017 summit was held in Hamburg, Germany, the 2018 summit was held in Buenos Aires, Argentina, the 2019 summit was held in Osaka, Japan, the 2020 summit was scheduled in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia but it was held virtually due to COVID-19, the 2021 summit was held in Rome, Italy, the 2022 summit was held in Bali, Indonesia and the 2023 summit was held in New Delhi, India. The 2024 Group of 20 (G20) Summit was held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.[28] The 2025 summit will be held in Johannesburg South Africa.

Several other ministerial-level G20 meetings have been held since 2010. Agriculture ministerial meetings were conducted in 2011 and 2012; meetings of foreign ministers were held in 2012 and 2013; trade ministers met in 2012 and 2014, and employment ministerial meetings have taken place annually since 2010.[29]

In 2012, the G20 Ministers of Tourism and Heads of Delegation of G20 member countries and other invited States, as well as representatives from the World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and other organisations in the Travel & Tourism sector met in Mérida, Mexico, on May 16 at the 4th G20 meeting and focused on 'Tourism as a means to Job Creation'. As a result of this meeting and The World Travel & Tourism Council's Visa Impact Research, later on the Leaders of the G20, convened in Los Cabos on 18–19 June, would recognise the impact of Travel & Tourism for the first time. That year, the G20 Leaders Declaration added the following statement: "We recognise the role of travel and tourism as a vehicle for job creation, economic growth and development, and, while recognizing the sovereign right of States to control the entry of foreign nationals, we will work towards developing travel facilitation initiatives in support of job creation, quality work, poverty reduction and global growth."[30]

In March 2014, the former Australian foreign minister Julie Bishop, when Australia was hosting the 2014 G20 summit in Brisbane, proposed to ban Russia from the summit over its annexation of Ukrainian Crimea.[31] The BRICS foreign ministers subsequently reminded Bishop that "the custodianship of the G20 belongs to all Member States equally and no one Member State can unilaterally determine its nature and character."

The 2015 G20 Summit in Antalya, Turkey, focused on "Inclusiveness, Investment, and Implementation," gathering leaders to address global economic challenges, development, climate change, and urgent issues like terrorism and refugees. Key outcomes included the Antalya Action Plan and commitments to financial stability, tax regulation, and energy policy.[32][33]

In 2016, the G20 framed its commitment to the 2030 Agenda, Sustainable Development Goals in three key themes; the promotion of strong sustainable and balanced growth; protection of the planet from degradation; and furthering co-operation with low-income and developing countries. At the G20 Summit in Hangzhou, members agreed on an action plan and issued a high level principles document to member countries to help facilitate the agenda's implementation.[34][35]

Japan hosted the 2019 summit.[36] The 2020 summit was to be held in Saudi Arabia,[37] but was instead held virtually on 21–22 November 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic under the presidency of Saudi Arabia. 2021 G20 Rome summit which was held in Rome, the capital city of Italy, on 30–31 October 2021.

Indonesia held the 2022 summit in November 2022. During its presidency, Indonesia focused on the global COVID-19 pandemic and how to collectively overcome the challenges related to it. The three priorities of Indonesia's G20 presidency were global health architecture, digital transformations, and sustainable energy transitions.[38] The G20 Presidency of Indonesia, in partnership with the Pandemic Fund secretariat, also officially launched the Pandemic Fund at a high-level event. The Pandemic Fund expected to be as a key part of the solution for reducing risks from epidemics and pandemics in the most vulnerable parts of the world and contributing to a healthier and safer world .[39] Indonesia's 2022 G20 presidency highlighted its leadership in promoting international cooperation, sustainable development, and Islamic messages of peace, including hosting the R20 forum to foster interfaith dialogue.[40][41]

Azali Assoumani, President of the African Union, is greeted by Narendra Modi, G20 Chairman, at the G20 summit in 2023.

India held the 2023 summit in September 2023.[42] The presidency's theme was Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (Sanskrit: वसुधैव कुटुम्बकम्; English:"One Earth, One Family, One Future"[c]).[43][44] In an interview on 26 August 2023, Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed optimism about the G20 countries' evolving agenda under India's presidency, shifting toward a human-centric development approach that aligns with the concerns of the Global South, including addressing climate change, debt restructuring through the G20's Common Framework for debt, and a strategy for regulation of global cryptocurrencies. G20 expanded by the inclusion of African Union, it is also the first inclusion since 1999.[45][46][47]

The Brazilian presidency launched the G20 Social, a place where for the first time the organization will bring the civil society into the debate where it can participate and contribute to discussions and policy formulations regarding to the summit.[48]

Chair rotation

[edit]

To decide which member nation should hold to chair the G20 leaders' meeting for a given year, all country members are assigned to one of five groupings, with all but one group having four members, the other having three. States from the same region are placed in the same group, except Group 1 and Group 2. All countries within a group are eligible to take over the G20 Presidency when it is their group's turn. Therefore, the states within the relevant group need to negotiate among themselves to select the next G20 President. Each year, a different G20 member country assumes the presidency starting from 1 December until 30 November. This system has been in place since 2010, when South Korea, which is in Group 5, held the G20 chair. The table below lists the nations' groupings:[49][50]

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 (Latin America) Group 4 (Western Europe) Group 5 (East/Southeast Asia)

To ensure continuity, the presidency is supported by a "troika" made up of the current, immediate past and next host countries.[51]

Organization

[edit]

The G20 operates without a permanent secretariat or staff. The group's chair (the presidency) rotates annually among the members and is selected from a different regional grouping of countries. The incumbent chair establishes a temporary secretariat for the duration of its term, which coordinates the group's work and organizes its meetings. Together with the previous and following presidency a so-called troika is formed, to provide a smooth transition of secretariat functions.[52]

The 2022 summit was held in Bali, Indonesia. India was the chair in 2023 and hosted the 2023 summit. South Africa is the current chair and will host the 2025 Johannesburg Summit.[53]

Additionally because of the lacking of a permanent secretariat the G20 has been relying on the OECD for more institutional competences substituting permanent secretariat functions.[54]

Proposed permanent secretariat

[edit]

In 2010, President of France Nicolas Sarkozy proposed the establishment of a permanent G20 secretariat, similar to the United Nations. Seoul and Paris were suggested as possible locations for its headquarters.[55] Brazil and China supported the establishment of a secretariat, while Italy and Japan expressed opposition to the proposal.[55] South Korea proposed a "cyber secretariat" as an alternative.[55]

Members

[edit]

As of 2023, there are 21 members in the group: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States, the European Union and the African Union. Guest invitees include, among others, Spain, the United Nations, the World Bank and ASEAN.[56][57]

Representatives include, at the leaders' summits, the leaders of nineteen countries, the African Union and of the European Union, and, at the ministerial-level meetings, the finance ministers and central bank governors of nineteen countries, the African Union and of the European Union.

In addition, each year, the G20's guests include Spain;[58] the Chair of ASEAN; a representative of the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) and a country (sometimes more than one) invited by the presidency, usually from its own region.[59][60][61]

The first of the tables below lists the member entities and their leaders, finance ministers and central bank governors. The second table lists relevant statistics such as population and GDP figures for each member, as well as detailing memberships of other international organizations, such as the G7, BRICS and MIKTA. Total GDP figures are given in millions of US dollars.

In September 2023, at the 18th G20 Summit, Indian PM Narendra Modi announced that the African Union has been included as a member of the G20, making it the 21st member.[62]

Member of head of state and head of government

[edit]
Member Leader(s) Finance portfolio Portfolio minister Central bank Central bank governor
Argentina Javier Milei Minister of Economy Luis Caputo Central Bank of the Argentine Republic Santiago Bausili
Australia Anthony Albanese Treasurer Jim Chalmers Reserve Bank of Australia Michele Bullock
Brazil Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva Minister of Finance Fernando Haddad Central Bank of Brazil Gabriel Galípolo
Canada Mark Carney Minister of Finance François-Philippe Champagne Bank of Canada Tiff Macklem
China Xi Jinping[63] Minister of Finance Lan Fo'an People's Bank of China Pan Gongsheng
Li Qiang[64][65]
France Emmanuel Macron Minister of Economics and Finance Éric Lombard Bank of France François Villeroy de Galhau
Germany Friedrich Merz Minister of Finance Lars Klingbeil Deutsche Bundesbank Joachim Nagel
India Narendra Modi Minister of Finance Nirmala Sitharaman Reserve Bank of India Sanjay Malhotra
Indonesia Prabowo Subianto Minister of Finance Purbaya Yudhi Sadewa Bank Indonesia Perry Warjiyo
Italy Giorgia Meloni Minister of Economy and Finance Giancarlo Giorgetti Bank of Italy Fabio Panetta
Japan Sanae Takaichi Minister of Finance Satsuki Katayama Bank of Japan Kazuo Ueda
Mexico Claudia Sheinbaum Secretary of Finance and Public Credit Edgar Amador Zamora Bank of Mexico Victoria Rodríguez Ceja
Russia Vladimir Putin Minister of Finance Anton Siluanov Bank of Russia Elvira Nabiullina
Saudi Arabia Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud Minister of Finance Mohammed Al-Jadaan Saudi Central Bank Fahad Almubarak
South Africa Cyril Ramaphosa Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana South African Reserve Bank Lesetja Kganyago
South Korea Lee Jae Myung Minister of Economy and Finance Koo Yun-cheol Bank of Korea Rhee Chang-yong
Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Minister of Treasury and Finance Mehmet Şimşek Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Fatih Karahan
United Kingdom Keir Starmer Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves Bank of England Andrew Bailey
United States Donald Trump Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent Federal Reserve Jerome Powell
European Union[66] António Costa Commissioner for Economy Valdis Dombrovskis European Central Bank Christine Lagarde
Ursula von der Leyen
African Union João Lourenço Commissioner for Economic Affairs[67] Victor Harison[67] African Central Bank (yet to be established) TBA
Mahamoud Ali Youssouf

Member country data

[edit]
Member Trade
bil. USD (2022)[68] 		Nom. GDP
mil. USD (2025)[69] 		PPP GDP
mil. USD (2025)[69] 		Nom. GDP per capita
USD (2025)[69] 		PPP GDP per capita
USD (2025)[69] 		HDI
(2023)[70] 		Population
(2022)[71] 		Area
km2 		P5 G4 G7 BRICS MIKTA CPTPP RCEP APEC OECD DAC C'wth SCO IMF economy classification[72][73]
Argentina 170.1 683,533 1,493,423 14,362 31,379 0.865 46,300,000 2,780,400 No No No declined invitation to join[74] No No No No negotiating No No No Emerging
Australia 721.4 1,771,681 1,980,022 64,547 72,138 0.958 26,141,369 7,692,024 No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Advanced
Brazil 626.4 2,125,958 4,958,122 9,964 23,238 0.786 217,240,060 8,515,767 No Yes No Yes No No No No negotiating No No No Emerging
Canada 1,179.1 2,225,341 2,730,110 53,558 65,707 0.939 38,743,000 9,984,670 No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Advanced
China 6,309.6 19,231,705 40,716,448 13,687 28,978 0.797 1,411,750,000 9,596,960 Yes No No Yes No applicant Yes Yes participant No No Yes Emerging
France 1,435.8 3,211,292 4,503,783 46,792 65,626 0.920 68,305,148 640,679 Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No Advanced
Germany 3,226.9 4,744,804 6,161,002 55,911 72,599 0.959 84,316,622 357,114 No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No Advanced
India 1,176.8 4,187,017 17,647,050 2,878 12,132 0.685 1,406,632,000 3,287,263 No Yes No Yes No No No No participant No Yes Yes Emerging
Indonesia 529.4 1,429,743 5,009,483 5,027 17,612 0.728 279,088,893 1,904,569 No No No Yes Yes applicant Yes Yes negotiating No No No Emerging
Italy 1,346.4 2,422,855 3,719,110 41,091 63,076 0.915 61,095,551 301,336 No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes No No Advanced
Japan 1,644.2 4,186,431 6,741,192 33,956 54,677 0.925 125,592,404 377,930 No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Advanced
Mexico 1,204.5 1,692,640 3,395,916 12,692 25,463 0.789 131,541,424 1,964,375 No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Emerging
South Korea 1,415.0 1,790,322 3,365,052 34,642 65,112 0.937 51,844,834 100,210 No No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Advanced
Russia 772.3 2,076,396 7,191,718 14,258 49,383 0.832 145,807,429 17,098,242 Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes Emerging
Saudi Arabia 598.8 1,083,749 2,229,611 30,099 61,923 0.900 36,168,000 2,149,690 No No No invited No No No No No participant No partner Emerging
South Africa 259.1 410,338 1,025,615 6,397 15,989 0.741 61,060,000 1,221,037 No No No Yes No No No No participant No Yes No Emerging
Turkey 617.9 1,437,406 3,651,873 16,709 42,451 0.853 85,551,932 783,562 No No No partner (unconfirmed) Yes No No No Yes No No partner Emerging
United Kingdom 1,353.3 3,839,180 4,447,841 54,949 63,661 0.946 68,492,933 242,495 Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Advanced
United States 5,441.0 30,507,217 30,507,217 89,105 89,105 0.938 337,341,954 9,833,517 Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Advanced
European Union [d]5,858.4 19,991,160 29,176,749 44,225 64,545 0.900 446,828,803 4,233,262 No No Yes No No No No No participant Yes No No Advanced (majority)[e]
African Union 1,379.0 2,834,002 10,826,442 1,930[f] 7,373[g] 0.577[h] 1,393,676,444[i] 29,922,059 No No No No No No No No No No No No Emerging

In addition to these 21 members, the chief executive officers of several other international forums and institutions participate in meetings of the G20.[59] These include the managing director and Chairman of the International Monetary Fund, the President of the World Bank, the International Monetary and Financial Committee and the Chairman of the Development Assistance Committee.

The G20's membership does not reflect exactly the 21 largest economies of the world in any given year; as the organization states:[1]

In a forum such as the G20, it is particularly important for the number of countries involved to be restricted and fixed to ensure the effectiveness and continuity of its activity. There are no formal criteria for G20 membership and the composition of the group has remained unchanged since it was established. Because of the objectives of the G20, it was considered important that countries and regions of systemic significance for the international financial system be included. Aspects such as geographical balance and population representation also played a major part.

Role of Asian countries

[edit]

A 2011 report released by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) predicted that large Asian economies such as China and India would play a more important role in global economic governance in the future. The report claimed that the rise of emerging market economies heralded a new world order, in which the G20 would become the global economic steering committee.[75] The ADB furthermore noted that Asian countries had led the global recovery following the late-2000s recession. It predicted that the region would have a greater presence on the global stage, shaping the G20's agenda for balanced and sustainable growth through strengthening intraregional trade and stimulating domestic demand.[75]

Invitees

[edit]
G20 members (dark blue), countries represented through the European Union and African Union (light blue) and previously invited states (pink) as of 2024.

Typically, several participants that are not full members of the G20 are extended invitations to participate in the summits. Permanent guest invitees are: the government of Spain; the Chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and a representative of the New Partnership for Africa's Development are invited in their capacities as leaders of their organisations and as heads of government of their home states. In addition, the leaders of the Financial Stability Board, the International Labour Organization, the International Monetary Fund, the Group of 24, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations, the World Bank Group and the World Trade Organization are invited and participate in pre-summit planning within the policy purview of their respective organisation.[76][58][77]

Other invitees are chosen by the host country, usually one or two countries from its region.[77] For example, South Korea invited Singapore. International organisations which have been invited in the past include the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), the Eurasian Economic Community (EAEC), the European Central Bank (ECB), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the Global Governance Group (3G) and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Previously, the Netherlands had a similar status to Spain while the rotating presidency of the Council of the European Union would also receive an invitation, but only in that capacity and not as their own state's leader (such as the Czech premiers Mirek Topolánek and Jan Fischer during the 2009 summits).

Permanent guest invitees

[edit]
Invitee Officeholder State Official title
International Labour Organization (ILO) Gilbert Houngbo — Director General
International Monetary Fund (IMF) Kristalina Georgieva — Managing Director
Intergovernmental Group of Twenty-Four (G-24) Iyabo Masha — Director
Spain[58] Pedro Sánchez Spain Prime Minister
New Partnership for Africa's Development (AUDA-NEPAD) Abdel Fattah El-Sisi Egypt President (chair)
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Mathias Cormann — Secretary-General
United Nations (UN) António Guterres — Secretary-General
World Bank Group (WBG) Ajay Banga — President
World Health Organization (WHO) Tedros Adhanom — Director General
World Trade Organization (WTO) Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala — Director General

Agenda

[edit]

Financial focus

[edit]

The initial G20 agenda, as conceived by US, Canadian and German policymakers, was very much focused on the sustainability of sovereign debt and global financial stability, in an inclusive format that would bring in the largest developing economies as equal partners. During a summit in November 2008, the leaders of the group pledged to contribute trillions to international financial organizations, including the World Bank and IMF, mainly for re-establishing the global financial system.[78][79]

Since inception, the recurring themes covered by G20 summit participants have related in priority to global economic growth, international trade and financial market regulation.[80]

The G20 has led the Debt Service Suspension Initiative, through which official bilateral creditors suspended debt repayments of 73 of the poorest debtor countries.[81]: 134 

Growth and sustainability

[edit]

The G20 countries account for almost 75% of global carbon emissions.[82] After the adoption of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Climate Agreement in 2015, more "issues of global significance"[80][83] were added to the G20 agenda: migration, digitisation, employment, healthcare, the economic empowerment of women, development aid[84] and stopping climate change.[85]

The G20 countries account for almost 75% of the global carbon emissions and promised in 2009 to phase out 'inefficient subsidies'. Despite these promises G20 members have subsidised fossil fuel companies over $3.3 trillion between 2015 and 2021,[82] with several states increasing subsidies; Australia (+48.2%), the US (+36.7%), Indonesia (+26.6%), France (+23.8%), China (+4.1%), Brazil (+3.0%), Mexico (+2.6%).[82] China alone generates over half of the coal-generated electricity in the world.[86]

Interrelated themes

[edit]

Wolfgang Schäuble, German Federal Minister of Finance, had insisted on the interconnected nature of the issues facing G20 countries, be they purely financial or developmental, and the need to reach effective, cross-cutting policy measures: "Globalization has lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty, but there is also a growing rise in frustration in some quarters […] development, [national] security and migration are all interlinked".[83]

G20 engagement groups

[edit]

The G20 engagement groups and pre-conferences are independent collectives that are led by organisations of the host country. They represent a diverse group of stakeholders and work collectively to develop non-binding policy recommendations formally submitted to the G20 leaders for consideration.

For the 2022 G20 hosted by Indonesia, there are 10 engagement groups formed to facilitate independent stakeholders in developing proposals and policy recommendations for G20 leaders.

Startup20 and other few engagement groups initiated under the G20 India Presidency of 2023.[87]

Influence and accountability

[edit]

The G20's prominent membership gives it a strong input on global policy despite lacking any formal ability to enforce rules. There are disputes over the legitimacy of the G20,[88] and criticisms of its organisation and the efficacy of its declarations.[89]

The G20's transparency and accountability have been questioned by critics, who call attention to the absence of a formal charter and the fact that the most important G20 meetings are closed-door.[90] In 2001, the economist Frances Stewart proposed an Economic Security Council within the United Nations as an alternative to the G20. In such a council, members would be elected by the General Assembly based on their importance to the world economy, and the contribution they are willing to provide to world economic development.[91]

The cost and extent of summit-related security is often a contentious issue in the hosting country, and G20 summits have attracted protesters from a variety of backgrounds, including information activists, opponents of fractional-reserve banking and anti-capitalists. In 2010, the Toronto G20 summit sparked mass protests and rioting, leading to the largest mass arrest in Canada's history.[92]

Views on the G20's exclusivity of membership

[edit]

Although the G20 has stated that the group's "economic weight and broad membership gives it a high degree of legitimacy and influence over the management of the global economy and financial system",[93] its legitimacy has been challenged. A 2011 report for the Danish Institute for International Studies criticised the G20's exclusivity, particularly highlighting its underrepresentation of African countries and its practice of inviting observers from non-member states as a mere "concession at the margins", which does not grant the organisation representational legitimacy.[94] Concerning the membership issue, US President Barack Obama noted the difficulty of pleasing everyone: "Everybody wants the smallest possible group that includes them. So, if they're the 21st largest nation in the world, they want the G-21, and think it's highly unfair if they have been cut out."[95] Others stated in 2011 that the exclusivity is not an insurmountable problem and proposed mechanisms by which it could become more inclusive.[96]

Norwegian perspective

[edit]

In line with Norway's emphasis on inclusive international processes, the United Nations, and the UN system, in a 2010 interview with Der Spiegel, the current prime minister of Norway Jonas Gahr Støre called the G20 "one of the greatest setbacks since World War II"[12] as 173 states who are all members of the UN are not among the G20. This includes Norway, a major developed economy and the seventh-largest contributor to UN international development programs,[97] which is not a member state of the EU, and thus is not represented in the G20 even indirectly.[12] Norway, like other such states, has little or no voice within the group. Støre argued that the G20 undermines the legitimacy of international organizations set up in the aftermath of World War II, such as the IMF, World Bank and United Nations:

The G20 is a self-appointed group. Its composition is determined by the major countries and powers. It may be more representative than the G7 or the G8, in which only the richest countries are represented, but it is still arbitrary. We no longer live in the 19th century, a time when the major powers met and redrew the map of the world. No one needs a new Congress of Vienna.[12]

However, Norway, has moderated this position in practice, and has contributed to a number of G20-work streams for years, in particular on health, energy and climate. Under the government of Erna Solberg, Norway attended the 2017 G20 summit in Hamburg, Germany.[98]

Spanish position on membership

[edit]

Spain is the world's twelfth largest economy by nominal GDP (the fifteenth largest by purchasing power parity), the fourth in the European Union, and the second among Spanish-speaking countries. In addition, since the 1990s several Spanish companies have gained multinational status, and Spain is an important foreign investor worldwide. Its numbers[clarification needed] exceed the numbers of several current members of the G20 such as Argentina or South Africa. This has led to what Henley et al consider to be a de facto position as a member of the G20. However, Spain, a permanent guest, does not plan to request official membership.[58]

Polish aspirations

[edit]

In contrast with the Spanish position, the Polish government has repeatedly asked to join the G20.

Before the 2009 G20 London summit, the Polish government expressed an interest in joining with Spain and the Netherlands and condemned an "organisational mess" in which a few European leaders spoke in the name of the collective EU without legitimate authorisation in cases which belong to the European Commission.[citation needed]

During a 2010 meeting with foreign diplomats, Polish president Lech Kaczyński said:

The Polish economy is according to our data the 18th world economy. The place of my country is among the members of the G20. This is a very simple postulate: firstly – it results from the size of the Polish economy, secondly – it results from the fact that Poland is the biggest country in its region and the biggest country that has experienced a certain story. That story is a political and economic transformation.[99]

In 2012, Tim Ferguson wrote in Forbes that swapping Argentina for Poland should be considered, claiming that the Polish economy was headed toward a leadership role in Europe and its membership would be more legitimate.[100][101] A similar opinion was expressed by Marcin Sobczyk in the Wall Street Journal.[102] Mamta Murthi from the World Bank said: "To be in 'a club', what Poland can do is to continue working as if it already is in the club it wants to join."[103]

In 2014, consulting company Ernst & Young published its report about optimal members for G20. After analyzing trade, institutional and investment links Poland was included as one of the optimal members.[104]

G20 membership has been part of the look program of Poland's Law and Justice party and President Andrzej Duda.[105] In March 2017, Deputy Prime Minister of Poland Mateusz Morawiecki took part in a meeting of G20 financial ministers in Baden-Baden as the first Polish representative.[106][107]

In September 2025, Polish President Karol Nawrocki announced that he had received an invitation from American President Donald Trump, to attend the G20 Summit, which will take place in 2026 in Miami, Florida. The statement was made following a meeting between the two presidents at the White House. According to the Head of the International Policy Bureau of the Chancellery of the President of Poland, Minister Marcin Przydacz, Nawrocki’s invitation to the G20 Summit marks the beginning of the process of Poland’s accession to the group of G20 countries[108][109].

Global Governance Group (3G) response

[edit]

In June 2010, Singapore's representative to the United Nations warned the G20 that its decisions would affect "all countries, big and small", and asserted that prominent non-G20 members should be included in financial reform discussions.[110] Singapore thereafter took a leading role in organizing the Global Governance Group (3G), an informal grouping of 30 non-G20 countries (including several microstates and many Third World countries) to collectively channel their views into the G20 process more effectively.[111][112][113] Singapore's chairing of the 3G was cited as a rationale for inviting Singapore to the November 2010 G20 summit in South Korea,[114] as well as 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 summits.[citation needed]

Foreign Policy critiques

[edit]

The American magazine Foreign Policy has published articles condemning the G20, in terms of its principal function as an alternative to the supposedly exclusive G8. It questions the actions of some of the G20 members and advances the notion that some states should not have membership in the first place. Furthermore, with the effects of the Great Recession still ongoing, the magazine has criticized the G20's efforts to implement reforms of the world's financial institutions, branding such efforts as failures.[115]

Calls for removal of Russia

[edit]

In March 2022, following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, U.S. President Joe Biden called for the removal of Russia from the group. Alternatively, he suggested that Ukraine be allowed to attend the G20 2022 summit, despite its lack of membership.[116] Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau also said the group should "re-evaluate" Russia's participation.[117] Russia claims it would not be a significant issue, as most G20 members are already fighting Russia economically due to the war.[118] China suggested that expelling Russia would be counterproductive.[116] In November 2022, Indonesia and Russia stated that Vladimir Putin would not attend the G20 summit in person, but may attend virtually.[119] During the 2022 summit, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy appeared in a video statement and repeatedly addressed the assembly as the 'G19' as a means of indicating his viewpoint that Russia should be removed from the group.[120] Despite the group refusing criticism on Russia directly in 2023 for the war, Putin was not present at the G20 summit due to the arrest warrant issued by the ICC in 2024.[121][122]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

G20

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Group of Twenty (G20) is an intergovernmental forum uniting the finance ministers and central bank governors of 19 major economies—Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States—along with representatives from the European Union and, since 2023, the African Union. These members collectively account for about 85% of global gross domestic product, over 75% of international trade, and approximately two-thirds of the world's population, positioning the G20 as a key venue for discussing systemic economic challenges. Established in 1999 in the aftermath of the 1997–1998 Asian financial crisis, the G20 originated as an informal body for coordinating measures among industrialized and emerging-market nations, expanding to annual leaders' summits in to address the global financial meltdown through joint stimulus and regulatory reforms. The forum's rotating presidency, held by in 2025, facilitates agenda-setting on priorities like sustainable growth, poverty reduction, and climate finance, though its non-binding declarations rely on voluntary compliance amid members' divergent national interests. While the G20's coordinated response to the 2008 crisis averted deeper via trillions in fiscal support and strengthened financial oversight frameworks, empirical assessments highlight waning effectiveness in subsequent years, with policy coordination faltering on issues like trade imbalances and debt crises due to geopolitical frictions and institutional limitations. Critics, drawing from analyses of summit outcomes, argue the group's exclusivity undermines broader legitimacy, as it excludes over 170 nations despite engaging non-members selectively, and its consensus-driven model has struggled with enforcement, evidenced by persistent global economic disparities and unaddressed vulnerabilities like those exposed in the downturn.

History

Origins as Finance Ministers' Forum

The Group of Twenty (G20) originated in response to the Asian financial crisis of 1997–1998, which exposed limitations in the existing architecture of international economic cooperation dominated by advanced economies through forums like the and G10. The crisis, beginning in in July 1997 and spreading across , led to sharp currency depreciations, banking failures, and recessions in affected countries, prompting calls for more inclusive dialogue involving major emerging markets to prevent future systemic risks. On September 25, 1999, during a meeting of G7 finance ministers and central bank governors in Washington, D.C., the decision was announced to establish the G20 as a permanent forum to broaden consultations on global economic and financial issues. This initiative aimed to incorporate systemic emerging economies—such as those in Asia, Latin America, and elsewhere—into discussions on international financial stability, recognizing that the G7 alone could not adequately address interconnected global challenges. The G20's membership comprised finance ministers and central bank governors from 19 countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States) plus the European Union, selected for their representation of approximately 85% of global GDP at the time. The inaugural G20 meeting occurred on December 15–16, 1999, in , , hosted by German Finance Minister Hans Eichel. Participants issued a communiqué emphasizing sustained , , and enhanced surveillance of like the IMF and World Bank, while committing to reforms in crisis prevention and resolution mechanisms. From its inception, the G20 operated informally without a or fixed secretariat, relying on consensus-driven meetings typically held three times annually to coordinate policy responses to macroeconomic imbalances and financial vulnerabilities. This structure reflected a pragmatic effort to foster among diverse economies without the bureaucratic rigidities of formal organizations, though it drew early criticism from some quarters for lacking enforceable commitments.

Elevation to Leaders' Level

The G20, initially comprising finance ministers and central bank governors since its inception in 1999, was elevated to the heads-of-state and government level in response to the escalating global of 2008. This shift occurred as the crisis, originating from the U.S. subprime collapse and spreading through interconnected financial systems, threatened worldwide , with major institutions like failing on September 15, 2008. Leaders recognized that the / format, dominated by advanced economies, lacked sufficient representation of emerging markets—which accounted for a growing share of global GDP—and thus could not effectively coordinate a comprehensive response. The decision to convene G20 leaders was driven by the need for broader legitimacy and decisiveness, given that G20 members represented approximately 85% of global GDP, 75% of global trade, and two-thirds of the at the time. The inaugural G20 Leaders' Summit took place on November 14–15, 2008, in , hosted by U.S. President at the . Attended by leaders from the 19 member countries plus the , the summit produced the Washington Declaration, in which participants committed to immediate actions including enhanced financial market surveillance, reforms to like the IMF and World Bank, and principles for sustainable economic recovery. Key pledges encompassed strengthening transparency and accountability in financial institutions, resisting , and ensuring no failures of systemically important institutions without appropriate public intervention. This elevation marked a pragmatic acknowledgment that multilateral coordination at the highest level was essential to mitigate the crisis's contagion effects, bypassing slower formal institutions. Subsequent summits solidified the G20's role as the premier forum for international economic cooperation, formalized in the London Summit's communiqués. The transition reflected causal realities of : advanced economies' policies had spillover effects on emerging ones, necessitating inclusive dialogue to avoid fragmented responses that could exacerbate downturns. While the G20 finance track continued to prepare agendas, leaders' involvement enabled binding commitments on fiscal stimulus totaling over $5 trillion globally by , credited with averting a deeper depression, though debates persist on the long-term efficacy of these measures amid varying national implementations.

Evolution Through Major Crises

The G20's response to the 2008 global financial crisis solidified its role as a crisis coordination body, with leaders committing at the London Summit on April 2, 2009, to a $5 trillion fiscal stimulus package and over $1.1 trillion in additional resources for the , World Bank, and other institutions to support global liquidity and . This included tripling IMF lending capacity to $500 billion and establishing the to monitor systemic risks, marking an institutional evolution from informal consultations to structured regulatory oversight. At the Pittsburgh Summit on September 24-25, 2009, leaders designated the G20 as the "premier forum for international economic cooperation," shifting focus from immediate firefighting to long-term frameworks for sustainable growth, including commitments to rebalance global demand and reform financial regulations like higher capital requirements for banks. Subsequent crises tested this framework, particularly the sovereign peaking in 2010-2012, where G20 summits in (June 2010) and Cannes (November 2011) endorsed enhanced IMF resources and European firewall mechanisms, such as the , to prevent contagion while urging fiscal consolidation to address underlying imbalances in public debt and competitiveness. The Los Cabos Summit in June 2012 further committed $430 billion to the IMF's New Arrangements to Borrow, reflecting adaptation to regional spillovers but highlighting limits in enforcing intra-group policy alignment amid divergent national priorities. These responses evolved the G20's agenda beyond finance to macroeconomic coordination, though effectiveness was constrained by non-binding commitments and geopolitical frictions, as evidenced by incomplete implementation of promised reforms. The prompted a rapid pivot to and coordination, with the extraordinary virtual summit hosted by on March 26, 2020, launching the Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI) for 73 low-income countries, suspending $12 billion in payments through 2020 and extending it to mid-2021, alongside pledges for $8 billion in concessional financing via IMF . Later summits, including Italy's 2021 meeting, expanded to equity through the facility and supply chain resilience, demonstrating agility in addressing multifaceted shocks but revealing persistent challenges in equitable burden-sharing, as wealthier members provided disproportionate aid while emerging markets pushed for broader debt restructuring via the Common Framework. This era underscored the G20's maturation into a hybrid economic- forum, yet critiques noted uneven outcomes, with global growth disparities widening due to varied stimulus scales and distribution inequities. More recent crises, such as the 2022 energy shocks and inflation surge following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, further strained consensus, as seen at the Summit in November 2022, where leaders issued a rare joint statement condemning the war and committing to food and measures, including $25 billion in support, while navigating exclusions of from some tracks. These adaptations highlight the G20's resilience in forging minimal viable agreements amid polarization, evolving from finance-centric origins to a broader, albeit fragmented, platform for crisis mitigation, without formal institutional upgrades like a permanent secretariat.

Membership and Representation

Core Member States and European Union

The Group of Twenty (G20) comprises 19 core member states and the (EU), selected for their systemic economic significance in the . These members represent advanced and emerging economies from diverse regions, ensuring broad geographical coverage including , , , , , and the . The core member states are , , , , , , , , , , , , the Republic of Korea, , , , , the , and the . Collectively, the G20 members account for approximately 85% of global (GDP), 75% of , and two-thirds of the world's , underscoring their dominant role in shaping global economic policies. Membership remains fixed without formal admission or expulsion processes, reflecting an informal consensus on representation of economies with substantial impact on international stability. No explicit quantitative criteria, such as GDP thresholds, govern inclusion; instead, selections prioritize a mix of industrialized nations and rapidly growing developing markets to address imbalances in prior forums like the G7. The holds full membership status alongside its individual member states , , and , allowing coordinated representation of European interests without double-counting in voting or rotational presidencies. The EU participates through its rotating Presidency, the President, and the President, focusing on areas like trade, climate, and where supranational authority applies. This dual structure—EU as a bloc plus select national members—enhances Europe's influence, as the three EU states represent key economies within the group, though the EU itself does not rotate the G20 chairmanship. Other EU countries, such as and the , frequently attend as permanent guests to align with broader European positions.

Selection Criteria and Economic Rationale

The G20 membership was established in 1999 for its finance ministers' forum, comprising advanced and emerging economies deemed systemically important to global financial stability, selected through consultations involving the , , and other key actors following the Asian financial crisis. These countries were chosen based on their substantial economic weight, including large shares of global GDP and trade, alongside considerations of regional representation to ensure broad coverage of influences on international . No formal, codified criteria exist for membership, distinguishing the G20 from organizations like the with predefined accession rules; instead, selection emphasized nations whose domestic policies could generate spillovers affecting the world economy, prioritizing those with significant capabilities and vulnerabilities in interconnected financial systems. The economic rationale centers on fostering coordination among actors responsible for the majority of global economic activity, thereby enhancing crisis prevention and response effectiveness in a multipolar where unilateral actions by major players could destabilize others. This approach reflects recognition that post-1997 crises exposed limitations of prior forums like the , which underrepresented fast-growing emerging markets; including entities like , , and ensured the group captured dynamics from both developed and developing spheres, promoting legitimacy through collective economic heft rather than equal per-capita representation. Together, the 19 sovereign member states, the , and (since 2023) the account for approximately 85% of global GDP, over 75% of , and about two-thirds of the , underscoring the rationale of concentrating dialogue on entities driving aggregate output and flows. Critics note that this selection process, while pragmatic, has led to exclusions of smaller but regionally pivotal economies, potentially limiting the forum's universality, though proponents argue the focus on systemic scale justifies the composition to avoid diluting decision-making efficacy. The absence of periodic review mechanisms reinforces the initial rationale of stability in membership to prioritize substantive policy outcomes over expansive inclusivity.

Regional Dynamics and Asian Influence

The G20 incorporates five major Asian economies—China, India, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and —as full members, reflecting the region's outsized role in global economic output and growth. These nations collectively represented 32% of global GDP in 2025, a rise from 22% in 2000, driven by rapid industrialization, population scale, and integration into global supply chains. Their inclusion in the G20, formalized during its elevation to leaders' level in , addressed the need to include systemically important emerging markets beyond Western dominance, particularly after the exposed gaps in prior forums like the G7. This representation ensures Asia's voice in coordinating responses to crises, such as the 2008 global meltdown where joint stimulus pledges by and others stabilized demand. China exerts the most substantial influence among Asian members, leveraging its position as the world's second-largest economy (nominal GDP of approximately $18.5 trillion in 2024) to advocate for multilateral reforms favoring developing nations, including greater IMF quota shares for emerging markets. However, its priorities often align with state-led development models, as seen in resistance to stringent commitments at the 2021 environment ministers' meeting, where joined and in blocking language. , with a GDP surpassing $3.5 trillion in 2024, emphasizes and digital infrastructure, using its 2023 presidency to secure permanent membership, a move analysts attribute to diluting 's sway over Global South agendas amid border disputes and economic competition. , as the third-largest economy ($4.1 trillion GDP in 2024), focuses on and supply chain resilience, often partnering with to promote "quality infrastructure" alternatives to 's , evident in joint G20 pushes for transparent investment standards. The Republic of Korea and contribute through innovation-driven policies and resource management, respectively, with South Korea advocating semiconductor safeguards and highlighting commodity trade vulnerabilities. Intra-Asian dynamics introduce tensions that subtly shape G20 deliberations, as bilateral rivalries—such as Sino-Indian territorial conflicts and Japan's disputes with over the —spill into economic positions on trade barriers and technology transfers. Despite this, cooperation prevails on shared priorities like countering , with Asian members collectively driving G20 initiatives for WTO reforms and for low-income countries during the COVID-19 recovery phase, where pledges exceeded $100 billion in liquidity support by 2021. These dynamics underscore Asia's pivot from peripheral to central in , prioritizing empirical over ideological divides, though source analyses from Western think tanks may understate internal Asian agency due to focus on great-power competition. Regional forums like engage peripherally via guest status, amplifying Southeast Asian input on without formal membership, as Indonesia's 2022 demonstrated through biodiversity pacts. Overall, Asian influence bolsters the G20's legitimacy by anchoring decisions in high-growth realities, accounting for over 50% of global GDP expansion in the 2015–2025 decade through channels.

Organizational Framework

Chairmanship Rotation and Summit Mechanics

The G20 presidency rotates annually among its member states to distribute responsibilities and ensure diverse perspectives in agenda-setting. The rotation selects the host country from a different predefined regional grouping each year, with the 19 country members divided into five groups of up to four nations each to promote geographic balance: (China, , , ), Group 2 (, , , ), Group 3 (, , ), Group 4 (, , , ), and Group 5 (, , , ). This system, formalized after the initial years, began with in 2010 and continues to cycle through groups sequentially. To maintain continuity across presidencies, the G20 employs a troika mechanism comprising the current, previous, and incoming host countries, which coordinate on agenda preparation and implementation. This arrangement, adopted at the 2011 Summit, facilitates smoother transitions by allowing the outgoing to brief successors and align on ongoing priorities. The transition typically occurs on December 1, as seen in the handover from to in 2024. The host presidency assumes responsibility for organizing the annual leaders' summit and over 100 preparatory meetings, establishing a temporary secretariat staffed by national officials rather than a permanent bureaucracy. G20 operations proceed through two parallel tracks: the Finance Track, led by finance ministers and central bank governors to address monetary policy, financial regulation, and fiscal coordination; and the Sherpa Track, guided by leaders' personal representatives (sherpas) for broader issues like trade, development, and global risks. Sherpas negotiate draft communiqués through iterative meetings, often starting months in advance, while deputies handle technical details in working groups. Summit outcomes culminate in a leaders' or communiqué, reflecting consensus on key priorities, though relies on voluntary compliance among members. Ministerial meetings under each track feed into the final agenda, with the host integrating input from engagement groups and guest nations to shape discussions. This decentralized process, lacking binding authority, emphasizes and shared economic interests for advancing cooperation.

Engagement Groups and Stakeholder Input

The G20 Engagement Groups comprise independent coalitions of non-governmental stakeholders, including , , labor unions, think tanks, , women, and urban representatives, which provide policy recommendations to G20 leaders and contribute to agenda-setting. These groups emerged as a mechanism to incorporate diverse inputs into the forum's deliberations, operating autonomously from governments while aligning with the annual presidency's priorities; they submit formal communiqués or position papers before summits, influencing sherpa and ministerial tracks without binding authority. Typically numbering 13 groups, the core entities include the Business 20 (B20), established in 2010 to aggregate views on trade, investment, and growth; Civil 20 (C20), which channels demands on inequality, climate, and ; Labour 20 (L20), representing workers' organizations on and ; Think Tanks 20 (T20), focusing on analysis; Youth 20 (Y20) for participants aged 18-30 addressing ; Women 20 (W20) on ; and Urban 20 (U20) for mayors tackling challenges. Supplementary groups, such as Science 20 (S20) or networks, vary by host country but follow similar consultative processes through task forces and stakeholder dialogues. Engagement occurs via periodic meetings, working groups, and consultations organized under the , culminating in recommendations presented at summits; for instance, during India's 2023 , groups coordinated on themes like and , with inputs integrated into the Leaders' Declaration. While these mechanisms enhance inclusivity—representing over 85% of global GDP through member economies' stakeholder ecosystems—their influence remains advisory, subject to G20 consensus and occasionally critiqued for limited enforcement or in group selection.

Institutional Proposals and Secretariat Debates

The G20 lacks a permanent secretariat, with administrative functions handled by the host country's foreign ministry and finance ministry, supplemented by the troika mechanism involving the past, current, and future presidencies to provide continuity across annual rotations. This informal structure, established post-2009 Pittsburgh Summit, prioritizes flexibility in agenda-setting by each presidency over fixed institutional apparatus. Proponents of institutionalization argue that without dedicated staff, knowledge transfer depends heavily on voluntary sherpa-level coordination, risking inconsistencies in tracking commitments across summits. Early proposals for a formal secretariat emerged amid the response, as leaders sought mechanisms to sustain post-crisis reforms beyond ad hoc meetings. In 2010, French President called for a permanent G20 secretariat akin to those of the or , aiming to centralize research, documentation, and follow-up on macroeconomic coordination. This initiative received partial endorsement, such as from South Korean officials during their 2010 presidency, who highlighted its potential for streamlined operations. Subsequent discussions, including during France's 2011 presidency, revisited the idea through working groups but failed to advance due to divergent member priorities. Debates intensified around pros of a secretariat—such as enhanced for long-term issues like and , and mitigation of risks from variable host capacities, where an under-resourced presidency could disrupt proceedings. Chinese analysts, for instance, have advocated for it to bolster macroeconomic and rules, viewing it as essential for elevating the G20's role in . Counterarguments emphasize cons, including the potential for bureaucratic inertia that could dilute the forum's crisis-responsive agility, as each presidency's unique priorities drive innovation without entrenched staff influencing outcomes. Critics, including Indian observers, contend that formalization might reduce member accountability, allowing reliance on a neutral body rather than active national engagement, and complicate consensus among diverse economies. The absence of a fixed location for any proposed secretariat has also raised concerns about equitable hosting burdens. No permanent secretariat has been established as of , with recent presidencies like Brazil's maintaining the troika's role in continuity while rejecting structural overhauls amid low consensus on institutional . Think tanks have floated hybrid "non-secretariats"—lean, member-funded units for logistics and tracking without executive power—but these remain conceptual, reflecting broader reluctance to emulate formalized bodies like the , which adopted a partial secretariat in 2014. The debates underscore tensions between emerging economies favoring permanence for sustained influence and established members prioritizing informality to avoid diluted in .

Policy Focus Areas

Financial Stability and Macroeconomic Coordination

The G20 has prioritized since its elevation to leaders' level summits amid the global financial crisis, coordinating regulatory reforms and emergency liquidity measures to prevent . At the inaugural Washington Summit on , , leaders committed to urgent actions including enhanced prudential oversight, increased IMF resources, and market stabilization efforts across member states. This response facilitated a collective fiscal stimulus estimated at over 5% of global GDP and regulatory tightening to address vulnerabilities exposed by subprime mortgage failures and ' collapse. Subsequent London Summit commitments in April 2009 mobilized approximately $1.1 trillion for , including $500 billion in new IMF lending capacity, which supported vulnerable economies and curbed contagion. A cornerstone achievement was the establishment of the (FSB) in April 2009 as successor to the Financial Stability Forum, formalized by G20 leaders at the Summit in 2009 with an expanded mandate to monitor systemic risks, promote regulatory coherence, and address "" institutions. The FSB coordinates on shadow banking oversight, resolution frameworks for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), and over-the-counter reforms, reporting annually to G20 finance ministers on implementation progress. These efforts underpinned standards, agreed under G20 auspices via the , which raised capital requirements to 7% of risk-weighted assets for common equity Tier 1 by 2019 and introduced liquidity coverage ratios to mitigate liquidity mismatches—phased implementation across G20 jurisdictions has enhanced bank resilience, as evidenced by limited failures during the 2020 shock. On macroeconomic coordination, the G20 Framework (FWG), co-chaired by members like and , facilitates dialogue on cyclical and structural policies, global imbalances, and risk monitoring. Integral to this is the Mutual Assessment Process (MAP), launched at in 2009, whereby the IMF analyzes G20 policy spillovers against shared indicators for strong, sustainable, and balanced growth, culminating in peer-reviewed action plans—such as the 2010 update urging fiscal consolidation in surplus economies and structural reforms in deficit ones. The MAP has informed post-crisis rebalancing, though empirical assessments indicate uneven progress, with persistent imbalances in savings-investment gaps among members. Complementary initiatives include the G20 Data Gaps Initiative, endorsed in 2009 to fill informational voids revealed by , delivering 20 recommendations on economic and financial data standards by 2022. Overall, these mechanisms have shifted global economic governance toward plurilateral oversight, though challenges persist in enforcing commitments amid divergent national priorities.

Growth, Trade, and Development Policies

The G20 has prioritized policies aimed at fostering strong, sustainable, balanced, and inclusive among its members, which collectively represent approximately 85% of global GDP and two-thirds of the world's . These efforts include commitments to structural reforms, such as labor market flexibility, investment in , and innovation-driven productivity gains, to counteract projected medium-term growth slowdowns. For instance, the has noted that growth in most G20 economies is expected to weaken over the next five years relative to pre-pandemic trends, underscoring the need for targeted reforms in areas like competition policy and fiscal sustainability. In trade policy, G20 leaders have repeatedly affirmed support for a rules-based multilateral trading , emphasizing the role of in driving growth and development, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and developing economies. Key commitments include enhancing access to digital technologies for SMEs and promoting facilitation to integrate developing countries into global value chains. However, empirical evidence from monitoring reveals a pattern of increasing trade restrictiveness, with G20 economies introducing more trade-restrictive measures than facilitating ones between mid-May and mid-October 2023, including tariffs, quotas, and export restrictions. This trend has persisted despite anti- pledges, as seen in the 2017 finance ministers' decision to drop explicit language on resisting protectionism amid U.S. opposition, highlighting tensions between rhetorical commitments and national policy actions. Development policies under the G20 framework are coordinated primarily through the Development Working Group (DWG), which addresses gaps in low-income countries by focusing on , , and alignment with the 2030 Agenda for . The DWG monitors collective actions across G20 members to implement the (SDGs), including initiatives on integrated national financing frameworks (INFFs) to mobilize domestic resources and scale systems. Recent DWG outcomes, such as the 2025 ministerial declaration on and calls to combat illicit financial flows, aim to enhance universal access to basic services in developing economies, though implementation varies due to differing national priorities. A cornerstone of G20 development and growth strategies is infrastructure investment, facilitated by the Global Infrastructure Hub (GI Hub), established in 2014 to bridge public-private sector gaps and catalyze quality investments. The GI Hub promotes frameworks for leveraging private capital in sustainable projects, estimating global needs at trillions of dollars across sectors like and , while addressing investment gaps in emerging markets. During the South African presidency in 2025, trade and investment tracks have emphasized harnessing for and employment, with deliberations on resilient supply chains and digital trade to support development objectives.

Sustainability, Climate, and Emerging Global Risks

The G20 addresses sustainability and climate issues through its Environment and Climate Sustainability Working Group (ECSWG), established to coordinate among members representing about 83% of global CO2 emissions in 2024. Ministerial declarations, such as the October 2024 statement, reaffirm support for the and urge accelerated action on , , and finance, including mobilizing resources for vulnerable nations. However, empirical assessments show G20 national climate strategies remain insufficient to align with Paris temperature limits, with projections indicating a need for at least 50% non-fossil across members by 2035 to preserve 1.5°C feasibility. Sustainability efforts emphasize practical domains like combating , , and via financial commitments, alongside principles for a resilient that promote conservation and sustainable marine resource use. Recent priorities under the 2025 South African presidency included elevating as a focus, culminating in declarations committing to reduction, protection of vulnerable populations, and shared clean air goals. These build on prior outcomes, such as 2023 high-level principles for sustainability, which stress alongside restoration. Implementation varies, with G20 countries collectively holding over 1,600 national policies as of 2019, predominantly in and sectors, though enforcement gaps persist due to differing national capacities and priorities. Emerging global risks in G20 discussions integrate climate-related threats with broader vulnerabilities, including escalating disaster frequency, intensity, and geographic spread, which impede . The 2025 Disaster Risk Reduction Ministerial Declaration highlights the need to reduce vulnerabilities and inequalities through accessible early warning systems, risk financing, and integration of disaster resilience into economic policies. Initiatives like G20-endorsed compendiums on risk transfer solutions aim to enhance financial resilience in low-income countries against shocks via and parametric tools. Broader risks, such as disruptions from and the economic toll of unmitigated hazards—estimated at $218 billion annually for G20 economies—underscore calls for public-private partnerships in catastrophe to close protection gaps.

Achievements and Impacts

Crisis Response Mechanisms

The G20's crisis response mechanisms primarily operate through its flexible summit architecture and ministerial tracks, enabling rapid coordination among leaders of the world's largest economies without a formal secretariat or binding enforcement powers. Established at the finance minister level in 1999 amid the Asian financial crisis, the forum was elevated to leaders' summits starting in November 2008 to address the global (GFC), marking its debut as a premier crisis-management body. This elevation facilitated unprecedented macroeconomic policy alignment, including commitments to fiscal stimulus totaling approximately 2% of global GDP and monetary easing to counteract recessionary pressures. A cornerstone mechanism emerged from the GFC response: the creation of the at the 2009 Summit, expanding the mandate of the prior Financial Stability Forum to include all G20 members, major , and standard-setting bodies. The FSB monitors systemic risks, develops regulatory standards—such as those for systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) and over-the-counter —and coordinates , contributing to post-crisis reforms like capital requirements that bolstered bank resilience. G20 leaders endorsed these through annual communiqués, leveraging and mutual assessments to promote compliance, though effectiveness relies on domestic adoption rather than supranational authority. In subsequent crises, the G20 adapted similar ad hoc initiatives. During the , it launched the Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI) on , , enabling 73 low-income countries to suspend bilateral payments to G20 official creditors from May through December 2021, freeing up an estimated $12.9 billion for health and economic needs. This was complemented by the Common Framework for Debt Treatments, extending DSSI principles to broader restructuring for unsustainable , involving coordination and private creditor participation. Empirical data indicate DSSI participation covered about 40% of eligible service, aiding fiscal space in vulnerable economies, though uptake was constrained by concerns and exclusion of multilateral . These mechanisms underscore the G20's in forging consensus among diverse economies during acute shocks, as evidenced by its role in tripling IMF resources to $500 billion in and mobilizing over $1 trillion in crisis lending. However, responses often prioritize short-term stabilization over long-term structural reforms, with coordination challenged by geopolitical divergences, as seen in uneven implementation of GFC-era pledges.

Policy Reforms and Global Economic Stabilization

The G20's elevation to the premier forum for international economic cooperation at the 2009 Summit marked a pivotal reform, transitioning it from finance ministers' meetings to leaders' level discussions amid the global financial crisis. This shift facilitated coordinated fiscal stimulus packages totaling approximately 5% of global GDP across member economies, which empirical analyses credit with averting a deeper by supporting demand and stabilizing financial markets. Subsequent reforms emphasized macroeconomic coordination through the Framework for Strong, Sustainable, and Balanced Growth, including the Mutual Assessment Process, where members peer-reviewed national policies to align global imbalances. In response to the 2008 crisis's root causes—such as excessive leverage and inadequate oversight—the G20 mandated comprehensive financial regulatory reforms coordinated by the , established in 2009. Key measures included the framework, which raised capital requirements for banks to 7-10% of risk-weighted assets and introduced liquidity standards like the Liquidity Coverage Ratio, enhancing systemic resilience. These reforms, implemented progressively from 2013 onward, reduced the probability of bank failures and supported during the shock, as evidenced by lower leverage ratios and improved loss-absorbing capacity in global systemically important banks. Additional policies addressed shadow banking through oversight of non-bank financial intermediation and resolvability standards for too-big-to-fail institutions, curbing contagion risks identified in crisis post-mortems. Reforms extended to multilateral institutions, notably the 2010 IMF quota and governance package endorsed by the G20, which doubled total quotas to about SDR 477 billion (roughly $750 billion) while shifting over 6% of voting shares toward emerging and developing economies, better reflecting their growing economic weight. This realignment, delayed until U.S. congressional approval in , aimed to enhance representation and crisis lending capacity, though implementation lags highlighted coordination challenges among members. During the Eurozone sovereign (2010-2012), G20 leaders urged fiscal consolidation and structural reforms in periphery economies while committing to firewall enhancements, contributing to stabilized bond yields and eventual recovery through combined ECB and IMF actions. For global stabilization in developing contexts, the G20 introduced the Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI) in April 2020, suspending bilateral debt payments from 73 low-income countries through June 2021, providing temporary relief estimated at $12.9 billion to free resources for and economic responses to COVID-19. Evolving into the Common Framework in November 2020, this extended case-by-case debt restructuring to creditors and encouraged private sector participation, though uptake remained limited to cases like and by 2021 due to procedural complexities and creditor coordination issues. These initiatives demonstrated causal efficacy in short-term liquidity provision but underscored the need for deeper reforms to address unsustainable debt dynamics in low-income countries, as evidenced by rising default rates post-suspension.

Empirical Measures of Influence

The G20 member states collectively account for approximately 85% of global on a nominal basis, underscoring their dominant economic weight in international affairs. This share has remained stable amid post-pandemic recovery, with projections for 2025 estimating around 79.5% of global GDP when adjusted for variations across members. Additionally, G20 countries represent about 75% of global merchandise trade exports and roughly two-thirds of the world's population, providing a broad base for coordinating macroeconomic policies that affect worldwide supply chains and labor markets. In multilateral financial institutions, G20 finance ministers and central bank governors control nearly 78% of voting power in the International Monetary Fund, enabling them to shape quota reforms, surveillance mechanisms, and emergency lending during crises such as the 2008 financial meltdown and the COVID-19 downturn. This concentration amplifies the forum's leverage over global liquidity provision, as evidenced by G20-initiated shifts in IMF voting shares toward emerging economies, totaling a 6% reallocation by 2010 to members like and . In the World Bank, G20 influence manifests through similar dominance in share votes, where advanced and emerging G20 economies hold the majority of capital subscriptions, influencing project approvals and development financing priorities. Empirical assessments of G20 policy influence often rely on compliance tracking by independent monitors like the University of Toronto's G20 Research Group, which evaluates adherence to summit commitments across , agendas. From to 2024, average compliance rates have hovered around 50-70% for priority pledges, with higher fulfillment in (e.g., implementation) but lower in areas like and due to divergent national interests. Market-based proxies, such as stock volatility studies, indicate G20 summits exert a mild stabilizing effect on global financial indices, reducing co-movements during uncertainty but lacking persistent long-term impacts on growth trajectories. These metrics highlight the G20's causal role in crisis mitigation—such as coordinating $10 trillion in stimulus post-—yet reveal limits in enforcing binding outcomes absent formal enforcement mechanisms.

Criticisms and Challenges

Exclusivity and Representation Gaps

The Group of Twenty comprises 19 sovereign states—, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , the , and the —along with the and, since September 2023, the as permanent members. These entities collectively account for approximately 85% of global GDP, 75% of , and two-thirds of the world's as of 2024. Despite this concentration of economic and demographic weight, the G20's fixed membership excludes over 170 countries, including notable economies such as , Africa's most populous nation and largest economy outside , and , the fourth-largest economy in the . Critics highlight the G20's self-selected composition as a core legitimacy deficit, arguing it functions as an elite club that sidelines smaller states and low-income nations whose interests are indirectly affected by its decisions on , , and global risks. For instance, prior to the African Union's inclusion, African representation was limited to alone, prompting concerns over the continent's under-representation in a forum influencing multilateral financial reforms critical to developing regions. Even post-2023, analysts contend that the African Union's seat, while advancing symbolic inclusion for its 55 member states, does not fully address granular regional disparities or empower non-member African countries like with direct voice, as the G20 remains insufficiently representative of the ' 193 member states. Non-members occasionally participate as guests—such as and at various summits—but lack voting rights or agenda-setting influence, exacerbating perceptions of exclusivity that undermine the forum's claims. This structure, designed for agility among major economies rather than universality, invites charges of democratic shortfall, particularly from excluded Global South actors who view G20 outcomes as imposing policies without broad consent. Proponents counter that the G20's informal nature prioritizes effectiveness over inclusivity, yet persistent calls for underscore unresolved tensions between its economic rationale and equitable representation.

Accountability, Effectiveness, and Consensus Issues

The G20 operates without formal enforcement mechanisms, relying instead on voluntary commitments and among members, which has led to persistent accountability deficits. Leaders pledged accountability at the inaugural 2009 Pittsburgh Summit, yet the group's network-like structure, characterized by repeated interactions without delegated authority, limits binding oversight and transparency. Existing accountability tools, such as progress reports on or financial reforms, face challenges in ensuring follow-through, particularly as the group's expanded role in agendas like the UN's 2030 strains these informal processes. Effectiveness evaluations reveal mixed outcomes, with strong initial responses to crises like the 2008 financial meltdown giving way to uneven implementation of subsequent commitments. The (FSB) has tracked G20 financial reforms since 2009, noting progress in areas such as banking regulations but highlighting systemic gaps in addressing vulnerabilities like non-bank financial intermediation, where implementation lags due to differing national priorities. Broader assessments of pledges on , , and development show partial fulfillment; for instance, a decade-long of G20 care economy commitments from 2014 to 2023 identified trends in rhetoric but persistent gaps in actionable policy shifts across members. These shortcomings stem from the absence of penalties for non-compliance, allowing domestic political pressures to override collective goals. Consensus-building is frequently undermined by geopolitical divergences, resulting in diluted declarations or outright impasses on contentious issues. Heightened tensions from events like Russia's 2022 invasion of and U.S.-China strategic rivalry have fractured unity, as evidenced by the 2023 New Delhi Summit's joint communiqué omitting explicit condemnation of the war to secure agreement. The group's consensus-based decision-making, requiring unanimity among ideologically diverse members—including democracies and autocracies—often leads to gridlock, particularly on topics involving or sanctions, where Western-led initiatives clash with positions from , , and others. While finance ministers achieved agreement on in July 2025 despite these frictions, broader summits risk lowest-common-denominator outcomes that prioritize procedural harmony over substantive progress.

Geopolitical Tensions and Membership Disputes

The G20 has faced significant geopolitical strains since Russia's full-scale invasion of on February 24, 2022, which prompted Western members including the , , and nations to advocate for Russia's exclusion or condemnation within the forum. Despite these efforts, no formal expulsion occurred due to the G20's consensus-based , with non-Western members such as , , and opposing suspension to preserve the group's universality and economic focus. At the 2022 Bali summit, leaders issued a communiqué that "most strongly condemned the war in " while allowing Russian Foreign Minister to participate amid heated debates, highlighting fractures where economic cooperation clashed with security concerns. Similar dynamics persisted at the 2023 New Delhi summit under India's presidency, where initial deadlock over Ukraine language was resolved by softening references to the "war" without naming Russia as the aggressor, enabling a joint declaration after concessions from both sides. Russian President Vladimir Putin attended virtually in some sessions but skipped the leaders' summit, citing an International Criminal Court arrest warrant, yet Russia's continued presence underscored the forum's resistance to politicization, as expelling a major economy representing over 3% of global GDP would diminish the G20's legitimacy in representing 85% of world output. These tensions have spilled into procedural disruptions, such as walkouts and boycotts, but have not derailed core economic agendas, revealing the causal limits of geopolitical leverage in a diverse group where veto power effectively resides with key holdouts. US-China strategic competition has further complicated G20 deliberations, exacerbating divisions on , , and supply chains amid escalating tariffs and controls since 2018. This has manifested in impasses, such as reluctance to coordinate on relief or , where US-led initiatives like the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) counter China's , fragmenting consensus on multilateral lending reforms. Empirical evidence from post-2022 summits shows reduced joint commitments, with the 2023 Delhi declaration omitting firm timelines for International Monetary Fund quota adjustments favored by to boost shares, reflecting how bilateral frictions prioritize zero-sum gains over collective action. Membership disputes center on the G20's informal structure, which lacks codified entry criteria and has invited criticism for underrepresenting the Global South despite comprising major economies. Established in 1999 as finance ministers' group and elevated to leaders' level in 2008, it excludes over 170 nations, prompting reform calls from bodies like the for proportional voting akin to IMF models to address legitimacy gaps. A key development occurred in September 2023 when proposed and secured consensus for the African Union's permanent inclusion, expanding effective membership to 21 entities and granting a collective voice for its 54 nations, though implementation has focused on agenda priorities like financial reforms rather than voting parity. Ongoing disputes include demands from nations for further expansions to reflect multipolarity, contrasted by incumbents' concerns over diluted influence and decision paralysis, as seen in stalled talks on admitting as a full member despite its guest status since 2017. Non-members like under President have voiced withdrawal threats in 2023, citing ideological misalignment with "socialist" elements, though no exit materialized, illustrating how sustains participation amid representational inequities. These frictions, rooted in the G20's origins rather than treaty obligations, have led to parallel forums like the G77 but have not prompted structural overhaul, preserving the status quo's efficacy in crisis response at the cost of broader inclusivity.

Recent Developments

Post-Pandemic Priorities and Recovery

Following the acute phase of the , G20 leaders shifted focus to coordinating global economic recovery efforts, emphasizing sustained fiscal support, for vulnerable nations, and health system resilience. At the Summit, leaders committed to decisive measures aiding countries most affected, including distribution and financial assistance to enhance resilience against future shocks, while underscoring the need to avoid premature withdrawal of policy support to preserve . The group's finance ministers, in their July communiqué, noted improved global outlooks due to rollouts and ongoing stimulus, pledging continued coordination on health, economic, and financial responses. A cornerstone initiative was the Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI), launched in May 2020 and extended multiple times, which suspended $12.9 billion in debt-service payments owed by 48 participating low-income countries to G20 creditors from May 2020 through December 2021. The first extension through June 2021 provided an additional $7.3 billion in relief for eligible nations, aiming to free resources for pandemic response and essential spending. This was complemented by the Common Framework for treatments, introduced in 2020, to facilitate restructuring for countries facing unsustainable post-DSSI, though implementation remained limited, with only and initiating processes by late 2022. Health priorities included equitable vaccine access and sustainable financing, with G20 commitments at the 2022 Summit advancing strong, inclusive recovery through international collaboration on pandemic preparedness and . The 2023 Declaration reinforced resilient growth by addressing debt vulnerabilities in developing countries and scaling up multilateral financing, while promoting digital public infrastructure for inclusive development. Finance tracks emphasized fiscal amid monetary tightening, with a 2022 roadmap outlining partnerships with multilateral development banks to bolster recovery and resilience in emerging economies. These efforts yielded mixed empirical outcomes: while DSSI participation covered about 65% of eligible countries at peak, total relief fell short of initial projections due to opt-outs over concerns, and broader recovery saw uneven progress, with low-income nations experiencing slower GDP rebounds compared to advanced economies. G20 coordination helped stabilize global finance, as evidenced by sustained IMF-World Bank assessments of improved , but persistent distress in over 60% of low-income countries highlighted limitations in scaling relief beyond official bilateral creditors.

2023-2025 Presidencies: India, Brazil, and South Africa

India assumed the G20 presidency on December 1, 2022, under the theme "One Earth, One Family, One Future" (), focusing on , , and global unity. The presidency hosted over 200 meetings across 60 cities, culminating in the Leaders' Summit on September 9-10, 2023. A key achievement was the adoption of the 83-paragraph New Delhi Leaders' Declaration by consensus on the summit's opening day, addressing economic resilience, , , and debt sustainability for low-income countries, despite divisions over the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which was referenced obliquely without explicit condemnation to secure agreement. The declaration committed to tripling capacity by 2030 and accelerating the green development pact for the Global South. Notably, the was invited to join as a permanent member, expanding G20 representation to better reflect emerging economies. Brazil took over the presidency on December 1, 2023, prioritizing social inclusion, the fight against hunger and poverty, energy transitions, and reforms to global governance institutions. The Rio de Janeiro Leaders' Summit occurred on November 18-19, 2024, under the theme "Building a Just World and a Sustainable Planet," following more than 140 meetings. Leaders adopted the Rio de Janeiro Leaders' Declaration, which endorsed the launch of the Global Alliance against Hunger and Poverty to mobilize resources for vulnerable populations and supported enhanced climate finance, including a proposed 2% levy on wealthy nations' revenues for developing countries. The declaration also advanced commitments on sustainable energy supply chains and inclusive health systems, though progress on governance reforms, such as IMF quota adjustments, remained limited amid geopolitical frictions. Brazil's emphasis on Global South issues, including taxation of the ultra-rich, highlighted efforts to address inequality but faced resistance from some members on implementation timelines. South Africa assumed the G20 presidency on December 1, 2024, with the theme "Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability," aiming to advance inclusive economic growth, industrialization, employment, and support for and the Global South. The presidency seeks to integrate marginalized voices through initiatives like the G20 Social Forum and build on prior agendas for , with the leaders' summit scheduled for November 2025 in . Priorities include tackling the global polycrisis via enhanced among members, promoting social and economies for Africa's growth, and mobilizing resources for and in developing regions. As of October 2025, early activities focus on consensus-building for equitable reforms, though outcomes remain pending amid ongoing geopolitical challenges.

References

  1. https://g20.org/about-g20/g20-members/
  2. https://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/organisations/g20
  3. https://g20.org/about-g20/
  4. https://g20.org/about-g20/overview/
  5. https://g20.org/g20-latest-news/
  6. https://rujec.org/article/49435/
  7. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10220461.2019.1705889
  8. https://saiia.org.za/research/a-decade-of-g20-summitry-assessing-the-benefits-limitations-future-of-global-club-governance/
  9. https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/asian-financial-crisis
  10. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-does-g20-do
  11. https://g20.utoronto.ca/g20whatisit.html
  12. https://g20.utoronto.ca/docs/g20history.pdf
  13. https://www.g20.in/en/about-g20/about-g20.html
  14. https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/international/g-7-and-g-20
  15. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/global-governance-breakthrough-the-g20-summit-and-the-future-agenda/
  16. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2008/11/20081115-1.html
  17. https://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2008/2008declaration1115.html
  18. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/globalleadershipintransition_chapter.pdf
  19. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/10/g20-must-live-its-crisis-solving-legacy
  20. https://g20.in/en/about-g20/about-g20.html
  21. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/stronger-europe-world/eu-g20_en
  22. https://mea.gov.in/Images/pdf/Twenty.pdf
  23. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600826.2020.1739630
  24. https://pism.pl/publications/The_Importance_of_the_G20_in_Shaping_Global_Economic_Governance_
  25. https://g20.utoronto.ca/biblio/kirton-sisu-2013.html
  26. https://www.g20.utoronto.ca/biblio/nudelsman-global-economic-governance.html
  27. https://theconversation.com/g20-is-too-elite-theres-a-way-to-fix-that-though-economists-255783
  28. https://www.ntu.org/library/docLib/P14-09-22-Strengthening-the-G20-Membership.pdf
  29. https://www.eda.admin.ch/dam/eda/en/documents/publications/SchweizerischeAussenpolitik/strategie-asien-g20-2025-2028_EN.pdf
  30. https://cebri.org/revista/br/artigo/130/rising-roles-for-emerging-economies-in-g20
  31. https://www.adb.org/publications/asias-strategic-participation-group-20-global-economic-governance-reform-perspective
  32. https://chinaus-icas.org/research/chinas-role-in-the-g20-and-beyond/
  33. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2023/09/11/asia-pacific/politics/india-g20-win/
  34. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/year-india-leads-g20-japan-g7-together-can-make-potent-team
  35. https://www.thinkchina.sg/politics/india-and-japan-new-asian-alliance-deal-china-challenge
  36. https://thediplomatinspain.com/en/2024/01/01/g20-as-a-reflection-of-international-dynamics/
  37. https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/12/14/aseans-path-to-g20-membership/
  38. https://www.worldeconomics.com/Thoughts/Asia-Pacific-Dominates-the-World-Economy-in-Size-and-Growth.aspx
  39. https://www.g20germany.de/Content/EN/Artikel/2017/11_en/2017-12-01-g20-rotation_en.html
  40. https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/g20_summit/2011/annex10.html
  41. https://www.boell.de/en/2016/11/30/rotating-g20-presidency-how-do-member-countries-take-turns
  42. https://g20.org/resources/faqs/
  43. https://saiia.org.za/g20-resource-centre/the-g20/
  44. https://theconversation.com/the-g20-how-it-works-why-it-matters-and-what-would-be-lost-if-it-failed-251500
  45. https://g20.org/how-g20-works/
  46. https://g20.org/tracks/
  47. https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/A-Guide-to-Committees-Groups-and-Clubs
  48. https://www.g20.in/en/workstreams/engagement-groups.html
  49. http://g20italy.org/italian-g20-presidency/engagement-groups.html
  50. https://bricspolicycenter.org/en/meet-the-g20-engagement-groups/
  51. https://g20.org/engagement-groups-2/
  52. https://g20.org/track/civil-society-c20/
  53. https://www.g20.utoronto.ca/g20whatisit.html
  54. https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/The_G20_-_a_pathway_to_effective_multilateralism.pdf
  55. https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/a_g20_non-secretariat.pdf
  56. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/secretariat-g20-story/
  57. https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/Transnational%2520Governance%2520and%2520Democratic%2520Legitimacy%2520-%2520G20.pdf
  58. https://www.siis.org.cn/Paper/1735.jhtml
  59. https://www.cciee.org.cn/Detail.aspx?newsId=11423&TId=231
  60. https://www.orfonline.org/research/doesnt-g20-need-a-secretariat
  61. https://www.cfr.org/councilofcouncils/global-memo/brazils-2024-g20-summit-right-agenda-little-consensus/
  62. https://cebri.org/revista/en/artigo/133/the-g20-as-a-multilateral-force
  63. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/conferences/shared/pdf/g20framework/Keynote_Turalay.pdf?edff74ffbc8baa7e40d93a445ead7067&edff74ffbc8baa7e40d93a445ead7067
  64. https://www.fsb.org/about/history-of-the-fsb/
  65. https://www.fsb.org/work-of-the-fsb/implementation-monitoring/reports-to-the-g20/
  66. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d510.pdf
  67. https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/boc-review-winter-12-13-lavigne.pdf
  68. https://www.imf.org/external/np/g20/pdf/map2011/umbrella.pdf
  69. https://www.imf.org/external/np/g20/pdf/map2015/map2015.pdf
  70. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2022/06/09/pr22190-fsb-imf-completion-g20-initiative-close-data-gaps-identified-global-financial-crisis
  71. https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2024/11/21/g20-economies-should-target-reforms-to-boost-medium-term-growth-prospects
  72. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news23_e/trdev_18dec23_e.htm
  73. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-39315098
  74. https://g20.utoronto.ca/2016/160710-trade-annex2.html
  75. https://dwgg20.org/
  76. https://www.gov.za/news/media-statements/planning-monitoring-and-evaluation-first-2025-g20-development-working-group
  77. https://g7g20-documents.org/database/document/2025-g20-south-africa-sherpa-track-development-ministers-ministers-language-chairs-report-on-the-g20-development-working-group
  78. https://www.gihub.org/about/about/
  79. https://g20.org/track/trade-and-investment/
  80. https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Countries-Regions/International-Statistics/Data-Topic/Environment-Energy/Environment/G20_CO2.html
  81. https://g20.org/track/environment-and-climate-sustainability-2/
  82. https://www.hoganlovells.com/en/publications/g20-reaffirms-its-commitment-to-tackle-climate-change
  83. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/jrc-news-and-updates/g20-climate-strategies-insufficient-meet-paris-agreement-goals-2025-01-31_en
  84. https://g20.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Issue-Note_Environment-and-Climate-Sustainability.pdf
  85. https://g20.org/track-news/sa-closes-g20-environmental-meetings-with-historic-cape-town-declarations/
  86. https://g20.utoronto.ca/2023/230728-environment.html
  87. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14693062.2021.1993776
  88. https://g20.org/g20-media/g20-disaster-risk-reduction-ministerial-declaration/
  89. https://wmo.int/media/news/g20-declaration-reduce-vulnerabilities-and-address-inequalities
  90. https://www.uncdf.org/article/9003/compendium-risk-transfer-solutions-financial-resilience-climate-shocks
  91. https://g20.org/g20-media/tackling-natural-catastrophe-insurance-protection-gaps-a-global-imperative/
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061723000017
  93. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/conferences/shared/pdf/g20framework/Keynote_Turalay.pdf
  94. https://www.fsb.org/about/
  95. https://www.fsb.org/work-of-the-fsb/market-and-institutional-resilience/post-2008-financial-crisis-reforms/
  96. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/factsheet/2020/05/11/debt-relief-and-covid-19-coronavirus
  97. https://findevlab.org/looking-back-at-dssi-a-tool-with-limited-effects/
  98. https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2021/12/02/blog120221the-g20-common-framework-for-debt-treatments-must-be-stepped-up
  99. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/strengthening-cooperation-for-a-changing-world-the-evolving-role-of-the-g20-in-global-economic-governance/
  100. https://www.g20.utoronto.ca/analysis/conclusions/fincrisis-l.pdf
  101. https://www.imf.org/external/np/g20/110723.htm
  102. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d344.pdf
  103. https://www.fsb.org/2020/11/implementation-and-effects-of-the-g20-financial-regulatory-reforms-2020-annual-report/
  104. https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Regulatory/Covid19/FSBImplementation-and-Effects-of-the-G20-Financial-Regulatory-Reforms-2020-Annual-Report-P131120-1-161120.pdf
  105. https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/faq/quotasgov.htm
  106. https://cebri.org/revista/en/artigo/185/g20-brasil-and-reforming-the-international-financial-institutions
  107. https://www.cfr.org/interview/g20-and-eurozone-debt-crisis
  108. https://www.eurodad.org/g20_debt1
  109. https://som.yale.edu/blog/the-limits-of-the-g20s-debt-service-suspension-initiative
  110. https://www.worldeconomics.com/Regions/G20/
  111. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/service/g20-a-meeting-at-the-highest-level-410934
  112. https://www.boell.de/en/2016/12/05/power-and-legitimacy-g20-multilateral-governance-system
  113. https://www.parlnet.org/wp-content/uploads/attachments/IMF%2520voting%2520shares_26102010.pdf
  114. https://www.worldbank.org/en/about/leadership/votingpowers
  115. https://www.g20.utoronto.ca/compliance/commitments.html
  116. https://www.g20.utoronto.ca/analysis/index.html
  117. https://www.globalgovernanceproject.org/making-good-g20-commitments/caroline-bracht/
  118. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1668.pdf
  119. https://www.reuters.com/world/g20-admit-african-union-permanent-member-new-delhi-summit-draft-declaration-2023-09-09/
  120. https://worldcommercereview.com/challenges-of-the-g20/
  121. https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/15/04/2025/how-fix-representation-problem-g20
  122. https://www.rgics.org/world/g20-significance-limitations-and-geopolitics/
  123. https://saiia.org.za/research/g20-is-too-elite-there-is-a-way-to-fix-that-though-economists/
  124. https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/articles/global-governance/g20-and-its-regional-critics-search-inclusion
  125. https://dl.tufts.edu/downloads/2z10x211p?filename=z890s523r.pdf
  126. https://www.bworldonline.com/opinion/2025/05/16/672720/g20-is-too-elite-theres-a-way-to-fix-that-though-economists/
  127. https://t20brasil.org/media/documentos/arquivos/TF06_ST_06__Improving_G20_Effe66fc0d379d921.pdf
  128. https://www.geg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Woods%2520Martinez%2520Diaz%2520Networks%2520PB.pdf
  129. https://www.idos-research.de/en/discussion-paper/article/towards-a-more-accountable-g20-accountability-mechanisms-of-the-g20-and-the-new-challenges-posed-to-them-by-the-2030-agenda/
  130. https://www.fsb.org/2025/10/g20-implementation-monitoring-review-interim-report/
  131. https://www.fsb.org/uploads/P131025-2.pdf
  132. https://www.asiapathways-adbi.org/2024/11/evaluating-g20-commitments-on-climate-change-health-well-being-and-agriculture/
  133. https://www.cgdev.org/blog/who-cares-10-year-analysis-g20-care-commitments
  134. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/can-the-g20-mend-the-worlds-geopolitical-fractures/
  135. https://t20southafrica.org/commentaries/revisiting-g20-policymaking-under-fractured-geopolitics/
  136. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/18/g20-finance-ministers-reach-consensus-on-key-economic-issues
  137. https://g20.org/g20-media/3rd-finance-ministers-central-bank-governors-meeting/
  138. https://www.reuters.com/world/g20-starts-bali-ukraine-war-raging-inflation-top-agenda-2022-11-15/
  139. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/15/g20-russia-ukraine-war-global-economic-suffering
  140. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/09/indian-pm-modi-says-a-consensus-has-been-reached-on-a-g20-declaration.html
  141. https://jgu.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/G20_Russia.pdf
  142. https://www.hse.ru/data/2024/10/24/1885173298/2%2520Vishal%2520Sagar%2520OF.pdf
  143. https://euromed-economists.org/the-african-union-au-is-granted-g20-membership/
  144. https://africa.time.com/g20/the-history-of-the-g20-from-1999-to-the-johannesburg-summit-2025/
  145. https://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2021/211031-declaration.html
  146. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0269
  147. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/debt/brief/covid-19-debt-service-suspension-initiative
  148. https://www.imf.org/en/About/FAQ/sovereign-debt
  149. https://g7g20-documents.org/database/document/2022-g20-indonesia-leaders-leaders-annex-annex-g20-action-for-strong-and-inclusive-recovery
  150. https://www.international.gc.ca/world-monde/international_relations-relations_internationales/g20/2023-09-9-g20-new-delhi.aspx?lang=eng
  151. https://dwgg20.org/app/uploads/2022/12/G20-Roadmap-for-Stronger-Recovery-and-Resilience-2022.pdf
  152. https://g20.org/summit-and-logos/2023-india/
  153. https://www.g20.in/content/dam/gtwenty/Indias_G20_Presidency-A_Synopsis.pdf
  154. https://www.mea.gov.in/Images/CPV/G20-New-Delhi-Leaders-Declaration.pdf
  155. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2023/11/the-indian-g20-presidency-taking-stock-of-key-outcomes?lang=en
  156. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2023/751474/EPRS_ATA%282023%29751474_EN.pdf
  157. https://www.india-briefing.com/news/key-outcomes-of-the-2023-g20-summit-held-in-india-29483.html/
  158. https://www.oecd.org/en/about/oecd-and-g20/brazils-2024-g20-presidency.html
  159. https://unsdg.un.org/latest/stories/ambitious-commitments-mark-end-brazils-g20-presidency
  160. https://g20.org/summit-and-logos/2024-brazil/
  161. https://g7g20-documents.org/database/document/2024-g20-brazil-leaders-leaders-language-g20-rio-de-janeiro-leaders-declaration-final
  162. https://epthinktank.eu/2024/11/25/the-2024-g20-summit-in-rio-de-janeiro/
  163. https://www.dw.com/en/did-brazils-g20-summit-deliver-on-its-promises/a-70826240
  164. https://g20.org/g20-south-africa/g20-presidency/
  165. https://g20.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/20241205v-FINAL-G20-CONCEPT-NOTE-SOUTH-AFRICA.pdf
  166. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/social-solidarity-economy-south-africa-g20-sustainable-growth/
  167. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/south-africas-g20-presidency-a-vital-opportunity-for-global-unity-and-sustainable-progress/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.